• Medical - Devices
  • Healthcare
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. logo
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
BIO · US · NYSE
325.29
USD
-3.07
(0.94%)
Executives
Name Title Pay
Lee Boyd Senior Vice President of Global Commercial Operations - Asia Pacific --
Mr. Norman D. Schwartz Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President 1.25M
Courtney C. Enloe Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary --
Mr. Roop K. Lakkaraju Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer --
Mr. Michael Crowley Executive Vice President of Global Commercial Operations 975K
Ms. Colleen Corey Executive Vice President of Global Human Resources --
Ms. Tania DeVilliers Senior Director, Corporate Controller & Interim Principal Accounting Officer --
Matthew Werner Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance & Privacy Officer --
Dr. Andrew J. Last Ph.D. Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer 682K
Mr. Yong Chung Vice President of Investor Relations --
Insider Transactions
Date Name Title Acquisition Or Disposition Stock / Options # of Shares Price
2023-12-16 WRIGHT DARA EVP, President, CDG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 502 0
2023-12-16 WRIGHT DARA EVP, President, CDG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 174 306.12
2023-12-16 WRIGHT DARA EVP, President, CDG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 502 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 49 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 49 0
2023-12-12 WRIGHT DARA EVP, President, CDG D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1200 299.16
2023-12-05 Allison Schwartz director A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 49 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 49 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 49 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ ALICE N 10 percent owner D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3270 0
2023-12-05 SCHWARTZ ALICE N 10 percent owner D - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 294 0
2023-11-28 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 642 305.1
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 35000 119.8
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 15000 159.32
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 16000 139.56
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 12024 273
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 12274 273
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 25642 273
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 35000 119.8
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 16000 139.56
2023-11-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 15000 159.32
2023-10-20 EVRAN SEDAT EVP, Global Supply Chain A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 4176 0
2023-09-19 DEVILLIERS TANIA INT PRIN ACCTG OFC D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2023-09-19 DEVILLIERS TANIA INT PRIN ACCTG OFC D - Restricted Stock Units 311 0
2023-09-05 EVRAN SEDAT EVP, Global Supply Chain D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2023-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 903 0
2023-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 448 394.6
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 5008 0
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 633 0
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 867 0
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 279 394.6
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 430 394.6
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 867 0
2023-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 633 0
2023-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 903 0
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 3005 0
2023-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 0
2023-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 394.6
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 405 0
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 141 394.6
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 520 0
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 394.6
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 520 0
2023-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 405 0
2023-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 433 0
2023-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2023-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 394.6
2023-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 464 0
2023-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 231 394.6
2023-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 361 0
2023-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 179 394.6
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 253 0
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 347 0
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 126 394.6
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 173 394.6
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 2003 0
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 347 0
2023-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 253 0
2023-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 464 0
2023-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 361 0
2023-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 173 0
2023-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 241 0
2023-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 84 394.6
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 169 0
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 169 0
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 59 394.6
2023-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 241 0
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 173 0
2023-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 60 394.6
2023-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2023-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 394.6
2023-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 557 0
2023-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 202 394.6
2023-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 0
2023-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 394.6
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 405 0
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 141 394.6
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 520 0
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 394.6
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 3005 0
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 520 0
2023-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 405 0
2023-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 557 0
2023-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 433 0
2023-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 4007 0
2023-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 542 0
2023-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 269 394.6
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 456 0
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 209 394.6
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 694 0
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 694 0
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 240 394.6
2023-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 456 0
2023-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 542 0
2023-09-04 Allison Schwartz director A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 82 0
2023-09-04 Allison Schwartz director D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 34 394.6
2023-09-03 Allison Schwartz director A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 56 0
2023-09-03 Allison Schwartz director D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 23 394.6
2023-09-02 Allison Schwartz director A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 44 0
2023-09-02 Allison Schwartz director D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 18 394.6
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 30 0
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 12 394.6
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 41 0
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 17 394.6
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 298 0
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 41 0
2023-09-01 Allison Schwartz director D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 30 0
2023-09-03 Allison Schwartz director D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 56 0
2023-09-02 Allison Schwartz director D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 44 0
2023-09-04 Allison Schwartz director D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 82 0
2023-09-04 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2023-09-04 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 275 394.6
2023-09-03 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 495 0
2023-09-03 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 172 394.6
2023-09-02 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 361 0
2023-09-02 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 125 394.6
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 329 0
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 114 394.6
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 520 0
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 394.6
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 520 0
2023-09-01 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 329 0
2023-09-03 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 495 0
2023-09-02 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 361 0
2023-09-04 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2023-09-04 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2023-09-04 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 295 394.6
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 3005 0
2023-09-03 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 526 0
2023-09-03 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 182 394.6
2023-09-02 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 409 0
2023-09-02 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 142 394.6
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 371 0
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 129 394.6
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 520 0
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 394.6
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 520 0
2023-09-01 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 371 0
2023-09-03 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 526 0
2023-09-02 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 409 0
2023-09-04 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2023-09-04 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2023-09-04 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 208 394.6
2023-09-03 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 495 0
2023-09-03 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 172 394.6
2023-09-02 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 361 0
2023-09-02 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 125 394.6
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 253 0
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 88 394.6
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 347 0
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 120 394.6
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 2003 0
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 347 0
2023-09-01 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 253 0
2023-09-03 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 495 0
2023-09-02 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 361 0
2023-09-04 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2023-09-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 12020 0
2023-08-30 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2350 215.98
2023-08-30 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 391 394.16
2023-08-30 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1582 395.76
2023-08-30 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 377 396.44
2023-08-30 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2350 215.98
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2600 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1290 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2320 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1151 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1805 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 895 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1266 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2081 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 628 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1032 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 39000 117.5
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 25389 381.78
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2081 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1266 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2320 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1805 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2600 0
2023-08-25 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 39000 117.5
2023-08-23 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 300 384.69
2023-06-15 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 379.39
2023-06-06 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 17.352 368.49
2023-06-06 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 181 368.28
2023-04-26 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2023-04-26 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - Restricted Stock Units 1388 0
2023-04-26 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1444 524.3
2023-04-26 COREY COLLEEN EVP, Global Human Resources D - Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1013 814.95
2023-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1000 0
2023-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 346 450.79
2023-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1000 0
2023-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 277 0
2023-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 277 0
2023-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 96 450.79
2023-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 700 0
2023-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 243 466.24
2023-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 700 0
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 215.98
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 850 159.32
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1000 486.08
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 746 486.89
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 150 215.98
2023-03-08 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 850 159.32
2023-02-10 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 644 0
2022-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 502 0
2022-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 226 407.98
2022-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 502 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D director A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 42 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D director A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 42 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 42 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 42 0
2022-11-07 Allison Schwartz director A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 42 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ ALICE N director D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2639 0
2022-11-07 SCHWARTZ ALICE N director D - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 252 0
2022-11-10 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 267 421.7
2022-11-10 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 112 422.28
2022-11-10 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0.3809 423.61
2022-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 902 0
2022-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 448 478.32
2022-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 902 0
2022-04-27 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2022-04-27 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - Restricted Stock Units 1317 0
2022-04-27 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1444 524.3
2022-04-27 Dahowski Diane EVP, Global Supply Chain D - Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1317 814.95
2022-04-26 Allison Schwartz director D - Bio-Rad B Common Stock 0 0
2022-04-26 Allison Schwartz director D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2022-04-26 Allison Schwartz director D - Restricted Stock Units 122 0
2022-01-04 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - Bio-Rad A Common Stock 0 0
2022-01-04 MAY SIMON EVP, President, LSG D - Restricted Stock Units 1486 0
2021-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 502 0
2021-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 502 0
2021-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 221 734.34
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 20 0
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 20 0
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1366 0
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 120 0
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 20 0
2021-11-09 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 20 0
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1800 326.15
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2400 215.98
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 524.3
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 748.08
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 333.34
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 613 333.34
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 159.32
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 613 748.84
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 750
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 4800 750.05
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1113 333.34
2021-11-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 433 524.3
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1800 326.15
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2400 215.98
2021-11-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 600 159.32
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 37000 100.06
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 20660 806.32
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 3000 0
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 1488 806.32
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 3000 0
2021-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 37000 100.06
2021-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2021-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 806.32
2021-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2021-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2021-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 806.32
2021-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2021-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2021-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 819.7
2021-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2021-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 819.7
2021-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 557 0
2021-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 277 819.7
2021-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 557 0
2021-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2021-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2021-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2600 0
2021-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1290 819.7
2021-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2600 0
2021-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1290 819.7
2021-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2319 0
2021-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1150 819.7
2021-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2319 0
2021-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2600 0
2021-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2600 0
2021-09-03 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 270 820.06
2021-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2021-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 819.7
2021-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2021-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 819.7
2021-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 557 0
2021-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 252 819.7
2021-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 557 0
2021-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2021-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2021-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2021-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 819.7
2021-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2021-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 819.7
2021-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 464 0
2021-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 222 819.7
2021-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 464 0
2021-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2021-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2021-09-02 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1805 0
2021-09-02 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 895 825.77
2021-09-02 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1805 0
2021-09-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 5064 0
2021-09-01 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 5064 814.95
2021-09-02 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 0
2021-09-02 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 825.77
2021-09-02 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 433 0
2021-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 0
2021-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 215 825.77
2021-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1621 814.95
2021-09-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1621 0
2021-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 433 0
2021-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1621 0
2021-09-01 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1621 814.95
2021-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 433 0
2021-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 433 0
2021-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 825.77
2021-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 240 0
2021-09-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 676 0
2021-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 240 0
2021-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 83 825.77
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2000 299.24
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2000 299.24
2021-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 902 0
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2532 814.95
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 2532 0
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 750 812.27
2021-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 902 0
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 651 813.15
2021-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 448 825.77
2021-09-01 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 599 814.09
2021-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1823 814.95
2021-09-01 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1823 0
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 540 524.3
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 541 0
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 541 0
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 540 524.3
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 269 825.77
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 440 828
2021-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 100 828.01
2021-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 361 0
2021-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 125 825.77
2021-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 361 0
2021-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1013 814.95
2021-09-01 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1013 0
2021-08-26 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 792.58
2021-08-09 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3000 139.56
2021-08-09 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2570 754.8
2021-08-09 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 430 755.72
2021-08-09 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3000 139.56
2021-08-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 327 760.26
2021-08-04 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1400 309.84
2021-08-04 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1400 309.84
2021-08-04 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 857 750.85
2021-08-04 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 954 751.98
2021-08-04 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 489 753.32
2021-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 276 0
2021-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 276 0
2021-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 96 640.73
2021-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1000 0
2021-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1000 0
2021-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 466 640.73
2021-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 700 0
2021-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 700 0
2021-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 250 592.23
2021-02-19 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 159.32
2021-02-19 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 640.94
2021-02-19 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 327 640.92
2021-02-19 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 196.107 640.17
2021-02-19 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 400 159.32
2020-12-07 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1800 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 162 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 502 0
2020-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 502 0
2020-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 174 576.72
2020-12-15 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 374 580.67
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-12-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 27 0
2020-11-06 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1200 159.32
2020-11-06 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 220 639.62
2020-11-06 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 734 640.78
2020-11-06 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 246 641.53
2020-11-09 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 423 0
2020-11-06 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1200 159.32
2020-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 3200 0
2020-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 1587 505.02
2020-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 3200 0
2020-09-11 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 0
2020-09-11 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 52 505.02
2020-09-11 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 150 0
2020-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 505.02
2020-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-11 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-11 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 505.02
2020-09-11 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 139.56
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 505.02
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 326.15
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 371 333.34
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 215.98
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 318 505.02
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 308 503.45
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 160.37
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 412 503.45
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 357 503.45
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 263 503.45
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 500 326.15
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 371 333.34
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 500 215.98
2020-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 400 160.37
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 500 139.56
2020-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2600 0
2020-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1290 484.23
2020-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2600 0
2020-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1290 484.23
2020-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 3000 0
2020-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 1488 480.2
2020-09-04 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2600 0
2020-09-05 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2600 0
2020-09-07 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 3000 0
2020-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 237 484.23
2020-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 173 484.23
2020-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 173 484.23
2020-09-05 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-07 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-07 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 170 0
2020-09-07 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 59 484.23
2020-09-05 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 0
2020-09-05 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 63 484.23
2020-09-04 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 180 0
2020-09-04 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 63 484.23
2020-09-04 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 180 0
2020-09-05 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 180 0
2020-09-07 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 170 0
2020-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 484.23
2020-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 226 484.23
2020-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 208 484.23
2020-09-04 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-05 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-07 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-08 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 0
2020-09-08 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 199 478.82
2020-09-08 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 400 0
2020-09-05 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-05 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 484.23
2020-09-04 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2020-09-04 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 484.23
2020-09-04 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-05 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2020-09-07 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-07 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 484.23
2020-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 247 484.23
2020-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2020-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 208 484.23
2020-09-04 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-05 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-07 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2020-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2319 0
2020-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1150 494.24
2020-09-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2319 0
2020-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 464 0
2020-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 464 0
2020-09-03 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 161 494.24
2020-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 556 0
2020-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 193 494.24
2020-09-03 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 556 0
2020-09-03 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 371 0
2020-09-03 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 184 494.24
2020-09-03 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 371 0
2020-09-03 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 154 0
2020-09-03 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 54 494.24
2020-09-03 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 154 0
2020-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 556 0
2020-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 193 494.24
2020-09-03 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 556 0
2020-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 963 0
2020-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1444 0
2020-09-02 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1444 524.3
2020-09-02 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 482 0
2020-09-02 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President and CEO A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 7220 0
2020-09-02 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President and CEO A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 7220 524.3
2020-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1733 0
2020-09-02 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1733 524.3
2020-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 2166 0
2020-09-02 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2166 524.3
2020-09-02 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1733 0
2020-09-02 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1733 524.3
2020-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 3610 0
2020-09-02 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3610 524.3
2020-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1733 524.3
2020-09-02 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1733 0
2020-09-02 RAMALINGAM AJIT SVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 963 0
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 326.15
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 315 517.64
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1000 215.98
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1200 160.37
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2000 139.56
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3000 119.54
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 5392 518.76
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1133 519.89
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3200 117
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3250 107.32
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 5668 520.94
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 339 521.86
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3500 98.04
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 3500 84.57
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 500 326.15
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1000 215.98
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1200 160.37
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2000 139.56
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3500 84.57
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3250 107.32
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3500 98.04
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3000 119.54
2020-08-19 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 3200 117
2020-06-12 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 37000 84.57
2020-06-12 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 21860 448.85
2020-06-12 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 37000 84.57
2020-06-01 Crowley Michael EVP, GBL Commercial Operations D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1500 485.4
2020-05-13 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 443 457.35
2020-04-29 RAMALINGAM AJIT EVP, Chief Accounting Officer A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 1384 0
2020-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 1000 0
2020-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1000 0
2020-04-29 Last Andrew J. EVP, Chief Operating Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 346 436.27
2020-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 700 0
2020-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 700 0
2020-04-08 Daskal Ilan EVP, Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 243 403.06
2020-04-01 RAMALINGAM AJIT EVP, Chief Accounting Officer D - No securities are beneficially owned 0 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 40 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ STEVEN D 10 percent owner A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 40 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 40 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 40 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad A Common Stock 2690 0
2019-12-03 SCHWARTZ ALICE N D - G-Gift Bio-Rad B Common Stock 240 0
2019-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Restricted Stock Units 2511 0
2019-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President A - A-Award Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 2511 366.89
2019-12-16 WRIGHT DARA Executive Vice President D - No securities beneficially owned 0 0
2019-12-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1250 159.32
2019-12-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 1250 159.32
2019-12-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 1250 370.11
2019-12-04 ERNST TIMOTHY S EVP, General Counsel & Sec D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 656 370.12
2019-11-11 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 848 351.45
2019-09-12 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 522 330
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 139.56
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 119.54
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 797 328.25
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - S-Sale Bio-Rad A Common Stock 41 329
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 600 139.56
2019-09-12 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) 600 119.54
2019-09-11 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2019-09-11 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 298 326.42
2019-09-11 HERTIA JOHN Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2019-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 600 0
2019-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 238 326.42
2019-09-10 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 0
2019-09-10 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 139 322.93
2019-09-11 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 600 0
2019-09-10 TUMOLO ANNETTE Executive Vice President D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 400 0
2019-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 3200 0
2019-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 1587 326.42
2019-09-10 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad B Common Stock 2000 0
2019-09-10 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - F-InKind Bio-Rad B Common Stock 992 322.93
2019-09-11 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 3200 0
2019-09-10 SCHWARTZ NORMAN D Chairman, President, and CEO D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 2000 0
2019-09-11 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 300 0
2019-09-11 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 104 326.42
2019-09-10 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 200 0
2019-09-10 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 70 322.93
2019-09-11 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 300 0
2019-09-10 STARK JAMES R VP, Corporate Controller D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 200 0
2019-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 500 0
2019-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 248 326.42
2019-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 400 0
2019-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 199 322.93
2019-09-11 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 500 0
2019-09-10 Magni Giovanni EVP, Chief Strategy Officer D - M-Exempt Restricted Stock Units 400 0
2019-09-11 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 0
2019-09-11 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer D - F-InKind Bio-Rad A Common Stock 52 326.42
2019-09-10 HUTTON RONALD W Vice President and Treasurer A - M-Exempt Bio-Rad A Common Stock 150 0
Transcripts
Operator:
Good day, everyone, and welcome to today's Bio-Rad Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Results Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, you will have the opportunity to ask questions during the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please note this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Head of Investor Relations, Edward Chung.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the second quarter 2024 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Roop Lakkaraju, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin our review, I'd like to remind everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I'll now turn the call over to our CEO, Norman Schwartz.
Norman Schwartz:
Thanks, Ed. Again, we appreciate your joining us on the call today. I guess I would say overall, despite a challenging market environment, we did have a solid quarter with revenue in line with expectations and margins actually ahead of expectations, driven by product mix, productivity gains and overall good cost management. I would say that while we have seen some positive signs with the improved biotech funding. We are continuing to see constraints in biotech, biopharma spending globally. As such, we do think it's prudent to revise our full-year 2024 financial outlook to better reflect what I think was a more modest pace of market recovery than originally predicted. Roop will cover this in greater detail as we review our updated 2024 financial guidance. During the quarter, we continue to make progress establishing the new leadership team. You've already met Roop, our new CFO, and have gotten a sense of his priorities as he comes up to speed, our new heads of life science and clinical diagnostics. I would say, have also hit the ground running and are working closely with CEO, Andy Last, to align on key initiatives. Lastly, here, we have made good progress on our search for a new Chief Operating Officer and have identified several finalist candidates. We do hope to share an update with you on this front in the coming weeks. We are continuing our corporate transformation path, more recently with efforts in supply chain and core process improvements, which are really starting to contribute to our margin expansion. We expect to build on this progress and when our life science business rebounds in future quarters, we anticipate we'll see further benefit here. On the capital deployment front, we've continued to be successful with share repurchases having bought back $100 million with the Bio-Rad stock during Q2 and an additional $96 million during the month of July. And just to continue on that, this week, the Board authorized an additional $500 million, which further positions us to make opportunistic repurchases going forward. So all in all, I guess I'd like to reiterate that we view our strategy and focus for the future growth of the company to be really very much intact. In clinical diagnostics, we have leading market positions globally for our core platforms, continue to invest in supporting their growth while building a position in new molecular diagnostics segments. And in Life Science, we both continue to maintain a focus on biopharma, especially for digital PCR and a process chromatography products and new products in development around cell biology, but we also continue to invest to enhance our leadership in digital PCR and other positions in the academic market. A very important area for us. As such, we believe we are well positioned to drive long-term growth in both the academic and biopharma markets in life science as we move through this dynamic period. So maybe now I'll turn the call over to Andy to provide an update on global operations. Andy?
Andy Last:
Thank you, Norman. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Second quarter of the year reflected a continuation of the same macroeconomic and market trends we have experienced with several quarters in the biotech and biopharma segments in China, alongside a generally improved market environment for our clinical diagnostic platforms. Our clinical diagnostics business continued to show steady growth in the quarter, delivering solid gains both sequentially and year-over-year. Growth was broad-based across the portfolio in all regions with solid performance in our immunohematology business when compared against the supply chain constraints we experienced in prior year. As we look toward the second half of this year, we are anticipating a continuation of normalized growth within our clinical diagnostics business. While it was in line with expectations, our Life Science Group sales declined double-digit year-over-year, reflecting ongoing low demand in biotech and biopharma and in China. However, sequentially, second quarter revenue for the Life Science Group improved mid-single-digits, and when excluding process chromatography sales, core life science grew sequentially mid-single digits in both biopharma and academic markets. Similar to the prior year, our process chromatography resins posted a year-over-year decline, reflecting the ongoing destocking trend across the industry. More importantly for us, this is the result of several very large customers who stopped up heavily during the prior years due to the critical importance of our products for specific key therapeutics. Outside of these key customers, we are starting to see a return to a normalized ordering pattern and are now looking to 2025 for a return to growth. We remain confident in the long-term outlook for this product area. Excluding process chromatography, our core Life Science business continued to stabilize, declining low double-digit compared to prior year and in line with our expectations. The declines were again concentrated in instrument sales primarily reflecting constrained biopharma spending, whereas consumable and reagent sales were largely flat, both sequentially and year-over-year. During the second quarter, we launched two new important life science platforms, the ChemiDoc Imaging Systems which is getting strong interest from customers and our new cost-effective single cell sample prep solution that is in the early phase of product introduction. Our Droplet Digital PCR franchise was soft in Q2, against a tough prior year compare that included the receipt of a onetime technology license payment and reduction of back orders created due to supply change challenge from prior periods mainly for QX600. However, excluding the onetime impacts in the prior year, revenue for ddPCR declined a more modest mid-single-digits. On a positive note, ddPCR reagents and consumables grew low-single-digits year-over-year despite the constrained funding environment. We are seeing strong interest in our recently launched ddPCR assay kits targeted at the oncology and cell and gene therapy markets. And we continue to maintain strong win-loss ratios for our Digital PCR platform in our current market segments. Importantly, we continue to target a fourth quarter introduction of the QX continuum which will allow us to end to the low-end segment where others have been primarily focused. In addition, we recently entered into a purchase agreement for a novel cutting-edge platform utilizing our core droplet technology that enables high throughput discovery of novel antibodies and T cell receptors and complements our phage display library. This is a high-growth, high-value market segment and assuming successful completion of development, we anticipate introducing this platform in the next two to three years. Reflecting on the current macroeconomic and market conditions, we were pleased to see the positive trend for capital raises for the biotech and biopharma markets continuing into the second quarter. As Norman alluded to earlier, we have yet to see this funding translate into improved orders as customers appear to remain conservative on capital deployment. Likewise, market conditions in China remain soft for the Life Science business, although we remain hopeful of some improvement in the outlook towards the end of the year and into 2025. In the Academic segment, we are seeing a slight softening of the global funding environment after a long period of strong research support. In addition to the slightly lower-than-anticipated NIH budget for the year, key European markets remain a mixed bag with lower funding in Germany, offset by more modest improvements in funding outlooks in the U.K., France and other EU countries. For Asia, the challenging research funding environment in China continues, and funding in Japan remains constrained, reflecting a shrinking economy, while Korean government spending on life science research remains soft as part of the deficit reduction. With these factors in mind, we remain cautious on the magnitude and timing of the recovery in life science markets and now with respect to more measured improvements in the back half of the year. We continue to expect steady normalized growth for our clinical diagnostics business in 2024. Operationally, we continue our focus on cost and productivity initiatives that have provided offsets to the softer top line. And as we look toward eventual market recovery for our Life Science business, we believe that Bio-Rad remains poised for further margin expansion. Thank you, and I will now pass you to Roop to review the financial results.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Thank you, Andy, and good afternoon, I'd like to start with a review of the second quarter 2024 results. Net sales were $638 million, which included approximately 1% currency headwind and represents a 6.3% decline on a reportable basis versus $681 million in Q2 of '23. On a currency-neutral basis, the year-over-year revenue decline was 5.4%. As Andy mentioned, this was the result of ongoing weakness in key life science end markets, somewhat offset by continued growth with the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Sales of the Life Science Group were approximately $251 million compared to $300 million in Q2 of '23, which is a decrease of 16.5% on a reported basis and a decline of 15.9% on a currency-neutral basis. The year-over-year decline impacted most product and geographic areas. Excluding process chromatography sales, which can fluctuate quarter-to-quarter, core Life Science Group revenue decreased 11.6% on a currency-neutral basis. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group were $388 million compared to $380 million in Q2 of '23, which is an increase of 2.1% on a reported basis and 3.2% on a currency-neutral basis. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics group was primarily driven by increased demand for quality controls and blood typing products. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral year-over-year revenue for the Diagnostics group posted growth across all three regions. For the company, Q2 reported GAAP gross margin was 55.6% as compared to 53.2% in the second quarter of '23. The increase in gross margin was primarily driven by cost control initiatives, product mix and lower logistics costs, partially offset by lower sales volume and continued higher material prices for constrained or strategic materials. Note that 90% of the improvement was driven by cost controls, product mix and logistics. SG&A expenses for Q2 '24 were $195 million or 30.5% of sales compared to $208 million or 30.5% in Q2 of '23. The decrease in dollars of SG&A expense was primarily due to lower employee-related expenses, restructuring costs and discretionary spending. Research and development expense in the second quarter was $59 million, or 9.2% of sales compared to $65 million or 9.5% of sales in Q2 '23. The decrease in dollars of R&D expense was primarily due to the cost control and lower restructuring costs. Q2 operating income was approximately $101 million or 15.9% of sales compared to $90 million or 13.2% of sales in Q2 of '23. Higher operating income is primarily driven by our proactive expense management initiatives and product mix, partially offset by lower sales. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of about $8 million compared to about $5 million in the prior year. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of '24 was 22.3%, largely consistent with the 22.5% rate in the year ago period. The change in fair market value of equity security holdings, which are substantially related to the ownership of Sartorius AG shares, resulted in a $2.9 billion loss and drove the reported net loss of $2.2 billion or $76.26 diluted loss per share compared to net loss of $1.2 billion or a diluted loss per share of $39.59 in Q2 of '23. Moving to the non-GAAP results. Non-GAAP financial measures, which exclude certain atypical and unique items that impact both gross and operating margins and other income are detailed in the reconciliation table in our press release. Second quarter non-GAAP gross margin was 56.4% compared to 54.4% Q2 of '23, primarily reflecting various expense management initiatives we've implemented. Non-GAAP SG&A dollar spend was slightly lower on a year-over-year basis, but as a percentage of sales, was higher due to lower revenue in Q2 '24. Specifically in the second quarter of '24, SG&A as a percent was 30.4% versus 29.2% in Q2 of '23. Non-GAAP R&D as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of 24 was 9.3%, which is flat to Q2 of 2023. Second quarter non-GAAP operating margin was 16.8%. Our non-GAAP operating margin has expanded by 100 basis points from Q2 of '23 as reported non-GAAP gross margin of 15.8%, driven by the improvement in gross margin and the proactive operating expense cost management initiatives. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2024 was 23.4% compared to 22.5% for the same period in '23. The higher rate in '24 was driven by a geographical mix of earnings. Finally, non-GAAP net income for the second quarter of 2024 was $89 million or $3.11 diluted earnings per share compared to $89 million or diluted earnings per share of $0.03 in Q2 of '23. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q2 2024 was $1.62 billion, compared to $1.65 billion at the end of Q1 2024. Inventory at the end of Q2 was -- I'm sorry, $804 million as compared to $783 million at the end of the first quarter. The increase is due to the strategic purchases of difficult to source raw materials that are critical to our supply chain. For the second quarter of 2024, net cash generated from operating activities was approximately $98 million, the same as Q2 of '23. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2024 were approximately $42 million and depreciation and amortization was $36 million. Second quarter of 2024 free cash flow was approximately $55 million, which compares to $63 million in Q2 of 2023. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2024 was $138 million or 21.6% of sales and was approximately $138 million or 20.2% of sales in the second quarter of 2023. During the second quarter, we repurchased 346,226 shares of our stock for about $100 million at an average purchase price of about $289 per share. During July 2024, we repurchased an additional $96 million at an average purchase price of about $293 per share. We also announced today that the Board authorized a $500 million increase to our existing share repurchase program. And in total, we now have approximately $578 million available for share repurchases as we continue to be opportunistic in our approach with buybacks. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. As referenced in Andy's commentary, we have seen improved funding for the biotech end market that is yet to fully translate into customer orders. Given the pace of customer bioprocessing, destock and the expectations of a much more moderated pace of biopharma recovery, we have tempered the outlook for our Life Science Group in the back half of the year. We continue to expect healthy normalized growth for the Clinical Diagnostics Group in 2024. Taken together, we now estimate currency-neutral year-over-year revenue to decline 2.5% to 4% for 2024 versus growth of 1% to 2.5% in our prior guidance. The 500 basis points change in our revenue outlook is because of lower process chromatography demand and slower-than-expected biopharma recovery offset by the higher levels of clinical diagnostics sales. For the second half of the year, we expect about 2% year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth versus a 7.5% year-over-year decline in the first half of 2024. This represents about 6% revenue growth in the second half of 2024 over the first half. For the Life Sciences Group, we expect between 10% and 12% currency-neutral revenue decline for 2024. The full-year Life Science Group year-over-year sales decline, excluding process chromatography related sales, is expected to be about 4%. In this business group, we expect low-double digit revenue growth for the second half of the year over the first half. For the Diagnostics Group, we are now guiding currency-neutral revenue growth to be between 3% and 3.5% for 2024. This represents revenue growth for the Diagnostics Group of about 2% for the second half of the year over the first half. Full-year non-GAAP gross margins are now projected to be between 54.5% and 55% versus 54% and 54.5% previously, reflecting a combination of better product mix and cost improvements we've implemented. Our updated gross margin outlook is higher than our prior guidance. However, below the 55.3% we achieved in the first half of the year, because of the expected lower revenue in the second half of 2024, which will drive a higher level of fixed costs under absorption than previously forecasted. We now expect full-year non-GAAP operating margin to be between 12% and 13% versus 13.5% to 14% in our prior guidance, reflecting a lower level of cost leverage in the second half, while we continue to carefully manage operating expenses. Full-year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be between 18% and 19% versus 19.5% to 20% in our prior guidance. Finally, we expect to close the acquisition of certain technology assets that Andy mentioned earlier in the call and are anticipating a onetime in-process R&D charge of approximately $30 million likely in the third quarter or at the latest by the end of 2024. This will be incremental to the full-year operating margin profile we've laid out above. That concludes our prepared remarks. We'll now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. And we will take our first question from Patrick Donnelly with Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Hey guys. Thank you for taking the questions. Maybe to start on the margin side. Obviously, a pretty nice performance in 2Q, but then, Roop, you just touched on to the cut for the year. Can you just talk about, I guess, what drove the strength in 2Q? And then, obviously, again, just that second half expectation margin down quite a bit there. Maybe just talk through the moving pieces as we work our way through the year and out of 2Q here?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes, certainly, Patrick, good to talk to you. So first of all, maybe just to start, I think just to remember, we are taking the overall gross margin up from a guide -- from where we were on the guide perspective based on the performance. And so even in the second half of the year, we expect stronger gross margin than what we had originally guided. Q2 is kind of strength in the gross margin, specifically is associated with mix. But the other part of it is really sustained improvements based on our cost initiatives and efficiency improvements and things like logistics costs that we've been very proactively managing. So those are the things that really helped Q2. And as we looked at these initiatives, the magnitude and timing can be a bit variable, and so we saw it flow through in the second quarter. We do expect that to sustain into the second half of the year and beyond. With that said, as we look at kind of the revenue and what we expect to flow through our factories, we anticipate more under absorption in the factories. And so we've been a bit conservative in giving kind of what that margin outlook is in the second half, while still taking up the overall range of the margin for the year.
Patrick Donnelly:
Yes. And then -- and just the op margins as well? Just maybe talk through those with the SG&A line?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes, of course. Op margins, when I look at the actions we've taken on a proactive cost management and just efficiencies, productivity that we're driving throughout the different areas of OpEx, that's taking hold as well. I think part of the headwind on the OpEx, which then affects the op margin is just the fact that sales are coming down from where we originally expected. And therefore, the cost leverage -- cost structure leverage isn't as strong yet even though we've got the gross margins improving. So that's simply flow through, and we've been very proactive in terms of that headcount management through the year. I think one thing to keep in mind is from an operating expense standpoint, we've been very prudent in how we looked at headcount management and cost management. We'll see a little bit of uptick in the second half of the year just because of some of the projects and other things that we want to drive execution on it in the second half.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just on process chrome. It seems like, obviously, some of the stocking lingering here and obviously, it seems like that's a big part of the Life Science decline for the year. Can you guys just talk about what you're seeing there? It seems like, again, you're taking out any sort of recovery for this year. But just what you need to see to kind of believe in a recovery there and visibility and just -- is it different geographies? I know it seems like it's concentrated to a few customers, but maybe just pull the card back a little bit on that piece?
Andy Last:
Hey, Patrick, it's Andy. Yes, I'll take that one. Yes, I think, look, the story here is a mixed bag. There are some positives. We're seeing a number of projects that we're engaged in improving in the first half and actually low-double digit improvement. So that's a positive trend line. But those small projects in early phase are not material revenue contributors in the first year. The kind of pullback on our overall guidance on process chromatography is very much the same story as Q1. It's just a more acute understanding of the magnitude of destocking that a small handful of very large customers have to go through. And they've got multiple manufacturing facilities, and it's been that struggle of getting full line of sight to all their sources of inventory. And so we're just being very prudent in our view on process chrome for the rest of this year, and we expect to see recovery in '25.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Patrick, this is Roop. Maybe just to build on one part is the geo piece. And based on the customers that Andy spoke of, it's in various geos. So it's not concentrated in any one geo.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe just one last quick one. Just on the digital PCR side, obviously, always a focus for investors. Are you seeing anything different in that market, both competitively and just on the demand side? It would be helpful. Thank you guys.
Andy Last:
I don't think we're seeing any real shift competitively that we've not already been seeing. Within the mix of life science overall, digital PCR instrumentation was the major factor again. Consumables were actually held up pretty well. And we -- and sequentially, quarter-to-quarter, we saw improvement. In fact, we saw quarter-to-quarter improvement broadly. It's really the -- in the case of digital PCR, it's a pretty tough compare in Q2 of last year, the call-out in the script of the onetime licensing fee and some of the kind of supply chain challenges that we actually managed to overcome in Q2 of prior year. So and as for the competitive situation, look, with maintaining our win rates in the segments we're focused in. And we feel very positive about the long-term outlook for digital PCR still.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes. And I think the -- this is Roop. I would just add, we are going to see second half strength in DD PCR over the first half. So when we think about that, we're pleased with kind of as it's coming back.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great. Thank you guys.
Andy Last:
Thanks, Patrick.
Operator:
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Dan Leonard with UBS.
Daniel Leonard:
Thank you and good evening. At a high level, with the current guidance, do you think you've framed the operating environment appropriately? Or are there any areas where you're trying to be conservative or any further areas where you're speculating on improvement that you don't yet have visibility on?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Hey, Dan, this is Roop. Maybe I'll start. In terms of spectrum, I think we framed it well in terms of what we're seeing and across the different areas. Obviously, from a Life Science Group, the process chrome is the area that, as Andy spoke up, we're seeing the greatest headwind, if you will. And that really -- our position with these customers is very strong in terms of the end therapeutics that they support. Those are market leading therapeutics. And so we feel very good about that and it can't be displaced. It's just a matter of that destocking that's occurring there. As we just talked about DD PCR, we're seeing positive signals and expect that to grow. Clinical Diagnostics has been positive throughout the year, and we expect it to have some normalized growth rate as we continue. The margin is the one area that I framed, which is maybe a little bit more conservative, but part of this is mix being a contributor to our positivity so far. It's hard to predict mix exactly. And so we're mindful of that. And then as I mentioned, the under-absorption, beyond that, and I think we haven't touched on China and maybe in the questions. But China is the one variable that's an open question. The new stimulus that's been introduced. It's interesting, but I'm not sure it will have that much of an impact. So we're again mindful of that. So I think we're trying to be very prudent in our view of what to layout for folks to expect in the second half, recognizing the markets are still dynamic and especially in a couple of the areas that we're playing in. And China is probably the one that's most variable for maybe not just us, but others as well.
Daniel Leonard:
Understood. And thank you for elaborating on all those assumptions. Just a quick follow-up. I know the single cell product has been a very high visibility R&D efforts at Bio-Rad for a couple of years now. You launched it in June. Hopeful that you could give any color on your go-to-market strategy or how to think -- we should think about framing that uptake?
Andy Last:
Yes. Dan, it's Andy. Thanks for the question. And look, I think we're consistent in where we think the value proposition for the product offering set, which is equal performance to the market leading solution, better value and a better workflow. And we think the long-term growth opportunity for single cell is solid. It's a sizable market. We expect it to continue to grow. I think the obvious acquisition of Fluent by Illumina is just kind of a testament to that. And I think that's going to kind of put more emphasis on value for the end market. We believe we've got a very well-positioned product with probably the best workflow of all the platforms. In terms of go-to-market, we've got a specialist focus in our early months of introduction to establish product performance and credibility out there with kind of key core labs and sensors. So that's the way we're approaching it as our platform value and we're kind of thinking about the work we'll do in the second half this year. We don't anticipate material revenue contribution that would change our outlook this year. But it's about building for next year.
Daniel Leonard:
Thank you, Andy.
Operator:
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Tycho Peterson with Jefferies.
Tycho Peterson:
Hey, good afternoon. Maybe you look at Life Sciences and backing out chrome, you're still down kind of 4% in the year. Most of your peers are flat. Can you maybe just talk a little bit about why that might be the case?
Andy Last:
Yes. I think we've got an element of mix that's playing into our disadvantage here, Tycho, amongst others and with the biopharma and digital PCR component. Maybe also a little bit with our qPCR business, since it was the beneficiary of a massive uplift in the COVID period. And we're still seeing some relative softness on recovery in qPCR instrumentation. So I think we've got that mix that's a little bit against us relative to others. And the other -- depending on other folks on the reagent instrumentation mix where reagents are holding up better this year overall. And I'd say the last piece that I would call out, which we should not forget is Q2 was a pretty tough compare for us. We had the onetime license fee. We actually -- despite the market we're starting to pull back really by the end of Q1 last year, we actually were doing a fair bit of supply chain recovery during Q2. So I'll compare was a bit elevated to pass other focus as well.
Tycho Peterson:
Okay. Capital deployment question, why not do a bigger buyback here? You've got peers buying $5 billion at 30x earnings. You guys are 5x extra carriers. Why don't do something more meaningful than the $500 million you just added to the repo?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Well, that's just -- that's the incremental authorization, I guess, and we're just mindful. I mean, those balance sheets that you referenced, Tycho, are large balance sheets. So that's one thing to keep in mind. With that said, we did close to $200 million through the Q2 period and through the blackout period, which we hadn't done. So I think our actions speak to our perspective that we're undervalued. The $500 million in incremental authorization, I think it's a strong message from the Board and us. And when you consider where our balance sheet is, that's a very reasonable percentage of our cash.
Tycho Peterson:
And then are you committing to kind of prioritizing that over M&A? I mean that's the other side of it. Your peers are saying multiples are still too high.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes. I guess, I'll start and maybe Norman, if you'd like to add. Prioritization, I think, listen, part of it is the technical aspect of the share repurchase and where intrinsic values are, and that's more of a technical answer. And so I wouldn't say we're necessarily prioritizing, but we're mindful and at the same time, M&A the right deals have to come. And as you mentioned, valuations have to be appropriate for the right technologies and they have to contribute to our product roadmap and strategy. And so timing is an important part of that. So we look at both as opportunities to drive long-term shareholder value creation.
Tycho Peterson:
And then maybe last one on digital PCR. Just with the continuum launch coming, any risks ahead of the launch, freezing the market? It's been delayed a couple of times.
Andy Last:
Yes, nothing outside of the normal risks that go with new product introduction and then all those final steps you go through. We're still targeting an initial entry in Q4. Really, it's about staging for next year, Tycho. Nothing more to add at this point, I don't think.
Tycho Peterson:
Understood. Thank you.
Andy Last:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we will take our next question from Jack Meehan with Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. Norman, I wanted to ask you about the COO search. It sounds like there's still a few folks in the mix there. As you look at the group, is CEO potential still a high criteria? And I guess, how do you think about that relative to some internal candidates you might have in terms of succession planning?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. I think as we said before, part of this -- part of evaluating the candidates has been a CEO of succession, and that's still part of the -- that's still a critical part of the mix.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then I also wanted to ask your latest thoughts on the Sartorius stake and just thoughts around potentially monetizing that to fund buyback or near-term M&A, if something presented itself? Just what's your latest thinking on kind of the strategic role of that state?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. I mean it's -- we still do see it. It's a monetizable asset. I think that the question is what's the future with your team not extending its contract, certainly, his tenure has been really good for us. And it's been really good for the company. And our investment has done really well. And I think, candidly, it's given us a much more valuable monetizable asset. But I guess at the end of the day, he's stepping down doesn't really impact our kind of overall views.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. Okay. And then I did have one cash flow question, Roop. On the relative inventory levels, I just kind of do some very basic benchmarking. It does look a bit bloated. Like if I look at inventory as a percentage of sales, maybe is one metric back in 2019 before the pandemic, it was around 24%. Today kind of annualized at over 30%. So maybe just it would be great to hear your thoughts like ability to start drawing this down to generate some cash? Are there any hurdles to doing that? Thanks.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes. Great point on that. You're spot on bloated. We haven't necessarily used that word, but we do think it's [indiscernible]. But I guess you pick your word. With all that said, we've got inventory. And some of it, quite honestly, has been purposeful because of the market, right? It's -- we needed to procure strategic materials to ensure continuity of supply. With that said, if I separate that out, we've got focused initiatives in terms of inventory reduction. Part of it is just operationally how we manage the sales and operations kind of alignment and there's improvements that are being made there. And we expect over time that that inventory will come down. And I'll say it more from an inventory turn standpoint, our inventory turns will improve, obviously, with revenue growth, you may see additional inventory on the balance sheet. But from an overall turns perspective, where we are today is unacceptable, and we're focused on improving that turns, which obviously will then drive stronger operating and free cash flow.
Jack Meehan:
Great. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And it appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.
Norman Schwartz:
Thank you for joining today's call. We will be at the Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference in Boston in early September and hope to catch up with some of you in-person. And as always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Take care.
Operator:
Thank you. This does conclude today's presentation. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.
Operator:
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to today's Bio-Rad First Quarter 2024 Earnings Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Also today's call is being recorded [Operator Instructions]. And now at this time, I'll turn things over to Mr. Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. Chung.
Yong Chung:
Thanks, Bob. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the first quarter of 2024 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Roop Lakkaraju, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin our review, I would like to remind everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I'll now turn the call over to our CEO, Norman Schwartz.
Norman Schwartz:
Thanks, Ed. First, what I want to do is officially welcome and introduce Roop Lakkaraju, our new CFO. He comes to us with a wealth of financial and operational experience which will certainly be valuable as we move forward. Roop has now been on board about 4 weeks and already contributing. In fact, Roop will walk you through our financial results for the first quarter in a few minutes. But I just want to say a few words. We have received questions about management turnover and succession in the last 6 months. I thought it would be useful to say a few words. So in short, as I think about it, each of these discrete departures is really centered around personal decisions, either related to other opportunities or retirement. From my perspective, it's all part of a normal progression for these individuals and for the company. And of course, with all of these individuals, I just want to take a minute to recognize and thank them for their contributions.
So as we move forward, we are making good progress filling some of these open positions. Some positions are being filled with external candidates like Roop, which gives the company an opportunity to bring in fresh outside experience and perspective. And others are being filled with internal candidates like Jim Barry, who we've recently announced as our new Head of Life Science. Jim brings a deep understanding of the company along with significant expertise in a variety of areas. So as I think about it today with Roop on board, the finance team is fully staffed. And we're close to an announcement on the new Head of Diagnostics. In addition, we have good initial candidate pool for the COO position. I do view these changes as opportunities to bring fresh insights and ideas to the table as we continue our transformational journey. So with that, maybe I'll turn the call over to Andy to provide an update on Bio-Rad's Global Operations. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Okay. Thank you, Norman, and good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for joining us. The first quarter of 2024 reflected a continuation of the same macroeconomic and market trends we had experienced in 2023 in the Biotech and Biopharma segments as well as China and Russia. As a result, our Life Science Group was in line with expectations and presented a soft quarter sales with a year-over-year decline which also reflected a tough comparison from Q1 of '23. In contrast, we were pleased with our Clinical Diagnostics group, which showed growth across all regions and provided a solid offsetting balance for overall Bio-Rad sales. Our Life Science business experienced double-digit declines, both across our Core and Bioprocessing product families. As previously communicated, our Process Chromatography sales, which have quarter-to-quarter lumpiness were down significantly against a tough compare in Q1 2023.
This reflects the general destocking trend across the industry and for us is the result of a few large customers still working through excess inventory. While we have seen indications of some customers starting to forecast purchase improvements, overall, we are expecting a further decline for Process Chromatography sales this year. However, we have converted some early customers from competing resins to our platform during the first quarter and have not lost any customers. As such, we remain positive on the long-term growth potential for this business. Overall, our Core Life Science business, excluding Process Chromatography Resins declined in the mid-teens in all regions, which was in line with expectations. Notably, declines were concentrated in instrument sales, whereas consumable and reagent sales were essentially flat, both sequentially and year-over-year. We are also looking forward to new product launches this year, more particularly the new ChemiDoc Go platform and our new Single-cell Sample Prep Solution in Q2. And of course, the QX Continuum later in the year, all of which are contemplated on our outlook for the year. Our Digital -- our Droplet Digital PCR franchise was soft in Q1 again, with a tough Q1 2023 compare, but the decline was single digit compared to our overall Core Life Science sales. During the quarter, we continued to make progress on our strategy, and we announced two deals in support of driving penetration of the platform into advanced clinical diagnostic uses. The first with Allegheny Health Network is focused on generating clinical evidence across a range of cancer types using Bio-Rad's Droplet Digital PCR technology for tumor-informed minimal residual disease monitoring of patients with solid tumor cancer following treatment. The second agreement is a collaboration with Oncocyte to commercialize their Advanced Transplant Monitoring Assays deploying Bio-Rad's QX600 Droplet Digital PCR System to provide a highly sensitive solution that could provide a more attractive alternative for laboratories that currently rely on centralized next-generation sequencing test providers. During Q1, we also released a new Multiplex Mutation Detection Assay, providing a comprehensive status readout of mutations in ESR-1, which is a key gene in breast cancer. We are very excited by the initial response we have seen for this assay. We're also pleased to see a key partner, Geneoscopy, announcing FDA approval of ColoSense, a new noninvasive RNA-based colorectal cancer screening test, that runs on our Digital PCR platform. Moving on to our Clinical Diagnostics business. We were very pleased with the broad-based performance of our products in Q1 as we saw solid mid-single-digit growth compared to a softer Q1 2023 with particular strength in EMEA and Asia Pacific. Strong sales in quality controls, immunohematology and diabetes were of note, an instrument supply for our clinical platform is now stabilized as we benefit from our new manufacturing facility in Singapore, which is fully operational. Reflecting on the first quarter's macroeconomic and market conditions, they broadly matched our expectations. We were pleased to see the positive trend for capital raises flowing into the biotech and biopharma markets, which is a prerequisite for second half growth. Although we have not yet seen any signs of the funding making its way into orders and expect this to be a second half of the year impact. China remains soft for the Life Science business, although the Chinese governments stimulus announcement was encouraging for the longer-term recovery of the market. We also continue to navigate the sanctions imposed on Russia where we maintain supply of some critical Clinical Diagnostic products. In the U.S., finalization of the NIH budget was delayed until late March, and at a slightly lower level than anticipated. And in the key European markets, government funding was more of a mixed bag with Germany down and generally flat in the U.K. and France. With this backdrop in mind, we remain cautious on the magnitude and timing of the recovery in Life Science markets, but are still anticipating improvements in the second half. We continue to expect normalized growth through our Clinical Diagnostics business in 2024. With that, I'll say thank you, and I'll now pass you to Roop to review the financial results.
Roop Lakkaraju:
Thank you, Andy. I'd now like to review the results for the first quarter. Net sales for the first quarter of 2024 was $611 million, which is a 9.8% decline on a reported basis versus $677 million in Q1 of 2023. On a currency-neutral basis, the year-over-year revenue decline was 9.6%. As Andy mentioned, the year-over-year decline was primarily the result of ongoing weakness in key Life Science end markets, somewhat offset by steady growth of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Sales of the Life Science Group in the first quarter of 2024 were $242 million compared to $324 million in Q1 of 2023 which is a decrease of 25.3% on a reported basis and a decline of 25.2% on a currency-neutral basis. The year-over-year decline impacted most product and geographic areas. Excluding Process Chromatography sales, which can fluctuate quarter-to-quarter, Life Science Group revenue decreased 16.6% on a currency-neutral basis.
Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the first quarter were $369 million compared to $352 million in Q1 of 2023, which is an increase of 4.7% on a reported basis and 4.8% on a currency-neutral basis. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics group was primarily driven by increased demand for quality controls, blood typing and diabetes. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral year-over-year revenue for the Diagnostics group posted balanced growth across all three regions. For the company, Q1 reported GAAP gross margin of 53.4% as compared to 53.5% in the first quarter of 2023 was in line with our expectations as we maintained a tight focus on manufacturing costs, which was partially offset by higher material costs and lower absorption. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was approximately $4 million in both periods. SG&A expenses for Q1 2024 were $215 million or 35.2% of sales compared to $226 million or 33% in Q1 of 2023. The decrease in SG&A spend was driven by the positive impact of our previously discussed cost reduction initiatives including lower employee-related expenses and discretionary spend as well as higher restructuring charges in the year ago period. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter is approximately $1 million versus approximately $2 million in Q1 of 2023. Research and Development expense in the first quarter was $66 million or 10.9% of sales compared to $75 million or 11.1% of sales in Q1 of 2023. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to decreased employee-related expenses and lower restructuring costs. Q1 operating income was $45 million or 7.3% of sales compared to $62 million or 9.1% of sales in Q1 of 2023, primarily due to lower sales versus the year ago period, which were partially offset by our expense management initiatives. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity security holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares added $422 million of income to the reported results. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $24 million compared to net other income of $40 million last year. The primary driver of the year-over-year change is the lower Sartorius dividend, which declined to $18 million in Q1 of 2024 versus the quarter of 2023. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2024 was 21.8% compared to 18.7% for the same period in 2023. The effective tax rate reported in these periods was primarily affected by the accounting treatment of our equity securities. First quarter reported net income was $384 million or $13.45 diluted earnings per share compared to net income of $69 million or a diluted earnings per share of $2.32 in Q1 of 2023. This change from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of our Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the first quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded approximately $4 million of amortization of purchased intangibles of approximately $1 million of restructuring expenses. These exclusions moved to non-GAAP gross margin to 54.2% for the first quarter of 2024, which is flat to Q1 of 2023. Non-GAAP SG&A dollar spend was slightly lower on a year-over-year basis, but as a percentage of sales was higher due to lower revenue in Q1 '24. Specifically in the first quarter of '24, SG&A as a percent was 34% versus 31.3% in Q1 of 2023. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded the amortization of intangibles of approximately $1 million, approximately $2 million for an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products and approximately $4 million of restructuring-related expenses. Non-GAAP R&D as a percentage of sales in the first quarter of 2024 was 10.5% versus 10.4% in Q1 of 2023. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded approximately $2 million of restructuring expenses and a small acquisition expense. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 7.3% on a GAAP basis to 9.7% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to non-GAAP operating margin of 12.4% in Q1 of 2023. We've also excluded certain items below the operating line, which is primarily related to the increase in value of the Sartorius Equity Securities and loan receivable holdings of $422 million. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2024 was 22.3% compared to 20.9% for the same period in 2023. A higher rate in 2024 was driven by geographical mix of earnings and change in valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets. Finally, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2024 was $65 million or $2.29 diluted earnings per share compared to $99 million or a diluted earnings per share of $3.34 in Q1 of 2023. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 2024 was $1.651 billion compared to $1.613 billion at the end of 2023. The change in cash and short-term investments from the fourth quarter of 2023 was primarily due to the change in working capital. Inventory of $783 million was essentially flat compared to $781 million in the prior quarter. For the first quarter of 2024, net cash generated from operating activities was $70 million, which compares to $98 million in Q1 of 2023. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2024 were $40 million, and depreciation and amortization was $37 million. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2024 was $109 million or 17.8% of sales and excluding the Sartorius dividend, was 14.8%. The adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2023 was $149 million or 21.9% of sales and excluding the Sartorius dividend was 16.8%. During the first quarter, we purchased 14,250 shares of our stock for a total cost of approximately $5 million or an average purchase price of approximately $330 per share. We continue to be opportunistic with our buyback program and still have approximately $275 million available for share repurchases under the current Board authorized program. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. As referenced in Andy's commentary, we are seeing some encouraging signs in the Life Science end markets. However, we remain cautious on the magnitude and timing of the recovery for the Life Science Group but are still anticipating improvement during the second half of the year. We continue to expect normalized growth for the Clinical Diagnostics group in 2024. Taken together, we are maintaining our full year outlook with currency-neutral revenue growth to be between 1% and 2.5% and non-GAAP operating margin projected to be between 13.5% and 14%. I'll now hand the call back to Norman to make a few concluding remarks.
Norman Schwartz:
Thanks, Roop. Just to close it out, I'd like to reiterate that in spite of all that's going on around us, our strategy and our focus for the future growth of the company is intact. In our Clinical Diagnostics business, we have these leading market positions globally for our core platforms, and we continue to invest in supporting the growth and building a position in, for example, a new Molecular Diagnostics segment through the development of PCR-1 an acquisition we made some time ago and leveraging our Droplet Digital PCR platform into high-value niches. In Life Science, we continue to maintain a focus on Biopharma, especially for Digital PCR, our Process Chromatography products and new products in development, say, particularly around cell biology. We do believe the long-term opportunity for sustained growth in this Biopharma market segment is solid. And certainly, we also continue to invest to enhance our leadership in Digital PCR and other leading platform positions in the academic markets that we serve.
Overall, between Life Science and Diagnostics, we do believe we're well positioned to drive long-term growth as we move through this dynamic period.
Yong Chung:
All right. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We go first this afternoon to Patrick Donnelly of Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Maybe start on the Life Science business. It came in a little bit light of what we were looking for. Can you talk about -- it seems like Process Chrome is an area you're calling out with a little bit of softness. Can you talk about what you saw in the quarter? And then obviously maintaining the full year guide, can you talk about the expectations for the Life Science business as we work our way through the year here and the growth expectations for the year on that segment?
Andrew Last:
Patrick, it's Andy. So let me take that question. So first on Process Chromatography in the quarter, I mean, big -- a tough compare to 2023 for sure, I think the Core Life Science business kind of really met the expectations. So we did call out that I think for us, Process Chromatography is softer than we anticipated. And that kind of drove the delta for us. As we look forward to the rest of the year, at this point in time, we're considering the Process Chrome is going to be softer than originally anticipated. I just want to reiterate because it's a valid question. We're not seeing that we're losing customers. We're maintaining share. In fact, we still believe we are winning share as we called out in the script.
On Life Science, it's just a higher level of uncertainty, I think, is where we sit right now. And most of the -- if not virtually all of the delta in Life Sciences instrument. The consumables and reagents are actually performing pretty consistently, sequentially and year-over-year. So it's just kind of -- it's the spend on -- capital spend on equipment, which is the major delta for us right now.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. So I guess when you think about maintaining a guide for the year overall, Process Chrome softened a bit. Are there offsets that came in better than you expected that are now -- you're thinking a little bit higher growth for the year? I'm just trying to figure out the balance here and the visibility into [ this? ]
Andrew Last:
Yes. So I think the core Life Sciences with the caveats that I just mentioned, I think we're -- it's in the line. There's some strength in clinical diagnostics that looks good to us right now. which kind of keeps us within our guide range overall.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe just on ddPCR, how did that perform in the quarter? How are you seeing the competitive landscape there? How did things trend and expectations for the year on that front as well would be helpful.
Andrew Last:
Yes. So interestingly, relative to core Life Science, which was down mid-teens, the Digital PCR franchise was down single digit percentage. And it was all concentrated in the instruments. The consumable reagent pull-through was pretty good. And as we look forward, we view the franchise recovering in line with market recovery as we go through the remaining quarters in the year. Competitively, we're not seeing any change to our win-loss ratio. And of course, our major competition is calling out some improvement in their year-over-year performance. It's not lost on us, but we just want to reiterate that they're in a segment which we've not yet entered which we'll be entering later this year.
Operator:
We go next now to Dan Leonard of UBS.
Unknown Analyst:
Great. This is [ Lou ] on for Dan. I think the first question, I wanted to touch a little bit on the Life Sciences as well. Can you share a little bit more color in the order trends? And maybe also the funnel activities? I think you mentioned like about something improvement. Have you seen any increasing activities in some new customers?
Andrew Last:
Yes. So thank you for the question. It's Andy again. So I think where we sit right now are really encouraged by the influx of capital into Biotech, Biopharma. That really is a prerequisite to second half [ x ] growth. It's not showed up in our order books as yet. And [ no ] the funnel is we're starting to have more positive sentiment and conversations within that segment. But it's not showed up yet a hard and fast orders.
Unknown Analyst:
Got it. Appreciate it. So I guess I probably wanted to touch on a little bit on the guidance as well. So it does look at the second half, the ramp [ is a lot deeper ] both in the revenue and margin? And then also you just mentioned you haven't seen anything -- orders yet. So can you just maybe share a little bit in terms of the visibility and your confidence in maintaining the guide? And then also maybe how we should think about Q2 as well. Do you see improving signals in April? So could help you like to see the sequential improvement?
Andrew Last:
Yes. I think I kind of answered that question as a carry on from my previous answer as it relates to biotech, biopharma. And I do think that we need to see the kind of encouraging signs turn into orders for the second half, which obviously will generate the ramp. Process Chromatography, we do view as being really a more challenging year overall due to destocking. But we see some good growth in our Clinical Diagnostics business. And we envisage that continuing throughout the year. So I think really just a reconfirmation of the comments that we made in the script and my earlier answer.
Unknown Analyst:
Got it. Just final question on the gross margin. It does come better than what we expected given the lower volume. Can you share a little bit the drivers of that? And then what's your expectation for the full year?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Yes, this is Roop. I'll take this to start. First of all, it did come in a little bit stronger, which we were very happy about. And part of it was expected just based on the cost actions we've taken and these sort of things, but also what played a part is the mix. And so that helps support a little bit of a stronger gross margin there. I think as we think about the rest of the year, and as Andy pointed out, we feel good about the overall view for the full year on the gross margin based on mix and quarter-to-quarter movement, we may see a slight movement in that gross margin. But overall, for the full year, we still feel very confident as it relates to how it fits in with our overall outlook for the year.
Operator:
We'll go next now to Jack Meehan with Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
First question is for Norman. I was just wondering if you could give a little bit more color on when we should expect updates in terms of the management hires for the new COO? And also the plan for the new Head of Diagnostics?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. I think we're getting pretty close on the diagnostics hire. I think we'll have something to announce pretty soon. And we've got a really good pool of candidates on the COO side. That will probably take a little longer, but we're pretty encouraged.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then for Roop, first, welcome to Bio-Rad and I had a couple of questions for you. The first is, could you just talk about, like as you're new in the seat, how you went about sizing up the guidance for 2024? And second is, if you could just talk about the cadence you're expecting for margins starting from 9.7% to get to the full year target? Like how you feel like that phases throughout the year and how you got confidence in that?
Roop Lakkaraju:
Sure. So first of all, thank you for the welcome. In terms of the process on the guidance, first of all, the company has an existing process, business review cadence that was already in existence. And so part of this was really for me to seamlessly integrate into the existing processes. As part of those processes, we start out with looking at revenue on a quarterly -- quarterly basis with our sales teams and walking through revenue drivers and market conditions and these sort of things. And then profiling that against what we were expecting. And understanding how mix might affect the next piece, which is the margins and these sort of things. There's also a number of cost actions that have been taken historically that we were also monitoring the impact of those cost actions as well as kind of market dynamics around materials pricing, logistics, trends, these sort of things and how that might affect the margin progress.
So we then just kind of walked down through the different areas of the P&L. When we got to the OpEx, it really is more around a run rate, the effect of things like merit and how that plays through. So we walked through that analytically. And then getting down, obviously, to the operating income. So based on the different drivers and our expectations and feedback from our sales team on how the ramp might look, how then that might flow through the factory from an absorption standpoint, it gave us confidence on reiterating our guidance overall. Then also, just to finish off the thought, I think, to your phasing question that also gave us perspective on how to think about the quarter-to-quarter trend through the year. And if there's any kind of specific things that we need to call out or think about more specifically.
Operator:
We'll go next now to Conor McNamara at RBC Capital Markets.
Conor Noel McNamara:
Norman, just one for you. I appreciate the color on the management departures and how that -- the timing was a lot of it was personal related, but can you give us more color on how other nonmanagement employee retention has been? Has there been any fallout from some of these departures?
Norman Schwartz:
No, there hasn't. I mean, obviously, in a company of our size and actually any size, you have a certain amount of turnover that's natural every year in the kind of the 5% to 10% range. But -- but no, these departures have not precipitated anything else.
Conor Noel McNamara:
Okay. And then just the color you gave on some of these ddPCR partnerships those are great announcements. But can you just kind of talk about some of the revenue opportunity for Bio-Rad. And is that -- do you see additional equipment placements as a result of these there's consumable pull-through? What's kind of the expected ramp of any sales benefit for some of those announced partnerships?
Andrew Last:
Yes. Yes. Thanks, Conor. This is Andy. So there's a slightly different profile for each of these announcements. Allegheny is much more focused on the real clinical insight around minimal residual disease and how best to deploy our technology to be more effective in that area. So that's really a value creation through insight learning, clinical information. The Oncocyte is more tangible in that this is to generate longer-term systems placements and test sales for Oncocyte in particular, and then we'll have some beneficial effect from that. But that's kind of a long-term strategy. It will have no material impact in the very near term. And then Geneoscopy, we are the platform they chose to develop on. And as they succeed and with that platform moving forward, they will create a consumable and reagent stream for us. And if there's an opportunity, which we believe there is to take that solution beyond the U.S. and into other markets, that creates spoke test revenue and consumable revenue and the system revenue opportunities. None of this is what I would call immediate near-term impact, but it's really solid long-term strategy.
Conor Noel McNamara:
Great. And I don't know if this is your last earnings call, but if so -- best of luck in retirement, and Roop, welcome to the team.
Norman Schwartz:
Just to be clear, it won't be Andy's last earnings call. We've made sure of that.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. And gentlemen, it appears we have no further questions this afternoon. Mr. Chung, I'd like to turn things back to you, sir, for any closing comments.
Yong Chung:
Yes. Thank you for joining today's call. We will be at the RBC Capital Markets Global Healthcare Conference in New York next week, and we'll be back in New York in June for the Jefferies Healthcare Conference. So as always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you, Mr. Chung. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude the Bio-Rad first quarter earnings results call. Again, thanks so much for joining us, and we wish you all a great remainder of your day. Goodbye.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the Bio-Rad Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Results Conference Call. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Edward Chung. Please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, Jenny. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Simon May, President of the Life Science Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn over the call to Andy Last, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad’s global operations.
Andy Last:
Okay. Many thanks, Ed, and good afternoon to everybody. Thank you for joining us. The fourth quarter of 2023 performed largely as expected, reflecting a continuation of the macroeconomic trends started earlier this year in the biotech and biopharma segments, China and geopolitical challenges related to Russia. However, revenue picked up nicely compared to Q3 in both Life Science and Diagnostics, although, as expected, we saw little in the way of budget flush in the fourth quarter of this year for the Life Science business. During the quarter, we smoothed out the remaining operational challenges associated with our SAP Go Live in Q3 in Asia-Pacific, and we are now operating on a single global instance of SAP across all our operations. In Life Science, we experienced a double-digit core business decline compared to Q4 prior year, where we had challenging compares due to strong budget flush, backorder burn down and we benefited from the launch of the QX600 ddPCR platform. We were pleased with the growth of our Clinical Diagnostics business in Q4, especially in Asia-Pacific, where we prioritized placements to capture some strong growth trends, particularly in our diabetes testing franchise. We are now past our supply chain challenges and finished the quarter with a more normalized year-end backlog. Overall, our ddPCR franchise had a soft 2023, with sales flat when excluding COVID, as compared to the high growth we had previously been experiencing from our focus in biotech and biopharma. However, we remain very positive on maintaining our leading market share in the markets we serve and are looking forward to the impact of the QX Continuum launch as we expand our focus on the lower-end market later this year. In addition, we continue to prioritize investment on application and assay expansion for the platform overall, with further launches coming during the year. Further, we are excited about the launch of several other new Life Science products this year, which include our new generation -- next-generation ChemiDoc Western blot platform and single-cell ddSEQ sample preparation solution. We were pleased with the Q4 finish for our Clinical Diagnostics business, especially double-digit year-end growth in Asia-Pacific as a function of demand and priority placements, which helped us to deliver mid-single-digit growth overall for the quarter. During 2023, our teams worked hard on reducing our back orders in the clinical business while bringing up Singapore to full production for the products transferred from France. We were pleased with the progress we made on our core franchises in quality controls, immunohematology, diabetes and autoimmune, net of the challenges in Russia and China. In Q4, inventory levels remained high and similar to Q3, continuing to reflect some impacts of our manufacturing transfer of clinical instruments from France to Singapore and also lower demand impacting inventory consumption in Life Sciences. We continued to exercise tight cost control in Q4 and this included lower employee-related costs reflecting reduced incentive compensation accruals. Looking toward 2024 for our Clinical Diagnostics business, we anticipate a more normalized year for customer demand. However, we remain cautious on the pace and dynamics of recovery in our Life Science business. We expect the first half of the year to be a decline due to ongoing softness in biopharma and biotech and prior year compares. But anticipate improvement in the second half of the year as funding improves along with stabilization in the broader biopharma market. The pace and shape of recovery in China remains uncertain, but China remains a priority market for future growth for the company. Overall, we see 2024 as a recovery transition year with higher levels of uncertainty than usual for our Life Science business due to the anticipated second half improvements in biotech and biopharma and the bioprocessing de-stocking recovery. On the latter point, we enter 2024 with a softer order book for process chromatography than the last few years. Mostly related to a couple of large customers with at least one of our large customers still working off elevated inventory throughout the year. On a positive note, our process chromatography resins are included in five of the novel therapeutics approved by the FDA during 2023. In addition, we are excited about the go-live of our new Singapore DC toward the last part of the year, which supports ongoing logistics improvements in the Asia-Pacific region and globally for both businesses. On the operating cost front, we have continued to make improvements in our cost structure. However, we will see a material step up in cost in 2024 for employee incentive compensation accruals, which along with annual merit increases, will create a meaningful cost headwind. We also expect to see ongoing tightening of sanctions against Russia, making conditions for meeting demand for our clinical business increasingly more challenging there. In closing, we continue to drive forward on our strategy with focus on execution on our priority market segments and platforms, investing in process and efficiency gains around our single global SAP instance and maintaining our investment levels to drive innovation for our core platforms. Thank you and I’ll now pass you to Norman to review the financial results.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay. Thank you, Andy. So, first, I’d like to review the results of the fourth quarter and the full year. So net sales for the fourth quarter of 2023 were $681.2 million. It’s a 6.7% decline on a reported basis versus $730.3 million in Q4 of 2022 and a 7.7% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Similar to the prior quarter, the fourth quarter year-over-year revenue decline was primarily the result of ongoing weaknesses in the biotech and biopharma end markets, again, primarily impacting sales of our Life Science segment products. In addition, we continue to experience weak demand for Life Science products in China. I think both as a result of the macroeconomic environment, as well as to some extent, the local made-in-China initiatives. COVID-related sales in the prior year were $13.4 million and immaterial in the fourth quarter of 2023. Therefore, core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, decreased 6.0% currency-neutral. And then on a geographic basis, currency-neutral revenue decreased year-over-year in the Americas and Europe and was relatively flat in Asia. The sales of the Life Science Group in the fourth quarter of 2023 were $291.1 million, compared to $359.7 million in Q4 of 2022, which is a 19.1% decline on a reported basis and 19.9% on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue experienced a broad-based decline of approximately 17%. In addition to the challenging biotech, biopharma end markets and soft macroeconomic conditions in China during the quarter, ddPCR and qPCR sales faced difficult compares due to the backorder burn down and other factors Andy mentioned in the year-ago period. And when excluding process chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business decreased 22.1% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q4 of 2022. And finally, the Life Science Group revenue excluding process chromatography and COVID-related sales decreased 18.7% currency-neutral. On a geographic basis, Life Science year-over-year core revenue decreased across all three regions. Conversely, we saw broad-based growth for the Clinical Diagnostics Group, fourth quarter sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group were $389 million, compared to $369.6 million in Q4 of 2022. This represents a growth of 5.3% on a reported basis and 4.2% growth on a currency-neutral basis. And then core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 4.3%. The Clinical Diagnostic Group benefited from particular strength in diabetes product sales, as well as from the reduction of elevated backorders. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group revenue is primarily driven by strong growth in Asia. For the company, Q4 reported gross margin was 53.8% on a GAAP basis and compares to 54.4% in the fourth quarter of 2022. The year-over-year gross margin decline was due to a number of factors including lower manufacturing volume, the impacts of inflation and inventory reserves. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods was $4.5 million, as compared to $4.4 million in Q4 of 2022. SG&A expenses for the fourth quarter of 2023 were $207.1 million or 30.4% of sales, compared to $212.2 million or 29.1% in Q4 of 2022. The lower SG&A in the quarter was mainly due to lower employee-related expenses, partially offset by a weaker dollar and a facility lease impairment. And total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.2 million versus $1.7 million in Q4 of 2022. Research and development expense in the fourth quarter was $63.9 million or 9.4% of sales, compared to $66.2 million or 9.1% of sales in Q4 of 2022. The lower expense levels reflect both lower employee-related and project expenses. Fourth quarter operating income was $95.3 million or 14% of sales, compared to $118.7 million or 16.2% of sales in Q4 of 2022. And looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity security holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad’s ownership of Sartorius AG shares added $324.3 million of income to the reported results. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $8.8 million, compared to net other expense of $6.1 million last year, primarily driven by increased interest income from investments. Effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2023 was 18.4%, compared to 24.2% for the same period in 2022. Tax rates for both years were driven by unrealized gains in equity securities and the lower rate in 2023 was primarily a result of changes in the geographical mix of earnings. Fourth quarter reported net income was $349.7 million or $12.14 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $827.7 million or diluted earnings per share of $27.78 in Q4 of 2022. This change from last year is again largely related to changes in the valuation of Sartorius holdings. So moving on to the non-GAAP results. On a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. So looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter, in cost of goods, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring benefit. These exclusions move the gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2023 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.4% versus 54.9% in Q4 of 2022. Non-GAAP SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2023 was 29.8% versus 28.5% in Q4 of 2022. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.2 million and in vitro diagnostics registration fee in Europe for previously proved products of $8 -- of $1.8 million and $851,000 of restructuring-related expenses. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the fourth quarter of 2023 was 9.1%, basically the same as 2022. In R&D on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $1.3 million in the restructuring expenses and $400,000 in acquisition-related costs. And the cumulated -- in the cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 14% on a GAAP basis to 15.5% on a non-GAAP basis. And this non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 17.4% in Q4 of 2022. We’ve also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in the value of Sartorius equity holdings and a loan receivable of $324.3 million and a $965,000 loss on venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2023 was 22.4%, compared to 28.1% for the same period in 2022. The lower tax rate in 2023 was primarily driven by the geographical mix of earnings and a release of reserves related to resolution of certain tax positions. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2023 was $89.3 million or $3.10 diluted earnings per share, compared to $98.5 million or diluted earnings per share of $3.31 in Q4 of 2022. So now, for the full year results. Net sales for the full year of 2023 were $2,671 million, which is a 4.7% decline on a reported basis, as compared to $2,802 million in 2022. On a currency-neutral basis, full year of 2023, net sales decreased 4.1%. COVID-related sales for the full year were about $4 million, compared to $109 million in 2023 -- 2022. So that core year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, decreased 0.4% or effectively flat on a currency-neutral basis. Now, looking at full year sales results by segment, sales of the Life Science Group for 2023 were $1,178 million, a year-over-year decline of 12% on a currency-neutral basis. When excluding COVID-related sales, Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue declined 4.9%. The majority of the year-over-year decline was driven by process chromatography, qPCR products and Western blot. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral full year core revenue, which as a reminder, excludes COVID sales, declined in Asia and Europe while the Americas posted modest growth. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostic products for 2023 were $1,489 million, which represents a 3.2% growth on a currency-neutral basis. When excluding COVID-related sales, the Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 3.4% and was driven by diabetes, quality control and blood typing products, partially offset by a decline in infectious disease products. On a geographic basis, Clinical Diagnostics currency-neutral full year core revenue growth grew across all three regions. Overall, company full year non-GAAP gross margin was 54.2%, compared to 56.6% in 2022. The year-over-year margin decline was driven mainly by product mix, lower COVID sales, inventory reserves and lower fixed cost leverage. Full-year non-GAAP SG&A expense was $814.6 million or 30.5% of sales, compared to $805.4 million or 28.7% of sales in 2022. The higher SG&A was related to SAP implementation in Asia, legal fees, a lease impairment and higher discretionary spend, partially offset by lower employee-related costs. Full year non-GAAP R&D was $254.8 million or 9.5% of sales versus $256.7 million or 9.2% of sales in 2022. And full year non-GAAP operating income was 14.2%, compared to 18.7% in 2022, which reflects the effects of revenue decline, shifts in mix and lower fixed cost absorption. And lastly, the non-GAAP effective tax rate for the full year of 2023 was 22.3%, consistent with our guidance range and compared to 22% in 2022. So moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of 2023 was $1,613 million, compared to $1,796 million at the end of 2022 and $1,765 million at the end of the third quarter of 2023. The change in cash and short-term investments from the third quarter of 2023 was primarily due to share repurchases, working capital and the timing of tax payments. Yesterday, just to mention, we concluded a new $200 million credit agreement maturing in -- now in February of 2029, which provides additional liquidity and enhances Bio-Rad’s financial flexibility. And this new credit line replaces a prior $200 million facility that was maturing in April of this year. Inventory at the end of Q4 increased slightly to $780.5 million from $775.8 million in the prior quarter and was primarily due to a higher level of finished goods. As we move on from the supply chain challenges of the past two years, we continue to anticipate inventory decreasing to more normal levels over the next six quarters to eight quarters. For the fourth quarter of 2023, net cash generated from operating activities was $81 million, which compares to $79.7 million in Q4 of 2022. This increase mainly reflects changes in working capital offset by the timing of tax payments. For the full year of 2023, net cash generated from operations was $374.9 million versus $194.4 million in 2022. This increase mainly reflects changes in working capital. During the fourth quarter, we purchased 659,000 shares of our stock for a total cost of $200 million or an average purchase price of approximately $303 per share, as we continue to be optimistic with our buyback program. Probably useful to note, we still have nearly $280 million available for share repurchases under the current board-authorized program. And further, just so you understand, full year share buybacks totaled 1,268,000 shares for approximately $429 million. Again, that’s for the year. As a comparison, we purchased about 479,000 shares of our stock for $216 million in 2022. Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2023 was $136.8 million or 20.1% of sales and adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2022 was 21.4%. Full year adjusted EBITDA, including the Sartorius dividend was $535.9 million or about 20.1%, compared to 23.8% in 2022. Net capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2023 were $42.1 million and full year CapEx spend was $156.5 million. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the fourth quarter was $37.2 million and $145.9 million for the full year. So, moving on to the non-GAAP guidance for 2024. So, as Andy alluded to earlier, we do see 2024 as a recovery transition year, so with higher levels of uncertainty than usual for our Life Science business and a steady growth outlook for Diagnostics. Given the operating expense headwinds and muted revenue growth, I think, it’s fair to say that margin expansion will be difficult this year. Keep in mind that employee-related expenses impacting our P&L represent somewhere between a 250-basis-point to 300-basis-point headwind that we need to overcome in 2024 and we have continuing geopolitical issues, especially as it relates to China and Russia. However, we remain -- we -- as we remain focused on improving our cost structure, we’re well-positioned for operating margin leverage and as revenue growth returns. Again, I think, 2024 is certainly very different to a normal year. This year, revenue is expected to be a bit more back-end loaded than usual based on the anticipated recovery in biotech and biopharma. Consequently, we do expect soft gross -- growth and operating margins in the first half of the year, particularly in the first quarter, with improvements in the second half kind of in line with the market recovery and revenue normalization. So with all that as a kind of a preamble, here’s how we see the year rolling out. We’re guiding a currency-neutral revenue growth in 2024 to be between 1% and 2.5% overall. The Life Science Group, year over year of currency-neutral revenue growth is expected to be between zero percent and 2%. And for the Diagnostics Group, we estimate currency-neutral revenue growth to be between 2.5 and 3%. With the backdrop of working through elevated backorders in the last year, we realized a little over 1% from price improvement at the corporate level, which was below inflationary trends to our overall cost. We are targeting to achieve a similar level of price realization this year, mainly through the Life Science Group. We’d also like to call out the sale of a non-core contract manufacturing business in December that was part of a prior acquisition. This business is reported under other operations, contributed revenue of $3 million to $4 million annually, but had really a material -- an immaterial impact on our overall financial results. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected to be between 54% and 54.5%, with steady improvement anticipated throughout the year. Gross margin for the first half of the year is expected to be below the full year range, with the second half anticipated gross margin recovery driven by improved sales volume. Full year non-GAAP operating margin is projected to be between 13.5% and 14%. We estimate the non-GAAP full year tax rate to be between 22% and 23%, and CapEx is projected to be approximately $160 million to $180 million as we continue to invest in our infrastructure to support our multiyear growth strategy. And finally, full year non-GAAP EBITDA excluding the Sartorius dividend is expected to be between 18.5% and 19%. And when we include the recently announced reduced Sartorius dividend, the adjusted EBITDA is expected to be between 19% and 19.5%. So in concluding today’s prepared remarks, just a few comments about on Bio-Rad’s ongoing corporate transformation and key accomplishments, maybe a little bit as a baseline for 2024. I would say in spite of all the macro variables, we feel we have a good realistic outlook for 2024. We’re clear of the pandemic. We’ve resolved our supply chain constraints. We successfully transitioned key diagnostics platforms to our Singapore manufacturing facility. We completed our global SAP implementation. And I think most important, we continue to make progress on our journey of transformation. In addition, as Andy mentioned, we have a number of exciting products in our pipeline to help us drive 2024 as we look forward to our Life Science markets recovering later in the year. Certainly looking back over the last four years, I think, it’s important to note that our underlying business has grown at a currency-neutral compound rate of 4.6%, including, I might mention Life Science, which has grown at over 8%. Overall, I think we feel good that we’re making solid progress and I do think we have a lot to look forward to.
Edward Chung:
That concludes our prepared remarks. And we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
Yes. Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Please ask your question.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great. Thanks for taking the questions, guys. Norman, I guess, this will be for you on the margins. Just in terms of the ramp throughout the year, can you just talk about the moving pieces? It sounds like the incentive comp is obviously going to hit pretty hard here in the first half. Is it a bit of a Singapore ramp picking up steam in the second half? Is it volume leverage? Maybe just talk about the cadence and the ramp of that margin story throughout the year here and just kind of how we should think about the pace?
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. I think it really has the most to do with the sales volumes. We get a lot of leverage from the sales and I think we should see the margins ramp with sales.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. Understood. And then just on the CFO search, maybe can you provide an update of where we stand, timing when that could happen? We’ve got a few questions on just a little bit of an update there would be helpful.
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. We’re really making good progress and candidly we’re hoping to have a new CFO on Board by the next earnings call.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. All right. Next few months. And then maybe one last one, just in terms of the outlook on China, just how you guys are thinking about that region both in the Life Science and Diagnostics. I know it’s two -- maybe two good -- two different stories there. So, yeah, just kind of let us know what you’re seeing there currently in each segment and the expectations for 2024 would be helpful?
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. Yeah. I’d say, near-term, it’s -- it seems to be a kind of a tough market, not many signs of immediate recovery and a little bit of uncertainty I think as to when we will see that. I think that the good old days of double-digit growth in China are, I don’t see that in the foreseeable future. For a life science business, I think we’ve seen the impact of -- combined impact of the in China for China, anti-corruption, and in general, a kind of a tough funding environment affecting the business. For Diagnostics, I think, they -- we’re continuing to see steady growth, but we do continually also continue to kind of carefully monitor the situation with these value-based pricing tenders, wondering if that may spread to some of our platforms or some of our more specialty products from the kind of higher volume products that have seen that in the short-term.
Patrick Donnelly:
Understood. Thank you, guys.
Operator:
Thank you. Your next question is from Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Please ask your question.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. First question I wanted to ask about the Life Sciences business. Can you talk about -- so in the script you talked about how the PCR and ddPCR businesses kind of saw some backlog burn down? Could you talk about like how long you expect this to persist in 2024 and when that might start to turn the corner?
Simon May:
Yeah. This is Simon. I think we’re really largely through the backlog burn down compares as we head into 2024. I think the short answer is the slate’s pretty clean now. We’ve obviously got a bunch of other macro conditions impacting the business as we referred to in the script and the H1 versus H2 contrast. But as we’re sitting here today, we don’t see backlog burn down as an issue going forward.
Andy Last:
Yeah. The call-out -- sorry just to add on Simon, the call-out was against the 2022 Q4 compares where Life Science had a meaningful contribution from backlog burn down.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. Okay. And then I was curious how process chrom played out in the quarter versus your expectations. I know you talked about starting the year with lower backlog there. Were there some larger than expected shipments in the quarter?
Simon May:
It’s Simon again. I think at a macro level we saw the conditions that we’ve been talking about all year with destocking continue to persist, and again, as I think Andy called out in the script as we enter Q1 our order book remains softer than we’ve seen it in previous years. I guess the follow-on question there is about are we seeing any green shoots and there’s certainly a lot of tentatively encouraging data starting to emerge as we look at our customer base. I think we’re seeing that a number of our customers we’re really anticipating are going to be through the destocking impacts in 2024 and we’ll see something like a return to normality. But at the same time we’ve got some larger customers who all the indications are they’re not going to be through it and so I think that’s going to net out to be tentatively we’ll see some recovery in the second half but there’s still a fair amount of uncertainty around it.
Jack Meehan:
Great. Okay. And then last one just was curious for any color on kind of below the line items within the guide for this year, just anything you would call out there. I think Sartorius announced their dividend for the year, just any color on that would be helpful.
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. They did cut the dividend. We baked that into our guidance and it’s understandable given the kind of cash constraints that they have.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Your next question is from Dan Leonard from UBS. Please ask your question.
Dan Leonard:
Thank you very much. I had another question about phasing for 2024. You mentioned that the year will be more back-end loaded. Could you elaborate on that? How much more back-end loaded than typical?
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. It’s a really good question. Normally it’s something like, kind of more like 49-51 when we think of a normal year and I think we’re going to see a much wider spread than that for 2024. I think it’s anybody’s guess exactly what it’s going to be, but I think, we’ll see a kind of a bigger delta between the first half and the second half.
Dan Leonard:
Much wider than the 2-point spread typically?
Simon May:
Yeah.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes.
Simon May:
I think more closer towards 4 points or 5 points spread between first half and second half then.
Dan Leonard:
Appreciate that. And can you share what are your growth assumptions for process chromatography, Droplet Digital PCR and comment on whether a couple of these new product launches you talked about the Continuum and the ddSEQ, whether they’ll be launched in time to contribute to the year?
Simon May:
Yes. Simon again. I think for process chromatography as I mentioned previously we’ve got these competing forces of accounts that are destocked and accounts that are still destocking, and I think the net of that is going to be negative, because the accounts that are destocking are our larger accounts. I think there’s still some ongoing uncertainty around that as we keep saying but the best read of the tea leaves that we’ve got right now is as mentioned. For Digital PCR we had a challenging Q4 for reasons that have been mentioned and that in the end made it a challenging year as well. As we look to 2024, I think we’re certainly seeing nice growth potential in Digital PCR. Again that’s predicated to some degree on recovery of the biopharma markets where we’ve been hit, we’ve got a very strong existing position there and also we’ve got some good new product launches coming out. So the way I think about it, it’s biopharma market recovery and it’s new product introductions. They’re both when not if events and so for the full year I think we’re looking at growth in Digital PCR.
Dan Leonard:
That’s helpful. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Your next question is from Conor McNamara from RBC Capital Markets. Please ask your question.
Conor McNamara:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Just on ddPCR, can you talk about the growth in the quarter or the negative growth on equipment versus consumables, obviously, you had a tough comp on equipment placements last year. But is there -- was there any consumable growth and how should we think about kind of the consumables a percentage of total ddPCR from here and where does it go?
Simon May:
Yeah. I think the short answer there is again primarily driven by biopharma headwinds. We saw challenges in both instruments and consumables, I’d say with approximately equal weighting. I think we’ve got a healthy mix now overall in terms of consumables and instruments, and again, as the markets recover we think we’re going to be the beneficiaries of that.
Conor McNamara:
Okay. Great. And then on capital deployment, obviously, you’ve still got some room on buybacks. Is buyback still the priority or is there anything on M&A that you’ve seen the opportunities open up or should we just think primarily about buybacks for 2024?
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah. We certainly, as we mentioned, we’ve got still several $100 million authorized by the Board and we’ll continue to be opportunistic with share repurchases, but we still have a focus to kind of continue to look for kind of good complementary business opportunities to tuck-ins, things that are complementary to the business. Probably no change in our thinking around acquisitions, so it’s a kind of a two-pronged approach. Could be buybacks, could be some tuck-in acquisitions.
Conor McNamara:
All right. Thanks for that.
Norman Schwartz:
Combination of both.
Operator:
Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will now hand the call back to Edward Chung for the closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thank you for joining today’s call. We will be at the Citi Unplugged Life Sciences Access Day in New York at the end of February and hope to see some of you there. As always, we appreciate your interest and we look forward to connecting soon. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now ended. Thank you all for joining. You may all disconnect.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Bio-Rad Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] And please be advised that today’s call is being recorded on Thursday, October 26, 2023. I would now like to turn the conference over to Edward Chung. Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the third quarter 2023 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I’d like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review these reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Andy Last, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad’s global operations.
Andy Last:
Many thanks, Ed, and good afternoon to everybody, and thank you for joining us. Well, the third quarter of the year fell below our expectations. The ongoing challenges within the biopharma segment and economic constraints in China continued to drive lower Life Sciences performance in the quarter. Clinical Diagnostics sales were weaker than we forecasted impacted mainly by the softer China market conditions. We still anticipate a strong year-over-year growth with Clinical Diagnostics Group in the fourth quarter. We continue to successfully maintain focus on tight cost control and on the supply chain front, we experienced modest constraints in supply for our clinical business, which impacted Q3 sales. Backlog remains on track to meet our year-end expectations. In Q3, we experienced further reduced demand from biopharma customers for our process chromatography resins and from both biopharma and smaller biotech customers for our Life Science research projects -- products. The continued tight spending environment in this segment constrained core ddPCR sales, which were roughly flat from the year ago period. Academic and government sales for Life Sciences was strong in the Americas, but showed declines in APAC driven down by China economic and policy constraints. EMEA academic sales were roughly flat, reflecting a soft funding environment in Germany, offset by stronger performance in the other European countries. While ddPCR sales within the quarter were softer than expected as a result of biopharma spending, we remain very positive on the long-term growth outlook for the platform. During the quarter, we were encouraged by several noteworthy announcements involving ddPCR. On the clinical testing front, our QX ONE platform has been selected for SMA testing for all newborns in Hong Kong. And here in the U.S., Geneoscopy announced they have published the results of their pivotal CRC-PREVENT clinical trial, reporting the highest sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer amongst similar tests powered by our QXDx ddPCR platform. Additionally, in the U.S., Verily won a major multiyear national wastewater testing contract from the CDC based on our QX600 platform. We see these as contributors to future growth and a strong reinforcement of the versatility and impact of the technology. As highlighted earlier, China was a continued challenge in Q3 for our Life Sciences business. And unfortunately, the economic constraints have now also impacted our Clinical Diagnostics business, which in the first half of the year has been a positive for us in this region. We have now further constrained our expectations for China for the year-end and look to 2024 before we expect to see signs of recovery. Our clinical business overall had a mixed quarter. We saw growth in demand in the U.S. and Europe as expected, which was partially offset by the softness in China. In particular, we were pleased with the continued momentum for our immunohematology and diabetes franchises in the quarter. Despite the market challenges of this year, we view our strategy framework as being very solid and our platforms and market opportunities as providing sustainable long-term growth. We continue to focus on driving and improving our execution, and with completion of a single global instance of SAP have now completed a major component of operational improvement. Looking to the end of the year, we continue to expect the biopharma and small biotech company turndown and ongoing constraints in China and Russia to impact the overall growth for our Life Sciences business, although we do expect to see sequentially improved sales in the final quarter of the year. We remain positive on the momentum and continued growth in the Clinical Diagnostics business although somewhat moderated by the greater market constraints in China as well as ongoing trade restrictions in Russia. Thank you. And at this point, I will now pass you to Ilan to review the financial results.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now, I would like to review the results of the third quarter. Net sales for the third quarter of 2023 were $632.1 million, which is a decline of 7.1% on a reported basis versus $680.8 million in Q3 of 2022 and a 7.9% decline on a currency-neutral basis. The third quarter year-over-year revenue decline was primarily the result of ongoing weakness in the biopharma end markets, impacting the sales of our Life Science tools and bioprocessing products. In addition, we experienced weaker demand in China as a result of the macroeconomic environment as well as the local made in China initiatives. COVID-related sales in Q3 were $300,000 versus about $17.2 million in Q3 last year. Core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales decreased 5.5% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue decreased in Asia and Europe, partially offset by increased sales in the Americas. Sales of the Life Science Group in the third quarter of 2023 were $263.5 million compared to $317.9 million in Q3 of 2022, which is a decline of 17.1% on a reported basis and a 17.8% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue decreased 13.7% and was primarily driven by lower sales of qPCR, process chromatography, western blotting products and about flat year-over-year ddPCR revenue. Excluding process chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business decreased 16.7% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q3 of 2022. The Life Science Group revenue, excluding process chromatography and COVID-related sales decreased 11.6% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science year-over-year core revenue decreased in Asia and Europe, partially offset by modest increased sales in the Americas. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the third quarter were $368.1 million compared to $361.9 million in Q3 of 2022 or growth of 1.7% on a reported basis and a 1% growth on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 1.4% on a currency-neutral basis. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics Group was primarily driven by blood typing and diabetes products as well as growth from our quality controls portfolio. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group posted currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe, partially offset by the decline in Asia. The reported gross margin for the third quarter of 2023 was 53.1% on a GAAP basis and compares to 54.7% in Q3 of 2022. The year-over-year gross margin decline was mainly due to unfavorable product mix, lower manufacturing volumes, higher material costs and inventory reserves and was partially offset by improved logistics costs. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.5 million compared to $4.4 million in Q3 of 2022. Third quarter operating expenses benefited from our cost-cutting initiatives as well as a contingent consideration benefit of $18.9 million from last year’s acquisition of Curiosity Diagnostics. SG&A expenses for Q3 of 2023 were $201.2 million or 31.8% of sales compared to $211.1 million or 31% in Q3 of 2022. The lower SG&A in the quarter included $4.1 million in contingent consideration benefit, as I mentioned earlier, as well as lower employee-related expenses. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.6 million versus $1.8 million in Q3 of 2022. Research and development expense in the third quarter was $43.5 million or 6.9% of sales compared to $66.8 million or 9.8% of sales in Q3 of 2022. The significantly lower R&D expenses recorded in the third quarter included $14.8 million in contingent consideration benefit that I mentioned earlier as well as lower project and employee-related expenses. Q3 operating income was $90.9 million or 14.4% of sales compared to $94.6 million or 13.9% of sales in Q3 of 2022. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity security holdings which are substantially related to Bio-Rad’s ownership of Sartorius AG shares, added $36.4 million of income to the reported results. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $9.7 million compared to net other expense of $13 million last year, primarily driven by increased interest income from investments. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2023 was 22.5% compared to 21.5% in Q3 of last year. The effective tax rate this quarter was primarily affected by an unrealized gain in equity securities and the tax rate reported in Q3 of 2022 was primarily affected by an unrealized loss in equity securities. Reported net income for the third quarter was $106.3 million or $3.64 diluted earnings per share compared to a loss of $162.8 million or $5.48 diluted loss per share in Q3 of 2022. This change from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items which impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring expense. These exclusions moved the gross margin from 53.1% for the third quarter of 2023 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 53.9% versus 55.6% in Q3 of 2022. Non-GAAP SG&A in the third quarter of 2023 was 31.7% versus 30% in Q3 of 2022. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $4.1 million of an acquisition related to the contingent consideration benefit mentioned earlier and in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $1.9 million, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.6 million, and $1.3 million of restructuring-related expenses. Non-GAAP R&D in the third quarter of 2023 was 9.2% versus 9.7% in Q3 of 2022. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $14.8 million of an acquisition related to the contingent consideration benefit mentioned earlier and a small restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 14.4% on a GAAP basis to 12.9% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 15.8% in Q3 of 2022. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $36.4 million, $2.5 million gain from the release of an escrow for an acquisition and about a $700,000 loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2023 was 23.9% compared to 21.7% for the same period in 2022. The higher rate in 2023 was driven by geographical mix of earnings and reduced compensation-related deductions. We continue to estimate the full year non-GAAP tax rate to be between 22% and 23%. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the third quarter of 2023 was $68.1 million or $2.33 diluted earnings per share compared to $79.2 million or diluted earnings per share of $2.64 in Q3 of 2022. Moving on to the balance sheet. During the third quarter, we purchased 58,478 shares of our stock at an average share price of $364.61 for a total cost of $21.3 million. We still have nearly $480 million remaining in our Board authorized share repurchase program and plan to continue with our opportunistic approach to buybacks as part of our capital allocation strategy. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q3 was $1,765 million compared to $1,728 million at the end of Q2 of 2023. The increase in cash and short-term investments from the second quarter was primarily due to changes in working capital. Inventory at the end of Q3 was $775.8 million, which is slightly lower than the inventory in the prior quarter. For the third quarter of 2023, net cash generated from operating activities was $97.7 million, which compares to $11 million in Q3 of 2022. This increase mainly reflects changes in working capital and income tax payments. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2023 was $112.7 million or 17.8% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q3 of 2022 was $135.7 million or 19.9% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the third quarter of 2023 were $44 million, and depreciation and amortization for the third quarter was $37.3 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. Given the current market environment, we are revising our 2023 financial outlook as follows. We now expect about a 3.5% currency-neutral year-over-year revenue decline in 2023 versus a growth of about 80 basis points previously. For the full year, we estimate currency neutral year-over-year revenue growth, excluding COVID-related sales to be between 0 and 50 basis points versus about 4.5% in our prior guidance. Of the 400 to 450 basis points core revenue guide down, 50 basis points are related to the third quarter revenue shortfall of which approximately 200 basis points is related to weakness in biopharma and remaining 50 basis points related to lower Clinical Diagnostics sales. The remaining 150 to 200 basis points reduction is attributed to reduce process chromatography and other biopharma demand as well as continued softness in China. For the Life Science Group, we expect about a 12% currency-neutral revenue decline for 2023. And when excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group currency-neutral revenue decline is projected to be between 4% and 5%. Excluding COVID and process chromatography related sales, Life Science Group revenue is expected to decline between 2% and 3%. For the Diagnostics group, while we remain encouraged with the overall demand we are now guiding core revenue growth to be about 4.5% versus 5.5% previously. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected to be about 54% versus about 54.5% previously, reflecting our updated expectation of shift in product mix and volume. We now project full year non-GAAP operating margin to be about 14.5% versus approximately 16% in our prior guidance as we continue to carefully manage discretionary expenses. And full year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be between 20% and 20.5%. We versus about 21.5% in our prior guidance. And now I’ll turn the call over to Norman for a few remarks. Norman?
Norman Schwartz:
Thank you, Ilan. So, I guess, I just wanted to take a minute here to really to recognize Ilan and his contributions over the last several years. As part of our transformation, Ilan has been a very valued member of the team, kind of working to improve financial planning and reporting processes as well as to enhance the Company’s external profile with the financial community. I think we all very much appreciate his guidance and contributions which do position us well for our continuing transformation. As you might imagine, we have initiated a search for his successor. And in the meantime, we have a strong, capable team who can manage very well in the interim. So, maybe while I have the floor, maybe a closing comment about this year. Certainly, it’s not unfolded the way we or many of our peers first envisioned it. Coming out of the pandemic, I think it has been challenging to predict the pace of recovery or market normalization, really all exacerbated by inflation we’ve not seen in 20 years, geopolitical events and, of course, the biopharma disruption. If I think about it a little bit, I think what we can be confident of is that our markets are buoyant and I feel the outlook is positive. There could always be a few more bumps in the road in the near term, but I do feel the Company really is well positioned to navigate what might come our way. And just maybe to reemphasize a point that Andy made, longer term, our strategy and vision for the future really has not changed. With that, operator, I think we’ll open the line up to questions.
Operator:
And ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
I am sure this is another question for Andy or Ilan, but the magnitude of the guidance reset in Life Sciences, relative to where you started the year, is the most dramatic of any of your peers by far. Why does there seem to be such an inability to accurately forecast the business and demand trends? And how do we assess whether this is, in fact, a market dynamic as opposed to potential share losses?
Andy Last:
Could you just say the very last piece again, Brandon? I didn’t catch your very last few words.
Brandon Couillard:
How do we assess whether this is, in fact, a market dynamic versus potential share losses in Life Science?
Andy Last:
Okay. Look, I think that we came out of 2022 with really good trajectory. And the effects that some companies had seen, particularly in bioprocessing, were not showing up for us. And that -- I think that’s something that we communicated at the end of the first quarter that that was a surprise. And it took a while within 2023 for those effects to really roll out into our funnel and start to experience the deferred orders being pushed out. But then the other factor that no one anticipated and which was meaningful for us was the Silicon Valley Bank collapse and the knock-on effects of that, which really impacted the spending profile of the smaller biotech companies, and we had significant trajectory in the smaller biotechs for, in particular, our Droplet Digital PCR platform, which also had some halo effect around it. So I think it took a couple of quarters for those effects to really materialize for us because our profile is a little different to some of the other players. So, that’s how I view it. And then, of course, since then, spending has not improved. The order pushouts have continued and it’s very difficult to gauge the true inflection point right now. And I think that’s probably a message is coming across broadly from other players in the category as well.
Simon May:
This is Simon. Maybe I’ll just add to that as well because as we look at our funnels and we look at our win-loss ratios across the portfolio, whether you’re talking about western blot or gene expression or digital PCR or our bioprocess business, we really don’t see any significant shifts there. I mean, obviously, the conditions in China in biopharma have really deteriorated. But the feedback that we consistently get from the field is that there’s still a high level of interest in the products, the products that we’ve launched to be really well received. And again, the funnel dynamics in terms of win-loss ratios are not seeing any significant shifts. So, we really do believe that this is a bunch of transient effects that are compounding and it’s making for a very difficult year but I don’t think there are any macro shifts in our competitive positioning in Life Sciences.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Ilan, I think the revised guide implies 4Q revenue steps up to about $700 million, I believe. 4Q is usually seasonally very strong for Bio-Rad, but this isn’t a normal environment either. So how derisked is that revenue outlook? What are some of the variables that can swing that target up or down as you’re keeping in mind?
Andy Last:
So it’s Andy. The variables that might swing that, I think they’re the same that we’re -- the variables would really be the same that we’re experiencing, just a little bit more acute, if China gets definitively worse than the trajectory it’s on, for example, that that would -- academia really pulled back some spending, that could have an effect. We’re not expecting a Q4 budget flush this year. That’s not in our thinking. If that materializes, that’s good news, but we’re not planning on that. Other than that, I don’t think we see anything that may be meaningful that we could predict.
Ilan Daskal:
And Brandon, I will add to the inputs that Andy just mentioned. Generally speaking, we have not deviated from our approach of kind of coming up with the realistic what we see in front of us in terms of the forecast and the guidance. So I don’t know that we are underestimating or overestimating our projections. And definitely, the fourth quarter this time around is an unusual circumstance in addition to the macroeconomic kind of environment to end this kind of inputs maybe the China environment today. I mean, I think it’s going to continue well into the end of the year. So, the smaller biotechnology companies environment in terms of the funding environment are not expected to improve in our mind through the end of this year. So, I agree with you, historically, traditionally, the fourth quarter used to be a stronger seasonality kind of quarter for us. That is not the case this time around.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Last one, and then I’ll jump back in the queue. Andy, given you and Ilan started at Bio-Rad around the same time, you’ve worked very closely together. You’ve both been instrumental to Bio-Rad’s transformation last four years or so. In light of his departure, I think investors would like to know, are you happy with the operational direction of the Company? Are you adequately incentivized to stay the course, or do you have an eye to retirement anytime soon?
Andy Last:
Yes, Brandon, thanks. First, can I just say I’m really sad to see Ilan move on. And you’re right, we have worked extremely closely. He and I are in each other’s offices virtually every day. So, it’s been a really good journey. I want to thank Ilan for that personally on the call. But my point of view right now is we started this transition. It’s not finished. And the focus really is on the transformation of the Company and executing against the strategy framework, which I firmly believe has the potential to increase operating performance for the Company moving forward.
Operator:
Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Maybe another one on the 4Q ramp, but on the margin side, a pretty meaningful step-up from whether it’s sequential or the rest of the -- prior part of the year. Can you just talk about the moving pieces to get to that implied margin? I think it’s 16.5%, 17% type margin in 4Q, yes, just a path to get there and get people comfortable that that’s a realistic number.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Hey Patrick, this is Ilan. I’ll start and Andy can chime in. But obviously, on the top line, we baked in kind of the updated mix with the software Life Science. And overall, I mean, on the operating expenses, we plan to continue some of those initiatives that we have been working on. And already in the third quarter, you can see that the operating expenses came in lower on a dollar basis. So, we continue to work on additional initiatives going into the fourth quarter. And again, overall, for the bottom line, I mean, we feel it is a realistic projection here.
Andy Last:
I may only add we’re still focused on keeping our operating cost structure as tight as possible. So, the volume and mix will have a decent flow-through in the fourth quarter operating margin.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe on China, if you could just talk about that market, a little bit surprising to see the diagnostics piece softer as well. Can you just talk about what you’re seeing? Is it various policies over there that’s impacting things? It would be helpful just to get a little more discussion there.
Andy Last:
Okay. So, the policies, I mean, are clearly impacting both Life Science and the Diagnostics side of the business. And they have -- they’re made in China for China. There’s the anticorruption, there’s volume-based pricing, and then you layer on top of that recession. And the government, I think, that is generally struggling to find the right way to stimulate the market. You can add in an extra effect of capital markets soft for biopharma, which was a focus for us for expansion and growth of our -- those pieces of our portfolio. They all have varying impacts to both sides of the business. And it’s just been a really tough ride through China, and there’s just no current clear reason to think that it’s going to improve in Q4. And on the Clinical side, it just created a softer pull for our products in China in the quarter. And we still have had a little bit of backlog on our Clinical business as we called out, which by the end of this year, we should be roughly where we expect to be, we may finish with a very slightly elevated backlog on clinical products at the end of the year, but we’re pretty much on track relatively speaking for that.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. On the diagnostics side, is it more the instrumentation? Obviously, the VBP stuff comes up quite often with all diagnostic players. Are you guys seeing anything on that front yet?
Dara Wright:
What was the question?
Andy Last:
The volume-based pricing. Sorry, we were just having difficulty here. Dara, do you want to comment on VBP?
Dara Wright:
Sure. It’s starting to impact how we navigate tender requirements. So I think how that’s translating to reality is things are a little bit slower as we’re navigating how best to position for new deal considerations. But value-based pricing, it has historically been applied to other sectors, but in a couple of provinces we’re starting to see it reach into IBD. [Ph] So I think right now, it’s just sort of impacting sort of forward-looking risk. And then as Andy said, we’re still working through some supply chain fulfillment challenges in backlog, which we’re weighted a bit towards that region as well. And we’re working through that and have line of sight for a really solid Q4 landing.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And maybe last one, just on the PCR side. You guys called out, I think, qPCR weakness, it seemed like ddPCR step down as well. Can you just talk about what you’re seeing in that market? Is it just a broader slowdown? Is it specific pockets there would be helpful.
Simon May:
I think again, it’s a compounding issues that we’ve already touched on here. So we’ve obviously got a fairly significant qPCR, Digital PCR footprint in biopharma. And again, the slowdown in early biotechs. We’ve seen a continuation of layoffs and project deferrals. That’s impacted the business. We’ve got the COVID compare. We’ve got all the challenges in China that we’ve already talked about. And I think on top of everything else, there’s kind of a club of systems out there in the market that were placed in the pandemic, and there’s a bit of free capacity out there. So, you roll all of these things together. Again, we refreshed our qPCR platform over the last couple of years. And again, the feedback that we get from out in the field is really positive in terms of how these products are being received in the market, but this compounding of market conditions right now is what’s adding up to a tough environment.
Andy Last:
May I just add one extra comment. You look for the silver lining on occasion. And the customer demand in that -- in small biotech biopharma, the desire to take in Digital PCR, in particular, remain very strong. What we’re actually experiencing is just the deferral of when they’re going to make the purchase because they’re constrained on kind of cash expenditure and some other changes going on structurally on the program focus. So the demand side remains very encouraging.
Operator:
Your next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron.
Jack Meehan:
So just wanted to talk about how the quarter played out here. So revenue was about 8% below the Street. Can you just talk about kind of the pacing of the quarter. Was most of the pressure you saw in September? And is it possible, are there any orders that slipped into 4Q for any reason?
Ilan Daskal:
I think, Jack -- this is Ilan Daskal. The way to think about it, I think we saw it throughout the quarter, but it accelerated towards the end of the quarter. So, the pace was kind of decline was stronger towards the end of the quarter. But throughout the quarter, it started to get weaker and weaker, but definitely, it accelerated towards the end.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And Norman, I know you mentioned in your comments, there’s potential for maybe a couple more bumps in the road along the way. I think there’s a debate amongst tools investors around further through the cutting cycle, or could there be kind of new risks ahead because of some of the changes in the funding environment for customers? Just curious like -- maybe like what you’re seeing through October? Do you -- I guess, like kind of what was the thinking that went behind the fourth quarter guide that you’ve built here?
Norman Schwartz:
Well, I think certainly, in terms of the fourth quarter guide, we look very carefully at kind of the order book and the funnel, the sales funnel, kind of accumulating as much data as we can to get the best assessment of where we think we’ll land for the year. When I think about bumps in the road, I think about the -- I think there were a lot of people that kind of thought the pandemic is over and everything will be back to normal next week. And I think we’re seeing a continuation of that with some of this kind of biopharma meltdown and the readjustments that are being made in some of these programs. It just -- I think we just have to be careful about calling the end and saying, it’s always possible that there’s something else that might bubble up.
Jack Meehan:
Understood. Okay. And then on the income statement, you previously talked about kind of OpEx reductions. I was looking at the SG&A line kind of on a non-GAAP basis, it actually increased a little bit sequentially, and that was despite kind of revenue declining sequentially. So, I was just wondering if you could talk about what happened in SG&A in the quarter. And like is there room to like pull more cost out given the lower top line?
Ilan Daskal:
So usually, what you see -- it was a minor kind of step-up, Jack. Usually, on the fourth quarter, we see a much higher kind of step-up in SG&A which this time around, actually more of the initiatives that we have been working on will kick in on the -- in the fourth quarter. So, we don’t anticipate the traditional step up in the fourth quarter. For the third quarter, it wasn’t that material.
Operator:
Your next question comes from the line of Tim Daley from Wells Fargo.
Tim Daley:
So first on the process chromatography business. So I think you were previously expecting down mid single to high single decline. With the update today, I’m getting to 13% down or so for the year. But even with that that implies a pretty significant step up in the fourth quarter. I think almost like 80% sequential dollar increase from 3Q to 4Q. So first off, are these numbers that I’m kind of getting to in the right ballpark? And then secondly, can you help us understand the visibility, confidence that you have to kind of get that big sequential step-up, especially given the commentary around a slower or lower than typical seasonality for this year-end?
Andy Last:
Yes, I think maybe it’s kind of some of the math might be a little off there. I think the process chrom overall it’s going to end up at a lower number, in kind of the guidance implication there. And it’s kind of like mid-teens. And so, I don’t think we’re seeing a meaningful step-up in process chrom in Q4. But yes, I think that’s really probably just a bit of math there, it’s slightly higher.
Tim Daley:
All right. Got it. That’s helpful. And then, Andy, can you -- the supply chain impacts weighing on the third quarter Diagnostics revenues. Can you just provide some details on like what is that, how big the impact was in the quarter? And if you expect those delayed revenues to be fully recuperated in fourth quarter?
Andy Last:
Yes. So essentially, we -- obviously, we’ve been communicating our supply chain challenge on the clinical side because various impacts of COVID plus we moved our plants from France to Singapore. We’re catching up quickly, but it’s sometimes difficult to get the pacing of that right. So, if you get a bit of delay, you also get a bit of pull-through, consumable pull-through delay as well. And so that factored a bit into our Q3. But we are looking at a pretty strong Q4, and we have good line of sight now. Our plant in Singapore is really cranking. We’ve done a lot of work leading out the workflows there. And so, we’re going to get the benefit of that in Q4 and also get some pull-through effect. So Q3 just ended up being softer as a result overall.
Tim Daley:
And then final one here for Norman. With the ‘23 guidance now 400 basis points lower, that midterm CAGR for 2025, the guidance updated in May now has an incremental 100 basis points or so steeper, I guess, headwinds in front of it. So, given the current environment, how are you evaluating the 2025 target? Or is this something that maybe will wait until a new CFO is in the seat to put their own fingerprints on, if you will?
Ilan Daskal:
So Tim, this is Ilan, I will chime in and then Norman probably will have some additional color. But already in the prior quarter, we communicated that the 2025 targets from our perspective is kind of in a holding pattern. We would like to get more insight and visibility going into 2024 in order to shape our thinking about the 2025 targets. So probably in the next kind of earnings call, early next year, when we have the 2024 kind of guidance in front of us, the 2025 numbers, we’ll know how to think about it and to see what is the reason impact and what magnitude, et cetera.
Norman Schwartz:
I think that covers it pretty well.
Operator:
Your next question comes from the line of Conor McNamara from RBC Capital.
Conor McNamara:
Just without getting into 2024 guidance, just how should we think about 2024 in general? And just which headwinds that you called out in this quarter likely to persist in 2024 and which are likely to end by the end of this year?
Ilan Daskal:
Hey Conor, this is Ilan. So I can start with obviously various aspects that are associated with the macroeconomic, I’m not sure personally that China will recover like in a few weeks. So that may take a little bit longer. The funding environment, which is obviously indirectly linked to the treasury yield is here to stay. The inflationary environment is here to stay for a while. So, there does and probably will continue for a while to have some impact on the smaller biotechnology companies funding, and the way they think about the pace of their spend. So these are definitely areas that we want to kind of think about it -- to think about and then not to mention the geopolitical everywhere now that is getting kind of -- to probably a new level that we have not experienced before. So, there are multiple fronts there that -- and when you think about Europe, I mean, overall, for us, Europe, generally speaking, is doing okay for us. But when you think about the macroeconomic, Germany is probably already in a recession. So, it’s going to be interesting. I mean specifically that domestically, we’re going into an election year domestically. So, we’ll have to wait and see how everything will shape up. But it doesn’t have to do anything with our own kind of organic initiatives, products, new products, the end markets that are not disappearing, they’re not going anywhere. So it’s only -- from my perspective, only a timing issue.
Conor McNamara:
Okay. Great. And just following up to Patrick’s question about PCR. Can you just talk about ddPCR, specifically because that slowdown was worse than any of your other business units. So how do we -- can you give investors some framework to think about how that -- how we can get comfort that that’s definitely a market environment and not competitive pressure because there have been some competitors out there making some noise. So we just want to make sure that you still feel good about your market position there in ddPCR?
Simon May:
I still think we feel good about the position. I mean, we’ve made no secret of the fact that the competitive landscape is intensified. And as we reflect on Q3, I think as we called out in the scripts, we had a couple of really notable wins there that we think are going to help continue to position us well for the future. I think what we really saw in Q3, again, is an exacerbation of these biopharma impacts. We have put secular strength in the early biotech sector. And I think what we saw in Q3 was a cumulative impact of these deferred projects and layoffs in the continuing extremely tight budget environment. Once again, we’re seeing a lot of interest in the products, but the money is just not flowing. We continue to see healthy adoption and really strong acceptance of our QX600 platform. So, as we look to the future, if we all believe that these impacts in biopharma transient and when we emerge from it, we think we’re going to be in a really strong position. And then, of course, we’ve got competitors who are playing more in the lower end segments, and we plan to enter there with the QX Continuum platform in 2024. So for sure, the competitive pressure is intensifying, but I think we’ve got compelling responses and where we’ve got leading positions in these segments will continue to do well as and when these markets recover.
Conor McNamara:
And just a quick follow-up on pricing. And I guess this is across everything in Life Sciences. What’s the pricing environment like? And how should we think about that going forward?
Andy Last:
Yes. I think that the environment is still inflationary. As you probably appreciate, on the clinical side, tender-driven business, you can only take very modest and periodic price increases. And we do that when we get that opportunity. On Life Science, there is still inflationary effect and we will still look to try and take modest price increases as we move forward to help offset our inflationary pressures that we’re receiving. And we expect to do -- we’ve done that this year. We expect to do that next year. And I think in the quarter, we probably got just over 1 point of price, 1.5 points of price on a net basis and think that that should at least be a floor.
Simon May:
We’ve seen a mix impact there with process chrom as well.
Andy Last:
Yes.
Conor McNamara:
Okay. And just a final question. This for Norm. Just given the recent selloff in the space and specifically in your stock, how does that change your acquisition strategy, if at all? And would you still consider issuing equity to pursue an acquisition target in this environment?
Norman Schwartz:
So I think that kind of in light of the recent stock dislocation, I think we will very much consider continuing our share repurchases as part of our capital allocation strategy and obviously, at this point, not such a good currency for M&A. I think, in fact, while we do continue to kind of look at opportunities, I think it’s probably fair to say that more of our focus over the next several quarters will be centered around kind of navigating our markets and our continued operational transformation.
Operator:
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn it back to Edward Chung for further remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thank you for joining today’s call. As always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks, operator.
Operator:
Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Bio-Rad Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Thursday, August 3, 2023. I would now like to turn the conference over to Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the second quarter 2023 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon, everyone and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed second quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad’s global operations. Andy?
Andy Last:
Thank you, Ilan. Good afternoon, everybody. So the second quarter of the year proved to be a continuation of trends from the first quarter of the year. We experienced ongoing strong demand for our clinical diagnostic products, contrasted by further softening of demand in the BioPharma segment of our Life Science business. The net result was a more modest growth of our overall core business than expected. On the operational front, we made meaningful progress in order backlog reduction. In Q2, we experienced a further decline in demand from our BioPharma customers, particularly for our process chromatography media, but also extending to other product lines. This resulted from a continuation of soft sales into emerging biotech companies, plus we also experienced headwinds from larger BioPharma. While some of this was already forecasted for the remainder of the year, Q2 revealed a significant delivery extension of existing orders for our process chromatography media beyond 2023. The softness is a result of customers reducing their inventory levels in bioprocessing and a tighter funding environment across BioPharma as indicated in Q1. Overall, we now anticipate a larger impact to our BioPharma business from the downturn than previously communicated. We do view the softness in process chromatography is transient, but do not anticipate broad-based recovery in 2023. In contrast, we remain positive on continued demand for Life Science products in academic markets. We saw strong and consistent demand from academia in all regions across the Life Science portfolio and experienced strong double-digit growth for ddPCR, despite the negative BioPharma macro trends. In particular, we are very pleased with the ongoing demand for our new QX600 Droplet Digital PCR System. During the quarter, we held our Droplet Digital PCR world event, which received excellent attendance and engagement reinforcing the long-term growth potential of our platform in this product area. We also know that demand broadly from the China Life Science segment continued to be weak, and the expected second half recovery is now in question against the backdrop of a slow economic recovery. During the quarter, we also completed a cross licensing and royalty agreement with QIAGEN related to digital PCR intellectual property. Overall, despite the BioPharma downturn, our core Life Science business grew mid-single digit. During the quarter, we achieved our Life Science backlog reduction targets and do not foresee product supply being a major constraint for the second half of the year. We were pleased to see continued demand recovery for our Clinical Diagnostics business, in particular, across Asia Pacific, led by solid performance in China, although we continue to monitor the China macro environment. We saw strong growth in our diabetes franchise and solid growth in our immunohematology and quality controls businesses. During the quarter, we launched the IH-500 next instrument, which includes updated software, enhancing the functionality of the system, along with increased security from potential cyberattacks. This platform update increases the competitiveness of our transfusion medicine portfolio. Overall product supply increased through the quarter, as our new Singapore facility continued to ramp up. We now have improved line of sight to reducing our backlog for the Diagnostics business grew by year-end and continue to focus on expanding capacity. In closing, we continue to be encouraged with the demand of our Clinical Diagnostics business with the increased placement of diagnostic systems supporting future growth and reagent pull-through. In addition, we continue to focus on the solid progress we have made in reducing our back orders. The Diagnostics business performance, however, is not offsetting the continued negative trend to the Life Science group this year, specifically for BioPharma accounts. Building on our environmental, social and governance priorities, we recently published our 2022 corporate sustainability report, which highlights the progress we’ve made in multiple areas, and reflects our commitment to society and to our stakeholders. So at this point, I’d like to close and pass you back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Great. Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the second quarter. Net sales for the second quarter of 2023 were $681.1 million, which is a decline of 1.4% on a reported basis versus $691.1 million in Q2 of 2022 and a 0.3% decline on a currency-neutral basis. The second quarter year-over-year revenue decline was mainly the result of significantly lower COVID-related sales of about $0.4 million versus approximately $33 million in the same period last year. Core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 4.6% on a currency-neutral basis. The second quarter revenue included $6 million of revenue from a onetime licensing fee as well as royalties of $500,000, both associated with a cross-license agreement related to digital PCR intellectual property. We currently estimate receiving ongoing royalties from this arrangement of about $500,000 per quarter. We incurred a onetime $2.3 million R&D expense related to this cross-license agreement, and we do not anticipate any royalty obligations on our end for the foreseeable future. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in all three regions. Sales of the Life Science Group in the second quarter of 2023 were $300.2 million compared to $322.4 million in Q2 of 2022, which is a decline of 6.9% on a reported basis and a 5.8% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 4.5% and was primarily supported by strong growth in Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR products. As Andy alluded to earlier, our Q2 results were impacted by the previously highlighted soft demand within early-stage biotech companies as well as increased headwinds from larger BioPharma companies, who are delaying capital investments and reducing bioprocessing inventory. In addition, we experienced weaker demand from government accounts in China due to softening macroeconomic conditions. Process chromatography posted a mid-teens year-over-year revenue decline, and we now anticipate a mid- to high single-digit decline for the full year versus our prior expectation of double-digit growth. Excluding process chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business decreased 4.2% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q2 of 2022, and was a result of lower COVID-related sales. The Life Science Group revenue, excluding process chromatography and COVID-related sales grew 8.5% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe, while Q2 core revenue posted a decline in Asia. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the second quarter were $380.1 million compared to $367.8 million in Q2 of 2022 or 3.3% growth on a reported basis and a 4.6% growth on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 4.8% on a currency-neutral basis, as routine testing continues to normalize to pre-pandemic levels. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics Group was driven by strong demand for diagnostic testing systems, primarily within diabetes and blood typing as well as nice growth from our quality controls portfolio. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group posted strong double-digit currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in Asia and was largely flat in the Americas and in Europe. The reported gross margin for the second quarter of 2023 was 53.2% on a GAAP basis and compares to 57.2% in Q2 of 2022. The year-over-year gross margin decline was mainly due to unfavorable product mix with a higher-than-anticipated percentage of instrument sales versus reagents, as well as lower than forecasted revenue in the Life Science Group. The year-over-year gross margin was further impacted by higher material and logistics cost as well as inventory reserves. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.3 million compared to $4.5 million in Q2 of 2022. SG&A expenses for Q2 of 2023 were $207.8 million or 30.5% of sales compared to $207.8 million or 30.1% in Q2 of 2022. We were able to maintain SG&A spend flat from the year ago level through tight expense management. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.6 million versus $1.8 million in Q2 of 2022. Research and development expense in the second quarter was $65 million or 9.5% of sales compared to $64.3 million or 9.3% of sales in Q2 of 2022. Q2 operating income was $89.6 million or 13.2% of sales compared to $122.9 million or 17.8% of sales in Q2 of 2022, as a result of the softer top line and gross margin fall though. Looking below the operating plan, the change in fair market value of equity security holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad’s ownership of Sartorius AG shares, negatively impact the reported results by $1.595 billion. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $5.4 million compared to net other expense of $4.9 million last year, primarily driven by increased interest income from investments. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2023 was 22.5% compared to 24.2% for the same period in 2022. The tax rate for both periods, were driven by the large unrealized loss in equity securities. Reported net loss for the second quarter was $1.162 billion, or $39.59 diluted loss per share compared to a loss of $925 million or $31.05 diluted loss per share in Q2 of 2022. This change from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.3 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $3.4 million of restructuring expense. These exclusions moved the gross margin from 53.2% for the second quarter of 2023 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.4% versus 57.8% in Q2 of 2022. Non-GAAP SG&A in the second quarter of 2023 was 29.2% versus 29.3% in Q2 of 2022. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $6.3 million of restructuring-related expenses, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.6 million, an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $2 million and an acquisition-related benefit of $800,000. Non-GAAP R&D in the second quarter of 2023 was 9.3%, which is the same as in Q2 of 2022. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $1.1 million of restructuring expenses and $400,000 of acquisition-related costs. The cumulative some of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 13.2% on a GAAP basis to 15.8% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 19.2% in Q2 of 2022. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $1.595 billion and about a $900,000 loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2023 was 22.5% compared to 19% for the same period in 2022. The higher rate in 2023 was driven by geographical mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the second quarter of 2023 was $88.5 million or $3 diluted earnings per share compared to $103.4 million or diluted earnings per share of $3.44 in Q2 of 2022. Moving on to the balance sheet. During the second quarter, we purchased 549,863 shares of our stock, at an average share price of $377.2 for a total cost of $207.4 million. Having completed the previous share repurchase program, the Board has authorized a new share repurchase program of up to $500 million of our stock. We plan to continue with our disciplined approach as part of our capital allocation strategy. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q2 was $1.728 billion compared to $1.857 billion at the end of Q1 of 2023. The decline in cash and short-term investments from the first quarter was primarily due to share repurchases during the quarter. Inventory at the end of Q2 reached $776.6 million from $752.9 million in the prior quarter. The higher inventory level was driven mainly by higher finished goods inventory within the Life Science Group, as a result of the softer demand as well as higher raw material and work in process inventory within the Diagnostics Group, as we continue to manage the elevated debt order. For the second quarter of 2023, net cash generated from operating activities was $98.1 million, which compares to $53.3 million in Q2 of 2022. This increase mainly reflects timing of tax payments. The adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2023 was $137.9 million or 20.2% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q2 of 2022 was $160.4 million or 23.2% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2023 were $34.6 million, and depreciation and amortization for the second quarter was $35.9 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. For the balance of the year, we expect much software sales for the Life Science Group and continued instrument demand within Diagnostics. While we ramped up production for the QX600 and have worked through our back orders for the Life Science Group and elevated order backlog remains for our Diagnostics Group. We continue to anticipate working through these back orders during the remainder of this year. As we indicated during our Q1 call, we continue to anticipate about $5 million in reduction of our elevated order backlog for each of the two remaining quarters of this year. Given the current market outlook, we are revising our 2023 financial outlook as follows. We now guide currency-neutral revenue growth in 2023 to be approximately 80 basis points versus about 4.5% previously. For the full year, we – excuse me, we estimate currency-neutral revenue growth, excluding COVID-related sales to be about 4.5% versus about 8.5% in our prior guidance. Of the 400 basis points, core revenue guide down 90 basis points are related to the second quarter revenue shortfall driven by weakness in BioPharma and softer demand in China, somewhat offset by 20 basis points from the one-time license fees. The remaining 330 basis points reduction is attributed to approximately 150 basis points related to process chromatography demand and 140 basis points, due to continued softness in other BioPharma and in China and 40 basis points for the Diagnostics Group reflecting a more cautious view around the macro environment in China. For the second half of the year, we expect about 4% year-over-year core revenue growth versus 5.4% year-over-year growth in the first half of 2023. This represents about 7.5% core revenue growth in the second half of 2023, over the first half of 2023. For the Life Science Group, we expect about 4% currency-neutral revenue decline for 2023. And when excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group full year growth is now projected to be approximately 4%. This represents core revenue growth to be about 7% for the second half of the year over the first half of 2023. The Life Science Group year-over-year sales growth, excluding COVID and process chromatography related sales is expected to be about 6%. For the Diagnostics Group, while we remain encouraged with the overall demand, we are now guiding core revenue growth to be about 5.5%. This represents core revenue growth for the Diagnostics Group of about 8% for the second half of the year over the first half of 2023. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected to be about 54.5% versus 55% to 55.5% previously, reflecting our updated expectation of shift in product mix and volumes. For the second half of the year, we now anticipate gross margin to be about 54.5%. We now project full year non-GAAP operating margin to be about 16% versus approximately 17.5% in our prior guidance, as we continue with our disciplined approach with operating expenses. For the second half of the year, we expect operating margin to be about 18% versus our prior guide of 21%. And full year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be about 21.5% versus about 23% in our prior guidance. For the second half of the year, we expect adjusted EBITDA margin to be approximately 22% versus our prior guide of 25%. Over the next several months, we expect to gain better visibility of the market dynamics, specifically around the longevity of the softness in BioPharma and its impact, if any, on our previously communicated 2025 targets. This concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Patrick, please go ahead.
Patrick Donnelly:
Hi, guys. Thank you for taking the questions. Maybe to start on the process chrome piece. Can you just talk about, I guess, the softness you’re seeing? Is that just the purchasing is getting pushed out, just soft budgets on the BioPharma side. Maybe just kind of give a little more color as to what you’re seeing. And then, it appears you’re not assuming any improvement in the back half. I just want to confirm that. So yes, maybe just a bit more color on the process chrome side.
Simon May:
Hi, Patrick, this is Simon speaking. Yes. I think in the second half of the year, we’re seeing some shifts in purchasing patterns. There were some orders that we’ve already secured, which are getting pushed out. That’s the main aspect, and we’re seeing a general softness in demand that’s spilling through into the second half of the year here. We’re detecting some potential signals of improvement. But from our side, it’s really too early to call, and we’re not seeing that reflected in the opportunity for those at this time. But, as we’ve said earlier, we remain pretty optimistic that this is transient, and we’re going to see pickup hopefully at some stage in 2024.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That’s helpful. And then maybe in China, you’re certainly not alone seeing some headwinds over there. I mean it sounds like it’s hitting both the Life Science side and then the macro, maybe some cautiousness on the Diagnostics. Can you just talk about, I guess, are you seeing it hit both now? Is the Diagnostics a little more kind of forward caution just because what you’re seeing on the economic side, the Life Science side. And then, maybe just expectations in the back half. I know there is a part of the cut, what is China going to look like in 2H?
Andy Last:
Yes. Patrick, Andy here. So I think for H1, I think our story is fairly consistent and a lot of softness in Life Science, which include the BioPharma component segment of that piece of the business. Diagnostics is relatively good for us in the first half, but we are certainly cautious about the second half given the macro economic situation in China, and that’s true for both Life Science and the Diagnostics side from our point of view right now.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That’s fair. And then maybe last one, just on the margin side. Can you just talk about – it sounds like the gross margins are getting a little bit impacted by some inventory and material costs. What you guys could do to maybe insulate the bottom line a little bit, I’m sure you take some cost actions. Maybe just give us a bit of color on what you guys are doing and how projectable that is into next year in terms of just how we should think about the base case on the margins? Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Patrick. This is Ilan. So there are a few aspects to call out first on the margin. Some aspects are transitory. Some are related to the inflationary environment overall. For example, material is still kind of elevated in terms of the overall cost, and it’s higher than last year. The product mix was definitely a headwind in terms of the mix between our Life Science group and the Diagnostics as well as within our Diagnostics Group with more instruments, which should be a benefit thinking more into 2024. And there are other kind of more of elevated one-time as the reserve, etcetera. On the other hand, we continue with a very, very disciplined approach in terms of the overall operating expenses. So you can see that the fall through to the operating income is much smaller than the impact on the gross margin, and that will continue to be the approach. But again, as I said, it’s kind of a mixed bag of kind of expected to impact – indeed impact this time around, some are more transitory, some – we will have to wait to see how the inflationary environment will continue to shape up.
Patrick Donnelly:
Understood. Thanks a lot.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Brandon, please go ahead.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Good afternoon. A lot of, if I just look at your pie chart the BioPharma is only 17% of your mix. Could you give us the outlook for that group is in total or you expect that BioPharma to do in ‘23, and how it compares to your prior view? And Simon, a question for you, is any of that weakness spilling over to ddPCR at all or do you see pretty consistent demand, budgets are there for those instruments given how differentiated it is?
Simon May:
Yes, Brandon, this is Simon. I think in our BioPharma business, we’ve obviously got a chunk that process chromatography and I think we’ve already provided commentary there. I think what 2023 is concerned, it’s certainly too soon to call any signs of recovery. And again, we will see what 2024 brings. Definitely spills over into our digital PCR business. We’ve got a strong footprint and presence in emerging BioPharma and digital PCR. We had a very strong quarter, notwithstanding that in the second quarter with robust double-digit growth and with the introduction of QX600 and the way that our customers are responding very positively to the advanced multiplexing capabilities there. That’s kind of offsetting the softness that we are seeing in BioPharma. But we are definitely seeing that impact outside of process chrome, but it tends to be a different kind of impact, which is more related to VCP funding with smaller emerging biotechs.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then, I guess, Ilan, any color you can share with us in terms of the phasing for revenue growth and margins between 3Q and 4Q? You got a tougher comp in the fourth quarter. I mean just in terms of the margins, I know that’s obviously kind of the peak margin quarter of the year given the higher volumes. Any more color you can share on how we should think about the phase in 3Q and 4Q?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Generally, Brandon, as you know, the fourth quarter tends to be a stronger quarter for us. I mean generally, we think about the third quarter and fourth quarter to be stronger, but definitely, the fourth quarter, as usual seasonality is stronger there than even the third quarter. In terms of the gross margin, it’s more again benefiting the fourth quarter from the fall through. So, it’s a slight benefit, but it’s not a huge difference, since we did guide for about for 54.5% in the second half. So – and when it comes to the operating expenses, we will continue, as I mentioned earlier, with a very disciplined approach in terms of the expenses. We expect it to be lower on a percent basis of sales, on a dollar basis, potentially slightly higher, but it’s a very, very disciplined approach.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then just in terms of inventory levels, I mean I am just surprised they continue to climb to this degree. I mean is this the peak level in 2Q, and we should expect them to come down sequentially from here? Just help us understand like when that you expect to peak out and that’s supposed to…?
Andy Last:
I am sorry, Brandon, this is Andy here. Yes, I mean I think we are near the top of this inventory where that’s been going on, which as we reported before, is a result of the diagnostics manufacture movement from France to Singapore. And then, the lead time required on purchase of raw material through the finished product. And then, with the lifeline downturn, that clearly was not expected anywhere close to this level of magnitude, that kind of – we got to catch up with that. So, I think that we are largely ahead of this. At this point in time, we will be looking towards normalization of inventory as we move forward.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Thanks.
Norman Schwartz:
Thank you, Brandon.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Tim Daley from Wells Fargo. Tim, please go ahead.
Tim Daley:
Thanks very much. So, I think that you said that transient, at least one from today’s call describing the BioPharma headwinds, but then also said not recovering until 2024. So, descriptions around the process chromatography cut seemed to be a lot of timing rather than demand destruction or loss. Just curious about, as we progress forward and then thinking about the contribution in ‘24 perhaps chromatography maybe above normal growth levels or the kind of expected levels? And then just additional comments on the [Technical Difficulty] targets here, given lower base sales, I guess grow off of?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, Tim, this is Ilan. I will start and then maybe Andy and Simon can chime in. But generally speaking, first of all, we are not yet guiding for ‘24. We generally not necessarily expecting a pent-up demand in process chromatography in 2024. We see it more as transitory and push-outs of orders. And these are kind of – think about it like a permanent kind of push-outs. So, it’s not that 2024, we expect process chromatography to be elevated due to a pent-up demand. I don’t know, Andy if had...
Andy Last:
Well, and I think there is an element in the question there about funnel, and I think this really is – this isn’t a change in the shape of our market share or our expectations over the long-term. This is – orders that we are expecting that have been pushed out. So, in that regards, this is a transitory shift timing. I think is the word you used in. That’s the way we look at it. What we are unclear on, and so I am taking a position on right now is when that timing is fully resolved.
Tim Daley:
Alright. Got it. And then second one, I know we have touched on China a bit, but China diagnostics was a nice tailwind this quarter. I know you took some of that out of the guide. But just could you help us understand on how much of that was maybe reopening tailwinds versus underlying growth? And now what the full China growth expectations are for the year within diagnostics?
Ilan Daskal:
I think it has to do more with the current macro environment that we are – we continue to monitor for the remainder of the year. I don’t know that it’s necessarily a leg of the reopening necessarily, as it is more kind of being more cautious that the environment will not change drastically. I mean overall, diagnostics is expected to achieve 5.5% year-over-year growth, which is a really nice growth for them and China performed so far really well for us. But again, with everything that we hear, it will be – we have to continue to monitor the second half specifically.
Tim Daley:
Alright. Perfect. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Tim.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Jack, please go ahead.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. Andy, I was wondering or maybe for Ilan as well, just the transition to the new manufacturing in Singapore. Just operationally, how did that go during the quarter? And can you talk about how that might contribute to your thinking around margins in the second half of the year?
Andy Last:
Yes. So, I will answer the first half, Jack. It went well. And both plants – we are now past the foreclose shutdowns in France, 100% focused now on the ramping of production in Singapore. It’s going well. We did make progress in the quarter on the diagnostics backlog. But as we have indicated before, it’s going to take the full year. We feel good about achieving that right now. And I think we communicated here some further inventory – our backlog, sorry, a burn down in the coming quarters. So, after the early difficulties, I believe we are on track now. So, as it relates to gross margin, do you want to comment on that?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. So Jack, obviously, the heavy lifting, as Andy mentioned, is behind us. We continue to ramp. I mean a lot of it has been achieved. And so, we continue to realize kind of more benefit. The two European sites are closed. And it will be – we will have a slightly additional kind of benefit also going probably into next year, once it will be fully ramped up. That’s where we are right now.
Jack Meehan:
Great. Okay. And then there has been a lot discussed about kind of some of the issues you are seeing in BioPharma at the moment. I was just curious like this might be a difficult question to answer here in early August, but what you think is the likelihood of some of these issues extending through the first half of 2024. What are you hearing from customers?
Simon May:
This is Simon. I think the simple answer is it’s too soon to say. I think we have kind of covered this two times or three times already. We are not seeing signs of material recovery in our funnels in the second half of the year. There is some commentary around some shifts in the funding environment, but that’s very early. It’s going to take time for that to trickle through to the comp phase. And quite simply, we just think it’s too soon to call 2024.
Jack Meehan:
That’s fair. Last question for Norman, the new repurchase authorization, that’s a nice kind of endorsement of maybe the value you see in Bio-Rad shares now. I was curious what your latest thinking is on the Sartorius stake. Just given, where Bio-Rad stock is trading, I am curious, would you ever consider monetizing a piece of this just to buy more of your own shares? Talk about kind of the commitment to that. Thanks.
Norman Schwartz:
Well, certainly, we have got plenty of cash on our balance sheet at the moment. That shouldn’t be an issue, certainly in the near-term. Obviously, we continue to see Sartorius as a strategic for us. And with respect to repurchase, we certainly continue to view that our valuation is low relative to peers. And so as we go forward, kind of looking at kind of when we repurchase kind of balance between, obviously, different uses of cash, and yes, different priorities. But it’s nice to have that new authorization in place and give us the opportunity to opportunistically buyback from time-to-time.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Thank you.
Norman Schwartz:
Thank you, Jack.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Conor McNamara from RBC Capital. Conor, please go ahead.
Conor McNamara:
Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions guys. Just can you talk more about the ddPCR, the strong double-digit growth you saw? Is there any more competitive pressure in the market there? And is there any pent-up demand and manufacturing issues on ddPCRs along on the diagnostics side?
Andy Last:
Thanks Conor, Andy here. So yes, we were very pleased with the performance in the quarter despite the challenges of softness in the BioPharma segment. The new instrument is going very well for us. We cleared out, all our production challenges in the quarter. No constraints moving forward. We have grown that franchise quite meaningfully in that segment, over the last few years. So our strategy for growing there has been very successful. We feel very positive about the forward-looking potential and BioPharma is a point of weakness in the middle of it. Competitively, I don’t think anything has really changed, certainly not within the last quarter. And that’s all baked into our thinking at this point in time.
Conor McNamara:
Great. Thanks for that. And just as a follow-up, if you look at the success of that product, how much of those sales are going into either new markets or new customers versus upgrading current PCR customers? I don’t know if you have that data available?
Simon May:
This is Simon. I can talk to that. I think it’s a bit of a spread. We are seeing a good number of customers who were upgrading from existing systems. I would say we have actually been pleasantly surprised that the uptake that we are seeing in BioPharma, where that multiplexing capability gives those customers a significant productivity advantage. And then, the third area where we are seeing uptake is in oncology research and clinical development, where again, the multiplexing in the sensitive to the system really serves that need very well. So, it’s kind of broad-based.
Conor McNamara:
Got it. Thanks. And just final on ddPCR, can you remind us the consumable pull-through with these placements? Are you still kind of at that 50-50 equipment versus consumables on ddPCR? And how – what’s the tail there as far as when that should accelerate on the consumables side?
Simon May:
In very approximate terms, we are still there. And I think over time, we still expect that to weight increasingly towards consumables. And I think we are seeing that trend to play out.
Conor McNamara:
Great. Thank you for that. And last question for me is on the OpEx side, you were down sequentially on total operating expenses. How should we think about that cadence for the rest of the year, and then going into going into next year? Is this a good run rate from Q2, or is there anything that’s abnormal in Q2?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. This is Ilan. So, as a percent of sales, we expect the second half, at least, to be slightly lower than that. On a dollar basis, maybe slightly higher, but we try to continue to be very disciplined in terms of the expenses overall.
Conor McNamara:
Got it. Thanks guys. Appreciate it.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Brandon, please go ahead.
Brandon Couillard:
Sorry. Just to clarify, are you saying OpEx in the second half up or down compared to the first half?
Ilan Daskal:
So, as a percent of sales, it’s going to be slightly lower. On a dollar basis, potentially slightly higher, but not meaningfully higher.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. That makes sense. A follow-up question for Simon, I am just curious the QIAGEN digital PCR cross licensing deal. What do you get out of it? Why I guess strike that deal with them?
Simon May:
Don’t really answer that Brandon, in terms of the deal confidential. I think we have already said what we are going to say about it in the script here. I think we are pretty happy with the terms, and that’s about where we have to leave it because of the confidentiality provisions we have got around it.
Brandon Couillard:
I will leave it there. Thank you.
Operator:
Okay. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn it back to Edward Chung for closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thank you for joining our call today. We will be participating at the Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference in Boston, next month. As always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon. Thank you for attending the Bio-Rad First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Matt, and I'll be your moderator for today's call. All lines have been muted during the presentation portion of the call open for opportunities for question-and-answer session at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Ed Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Ed, please go ahead.
Ed Chung:
Thanks, Matt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the first quarter 2023 financial results and from an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goal and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and CFO.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed first quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's global operations. Andy?
Andy Last:
Thank you, Ilan. Good afternoon, everybody. The first quarter of 2023 was characterized by solid growth for our core business coupled with a significant reduction of COVID-related sales. However, we also experienced a number of market and operational challenges, which overall resulted in a lower-than-expected performance for the quarter. While demand generally across the portfolio was in line with our expectations, there was some softness in smaller biopharma companies where we have seen historically strong demand for our life science products. This correlates with funding constraints the industry started to experience in the first quarter. We also saw a lower quarter for our process chromatography products, primarily reflecting the softness due to the timing of orders. In addition, we saw a further tightening of sanctions, which impacted our business in Russia with a negative impact on sales in the quarter. And we now expect lower overall performance for the year in Russia, especially in our Life Science business. On the operational front, we did not make the expected pace of progress within our supply chain to address our order backlog. And as a result, backorder reduction was modest. Of the estimated $30 million we expected to recognize from elevated 2022 backorders, we achieved a reduction of approximately $5 million in the first quarter, and we expect a similar amount for the remaining three quarters of the year. This was in part driven by a slower-than-expected ramp-up of production in our new Singapore facility. This also contributed to higher-than-typical finished goods inventory as we made the transfer. Our backlog was also impacted by the shift in sales mix and by the placement of more clinical systems than expected at low margins. We also experienced cost inflation that was higher than our net price realization in the quarter. All of these factors affected gross margins for the quarter. We saw an increase in demand for our clinical business globally as the impact of COVID finally receded. In addition, demand for our newly launched ddPCR platform, QX600, and continued a strong trend line from Q4 2022. And our pipeline is robust and growing, and we are seeing strong uptake in biopharma, translational research and oncology. The market launch of QX Continuum, our more affordable digital PCR product remains on track for year-end. And we launched a few weeks ago the new PTC Tempo product line our next generation of PCR thermal cycles. We completed development and early access of our ddPCR microsatellite instability kit and we'll be launching later this quarter. This assay kit includes an automated analysis package and enables clinical researchers to assess microsatellite instability status across multiple cancers and is part of our expanding oncology assay menu for Droplet Digital PCR. Overall, we were pleased with the over 6% currency-neutral core sales growth for the first quarter despite the year-over-year decline in COVID sales. In particular, we are very encouraged by the high demand in our Clinical Diagnostics business as we expand our installed base, providing a solid foundation for increased reagent pull-through and continued long-term growth. Looking forward to the remainder of this year, we expect strong demand for our clinical systems to continue, and we also expect continued double-digit demand for our Life Science business. We see strong growth for our process chromatography business, although this is now forecasted to be slightly lower than initial estimations. On the supply chain front, we are expecting to clear our extended Life Science backlog by the end of the second quarter and our clinical backlog by the end of the year. In addition, as we progress through the remainder of the year, we expect production to continue to ramp up in Singapore as well as expansion of capacity for the QRX600 ddPCR system as initial demand in Q1 exceeded our ability to fulfill. And with that, I will say thank you and pass you back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Great. Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the first quarter. Net sales for the first quarter of 2023 were $676.8 million, which is a 3.3% decline on a reported basis versus $700.1 million in Q1 of 2022. On a currency-neutral basis, the year-over-year revenue decline was 0.3%. The first quarter year-over-year revenue decline was mainly the result of significantly lower COVID-related sales of approximately $2.6 million versus $45 million in the first quarter of last year. Core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 6.1% year-over-year on a currency-neutral basis. As Andy alluded to earlier, our Q1 results were impacted by increased sanctions in Russia, increased early-stage biotech companies pressures and continuing certain supply chain challenges, including those associated with our manufacturing lines transfer and ramp up in Asia. The production transition contributed to a continued elevated order backlog, mainly within the Diagnostics group. In addition, we continue to ramp capacity to accommodate the growing demand for the new QX600-ddPCR system. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe while core revenue modestly declined in Asia, primarily due to a tough compare for the process chromatography franchise related to a very large customer order in the year ago period. Sales of the Life Science Group in the first quarter of 2023 were $323.6 million compared to $347.2 million in Q1 of 2022, which is a decrease of 6.8% on a reported basis and a decline of 3.6% on a currency-neutral basis. The underlying Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 9.6% and was primarily driven by our qPCR products, Western loading and digital PCR. This growth was lower than we projected as a result of increased sanctions effective sales of certain products to Russia as well as growing revenue headwind from biopharma companies due to the funding environment for early-stage biotech companies. As I mentioned earlier, we continue to ramp capacity to accommodate the growing demand for the new QX600-ddPCR system. Process chromatography revenue which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, posted a mid-single-digit year-over-year decline due to a tough compare as well as some softness in the bioprocessing market. With that being said, we will expect -- we still expect double-digit growth for 2023 despite a low revenue projection relative to our prior forecast. Excluding process chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business declined 3.3% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q1 of 2022 and was a result of lower COVID-related sales. The Life Science Group revenue, excluding process chromatography, and COVID-related sales grew 13.6% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe, while Q1 core revenue posted a decline in Asia due to the previously mentioned tough compare for process chromatography. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the first quarter were $352.1 million compared to $351.8 million in Q1 of 2022 or largely flat on a reported basis and a 2.8% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 3.1% on a currency-neutral basis. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics group was primarily driven by a robust demand for diagnostic instruments, primarily within blood typing and diabetes, which was not entirely fulfilled due to our manufacturing constraints. We continue to see strong rebound in placements of instruments in China, which should contribute to reagent pull-through volumes in the coming quarters. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue for the Diagnostics Group posted a double-digit growth in Asia and were largely flat in the Americas and Europe versus the year ago period. The reported gross margin for the first quarter of 2023 was 53.5% on a GAAP basis and compares to 57.5% in Q1 of 2022. The year-over-year gross margin decline was mainly due to lower COVID-related sales, unfavorable product mix and higher cost raw materials. The gross margin this year was further impacted by higher-than-anticipated percentage of instrument sales versus reagents as well as from the lower-than-forecasted revenue in the Life Science Group. In addition, we were not able to fully recover the higher inflationary costs this year as the increases in certain raw materials and elevated logistics costs were not fully recovered in selling prices. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.3 million compared to $4.5 million in Q1 of 2022. SG&A expenses for Q1 of 2023 were $225.6 million or 33.3% of sales compared to $196.7 million or 28.1% in Q1 of 2022. The increase in SG&A expenses was driven by higher employee-related expenses, a restructuring charge and higher discretionary spend. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.7 million versus $1.8 million in Q1 of 2022. Research and development expense in the first quarter was $75 million or 11.1% of sales compared to $59.5 million or 8.5% of sales in Q1 of 2022. The year-over-year increase was due to increased employee-related expenses, following the Curiosity acquisition in the third quarter of 2022, higher project-related spend and restructuring costs. Q1 operating income was $61.9 million or 9.1% of sales compared to $146.4 million or 20.9% of sales in Q1 of 2022. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings which are substantially related by its ownership of Sartorius AG shares, negatively impacted the reported results by $17.5 million. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $40.4 million compared to net other income of $30.7 million last year. Q1 of 2023 included a $34.8 million dividend from Sartorius versus $31.6 million dividend in the first quarter of 2022. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2023 was 18.7% compared to 22.9% for the same period in 2022. The effective tax rate reported in Q1 of 2023 was primarily affected by geographical mix of earnings. The effective tax rate reported in Q1 of 2022 was primarily affected by an unrealized loss in equity securities. Reported net income for the first quarter was $69 million or $2.32 diluted earnings per share compared to a loss of $3.367 billion or $112.50 diluted loss per share in Q1 of 2022. This change from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the first quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.3 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring expense. These exclusions moved the gross margin from 53.5% for the first quarter of 2023 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.2%, versus 58.2% in Q1 of 2022. Non-GAAP SG&A in the first quarter of 2023 was 31.3% versus 27.2% in Q1 of 2022. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.7 million and an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $1.9 million, acquisition-related costs of $800,000 and $9 million of restructuring-related expenses. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the first quarter of 2023 was 10.4% versus 8.5% in Q1 of 2022. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $4.2 million of restructuring expenses. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 9.1% on a GAAP basis to 12.4% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 22.4% in Q1 of 2022. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $17.5 million and about a $1 million loss associated with natural investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2023 was 20.9% compared to 19.6% for the same period in 2022. The higher rate in 2023 was driven by geographical mix of earnings and lower compensation-related deductions. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2023 was $99.4 million or $3.34 diluted earnings per share compared to $161.5 million or diluted earnings per share of $5.02 in Q1 of 2022. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 was $1.857 billion compared to $1.796 billion at the end of 2022. The change in cash and short-term investments from the fourth quarter of 2022 was primarily due to the change in working capital. Inventory at the end of Q1 reached $752.9 million from $719.3 million in the prior quarter. The higher inventory level was driven mainly by rebuilding of finished goods safety stock for certain instruments. In addition, we are rebalancing inventory levels as we complete the transition of some of our manufacturing. We did not purchase any shares of our stock during the first quarter. But as we have done in recent years coming out of blackout periods, we will continue to be opportunistic with share buybacks, particularly when we believe there is a significant dislocation in the valuation of our stock. To that end, we have over $200 million available to deploy under the current Board authorized program. For the first quarter of 2023, net cash generated from operating activities was $98.1 million, which compares to $50.5 million in Q1 of 2022. This increase mainly reflects changes in working capital. The adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2023 was $148.5 million or 21.9% of sales, and excluding the Sartorius dividend, was 16.8%. The adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2022 was $215.4 million or 30.8% of sales and excluding the Sartorius dividend, was 26.3%. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2023 were $35.7 million and depreciation and amortization for the first quarter was $35.6 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. Taking into account the macroeconomic factors as well as our continued operational transformation initiatives, we are revising our 2023 financial outlook as follows
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
I'll appreciate all of the detail you've just walked you there like an unpack. I'll just start with '23 guidance rest on the top line. Can you help us bridge the components and the puts and takes between Russia weakness early-stage biopharma lower process media demand? And secondarily, what gives you the confidence in terms of the separation on the top line?
Andy Last:
Brandon, it's Andy, actually. So maybe I'll just walk through the answer to that. And you did capture the big levers in [Technical Difficulty] once out of Russia, which has had a meaningful impact. Biopharma softness, which did have some impact, particularly in the kind of, let's call it, emerging biopharma companies and the financial access to capital in Q1, which flowed through to broad demand, broader kind of slowdown in demand for our Life Science products. The process chrome story s not so much an emerging biopharma story as much as I think we've finally now just seen some of the effect of the overall inventory rebalancing that has been going on in the industry, and we had not been seeing that previously. I'd say the last two points to highlight on the revenue bridge would be a slower pace of back order reduction, which -- and I don't think we're seeing we're able to capture everything that we initially estimated. And related to our gene expression business, just generally a softer demand that is being experienced this year against the very significant installed base that we had previously put out there over the last two or three years.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Maybe in terms of the '25 targets, I mean, just generally, conceptually, why update those now, especially given what seems to be all the operational challenges based in the quarter and macro variables that you discussed on the call? Number two, can you share what the implied targets would be in terms of revenue dollars in '25? And if my math is right, would that just kind of 8% organic CAGR in the next three years, to get there?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, Brandon, thanks for the question. So first of all, we are updating the 2025 based on our latest view and in light of the changing environment that we are experiencing. Obviously, as Andy mentioned just now, the entire kind of biotechnology sector and the funding and that was one of the growth drivers that we called out during the Investor Day, and we see headwind there. The overall inflationary kind of cost that we today believe is here to stay. I mean I'm not sure that it is transitory, and that was not taken into account when we presented during the Investor Day. So we are layering on what does that mean for the next two to three years. And this, we do believe that an update to the 2025 target model in order to set the expectation. With that said, it doesn't change our thinking in terms of the overall transformation that we are working on and everything that we still plan to achieve and all the kind of new instruments that are in the pipeline and the development. And so that doesn't change our thinking. It's more kind of, I would argue, macro-driven, and we have to kind of communicate accordingly. In terms of the growth, yes, I mean, so your math is correct, it's about -- on a core basis, it's about 8%. And that's the update. If you think about the currency neutral basis, it's about is $3.4 billion for 2025 on a currency-neutral basis.
Brandon Couillard:
Got it. Last one for Simon. Your closest competitor in digital PCR earlier today talked about a market CAGR the next three years in the 30% to 40% range. I want to see if that's consistent with your view in terms of how you would assess the market and if you view the opportunity on the growth outlook differently for your business?
Simon May:
There's definitely emerging competition in digital PCR without doubt. And we observed that very closely, and we take it very seriously. And as we said before, I think it really is also helping to significantly expand the market opportunity in ddPCR. And when we hear the commentary and the disclosures from our competitors and we kind of overlay that with the growth trajectory that we see in our own business. We think it's pretty consistent overall, and we think it's playing out the way that we thought it would. And then when we think about our overall position today, we talked about how the demand for the QX600 platform and customer acceptance is really fantastic. So we're feeling good about that. And in the biopharma segment, notwithstanding some of the market softness that we're seeing at the present side, we've got a very strong position there. We think the market's ultimately got very long legs. And I think we've got quite a nice moat around that business. We've got a really formidable of high-performance assays. And we know in this segment that performance really, really matters. And our QX One platform is really best-in-class in terms of throughput and automation. And then as was mentioned earlier, we've already got the QX Continuum platform that's in development, and I can tell you that program is running quite nicely. So when we think about the overall dynamics here, I don't think anything has fundamentally changed since we discussed this at Investor Day.
Operator:
The next question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Your line is now open.
Patrick Donnelly:
Maybe a similar main questions. On the process chrome side, it sounds like you saw a pretty good slowdown in the quarter. Andy, I think you called out timing as an impact, but obviously, the guidance coming down pretty significantly for the year. How much do you think timing versus change in demand? What are you seeing in the market? And what's the ability to execute in the backdrop of, again, if the demand is holding up? Is it just an execution issue? Maybe just kind of give us a little more color there.
Andy Last:
Yes. I mean, timing is always a challenge for that business, and I'm sure you guys -- you know that well. But -- and in Q1, in particular, the tough compare to prior year for us. So we -- that really wasn't a great surprise from that point of view. Looking forward, I think we are just starting to experience some of the kind of -- we're calling it inventory rebalancing and just a more prudent or conservative approach from the end market as we go forward. And we feel it's prudent to reflect that in the way we're thinking about our guidance this year. Underlying all of that, though, is still extremely solid and consistent demand for the process chrome business. The new products we've introduced have been exceedingly well received, and we're starting to see uptake and traction on those. So our go-forward thesis on process chrome is [Technical Difficulty] we're finally seeing some of the effect that I think others have been calling out for a while. We're finally seeing a little bit of that flow through to our business now.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That's helpful. And Ilan, maybe on the margin side, I think you called out some maybe more aggressive expense management. As you think about first half to second half ramp on the margins, can you just talk about what levers you guys are pulling the visibility into hitting those numbers and got a pretty good step up from first half to the second?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate the question. So we have several initiatives that are in flight, and it's part of our kind of plan already. We anticipate that we will be able to realize it in the second half, and it will roll over also into next year. And these are obviously multiple initiatives that we are pretty confident that we will be able to achieve its part of the guidance. Obviously, it's baked in. And obviously, the goal there is to mitigate the softness that we guided for on the top line as well as some aspect of the gross margin. And I think that we have a very good plan to achieve it, and it's mainly focused on the second half of this year.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe on the long-term guide, Life Science came down, I think, 150 bps. When you think about that change to the growth build in terms of the algorithm you guys have behind the scenes there. What -- I guess, what segments were the biggest step down? I mean the digital PCR changed at all? Was it process chrome? If you can just help us think about what softened in that algorithm is I think when you guys gave a guide, we can get a ton of building blocks. So just trying to figure out what areas maybe it was all of them, but just if you could help us out there, it would be helpful.
Andy Last:
Yes, Patrick, let me take a shot at this question. I think what we determined is that the biopharma softness is contributing to life science growth at a slower pace. It's kind of the simplest way to think about it. And with the kind of shake up that's gone on a little bit in the emerging smaller biotech companies, where we've had meaningful business and very strong growth. And just it's that effect flowing through over the next couple of years. And I wouldn't think of it as anything more than that at this point in time. Just to reiterate that the fundamental pillars in the Life Science business on process chromatography and Droplet Digital PCR and then related products very solid. So we're, I think, prudently putting forward that we see a slower growth as a result.
Simon May:
I think as well, Russia wasn't part of the initial calculus. So now it is. It's not a massive impact, but it does make a dense and that flows through to the projection as well.
Operator:
The next question is from the line of Dan Leonard with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.
Daniel Leonard:
I think Brandon asked this question, but I'm not sure I caught the answer. The revised guidance still assumes a meaningful sales acceleration in 2H. The fourth quarter comp is tough, macro is not getting better. So what are you looking at to support that second half ramp?
Andy Last:
Yes. So, we do see a slightly lower growth projection from the Life Science business, which I think we just reflected in the commentary, which is some partially offset by and improved performance in the clinical business in the second half. We're seeing actually fairly robust demand for our clinical systems that we expect to continue. So you've got a little bit of a mix shift playing out there on -- across the two business groups, which will further help support the second half performance has a small mix impact on margin, which we're also reflecting because of the differential between the two business groups.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, Dan. I will add to that also that from there, obviously, it flows throughout the P&L. On the gross margin, we expect it to improve as the year progresses as well as we have a list of initiatives that are in flight and some of the scheduled to start that will benefit the second half.
Andy Last:
We've got one final factor, which is the burn down of backlog in the second half. And so we have much better line of sight to the phasing of that in the second half, and that will also contribute to the second half growth and QX600 on the Life Science side is it's a very robust pipeline.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So on the QX600, yes, exactly, Andy. I mean, it's about the manufacturing kind of volume that we plan to have a much higher volume in the second half than in the first half. And that's obviously a nice contribution, not only about the top line, but it's above average margin that flows through.
Daniel Leonard:
Okay. And then my follow-up question, Andy, you commented on softer demand for gene expression against a significant installed base. Why isn't that a multiyear problem?
Andy Last:
Well, I think as we move forward, it is an element. I think it's a good point you're making there, and it's an element that is factored into the Life Science forward-looking view on the '25 trajectory, right? And it is a factor that is hard to really quantify in the market after you placed all these instruments over the last two-plus years, three years. So it's a good call out, and it's a fair point, but it is considered in our '25 reguide for Life Science.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
First question is on the Russian sanctions. Can you just quantify for us the impact that's now embedded in your forecast? And when did it start? And when -- just I guess one more annualize.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Jack. I appreciate the question. Historically, we called out that Russia was between 1% and 2% of revenue on an annual basis. Obviously, the sanctions kept accumulating. And when we started the year, we still had a nice pipeline. And I would say that about 1/3 of our projection -- more than 1/3 of the projection for this year was impacted by incremental sanctions that we had to revise it this quarter. These are not the prior sanctions. These are incremental sanctions that prevent us from shipping more than 1/3 of our projected or prior projection for this year.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then in the Diagnostics business, so it sounded like regionally, you did well in Asia I was just curious if you could comment on what you're seeing here in the U.S. and in Europe. I think I heard largely flat. We've been hearing about better volumes from a lot of the services providers. So just -- just how is that playing through in your U.S. and Europe business?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. I believe we have Dara, she remotely. So Dara, I'm not sure were you able to hear the question.
Dara Wright:
Yes. This is Dara here. Ilan can you hear me okay?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you.
Dara Wright:
Great. So demand is strong in all regions, elevated a bit in Asia Pacific as a consequence of China opening back up with the COVID restrictions lifted in Q1, the actual sales were sort of biased towards Asia Pacific in Q1, so the revenue was bias there, but demand and backlog is similarly sort of higher than historically in EMEA and Americas. So bodes well as we burn down that backlog, placing instruments globally, in which increases our installed base.
Jack Meehan:
Great. Then one final one for Norman. We're in this macro environment, which is evolving a little bit. Your business should be, I think, more defensive when it's all said and done. Just was curious how kind of the evolving landscape might change your philosophy, if at all, when it comes to M&A and what you're seeing in the funnel?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. So the funnel remains about the same. Obviously, when you think about kind of valuations coming in, it's a little stickier on the way down. So that's a dynamic that I think we're aware of. But again, we've got a couple of things in the hopper, and we continue to see it as a viable option for cash deployment as we go forward to add to the business.
Operator:
The next question is a follow-up from Brandon Couillard. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Just to push back on your answer to Patrick's question, I think -- I mean the biopharma exposure you have is only 15%. You're talking about a sliver of that overall market. First I want to make sure I understand that right. And then what's embedded in your outlook for that earlier stage biotech customer base? Could you quantify it in terms of sizing, but also kind of what you're expecting in terms of growth from that market?
Andy Last:
Yes, Brandon, I mean, I don't think we've quantified or segmented our sales within the biopharma segment overall. We've done particularly well in emerging biotech, especially because the cell and gene therapy-based therapeutic development there and those companies, but the -- so that's more of a broader life science product impact. The process chrome is obviously for the much more mid and large sites biopharma companies. And there, I think we're just literally subject to the macros that have been going on across the industry, which we had not seen before, and it started to show up a bit for us this year. So we've moderated our growth expectations this year, although they're still good, healthy double-digit growth for the bioprocessing side of the business.
Simon May:
I'll just maybe add that about 1/3 of our Life Science revenue is contributed from biopharma, but we're pretty overweight in the smaller and emerging biotech companies, whether you're talking about process chromatography, we've talked about this previously, how our resins really play in these emerging biologic therapeutics. And also in our Life Science portfolio, generally, we see the halo effects in the emerging biotechs, more so than big pharma, which tend to be locked up in really large contracts.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Last one for Ilan, can you just to make sure the definitions, I understand correctly, your 25% EBITDA margin target, that includes the Sartorius dividend, I just want to make sure and how much is that in contemplated? Is it the $34 million this year or the ones the size of the dividend last year at the Analyst Day, which is much different?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So we try to compare it kind of apples to apples. And back in the Investor Day, we said that it included about $19 million of dividend. And that's what we assume now to be consistent.
Operator:
There are no additional questions waiting at this time. So I'll pass the conference back to the management team for any closing remarks.
Ed Chung:
Thank you for joining today's call. We will be at the RBC Capital Markets Global Healthcare Conference in New York later this month and also in New York, the Jefferies Healthcare Conference in June. As always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks.
Operator:
That concludes the conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for attending today’s Bio-Rad Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. My name is Tia [ph], and I will be your moderator for today’s call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to your host, Edward Chung with Bio-Rad. Please proceed.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, Tia. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year 2022 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary, regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad’s results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and it is difficult to predict the full extent of potential impact the pandemic could have in the future. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks will include references to non-GAAP financials including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I’ll now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our CFO.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed fourth quarter and full year discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer to provide an update on Bio-Rad’s global operations. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Okay. Many thanks, Ilan. Good afternoon, everybody. As we enter Q4, we continued our focus on improving our supply chain situation. During the quarter some supply chain component constraints still persisted for a number of instruments, but overall were less problematic, and our primary focus was on production to meet demand. As a result, we made solid progress on reducing our backlog in the quarter. However, there was a resulting impact on product sales mix. And as expected, we still exited Q4 with an elevated backlog position for both our Life Science and Clinical Diagnostic businesses. Inventory levels remains high as we continue to source components to support demand, our manufacturing transition to Singapore, backlog reduction and better secure supply continuity through the coming year. While still high logistics costs showed improvements in Q4, although higher cost of materials continued to persist from purchases earlier in the year. Despite the product supply challenges experienced throughout 2022, we have been extremely pleased with the level of customer support and willingness to work through our backlog with us. As anticipated during the quarter, the global effects of COVID on our business continued to diminish, and in particular COVID-related sales were roughly in line with our expectations. Overall operations within Bio-Rad were back to normal with the exception of China, where changing government policy from their previous zero-tolerance policy led to a large increase in infection rates impacting a significant percentage of the country and our employees. This also had a negative effect impact on demand from our routine diagnostic tests in China. The fourth quarter also displayed continued strong demand trends across our portfolio and, in particular, we were very pleased with strong placements for the recently launched QX600 Droplet Digital PCR platform. Initial adopters include customers at the cutting edge of oncology research and testing such as Biodesix, a diagnostics company, which is developing a minimum risk residual disease test from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center on the platform. Also of note, during the fourth quarter, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with NuProbe to accelerate the development of next generation highly multiplex digital PCR assays for oncology applications. As we enter 2023, we have now developed a strong pipeline across multiple customer segments for the QX600. And in conjunction with our portfolio of many thousands of assays, we expect to see continued strong growth of our Droplet Digital PCR portfolio in 2023. Q4 sales of our process chromatography franchise also displayed strong double-digit growth and we are pleased with the continued performance of this business and adoption of the recently launched pre-packed columns as well as increasing interest in our [new BR resins] [ph] for new biological therapeutics and vaccines. Looking to our 2023 overall demand remains strong, and we continue to drive disciplined execution of our strategy. While we still have some challenges in supply chain, our primary activity is now on scaling production to reduce our instrument backlog and meet growing demand, particularly in the clinical diagnostics business. And we anticipate backlog will be normalized in the second half of the year. Also in the back half of the year, we are planning for the introduction of 2 new platforms from our development pipeline, the QX Continuum, and our second generation single-cell platform. The Continuum represents a next generation Droplet Digital PCR system with an integrated workflow that’s designed to be cost effective. Our single-cell application targets the large single-cell multiomics market. With the COVID pandemic largely behind us, we do not anticipate any meaningful COVID-related sales in 2023. In addition, we continue to monitor the Russia and Ukraine war situation and potential for further sanctions and downside. Thank you for your attention. And I will now pass you back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now, I would like to review the results of the fourth quarter and full year. Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2022 were $730.3 million, which is 0.3% decline on a reported basis, versus $732.8 million in Q4 of 2021. On a currency neutral basis, the year-over-year revenue growth was 5.8%. As expected COVID-related sales continued to taper and were about $13 million in the quarter. Year-over-year core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 10.6% on a currency neutral faces. On a geographic basis, we experienced double-digit currency neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Asia, while Europe posted a more modest increase, primarily reflecting ongoing supply chain constraints for diagnostic products. As Andy mentioned earlier, despite improvements in the supply chain, we estimate that we ended 2022 with an elevated order backlog of approximately $50 million, of which we expect to retain about $30 million. Sales over the Life Science Group in the fourth quarter of 2022 were $359.7 million, compared to $326.6 million in Q4 of 2021, which is an increase of 10.1% on a reported basis, and growth of 16.4% on a currency neutral basis. The underlying Life Science year-over-year currency neutral core revenue growth was 28.1% and benefited in part from the reduction of order backlog. The year-over-year growth was primarily driven by Droplet Digital PCR, process chromatography and Western blotting. We also saw good growth for our qPCR products in part driven by the uptake of our new CFX Opus platform. We continued to experience strong initial customer interest and demand for our recently introduced QX600 ddPCR system. And we expect the more meaningful revenue contribution from this platform in 2023. Process chromatography which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, again posted strong double-digit year-over-year growth. Excluding process chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business grew 14% on a currency neutral basis versus Q4 of 2021, and was partially offset by lower COVID-related sales. When also excluding COVID-related sales, revenue growth was 27.1% on a currency neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency neutral year-over-year core revenue growth across all 3 regions. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the fourth quarter were $369.6 million, compared to $404.9 million in Q4 of 2021, which is an 8.7% decline on a reported basis, and the 2.9% decline on a currency neutral basis. Core clinical diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, declined 1.9% on a currency neutral basis. Clinical Diagnostics Group revenue, which was primarily impacted by ongoing supply chain constraints, which delayed instrument placements across multiple platforms and the uptake of associated consumables. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group year-over-year currency neutral core revenue grew in the Americas, and declined in Europe and in Asia. In addition to supply chain constraints, Asia Pacific sales were also impacted by COVID dynamics in China, resulting in lower volume of routine testing. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we corrected 2 accounting policies, and believe these changes are a key material to our overall financials. We determined that R&D expenses associated with developing and enhancing our cloud-based capabilities that incurred during the years 2020 through 2022 should have been capitalized. We revised our historical financial statements to reflect this correction, and it will be reflected in our 10-K filing. For full year 2022, the correction was about $5 million, or about 20 basis points headwind to gross margin, and the benefit of about $8 million, or about 30 basis points for operating margin. The benefit for the full year adjusted EBITDA margin is $15 million, or about 50 basis points. By comparison, the 2021 full year gross margin headwind is estimated to be about $3 million, or about 10 basis points, with an operating margin benefit of $11 million, or about 40 basis points, and adjusted EBITDA margin benefit of $15 million or 50 basis points. In addition, we corrected our policy on the timing of revenue recognition related to certain equipment that requires the installation, and we believe that it contributed $5 million to $10 million of onetime revenue to the quarter. The reported gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2022 was 54.4% on a GAAP basis, and compares to 54.6% in Q4 of 2021. The fourth quarter year-over-year gross margin decline was mainly due to an unfavorable product mix, reflecting a higher percentage of instrument sales, lower COVID sales and higher raw material costs associated with supply chain constraints. Amortization related to prior requisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.4 million as compared to $4.7 million in Q4 of 2021. SG&A expenses for Q4 of 2022 were $212.2 million or 29.1% of sales compared to $224.1 million or 30.6% in Q4 of 2021. The year-over-year SG&A expenses decreased mainly due to the stronger dollar and normalized employee-related benefits, but was partially offset by higher discretionary spend. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.7 million, versus $1.8 million in Q4 of 2021. Research and development expense in the fourth quarter was $66.2 million, or 9.1% of sales, compared to $66.9 million, or 9.1% of sales in Q4 of 2021, and consistent with our targeted R&D investment. Q4 operating income was $118.7 million, or 16.2% of sales, compared to $108.9 million, or 14.9% of sales in Q4 of 2021. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad’s ownership of Sartorius AG shares added $979 million of income to the reported results. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $6.1 million compared to net other income of $7.5 million last year. Q4 of 2022 included a $14.4 million charge associated with an investment impairment. Overall, we generated $16.6 million in interest income during the fourth quarter from our cash balance, partially offset by $11.7 million in interest expense related to our $1.2 billion notes. The effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2022 was 24.2% compared to 22.8% for the same period in 2021. The effective tax rate recorded in Q4 of 2022 was partially affected by an unrealized gain in equity securities. And the tax rate reported in Q4 of 2021 was primarily affected by an unrealized loss in equity securities. Reported net income for the fourth quarter was $828 million or $27.78 diluted earnings per share, compared to a loss of $1.572 billion or a diluted loss per share of $52.54 in Q4 of 2021. This increase from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.4 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring benefit. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2022 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.9% versus 55.2% in Q4 of 2021. Non-GAAP SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2022 was 28.5% versus 30.2% in Q4 of 2021. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.7 million and in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $2.5 million, acquisition-related benefit of $500,000 and $700,000 of legal expenses as well as restructuring related expenses. Non GAAP R&D expense in the fourth quarter of 2022 was 9.1% versus 9.4% in Q4 of 2021. In R&D on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a small restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 16.2% on a GAAP basis to 17.4% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 15.7% in Q4 of 2021. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable of $979 million, a $14.4 million loss associated with an investment impairment, and $1.7 million loss on venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2022 was 28.1%, which is consistent with our full year tax rate guidance compared to 20.4% for the same period in 2021. The higher rate in 2022 was driven by geographical mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $98.5 million or $3.31 diluted earnings per share, compared to $98.5 million or diluted earnings per share of $3.26 in Q4 of 2021. Moving on to the full year results. Net sales for the full year of 2022 were $2.802 billion, which is a 4.1% decline on a reported basis as compared with $2.923 billion in 2021. On a currency neutral basis, full year 2022 net sales increased by 0.3%, and when also excluding in 2021, a onetime $32 million settlement for bake royalties from 10x. Sales in 2022 grew 1.5% on a currency neutral basis. COVID-related sales for the full year were about $109 million, compared to $266 million in 2021. Year-over-year core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales and the legal settlement, increased 7.2% on a currency neutral basis. Sales of the Life Science Group for 2022 were $1.347 billion, excluding the 2021 legal settlement, the year-over-year growth was 2.7% on a currency neutral basis, when excluding COVID-related sales and the 2021 legal settlement, Life Science year-over-year currency neutral core revenue growth was 15.2%. The majority of the year-over-year core growth was driven by Droplet Digital PCR, process chromatography, our qPCR products and Western blot. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency neutral full year core revenue grew across all three regions. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products for 2022 were $1.451 billion, which is 0.4% growth on a currency neutral basis, when excluding COVID-related sales, Clinical Diagnostic year-over-year currency neutral core revenue growth was 1.3%, which was impacted by supply chain constraints. On a geographic basis, Clinical Diagnostics currency neutral full year core revenue grew in the Americas and Europe, while sales declined in Asia primarily due to COVID lockdowns in China. As mentioned earlier, the year ago comparisons for gross operating and adjusted EBITDA margin have been modestly revised due to our adoption of capitalized internal use software accounting. The full year non-GAAP gross margin was 56.6% compared to 57.2% in 2021. The year-over-year margin decline was driven mainly by product mix, lower COVID sales, higher logistics and expedited freight costs, as well as higher raw material costs. Full year non-GAAP SG&A expense was $805.4 million or 28.7% of sales compared to $824 million or 28.5% in 2021. The lower SG&A spend benefited from a strong dollar and more normalized employee-related costs somewhat offset by higher discretionary expenses. Full year non-GAAP R&D expense – R&D was $256.7 million or 9.2% of sales versus $247.6 million, or 8.6% in 2021. And full year non-GAAP operating income was 18.7% compared to 20.1% in 2021, largely due to the various impacts of our supply chain constraints during the past year. Lastly, the non-GAAP effective tax rate for the full year of 2022 was 22%, which was consistent with our guidance range and compares to 21.2% in 2021. Moving on to the balance sheet, total cash and short-term investments at the end of 2022 was $1.796 billion compared to $875 million at the end of 2021 and $1.856 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2022. The change in cash and short-term investments for the third quarter of 2022 was primarily due to working capital and share repurchases. Inventory at the end of Q4 reached $719.3 million from $685.9 million in the prior quarter. The increase in inventory continues to reflect our supply chain constraints, and is mainly due to carrying higher levels of raw materials. As we anticipate further easing in our supply chain constraints in 2023, we would expect to lower inventory levels over the next 8 quarters. For the fourth quarter of 2022, net cash generated from operating activities was $79.7 million, which compares to $161.1 million in Q4 of 2021. This decrease mainly reflects changes in working capital. For the full year of 2022, net cash generated from operations was $194.4 million versus $669.5 million in 2021. This decrease also mainly reflects changes in working capital. During the fourth quarter, we purchased 241,000 shares of our stock for a total cost of $91 million or an average purchase price of approximately $376 per share. As we continue to be opportunistic with our share buyback program. We still have a total of approximately $207 million available under the current Board authorized program. Full year share buybacks totaled 497,000 shares for approximately $216 million. In 2021, we purchased about 90,000 shares of our stock for $50 million. Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2022 was 21.4% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q4 of 2021 was 19.5%. Full year adjusted EBITDA, including the Sartorius dividend was $667.9 million, or about 23.8% compared to 24.6% in 2021. Net capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2022 were $34.7 million and full year CapEx spend was $112.6 million. Depreciation and amortization for the fourth quarter was $35.5 million and $137.3 million for the full year. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance for 2023, while the supply chain constraints have created a more than anticipated challenge during 2022, we believe that it is transitory, and does not change our thinking about our 2025 financial outlook. We expect that our backlog backorder dynamics will continue to normalize. And as I mentioned earlier, we assumed to recover in 2023, about $30 million of the order backlog from 2022. We are guiding a currency neutral revenue growth in 2023 to be between 6% and 7%. Starting in 2023, we do not anticipate breaking out COVID-related sales, as its contribution becomes immaterial to our overall revenue base. When excluding the 2022 COVID-related sales, we estimate currency neutral revenue growth in 2023 to be between 10% and 11%. The Life Science Group year-over-year currency neutral revenue growth is expected to be between 8% and 9%. When normalizing for 2022 COVID-related sales, we expect to be between 16% and 18% currency neutral year-over-year revenue growth for the Life Science Group. For the Diagnostics Group, we estimate currency neutral revenue growth of about 5%, as we expect supply chain constraints to normalize in 2023. When excluding COVID-related sales, we expect revenue growth between 5% and 5.5% for the Diagnostics Group. Due to the elevated order backlog during 2022, we realized about 1% price improvement, which was below the inflationary trends in our overall costs. For 2023, we assume price increase realization between 1.5% and 1.8%, mainly within the Life Science Group. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected to be about 57% in the first half of 2023 and improving to 58% towards the end of the year, as we cycle through higher material cost embedded in our inventory, and we expect our logistics costs to normalize. Full year non-GAAP operating margin is projected to be approximately 19.5%. We estimate the non-GAAP full year tax rate to be between 22% and 23%. CapEx is projected to be approximately $180 million as we plan to complete our ERP implementation in Asia, as well as capacity expansion to support our multiyear growth strategy. Finally, full year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be about 25%. And now, I’ll turn the call over to Norman for a few remarks. Norman?
Norman Schwartz:
So, thank you, Ilan, I guess, I would say that after 3 pandemic influenced years, it is really encouraging to see signs of returning to a – what I think of as a more normalized business environment. As you might imagine, everybody here is really looking forward to putting the challenges of the last few years behind us. And, I guess, I would add that the muscle building and improvements that we made as a result during this time, I think, we’ll continue to be valuable for us going forward. So I think about the macro view a little bit even though China and Russia, as Andy mentioned earlier, continue to be a little bit challenged, it would appear that most of our markets around the world, we’ll be strong in 2023 really supported by a kind of a solid funding environment around our targeted market. I think, overall, we are certainly pleased with the progress that we’re making on our strategic initiatives. And, I think, it’s fair to say we have a robust pipeline of products and development to support our ambitions going forward. So, we’re continuing and also to evaluate opportunities to add to our portfolio in organically, so a lot to look forward to.
Ilan Daskal:
Operator, that concludes our prepared remarks and we’ll now open the line to take your questions.
Operator:
We will now begin the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Please proceed.
Patrick Donnelly:
Hey, guys, thank you for taking the question. Ilan maybe first – Andy as well, just on the guidance, pretty healthy Life Science number there, 16 to 18 ex the COVID. Can you just talk about the growth drivers there? How much of that is maybe some of that backlog catch-up? And also maybe just the pacing across the year, obviously, a lot goes into between COVID and comps, it would be helpful. Just to get your perspective about the right way to think about that piece and, again, maybe some of the growth drivers that play into it.
Andrew Last:
Yeah. Hi, Patrick. Thanks for the question. Andy here. So as we look at 2023 revenue overall, let me just break it down between the 2 business areas. So, overall, I would say the strategic drivers of revenue growth remain consistent with our digital PCR platform, process chrom continued growth in that platform area. And we’re also going to benefit from new PCR products that were launched during the past year, and we’ve got some more coming during 2023. I think, our focus on biopharma penetration, where we’re largely underrepresented still is also a very significant driver, as we look to our growth in Life Science. And as a backdrop, we see Life Science funding broadly being positive, and in all regions of the world. And so that’s our general story on Life Science as I look to the clinical business. Really, it’s a continued growth of quality controls, continued share gains in immunohematology business. We’ve had some recent wins there, and we’ve got a growing demand pipeline. I would say also continued growth in Asia Pac and, in particular, kind of recovery in China more in the second half of 2023. Backlog reduction will be a feature in more the first half of the year. And, I think, it was mentioned in our script that Clinical has probably got the larger of the backlog challenge as we enter 2023. But we have really clear line of sight now. Q4 was still a bit challenging for us. And growth will kind of improve through the year for the business overall. So, I think that that’s pretty much a wrap-up of how we’re looking at 2023.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That’s very helpful. And then maybe to your point there in terms of early in the year, a little bit of the supply chain, a little bit of China, can you just talk about the impact you saw in 4Q, it seemed like the diagnostics piece, clearly, some headwinds, both from shipping delays, and probably China. Maybe just talk through, I guess what you saw there in terms of the impact, and then the expectation, how much of this lingers into 1Q, particularly maybe the China piece? What the right way to think about that is?
Andrew Last:
Yeah, as we’ve mentioned before, the ability to overcome the supply chain constraints in the Life Science is much easier than the Clinical side of the business, and that did persist for us through Q4. And then, Q4 in China with the change in government policy that reflects, that kind of basis represented both supply chain challenge as well as some demand drop off. So China didn’t really perform quite as expected for us in Q4. As we go into Q1 really our focus is on production, the improvement in volume on our instrument platforms to meet the backlog burned down and growing demand. And so, it’s less a component issue for us now on the clinical business, it is much more ramping the volume of production as we go. And when we believe that’s the first half phenomena for us.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And if I can sneak one more in for Ilan, maybe on the margin piece, nice numbers here this year, thinking about 2023. And then, just the path – continued path to some of the targets you laid out at the Analyst Day last year. Can you just talked about, I guess, the key levers you have in 2023. And then similarly, as we think about that EBITDA moving towards bigger than 28% number in 2025, those levers that are still left to pull, and some of the restructuring probably comes into play this year. But it’d be helpful just to talk about the moving pieces this year. And then, again, the confidence as we work our way towards that that 28% number.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate the question. So, if you look at the challenges that we experienced in 2022, and we think about 2023, specifically around supply chain constraints, and the impact on elevated cost of raw materials, specifically in higher logistics costs. So as Andy mentioned earlier, we believe it’s going to continue to improve. And that’s part of our thinking in terms of if you think about the gross margin, the improvement of gross margin throughout 2023, specifically in the second half of it. And then when you think about the other internal initiatives that we have in terms of productivity and efficiencies in terms of the restructuring that we completed, and move to Singapore, that is in the final phases of additional manufacturing footprint. So all these initiatives, we’ll also contribute towards the achievement of the 2025 goals. And that’s kind of what gives us the confidence level that the challenges that we went through in 2022 or more transitory will continue to somewhat – to some extent into 2023. But it does not change your thinking about the 2025 model, and the targets that we laid out back in the Investor Day. And, obviously, that comes from the top-line kind of growth drivers that in terms of that you’re aware of.
Patrick Donnelly:
Right. Thank you, guys. I appreciate it.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with Credit Suisse. Please proceed.
Dan Leonard:
Hello, thank you for taking the questions. My first question on the 2023 sales guidance, I guess, how important are those second half product launches you mentioned the Continuum and the second generation single-cell instrument? How important are they to the 2023 sales outlook? Or are these more 2024 drivers?
Andrew Last:
Yeah, thanks, Dan. They’re not a material contributor in 2023. This is really staging our 2024 revenue ambitions there. So that introductions to the market, but no material contribution.
Dan Leonard:
Understood. And, Andy, if possible you can give an update on the Singapore manufacturing transition?
Andrew Last:
Yeah, happy to do so. The plant is up and running in Singapore across all the product lines. We’re very pleased with the plant coming up to speed. I would say that the other key consideration here is that we still have our French plants operating. And that is – wasn’t our initial plant at this point in time, but we’ve kept them open because of the backorder reduction challenges that we have. And so we’re keeping our plants open through the first half to the end of Q2. And then, we’ll finally close those plants and continue to grow capacity in the Singapore facilities. So at this point, all has moved well, we’ve just had some kind of small diversions, I would say in the past year.
Dan Leonard:
Understood. And my final question, this might be related, Ilan, I think you mentioned it would take 8 quarters to normalize inventory. Why would it take so long and is there any opportunity to normalize sooner?
Ilan Daskal:
So, generally speaking, Dan, first of all, in 2023, we plan to have a lower inventory level than 2022, just as the target we set ourselves. Some of the procurement [of the protrudes] [ph] raw material was done for instruments that in components that will last longer than the next 4 quarters. And on purpose, we wanted to have some elevated level of raw material. And I do not see any risk of any write-offs for those, since these are all for instrument buildup. So that was kind of part of our thinking in terms of kind of the long-term plan, that’s the reason that it will take probably 8 quarters to normalize. As you can imagine, despite the fact that component availability became kind of audited ease in terms of availability, but it’s not yet back to kind of a normalized level. And we still have some challenges there. And maybe, Andy, do you want to…
Andrew Last:
Yeah. Just this kind of a carry-forward effect from keeping the clinical plants open on 2 sides of the world as well for 2 to 3 quarters longer than anticipated just some double down on inventory that will then have to also burn through, so that’s another contributory factor.
Dan Leonard:
Got it. Thank you.
Andrew Last:
Thank you, Dan.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please proceed.
Brandon Couillard:
Hi. Thanks. Good afternoon, guys. Just a question on the full year growth outlook, make sure I got the chart that we take out kind of the COVID headwinds, assume that goes to zero. You talked about core growth in the double-digits, I think, you said 10% to 11% for the year, which ahead of your sort of LRP that you laid out in the Analyst Day. Can you just talk about level of confidence in that level of growth, and where in the portfolio, you may have been a little more conservative in terms of your expectation?
Andrew Last:
Brad, so it’s Andy here, you broke up a little bit at the end there, so sorry. But, I mean, we have a fairly diligent process for building our plans for the year, bottoms up by region by portfolio or carrier. But the macro trends for us seem pretty robust on a fully global basis. Portfolio areas of growth that we’ve highlighted before, very consistently performing, I think, 2022 didn’t quite – we didn’t quite reach our initial growth expectations, fully realized growth expectations. So you’ve got a little bit of a comp benefit there too, a little bit of benefit coming through from some elevated backorder that we’re taking into 2023. So when we look at growth aspirations, which portions of the portfolio we expect to continue to grow, we’ve got new product contribution, both from products launched within 2022 and some new ones in particular areas of the portfolio. This year, we feel we’ve got a good growth trajectory for the business going forward.
Brandon Couillard:
Then on the digital PCR business, it changes in the competitive landscape that you’re seeing in the market, I know, Roche’s launched their system. And then any kind of updated stats on that segments and could you share with us in terms of the instrument versus consumable mix where that stands today and maybe the in-market mix, maybe between biopharma diagnostics and just research or what that looks like now?
Simon May:
Yeah, this is Simon. As we think about the digital PCR business overall, I’ll say we’re pretty pleased with the growth trajectory that we saw throughout 2022. We’re pleased with the new product introductions, and compound that with the burn down that we’ve started to see in the order backlog. We feel good that we’ve got some momentum as we come into 2023. And we talked previously about the market dynamics, yeah, there’s emerging competition and we see it as a double-edged sword. It’s expanding the addressable opportunity, but it’s also something that we take very seriously. And, as some of the earlier comments have mentioned, we’re excited about the QX600 launch and the initial uptake that we’re seeing with that. And when you blend the capabilities of that platform with the assay capabilities we’ve secured access to with NuProbe. We believe we’re going to be able to access segments of the market in a way that we weren’t always able to do when we can be best-in-class in terms of performance. So we think we’ve got a lot of momentum, and we also continue to feel very good about the mix between instruments and consumables as we head into 2023. And we see a lot of data points out in the market as well. And I think from our viewpoint, that’s just really corroborated how good we felt about the performance in 2022, and how particularly bullish we are coming into 2023.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Simon, well, I’ve got you. On the NuProbe licensing the oncology content for ddPCR, what’s the timeline for commercialization of that? And then you’ve also had a couple of other partnership announcement recently with Cytek on the StarBright, whether cytometry dyes, there’s another one that [Element Bioscience] [ph] for RNA library prep kits. Are any of those materials in terms of revenue contributors in 2023, this part of a broader strategy to monetize more of the content you have in the portfolio through partnerships?
Simon May:
I wouldn’t think about any of those as being material in 2023, I think we’re going to have a pretty significant emphasis on assay development around new probe in 2023. I mean, we’ve already got a lot of oncology content in the digital PCR franchise. It generates a lot of revenue for us already. And, I think, that’s going to be a meaningful extension over time from 2024 onwards. Similarly, with the Cytek agreement that you mentioned, we’ve got best-in-class performing dies there with StarBright. And in addition to pushing direct portfolio, we’re certainly wide open to partnerships there and within the partnership with Cytek is going to serve as well over time, but again, not meaningful in 2023.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Last one, Ilan, did you mentioned a $5 million to $10 million onetime revenue benefit in the fourth quarter. And what’s the operating impact of that if the operating income line?
Ilan Daskal:
So Brandon, it’s – on average kind of the gross margin benefits. So it’s not anything higher or lower. It’s blended average for the gross margin. And it is a onetime for the fourth quarter between $5 million and 10 million, as I mentioned.
Brandon Couillard:
Thank you very much.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Brandon.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please proceed.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. I wanted to start with M&A for Norman, just based on what you’re seeing now. And if you look out for 2023, do you think tuck-in deals are more or less likely than something more transformative? And either for you or Ilan, just latest thoughts on balance sheet and willingness for using equity as part of a deal?
Norman Schwartz:
Yeah, so we’re kind of encouraged by what we see for 2023, if you think about that rising interest rates, if I think slowed other people down a little bit. We certainly see opportunities out there, whether they would be more tuck-in or more transformational. I think that’s certainly, I mean, we’ll see what we managed to find, you know, we would hope to do something a little larger. We’ve done a number of these smaller tuck-ins, especially these kinds of technology, additions to the portfolio. I think, we’re looking now for something with a top-line and a bottom-line.
Ilan Daskal:
And, Jack, with it in terms of the mix between equity and debt. Our preference is again to try and maximize the debt capacity. And maybe even you can call it a little bit stretching it, if historically were discussing around 3x of gross leverage, we’ll try to be even above that so long that we maintain our investment grade level. And that can provide us kind of a nice size opportunity – to target a nice size opportunity.
Jack Meehan:
Right. And then just wanted to ask you a little bit more about potential for backlog flush in 2023. So you talked about $50 million of elevated backlog, and I think I heard you say you think you can capture $30 million of that, just smaller than I would have expected, when I look at the inventory balance at year end up about $150 million year-over-year. So I was just curious like your line of sight into that and any color on, is it mostly Life Sciences?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So, Jeff, maybe one comment from my side, maybe that is also related to the fact that it will take us about 8 quarters and 4 quarters to normalize that inventory level, since we did procure on purpose in certain components longer-term kind of capacity. And probably that explains the reason for the higher elevated and the kind of normalization and capturing kind of the order backlog, or elevated order backlog during 2023.
Jack Meehan:
And then, final one for you Ilan and maybe also for Andy. The margin target of 19.5%, so off the new accounting in 2022. I think that’s 80 bps of expansion year-over-year. If I look over multiple years in the past, you’ve done over 100 a year, maybe even better than that. I know, there’s some dynamics with COVID and supply chain, but is there anything notable you would call out for why kind of the trend lines a little below the historical levels?
Ilan Daskal:
It’s a good question, Jack. I mean, some of the challenges, obviously, from 2022, we’ll continue in part of 2023. So that is still a headwind, when you think about the higher cost of materials that we have to flush through the inventory cycle. And that has an impact on gross margin, obviously, and it’s a fall through to the operating margin. I think that’s kind of the main item that we have to kind of work through during 2023. And that’s again the reason that we do believe that it’s still transitory and that’s exactly the basis for our thinking in terms of still confirming the 2025 target model, because by that time, we believe that those issues will no longer be there.
Jack Meehan:
Sounds good. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Jack.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] There are no additional questions at this time. I will now hand it back to the management team for closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thank you for joining today’s call. We will be at the Citi Conference in early March and hope to see some of you there. And as always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon.
Operator:
That concludes today’s conference call. Thank you. You may now disconnect your line.
Operator:
Good evening, and thank you for attending today's Bio-Rad Laboratories 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. My name is Daniel, and I will be your moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations of Bio-Rad. Edward, please proceed.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, Daniel. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the third quarter 2022 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. On the call with me today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I'd like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed third quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's global operations. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Right. Thank you very much, Ilan. So as the world continued its must recovery from the pandemic, we experienced strong demand for both our Life Science and Clinical Diagnostic products, and our organization is broadly back to normal operations. We also had modestly higher-than-expected demand for COVID-related products, particularly in Asia Pacific. However, improvement in product supply in the quarter was slower to materialize than we expected which negatively impacted sales across several product lines, particularly early in the quarter, and we continue to carry a significant order backlog. As previously mentioned, the areas of challenge have been primarily electronic components for instruments. We did experience improved product supply as the quarter progressed, and we now see a positive improvement trend for product supply as we enter the fourth quarter. In addition, during the quarter, we experienced significantly elevated logistics costs and ongoing higher cost in raw materials. Inventory levels increased quarter-to-quarter, reflecting strength in demand and the order backlog as we focus on procuring the remaining key components. During the quarter, we launched our next-generation Droplet Digital PCR system QX600, which brings advanced 6 color-based multiplexing and application flexibility, especially in oncology and reproductive health to our customers. We are extremely pleased with the market response and have quickly built a strong order book. Also in Q3, we completed the acquisition of Curiosity Diagnostics and their PCR-1 system. This system provides a sample to answer, high multiplex and rapid diagnostic PCR system to facilitate our entry into the molecular disease testing market with a differentiated platform. Integration of this Warsaw, Poland-based company is progressing very smoothly. While relatively small, our business operations in Russia continued to be challenging as a result of increased sanctions and employee concerns over the military draft mandate. We expect sanctions to continue to impact operations for the near to medium term. Overall, we are very pleased with our performance in China, although the protracted Zero COVID policy had some extended effect on our Clinical and Life Science businesses in Q3, and we see the recovery to normal taking a little longer. In closing, as we enter Q4, our organization continues to focus on resolving the supply chain challenges, which importantly have already begun to ease reducing our backlog and meeting the high levels of demand we are experiencing from our customers. Thank you. And I’ll now pass you back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the third quarter. Net sales for the third quarter of 2022 were $680.8 million, which is an 8.9% decline on a reported basis versus $747 million in Q3 of 2021. The third quarter decline in revenue was mainly a result of lower COVID related sales this year as well as the receipt of a onetime $32 million settlement for bank royalties from 10x in the year ago period. On a currency-neutral basis, revenue declined 4.1%. We estimate that COVID-related sales were $17 million in the quarter and continued to reflect an elevated level in demand, particularly in Asia as a result of the ongoing outbreaks in China. Year-over-year core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales and the 10x $32 million settlement in the third quarter of 2021 increased 6.1% on a currency neutral basis. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in Europe and Asia. Core revenue in the Americas was largely flat as a result of the supply chain constraints that we have been experiencing in the past year. As Andy mentioned earlier, we continue to carry an elevated order backlog as a result of supply chain constraints and continued strong customer demand. We are now seeing higher production volumes and anticipate reductions of order backlog through the remainder of this year. Sales of the Life Science Group in the third quarter of 2022 were $317.9 million compared to $373.5 million in Q3 of 2021, which is a 14.9% decline on a reported basis and an 11% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding last year's 10x settlement, the Life Science Group sales declined 6.9% on a reported basis and a 2.3% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Despite supply chain constraints, the underlying Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 9.4%. The year-over-year growth was primarily driven by Western loading, qPCR, process media and our antibody products. We continue to see a strong order backlog for ddPCR instruments as we continue to work through the supply chain challenges. I will highlight that ddPCR consumables continue to post strong double-digit growth. During the third quarter, we launched the QX600 ddPCR system as previously communicated. While not material to the third quarter results, the initial market reception for the QX600 has been encouraging, and we are seeing a strong order pipeline building. Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, continues to experience solid year-over-year growth, and we continue to expect strong double-digit growth for the franchise for the full year of 2022. Excluding Process Media sales and last year's 10x settlement, the underlying Life Science business declined 4.2% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q3 of 2021 due to lower COVID-related sales. When also excluding COVID-related sales, revenue growth was 9.6% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in Europe and Asia and was relatively flat in the Americas. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the third quarter were $361.9 million compared to $372.2 million in Q3 of 2021, which is a 2.8% decline on a reported basis and growth of 3% on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year growth, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 3.7% on a currency-neutral basis despite headwinds from sporadic lockdowns in China. The Diagnostics Group currency-neutral year-over-year increase was primarily driven by quality control, blood typing and infectious disease products. And as I mentioned earlier, supply chain constraints had an impact on instrument placements. Despite the supply chain constraints impacting the instrument placements, we experienced increased consumables volume for diagnostics driven by strong recovery in routine testing markets. As such, we believe that we are positioned to benefit from the strong underlying market dynamics in the coming quarters. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue grew in the Americas and Asia and declined in Europe. The reported gross margin for the third quarter of 2022 was 54.9% on a GAAP basis and compares to 58.6% in Q3 of 2021. Recall that in the third quarter of 2021 included $32 million from a legal settlement that benefited gross margin in the year ago period. The year-over-year gross margin decline was also impacted by significantly higher logistics and material costs, lower COVID sales as well as overall product mix. These headwinds were partially offset by a positive currency impact * due to the strong dollar and continued operational efficiencies achieved through the restructuring efforts. While we have implemented price increases to address inflationary costs, the realized price capture has only been a partial offset due to our instrument backlog situation. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.4 million as compared to $4.7 million in Q3 of 2021. SG&A expenses for Q3 of 2022 were $211 million, or 31% of sales compared to $216.2 million or 28.9% in Q3 of 2021. The year-over-year SG&A expenses decreased mainly due to the stronger dollar and normalized employee-related benefits but was partially offset by higher discretionary spend. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.4 million in Q3 of 2021. Research and Development expense in the third quarter was $69.9 million or 10.3% of sales compared to $64.5 million or 8.6% of sales in Q3 of 2021. The year-over-year R&D expenses increased mainly due to project spend. Q3 operating income was $92.8 million or 13.6% of sales compared to $156.8 million or 21% in Q3 of 2021. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares, negatively impacted the reported results by $289 million. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $13 million compared to net other expense of $3.2 million last year. Q3 of 2022 included about $8 million of interest and foreign currency expense and $5 million of expense related to an investment impairment. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2022 was 21.5% compared to 21.8% for the same period in 2021. The effective tax rate reported in Q3 of 2022 was primarily affected by the unrealized loss in equity securities and the tax rate reported in Q3 of 2021 was primarily affected by an unrealized gain in equity securities. Reported net loss for the third quarter was $164.2 million and the diluted loss per share was $5.52 compared to $3,928 billion of net income and $129.96 per share in Q3 of 2021. This decrease from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis. We have excluded certain artypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.4 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $1.3 million of restructuring costs. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the third quarter of 2022 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 55.7% versus 57.9% in Q3 of 2021. Non-GAAP SG&A in the third quarter of 2022 was 30% versus 29.6% in Q3 of 2021. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded restructuring expense of $2.8 million and in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $2.2 million, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million and a small legal related benefit. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the third quarter of 2022 was 10.2% versus 9% in Q3 of 2021. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $500,000 of restructuring costs. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 13.6% on a GAAP basis to 15.5% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 19.4% in Q3 of 2021. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decreasing value of Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $289 million and a $6.6 million loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2022 was 21.6% compared to 18% for the same period in 2021. The higher rate in 2022 was driven by geographical mix of earnings as well as a decrease in compensation-related tax deductions. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the third quarter of 2022 was $77.9 million or $2.60 diluted earnings per share compared to $112.2 million and $3.71 per share in Q3 of 2021. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q3 were $1.856 billion compared to $1.973 billion at the end of Q2 of 2022. Inventory at the end of Q3 reached $685.9 million from $657.1 million in the prior quarter. The increase was the result of the ongoing supply chain constraints. For the third quarter of 2022, net cash generated from operating activities was $7.5 million, which compares to $230.4 million in Q3 of 2021. These lower quarterly operating cash flow mainly reflects the changes in the operating results and in working capital. During the third quarter, we completed the acquisition of Curiosity Diagnostics for a total consideration of up to $170 million, consisting of approximately $100 million in cash and up to $70 million in future milestones. During the third quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2022 was $132.3 million or 19.4% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q3 of 2021 was $165.1 million or 23.1% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the third quarter of 2022 were $24.1 million, and depreciation and amortization was $32.7 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. Taking into account the strong customer demand, we maintain the full year currency-neutral revenue growth outlook to be at the high end of our guidance range of 1% to 2%. Based on the stronger-than-anticipated COVID sales contribution year-to-date, we now assume full year COVID-related sales of about $105 million. Core revenue growth, which excludes COVID-related sales and the prior year legal settlement for bank royalties is now expected to be about 8%. We anticipate full year core growth for the Life Science group to be about 15% and the Diagnostics group to be approximately 3%. As a result of the ongoing supply chain constraints, we now anticipate a full year gross margin projection to be about 57% versus our prior guidance of 57.5%. Operating income margin guidance remains at about 19% as we manage our operating expense plan for the remainder of this year. We now project an adjusted EBITDA at the low end of our prior guidance range of 24% and 24.3%. We continue to execute on our overall capital allocation model, which includes acquisitions such as Curiosity, and we will continue to be opportunistic with share buybacks. I'll now turn over the call to Norman to make a few comments regarding our capital allocation strategy. Norman?
Norman Schwartz:
Thanks, Ilan. I thought it would be useful to take a few minutes to address the recent rumors of a potential transaction with one of our peers. So while I'm not going to comment on the speculation. I do think it would be helpful to reinforce our thinking around capital deployment in general. Our primary focus, as we stated a number of times, is investing in the organic growth strategy, most recently communicated at our Investor Day in the first quarter of this year. In this regard, we have solid R&D investment levels in the 9% to 10% range. And we are also investing to improve our channel reach and capabilities to allow us to grow in our key targeted markets. Additionally, we have multiple initiatives in process focused on building our systems and operational capabilities to support this growth. The next area of investment for us is, of course, inorganic opportunities, acquiring new products or technologies to further our strategy and at the end of the day, make us more valuable to our customers. Over the last several years, these have been smaller or medium-sized acquisitions, which over time have contributed to about 1/3 of our growth, if you look back. In all cases, we've given careful consideration to the strategic, financial and operational fit. It's clear that we've made a lot of operational progress in recent years. And we now feel we could acquire and absorb a larger and more transformational opportunity, if it met our strategic and financial metrics. And the third capital deployment avenue for us is buying back our own shares. Even though we did not buy anything back in this last quarter, we have been active here over the last few years. And today, we have about $300 million authorized by the board for this purpose. I think the point is that we see all 3 of these as important elements of an overall capital allocation strategy. So that really concludes our prepared remarks today, and we'll now open up the line to take your questions. Daniel?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Patrick Donnelly of Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Norman, maybe I can just follow up on the capital allocation commentary there, helpful perspective. I appreciate that. Maybe just given kind of that three-pronged approach, we can dive in a little bit in terms of the larger deals, I guess, you've always kind of framed those as opportunistic, few and far between I guess, how do you see the pipeline currently? And then would you -- how do you think about the Sartorius stake in terms of using that for a deal versus the strategic value of it holding it as we kind of look at the landscape here?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. So I don't think the landscape has changed markedly in the last several months, it's still about the same. As we've always said, they're few and far between. And -- but we do consider -- we do continue to look at what might be possible. Certainly, when we think of all of that, we still see Sartorius as very strategic -- and as you know, there's still 5 or 6 years left on the trust. So we've got a little bit of time to wait on that.
Patrick Donnelly:
And I guess when you think about a deal in terms of -- if you didn't use Sartorius, you went after a large acquisition. I know you said in the past, you would be willing to use some equity, I guess, here kind of below $400. Is there more of a kind of lack of interest in kind of issuing a lot of equity with shares at this valuation? How do you think about that piece?
Norman Schwartz:
Well, I think it certainly depends on what the opportunity is, and I think we have to look at it holistically. We've got obviously, three elements that we can think about. We've got cash on the balance sheet. We've got debt capacity. And then I would say we are comfortable with some economic dilution using equity. But obviously, we're going to be careful and prudent with all of that.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That's helpful. So moving on from the capital allocation side. Ilan, maybe on the kind of near term here, just looking at the gross margin piece, can you just talk about, I guess, the headwinds you saw there? It seems like logistics, some raw materials. Can you just talk about, I guess, the visibility into the improvement there for, obviously, you adjusted the guidance a little bit. But just maybe the moving pieces there and how we should think about that as we get into 4Q and then even into '23.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate the question. Yes, so when we look at the third quarter, definitely logistics was a headwind and with our normalized kind of level of spend, but it was kind of interrelated somewhat also to the supply chain constraints. So there were still constraints in terms of specifically electronic components, as Andy mentioned in the prepared remarks. And there was also some mix within kind of the revenue itself. On a positive note, our manufacturing cost in terms of the FX was a little bit of a tailwind in terms of the overall cost there. As Andy mentioned earlier, we see an improvement, and we -- our guidance also bakes in a nice improvement in terms of the overall supply chain. And we do see an increased volume that is being manufactured constantly and incrementally. So that also will benefit the logistics cost overall. And we are very encouraged because the overall order backlog is still nice, although it's going down, but customers are still holding up. Logistics cost part of it, for example, was expedited shipments because customers do come first for us. So obviously, when it comes to the fourth quarter, we can see that the order backlog is still a nice size, although it's going down with the higher volume that we are able to manufacture.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That's helpful. And then just one last one just on the 4Q guide. Even with you guys kind of bring in the noncore -- or sorry, non-COVID down slightly, it's still implying a pretty healthy uptick there in 4Q, I think, into the teens even in terms of that growth. So is that just all the supply chain easing and kind of working through that backlog. Can you just frame, I guess, the visibility into the supply chain easing? Is it something you're already seeing? And then how much of that backlog can you kind of work down, convert in 4Q to kind of hit some of those numbers?
Andrew Last:
Yes. Patrick, it's Andy. So yes, I think we mentioned in the script that we're already seeing it easing. We were more constrained at the beginning of the quarter than as we came out of the quarter and now entering into Q4, we see our production improving. So I think that's our expectation right now is we will meaningfully work down a significant piece of our backlog as we get to the end of the year. We still expect to have some backlog as we move into the first quarter of next year. But -- we do expect improvement, and we do have the visibility on the production at this point in time.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly -- my apologies. But the next question comes from Brandon Couillard of Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe a question for Simon. You did mention ddPCR is one of the standout growth drivers-- in the press release. Curious if you see any deceleration of growth in that category? Was there perhaps some customers waiting for the QX600 launch? And if you can just talk about the types of customers or markets that, that platform will open up would be helpful.
Simon May:
Yes. Thanks for the question, Brandon. We definitely had a few customers, I'd say, waiting for the launch of QX600. I'd say the quarter overall was a bit of a mixed bag for the franchise. We've heard already on the call that the supply chain challenges was a headwind in the third quarter and particularly with instrument platforms. And I think in ddPCR, we felt that a little more prominently than some of the other product lines. At the same time, as we've heard already, demand remains strong across multiple application segments, and we're very happy with the launch of the QX600 and the initial pipeline that we're building and seeing for that. So, I think in the quarter as a whole, the puts and saves kind of net out across multiple market segments. And as we enter Q4, we're sensitively confident of a rebound.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. And then maybe one for Ilan. In terms of -- just back on the gross margins in the third quarter, any way to quantify the logistics and freight and other items in terms of the year-over-year impact on gross margins in the quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Logistics was by far the highest kind of headwind. And the offset was somewhat the foreign exchange benefit throughout the global manufacturing footprint costs. And mix was probably the third kind of thing. But in terms of order of logistics was first.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. And you could share with what that pricing realization was in the third quarter, and you mentioned some of that has been the capture is not quite what you put through in terms of the list price increases. Should we expect that to step up materially in the fourth quarter into the magnitude?
Andrew Last:
Yes, this is Andy. So we have a modest price realization through year-to-date, but clearly not sufficient to overcome all of the inflationary costs here especially since we have quite a backlog and below that backlog is being carried for a while now. So kind of pre price increases. And so as our backlog unwinds, we do expect to capture more of what we've put into our price increases. And so we're hopeful that Q4 will see some improvement as we roll in through the quarter.
Brandon Couillard:
Lastly, just on the Curiosity Diagnostics acquisition in the quarter. Is there any revenue associated with that business? If not, you can talk about commercial time lines and maybe just competitive differentiation of the multiplex platform versus others that are on the market?
Dara Wright:
Sure. Thanks, Brandon. This is Dara. So the platform is pre-commercial, so it's a technology acquisition. So there's still quite a bit of work to do to complete the assay development pipeline and clinical trials. It will be going into regulated markets. So we don't anticipate any contribute material contribution next year. I think it will be sort of beyond the 2023 time line as we roll through that development investment. So at a high level, it's a rapid multiples sample-to-answer PCR platform and we'll be targeting initially syndromic infectious disease applications. There are quite a number of features inherent in their approach that are differentiated versus other offerings. And we also think it will help us extend into additional market segments not currently served by the existing syndromic test platforms today. So look forward about -- looking forward to sharing more about that as time marches on in 2023.
Operator:
The next question comes from Dan Leonard of Credit Suisse.
Daniel Leonard:
I have a couple. The first one on the supply chain challenges. Are they influencing at all your win rate in Digital PCR or any other market categories, but do you feel like you're still winning your entitlement and just absorbing the products in backlog?
Andrew Last:
I think we would say that we're mostly absorbing this in backlog, it's hard to claim that there's not a few months here and there. I think there are, inevitably, especially on the more commoditized product areas. But the size of our backlog has built through the year, and now we're working it down. So we've been very supported by basically customer loyalty to our product offerings. And so that's contributes a little bit to our elevated logistics costs in Q3 as we were really expediting shipments to them so a lot more in Q3 if this product did come off the production line. So yes, that's essentially, I think, how we see it right now.
Daniel Leonard:
Understood. And then just a couple of follow-up on capital deployment. Ilan, does that uncertainty that Bio-Rad might be deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act I guess 2 questions. Has that been resolved? And then secondly, if it hasn't, does that have any impact on your ability to finance an acquisition?
Ilan Daskal:
Thanks for the question. So we have never perceived ourselves as an investment company. So -- and this is still the case. And this is not any showstopper for any potential acquisition or any target or any aspect of the capital allocation, whether it's our debt or issuance of capital or equity that is blocking us from pursuing any opportunity.
Daniel Leonard:
And possibly, you can comment on why you didn't repurchase any shares in the quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
We are trying to be as much as we can opportunistic coupled with the overall capital allocation thinking. And as you can see, the market is not growing maybe in the right direction, but definitely, we have still about $300 million debt on the plan and we'll continue to pursue the same kind of approach. And historically, if you recall, we had similar situations that market was down, and we were not in the market. And usually, when we step in, we step in with large larger chunks and in specific quarters. So -- we will just continue to pursue the same opportunistic approach that we adopted in the past.
Operator:
The next question comes from Jack Meehan of Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
Wanted to start on capital allocation. Norman, just given the talk of a large deal, one of the top questions I've gotten from investors is succession planning at Bio-Rad. I personally really enjoy working with you. So I hope it's not soon, but is there any color you can just share with the investment community on long-term leadership plan for Bio-Rad? And if you were to do a deal that led to a much larger organization? Just how would you structure a leadership team to manage that?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Well, okay. So first, I think I've still got a few more years in me. So that's the #1. We do work on succession planning internally and have, I think, some good ideas around that. I think that in terms of structuring something, I think it really depends largely on what it is. And we have to kind of evaluate how it fits, how it needs to be managed over the last several years. Of course, we've evolved into this kind of more what would I call it, a more functional organization. And that's allowed us to do a number of things and make a lot of progress. And again, I think it's time and situation dependent. Would we stay with that organization? Would we move to another kind of organization? Again, I think it's really all facts and circumstances.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then on the business, Ilan or Andy, can you talk about like when you look at the backlog, just median time to deliver versus a normal period? Or is there a way to quantify how much larger sales would have been in the quarter if the supply chain issues didn't persist. I just look at the inventory, and we're talking about tens of millions of dollars bill,just any level of context would be helpful.
Andrew Last:
Yes, it's a tough one to answer. It's predominantly interim platforms, as we've indicated, electronic components and in some cases, an average is really meaningless in this regard because there's a very broad range of time associated with some of those backlogs and for particular customers. So it can be 6 weeks, it can be a few -- several months. And as the years progress that, that has built and we've built inventory, as you can see, reflective of our demand waiting on those final components, which procurement is spending a lot of time on chasing. And I don't think it's probably appropriate to put forth what Q3 might have been because that's probably not the right kind of metric to be focused on because we're rolling into Q4 at this point in time.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. And Jack, what I can say, I can confirm that it was definitely much higher than the order backlog that rolled over from last year to this year, so at the end of last year. Another indication that you can look at is the higher inventory level that's now we carry in the balance sheet. And the incremental, a lot of it is in raw materials. So when it translates into revenue, so you get kind of an order of magnitude there of the kind of the opportunity, you can call it.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then just the last one. Ilan, you mentioned the Russia business. I forgot if it was your Andy. Can you just remind us the size of the business for Bio-Rad and how that's performed this year? Is there a risk that you might be borrowed from selling to the country? Just how do you manage that?
Andrew Last:
Yes. I mean we have a team focused on deciphering and executing against this myriad of sanctions that come at us. More of the business in Russia for us is Clinical and Life Science. It's between 1% to 2% of sales. It fluctuates a bit on a typical year, and it is down a bit this year, as you might expect, more so on the Life Science side than on the Clinical side. And we literally have a team that's focused on just interpreting every single sanction and whether it impacts us or not and can we load this truck as expected or not. And it's not getting better, and it's difficult to know what it really will look like by the end of this year and moving into next year.
Operator:
There are currently no additional questions registered at this time. [Operator Instructions]. We have a follow-up question from Brandon Couillard of Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Ilan, since you quantified the interest income in the third quarter and then as we look at kind of $2 billion of cash on the balance sheet and move up in rates, you just talk about your cash, your capital allocation? And what would be a reasonable interest income rate to assume on that cash position out into next year?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Brandon. Obviously, when we raised the last the bond with probably a great timing. Today, the [indiscernible] treasury is above the coupon that we pay. It takes time to catch up. Specifically, if you think about the bonds, it was about $11 million of an expense for the quarter, and this specific quarter was about $8 million of interest income, but it continues to catch up as we will continue to roll the investments. So it should get within the next 1 to 2 quarters, assuming that these interest rates will continue to be out there, at least into kind of parity between the 2 could also be kind of moving into a gain there.
Operator:
We have another follow-up question from Jack Meehan of Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
So a couple of more business questions. Process media, I'm not sure if I missed in the script, but just can you give a magnitude of the growth in the quarter and on top of discussion this earnings season has been stocking dynamics with customers. Just are you seeing any of that? Just any color on inventory trends of customers would be helpful.
Simon May:
Yes. This is Simon. We saw high single-digit growth in process chromatography in the quarter, and we've been very conscious of the commentary elsewhere on stocking patterns. In our franchise, we haven't really been subject to supply chain challenges, and we've been able to assure our customers that will be delivering in a promised fashion. So we really haven't seen any noticeable change in ordering pattern or stocking from our customers, but we continue to watch it very closely, of course.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then on the diagnostics side, the 2 businesses that weren't called out, diabetes and autoimmune. Can you just talk about how they performed in the quarter if they declined, like what might have been contributing to that?
Dara Wright:
Yes. The main sort of headwinds there were just supply chain-related instrument placements. Those are both closed systems, consumables across the board continue to post good growth. It was really our impact of inability to fulfill instruments.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then last one is on the China region in Diagnostics. I know it sounds like in the past, you've managed through the lockdown recently, but just talk about how the region performed any impact.
Dara Wright:
Sure. Very similar to sort of the conversation that we had last quarter in that there are 2 dynamics. The most material one is the larger supply constraint dynamic given the inability to fulfill instrumentation into China. And then the second was the periodic lockdowns, which have an impact on routine testing as well as an impact on logistics flow, just getting materials into the region. At a high level, though, demand remains strong. And if we look at sort of the core clinical testing growth, it is demand is very much in line with pre-pandemic levels. The challenges really are these sort of circuit breaker events that just make the flow less than smooth over the last few quarters as well as the supply constrained headwinds that we're working through.
Operator:
There are currently no additional questions registered at this time. So I'll pass the conference back over to the management team for closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Yes. Thank you for joining today's call. We will be participating at the upcoming Crédit Suisse 31st Annual Healthcare Conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, in November, and hope to see some of you there. And as always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon.
Operator:
That concludes the conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's Bio-Rad Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. My name is Hannah and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to pass the conference over to our host Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, operator. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us. Today we will review the second quarter 2022 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements in our management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed second quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations. Andy?
Andy Last:
All right. Many thanks, Ilan. Good afternoon, everybody. So the second quarter of the year continued with a similar profile to the first quarter. Overall demand for both Life Science and Clinical Diagnostics continued to be strong and localized surges of COVID continued. China in particular drove higher-than-expected PCR instrument demand. However, the stringent lockdown policies in China and the extended nature of the lockdown did have a negative impact on local sales on both sides of the business during the quarter. With the relaxation of the lockdown, we are now seeing improved conditions for the second half of the year. The lockdown also had some further negative effect on the ongoing supply chain challenges we have all been experiencing. Our organization and operations continued to work efficiently during the second quarter. And despite sporadic localized upticks in COVID, our offices have remained open. The expected level of improvement in supply chain constraints in Q2 did not fully materialize and the quarter was again challenging for supply of instruments against the backdrop of strong demand. As a result, our order backlog continued to build along with our inventory levels of raw materials and work-in-progress instruments. With that said, we have found our orders to be sticky and our customers are being patient. During the quarter, we also experienced a continuation of elevated logistics and raw material costs. Overall, we are putting significant effort into procuring required materials and remain optimistic around improvement in supply chain constraints towards the back half of this year. With the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine and imposition of further sanctions on Russia, we did experience a modest decline in our Life Science business sales to Russia during the quarter, while sales of our Clinical Diagnostics products were largely unaffected. And we expect this dynamic to continue through at least the remainder of the year. As a final comment, despite the challenges of COVID its impact in China in particular and the Russian war on Ukraine, our organization has continued to excel in managing the supply chain challenges and supporting the needs of our customers. And we're very encouraged by the strong and consistent improvement in demand across our Life Science and Clinical Diagnostics businesses. So with that, I'll say thank you and pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal :
Thank you Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the second quarter. Net sales for the second quarter of 2022 were $691.1 million, which is a 3.5% decline on a reported basis versus $715.9 million in Q2 of 2021. The second quarter decline in revenue was mainly a result of lower COVID-related sales this year. On a currency-neutral basis sales increased 0.5%. We estimate that COVID-related sales were about $33 million in the quarter and continued to reflect an elevated level in demand particularly in Asia as a result of the ongoing outbreaks in China. Looking ahead, we continue to anticipate a significant tapering compared to the last two years and expect about $15 million of COVID-related sales in the back half of this year. Core year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 5.7% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe. Core revenue in Asia declined, which reflects the extended lockdowns in China that negatively impacted our diagnostics business during the quarter. As Andy mentioned earlier, we continue to carry an elevated order backlog as a result of supply chain constraints and continued strong customer demand. We expect improvement relative to the first half of the year, although, we anticipate back orders to continue through the remainder of 2022. Sales of the Life Science Group in the second quarter of 2022 were $322.4 million, compared to $334.2 million in Q2 of 2021, which is a 3.5% decline on a reported basis and a 0.5% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Despite supply chain constraints having an impact on instrument placements the underlying Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth, which excludes COVID-related sales was 10.6%. The year-over-year growth was driven by process media, western blotting, Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR products. Process media which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis saw strong year-over-year double-digit growth versus the same quarter last year. We are pleased with the continued momentum from our process media business and believe that the recently introduced pre-packed CHT columns should enhance our position in this segment. Excluding process media sales, the underlying Life Science business declined 4.5% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q2 of 2021 due to lower COVID-related sales. When also excluding COVID-related sales, revenue growth was 6% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth across all three regions. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the second quarter were $367.8 million, compared to $380.2 million in Q2 of 2021, which is a 3.3% decline on a reported basis and growth of 0.7% on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year revenue growth, which excludes COVID-related sales increased 2.1% on a currency-neutral basis. The diagnostics group currency-neutral year-over-year sales increase was driven by blood-typing, quality control and clinical immunology. And as I mentioned earlier, supply chain constraints had an impact on instrument placements. We have seen both recovery and increasing global demand for blood typing products, as elective surgeries resume to pre-pandemic levels and hospitals seek to expand capacity. Specifically, we are benefiting from new account expansion in the Middle East and Africa from meaningful new tender wins. On a geographic basis, the diagnostics group year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue grew in the Americas and Europe and declined in Asia. The reported gross margin for the second quarter of 2022 was 57.3% on a GAAP basis, and compares to 56.1% in Q2 of 2021. The year-over-year gross margin improvement benefited from the stronger US dollar, product mix and continued operational efficiencies, which was partially offset by elevated logistics costs. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.5 million, as compared to $4.6 million in Q2 of 2021. SG&A expenses for Q2 of 2022 were $208.7 million, or 30.2% of sales compared to $213.4 million, or 29.8% in Q2 of 2021. The year-over-year SG&A expenses decreased, mainly due to the stronger dollar and normalized employee-related expenses, but was partially offset by higher discretionary spend. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.4 million in Q2 of 2021. Research and development expense in Q2 was $67 million, or 9.7% of sales compared to $63.4 million or 8.9% of sales in Q2 of 2021. The year-over-year, R&D expenses increased mainly due to project expense. Q2 operating income was $120.2 million, or 17.4% of sales compared to $124.8 million or 17.4% in Q2 of 2021. Looking below the operating line the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares negatively impacted the reported results by $1.338 billion. During the quarter interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $4.9 million compared to net other income of $1.3 million last year. Q2 2022 included $10.7 million of interest expense related to the $1.2 billion senior notes issued earlier this year, partially offset by $5 million of interest income as well as an escrow release of $1.4 million, related to the sale of the informatics business back in 2020. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2022 was 24.2% compared to 21% for the same period in 2021. The effective tax rate reported in Q2 of 2022 was primarily affected by the unrealized loss in equity securities and the tax rate reported in Q2 of 2021, was primarily affected by an unrealized gain in equity securities. Reported net loss for the second quarter was $927.2 million and the diluted loss per share was $31.12 compared to $914.1 million of net income or $30.32 per share in Q2 of 2021. This decrease from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles. This exclusion moved the gross margin for the second quarter of 2022 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 57.9% versus 56.9% in Q2 of 2021. Non-GAAP SG&A in the second quarter of 2022 was 29.4% versus 29.2% in Q2 of 2021. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $2.5 million, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million, legal-related expenses of $900,000 and a small restructuring-related expense. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the second quarter of 2022 was 9.7% versus 9.1% in Q2 of 2021. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a small restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 17.4% on a GAAP basis to 18.8% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 18.5% in Q2 of 2021. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $1.338 billion, a $1.6 million loss associated with venture investments and $1.4 million gain from the escrow release related to the 2020 informatics business sale. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2022 was 19% compared to 21.5% for the same period in 2021. The lower rate in 2022 was driven by the geographical mix of earnings, as well as benefit associated with preferential tax rates related to export sales. And finally non-GAAP net income for the second quarter of 2022 was $101.4 million or $3.38 diluted earnings per share, compared to $106.6 million or $3.64 per share in Q2 of 2021. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q2 were $1.973 billion compared to $2.079 billion at the end of Q1 of 2022. Inventory at the end of Q2 reached $657.1 million from $605.5 million in the prior quarter. The increase was the result of the ongoing supply chain constraints. For the second quarter of 2022, net cash generated from operating activities was $50.2 million, which compares to $154.6 million in Q2 of 2021. The lower quarterly operating cash flow, mainly reflects changes in working capital. During the second quarter, we purchased 255,000 shares of our stock for a total cost of $125 million. Last week, the Board authorized an additional $200 million for share repurchase on top of our existing program. In other ways, we now have approximately $298 million available for potential buybacks. The adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2022 was 22.6% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q2 of 2021 was 22.3%. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2022 were $14.2 million and depreciation and amortization for the second quarter was $32.6 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. Based on the stronger-than-anticipated COVID sales contribution in the first half of this year, we now assume full year COVID-related sales of about $93 million of which approximately $15 million are projected for the second half of 2022. We now anticipate full year currency neutral revenue growth to be at the high end of our guidance of 1% to 2%. Core revenue growth, which excludes COVID-related sale is now expected to be at the lower end of our prior guidance range of 8.5% to 9.5% on a currency neutral basis as we continue to balance between the ongoing strong customer demand and supply chain constraints. We achieved 6% currency neutral revenue growth in the first half of the year and expect it to approach 11% for the second half of this year versus the second half of 2021. This represents about 9% growth in the second half of 2022 over the first half of 2022. We are maintaining the full year gross margin projection to be approximately 57.5%, operating income margin at about 19% and adjusted EBITDA to be between 24% and 24.3%. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
Certainly. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please proceed.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi, guys. This is Matt [ph] on for Brandon. Thanks for taking my questions. Ilan appreciate all the color on the updated guidance. Could you just break out what you're expecting now for the full year between the two segments on a core growth basis excluding COVID? And then in terms of the step-up you've talked about in the back half of kind of plus 11% from the plus 6% in the first half, can you just talk about level of visibility and confidence you guys have in that acceleration in the back half of the year here?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. So I'll start with the first part. We generally maintain the overall guidance for both of the business groups similar to what we provided earlier in the year. Specifically in the second quarter, we saw some softness in the diagnostics business specifically in China. But again generally we are maintaining the guidance for each of the business groups for the full year. I don't know Andy if you want to add…
Andy Last:
No I think that's right. I've got nothing to add now at this time.
Unidentified Analyst:
Okay. And then maybe Andy sticking with you on the supply chain. You talked about kind of continuing some level of the challenges in the back half of the year. Can you just talk about on a relative basis do you expect it to ease versus what we saw here in the first half, the level you expect it to get better in the back half and some maybe initiatives you guys are taking to handle that maybe worse for a longer type scenario?
Andy Last:
Sure. No absolutely. We do expect it to ease in the second half relative to the first half, which has been challenging obviously. You did note that we mentioned we increased inventory during Q2, a lot of work in progress just sitting waiting on some instruments; sitting waiting on a small handful of components. So when they come in we're staged to improve our sales pacing in the second half. We don't anticipate supply constraints going away completely by the end of the year but we certainly do expect them to ease as we move forward. And in terms of actions we're taking, I mean, we continue to put a lot of emphasis internally on the procurement side of the organization and being flexible on manufacturing lines as components become available and we expect to continue to do that through the second half.
Unidentified Analyst:
Great. And then last one more of a housekeeping one for you Ilan. On the tax rate it's come in below 20% here two quarters in a row. I think the initial guide was in the 22% to 23% range for the year. Is that still the right range, or any updated thinking on what we should pencil in for the tax rate for the year now? Thanks.
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. It's still generally speaking the right range. Obviously on a quarterly basis, the geographical mix of earnings does weigh in. We did get. And we'll continue probably later in the year get some benefit from the export sales which does benefit a little bit the rates. But overall, yes, we are maintaining it.
Unidentified Analyst:
Super, thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Please proceed.
Patrick Donnelly:
Hi guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Ilan, maybe one on the Life Science business, you talked about kind of the backlog continuing to build order growth healthy supply chain seems to be holding you back a little bit there. Can you just talk about I guess the demand environment, maybe if you're willing to quantify the backlog relative to what it was at the start of the year what the order growth is? Maybe some metrics just to help us kind of think about what you guys are seeing and what you could deliver I guess in a normalized supply chain environment because again putting up good numbers. It feels like it could be better if the supply chain was normal. So I'm just trying to flesh that out a little bit.
Simon May:
Hi. Patrick, its Simon here, I'll take that one. In terms of the backlog we're not going to hang numbers on that. I think we provided some commentary earlier in the conversation here. I'd say that demand across the board in Life Science continues to be healthy as we're seeing recovery in the core markets. And we've got a couple of business areas that we've called out as growth pillars previously where we continue to see really strong demand. And I think in consumables and assays, we've seen really robust demand in a couple of areas of business. And that's been moderated to some degree by the supply chain challenges that we've already spoken about here. I think as we enter the second half of the year, I'd echo Andy's comments on, how we're thinking about improvement in supply chain. But the underlying demand remains strong. And we've got a healthy backlog.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then, Andy on the supply chain side, I know last time we chatted you kind of mentioned that you had a lot of work-in-progress inventory with waiting on one or two inputs chip here or there. Is that still the case? Is it kind of just waiting on some of those things to ease? And again, maybe just visibility and what that inventory looks like now relative to kind of what you saw last quarter where right now it's building up a little bit on you guys with things almost finished and just waiting on one or two things?
Andy Last:
Yeah. I mean, I think that the profile is the same. A lot of work in progress waiting on sometimes just one component, our inventory levels increased about $50 million quarter-over-quarter so Q2 over Q1 and we had a lift in Q1 too versus Q4. So you can see that we're really staged as we get relief by procuring the right component to ship. So our shipping profiles during the quarters are quite different as well as you might expect. I think that will just continue, but with improvement in the second half versus the first half.
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah and Patrick maybe, I'll add to that also.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay.
Ilan Daskal:
Obviously, Andy mentioned earlier, that the order level is healthy and continues to grow. And the elevated inventory level actually will be fulfilled once we are able to procure a few more components. So generally, we are encouraged. We don't see any risk to that inventory. And actually we are really encouraged by the order backlog that we see out there.
Andy Last:
Yeah. And just to add on the order backlog and I'm sure it's kind of common across a number of players in the industry right now. It's very sticky. We feel really good about our customer relationships. We do not see a lot of attrition against our orders. So we've got pretty good sense about what's going on there.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. No that's good to know on the inventory side as well where these things are kind of ready to go the orders are there and just waiting on one or two things [indiscernible] you guys will be able to see a nice inflection there. And maybe last one Ilan just on the cost side. You guys obviously put in some pretty significant restructuring activities. It feels like they should start to take hold as we work our way through the back half of the year. Can you just kind of update us where you are on that transition, when we should see some of those cost benefits start to show up on the margin side? It feels like a nice lever for you guys to pull.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Yes, thanks Patrick for the question. So, first I'll start with the restructuring itself and the activities associated with the restructuring are all on track in terms of the activities both in Europe as well as in Asia. And we're starting to ramp some of that activity already in Asia. And in addition even if you look already in this quarter's results part of the gross margin, improvement year-over-year is associated with improved efficiency and productivity that we are seeing. Another piece there was obviously benefiting from foreign exchange ratio. And there were some elevated -- on the other hand elevated logistics cost. But definitely the efficiency and productivity did contribute to some of that benefit year-over-year on the gross margin. So again everything is in line and is baked into our full year guidance and no delays there.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great. Thank you guys.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our last question is from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please proceed.
Jack Meehan:
Thanks. Good afternoon. I wanted to continue on the supply chain theme. I guess my first question is back in the fourth quarter you talked about I think $30 million of sales that were impacted. I was just curious if you've caught up on any of that year-to-date? And is it possible to quantify what impact -- or what the sales would have been if you didn't have these shortages here in the second quarter?
Andy Last:
Yes we're not going as far as to actually put the numbers out there at this point I'm afraid Jack. But yes, you are right, we had a backlog at the end of Q4. We didn't anticipate we would recapture all of that backlog in the following quarter. But since then our backlog has increased reflecting the supply constraints. You could look at it as a healthy backlog and strong order pipeline is another way to consider it. But we're selling based on supply chain constraints right now.
Jack Meehan:
And the component shortages that you talk about, is it still predominantly semiconductor chips or has it broadened to anything else?
Andy Last:
No it's mostly electronic components. And it can be as simple as one chip here and there as you get some [indiscernible] a bearing or -- some unanticipated component. But it is mostly electronic components and chips are the biggest--
Jack Meehan:
And the product families that are impacted it's predominantly ddPCR, or what other products would that hurt?
Andy Last:
Yes all instruments. It's across our instrument lines whether they're clinical or life science. And we have a fairly broad portfolio of instrumentation as you know. So we see it across a large number of different product areas. And our ability to supply those just fluctuates based on getting that -- those components in.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Thanks for humoring those questions. I did have a couple of other ones. Just China is it possible that -- so that's the one region that declined this quarter. Just talk about the rate of the decline in the diagnostics business. Like what would the segment have done if not for the lockdowns?
Andy Last:
I think we have Dara on the line and I know she's probably got a few comments, she can make around that.
Dara Wright:
Sure. Yes, I don't think that we're going to sort of articulate what the growth kind of would have been if we hadn't had the lockdown, but it was a material impact. The lockdown was for most of the quarter and compounded by sort of logistics challenges and the China lockdown was a bit of a one-two punch. So, we're going to need to catch up from that in the back half of the year. I mean similar to the instrument supply constraints, demand is strong. It's just fulfillment challenges, frankly. I don't know Andy, if there's anything you want to add specifically about China, other than it was a real impact broadly in Q2.
Andy Last:
No, I think that profiles it well without getting into specific details on the numbers.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Last question, for me. Is there any color you can give on, pricing in the quarter or the year just how that's trending? Do you feel like -- have you been more active in trying to manage that in this inflationary environment?
Andy Last:
Yes, very good question. And yes, we have. We did roll out price increases averaging 4% to 5% mostly across the Life Science business in the first half. We've started to see some realization of those price increases now. It is largely offsetting the inflation, with the cost inflation we're experiencing on logistics and raw materials. We're assessing further price increases before the end of the year. We would like to try and take a bit more price in the second half, if we feel we can. And -- but overall, we are looking to offset the inflationary costs that are coming at us.
Jack Meehan:
Super. Thank you, guys
Andy Last:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. There are no additional questions running at this time. So I will turn the call over to Ed Chung, for closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, everyone for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks.
Operator:
That concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's Bio-Rad Laboratories Q1 2022 Financial Results Call. My name is Hannah and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to our host Ed Chung, Head of Investor Relations with Bio-Rad Laboratories. Please, go ahead.
Ed Chung:
Thanks, Hannah. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today we will review the first quarter 2022 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Chief Financial Officer, Ilan Daskal.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin the detailed first quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations. Andy?
Andy Last:
Many thanks, Ilan. So the first quarter of this year represented an interesting shift in the dynamics of our business. Overall, our markets have recovered to close to pre-pandemic levels of demand, as the macro incidence rates of COVID and COVID testing has declined. However, significant more localized surges, especially in China, drove higher-than-anticipated PCR instrument demand during the quarter. The surge in China and subsequent major city lockdowns in the country are of course now creating increased uncertainty around logistics and near-term demand, which if protracted could adversely impact Q2 sales. Overall, we still expect that our COVID-related sales will continue to ramp down quickly compared to the last two years. In addition, during Q1, the Russian invasion of Ukraine resulted in a position of significant sanctions and actions towards Russia. While these sanctions did not cause a material impact to Q1 revenues, we will closely monitor this dynamic situation going forward. Operationally, we have now opened up our offices for a broad return to the workplace and are seeing a positive uptick in business-related travel for customers and business meetings. To date, we have continued to maintain a very high internal safety rate for our employees. The overhang of the pandemic's effects on the supply chain, however, remains significant. And we experienced ongoing difficulty in securing raw materials, especially electronic components, as well as higher logistics costs. We do not see this easing until the second half of the year and continue to carry an order backlog, primarily on instruments as a result. In closing, while we continue to experience supply chain challenges, we are very pleased with our organization's ability to continually adjust to the changing demands of the COVID pandemic and other major macro factors impacting us. So at this point, I'll say thank you and pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the first quarter. Net sales for the first quarter of 2022 were $700.1 million, which is a 3.7% decline on a reported basis versus $726.8 million in Q1 of 2021. On a currency-neutral basis, sales decreased 0.8%. The first quarter decline in revenue was as result of lower COVID-related sales this year. We estimate that COVID-related sales were about $45 million in the quarter, which reflects an elevated level in demand. Looking ahead, we continue to anticipate a significant tapering in COVID-related sales compared to the last two years. Core year-over-year revenue growth, which excludes COVID related sales, increased 6.5% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth across all three regions while COVID-related year-over-year sales declined globally. We note that the key markets were nearly at full recovery prior to the lockdowns in China during the final days of March. As Andy mentioned earlier, we continue to carry an elevated order backlog as a result of supply chain constraints. Overall, we still anticipate supply chain constraints for the Life Science group to ease starting midyear and for the Diagnostics group to ease towards the end of this year. Sales of the Life Science group in the first quarter of 2022 were $347.2 million compared to $366.5 million in Q1 2021, which is a 5.3% decline on a reported basis and a 2.5% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the underlying Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 12.9%. The year-over-year growth was driven by Process Media and Droplet Digital PCR. Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, saw strong year-over-year double-digit growth versus the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales, the underlying Life Science business declined 9.6% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q1 of 2021 due to lower COVID-related sales. When also excluding COVID-related sales revenue growth was 6.2% on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and in Asia while Europe was about flat. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics group in the first quarter were $351.8 million compared to $358.5 million in Q1 of 2021, which is a 1.9% decline on a reported basis and a 1.1% growth on a currency-neutral basis. Core Clinical Diagnostics, year-over-year revenue growth, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 1.7% on a currency-neutral basis. The Diagnostics group currency-neutral year-over-year sales increase was driven by blood-typing and clinical immunology as well as the recovery of routine testing, which is now approaching pre-COVID levels. Supply chain constraints had an impact on instrument placements within the diabetes franchise. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group year-over-year currency-neutral sales grew in the Americas and Europe and declined in Asia. The reported gross margin for the first quarter of 2022 was 57.6% on a GAAP basis and compares to 55.1% in Q1 of 2021. The year-over-year gross margin improvement was mainly due to a decline in expenses associated with the European restructuring initiative in the same period last year, which was partially offset by increased logistics costs and less favorable product mix. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.5 million compared to $4.6 million in Q1 of 2021. SG&A expenses for Q1 of 2022 were $197.6 million or 28.2% of sales, compared to $225.9 million or 31.1% in Q1 of 2021. The year-over-year SG&A expenses decreased mainly due to higher expenses in the same period last year associated with the European restructuring initiative and was partially offset by higher employee related expenses. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.4 million in Q1 of 2021. Research and development expense in Q1 was $62.5 million or 8.9% of sales, compared to $73.9 million or 10.2% in Q1 of 2021. The year-over-year R&D expenses decreased due to higher expenses associated with the European restructuring initiative in the same period last year, partially offset by increased project spend and employee-related expenses. Q1 operating income was $143.4 million or 20.5% of sales, compared to $100.9 million or 13.9% in Q1 of 2021. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares, negatively impacted the reported results by $4.545 billion. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $30.7 million, compared to $16.9 million last year. Q1 of 2022 included $31.6 million of dividend income from Sartorius, compared to $19 million last year. Q1 of 2022 also included $4 million of interest expense related to the recently issued senior notes. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2022 was 22.9%, compared to 24.7% for the same period in 2021. The effective tax rate in Q1 of 2022 was primarily affected by the unrealized loss in equity securities and the tax rate reported in Q1 of 2021 was primarily driven by the unrealized gains in equity securities last year. Reported net loss for the first quarter was $3.3696 billion and the diluted loss per share was $112.57, compared to $977.4 million of net income and $32.38 per share in Q1 of 2021. This decrease from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring expense. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the first quarter of 2022 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 58.3% versus 59% in Q1 of 2021. Non-GAAP SG&A in the first quarter of 2022 was 27.4% versus 25.4% in Q1 of 2021. In SG&A on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $2.8 million, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million, legal related expenses of $1.2 million and a small restructuring related expense. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the first quarter of 2022 was 8.9% versus 7.9% in Q1 of 2021. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a small restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 20.5% on a GAAP basis to 22% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q1 of 2021 of 25.8%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $4.545 billion, and about a $1 million loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2022 was 19.6% compared to 23.6% for the same period last year. The lower rate in 2022 was driven by the geographical mix of earnings as well as benefit associated with preferential tax rate related to export sales. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2022 was $149.1 million or $4.94 diluted earnings per share compared to $157.4 million and $5.21 per share in Q1 of 2021. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 were $2.079 billion compared to $875 million at the end of 2021. The change in cash and short-term investments from the fourth quarter was primarily due to proceeds from the recent $1.2 billion senior notes offering. During the first quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock and we had a total of $223 million available for potential share buybacks. For the first quarter of 2022, net cash generated from operating activities was $46 million, which compares to $114 million in Q1 of 2021. The decrease in operating cash flows was driven mainly by the change in working capital. The adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2022 was $211.1 million or 30.2% of sales and excluding the Sartorius dividend was 25.6%. The adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2021 was $232 million or 31.9% of sales, and excluding the Sartorius dividend was 29.3%. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2022 were $28.9 million and depreciation and amortization for the first quarter was $32 million. Moving on to the guidance, we maintain our full year currency-neutral revenue growth guidance to be between 1% and 2% or 8.5% to 9.5%, when excluding COVID sales. Taking into account the current supply chain challenges we anticipate full year core growth for the Diagnostics group to be between 2% and 3% versus our prior guidance of 3% to 4%. For the Life Science group, we now expect 2022 core growth to be at the high end of our prior guidance between 16% and 18%. Given the higher Sartorius dividend declared in the first quarter, we are increasing our adjusted EBITDA guidance accordingly. We now project full year adjusted EBITDA to be between 24% and 24.3% versus our prior guidance of 23.5% and 23.8%. That concludes our prepared remarks and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
Certainly. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Please proceed.
Patrick Donnelly:
Hey guys. Thank you for taking the questions. Ilan maybe on the Life Science business, you have touched on it there at the end suggesting the year maybe comes in at the top end of that guide. And again the guide initially was certainly well above what we were expecting and a nice growth rate. Can you just talk about what you saw in the quarter there first of all to come in above expectations and then secondly, again, to give you the confidence to raise that? I know there's some supply chain things and things you guys are watching, but would love some color around the drivers of that business doing a little bit better.
Andrew Last:
So, Patrick I think -- this is Andy. I'll take that one. In Q1, we had good performance from digital PCR again and also process chrom was particularly strong in Q1. When we look through to the full year -- now we did have supply chain constraints in Q1. But when we look through to the full year we see good visibility to those constraints kind of easing off by the middle of the year for the Life Science business. And so that's the basis of the slight shift in guidance on the Life Science business.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then Ilan maybe on the margin side obviously kind of reiterating that kind of up margin guide there. Can you just talk about how the quarter tracked relative to your guys' expectations? Again visibility into kind of hitting that number. I know the restructuring should start to help at the end of the year, but maybe just talk about the different levers you guys have to pull and what you saw in the quarter on the margin front.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Patrick. Appreciate the question. I'll start maybe with the gross margin. There were several moving parts obviously starting the quarter. But as the quarter progressed, there were areas that we knew in advance for example the product mix with the COVID, kind of, subsiding which is a little bit of a headwind to margin. There were others that were some tailwind. Logistics is still a headwind. With elevated freight that's another component that was definitely out there. We saw some of the discretionary expenses that are starting to come back as well as service costs that we are -- kind of, within the customers' premises and servicing customers. And that's kind of -- when you think about it year-over-year, definitely, we see a difference there. And the last point that I'll call out here there was some headwind, specifically this quarter, which is associated with our ramp in our Singapore facility with some of the transitioning from our European kind of closure. And these are costs that we did expense and is part of the gross margin and so it's kind of a duplication of cost for this quarter that we saw.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, that's helpful. And then maybe on the product side, you guys gave a good amount of detail on ddPCR at the Analyst Day. Just wanted an update in terms of how that performed in the quarter, expectations for that for the remainder of the year. I don't know if maybe Simon is there to talk a little bit about what you saw in the quarter and again, kind of, how you're thinking about the year playing out?
Simon May:
Yes, I'd say overall we were pretty pleased with the performance in the quarter. Some of the supply chain challenges that we've experienced led through to a moderate degree, but demand for ddPCR products overall remains pretty strong and I'd say we've got a pretty bullish outlook on the full year.
Patrick Donnelly:
All right. And last one Ilan maybe for you just on the capital allocation side. You mentioned no shares repurchased in 1Q with the stock hovering at call it $500. You guys have been opportunistic in the past. What does the window look like here given the market volatility? Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thanks Patrick. Appreciate the question. There are a few aspects here. First, we obviously will continue to be opportunistic in the approach. And similar to the past, once we feel comfortable, we won't be shy to step in with larger amounts of the buyback. With that said, we continue to balance it with the other capital allocation kind of matrixes in terms of potential inorganic activities and we need to prioritize and to balance between all the other aspects. And that will continue to be kind of the driver for us in terms of determining the right timing to step in, in terms of the buyback.
Patrick Donnelly:
Understood. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you, Mr. Donnelly. The next question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please, proceed.
Brandon Couillard:
Hey. Thanks for the question. Ilan, in terms of the slightly lower diagnostics outlook for the year, is that all tied to the China lockdowns? And I think you mentioned anticipation of some impact in 2Q. Are you able to quantify that?
Dara Wright:
Yes, it's largely related to supply constraints, frankly. Largely, related to supply constraints and particularly, because we're in a highly regulated environment. It's not sort of as easy to source and replace components, particularly electronic components, which are plaguing the industry broadly. So, frankly, that's it. The demand is good. We're supporting our customers, but it does provide a bit of headwind for a bit longer throughout the year.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe just sticking with that. I think it might be helpful, if you're able to just quantify the percent of the China business that is diagnostics in general. If you're able to quantify the number.
Ilan Daskal:
So, generally speaking, Asia is just over 20% for us. Overall, China is a material portion of the overall kind of Asia revenue. We historically did not kind of split between the two groups, but that's kind of, if I had to quantify it on a high level, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Then maybe one for Simon, in Process Media. Do you think you're gaining share in that market? And are you having better success winning earlier-stage programs? And would you expect the Process Media strength to continue through the second half of the year? It feels like you might be lapping some pretty tough comps ahead.
Simon May:
Yes. I think, overall, we're pretty pleased with the growth rate that we saw in Q1 for sure. And as we think about the portfolio strength there, our play -- our technology play is pretty esoteric and it hit some sweet spots in therapeutic modality areas that are growing and I still think were relatively underpenetrated. It will continue to remain a little bit lumpy from quarter-to-quarter, but I think we see the momentum continuing.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then, lastly for Ilan. SG&A, non-GAAP number was down like $30 million sequentially. Can you just elaborate on the bridge there? And how should we think about the OpEx phasing, as we move through the balance of the year?
Ilan Daskal:
So it was on a GAAP that it was down. It was mainly the restructuring last year. On a non-GAAP, actually, it was slightly up from $184 million to $192 million. And so, these are employee-related and some insurance payment that we received last year. So these were many pretty minor changes. But, overall, the GAAP that you're alluding to is more on a GAAP basis, not on a non-GAAP basis.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Maybe I’ll check my amount. All right. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you, Mr. Couillard. The next question is from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please proceed.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. Ilan, to start, I was wondering if you could give some color around what your expectations are for core growth by segment in the second quarter.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So, Jack, thanks for the question. We are guiding on a full year basis and that's where probably we'll remain kind of in terms of the overall guidance. What I can say as we mentioned during the call the supply chain constraints, we expect them to ease by midyear for Life Science. And that's part of the reason that we felt comfortable to up the midpoint of the guidance for Life Science to the higher end of the range of between 16% and 18%. For Diagnostics it will take probably through the end of the year and that's the reason that we a little bit lowered the guidance range over there.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then on the COVID front has your target for the full year changed at all? And within China, you talked about some additional instrument demand. Are you exposed on the consumables side to any of the mass testing which is going on?
Andy Last:
This is Andy. Just to clarify the last piece of your question you're referring to COVID testing in China on the consumables side.
Jack Meehan:
Correct. Yes.
Andy Last:
Yes. No not – so to answer the last bit first no not particularly. Our footprint has really been on the instrumentation pretty much through the entire pandemic. And so could you repeat the first part of the question as well?
Jack Meehan:
Sure. Yes. Just the target for the full year has that changed at all related to the COVID contribution?
Andy Last:
No we're not currently adjusting our full year COVID guidance number right at this point in time.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Jack I mean we originally thought about most of the amount to be more on the first half of the year. We currently don't have a better visibility that we feel comfortable to change that number.
Jack Meehan:
Right. Okay. And then you mentioned the return to work and increase in sort of travel cost. Is it possible to quantify just what sort of step-up you expect for the remaining of the year related to some of the discretionary costs coming back into the business?
Ilan Daskal:
So first of all, we baked it into our forecast already in the beginning of the year. We do not assume that it's going to go back to pre-pandemic level. That was not part of our guidance. But it's above the 50% level that it was during the pandemic. So it's 50% from the pre-pandemic and above the pandemic itself.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then final question. Obviously, you've had pretty unprecedented market volatility. This year seems like one thing after another. I was just curious in the midst of – you did the debt raise. You just redid your credit agreement. I was just curious how the backdrop might influence your thinking around interest appetite in larger deals. I know you've been vocal around interest in merger of equals as well. Just curious if you could weigh in on all that.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Maybe I'll take that. Yes. I mean obviously, we continue to be interested in inorganic growth as well as the organic growth, which is actually going pretty well. On the M&A side we do have several things that we're looking at. And as we said I mean obviously, we do have an appetite for doing something larger. But obviously, those are few and far between. So we'll have to wait and see. In the meantime, we're just doing a number of – yes we are continuing to pursue a number of kind of tuck-in opportunities.
Operator:
Thank you, Mr. Meehan. There are no additional questions waiting at this time. So I will turn the call over to Ed Chung for closing remarks.
Ed Chung:
Thank you for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest and we look forward to connecting soon. Take care.
Operator:
That concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good evening. Thank you for attending today's Bio-Rad Laboratories Q4 and Full Year Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Hannah, and I will be your moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations with Bio-Rad. Please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Thanks, Anna. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year 2021 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Simon May, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us, and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. Before I begin the detailed fourth quarter and full year discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Right. Many thanks, Ilan. So as an opening comment, I would like to once again recognize the tremendous contributions, resilience and responsiveness of all of our employees around the world as we closed out a second challenging year of the pandemic. As we enter 2021, we continue to maintain our focus on the 3 key areas we previously highlighted. The ongoing safety of our employees, continuing manufacturing operations to ensure product supply and support of our customers; and making sure we continue to advance our core strategies. During Q4, we continued to experience solid recovery in most of our key global markets as well as an uptick in demand for COVID-related products driven by the explosive spread of the new Omicron variant. As indicated in Q3, we also experienced a growing increase in supply chain challenges driven by the inconsistency of supply for key components, particularly electronic components and plastics. We also saw some logistics challenges at year-end. The organization responded well to this situation, although it did result in an inability to fulfill all our orders in Q4. In addition, for the first time, we saw a greater impact to Omicron on our workforce, although we believe our mandatory vaccination program in the United States helped us to avoid the worst of this situation. Overall, despite these challenges, we finished the year strongly and are very encouraged by the progress and growth we delivered in 2021. And as we enter 2022, we continue to spend considerable effort on sourcing components and balancing our efforts to meet growing customer demand and expect that this situation will persist through Q1 and well into Q2. As a result of the COVID-19 Omicron variant, we also extended our work-from-home policy until March 15, at which point we will reassess the situation. While we experienced an uptick in demand for our COVID products in Q4 as Omicron spread, we still expect COVID-related demand for our products to be sequentially lower in 2022. We see that the majority of our end markets are well served and testing capacity -- with testing capacity. However, the nature of the COVID pandemic may well generate pockets of unexpected demand as hotspots of disease break out across our global markets. Broadly, our end markets have now adapted well to operating in the pandemic environment, and core product demand is generally recovered to close to normal levels. So thank you for your attention, and I'll pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the fourth quarter and full year. Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2021 were $732.8 million, which is a 7.2% decrease on a reported basis versus $789.8 million in Q4 of 2020. On a currency-neutral basis, sales decreased 6.9%. The decline in revenue was a result of $32 million related to the intellectual property litigation award included in Q4 of 2020 as well as lower COVID-related sales this year. Excluding the $32 million damages awarded in 2020, the fourth quarter year-over-year currency-neutral revenue decline was 2.9%, again, mainly related to lower COVID sales. We estimate that COVID-related sales were about $46 million in the quarter, which was roughly double our forecast and reflected continued spikes in demand from geographies where new outbreaks have occurred. Despite the supply chain challenges, the fourth quarter currency neutral for year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 10.2%. In addition, supply chain constraints did impact the fourth quarter revenue by approximately $30 million, of which we expect to recover about $20 million in 2022. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth across all three regions, while COVID-related year-over-year sales declined globally. As a reminder, our core revenue is defined as currency-neutral, non-GAAP and excludes COVID results. Sales of the Life Science group in the fourth quarter of 2021 were $326.6 million compared to $428.5 million in Q4 of 2020, which is a 23.8% decline on a reported basis and a 23.4% decline on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales and the $32 million settlement for back royalties, the underlying Life Science business year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 7.9%. The year-over-year growth was driven by Droplet Digital PCR as well as our qPCR business, which is experiencing nice uptake from our new generation CFX Opus platform. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced currency-neutral year-over-year core revenue growth across all three regions, while COVID-related year-over-year sales declined globally. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics group in the fourth quarter were $404.9 million compared to $359.6 million in Q4 of 2020, which is a 12.6% increase on a reported basis and a 12.8% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Clinical Diagnostic business year-over-year currency-neutral core revenue growth was 12.1%. During the fourth quarter, the Diagnostics group posted growth across all of its product lines. The year-over-year growth was driven by a recovery of routine testing, which is now generally approaching pre-COVID levels. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew mid-single digits in the Americas and saw double-digit growth in the Europe and Asia regions. The reported gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 54.7% on a GAAP basis and compares to 58.3% in Q4 of 2020. The fourth quarter gross margin year-over-year decline was mainly due to the $32 million settlement payment in 2020, and to a lesser extent, product mix increased freight cost and lower manufacturing utilization related to our overall supply chain challenges. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.7 million as compared to $4.6 million in Q4 of 2020. SG&A expenses for Q4 of 2021 were $224.1 million, or 30.6% of sales compared to $219.1 million or 27.7% in Q4 of 2020. Increases in SG&A spend was mainly the result of employee-related expenses and increased marketing activities. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.4 million in Q4 of 2020. Research and development expense in Q4 was $69.9 million, or 9.5% of sales compared to $65.8 million or 8.3% of sales in Q4 of 2020. Q4 operating income was $107 million or 14.6% of sales compared to $175.2 million or 22.2% of sales in Q4 of 2020. The lower year-over-year operating income was driven by the significantly lower contribution from COVID-related sales. The reduced COVID sales negatively impacted mix and along with supply chain constraints, contributed to lower manufacturing utilization. In addition, Q4 of 2020 benefited from the $32 million intellectual property settlement. Looking below the operating line. The change in fair market value of equity securities holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares, negatively impact the reported results by $2.153 billion. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in a net benefit of $7.5 million, primarily driven by the investment income and compared to $1 million of expense last year. The effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 22.8% compared to 22.2% for the same period in 2020. The effective tax rates were primarily affected by the change in value of the security holdings. Reported net loss for the fourth quarter was $1.574 billion and diluted loss per share were $52.59. Leases have decreased from last year and is largely related to changes in valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.7 million of amortization of purchased intangibles, a small restructuring and nonrecurring items. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2021 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 55.4% versus 58.2% in Q4 of 2020. Non-GAAP SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 30.2% versus 28.2% in Q4 of 2020. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million, and in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $1.6 million, legal-related expenses of $900,000 and the restructuring related benefit of $1.4 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 9.8% versus 8.7% in Q4 of 2020. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a $2 million restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 14.6% on a GAAP basis to 15.4% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 21.4% in Q4 of 2020. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $2.153 billion and about a $1.6 million loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 20.3% compared to 24.3% for the same period in 2020. The lower rate in 2021 was driven by the geographic mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was $97 million or $3.21 diluted earnings per share compared to $121 million and $4.01 per share in Q4 of 2020. Moving on to the full year results. Net sales for the full year of 2021 were $2.923 billion on a reported basis. Excluding the settlement for back royalties of $32 million, 2021 sales reached $2.891 billion, which is 12.8% non-GAAP revenue growth on a currency-neutral basis. COVID-related sales for the full year were about $266 million compared to $318 million in the year ago period on a currency neutral basis. For year-over-year revenue growth, which we define as currency-neutral non-GAAP and excludes COVID-related sales was 17%. Sales of the Life Science group for 2021 were $1.401 billion. Excluding the settlement for back royalties of $32 million, the year-over-year growth was 12.3% on a currency-neutral basis. When excluding COVID-related sales, Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral growth was 23.6%. The majority of the year-over-year growth was driven by our core PCR products, Droplet Digital PCR, Process Media and Western Blot. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral full year-over-year sales grew across all 3 regions. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products for 2021 and were $1.516 billion, which is growth of 13.6% on a currency-neutral basis. When excluding COVID-related sales, Clinical Diagnostics year-over-year currency-neutral growth was 12.8%. The strong year-over-year growth was driven by the overall recovery of routine testing. On a geographic basis, Clinical Diagnostics full year-over-year sales grew across all regions. The full year non-GAAP gross margin was 57.3% compared to 56.9% in 2020. The year-over-year margin increase was driven mainly by improved manufacturing efficiencies as a result of our various initiatives. Full year non-GAAP SG&A as a percentage of sales was 28.6% compared to 30.9% in 2020 and benefited from higher revenue despite increased employee-related costs and discretionary expenses. Full year non-GAAP R&D was $258.6 million or 8.9% of sales versus $227.9 million or 9.1% in 2020. And full year non-GAAP operating income was 19.8% compared to 17% in 2020, representing significant year-over-year improvement in performance. Lastly, the non-GAAP effective tax rate for the full year of 2021 was 21.2%, which was consistent with our guidance range. The 21.2% non-GAAP effective tax rate for 2021 was lower than the 24% non-GAAP rate for 2020 is a result of an increase in compensation related tax deductions. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of 2021 was $875 million compared to $997 million at the end of 2020 and $1.343 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2021. The change in cash and short-term investments from the third quarter was primarily due to the loan to the Sartorius herbs special purpose entity and the payment for the Dropworks acquisition, which was partially offset by cash flow generated from operations. During the fourth quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock, and we had a total of $223 million available for potential share buybacks. Full year share buybacks was about 90,000 shares for $50 million. In 2020, we purchased about 292,000 shares of our stock for $100 million. For the fourth quarter of 2021, net cash generated from operating activities was $157.9 million which compares to $284.7 million in Q4 of 2020. This decrease mainly reflects change in working capital and lower operating profits. For the full year of 2021, net cash generated from operations was $656.5 million versus $575.3 million in 2020. This increase mainly reflects higher full year operating profits. Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 19.1% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q4 of 2020 was 25.2%. Full year adjusted EBITDA, including the Sartorius dividend, was $696.4 million or about 24.1% compared to 21.7% in 2020. Net capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2021 were $43.2 million and full year CapEx spend was $120.8 million. Depreciation and amortization for the fourth quarter was $33.7 million and $133.8 million for the full year. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance for 2022. Overall, we are pleased with the performance in 2021 as the global economy is adapting to operating with COVID. Going into 2022, we expect to continue the positive momentum that we established in 2021. However, we expect to see the ongoing supply chain constraints that we experienced in Q4 persist through the first half of 2022. As a result, we anticipate a lower year-over-year growth in the first half of 2022 with higher growth in the back half of the year. As mentioned earlier, we expect to recover in 2022, about $20 million of revenue carryover from 2021 related to supply chain constraints. We are guiding a currency-neutral revenue growth in 2022 to be between 1% and 2%, which includes about $70 million of COVID-related sales that are significantly subsiding from the prior 2 years. Excluding COVID-related sales, we estimate currency-neutral revenue growth in 2022 to be between 8.5% and 9.5%. We estimate about 2% to 3% currency neutral revenue growth for the Diagnostics group. The Diagnostics group year-over-year revenue growth, excluding COVID, is expected to be between 3% and 4%. The Life Science group year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth is expected to be between flat and 1.5% as we project the COVID-related sales in 2022 to significantly decline. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science group year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth is expected to be between 16% and 18%. We continue to assume that we will experience quarterly revenue fluctuations for Process Media, although we estimate an overall double-digit growth for the full year. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected to be about 57.5%. We plan to offset inflationary cost pressure with targeted price realization, particularly within the Life Science group. Full year non-GAAP operating margin is projected to be approximately 19%. We estimate the non-GAAP full year tax rate to be between 22% and 23%. CapEx is projected to be approximately $140 million, and full year adjusted EBITDA margin to be between 23.5% and 23.8%. Lastly, I'd like to remind everyone that we will be holding an in-person Investor Day on February 25 at the New York Stock Exchange. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. The first question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Ilan, maybe just starting with the outlook on the top line. I mean 9% growth in the base business, including 16% to 18% life sciences, it's pretty punchy and well above kind of what we're I think accustomed to seeing out of Bio-Rad in a normal year. Can you just sort of elaborate on kind of the drivers of that strength, particularly in Life Sciences and your level of visibility to hitting those targets and to what degree, if at all, you kind of embedded some conservatism perhaps from ongoing component shortages, things like that.
Andrew Last:
So Brandon, actually, this is Andy. Yes, I think the guidance reflects basically the execution of the core strategies that we've been pursuing for the Life Science business, the growth drivers in biopharma, the ongoing growth in our digital PCR business, process Chrome, et cetera. So it's -- certainly, it's an improvement in growth rate. As to the component supply, so we're seeing a challenge in -- certainly in the first quarter, and we see that extending a bit into the second quarter. But we do see line of sight to the end of those supply constraints. And all being well, we'll see a good acceleration in the second half. So I would say -- the performance is driven by the execution of our core strategies, which are playing out nicely in our various end markets.
Ilan Daskal:
And Brandon, I will highlight what I mentioned earlier that in the first half, we anticipate that the year-over-year growth is going to be lower than the back half of the year. I mean that's exactly what drives us kind of to guide that way.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And maybe just on that, Ilan, any kind of color you can kind of share with us sort of how we should think about top line growth for the first half versus second half? I mean first half maybe low singles and then in the back half, north of the top end of the range for the full year? Any kind of...
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. That's a fair assessment, Brandon, low single in the first half and then accelerating in the second half. Overall in the midpoint for the full year, it's above 9%.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Got you. And then in terms of the margin outlook, I mean, the 19% operating margin for the year, quite a bit better than we expected. Are you able to quantify the impact of the lower COVID revenues compared to what you're sort of anticipating for base business margin expansion? And secondly, are you -- do you expect to capture any benefit from the European restructuring in the second half at all?
Ilan Daskal:
So yes, it's a great question, Brandon. We did not break down specifically the COVID-related kind of impact on the bottom line. However, the guidance does bake in the virus initiatives that we started last year, we do plan to have some realization of the benefits in the back half of this year. So that's definitely a contributor. The mix this year and the fall-through from a higher top line and higher utilization that we expect in the manufacturing footprint are also a contributor to the overall gross margin. On the other hand, on the operating expenses, we do plan on incremental discretionary costs, we return to the office. And increased employee-related costs. So that's the overall dynamic. But I think I'll capture kind of for you most of the kind of levers that led us to the guidance.
Brandon Couillard:
Great. And Andrew can you give us a sense kind of what you're embedding for net pricing for the year?
Andrew Last:
Can you say the question again, please, Brandon?
Brandon Couillard:
Yes, just around -- yes, net pricing for the full year. And I think you said most of that...
Andrew Last:
Yes. We're certainly looking to take pricing through where we can, but it's largely an offset to basically cost inflation, raw material inflation that we're experiencing. So, I think pretty much consistent with the rest of the industry right now, which is on the Life Science side. We do see opportunity to essentially offset the cost drivers that are coming at us to with some price improvement.
Operator:
The next question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Maybe one on the supply chain, it might be for you, Andy. Can you just talk about where the pressure points are? I mean I know last quarter, you kind of talked about it being a little bit of everywhere and a new -- kind of a new issue every week that you guys were able to handle. Is it still a little bit of that? And then again, encouraging to hear the line of sight that you guys feel this will alleviate around the middle of the year. I guess, just talk about that confidence level and you're expecting to continue to get pushed out. It was nice to see only a little bit of sales lost versus capture in 1Q. Should we expect that trend to continue?
Andrew Last:
Yes. So, the supply constraints for the first part of your question, there is a little bit of randomness to it. We have a very large portfolio, as you know, and they're mostly electronic components of different forms. It can be as simple as a power supply, but a lot of it is chip related, which is a broad global problem right now. And it's just very inconsistent and you believe you're going to get a certain component, and then it doesn't arrive. And you have to scramble. So, it's very challenging. The organization is doing extremely well to cope with it. As we look into Q1 and through Q1 to Q2, we do feel we're kind of in the thick of it, and then we see Q2 will be kind of supply catching up with demand. And that's our current line of sight. We're generally getting signs that the component supply will come back, more completely in Q2. So that's why we're guiding second half. And it is a major acceleration. The big challenge, of course, is to retain the orders through that period. And in some parts of the portfolio, we can definitely do that. In other areas, it's much harder. And we've considered that in our guidance.
Patrick Donnelly:
That's helpful. And then maybe to circle back on the top line. Again, the Life Science growth really strong and good to see. Can you talk about where we are in digital PCR. Obviously, I'm sure we'll hear more about it in a couple of weeks. But just in terms of the growth outlook, clearly, a big driver this year. It feels like we're still early innings, but we love your perspective on what applications we're seeing kind of take off here. And then again, the growth outlook, the sustainability of this type of growth as this is a big driver.
Andrew Last:
Yes. Look, we remain very, very confident about the growth potential of digital -- Droplet Digital PCR had another good year. Another good year is anticipated in our guidance, strong double digit. And I would say our strategy and focus areas remain consistent, strong biopharma performance and just general end market adoption as they better and better understand the value proposition of high sensitivity, but easy-to-use digital PCR. So, there's nothing to suggest a slowdown in our view right now.
Ilan Daskal:
And Patrick, I will add that, obviously, later this month in the Investor Day, we plan to...
Andrew Last:
Yes. We'll elaborate more and talk maybe a bit more about the product portfolio that we're working on for the future.
Patrick Donnelly:
Yes, look forward to that. Ilan, maybe one for you on the cap deployment side. You mentioned you did buy back in stock in 4Q. Given the market pullback in January, should we expect you guys are typically pretty opportunistic? Were you active on that front to start the year? And then secondarily, kind of just your appetite? I know you guys talked a little bit about appetite for bolt-ons. Norm, if you have any perspective as well, that would be great.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So Patrick, obviously, we were and still are in a quiet period, so we were not able to trade, but we'll definitely continue to be opportunistic. We have about $223 million in our plan, and we will find the right timing to step in. As similar to the past, if -- we won't hesitate to be a receiving case, we find those opportunities.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. And certainly, in the fourth quarter, you may remember, we did manage to complete the acquisition to Dropworks, bought ourselves kind of a platform in development for what I would call the entry level in Droplet Digital PCR really adds to our portfolio, continue to have a number of opportunities in the queue, and we're working through them.
Operator:
The next question is from the line of Dan Leonard with Wells Fargo.
Daniel Leonard:
So I want to circle back to a question Brandon asked earlier on the margin side. Your EBITDA margin guidance for 2022 puts you well in the range of what was your prior 2023 target without meaningful COVID revenue to contribute. So what's trending better than your initial plan? What would you point to?
Ilan Daskal:
In terms of the -- it's probably a combination of top line growth mix that we do benefit from the overall mix fall through to the gross margin. And the various initiatives, I mean the restructuring that we communicated early last year, there are additional initiatives that are ongoing in our kind of operations in other areas. So it's probably throughout kind of the different line items of the P&L that gets us there.
Daniel Leonard:
And you mentioned a couple of times biopharma. The last time you offered at your Analyst Day, 5 years ago, a proportion of revenue in Life Science coming from biopharma was pretty low. I think 2/3 of that Life Science segment was academic actually. Has that mix meaningfully changed? Can you update us on what the proportion between academic and biopharma looks like in that business today?
Ilan Daskal:
So then we do plan to provide an update on that in the Investor Day. I mean we're going to elaborate and you'll see the analysis there. I don't know, Andy, today you...
Andrew Last:
Well, I think we're fine-tuning that set of numbers. So however, I think to communicate some numbers now that we end up changing are -- as we make sure they're fully an accurate set. But stay tuned, yes.
Ilan Daskal:
Stay tuned for -- that's definitely something that we plan to discuss during the Investor Day.
Daniel Leonard:
I look forward. And then final question. What's your outlook for demand in China in 2022?
Andrew Last:
I think our outlook in China is consistent with recent history. We're largely underpenetrated in China. So where -- so for us, we see China, in particular, and the whole Asia Pac region as an upside opportunity as we penetrate those markets and in particular, biopharma. And we're investing in the region. So we're investing in our channels. So for us, it's a growth driver.
Operator:
The next question is from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
I wanted to go back just to clarify on the supply chain impact. Just is it possible to give a little bit more granularity on which products were impacted or break out that $30 million impact by division? And when do you expect the $20 million to hit? Do you expect that to come back more later in 2022?
Andrew Last:
So it was predominantly on the Life Science side. I would say very largely on the Life Science side of the business, small impact on the clinical side. And we don't see it coming back in one bolus, it's going to be spread towards the latter part of Q2 and into the second half of the year.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then another question on digital PCR. So I was hoping you could just give a mark-to-market. What is the mix of this business now between recurring and capital if you look at the sales in 2021? And on the capital side, I was curious just with the introduction of QX ONE a couple of years ago and then some of the innovation you're working on now, just the expectations for how has the capital piece been growing?
Simon May:
This is Simon. Obviously, over time, we're seeing a healthy migration where that mix is concerned, I'd say at the present side, it is around 50-50, and we'd expect to see that continue to evolve in a positive direction.
Jack Meehan:
And the capital piece, how have the new launches been going?
Simon May:
Yes, X1 has been very well accepted in the market. We've been happy with the upside there.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Great. And then I had 1 on Sartorius. So just looking at the balance sheet. So the stake came down to $14.4 billion in the quarter. So just was hoping you could help me with the math because Sartorius' share price actually was up almost 10% in the fourth quarter. I know it's come in to start the year, but just -- help just better understand why the value actually came down sequentially.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. So Jack, we hold 2 different shares. You have the ordinary shares of Sartorius and the preference shares. They're also traded separately and they carry different values every day. And so we have 2 different stakes and probably that's for the difference that you see.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And last question. I think earlier today, Sartorius talked about a higher dividend rate to start the year. Just was hoping you could quantify what that means for Bio-Rad and what I should be penciling in here in the first quarter.
Ilan Daskal:
We generally don't guide by quarter, but our current assumption is about -- because we didn't know about the dividend that they're going to announce. So our assumption was a flat dividend from last year. So we will have to bake in, if there is any difference there.
Operator:
There are no additional questions leading in queue at this time. So I will pass the call back to Ed Chung for any closing remarks.
Edward Chung:
Thank you for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Goodbye.
Operator:
That concludes today's Bio-Rad Laboratories Q4 and full year financial results conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Third Quarter 2021 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Lydia and I'm your operator today. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference call over to your host, Mr. Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Edward.
Edward Chung:
Thank you, Lydia. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us today. We will review the third quarter 2021 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and exceptions -- expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are a commentary regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share which are our financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I now turn over the call to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. Before I begin the detailed third quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Thank you, Ilan. So good afternoon, everybody. To start with, I'd like to take a moment to thank Annette Tumolo, our President of the Life Science Group for nearly 33 years of service at Bio-Rad as she plans to retire at the end of this year. Annette's efforts and leadership have contributed to significant growth for the Life Science Group and Bio-Rad and the company has started a search for a successor and we will provide an update in the coming months. Now, I'd like to take a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. We're now entering the seventh consecutive quarter of operating within the COVID pandemic and so I shall make my comments brief as we have now established an operating cadence with embedded employee safety practices. Our end markets continued to show improvement during Q3, with demand pickup in both life science and diagnostic markets in all regions. The supply chain constraints highlighted in our Q2 call, however, have persisted in particular, for supply and cost of plastic raw materials, electronic components and higher logistics costs. To date, we have been able to balance supply and demand through careful management. However, we see this supply constraint trends continuing through year-end and into 2022 and thus increasing the challenge of adequately meeting customer demand. As a result of the COVID-19 Delta variant, we recently pushed out our return to the workplace date for the U.S. into early November. During Q3, we introduced a mandatory vaccination requirement for all employees in the U.S. and are extremely pleased with the results of this decision. We are believing -- we believe we are maintaining our commitment to a safe workplace for all our employees. As we enter Q4, we expect COVID-related demand for our products to be sequentially lower. And overall, we believe the majority of our end markets are approaching close to normal operations, although we recognize that COVID will continue to create dynamic market challenges. So at this point, I'll turn it back to Ilan. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the third quarter. Net sales for the third quarter of 2021 were $747 million which is a 15.4% increase on a reported basis versus the $647.3 million in Q3 of 2020. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 13.8%. The third quarter sales include a $32 million settlement for back royalties from 10x. Excluding the back royalties, the Q3 year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth was 9%. On a geographic basis, we experienced strong currency-neutral growth in the Americas and in Asia, while growth in Europe declined slightly due to a tough year-over-year compare of COVID-related sales. We estimate that COVID-19-related sales were about $57 million in the quarter as we continue to benefit from spikes in demand in geographies where new outbreaks have occurred. Sales of the Life Science Group in the third quarter of 2021 were $373.5 million compared to $324 million in Q3 of 2020 which is a 15.3% increase on a reported basis and a 13.9% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding the $32 million settlement for back royalties, the underlying Life Science business grew 4.1% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q3 of 2020. The year-over-year sales growth in the third quarter was driven mainly by increases in Droplet Digital PCR products and excluding COVID-related sales, our core qPCR business also experienced nice growth driven by strong uptake of our newer generation CFX Opus platform. Process Media which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, saw strong year-over-year double-digit growth versus the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales and the $32 million settlement for back royalties, the underlying Life Science business declined 2% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q3 of 2020 due to lower COVID-related sales. When also excluding COVID-related sales, Life Science year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth was 21.8%. Overall, we have seen strong growth in the biopharma market for our Droplet Digital PCR platform. We also continue to see steady adoption of ddPCR in wastewater solutions, supported by government funding towards public health labs. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across the Americas and Asia but declined in Europe. When excluding COVID-related sales, European region revenue posted a double-digit increase from the year-ago period. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the third quarter were $372.2 million compared to $322.2 million in Q3 of 2020 which is a 15.5% increase on a reported basis and a 13.7% increase on a currency-neutral basis. During the third quarter, the Diagnostics Group posted growth across all of its product lines. The year-over-year growth was driven by a recovery of routine testing which appears to be approaching normal levels, with the exception of blood typing which is progressing at a slower pace. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew double digits across all regions. The reported gross margin for the third quarter of 2021 was 58.6% on a GAAP basis and compares to 56.7% in Q3 of 2020. The Q3 2021 gross margin improvement was mainly driven by the settlement payments as well as our productivity and efficiency initiatives. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.7 million as compared to $4.8 million in Q3 of 2020. SG&A expenses for Q3 of 2021 were $216.2 million or 28.9% of sales compared to $198.2 million or 30.6% in Q3 of 2020. Increases in SG&A spend was mainly the result of employee-related expense. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.4 million versus $2.3 million in Q3 of 2020. Research and development expense in Q3 was $64.5 million or 8.6% of sales compared to $59.5 million or 9.2% of sales in Q3 of 2020. Q3 operating income was $156.8 million or 21% of sales compared to $109.6 million or 16.9% of sales in Q3 of 2020. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings added $4.869 billion of income to the reported results and is substantially related to holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in a net expense of $3.2 million, primarily due to foreign exchange losses and compared to $5.5 million of expense last year. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2021 was 21.8% compared to 21.9% for the same period in 2020. The tax rate for both periods were driven by the large unrealized gain in equity securities. Reported net income for the third quarter was $3.928 billion and diluted earnings per share were $129.96. This is an increase from last year and is largely related to changes in valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margin as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter, in sales, we have excluded $32 million related to 10x legal settlement. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.7 million of amortization of purchased intangibles, $4.1 million in IP license costs associated with the debt royalty payment and a small restructuring cost. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the third quarter of 2021 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 57.9% versus 57.5% in Q3 of 2020. Non-GAAP SG&A in the third quarter of 2021 was 29.6% versus 29.4% in Q3 of 2020. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $2.4 million, legal-related expenses of $2.3 million and a small restructuring and acquisition-related benefit. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the third quarter of 2021 was 9% versus 9.2% in Q3 of 2020. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a small restructuring cost. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 21% on a GAAP basis to 19.4% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 18.8% in Q3 of 2020. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $4.869 billion and about a $2 million loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2021 was 18% compared to 22.5% for the same period in 2020. The low rate in 2021 was driven by the geographic mix of earnings. In addition, the effective tax rate was lower as a result of an increase in compensation-related tax deductions. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the third quarter of 2021 was $112.2 million or $3.71 diluted earnings per share and that compares to $90.3 million and $3 per share in Q3 of 2020. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q3 were $1.343 billion compared to $1.167 billion at the end of Q2 of 2021. During the third quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock. For the third quarter of 2021, net cash generated from operating activities was $230.4 million which compares to $135.7 million in Q3 of 2020. This increase mainly reflects higher operating profits. Following the end of the quarter, we completed the acquisition of Dropworks for approximately $125 million in cash. Dropworks is developing a droplet-based digital PCR system that could provide a more cost-effective solution to streamline the digital PCR workflow for life science research and diagnostic applications. We see Dropworks as accelerating Bio-Rad's entry into the lower-end segment of the digital PCR business and allow for expansion in the $2.5 billion to $3 billion qPCR segment, thereby significantly increasing the opportunity for our ddPCR platforms. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2021 was 23.1% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q3 of 2020 was 22.9%. Net capital expenditures for the third quarter of 2021 were $34.6 million and depreciation and amortization for the third quarter was $33.7 million. Moving on to the guidance. Overall, we expect a continued trend to a more normalized growth rate. However, we are seeing increased supply chain constraints that creates an elevated level of uncertainty around timing of customer deliveries. We are now guiding full year 2021 non-GAAP currency-neutral revenue growth to be between 12% and 13% versus our prior guidance of 10% to 10.5%. This updated outlook reflects a wider revenue range due to the supply challenges which we are experiencing. Full year COVID-related sales are now expected in the range of $240 million and $245 million versus our prior guidance of $200 million to $210 million. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected to be between 57.5% and 57.8% versus prior guidance of 57% and 57.5%. Full year non-GAAP operating margin is forecasted to be about 19.5% versus prior guidance of 19%. Our updated guidance assumes higher operating expenses in Q4 as we continue to anticipate a gradual return to more normal activity levels. Our updated annual non-GAAP effective tax rate is projected to be between 21% and 22%. The lower rate versus our prior guidance is mainly due to an increase in compensation-related tax deductions. Full year adjusted EBITDA margin is now forecasted to be between 23.5% and 24% versus prior guidance of 23% and 23.5%. Lastly, with the uncertainties surrounding COVID, we are now planning to hold our Investor Day in February due to our preference to host an in-person event. That concludes our prepared remarks and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Patrick Donnelly of Citi. Our next question comes from Dan Leonard of Wells Fargo. Dan your line is open.
Dan Leonard:
Hi, thank you. So hoping, first, you could elaborate further on the margin guidance in the fourth quarter. It looks like operating margins are stepping down to 15%?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure, Dan. Actually, operating margin, we are guiding to a higher one. And if you bake it into the fourth quarter, I think it's also slightly higher. Are you comparing it year-over-year, sequential quarter versus prior -- the guidance? I'm trying just to gauge a little bit more versus which guidance are you comparing it to?
Dan Leonard:
Well, the plug for the full year guide. I think you said 19.5% for the full year and given the non-GAAP results through the first three quarters, we're coming up with an implied 15% in Q4 to get to 19.5% and that compares lower than previous quarters, either year-on-year or sequentially.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So we did indicate slightly higher operating expenses in terms of the fourth quarter sequentially. And that's seasonality, some of the discretionary expenses that are back and some of employee-related expenses that are also sequentially higher. That's correct, then yes.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then, just a follow-up. Can you offer an update on the progress you're making against the restructuring initiatives you announced back in February? Are you seeing any cost savings from those efforts? Or is that more of a 2022 event?
Andrew Last:
Yes. Dan, it's Andy here. So to parse the question first, progress is going very well. I would say we're on track with our expectations. So thinking of contributions to operating performance, it really is a delayed effect. The majority of that performance enhancement coming in 2023. Some will materialize in '22 more to the latter half of the year. But everything is on track against our expectations right now.
Dan Leonard:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Patrick Donnelly of Citi has re-registered the question.
Patrick Donnelly:
Can you hear me all right now?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, we can. Thank you.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, great. Sorry about that. Maybe, Ilan, just touching on the supply and demand issues you guys kind of called out you and Andy, can you just talk through a little more detail maybe where you're seeing the pressures, whether it's business line or particular segments? And then again, it sounds like you're expecting it to persist through '22. Maybe just talk through what you guys are doing to address it, how we can expect that impact to play out over the next couple of quarters?
Andrew Last:
Yes, Patrick, this is Andy. So look, it's fairly broad and the challenge, we sell complex products. So you only need one component to be missing in the supply chain to impact you. So I don't think we're experiencing anything that's different to the rest of the industry or even beyond our sector just globally. And it is very hard to determine when this will tail off. So prudently, we're expecting it to transition into 2022 as well. But it can be as simple as an on-off switch to full integrated boards and plastics various products. So that's the issue we're facing. What are we doing? We are working extremely hard. The team on supply chain and procurement is really working our supply partners. And to date, we've been doing very well. But there are constraints and I think we view it as prudent to call them out because at some point, they start to impact your ability to meet customers in a timely way.
Patrick Donnelly:
Right, sure. And along with the revenue potential disruption, obviously, increased costs could come along with it as well, Ilan. Maybe just talk about, are you guys expecting a margin impact from this? Are you seeing increased costs from this inflation, whatever it might be? Can you just talk about the input costs, if you're seeing any impact there?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Patrick. I mean there are components and some areas that we do see pockets of price increase. Obviously, we baked in everything into the guidance. We'll have to continue and see kind of how long does it last and what does it mean, obviously, moving forward. But so far, we were able also kind of to balance it off with some of our productivity initiatives that we have internally. So yes, we did bake some of it into our guidance.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe one for Annette. It sounds like this is her last call, so congrats on the retirement. But maybe on ddPCR, it sounds like biopharma is pretty strong. Can you just talk about the impact of QX ONE there? What you're seeing in terms of the demand? How durable do you think this is? Obviously, the wastewater picked up around COVID but just how that segment is going and the expectations kind of going forward in terms of the growth profile.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. Thanks, Patrick. Well, we have maintained the strong double-digit growth that we were seeing before the pandemic, throughout it. And we continue to believe that there is a sustainability to the level of growth that we're seeing in our entire Droplet Digital PCR portfolio. We certainly have penetrated the biopharma market across from discovery into QC and manufacturing with all of our platforms, the QX ONE playing out more strongly in the QC in the manufacturing segment. And we have a really strong demand and great pipeline moving forward. So we're very, very optimistic across the entire product line.
Patrick Donnelly:
Very helpful. Maybe one quick last one for Norm, just on the capital deployment side, can you just update us on your appetite for larger deals? Any change to the strategic component of Sartorius or how you're thinking about Sartorius going forward, Norm?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. So obviously, we still think of Sartorius as a very strategic asset for us. I think we feel good about the fact that we successfully closed the Dropworks acquisition this last quarter and we continue to have kind of a portfolio of opportunities that we're exploring going forward. So it's a pretty busy time.
Patrick Donnelly:
All right, thank you very much.
Operator:
The next question comes from Jack Meehan of Nephron Research. Jack please proceed with your question.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you, good afternoon. My first question was on the diagnostics market in China. There's been a lot of focus on centralized purchasing initiatives in the region. I was curious what you might be seeing on the ground? How broad that might be? And just how you think Bio-Rad's business is positioned there on the diagnostics side?
Ilan Daskal:
Jack, I will let Dara answer this question.
Dara Wright:
Yes. Yes. So I think in general, kind of despite the ongoing sort of trend in the China market related to China for China and localization and other implications, we don't really see much impact there just given our mix and where we participate. It certainly is a trend we will continue to monitor, to inform both our manufacturing and supply chain strategies. But at this point, we don't see any negative impact from those macro level trends.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then when the -- I guess, stick with diagnostics. The recovery looked pretty good in the quarter. Maybe just comment though, do you think Delta had any impact on the business during the quarter in terms of utilization? Obviously, you ended up in a good spot but what did you see throughout August and September?
Dara Wright:
Yes. Similar to prior quarters, it's really sort of region-specific and how certain kind of health care systems are able to balance the mix of routine health care delivery and diagnostic testing versus dealing with an increased burden from COVID-related cases. In North America, really operating sort of to pre-pandemic levels, almost 100%. In Europe, we see a little bit of an impact to elective surgeries as was articulated in the opening comments from Ilan. So that's really the only area where we're a little bit behind pre-COVID levels. But overall, I would say, the health care systems are learning how to sort of operate in this new normal of delivering routine care and accommodating sort of acute spikes in COVID-related care.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then my final question, I want to turn to the Life Science business. So I think I caught, Ilan, in your comments, 22% growth, ex-COVID, ex-Process Media, so by my math, that's compounding in the double digits. A lot of your peers are more like mid- to high single digits is kind of what we've been seeing. Not sure if it's all ddPCR but just maybe broadly how you're feeling about the funding environment? And also, are there any other products that really have been standing out?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Annette, do you want to address the question? Or...
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. Well, we've seen really good recovery in our base business and even when we compare it to 2019. Throughout the course of the year, we've seen really strong performance from our protein quantitation business. Certainly, process is driving a lot of the growth there as well but digital PCR continues to be a very important growth driver for the Life Science group. And I'm not sure if I answered...
Jack Meehan:
Congrats Annette on the retirement. Yes, that's helpful.
Annette Tumolo:
Thank you.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard of Jefferies. Brandon your line is open.
Brandon Couillard:
Hey thanks, good afternoon. Annette, I want to echo best wishes in your future retirement as well. And a follow-up question on the ddPCR business, a couple of things. Any chance you could give us a sense of the mix today where it stands between capital equipment and recurring consumables? And any comments just kind of on the competitive landscape? We've seen some new introductions out there from a couple of other companies. Just curious what impact those might be having, if at all.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. Sure. Well, we have essentially closed systems. So we get really, really good pull-through on all the systems that we sell. And I think last I looked, it was almost 50-50. So really good balance between the consumable pull-through and the platform sales. We're certainly aware of new entrants into the market. We know that Thermo recently launched a new low throughput digital PCR system. And we occasionally see these new products in the field. But frankly, we continue to win sales based on our differentiated value proposition and superior performance. And I think we feel pretty confident in our strategy and the current product offering that we have. I think, if anything, the new competition just really validates the utility of this digital PCR application in the bigger PCR market. So we're feeling pretty good about where we are.
Brandon Couillard:
As a follow-up to that, I'd be curious if you could just elaborate a little bit more on the Dropworks business. Can you share the revenue base with us, kind of the margin profile, a sense of growth over the last couple of years? And I'd also be curious if you could kind of touch on exactly why this platform is particularly suited for the low-end market, more basic research and diagnostics, whereas the QX ONE maybe isn't the right tool for that type of customer?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. the QX ONE was really developed for the biopharma market, where high throughput and automation was really -- and very high performance were really the key drivers. I think when we want to address a broader saving qPCR markets with digital products, we certainly were looking for integrated workflows and that's something that we have with the Dropworks platform and the design and -- of this platform is well suited for cost-sensitive segments, the low end of the digital PCR market. And certainly, we think we can disrupt some of the higher end of the qPCR market with this product as well.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Maybe Ilan, any financials you can kind of share with us in terms of the revenue base or margin profile? Is it profitable or not? Any numbers on that business?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, we usually, Brandon, don't break down that level of details within each of the business groups.
Annette Tumolo:
Yes.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. May be I'll follow up then, just a clarification, Ilan. The core growth for the year of 12% to 13%, does that include the $32 million of back royalties from 10x? Just want to be sure.
Ilan Daskal:
No, that does not include that $32 million of 10x. It does not.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. Okay. And then lastly, if you sort of think about '22 and granted, not expecting you sort of give guidance at this point but just a sense of how we should sort of think about the profitability trend next year as your ability to manage the P&L as the COVID revenues likely come down next year? And would it be relevant to think about the fourth quarter as kind of a good baseline in that context where most of the COVID revenues have kind of washed out next year?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, it's a great question, Brandon. Obviously, generally, at this point, we are not yet prepared for -- to comment on the full 2022. But if you think about kind of -- regarding our initial thinking, we do believe that for us, COVID-related sales will continue to go down. And if you think about the guidance this quarter, it implies already in the fourth quarter, a range of about $20 million to $25 million for the COVID-related sales and we believe it will continue to go down. We'll have to balance the different inputs, the supply chain constraints, the longevity and what is it going to and how is it going to impact in our thinking about 2022. The material cost, there are different aspects that we still need to kind of compile and see what does it mean for the overall guidance. In terms of the core top line, we continue to believe that we have really good kind of base to think about kind of the next level in terms of the 2022. We -- if you think about it, we continue to be in the path to achieve our 2023 target model that we communicated back in December. That's our current thinking.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We have no further questions in the queue. So I'll hand back to the team to close.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Lydia. Thank you, everyone, for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest and we look forward to connecting soon. Thank you.
Operator:
This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q2, 2021 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Edward Chung:
Thank you, Joanna. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the second quarter 2021 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad with me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I'd like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are commentary, regarding the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on Bio-Rad’s results, operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that I will now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ed. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us, and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. And also we want to officially welcome Edward Chung, he is our Head of Investor Relations. Before I begin the details second quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad’s operations in light of the current pandemic related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Thank you, Ilan. So I'd like to take a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. Overall Bio-Rad has adapted well to the working constraints that COVID has imposed upon us and we find ourselves able to respond and react well to everyday operational changes and demands. We continue to make solid progress on our core strategies support of our customers in the safety of our employees. With improvement in our end markets after significant downturn a year ago, we are responding well to increased demand, but as with other manufacturers in Life Sciences we are having to work hard to procure raw materials in some challenged areas such as plastics and electronic components as well as dealing with increased pressure on raw material costs. We also continue to experience higher than typical logistics costs as indicated in our Q1 call. With emergence of the COVID 19 Delta variant, we are maintaining our work from home policies for the near term as we work on return to the workplace plans targeted for later this quarter and we continue to monitor the global pandemic situation carefully. Given the fluidity, the delta variance has created. Employee safety remains a principal focus and we are pleased with our safety record and the growing vaccination status of our organization. As we enter Q3, we expect the emergence of the delta variant will continue to create some challenges and we are maintaining vigilance and flexibility as a result. Overall, we expect to see continued improvement in our end markets through the second half of the year as our customers continue to adapt. However, the new delta variant clearly introduces an element of uncertainty as we move forward. Thank you for your attention, and I'll pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the second quarter. Net sales for the second quarter of 2021, were $715.9 million, which is a 33.4% increase on a reported basis versus $536.9 million in Q2 of 2020. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 27.5%. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral growth across all three regions. Sales of our core products in the second quarter of last year were negatively impacted by the pandemic and generally we are seeing a continued gradual capacity improvement at both academic and diagnostic labs, which we estimate between 90% and 95% of pre-COVID levels. We estimate that the COVID-19 related sales were about $68 million in the quarter. Sales of the Life Science Group in the second quarter of 2021 were $334.2 million compared to $252.1 million in Q2 of 2020 which is a 32.6% increase on a reported basis and a 27.1% increase on a currency neutral basis. The year-over-year sales growth in the second quarter was driven mainly by increases in western blotting, Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR products. We have seen strong growth in the biopharma market for our Droplet Digital PCR platform. We are also seeing a healthy uptick for DD PCR in wastewater solutions, government funding towards public health labs is driving increased demand for our DD PCR products that offer automated solutions with high accuracy and sensitivity. Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis saw a year-over-year double-digit growth versus the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales, the underlying Life Science business grew 29.1% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q2 of 2020. On a geographic basis, Life Science, currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across all regions. Before moving on, I would like to highlight the growth legal settlement we 10x Genomics announced earlier this week. This settlement resolved the multi-year global litigation with 10x over outstanding issues in the field of single-cell and includes a global cross license agreement. In addition to past and future royalties Bio-Rad received broad freedom to operate in the single-cell market and maintain exclusivity to our micro well single-cell IT. We estimate that the future royalty payments from this legal settlement could total $110 million to $140 million over the life of the agreement, which runs through the year 2030. This includes payments of $32 million in the third quarter for back royalties owed to Bio-Rad for the period from November 2018 through December 2020 as well as for settlement fees and interest. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the second quarter were $380.2 million compared to $283.2 million in Q2 of 2020 which is a 34.3 % increase on a reported basis and a 28% increase on a currency-neutral basis. During the second quarter, the Diagnostics Group posted double-digit growth across all of its product lines. The year-over-year growth was driven by a recovery of routine testing. Elective surgery recovery is still progressing, although at a slower pace. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across all regions. Our Diagnostics Group announced last month, the partnership with Celgene, which is a global leader in multiplex molecular diagnostics. Bio-Rad will exclusively market the Celgene test in the U.S., pending regulatory approvals, Celgene diagnostic products of high-sensitivity and specificity and our optimized to work with Bio-Rad CFX Real-Time PCR systems. The reported gross margin for the second quarter of 2021 was 56.1% on a GAAP basis and compares to 54.6% in Q2 of 2020. Reported gross margin in Q2 of 2020 included an $8 million customs duty charge and excluding that charge, the Q2 gross margin further improved this quarter as a result of our productivity and efficiency initiatives. However as mentioned, we currently see increased pressure on raw material costs and higher logistics costs. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.6 million and compares to $5 million in Q2 of 2020. SG&A expenses for Q2 of 2021 were $213.4 million or 29.8% of sales compared to $189.3 million or 35% in Q2 of 2020. Increases in SG&A expense was mainly the result of employee-related performance compensation expense. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.4 million versus $2.3 million in Q2 of 2020. Research and development expense in Q2 was $63.4 million or 8.9% of sales compared to $52 million or 9.7% of sales in Q2 of 2020. Q2 operating income was $124.8 million or 17.4% of sales compared to $51.7 million or 9.6% of sales in Q2 of 2020. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings added $1.013 billion of income to the reported results and is substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $1.3 million primarily due to foreign exchange and compares to $10.7 million of income last year. Q2 of 2020 includes an $8.9 million dividend from Sartorius which was declared in June and was paid in July. In 2021, the Sartorius dividend was declared in the first quarter. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2021 was 21% compared to 22.4% for the same period in 2020. The tax rate for both periods was driven by the large unrealized gain in equity securities. In addition, the second quarter of 2021 effective tax rate was lower also due to a less of statute of limitations of certain tax reserves. Reported net income for the second quarter was $914.1 million and diluted earnings per share were $30.32. This is a decrease from last year and this related to changes in valuation of the Sartorius Holding. Moving on to the non-GAAP results, looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain our typical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter in cost of goods sold. We have excluded $4.6 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $1.2 million of restructuring-related expenses. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the second quarter of 2021 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 56.9% versus 55.5% in Q2 of 2020. Non-GAAP SG&A in the second quarter of 2021 was 29.2% versus 33.9% in Q2 of 2020. In SG&A on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $2.4 million legal related expenses of $8.8 million and restructuring and acquisition-related benefits of $7 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the second quarter of 2021 was 9.1% versus 9.8% in Q2 of 2020. In R&D on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $2.1 million of restructuring benefits. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 17.4% on a GAAP basis to 18.5% on a non-GAAP basis. These non-GAAP operating margins compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q2 of 2020 of 11.8%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $1.013 billion and the $1.8 million loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2021 was 21.5% compared to 23.8% for the same period in 2020. The lower rate in 2021 was driven by the geographic mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the second quarter of 2021 was $106.6 million or $3.54 diluted earnings per share, compared to $48.3 million or $1.61 per share in Q2 of 2020. Moving on to the balance sheet, total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q2 were $1.167 billion compared to $1.025 billion at the end of Q1 of 2021. During the second quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock. For the second quarter of 2021, net cash generated from operating activities was $154.6 million, which compares to $92.1 million in Q2 of 2020. This increase mainly reflects higher operating profits. The adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2021 was 22.3% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q2 of 2020 was 18.6% and excluding the Sartorius dividend was 16.9%. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2021 were $23.4 million and depreciation and amortization for the second quarter was $33.7 million. Moving on to the guidance Andy previously alluded to continued uncertainties surrounding the pandemic, which could create some challenges and we look, sorry. As we look to the better half of this year. That being said, with customers continuing to adapt in this environment, we assume a gradual return to pre-pandemic activity and a more normalized business mix during the second half of 2021. We are now guiding non-GAAP, currency neutral revenue growth to be between 10% and 10.5% for 2021 versus our prior guidance of 5% to 6%. This updated outlook assumes the full year COVID-related sales to be between $200 million and $210 million of which approximately $40 million to $50 million are projected for the second half of 2021. Excluding COVID-related sales, the non-GAAP year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth in the second half is expected to be between 13% and 14%. These represents between 4.5% and 5.5% growth in the second half of 2021 over the first half of 2021. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected to be between 57% and 57.5%. Full year non-GAAP operating margin is forecasted to be about 19%, which assumes higher operating expenses in the second half of 2021 versus the first half as we are anticipating continued gradual return to more normal activity levels. This guidance excludes any benefit related to the settlement we 10x Genomics. Our updated annual non-GAAP effective tax rate for 2021 is projected to be between 23% and 24%. Full year adjusted EBITDA margin is forecasted to be between 23% and 23.5%. That concludes our prepared remarks and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Your line is open.
Patrick Donnelly:
Thanks guys, maybe to start on the margin, Ilan I mean, really strong performance nice to see kind of flow through to the raise in the back half. Can you just talk through, I guess the levers you're seeing how much of it is just the high margin COVID stuff coming through versus I know a lot of the restructuring is going to be out years, but just in terms of some of the cost initiatives you have going, just kind of wondering the moving pieces on the margin side, what levers you guys are pulling there?
Ilan Daskal:
Hey good afternoon Patrick thanks for the question. Yes when you think about the margin and let's start with the gross margin. We do see already, a lot of benefit from the various initiatives that we had pretty around the efficiencies and productivity and that was definitely part of the results for this quarter and will continue to be part of, you know the guidance in the second half of the year. There were some headwinds – associated with our FX et cetera. But for the most part the benefit is associated with the ongoing initiatives around productivity and initiative. Similarly, we continue to see follow through not only from the higher guidance on the top line, and obviously you know improved utilization in the second half, but continued also benefit from those efficiencies and productivity.
Patrick Donnelly:
Are you still yes go ahead….?
Ilan Daskal:
Sorry and then, then you have the mix impact for the COVID versus first half versus second half obviously the drop-off of the COVID-related sales to about $40 million to $50 million in the second half, does create kind of some level of headwind to the overall margins.
Patrick Donnelly:
And are you seeing anything in terms of the offset in terms of input costs or supply chain issues and given that comment versus peers. Just wondering what you guys are seeing on that front?
Ilan Daskal:
Do you want to take it Andy?
Andrew Last:
Well, I mean I don't think we're breaking it out but we are certainly experiencing and absorbing the some higher costs coming through from logistics and the rest is really some modest raw material increases and then you know just challenges in procurement.
Ilan Daskal:
And freight.
Andrew Last:
And freight yes.
Patrick Donnelly:
Right, okay and then maybe one for Annette on a single-cell side it's great to see the litigation will be over for you guys with Cell C. I know you guys had previously talked I think about seeing some products maybe rollout potentially later this year. Is that still the plan and again, it feels like the 10x stuff clears the deck for you guys. So I just wanted to get an update on that front in terms of timing and expectations?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes Annette if you're on the, if you're able to respond.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure, so we are – we acquired Cell C and their technology was pretty early stage, and I will admit that we were slowed down a little bit by COVID and getting all the staff on board for the investment we want to make in R&D. That said, we're making really good progress and we expect product to start rolling out in early 2022.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, that's helpful. And one quick last one for Norm, just on the balance sheet capital allocation. Any changes in terms of your thoughts on Sartorius or large M&A I know you guys are always looking would love just an update in terms of what the pipeline looks like, and your desire there?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes I mean, I guess I would say we continue to evaluate a robust number of what I call, both tuck-in and technology opportunities and candidly to look for something more transformational. So we continue to work on all of that.
Patrick Donnelly:
Understood, thank you, guys.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Pat.
Operator:
Your next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard of Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard:
Hey, thanks, good afternoon. Ilan so you took up the core growth guidance for the year by 400 basis points, of which the COVID revenues only account for 100 bps of that. Can you just talk about what areas of the business you're seeing the most upside in? And could you share sort of an updated view on the two segments, what you're penciling in for the full year in terms of organic growth between Life Sciences and QX?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure, Andy, do you want to start.
Andrew Last:
Sure, so I think the uptick that we are forecasting Brandon is fairly broad-based. Clearly, the core business is coming back on both academic and in the institutional side as well as the industrial side, which has been more robust in the background. Anyhow clinical is coming back nicely across all the regions, maybe with the exception of elective surgeries, which still seem to be lagging a little bit behind the more routine testing and that's broad-based as well. So as we look to the second half, it's really across all of our product lines in both market segments in all regions. So I think that's the summary version of our second half.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes Brandon, I will add also that also when we compare it to the 2019 kind of results on a two-year stack overall for Bio-Rad it represent over 10% for the two years stack growth.
Brandon Couillard:
Right, right.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes.
Brandon Couillard:
Guys there is a follow-up on that, I mean any color you can share with Ilan in terms of the phasing of revenues and margins between 3Q and 4Q. I mean 4Q is typically your highest revenue quarter and as a result give us profitable seasonally. Any just color you are able to share we sort of update model for the back half?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, obviously as you mentioned, Brandon the fourth quarter seasonally usually is higher, but this year is a little bit, kind of unpredictable the first half was a very, very good first half. Generally speaking, there is some benefit always from the fall through to the utilization and the gross margin, when you have a higher top line. So it's a gradual improvement on the bottom line as well as the gross margin, but again it will depend how the top-line will shape up.
Brandon Couillard:
That's okay, One for Annette on the DD PCR business you just talk about what you see is kind of the top three drivers of growth right now in terms of end markets or applications and any color you can share between how the mix of demand has evolved between the QX ONE and the legacy platform about a year into that launch now?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure, we are seeing really strong demand in pharma and biopharma for the QX ONE System, because it was really frankly developed for that market segment. So really strong growth it's adding a lot of incremental growth to the business in the QX ONE. But we also have strong demand for our QX 200 systems. The wastewater surveillance market is evolving and we're now seeing more up-take in EMEA it started in the U.S., we don't expect that to slowdown. And we still sell an awful lot of QX 200 systems into pharma and biopharma as well. So really strong and our academic market has always been strong and it's a good mix across all three segments of platforms and the consumables that go along with it.
Operator:
Your next question is coming from the line of Dan Leonard from Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Dan Leonard:
Thank you. So I was hoping maybe you could elaborate further on the demand drivers in your Life Sciences business even excluding COVID. If you look at the two year stack compared to 2019, the growth rates are double-digits in Life Science and that is not the trajectory we're used to seeing from that business. So any further color you could offer on the big demand drivers?
Ilan Daskal:
Annette, do you want to take that one.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure, sure we're definitely seeing strong recovery. So that's part of what's behind it like you're right our growth. If you look at growth over 2019 pre-COVID is really strong. It's a strong funding environment, one of the benefits may be of the pandemic is that government certainly in the U.S. and to some extent the EU have really scored a lot of funding into translational medicine, infectious disease, vaccine development, and we have a broad product portfolio that speaks to customer need across all of that. So we think that's really driving a lot of the growth and we're optimistic about the environment moving forward.
Dan Leonard:
So that touches a bit of my next question as you think that this is sustainable or is it something you worry about it is it challenging comparison as we roll into 2022?
Ilan Daskal:
So Dan, we cannot comment today on the 2022 number generally speaking, I mean, let's say we can’t guide for that.
Dan Leonard:
Ilan a couple of quick clarifications on the royalty settlement. First off, did you say you're going to not include any royalties from 10x Genomics in your P&L your non-GAAP was out?
Ilan Daskal:
So no, I'm not sure that I'm going to non-GAAP, but it was not included in our guidance that I provided.
Dan Leonard:
Okay and is that $110 million plus number is that a net number. Net of the royalties, you might owe them or is that what they'll owe you potentially between now in 2030?
Ilan Daskal:
So net of, what are you referring to Dan exactly sorry.
Dan Leonard:
So it was across license agreement right, so presumably there is some chance you pay them some money, they pay you some money is the $110 million, a net number or is it a gross number?
Ilan Daskal:
So Dan these are the amounts that we anticipate to receive from 10x.
Dan Leonard:
From 10x, okay. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Sure.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Your line is open.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you, good afternoon. I was wondering if you could give a little bit more color on the duration of the COVID revenue that you see. So you have $40 million to $50 million in the back half of the year. Just as you kind of look at the tail here. Do you have any view as to what might carry on beyond 2021, how much is, there some portion that seems more durable, do you like wastewater in there?
Norman Schwartz:
So there is the potential for wastewater to be more durable again that very much depends on the funding environment. But as you know the majority of our revenues were driven by instrumentation and we do view that market is becoming very saturated in terms of capacity right now. We do have some test revenue, but it's very small in relation to the instruments and to our peer set. So we currently see COVID tailing off to a relatively small number by the end of this year and then we'll see what 2022 brings in our guidance for next year, when we get there.
Jack Meehan:
And this is the second consecutive quarter you've called out western blotting as an area of strength within Life Sciences. I was wondering if there is anything specific that's been driving that demand or if you just think it's more, kind of funding in general that's been supportive.
Norman Schwartz:
I think it's more a general funding trend and it's kind of a staple in labs. So we view it as labs are getting up and running and just kind of doing the routine kind of characterization work that they typically do and they dry up during COVID now the labs are coming back and it's broad based, broad based return.
Jack Meehan:
Great and then maybe just on the diagnostics side was just curious, you called out the elective procedures, but if you look about kind of the product family is within clinical diagnostics. Do you think any are taking longer to come back, then you might have expected or could have some lingering impact as you exit the year?
Ilan Daskal:
Dara do you want to answer the question.
Dara Wright:
Sure. No, just that one really I mean blood typing is a product family that associated with elective surgeries. So that's the area that's most impacted when the hospital systems get overwhelmed by COVID cases, but all other areas of routine testing, diabetes quality controls et cetera are all in line with what Ilan said right around 95% to pre-COVID levels so, really good recovery across the core and across all regions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] I’m not showing any other questions. As of this moment, I would like to turn the conference back to the management.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest and we look forward to connecting soon. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q1 2021 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Thank you. I'd like to turn it over to Mr. Ron Hutton. You may begin the conference, sir.
Ronald Hutton:
Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the first quarter results of 2021. With me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and the impact and the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. We cannot be certain that Bio-Rad's responses to the pandemic will be successful, that the demand for Bio-Rad's COVID-19-related products is sustainable or that Bio-Rad will be able to meet this demand. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I will now turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us, and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. Before I begin the detailed first quarter discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Thank you, Ilan, and I'd like to take just a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. As expected, COVID continues to have an impact on our operations, but as previously communicated, we have now adapted well to this environment, and our employees around the world continue to perform to the highest standards. We continue our focus on the 3 areas previously communicated, the ongoing safety of our employees; continuing manufacturing operations to ensure product supply and support of our customers; and making sure we continue to make progress on our core strategies. Overall, we continue to be very pleased with our employee safety despite the increases in COVID in some areas of the world. Our internal COVID transmission rates remain extremely low, and we are starting to benefit from the vaccination programs. In Q1, we have maintained the work from home policies we adopted in 2020 and are continuing to monitor the pandemic closely as we assess the right timing for a more general return to the workplace. As we enter Q2, we expect to continue to experience the impact of the pandemic for at least the coming quarter, but are confident in our ability to meet customer demand while progressing our core strategies and new product development objectives. And as the global economy trends towards recovery, we're also paying close attention to our supply chain as accelerated demand for raw materials has the potential to cause constraints and prolong higher-than-typical logistics costs. Provided there is positive global progress on controlling COVID, we anticipate operations starting to return to more normal operating practice in the second half of the year. So thank you, and I'll pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the first quarter. Net sales for the first quarter of 2021 were $726.8 million, which is a 27.1% increase on a reported basis versus $571.6 million in Q1 of 2020. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 23.4%. The first quarter year-over-year revenue growth was impacted by a tough compare of about $10 million revenue carryover to Q1 of 2020 related to the December 2019 cyber-attack. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral growth across all 3 regions. We continued to see strong demand for product associated with COVID-19 testing and related research. Generally, we are seeing most academic and diagnostic labs now running about 90% capacity, which is an improvement to what we saw in Q4. We estimate that COVID-19-related sales were about $94 million in the quarter. Sales of the Life Science Group in the first quarter of 2021 were $366.5 million compared to $227.2 million in Q1 of 2020, which is a 61.3% increase on a reported basis, and a 56.9% increase on a currency-neutral basis. The year-over-year growth in the first quarter was driven by the continued strength of COVID-19-related qPCR products. In addition, we saw strong double-digit year-over-year sales growth in Droplet Digital PCR, Western Block and antibody products. In addition, Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, saw strong double-digit year-over-year growth in the quarter over the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales, the underlying Life Science business grew 56.2% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q1 of 2020. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across all regions. In addition to continued adoption of Droplet Digital PCR in BioPharma, we also saw good demand for the QX ONE in wastewater testing applications for COVID, and we expedited the introduction of COVID variant assays, which are being well received. Key opinion leaders continue to highlight the sensitivity advantage of Droplet Digital PCR. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the first quarter were $358.5 million, compared to $340.3 million in Q1 of 2020, which is a 5.4% growth on a reported basis, and a 2.2% growth on a currency-neutral basis. During the first quarter, the Diagnostics Group posted solid growth in diabetes and in quality controls. We started to see a recovery of market demand for non-COVID business, with diagnostics labs returning to about 90% of pre-COVID levels. The recovery of routine testing and elective surgeries is still progressing. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group posted growth in Asia. The reported gross margin for the first quarter of 2021 was 55.1% on a GAAP basis, and compares to 55.5% in Q1 of 2020. The current quarter gross margin percentage declined mainly due to expenses associated with the restructuring initiative that we communicated earlier this year, offset by better product mix, lower service costs and higher manufacturing utilization. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.6 million compared to $3.9 million in Q1 of 2020. SG&A expenses for Q1 of 2021 were $225.9 million or 31.1% of sales compared to $193.7 million or 33.9% in Q1 of 2020. The year-over-year SG&A expenses increased mainly due to expenses associated with the restructuring initiative and higher employee-related expenses, and it was offset slightly by a $5 million cybersecurity insurance settlement related to the 2019 cyber-attack as well as lower discretionary spend. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.4 million versus $2 million in Q1 of 2020. Research and development expense in Q1 was $73.9 million or 10.2% of sales compared to $49.3 million or 8.6% in Q1 of 2020. The year-over-year R&D expenses increased due to expenses associated with the restructuring initiative and increased project spend. Q1 operating income was $100.9 million or 13.9% of sales compared to $74.4 million or 13% in Q1 of 2020. Looking below the operating line. The change in fair market value of equity securities holdings added $1.179 billion of income to the reported results, which is substantially related to holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $16.9 million compared to $3.3 million of expense last year. Q1 of 2021 included $19 million of dividend income from Sartorius, which was declared this year in Q1. In 2020, the Sartorius dividend was declared in the second quarter. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 24.7% compared to 23.7% in Q1 of 2020. The tax rates for both periods were driven by the large unrealized gain in equity securities. The year-over-year increase in our effective tax rate was due to the restructuring initiative announced earlier this year. Reported net income for the first quarter was $977.4 million, and diluted earnings per share were $32.38. This is an increase from last year and is substantially related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.6 million of amortization of purchased intangibles, $24 million of restructuring-related expenses and a small legal reserve benefit. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the first quarter of 2021 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 59% versus 55.9% in Q1 of 2020. Non-GAAP SG&A in the first quarter of 2021 was 25.4% versus 33.3% in Q1 of 2020. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded restructuring-related expenses of $34.7 million, legal-related expenses of $4.4 million, and amortization of purchased intangibles of $2.4 million. In R&D, we have excluded $16.9 million of restructuring-related expenses. The non-GAAP R&D expense in Q1 was consequently 7.9%. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 13.9% on a GAAP basis to 25.8% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q1 of 2020 of 13.9%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increasing value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $1.179 billion, and $1.8 million of loss associated with venture investments. Our non-GAAP effective tax rate for the quarter was 23.6% versus 25.7% in Q1 of 2020. The tax rate was impacted by changes in the geographic mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2021 was $157.4 million, or $5.21 diluted earnings per share compared to $57.6 million and $1.91 per share in Q1 of 2020. Moving on to the balance sheet. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 were $1.025 billion, compared to $997 million at the end of 2020. During the first quarter, we purchased 89,506 shares of our stock for a total of $50 million at an average price of approximately $559 per share. For the first quarter of 2021, net cash generated from operations was $114 million, which compares to $63 million in Q1 of 2020. The improvement is mainly driven by higher operating profits. The adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2021 was $232 million or 31.9% of sales, and excluding the Sartorius dividend, was 29.3%. The adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2020 was $107.4 million or 18.8% of sales, which did not include the 2020 Sartorius dividend. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2021 were $19.5 million, and depreciation and amortization for the first quarter was $32.7 million. Moving on to the guidance. We began the year with a projection of between 4.5% and 5% non-GAAP sales growth, and a non-GAAP operating margin of between 16% and 16.5%. Even though we continue to be uncertain about the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, given the results of the first quarter and our current outlook, we are now guiding currency-neutral revenue growth in 2021 to be between 5.5% and 6%. This includes COVID-related sales, which we estimate to be between $170 million and $180 million versus our prior estimate of about $150 million and $160 million. We project most of the 2021 COVID-19-related sales to occur during the first half of the year, and we continue to assume a continued gradual return to pre-pandemic activity and a more normalized business mix. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected between 56.5% and 57% versus our previous guidance of 56.2% and 56.5%. And full year non-GAAP operating margin to be about 17%, and full year adjusted EBITDA margin to be about 22% versus previous guidance of 21%. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. First question is coming from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Ilan, maybe just starting with the updated guidance outlook. It would suggest that organic growth over the balance of the year would be about flat to maybe plus 1%. Could you talk about what that embeds in terms of the two segments for the balance of the year? And whether you think diagnostics can continue to ramp with that double-digit target you talked about before?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Brandon. And I believe that you refer to organic in this case, ex-COVID sales?
Brandon Couillard:
Yes, that's right.
Ilan Daskal:
So I'm not sure that we are at about flat. Actually, if you run the math, It's about 7.5%. And -- for the full year, are you referring? Or for the first quarter year-over-year, sorry?
Brandon Couillard:
Well, including the COVID dynamic, it would suggest that organic from 2Q to 4Q is about flattish, given the 23% that you did in the first quarter.
Ilan Daskal:
Okay, okay. So you compared quarter-over-quarter, the Q4 over Q1?
Brandon Couillard:
Yes, kind of the trends of the amount to be here, to get to the full year.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, that's fair. I would highlight on that, Brandon, that seasonally, usually, Q4 is a strong quarter for us, and the first quarter is usually kind of not as strong as Q4. So actually, having a flat quarter is to us an excellent result.
Brandon Couillard:
Could you speak to what the guide assumes specifically for Diagnostics? The 2% core growth in the first quarter was an improvement, but not quite as material of a rebound as we've seen from some other central lab peers. Curious why that might necessarily be the case and which areas are lagging? Maybe that's a better question for Dara.
Andrew Last:
So Brandon, maybe I can make it quick, it's Andy speaking. We had a strong Q1. We had a strong start last year, and that included some of the carryover from the COVID -- the cyber ninth attack in December of '19. Actually, we were pretty pleased with the recovery of the diagnostics business in Q1 and it's fairly broad-based, but I would say more so in Asia Pac as that was the first region that started to show a negative impact in 2020. So I'd say it's meeting -- it's really meeting our expectations for our guidance for the year.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Maybe shifting over to some of the P&L lines. SG&A, just on a dollar basis, was down a lot year-over-year and sequentially. Was there some timing benefits from maybe some investments that perhaps may have gotten pushed out to later in the year? Are you finding some new areas for cost outs right now? Just help us to understand the trend in that line?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure, Brandon. So there are a few probably components to highlight here. First, we have the $5 million reimbursement, the insurance reimbursement regarding the cyber-attack claim. And so that needs to be probably kind of, if you normalize for that, so from a normal run rate, it's higher by $5 million. Then the other aspect that I would highlight is, still kind of lower discretionary expenses associated with the COVID-related environment. And those, we believe, will come back later in the year. That's our assumption. And some of it is also planned hiring that we still have for the remainder of the year. So these are probably the main components that I would highlight there.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then in terms of the COVID revenue contribution, can you break down the contribution sort of between PCR instruments, your new COVID EUA PCR test, and how much might be research related and other?
Ilan Daskal:
So I can say that the vast majority is the qPCR instruments, that's definitely the vast majority. Everything else is way, way, way smaller. So it's still the same as we have experienced in the prior quarter in terms of the ratio of the qPCR instruments.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. Next question is coming from the line of Dan Leonard from Wells Fargo.
Daniel Leonard:
Thank you. So I'll try to ask Brandon's question in a different way. So appreciate the guidance raise, but given your strong Q1 performance, the magnitude of the raise actually suggests that Q2 through Q4 are worse than I was initially thinking. So are there any offsets you'd want to flag?
Ilan Daskal:
So generally speaking, Dan, I'm not sure how did you run your math, but I can tell you that the way we think about it -- most of the incremental kind of portion of the guidance is associated with the first quarter COVID-related sales, some of it is also -- some assumptions associated with later in the year, but most of it is the incremental benefit that we have experienced in the first quarter. When you think about it from a full year perspective, Diagnostics is still kind of -- we assume, a low double-digit kind of growth there. And we said last time about flat for Life Science, now maybe it's about 2% or so. So definitely, it's an updated guidance upwards from the last quarter.
Daniel Leonard:
Okay. And can you speak to the margin dynamics associated with the COVID products, just given that your margins were so strong in Q1 and well higher than what you're forecasting for the full year?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. So on a high level, Dan, it's about volume and mix. If we think about the full year guidance of COVID-related sales of between $170 million to $180 million, of which about $94 million was in the first quarter, and COVID-related sales are above the company average, that definitely is a strong quarter for us, and that was the driver associated with higher utilization in the manufacturing footprint. So when you blend it with the remainder of the year kind of guidance, probably gross margin is going to be lower in the upcoming quarters. With that said, you can get for the full year, our updated guidance of 56.5% to 57%.
Daniel Leonard:
Okay. And final question. Can you offer an update on how you're progressing with your recently initiated restructuring plans? We see the expenses in the P&L, but we'd love some color commentary.
Andrew Last:
Yes, sure. This is Andy. Essentially, [indiscernible] is progressing as we had planned. We've got a lot of changes going on and multiple functions, predominantly in Europe, as we communicated in our press release. So all of those plans are proceeding. They take time to work through. I think we've communicated before that the majority of the kind of net benefit won't be until 2023. That's still the case. So at this point in time, it's still early in our restructuring efforts, but we're pleased with the progress.
Operator:
Next question is coming from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Ilan, maybe just building on that last one. In terms of the margin guidance increase, how are you thinking about the combination of mix? And then even restructuring activities, leverage in terms of the SG&A, some cost restructuring, can you just talk to, I guess, the different levers that you're thinking about, kind of moving that margin number up a little bit this year?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thanks, Patrick. So when you think about the restructuring, generally speaking, this year, we do not think that there would be much benefit out of the restructuring. We will start, and we expect to see some benefit to start sometime next year, and to fully realize it in 2023, and that's part of our kind of long-term strategy, and that's part of what we have been communicating since December. But again, for this year, we do not anticipate to gain much benefit out of the restructuring. The gross margin in general and the operating margin, it's -- and specifically, you alluded to the gross margin, it's a volume and mix kind of benefit that we are experiencing right now.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, understood. And then on the cap deployment side, nice to see you guys buy back some stock, very timely as well, sounds like a nice price. How should we think about that going forward? Always good to get an update from Norm in terms of how you're feeling about the pipeline? Is the larger deal still on the table? Just your thoughts there at the moment.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Obviously, we continue -- this is Norman. We continue to pursue these inorganic opportunities. We did look at several things in the first quarter. Nothing that we've landed yet, but we continue to be very active in this area.
Patrick Donnelly:
And then maybe one for Annette, just on the wastewater opportunity, because it's nice to hear you guys call that out of the strength. How should we think about that? I know you -- last quarter, you were talking about o U.S. becoming a little bigger of an opportunity. How do you think about that market overall? And how it's developing over the last couple of quarters?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. It's a brand-new market, and it is developing rapidly. I mean, I think we could imagine over time, that this could develop into a $100 million or $200 million opportunity, but it's early days. That said, the Droplet Digital PCR platform was almost made for this application. When you think about what you're trying to do, you're searching for a needle in a haystack, essentially, which is the strength of the product that we have. So we're getting good pickup in government university labs, now service labs are picking up. At first, this really was a U.S. opportunity and it's spread across Europe now and other geographies as well. So I think we're optimistic about it, and we've worked on putting variant assays online for people to buy, and we're working on a specific wastewater kit that interrogates for all the variants as well.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. Perfect. And last one for me, just housekeeping. I think there was some news flow on the litigation front with Tenax. Can you just give us a quick update there and where you stand?
Andrew Last:
Yes. I'd say that our comment really is, so this was an appeals court that upheld the earlier findings by the International Trade Commission and so today's federal circuit decision was not unexpected at all and it really doesn't impact our business. And so I think that's probably the only comments that we would make around the litigation at this point.
Operator:
Next is from Jack from Nephron.
Nisarg Shah:
This is Nisarg on for Jack. To ask Dan and Brandon's question a third way, how much did the first quarter beat your internal target by? It was 12% above our forecast, which is why I think we're all surprised that the full year guidance is only moving up by 1 point.
Ilan Daskal:
So thanks for the question. And let me share with you, first of all, we usually -- and we do not guide by quarter, but generally speaking, if you recall in our guidance from last quarter, we did indicate and we emphasized it today that most of the COVID-related sales will be in the first half of the year. And we experienced obviously stronger-than-expected first quarter COVID-related sales. And that's most of the incremental guidance that we have alluded to, right? I mean, so generally speaking, we are operating under the assumption that in the second half of the year, the business mix is going to normalize. So I think we are pretty consistent there.
Nisarg Shah:
Got it. Could you also elaborate on the regional growth in Diagnostics that you're seeing in Europe and North America? And like what's held those markets back on a relative basis versus APAC?
Ilan Daskal:
Dara, do you want to take this one?
Dara Wright:
Sure. So as we said in the opening comments, we're operating broadly around 90% to pre-COVID levels, but there are regional dynamics embedded in there, largely related to the mix and what percentage of certain product lines are sold in certain regions, and how impacted or non-impacted they've been by COVID. So North America is really getting up to that pre-COVID level from a performance perspective. Europe is closed, except where there's still some growth being moderated in elective surgeries, and that's a region where we have very strong sales of immunohematology, so that makes sense. And then APAC was strong, largely driven by China, which I think we've seen from other announcements, too, is that China is kind of coming back and particularly, diabetes were very strong in Q1. And that's the scenario where that product line is really quite strong. Other parts of Asia Pacific continue to really be challenged by COVID. So it's kind of a country-by-country story, frankly.
Nisarg Shah:
Got it. And one more. So what was the growth in Process Media in the quarter? And do you think you're seeing demand for COVID vaccine?
Ilan Daskal:
For the first question, can you repeat? The growth of what?
Nisarg Shah:
What was the growth in Process Media in the quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
Oh, okay. So yes, it is a double digit. But you got the -- what we provided was the growth overall for Life Science, ex-Process Media. So you can kind of probably figure out, reverse engineer kind of the number there. But it was very strong.
Nisarg Shah:
And with that, do you think you're seeing demand for COVID vaccines with that?
Andrew Last:
I mean we're not a major player, I think, as you probably know, in this segment, particularly. All -- we're getting some COVID vaccine effect, but nothing like you would expect if you were one of the majors selling into that segment.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. We have a follow-up question coming from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Ilan, if we strip out the COVID-related revenues out of Life Sciences, it looks like the base Life Sciences organic growth was up something like 20% in the first quarter. Can you just touch on the primary drivers of that?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. And so you're right, it was almost that number. And actually, we saw nice growth across all the verticals of Life Science. And we indicated those. But when you think about it, Droplet Digital PCR, the antibody, the western blotting, more specifically strong, but the others also had a nice growth as well. Annette, sorry, do you want to add anything?
Annette Tumolo:
No, I was just going to add, we were really pleased with that. The strength of the recovery across all the businesses, probably fueled by return to the lab and some pent-up demand for some of the core products that we have as people are back at the lab bench.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. And then maybe one more for you, Annette. We noticed you're running an instrument trade-up program in Life Sciences in the U.S. in the second quarter. Is this a new commercial initiative for Bio-Rad? I don't recall seeing something like this before, and should we expect any material revenue or gross margin impact from this in 2Q?
Annette Tumolo:
I'm sorry, which program are you talking about?
Brandon Couillard:
It's an instrument trade-up program that touches DD PCR, touches proteomics, flow, cell culture.
Annette Tumolo:
Okay. So it's just in -- yes, sorry, I wasn't sure which program you were referring to. Look, we occasionally put those kind of incentives in for our customers. And I think that the general answer to your question is, we wouldn't be doing it if we didn't expect some return on the program. I think that it's certainly not at the center of what's driving all of our growth, but it's one of the typical kinds of promotions that our global commercial organization runs from time to time.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. We have no questions at this time. Presenters, you may continue.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you all for joining today's call. We appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon.
Operator:
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q4 and Full Year 2020 Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Ron Hutton. Please go ahead.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you, Latif. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year results of 2020. And with me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. We cannot be certain that Bio-Rad's responses to the pandemic will be successful, that the demand for Bio-Rad's COVID-19-related products is sustainable or that Bio-Rad will be able to meet this demand. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I will now turn over the call over to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. Now before I begin the detailed fourth quarter and full year discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andy Last:
All right. Thank you, Ilan. I just like to take a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. As an opening comment, I would like to recognize the tremendous contributions and flexibility of our employees around the world during 2020, and their response to the shifting needs of operating in a pandemic have been truly exemplary. So at the onset of the pandemic, we set ourselves three key areas of focus to manage through this challenging period, which we continue with into 2021. As a quick reminder, these are the ongoing safety of our employees, continuing manufacturing operations to ensure product supply and support of our customers, and making sure we continue to make progress on our core strategies. As we closed out 2020 and entered into 2021, we’ve now achieved a steady state for operating in the pandemic reflecting employee safety, work from home, and adoption of company and local policy and practices. Overall, we have experienced minimal internal transmission of COVID across the company, and where we have suspected cases have found the internal testing of employees in the U.S. using our Droplet Digital PCR platform to be very valuable in maximizing productivity. As we enter 2021, we are well positioned to meet market and customer demands driven by the pandemic and our manufacturing sites and R&D is operating effectively. In addition, our commercial organization has deployed digital tools where appropriate to minimize onsite visits to only the essentials required to keep customers up and running on our platform. So with that brief overview, I will pass it back to Ilan. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. And now would like to review the fourth quarter and full year results for 2020. Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2020 were $789.8 million, which is a 26.5% increase on a reported basis versus $624.4 million in Q4 of 2019. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 24.4%. The fourth quarter sales included $32 million of damages award related to intellectual property litigation with 10x Genomics, covering the period between 2015 and 2018. Excluding the 32 million, the fourth quarter year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth was 19.4%. The fourth quarter year-over-year revenue growth also benefited from an easy compare of about $10 million revenue carryover to Q1 of 2020 related to the December 2019 cyber attack. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency neutral growth across all three regions. We saw strong demand for products associated with COVID-19 testing and related research. Generally, we are seeing most academic and diagnostics labs now running between 70% and 90% capacity, which is similar to what we saw in Q3. We estimate that COVID-19-related sales were about $132 million in the quarter. Sales of life science group in the fourth quarter of 2020 were $428.5 million, compared to $242 million in Q4 of 2019, which is a 77.1% increase on a reported basis, and is 73.9% increase on a currency-neutral basis, and it was driven by our PCR product lines as well as strong performance in the biopharma segment. The fourth quarter revenue also included a $32 million damages award related to intellectual property litigation. Excluding the $32 million damages award, the currency neutral revenue growth was 60.9%. The year-over-year growth in the fourth quarter was across all of the life science key product areas. Process media which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, so strong double-digit year-over-year growth in the quarter over the same quarter last year. Excluding process media sales and the $32 million damages award, the underlying life science business grew 64.6% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q4 of 2019. Growth in the overall life science segment was offset by continued softness in academic research demand as these labs around the globe are still operating below capacity. However, we believe that some of the demand was associated with larger than normal end-of-year budget release. On a geographic basis, life science currency neutral year-over-year sales grew across all regions. Last month, the FDA granted an EUA for our COVID qPCR assay kit, which runs on Bio-Rad's existing CFX PCR platforms as well as qPCR systems from other providers. The assay kit is a multiplex test that targets two separate regions in the viral genome to ensure greater sensitivity and tolerance to potential mutations. In addition, earlier today, we received an EUA approval from the FDA for COVID FluA and FluB qPCR syndromic multiplex test. These tests, which allows discrimination between each of the three different viruses also runs on Bio-Rad's CFX PCR platforms as well as qPCR systems from other providers. Sales of clinical diagnostics products in the fourth quarter were $359.6 million compared to $379 million in Q4 of 2019, which is a 5.1% decline on a reported basis and the 6.6% decline on a currency-neutral basis. During the fourth quarter, strength in our quality controls products was offset by weakness across the rest of the diagnostics portfolio, resurgence of COVID cases during the fourth quarter, the impact of the recovery of routine testing trends, and the elective surgeries. On a geographic basis, the diagnostics group was relatively flat in the Americas, but posted declines in the other regions. The reported gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 58.3% on a GAAP basis and compares to 52.9% in Q4 of 2019. The current quarter gross margin benefited mainly from better product mix, lower service costs, higher manufacturing utilization, as well as $23 million gross margin benefits associated with a 10X Genomics damages award. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.6 million compared to $4.5 million in Q4 of 2019. SG&A expenses for Q4 of 2020 were $219.1 million or 27.7% of sales compared to $214.2 million or 34.3% in Q4 of 2019. The year-over-year SG&A expenses benefited from ongoing cost savings initiatives and lower discretionary expenses and was offset somewhat by higher employee-related expenses. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.4 million versus $2.1 million in Q4 of 2019. Research and development expense in Q4 was $65.8 million or 8.3% of sales compared to $57.1 million or 9.1% of sales in Q4 of 2019. Q4 operating income was $175.2 million or 22.2% of sales compared to $59.2 million or 9.5% of sales in Q4 of 2019. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings added $904 million of income to the reported results, and this is substantially related to holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. During the quarter, interest in other income resulted in a net expense of $1 million compared to $5.8 million of expense last year. Our GAAP effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 22.2% compared to 20.9% for the same period in 2019. Our GAAP tax rate in 2020 and 2019 were affected by the large unrealized gains in equity securities. In addition, the 2019 tax rate included a discrete benefit which allowed us to apply higher foreign tax credits. Reported net income for the fourth quarter was $839.1 million and diluted earnings per share were $27.81. This is an increase from last year and is again substantially related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the fourth quarter non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter in sales, we have excluded the $32 million damages award. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $8.7 million IP-licensed cost associated with the damages award $4.6 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring benefit. These exclusions move the gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2020 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 58.2% versus 54.1% in Q4 of 2019. Non-GAAP SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2020 was 28.2% versus 31.7% in Q4 of 2019. In SG&A on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchase intangibles of $2.4 million, legal related expenses of $6.3 million and restructuring and acquisition-related benefits of $3.1 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the fourth quarter of 2020 was 8.7% versus 8.2% in Q4 of 2019. In R&D on an non-GAAP basis, we have excluded a small restructuring benefits. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 22.2% on a GAAP basis to 21.4% on a non-GAAP basis. These non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q4 of 2019 of 14.3%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $904.3 million, $2.1 million associated with venture investments and $3 million of interest income associated with a 10X damages award. Our non-GAAP effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 24.3% compared to 17.7% in 2019. The non-GAAP tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2019 was lower compared to 2020 due to a discrete benefit, which enabled us to apply higher foreign tax credits. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2020 was $121 million or $4.01 diluted earnings per share, compared to $70 million and $2.32 per share in Q4 of 2019. Moving on to the full year results, net sales for the full year of 2020 were $2.546 billion on a reported basis, excluding the 10X damages award of $32 million sales were $2.514 billion which is 8.9% growth on a currency neutral basis. We estimate that COVID-19 related sales were about $313 million. Sales of life science group for 2020 were $1.23108 billion, excluding the 10X damages award of $32 million, the year-over-year growth was 35% on a currency neutral basis. The majority of the year-over-year growth was driven by our four PCR products, droplet digital PCR and process media. On a geographic basis, life science currency neutral full year-over-year sales grew across all three regions. Sales of clinical diagnostics products for 2020 were $1.305 billion which is down 7.1% on a currency neutral basis. On a full year basis, clinical labs have seen a significant negative impact of the pandemic, which was slightly offset by growth within quality controls. On a geographic basis clinical diagnostics full year-over-year sales, so declined across all regions. The full year non-GAAP gross margin was 56.9% compared to 55% in 2019. The year-over-year margin increase was driven mainly by product mix and manufacturing efficiencies, which was somewhat offset by higher logistics costs. Full year non-GAAP SG&A was 30.9% compared to 34.4% in 2019. The lower SG&A was driven by our ongoing cost savings initiatives and lower discretionary expenses, offset somewhat by higher employee related expenses. Full year non-GAAP R&D was 9.1% versus 8.5% in 2019 and full year non-GAAP operating income was 17% compared to 12% in 2019. Lastly, the non-GAAP effective tax rate for the full year of 2020 was 24% compared to 24.1% in 2019. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for 2020 was consistent with our guidance of 24%. Moving on to the balance sheet, total cash and short-term investments at the end of 2020 was $997 million, compared to $1.120 billion at the end of 2019 and $1.160 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2020. In December, we repaid the $425 million of outstanding senior notes. Year-end inventory decreased by about $18 million from the third quarter of 2020. The decrease in inventory was driven by higher demand for COVID-19 related products. During the fourth quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock. We have a total of $273 million available for potential share buybacks. Full year share buybacks was about 292,000 shares for $100 million. In 2019, we purchased about 88,000 shares of our stock for $28 million. For the fourth quarter of 2020, net cash generated from operating activities was $284.7 million, which compares to $159.8 million in Q4 of 2019. For the full year of 2020, net cash generated from operations was $575.3 million versus $457.9 million in 2019. The adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 25.2% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q4 of 2019 was 18.7%. Full year adjusted EBITDA included the Sartorius dividend was $546.4 million or about 21.7% compared to 17.5% in 2019. Net capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2020 were $39.2 million and full year CapEx spend was $98.9 million. Depreciation and amortization for the fourth quarter was $36.2 million and $138.1 million for the full year. In December, we communicated our long range plan. We project revenues to grow to an overall range of $2.75 billion and $2.85 billion by the end of 2023. This growth will be driven by Droplet Digital PCR, single cell applications, clinical diagnostics, bio production and increasing growth in biopharma customers. We expect non-GAAP gross margin in 2023 to land in a range of 57% to 57.5%. We expect this positive increase to come from footprint optimization and better capacity utilization. Adjusted EBITDA margin should be in the range of 23% and 24% based on top-line growth, productivity improvements, and SG&A leverage. Last week, we initiated a strategy driven restructuring plan to improve operating performance as part of our 2023 goals. The restructuring plan primarily impact our operations in Europe and includes the elimination of certain positions, the consolidation of certain functions and the relocation of certain manufacturing operations from Europe to Asia. The restructuring plan is expected to eliminate a total of approximately 530 positions, approximately 200 positions in manufacturing and 330 positions across our SG&A and R&D functions and subsequently creation of a total of about 325 new positions approximately 100 new positions in manufacturing and 225 new positions across SG&A and R&D functions. The restructuring plan will be implemented in phases over the next two years. As a result of this restructuring plan, we expect to incur between approximately $125 million and $130 million in total costs, which we anticipate will consist of approximately $86 million cash expenditures in the form of one-time termination benefits to the affected employees. Approximately $19 million in capital expenses associated with the restructuring plan and about $20 million to $25 million in one-time transaction cost. We anticipate about $80 million to $90 million of restructuring charges related to this restructuring plan will be recorded in the first quarter of 2021 with a balance recorded by the end of 2022. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance for 2021. While we are pleased with the overall performance in 2020, we continue to be uncertain about the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic although we assume a gradual return to pre-pandemic activity levels and normalized business mix. We are guiding a currency neutral revenue growth in 2021 to be between 4.5% and 5%. We estimate about 10% to 11% revenue growth for the diagnostics group, the life science group year-over-year revenue is expected to be about flat as we projected COVID-related sales in 2021 to be about half versus 2020. We continue to assume that we will experience quarterly revenue fluctuations for process media although we estimate an overall double-digit growth for the full year. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected between 56.2% and 56.5% and full year non-GAAP operating margin to be between 16% and 16.5%. We estimate the non-GAAP full year tax rate to be between 24% and 25%. CapEx is projected between $120 million and $130 million and full year adjusted EBITDA margin of about 21%. And now, I'll turn the call to Norman for a few comments.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay, great. Thanks, Ilan. I don't really have a lot to add. I do think companies would say that that 2020 is certainly one for the history books. As I think back on the year and I think as Andy alluded to in the beginning, it was certainly an all out effort this last year to manage a myriad of challenges and not to lose sight of where we're headed in the longer term. I think as well, as Ilan, pointed out, the COVID-related revenues are expected to moderate in 2021. But I do feel that there is still a big question of when the pandemic will come under control. So in the meantime, we'll continue to work on our core initiatives to allow us to make progress over the next few years and certainly we appreciate your continued interest in Bio-Rad. So thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Norman. Operator, we will now open the line to take your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Dan Leonard of Wells Fargo.
Dan Leonard:
So my first question, can you help frame the restructuring announcement? What's the annual savings target you hope to achieve when the dust settles? And how would you characterize the efforts? Is it part of an ongoing journey or is this the big bang on the path to 2023 with the balance of the margin lifts coming from fixed costs leverage?
Ilan Daskal:
I will start and Andy probably will chime in, Dan, thanks for the question. Generally speaking, Dan, it's part of our three years trajectory that we have communicated back in December. This restructuring will go through the end of next year, so it's a two years initiative to complete it. And basically, everything is kind of baked in, in all the three years kind of projections that we provided in order to achieve our 2023 goals. It's not necessarily a one big bang. I mean, there are different phases to this plan. And, again, it would take throughout the next two years. Andy, I don't know, if you have…
Andy Last:
I don't have anything material to add to that. I mean, we're working on other things as well, of course, continually, but it is a major and material restructuring.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then just my follow-up, could you elaborate on performance in your clinical segment, it does seem like the quarter-on-quarter, weakening in the organic growth rate, it seems a bit discordant with what some of the markets are saying, some of your customers are saying, so could you elaborate further on what you think that the drivers of that were either from a product mix standpoint or a regional standpoint and any color would be helpful? And then, of course, what would improve that?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Dara, do you want to take that one?
Dara Wright:
Sure. So, really, it is a story of product mix and region. So at a macro level, we're about 80% to 90% of pre-COVID levels. And in North America, we're very close to pre-COVID performance. The real material dynamic is related to Europe, and the step up in restrictions and lockdowns that we saw in Q4 had a pretty big impact on elective surgeries. So, I would say blood typing, is a real story there in Europe as an area that still is kind of getting back to pre-COVID kind of routine levels. And then in China as well, we saw a little bit of a shift from typical wellness program to COVID-related, infectious disease programs that moderated a bit the diabetes business. So, it kind of puts and takes regionally, puts and takes within different product lines, but certainly things continue to move in the right direction with North America being kind of the bright spot there.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard of Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
One, in terms of the '21 top-line outlook pretty encouraging, given some of the comps you're lapping and kind of the roll-off of these COVID tailwinds. Can you help us understand some of the upside and downside variables that that you're thinking about? And as far as the recovery in diagnostics, should we anticipate that to mostly come in the back half of the year? Any color you can help us with in terms of the phasing of organic growth overall sort of moving through the year?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, Brandon, I'll try and put a bit more color around that. So yes, obviously, a big step back on the COVID sales anticipated as we indicated, but core clinical diagnostics continuing the recovery trend that Dara talked about, but not until second half after we get back to full normal consumption in our view. The first half has still got some COVID effects, we're guided to roughly half of last year for COVID sales, and we expect the majority of that to be in the first half of the year. Below that, recovery in the core research, life science research products, and on a good recovery in the clinical diagnostics franchise as the year progresses.
Brandon Couillard:
In terms of your new COVID PCR test, to what extent if at all have you baked in any incremental contribution from those tests? Can you talk about your manufacturing capacity on a monthly basis and remind us approximately how big is your global PCR installed base?
Norman Schwartz:
So, I'm going to ask Annette if she would like to comment and then I might add on that.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. We spent a lot of the year scaling manufacturers to meet demand both for our platforms in other reagents and consumables. And I think we're in a pretty good place right now to meet customer demand across all of our PCR products, so that's good news for us and our customers. We have been selling qPCR products for well over a decade, and there are thousands and thousands and thousands of products out there and we certainly sold an awful lot this year, Brandon. So, we're going to be as you might imagine, making sure we approach those customers with our new test options, certainly as they may need to scale or have a need for reliable second sources.
Norman Schwartz:
Thanks Annette. And I'd say, Brandon thinking about the numbers, we've baked in a modest contribution within our COVID-related sales, since we now relate. Our strategy is generally second source to the installed base. And so, it's a modest contribution as we look at our year.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. Maybe a follow up for you, Annette, on the DD PCR business, can you give us a sense of just how fast overall that business is growing, maybe including or ex-COVID? And are you pushing hard enough into diagnostics specifically? I mean, you've got one FDA approved test on the platform, are any other kits in development that could help accelerate uptake in that setting?
Annette Tumolo:
That's a great question. So you probably know that we talked about strong double-digit growth pretty much at every earnings release from that product area, and we continue to anticipate that in the future. The research market is still growing strongly. The biopharma, discovery, and production markets are growing strongly, and we certainly, you can imagine that, are investing quite significantly, I think in moving into diagnostics with our partitioning platforms. So, I think, stay tuned for what's to come there.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Maybe one more for Norman. The Sartorius stake is worth about 12 million now give or take, that's about 65% of your equity value, implied valuation on your stock stripping that out and still pretty low. Is there any sense of urgency at the Board level to monetize the stake? Is the Board considering any strategic alternatives such as the tax free spin? If not, why not? And any update to share in terms of what you referred to on the third quarter call as far as potentially being deemed an investment entity and your planning strategies as opposed to address that? Thank you.
Norman Schwartz:
So, we certainly haven't at the Board level, talked about a tax-free spin. As we said in the past, we continued to see that as a long-term investment, and I think we've got seven or eight years to go on the trust. Obviously, they continue to do very well. And so, that's kind of where we are today. As you know, we've always considered to be a strategic investment. But obviously, if something more strategic comes along, there is the possibility to liquidate that position.
Ilan Daskal:
And Brandon, regarding the question about the investment, we continue to work to resolve it, and as we mentioned in the last quarter, it probably will take a few more quarters for us to resolve this item.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly of Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Norman, maybe we got you staying on that topic there with Sartorius, in the past quarters and past meetings we've had with you, there's been some willingness to kind of address larger deals and it felt like maybe you were kind of wanting to do something larger. It sounds like now correct me if I'm wrong, maybe softening a little bit on that and kind of happy with where Sartorius is, can you just talk about I guess the M&A landscape. How you guys are feeling on the capital deployment side? And yes, we'll just be curious to hear your perspective on the opportunities out there.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. So I think like many of our peers, we do continue to look for those products and technologies to add to our portfolio. I think as you know and we've said more recently, we're especially interested in the idea of doing something larger and maybe even transformational. But of course, as these larger transformational opportunities are few and far between, but we continue to pursue the opportunities that come our way.
Patrick Donnelly:
Understood, okay. And then, Ilan, maybe for you just on the COVID expectations for '21. Certainly appreciate the call it, half of what it was in '20. At the same time, Norman kind of touched on at the end of the prepared remarks there, it's very uncertain how this whole thing will play out. The pandemic doesn't seem to be going anywhere, unfortunately. So can you just talk about I guess, the conservatism layered in here, obviously, 4Q came in well above what you guys were expecting on COVID. So maybe just talk to I guess how you guys planned out that number. And then, the pacing throughout the year, you kind of projecting a big tail off in the back half as the pandemic, hopefully subsides just want to get full understanding there?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Patrick. Generally speaking, you're right. I mean, we took into account or what we project and what we believe that the second half of the year will kind of normalize. And we will see the gradual improvement in diagnostics and the tailwind from, the COVID related sales will start to tail-off. So, the way that if you think about kind of calendarizing, the first half in our projection, we would benefit way more from the COVID-related to the second half that's the way we think about it. And we'll have to see how everything will shape up. But hopefully, the vaccines et cetera, the second half will normalize.
Patrick Donnelly:
Yes, sure. And then one for Annette, just on the wastewater opportunity, certainly is getting a little more attention, it feels like momentum is picking up there. Do you have any better sense of how big this market could be for you guys in the near term? And then, maybe just talk about the uptake you saw in 4Q and then kind of expectations here in the near term?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. This is brand new market, obviously, and kind of rapidly developing and emerging. I think that our best estimates are probably somewhere up to $200 million, over the next several years -- four to five years. We're looking closely at it right now, most of the demand is North American U.S.-based, but we are certainly working outside the U.S. to try and get attention to the utility of that kind of surveillance. We're about to launch an application kit that will support the surveillance and we'll add variants to that as we can. So, we're taking a good run at making sure that we can supply the market with products that will help.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, great. And then, just a quick housekeeping, one for you, Andy, appreciate you saying the PCR test is a modest benefit. Just got a couple investor questions in terms of what modest means? Should we think about $10 million, $20 million or just any ballpark would really help in terms of the dollar amount?
Andy Last:
Yes. I think you should be roughly in that range. As I said, our upside was driven predominantly by the instrument placements. And so, we would be recognized, we went into molecular diagnostics segment, this is coming late and we've got well-reasoned aspiration on those products.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan of Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
I was hoping you could give a little bit more color on the bioprocessing business [indiscernible] sound like from the commentary, you ended on a pretty strong note. Was there anything you could call out in terms of demand and maybe COVID vaccines help contribute to that?
Ilan Daskal:
Annette, you want to take that one?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. Well, certainly, all of the vaccine developers are already our customers in this area. We this is a business that whilst there are some fluctuations quarter-over-quarter overall has been delivering strong double-digit growth. And primarily, it's because of the markets that we address with these products, the biologic drug development and now, vaccine development and production. So, I can't say that that the result was primarily because of uptake from vaccine manufacturers, although we're there in all those accounts. The business is strong and growing.
Jack Meehan:
And then, on the litigation award that you recognized in the quarter that covered the period 2015 through 2018? What about 2019 through 2020? And how are you going to account for this kind of on a go forward basis?
Annette Tumolo:
I was just going to say, we really, we still have open litigation and we don't really discuss that in advance, but perhaps Ilan has something to add about how we're going to treat it.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, you're absolutely right. So we don't anticipate to book anything additional, so long the litigation is still on.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. I know, when you laid out the new targets, one of the growth drivers you've talked about is single cell. Andy or Annette, I was wondering if you just give us an update on some of the work you're doing there. And any updates we can maybe expect in terms of products and from Celsee this year?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. It's still early, we haven't even had a year yet post acquisition. And certainly, it was an unusual time to acquire a startup. We are investing, I think significantly in that area in our Celsee acquisition. And our goal is to put compelling tools for single cell analysis that really provide best-in-class biological insights. And we think, towards the latter part of this year, you're going to start seeing some of those products, roll out the door.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And maybe just one cleanup. Can you just confirm in terms of the COVID testing tailwinds are you going to be booking that entirely on the lifetime science side or only the test kits be reported in diagnostics in 2001?
Andy Last:
I mean, it's predominantly still life science based. If there's any pick up on, we've got the serology test on the diagnostic side is very, very small. We've got some antigen based sales, but they'll get reported in clinical if they become material contributors.
Operator:
Next question is a follow up from Brandon Couillard of Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
In terms of maybe Ilan or Annette, in terms of the COVID benefit in the fourth quarter was all of that PCR instrumentation and was DD PCR a big part of the sequential up tick?
Annette Tumolo:
Brandon most of it was associated with our qPCR products. Certainly, there was some upside from wastewater in Q4, but mostly we were getting kind of organic growth out of the Droplet Digital PCR business. And by the fourth quarter, we had really completed scale up of all of our manufacturing for the platforms, so that helps a lot.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then, Ilan FX rates have obviously moved more favorably recently. You have a general sense of, what currency should add to the top-line in '21, and then, maybe a sense of how accretive that might be to the year-over-year margin expansion?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, it's a great question, Brandon. It was probably about 2% for 2020, so when you think about 2021, I mean, with the projection that the dollar will continue to weaken. So obviously, it does contribute to the top line. There is, obviously some, negative impact on the operating expenses, as well as on the manufacturing. I mean net-net, there is still some fall through but, I don't have here kind of specific number to call out. But for sure, on the top-line, it is a contributor.
Brandon Couillard:
Last one for me, are you still planning to host some type of Analyst Day event in the first half of the year?
Ilan Daskal:
We do plan to host it sometime later this year. Yes, and we have to kind of find the right timing. I mean, hopefully, again, with vaccines everything will normalize, so that would be a great opportunity.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Ilan Daskal for closing remarks. Sir?
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you. Okay. So we appreciate you joining the call today and your interest in Bio-Rad and we look forward to connecting soon. Thank you, everyone.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2020 Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Director for Investor Relations, Kevin Han. And you may begin.
Kevin Han:
Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the third quarter of 2020. And with me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations. And the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. We cannot be certain that Bio-Rad's responses to the pandemic will be successful, that the demand for Bio-Rad's COVID-19-related products is sustainable or that Bio-Rad will be able to meet this demand. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I will now turn over the call back to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Kevin. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us, and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. Now before I begin the detailed quarterly discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andrew Last:
Thank you, Ilan. So I'd like to take a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. Before I begin, we would like to recognize our employees globally who have continued to work above and beyond to serve our customers during the pandemic. We truly appreciate the hard work and dedication across our organization. As a reminder, we have 3 key areas of focus as we continue to manage through this challenging period
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the third quarter. Net sales for the third quarter of 2020 were $647.3 million, which is a 15.5% increase on a reported basis versus $560.6 million in Q3 of 2019. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 14.9%. On a geographic basis, we experienced currency-neutral growth across all 3 regions. We saw strong demand for products associated with COVID-19 testing and related research. However, we saw lower demand in the rest of our business. Overall, in Q3, we have seen a gradual improvement in demand for both our Life Science and Diagnostics products in our regions as compared to Q2. Generally, we are seeing most academic and diagnostics labs now running between 70% and 90% capacity and slowly continuing to improve. Biopharma labs are broadly running at a slightly higher capacity rate of 80% to 90%, and we continue to monitor the situation closely. We estimate that COVID-19-related sales were about $98 million in the quarter. Sales of the Life Science Group in the third quarter of 2020 were $324 million compared to $215.7 million in Q3 of 2019, which is a 50.2% increase on a reported basis and a 48.8% increase on a currency-neutral basis. The majority of the year-over-year growth in the third quarter was driven by our core PCR products, Droplet Digital PCR and Process Media. Both core PCR and Droplet Digital PCR product revenue increases were largely COVID-19-related. Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, saw strong double-digit year-over-year growth in the quarter over the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales, the Life Science business grew 53% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q3 of 2019. Growth in the overall Life Science segment was offset by continued softness in the academic research demand as these labs around the globe were operating below capacity. We expect a continued gradual increase in lab utilization and are carefully monitoring the situation. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across all regions. We continue to be encouraged by our Droplet Digital PCR business, which is becoming more broadly adopted in wastewater testing as the gold standard. Droplet Digital PCR is now being used at the Environmental Protection Agency, the Water Research Foundation and more than 2 dozen labs globally for wastewater testing, including the State of Michigan, which is establishing a standardized and coordinated network of COVID-19 monitoring systems across the state. In addition, last month, we launched 2 new PCR systems
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Ilan, probably one for you. Can you just break out the COVID sales a bit more? The expectations going into 4Q, certainly appreciate the smaller relative benefit, but any more granularity there would be helpful. Basically, just wondering how much was related to ddPCR versus maybe some of the more instrument build-outs? And how you're expecting that to trend?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure. Thank you, Patrick. So first of all, $98 million was the incremental revenue that was associated with the COVID-19-related sales. The vast majority is associated with our core PCR and ddPCR, lesser extent, I mean, a very small number was associated with our serology test. And again, most of it were instruments. And that's the split. And when we think about Q4, we currently believe that it will be a lower number than the Q3 number.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. I guess I was just kind of wondering, should we expect a significant step down? Or is it going to be in the same ballpark, just slightly down from that kind of, call it, $100 million or so?
Ilan Daskal:
In Q2, if you recall, it was about $71 million overall with a similar kind of split between the core PCR, ddPCR and the serology in terms of the ratios. And so far, it's a little bit difficult to tell. It's going to be probably somewhere in between those two, but maybe slightly lower. But it's probably not going to be much less below the Q2 numbers. That's what we think about right now.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. No, that's a helpful way to frame it. And then on the margin side, clearly saw some nice drop-through from the big revenue beat there. Are you able to parse out how much of the margin expansion was related to the COVID revenues coming in, obviously, well above what we expected, I think you guys expected as well versus more kind of that core expansion that you've been obviously working on with the initiatives there?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So definitely, the COVID-related sales contributed both on the mix side as well as on the utilization, and these were the main components. There was some headwinds associated with freight, for example. But for the most part, it is the mix and the contribution of COVID-19-related products as well as for the utilization in some of the manufacturing footprint.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then one maybe it might be for norm, if he's there. I mean given the strong cash flow you guys are seeing, how are you guys thinking about the M&A landscape? I know over the past few quarters, you talked a little bit about being more acquisitive on the larger side. Obviously, the Sartorius stake. To your point there, it's gotten so big, you kind of have to look at some different regulations on the investment side. If you wanted to monetize that, clearly, a lot of dry powder. So how should we think about your activity, what the pipeline looks like? And again, your appetite maybe on the larger scale, given your flexibility there?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. I think as you know, over the past several years, we've done a few more of these early stage things. And I think it is fair to say that our appetite and the kinds of things we're looking at today are a little larger in size and more established companies as opposed to these technology plays that we've invested in. So again, we've got several things in the pipeline, see if we can land 1 or 2 of them.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And one last quick housekeeping one. Ilan, I know you mentioned in December, we'll get something on the revenue side. I guess what venue -- is it going to be just -- you're going to press release new 3-year targets? I just want to make sure we are thinking about that right.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So we plan to press release some financial measures. And stay tuned. But we'll follow-up with several calls as well.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Ilan, maybe to start with you. SG&A leverage, obviously, pretty good in the third quarter. Should we view this as kind of a new base that you think might be sustainable kind of under the 30% range? And maybe if Andy could chime in and touch on some of the areas where you see opportunity for additional cost savings in the business and any specific priorities that you're looking at right now would be helpful.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Brandon. I'll start, and Andy will chime in. Generally speaking, we definitely continue to enjoy some of the lower discretionary expenses, although some of these expenses did start to come back, but they're definitely not at the level of pre-pandemic. So assuming that we'll get back to pre-pandemic level, SG&A will continue to be higher from the prior quarter. And some of it was associated also with employee-related expenses. So if you think about the mid-30s level that we were there, we continue with our cost-saving initiatives that we started before the pandemic, and we are very successful in terms of realizing savings there. With that said, we believe that currently, we run below our normalized level of SG&A. So I expected some more kind of in between.
Andrew Last:
Yes. I think certainly, Brandon, we -- this does give us an opportunity to rethink some of the way we operate. I think that -- I think we've all seen how successful we've been working in a remote environment, and it wouldn't surprise me if -- as we return to normal, there is somewhat less travel than we've experienced in the past. And I'm sure there's some other areas like that, that we can think about where we can continue to work on our SG&A.
Brandon Couillard:
All right. Maybe one for Annette. Would love to get some color from you on a few areas of the ddPCR business. Number one, just around the wastewater opportunity, whether that's really the -- a need of more of a niche application. I know there are multiple other kind of technologies that are also being dabbled with out there for that application. As well as any color you might be able to share for sort of a non-COVID-related areas of demand, particularly the QX ONE. And I'd be interested if you're looking at the upgrade program for that system right now.
Annette Tumolo:
Okay. Thanks, Brandon. So the wastewater surveillance market is a brand-new opportunity for us for COVID. And we're doing some background work to try and understand the size of the market opportunity. But we think the need for surveillance to detect early community outbreak is likely to be a longer-term need, and we're very well positioned to support this with our ddPCR products. Yes, there are other technologies that you can use, but looking for that needle in the haystack in an environment with a lot of inhibitors, as you might imagine, is a situation that ddPCR can really serve quite well. So we're pleased with the uptake we've taken so far, and we're really taking a harder look at what the longer-term opportunity is. Second question -- oh, so non-COVID. Like the clinical diagnostics market, we're seeing some gradual return to normal. We're not quite there yet. But sequentially, we see the improvement of revenue coming in from our core products. And this means people are back at the lab doing experiments, western blooding, things like that. So we're optimistic. I think like our own R&D teams, I think research labs around the world are figuring out the right algorithm to have people come back in the lab and stay safe and get some work done. So I think we're starting to see that as part of the return to normal.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. And then last one, I don't know, maybe Ilan or Andy. Maybe update kind of where you think you stand with 10X Genomics litigation right now and when you might actually expect to receive some of that cash that's been accrued that they owe you?
Andrew Last:
So this is Andy. I mean we're not typically commenting on the litigation situation with regard to 10x. And so I think we'll kind of continue to work through that litigation. And we'll obviously report when there's something that we feel we can disclose.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron Research.
Jack Meehan:
I wanted to probe a little bit more on the COVID expectations going from the third to the fourth quarter. Is there any color you can provide around your capacity on the testing assay side? And within -- you expect overall sales to go down sequentially, but do you assume that piece is stepping up in the year-end?
Andrew Last:
So I mean Annette can certainly chime in as well on the back end of my comments. But as you probably know, the majority of our COVID-related sales are instrument placements since we don't have an established molecular diagnostics franchise. So our sales are more related to capacity building than they are test pull-through. So our point of view on Q4 is demand is there. We think it's going to be overall a bit softer than Q3.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then on the -- oh, go ahead, Annette.
Annette Tumolo:
No. Sorry, I was just going to add we're somewhat new to the molecular diagnostics market, but we have submitted a qPCR test to the FDA for an emergency use authorization. So stay tuned for that.
Jack Meehan:
Would you need an EUA to be able to launch a test to the market? Or is it -- could you actually roll something out in advance of that?
Ilan Daskal:
We need the EUA if labs choose to create their own LDT through components, put full insulin together. They're at full liberty to do that, and that's obviously why many are buying our system and then building their own assay.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then as you look across both businesses, is it possible to quantify at all if there was any potential catch up in investment in the third quarter from the second quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. It's a good question. It's nothing that's evident to us. That's not to say that there may not have been a pocket of catch-up here and there, but nothing that we would say that we -- is evidenced whilst it's been material to Q3, the Q3 results.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then on the quality control side, I know you called that out as kind of an area of strength in diagnostics. So I was wondering if there was anything that stood out from a menu perspective? Do you think COVID testing could have helped that?
Ilan Daskal:
I don't -- I'll start to add on to my initial response, which is that, no, I think our quality control business, very broad-based across routine testing and COVID-related controls are really only a small component. So it's more indicative to us of sequential improvement in routine testing across the board.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And last one, if I can squeeze it in is, how is progress going with Celsee since the acquisition? And any updates in terms of time line for new products there?
Ilan Daskal:
I think we'll pass this one to Annette.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. So it's certainly early days with the technology, but we are seeing some traction in the market. We are investing in a new next-generation platform, and the work is progressing quite well. We're also developing a series of application-based kits for the single cell market. So we're very excited about the R&D that's going on in Ann Arbor. And like I said, supporting that with significant investments.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard from Wells Fargo.
Dan Leonard:
So my first question for whoever wants to take it, how much time are you spending on contemplating and thinking about how to better leverage your larger installed base of PCR equipment in molecular testing post pandemic? How much of a focus is that for you?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. That's an interesting question. Certainly, we've spent a fair amount of time thinking about that, and it's an obvious opportunity for us. And as Annette said, we've got an EUA in the FDA now on the shorter term. But yes, we are thinking about longer term what more could we do.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then just trying to frame the potential risks as we have a renewed wave of shutdowns. It seems like that's happening in France. I have just stuck in my mind that you're over-indexed to France, but that could be a 15 years' old memory. So can you mark me to market kind of where do you see your greatest exposure from a renewed wave of closures and how are you trying to frame that?
Ilan Daskal:
So I think that, that's pretty global. I don't see any one particular geography that's where we're more or less exposed. And again, it's an area that we're watching very closely to -- quite aware of the fact that this thing isn't going away.
Andrew Last:
May I add an extra dimension to that? I think -- so obviously, the resurgence is something that we need to kind of keep our eye on extremely closely, though. I think we're also experiencing that many people have learned how to work now with COVID as the backdrop. And so unlike the first surge of the year, we think it's likely to be more moderated, but it's certainly not going to go without impact. And so it's much harder to gauge how much impact there might be from this current resurgence that's going on.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then maybe my final question for Ilan. Ilan, you mentioned some technicality that might get Bio-Rad classified as an investment company. What would be the implications of that?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Danny. It's a great question. I mean, basically, in the near term, we don't think it has any impact on our operations. And obviously, we are currently working on the resolution. So that's our thinking right now.
Operator:
There are no more questions at this time.
Ilan Daskal:
All right. Okay. Thank you, everyone, for joining us today, and we look forward to connecting with you in the next quarter. Thank you.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect at this time.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q2 2020 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Kevin Han. Please go ahead, sir.
Kevin Han:
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the second quarter of 2020. And with me on the phone today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group, and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements are statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad's results and operations, and steps Bio-Rad is taking in response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. We cannot be certain that Bio-Rad's responses to the pandemic will be successful, that the demand for Bio-Rad's COVID-19-related products is sustainable or that Bio-Rad will be able to meet this demand. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I'll now turn over the call to Ilan Daskal, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Kevin. Good afternoon. Thank you all for joining us, and we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy during these challenging times. And also, we want to officially welcome Kevin Han as our new Head of Investor Relations. Kevin comes to Bio-Rad with a breadth of experience in finance, capital markets, financial analysis and investment management, primarily in the life sciences and medical technology space. We believe that he will make an excellent addition to Bio-Rad. Now before I begin the detailed quarterly discussion, I would like to ask Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's operations in light of the current pandemic-related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andy Last:
Okay. Thank you very much, Ilan. And I'd like to start by taking a few minutes to review our current state of operations around the world. Before I begin, I'd like to recognize our employees around the world who continue to make extraordinary efforts to serve our customers under the current circumstances. So thank you to all of our employees for your dedication and continued commitment to the company. Your efforts are truly appreciated. So since the beginning of the pandemic, we have been focused on three key areas to manage through this challenging period
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. And now I would like to review the results of the second quarter. Net sales for the second quarter of 2020 were $536.9 million, which is a 6.2% decrease on a reported basis versus $572.6 million in Q2 of 2019. On a currency-neutral basis, sales decreased 4.4%. On a regional basis, strength in Asia was offset by weakness in other regions. As Andy alluded, the pandemic resulted in a significant change in the mix of product demand across our portfolio. We saw strong demand for products associated with COVID-19 testing and related research. However, we saw lower demand in the rest of our business. We estimate that the COVID-19-related sales were about $71 million in the quarter. Sales of the Life Science Group in the second quarter of 2020 were $252.1 million compared to $212.4 million in Q2 of 2019, which is an 18.7% increase on a reported basis and a 20% increase on a currency-neutral basis. The majority of the year-over-year growth in the second quarter was driven by our core PCR products, Droplet Digital PCR and Process Media. Our core PCR and Droplet Digital PCR products revenue increases were driven by strong demand for COVID-19-related products. Growth overall in the Life Science segment was offset by softer academic research demand as these labs around the globe were operating materially below capacity. Process Media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, saw significant year-over-year growth in the quarter, which was primarily due to an easy compare over the same quarter last year. Excluding Process Media sales, the Life Science business grew 14.1% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q2 of 2019. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew in Asia and in Europe, while the Americas were about flat. We continue to be excited about our Droplet Digital PCR platforms. The unique sensitivity and specificity of the technology continues to open up new opportunities and applications. During the current pandemic, it is being deployed to monitor SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in wastewater streams. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics products in the second quarter were $283.2 million compared to $357.1 million in Q2 of 2019, which is a 20.7% decline on a reported basis and an 18.7% decline on a currency-neutral basis. During the second quarter, Clinical Diagnostics segment experienced weakness across all of its product lines due to the reduced demand from lower noncritical hospital and clinic visits. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group posted declines across all regions. We continue to execute on our new product development strategy. We launched in the second quarter the GelDoc Go Imaging System, which provides a benchtop imaging solution in a compact and automated package. We also launched a new label claim for our Geenius HIV 1/HIV 2 Supplemental say, which is now approved by the FDA for using blood and plasma donation center settings. The reported gross margin for the second quarter of 2020 was 54.6% on a GAAP basis and compares to 53.7% in Q2 of 2019. The current quarter gross margin benefited mainly from better product mix and higher utilization, partially offset by an $8 million customs duty charge taken in the quarter relating to products shipped primarily in prior years. This $8 million expense impacted the gross margin by about 150 basis points. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $5 million compared to $3.8 million in Q2 of 2019. SG&A expenses for Q2 of 2020 were $189.3 million or 35.3% of sales compared to $201.3 million or 35.1% in Q2 of 2019. Reduction in SG&A expenses was the result of disciplined hiring and lower discretionary spend, primarily travel and marketing expenses, due to the impact of COVID-19 as well as ongoing cost savings initiatives. The year-over-year decrease on a dollar basis was $12 million, and we expect that most of the discretionary cost savings will gradually come back over the coming quarters as we return back to the workplace. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.3 million versus $1.6 million in Q2 of 2019. Research and development expense in Q2 was $52 million or 9.7% of sales compared to $50.1 million or 8.8% of sales in Q2 of 2019. Q2 operating income was $51.7 million or 9.6% of sales compared to $56.4 million or 9.8% of sales in Q2 of 2019. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings, added $1.183 billion of income to the reported results and is substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $10.7 million compared to $3.2 million of expense last year. Q2 of 2020 includes an $8.9 million dividend from Sartorius, which was declared in June and was paid in July. In 2019, the dividend was declared in March and was paid in April. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 22.4% compared to 22.2% in Q2 of 2019. Reported net income for the second quarter was $966.4 million and diluted earnings per share were $32.15. This is an increase from last year and is substantially related to changes in valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results, looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and the negligible restructuring benefit. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the second quarter of 2020 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 55.5% versus 54.4% in Q2 of 2019. Non-GAAP SG&A in the second quarter of 2020 was 33.9% versus 34.5% in Q2 of 2019. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization and purchased intangibles of $2.3 million, legal-related expenses of $2.6 million and restructuring and acquisition-related costs of $2.4 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense in the second quarter of 2020 was 9.8% versus 8.8% in Q2 of 2019. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded about $700,000 restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 9.6% on a GAAP basis to 11.8% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q2 of 2019 of 11.1%. We have excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $1.183 billion, a $1.1 million of loss associated with venture investments and an $11.7 million gain on the sale of a small noncore business that was part of our other operations segment. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the quarter was 23.8% compared to 26.5% in Q2 of 2019. The decrease in rate was driven by a change in our geographic mix of earnings and the taxation of our foreign earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the second quarter of 2020 was $48.3 million or $1.61 diluted earnings per share compared to $44.8 million and $1.49 per share in Q2 of 2019. Moving on to the balance sheet, total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q2 were $1.037 billion, which was roughly unchanged from the end of Q1 of 2020. During the second quarter, our inventory increased by about $71 million from Q1 of 2020 levels. The increase of inventory that we saw in Q2 of 2020 was driven by normalizing the level of our safety stock resulting from the cyber-attack in late Q4 of 2019, and our decision to secure additional components given the supply chain disruption that we experienced during the earlier part of the year. We expect to reduce inventory levels over the next three quarters. During the second quarter, we did not purchase any shares of our stock. In July, our Board refreshed our capacity authorizing a $200 million increase to our share buyback program, and we now have a total of $273 million available for potential share buybacks. For the second quarter of 2020, net cash generated from operating activities was $92.1 million, which compares to $155 million in Q2 of 2019. This reduction mainly reflects the change in working capital and the timing of the Sartorius dividend tails. The adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2020 was 18.6% of sales, and excluding the Sartorius dividend, was 16.9%. The adjusted EBITDA in Q2 of 2019 was 16%. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2020 were $18.1 million, and depreciation and amortization for the second quarter was $34.7 million. Moving on to the guidance, we continue to be uncertain about the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. With that said, we currently believe that the third quarter year-over-year currency-neutral sales may be flat to up 5%. This assumes that the third quarter will see a gradual improvement from June levels, a smaller relative benefit of COVID-19-related product sales versus Q2 and the modest benefit from our serology test. We continue to assess various demand and supply indicators as well as return to the workplace protocols. We continue to believe that the COVID-19 impact will be transitory, and we would expect gradual recovery in the second half of the year, but currently, it is difficult to predict the rate of recovery that we might experience. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Dan Leonard from Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard:
Thank you. So a question on the COVID surge demand in the quarter. How much of that 71 million was equipment-related versus consumables? And do you have any efforts to perhaps be more directly involved in testing? So there must be 100 qPCR tests out there, but I don't think Bio-Rad has one yet and so curious for your thoughts on that.
Andy Last:
Okay. Dan, hi, this is Andy here. I think what we'd say is the majority of the sales there were instrument. Of course, we do have reagents, too, and on our core PCR business there, some embedded Droplet Digital PCR sales, too. That was the answer to the first part of your question. Could you just repeat the second part?
Dan Leonard:
Yeah. The second part was, do you have any aspirations to be more directly involved in the testing effort? I mean I noticed you don't have your own qPCR test, and I'm uncertain if you have plans to develop one or otherwise.
Andy Last:
Yes. So we've got a ddPCR EUA that was approved. And I'll allow Annette – I'll pass to Annette to answer the question on the qPCR question.
Annette Tumolo:
Okay. Thanks, Andy. Yeah, as Andy said, we have quite a large footprint in instruments, but we did see dramatic increase in demand for our reagents and our plastic consumables that go along with it. We chose to put a Droplet Digital PCR COVID test kit out first, and we are always evaluating whether putting a qPCR test out would make sense for us. I mean, it may, and that's something that we could always choose to do.
Dan Leonard:
Okay, thank you. And my follow-up question, what are your expectations on the pace of academic, government and market demand into Q3? It seems you're over-indexed there in Life Sciences, and it seems like that's an important variable in the Q3 outlook. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Andy, do you want to take that?
Andy Last:
Sure. I can take that. So we expect to continue to see a gradual increase in opening as we go through Q3. We're not expecting any sudden changes in pace, to be fair. We saw a gradual opening through Q2, picking up in the second half a bit. And we're thinking the same as we go through Q3.
Dan Leonard:
Thanks for the color.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Dan.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Your line is now open.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great, thanks. Ilan, maybe one for you on the margins, very encouraging and particularly in this environment to see the expansion there. Can you just talk through the strength, particularly with the onetime headwind you guys faced? And then the expectations going forward, how much of it was mix, as you kind of talked about the COVID benefit maybe a little smaller as we go forward? How much was related to that versus some of the internal initiatives that you guys have had going for some time here?
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate the question. So yes, this quarter, we had, obviously, a better gross margin due to the better mix. As well as some benefit from the inventory buildup that started post Q4 of 2019. Generally speaking, when I think about the full year, I don't think that there will be a big impact on the full year gross margin. We plan to take the utilization a little bit lower in the second half since we have built up some inventory this quarter. And also it depends on the mix that we'll experience in the second half, but assuming that we'll have a gradual continued recovery out there. It will have a balancing kind of effect on the overall kind of mix and the benefit on the gross margin going into the second half.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just on the Clinical Diagnostics side. Can you just talk through the trends as we progressed through the quarter? How much improvement did you see as we went through June there? And then also, as we've seen this reuptick of COVID in July, I've heard some kind of say the elective stuff has pulled back a little bit. It'd be great if you could just talk through what you've seen quarter-to-date as well on that side. Did you see things come back and then take a little bit of a pause or have things progressed pretty well?
Ilan Daskal:
Dara, do you want to take that question?
Dara Wright:
Sure. We did start to experience some modest recovery in June and exactly, as you said, still muted by selective procedures and routine testing really not being back to historical averages. So we're in watchful waiting, but we did see an improvement in June.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great and maybe a last one, just on the ddPCR side, are you guys getting this technology in front of customers that perhaps you weren't accessing before COVID, meaning has the demand upticked to a level where the installed base is all of a sudden strengthening quite a bit? And the technology is getting out there in a more broad sense, whereas on the other side of COVID now, maybe you have a bit of a stronger franchise, given the acceleration there?
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah, I'll address that question to Annette.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. I think the general answer that – to your question is, yes, that's likely what's happening. We've been experiencing good growth with this platform for quite a long time, and we continue to see it. We had not focused the technology on infectious disease. And I think what has emerged is how it can be quite useful in this area in virology, in particular. So I think we'll have kind of a lasting effect there. And certainly, we've already been present in wastewater monitoring for wastewater that's being reused, they monitor for pathogens. They're using the platform because it's highly sensitive and very precise. It's being used by governmental agencies for environmental monitoring, public safety, for swimming areas. So I think we're seeing an uptick there, people getting in – monitoring for those reasons are now saying, gee, maybe we should be looking to monitor for SARS. So I think we're going to get some lasting kind of customers in that area as well.
Patrick Donnelly:
Very helpful, thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Patrick.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
Thanks, good afternoon. I was hoping just a little bit more granularity on the $71 million benefit from COVID in the quarter. How much of that was in Life Sciences versus whatever benefit you might have seen with serology on the diagnostics side?
Andy Last:
Hi, Jack. Yeah. This is Andy. The majority came through the Life Science PCR and Digital PCR side of the business. Contribution from serology was very modest. We launched our product late in the quarter, and so it was a very modest contribution.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And I guess you were capacity constrained in the second quarter. And I know your third quarter guidance calls for a step down sequentially in the contribution. But I guess, why would that be the case if the manufacturing footprint is where it needs to be going into the summer?
Andy Last:
Annette, do you wish to answer that question?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. I can take that. So at the beginning of this pandemic, we experienced, as did many others, a real upswing in demand, and we spent several months in the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter, scaling our manufacturer to meet demand across our platform, our reagent and our plastics consumables lines. I think we're in a good place now to meet demand and to scale further if we have to. We do have to watch out for supply chain constraints as our – other life science companies do as well. But I think moving into the third quarter and through the end of the year, we've gotten ourselves into a good position to meet demand.
Jack Meehan:
Got it and then if I look at the Life Science results, if the COVID tailwind was concentrated there, and you had the biochromatography Process Media tailwind I'm getting something like the core business, I don't know if my math is right, I'm trying to do it while we go, but down well over 20%. Can you just talk about some of the additional products and the expectations for a recovery going into the back half within the Life Science segment?
Andy Last:
Yes. I think when we look at that question, I think we feel our business is kind of down in line with the majority of the other reported – reports for Q2 in the kind of high-teens percentage. We don't see our core Life Science being down over 20%.
Ilan Daskal:
And the way we think about it, Jack, also thinking about the second half, obviously, part of our guidance for the third quarter and is a continued gradual recovery, and that goes back to a more normalized kind of mix throughout the portfolio.
Andy Last:
Yeah. I didn't – I think we felt quite comfortable with where we were given the market conditions as we netted it out, so nothing new.
Annette Tumolo:
That's right. Quite in line with the market dynamics, I think.
Jack Meehan:
Got it and if I can squeeze in one final one. I was curious – just thoughts around capital allocation, the Sartorius stake, if you just look over the last 1.5 years, it's gone from almost $3 billion to closing in on $7 billion now. Does the pandemic change your views at all around the strategic nature of that and looking to build it or the way you think about potentially pursuing larger M&A?
Norman Schwartz:
So obviously, Sartorius has continued to do very well. Hence, the increase in their market cap. It's – obviously, it's been a pretty good investment for us.
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. I would add also, Jack, in terms of the overall capital allocation. I mean, it's a similar strategy that we have been discussing in the past year. We have continued interest with the strategy of those smaller tuck-in acquisitions, which we continue to pursue as well as with a much higher appetite for entertaining a larger transaction. And that's obviously – will be more opportunistic. I mean, you need to wait for those to become available. And again that will be complimented by the share buyback, which the Board now authorized to increase the plan.
Jack Meehan:
Great, thank you all.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Jack.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Start with Ilan maybe. As you look at the back half of the year, very specifically around the third quarter, any parameters you can share with us as far as the step down sequentially of the COVID tailwinds? Is it over half or less than half you expect to capture in the third quarter? And then if you look at the OpEx line, a significant amount of leverage in G&A in the second quarter, how much of that spend comes back into the model in the second half of the year?
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. Thank you, Brandon. I think to your first question, I think it's a little bit premature to assess how Q4 is going to shape up. We can tell you, based on the last several months that a lot is happening every few weeks. So I don't know that the general seasonality that we experience every year will be similar this year. Thinking about the operating expenses, so most of the savings specifically this quarter are going to come back at some point, I mean, and it will take a few quarters. With that said, I can tell you that, obviously, that we will have to revisit kind of how do we spend the discretionary expenses, and how do we manage potentially with less travel, et cetera. So if I have to kind of categorize it, most of it is still associated with discretionary, specifically this quarter. Some of it is associated with our long-term initiatives to reduce our operating expenses. And as you can see also on the R&D side, we continue to invest on a dollar basis actually, it was slightly higher. We do not have any intention to reduce our R&D investment.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe one for Annette, on ddPCR, let's get an update now, I guess, six or eight months into the launch of the QX ONE platform, specifically which customers you feel are adopting fastest, what percent of new placements there are or upgrades from the legacy system? Anything you can share with us on how that launch is proceeding.
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. Well, fortunately, it's proceeding quite well. And the primary segment where we focused this product was biopharma and to a large extent in the QC and manufacturing parts in the cell and gene therapy markets. And we have many customers who adopted our QX200 for that application, and we see some of those customers adding QX ONE to their repertoire. We see some of those customers looking towards, gee, I like the QX ONE, maybe I'll convert to QX ONEs. But we're pleased with the progress that the product introduction has made.
Brandon Couillard:
Just a quick question, Ilan, just to confirm, the non-GAAP gross margins, did that still include the $8 million customs charge? I just want to make sure you didn't back that out of the non-GAAP adjustments.
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah, it does. I did not take it out. That's correct. And it's about 150 basis points.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. So margins would have been 150 better, excluding that. Okay. Very good, thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time, I'm showing no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Ilan Daskal for closing remarks.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, operator. Thank you, everyone, for joining our call today and we look forward to connecting with you in the near future.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q1 2020 Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Earnings Conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Thank you. I would now like to hand the call over to your speaker today, Mr. Ron Hutton. Please go ahead.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you, Buena. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the first quarter results for 2020. With me on the phone are, Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risk and uncertainties. Included in these forward-looking statements, our statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Bio-Rad results and operations and steps Bio-Rad is taking and response to the pandemic. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, and the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. We cannot be certain that Bio-Rad’s responses to the pandemic will be successful that the demand for Bio-Rad's COVID-19 related products is sustainable or that Bio-Rad will be able to meet this demand. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I will now turn to turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon, thank you all for joining us. And we hope that you and your families are well and staying healthy. We would like to recognize and thank our employees around the globe who continue to make extraordinary efforts to serve our customers under the current circumstances. Before I get into detailed quarterly discussion, Andy Last, our Chief Operating Officer, will provide an update on Bio-Rad’s operations in light of the current pandemic related environment that we are experiencing globally. Andy?
Andy Last:
Thank you, Ilan. So I'd like to take a few minutes to update you on our current state of operations around the world. To closely monitor and keep closed all of our sites, we've established the COVID-19 oversight team to manage and respond to the pandemic situation. As we manage through the challenging period, we're focused on three key areas; the ongoing safety of our employees; continuing manufacturing operations to ensure product supply and support of our customers; and making sure we continue to make progress on our core strategies. In the area of employee safety, we have implemented work from home globally for all employees who are not essential to maintaining ongoing production and safe use of our facilities. Travel is limited only to essential customer visits for our field base personnel. For all employees who are at work, we have implemented safety procedures in line with CDC recommendations and/or local authorities when required. In China and other Asian region countries where stay at home has been lifted, we have our teams back in the office where we are adopting shifts, monitoring temperatures and still maintaining social distancing and cleaning routines in accordance with applicable local guidelines. We'll continue to follow this phased return to work approach as other reasons begin lifting shelter in place restrictions. Overall, we're very pleased with the positive response of our employees. Our manufacturing operations teams have responded extremely well to the situation. And to-date, we've been overall able to maintain continuous production in most of our sites and have been working closely with our customers to ensure product supply continuity. As part of our response efforts, we've been able to mitigate many of the changes in customer demand both up and down by balancing production and resources across our sites and in a few instances we have temporarily suspended production. In particular, we saw in the first quarter high demand for our PCR and Droplet Digital PCR products and similar to other companies, have experienced some challenges in procurement and scaling production. These challenges have generally been due to all suppliers being impacted by shelter in place requirements, as well as their inability to meet increased demands. With the recent launch of our SARS-CoV-2 serology test, we're also now scaling manufacturing both the U.S. and in Europe to meet the expected demand. As we look forward, we continue to monitor demand across our portfolio to optimally manage this situation, adjust capacity in our supply chain and ensure continuity of high quality product to our customers. And lastly, while much time and energy has been recently focused on managing through the impact of the global pandemic, we continue to work on our core initiatives and strategies. Thank you. And I'll pass it back to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Andy. And now, I'd like to review the results of the first quarter. Net sales for the first quarter of 2020 were $571.6 million, which is 3.2% increase on a reported basis versus $554 million in Q1 of 2019. On a currency neutral basis, sales increase 4.3%. Sales in all regions were impacted by the global spread of COVID-19 as the quarter progressed. This was evident first in Asia. And late in the quarter, we experienced the tapering in demand in the U.S. and in Europe. As you recall, we estimated $5 million revenue carryover from Q4 due to the cyber attack. We now feel that the first quarter probably benefited by closer to $10 million. As Andy alluded to, the pandemic resulted in a significant change in the mix of product demand across our portfolio. We saw strong orders for PCR based products related to COVID-19 testing and research, and lower demand mainly within the clinical diagnostics portfolio, which was impacted by shelter in place guidelines. Sales of the Life Science Group in the first quarter of 2020 were $227.2 million compared to $215.7 million in Q1 of 2019, which is 5.3% increase on a reported basis and 6% increase on a currency neutral basis. Much of the year-over-year growth in the first quarter was driven by double-digit growth in gene expression, Droplet Digital PCR, antibody products and food safety. Our core PCR, and Droplet Digital PCR products revenue increases were driven by strong demand related to COVID-19 testing and related research. Growth in the Life Science segment was somewhat offset by softer academic research demand, as well as the tough compare to 2019 related to our Process Media produce line. Excluding Process Media sales, the Life Science business grew 11.1% on a currency neutral basis versus Q1 of 2019. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency neutral year-over-year sales grew in Asia and in Europe, as well as a nice growth in the Americas when excluding Process Media. Sales of clinical diagnostics products in the first quarter were $343 million compared to $334.1 million in Q1 of 2019, which is 1.9% growth on a reported basis and the 3.2% growth on a currency neutral basis. During the first quarter, we posted solid growth in blood typing and quality controls. This growth was somewhat offset by year-over-year decline within our diabetes and immunology product lines, which showed the earliest times of reduced demand due to lower non-critical hospital and clinic visits. Overall, a decrease in routine led testing and elective surgeries impacted the diagnostic group revenue. On a geographic basis, the diagnostic group posted growth in the Americas and in Europe. As you may have seen in our recent press releases, we are the first company to receive FDA emergency use authorization for a total antibody serology tests for COVID-19. A test, which has also met CE Mark requirement for Europe. Clinical evaluation of this test is demonstrated diagnostics specificity of more than 99% and diagnostics sensitivity of 98%, eight days after the onset of symptoms. We also received FDA emergency use authorization for our Droplet Digital PCR COVID-19 test kit. The test can detect the virus with high sensitivity even when a low viral load is present. The reported gross margin for the first quarter of 2020 was 55.5% on a GAAP basis and compares to 56.3% in Q1 of 2019. In 2019, gross margin benefited from an escrow release of $7.4 million related to an acquisition from 2011. Net of this, the current quarter gross margin benefited mainly from better product mix and lower inventory reserves expense. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $3.9 million compared to $3.7 million in Q1 of 2019. SG&A expenses for Q1 of 2020 were $193.7 million or 33.9% of sales compared to $207.6 million or 37.5% in Q1 of 2019. Reduction in the SG&A expenses were the result of ongoing cost savings initiatives, as well as disciplined hiring in low discretionary spend, driven by travel and marketing expenses due to the impact of COVID-19. Total amortization expense related to acquisition recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2 million versus $1.7 million in Q1 of 2019. Research and development expense in Q1 was $49.3 million or 8.6% of sales compared to $47.6 million or 8.6% in Q1 of 2019. Q1 operating income was $74.4 million or 13% of sales compared to $56.6 million or 10.2% in Q1 of 2019. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity securities holdings is at $827.7 million of income to the reported results, and is substantially related to holding of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $3.3 million compared to $11.4 million of income last year. Q1 of 2019 included $15.7 million of dividend from Sartorius, which was not declared in Q1 of 2020. The effective tax rate was 23.7% compared to 23.2% in Q1 of 2019. Reported net income for the first quarter was $685.9 million and diluted earnings per share were $22.72. This is a decrease from last year and is substantially related to the valuation of the Sartorius Holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain critical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the first quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $3.9 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $1.5 million of restructuring benefit. These exclusions move the gross margin for the first quarter of 2020 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 55.9% versus 65.6% in Q1 of 2019. Non-GAAP SG&A in the first quarter of 2020 was 33.3% versus 36.4% in Q1 of 2019. In SG&A on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $2 million, legal related expenses of $1.8 million and restructuring and acquisition related benefit of $600,000. In R&D, we had excluded $400,000 of restructuring benefit. And the non-GAAP R&D expense in Q1 was consequently 8.7%. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 13% on a GAAP basis to 13.9% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q1 of 2019 of 10.5%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increasing value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $827.7 million and $1.3 million of loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rates for the quarter was 25.7% versus 28.5% in Q1 of 2019. The tax rate was impacted by changes in the geographic mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2020 was $57.6 million or $1.91 diluted earnings per share compared to $49.6 million and $1.65 per share in Q1 of 2019. Moving on to the balance sheet. The cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 were $1.42 billion compared to $1.120 billion at the end of 2019. During the first quarter, we purchased 291,941 shares of our stock for a total of $100 million at an average price of approximately $342 per share. For the first quarter of 2020, net cash generated from operations was $63 million, which compares to about $43 million in Q1 of 2019. This improvement mainly reflects the higher operating profits and improved working capital. Following the end of the quarter, we completed the acquisition of Celsee for $100 million in cash. Celsee is an exciting early stage company with products focused on detection and analysis of single cells. We plan to further invest in new applications to enhance Celsee's technology. We also completed in early April a divestiture of a small non-core business that’s used to be part of our former analytical instruments group. The proceeds from this transaction were about $12 million. The adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2020 was $107.4 million or 18.8% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2019 was $101.7 million or 18.4% of sales, which included the 2019 Sartorius dividend. The adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2019, excluding the Sartorius dividend, was about 15.5%. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2020 or $21.6 million and depreciation and amortization for the first quarter was $33.6 million. Moving on to the guidance. Given the uncertainties regarding the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are withdrawing our previously issued annual guidance for this year. We currently believe that the second quarter year-over-year sales may decline by 10% to 15%. We continue to assess various demand and supply indicators, as well as return to work protocols. We believe that the COVID-19 impact will be transitory and we would expect some recovery in the second half of the year. But currently it is difficult to predict the rate of recovery that we might experience. That concludes our prepared remarks and we will now open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And your first question is from the line of Brandon Couillard.
Brandon Couillard:
I’d actually start with Dara just on the serology antibody test. You faced an entrenched market with many of our high volume immunoassay systems that have great tests as well. At a high level, what is Bio-Rad’s kind of fight to win in the category? And secondly, any color you can share with us in terms of your manufacturing capacity, where it stands today in terms of number of tests per month where you expect that to be in a few months from now, expected ASP? And then any color on the EVOLIS platform in terms of installed kind of throughput metrics you can help us with?
Dara Wright:
So starting with your first question around positioning. I mean, as you said, there are other players with a variety of throughput capabilities who are entering the market. We believe that a key differentiator for our platform is that is an opens system and incredibly well suited for medium sized labs, or as a complementary format to high throughput systems, which are typically closed systems. And so as recent testing starts to ramp up in those large laboratories, we also expect that there will be more competition for volume on those closed systems. And so we believe that our platform offers a really, really nice approach to either do batch processing alongside those systems and/or we think the work flow is really great for medium sized labs. It can be run on our EVOLIS platform, which is our automated plate reader that we refer to, of which there are more than 3,000 installs globally. Or it can be adapted to any plate based system of which there are tens of thousands of systems globally, to automate both the kind of the pipe heading and the plate handling. So, great flexibility there. From a capacity perspective, this is an exceptionally scalable format from manufacturing approach as well. So we've got the capability to manufacturer few millions of tests a week if the demand is there. And as you've probably read, the adoption of serology routine practice is still being established but we believe that the opportunity is meaningful. And then lastly, you asked about ASP. So that the pricing for CPP code in North America still being established, we think that ASP will depend on volume, as well as other market entrants but likely to be in the mid-single-digit range. Was that all your questions, Brandon?
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe just one more on the science. You talked about measuring antibodies eight days post infection, many others have kind of oriented around a 21-day window. And then secondly, could you sort of speak to the value of the total antibody approach rather than just measuring say IgA as many others have decided to sort of focus on?
Dara Wright:
Our product is designed to protect IgM, IgG and IgA. And IgM is the first antibody type that appears post symptom onset as early as six, seven days post infection. So by virtue of having a kit that's designed to detect all of these serotypes, it enables earlier detection, so upwards of about 100%, 99% sensitivity as early as eight days post symptom onset. So as these tests are being used to complement diagnostic workup, especially if a patient has a negative PCR test, we believe the earlier detection is really quite useful.
Brandon Couillard:
And one follow up for Ilan just in terms of the 2Q directional commentary being down 10 to 15. actually one of the tightest ranges we've seen from many other companies to-date so far. Could you get a sense of how that might break down between Life Sciences, is the main wildcard just the pace of lab reopenings? And any chance you might be able to sort of quantify the positive COVID tailwinds that might be through there relative to the COVID related sort of headwinds from let's say lap closures?
Ilan Daskal:
There are several components that obviously we have to consider when we think about the potential Q2 revenue. Generally speaking, the return to work and if you think about Asia or China, it's a gradual return to work. And we have to wait to see kind of how it evolves in the other regions. And obviously, we do see continued demand for the core PCR instruments. So, that will continue to be kind of a driving driver for the Q2 revenue. And then we had to continue to monitor in terms of the elective surgeries and return to kind of the to the clinics, and how they kind of impact the diagnostics group. So, so far, we've seen different scenarios and that's how we came up with a range for Q2, and we'll have to wait and see how Q2 is going to evolve.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly.
Patrick Donnelly:
Ilan, maybe one for you. Certainly appreciate the guidance range. Can you just talk about on the margin side? It’s obviously been a big focus for you guys and when times are good revenue was kind of growing nicely in the mid-single-digits there. Can you talk about what levers you guys are pulling here in the near-term given the pressure on the revenue that obviously nobody saw coming? How nimble can you be with some of those initiatives that you have out there?
Ilan Daskal:
Andy, do you want to start on…
Andy Last:
Your question was to Ilan, I'm sure hell add on at the end. On the supply chain side, clearly makes an overhead absorption, critical factors when looking at margin. And we'll be watching that closely as we go, as we go through the quarter. Some areas of mitigation for us are closely monitoring demand versus supply, so that we can reduce our capacity quickly and also be in a position to respond again, so if demand picks up we had a pace and expectation. So that’s how we’re looking at our supply chain situation and its impact on margin.
Ilan Daskal:
And I would add to that, Patrick, also that overall, we continue to be very disciplined. And so the discretionary expenses, whether its travel, whether its disciplined hiring, and we’ll react to any change in the marketplace.
Patrick Donnelly:
And just be clear, the 20% has been also pulled, correct?
Ilan Daskal:
The 20%, generally, yes. And we'll have to see how the second half of the year will shape up, and this 20% EBITDA.
Patrick Donnelly:
And then maybe one on blood typing. And obviously, there's a great need and demand for that right now in this environment. It seems like people have been mostly unwilling or reluctant to go to donation center. So how should we’d be thinking about the growth for that business in the near-term here?
Norman Schwartz:
So I think there maybe two ways to look at it. One is -- maybe I'll take that for a second, one way to look at it is things getting back to normal. Obviously, with elective surgeries down, the blood typing has been a little weaker as that market -- as people kind of returned to elective surgeries and hospitals open up, I think we'll come back to seeing that more normally. Overall, it's a slow growing market. And so we would expect it to, again, come back to some degree of normalcy and then continue at that pace.
Patrick Donnelly:
And then last one, on the share repo $100 million in the quarter, really, really encouraging to see. I think it's the biggest number certainly I've seen you guys do. Was it just being opportunistic given the market pullback? Should we expect higher cadence going forward? Maybe just dive into that a little bit? Thanks.
Ilan Daskal:
It was part of the approach that we took and we have been communicating this approach for a while. And currently, we have about $70 million left in the pool. But with that said, we have to see how the market evolves and what does it mean, and what type of clarity we get and visibility we get to the rest of the year. And generally speaking, we'll continue to be opportunistic.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Dan Leonard.
Dan Leonard:
So first a question on your diagnostics business. Could you offer like what proportion of that business would you say is sensitive to noncritical testing volume versus what might be more insulated in run rate in any environment?
Dara Wright:
Do you want to take that Ilan, or would you like me to?
Ilan Daskal:
Sure, you can take that Dara…
Dara Wright:
I think it’s, for any of the products that are being used routinely like our quality controls, those are relatively protective and/or aspects of that you miss in hematology business are not tied to surgeries. Things like diabetes testing obviously has been constraint as people have been staying away from the routine kind of testing environment. But as certain countries start to lift shelter in place orders what we expect that to come back to previous levels.
Dan Leonard:
And then on the PCR business, Andy, I think you mentioned supply chain issues. Can you elaborate on when these issues might resolve? And is it right to infer that in PCR right now, you're selling everything you can and the only rate limiting factor is the supply constraints?
Andy Last:
So the supply chain side, I think is increasingly becoming more and more solvable. When COVID hit, there was this crazy rush for demand and it was surge demand that the industry hadn't expected. So I think broadly everyone stuck with the same problems. And to a large degree, I would say that at the moment, we've been able to sell pretty much everything we can produce. And we've been working hard to expand capacity at a couple of sites that we manufacture, both co-PCR and Droplet Digital PCR platforms, and consumables and reagents. There is a little competition out there for some core components but largely, we've been able to secure our fair share with that.
Dan Leonard:
And then my final question is just hoping somebody could elaborate on the Celsee acquisition. What are the objectives there? Is it more of an IT play like RainDance or is it something that you expect you’re going to develop and perhaps obsolete the DDC over time or complement the DDC? Any elaboration would be helpful, and thank you.
Norman Schwartz:
I think we'll invite Annette on that one.
Annette Tumolo:
Yes, I'd be happy to take that. I can say it's certainly the acquisition comes with important intellectual property. But this technology is one that we think has broad applications in the single cell partitioning and sorting markets and it's flexible, its cost effective, scalable to high throughput cell analysis. And it's really well suited to the kind of transcriptomic and genomic and multiomic applications that customers trying to interrogate single cells are so interested in doing, so we're really excited. And we have now the flexibility of choosing the right test tube for right application and droplets are certainly a good test tube for many of the kinds of things we're trying to do. But right now, we're focused on expanding the Celsee platform to the many applications in single cell that people are so interested in doing.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]
Ron Hutton:
Okay, operator, if there are no more questions, can you pull the line again?
Operator:
No questions at the moment sir. Please continue.
Ron Hutton:
Okay, thank you everyone. We appreciate you joining the call today.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. And thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q4 and Full Year 2019 Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Earnings Conference call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised, that today's conference may be recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Ron Hutton. Thank you. Please go ahead sir.
Ron Hutton:
Thanks, Daniel. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2019. With me today are, Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of Life Science Group; and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I'd now like to turn the call over to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. We will review the fourth quarter and full year results for 2019 on a GAAP basis, as well as commentary on a non-GAAP basis. Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2019 were $624.4 million, which is 1.2% increase on a reported basis versus $616.8 million in Q4 of 2018. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 2.3%. The fourth quarter revenue fell short by about $20 million from the midpoint of our guidance, mainly due to the cyber-attack that we reported in early December. We expect to recover in Q1 of 2020 about $5 million of the Q4 revenue shortfall. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product areas and growth in the Americas and in Europe. Sales in Asia were most impacted by the cyber attack, mainly impacting the Life Science group sales. Sales of the Life Science group in the fourth quarter of 2019 were $242 million compared to $239.6 million in Q4 of 2018 which is 1% increase on a reported basis and 1.8% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Much of the year-over-year growth in the fourth quarter was driven by a double-digit growth in Droplet Digital PCR and in Food Safety, as well as very strong results for Process Media. Excluding process Media Sales, the Life Science business declined 2.1% on a currency-neutral basis versus Q4 of 2018 as a result of the cyber attack, which impacted mainly the revenue of Life Science. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew in the Americas and in Europe. Our Droplet Digital PCR business continues to have good momentum. The fully integrated QX ONE system was launched in Q4 and we are very pleased with the demand outlook, as we continue to ramp production and shipments. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics products in Q4 were $379 million compared to $373 million in Q4 of 2018, which is 1.6% growth on a reported basis and 2.8% growth on a currency-neutral basis. During the fourth quarter, we posted solid growth of Blood Typing, quality control diabetes and immunology product lines. This growth was somewhat offset by year-over-year decline within the infectious diseases business. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group posted growth in Asia and in the Americas. The reported gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2019 was 52.9% on a GAAP basis and compares to 53.9% in Q4 2018. The fourth quarter gross margin was negatively impacted, mainly by lower revenue fall-through, the temporary production outage and lower manufacturing utilization, due to the cyber-attack, as well as a restructuring reserve. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.5 million compared to $4.2 million in Q4 of 2018. SG&A expenses for Q4 of 2019 were $214.2 million or 34.3% of sales. The SG&A expense in Q4 of 2018 was $214 million or 34.7%. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the fourth quarter was $2.1 million versus $1.8 million in Q4 of 2018. The SG&A cost savings initiatives remain a focus area to achieve our 2020 goals. Research and development expense in Q4 was $57.1 million or 9.1% of sales compared to $53.1 million or 8.6% in Q4 of 2018. Q4 operating income was $59.2 million or 9.5% of sales compared to $227.1 million loss in Q4 of 2018. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of the equity securities holdings added $646 million of income to the reported results and is substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also, during the quarter, interest and other income, resulted in net other expense of $5.8 million compared to about $84,000 last year. The year-over-year increase primarily reflects losses and impairments on some of our venture investments. The effective tax rate in Q4 of 2019 was 20.9% and compares to 20.4% benefit in Q4 of 2018. Reported net income for the fourth quarter was $553.5 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $18.31. The increase in net income and earnings per share versus last year is substantially related to the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles, $1.5 million of acquisition-related benefits and $4.4 million of restructuring expenses. These exclusions move the gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2019 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.1% versus 55.4% in Q4 of 2018. The non-GAAP SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2019 was 31.7% versus 32.7% in Q4 of 2018. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $2.1 million, $1.3 million of acquisition-related benefits, a restructuring cost of $13.2 million and $2.2 million adjustment to legal reserve. In R&D, we have excluded a restructuring cost of $6.1 million. The non-GAAP R&D expense in Q4 was consequently 8.2%. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments, result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 9.5% on a GAAP basis to 14.3% on a non-GAAP basis, which is about flat from Q4 of 2018. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $646 million and $1.8 million losses associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the quarter was 17.7%. A change in the tax rules this quarter enabled us to apply higher foreign tax credits. And finally non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $70 million or $2.32 diluted earnings per share compared to $63.1 million and $2.09 per share in Q4 of 2018. Moving on to the full year results. Net sales for the full year were $2,312 million, which is 3.3% growth on a currency-neutral basis. The annual revenue is about $20 million below the midpoint of our guidance, mainly due to the fourth quarter cyber attack. We expect to recover in Q1 of 2020 about $5 million of the fourth quarter revenue shortfall. Sales of the Life Science group for 2019 were $885.9 million, which is an increase of 2.8% on a reported basis and 4.6% on a currency-neutral basis. Much of the full year-over-year growth was driven by double-digit growth in Droplet Digital PCR, Food Safety and Process Media. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral full year-over-year sales grew in the Americas and in Europe driven mainly by the demand from biopharma market. Life Science sales in Asia were mostly impacted by the cyber-attack in December. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products for 2019 were $1,412 million, which is about flat on a reported basis and 2.8% growth on a currency-neutral basis. The full year-over-year growth was driven mainly by Quality Control, Blood Typing and Autoimmune testing products. During the year, we continue to see a nice year-over-year increase in new instrumental installations. On a geographic basis, Clinical Diagnostics full year-over-year sales saw growth in the Americas and in Asia as well as a modest growth in Europe. The full year non-GAAP gross margin was 55% compared to 54.5% in 2018. The year-over-year margin increase was driven mainly by product mix, manufacturing efficiencies and lower cost of inventory reserves, but was negatively impacted by cost associated with the cyber attack. Full year non-GAAP SG&A was 34.4% compared to 35.2% in 2018. The SG&A remains a focus area for us to achieve our 2020 goals. Full year non-GAAP R&D was 8.5% versus 8.7% in 2018 and full year non-GAAP operating income was 12% compared to 10.7% in 2018. Lastly, the full year non-GAAP tax rate was 24.1% versus our guidance of 27%. The lower tax rate was mainly driven by a change in the tax rules, which enabled us to apply higher foreign tax credits. Moving on to the balance sheet, total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q4 were $1,120 million compared to $850 million at the end of 2018 and $985 million at the end of the third quarter. We reclassified $425 million of the outstanding bonds that are due in December of this year from long-term liabilities to current liabilities. During the fourth quarter, we purchased 22,343 shares of our stock for $8 million at an average share price of approximately $358. For the fourth quarter of 2019, net cash generated from operations was $160 million, which compares to about $105 million in Q4 of 2018. This improvement mainly reflects the higher operating profits and improved working capital. For the full year of 2019, net cash generated from operations was $458 million versus $285 million in 2018. The adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $116.8 million or 18.7% of sales. Full year adjusted EBITDA, including the Sartorius dividend that was declared in Q1 and paid in Q2 was $405.3 million, or about 17.5% compared to 16.2% in 2018. Net capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2019 were $21.6 million and full year CapEx was $98.4 million. Depreciation and amortization for the fourth quarter was $34.5 million and $134.2 million for the full year. Moving on to the guidance for 2020. We are pleased with the overall performance in 2019 and we continue to see strong momentum in 2020. We are guiding a currency-neutral revenue growth in 2020 between 4.5% and 5.25%. It is too early for us to estimate at this point of time the potential global impact of the coronavirus outbreak. We estimate 7% to 8% currency-neutral revenue growth for the Life Science group and between 3% to 4% for the Diagnostics group in 2020. We continue to assume that we will experience a quarterly revenue fluctuation for Process Media. Q1 revenue is expected to be lower for Process Media compared to Q1 of 2019. However, we estimate an overall double-digit growth for the full year. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected between 55.7% and 56.1% and full year non-GAAP operating margin between 13.8% and 14.3%. We estimate the non-GAAP full year tax rate to be about 26% and CapEx is projected between $100 million and $110 million. Overall, we are on track to achieve our goal of 20% adjusted EBITDA run rate by the end of this year. And now, I'll turn the call to Norman for a few comments.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay. Thanks, Ilan. Just a few general comments, I think if you look – for me, if you look past all the viruses that are floating around, I think we are pleased with the underlying progress and we continue to make on the 2020 goals that we've been pursuing. That progress is for me a combination of good steady sales growth and expense discipline. On the sales side of the equation, the markets for our products continue to grow around the world and our outlook for 2020 is positive. I think for me that outlook is driven by the robust markets, but also by the planned introduction of new products and platforms across the business and the full year effect of products introduced in 2019, most notably probably the QX ONE Droplet Digital PCR System introduced late in the year. I think the outlook also factors in the effect of two acquisitions we completed in 2019 one in Life Science and one in Diagnostics. So as you see from the results we also continue to make progress on improving our operating income largely driven by a focus on SG&A expenses. But we also benefited from some of the supply chain improvements that, we've previously talked about. I guess, there's certainly more we can do to capture the benefits of the investments, we've made in systems and the organization and in the markets that we're pursuing. And I do look forward to another year of progress.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Norman. We will now open the line to take your questions, Operator?
Question-and:
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Good afternoon. Ilan, if I interpret your comments right you only expect to recapture $5 million of the $20 million from the cyber-attack, in the fourth quarter. Is that right? And should we just consider the other $15 million, as just lost orders? And any chance you could quantify the impact of the cyber-attack on gross. And operating margins in the fourth quarter specifically?
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Brandon. I appreciate the question. So to your first question, the answer is yes. I mean, we plan to capture $5 million out of the $20 million. And the remaining $15 million, we currently don't anticipate or plan or kind of forecast to recover the $15 million from Q4. And when you think about the overall expenses and the impact on the operating expenses, it was broad-based overall. I mean you can think about to the disruption, to manufacturing, to operations, in general. And there was a tail, throughout the quarter. So it's very difficult to kind of carve it out from the ongoing results. And so, what we decided to do is just to, kind of announce what were the overall results. It's all baked into the results that we announced.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And as we think about the full year operating margin. Can you just help us reconcile the adjusted operating margin guidance, 13.8% and 14.3% relative to your comments of the EBITDA exit rate? Should we just plug that Sartorius dividend even though it pays in the first half of the year, into the fourth quarter to try to think about profitability in exiting the year, the right way to do the math?
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. So, Sartorius usually, historically at least, tend to pay the dividend either in Q1 or Q2, and the first half of the year sometime. And the way we think about the EBITDA overall Brandon is a run rate of 20%, when you take into account the dividend from Sartorius. On a full year basis, it would be, in 2021.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. And then, a question maybe for Andy, if you could just perhaps elaborate on some of the cost initiatives, some of the areas of the business that you'll be focused on in 2020, in terms of cost outs? And if you could perhaps quantify the net savings you anticipate from the European restructuring plan, which I think should be done by the second quarter?
Andy Last:
Yeah. So, I'll maybe split this between, Ilan and myself. I mean, there's no real commentary on changes in our focus for cost outs. I mean we continue to pursue improvements in SG&A, overall on a -- broadly based. And of course I think, as we've talked before. We're starting to turn it right to longer-term manufacturing strategy. And our overall footprint going forward, which will elaborate more on later in the year. I think there was another piece of that question? Or is that -- did I cover everything there?
Ilan Daskal:
I think, Brandon -- I think, you have covered the question.
Andy Last:
I think I covered that, Okay.
Ilan Daskal:
So Brandon, yeah, I mean, as Andy mentioned, the focus is to continue to extract leverage from -- mainly on the SG&A. And the focus is on the SG&A line for 2020. We do plan to have an Investor Day sometime in the second half of the year, which we will lay out kind of the follow-on strategy beyond 2020. And we'll communicate more then.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then just one follow-up for you Ilan, and since you quantified the contribution you anticipate from the two acquisitions on 2020, revenue growth. And as we sort of think longer-term, can you sort of help us think about the runway for the tax rate to continue to come down over time?
Andy Last:
Maybe I can comment on that.
Ilan Daskal:
The first one yeah.
Andy Last:
Yeah. So, I mean these were small kind of early phase technology tuck-ins. So I mean, it's kind of -- and it's not -- it's a very small number. There'll be new products coming out from the work we've done on those tuck-ins. So it will contribute. We're looking forward to it, as well a focus on getting those established in the marketplace so we can build on that position in 2021 and beyond.
Ilan Daskal:
And Brandon to your other question regarding the tax rate. So the change that was made this quarter was retroactive for 2018. So the overall rate was down to 24% on an ongoing basis, it's about 26% maybe we think with regarding long-term right now with our current tax structure somewhere in the mid-20s. That's the way we think about it right now.
Brandon Couillard:
All right. I’ll jump back. Thank you.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you.
Andy Last:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard:
Thank you. My first one on China. Appreciate it's tough to tell the impact of the coronavirus, where we stand today. But can you speak to your supply chain exposure in China?
Andy Last:
Yeah. I think first to reiterate your first comment it is tough to tell the full outlook on the impact in China. Our supply chain in China, I think is probably very similar to other major Life Science and Diagnostic companies. We do have manufacturing in Singapore and DCs around the region. So we're just -- we’re subject to the same let's call it reduced workforce challenges that exist in the warehouses and the channel support infrastructure in China. I think we're no better or no worse than anybody else at this point in time.
Dan Leonard:
But you don't source any meaningful amount of material that would go into your equipment from China? Am I hearing right?
Andy Last:
Can you say it again Dan?
Norman Schwartz:
We do source…
Dan Leonard:
You don't source a meaningful amount of raw materials from China do you?
Norman Schwartz:
We do source some -- obviously some electronic parts and those kinds of things from China. To date, we haven't seen big disruptions in that. Again we just have to wait and see.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then just a couple of follow-up questions on the trends in Diagnostics. It sounds like the European Diagnostics business was negative again in the quarter. When do you expect that region will bottom? And then secondly on diabetes specifically, I think the performance in 2019 was a bit lumpier than typical. Can you maybe mark that to market in terms of what was the total diabetes growth rate in 2019? And what you expect the trend to look like there? Thank you.
Dara Wright:
Sure. Hi, this is Dara Wright. So I'll start with the European comment. So our growth largely mirrors the market growth that we see broadly right? It's been moderated in recent years by lab consolidation and downward price pressures. But I would say those are fairly consistent trends at this point. Now that is offset by bright spots in more rapid growth outside of some of the more mature European countries, for example, in Eastern Europe. On the diabetes front, I think you asked about some of the lumpiness. I think Q4 was a bright spot. We had a meaningful contract win in North America and we continue to see increased adoption both in new installations and test volume in parts of Asia Pacific and we'll continue to focus on those regions as we move forward.
Dan Leonard:
Thanks for the color.
Andy Last:
Thanks, Dan.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Jack Meehan with Barclays. Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. I wanted to start just with a clarification on the $20 million impact in the quarter. First, what was the split between Life Science and Diagnostics? I know the BioPlex assay builder as an example was down, so there was some Diagnostic impact? And then what is the 2020 guidance assume in terms of -- do you just assume you have an easy comp in the fourth quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
So to your first question Jack, the -- most of the revenue was with Life Science for the fourth quarter. And the guidance, yeah, everything is all-in and Q4 will be an easier comp, yes.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then I think in the fourth quarter, you had the 8-K about the repositioning of the sales force in Europe. I was just wondering if you could talk -- maybe elaborate a little bit more on the strategy there. And how you're going to market?
Andy Last:
Yeah. This is Andy. So we took a broad-based restructuring charge in Europe in Q4. The channel was certainly a piece of that. As we looked at our let's call it channel structure across the Diagnostics business relative to lab consolidation for example. And so, we're really fine-tuning the channel and our infrastructure there to reflect the European performance and the consolidation that's gone on on the Diagnostic side.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. I mean, we plan to repurpose some of it Jack obviously with the consolidation that Andy mentioned in Europe. I mean, the strategy is really to repurpose it to the growth areas and locations. So, it was in Europe and a few other locations as well the restructuring itself.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then maybe one final one on I guess the -- on single cell with the droplets. I think there was an update on the litigation front yesterday related to the TVC. I was wondering just what if any impact that has? And then maybe for Annette, if you could just give us an update in terms of expectations for potentially a new product launch on the single-cell side that would be helpful.
Annette Tumolo:
Okay. So, yes, we had a decision out of the International Trade Commission that we are found to directly infringe three of the 10X patents on our NGS sample prep products. This is completely unrelated to Droplet Digital PCR products. And although, we're really focused on developing new products and building our market presence in the single-cell area, the impact of that decision on current revenue isn't material at all. And we have a vibrant and active R&D program to develop new products in this area. We released one last year called the ATAC-Seq RNA sample prep product. So we're in this market for the long run. But this decision doesn't really have material impact on our revenues.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you.
Annette Tumolo:
And I guess, I'll add one more thing. It really won't impact our customers either because we took steps to have manufacturing domestic, manufacturing for all of those products.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Citi.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great. Thank you Maybe just one on the margin side, nice to see you guys reiterate the target. Can you just talk about that the ransomware caused any additional spend kind of this year beginning of 2020 including the end of 2019 that caused you guys to take a different path to get there? In other words did you have to pull some other levers to keep on course for that 20% after the unexpected cyber attack?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate the question. So, there was an incremental cost mostly in Q4. There is some tail end going into Q1, but as you can see specifically when you look into the operating expenses, we have been investing a lot in terms of improving the -- and the focus on the SG&A. And with the incremental cost, I think the results is -- we are very satisfied with what we end up the Q4 results. And so it's all baked in the forecast for 2020 and the actual. And so, there is some small tail in -- tail end going into Q1 most of it was baked in Q4.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then on the 2020 guide, encouraging to hear you guys talk about kind of 7% to 8% type growth in Life Sciences. Can you just talk about what the growth looks like on the ddPCR side? How big that business is getting for you guys now? I know, Norm you talked about the TAM kind of moving up a few times as you guys gain more and more traction. Maybe just update us on your thoughts on what this market could look like in a few years.
Dara Grantham:
So, we have a very optimistic outlook for the Droplet Digital PCR business. We're expecting our first full year of revenue from our new platform as Norman mentioned. And really I think we're just beginning to scratch the surface in the opportunities in Diagnostics for this business. So, we don't usually talk about the exact size of the business, but we have been in very robust double-digit growth for year upon year upon year. We don't expect that to change and we're investing heavily in that business.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe just one on the capital deployment side, you guys obviously have the share repurchase out there has been pretty muted nice to see some activity this quarter, but obviously not too much. I mean, are you guys in a stage where you're kind of preferring the M&A side and the cash build is kind of in order to pursue that an element on that decide what would the metrics look like for a deal you guys would target? How large would you go? And then also what would be important to you in terms of a deal target?
Norman Schwartz:
So, there were about four or five questions in there. So, certainly, I think every quarter, it's a decision we have to make between how we deploy that capital. And if you have acquisition opportunities and then you have to balance that against share repurchases and we just try to do that quarter-by-quarter. So the second part of the question, again was?
Patrick Donnelly:
Yeah, just in terms of what are you guys feeling like you prefer M&A? What would the deal look like? How large would you be willing to go?
Norman Schwartz:
Okay. Yeah. So obviously considering the cash on our balance sheet and the lack of debt we have or the very little debt we have, and the earnings we've got. We got a fair amount of capacity we could do something fairly reasonably sized. Again for us, it's always been about the valuations and making sure that we get a good payback on it.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. Excellent.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question is a follow-up from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your lien is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Ilan just want to circle back with you. I mean, the operating cash flow is pretty remarkable. Could you just sort of speak to the runway that you see to continue to bring down the working capital? Should we still expect inventories to continue to come down on a sequential basis? And what are some of the drivers of that operationally?
Ilan Daskal:
Yeah. Sure. Thanks, Brandon. So in Q4 inventory was down about $34 million. And most of it actually was associated with the cyber-attack that we had to deplete some of our safety stock. Overall, we had a target to reduce year-over-year inventory, which is part of the $34 million and so the way to think about it going into 2020, it will go up probably somewhat in the first half. And there is another target to take it back down towards the end of 2020.
Brandon Couillard:
Very good. Thanks.
Operator:
And our next question is a follow-up from Jack Meehan with Barclays. Your line is open.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you, again. One follow-up on the Diagnostics business. So guiding to 3% to 4% organic growth this year, can you maybe just talk about the various products within that? Are there any changes you're expecting in terms of trend rates for the businesses within that?
Dara Wright:
Yes. So the growth drivers and the regional performance that we've been experiencing in 2019, we expect to be fairly consistent in 2020. So we'll continue to focus on some of our core value proposition around laboratory productivity. So we'll focus on quality control enablement of total lab automation support. And then from a regional perspective, we're focused on regional expansion in both Blood Typing and diabetes platforms and then also new test menu we launched a Lyme disease assay last year. We'll have a full year benefit of that as well as some kind of late in year FDA clearances. So – for the blood typing platform in North America as well as some other label claim extensions in some of our rapid infectious disease platforms we'll get full year benefit of.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then on the Life Science side. I was curious we talked about the headwind from – the potential headwind from coronavirus. But I was curious, if you thought any of your products could actually see a potential tailwind related to some of the testing needs?
Annette Tumolo:
Yeah. I mean, we have certainly seen an uptick in demand across all of our PCR products both reagents and platforms. So yeah, I mean, I think we might get a little upside there.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you.
Operator:
I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to management for any closing remarks. Ron Hutton Okay. Thank you very much for your interest and for joining us this afternoon and we look forward to talking to you and being in touch next quarter if not earlier. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories' Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. I'd now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Please go ahead.
Ronald Hutton:
Thank you, Liz. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the third quarter financial results for 2019. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everybody that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I'd like to turn the call now over to Ilan Daskal. Ilan?
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. We will review the results on a GAAP basis as well as commentary on a non-GAAP basis. Net sales for the third quarter of 2019 were $560.6 million, which is an increase of 2.8% on a reported basis versus $545.1 million in Q3 of 2018. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 4.5%. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product areas and growth in all 3 regions. When comparing to the third quarter of last year, remember that Q3 of 2018 included about $6 million of sales that customers pulled into the second quarter of 2018, substantially all of it related to our Diagnostics business. If we adjust the easy compare of the sales that customers pulled in last year from Q3 to Q2, we estimate that the year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth for Q3 of 2019 was about 3.4%. Sales of the Life Science group in the third quarter of 2019 were $215.7 million compared to $206.6 million in Q3 of 2018, which is an increase of 4.5% on a reported basis and 5.7% increase on a currency-neutral basis. Much of the year-over-year growth in the third quarter was driven by double-digit growth in Droplet Digital PCR and in Food Safety as well as good demand within gene expression and western blotting product lines. Process media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, had a slight year-over-year growth. Excluding process media sales, the Life Science business grew about 5.8% year-over-year on a currency-neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral year-over-year sales grew across all 3 regions. Our Droplet Digital PCR platform continues to have good momentum, and we are scheduled to introduce next month the QX ONE, which is a fully integrated system. This allows customers to fully automate the Droplet Digital PCR workflow and increases the multiplexing capability. We have an initial backlog of orders for this new instrument, and we anticipate production and shipment ramp over the next 12 months. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the third quarter were $341.8 million compared to $334 million in Q3 of 2018, which is a 2.4% growth on a reported basis and a 4.3% growth on a currency-neutral basis. When adjusting for the $6 million sales that customers pulled in last year from Q3 to Q2, the year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth was about 2.4%. During the quarter, we posted solid growth of Blood Typing, quality control and immunology product lines. This growth was somewhat offset by year-over-year decline within diabetes as a result of price pressure in core markets. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group posted nice growth in the Americas and in Asia, while the macroeconomic environment in Europe weighs on the growth rates in the region. The reported gross margin for the third quarter of 2019 was 54.8% on a GAAP basis and compares to 52.6% in Q3 of 2018. The year-over-year margin increase is driven mainly by product mix and lower cost of inventory reserves. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $3.9 million compared to $4.7 million in Q3 of 2018. SG&A expenses for Q3 of 2019 were $201.6 million or 36% of sales. The SG&A expenses in Q3 of 2018 were $201.2 million or 36.9% and including $4 million of contingent consideration benefit. Total amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.9 million versus $1.8 million in Q3 of 2018. Reducing the SG&A spend continues to remain a focus area to achieve our 2020 goals. Research and development expense in Q3 was $47.9 million or 8.6% of sales compared to $49.2 million or 9% in Q3 of 2018. All of this adds up to a reported Q3 operating income of $57.5 million or 10.2% of sales compared to $36.3 million or 6.7% in Q3 of 2018. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of the equity securities holdings reduced the reported income by $390.6 million and is substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $2.1 million compared to $4.2 million last year. The year-over-year improvement primarily reflect higher investment income. The effective tax rate in Q3 of 2019, and was 22.8% and compares to 23.1% in Q3 of 2018. Reported net loss for the third quarter was $258.8 million, and diluted loss per share for the quarter was $8.68. The decrease in net income and earnings per share versus last year is substantially related to the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and the operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded $3.9 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $3.2 million of restructuring expenses. These exclusions moved the gross margin for the third quarter of 2019 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 56% versus 53.5% in Q3 of 2018. The non-GAAP SG&A in the third quarter of 2019 was 35.5% versus 36.3% in Q3 of 2018. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.9 million, a restructuring cost of $2.7 million and $1.9 million adjustment to legal reserves. In R&D, we have excluded a small amount of restructuring benefit. The non-GAAP R&D expense in Q3 was 8.5%, which is in line with our expectation. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 10.2% on a GAAP basis to 12% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q3 of 2018 of 8.2%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the decrease in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $390.6 million as well as a small loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the quarter was 25.5%, and we estimate the full year tax rate, on a non-GAAP basis, to be approximately 27%, which is primarily driven by the geographic mix of earnings. And finally, non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2019 were $48.6 million and $1.61 per share compared to $27.6 million and $0.91 per share in Q3 of 2018. Moving on to the balance sheet. In the first quarter of 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard related to leases, which requires us to recognize most leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The right-of-use assets balance in the third quarter was $217.5 million and associated liabilities are included in the other current liabilities and in other long-term liabilities. These balances primarily represent our operating lease obligations for facilities and auto leases. The adoption of this standard has a minimal effect on the income statement. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q3 were $985 million compared to $850 million at the end of 2018. During the quarter, we completed an acquisition of a small manufacturer in the Diagnostics group that will expand our capabilities within our quality control products. Also during the third quarter, we purchased 14,745 shares of our stock for $5 million at an average share price of $339.05. For the third quarter of 2019, net cash generated from operations was about $100 million, which compares to about $62 million in Q3 of 2018. This improvement mainly reflects the higher operating profits and improved working capital. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2019 was $95.1 million or 17% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in the first 9 months of 2019 was $288.5 million or about 17.1% compared to $253.1 million or 15.1% in the first 9 months of 2018. Net capital expenditures for the third quarter of 2019 were $31.1 million. We project that the full year CapEx spend will likely be at the low end of the forecasted range of $110 million to $120 million. Depreciation and amortization for the third quarter was $33.6 million. Moving on to the guidance, the overall performance in the first 9 months of the year. We continue to see strong momentum for the fourth quarter. However, we remain cautious of the macroeconomic softness environment in Europe as well as geopolitical and global trade tension in other parts of the globe. With that in mind, we are maintaining our full year guidance range. We estimate a full year-over-year currency-neutral revenue growth between 4% and 4.5%. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is projected between 55.5% and 56%, and full year non-GAAP operating margin between 12.5% and 13%. And with that, we will open the line to take your questions. Operator?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe for Ilan. I generally think about Bio-Rad as being the least macro-sensitive business in my coverage universe. Can you sort of elaborate on the parts of the Diagnostics business that you'd perceive as being a little more macro sensitive, perhaps in some instrumentation placements? And then on diabetes pricing that you mentioned in the script, is that a competitive dynamic? And what regions is it mostly concentrated in? If 1 or 2?
John Hertia:
Brandon, this is John Hertia, I'll take that. I'd say that the overall macro diagnostics market in Europe is pretty soft. It's not just a function of our product line, but it's just -- in general, if you look at many of the market reports out there, and that's certainly reflected. We did see some growth in EMEA in the quarter. We're mindful about the fact that this was an easy compare to last year. We do look to continue a modest growth trend from EMEA. But as Ilan mentioned, we're watchful of the geopolitical instability and how that might impact our business in the Middle East. With respect to diabetes, we have been continuing to see price pressure over the quarters. That's certainly affected our business, and I'd say across most regions. But I'd also say that some of the decline this year was related to timing, which sometimes happens with shipments in our diabetes business.
Brandon Couillard:
And one for Annette. On the QX ONE launch, could you help us just sort of understand the mix of the current backlog between upgrades and new users? Do you expect that system to sort of open up accounts who would adopt it sort of given the workflow and plexing advantages? And can you sort of speak to sort of the traction of the system in the clinical markets right now?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. This system was really designed primarily for BioPharma customers, and we know that we have current BioPharma customers who are interested in adopting the new system as well. But there are customers who have been waiting for this system because of the workflow and the multiplexing capability. I'm not sure if that answered all of your questions, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard:
Oh, I think so. Okay. And then maybe -- I'm not sure if Andy's here. Maybe Ilan, you could speak to -- now that you've sort of been in the business for about 6 months, where do you see some of the best opportunities for cost outs? And any specifics -- specific actions you would expect to take kind of over the next 12 months would be helpful.
John Hertia:
If you want to?
Andrew Last:
I can certainly add. I mean SG&A -- I think Ilan called it out in the script. This is Andy, I'm sorry. SG&A continues to be a focus area for us, and we'll continue to work to reduce that as a percent of sales. Operating efficiencies broadly a gain though well -- we're not working to the release 2020 guidance yet or any expectations around that, but -- and SG&A is the primary focus for us.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan with Barclays.
Jack Meehan:
I wanted to continue on with the QX ONE launch and just get a sense for the initial game plan. Is there a menu that you're looking to launch that with? What are some of the key assays that you're planning to roll out over the next year or 2?
Annette Tumolo:
That's a great question. So we made sure that this platform was 100% compatible with our current platform and assays. So we have thousands of RUO assays that are available for people to buy today and they can buy them tomorrow for the QX ONE. In addition, we'll be rolling out 4 color versions of those assays, so they could increase their multiplexing in one well with validated assays. Over time, we will likely move this platform into the IVD market, and that's when we'll have regulated menu developed.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. Is there any color you can give on the economics of the platform? And is there -- and also, maybe just the size of the current installed base? And how many of those you expect to move on to the new system?
Annette Tumolo:
Well, I can say that we have spoken with quite a few current customers who intend to continue to use their old platform and add this platform into their workflow, and we have also spoken to quite a few new customers as well who don't have our platform yet. This is a higher-end platform than the QX200. So you get a lot more flexibility and ease of use and workflow flexibility, and you'll have to pay a little bit more for the platform.
Jack Meehan:
Great. Keep it going, Annette. Maybe are there any updates you can provide in terms of some of the new product development in single cell using the droplet technology?
Annette Tumolo:
What I can tell you is we have several active programs. We just launched a new product for epigenomics in single cell. It's our ATAC-Seq product that is generating a lot of interest with our customers, and our collaborators are generating a lot of really great data using that kit. And we're working on next-generation systems for a single-cell RNA-Seq as well.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And one final one, and I'll hop back in the queue. Just the results are about as in line with my numbers as you can get on the revenue line. So I have to follow-up on Brandon's question related to diabetes. That was really the only delta I see. John, you mentioned some -- there could have been some timing related to that? Is it possible to quantify how much may have moved into the fourth quarter?
John Hertia:
Not really.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe one for you, John. One of the other diagnostics players in the space alluded to some material change in the macro environment in China, specifically for diagnostics. Just curious if you've seen any changes in the landscape there.
John Hertia:
Well, we do -- from a diagnostics perspective, we continue to see significant growth in Asia. But I guess I'd turn it over to Andy to talk about maybe China in general for the company. And then if you have any follow-up questions after that.
Andrew Last:
So with respect to China, more specifically, we've been encouraged by our year-to-date performance. We remain optimistic for Q4. I think like everybody else, we'd also put out the caveat that we're closely watching the geopolitical situation and impact of tariffs, which have been, so far, modest in our exposure. But we keep an eye on that for the long term and any changes. So we're cautiously optimistic as we look forward in China.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then maybe one follow-up for Annette. Would love to get an update on the cell analysis portfolio. And specifically, any interest you're seeing in the ZE5 Cell imager?
Annette Tumolo:
Well, I think we're seeing good demand in our flow analysis products. And with respect to the ZE5, we see a lot of traction in pharma and BioPharma due to the particular feature set and value proposition it offers those customers.
Brandon Couillard:
Right. Maybe one for Norman, just to round out here. Cash continues to build pretty substantially on the balance sheet. The buyback is relatively immaterial in the third quarter. Just give us a sense of perhaps why the buyback doesn't seem to be a higher priority? And kind of your current view on the M&A pipeline and whether or not you might be any closer to finding something attractive out there.
Ronald Hutton:
So Brandon, I'm [indiscernible].
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. It's always...
Ronald Hutton:
Go ahead, Norman.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Yes. I've got that. I think that it's always a balance. You've got opportunities that you're looking at. And so you -- it's -- we try to keep the cash for those. But nevertheless, we did get in the market and did buy back some shares during the quarter. So again, it's a balance between saving it for the right acquisition and the buyback. So we're trying to manage it the best we can.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from the line of Jack Meehan with Barclays.
Jack Meehan:
Maybe just to start on the process-risen business, so I know that was up modestly year-over-year. I think previously, you're assuming some modest levels of growth back half over back half. But is that still the implied assumption through the fourth quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
So, Jack. Yes, thanks for the question. The answer -- the short answer is yes. I mean we still project the incremental growth to be this year. So obviously, most of the growth we projected in Q4.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then the gross margin of 56% was really strong, 250 bps year-over-year. Was there anything to call out in terms of some of the efficiency initiatives or mix of consumable versus instrument, which might have helped that progression in the quarter?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Great question. Thanks, Jack. There is, obviously, the mix with more consumables in this quarter relative to Q3 of 2018. That was definitely one major component there. And two other items that I would highlight will be the lower inventory reserves and the lower logistics cost. These are two items that we called out last year at the same time. And these are definitely items that in assay areas that we improved, and that contributed to the incremental gross margin this quarter.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And maybe, Andy, I know you mentioned you weren't giving 2020 guidance at this point. But at the last Analyst Day in November of 2017, you had the 20% target. Just given the progression you've had the last few years and the trajectory year-to-date, I mean does that still feel pretty doable?
Andrew Last:
Yes. I think we're optimistic about exiting 2020. And I've stated -- with our stated targets in hand, I think at this point to say we can't achieve that.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And maybe just a final one on the income statement, the tax rate came in a little bit below my forecast, but it still feels like there's a lot of opportunity to keep pushing that down over time. Ilan, is there a number you have in mind? Like is this good 25.5% number to use on a go-forward basis?
Ilan Daskal:
So, Jack. Yes, thank you. For this year, we project a 27% rate. Overall, it depends on the geographic mix. That's one main item that does impact the overall non-GAAP rate. And long term, we may get to the mid-20s, but I'm not -- I mean I'm not ready right now to kind of forecast 2020, and I'll provide an update on the next call. But for this year, it's still at the 27% level.
Operator:
I'm showing no further questions in queue at this time, so that will conclude today's question-and-answer session. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Bio-Rad Laboratories' Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ron Hutton, Treasurer and Vice President. You may begin.
Ronald Hutton:
Thank you, Tiphanie. Good afternoon, and thank you, all for joining us today. Today, we will review the second quarter financial results for 2019. With me today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. I'd now like to turn the call over to Ilan.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon, and thank you, all for joining us. We will review the results on a GAAP basis as well as commentary on a non-GAAP basis. Net sales for the second quarter of 2019 were $572.6 million, which is a 0.6% decline on a reported basis versus $575.9 million in Q2 of 2018. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 2.7%. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product areas and growth in all three regions. When comparing to the second quarter of last year, remember that Q2 of 2018 included about $6 million of sales that customers pulled in from Q3. Q2 of 2018 also included about $4 million higher sales associated with a discontinued RainDance Myriad account, and we expected to be immaterial as of Q3. If we exclude the Myriad's reduction of sales and the sales that customers pulled in last year from Q3 to Q2, we estimate that the year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth for Q2 of 2019 was about 4.6%. Sales of the Life Science group in the second quarter of 2019 were $212.4 million compared to $217.8 million in Q2 of 2018, which is a decline of 2.5% on a reported basis and about flat on a currency-neutral basis. Process media, which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, was slow in the second quarter after a very strong sales in Q1 of 2019. All other product areas within Life Science had a solid year-over-year growth and of note, at double-digit growth in Droplet Digital PCR antibody business and in Food Safety. Our Droplet Digital PCR growth continues to have good momentum due to its high-sensitivity precision and thousands of optimized assays. To date, it is cited in several thousand of peer-reviewed publications. Excluding process media sales, the Life Science business grew about 7.5% year-over-year on a currency-neutral basis, driven by continued BioPharma demand. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral sales, excluding process media, were strong across all 3 regions and most notably, in the Americas. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the quarter were $357.1 million compared to $354 million in Q2 of 2018, which is a 0.9% growth on a reported basis and a 4.8% growth on a currency-neutral basis. During the second quarter, we posted solid growth of diabetes and quality-control products. Immunology also had strong quarter, which has driven by -- sorry, which was driven by a reagent pull-through, that's very high one. We also received this quarter, an FDA approval for our BioPlex Lyme disease panel, which had been much anticipated by our customers. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics group posted a year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth across all 3 regions. The reported margin for the second quarter of 2019 was 53.7% on a GAAP basis and compares to 52.4% in Q2 of 2018. If you recall, in Q2 of 2018, we experienced product mix headwind and atypical inventory-related expenses. Much of the year-over-year margin increase is driven by improvement in these 2 areas. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $3.8 million compared to $4.7 million in Q2 of 2018. SG&A expenses for Q2 of 2019 were $201.3 million or 35.1% of sales compared to 36.5% in Q2 of 2018. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.6 million versus $2.1 million in Q2 of 2018. Reducing the SG&A spend remains a focus area to achieve our 2020 goals. Research and development expense in Q2 was $50.1 million or 8.8% of sales compared to $47.5 million or 8.2% in Q2 of 2018. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of the equity securities holdings added $716.4 million of income to the reported results and is substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $3.2 million compared to $9.9 million income last year. The year-over-year decrease primarily reflects the Sartorius dividend that was declared this year in Q1 versus Q2 last year. The effective tax rate used in Q2 of 2019 was 22.2% and compares to 21.2% in Q2 of 2018. These rates are primarily driven by the sizable gain related to our Sartorius investment and in Q2 of 2019 also included tax reform-related benefits. Reported net income for the second quarter was $598.8 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $19.86. The increase in net income and earnings per share versus last year is substantially related to the valuation of the Sartorius holding. Moving down to the non-GAAP results. Looking at our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the growth and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $3.8 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and small restructuring adjustment. The exclusions moved the gross margin for the second quarter of 2019 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 54.4% versus 53.4% in Q2 of 2018. If you recall, Q2 of 2018 included a headwind from product mix and atypical inventory-related expenses and again, much of the year-over-year margin increase is driven by improvements in these 2 areas. The non-GAAP SG&A in the second quarter of 2019 was 33.9%, an improvement of more than a point versus the 35.1% in Q2 of 2018. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.6 million, legal-related expenses of $5.4 million and small amounts for restructuring cost and acquisition-related benefit. In R&D, we have excluded a small amount of restructuring benefit. The non-GAAP R&D in Q2 was 8.8%, which is in line with our expectations. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments results in moving the quarterly operating margin from 9.8% on a GAAP basis to 11.7% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q2 of 2018 of 10%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holding of $716.4 million as well as a small loss associated with venture investment. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the quarter was 26.4%, which was primarily driven by the geographic mix in the second quarter earnings. We continue to estimate the annual tax rate on a non-GAAP basis to be in the 27% to 28% range. And finally, non-GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2019 were $47.4 million and $1.57 per share compared to $49.5 million and $1.64 per share in Q2 of 2018. Moving on to the balance sheet. In the first quarter of 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard related to leases, which requires us to recognize most leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The right-of-use assets balance in the second quarter was $215.5 million and the associated liabilities included in other current liabilities and in other long-term liabilities. These balances primarily represent our operating lease obligations for facilities and auto leases. The adoption of this standard has a minimal effect on the income statement. The total cash and short-term investment at the end of Q2 were $987 million compared to $850 million at the end of 2018 and $865 million at the end of the first quarter. During the second quarter, we purchased 51,398 shares of our stock for $15 million at an average share price of $291.85. For the second quarter of 2019, net cash generated from operations was about $155 million, which compares to about $78 million in Q2 of 2018. This improvement mainly reflects the higher operating profits, improved capital -- working capital, the payment of the Sartorius dividend that was declared in Q1 as well as a tax refund. The adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2019 was $95.1 million or 16.6% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in the first 6 months of 2019 was $196.7 million or about 17.5% compared to $180.3 million or 16% in the first 6 months of 2018. Net capital expenditures for the second quarter of 2019 were $22.2 million or 3.9% of sales. The full year expectation for CapEx spend is at the low end of the forecasted range of $110 million to $120 million. Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter was $33 million. And lastly, I would like to mention that we are pleased with the Federal Court's recent ruling, upholding the decision against 10X Genomics and the $23.9 million award and injunction related to our Droplet Digital PCR intellectual property. Moving on to the guidance. We are pleased with the overall performance in the first half of the year. And we continue to maintain the annual guidance range. We expect a full year-over-year currency-neutral sales growth of 4% to 4.5%. We continue to target a non-GAAP gross margin in the 55.5% to 56% range for the year, and non-GAAP operating margin range of 12.5% to 13%. And with that, we will open the line to take your questions. Tiphanie?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. And our first question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs.
Patrick Donnelly:
Maybe one for you Ilan, your margins came in ahead of our expectations again this quarter. You're clearly gaining some momentum with the internal initiatives there. Can you just give us an update on what you're seeing to date? Obviously, you've been on the seat for a little while now. And then expectations going forward as we think ahead even to the 2020 target. What are the key leverage or initiatives you have yet to kind of capitalize on that help you get towards that target?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, sure. Good question. So being here for a few months. Obviously, Norman, myself and also Andy, we looked at the initiatives that are ongoing to achieve the 2020 target model. And we are also looking at additional initiatives in order to achieve the 2020 margin. For the most part, we are focused on the SG&A-related items. And to a lesser extent but also an incremental extension of the gross margin but again, the main focus is on the SG&A line.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe just on the growth side, flat organic and Life Science was actually pretty encouraging given the comp there. Can you just talk through what specific areas you're seeing strength? And then maybe specifically on the DD PCR, that seems to be continuing to gain momentum. Can you just help frame that opportunity for us? And what type of sales are you seeing to date, if you're willing to break that out? Just trying to get a better hand on how significant of a growth driver that can be for you guys going forward?
Annette Tumolo:
This is Annette. Yes, well, we're seeing good growth across all of our core product lines, and that's really encouraging to us. But in particular, genomics lines and Digital PCR is really leading the way there. We are getting really good traction in the BioPharma segment for sure, and we're moving -- we have a lot of our customers adopting and validating our platform for lab-developed tests, so we're moving into the clinics along with some of our cleared products. And we're just starting. So we really see the traction in those segments. And we are very optimistic moving forward.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. Maybe just one last one, Ilan. I know you briefly touched on the litigation side. Can you just maybe parse that a little bit on the update? We saw last week obviously talking about 15% royalty, some sort of injunction. Maybe just give us your thoughts on what you expect to kind of be finalized on that front? Maybe timing, once we'll have kind of -- again a conclusive, definitive outcome there.
Annette Tumolo:
This is Annette again. I'll take that. We generally don't like to talk a lot about ongoing matters in litigation but there is -- there's been some public announcements there. The Delaware court recently confirmed the jury verdict that the 10X's products infringed the patents that we asserted and awarded us damages. At the judge follows that with a ruling issuing an injunction. The way it works though is the court has to finalize that order and that's what's happening now. And we imagine, in the next days to weeks, we'll get the final issuance from the court on what exactly the details of that injunction are.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Mitch Petersen with Barclays.
Mitchell Petersen:
Maybe first off, just on Droplet Digital, I was hoping, you could update us on the timing of the new products that you're developing there?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. We are launching our next-generation integrated system with 4 colors probably in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Mitchell Petersen:
Got it. That's helpful. Maybe similarly, just on that business within Droplet Digital, could you comment on how big your business is in single cell today? And then relatedly just on, I mean you called a double-digit growth for Droplet Digital as a whole, just as a clarification, does that include the headwind from RainDance in the quarter?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, definitely. It does include the headwind from RainDance. And usually, what we disclose is kind of the double-digit growth as we mentioned.
Mitchell Petersen:
Got it. And then lastly for me. I noticed that you didn't call out Blood Typing in the script. Could you just comment on how that business trended in the quarter?
John Hertia:
This is John Hertia, I'll take that. Our Blood Typing business did grow year-over-year. It just wasn't at highlight level. But we continue to see strong placements of both the IH-1000 and IH-500 around the world and strong reagent pull-through.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank.
Daniel Leonard:
Can you please elaborate on market conditions in China across both your business? That seems to be a point where we've seen softness from a number of peers in the quarter.
Andrew Last:
This is Andy. I'll take that and others can certainly add. Generally, we've pleased with our China performance. We're not experiencing any material impact the way that some others may have reported. And subject to any major geopolitical shifts that may occur, we continue to see China as a positive for us across the portfolio.
Daniel Leonard:
Okay. And a couple of product-specific questions in Diagnostics for John. John, can you update us on the autoimmune Diagnostics test environment in the U.S., specifically in the competitive environment? And then secondly, can you help us frame how you're thinking about this Lyme test opportunity? It seems like there's more in the news about that lately.
John Hertia:
Okay. Let's take autoimmune first. It's kind of a fragmented market. We have the only fully automated, integrated multiplex system for autoimmune testing. We're seeing an evolution of manual IFA slide testing through automated systems. And that's the heart of our BioPlex business, which is doing quite well year-over-year.
Daniel Leonard:
And then on Lyme?
John Hertia:
On Lyme, we just introduced -- we just got FDA approval for the Lyme test. It's a large and growing market. There's a lot of dissatisfaction in Lyme right now. There's multiple court cases going around the world because of the lack of sensitivity and specificity in the market. It's a hard disease to diagnose and it takes a long time. We have a very novel assay design that gives us better sensitivity and better specificity than anything else on the market. And it's a fully automated solution.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Annette, maybe starting with you. Could just give us an update on where you stand with your cell analysis portfolio? Going back a year or 2, you're kind of cobbled together your imaging sales order and the flow cytometer. Just update us on where uptick is with that platform? And then would you still expect process media to be a headwind to Life Sciences in the back half as well?
Annette Tumolo:
Okay. So we are seeing really strong uptick in the BioPharma segment of our Cell Biology products, in particular, our ZE5 flow cytometer, flow analyzer. So we continue to invest. We think it is a perfect time to develop new tools for our customers in this era of Cell Biology. So we're optimistic about the future of the products we have. And we're looking to expand our market share in that area. With regard to process chromatography, we think the second half of the year, we're going to see incremental and year-over-year growth. And we think that will end the year with growth over 2018. We've said this before, quarter-to-quarter, it can be little bit lumpy. So it's hard to compare quarter-over-quarter results sometimes.
Norman Schwartz:
And Brandon, I'll add to that for process chrom. I mean, in the first half, it was about flat relative to last year. And we do anticipate most of the incremental revenue to come in, in the second half, as Annette mentioned.
Brandon Couillard:
One more on Droplet Digital, Annette. There's been some newer entrants in the Digital PCR space coming and with company platforms. Could you sort of speak to the advantages and disadvantages of your Droplet system versus other digital platforms?
Annette Tumolo:
Well, I can say that our platform and our optimized assays, which we have thousands of, have already enabled a lot of breakthrough research. And given clinicians, new options in liquid biopsy and Precision Medicine, and we've got thousands, as Ilan mentioned, of peer-reviewed publications that support the scientific utility of the Droplet system and clinical utility of the Droplet platform that we developed. So I think that our focus moving forward is to make sure that we're developing new platforms in that area that will both expand the applications and the relevance to new market segments for Digital PCR and build on the already-compelling value proposition that we have. Droplets are a really good test tube for this assay and they are very, very scalable. And given our success in this market that we created, it doesn't surprise us that people want to join in with us, but we think that we're in a position to just continue to build on the really strong lead that we have.
Brandon Couillard:
Maybe one for you Ilan. Cash continues to build on the balance sheet. Appreciate that you did $15 million of buybacks in the second quarter. But that's a tiny fraction really of what you generated just in the second quarter in terms of cash flow. Just curious like why that's not a bigger priority for you given the operating cash flow improvement and where the underlying valuation of the stock is here when you strip out the Sartorius valuation, just curious what you're thinking there?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. Great question. Generally, we continue to be opportunistic in terms of the buyback. The Board authorized us $250 million plan, we did about $65 million so far. And we plan to continue to be opportunistic and the way we think about it is, how do we kind of bundle it as part of the overall capital allocation model. And specifically, we admire inorganic kind of opportunities that we keep looking into.
Brandon Couillard:
Last one for Norman. Just -- an update from your end in terms of how the M&A pipeline is shaping up right now? Again, balance sheet is most over-capitalized, has been in quite some time. Are you any closer today to perhaps finding a bolt-on deal or not?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Yes, I think we've certainly got some possibilities out there and are encouraged by what we're seeing and the progress we're making on a couple of fronts. So hopefully, we can put more of that capital use in the near term.
Operator:
And I am currently showing no questions in queue. This concludes our Q&A session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Ilan Daskal for closing or further remarks.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. And we'll connect again in the next quarter's call.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q1 2019 Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Ron Hutton. Sir, you may begin.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you, Jimmy. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters because our actual results may differ materially from our plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail our risk factors in our business. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share which are financial measures that are not defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that I'd like to turn the call over to Ilan Daskal, EVP and CFO.
Ilan Daskal:
Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us. Today we will review the first quarter financial results for 2019. With me today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Andy Last, Chief Operating Officer; Annette Tumolo, President of the Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. We will review the results on a GAAP basis as well as commentary on a non-GAAP basis. Net sales for the first quarter of 2019 were $554 million which is a 0.4% growth on a reported basis versus $551.5 million in Q1 of 2018. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 4%. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product areas and growth in all three regions with a particular strength noted in the Americas. When comparing to Q1 of last year, remember that Q1 of 2018 sales included a royalty settlement of approximately $6 million within the Diagnostics segment. Also included in Q1 of 2018 is about $6 million of RainDance sales compared to about $1 million in Q1 of 2019. If we exclude the RainDance reduction of sales and the royalty settlement in Q1 of 2018, we estimate that the currency-neutral sales growth for Q1 of 2019 was about 6%. Life science in the first quarter of 2019, the revenue was $215.7 million compared to $197.8 million in Q1 of 2018 which is an increase of 9.1% on a reported basis and the year-over-year growth of 12% on a currency neutral basis. The growth in the first quarter was across all product areas with particular strength within cell biology and food safety. Digital PCR also had a nice growth when excluding the RainDance sales and our process media product line which can fluctuate on a quarterly basis, had a very strong quarter. Excluding process media sales, the Life Science business grew about 5.5% year-over-year on a currency neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral sales were strong across all three regions and most notable in the Americas. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the quarter were $334.1 million compared to $350.8 million in Q1 of 2018 which is a 4.8% decline on a reported basis and less than 1% decline on a currency neutral basis. Excluding last year's tough compare of the royalty settlement, the diagnostics business grew about 1% year-over-year on a currency neutral basis. Despite a steady growth, it is important to know that placements of our key diagnostic systems showed consistent growth during the first quarter of 2019 versus Q1 of 2018. During the quarter, the Diagnostics Group posted solid growth in the Americas, across all the product areas and of note growth in blood typing and in autoimmune testing products. These geographic growth was somewhat offset by a weaker quarter in parts of EMEA and in Asia. The decline in Asia was associated with order timing this quarter and a tough compare with Q1 of 2018. Overall, our outlook for Asia remains positive. The reported gross margin for the first quarter of 2019 was 56.3% on a GAAP basis and compares to 54.8% in Q1 of 2018. The current quarter gross margin benefited from an Escrow release of $7.4 million related to an acquisition from 2011 within the Life Science group. The gross margin also benefited from improved logistics cost and inventory reserves. The improvement was partially offset by product mix and higher service costs. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $3.7 million compared to $4.8 million in Q1 of 2018. SG&A expenses for Q1 of 2019 were $207.6 million or 37.5% of sales compared to 37.9% in Q1 of 2018. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.7 million versus $2.1 million in Q1 of 2018. Research and development expense in Q1 was $47.6 million or 8.6% of sales compared to $49.4 million or 9% in Q1 of 2018. Looking below the operating line, the change in share market value of the equity securities holdings added $1 billion and $59 million of income to the reported results, and it substantially related to the holdings of the shares of Sartorius AG. Also during the quarter. interest and other income resulted in net other income of $11.4 million compared to $4.1 million income last year. Q1 of 2019 includes $15.7 million of gross dividend income from Sartorius which was declared this year in March and was paid in April. In 2018, the dividend was declared and paid in the second quarter. Remember that in the first quarter of 2018, other income included $9.2 million for the divestiture of a small product line and the sale of surplus land in Europe. The effective tax rate used in Q1 of 2019 was 23.2% and compares to 24% in Q1 of 2018. Reported net income for the first quarter was $865.2 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $28.74. The increase in net income and earnings per share versus last year is substantially related to the valuation of the Sartorius Holding. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the first quarter in cost of goods sold. We have excluded $3.7 million of amortization of purchased intangibles, $7.4 million Escrow release related to our prior acquisition within the Life Science group and a small restructuring adjustment. These adjustments move the gross margin for the first quarter from 56.3% to 55.6. These non-GAAP gross margin compares to a non-GAAP gross margin of 55.7% in Q1 of 2018. The non-GAAP SG&A in the first quarter of 2019 was 36.4% an improvement versus 37.1% in Q1 of 2018. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.7 million, legal related expenses of $4.4 million, acquisition related benefits of $365,000 and a small restructuring costs. In R&D, we have excluded a small amount of restructuring costs. The non-GAAP R&D in Q1 was 8.6%, which is in line with our expectation. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving this quarterly operating margin from 10.2% on a GAAP basis to 10.5% on a non-GAAP basis. These non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin in Q1 of 2018 of 9.7%. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity holdings of $1 billion and $69 million as well as $440,000 associated with venture investments and other nonrecurring items. The non-GAAP effective stocks rate for the quarter was 28.5%, this higher tax rate reflects a change in geographic mix of the profitability, however, we still expect the full-year non-GAAP effective tax rate to be between 27% and 28%. And finally, non-GAAP net income and earnings per share for the first quarter of 2019 were $49.6 million and $1.65 per share compared to $35.4 million and $1.17 per share in Q1 of 2018. We estimate that the Sartorius dividend net of an estimation of it's stocks provision totals $0.40. The estimated EPS benefit of $0.40 shift from Q2 to Q1 and Sartorius may continue to declare future annual dividend distributions in the first calendar quarter of each year. Moving onto the balance sheet, as of March 31st, total cash and short-term investments were $865 million compared to $850 million at the end of 2018. The first quarter historically has tended to be a heavy cash use quarter as we typically pay the annual bonuses and commissions as well as annual software and IT related maintenance expenses. Also during the quarter, we completed an acquisition of a small company in the Life Science group that will expand our suite of genomic reagent offerings. In the first quarter, we adopted the new accounting standard related to leases which requires us to recognize most leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. You will note at $222 million addition to the balance sheet of right-of-use assets and associated liabilities which are included in other current liabilities and in other long-term liabilities. These balances primarily represent our operating lease obligations for the duration of the global facilities and other leases. The adoption of the standard has a minimal effect to the income statement. For the first quarter of 2019, net cash generated from operations was $43 million which compares to $40 million in Q1 of 2018. This improvement reflects the higher operating profits partially as a result of a disciplined cost control. The adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2019 which includes the Sartorius dividend was $101.7 million or 18.4% of sales. The estimated adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of 2019 and excluding the Sartorius dividend was about 15.5% the adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of 2018 was $81.1 million or about 14.7% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2019 were $23.6 million or 4.3% of sales. Our expectation for the full year CapEx spend remains in the range of $110 million to $120 million and depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $32.9 million. We are currently on track with the annual guidance that was provided during the last call. And with this Norman, do you have anything you would like to say before we open the call for the questions?
Norman Schwartz:
Sure. I think Ilan covered the quarter well. I just wanted to say that it's great to have both Ilan and Andy, Andy last on Board, both recently joined us and they both bring a wealth of experience and fresh perspectives to Bio-Rad. As you may know, Ilan's background is in accounting and finance and he has spent most of his career in the semiconductor industry mostly with global companies. Andy, is rooted in the biological sciences and over the years he has progressed through product and general management at some recognizable names like Applied Biosystems, BD and Affymetrix and bringing with him a wealth of industry and operational experience. I think they both joined us as we're off to a good start for the year. And the organization looks forward to their contributions. And with that, Jimmy, I think we'll open up the line to take your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mike Sarcone with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Mike Sarcone:
Thanks, good afternoon, this is Mike Sarcone on for Dan Leonard. Just first on the Life Sciences business, you called out particularly strength in the Americas. Can you give us some more granularity on what you saw in APAC and Europe?
Annette Tumolo:
Hi, this is Annette. So we saw good growth across all our geographies, we called the Americas out because they were particularly strong. So I don't have anything bad to say about growth in Europe and EMEA and Asia. They are growing across all of our key product areas.
Mike Sarcone:
And just one on the Clinical Diagnostics business. You gave a positive mentioned to autoimmune and blood typing. Can you maybe delve into any areas where you saw particular weakness just to get some granularity there?
Ron Hutton:
Mike, you're looking for a year-over-year increase?
Mike Sarcone:
No, well, you had mentioned, you called out the positives in the quarter for clinical diagnostic. I was just curious if there was anything that stood out as being particularly weak in the quarter. And if you could kind of talk to that.
Ron Hutton:
Particularly weak in the quarter?
Mike Sarcone:
Yes.
Ron Hutton:
Well, I think in the in the earlier narrative, we talked a little bit about Asia and parts of Europe being a little bit weak Asia because of sort of the ordering lumpiness and there were certain parts of Europe, I'd say probably non-core Europe that were weaker. And we did see some growth in quality control and diabetes on a global level but we didn't highlight that because it wasn't as strong as both the BioPlex autoimmune business and blood typing.
Norman Schwartz:
And let me add to that also for Asia, specifically, we believe it's a timing issue and it's not kind of a sustained weakness that we see so far.
Mike Sarcone:
Got it. Thank you. And last one for me. Are you still expecting EMEA on the clinical diagnostics side, to return to growth this year?
Ron Hutton:
Yes. We did actually see some growth in quarter one. I think we've mentioned over the last few calls, if you go back to couple of years, there was some consolidation in Europe and assets load growth and then we talked at our last earnings call about EMEA having worked through the D3 transition for SAP that seems to be continuing and they did show growth overall for this quarter, which was encouraging.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks, good afternoon. I actually like to start with Andy. I'm curious if there are any similarities, you can draw from your time at Affymetrix where I think you took operating margins up something like 600 basis points over time that you can apply and that adhere at Bio-Rad, What are some of your near-term priorities as you sort of take over this CEO role in some of the biggest opportunities you see near term?
Andy Last:
Thank you, Brandon. So 600 basis points for that. Okay. Well, I think, the main comments I would make is that was really a question of probably managing the portfolio of the company and applying the resource where the biggest growth opportunities were. When I come into Bio-Rad, I mean I'm on a couple of weeks and it's very early. I've got to -- fully understand the business and the profile of the business, but it's got a similar mix to Affymetrix and I feel confident that we can apply the same principles as we move forward.
Brandon Couillard:
All right, super and then maybe one for you, Ilan it's early but based on your first few weeks at the company, any reason to back off the 2020 targets? How would you just sort of describe your level of comfort with those that were established sort of by your predecessor? And any thoughts as to how you might be able to use the balance sheet more sensibly and do you think of carrying $400 million to $500 million of net cash is an optimal position for the balance sheet.
Ilan Daskal:
Yes, sure. Thanks, Brendan. So let me start with the 2020 target. I did have kind of a talk down and look at it and at the first kind of conclusion, I think that is -- is a reasonable target to achieve and that's by the end of 2020. We have several initiatives within the Company, several that are focused in the SG&A and in gross margin expansion. And Andy and I are going to look into those initiatives on a bottom-up basis and we're going to dive into each one of them. But overall, again it is targeted, I believe we can achieve by the end of 2020. Going back to your second question regarding the capital allocation model. So when you look at it, we have a $250 million buyback program right now, we did about 49 so far. And when you think about the inorganic activities, as an example the acquisition that we did this quarter. We continue to have the same kind of approach of either at tuck-in technology acquisitions or IP or alternatively acquisitions with nice cash flow this year in order to augment the free cash flow overall and at least for the time being, we think this is the best use of the overall capital allocation model that will deploy.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay and then what are your net -- could you speak to in sort of the demand trends you're seeing in the ddPCR business any moderation in growth there at all? And what are some of the key drivers and applications that are driving adoption of that system and any chance you could share with us the update on where the global installed base stands now? Thank you.
Annette Tumolo:
I can probably answer some of those questions, Brandon. So we continue to see really good adoption for liquid biopsy application. It's is growing across all geographies. So we are very happy about that and we see really strong sales into the biopharma segment, both in discovery and in the QC and manufacturing and as people are manufacturing some of these newer cell-based drugs. So those are 2 areas that continue to drive good growth for us. Tell me what your other question was? We don't really talk about our installed base, but to say it's growing, and we expect this year to really continue the consumable pull through on all of those products as well.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then maybe last one for John, perhaps a little bit of a slower start arguably some timing dynamics in there in diagnostics in Asia but you still expect that business to grow 3% to 4% for the year and then specifically on the blood typing business, how do you think your growth stacks up relative to that level of the market? And could you sort of speak to perhaps your competitive win rate if you launch some of these newer platforms in the U.S.? Thank you.
Ron Hutton:
Yes. I'll start with the first question and Brandon overall guidance and confidence for us at both the group level and in Asia is fine we would stick with that. Blood typing continues to be strong, we don't really talk about competitive shares but we grew the business nicely in the first quarter. Adoption in the U.S. has been really good with the recent FDA approvals of the IH24 and then just last month IH500, we expect that to improve. We always start the medium volume market was the largest part of the market in the United States and IH500 is particularly well suited for that, so we continue to see good prospects for that business overall.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great, thanks. Maybe just one on the Life Science business, you obviously put up a great quarter. Maybe just talk through the magnitude of the beat there the durability of the growth, I know the guidance is for more kind of 5% to 6% type growth, nice double-digit growth to start the year, it doesn't seem like the outlook changed much but maybe just walk us through the dynamics. Is there any pull forward dynamic or any reason to think that the growth will slow materially again to get closer to that guidance range?
Annette Tumolo:
We were happy that we had really strong growth across all of our core businesses and some of our newer businesses and good growth from process chromatography resins and that's one of those businesses where we can see fluctuations quarter-to-quarter in customer orders and we don't like to but we call that a lumpy business. So in the first quarter, we did have some pull through of orders that we expected to come in Q2, we got them in Q1. So I think that that moderates some of our expectations moving forward.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, makes sense. And then the Ilan maybe some on the margin story, particularly this year seems a little ahead of schedule. We had it a little more back half-weighted. So can you just talk through what came in a little ahead of expectations on the margin side, what levers you guys been able to pull again maybe a little ahead of expectations?
Ilan Daskal:
Yes. So first let's recap the -- On a non-GAAP basis, the margin was about 55.6, which is about flat year-over-year. When you back out the RainDance revenue as well as the royalties from last year, you get a pickup of about a point or so. A lot of that pickup was in outcome of the initiative from last year. If you recall, the consolidation of the warehouses and logistics and supply chain kind of improvement and that contributed a lot of you know, of the incremental kind of margin and obviously process from was the other piece for this quarter.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then last one from me just on the softness in Asia. Can you just give a bit more color on the order timing that things slip into 2Q that you've already recognized and expect to see a catch up on revs in 2Q or was it more uncertain in terms of the timing there?
John Hertia:
It's John Hertia. I think will -- again guidance hasn't changed so we think over the course of the year, the the anticipated orders that we're expecting for Asia will come in.
Operator:
Thank you [Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Jack Meehan with Barclays. Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
Thank you. Good afternoon. I was hoping you could start in the diagnostics business. I was curious how the quality controls business performed in the quarter, just given that usually pretty steady-eddy, I'm surprised it wasn't called out for growth, were there any one-time factors in the quarter or geographic point you would highlight?
John Hertia:
This is John Heritia. It did grow a little bit in the quarter but, but not a call out business, a part of that mitigated growth was related to the earlier comments that we had and ordering patterns in China and in certain parts of Europe.
Jack Meehan:
Got it. And then, I was curious on the Droplet Digital side, how some of the liquid biopsy rollout, how that's going and similarly any updates on timing of rollout of applications in single cell?
Annette Tumolo:
Sure. So you may have heard that we achieved FDA clearance of the first Droplet Digital platform and test for use in liquid biopsy to monitor molecular response to chronic lukemia and we are going to launch that product in the second quarter by the end of the second quarter. So that was a really big development for us and we expect to see that help expand the adoption of lab developed tests on that platform, so these are all things that are helping expand our share in the liquid biopsy market. On the NGS sample prep single cell front, we have announced that we are launching in the next few weeks, a new application for interrogating the epigenomics of single cell, it's an attack seek kit for single cell NGS sample prep. So that's our next application coming out.
Jack Meehan:
Great and just one final question, could you give a little bit more color on the sizing and the nature of the acquisition on the Life Science side in the quarter and any thoughts around the attractiveness of buyback at this point?
Annette Tumolo:
I can answer the first part. We acquired a novel technology for genomic reagent application and right now we're kind of heads down, focused on getting the product transferred into our manufacturing plants, we plan to launch probably in the 4th quarter of this year and we'll have more to say about it closer to launch.
Ron Hutton:
And Jack to your second question. So in Q1, I mean after we filed, we had a close window, so we were not able to since the beginning of the year to be in the market. Generally speaking we will continue to be opportunistic with the buyback and it depends on the timing and when we feel that it sees the right opportunity for us to step in.
Jack Meehan:
Okay, that makes sense. Thank you Ron.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you and I am showing no further questions in the queue at this time, I'd like to turn the call back to your Ilan Daskal for any closing remarks.
Ilan Daskal:
Do you want to pull one more time may be?
Operator:
Certainly. [Operator Instructions] we'll take a moment to see if any final questions up here in the queue. We do have a follow-up from Jack Meehan with Barclays . Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
I'll continue with a couple others that I had, I guess you called out some of the one-timers in the first quarter. Is there anything just as we think about the progression into the second quarter and into the second half. You would know, just in terms of one-timers year-over-year?
Norman Schwartz:
So, one timers for example on the top-line on the process from, it's going to fluctuate as it does every year and that's the one that I can think about here right now.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. And then the other progression I wanted to ask was on the gross margin side, I know there's been a little bit of movement related to the blood typing instrument versus reagent pieces but just as we think about the progression through the rest of the year, anything on that you would point out to you?
Norman Schwartz:
In blood typing specifically?
Jack Meehan:
Or just overall, which would impact the gross margins for the business.
Norman Schwartz:
So generally, we don't break down the specific of each product line but the growth between blood typing is very nice and the pull through continues to be healthy and we are very pleased with the progress, I mean including the penetration into the U.S. market.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Do you still think 55.5 to 56 is a good range for the full year?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, we do.
Operator:
We have a question from [Christine Cyngles], a Private Investor. Your line is now open.
Unidentified Analyst:
Thank you. Hello everyone. I just wanted to take a minute to say farewell and certainly thank the investment community for your interest and support over these many years. I've certainly enjoyed working with you very much. And I also wanted to say that I'm confident that Bio-Rad is in good hands and well positioned for the future and like you, we all be like you, I'll be excited to what the future unfolds. So with that, I'll say goodbye and best wishes for continued success and hopefully our paths will cross again one day.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you, Christine. I wanted to thank you also for your support in my transition here in the past few weeks. I don't know, Norman if you want to add anything?
Norman Schwartz:
No.
Ron Hutton:
No, okay, good. Thank you, Christine.
Operator:
Thank you [Operator Instructions] I am showing no questions in the queue at this time.
Ron Hutton:
Okay, thank you everyone for joining our call today and we appreciate your continued interest. Thank you.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's program. This does concluded and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. earnings conference call. [Operator instructions] I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from our plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss, in detail, our risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2018, as well as provide some insight into our thinking for 2019. With me today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Annette Tumolo, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. Today, we will review our results on a GAAP basis and then provide some commentary and insight to our results on a non-GAAP basis. Let’s start with the top line. Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2018 were $617.5 million, and as expected, slightly lower versus the same period last year record sales of $621.3 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 1.9% and higher than our guidance. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product lines with particular strength noted in the Americas and Asia Pacific. Life science sales in the fourth quarter were $239.6 million, a slight increase on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of 2.3% on a currency-neutral basis. It is important to note that this increase was on top of the 12% currency-neutral growth in the year-ago period. Much of the growth in the fourth quarter of this year was driven by continued strong demand for our Cell Biology, Western Blot and Digital PCR products, as well as higher-than-market growth for gene expression and antibody products. This growth was somewhat offset by the tough compare and expected decrease in our process media product line, as well as the expected reduction of sales of RainDance products. The combined decline in sales of RainDance and process media products totaled more than $8 million in the fourth quarter. On a geographic basis, life science experienced strong currency-neutral sales growth, most particularly in the U.S. and China. Sales of clinical diagnostics products in the quarter were $373.7 million, compared to $378.4 million last year, a decline of 1.3% on a reported basis, but growth of 1.7% on a currency-neutral basis. During the quarter, we posted solid growth in the U.S., especially for blood typing, quality control and autoimmune testing products, as well as growth in Asia Pacific. This geographic growth was partially offset by a decline in Europe. The reported gross margin for the fourth quarter was 54% on a non-GAAP basis and lower than last year, but certainly improved from recent levels experienced in the second and third quarters. The current quarter margin was impacted by a sizable restructuring charge, changes in product mix, higher service costs. as well as additional inventory-related expense in our European operations. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold for the quarter was $4.2 million, which compares to $4.9 million in the same period last year. SG&A expenses for the fourth quarter were $212.5 million or 34.4% of sales. When compared to the third quarter of this year, the sequential increase in spend is the result of higher employee-related expenses, as well as a significant increase in litigation cost as we vigorously defend our key intellectual property. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.1 million in the third quarter of last year. Research and development expense in Q4 was in line at $53.1 million or 8.6% of sales. During the quarter, we impaired approximately $300 million of goodwill and intangible assets related to prior acquisitions, the lion share being ready to the acquisition of DiaMed, which was completed in 2007. The dynamics in pricing environment of the global blood typing market has changed significantly compared to 10-plus years ago, leading us to make the appropriate accounting decision regarding the value on our books. And while we have taken the appropriate accounting action, we continue to be optimistic about the business with future growth and margin-expansion opportunity. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of our holdings of equity securities resulted in a loss of $814 million in our reported results for the quarter and is substantially related to our holdings of ordinary and preferred shares of Sartorius. Also, during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net expense of $84,000 compared to $10 million of expense last year. This improvement primarily reflects higher investment income, as well as lower foreign exchange hedging cost versus last year. The effective tax rate used during the fourth quarter was 20%. This lower-than-expected rate was driven by the sizable loss related to our Sartorius investment and impacted by the benefit from tax reform in the U.S. and the non-deductible goodwill impairment. Now as we look at our results on a non-GAAP basis, it’s important to note that we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both our growth and operating margins. These items are detailed in the reconciliation chart in our press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the fourth quarter. In cost of goods sold, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $4.2 million, as well as restructuring charges of $5.1 million related to a manufacturing operation in Europe that we will be closing and consolidating into one of our existing facilities in early 2020. This represents another step along the path to optimizing our global supply chain and is expected to result in more than $2 million of annual savings starting in 2020. These adjustments move the gross margin for the fourth quarter from 54% to 55.6%. This non-GAAP margin compares to a non-GAAP margin in the fourth quarter of 2017 of 55%.In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million, legal-related expenses of $8.7 million, a small acquisition-related benefit and restructuring cost of $421,000 related to a prior action. In R&D, we have excluded $1.3 million of expense related to restructuring, as well as excluded the impairment charge. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments results in moving the operating margin for the fourth quarter of 2018 from 11.11% on a non-GAAP basis to 14.5% on a non-GAAP basis. This significant improvement, compared to the first three quarters of 2018, represents good expense control and early signs of driving operating leverage, especially in SG&A, where the margin dropped to 32.7% of sales. We have also excluded the change in fair market value of our equity holdings and a small loss associated with venture investments that are recorded on the equity method of accounting from our non-GAAP results. With all of these various items in mind, we adjusted our tax provision for these exclusions resulting in a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 28%, significantly improved from the third quarter and in line with our guidance given on the last earnings call. And finally, non-GAAP net income and earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2018 were just over $64 million or 10.4% of sales and $2.13 per share, which compares to $57.3 million and $1.90 per share last year. Looking at the full-year results, we are pleased to report annual sales of $2,290,000,000, which represents currency-neutral growth of 5% and ahead of our guidance. This growth reflects strength across many product and regions for both life science and diagnostics. Our life science group posted record annual sales of $861.7 million, an increase of 9.7% on a reported basis when compared to 2017 and growth of nearly 9% currency neutral. This impressive growth was driven by continued strong demand for our Droplet Digital PCR product family, as well as solid growth in areas where we are increasing focus and investment such as cell biology and food safety. All three of these key product areas growing double digits for the year. Equally satisfying is seeing significant increases in sales for our more traditional product areas of gene expression in Western Blotting. And of course, our process media business came back exceptionally strong in 2018 and finished the year at record levels. From a regional view, life science sales increased in all three geographies, led by double-digit growth in the U.S. and China. For the year, clinical diagnostics sales were $1,412,000,000, an increase of 3.8% on a reported basis and 2.7% currency neutral. This growth was fueled by continued momentum in quality control, blood typing and autoimmune testing products. During the year, we placed more than 2,000 new instruments around the world, which bodes well for higher consumable sales in the years to come. From a regional view, diagnostics sales increased most notably in the U.S., China and Japan and were partially offset by continued challenges in Europe. We now believe that much of the ERP transition woes in that region are behind us. And we are looking forward to growth returning for diagnostics sales in EMEA in 2019. Looking to the full year operating results on a non-GAAP basis, the 2018 gross margin was 54.6% and compares to a non-GAAP margin of 56.1% in 2017. This 150 basis point decline is attributable to changes in product mix, including pricing pressure, primarily in our diagnostics segment, as well as start-up cost associated with our entry into the U.S. blood typing market. We estimate that mix and pricing accounted for approximately 70, 7 0, basis points of the decline, while start-up cost for the U.S. Blood typing entry accounted for an additional 25 or so basis points. Also, putting pressure on the gross margin during 2018, but not included in our non-GAAP calculation, was more than $10 million of cost associated with the ongoing transition of Europe to a new more efficient operating model. These costs were primarily related to the write-down of inventory in various locations around Europe. While product mix and market pricing is an ongoing part of doing business, we believe that the European transition-related costs are behind us. And as we build the sales for blood typing products in the U.S. over the coming quarters and years, pressure on the gross margin related to these start-up costs will be less of a needle-mover. And there is also more good news for the long-term gross margin expansion. And it is important to note that during the year, we made significant progress with building long-term efficiency into the supply chain through the closure of numerous warehouses and the consolidation of both direct and indirect procurement. During 2018, these moves already reduced overall spend by an estimated $10 million and should contribute even more in 2019. Despite the lower-than-expected gross margin, our non-GAAP operating margin for the full-year 2018 expanded 150 basis points from 9.2% in 2017 to 10.7% in 2018. This expansion is substantially the result of lower ERP-related spend of approximately $15 million, coupled with savings of more than $20 million from this shutdown of our new Bio and RainDance operations. I would also highlight that our non-GAAP SG&A expense for 2018 was held flat to the 2017 level, garnering a 200 basis point improvement in the SG&A margins and evidencing our ability to harness operating leverage. And finally, non-GAAP net income for 2018 increased more than 35% to $176.7 million or 7.7% of sales, compared to $127 million or 5.9% of sales in 2017. Non-GAAP earnings per share for the year increased to $5.84, compared to $4.23 in 2017. Moving to the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2018, total cash and short-term investments were $850 million, compared to $760 million at the end of 2017 and $866 million at the end of the third quarter. The decrease on a sequential basis primarily reflects cash used for our share buyback program. During the fourth quarter, we purchased 179,000 shares for approximately $49 million. Additionally, during the quarter, we purchased two buildings for approximately $25 million that will primarily be used to accommodate the planned expansion of our digital biology growth. We continue to make excellent progress on improving our cash flow. For the fourth quarter of 2018, net cash generated from operations was just over $105 million, which reflects higher cash generated than in all of 2017. Cash generated from operations for the full year 2018 totals more than $285 million and significantly exceeds the cash flow we have been seeing over the past several years. Moreover, free cash flow for the year is the highest we have recorded since 2011. This positive result reflects improvement in both collections and inventory management as we continue to make progress toward optimizing our global operating model and systems. As an example, our DSOs improved by more than 15 days from the 2017 level and cash conversion days improved by nearly 30 days for the year, bringing these metrics more in line with the pre-ERP disruption result. The adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter was $118.2 million or 19.1% of sales. Full year adjusted EBITDA, including the Sartorius dividend paid during our second quarter, is $371.2 million or 16.2% of sales. This year-to-date adjusted EBITDA margin compares to 15.2% in 2017, 100 basis points and $43 million of improvement. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $53.9 million and that includes the property purchase I just mentioned. Full year CAPEX was $125.5 million. Excluding the buildings, CAPEX for the year was in line with our expectations of around $102 million. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was 34.6 million and 138 million for the full year. Now let’s move to the outlook for 2019. Today, we are excited to share our thinking for 2019, which anticipates continued sales growth near the top of our stated range, as well as continued expansion in operating and adjusted EBITDA margins. Let’s start with the top line. For 2019, we are guiding currency-neutral sales growth to be in the four to 4.5% range. On a reported basis, using current exchange rates, that growth could look more like 3% to 3.5%, but we will see what the dollar does throughout the year. As we look at the components of the estimated four to 4.5% currency-neutral growth, we are anticipating both segments to drive that growth through new products, as well as geographic expansion. For life science, we see continued momentum as funding for research in our major markets seems to be holding steady. As such, we estimate 2019 growth for life science in the 5% to 6% range, which we would point out, is on top of the very strong performance of 9% growth recorded in 2018. This outlook anticipates continued growth in all of our key product market areas and regions and also anticipates a significant year-over-year decline in sales of RainDance products. For diagnostics, in 2019, we are targeting currency-neutral growth in the 3% to 4% range. This accelerated growth rate, when compared to the 2018 results, reflect a return to growth in EMEA, as well as continued expansion into the U.S. blood typing market. Looking to the margin profile for 2019, on a non-GAAP basis, we are targeting gross margins to be in the 55.5% to 56% for the full year with the strongest margins coming later in the year as we recognize more savings from our logistics consolidation in Europe and higher sales from blood typing in the U.S. For the non-GAAP operating margin, we are guiding to the 12.5% to 13% range as we continue to manage expenses and drive operating leverage. Research and development expense are targeted at 9% of sales and the tax rate is estimated to be 27% to 28%. And finally, we are estimating CAPEX of 110 to $120 million. We are pleased with the solid progress we have made in 2018, as well as the incremental progress we are targeting for 2019. The top-line growth, coupled with the improved margin profile, will also drive our adjusted EBITDA incrementally higher and still in line to achieve our longer-term target of a 20% EBITDA margin by the end of 2020. And now I’ll turn the call over to Norman for a few comments.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay. Thank you, Christine. So, I thought I’d take a few minutes to give you a little bit of sense of where we are today. A little bit echoing what Christine has already mentioned, but first on our results. As most of you know, we laid out some midterm targets at our investor day at the end of 2017. If I think about 2018, this was the first year of the plan and it’s certainly clear we’re making progress. Not only were we able to increase the trajectory of our sales growth, but we’re able to begin a steady return to our historical profit margins. I think strong demand for our products, especially in life science, as Christine mentioned, was a key driver coupled with good disciplined expense control. When I look back at the year, and especially if I look back at, say, 2017. 2017, which was when we lamented SAP in Europe, it did bring with it some challenges, challenges with customers. I think in 2018, we manage to regain that customer confidence, which was so important for us. And I think this also helped the results, from a sales perspective, allowing us to really spend more time on offense versus defense. As a measure of the progress we’ve realized over the past year in Europe, our net promoter scores, a measurement of customer satisfaction, have rebounded dramatically. As Christine mentioned, over the last several months or last 12 months, we’ve also seen good progress on our longer-term goal to realize savings from a consolidated supply chain organization. The creation of a global procurement function to get a supply cost and also rationalized warehousing and distribution in Europe allow us to realize some near-term margin improvement. We do expect to continue to make progress in 2019 on our midterm goals, not only from continued efforts in supply chain, but in many other areas around the company where we can leverage the organization and advantages of a data-rich environment, partly enabled by our new IT systems. As usual, we also have a few important new products lined up for introduction this year. Starting off the new year, I think we’re very pleased to have gotten FDA clearance to be able to market our Droplet Digital BCR-ABL kit in the clinical market for monitoring leukemia. I think this is – we’re pretty excited about that. I’d also expect to continue to make progress in a number of market areas outside of digital biology, including the research market for cell biology, food safety and the U.S. market for blood typing, all areas that we’ve been investing in. And as Christine has mentioned, while in the short term, growing our position into the U.S. blood typing market has created some gross margin headwinds, it is a critically important market for us longer term. So, I’m also pleased to say, and I’m sure this is a question on your mind that we’ve got a good field of candidates for both the open chief operating officer position and for Christine’s position. As Christine mentioned, our outlook, our financial outlook for 2019 does signal continued growth on the top line coupled with the increased margin expansion. And this will be another important step for us toward achieving our targeted 20% EBITDA margin by the end of 2020. So, I guess all of this is to say that we feel pretty good about where we are and the opportunities that we have for the year ahead. So, I think, maybe with that, we’ll open it up for questions.
Operator:
[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks, good afternoon. Norman, Christine, appreciate all the detail in your prepared comments. If you look at 2019, could you help us with some of the bridge components, the puts and takes around the margin expansion that you anticipate? You would observe quite a number of headwinds from mix and inventory charges through most of 2018. Are those certainly behind you now, would you expect those to carry over to some extent into the first half of the year? And did I hear you right and that you expect another 10 million plus of incremental savings from supply chain benefits in 2019?
Christine Tsingos:
So thanks for your question, Brandon. So, I’ll start with the latter. Yes, I think you did hear that right. And with each year, we start to get a cumulative impact of progress we’ve made on the logistics front in terms of these warehouses. But also, looking more efficiently in our shipping methods and things like that, we gain more leverage on our procurement side. And then over time, probably beyond the 2020-time frame, we’ll continue to look at our manufacturing footprint, and that could add to more savings there as well. And then to the other question, yes, I think some of the transition woes that have translated into cost for us during 2017 and certainly during 2018 as well, I believe those are mostly behind us now and don’t anticipate those following us into 2019, at least certainly not to the extent that we’ve been experiencing over the last 18-plus months. And finally, the – as we look to the margin expansion going forward, you asked about mix, that’s the one thing where you can’t really say it’s ahead of us or behind us. What happens with mix and pricing in any given quarter really is harder to predict in the short term and can be up or down in any particular quarter. Over the long term, we continue to launch new products, which help the margins. We continue to push for a higher consumable mix, which would help the margins. But I can’t really say oh, it’s something that’s behind us or in front of us. It’s just kind of the fact of doing business.
Brandon Couillard:
And this might be a question better for John Hertia, but could you just speak to your level of confidence that diagnostics can return to growth in EMEA in next year? And is that a function of demand, maybe some of the new products or actual pricing environment getting somewhat more favorable?
John Hertia:
A combination of things. I think Christine mentioned some of the transition woes. I think diagnostics was particularly hit hard in 2017 and 2018 with some of the ERP transition, we do believe that’s behind us. There was some softness in the market and I think that’s been improving. And there was some lumpiness with distributors that I think are behind us too. I think that, in combination with, again, U.S. traction for the blood typing products has been incredibly strong. We got IH-24 FDA approved. We submitted in Q4 for IH-500 approval to the FDA and we’re anticipating that in 2019. I think a combination of those two bodes well for 2019.
Brandon Couillard:
A question for Annette on the ddPCR business. Could you quantify the size of the market opportunity for BCR-ABL tests? What are your next plans following that first FDA clearance? And now that you have the first FDA approval for the female indication, how quickly can you – do you think you can – we can see this technology kind of move into the solid tumor space?
Annette Tumolo:
Well, Brandon, I think you know, we’re focused on liquid biopsy. So, this is our first test and it’s really the first important step in building our oncology menu and also moving toward having a system that people can develop, lab-developed tests on as well. So as far as – there is a market uptake, so we don’t expect immediately really large results from the BCR-ABL test because it’s got to be validated in everybody’s labs. But we expect really a big follow-on for people adopting the platform putting their own content on it while we develop our own oncology menu.
Brandon Couillard:
And last one for Norman. I understand that the CFO search is a little bit earlier stage, but could you give us a little bit more specifics about exactly where you stand with the COO search? And when you might expect to have someone onboard that you could announce publicly?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, we’ve identified several very good candidates, and we’re working very hard to get that filled as soon as we can.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. Thanks so much.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
Patrick Donnelly:
Great. Thanks, guys. Christine, maybe just on the gross margins, nice to see those bounce back. Now that we’re a couple of quarters removed from the initial region rental system placements that kind of diluted gross margins a bit. How much are using some of those higher-margin consumables start to flow through and positively impact margins? And then to the level you are able to break it out, how much of an inflection there are you calling for next year?
Christine Tsingos:
So just to clear, the inflection in that particular part of the gross margin?
Patrick Donnelly:
Yes, just the consumable pull – yes, the consumable pull through on those?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure. So, I think as you are referring to some of the headwinds that we faced, particularly with bringing the blood Typing IH-1000 into the U.S, we have had higher placements than we originally anticipated. But it’s not like those placements happened several quarters ago and now it’s just all consumable. We continue to have really good placements of new instruments. And so, what will happen, Patrick, over time, all of those instruments will be producing a consumable stream and that’ll build to a sizable enough bullets of revenue, if you will, to absorb what is always kind of start-up cost when you’re placing new instruments. These costs are a little higher with bringing this to the U.S. and we’ve experienced with other products in other geographies. So, I think, for us, it’s really about – the next few quarters, I think, we’ll continue to feel a little bit of it. Although, with each passing quarter it becomes less of an impact. And that’s why we mentioned the margins kind of building toward the end of the year. In terms of the overall mix between instruments and consumables, we have a very high consumable mix today and we continue to try and drive that higher each year. But quarter-to-quarter, it’s always difficult to predict.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, thanks. And then on the capital allocation side, very encouraging to see the repurchases get started in the quarter with the $50 million. How should we be thinking about the cadence of repurchase activity going forward? And then how are you guys balancing preference for that versus M&A, et cetera?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure. So, I think, given our balance sheet profile, our cash flow profile and our anticipated – and even increasing that further, we continue to believe that we have the capability to have capital allocation along multiple lines. Our number one preference continues to be acquisition, both on the tuck-in side and always looking for something more transformational. But with that being said, I think our capital capacity will allow us to continue the buyback program as well, while we are continuing to pursue acquisitions.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay. And then maybe just last one for me. It was nice to hear you guys reaffirm the 2020 EBITDA target, can you just talk through the confidence level hitting that number, now that 2018 is done, you guys showed nice progress, maybe came in a little lower than you were expecting when the guidance was initially provided? And then just the key levers over the two years to get there? Any change in your thoughts as to where the expansions coming from, gross margins versus OpEx as to when you initially gave it to now?
Christine Tsingos:
Yes. That’s a pretty good question. I think overall, the answer is probably not much change in our thoughts. It is not as accessible as maybe we thought it was initially, but still very doable. And when you think back to our investor day presentation, Patrick, you probably remember the chart when we outlined the $600 million – 600 basis point improvement, if you will, and about 150 of that was expected to come from the gross margin and another 75 to 100 down the R&D side and really the vast majority was in SG&A. And I think we’ll still kind of see that balance that in SG&A is where we can gain quite a bit of traction. And we continue to be focused on that. And that has proved very beneficial in 2018 while the gross margin came under pressure. But I still think we stand behind that 150-basis point opportunity in the gross margin as well.
Patrick Donnelly:
Okay, very helpful. Thanks Christine, and congrats on the retirement.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.
Q - Dan Leonard:
Thank you. So first a question on the tax rate. Christine, when do you think that you’ll be able to gain a more material reduction in your tax rate?
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, great question. I share a little of your frustration. We still anticipate the tax rate coming down over time to the mid-20s. And who knows where we might be able to take it longer term from there. In the short run, Dan, when you think about our profile in Europe, where we’ve had all of these challenges, both in terms of the additional expenses and other charges, the restructuring we’re doing, et cetera, all of that, obviously, has led to dampening the profitability in Europe and, therefore, we’re not gaining that benefit from our new European headquarter structures as we’d hoped. But I think that’s more situational than systemic. And maybe our benefit of moving the tax rate down to the mid-20s is delayed a little. But I think the opportunity for us still exist. And as we look to 27% to 28% for 2019, and we’ll continue to work to improve that, not just through the European profile, but also through other tax planning measures that we’re evaluating.
Q - Dan Leonard:
Okay, thank you. And then a couple of questions on diagnostics. First one, how are you thinking about the impact of reimbursement pressure on your customers in the U.S. market? Do you feel like you’ve got that factored into guidance for 2019?
John Hertia:
Yes, I mean, we’ve seen – I mean, our customers have seen some impact. We’ve had some residual trickled down, but not so much in 2018. And I think our forecast in 2019 reflects sort of the reality of the reimbursement rates in the U.S.
Dan Leonard:
Okay. And then finally, John, can you bring us up to speed, just given the goodwill writedown on DiaMed. Can you bring us up to speed, what has happened outside the U.S. in the blood typing market? And how that’s changed or differed from your initial outlook?
John Hertia:
Well, let’s see, the Asia part of it, I’d say, our performance in Asia has gone very well. The price pressure that came with maybe a conversion of a largely manual and semi-automated market to highly automated market, affected the gross margins for us. And I would say, pretty much everybody, industry, that didn’t exist in 2007 and 2008, that’s gone through a transformation since then. And probably, the largest part of it has just been the reality of some slowness and the realities of the European market. I think it’s been – DiaMed was largely a European-based company, it’s largest to expansion. Potential was both in North America and in Asia and it took us for a lot of technical and intellectual property reasons while to get there. We are now making good progress in both. But I think that reality of the distance between where we started in 2007 and how fast we thought we could get to the U.S. market and make penetration in Asia was a large part of it, and then there’s conversion from largely a sort of a manual semi-automated market to a very highly automated market, similar to clinical chemistry and immunochemistry, I think, affected the business overall.
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, I think the other big change is the dynamics of the U.S. market over that time period in the pricing. Back when we acquired DiaMed, the pricing in the U.S. market was almost double that of Europe and now we’ve seen it pretty much come down and equalize throughout the world.
Dan Leonard:
Interesting color. Thank you
Operator:
Our next question was from Jack Meehan with Barclays. Your line is now open.
Jack Meehan:
Thanks, and congrats on the progress you guys have been showing. Let me keep going on diagnostics business. Maybe one of the areas you called was the autoimmune business. So, was wondering if you could give us what your outlook for that business is in 2019? Whether there is any new menu you expect to add during the year? And then have there been any changes in the competitive environment with companies like your EUROIMMUN entering U.S?
John Hertia:
And it’s – Jack, this is John. It’s largely a function of the BioPlex business. So, I’d say systems placement in that business has been very strong. 2018 was another record year for system placements. The growth this year has come a lot from autoimmune, but also from some of our recent tests in syphilis and HIV and Vitamin D. So we’re seeing good growth year. We are planning some new assay introductions in 2019, we filed them with the FDA, and we’re not in a position to announce which ones they’re at this point. But I think you’ll see some menu expansion in the first and second quarter of 2019. And I’d say, the outlook overall for that business, both in the U.S. and outside the U.S. is strong.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then maybe just conversely, I know one of the headwinds has been in the blood virus business for a while, I’m curious what the outlook – how that’s been performing? What the outlook is? Do you think there’s a point where that can start to stabilize? Or is that still further out on horizon?
John Hertia:
It’s still declining. It’s not at the trajectory. It was just declining in 2017, it was pretty steep then, it slowed. Some of the business is just historical microplate and that’s an older product later in its life cycle. We’re looking at a lot of new areas in microbiology. It’s an area that is sort of right for transition. Those won’t hit in 2019, but I think as we start getting into 2020 and 2021, you’ll begin to see a little bit of a trajectory change.
Jack Meehan:
Great. And then maybe just last one was – just want to make sure I have the numbers right. Christine, I think I heard you say on the life science side, an $8 million headwind, was that right collectively between process media and RainDance? And can you break those out, the size, please?
Norman Schwartz:
In 2018.
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, in the fourth quarter.
Jack Meehan:
Okay, how much – what was the size of each?
Christine Tsingos:
About half and half.
Jack Meehan:
Okay. Thanks for the color.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Mitchell Petersen with Barclays. Your line is now open.
Mitchell Petersen:
Thank you. Yes, I was hoping you could provide an update just on your new product initiatives, specifically in Droplet Digital? And just talk a little bit more about those applications, whether there is anything coming in single cell or any of the other applications there? Thanks.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. So, I think we’ve talked a little bit about our next-generation platform where we’re integrating the full workflow inside of one instrument, and we are on track to get that product released and available for sales by the fourth quarter of this year. We’re all looking forward to that. We are working on next-generation single-cell products. We are about to launch a new application in single cell called ATAC-Seq. And so, we’ve got a couple of new products coming out in 2019, one in the first half of the year and hopefully one toward the end of the year or early in 2020. So, we have an intense focus in that area as well. And I think I mentioned that with the CE-IVD-marked platform and now the FDA cleared platform for BCR-ABL, we’re looking to expand our oncology menu as well for solid tumor via liquid biopsy.
Mitchell Petersen:
Got it. And then maybe similarly, I was hoping you could provide an update on the litigation with Tenax. I’ve been most curious about the current trial, the one that’s in posttrial motions. And then if you were awarded an injunction, I guess, what would the strategy be to take advantage of that opportunity and fill in the gap in the market?
Christine Tsingos:
So, I’m just going to say, I’m going to channel my inner General Counsel here. We can’t really talk about ongoing litigation. So, I can’t really say much except what you’ve seen in press releases.
Mitchell Petersen:
Okay, fair enough.
Operator:
And we have a follow-up question from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Christine, just a clarification on 2019. Any chance you could quantify the RainDance revenue headwind? And then, John, I believe you exited the QuickStep HLA market in the U.S, is that a material number to perhaps call out as a drag on diagnostics?
Christine Tsingos:
So the – Brandon, the headwind for RainDance is about $9 million.
Annette Tumolo:
Largely from the exit of our Myriad business.
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, yes. But the anticipated decline 2019 versus 2018 is about $9 million.
Annette Tumolo:
That’s correct.
Christine Tsingos:
And what was the second half?
John Hertia:
Yes, Brandon, can you repeat the second question on blood typing?
Brandon Couillard:
Yes, the second part, you discontinued the QuickStep HLA product in the donor screening market, just curious if that’s a headwind worth calling out?
John Hertia:
No, not at all. It is very small.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then, Christine, just on the balance sheet, you clearly made some good progress on the working capital front. Should we expect that to continue into 2019? And you think there’s a chance that inventories can continue to come down on an absolute basis?
Norman Schwartz:
That’s certainly a focus that we have for 2019.
Christine Tsingos:
So, I think – yes, I think we’re anticipating some incremental working capital improvement. I don’t know that we get the big step function, as we did this year. But certainly, continued improvement there. And as Norman mentioned, there is a very sizable focus on inventory this year.
Brandon Couillard:
Very good. Thank you.
Operator:
At this time, I’m showing no further questions. I’d like to turn the call back over to Christine...
Christine Tsingos:
Kyla, can you pull one more time, please?
Operator:
[Operator instructions] I’m not showing any questions.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. All right. Great. Well, thank you, everyone, for joining us today on the call. And we really appreciate your interest and support as we close 2018 and look forward to 2019. And hopefully, we’ll be seeing you soon. Thanks. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This does conclude the program. You may disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Patrick Donnelly - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc. Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Q3 2018 Bio-Rad Laboratories Conference Call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. Late, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Ron Hutton. You may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Twanda. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance, and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from our plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail our risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. On the call today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Annette Tumolo, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. Today we will review our results on a GAAP basis and then provide some commentary and insight to our results on a non-GAAP basis. Net sales for the third quarter of 2018 were $545.1 million and growth of 2.1% versus the same period last year sales of $534.1 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 3.4%. During the quarter we experienced good demand across many of our key product lines with particular strength noted in the Americas and Asia-Pacific. When comparing to last year, remember that the third quarter of 2017 included an estimated $12 million of revenue that was recovered from the earlier ERP related disruption in Europe. If we neutralized for those recovered sales as well as for approximately $6 million of sales that were pulled forward into the second quarter of this year, we estimate that currency neutral growth for the third quarter of 2008 was nearly 7%. Let's look at the segment performance a little closer. Life Science sales in the third quarter were $206.6 million, an increase of 7.1% on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of 8% on a currency neutral basis. Much of the growth in the third quarter was driven by continued strong demand for our cell biology, digital PCR, western blot, and food safety products, all of which grew double digits. We also experienced another quarter of increased demand for our process media product line. Life Science growth in the quarter was offset somewhat by the anticipated decrease in sales of RainDance products by approximately $4 million. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced strong currency neutral sales growth, most particularly in the U.S. and China. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the quarter were $334 million compared to $338 million last year, a decline of 1.2% on a reported basis and up slightly on a currency neutral basis. During the quarter, we posted solid growth in the Americas, especially for blood typing and autoimmune testing products, as well as good growth in Asia-Pacific. This geographic growth was offset by the expected decline in Europe. As many of you know, the third quarter was anticipated to be a very tough compare given the unusual ERP related patterns, I mentioned a moment ago. Excluding this tough to compare scenario, we estimate that Diagnostics sales growth would have been approximately 5% for the third quarter. The reported gross margin for the third quarter was 52.6%, lower than our annual target and essentially flat with the second quarter gross margin. The current quarter margin continued to be impacted by the product mix, high service, warranty and reagent rental costs, as well as additional inventory related expense. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold for the quarter was $4.7 million which compares to $4.9 million in the same period last year. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were $201.2 million or 36.9% of sales, an improvement when compared to 37.1% last year. When compared to the second quarter of this year, the sequential decrease in spend is the result of lower employee related expenses, as well as a contingent consideration benefit of $4 million. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.8 million versus $2.4 million in the third quarter of last year. Research and development expense in Q3 was $49.2 million or 9% of sales. When comparing to the third quarter of last year, remember that the year ago period included $7.6 million of one-time restructuring expense related to our GnuBIO project as well as a $3 million milestone accrual for the acquisition of our new flow cytometer. Going forward, we continue to target our annual R&D investment at 9% of sales. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of our holdings of equity securities added $318 million of income to our reported results for the quarter and it's substantially related to our holdings of ordinary and preferred shares of Sartorius. Also during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other expense of $4.2 million compared to $8.2 million of expense last year. This improvement primarily reflects higher investment income as well as lower foreign exchange hedging cost versus last year. The effective tax rate used during the third quarter was 23% and compares to 28% for the same period last year. This lower than expected tax rate was driven by the sizable gain related to our Sartorius investment as well as the benefit of tax reform in the U.S. Excluding Sartorius and any discrete items that may occur during the year, we expect the full year effective tax rate to be in the 27% to 28% range. Reported net income for the third quarter was $269 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $8.89. This significant increase in net income and earnings per share versus last year substantially relates to the valuation of our Sartorius holdings. With this change in accounting regulations for equities securities, coupled with multiple atypical events and charges, it is important to review the results in a manner more reflective of our base operation. As we look to our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both our gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation chart in our press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter in cost of goods sold, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $4.7 million as well as restructuring costs of $410,000 related to the closure of our RainDance operation. These adjustments move the gross margin for the third quarter from 52.6% to 53.5%. This non-GAAP margin compares to a non-GAAP margin in the third quarter of 2017 of 56.9%. In operating expense on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.8 million, legal related charges of $4.4 million, a net acquisition related benefit of $2.8 million and a small restructuring charge related to a prior action. In R&D, we have adjusted the reported results to include $496,000 of expense which was reversed as part of the true-up of a prior restructuring accrual. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the operating margin for the third quarter of 2018 from 6.7% on a GAAP basis to 8.2% on a non-GAAP basis. Despite a strong topline and relatively good operating expense control, the lower than expected gross margin in the quarter resulted in a non-GAAP operating margin below our expectation. However, if we look year-to-date, the non-GAAP operating margin is 9.3% compared to 7.1% for the first nine months of 2017, representing good progress year-over-year. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line which are, the quarterly increase in value of our equity holdings of $318 million as well as $220,000 of loss associated with venture investments that are recorded on the equity method of accounting. With all of these various items in mind, we adjusted our tax provision for these exclusions resulting in a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 32%. This higher tax rate when compared to the non-GAAP rate of 27% in Q2 primarily reflects a change in our geographic mix of profitability. And finally, non-GAAP net income and earnings per share for the third quarter of 2018 were $27.6 million and $0.91 per share compared to $30.7 million and $1.02 per share last year. Moving to the balance sheet, as of September 30, total cash and short term investments were $866 million compared to $761 million at the end of 2017. We continue to make excellent progress on improving our cash flow. For the third quarter of 2018, net cash generated from operations was just over $62 million, which compares to $28 million in the year ago period. Cash generated from operations in the first nine months of 2018 is $180 million and significantly exceeds the cash flow in all of last year. This positive result reflects improvement in both collections and inventory management as we continue to make progress toward optimizing our global operating model and system. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter was $73 million or 13.4% of sale. Year-to-date adjusted EBITDA, which includes the Sartorius dividend paid during our second quarter, is $253 million, or 15.1% of sales. This year-to-date adjusted EBITDA margin compares to 13.2% in the first nine months of last year nearly 200 basis points and $50 million of improvement year-over-year. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $21.9 million. Given the year-to-date CapEx spend of approximately $72 million, the full year expectation for CapEx will likely be at the low end of our forecasted $100 million to $110 million range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $34.8 million. Moving to the outlook for the fourth quarter, we are pleased with the continued momentum on the topline. For Life Science, strong research funding around the world coupled with a good lineup of new products and technologies has fueled currency neutral growth of nearly 12% in the first nine months of the year. In our Diagnostics group, while year-to-day currency neutral growth is around 3%, we have made solid inroads to the U.S. blood typing market and sales of our BioPlex 2200 instruments and assays continue to outpace the market. With all that being said, we are moving into our toughest compare of the year. Remember that the fourth quarter of 2017 was a substantial record quarter for Bio-Rad with revenue exceeding $620 million. This compare will be especially difficult for our Life Science Group, remembering that the fourth quarter of last year grew at more than 12% fueled in part by the resurgence of growth for process media. With that in mind, we would not be surprised to see a year-over-year decline in Life Science sales in Q4. While Diagnostics has less of a tough compare, we are still ramping our blood typing business in the U.S. and it takes time for the cumulative impact of reagent sales to move the needle. And as we've talked about, we continue to face tough competition across many of our product lines. Knowing all these nuances, today, we are reiterating our guidance for full year revenue growth in the 4% to 4.5% range. This annual revenue growth target implies reported sales for the fourth quarter in the $595 million to $610 million range. When thinking about our guidance for the full year operating margin, we must absorb the lower than expected gross margin recorded in the first nine months of the year. As I mentioned earlier, this lower margin is the result of changes in product mix, a high level placements of blood typing instruments in the U.S., which incur significant costs in advance of the expected reagent revenue flow and inventory costs incurred as we continue to transition Europe to our new operating model. While we believe the fourth quarter should show improvement in the margin closer to our historical level around 55%, it will not be enough to overcome the year-to-date results. As such, and as we cautioned on the second quarter earnings call, we are revising our full year operating margin target to be in 8% to 9% range on a GAAP basis, which is down from our previous target of 10%, but still improved significantly when compared to the 2017 operating margin of 5.5%. On a non-GAAP basis, we estimate the full year operating margins to be in the 9.5% to 10.5% range compared to the previous estimated margins on a non-GAAP basis of 11% to 11.5%. As has been our practice in prior years, we will share our thinking and outlook for 2019 in February during the fourth quarter earnings call. And now, we are happy to take your question.
Operator:
Our first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hi, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine in terms of the gross margin in the third quarter, could you help us bridge the year-over-year decline in terms of the moving parts between the impact of the instrument placements, currency, the inventory charges? And then to confirm the operating margin guidance for the year, does that include the impact of FX, which I suspect has gotten much worse for you in terms of the full year guide. Any chance you could quantify the effect of just currency in terms of the updated margin guidance for the year?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Well, in terms of what's impacting the gross margin between the various categories that I talked about, I'd say about half of the impact relates to mix if you will and the other half is really just added costs for either continuing to transition the European operations or cost associated with the upfront investment in these reagent rental placements. And then as far as FX is concerned in terms of impact, it is true that it is becoming more and more of a negative impact and we do have nine months behind us and so that's part of the headwind that we face. I don't have a specific breakout, Brandon, as to how much is of the change in outlook is related to FX. But let me see, if I can find it while we continue with the call.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. I'm just curious, given this is kind of like the third quarter that we've seen the heavy instrumentation placement mix that, I would have I guess suspected that some of the placements that took place in the first half the year would have been at least contributing or are starting to pull through reagent revenues from those. Can you help us sort of understand sort of the ramp timelines with some of these blood typing instruments as well as the BioPlex 2200s and really as to – if there is something else going on beyond just the instrument mix, whether it might be COGS inflation or factory or ops issues?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So let me answer a little bit of that and I certainly welcome John Hertia to pipe in. I don't want this to be interpreted that we've placed instruments and they're not generating any revenue. They do indeed, after – about – it takes about 90 days to complete the installation and get the customer exempted (00:21:33) and then the reagent revenue starts to flow. I think that the difference is that the reagents are at a lower price and cumulatively, you need a lot of those to move the needle of a business as big as our blood typing business. But nonetheless, certainly the instruments are beginning to produce revenue. The higher costs that we incur when you think about it as we're feeding the U.S. market, we are bearing the additional cost of bringing these instruments which are manufactured in Europe and the reagents as well into the U.S. and placing them and taking on the initial warranty et cetera. Those – one is a true additional cost which we will continue to offset in other ways. And the other is timing, again, of just what it takes upfront as you initially install these versus the reagent flow later in the product life cycle. So John Hertia, I don't know if you want to add anything of what you're seeing for the businesses blood typing or the BioPlex 2200 in the U.S. and around the world?
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think placements of both have been stronger than expected in the U.S. The ramp up time to reagents in the BioPlex is 60 to 90 days from the time they get the instrument to the time they're running the reagents. It's a little longer for blood typing in some institutions where it could take three to up to six months to do all of the validation and cross validation of results before they come fully online simply because of the sensitivity of the results and the product line. And so that ramp up takes a little bit longer but it's definitely beginning to kick in.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
That's a good point.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That's helpful. And then last one I guess, Christine, anything changed in your view with respect to your 2020 margin targets and your ability to reach those and how would you expect, I guess, the pace of that margin expansion to play out kind of over the next proceeding two years. Thank you.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. No, I think that's a great question, Brandon. And we're in the process right now of doing a very tight bottoms-up of our 2019 forecast. And we always do the out years as well. I really don't think that there is anything that we're seeing today that changes our target of hitting our 20% goal by the end of 2020. I think clearly being shy of where we wanted the first year of that progression to be, puts a little more pressure on mining the benefits and the margin expansion in 2019 and 2020. But even with that being said, as John Hertia just pointed out, the pace that we're placing these instruments in the U.S. is higher than we'd anticipated, but – that means the cost that we're bearing today is higher than we would have anticipated. But at the same time it bodes well for good margin business, higher margin business down the road. The other factors that are part of our 2020 vision, the specific projects that we're working on and actions that we're taking beyond what's going on with the topline, those are still in place and those are still being worked on and we are starting to see the benefit of many of those and I guess you can see that more in cash flow than you can right now in our operating results. But that's a long winded way for me to say, I think we're still targeting our 20%. I think we believe strongly in that goal. The trajectory is a little bit different in terms of how it rolls out than we would have originally anticipated, but everything, nonetheless, is still identified.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That's very helpful. I'll leave it there and let some of the newbies jump in. Thank you.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And Norman, I don't know if you want to add any commentary to the 2020 outlook or not?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, obviously we're still working diligently to meet that plan. And we've got lots of irons in the fire there to make that happen.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Patrick Donnelly - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Great. Thanks for taking the question. Christine, maybe just on the instrument placements, can you help us think about when gross margins reflect higher on these placements? I guess trying to get out when you currently feel like you're going to see that impact on a corporate level given the increased instrument placements relative to your expectations? Is this going to continue for another couple of quarters in terms of gross margin dilution? Or when do we see those reagent pull throughs really inflect on the gross margins?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah, Patrick, if I kind of pick up on John Hertia's comments from a moment ago much of the drag is related to feeding the U.S. blood typing market and that's bringing with it additional costs and the labs need to not only go through installation, but they have several validation and crossover studies that they need to complete. And as John just said that can take 90 days, it can take up to six months. So while we do expect some recovery of the gross margin in Q4, I don't think that's really reflective yet of the cumulative impact of higher reagent revenue. We're not prepared to talk about 2019 specifically but if we think about spending the full year of 2018 placing instruments in the U.S. and beginning to get those, help their labs with the validation and start that reagent stream, then as we move through 2019, I would expect that we would, on a corporate level, start to see the benefits of that. So we'll have more specific insight on the fourth quarter call when we give our 2019 outlook.
Patrick Donnelly - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Okay, that's helpful. And I guess when we think about – Brandon asked about the 2020 targets, you guys sound like you're still confident there. I guess when we think about the progression, like you said, maybe the progression is going to be a little bit different starting on a little lower level here but are there things that, as the gross margins have kind of come in a little lighter than you expected, you now will pull forward some of these initiatives that you've talked about between procurement, facility consolidations, the ERP systems, costs coming down? Is there opportunity to move some of those costs forward to next year to kind of offset a little bit of this gross margin issue before it inflects higher, or what are your thoughts on that? How nimble can you be?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I think there are some things that we can pull forward. Other projects that – as Norman mentioned that we've been working on and identified, they kind of have their own timeline especially when you're dealing with changes in manufacturing in a regulated environment that just takes time, but that was kind of baked into the plan. It will help that some of the temperament of the gross margin this year has been pretty situational not just with we've been talking about, for example, the U.S. blood typing market, but situational with working through the optimization of our European operating model after tremendous change in 2017 and some of the charges that we've taken, especially the inventory-related charges, those obviously we don't anticipate to repeat. That's more situational, so that something easier to overcome. It's not a change in course or practice or acceleration as you were asking about. But it also isn't something that would force us to have a course change. Maybe I've totally confused you. Hello?
Operator:
Mr. Donnelly, your line is open. Check to see if you are on mute?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
That's all right, Twanda. We can go on to the next question and then Patrick can get back in the queue if he has more – if he needs clarification.
Operator:
All right. Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan of Barclays Capital. Your line is open.
Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hi. Thanks. Without going overkill on the margin front, I did have one more on the gross margin. I was curious whether you considered anything one-time within the adjusted gross margins in the quarter. One of the things you talked about was the higher cost for service. I understand kind of the mix dynamic and whatnot. But just curious whether there was anything else that would roll off as we move into 2019 on the gross margin front.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. So Jack, the only thing that would – to use your words one-time and maybe and I'll call it more situational, if you will, is we continue to kind of right size and optimize the inventory in Europe. And there was as such probably another couple million dollars that we took a charge for in the third quarter and we had an even larger charge that we talked about on the Q2 call. It's not something that I'd be willing to non-GAAP out because it is part of running our business but it also though is a pretty specific identifiable event, if you will.
Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Maybe just from a management perspective, I was curious, Norman, is there any update in terms of the hiring process for a COO?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes, we're actively looking at other candidates at the moment and we've got a fresh slate that's being developed and so we're continuing to work on that.
Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Great. And then maybe just from a revenue perspective, I thought the Life Science revenues looked pretty good in the quarter, seemed relatively broad based. The one I have to ask about is the process media. What the level of contribution was there year-over-year and just how that might swing come the fourth quarter?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So it's a good question. I think process media was up about $8 million year-over-year. As we move into the fourth quarter, I think we expect it to be down year-over-year because that will be their first kind of tough compare. It was Q4 last year when it came roaring back and that's a little bit of the reason why despite another good quarter of topline growth we're keeping with that 4%, 4.5% outlook. The other thing I'd remind you of though is if we exclude the process media sales I think that Life Science still grew about 6.5%. And really we shouldn't exclude all $8 million because we did, through the shutdown of our RainDance operation, see a year-over-year decrease of sales of about $4 million and that kind of offset some of that $8 million year-over-year.
Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Great. Final one if I can squeeze it in is I'd be curious, I'm down here in San Antonio at AMP, what the latest is for droplet digital in terms of getting some of the FDA approvals? I think one you've been working on with BCR-ABL just if there are any updates in terms of the timeline for having clinical test approved? Thank you.
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
This is Annette. I'll take that. So we have – we're in the submission process, so we are talking to the FDA all the time and I wish I had a crystal ball to know exactly when our clearance would come, but we expect it anytime. So we're continuing our regular dialogue with them on this process.
Jack Meehan - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Thanks, Annette. The watch continues?
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. A couple from me. So you talked at length about the better instrument placements than you had expected. Can you help us at all put some framing around what that means for the revenue line going forward? And maybe this is a John Hertia question, is this something that lifts the Diagnostics business out of its low-single-digit trajectory into something higher in forward periods?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So before John jumps in on that, I mean obviously we're not ready to talk about 2019 yet. But even with that, Dan, this is just one part of our business. We have several sizable businesses within Diagnostics, certainly within Life Science. And no single one of them is some big overwhelming needle mover if you will, everything is a contributor. Certainly in terms of year-over-year growth, I think blood typing in the U.S. should be able to outpace the industry averages and the company averages and help move the needle. But it's just one of many opportunities that we have going forward. So I don't know, Dan, if that answers your question or what – if you're looking for something different.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
I was looking for a little bit of framework but if – but I can leave it there. Secondly, Christine, I believe you went live with SAP in Italy, Spain, a couple of Nordic countries in Q3. Can you comment on how that went?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah, no, thanks for asking. We did Southern Europe and the Nordics, went live at the beginning of July and it was a much less complicated implementation than the past because it was primarily commercial operations not the more complex manufacturing. I think so far so good. The team was pretty well prepared not just with the deployment but those that were catching the ball. It is always does take time for people to get used to new processes and screens and systems and charts and you name it. And so we'll continue to improve those, but I think we're pretty pleased at how well they were able to catch the ball and come right into the SAP world. A lot of lessons learned from the prior European deployments that we took advantage of.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Great. And then my final question on the buyback. Did you buy back any stock in the quarter or do you plan to buy back any going forward? Just any update on the authorization that you announced a year ago?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So as you probably know almost since the day we announced it we've kind of been in a blackout period. So we didn't buy any during the quarter. Though with that being said, I think we anticipate next week the trading window will open and it's not lost on us. The movement in the share price and the value that's there, so we're discussing the buyback internally now, vis-à-vis potential execution.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Christine Tsingos for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Great. Well, thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today. We appreciate your interest in Bio-Rad, we appreciate your thoughtful questions and we look forward hopefully to seeing you soon. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q2 2018 Bio-Rad Laboratories Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference call may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Vice President and Treasurer, Ron Hutton. You may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, David. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance, and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from our plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail our risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward -looking statements made during the call today. Our remarks today will also include references to non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted income per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I'll turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. On the call, we will review our results on a GAAP basis and then provide some commentary and insight to our results on a non-GAAP basis. Today, we are pleased to report net sales for the second quarter of 2018 were $575.9 million and growth of 14.1% versus the same period last year sale of $504.7 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased an impressive 11%. During the quarter, we experienced good demand across many of our key product lines resulting in double-digit growth in all three major geographies. When comparing to the second quarter of last year, remember that an estimated $16 million of revenue was disrupted in association with the go-live of our European deployment of SAP in April 2017. If we neutralize for last year's disruption as well as for a small amount of sales that were pulled forward into the second quarter of this year in conjunction with the recent completion of our system deployment in Western Europe, we estimate that currency neutral organic growth for the quarter was around 6.5%. Now, let's look a little closer at the segment performance. Life Science sales in the second quarter were $217.8 million, an increase of 21.4% on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of nearly 19% on a currency neutral basis. Much of the growth in the second quarter was driven by continued strong demand for our cell biology, Digital PCR and food safety products. We also experienced another quarter of increased demand for our process media product lines. You may recall that 2017 was a tough year for growth in process media, making this year a bit of an easy compare. With that being said, and excluding the process media sales, our core Life Science business still grew an impressive 14% currency neutral in the second quarter of this year. On a geographic basis, Life Science experienced double-digit currency neutral growth in all three of our geographies and were particularly strong in the U.S., Europe and China. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the quarter were $354 million compared to $322.1 million last year, an increase of 9.9% on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 6.5%. During the second quarter, we posted solid growth of blood typing, autoimmune testing and quality control products. Of particular note, during the quarter, we experienced a significant increase in instrument placements for the blood typing market with the unit volume more than doubling both year-over-year and sequentially. Looking at the regional view, sales of diagnostic products were particularly strong in the Americas, China and Europe. The reported gross margin for the second quarter was lower than our annual target at 52.4% and compares to 54.2% last year. The current quarter margin was significantly impacted by changes in the product mix, as well as certain expenses borne out of the continued transition of our European operations. As I mentioned earlier, during the quarter, we placed a significant number of diagnostic instruments, most notably for the blood typing market. The short-term impact is a sizable headwind to margin, but longer term, these placements bode well for sustainable higher margin consumable revenue. In addition to the product mix headwind, during the quarter, we experienced a higher level of restructuring and inventory-related expense, much of which stems from the continued transition of Western Europe to our new operating model and global ERP platform. And finally, for the second quarter of 2018, amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.7 million, which compares to $7.1 million in the second quarter of last year. SG&A expenses for the second quarter were $210.4 million or 36.5% of sales, an improvement versus last year in terms of dollars and as a percent of sales. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.1 million versus $1.8 million in the second quarter of last year. Research and development expense in Q2 was $47.5 million or 8.2% of sales. When comparing to the second quarter of last year, remember that the year ago period included more than $11 million of one-time acquisition-related expense for the purchase of an early stage diagnostic device as well as expense associated with the acquisition of our new flow cytometer. Going forward, we continue to target our annual R&D investment at 9% of sales. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of our holdings of equity securities added $286.4 million of income to our reported results for the quarter and is substantially related to our holdings of ordinary and preferred shares of Sartorius AG. Also, during the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $9.9 million compared to $2.8 million last year. This increase primarily reflects the annual receipt of our Sartorius dividend, which increased more than $3 million from last year, as well as lower foreign exchange hedging cost versus last year. The effective tax rate used during the second quarter was 21% and compares to 24% in the first quarter of this year. This lower than expected tax rate was driven by the sizable gain related to our Sartorius investment, coupled with a benefit of tax reform in the U.S. Excluding Sartorius and any discrete items that may occur during the year, we continue to expect the full year effective tax rate to be in the 26% to 27% range. Reported net income for the second quarter was $268 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $8.87. This significant increase in net income and earnings per share versus last year substantially relates to the valuation of our Sartorius holdings. With the change in accounting regulations for equity securities, coupled with the multiple atypical events and charges, it is important now for us to review our results in a manner that is more reflective of our base operations. As we look at our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical or unique items that impacted both our growth and operating margins as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation chart in our press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the second quarter and cost of goods sold, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $4.7 million as well as $1.3 million of restructuring cost related to the shutdown of a small manufacturing facility in Europe. These adjustments move the gross margin for the second quarter from 52.4% to 53.4%. This non-GAAP margin compares to a non-GAAP margin in the second quarter of 2017 of 55.6%. As a side note, I'd like to reiterate my earlier comments about the substantial impact of change in product mix toward a higher number of instrument placements as well as the increased inventory cost related to our transition to a more optimized operating model in Europe. If we were to further normalize the non-GAAP margin for both the product mix effect, which is estimated at 70 basis points, and the atypical quarterly expense for inventory, which is estimated at 100 basis points, we calculate the gross margin would have been approximately 55.1% for the quarter. In operating margin expense on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchased intangibles of $2.1 million, legal-related charges of $5.1 million, acquisition-related costs of $1.5 million and a small credit to restructuring cost of about $0.5 million. Of particular note, we would highlight that we continue to make progress on the SG&A margin on a non-GAAP basis, as evidenced by the 200 basis point decline just from the first quarter of this year to 35.1%. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the operating margin for the second quarter 2018 from 7.6% on a GAAP basis to 10% on a non-GAAP basis. This represents a significant improvement over our non-GAAP operating margin of 3.5% in the second quarter of last year. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the quarterly increase in value of our equity holdings of $286.4 million as well as $405,000 of loss associated with venture investments that are recorded on the equity method of accounting. With all of these various items in mind, we adjusted our tax provision for these exclusions, resulting in a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 27%. And finally, non-GAAP net income and earnings per share for the second quarter of 2018 were $49.5 million and $1.64 per share, which compares to $18.8 million and $0.62 a share last year. Moving to the balance sheet, as of June 30, total cash and short-term investments were $824 million compared to $761 million at the end of 2017. For the second quarter of 2018, net cash generated from operations was nearly $78 million, which compares to $63 million in the year ago period. Perhaps more noteworthy is to point out that cash generated from operation in the first half of 2018 has already exceeded the cash flow in all of last year. This positive result reflects our higher operating profit as well as good improvement in both collections and inventory management as we continue to make progress towards optimizing our global operating model and systems. Also noteworthy, the adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was $101.5 million or 17.6% of sales. For the first half of 2018, adjusted EBITDA is just over $183 million or 16.3% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $22.6 million and in line with our full year expectation for CapEx in the $100 million to $110 million range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $34.3 million. Also of note on the balance sheet is the significant increase in other investments, which now include the mark-to-market of the ordinary voting shares of Sartorius. Associated with this is the significant increase in other long-term liabilities for the tax on our Sartorius gain as well as the increase in retained earnings reflected in stockholders' equity. Now, let's move to the outlook for 2018. Given the strong year-to-date top line performance, today we are raising our currency neutral revenue growth guidance to be 4% to 4.5% for the full year, up from the previous outlook of 3.5% to 4%. This new target range incorporates our growth in the first half of this year, but also continues to reflect what may be a tough to compare in the second half of 2018. Remember that the third quarter of 2017 was positively impacted by approximately $12 million of revenue that was recovered following the ERP-related disruption, and is on top of what is typically a challenged quarter due to seasonality. It is also worth noting that the fourth quarter of 2017 was a substantial record sales quarter for the company at more than $620 million, making year-over-year growth in Q4 uniquely challenging. When thinking about our guidance for the full year operating margin, today we are maintaining our previous outlook, that is 10% on a reported GAAP basis, or 11% to 11.5% on a non-GAAP basis. Our non-GAAP operating margin for the first half of the year is 10% and behind the annual outlook. Today's reiteration of operating margin guidance assumes our expectation that the second half of the year will have improved gross margin results, returning to a more normalized 55.5% to 56%. This gross margin improvement along with top line growth and continued expense control in SG&A are expected to result in an annual operating margin that is within the range of our guidance. And now, we're happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Our first question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. So, first off on the revenue guidance, Christine and Norman, is it correct to infer that you're assuming no organic revenue growth in the second half of the year? And is there anything to flag outside of the comparisons?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, I think it's correct to assume that there's much lower growth in the second half of the year on a currency neutral basis. I wouldn't say no, but certainly very, very different than what we've experienced in the first half of the year.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. And Christine, could you offer your latest thinking on the impact of currency on your operating margin target for the year?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, it's a good question. I mean, as we looked at our targets at the end of Q1, we saw that we still had a bit of a benefit. I think now, as we look to the second half the year, we're getting to a more neutralized currency impact on the operating margin. And you may recall, Dan, that in the Q1 call, when we took our 10% GAAP goal – operating margin GAAP goal and moved it to 11.5% on a non-GAAP basis, that was really incorporating some positive currency impact and some of that's gone away. And that's why we're now looking at 11% to 11.5%.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you. And then my final question, I just want to make sure I better understand the variance in your gross margin in the quarter. So you flagged upside in placements of diagnostic instruments, but aren't those typically reagent rental and thus capitalized? So can you, I guess, better help me bridge the variance there and correct my understanding on the reagent rental math?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So, you're asking about kind of the downdraft in the second quarter that we just reported to margin?
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Yes.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah, so great question. And as I mentioned, it was a record number of placements for us in the quarter. Some are reagent rental, but there's also a sizable amount that are also sold. And you may recall that last year, our model in China for instruments changed and we no longer do the reagent rental program in China per some of the government regulations that they have there, and a high number of the placements this quarter were in China. And typically, as you're pricing these long-term contracts, the recovery of the gross margin is more on the reagent, the sustainable reagent flow not the instrument itself.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Well, and I guess I have a follow-up then on that comment. So if you had outsized instrument placements in China in diagnostics, do you think any of that was maybe pull forward as a result of customers placing orders in front of potential tariffs or do you think there's any relationship there at all?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. It's a great question and I had that same question for the person who runs our entire region there. And he does not believe that that's the case. That it is, in fact, the demand for the product itself and customer accounts that we've been working on for some time.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. I'll hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon. Christine, appreciate all the gross margin detail you shared with us between mix and inventory costs. Just curious when do you expect those inventory costs related to the ERP transition to actually go away, should those start to abate in the second half of the year, or will they be with us kind of into 2019 to some extent?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, Brandon, I think quite a bit of it was just related to actions in this second quarter. And that's why I wanted to call it out. We didn't non-GAAP it out because it really is part of our ongoing business operations, but it was very outsized for the quarter itself. So, we wanted to kind of, quote, normalize that in. There may be a little bit more that continues in the third quarter, but I don't think it continues late in the year and certainly not into next year. Part of what we're doing is transitioning along our plan of a more optimized supply chain and we're moving more warehouses, for example, into our two main warehouses that we've established in Europe, and bringing that model along. And as such, sometimes you have inventory adjustments that go with that, and part of it relates to looking in more countries into our global ERP system.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. And then, with respect to the second half outlook on the gross and operating margin line, anything you can share with us in terms of your expectations for the cadence of gross and operating margins between the third and fourth quarter? I mean, the fourth quarter is typically one of your more profitable periods; it's a higher revenue seasonally. But anything you can share with us in terms of the pacing of the margin improvement between third and fourth quarter?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I'm glad you asked that question, Brandon. From our visibility that we have right now, I think that we're looking for more of the improvement in the fourth quarter. When you think about the instruments that we've placed in the second quarter, and generally it takes 60 to 90 days to complete installation and customer acceptance and really start to see that reagent revenue flow, which could make for some challenge to continue on the gross margin in the third quarter. But we hope by the fourth quarter, that higher margin reagent revenue is starting to flow through the top line. So some improvement in Q3, but more of it in Q4.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. And then, maybe a question for Annette, if she is with us. Life Science's growth, I mean just exceptional even outside of ddPCR and chromatography. Outside of really cell biology and some of those newer growth areas, it looks like the legacy portfolio of relatively mature product lines is growing pretty nicely, high single, low double digits. Can you sort of walk through what some of the biggest drivers are of that growth resurgence and some of the product franchises where you think you may be picking up some share, doing a little bit better than the underlying market?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, Annette is not with us, but I think you're absolutely right that even the classic lines, product lines seem to be pretty strong. And I think that part of that comes from strong regional performance around the entire world, and then various of those product lines seem to be doing pretty well.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. So, Brandon, one of the interesting ones for me to always look at is our more traditional thermal cycling, real-time PCR business. Even in the face of continued strong demand and growth for Digital PCR, our more traditional gene expression business is growing very, very well. And then, some of the western blotting and continuing in food. So, as you point out, really, kind of hitting on all cylinders.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Helpful. And then, one last one for you, Christine, nice to see the working capital start to taper off a little bit here in the second quarter. How should we think about that trending in the back half the year, I guess, in terms of inventories or AR on an absolute dollar basis from here?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I would hope that we would see continued improvement. Obviously, first and foremost, it starts with the operating profits of the company. And so, having the top line growth and margin expansion, as we expect, will help drive that. At the same time, we'll continue to whittle away on those improvements. I don't know that'll be as dramatic as we've seen in the first half of the year, but I would hope that we will continue to grow the cash flow and reduce the working capital.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Very good. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question in queue comes from David Westenberg with C.L. King. Your line is now open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi. Thanks for taking the questions and congrats on this absolutely terrific quarter. So, can you give us any update, and I apologize if there's a press release or some news flow that I missed, the latest update on the COO role?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. There hasn't been a press release. We've continued to look. The idea is to find, obviously, the right person for the role and that's a continuing process.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And then just in terms of large orders, is there any necessarily – or is there any large customer concentration on the new orders or was it just a number of large orders across the board in either Diagnostics or – I know you called out Diagnostics, but for orders, but also Life Sciences?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think just across the board, it's pretty broad in terms of the – where the orders are coming from. Obviously, the process chromatography was fairly strong in the quarter and that business tends to be concentrated in fewer larger customers. But otherwise, yeah, it's pretty broad.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And maybe, John, do you want to...
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And then, Europe has been a little bit challenging in the past. In terms of a European macro, is that improving, and then, any expectations in the back half of the year with ERP in Europe, any change in thinking kind of there, broadly?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think broadly on the Life Science side, it seems to be pretty solid. I think we continue to struggle as most people do on the diagnostics side. We've got a lot of, still a lot of kind of consolidation, control the health care costs. So, I don't know, John, anything to add to that?
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think it's maybe a combination of three things. Some of it for Europe this year was just timing of some larger orders with channel partners. So it's been a general softness we're seeing across the IVD industry. And we're working through the introduction of new processes for D3. All of those are contributing.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thanks. And then maybe just last one on the acquisition front. It's been a little while since you made a larger one. Is there any sort – type of maybe business that you're homing in on or anything close in terms of acquisitions here? Thank you.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So we continue to have opportunities both across Life Science and Diagnostics and we're continuing to pursue those things.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Thank you very much, and congrats on a great quarter.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Dave. Should we poll one more time?
Operator:
And our next question in queue comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. Just one clarification, want to make doubly sure. So, Christine, the new organic growth guidance of 4% to 4.5%, that assumes the 11% organic growth in the quarter, right. You're not using that normalized 6.5% organic growth number in the new guide.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No. I mean, it does assume what was reported on a currency neutral basis.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
And the bridge from the 11% to the 6.5%, it looks like about 3 points of that bridge was the comp and the shift in the base. And then, there was another point that you said there were some small pull forward into Q2. Is that about a point of growth?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
It was actually about 1 point of growth. And that relates to – in early July, we hooked in the rest of Western Europe into our global ERP system, and our practice has been always in the past, we offer our customers with standing orders, the opportunity to bring those forward in advance of our go-live. And I think the small pull forward is in $5 million to $6 million range.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
But that also then makes Q3 even tougher.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Of course. Thanks.
Operator:
And I'm showing no further questions in queue at this time.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay, great. Well, everyone thank you so much for your time today. As always, we appreciate your continued interest in Bio-Rad, and we look forward to the next time we speak. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's programming and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.
Executives:
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ms. Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Paige. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us. With me today are Norman Schwartz, our CEO; Annette Tumolo, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. Today, we will review our results on a GAAP basis and then provide some commentary and insight to our results on a non-GAAP basis. Before we begin the review, I'd like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, and expectations, our future financial performance, and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward -looking statements made during the call today. So let's move to the first quarter financial results. Net sales for the first quarter of 2018 were $551.5 million and impressive growth of 10.3% versus the same period last year sales of $500.1 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 4.5%. In addition to strong product sales around the world, the first quarter sales result also include approximately $6 million of recorded sales associated with the settlement of a royalty dispute in our Diagnostics segment as well as $6 million of RainDance sales which compares to $2 million of sales last year. When comparing the first quarter of last year remember that an estimated $9 million of revenue was pulled forward in anticipation of the go-live of our European deployment of SAP in April 2017. If we exclude both the acquired and royalty settlement sales from the first quarter of this year as well as neutralize for last year's pull forward, we still estimate the currency-neutral organic growth for the quarter was around 4.5%. During the quarter, we experienced good currency-neutral growth across many of our key market and product areas within both the Life Science and Diagnostics segments. Of particular note, sales of Droplet Digital PCR, process chromatography media, quality controls and auto immune products were particularly strong during the quarter. From a geographic standpoint, sales in the quarter grew most notably in North America, China and Asia Pacific, offset somewhat by slower sales in Europe which are primarily reflective of the tough compare to the pull-forward of orders in that region last year. We look a little closer at the segment performance for the quarter. Life Science sales in the first quarter were $197.8 million, an increase of 13.5% on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of nearly 9% on a currency-neutral basis. Much of the growth in the first quarter was driven by strong double-digit sales growth of our Digital PCR instruments and reagents as well as products for the cell biology market, two of our biggest investment areas. We also experienced another solid quarter of demand for our process media product. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral sales were particularly strong in North America, China, and Europe. Sales of Clinical Diagnostic products in the quarter were $350.8 million compared to $322.3 million last year, an increase of 8.9% on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 2.4%. The overall growth rate for the Diagnostics group was negatively impacted by the pull forward of approximately $9 million of sales in the first quarter of last year as we prepared our customers for the go-live of SAP in Europe which were partially offset by the addition of $6 million of revenue related to the settlement of a royalty dispute in the current quarter. These somewhat unique revenue events reduced the Diagnostic reported growth in the first quarter by approximately 1%. During the first quarter of this year, we posted solid growth of diabetes and autoimmune testing products. Our quality controls also continued to grow nicely in the first quarter. Looking at the regional view, sales of diagnostic products were particularly strong in China, Asia-Pacific and North America. The reported gross margin for the first quarter was lower than our annual target at 54.8% that compares to 54% last year. The current quarter margin was impacted by changes in product mix, as well as higher logistics and inventory costs when compared to last year. For the first quarter of 2018, amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.8 million, which compares to $5.1 million in the first quarter of last year. SG&A expenses for the first quarter were $209.1 million or 37.9% of sales, up versus last year in terms of dollars but down as a percent of sales. When comparing to last year, remember that the first quarter of 2017 included a contingent consideration benefit of $9.4 million. Other increases in SG&A spend for the first quarter of this year include higher employee related costs, as well as higher than anticipated audit fees. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $2.1 million versus $1.7 million in the first quarter of last year. The increase in amortization versus last year reflects the inclusion of RainDance. Research and development expense in Q1 was 9% of sales or $49.4 million, essentially flat when compared to the first quarter of last year and in line with our targeted investment levels. Looking below the operating line, during the quarter, we recorded several atypical items resulting in additional income of $9.2 million for the divestiture of a small product line that was previously included in our other segment plus a gain on the sale of land in Europe. In addition, you may have noticed the sizable income related to the change in fair market value of equity securities on our P&L for the quarter. As many of you know, beginning in 2018, a change in accounting regulations now requires us to re-measure the value of our equity holdings through the P&L. For the first quarter, the change in value from December 31, 2017 to March 31, 2018 was nearly $816 million, substantially related to our holdings of ordinary and preferred shares of Sartorius. Given the potential size and volatility of equity values going forward, we will continue to present this as a separate line item on our P&L. The effective tax rate used during the first quarter was 24%. This lower than expected tax rate was substantially driven by the sizeable gain related to our Sartorius investment, coupled with the benefit of tax reform in the U.S. Excluding any discrete items that may occur during the year, we continue to expect the full-year effective tax rate to be in the 26% to 27% range on a GAAP basis. Reported net income for the first quarter was $657 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $21.77. With that extraordinary result in mind, it is likely not a surprise why we are also now reporting our financial results on a non-GAAP basis. As we look to our results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical or unique items that impacted both our gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in a reconciliation chart found in our press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the first quarter and cost of goods sold, we have excluded amortization of purchase intangibles of $4.8 million as well as $188,000 of restructuring costs related to the shutdown of the diagnostic project that we discussed on our fourth quarter earnings call. These adjustments moved the gross margin for the first quarter from 54.8% to 55.7%. This non-GAAP margin compares to a non-GAAP margin in the first quarter of 2017 of 57%. Remember that the higher margin last year was driven substantially by the pull-forward of sales, which consisted primarily of high margin consumables. In operating expense on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded amortization of purchase intangibles of $2.1 million, legal related charges of $3.7 million, acquisition-related contingent consideration of $2.1 million and restructuring cost of $850,000. Of particular note, we would highlight that our SG&A margin on a non-GAAP basis has decreased from 39.7% in the first quarter of 2017 to 37.1% in the first quarter of 2018, greater than 250-basis-point improvement versus last year. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments results in moving the operating margin for the first quarter of 2018 from 7.9% on a GAAP basis to 9.7% on a non-GAAP basis. This represents a significant improvement over our non-GAAP operating margin of 7.4% in the first quarter of last year. As I mentioned earlier, we have also excluded certain items below the operating line which are the quarterly increase in value of our equity holdings of $816 million as well as $9.2 million of gains associated with the sale of a small product line and a property owned in Europe. With all of these various items in mind we adjusted our tax provision as well for these exclusions resulting in a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 27%. And finally non-GAAP net income and earnings per share for the first quarter of 2018 were $35.4 million and $1.17. Moving to the balance sheet as of March 31, total cash and short-term investments were $768 million compared to $761 million at the end of 2017. It may seem like a small change but remember that our first quarter historically has tended to be a heavy cash use quarter as we typically pay annual incentive bonuses and commissions, annual hardware and software maintenance costs and so forth. As such historically this has often resulted in negative cash flow from operations for the period. For the first quarter of 2018, net cash generated from operations was more than $40 million which compares to a negative $56 million in the year-ago period. This positive result reflects good improvement in both collections and payables efficiency in Europe, as we continue to make progress towards stabilization on the new ERP system. Also noteworthy, the adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was $88.7 million or just over 16% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $27.2 million, down significantly versus the first quarter 2017 of $39.3 million primarily reflecting the decrease in spend on our global ERP project. Our full-year expectation for CapEx remains in the $100 million to $110 million range. And finally depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $34.3 million. Also of note on the balance sheet is the significant increase in other investments which now include the mark-to-market of the ordinary voting shares of Sartorius. Associated with this write-up is a significant increase in other long-term liabilities for the tax on our Sartorius gain as well as the increase in retained earnings reflected in stockholders' equity. Moving to the outlook for 2018. On our last earnings call, we shared our thinking for 2018 and that is our goal for currency neutral sales growth of 3.5% to 4%, full-year gross margins in the 55.5% to 56% range and targeting the operating margin at 10%. Today we are reiterating that guidance. The strong top-line performance in the first quarter coupled with the positive outlook in many of our key end markets reinforces our confidence in achieving the 3.5% to 4% sales growth goals, as well as our ability to expand margins throughout the year. When thinking about our guidance on a non-GAAP basis and using current foreign exchange rate, the operating margin target increases from an estimated 10% to an estimated 11.5% for the full year. And with that, we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Your first question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hey, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine, two part question for you on gross margins. Any chance you could split out the effect of that pull-forward in the first quarter of last year that made the comp tougher? And then secondly, what would your gross margin outlook be on a non-GAAP basis for the year?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So in terms of kind of recasting last year without the pull-forward, we haven't done that specific math but on average our consumables certainly carry a higher than the consolidated gross margin of the company and what we had our customers who are on standing orders to do is pull forward those consumables. So, the short answer is Brandon, we didn't make that specific calculation, but in general the consumables carry margins that that can be 60% or better, so that was part of it. And then your second question?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
If you could recast the gross margin guidance for the year on a non-GAAP basis?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So we were talking about operating margin going from 10% to 11% and some of that is gross margin improvement but also operating margin improvement. And on the gross margin the 55.5% to 56% probably is now 56% to 56.5% if you will and then the balance of that improvement getting to a target of 11.5% is found on the operating line.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That's helpful. And then as we look at the balance of the year, can you help us think through how you anticipate the cadence of year-over-year margin expansion to progress through the year. And in particular, I think if you get back to the Analyst Day, I think you had pointed to SG&A in terms of absolute dollars I believe that will be in flat on a local currency basis for the year. How should we expect that to progress as we move over the next few quarters?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah, that's a great question. And as we progress through the year, we do anticipate improvement in our margins with a particular note as we look short term to the second quarter you will remember that quarter we experienced quite a bit of disruption related to the ERP go-live which would then imply easier to compare on the top-line this year and if we have good solid growth on the top-line that helps with margin expansion. So it wouldn't surprise me to see strength in the margins and in the second quarter in terms of how it rolls out through the years and then, Q3 being back to our seasonal type of tough quarter and maybe something more that we've seen historically and then ending with a good strong Q4. Much of the margin improvement is driven by continued growth and performance on the top-line. And as you look at SG&A spend, if we continue to work to hold it flat throughout the rest of this year, then as we grow the top line, you'll see the SG&A margin continue to expand. The other thing that is important to point out is the 3.5% to 4% reiterating on the top-line takes into consideration that we have just divested a small product line which represented about $8 million a year of sales for us. So we are looking at keeping our top-line guidance and finding other way to make up for that $8 million.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That's helpful, and then I guess, lastly for you Norman, any update you can share with us on the M&A pipeline, how you're thinking about the assets that are out there and the types of businesses you might be looking at right now. Thanks. Thanks.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So there continue to be a number of things of interest I would say mostly in the tuck-in category. We continue to be encouraged by what we're seeing and we'd hope that there would be something we can do this year.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
All right. I'll hop back. Thank you.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Dan Leonard from Deutsche Bank.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. So first off, a question on the revenue guidance, so Christine can you help me put in context – so you had a strong first quarter of 4.5% organic revenue growth which is above your guide. The Q2 comp looks pretty favorable given the ERP disruption in the prior year. Is there anything you're seeing as potential caution flags in the second half of the year that would make you -- where are you thinking about a revenue number a bit higher than 3.5% to 4% for in the full year?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No. And maybe it's a good time to remind everyone that the 3.5% to 4% was organic currency neutral on a reported basis. Certainly you can end up being higher than that, but the second half of the year has a couple of tough compares, Q3 becomes a tough compare because that's the quarter we made up last year for the disruptive quarter of Q2 last year. And then of course Q4 was a very big quarter for us in 2017. So the growth rates probably are tougher to compare and especially in the fourth quarter.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Makes sense and then secondly when you were walking through some of the points of strength, I notice you didn't say blood typing or immunohematology, so can you remind us, are you getting any revenue yet from that LabCorp contract win you announced in November and any update on the progress of the immunohematology ramp in the U.S.?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
We are and I'll just make a quick comment and then I'll let John Hertia pipe in and that's probably my doing on the script in terms of not mentioning in it specifically because it is a mixed result. They had the tough compare in Europe. Because a lot of the pull-forward last year was in blood typing products, but they also had very, very good growth in the U.S. as we gained traction in this very important market for blood typing, so John Hertia, that's a good set up for you to talk a little more about it.
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. Things in the U.S. are going very, very well for blood typing. I would say the LabCorp implementation is about 85% done with just a few sites finishing up validation and revenue will kick in strongly after that. And we're also getting really good acceptance from the low volume systems that we announced at the beginning of the year. And they're both as backup systems for the IH-1000 and then, kind of introduction in what has been somewhat of a tired market in the past and this is the first time some new technology has been introduced. And also in Asia Pacific, blood typing has been growing very, very strong for us so both North America and Asia have been doing really, really well with respect to blood typing.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. I appreciate that color and then this is my final question and I'll hop back in queue. Christine, possible that of the 230 basis points of year-on-year operating margin expansion on the non-GAAP comparison, operating margin expansion, how much of that was due to foreign currency to weaker U.S. dollar?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Dan, good question, I don't have the details. I don't have the details with me.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of David Westenberg with C.L. King.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi, thanks for taking the question and congrats on a good quarter.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
So you continue to talk about the strength in the Droplet Digital PCR instrument, in RainDance you acquired last year. So can you talk about maybe some of the synergies that you're seeing or anticipate seeing in the RainDance acquisition with your own Digital Droplet PCR system, whether it be R&D or sales synergy?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I think Annette, that...
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. So I think we are very happy with our Digital PCR results and we continue to grow the QX200 and our automated Droplet generators that go along with it. We certainly gained a lot of knowhow and intellectual property with the RainDance acquisition and we're really able to integrate that quite well into our R&D programs moving forward. So we're really happy with that as well.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
All right. Yeah. Thank you. And then when we take your guidance, can you talk about considerations of new products versus geographic expansion versus just general growth in the market and how that might break down?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And so, Dave, I just want to make sure I understand you're just talking in general going back to kind of the Investor Day looking at our growth?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Exactly. Components of the growth and those are the three that you laid out in terms of this guidance. Is that still kind of the proportions that you're looking out there in this year's guidance?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think it is still in line. Obviously as time moves on towards our 2020 target, you start to have cumulative impacts of new products and the geographic expansion. But I think for the first quarter out of the gate we do experience the negative of the pricing pressure, et cetera, but as Annette and John Hertia pointed out in a couple of their product line lines we're seeing very good both geographic extension as well as some new market, new product activity.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Got it. And I noticed on your – in the breakout of the non-GAAP numbers, there is not any inclusion of consultant fees in anticipation of the ERP. I was just wondering, are you still seeing that this year or had those completely fell off?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, no. We still have costs this year and at this point, it's hard to call those either atypical or unique. I think it is part of the investment in our business and so it's not something that we would non-GAAP out, but as you may remember when we were talking about the outlook for the year we were looking at pretty significant reduced spend in the ERP project for 2018. And that's part of the benefit of the margin expansion. But it's not something that we're going to highlight or non-GAAP out.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
I appreciate it. I'll jump back in queue. And then thanks very much for taking the questions, and congratulations on a good quarter.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
Your next question is from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Hey, thanks. One question for Annette, if you could share with us any updates or any progress you might have made with respect to the licensing activity for the Droplet Digital PCR IP?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hi, Brandon. We're rolling – we're getting ready to roll that program out. We really wanted to be thoughtful about how we were going to do that. But we're engaged right now with several parties for commercials that – commercially use licenses for the technology. So it's moving along as we had hoped.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. And then maybe one for Norman, any update you could share with us as far as the COO search and whether you're looking more externally or internally, whether a candidate might be pretty close to coming onboard?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So we've got both internal and external candidates. And I would imagine we'll have something in the not-too-distant future.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
All righty. Thank you.
Operator:
We have no further questions. Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn it back to management for any further comments or closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you, Paige. Again thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today. We appreciate your interest and look forward to the next time we have a chance to speak. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Full Year Bio-Rad Laboratories Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Sir, you may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Victor. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, and expectations, our future financial performance, and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2017, as well as provide some insight into our thinking for 2018. With me today are Norman Schwartz, John Goetz, Annette Tumolo, President of our Life Science Group, and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Let's start with a review of the quarterly results. Net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 were $620.4 million, an increase of 8.6% when compared to the year-ago period sales of $571.5 million. On a currency neutral basis, quarterly sales growth was approximately 5.4%. This solid quarterly growth was driven by good demand for our Life Science products, including continued strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables, and cell biology products. We are also pleased to report sizable quarter-over-quarter growth in process media. Our Clinical Diagnostics Group also continued to post top line growth during the fourth quarter, particularly in sales of our blood typing, diabetes monitoring, and autoimmune testing products. On a geographic view, we experienced solid growth in all three of our major regions
Operator:
Yes, ma'am. Our first question will come from the line of Tim Evans from Wells Fargo. You may begin.
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Hi, Christine. Thank you for the comments. On your 2017 margin comments, if I take the chart that you have in the press release, the table that have all the kind of the one-timers, and I recalculate the margin, I'm coming up with 8.8%, and you were citing 7.5%. I just want to...
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I think...
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
...make sure that the – yeah. Go ahead.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I think the difference is when I estimate, I really am looking at non-recurring as opposed to including non-cash. So I think the difference in the press release, you probably included the ongoing amortization of acquired intangible, and I did not, because that is more recurring in nature. But either way, I think we get to the same.
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Right. Okay. That's understood. And I just wanted to make sure that that table in there is reflective of the way that you will be reporting your non-GAAP financials going forward.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, certainly, if you look at the categories that we list in the press release and you look at the categories on this chart, many of them would fit the definition of non-GAAP that we've identified.
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay. And then lastly, 10% operating margin target in 2018 under GAAP, are you in a position to tell us what that would look like under non-GAAP?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, I think under non-GAAP, that this is going to be mostly items that we're probably not aware of yet that are more non-recurring in nature, the one item that's on the list that is more known is amortization, and you can see what the number is in Q4 and use that as a baseline. But other than that, these are not items that we could predict.
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay. So you don't have anything, any non-recurring items baked into that number?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Into the 10% number?
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Correct.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Only amortization.
Tim C. Evans - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Understood. Thank you very much.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
You're welcome.
Operator:
And our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard from Deutsche Bank. You may begin.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. So one more question about the EBIT margin target 2018. Christine, you said that's currency-neutral. What currency is included in that 10% number? Is it December run rates, is it something different?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No. So, good question, Dan. When we talk about currency-neutral, we were actually looking at our plan as it would unfold in 2018, and then comparing that to the rate that 2017 unfolded, if you know what I mean. So there's kind of a Q1 way to two, three (00:30:21), it actually goes monthly. To make it a true currency-neutral, if we think about it using December 31 rate that it changed quite dramatically, then we would have the benefit of both higher growth and perhaps a little better margin expansion on a reported basis.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. So the currency-neutral reflects more of an average 2017 rate when you're forecasting 2018?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Basically.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Yeah, okay. And then on the tax rate, the 26% to 27% target for 2018, is that now the normalized rate or is there still room to work that down over time as you bring up your tax planning in Europe?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, certainly, it is a new level for us. Majority of that benefit is coming from the European structure. We do have to make some benefit from U.S. tax reform. But remember that historically the majority of our profits have been outside the United States. Having said that and directly to your question, as the business grows over time, so should the benefit. And so, while we look to 26% to 27% in 2018, depending on business performance, that could improve in 2019, 2020 and beyond.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. And then maybe just one final question on the operating business. If John Hertia is there, John, perhaps you can comment on what you're seeing in the North American Diagnostics market, whether you think that customers are still being hesitant due to oncoming Medicare cuts, and then finally if you can talk about the blood typing ramp. Thank you very much.
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. Blood typing, I'd say for both the fourth quarter and the year in the U.S. went very well. The introduction of the IH-1000 went very, very well. This year, we exceeded our placement plan, and we also announced at the Investors Day last November that we've picked up LabCorp as a large account for blood typing, the majority of that was implemented toward the end of last year, and then in the first quarter of – it will include implementations of systems over the first quarter of this year. So I'd say blood typing is going very well. We also had FDA approval for our main workstations (00:33:02) that we announced in January that gets us into both the smaller labs and will act as a backup system for the placement – backup systems for the placement of additional IH-1000, so another good stimulus. And that's just the second step of a four-part program, we started with the IH-1000, we have manual systems. We'll be introducing later this year the IH-124, the IH-24, and then into next year, the IH-500, which gets sort of complete the product portfolio. Harnessing (00:33:33) in the slowness in the U.S., some of that was related to, for us, significant declines in our infectious disease business, some of that was a one-time headwind due to a loss of a particularly large customer which won't be reoccurring in 2018. With respect to PAMA and reimbursement, I think it's still an uncertain picture, materials count for a percentage of laboratory operating costs. And so as our labs are being hit with reductions in reimbursement rates, a portion of that would be included in materials and we would be working with the laboratories on how to help mitigate that. But they'd also be looking for ways to improve their operating efficiency as they're looking to reduce overhead and the labor costs, and that opens up opportunities for us in automation of any of our assays. So, I'm still uncertain, but both positive and negative.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Appreciate all the color. Thank you.
Operator:
And our next question comes from the line of David Westenberg from C.L. King. You may begin.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi. Thank you for taking my question. So congrats to John on his retirement. So I just wanted to ask, what are you looking for in a new COO? Do you think you're going to be looking at an internal or an external candidate, and what specific kind of experience are you looking for here?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So obviously, this is a kind of a – what I think of is a kind of a heavy operational role, obviously somebody with a kind of good overall general management experience in a larger environment like the one we're in, we have and we'll look at both internal and external candidates and that process is ongoing.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thank you. And just as a reminder, this one is probably a little bit more for Christine in terms of cadence. I know you're starting to lap the ERP. So, I think in Q1 you had some ordering, and then in Q2, you had made the ERP go-live. So can you just give us – I know you don't want to give quarter-by-quarter guidance, but just kind of a way to think about the growth rates in the first half of the year around ERP and just kind of give us a reminder of what exactly we'd be lapping here.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. No, good question. And you're right, we don't give quarterly guidance, but it is important to kind of know some of the unusual patterns of 2017. As you pointed out, the second quarter of 2017 was a very difficult quarter for us with the go-live in Europe. And so as such, as we look at the second quarter of 2018, it's probably a relatively easier compare than others. And perhaps in Q3, maybe some of the reverse of that is true because in 2017, we made up so much in Q3. In the first quarter, I think especially when we look at the compare, Diagnostics had a very big quarter in Q1 of 2017. So that's a bigger hill for them. And now we've just reported a very impressive fourth quarter of 2017. So I'm not sure what that means for Q4 of 2018, but that's a big one to beat.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Got it. Now that's just very helpful. And then historically, you've been fairly disciplined buyers. And I think in the past, you said you used a DCF to evaluate acquisition targets. So with valuations currently where they're at, are you having any change in the way you're looking at acquisitions, and is there any change in terms of the importance of how near-term accretive these acquisitions that you're looking for will be?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, I don't think there is any fundamental change in the way we think about acquisitions. I think that we look for kind of payback on these on kind of a cash-to-cash basis. And there continue to be opportunities that we're looking at, and we'll see what happens throughout the year.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I think that's fair. I mean, you're right, the multiples are fairly high. There are certain assets we would love to acquire, but we remain pretty disciplined with our model as Norman says, and we run a discounted cash flow model and are very much looking at that cash-to-cash payback. And with that being said, some of the businesses out there carry high multiples deservedly so, and others don't, so we're going to keep looking at this on a deal-by-deal basis.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
All right. And thank you very much.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. You may begin.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon. Christine, a few for you, just starting with the fourth quarter of 2017, can you tell us how much the process media business grew year-over-year in terms of dollars? And then secondly, do you have a sense of, even if it's just ballpark, what the Diagnostics business would have done in terms of core growth in the fourth quarter if we strip out the infectious disease customer loss in the U.S.? And did I hear John correctly that that will not be a headwind at any point in 2018, that loss?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, for Life Science and the process media business in the fourth quarter, that was up about $7 million year-over-year. Infectious disease across the board for Diagnostics, this is probably the fourth or fifth year in a row that that business has declined, and for the full year, it's 15-or-so-plus million dollars. And part of being able to accelerate growth next year is hopefully not seeing that same level of decline.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. That's helpful. And then as far as the 2018 outlook goes, I mean, on a year-over-year basis, you're going from 7.5% to 10%, it's seemingly a big move, but relative to the second half of the year, where you did double digits on an adjusted basis LTM in the second half of the year, so can you help us sort of quantify the buckets of the expense savings that you expect between ERP, supply chain, GnuBIO, and so forth?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, we certainly haven't quantified every bucket. We have talked about the GnuBIO savings of about $15 million a year, ERP savings of about $15 million a year, obviously improvement in the gross margins. I think one of the many benefits to move into non-GAAP reporting is that we'll be able to have all of this on the same page in terms of how we're looking at the base operations of the business. And what I mean by that goes back to that earlier question about – that Tim had and viewing the margins with or without purchase accounting as we've made adjustments in our little table over the years and called it out on our script, it really was focused on the atypical or unusual non-recurring things, and as we move to non-GAAP, then we would also include amortization in that. So I think that'll get us all in a level...
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
...playing field. And then the other thing I missed is...
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
...Brandon, is that on a reported basis, with the weakening of the dollar now compared to where it's been over the past year, that not only will on a reported basis accelerate our top line growth rate, but could also help with some margin expansion beyond the 10% target.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. Thank you. Question for Annette, would love to get an update on the single-cell opportunity. I've always viewed that as very much incremental to the main ddPCR opportunity. I'm curious as to – perhaps you could give us a ballpark range of how much of that business is just single-cell today, and what inning you think we're in in terms of the liquid biopsy market developments at this stage. And then secondly, whether you do expect – so you're currently evaluating licensing opportunities which you've alluded to a little bit at the Analyst Day, how those conversations are kind of progressing.
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Well, I think our experience entering the single-cell market this year really validated our view of customer interest in this very new emerging market. So it certainly is a new part of the droplet-based business that we're growing. Our business in Digital PCR is larger as you could imagine. But I think we're very encouraged by customer demand and interest in this area. So happy there, and we're going to grow that into a whole new area of business for our droplet partitioning technologies. We are making progress in liquid biopsy, we have released our first CE IVD platform and kit for monitoring blood cancers, PCR-ABL specifically, and we're getting a lot of interest outside the U.S., where we can sell those products and we're about to submit to the FDA for the U.S. base. So we're very encouraged in that area, it continues to grow, and we're investing more aggressively in that area. And I think the last question you asked for was about our licensing program, and we're working on a commercial use license program that we're hoping to roll out in first quarter or the early second quarter, and considering where we might have opportunities to license the significant intellectual property that we have in this area.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
It's very helpful. One last one for John Goetz, couldn't let you sneak off the call without speaking here. Just curious, as far as your retirement goes, just you can help us understand so sort of why now, and to what extent the margin expansion plan blueprint, if you will, is somewhat institutionalized in the organization and also the independence of yourself?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, Brandon, I sat down and asked myself, how many good years do I still have left. And that's a pretty sobering question to ask. And there are personal priorities that start to change. I'm very much looking forward to spending time with my grandkids. I've done a lot of traveling for the company, and I kind of like my wife to be able to actually see one or two of these very interesting places I've been to. I also want to do a lot more in terms of volunteering. I'd like to kind of give back a little bit, so I got some good plans there. So I got a small vineyard at the back of my property. I'd like to try my hand at making some wine, and I'm a big college football fan. So I'd like to take in a couple of home games in Pullman, Washington, and aside from that, my wife Linda (00:46:44) has got quite a list of things for me to do. So, I'm certainly not going to be looking for anything to do. Why now? I think I feel really good about where the company is today in terms of its seriousness, planning towards improving its top and bottom lines. We've done some really good planning over the course of the last couple of years and it's kind of culminated this year with a very specific idea of cascading of goals from the top of the company throughout the whole organization. I feel really good about it, I feel very proud about it. And handing this off to the next guy or gal, I think we've really set the stage for success in my opinion. So for me, it's a pretty good time to take a step back, and a lot of my personal wealth is tied to Bio-Rad stock, so I'm going to be watching that pretty carefully as I read the newspapers and watch my cellphone stock quotes.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Very good. We wish you the best of luck. Closing the loop, last one, Christine, on the balance sheet, so it's been about eight months since the final module of the ERP system was deployed in Europe. I mean, should we start to begin to see this net working capital build begin to taper in the first quarter? And anything you can tell us in terms of range for operating cash flow expectations for 2018?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. Yeah. So, certainly, as we move through the year, we're going to see improvement. Our experience in the past has been it's generally taken us at least a year for things to more normalize and then little bit longer than that to really start to reap the benefits, and we don't anniversary that one year since go-live until the second quarter. But a lot of this will be driven by continued top line growth in generation, as well as process improvement in stabilization. So I think it builds through the year.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Very good. Thank you.
Operator:
And I'm showing no further questions at this time. And I'd like to turn the call back to Ms. Christine Tsingos for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Tsingos. Thank you, Victor. All right, everyone, thank you very much for taking the time to be with us today. As always, we appreciate your interest in Bio-Rad and look forward to seeing you soon. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program, and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Ron Hutton. Sir, you may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Skylar. First of all, we would like to thank you for your patience as we were experiencing some technical difficulties. We trust they've been overcome and we are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. Before we begin the call, though, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn it over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Also on the call today are Norman Schwartz; John Goetz; Annette Tumolo, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of Diagnostics Group. Today we are pleased to report net sales for the third quarter of $535 million, an increase of 5.2% on a reported basis and versus the same period last year's sale of $508.7 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 3.4% when compared to last year. During the quarter, we experienced good currency-neutral sales growth across many of our regions, most notably, Europe and Asia Pacific, as well as across many key life science and diagnostics product areas, including strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables, cell biology and food safety products in the life science group, and product for blood typing, quality control and autoimmune testing in the diagnostic group. Also contributing to growth in the third quarter were $5 million of sales from the recently acquired RainDance Technologies and approximately $12 million of recovered sales that were disrupted by our transition to the global ERP in Europe in the second quarter. The reported gross margin for the quarter was ahead of expectations at 56.9% and compares to 54.2% last quarter and 54.9% in the year-ago period. This increase in margin versus last year is related in part to decreases in royalty expense and amortization of acquired intangibles as well as favorable manufacturing variances. In addition, the consolidated gross margin in the third quarter benefited by approximately $7.8 million for two corrections of items that occurred in the second quarter as we transitioned our European operations to the global ERP system. These corrections were predominately a reclassification between SG&A and COGS that has no impact to net income. And the second was a small amount of sales that should have been recorded in the second quarter. These two items added approximately 1.2 points to the third quarter gross margin. And, finally, when looking at the gross margin, the total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to prior acquisitions was $4.9 million for the quarter and compares to $7.2 million in the year-ago period. The decrease in amortization is related to the completion of the DiaMed-related purchase accounting in cost of goods sold, partially offset by the inclusion of RainDance. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were $196.8 million or 36.8% of sales compared to $201.5 million and 39.6% of sales last year. On a sequential basis, SG&A expense decreased $16 million, driven primarily by a $10 million decline in spend related to our ERP project, as well as a $3 million benefit from the revaluation of contingent consideration. This lower spend was partially offset by the adjustment to correct the ERP transition-related classification item that I just discussed, which essentially increased SG&A by approximately $5.3 million. Also during the quarter, we recorded $800,000 of severance expense for the shutdown of our GnuBIO operation. And, finally, quarterly SG&A includes a total of $2.4 million for the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. The increase in amortization versus the year ago period reflects the acquisition of RainDance. Research and development expense in Q3 was 11.5% of sales, or $61.4 million, which compares to 9.8% or $49.9 million last year. During the third quarter, we made the decision to terminate our efforts to develop a targeted sequencer for the diagnostic market based on the technology acquired with GnuBIO in 2014. This decision resulted in R&D shutdown expense of $7.6 million during the quarter. In addition, the higher R&D spend includes $3 million of a milestone accrual for our new flow cytometer for the cell biology market. Excluding these two events, the shutdown costs for GnuBIO and the milestone for the flow cytometer, base R&D expense would have been 9.5% of sales. Going forward, we expect R&D expense to continue to be in the 9% to 10% of sales range. The reported operating margin for the third quarter was 8.7% of sales, reflecting a significant improvement both sequentially and year-over-year. This improvement in profitability is largely driven by the increase in sales, as well as the decreased spend on ERP and professional services. The misclassification of sales included in the current quarter results added approximately $2.5 million of operating profit, but this was more than offset by the one-time shutdown expense of $8.4 million for the GnuBIO project. Excluding the net impact of these two unusual items, the operating margin for the third quarter would have been more than 9.5%. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $7.5 million compared to $5.4 million of net expense last year. This increase is the result of higher foreign currency exchange costs, largely associated with our transition to the new operating model in Europe. The effective tax rate used for the third quarter was approximately 29%. This lower than expected quarterly rate reflects a discrete benefit related to share-based compensation in the quarter. When comparing to the third quarter of 2016, remember that last year's rate was unusually low, at 19%, and related to an increase in foreign tax credit. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, we continue to expect the full year tax rate to be in the 30% to 31% range. Net income for the third quarter was $27.4 million, which compares to $18.4 million in the year ago period. Reported diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.91. As I mentioned earlier, the reclassification between SG&A and cost of goods sold does not impact net income. However, the $2.5 million of revenue that was included in our current reported results added approximately $0.06 to earnings per share for the third quarter, while the $8.4 million expense related to the GnuBIO action negatively impacted earnings per share by approximately $0.19. In looking to the segments, Life Science reported sales for the third quarter increased 8.7% to $193.6 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales grew 7.6% versus last year. This strong quarterly result reflects growth in all regions for Life Science and across many of our key product areas. Of particular note, sales of our Droplet Digital PCR products continue to do well, along with our more traditional gene expression products. Sales of cell biology and food safety products also performed well for the third quarter, with both up double-digits versus last year. Life Science sales growth in the quarter continued to be negatively impacted by lower sales of process media, a decline of approximately $6 million in the quarter versus last year. We expect this downward trend for process media to begin to turn around in the fourth quarter. Our Clinical Diagnostic Group posted quarterly sales of $338 million, an increase of 3.3% compared to last year. On a currency-neutral basis, Diagnostic sales grew 1.2%. Growth during the quarter was primarily fueled by good demand for our blood typing products, BioPlex instruments and panels and our quality controls. On a geographic view, Europe and Asia Pacific were the growers for Diagnostics in the quarter, while the Americas was down compared to last year. Much of this decline is attributed to the continuing weakness in our blood virus testing business. In addition, while it is difficult to quantify, we believe the tepid growth for Diagnostics in the U.S. during the third quarter was also partially related to sales lost due to the hurricanes as well as a general slowing as some of our customers digest the recent PAMA regulatory changes. Moving to the balance sheet as of September 30, total cash and short-term investments were $721 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $28 million compared to $62.4 million last quarter and $52 million in the third quarter of last year. This decrease in cash flow versus the second quarter is substantially related to our ERP transition in Europe. Not unlike what we saw with our second deployment in the U.S. during the summer of 2015, collections are down in the near-term. In addition, payments to inventory suppliers are up as we prepared for our fourth quarter. EBITDA for the quarter was $80 million or more than 15% of sales. Year-to-date EBITDA is nearly $184 million or 12.1% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $20.3 million which represents a decrease, both sequentially and year-over-year. This decrease in capital spend for the current quarter is related to the lower spending on our ERP project as well as the completion of some key European infrastructure projects. With year-to-date CapEx spend of approximately $85 million, we are revising our full outlook to be slightly lower in the $115 million to $125 million range. And, finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $35.4 million. Moving to our outlook for the fourth quarter, we are pleased to see acceleration in sales in some of our key markets and product lines during the third quarter, especially on the life science side of the business. And while we are somewhat cautious about the slowing of diagnostic sales in the U.S. in general, we are seeing good demand for key product lines such as our BioPlex 2200 family of products and our IH-1000 blood typing business. With that in mind, we are anticipating full company net revenue for the fourth quarter of 2017 to be in the $615 million to $625 million range. This estimate assumes using current foreign exchange rates. From a profitability standpoint, our original annual guidance had been for consolidated gross margins of 55% and a currency-neutral operating margin of around 7% for the full year. On our last earnings call, we affirmed our annual gross margin guidance, but we've revised our operating margin target slightly to be between 6% and 6.5% for the full year, including the acquisition of RainDance. Today we are affirming that full year guidance which anticipates the fourth quarter gross margin to be in the 54.5% to 55% range and the operating margin to be in the 9.5% to 10.5% range for the fourth quarter. As has been our practice in prior years, we will share our thinking and outlook for 2018 in February during the fourth quarter earnings call. And now, we're happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon. Christine, appreciate all the detail on the margin puts and takes. Just to be clear, I guess first of all, could you help us understand in terms of the GnuBIO shutdown, I think that business had been spending about $25 million a year in investment. How much of that you're going to drop to the bottom line? Is there any benefit from that in the fourth quarter? And then lastly is in terms of the fourth quarter operating margin guidance, you said 9.5% to 10.5%. Just to make sure that we're clear apples-to-apples, that would compare versus, to the 9.5% I think you said would be core in the third quarter. Is that correct? So a step up?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So taking it from the last question, essentially, yes, because that outlook assumes current exchange rates and they moved a little bit over the third quarter, but certainly different than what it was at the beginning of the year. So regarding the GnuBIO shutdown, I think, you're right. We were spending in kind of the low $20 millions a year on that operation. And so there will be some savings in fourth quarter, but the bolus of the savings will come in 2018. We do plan to redirect some of the R&D spend into areas like liquid biopsy where we really are getting a lot of demand and we have some great new technology going on there. But certainly the bottom line will benefit in 2018 and we'll talk about that more at our Investor Day on November 28.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. And this is maybe the first time, I guess, in recent memory I can recall that the European diagnostic business is actually up year-over-year in the third quarter. Be curious if you think we're finally starting to turn the corner there on what's been a long period of pricing headwinds and peaking market share.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. Brandon, I mean that's a good question and there are puts and takes in Europe. I think part of what was driving that growth is this make-up of sales that were disrupted in Europe during the transition during the second quarter. Not all of that $12 million that we made up was in Europe, but the bolus was. And the bolus of that was probably diagnostics. So that did contribute to some of the growth in Europe. Having said that, if we strip that out, Europe was at least flat, so I guess that could be a good sign going forward.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. And then one more. In terms of the fourth quarter guide, does that contemplate that you recoup what I guess is another $4 million or $5 million of outstanding backlog from the second quarter disruption in the fourth quarter?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. So there's probably a small amount of catch-up. When we estimated in the second quarter that, $15 million to $17 million, we were also kind of estimating a normalized level. And I think we're really getting back to normalized now as we're running through the fourth quarter. So there may be a small amount of make-up, if you will, from disrupted sales. But, frankly, it's now hard for us to decipher that, because the business is flowing along and products are being made and shipped and what have you. And so I think we feel good about having recovered. And as we look to growth in the fourth quarter, much of the driver is really in the base business.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Good to hear. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from David Westenberg with C.L. King. Your line is now open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hey. Thank you for taking the question. So I had a little bit of technical difficulty with my cell dialing in, so sorry if I missed this. But you did note that when you strip out some of the stuff in the quarter and certainly the GnuBIO charge, operating income would have been 9.5% or operating margin. And then, in the Q4 guide, it's from 9.5% to 10.5%. The Q4 is usually a pretty good quarter in terms of operating margin. Was there something – can you talk about kind of why that's the case here?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I'm not sure I fully understand where you're going with the question, Dave. Sorry. What is the case? Why is the margin stronger in the fourth quarter, or?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. So usually, I mean, like, when you look at your performance, usually, your best operating quarter is the fourth quarter. And when you strip out GnuBIO, I think you did better than what I was anticipating, and I think a lot of what everyone else was anticipating. So I don't know. I guess I'm seeing a lot of improvement right here. And then, I kind of would think that the cadence would continue improving, particularly into Q4, which is typically the strongest quarter for you, guys.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. So, well, I mean, I think we do feel like the strength in the margin will continue into the fourth quarter, thus discussion about the 9.5% to 10.5%. And I think it helps to look at kind of the year-to-date results, because some of these reclassifications that we talked about were just really between Q2 and Q3, but puts us on solid footing for the year-to-date results. And looking at where that is and then moving into the fourth quarter, I think you'll see some of that growth.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And then, just a question for perspective purposes. So when you – let's say, on your Q1 call, when you were laying out sort of a – remember Q2 is the ERP related go-live quarter, keep your expectations in check. And now that we've cleared Q3, can you talk about where you are, where you think the company is relative to your expectations maybe going into the year? I don't know if you can give any like quantitative data on that or qualitative data on that. I guess it doesn't matter. I'm just trying to just really piece together your perspective relative to what you had in Q1 or when you reported Q1 and you said all hands on deck. It's go-live time.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So perspective on the top line is your question or...
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Yes, both in terms of top and bottom line. I'm mostly referencing where you are in terms of – your thoughts in terms of ERP related disruption relative to your expectations in Q1.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Well, let's see. Where should we take this? So you're right. In Q1, there was a get ready, we're going live. There was also the acquisition of RainDance. Both would kind of change the original outlook for the year. The original top line outlook was for the base business currency-neutral of around 4% and adding perhaps up to a point, maybe 75 basis points with RainDance. As we talked about on the last call with the headwinds of process media, which is probably the biggest change from the original plan that we would be at lower in that. And I think that may still be true on a currency-neutral basis. But currencies are starting to come to parity, if you will. So I think, again, using current FX, we are in that range for the top line growth. In terms of business interruption for the ERP, day-to-day operations with every day that's passed since we've gone live, that becomes smoother and smoother. And you can see that in catching up of the, what we call, disrupted sales and getting to a more normalized level. The part that takes time – and we saw this with the prior two deployments – is really more evident on the working capital side, if you will, in terms of both the collection process and invoicing and all of that, as well as add some of the spend that has come along with this transition. But like we saw with the first two deployments, after you get through that first three to four quarters that really smooths out, evens out, and not only gets back to normal, but that improves from there because of the efficiencies that we've built into the system. Does that answer your question?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Definitely the second part, the more qualitative part was actually, yes, incredibly helpful for me. And then in terms of RainDance and its contribution, I mean you don't need necessarily say quantify, but can you talk about how much synergy you've had with RainDance and your own Digital Droplet PCR system relative to sort of expectations there?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
You mean synergy in terms of technology?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
The sales back synergy. I'm more looking at like sales synergy there.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Well, so I think we've talked about this before with the RainDance acquisition. First and foremost, it was very much a technology-driven, intellectual property-driven acquisition. Having said that, they do have a good base business. The vast majority of it is a single customer, Myriad Genetics, and so they represent the bulk of the sales. But our plan was and continues to be really to focus the market on the products and technologies that we've been developing and selling in our existing digital biology group and adding some of that talent and technology and IP on top of that as we move forward. And perhaps, Anette, if you'd like to add anything in terms of the value of the business in RainDance and where we're going.
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, sure, Christine. I think you described it really well. We certainly have overlapping products. And as it turns out, the original Bio-Rad products really had much larger share and uptake in the market. But RainDance had developed a lot of very good technology and really important intellectual property which we think was very, very important for us moving forward. So that's mainly, I think, how we're going to leverage that acquisition.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. And the other, Dave?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. And -
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sorry.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Finish your thought.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Yes. The other thing I was just going to add is when we did the acquisition, the goal was, while it was a bit of a negative on the operating income line, initially the goal was to get that to contributing within 18 months. And we did write off part of the purchase price early on, which added the additional drag this year. But I think we're well on track to have it be contributing by the second half of 2018.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. I appreciate it. Thank you very much and look forward to seeing you at the end of the month.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay.
Operator:
At this time, I'm showing no further questions. I'd like to turn the call back over to Christine for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sorry, Skylar. Can you just poll one last time just to be sure? Because we had the technical difficulties at the beginning, I just want to make sure. And otherwise, I'm happy to wrap up.
Operator:
We have a follow-up from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Great. Thank you. We can't end on that note. Would love to hear from John Hertia, Christine. You spoke to the blood typing business seeing some traction in the U.S. John, would love to get your perspective on how that launch is going. Anything you can tell us in terms of placements and whether many of those instruments are actually starting to generate recurring revenues, consumables revenues yet, or if that's still on the cusp for 2018?
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure, Brandon. It's going well. The traction that we were hoping for is taking place. Although I can't give out specific system numbers, I can tell you that we're going to be at or a little ahead of what our forecasts were for 2017, which we think is good news. As you have to remember with these systems, they're large. There's a lot of validation that goes in. And so the reagent flow will begin taking place this year, but you'll begin to see more of the impact of that in 2018.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Very good. Thanks.
Operator:
And we have a follow-up from David Westenberg. Your line is now open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Thank you for taking the follow-up. So just on the acquisition front, any thoughts to whether you would aim for more towards the Life Science segment or aim more towards the Diagnostic segment? Can you let us know why that would be where you'd target?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So we do have a pretty interesting acquisition pipeline right now. I'm going to save the answer to that question for Investor Day on November 28 because we are going to be talking about it, as we have the management presentation from both Annette Tumolo on the Life Science side and John Hertia on the Diagnostics side and myself and John Goetz and Norman Schwartz. And so, that's definitely part of the conversation, so I think I'll save that for then if that's okay, Dave.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
No problem. Thank you so much.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Well, everyone, again, our apologies for the technical difficulties at the beginning of the call. As always, we're here and available to answer any other questions you may have. And thank you again for your time and your interest. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Mike Sarcone - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories Q2 2017 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Vice President and Treasurer, Mr. Ron Hutton. Mr. Hutton, you may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Sherry. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our financial – our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Also on the call today are Norman Schwartz; John Goetz; Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Net sales for the second quarter were $504.7 million, a decrease of 2.3% on a reported basis versus the same period last year's sales of $516.8 million. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales declined 1.6%. On our first quarter earnings call in May, we shared our caution and expectation that with the transition of Western Europe to our global ERP system, productivity would likely slow down as people adapted to the new system and processes and that this, in turn, could lead to lower sales. During the second quarter, we indeed experienced a substantial slowdown in our supply chain operations. You may remember that when we went live with our global ERP in the U.S. during the summer of 2015, we experienced a similar impact with sales disruption at the time to be estimated at $10 million. This current European deployment is substantially larger, both in terms of number of manufacturing sites and selling locations and, as such, the level of disruption and negative impact on sales is also larger. For the second quarter, we are estimating the slowing of productivity and manufacturing and distribution resulted in a negative impact to sales of $15 million to $17 million. This amount, coupled with approximately $9 million of sales that were pulled forward into the first quarter in anticipation of the European go-live, led to the significant headwind when compared to last year. In addition to ERP transition challenges, we also experienced another lumpy quarter for our process media business, as current Biopharma ordering patterns make for a tough comparison with last year. Having said all that, it is important to note that we did experience bright spots with good sales growth across several of our key markets during the quarter. Most notably, sales of our Droplet Digital PCR, western blotting, diabetes monitoring, autoimmune, and quality controls product lines all posted solid growth in the second quarter. On a geographic basis, quarterly top line growth was highlighted by strong sales in the Asia-Pacific region, including solid double-digit growth for both China and India. And finally, sales from the recently acquired RainDance business contributed $5.4 million to the top line during the second quarter. The reported gross margin for the second quarter was essentially flat with last quarter as well as the year-ago period at 54.2%. For the quarter, the total noncash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to acquisitions was $7.1 million, which compares to $7.2 million in the second quarter of last year. SG&A expense for the quarter was $213 million, or 42.2% of sales, compared to $195 million in the first quarter and $205.5 million or 39.8% of sales in the year-ago period. The sequential increase in SG&A primarily reflects increased expense associated with our ERP project and operating model changes in Europe. We estimate that ERP project-related expense increased $6 million from the first quarter. Also, when comparing SG&A spend on a sequential basis, remember that the first quarter of this year included a one-time contingent consideration benefit of $10 million. And when comparing to the year-ago period, remember that the second quarter of 2016 included approximately $10 million of expense for the European restructuring. Also included in SG&A this quarter is $1.8 million for amortization of intangibles related to acquisitions. Research and development expense in Q2 was higher than expected at 12.4% of sales or $62.6 million compared to $49.8 million last year. The year-over-year increase in R&D spend is primarily a reflection of acquisition-related expense, including $7.5 million for the purchase of a promising, early-stage diagnostic device, plus $4 million for development milestones of our new flow cytometer for the cell biology market. The inclusion of RainDance also contributed to the year-over-year increase. Going forward, we are targeting base R&D to return to the 9% to 10% of sales range. However, it is important for me to note that in addition to this base level of investment, we are anticipating up to $9 million of additional milestone expense for the new flow cytometer technology in the second half of this year. As you can see, the second quarter operating results are below expectations and certainly disappointing in the short term. The top line headwinds, principally related to the ERP disruption and the lumpiness of our process-media business, combined with additional ERP and acquisition-related expense and the inclusion of RainDance, all resulted in the reporting of a loss at the operating line for the second quarter. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in a net income position of $3.5 million compared to a net $4.3 million position in Q2 of last year. This decline in income versus last year is largely related to higher foreign exchange losses, partially offset by an increase in dividend income typically associated with our second quarter. The effective tax rate used during the second quarter is actually a benefit and somewhat meaningless. This quarterly rate was driven by the combination of the low profit before tax coupled with discrete tax benefits related to the transfer of intangible assets within Europe as we set up our new operating model and a benefit related to share-based compensation. Given the year-to-date effective rate of 18% and excluding any discrete items that may occur, we now anticipate the full year tax rate to be in the 31% to 32% range. Reported net income for the second quarter was $5 million, and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.17. This compares to net income of $18 million and $0.61 per share in Q2 of last year. Excluding the acquisition-related expense of $7.5 million associated with new technology for the diagnostic market, plus the flow cytometer milestone expense of $4 million and the inclusion of RainDance and its quarterly operating loss of $2.5 million, we estimate that net income would have been approximately $15 million for the second quarter and earnings per share would have been approximately $0.51. And now for certain segment information. Life Science sales for the second quarter were $179.4 million, a slight decrease on a reported basis compared to last year's sales of $180 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales grew 0.3%. These quarterly results reflect strong growth of our Digital PCR products, both instruments and consumables, sales of western blotting products and the inclusion of the acquired RainDance sales I mentioned earlier. This growth was substantially offset by a sizable decline in our process media business, reflecting a difference in the quarterly ordering patterns of our Biopharma customers when compared to last year. Additionally, we estimate that disruption related to the ERP go-live in Europe negatively impacted Life Science sales by approximately $3 million to $4 million during the second quarter. On a geographic basis, sales to the U.S., China and Asia-Pacific markets posted good increases for Life Science during the quarter. Our Clinical Diagnostics segment posted quarterly sales of $322 million compared to $333.7 million last year, a decrease of 3.5%. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales for the Diagnostics Group declined 2.7%. This decline is largely attributable to the supply chain challenges of the ERP implementation, as many of our diagnostic instruments and consumables are manufactured in Europe. We estimate that ERP-related disruption to the Diagnostic sales in the second quarter was $12 million to $13 million. The most notable year-over-year decline was seen in our blood typing product family, which also felt the impact of the absence of sales that were pulled forward into the first quarter. Setting this aside, it is important to highlight that sales of diabetes monitoring and BioPlex 2200 products posted double-digit growth in the second quarter. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral sales to the Asia-Pacific market, most notably, China and India, were especially strong for Diagnostics during the quarter. Moving to the balance sheet as of June 30, total cash and short-term investments were $717.4 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $62.4 million compared to a negative $56.2 million last quarter and $77.2 million in Q2 of last year. This significant increase in cash flow versus the first quarter is substantially related to the higher vendor payments that we processed in the first quarter in advance of our go-live as well as higher investment income from the annual Sartorius dividend in the second quarter. EBITDA for the quarter was $44 million or just under 9% of sales. For the first half of 2017, EBITDA is $104 million, or just over 10% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter declined to $25.6 million from $39.3 million in the first quarter, reflecting the transition from deployment stage to support stage of our ERP project. Our full-year expectation for CapEx remains in the $125 million to $135 million range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $37 million, up on a sequential basis, primarily related to increased depreciation associated with our ERP project. Moving to the outlook for 2017, the second quarter has certainly been a bump in the road on our journey to greater efficiency and profitability. With that being said, we continue to anticipate currency-neutral organic sales growth of approximately 4% for the full year. This growth rate does assume that a substantial portion of the estimated $15 million to $17 million of ERP-related sales disruption that we experienced during the second quarter is made up by the end of this year. And while we are making progress with improving our productivity levels, we are also facing sizable increased demand for our blood typing and diabetes monitoring products that are manufactured in Europe. Obviously, increased demand is a good problem to have, but will also likely extend the time it takes for us to return to a more normalized state. And finally, on top of the anticipated 4% organic sales growth, the inclusion of RainDance could add up to another 1% of sales growth for the full year. Moving to the outlook for operating profit and margin for the remainder of the year and considering the sizable top line headwinds and acquisition-related expense in the first half of the year, it will be difficult for us to achieve our original goal of 7% operating margin on a reported basis for the full year 2017. We are currently estimating the full year operating margin to be in the 6% to 6.5% sales range. Given the year-to-date margin of 2.3%, this revised target clearly anticipates a strong recovery of profitability in the second half of the year, albeit likely back-end loaded. While the third quarter may continue to feel some growing pains during our transition to a new operating model, we anticipate that by the fourth quarter we will be able to greatly improve our productivity and shed much of the added expense we have been carrying in the first half of the year. And now, I will turn the call over to Norman Schwartz.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Christine. So I just wanted to say, while the results for the quarter were obviously somewhat disappointing, I would emphasize that given the massive amount of change that we initiated in the second quarter, I think we have not done too badly. We not only turned on our new global ERP system across major parts of Europe, we reorganized our legal entity structure in Europe, our European product distribution opened up a brand new distribution center here and moved to a shared service model. I think all allowing us to consolidate significant resources throughout the region. As anticipated, we did experience some slowdown in fulfilling customer orders. However, from day one, we have been able to make product, take orders and ship to customers. And I do feel the team has done a remarkable job, and I'm confident that we will work through the challenges of this transition over the next few quarters. I guess I would also say with this final major deployment behind us, we have almost 100% of our manufacturing and more than 65% of our sales on a single system. And as the dust settles, I think we certainly can begin to look to the benefits of the changes that we've made. So, Sherry, now I think we're happy to open it up for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hey, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
I guess to kick off on ERP, could you give us a little more detail on, I guess, the dynamics in the quarter, whether this was a function of supply chain issues, your ability to source raw materials? Or whether it was really more delays in shipments to customers? I'm curious as to whether this dynamic perhaps it begins to normalize say exiting the quarter with most of the drag absorbed earlier in the period?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So, gosh, Brandon. It's probably a little bit of everything. When you transition – this is an SAP system that helps you manage the business in a full end-to-end process. I think, for us, transitioning to a new system in production just naturally slows things down, and then the same in the warehouse itself in terms of fulfilling orders. I don't think we hit any glitches in terms of how the system operates. But from the person on the phone taking the order to the person on the manufacturing plant floor making the product to then our new warehouses picking and packing and shipping, all in the face of pretty strong demand, just was a lot to get through in the quarter.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. Just to amplify that a little bit. I mean, you can imagine when you turn on a new program for the first time, or go through some kind of an upgrade personally, it takes time to learn the system. And if you've got thousands of transactions you're trying to accomplish every day, it just – things go slower. And it's a bit like the old show in I Love Lucy where she's on the candy line and the candy keeps coming down the line. You have a little bit of that going on all around the organization. You've got a lot of new people in place with these shared service centers not only learning the system but learning the customers, learning the products. And so it just takes a little time to work through it.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Fair enough. Christine, in terms of the drag from the ERP productivity in the second quarter, any sense of when you would expect to recuperate those revenues between the third and fourth quarters?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. It's a good question. Because we can see that we've already made progress in catching up on some of the backorders or the shipping. But at the same time there's a lot of new things coming out on the demand side and the new order side. So that's why I don't think we're going to be able to make it all up in one quarter the way we did when we went live in North America. You may remember that the backorder we made up the following quarter after go-live. I think for us this is really going to take us through the fourth quarter. Our goal is to get to that normalized state so that we can enter 2018 kind of firing on all cylinders.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Gotcha. One more for Christine. In the second quarter could you quantify the dollar impact from the process media business? The decline.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
In terms of the decline year-over-year?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think it's about $8 million.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. And as far as the full year outlook goes, number one, could you give us a sense of what's embedded in guidance for the total costs that you're absorbing both from the ERP project as well as the other duplicative costs, number one? And then number two, in terms of the operating margin guidance, I believe your prior outlook for about 7% excluded RainDance, which I think is about a 50 basis point drag nut now it includes. I just want to make sure that's the case.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
That is the case. So in terms of what we're carrying this year, you just mentioned about $10 million of operating loss in RainDance and we did on top of that $10 million there was some charge in Q1. But to the first part of your question in terms of the ERP spend or what we call ERP-related, meaning the folks working on the project as well as some of the backfill that we have throughout the organization so that our folks can focus on the project, for the full year of 2017 that's probably running in the $35 million to $40 million of expense for us. And as we move into 2018, we expect that to go down. Same is true for – I think when you asked about duplicate costs and that in the year, I think you're referring to some of this duplicate head count that we have because we were spinning up shared services, we're spinning up a new warehouse, but we're not able to, at least in the first half of the year, shut down that. For 2017, that's probably $6 million of expense. A lot of that is front-end loaded, but again, hoping to shed that as we move into 2018.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Very good. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank.
Mike Sarcone - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Hey guys. This is Mike Sarcone on for Dan Leonard. Thanks for taking the questions. The first one, as it relates to that 4% organic growth, I know you said it assumes you recover a substantial portion of the revenues that were delayed from the ERP implementation. Can you just comment on what type of visibility you have in terms of recouping those revenues?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
In terms of visibility, I mean, and this is a testament to the SAP system, we're able to see line-by-line what's going on in the business, both in terms of the impact as well as where we are in terms of the catch-up. So I think that we'll continue to monitor that and, as I said, we're making progress every day. And demand in the market seems to be hanging in there around the world too. So all of that kind of contributes to our reiterating our original top line outlook of 4% organic growth rate.
Mike Sarcone - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Got it. That's helpful. And I know you said the European implementation was way larger than North America. Did you guys have an internal forecast maybe or an expectation for what type of disruption you could see quantitatively? And if so, can you comment on what you actually did see in Q2 stacked up to that?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So the answer to the first part of your question is, no, I don't think we had a financial outlook for the magnitude of the disruption. We certainly knew there would be disruption and we talked about it on the Q1 call in May. Because this is now our third major deployment, so we've experienced this before. I think that the magnitude of the disruption is larger than we may have anticipated. But, as Norman said, we've been operating the business from day one and it really is just about keeping up pace of where we were before we went live and getting back to that level.
Mike Sarcone - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Tim Evans with Wells Fargo.
Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Hi. This is Sara Silverman on for Tim. I wanted to...
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hi, Sara.
Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Hi. I wanted to see – can you just talk about what you're seeing in the process chromatography media business given the slowdown this quarter? Kind of just curious about your commentary around what's going on there and what the trajectory is and when you kind of expect to see a recovery.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, this is a business that is very traditionally lumpy. This is a supply chain provision into the drug development market, and customers are very often buying for their own purposes as they decide to shore up safety stocks or run down stocks. So it's very hard for us to know exactly where things are going to land. But this is really par for the course. We have a pretty long history with this business, and we're not terribly surprised by the ups and downs. We are sometimes surprised by the magnitudes.
Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I'm not saying that it forecasts a negative outlook for the business going forward, either. Perhaps that's worth saying too.
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. And I think last year we saw customers stocking up, for lack of a better word, in terms of process media and the Biopharma production to market, and that makes for a really tough compare in the first half of the year. But certainly, the long-term outlook of the business, for us, remains very positive.
Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay. Thanks. That's helpful. And then, kind of stepping back, bigger picture, can you help us a little bit on the bridge from kind of operating margin at the end of this year to kind of your stated goal of around 15%? Just if you're able to give us some sort of sense of how much of the improvement is kind of less investment in ERP versus cost savings improvements versus kind of sales growth on some of your less profitable assets, so far?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So, Sara, I think you have the – you're identifying some of the correct budgets – or buckets of spend as we move forward. In terms of where does improvement come from, it is related to spend on the project. It is related to some of these technology investments that we've been making for cell biology, for Droplet Digital PCR, et cetera, that those get up-righted as time goes on. And it's about the sales top line increasing and contributing to the bottom line. And it's about really extracting benefits of a more efficient model. So with all of that as my setup, we are all very much looking forward to our Investor Day, which we will hold in New York the morning of November 28. And part of our goal at that meeting is to help give more color and detail around our bridge to our 2020 financial goal.
Sara Silverman - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay. Great. Well, I guess I'll wait for that then. Thanks for taking my questions.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Absolutely.
Operator:
Thank you. Speakers, I'm showing no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back over to you for any additional remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Can you poll one more time?
Operator:
We do have a question from Mike Sarcone with Deutsche Bank.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Hello. Dan Leonard here this time. We're hopping around with a few things. So hoping to better understand, if you could educate me; how do you mitigate any competitive disruption or competitive impact with the customers? It sounds like you conditioned your customers to expect things like elongated delivery times in Q2, but things came in a bit worse than you planned. So presumably, you have competitors that use that to their advantage. And what can you do to offset? Because you must think you're offsetting it if you're not changing the organic revenue growth guide and outlook.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. Well, in most of the business, especially in Europe, these are diagnostic customers with these technologies embedded in their labs. I mean, we did try to work with them closely. As you remember, we had a fair amount of pull-forward of orders and we've, obviously, we just try to stay very close to those customers. You can never say that you're going to retain all of those customers. You've probably got the odd customer who gets fed up and the salesman walks in from a competitor, and you lose that business. And certainly, the same is true when other companies have disruptions or problems, and we try to be Johnny-on-the-spot, as well. So it goes back and forth. But we have tried to stay very close to the customers and hold their hands throughout this entire process. And I was at the AACC the last few days and talking with some customers who – especially one large customer who had some issues, and we worked through that with them and they're certainly very happy now. So we can only try.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think the other thing, Dan, to remember is most of the disruption was on the Diagnostics side of the business and related to large instruments that are already placed. These tend to be closed instruments. And while Norman says we are hand-holding, making sure all of our customers are happy, they're sticky customers.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you for that color.
Operator:
Thank you. I'm showing we do have a follow-up from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Christine, could you break out the year-over-year impact on, I guess, on the SG&A line from ERP expenses? You said it was up $6 million sequentially, but curious if you have the year-over-year number.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Probably up a little more than that on a year-over-year basis. Probably $7 million, $7.5 million, something like that.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. And then I guess just to confirm, is it safe to say that despite the lower base profitability outcome for this year that your 2020 margin targets are still unchanged?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Still unchanged.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Roger that. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. I'm showing no further questions in the queue.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you, everyone, for your interest and your participation today. And hopefully, we will see you in New York on November 28 for our Investor Day. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may all disconnect, and have a wonderful day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q1 2017 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Ron Hutton. You may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you very much, Michelle. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our financial future performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'll turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today are John Goetz, our Chief Operating Officer; Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group, John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group; and Annette Tumolo, who heads up our Digital Biology Group. Net sales for the first quarter of 2017 were $500.1 million, an increase of 6.1% versus the same period last year sales of $471.2 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 6.7%. The first quarter sales results include approximately $1.9 million associated with the acquisition of RainDance as well as an estimated $9 million of revenue that was pulled forward in anticipation of the go-live of our European deployment of SAP. If we exclude these acquired and pull forward sales, currency-neutral organic growth for the first quarter was around 4.4% and ahead of expectations. During the quarter, we experienced good currency-neutral growth across many of our key market and product areas within both the Life Science and Diagnostics segments. Of particular note, sales of Droplet Digital PCR, western blotting, blood typing and autoimmune products were particularly strong during the quarter. From a geographic standpoint, sales in the quarter grew, most notably in Asia Pacific, China and Europe, offset somewhat by slower sales in the U.S. and Japan. I should point out that sales growth in Europe during the first quarter was driven significantly by the pull forward of orders in advance of our system go-live in the region. However, even without the accelerated product timings, we posted good currency-neutral growth in Europe for both segments. The reported gross margin for the first quarter was lower than expected at 54% and compares to 56% last year. This lower margin is primarily the result of $10 million of one-time expense related to the acquisition of RainDance. In terms of the base operations, the gross margin for the quarter was negatively impacted by some duplicate costs associated with the launch of a new supply chain model in Europe, which was offset by a favorable product mix and a decrease in amortization expense related to acquisition. For the first quarter of 2017, amortization recorded in cost of goods sold was $5.1 million, which compares to $7.2 million in the first quarter of last year. This decrease reflects the completion of amortization in COGS related to the DiaMed acquisition, partially offset by an estimate for the addition of RainDance. As we have been guiding, SG&A expenses for the first quarter were up substantially and relates to the implementation of SAP in a new operating model in Europe. This new model includes the beginnings of a more efficient logistics footprint as well as shared services for back-office activities. We estimate incremental spend related to those activities in the first quarter were in the $6 million to $8 million range. This incremental expense was offset by a nearly $10 million reduction in contingent consideration, which was a benefit to SG&A during the quarter. With that, reported SG&A expense for the first quarter of 2017 was $194.9 million or 39% of sales compared to $189.7 million or 40.3% of sales last year. Total amortization related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.7 million. Research and development expense in Q1 was in line with expectations at 9.9% of sales or $49.5 million, which compares to $48.6 million or 10.3% of sales in the first quarter of last year. The primary driver of the increased R&D spend relates to our ongoing investment in new applications for our Droplet Digital PCR technology. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $5.4 million, essentially unchanged from the year ago period. The effective tax rate used during the first quarter was 38%. This higher than expected rate is substantially driven by an increase in losses at some of our smaller foreign locations for which no benefit is expected. Given this high first quarter rate and excluding any discrete items that may occur during the year, we now expect the full year effective tax rate to be in the 31% to 33% range and slightly higher than our prior guidance of 30% to 32%. Despite the strong top-line results, net income for the first quarter was $12.4 million, essentially flat with last year, and directly related to the incremental spend on our many internal investments. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.41. And now for certain segment information. Life Science sales for the first quarter were $174.3 million, an increase of 5.1% on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of 6.3% on a currency-neutral basis. Excluding the addition of $1.9 million of RainDance sales for about half the quarter, Life Science organic growth was 5.2%. This year-over-year growth rate is even more impressive when considering that the first quarter of 2016 Life Science currency-neutral sales grew by nearly 10%. Much of the growth in the first quarter of this year was driven by continued strong demand for our Digital PCR instruments and reagents, sales of our newly released western blot imager and sales of our PCR food testing products. We also experienced good growth of our amplification and cell biology product lines. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency-neutral sales were particularly strong in Europe, China and the Asia Pacific region. This growth was partially offset by slower sales in North America that were impacted by a year-over-year decrease in process media revenue. As you know, the process media sales cycle can be lumpy, especially when compared to the record sales set last year. From a strategic standpoint, during the first quarter, we made two important announcements regarding our Life Science group. The first is the conclusion of the acquisition of RainDance, which gives us valuable intellectual property and further strengthens our current and future offering of droplet-based products for both research and clinical markets. The second important milestone is the product launch of the Illumina Bio-Rad Single-Cell Sequencing Solution, an important new workflow that allows for a deeper view into the gene expression of individual cells. And while it is still early days for these two important additions to our Life Science portfolio, the early feedback and product pipeline seems very promising. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products in the quarter were $322.3 million compared to $301.7 million last year, an increase of 6.8% on a reported basis. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales were up 7%. The overall growth rate for the Diagnostic group was positively impacted by the pull forward of approximately $9 million of sales in advance of our April go-live of SAP in Europe. Similar to prior deployments, we offered our customers who typically have standing monthly orders or frequently used short-life consumables the ability to ensure their supply of products, while we transition to new systems and processes. Excluding this $9 million impact, Diagnostic sales for the first quarter increased over 4% on a currency-neutral basis, which compares to a 1% currency-neutral growth in the year ago period. During the first quarter of this year, we posted solid growth of blood typing and autoimmune testing products with both lines increasing double-digits. Our quality control also continued to grow nicely in the quarter. Looking at the regional view, sales of diagnostic products were particularly strong in Europe, China, Asia Pacific and the Middle East. Moving to the balance sheet, as of March 31, total cash and short-term investments were $679 million compared to $844 million at the end of 2016, a decline of $165 million. It is not unusual for our first quarter to be a heavy cash use quarter as we typically pay annual incentive bonuses and commissions, annual hardware and software maintenance costs and so forth. But more specific to the first quarter of 2017 was also the cash payment of approximately $83 million to RainDance, as well as an estimated $20 million to $25 million of accelerated payments that we associate with the preparation for the transition to SAP in Europe. Also impacted net cash generated from operations during the quarter was a negative $56.2 million compared to a negative $7.4 million in the year ago period. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is a result of many of the items I just mentioned, coupled with a slowdown in collections. All-in-all it was a tough quarter for working capital, but much of it is identifiable and event-driven and not necessarily indicative of a new level. As we exit the heavy investment year of 2017, we fully anticipate harnessing the benefits of our new operating model in global systems, in turn delivering significant incremental improvement in working capital over the long-term. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $39.3 million and down versus the fourth quarter amount of $45 million. Our full year expectation for CapEx remains in the $125 million to $135 million range. Finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $33.7 million. And moving to the outlook, on our last earnings call, we shared our thinking for 2017. And that is our goals for currency-neutral sales growth of 4%, full year gross margins in the 55% range, and targeting the operating margin at about 7% on a currency-neutral basis. Today, we are reiterating that guidance. You may also recall that we indicated some caution about our ability to reach a 7% currency-neutral operating margin, especially given the significant expenditures related to the system and operating model changes in Europe, which will be occurring throughout 2017. Our caution about achieving the profit margin goals still stand. While we successfully went live with SAP in Europe the first week in April, it is still early days in terms of system adoption. You may remember that with our last major deployment, North America in July of 2015, productivity noticeably slowed down as people learn the new processes. We fully expect that to be the case this time too. With that in mind and coupled with the pull forward of revenue into the first quarter, it would not surprise us to see a slowing of sales in the short-term, while still bearing the burden of significant investment. As I mentioned earlier, we completed the RainDance acquisition in the middle of February. While we're still getting our arms around the business, we currently anticipate the addition of RainDance will add $18 million to $20 million of sales for 2017. Regarding the impact to profitability, our best estimate at this time is that the consolidation of RainDance could negatively impact operating income by $7 million to $10 million in 2017. A portion of this projected impact is related to purchase accounting and integration costs, but nonetheless could bring our total operating margin below our 7% target. We're hoping to bring the RainDance acquisition to accretion within the first 18 months to 24 months. And now, we're happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard of Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hi, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Maybe this one is for John Goetz on the ERP deployment. So far so we're a month into the go-live. Could you just give us an update on sort of the status of operations? How smoothly it's gone, sort of, relative to your expectations and perhaps relative to the prior to go-live experiences?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. Well, we're happy to say that we're able to take our orders from customers and process them through the system, ship and invoice, relieve inventory, and do all of the things that we need to do. And, for me, that's a real good positive. Having said that, we're experiencing all the usual things you might expect in a go-live of this magnitude and complexity from how we enter orders, processing, changes to the master data, so that we could process them all the way through to shipment. It's all of the usual things. But if you just take a 30,000 foot look at it, I feel really good about where we are. We still have some months ahead of us to stabilize the system fully. And, as Christine mentioned, adoption is the big thing we're after right now. But, for me, I'm considering this a pretty good situation.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. Brandon, I'll echo a lot of that. I think that all the preparation that went into this, our buddy (17:27) system on the ground, when we went live and trying to take advantage of lessons learned from the first two deployments served us well. And as we now go through the process of running the day-to-day business and soon we'll be going through the close process, et cetera, productivity just naturally slows down from the very beginning of making product all the way through collecting. But you may remember with the second deployment in the summer of 2015, while it did slowdown in that first quarter and we ended up with more backlog, we were able to make it up fairly quickly in the following quarter. So, hopefully that would be the cases as well. But the pull forward in this deployment was more sizable than in the second deployment. And coupling that with the natural slowdown in productivity, that's what kind of leads to our near-term caution. But we did reiterate our outlook for the full year fully expecting to make that up.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. It's helpful. And staying on that topic, why was there no pull forward in the Life Sciences business out of curiosity? And then, I think, Christine, you mentioned that the incremental ERP expenses year-over-year were $6 million to $8 million. How does that trend – what that trend look like over the balance of the next three quarters?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, in terms of pull-through, remember, we're going live in Europe and the vast, vast majority of the manufacturing in Europe is all Diagnostic products. And they are products for the blood typing market, for the blood virus market. And many of these consumables are very critical in the process. Whereas for the Life Science group, much of their manufacturing is here in North America or in Asia and that's why you see it heavily skewed to consumables in the diagnostics space. And can you tell me again your second question?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. The incremental ERP expenses you said in the first quarter were $6 million to $8 million. Curious what that looks like over the next three periods.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Oh, good question. So, it's more than just ERP, when you think about that $6 million to $8 million. I mean a chunk of it is the project and project related but then also right now we're running some duplicate costs as we spin-up our new warehouse in Europe and we spin-up shared services at our regional headquarters. All of that contributes to incremental spend without the relief of kind of letting go of the old model, which obviously had to run the business in the first quarter and will continue to be a support through the second quarter. So, that – I would expect that increment would continue in the near-term. But our plan is that as we get to towards the end of 2017 and exit 2017, a lot of that duplication of head count, of warehouses, et cetera, really starts to go away and sets us up for incremental improvement in 2018.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That's helpful and then maybe a two-part question for Shannon and John. If you could speak to – give us an update on how the – some of the new product launches are going, in particular on the Diagnostics side, the new IH-1000 and would love to hear your comments on how the Illumina partnership has gone so far? Anything can you tell us in terms of like order book or placements or just customer activity would be useful. Thanks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. So, John can speak to that and maybe Annette can talk about the Illumina partnership.
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure, Brandon. A little bit about blood typing in hematology. Overall, across all of our selling regions, the business is strong for the first quarter. As you know, we got IH-1000 FDA approved at the tail end of the last year. We don't release data on a geographic basis, but I would say that we're pleased with the traction we've received so far in the U.S. We had favorable expectations of how customers would react to simplified workflow and the largest line of gel cards offered in the U.S. And so far we're getting echoes of positive response across all of them.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. So we've always talked, Brandon, about it being a very long sales cycle. It's a very sticky business, as you know. But I think that the feedback is good and in terms of really contributing and moving the needle. For that, we've always looked to late this year and then going into the future. And then, Annette, on the new Illumina Bio-Rad Single-Cell?
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So we launched the product in late January and early February. And we've gotten great feedback from the field so far. They're very happy to have a new tool to sell. Good customer acceptance, really strong promising pipeline that the sales force are delivering. I think one of the most – aside from great enthusiasm for the customers, the interaction in the field between the two companies, which was an experiment for us, if you will, has been really, really good. Good cooperation with the Illumina and Bio-Rad sales organizations to really give the customer a seamless experience, when they're interacting with both companies about the technology. So far so good.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. And if I could squeeze one more in with respect to your announcement, I guess, in early March, you spoke to pointing to developing a target leverage ratio. And I'm just curious if you could help us understand. When those plans might be formalized and if it's reasonable to believe you could be in the market buying back stock as early as the second half of this year?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, good question, Brandon. And I think it's more than just leverage. We're looking at the overall capital allocation framework. And, as you know, we have a new board of directors that was elected a few weeks ago and – or a week ago. And so one of the first things we'll be doing is working with them to get their input, advice and ideas on capital allocation framework. And, obviously, first, we have to get them up to speed on Bio-Rad and the business, our goals and objectives. So, what we're targeting is late this year having an Analyst Day and sharing more information at that time, after we've spent some time with our board of directors.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. I'll hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Dan Leonard of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Thank you. First off, Christine, could you characterize your incremental confidence in the top-line target for the year of the 4% given the way the markets have transpired over the past three months?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, I think that we're still targeting the 4% top-line growth that we talked about in late February when we had our earnings call. And then, obviously, the addition of RainDance could add up to a point of that growth. What's been going on since then, one day, there is no NIH budget, the next day there is a budget and it's going up a little. So I think that, we'll keep watching. There is some encouraging things, Dan. Obviously, if the NIH budget is growing, that's good for us, because the majority of our Life Science sales are still into the academic research world, government and academic research world. It's nice to see pretty good signs of growth in Europe, even without this pull forward, that was primarily a European event, still very good base growth for both Life Science and Diagnostics. Granted it's an easy compare, in some cases, because we've struggled in Europe for some time, but that's also very encouraging for the future. In some of the emerging markets, we'll have to wait and see. Hopefully, the economies hold up. China continues to be a good, strong market for us. So, I think, it's too early to change our expectation, but we're off to a good start.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. That's helpful. And then just a clarification. Does that 7% operating margin target – does that include contingent consideration reversals like you saw in Q1?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Because the charge in cost of goods was pretty much an offset to what went on in contingent considerations, they kind of neutralized each other out and kept us for the base business at around that 7%. I think going forward because this was kind of a large one-time event for contingent consideration and I'm not anticipating anything quite that sizable going forward.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from David Westenberg of C.L. King. Your line is open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi. Thanks for taking the question. So, can you talk about some of your new board members? Actually specifically what you were looking for when you picked out these new board members and how you see them as an asset on a go-forward basis?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Sure. So, very exciting to have the new board and had a good opportunity to spend time with them last week. When we were looking at where we're headed as a company in terms of continuing to expand globally, we're getting to the end of – or certainly far along in our ERP deployment. It was important to have board members who were really well-suited to help us for – with our next level of growth and opportunity. And that is extracting the benefit from these very sizable investments that we've been making, not only in terms of systems, but how we run the business in a more efficient way. And many of the new board members come from backgrounds where they've gone through this ERP type of implementation and extracting benefit. I think, having their experience on the capital allocation side, as we move forward and see a little light at the end of the tunnel to start to expand our margins, our cash flow will expand, and it becomes even more important for us to focus on the appropriate framework and use of that. So those are a couple of the reasons. Having somebody with good governance and regulatory background – we're in a highly regulated market, as you know, all over the world. And Arnie Pinkston brings tremendous amount of experience in that area, having spent his career at Allergan and Beckman and Lilly. So all of that's very valuable, as we continue to expand and grow globally. Those are a few of thoughts off top of my head, very exciting.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Right. No, this is very helpful. And then just a little bit of a continuation of Dan's question. Did you see any weakness specifically in Q1 to the NIH funding? And if so, do you anticipate maybe a stronger Life Science sales in Q2 and Q3 as people feel a little bit more comfortable? Knowing that I mean obviously it's just funded till September, but still maybe was there any maybe a relief bump in Q2 or...
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. So, well, too really to know about Q2 and it's hard to say in Q1 how people may have behaved if there was uncertainty around the budget, were they hanging on to their money, just in case. That's hard to peel back the onion and know for sure. What we can do is we can look at our specific business. And especially in North America, there was a very large year-over-year decline in process media. And, again, it's just a lumpy business. Our outlook remains very strong for that. But it certainly was enough to move the needle. At the same time, you look in North America for some of our very core products, amplifications and cell biology, as well as the new imager in western blotting and all of that and there is real growth going on there. So, hopefully, the combination of a good product lineup and more certainty around the funding environment will bode well for North America going forward.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thank you. And on the capital deployment front, is the focus in the next couple quarters ERP? Or are we still looking at maybe small tuck-in acquisitions? Is that at the table during the next couple quarters or is that still on the table?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I think it's always still on the table. I think acquisitions are an important way for us to bring new technology to the company and expand our product portfolios in the markets that we serve. Having said that, there are – some are opportunistic, some are more targeted, but they're not quite as frequent as even we would like them to be. But they're certainly on the table and we'll continue to look at opportunities in both Life Science and Diagnostics. In terms of the more certain capital investments that we're making there, we'll continue to move forward investing in systems and the build out in Europe as we expand our new process footprint, if you will. So more of the same of that, but certainly we'll continue to look for opportunities in acquired technologies products businesses.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Great. And if I can just sneak in one more. What would be some of the puts and takes if ERP were to, let's say, drag on a little bit further than you like and maybe in the early next year? I mean what would be some of the causes that would be responsible for it?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
When you ask about ERP dragging on, are you referring to the project continuing or are you referring to the business slowing down, while people adopt to the systems.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Both actually.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I'll start with the business slowing down as they adopt to the new system. Again, we've seen this in our prior deployment, so wouldn't be unexpected or unusual for it to happen now. It just takes time for people to learn something new and get very proficient at it. When we went live in North America, we ended up that first quarter of go-live with an $8 million to $10 million backlog and we made it up in the following quarter. My only caution here would be, while it could put a fair amount of pressure on our second quarter, then we move into the third quarter, which is a seasonally slow quarter in Europe – do they really make it up right then? I don't' know. That's to be seen. And I have no reason to believe one way or another, but as I'm thinking about the seasonality of that business versus North America, there is that one element. As far as spending on the project, I mean the project will continue and we will continue to implement around the world and bring our commercial businesses into this single instance of SAP. The change though in spending is what we really have in front of us now, our commercial operations, I don't want to say they're easy, because nothing about this is easy, but they are certainly less complex than the manufacturing operation. So our plan is to move forward in kind of very deliberate byte size system-by-system approach with the implementation and that will probably go on for the next two years or three years as we look at these commercial operations. And then we're going to look at them individually and judge the ROI. More importantly, though, I think we are hoping that that much of this implementation we're going to be able to do with the knowledge that we have now built internally having gone through three very sizable deployments. And using our own people should allow us to finish off these implementations at a lower cost. So, this year, a fair amount of spend. I'm always wanting to remind people that once we go live, all of the labor is expensed, whereas when you're going through your deployment, it's capitalized. So we have that in front of us right now. But then as we move to 2018 and beyond, we'd like to be able to incorporate both the project and the cost as part of our ongoing business over the next few years.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
This has all been very helpful. Thank you so much.
Operator:
And I'm showing no further questions. Please proceed with any closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Great. Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for taking the time to join us today. Stay tuned for more information about our upcoming Analyst Day. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc. Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this conference call may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Sir, you may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, expectations, our financial future performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn it over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2016 as well as provide some insight into our thinking for 2017. With me today are Norman Schwartz, John Goetz, Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group, John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group; and Annette Tumolo, Executive Vice President of our Digital Biology Group. As some of you may already know, Annette oversees our Droplet Digital businesses and will now also be providing leadership over our new RainDance operations. Let's start with a review of the quarterly results. Net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 were $571.5 million, up slightly when compared to the year ago period sales of $570.6 million. On a currency-neutral basis, quarterly sales growth was approximately 1%. As we cautioned on our last call, sales of Life Science products were down year-over-year, primarily as a result of a tough compare to the fourth quarter of 2015. This tough compare is related to more than $10 million of backlog that was pushed into the year ago period as well as in sales of process media products, which were also strong in Q4 of last year. Partially offsetting this tough compare for the Life Science segment were continued strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables. Our Clinical Diagnostics Group continued to post strong top line growth during the fourth quarter, particularly in sales of our diabetes monitoring and auto immune testing products, as well as quality controls. The consolidated gross margin for the quarter was better than expectations at 55% and compares to last year's gross margin of 54.1%. The improvement in gross margin is attributable to our Diagnostics Group and largely the result of improved product mix, overhead absorption and lower amortization of intangibles. During the fourth quarter, we recorded a total of approximately $4.5 million in cost of goods sold for the non-cash purchase accounting expense related to acquisition. This compares to $6.6 million of amortization expense in the year ago period. SG&A expense for the fourth quarter was $220 million or 38.5% of sales compared to $193.1 million or 33.9% of sales last year. This higher expense is driven by increased reserves for legal settlements of $10.9 million, plus $2.1 million of contingent consideration expense related to our new flow cytometer, and increased ERP project-related costs, which were approximately $4 million higher in the quarter versus the same period last year. Also remember when comparing to last year, the fourth quarter of 2015 included a contingent consideration benefit of $4.9 million. If we exclude these $22 million of year-over-year changes in expense, SG&A as a percent of revenue for the fourth quarter of this year would have been 34.7%. And finally, in SG&A, amortization of intangibles related to prior acquisition was approximately $1.7 million for the quarter, up slightly from the year ago period. Research and development expense in Q4 was 10.1% of sales or $57.5 million versus $55.9 million last year. This increase in R&D spending, when compared to last year, primarily reflects a $7 million milestone payment recorded in our Life Sciences Group, related to the purchase of the new flow cytometer for the cell biology market. Another driver of the increased R&D spend relates to our ongoing investment in new applications for our Droplet Digital PCR technology. During the fourth quarter, we impaired the goodwill and in-process research and development associated with the acquisition of GnuBIO for a total of $59.9 million. When we acquired GnuBIO in 2014, the technology was very early stage. As it has taken us longer to bring these products to market than originally estimated, the value of the expected future cash flows has changed, and thus the appropriate accounting is for us to write down the original investment. Nonetheless, we continue to believe that the customer value proposition for a targeted sample-to-answer sequencer remains intact, and we will move forward with completing development. Our plan is to launch a new product for the clinical research market late this year. Obviously, the inclusion of several unusual charges during the fourth quarter negatively impacted our operating margin. If we exclude the $70.8 million for legal-related reserves and the impairment charge, the operating margin for the fourth quarter would have been approximately 8%. Interest and other for the quarter was a net expense of $5 million compared to $5.3 million last year. The effective tax rate used in the fourth quarter was lower than expected at 27%, primarily the result of the mix of earnings in lower tax jurisdictions, as well as benefit related to the repatriation of foreign earnings. When comparing to the year ago period, remember that last year's rate benefited significantly from sizable foreign repatriations as well as the reinstatment of the federal R&D tax credit for 2015. Driven substantially by the impairment of the GnuBIO assets, reported net income for the fourth quarter was a loss of $20.6 million or minus $0.70 per share on a diluted basis compared to $49.5 million last year or $1.68 per share. Excluding the impairment and legal related charges, we estimate that earnings per share for the quarter would have been $0.98. And now for certain segment information. Life Science Group reported sales for the fourth quarter were $206.8 million. This represents a decline of 5.2% versus last year or minus 4.3% on a currency-neutral basis. As I mentioned earlier, these quarterly sales reflect a tough to compare with Q4 of 2015, especially in light of the backlog catch-up and the timing of sales of processed media products. The headwinds were partially offset by continued strong performance for our Droplet Digital PCR product family as well as strong sales of our food safety product line. Throughout the year we made a concerted effort to smooth out sales of our traditional protein and gene expression product, and that certainly impacted our ability to post growth in the fourth quarter. On a geographic basis, currency-neutral sales in Q4 declined in our largest regions for Life Science. In North America and China, primarily related to the system transition in 2015, and our efforts to smooth out the revenue flow, and in Europe, where we experienced some slowness. Our Clinical Diagnostic Group achieved good sales for the quarter of $360.8 million compared to $348.6 million last year, an increase of 3.5% on a reported basis and growth of 4% currency neutral. These sales were led by continued strong performance in the quality controls and diabetes product lines as well as solid growth for BioPlex 2200 revenue. On a geographic view, diagnostic currency neutral sales for the quarter increased most notably in China, Asia-Pacific, North America and Japan, while sales in Europe continued to decline. Looking at the full year results, we are pleased to report annual revenues of $2.068 billion. While this represents an increase of 2.4% versus last year on a reported basis, on a currency-neutral basis, sales for the year grew 4%. This difference in growth rate reflects a currency headwind to sales of more than $31 million for the full year. Despite the tepid revenue in the fourth quarter, our Life Science Group posted all-time record annual sales of $730.7 million, an increase of 5.1% versus 2015 on a reported basis, and growth of an impressive 6.5% currency neutral. These record sales reflect annual growth in every region and every product group for Life Science, primarily fueled by continued strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables and processed media. We also saw a good annual growth in our gene expression, Western Blot reagent and food safety product line. From a geographic view, sales in North America, China, and Asia Pacific were the biggest contributors to year-over-year growth for the Life Science Group. For the year, clinical diagnostic sales were $1.323 billion, an increase of 1% on a reported basis, and growth of 2.6% on a currency-neutral basis, representing a currency headwind of nearly $22 million for the full year. This growth was fueled by continued momentum in quality control, blood typing and diabetes monitoring products. Also important to highlight are sales of our BioPlex 2200 instrument and panel, which grew double-digits during 2016 as we've placed a record number of new instruments at reference labs and hospitals around the world. We now offer more than 60 tests on the BioPlex 2200 and the installed base exceeds 400 instruments. On a geographical view, sales in North America, China and Asia Pacific were the biggest contributors to year-over-year currency-neutral growth for the Diagnostics Group. Total company gross margins for the full year of 2016 were in line with our annual guidance at 55% and compares to 55.5% in 2015. The decrease in margin versus last year is largely the result of approximately $2 million of restructuring charges for Europe, as well as higher service costs and changes in product mix. Also important to note, total amortization of intangibles and purchase accounting recorded in cost of goods sold for 2016 was $26.1 million. This compares to $27.7 million last year. With a number of out of the ordinary expenses booked during the year, SG&A expense as a percent of sales was 39.5% for 2016 or $816.7 million and compares to $762 million in 2015. Excluding more than $37 million associated with the restructuring in Europe, legal settlements and changes in contingent consideration, SG&A as a percent of sales was approximately 37.7%. And finally, in SG&A, total expense for acquisition-related amortization was $6.9 million for the full year. Research and development expense in 2016 was $206 million or 10% of sales and compares to $193 million or 9.6% of sales last year. This increase is substantially in our Life Science Group as we continue to invest heavily in new products for the cell biology market, including our new flow cytometer, which is expected to launch later this year, as well as increased investment in digital biology applications, such as liquid biopsy. Looking to 2017, R&D expenses as a percentage of sales will likely stay at that 9% to 10% level as we move a number of projects through the product development pipeline. The full year reported operating margin was significantly negatively impacted by the various accounting charges taken throughout the year. If we exclude the non-cash $95 million of expense related to the European restructuring, legal-related settlements and impairments of acquired assets, the operating margin for the full year would be approximately 7%. The effective tax rate for full year 2016 was in line with our guidance of 32.3%. For 2017, we expect the effective tax rate, excluding any discrete items that may occur, to be in the 30% to 32%. Reported net income for the full year was $28.1 million with fully diluted earnings per share for the year of $0.95. As we have discussed, 2016 contained a number of non-cash or non-recurring expenses and we have highlighted $95 million of those charges. Excluding that amount, we estimate that earnings per share for the full year 2016 would have been $3.24. If we exclude the non-cash amortization of intangibles and revaluation of contingent consideration booked during the year, earnings per share would be approximately $3.99. For 2016, Bio-Rad's balance sheet remains strong. As of December 31, total cash and short-term investments were $844 million compared to $790 million at the end of last year. Net cash generated from operations during the fourth quarter was substantially higher at $95 million and $216.4 million for the full year 2016. This compares to net cash generated from operations in 2015 of $186 million. The year-over-year increase in cash flow is substantially related to the higher sales and improvement in collections. EBITDA for 2016, adjusted for the impairment charges, was $269 million for the full year and $72 million in the fourth quarter. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were higher at $45 million as we continue to invest heavily in our third deployment of SAP as well as our new operating footprint in Europe. Total CapEx was $141 million for the full year, slightly ahead of the $130 million to $140 million range estimated on our last call. Looking to 2017, we estimate that CapEx spending will decrease to the $125 million to $135 million range as we complete our last major deployment of SAP and other foundational projects in Europe. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $35.1 million and $142.9 million for the full year. Moving to our outlook for 2017, let's start with the outlook for the base business. Looking to 2017, we see several opportunities for growth on the top line. The momentum we are seeing in many of our Life Science product lines is encouraging for future growth. In addition, funding for research in our major markets seem to be holding steady. As such, we are targeting Life Science growth to be in the 4.5% to 5% range. On the Diagnostics side of the business, we also see opportunities for currency-neutral growth in many of our core businesses, including an increase in consumable sales associated with our new instruments for blood typing and diabetes monitoring. During 2016, we placed a record number of new instruments in laboratories around the world, which bodes well for higher margin growth over the next few years. Partially offsetting this expected growth, we continue to face some challenges in the diagnostics market, including price pressure in government tenders and lab consolidation, especially in Europe. Even with that in mind, we are targeting the Diagnostics' currency-neutral sales growth rate to be higher than 2016. And that is in the 3% to 3.5% range. Overall, the combined result of the opportunities across both businesses leads us to the expectation for annual sales growth in 2017 of around 4% on an organic basis, which is equal to the accelerated growth we experienced in 2016. With regard to margins, we are hoping to maintain our gross margin at 55% for the full year despite increased costs projected in the first half of the year associated with the build-out of our new warehouse in Europe and other redundant expenses in advance of the ERP system go live. In thinking about the operating margin for 2017, we continue to see sizable investment in the pipeline as we complete the build-out of a new operating footprint in Europe and go live with our third deployment of SAP in April. During the first half of the year, we will likely see expenses in the region increase sizably for both the ERP projects and the operating redundancy and then start to reduce late in the year. Even with that in mind, our currency-neutral operating margin goal for 2017 is 7% for the full year. On a reported basis, the strong U.S. dollar will likely continue to have a negative impact on our reported results for 2017. As many of you know, Bio-Rad is a very global company in terms of both sales and operations and currency can have a significant impact on our reported results. More than 60% of our sales are non-U.S. dollar and we estimate that around 35% or 40% of our expenses are non-U.S. dollar. As such, with today's strong dollar environment, currency can have a significant negative impact to our financial outlook. As I mentioned, our outlook for currency-neutral sales growth in 2017 is around 4%. However, using current exchange rates, currency could actually result in a revenue headwind of $20 million to $50 million, which in turn result in very low-single digit growth on a reported basis. And while we do have some natural hedge with the non-dollar denominated expenses, this currency headwind could impact our expected operating margin by as much as 50 basis points in our reported numbers. As you know, we have recently completed the acquisition of RainDance Technologies. We are excited to add RainDance to the Bio-Rad family and further strengthen our current and future offering of droplet-based products for both the research and clinical market. With regard to the 2017 outlook that I just discussed, the addition of RainDance could add about $20 million in revenue and thus drive our currency-neutral sales growth to 5% for the full year. Regarding the impact to profitability, our best estimate at this time is that the consolidation of RainDance could negatively impact operating income by $7 million to $10 million in 2017. The majority of this projected impact is related to purchase accounting and one-time integration costs, but nonetheless could bring our projected operating margin to be below 7% for the year. Having said that, the historical head count and spend at RainDance has already been significantly reduced and our goal is to reach accretion within 18 months. And now, I'll turn the call over to Norman for some final remarks.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you, Christine. As we wrap this up, I guess I just wanted to say that despite a relatively flat outlook for 2017 profit margins, we do remain highly committed to focusing on ways to create greater operating leverage and cash flow in the years to come. We are excited to finally be seeing the light at the end of the tunnel after years of substantial investment in new technologies and markets, a global ERP system, and a new consolidating operating model for our European operations. It's – again, we feel like it's kind of the light at the end of the tunnel. It has been a lot of money and many years of hard work in the making and we do appreciate your patience. Our long-term goal of accelerating top line growth while significantly increasing our operating margin to the mid-teens or higher is in sight and we are certainly excited about delivering this increased value to our shareholders.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So with that, we're happy to take your questions.
Operator:
And our first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard of Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Hey. Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hey, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Well, Christine, I really appreciate all the detailed color on all the puts and takes there. As we think about the operating margin outlook for this year, given that a good portion of the ERP expenses will come onto the P&L from capitalized, can you quantify what that incremental number alone is in 2017 versus 2016?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I think that the spending was already higher in 2016 and so incrementally as we look to 2017, and this is assuming a fairly quick stabilization period, I think the incremental spend is only a few million dollars, $3 million to $5 million. Obviously, that changes quite a bit if the team stays in stabilization mode longer.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. Super. And then, I'm not sure if Norman or Annette or Shannon would be best to address this, but as we think about the RainDance deal, could you sort of educate us on the rationale for the acquisition? How do you expect to integrate the two Droplet Digital platforms and what does it really add to your capabilities in that area?
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. This is Annette. So, RainDance has Droplet Digital PCR products that are very complementary to the products we have in that space today. So it strengthens our position in Digital PCR, and they have expertise and products in next-generation sequencing sample prep that will really accelerate our move into that market. Additionally, they have foundational intellectual property that I believe will give us maximum flexibility as we move into markets adjacent to Digital PCR that are droplet-based.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. Super. Maybe one for Shannon, any color you can give us on how the new Illumina single-cell partnership rollout is going in terms of customer feedback or demand? And maybe walk us through sort of the economics of that deal through instrument ASPs and kind of maybe instrument pull-through metrics, whatever you can would be helpful.
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Brandon, this is Annette. So we just launched the product on February 10 and I have – we've sold some systems so far. I've gotten feedback that the interaction in the field between Bio-Rad and Illumina is going very well and the cooperation and customer-facing co-commercialization teams are going very, very smoothly. So we're pretty optimistic about the outlook for the product for the year.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And Brandon, regarding the impact on the 2017 outlook and the P&L, there are two sources of revenue from this partnership for Bio-Rad. One is the ability for us to sell the instrument that we develop for single-cell both in the bundle as well as – or for new customers as well as to their installed base. And then, the second revenue stream is in the form of royalty that come to us from Illumina. We don't disclose to that level of detail, as you well know, but I can tell you that we've been fairly conservative in our expectation. In 2017, I know that Illumina is very excited and I hope they're spot on. I would love to be proven wrong, but we've taken a fairly conservative approach in terms of what we're anticipating for revenue in 2017.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Great. And perhaps one for Norm, could you sort of educate us on what the budget process was like coming into 2017, how it might have differed from prior years and to the extent that that process has given you better visibility or granularity into exactly where all the cost opportunities are once the ERP go-live is finished?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes, Brandon, this is John. I'll take that. Yes, we've been thinking about 2017 for, let's say, more than the last couple of months, I'll put it that way. We've organized the approach to look at improvements across the board, starting in our supply chain area, and we have very specific targeted projects that we've got in mind there. We've also taken a very detailed look at our OpEx spending and we've really tied that right down to location, head count, and the needs in which we see ourselves in. So, largely, as we think about 2017, for me and the organization, it's to get through this go-live in Europe, which we've got scheduled for early April, get that stabilized in three months' time, and then begin the process of shedding costs associated with that and moving onto the next smaller deployments going forward. So those for me are the really key aspects of it. And then, with respect to top line planning, accelerating growth is really part and parcel to getting our ship righted here. And we're pretty optimistic, I think as Christine alluded to, about the coming periods.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. Thanks so much.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Great. Thank you. And I also appreciate all the detail in the prepared remarks, so thanks for that. My first question, on the path to, Norman, as you said, mid-teens or higher operating margin, could you give us at least in broad brush strokes more detail on the components and the timing? Because if you assume mid-teens operating margin on your 2016 revenue base, that is $165 million in additional operating profit. I'm just trying to track down where all that would come from.
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So I think it comes from a couple of places. Certainly, the sales growth, and I think as John said, we set the course for sales growth not only for 2017 but for the next few years. And that's, of course, one of the principal drivers. And then, as we go down the balance sheet, I think as we've called out a number of times, our SG&A is on the high side compared to our peers, and we really circled in on very tight control over SG&A for the next few years to help drive those margins. So, as we go forward and see, and are planning now and working on how we harvest the benefits of the SAP system, and some of these other investments that we've made, I think that's really where it all comes from.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. That's helpful. And secondly on the smoothing efforts in the Life Science business, can you elaborate further – I think this is a question for John – really what that entailed and will we see any residual impact in 2017?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. If you remember last year, we had a very good strong fourth quarter, and that's great, but it drove our manufacturing plants wild with maximum volumes through the plant and shipping challenges like we've never had before. So we asked our supply chain folks to get together with our commercial guys and to say can we figure out how to kind of smooth this a little bit so that we don't have such a huge number in the fourth quarter. Maybe some customers might actually want product in third quarter or could we at least move some of our manufacturing a little earlier so we don't run it all to the hilt over the holidays like we did in 2015. So that's what that was about.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. And I think in terms of how it plays out, Dan, and you can see this in how 2016 rolled out, there's going to naturally be some tougher versus easier to compare periods as we look to 2017, especially for Life Science, and we think about that strong double-digit growth they had in Q3, et cetera. But, overall, I think on an annual basis, we're still looking for pretty solid growth.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay, and then final question for you, Christine. Have you taken a look at some of the proposed plans for corporate tax reform and what impact it might have on Bio-Rad? And I think the part I could use the most help with is the potential border tax adjustment. Given you have all these costs in Europe, it's unclear whether you're a net importer or exporter.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. So I'll take that one first. We are a net exporter. It is true that we have a sizable footprint in Europe, but we also have a sizable footprint here in the United States, and on both sides of the business, but especially on the Life Science side, we are a net exporter. Regards to some of the other plans, we don't know until we know, until these plans become real, but whether it's what the Republican Party is talking about or Trump talks about from time to time, I think either way you slice it, Dan, we're probably going to be a beneficiary of that in terms of a lower tax rate in the U.S. And then, on top of that, we will be able to turn on a lower tax rate in Europe with the turning on of SAP in Europe. So if we're really lucky, we'll get a benefit in Europe as well as a benefit of whatever they do here in the U.S.
Dan Leonard - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of David Westenberg of C.L. King. Your line is now open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. So can you talk about the expectation going into the April go-live? Is there anything that's come up in the last couple months or anything that might be – any hurdle that you've encountered recently that might be a challenge to implementation?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So maybe I'll take that. This is Norman. Obviously, these things are hard and I think this is certainly our biggest, most complicated deployment. I think we've spent a lot of time thinking about what we need to prepare and getting prepared. You can never figure out everything down to the last detail, but I guess I'm feeling pretty confident that we are as well prepared as we can be. We've got people on the ground and we've got extra resources at the ready to deal with whatever issues come up, and I think we're as well prepared as we can be.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And I would agree with that. We've tried to take advantage of lessons learned. We've created a buddy system to send our power users based here in the U.S. to be there on site as we go live and transition over the week shortly after going live. But this is really complex, because, remember, we're not just turning on some new system in Europe, we have totally changed how we run our business, as you've heard me say, do business with ourselves in Europe and change that operating model with the advent of a European headquarters and the advent of a shared service center, et cetera. So there is a lot of change we have to manage. To kind of Brandon's earlier question, the biggest risk to our outlook for 2017 really surrounds our ability to get through this transition fairly successfully. With that being said, I agree with Norman, and I think we're all feeling pretty good. There's been a lot of people paying attention to this and working on it and are going to be at the ready come early April when we turn it on.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Got you. Thank you. That's very helpful. And just a follow-on to that question, I think earlier in the call you mentioned something about sort of three months to stabilize. What's the puts and takes that might affect that three months to, I don't know, be four months or two months or whatnot?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. And so then I just want to clarify what that means in terms of stabilization. I think what John was talking about is the team that works on this project would like to move on to the next implementation. And we talk about this being our last major implementation and it is, because with this deployment, we will virtually have almost all of our manufacturing worldwide on SAP and what's left are sales operations that will roll out over time. But we would want to get the team quickly not needed anymore for the transition so that they can move on to the next implementation, which under the accounting terms means all that labor is capitalized instead of expensed. And that's kind of the risk to the P&L and the assumptions in the P&L. In terms of overall business stabilization, I think we've said in the past that that really takes almost a full year before people get really proficient of using SAP and taking advantage of SAP. And so, some of these redundancies that we have in head count and what we call backfill in the business, et cetera, they'll stay throughout much of 2017 to make sure that not only is the system working well, but people know how to take advantage of it. And we've talked about when we really start to see the benefit coming back to us is after that one-year anniversary or the second half of 2018.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
That was very helpful. Thank you so much. And I guess just last one on GnuBIO. Again, it's a little puts and takes and timing thing here. What could affect that end of the year launch date on that GnuBIO system?
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
This is Annette. So we acquired early-stage technology and the team has made tremendous progress towards reducing risk in commercialization. We have a few more hurdles that we have to do to finish development and we need to get in a full-on beta test. And so predicting the exact month for when we're going to end could be a little tricky.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Late in the year.
Annette Tumolo - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes. Oh, yes.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. Perfect. Late in the year. All right. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from a follow-up from the line of Brandon Couillard of Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Just one follow-up for you, Christine. Could you quantify the actual dollars related to ERP that was in the P&L in 2016? And I know you already said that that's $3 million to $5 million higher in 2017. Just curious if you could give us what the base actual dollar number is.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
For the project?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, when we think about the project, there's spend directly associated with the project and then there's kind of this ancillary spend where we have a lot of temporary help that's backfilled while our good people are working on the project. And where we've been running, and as you know, is kind of that $25 million to $30 million a year for the project itself and then maybe an extra $10 million or so in the related costs, if you will. That doesn't include depreciation, but really more about this backfill. So if you add those two together, we're high 30s for 2016 and 2017 is pretty similar and then should go down from there. And again, the reason is pretty similar is we're anticipating a fair amount of health in the stabilization and continuing to need to backfill as we go through that period.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Great. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Matthews of RAM Partners. Your line is now open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Thanks. Brandon just asked my question, but to follow up on it, does the high $30 million go to zero over time, or does it go to just a lower number?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So in terms of cash spend, I don't think it goes to zero. There's an ongoing support cost. SAP is a thing – we obviously have to support it. We'll be de-commissioning all these old systems. So I don't think it goes to zero. And on a reported basis, Jeff, we're taking on a fair amount of depreciation.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Right.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And as I look over the long term, that depreciation is probably going to run around $25 million a year. In 2016, it was already up to $15 million. But on a cash basis, certainly it changes quite a bit, and the spend on the project, both in terms of cash running through the P&L and capital, goes down pretty significantly as we look out to 2018 and beyond, but there'll always be some sort of cost associated with this. And again, we're going to take the rest of the deployments in kind of measured approaches based on where we get the greatest return in each of these sales locations.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Right. Thanks. And did you give a CapEx and depreciation estimate for 2017?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Probably not a depreciation estimate, although, as I just kind of hinted at, I think that depreciation associated with the SAP system increases $8 million to $10 million in 2017. For CapEx, what I said was $125 million to $135 million, and that's versus $141 million that we spent in 2016. Remember in our CapEx, there's three major components. There's all the new investments and that's what's been driving sizable spend the last few years and it's primarily around this SAP system. There's always some level of maintenance CapEx. And then, within our CapEx, traditionally about a third of it has been related to reagent rental and these instruments for the Diagnostic business that we are placing in hospitals and labs all over the world. With a lot of new instruments that are just coming on for Diagnostics, either we launched them late in 2016 or they're coming even more instruments in 2017, reagent rental in CapEx could go up. And so, you're not seeing as big of a drop from $141 million to this new range of $125 million to $135 million as maybe could have been, but the mix is definitely changing.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Got it. Terrific. Thanks very much.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
You're welcome.
Operator:
Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Ms. Christine Tsingos for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
You want to poll one more time.
Operator:
And I'm showing no further questions.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. That's great. Well, thank you, everyone, for your interest and spending time with us today. And I reiterate what Norman said. We really appreciate your patience and support, and hope you share our excitement for the future. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc. Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2016 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this conference may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Hutton, you may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thank you, Andrea. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our financial future performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Also on the call today are Norman Schwartz, John Goetz, Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Today, we are pleased to report net sales for the third quarter of $508.7 million, an increase of 8.3% on a reported basis and versus the same period last year sales of $470 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased an impressive 9.1% when compared to last year. During the quarter, we experienced good currency-neutral sales growth across many of our regions with North America, Asia Pacific and China, all up double digits. We also experienced good growth across many key Life Science and Diagnostic product areas, including strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables, process chromatography media, and products for diabetes monitoring and autoimmune testing. You may remember that in the third quarter of last year, our Life Science Group faced a significant slowdown, primarily related to system and productivity challenges associated with the go-live of our new SAP system in North America. At the time, we estimated that the system adoption issues negatively impacted sales by $5 million to $10 million in the third quarter of 2015. Even with this relatively easier to compare to last year and assuming the impact to be at the top of the range of $10 million, currency-neutral sales would have increased more than 6% in the third quarter of 2016. The reported gross margin for the quarter was essentially in line with expectations at 54.9% and compares to 54.2% last quarter and 56.1% in the year-ago period. This decline in margin versus last year is related to higher manufacturing and logistics costs, increased amortization of intangibles, and a shift in the product mix, which included a higher level of instruments. During the quarter, the number of diagnostic instrument placements increased by more than 20% versus the same period last year. This change in the product mix puts downward pressure on the margin in the short term, but bodes well for higher-margin consumable growth in the future. The total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to prior acquisitions was $7.2 million for the quarter and compares to $6.7 million in the year-ago period. The increase in amortization is related to the new flow cytometry technology purchased earlier this year. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were $201.5 million or 39.6% of sales compared to $187.4 million and 39.9% of sales last year. While relatively flat as a percentage of sales, the year-over-year increase in expense is the result of higher costs associated with our current deployment of SAP and the establishment of our new shared service center and European headquarters as well as higher accrued commissions and employee-related costs. In addition, we recorded approximately $5 million of expense for various legal matters. And finally, quarterly SG&A includes a total of $1.7 million for the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. Research and development expense in Q3 was 9.8% of sales or $49.9 million, which compares to 9.2% or $43.3 million last year. This increase primarily reflects higher investments in Droplet Digital products for the Life Science and Diagnostic markets as well as new products for the cell biology market. Going forward, we expect R&D expense to continue to be in the 9% to 10% of sales range. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $5.4 million compared to $7.3 million of net expense last year. This improvement is the result of decreased foreign currency exchange losses and hedging costs, as well as higher investment income when compared to last year. The effective tax rate used in the third quarter was approximately 19%. This significantly lower-than-expected quarterly rate is primarily reflective of adjustments in foreign tax credits and lapses in statutes of limitation. These discrete items, coupled with the relatively low profit before tax, combined to have a sizable impact on the effective rate for the quarter. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, we continue to expect the full-year tax rate to be in the 32% to 34% range. Net income for the third quarter was $18.4 million, which compares to $17.4 million in the year-ago period. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.62. And now for certain segment information. Life Science reported sales for the third quarter increased 18.4% to $178.1 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales grew 19.3% versus last year. If we exclude the $10 million of system-related revenue impact in the year-ago period that I mentioned earlier, Life Science sales still grew an impressive 11.8%, with all regions and product groups up double digits versus last year. Of particular note, sales of our Droplet Digital PCR products continued to do well along with our western blot and process chromatography product families. On a regional basis, sales in North America, China and the Asia Pacific region were particularly strong for Life Science during the quarter. Our Clinical Diagnostic Group posted quarterly sales of $327.1 million, an increase of 3.5% compared to last year. On a currency-neutral basis, sales grew 4.4%. Growth during the quarter was primarily fueled by good demand for our diabetes monitoring products, Bio-Plex instruments and panels, and our quality controls. On a geographic view, China, Asia Pacific and North America posted good growth versus the year-ago period. Partially offsetting this growth, our European markets continue to be negatively impacted by the challenges from lab consolidation and pricing pressure as well as seasonality, resulting in a decline for the quarter. Moving to the balance sheet as of September 30, total cash and short-term investments were $810 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $52 million compared to $77 million last quarter and $82 million in the third quarter of last year. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is substantially related to higher payments to inventory suppliers and professional fees in the current quarter, remembering that last year at this time payments were delayed in association with the North American deployment of SAP. EBITDA for the quarter was $67 million or 13% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $39.1 million, which represents an increase both sequentially and year-over-year. This increase in capital spend for the current quarter is related to costs associated with our European deployment of SAP, the increase in reagent rental instruments placed during the quarter, and investments associated with our future operating footprint in Europe. Year-to-date CapEx spend is approximately $96 million and in line with our revised annual estimate of $130 million to $140 million for the full year. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $38.5 million. Moving to our outlook for the remainder of the year, we continue to anticipate top-line growth ahead of our original guidance. At the beginning of the year, we estimated currency-neutral revenue growth of 2.5% to 3%. Through the first nine months of 2016, currency-neutral revenue growth is substantially higher at 5.2%. Looking to the fourth quarter, we anticipate continued sales growth for Diagnostics as consumable streams related to instrument placements continues to build. On the Life Science side of the business, we anticipate continued demand for many of our key product areas. However, posting quarterly growth year-over-year may prove difficult for the Tools business and will likely be down versus the fourth quarter of last year. Just as we saw a relative easier to compare in the third quarter, the corresponding tough to compare will likely be illustrated in the fourth quarter, remembering that in the fourth quarter of last year, we were able to make up substantially all of the backlog that occurred after our ERP-related slowdown. Even with this growth challenge in the fourth quarter, we anticipate that for the full year, currency-neutral sales growth will be above 4% and ahead of our original guidance. From a profitability standpoint, our original annual guidance has been for consolidated gross margins of 55% and a currency-neutral operating margin of around 8% for the full year. On our last earnings call, we stated that meeting the 8% operating margin target was not achievable on a reported basis. But when we excluded approximately $18 million of one-time expense, the currency-neutral operating margin for the first half of the year was estimated to be 7%. Through the first nine months of 2016, the reported gross margin is 55% and the reported operating margin is 5.1%. However, we estimate that the currency-neutral operating margin, excluding approximately $23 million of one-time charges, is 6.9%. As we look to the fourth quarter, our typical pattern has been for consolidated gross margin to be somewhat lower, reflecting a product mix shifting more towards instruments. That will likely be the case this year as well. With that in mind, we anticipate gross margins for the fourth quarter to be in the 54% to 54.5%, leading to an estimated full-year margin of 54.5% to 55%. From an operating profit view, we are working to make progress in the fourth quarter despite the anticipated decline in gross margin and hope to achieve a currency-neutral operating margin for the full year, excluding the highlighted one-time charges, of 7%, if not better. As has been our practice in prior years, we will share our thinking and outlook for 2017 in February during the fourth quarter earnings call. And now, we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Hi, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Perhaps, this is probably best for Shannon, but in terms of the Life Science's core revenue growth in the quarter, understanding that about three-quarters of that business is tied to global government and academic markets, which have been, let's say, less than robust for others so far this period, what do you think contributed to your outperformance in the period? Number two, to what extent, if at all, was some of the strength in the third quarter pulled forward from the fourth? And outside of Digital PCR, which is somewhat unique to Bio-Rad, can you sort of speak to demand trends or what you saw in the other parts of the business?
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. So starting backwards, I guess, we saw demand across the board for our product mix in the third quarter as all the product groups did really, really well, and that includes things like quantitative PCR, real-time PCR, cyclers, reagents. They all did really well. Western blotting and electrophoresis, which is a core technology for Bio-Rad, really, really strong. So, I would say, there's not just Droplet Digital that's doing well, but it's amongst a bunch of very successful products. You asked about the academic market. And I've observed that we're doing pretty well in the academic markets in North America and in Europe and had pretty strong performance there. And I know that's not the same as what everybody's seeing. And what was the third...?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And Brandon, your question about the revenue being pulled in from fourth quarter.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I don't think meaningfully. And what I will tell you is from the beginning of the year, we've worked with our commercial organization to really concentrate on trying to smooth out the sales cycle through the year so it's not as back end loaded, and they've worked on that all year. But I don't have any evidence that anything meaningfully got pulled in from Q4 into Q3.
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, no.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Shannon, on the Droplet Digital PCR demand, can you speak to any particular areas or specific applications as to where you're seeing the biggest uptake? And was there, by chance, a large contract that you booked in the quarter that we should view as kind of one-time in nature at all?
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
No, not for one-time. And this is a truly enabling technology and it can be applied in a lot of really interesting and exciting ways. I'd say, the leading application right now is in the liquid biopsy technology space. So, it's very, very attractive and it's doing things people really want to be doing.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
And I think part of the growth, Brandon, was good growth for process media, which historically could be a pretty lumpy business, but I think what we've seen now that we're spec-ed in to so many drugs is that they're able to continually achieve pretty good growth every quarter. While any given customer may have an annual order or a lumpy order, there's enough overlapping that it's really starting to smooth out and be consistent growth.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Christine, one for you. In terms of the full-year guidance, could you give us what you're kind of expecting in terms of the FX impact to both revenue and the operating income line?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, it's interesting, Brandon, because I think that it's been a bit of a headwind through the first nine months of the year, although it's becoming less and less of a headwind. I think the headwind in Q3 to the top line was about $4 million. And I can't predict what currencies are going to do over the next couple of months, but certainly if they stay where they are, we may experience for the first time a currency tailwind – for the first time in a long time, a currency tailwind in the fourth quarter. So, net-net, if we're currency-neutral up 5.2% year-to-date, and I'm hoping to stay above 4% – we're hoping to stay above 4% for the full year, then I think we'll see a little bit of a slowing of growth in the fourth quarter because of the tough to compare, but should help neutralize some of the headwinds that we've seen in the first nine months of the year.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. And then, maybe one for John Hertia. I noticed that you finally got the IH-1000 Blood Typing instrument approved in the U.S. Now, with that behind you, could you sort of share your go-to-market strategy for that instrument? Any feedback to speak to coming out of the AAB (sic) [AABB] Conference? And any chance you could you give us a sense of sort of what your near-term funnels look like in terms of potential placements maybe over the next year and general pricing strategy with the launch?
John Hertia - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, we were pleased to finally get approval. The good news is it came at the very beginning of the AABB show in Orlando and there was a lot of customer excitement. It's important to remember it's just the first step in a series of steps. I mean, the good news for us is that North America is the largest blood bank market and we introduced infinity last December and got FDA approval. We have FDA approval now for the IH-1000. It's a longer sales cycle. So, it probably isn't going to be until maybe the second half of next year that it begins to have a significant sales impact, because of just the complexity of the instrumentation, the need to validate it as you go through the selling process. We had a lot of excited customers at the AABB. Following the IH-1000 North American gel, we have future plans to introduce manual instrumentation, the IH-500, so that we'll have the most complete line of the immunohematology systems in the market.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. I'll hop back in the queue. Appreciate it.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Westenberg with C.L. King. Your line is open.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. So, first off, we've seen the NGS sort of bellwether (20:42) take a couple – take a big hit two weeks ago, and it sent valuations sort of across the space down. Number one – related to that, two questions. Number one, are you seeing any decrease in demand with maybe the slowdown with bellwether's (20:53) business? And number two, if the valuations across the board in some of these NGS ancillary technologies are cheaper, would that make you more likely to maybe acquire one of those in the future?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, you're talking about kind of the group that's doing the next-gen sequencing and that's where they've been getting a lot of their historic growth, and probably not a market we've played a lot in. Is that kind of where you're coming from, Dave?
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Exactly.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, historically, it hasn't been a market that we've been very involved in, which sounds like it may be a good thing right now. But certainly, as we continue to sell – and Shannon, you can comment on this, too – the Droplet Digital PCR into the biopharma market and maybe working on certain things and using that technology, they continue to expand their research.
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I guess I was trying to grasp the specific question.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
So, number one, I mean, if you have less alumina placements, I mean I know they're a little bit more on the higher end, and I know your Droplet Digital PCR is probably more around the next-seq than the high-seq, where they're having the most struggles. But I guess what I'm asking is, if you're seeing a slowdown demand in next-generation sequencers, I mean how do you anticipate it hitting the Droplet Digital PCR instrument?
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
We haven't seen a slowdown.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Okay.
Shannon Hall - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, it's just robust demand. I would say, people are still developing ideas about how to put this technology to work into interesting science.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Got you. All right. And then, just in terms of the NIH, how do you anticipate a lot of that spending will come in the fourth quarter, this particular fourth quarter? Are you seeing any changes with NIH?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
I mean, I think academically-funded research has been doing pretty well for us. And so, I'd expect to be really successful in the fourth quarter along the same lines, but it remains to be seen.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Got you. And then lastly, just a clarification, was that $5 million in legal fees that you called out?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes.
David Westenberg - C.L. King & Associates, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Matthews with RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Thanks very much. Can you hear me?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
We can hear you, Jeff. Hi.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Three things. One, you talked about Europe was weak. Is there any difference between Western economies and Eastern economies there? And then related to that, Russia seems to be getting better as an economy, and I wondered if you're seeing any signs of life there as far as tenders go.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. I know, a good question, Jeff. I think it's Western Europe that has been kind of the bigger challenge for us in recent years, where we're seeing a lot of pricing pressure from these tenders and lab consolidation, et cetera. As you point out, Eastern Europe, especially on the Diagnostics side and also on the Life Science side, saw some good growth in the third quarter, but it's Western Europe for Diagnostics where we continue to see a lab consolidation and pricing pressure.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. Then you called out Asia Pacific. Does that mean Japan is doing better? And if I remember correctly, you haven't called that out for a while.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah. No, Japan continues to be kind of a mixed market for us, and for the company was down year-over-year. But when we talk about Asia Pacific, we really are looking at kind of the Pacific Rim and from India through Southeast Asia, et cetera. China is a big enough market for us that it kind of stands on its own, and so we'll call that out. But Japan, we're seeing some tough growth – tough ability to get growth on the Diagnostic side; and for Life Science, it's been fairly flattish.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. That makes sense. And then third, on the ERP, where are you in that? What will you be doing in 2017? And from what you've already done so far, Christine, is it making your life any easier in terms of rolling out the P&L, handling working capital, all that good stuff?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
So, good questions, Jeff. So, to answer your question, in 2017, I think most important, we're hoping to go live with our third deployment, our major Western European, if you will, deployment of SAP in the springtime. And all eyes are focused on getting ready for that. And it's not just about designing the system, but really getting the organization ready to catch the ball and catch the new operating model, and a model that's going to have us operate as a single region in Europe, if you will. So, that work will continue at the beginning of 2017, and then we're hoping in the April-May timeframe to go live with the European deployment. And after that, based on prior deployments, I'm sure that it'll be all hands on deck, helping with the transition and people getting used to using the new system. It wouldn't surprise me to see a slowdown in productivity in the short term as we've seen here, just because it's new and it's different. But we're trying to take advantage of lessons learned. We've created a system where our power users that are here in North America are ready to go and sit side by side with the new users in Europe when we go live and get through the transition. Your question, has it made my life easier? I think in a lot of ways, yes, absolutely; although we transition from one thing to the next, and so we're not slowing down. But if I take a breath and really look at what we've been able to achieve in North America, we did move to a shared service center for transactional accounting, and that's helped with the efficiency. It's helped with the audit. It's helped with the analysis of the numbers. So, perhaps, more importantly, for the company, it's helping with working capital. And after, I'm hoping, we get through the transition of going live with the third deployment in Europe next year – and it will take them a good nine months, if not more, to really take advantage of the system. But I'm hoping to see those same benefits ripple through to that deployment, because once we're there, Jeff, we will have substantially all of our manufacturing around the world on SAP as well as 70% of our revenue. And from there, we really hope to move the needle.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Great. Thanks very much.
Operator:
Thank you. And we have a follow-up question from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. While we're on the ERP topic, I don't know if Christine or perhaps John Goetz, this might be better for you. I mean, we've talked a lot about the cost opportunity at length, but could you discuss whether you see ERP as potentially enabling incremental revenue opportunities as well, either through better strategic pricing visibility or perhaps discounting control from the sales force?
John Goetz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yes, certainly. This is John Goetz. I guess, the short answer is we are expecting gains in each one of those areas that you're outlining. It's really part of one of the reasons why we wanted to go with this system at single instance to begin with, which will give us this opportunity to look globally at our inventory, wherever it is, to optimize its location, and its quantities where we need it. Same thing then we intend to be able to do with our planning process to optimize how much we build, so that we're not overbuilding or under-building. And these are really huge improvements, we think, in how we operate the company, and we're expecting those to begin once we get through this third deployment. Frankly, at the moment, those opportunities that we're looking at are post E3 and all of our energy and focus is to get through E3 in one piece. And following on Christine's comment about our preparation for that, we're doing everything we possibly can to make sure that we don't have a negative impact on the business when we do flip that switch in April.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. And then one more, Christine, for you, back in terms of the third quarter. Any chance you could break down the bridge in the gross margin in the period, specifically, perhaps quantify the drag from the heavier instrument placements in the third quarter on the gross margin line?
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Well, I can, Brandon. I think the year-over-year decline in margin is about 120 basis points. Isn't that right, about 1.2%? And the majority of that, I would say, relates to the shift towards instruments. And it's not just the margin being a little lower on the instruments and placing these in reagent rental and taking on the depreciation, but also in terms of the warranty costs and the logistics costs, those correspondingly go up as well. And those are the primary buckets that created the change. So, in some way, I can relate the majority of the differential year-over-year to the increase in instrument places and the corresponding costs.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Last one for Norm. Any update in terms of how you're thinking about the current backlog or what's in the M&A pipeline, and your appetite to execute a deal over the next year through the ERP rollout, and whether you see any potential values floating around out there?
Norman D. Schwartz - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Yeah, absolutely. We've got a pretty good book of things that we're looking at evaluating. And certainly, I'm really hoping that it's something that will come to pass in the next three to six months.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Great. That's it for me. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Christine Tsingos for any closing comments.
Christine A. Tsingos - Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.:
Okay. Great. Thanks, Andrea, and thank you, everyone, for taking the time to join us today. We truly appreciate your interest. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes the program, and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.
Executives:
Ron Hutton - VP, Treasurer Christine Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Norman Schwartz - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group Shannon Hall - Executive Vice President & President, Life Science Group John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer & Executive Vice President
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners
Operator:
Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Second Quarter 2016 Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. You may begin.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you. Before we begin the call I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward looking statements made during the call today. With that I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us. Also on the call today are Norman Schwartz, John Goetz, Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Today we are pleased to report net sales for the quarter of $516.8 million, an increase of 2.1% on a reported basis versus the same period last year's sales of $506.1 million. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 2.8%. During the quarter we had good growth across many of our key life science and diagnostic markets, most notably in our Droplet Digital PCR and process media product lines, as well as sales of diagnostic product for autoimmune testing and blood typing and quality control. If we look geographically, the quarterly top line growth was led by strong sales in the US, China, Asia Pacific and the emerging markets. The reported gross margin for the second quarter was below expectations at 54.2% compared to 55.2% last year. On a sequential basis, the decline in margin is primarily reflective of changes in sales mix, as well as additional expense related to higher manufacturing costs. Additionally, the second quarter costs of goods includes $1.7 million of employee related expense associated with a planned restructuring of our European operation. For the quarter, the total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to acquisitions was $7.2 million, which compares to $7.3 million in the second quarter of last year. SG&A expense for the quarter was $205.5 million or 39.8% of sales compared to $192.8 million in the year ago period. The increase in SG&A spending is driven substantially by discrete expenses of approximately $10 million for the planned European restructuring, as well as more than $3 million associated with various legal matters. When comparing to last year, remember that the second quarter of 2015 reflected a sizable currency benefit which essentially lowered expense on a reported basis. Also included in SG&A this quarter is $1.7 million for amortization of intangibles related to acquisition. Research and development expense in Q2 was 10.1% of sales or $52.2 million compared to $46.5 million last year. The year-over-year increase in R&D spend is a reflection of additional investment in our digital PCR and cell biology product lines, as well as a one-time expense of $2.4 million for the termination of a small diagnostics development project. Going forward, we expect R&D to continue to be 9% to 10% of sales. As you can see, the second quarter operating income and margin are below expectations on a reported basis, largely driven by the discrete situational expense items taken in the quarter. The three categories are the restructuring of our European operation, the termination of a small diagnostics development project, and expense associated with various legal matters. These three items totaled nearly $18 million. Excluding these charges, operating income for the quarter would have been more than $40 million and essentially in line with expectation. It is also important to note that we are restructuring our operating model in Europe in conjunction with the upcoming system implementation to create a more efficient organization. While the second quarter reflects a total restructuring charge of $11.7 million, once completed, we hope to show a savings of $5 million to $7 million per year beginning in the second half of 2018. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in a net income position of $4.3 million compared to a net expense position of $665,000 in Q2 of last year. This improvement versus last year is largely related to an increase in dividend income typically associated with our second quarter. The effective tax rate used during the second quarter was slightly higher than expected at 33% reflecting discrete items related to increased tax reserves for foreign taxes. Given the year to date effective rate of 35.6% and excluding any discrete items that may occur, we now anticipate the full year tax rate to be in the 33% to 34% range. Reported net income for the second quarter was $18 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.61. This compares to net income of $28.4 million and $0.97 per share in Q2 of last year. Excluding the approximate $18 million of accounting expense that I mentioned earlier, we estimate that net income would have been $30.4 million and earnings per share would have been $1.03. Life Science sales for the second quarter were $180 million, an increase of 5.5% on a reported basis compared to last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales grew 6%. These quarterly results reflect strong growth of our digital PCR products both instruments and reagents, as well as our process media and cell biology products. On a geographic basis, sales to the US, China and Eastern European markets posted sizable increases for life science during the quarter. We are pleased with the strong demand for our digital PCR and cell biology family of products and will continue to invest in expanding those opportunities. During the quarter we launched several new multiplex screening kits for the detection of cancer mutation using the Droplet Digital PCR technology. And finally for the Life Science segment, we continue to make good development progress for our Illumina partnership in the single-cell analysis area. Our clinical diagnostics segment posted quarterly sales of $333.7 million compared to $332.1 million last year, an increase of 0.5%. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales for diagnostics grew 1.3%. This growth was led most notably by sales of blood typing and BioPlex 2200 products, as well as quality control products. On a geographic basis, currency neutral sales to the US, China and Eastern Europe markets were especially strong for diagnostics during the quarter. Perhaps more noteworthy is that for the first time in more than three years we recorded a small uptick for sales of diagnostic products in Europe. While we continue to experience significant competition, price pressure and lab consolidation in this important region, and one quarter certainly does not make a trend, nonetheless, it is good to see some signs of life in Europe. And finally for diagnostics, during the quarter we continued to expand our family of quality controls with the launch of Amplichek II, the first in a series of infectious disease controls for the molecular diagnostic testing market. And moving to the balance sheet as of June 30, total cash and short-term investments were $795.8 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $77.2 million, compared to a negative $7.4 million last quarter and $38.5 million in Q2 of last year. This significant increase in cash flow is substantially related to improved customer collections as well as higher investment income. EBITDA for the quarter was $70 million or just under 14% of sales. Also during the quarter we experienced excellent improvement in both day sales outstanding and day sales and inventory when compared to the first quarter. On a worldwide basis, DSO improved sequentially by nine days and is in line with historical levels. DSI significantly improved with the reduction of 26 days sequentially. Our long term target is to reduce DSI even more as we take advantage of a global ERP system and better inventory management. However, it is important to remember that in the short term inventory levels will likely grow in anticipation of our typical yearend sales trends as well as the upcoming deployment of SAP in Europe. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $31.5 million. Our full-year expectation for CapEx has been in the $140 million to 150 million range. Given the year to date spend of around $57 million, we may likely be under that estimate in the $130 million to $140 million range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $37.6 million, up both sequentially and year-over-year primarily related to increased appreciation associated with our ERP project as well as the $2.4 million write off of the diagnostics R&D project I mentioned earlier. Moving to the outlook for 2016, we see both bright spots and challenges. As a reminder, our annual goals have been for currency neutral sales growth of 2.5% to 3%, full year gross margins in the 55% range, and targeting to hold the operating margin flat at about 8% on a currency neutral basis. We have also highlighted that currency headwinds could negatively impact sales growth by $50 million to $75 million and subsequently the operating margin by 50 basis points or more. And finally, I also want to reiterate what we have been saying about the numerous challenges to maintain a flat year-over-year operating margin during what will be a year of even greater investment in systems and infrastructure. Looking to the remainder of the year, we are pleased with our year to date topline currency neutral growth of 3.3%, which is ahead of our annual guidance. And the continued strength of certain product lines and geographies bode well for growth in the second half of the year. Our year to date gross margin is 55.1% and in line with our guidance. And we are cautiously optimistic about maintaining that level in the second half of the year despite anticipation of continued pricing pressure as well as our typical pattern of the product mix shifting towards instruments in the second half of the year. Looking to the outlook for operating profit and margin for the remainder of the year, and including the significant discrete charges taken in the second quarter, it is clear that we will not be able to achieve an 8% annual operating margin on a GAAP basis. Excluding these charges, we estimate that our currency neutral margin for the first half of the year is just over 7% and evidence of the challenges to maintaining flat year-over-year margins. Still, we will continue to target and work toward achieving the 8% margin excluding of course the $18 million of second quarter discrete charges. If we are successful in achieving this operating profit goal, much of that will depend on at least maintaining if not improving the gross margin during the coming months. And now we are very happy to take your questions and I ask that you bear with us with AACC happening this week. We have management dialing in from various locations, but we will do our best to make sure that all your questions get answered.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks good afternoon. Given ACC this week, I'll just start there, I mean, pleased to see a real barnburner showing in the European diagnostics business. I mean, John is there one or two things that you would attribute the - albeit modest improvement but you positive experience in Europe? And you've taken share there has been a couple of big tenders perhaps that you picked up recently and given you are out of date on the ACC right now, if you could just sort of give us your view of the global landscape, sort of across the geographies what you're seeing in your business would be helpful?
John Hertia:
Sure. We don't actually disclose it's a growth by product line, but I would say that last year we did introduce two major platforms, both the D-100, the new diabetes instrument and the IH 500 for blood typing and Europe and both of those it had a really solid up-tick in systems. We've also seen some stabilization in the consolidation of labs, particularly in France. We don't know if that's as finalized, its shrinkage, but it seems to be lessening, and we're hoping that's a good indicator for the future.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. Christine, you mentioned you spike out the process chromatography strength in life science business in the quarter, could you sort of parse that out for us realizing is somewhat lumpy just the effect that it had on growth either dollars or percentage basis?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure. So we don't typically disclose our sales by product line, and you are right that it's a - can be a very lumpy business, but each quarter with posted pretty good double-digit growth in that arena as we have now been expect more than 40 drugs that tends to have a somewhat smoothing impact. But so far this year we have been able to post growth in that area. Shannon, I don't know if you'd like to add anything to the process media commentary?
Shannon Hall:
I guess, I would just say we're pretty consistent in our growth profile and we have the kind of portfolio that appeals to a lot of interesting medicines manufacturers at this time. So it's been good.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. One more for you, Christine, in terms of the guidance outlook for the year, it was a clear whether or not you are raising the revenue forecast for the year the 2.5% to 3% range and then secondarily could you parse out the effect of FX on the operating income dollar line in terms of dollars in the quarter?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure. So that's a good question about the top line guidance. I think we're off to a good start for the year and there's a lot of positive things for the rest of the year, but also a lot of challenges. And in terms of competition, price pressure and things like that. So I am not sure that we want to raise our range. That's been up at 2.5% to 3%, but certainly I think we're feeling better about the top end of that range. And tell me again Brandon your question about foreign exchange impact?
Brandon Couillard:
Yes, just with the effect of currency was on the operating income line in terms of dollars in the quarter?
Christine Tsingos:
For the quarter, it was just around $2 million for the quarter.
Brandon Couillard:
$2 million, negative.
Christine Tsingos:
It’s about $2 million negative. I think year-to-date the headwinds on the revenue line are around $23 million and about $5 million on the operating income line. And that's really consistent with this kind of 20% to 25% of the top-line impact being felt on the operating line.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. And then back of the diagnostics business, John, coming back to you. Any update you could share with us on the status of the IH 1000, and then just any update there?
John Hertia:
Not too much new. We have turned in all the information to the FDA that they have requested. They had a couple of small follow up questions. Those were sent in. We think we have finalized all the information we need to send to them. At this point we are just waiting.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. I will get back in the queue. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Jeffrey Matthews from RAM Partners. Your line is now open.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Hi, thanks. Can you hear me?
Christine Tsingos:
Hi, Jeff. We can hear you.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Good to hear you. How are you?
Christine Tsingos:
Good.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Three things. One, Christine, you called out three items and you said that they were discrete charges. And my question is, in the legal cost in the quarter, are those a onetime charge or will they recur because I assume the legal stuff is it going away anytime soon?.
Christine Tsingos:
I would characterize them more as one time rather than recurring. I mean, obviously, we always have certain legal things that can come and go from time to time. But these are specific to various matters.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Got it, okay. And then, the improvements in receivable and inventory, just sequentially, pretty eye-popping. Are they a result of the benefits of the ERP system in the US kicking in or is it a catch up from inefficiencies caused by the ERP implementation that have disrupted things you're not getting back to normal, or is it just the focus on cash flow?
Christine Tsingos:
Well, good question. I think a lot of it Jeff is just kind of the way the business cycle works. In terms of typical patterns could that you would see in our first quarter or second quarter. I will say that I think the first quarter of this year was probably higher for those metrics than typical, and that's related a little bit to how the operating cycle works in the first quarter, but also as you point out, to stabilization and adoption of the system. And I think as time goes on, we continue to smooth it out and are more efficient on invoicing customers which then helps us be more efficient collecting from customers and so on. But our CSIs and CSOs are kind of business cycle driven through the year depending on typical quarterly patterns. The caution about the short term is, we will typically build inventory for a sizable sales projection that comes late in the year, and then as we move into next year, our goal is to go live with the European SAP system the first early April time frame and so it wouldn't surprise me if there was a little bit of inventory build in anticipation of that transition. But certainly, our long-term goal is significant improvement in TSI.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Got it. Okay thanks and then third thing Eastern Europe is surprising - opposed Life Science the diagnostics, and I recall I think it is even at the Jefferies conference in June that it just seemed like Eastern Europe have sort of copy slow growth Western Europe bug. What happened there? What kind of customers are these? Are these country tenders, why did they come back so quickly relative to where they have been?
Christine Tsingos:
So I think, I'll take the easy part of that answer and some of it is comparison from last year which last year at this time was a fairly tough quarter for both Life Science and Diagnostics. But not to the gate what is real growth going on over there. So I guess John Hertia I am not sure if you have anything specific to add about growth in Eastern Europe? For either of the groups.
John Hertia:
From a diagnostics perspective, probably the two dominating parts of Eastern Europe are Russia and the Middle East. And we did have some pretty good sales growth in Middle East, and we were able to work through some of the registration issues that have been affecting us in Russia, and we were able to ship out a little bit more than we had anticipated for both of those were a little better than we had expected.
John Goetz:
I think what you heard from John Hertia pretty well encapsulates the uptick there that we saw and what we're calling Eastern Europe. I really don't have too much more to add than that.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Okay. That's perfect thank you very much. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] and we do have a follow up question from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard:
Thanks. Christine to buy question for you. First, you quantified I think the cost savings you expect from the restructuring which you beginning the second half of '18. Are there any near term cost benefits from the terminating the R&D project that you spiked out? And then, I got a follow up on the ERP after that.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay sure. So I think taking the second half of your question, the Road project probably doesn't have a lot of savings for us going forward. These are Road was expensed all along, and we will just turn our focus to other opportunities within the diagnostics segment. So I don't anticipate that giving too much savings in the shorter term. And tell me again on the restructuring Brandon your question.
Brandon Couillard:
You called out the restructuring or the cost savings you expect from the restructuring program I think you said $5 million to $7 million during the second half of 2018. Is there some reason that it wouldn't kick in sooner?
Christine Tsingos:
Well, primarily because to do a restructuring in Europe is a long process. There is a notification period etc. and we don't anticipate a lot of changes in the structure or employees until after we have gone live with the system. And so a lot of that will happen throughout '17 if you well, and perhaps even somewhat into '18 all that I think the majority of it is '17. Because of the long notification period, we had the appropriate accounting to take the restructuring charge at this time, but the process of doing that will occur over the next 12 to 15 months.
Brandon Couillard:
And then one more for you while we're on the topic, with respect to the ERP program, you talked about getting back to mid-teens, 50% type margin was the system is fully go live globally. Can you just help us think through the bridge, the mechanics, spots in the P&L areas of the business that get is really from where we are this year in terms of 7%, 8% GAAP operating margin to that 50% level pretty soon after it is done.
Christine Tsingos:
Sure, absolutely. We haven't really disclosed dollars or percentages specifically by category. But I can tell you that moving from 7% or 8% to 15% or even better starts at the cost of goods line and improving gross profit, and that through not only not better inventory management as I mentioned earlier, but having a smaller more appropriate footprint within our distribution channel and our savings there and some of that relates to this restructuring having regional European wide regional purchasing power it’s not global purchasing power on many of the direct and indirect materials that we buy. Those are just some of the areas where we can have savings in the gross margin. And then, as we look at SG&A, a lot of that is about people. You've heard us talk about over the last many years that in Europe we have a pretty significant opportunity to restructure and run the business more efficiently. It's a region where we've grown up centrally over time with a lot of our own locations and then we've layered on numerous acquisitions, and the result of that has been a fair amount of redundancy, especially in the back office. And so with a single system, we will be able to run the region much more efficiently, run it as a region rather than individual operations. And they are you will see the savings and certainly in employee related costs, but also hopefully we will gain efficiencies in the commercial organization by having more shared service operations for order entry and obviously in the finance organization by being able to take advantage of the single system, and again create shared sources for transactional accounting. So those are some of the broad categories where we will see the savings. In addition to that, they are spending today on very complex IT environment. We know when we started this journey we started with 39 ERP systems around the world, and as we move more towards a global SAP system and trying to get that 39 number down to hopefully something under 10, then we'll eliminate the costs associated with running all of those systems all over the world. So lots of different areas Brandon for us to achieve savings and return to the profitability levels we were at a few years ago if not even better profitability.
Brandon Couillard:
Extremely helpful, thank you. I haven't heard from Norman on the call. Just curious if what you're seeing in the M&A pipeline if there's anything interesting out there and sort of your appetite is for perhaps a larger deal as you sort of start going down the ERP effort in Europe? Thank you.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, very interesting certainly there are, if you see there seems to be kind of more interesting things in the pipeline. Certainly nothing we can talk about yet, but I am encouraged that there do seem to be a few more opportunities.
Brandon Couillard:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we do have a follow up question from Jeffrey Matthews from RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Hi. Thank you. On European restructuring Christine I'm kind of curious what triggered it now as opposed to say year end last year when you are doing your planning for the year ahead. Is it related to the ERP implementation planning, or did something come up for you just said let's do this?
Christine Tsingos:
I think it is very much related to the ERP planning, and again, the ERP will give us a foundation to run our business much more efficiently. It is as I mentioned a long process in many countries in Europe to do something like this, and you really can't started to see in. And we are meeting the continue to run the business until we are able to transition to a new operating footprint if you will. And a lot of focus frankly that we're going to have over the next several months is making sure that while we are transitioning through this period that we don't lose sight of running the day-to-day business today. But the timing is somewhat tied to an anticipation of going live next spring, but also being very cognizant of the process requirements in Europe.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Do you think it's likely that you have more charges down the road? You've been there for so long it's been such a big operation you're somebody people and facilities there, or did you try to just handle it all in one charge?
Christine Tsingos:
We did try to be very thoughtful and think about the long-term. I'm not going to say there won't be any charges for anything in the future. But we really did try and think about our future footprint and structure right down to the position, and that's related to this $11.7 million charge. If there are other infrastructure changes that we make, footprint reductions that we make, they may or may not have a charge associated with them. It’s not something I can estimate at this time. But certainly I hope we have been able to the bulk of the employee related charge.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Sure. I understand. And then on China you called it out as being especially strong. And I'm wondering either John or Norman where China stands in importance relative to other geographies, and what do you think it can be 5 to 10 years from now?
Christine Tsingos:
Norman, do you want to take that?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes I could. Certainly, we even though sometimes China seems to be kind of in fits and starts, we do think the outlook for China is very good. We continue to see and feel that there would be good growth over the long-term, both in the life science and diagnostics arenas. So I think you do start to see a little bit of drawbridge mentality in China with respect to the registration of new products in that kind of thing. They are becoming a little more kind of, I don’t know what I would call it, strident in their approvals performed goods and so you see a little bit of that, what I call the [indiscernible] business in China, but it's something that yet I think we can well navigate.
Jeffrey Matthews:
All right. Thanks very much.
Operator:
Thank you. And I am showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Christine for any further remarks.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. Great. Thanks, Dominion. Thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today, and hopefully we'll be seeing you soon. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group Shannon Hall - Executive Vice President & President, Life Science Group John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer & Executive Vice President
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories, Incorporated Q1 2016 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Ron Hutton. You may begin.
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Thank you, Karan. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn over the call to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Norman Schwartz, John Goetz, Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Net sales for the first quarter of 2016 were $471.2 million, a slight decrease versus the same period last year's sales of $472.8 million. This decline reflects the continued strong currency headwind, which represented a negative impact on sales of nearly $20 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 3.9%. During the quarter, we experienced good currency neutral growth across many of our key market and product areas, most notably in our Life Science segment, as well as certain products and markets in our Diagnostics segment. Sales growth in the quarter was somewhat tempered by continued weakness in the European diagnostic market, as well as challenges in the Eastern European region, both of which posted a decline in currency neutral sales versus last year. Offsetting these tepid regions was solid growth in the U.S., Asia Pacific and selected emerging markets. The reported gross margin for the first quarter was in line with expectations at 56% compared to 57.1% last year. The current quarter margin is the result of good product mix, partially offset by increased costs. The higher margin in the first quarter of last year reflected sizable, favorable manufacturing variances during that period, making the first quarter of this year a bit tough to compare. Amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was higher at $7.2 million, which compares to $6.8 million in the first quarter of last year. The increase in amortization relates to the newly acquired flow cytometry technology for the cell biology market. SG&A expenses for the first quarter were up slightly at $189.7 million or 40.3% of sales compared to $188.6 million or 39.9% of sales last year. When compared to last year, SG&A expense during the quarter benefited from the strong U.S. dollar. Excluding the currency benefit, SG&A spending increased approximately $7.8 million versus last year. This increase is substantially the result of higher depreciation and spending on professional services. Total amortization of intangibles recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.7 million. Research and development expense in Q1 was in line with expectations at 10.3% of sales or $48.6 million, which compares to $47.2 million or 10% of sales in the first quarter of last year. The increase in spending relates to our investments in Droplet Digital PCR technology and products for both the research and diagnostic market. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $5.5 million compared to $7.7 million of expense in Q1 of last year. This decrease in net expense versus last year is largely related to lower foreign exchange hedging costs. The effective tax rate used during the first quarter was 39%. This higher than expected rate includes discrete items related to losses in some of our smaller foreign locations, as well as increased reserves for foreign tax audit. Given the first quarter rate and excluding any discrete items that may occur during the year, we now expect the full-year effective tax rate to be at the top of our previously stated range of around 32%. Net income for the first quarter was $12.3 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.42. Looking to our segments, Life Science sales in the first quarter were an impressive $165.9 million, an increase of 6.4% on a reported basis when compared to last year and growth of nearly 10% on a currency neutral basis. This growth was driven by continued strong demand for our Droplet Digital PCR products, as well as strong sales of our process chromatography media. We are especially pleased with the continued growth in our process media business, where our products are now specified in 40 FDA approved drugs. During the quarter, we also experienced good growth of our amplification and Western blotting products. On a geographic basis, Life Science currency neutral sales were particularly strong in Western Europe, China, and the U.S. This growth was partially offset by slower sales in the Eastern European region. From a strategic standpoint, during the first quarter we made two significant announcements regarding our Life Science Group. The first is our new exclusive partnership with Illumina to develop the most comprehensive next-gen sequencing workflow for single-cell analysis. And the second is our acquisition of a new high-performance analytical flow cytometer platform. We hope to launch both of these products by the end of the year, which should bode well for continued growth in 2017. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products were $301.7 million compared to $313.6 million last year, a decrease of 3.8% on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales were up about 1% for the Diagnostics Group, highlighting a currency headwind to sales of more than $14 million. Additionally, the overall growth rate reflects a delay in some orders as well as continued competitive and pricing pressure, especially in Europe. During the quarter, we posted excellent growth in the U.S., as well as Japan and the Asia Pacific region. From a product standpoint, sales of quality control, diabetes monitoring and autoimmune testing products continued to grow nicely. Of particular note, demand for our BioPlex 2200 instrument and assays continues to gain momentum as many customers around the world adopt the system and additional panel. And finally, during the first quarter, we announced receiving CE IVD marking for the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System, so that medical practitioners in Europe can use our platform as an aid in clinical decision making. Looking to the balance sheet, as of March 31, total cash and short-term investments were $752.9 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was a negative $7.4 million compared to a plus $29 million in the year-ago period. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is the result of lower sales on a reported basis, which includes approximately $14 million of currency headwinds in receivables, higher payments to suppliers and increased employee-related payments associated with various 2015 incentive plan. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were lower than expected at $25.3 million. Our full year expectation for CapEx remains in the $140 million to $150 million range as we continue to invest in our global ERP system and related infrastructure projects. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $34.1 million. Moving to the outlook, on our last earnings call we shared our thinking for 2016. That is our goals for currency neutral sales growth of 2.5% to 3%, full year gross margins in the 55% range and targeting to hold the operating margin flat at about 8% on a currency neutral basis. We also highlighted the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against our major currencies could result in a top-line currency headwind of $50 million to $75 million, and thus perhaps flat year-over-year reported sales. And while we do have some natural hedge with our expense mix, we guided that this sizable headwind could negatively impact our projected currency neutral operating margin by 50 basis points or more for the full year. As you can see with our first quarter results, the currency impact is still fairly significant, negatively impacting sales by nearly $20 million and operating profit around $4 million. Despite the relatively low profitability posted in the first quarter, we are maintaining our guidance for the base business given at the beginning of the year. However, I want to reiterate what we have been saying about the numerous challenges to maintaining flat year-over-year operating margins during what will be a year of even greater investment in systems and infrastructure. As we move through 2016, we will carefully monitor the top-line growth and ongoing investments with a goal of meeting our margin targets. And one final note regarding the outlook. With the acquisition of the new flow cytometer, we expect that amortization expense will increase approximately $700,000 per quarter. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
Thank you. And our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Brandon?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Hey. Thanks. Good afternoon. Yeah. Can you hear me?
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Yes.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine, business, could you break out the effect of, as you saw in growth in Eastern Europe on just the overall segment. If you back out those two regions, which have been weak for sometime though, sort of what does the base business look like in terms of growth?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So, you're breaking up a little. Backing out, I think, I heard Eastern Europe and something else.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. Just if we back out those two weak markets, how would growth look for this segment sort of excluding those two regions?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
For Diagnostics?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yes.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So, Eastern Europe is smaller than some of the other segments. And obviously on a currency neutral basis, backing it out would increase their growth rate. But Western Europe is probably one of the largest regions, if not and I guess, the U.S. is probably larger now than Europe with what's been going on in Europe. So, I don't have a specific growth rate. But I think that it'd be safe that it would be a couple of points.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
I'm not sure if John Hertia's there. But I mean, if you had a point to one market or product vertical where you think you're gaining some share, which it certainly seems like you might be at least in the U.S. market, what are the kind of top two or three sort of contributors which you think are accounting for the strength?
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Brandon, if I get this right, you are asking for what markets might be strengthening in the U.S. market?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Gaining share, yeah.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. That's right. I'm sorry, if I'm not coming through. Sorry.
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
We were pretty strong across almost all segments in the U.S. line. We did introduce, I think we'd reported in the last conference call we did get FDA approval for a new diabetes instrument, the D-100 and got approval for a new blood typing instrument, the infinity and those are both contributing. And as Christine mentioned, BioPlex is doing very well around the world and that certainly is contributing to the U.S. too, especially in the areas of autoimmune, mumps testing and in the expansion of HIV and Vitamin D.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. While I have you, any update you can share with us on the status of the new Bio project?
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
The new Bio project continues, continue to make progress and we're anticipating something in the near future.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
All right.
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Obviously, it's still in development.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. Last one, Christine. Do you have a revised FX outlook in terms of the revenue impact for the year you can share with us?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Well, I mean, it all depends on where the currencies go from here. So I think we will stick with the originally anticipated – that kind of $50 million to $75 million. We had $20 million of it on the top line in the first quarter. I still think that as we get to the second half of the year then we don't have the same headwinds, but a lot of that Brandon is just going to depend on what happens to the rate.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Got you. Okay. Thanks. I will hop back. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Leerink Partners. Your line is open.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Hi, this is actually Kevin Chen in for Dan today. So my first question is regarding the Life Sciences. Were there any one-time items or large orders in the quarter and how should we think about the order rate for that business?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
I think the Life Science growth, it's a combination of really good ongoing strength in some of the base business and the Droplet Digital PCR technology. We did have a good quarter for the process media, which can be a lumpy business as customers will buy in bulk. And so, in any given quarter there could be $3 million to $5 million of an extra order in there, but even that business is starting to smooth out a little now that we have such a broad reach of customers.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. Thanks. And then my follow up would be on China recently expanded their Life Science spending. I'm just curious what you're hearing on the ground over there and do you perhaps see any incremental tailwinds going forward?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
China Life Science spending trends continues to be pretty robust. I guess that's the way, I would describe it.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Okay. That's good to know. And then, and just lastly, I know you mentioned tax rate was so far in the high-end of the range. But how would it trend throughout the year? Was it – can you just help us understand that?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Well, I think you know, we guided to 30% to 32%, and now we've just kind of banked a 39% in terms of the effective tax rate. Obviously, as the year moves on, some of the discrete items get spread on an annualized basis. So I think for a base rate of being in that 30% to 32% is where we'll probably trend for the year because of the Q1 39%, you know I think the math is going to point more to that, that higher end at 32%, with the caveat of, you know every quarter there could be discrete items that move the rate either up or down.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Jeffrey Matthews with RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Thanks. Hi, everybody.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Hey, Jeff.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Christine, you mentioned increase in professional fees as part of the SG&A increase on a currency neutral basis. Does that relate to the ERP spending, and is that going to increase as you go into your next phase?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Some of it relates to ERP. Some relates to legal costs. But I think for the ERP, we've talked about spending operating expenses in that $30 million, low $30 million number and I think that's probably still the right number to use. Remember, a lot of the professional fees with the project are actually capitalized labor, but then there is a lot of kind of side projects, if you will, other systems that are impacted by this that require some professional services as well.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. Thanks. And then, the dollar has been pretty weak lately. And the last time you came out with your here is what the dollar is going do to us this year, I think that was pretty much close to the peak in the dollar. Are you just not, don't want to change your outlook at this point? You want to see where things go or has there been no movement in the currencies that are really particular to Bio-Rad?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Well, so no, Jeff, it's a good point and we have seen, since December 31, some weakening in the dollar even against some of our major currencies. But we also have exposure to the Russian ruble and Brazil and some currencies that are still a bit volatile. So, it's kind of a mixed bag for us. Obviously, if we keep trending this way, then the currency headwinds for the full year should come in lower than what we anticipated at the beginning of the year.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. And then on the Illumina announcement, how did that come about and when might there be something in the marketplace related to that?
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
So, I guess, it came about, this whole area of single cell analysis is something that's of more and more interest to customers and Illumina was looking for a kind of a complete solution for the customers, and I guess they probably approached us. I don't know who made the first move, but got together and looked at what we could do together with that. And so that's, I guess that's the way it basically came about. The two groups are working pretty closely together and anticipate something coming out around the end of the year.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay, great. And then a final one. I'm just curious on the U.S. It seems like we've had some loosening up in the NIH budget or increases in it and you seem more optimistic in the U.S., is just things generally better here now than they have been?
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Yes. There's certainly, I mean the word sequestration has seemed to have dropped out of everybody's vocabulary and I think that's certainly a big help. In addition to that, I think there is certainly an increased focus. The government has kind of I would say gotten back on track with the importance and value of this basic science and investing in science in the NIH. And so, I think that's a good trend.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Great. Thanks very much.
Operator:
Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back to Christine Tsingos for any further remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So, can you just poll one more time?
Operator:
Yes. And I'm still showing no further questions.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Okay.
Operator:
Oh, we do have one more question from Jeffrey Matthews from RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
What the heck.
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Okay.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Haven't asked the acquisition question in a while. Just wondering what the landscape looks like these days. Money got pretty tight in the first quarter and it seemed to be a good time to be a Bio-Rad seller. I don't know if that's filtered into any of the companies you are looking at. But, are you optimistic about adding anything to the portfolio this year?
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Yeah. We are optimistic. As you know, it's always hard to say when something might actually happen or what competition for it might be, but we continue to kind of work along that path and I'm certainly hoping that we can do something this year.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Thanks very much. Good luck.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question comes from Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Question for Shannon on the process chromatography business. Christine called out 40 FDA approved products in which you are specified. Is that a substantially higher number than where you are, let's say 12 months ago?
Shannon Hall - Executive Vice President & President, Life Science Group:
Not substantially.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
it's certainly higher.
Shannon Hall - Executive Vice President & President, Life Science Group:
Yeah.
John Hertia - Executive Vice President & President, Clinical Diagnostics Group:
But I think the point is that it continues to grow, and I think the other point is being spec'd in those drugs is a good indicator of a repeatable or continuous business.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. Then one question for John Goetz. I would love to get your views, sort of as we look out over the next, let's call it, 18 months. What does the time line look like for the ERP deployment in Europe? Kind of when do you expect to turn the first – go-live in the first country and then kind of walk us all the way through the end of next year?
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer & Executive Vice President:
Okay. We are currently in the, I would say the configuration phase of the project. Right now, our teams are working on it as we speak in Europe. A lot of that is cleaning up data of course, but it's the localization of the system that we've put in place here in the U.S., but having it more applicable to what we're doing in Europe. We see a go-live timeframe right at the start of second quarter next year. That's our -- it's kind of our hard target and assuming everything goes well, we'll flip the switch at that time. And of course when you do that, you immediately jump on that system with a lot of hyper care as you pull yourself through the mess of a go live. So then we'll see probably another couple of quarters, maybe even three quarters of stabilization over there. It's a pretty complicated roll out and then I think we're probably going to take subsequent roll outs in more bite size pieces as we maybe complete the rest of our European deployment. There is some countries that are excluded in this scope, and then we'll move onto Asia in the subsequent quarters and kind of go from there. But, by the time we finish this deployment that we plan for Europe, which is a go-live in that second quarter timeframe next year, we'll have captured the lion share of our manufacturing plants and top-line sales. So, that's – we're really encouraged by that.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Okay. Great. Well, thank you as always for your interest in Bio-Rad and taking the time to join us today. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group Shannon Hall - Executive VP & President-Life Science Group
Analysts:
Dan L. Leonard - Leerink Partners LLC Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories, Incorporated Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants' are in listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. And instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I'd now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Ron Hutton, Treasurer. Please go ahead.
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Thank you. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn over the call to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2015 as well as provide some insight into our thinking for 2016. With me today are, Norman Schwartz; John Goetz; Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Let's start with a review of the quarterly results. We are pleased to report net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 of $570.6 million, a decrease of 4.6% when compared to the year ago period sales of $598.2 million. On a currency neutral basis however, quarterly sales actually grew 2.8%. This dramatic difference represents a currency headwind of more than $44 million on the top line. During the quarter, we experienced good currency neutral sales growth across many of our product lines, most notably in our Life Science group including continued strong sales of our Droplet Digital PCR products, process media, and our Cell Biology product line. Our Diagnostics Group also posted good growth for the quarter with strong sales of our diabetes monitoring, autoimmune and blood typing products as well as quality control. The consolidated gross margin for the quarter was in-line with expectation at 54.1% and compares to last year's gross margins of 53.1%. The improvement in gross margin is largely the result of approximately $8.4 million of one-time cost in the fourth quarter of last year associated with the discontinuation of a small product line. In addition, during this fourth quarter, we've recorded a total of approximately $6.6 million in cost of goods sold for the non-cash purchase accounting expenses related to acquisition. This compares to $7 million of amortization expense in the year ago period. SG&A expense for the fourth quarter was $193.1 million or 33.9% of sales compared to $207.5 million, or 34.7% of sales last year. When compared to last year, the current quarter SG&A includes benefit related to currency translations which effectively lowered SG&A on a reported basis by about $11 million. In addition, the current quarter includes a contingent consideration benefit of $4.9 million. And finally in SG&A, the amortization of intangibles related to prior acquisitions in the fourth quarter was approximately $1.6 million, down slightly from the year ago period. Research and development expense in Q4 was 9.8% of sales, or $55.9 million versus $59.3 million last year. This decrease in R&D spending from last year is primarily related to the completion of key projects as well as expense taken in 2014 for the discontinuation of a product line. With the strong sales growth, improved gross margin and lower operating spend, the reported operating margin for the fourth quarter was better than expected at 10.4% and compares to 8.5% in the fourth quarter of last year. However, when thinking about last year, we remember that the fourth quarter of 2014 included one-time expenses related to the shutdown of certain product lines as well as contingent consideration charges. Interest and other for the quarter was a net expense of approximately $5.3 million compared to $4.8 million last year. The effective tax rate used in the fourth quarter was significantly lower than expected at 8.7%, a result of the reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit for 2015, a reduction in certain tax reserves and a tax benefit from excess foreign tax credits related to a dividend from one of our foreign subsidiaries. Reported net income for the fourth quarter was $49.5 million, or $1.68 per share on a fully diluted basis, compared to $39 million last year or $1.34 per share. Excluding the discrete tax items I just mentioned, we estimate that earnings per share would have been $1.31. And now for certain segment information. Our Life Science Group reported strong sales for the fourth quarter of $218.1 million. This represents a decline of 2.5% versus last year. However on a currency neutral basis, sales increased 3.4% for the quarter. As I mentioned earlier, these quarterly results reflect continued strong sales of our Digital PCR systems and consumables as well as process media and our family of cell biology and western blotting products. On a geographic basis, currency neutral sales grew across many regions of Life Science, most notably North America, China and Europe. You may recall that during the third quarter, Life Science sales were negatively impacted by system and productivity challenges associated with the go live of our second deployment of SAP. And on the last earnings call, we signaled some caution regarding the group's ability to catch up the backlog especially in the face of sizeable Q4 demand. Today we are pleased to report that the system-related challenges have been substantially remediated. Our Clinical Diagnostics Group also achieved good sales for the quarter of $348.6 million, compared to $370.3 million last year, a decrease of 5.9% on a reported basis but growth of 2.5% currency neutral. These sales were led by continued strong performance in the quality control and diabetes product line as well as solid growth for blood typing and BioPlex 2200 revenue. On a geographic view, diagnostic currency neutral sales for the quarter increased most notably in China, North America and the emerging markets, while sales in Europe continued to decline. Looking at the full year financial results, we are pleased to report annual revenues of $2.019 billion. While this represents a decrease of 7.2% versus the last year on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, sales for the year grew 1.6%. This dramatic swing reflects a currency headwind to sales of more than $190 million for the full year. Our Life Science Group posted annual sales of $695 million, a decline of 4.6% versus 2014 and growth of 2.5% currency neutral with the swing representing $52 million of currency headwind. This growth was fueled by continued strong sales of our Digital PCR instruments and consumable. We also saw good annual growth in our western imagers and reagent, cell biology and process media products. From a geographic view, sales in North America, Europe and China were the biggest contributors to year-over-year growth for the Life Science Group. For the year, clinical diagnostic sales were $1.310 million, a decline of 8.5% on a reported basis, but growth 1.1% on a currency neutral basis, a currency headwind of $138 million for the full year. This growth was fueled by continued momentum in quality controls, autoimmune and diabetes monitoring products. On a geographic view, sales of North America, China and Latin America were the biggest contributors to year-over-year currency neutral growth for the Diagnostics Group. Total company gross margins for the full year of 2015 were in line with guidance at 55.5% and compares to 54.2% in 2014. The increase in margin versus last year is primarily the results of a more favorable product mix as well as the one-time charges for the discontinuation of small product lines and consolidation of small manufacturing operations during 2014. Also, important to note, total amortization of intangibles and purchase accounting recorded in cost of goods sold for 2015 was $27.4 million. SG&A expense as a percent of sales was 37.7% for the year, or $762 million and compares to $808 million in 2014. The decrease in spend year-over-year relates to benefit associated with the stronger dollar as well as the reduction in overall contingent consideration and the absence of the FCPA related settlement accrual taken during 2014. And finally in SG&A, total expense for acquisition related amortization was $7.4 million for the full year. Research and development expense in 2015 was $193 million or 9.6% of sales and compares to $220 million, or 10.1% of sales last year. This decrease is a result of the discontinuation of an underperforming product line in 2014 as well as the wind down of spending for new instruments for blood typing and diabetes monitoring that were launched earlier in 2015. Looking to 2016, R&D expenses as a percentage of sales will likely stay at that 9% to 10% level, as we move a number of investments through the product development pipeline. Net income for the full year was $113 million versus last year's net income of $88.8 million. Fully diluted earnings per share for the year were $3.85. The effective tax rate for the full year 2015 was 22.5% and lower than our 2014 full year tax rate of 32.5% due to the previously mentioned discrete items affecting the fourth quarter as well as the mix of sales in lower tax jurisdiction. For 2016, we expect the effective tax rate excluding any discrete items that may occur to be in the 30% to 32% range. For 2015, Bio-Rad's balance sheet remains strong. As of December 31, total cash and short-term investments were $790 million compared to $698 million at the end of last year. Net cash generated from operations during the fourth quarter was $36 million and $186.2 million for the full year 2015. This compares to net cash generated from operations in 2014 of $273 million. The year-over-year decrease in cash flow is substantially related to the lower sales on a reported basis and includes approximately $31 million of currency headwinds and receivables. EBITDA for 2015 remained strong at nearly $300 million, which includes $94 million of EBITDA generated in the fourth quarter. The EBITDA margin improved to 14.8% of sales and compares to 14% in 2014. Net capital expenditures were $28 million for the quarter and $112 million for the full year, slightly below the $120 million to $130 million range estimated on our last call. Looking to 2016, we estimate that CapEx spending will increase to the $140 million to $150 million range as we continue to invest in our global ERP and other systems as well as some foundational projects in Europe. Finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $33.9 million and $131.8 million for the full year. Looking to 2016, we see several opportunities for growth on the topline. The momentum we are seeing in many of our Life Science product lines is encouraging for future growth. In addition, funding for research around the world seems to be improving. As such, we are targeting an increase in the Life Science growth to be in the 4% to 5% range. On the Diagnostics side of the business, we also see opportunities for currency neutral growth in many of our core businesses, including an increase in consumable sales associated with our new instruments for the blood typing and diabetes monitoring markets. Offsetting much of this expected growth, we continue to face some sizable challenges in the diagnostic market, including a continued decline in Europe, price pressure in government tenders and lab consolidation in selected markets around the world. As such, we are targeting the diagnostic currency neutral growth rate to be similar to the 2015 rate of 1% to 1.5%. Overall, the combined result of the opportunities and challenges across both businesses, leads us to the expectation of sales growth in 2016 of around 2.5% to 3% on a currency neutral basis for the full year. With regard to margin, you can see that we made solid currency neutral improvement to our profitability in 2015, even in light of another year of significant spending for new technologies and systems. During 2015, we improved the gross margin by more than 100 basis points and are targeting to maintain, if not slightly improve those levels in 2016. In thinking about the operating margin for 2016, we continue to see sizable investment in the pipeline as we move our global ERP project to Europe, our most complex region from an operating standpoint. During the year, we will not only be investing in the ERP design and implementation, we will also be investing in new infrastructure and organizational improvement to ready the region for a more efficient footprint and transaction flow post-SAP. All of these projects require a significant increase in spending. Having said that, we do not want to take away the gains made during 2015 and we will work hard to maintain a currency neutral operating margin around 8% to 8.5% for the full year. On a reported basis, the strong U.S. dollar will continue to have a negative impact on our reported results for 2016 at least for the first half of the year. As many of you know Bio-Rad is a very global company in terms of both sales and operation and currency can have a significant impact on our reported result. More than 65% of our sales are non-U.S. dollar and we estimate that around 35% or 40% of our expenses are non-U.S. dollar. As such with today's strong dollar environment, currency can have a significant negative impact to our financial outlook. As I mentioned during the 2015 results comments, changes in foreign currency negatively impacted our revenue by more than $190 million for the year. And as I mentioned, our outlook for currency neutral sales growth in 2016 is 2.5% to 3%. However, if we use exchange rates as of December 31, currency could actually result in a revenue headwind of $50 million to $75 million and perhaps flat year-over-year reported sales. And while we do have some natural hedge with the non-dollar expenses this currency headwind could impact our expected operating margin by 50 basis points or more and essentially mask the great progress that we made with operating profit. In closing, let me just say that despite a relatively flat outlook for 2016 profitability, we will remain highly committed to focusing on ways to create greater leverage in our operating expenses, while at the same time continuing our investments in new technologies and systems. It is through these new products and technologies and a more efficient footprint that we can improve our gross profit, and it is through changes in our organizational structure and implementing new global IT systems that we can reduce our overall operating cost, all of which will ultimately contribute to a significant improvement in our operating margin in the years to come. And now I'll turn things over to Norman for a few comments.
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you, Christine. So, I think it's fair to say, while currency had an overwhelming effect on the reported results, I mean, I think you can see from Christine's comments that we did make progress on many fronts, kind of the underlying currency neutral sales growth did benefit from a wave of new products that were not only introduced in late 2014, but also supplemented by some of the notable introductions and regulatory clearances that we had from 2015, and certainly we expect continued travel from those. I think that internally much of our attention was focused on our ERP project, deployment two in this last year and also completing the restructuring of our operations. With the implementation of these global systems, we saw the opportunity to move to what we think of as a more functional structure which we spent much of 2015 implementing. I would say the two most notable or principle changes we made were to globalize our commercial or the selling operation and to globalize our supply chain. We spent much of the year establishing the structure filling the positions created by this change. I think we were fortunate in this regard to have some good bench strength and feel the majority of these positions from within. We do see much potential from this organization. The product groups can now focus their attention to our markets and ensure we continue to develop the innovative quality products that we are known for. And the globalization of our sales and service organization should allow us to think more globally. And really to better serve our increasing number of global customers. And finally, our new supply chain organization which encompasses procurement, manufacturing and distribution. I think for us functionalizing these areas and globalizing these areas gives us many opportunities to drive both efficiency and effectiveness for the company. Obviously, it will take some time to see the results. But, we do expect them to be measurable. I do feel we have now largely completed this transition and it appears that everyone's excited about what we can accomplish for the company going forward. So with that, I guess we will open it up to questions.
Operator:
Thank you ladies and gentlemen. Our first question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with Leerink. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Dan L. Leonard - Leerink Partners LLC:
Thank you. First of all, on the ERP, is there any way to think about – if you had any boost in the fourth quarter from resolving some backlog that was left over from the third quarter issues? Or do you consider the fourth quarter organic sales growth to be a run rate number?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Dan, that's a really great question. And you may remember on the third quarter call, we were kind of estimating that disruption could have been $5 million to $10 million range and it's really hard to pinpoint that number. But I think we made up at least 90% of whatever that number was, pick something in the middle, $7 million, $8 million. I think that was part of the growth in Q4, but it's difficult to pinpoint exactly how much is make up from Q3 and how much is Q4. Without a doubt, we knew going into Q4 where the orders were coming in and the demand wave that was in front of us. So I don't want to take away from the organic nature of the fourth quarter either.
Dan L. Leonard - Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. And I know you said China grew across both Diagnostics and Life Sciences, can you quantify the growth rate at least ballpark. Was it mid-single digits? Was it high single digits? And what's your expectation for China in 2016?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Sure, so I'll talk a little bit about 2015 and then maybe John and Shannon want to chime in on 2016, and you know, Dan we don't talk about sales specifically per region or growth rate per region, what I can tell you is that Diagnostics continues to grow at a really nice double-digit rate in China. Life Science I think because of a lot of what happened in the beginning of the year, some slowing has been system related. Much of that impacted China. They ended up with a growth rate in China that's in the single digits for the year, which was probably lower than what we would have expected at the beginning of the year. But both exited 2015 with pretty decent momentum in China. I don't know if there's anything – 2016 China?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
For Diagnostics, this is John Hertia. China continues to represent good opportunities in immunology and quality control and diabetes. There's still a little bit of a challenge with respect to registration they have, the China FDA. And that's a little bit of a wild card going into 2016. So we're probably a little conservative on how that could impact us going into the next year.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah, good point.
Dan L. Leonard - Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. And then my final question I guess for you John. How are you contemplating the potential introduction of the IH 1000 in the U.S.? How is that being contemplated in the guidance for 2016? Could that present potential upside to guidance or is that the kind of launch that would take a little bit longer to fully show-up in numbers?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
So we were targeting three FDA approvals for 2015. We did get two of them in. We got T100 cleared in December and the infinity blood typing system also cleared in December. The FDA did ask for some additional data, the North American gel and the IH 1000, we're in the process of getting that back to them. And we'll just have to wait for some additional guidance from them. From the time that we get clearance to introduction isn't a very long runway.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
And I think in terms of the outlook in the plan, Dan, we don't have the clearance yet, I think we remain very optimistic that we will receive it. But at the time as we've said all along coming into the North American market with the gel technology while quite compelling for the customers. It is a long sales cycle and not something that happens overnight. So I think we've been very conservative in our expectations all along as to how quickly we would ramp up and take share in the U.S. market, and I think that's true for the 2016 plan as well.
Dan L. Leonard - Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. . Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Hi, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine, did you disclose the impact on the operating profit dollar line from currency in the fourth quarter?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
I don't think I said what the...
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
But do you have it on – at your fingertips? Or do you have it at your fingertips by chance?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
If I can get this stack of papers. Yeah, I think the operating margin was – well, that's year-to-date. Wait a minute, you want the quarter?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. Just the fourth quarter number.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. I think the operating margin was closer to 11% for the quarter instead of the 10.5% on a currency neutral basis.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. So maybe about – okay, all right. A question on the Propel flow cytometer acquisition. Could you speak to the financial implications of that? Is that dilutive near-term and sort of what do you see is the competitive differentiation of that system? And do you think there is an opportunity to bundle it with the (29:19) you picked up back in 2012?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So in terms of – in terms of impact on operating expense, going into 2016 is all included within our outlook. In terms of market opportunity, you are talking about the new flow cytometer?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Yeah. The press release you put out I think last week or two weeks ago?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So I think Shannon's probably a better person to speak about the opportunity and how it fits in our product family.
Shannon Hall - Executive VP & President-Life Science Group:
So, we've been pursuing the cell biology market as an area for growth for Bio-Rad, it fits really closely with our overall approach to doing protein and DNA and RNA analysis at the bench. Our cell biology portfolio was oriented towards accessing a broader user base which is part of what S3 is about and the cytometer builds on that by offering a user centric cytometer that offers features really aimed at creating an accessible cytometer across multiple levels of users and multiple levels of analytical capabilities.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine, any chance you can quantify the near-term drag on the OP line from that?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
It's about $10 million in the fourth quarter.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
All right. I think that's all I got. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. And I am showing no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to Christine for any closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Okay, well thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today. We appreciate your interest and of course, we are available for any follow-up questions that you may have. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer Shannon Hall - Executive VP & President-Life Science Group Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group Dan L. Leonard - Analyst, Leerink Partners LLC
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Bryan Langsam Engler - Great Lakes Advisors LLC Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP Scott Wilkin - UBS Global Asset Management
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories, Incorporated Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants' lines are in a listen-only mode to reduce background noise, but later we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. Instructions will follow at that time. I would now like to introduce your first speaker for today, Ron Hutton. You have the floor, sir.
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Thank you, Andrew. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our financial future performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn over the call to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Net sales for the third quarter of 2015 were $470 million, a decrease of 11.4% on a reported basis and versus the same period last year sales of $530.6 million. The currency headwind to sales was more than $49 million for the quarter. On a currency neutral basis, sales decreased 2.2% when compared to last year. You may remember that on the second quarter earnings call we cautioned that the continued challenges in Europe coupled with seasonality could make for a tough quarter, especially for our Diagnostics group, and that certainly was the case. In addition, our Life Science group also faced challenges, primarily related to a slowing of growth in various emerging markets as well as system and productivity challenges associated with the go-live of our new ERP. Even with these challenges, during the quarter we did experience good currency-neutral sales growth across some our key Life Science and Diagnostic product lines, including sales of our Digital PCR consumables and our western blotting workflow products as well as our quality controls product line. The reported gross margin for the quarter was slightly better than expected at 56.1% and compares to 54.4% in the year-ago period. This improvement in margin versus last year is related to a more favorable product mix, lower cost as a result of the manufacturing operations and product lines that were shut down during 2014 and a decrease in amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. The total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to prior acquisitions was $6.7 million for the quarter, which compares to $8.1 million in the year-ago period. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were $187.4 million or 39.9% of sales compared to $202.6 million and 38.2% of sales last year. The year-over-year decrease in expense relates to foreign currency translation as well as one-time items contained in the third quarter of 2014, including an accrual of $9.6 million in connection with the final settlement of the FCPA matter and a $3 million benefit related to the valuation of the purchase consideration for prior acquisitions. And finally, quarterly SG&A includes a total of $1.9 million for the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. Research and development expense in Q3 was 9.2% of sales, or $43.3 million, down both sequentially and versus last year. This comparison reflects a decline in spending associated with the completion of key projects as well as some reduction related to currency translation. Going forward, we expect R&D expense to continue to be in the 9% to 10% of sales range. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $7.3 million compared to $10.8 million last year. This improvement is partially the result of foreign currency exchange losses, which were substantially lower this year versus last year. And as a reminder, the third quarter of last year included an additional $2.4 million of accrued interest associated with the FCPA matter. The effective tax rate used for the third quarter was approximately 32% and in line with our guidance. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, we continue to expect the full year tax rate to be in the 31% to 33% range. This range excludes any impact from the potential reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit which, once reinstated, will have a significant positive impact on the rate. Net income for the third quarter was $17.4 million, which compares to $11.5 million in the year-ago period. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.59. Life Science reported sales for the third quarter decreased 13% to $150.4 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales declined 5.9% versus last year. Sales of our Droplet Digital PCR products continue to do well along with our V3 Western Workflow product family. However, revenue growth for the Life Science group overall during the quarter was significantly impacted by a slowdown in our supply chain activity in the wake of the go-live of our second deployment of SAP. The temporary disruption in productivity while adapting to new systems and processes is not atypical, although the impact to the third quarter revenue was sizeable, especially in North America. We believe that this negatively impacted Life Science sales in the quarter by $5 million to $10 million. The good news is that bookings remained strong during the third quarter and much of the disrupted revenue was likely a matter of timing and not a change in demand. Our Clinical Diagnostic group posted quarterly sales of $316.2 million, a decrease of 10.9% compared to last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales were down slightly about 0.5%. Growth during the quarter was primarily fueled by good demand in our quality control products as well as our Bio-Plex business. On a geographic view, North America posted good growth with nearly every product line up versus the year-ago period. Looking outside the U.S., our European markets continue to be negatively impacted by the challenges from lab consolidation and pricing pressure. And as I mentioned earlier, seasonality was also a factor in our slower growth. And now for a quick review of the balance sheet. As of September 30, total cash and short-term investments were $786 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $82 million compared to $38 million last quarter and $91 million in the third quarter of last year. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is substantially related to the decrease in reported sales and includes approximately $42 million of currency headwinds in receivables. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $65 million, or 14% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $24.7 million, which represents a decrease both sequentially and year-over-year. The decrease in spend for the current quarter is related to the timing of payments and will likely be paid before year end. However, given the year-to-date run rate, our full-year expectation for CapEx is now slightly lower, in the $120 million to $130 million range. Depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $33.6 million. Moving to our outlook for the remainder of the year, we continue to anticipate strong currency headwinds to the top line. Year-to-date, that headwind has been more than $146 million. On a currency neutral basis, year-to-date sales growth is 1.2% and below our original annual guidance of 3%. Given the third quarter results and the continuing market challenges in Europe and coupled with our own systems-related issues in our Life Science group, we now expect full-year currency neutral sales growth in the 1% to 1.5% range for the full year. As I mentioned earlier, the slowdown in our supply chain processes is likely a matter of timing and not lost sales, but it may take us into early next year to fully regain the tempo in recognized revenue. And finally, let's not forget that sales in the fourth quarter of last year were substantial, which could make for a tougher comparison. From a profitability standpoint, our guidance has been for consolidated gross margins of 55% and an operating margin of 9% on a currency-neutral basis. While year-to-date results are running at or slightly above our margin guidance, remember that historically our margins tend to drift down in the fourth quarter as product mix shifts more towards instrument sales and spending for projects becomes fully ramped. As has been our practice in prior years, we will share our thinking and outlook for 2016 in February during the fourth quarter earnings call. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
And our first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. I guess maybe this is a better question for John. Could you elucidate some of the issues that occurred with the ERP rollout in the quarter? If I think back to the second quarter call in August, which was probably a month and a half after the initial rollout, it didn't sound like there were any disruptions or issues that had occurred at that time. What changed really between now and then?
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer:
Yeah, this is John Goetz. I guess what we've found is that the process timing, being able to take an order and get a product shipped, has taken a lot longer than we really realized at the time of the call. And really what that's done is it's moving shipments and sales recognition out beyond probably I think somewhere around two weeks. So that's what we're looking at there. In addition I think the adoption of the system in our manufacturing plants has gone a little rockier than we've experienced during the first rollout. During the first rollout, we really had only one manufacturing plant come online. With this one, this brought up all of the rest of our Diagnostic manufacturing as well as all of our Life Science manufacturing here in the United States, so this has added quite a bit of complexity. So the amount of time and effort that we've had to be able to cover the questions and requests to respond to some of the concerns of our users has just taken us a little bit longer to get a handle on.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Which outstanding issues, if any, are still to be resolved? And, Christine, why would it necessarily take several quarters for the revenue trend to normalize?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Sure. So I think a lot of this, Brandon, is just people getting used to how to use a brand new system. And we know from the first deployment that it takes six months to nine months for people to really get good at doing their jobs again with new processes, new screens, et cetera. I think what we're facing here different in deployment two than deployment one, as John said, it really brings in our entire Life Science group, and much of their manufacturing is here and they ship to many places around the world, so it can ripple to a lot of locations around the world. And people need to, as they get used to the processes, then things start flowing more quickly. So part of the caution on how long it'll take is a little bit based on what we experienced with the first one, but also knowing that the complexity of this second deployment and the complexity of our Life Science business is even that much greater and could take more time to normalize. And part of it, frankly, is that demand has been quite strong and so there was a lot hitting on the system at the same time people were getting used to these new processes.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. And then in Life Science business, Christine, could you give us a sense of how the process chromatography media performed in the period? I believe you lapped a pretty tough comp there. Was curious if that was an incremental headwind for the segment as well?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Sure. And Shannon Hall, our President of Life Science, is here. So I'm going to let her talk about that as well in terms of the process media, a tough compare year-over-year.
Shannon Hall - Executive VP & President-Life Science Group:
Yeah, that period is a tough-to-compare period. But...
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. It's a lumpy business.
Shannon Hall - Executive VP & President-Life Science Group:
Yeah, very much so. It's been a solid year so far. We continue to see great demand in that area, so I'd say it'd be easier to look at on a full-year basis.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. And then last one finally, Christine or maybe this is a better one for Ron, I've been getting quite a number of questions from investors recently about your exact exposure to Sartorius. And I believe in your last Q for the first time you called out an unrealized gain of about $400 million which you attributed to the preferreds. Was curious if you could quantify your exact exposure in terms of the preferred stock, either in number of shares or any round numbers?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So, historically we really haven't disclosed exactly what we own in preferred shares. We do talk about what's on the books versus – the carrying value versus the estimated market value. And as a reminder, the voting shares we are holding at cost, the preferred shares we mark-to-market and I think certainly they continue to do well and so the unrealized gain on our investment continues to increase as well.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super. I'll hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bryan Engler from Great Lakes Advisors. Your line is open.
Bryan Langsam Engler - Great Lakes Advisors LLC:
My question has been answered. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Matthews from RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Can you hear me?
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Yes.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Hi, Jeff.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Aside from the currency and the ERP, what were the big surprises operationally in the quarter, would you say?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
I think those are the two big ones. I think that the continued softness in Europe, I think that probably when we went into the year we were a little more optimistic about maybe being farther through the cycle, especially in France, with this lab consolidation, but it appears that we've got a ways to go with that.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah...
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Excuse me, why do you think that is, Norm? What's happening that keeps this ball rolling?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
It's just the continuous consolidation of labs, especially in France.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
I think, remember, Jeff, we had a very strong market share position in France compared to some of our competitors. So as that market has consolidated in terms of the number of labs, we've probably felt a disproportional impact compared to other IBD providers in France because we had such a strong market share position there. And I think some of the economic woes of the region are bleeding into Eastern Europe and that may be more than we would have anticipated at the beginning of the year. And you know regulatory changes continue throughout much of the emerging market world, both in Eastern Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. And that leads to my next question which is, what have you seen in China and Japan this last quarter? What's new and different?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
Not much is new and different, I would say. Japan continues to hobble along at a slow pace for both Life Science and Diagnostics. China, it's kind of running about the same as it has been. Certainly I think some of the slowdown that we have experienced in China this quarter has been related to the ERP implementation and being able to ship products and recognize the revenue in the quarter, but I think the underlying market is still about the same.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. So I guess ERP-wise then, IBM is happy to get to keep all their people there and spend a lot more time trying to help you out.
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. I would say it's largely a learning curve. The system is running. I think it's running pretty well. It's just our adapting to the way it works and changing our mindset around the discipline of this system is probably the biggest challenge.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
It sounds like what John was saying earlier, you went from the first iteration, you added one plant. This time you added multiple plants. And I would imagine it's mainly just a function of the scale of it. Is there anything that you see in it that makes you any less enthusiastic about what you're thinking the outcome will be, or does it change your timing of the rollout in Europe?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
No, I think we're still enthusiastic about it. I think the people who are using it see the benefits of it. It's just a matter of getting used to it and learning to use it as a tool. It's kind of like when you pick up a hammer or a saw for the first time, it takes a while to get acclimated to it and to learn how to use it. I think it's the same thing with this system.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
And how about timing on the European implementation? Any change there?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah, we've been continuing to talk about going live in Europe during 2017 and we'll spend much of 2016 doing the design. With each deployment, the complexity increases as we take it to more complex pieces of our business. And without question, the life science business model is much more complex than a diagnostic business model and the number of products is at least three times. And so the second deployment was a big implementation for us. That'll actually help us a little as we go to Europe, because most of the products will be in the system already. So hopefully we'll be able to stay on the projected timeline of going live in a series of deployments during 2017 as we roll through Europe.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay, thanks. And final question and I don't know what you can say about this, but this whistle blower case related to the FCPA stuff seems to be creating new precedents into law. Has this continuation of it in its current iteration had any impact on your settlement? Is there anything that could come out of this that could affect the P&L that we should be aware of, or is this just a side issue?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
I think it's probably better not to comment on items that are currently open litigation.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Understood. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. It looks like we have a follow-up from Mr. Couillard from Jefferies. This is Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Go all the way around the horn, a question for John Hertia. Could you give us an update on where the IH 1000 stands with the FDA, whether you've had any dialogue or feedback from the Agency, which seems to be holding up the approval? And then in terms of the BioPlex 2200, would love to get a status update on where you stand in terms of the menu rollout and any round numbers you can give us in terms of placement growth activity year-to-date.
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Sure. Brandon, this is John. Maybe we'll address the IH 1000 first. So we are in constant dialogue with the FDA. Still pretty optimistic that we'll get news before the end of the year on the IH 1000 and the North American gel launch and also the infinity System, which is targeted at our mid-volume laboratories. On BioPlex, we're seeing I would say increased traction in autoimmune. We've had really good response to celiac and our measles panel, also the addition of vitamin D and HIV. And we're seeing a wave of, let's say, increased requests for second and third placements within accounts that had BioPlex upfront and that's been really good news.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Great. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Matthews from RAM Partners. Your line is open.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi. Thanks. Norman, Theranos seems to be imploding. I don't know if you were as surprised as I was reading about it. Wondered if you had any thoughts about what it means for what they were ultimately trying to do. Does it cast doubt on the whole notion of this liquid biopsy explosion or is it a one-off bad business model kind of thing?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
I don't know. It's really hard to say. I guess I would put this down to maybe growing pains. And it seems like any young company goes through a few of these things. I think there's certainly some value in what they're trying to do and the audience that they're trying to reach and so we'll have to see how they navigate it.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
All right. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard from Leerink. Your line is open.
Dan L. Leonard - Analyst, Leerink Partners LLC:
Thanks. And I hopped on late, so apologies if it's been asked already. But you called out Digital PCR again as a growth lever in the Life Sciences business. Can you give us an update on how large that business is, either in terms of revenue or placements and then also any insights into the Droplet next-gen sequencing instrument that you might be able to offer?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So, Dan, as you know, we don't give out details of our revenue by our various product lines. We believe it continues to do very well, both in terms of revenue and the instrument placements all over the world and another encouraging sign is how our customers are using the product itself and the papers that continue to be published which then has a kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy of generating even more demand for that product. But it's not something we've given out specific information on in terms of the size of that business.
Dan L. Leonard - Analyst, Leerink Partners LLC:
But it does sound like you continue to expect it to be a good growth driver going forward?
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yes.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah.
Dan L. Leonard - Analyst, Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. And then the Droplet sequencing instrument, is there any updates to be had there?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Development and...
Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer:
Okay. Well, certainly that continues to be under development. They're making good progress. I don't have an exact schedule for you, but it's still a little ways off.
Dan L. Leonard - Analyst, Leerink Partners LLC:
Got it. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Scott Wilkin from UBS. Your line is open.
Scott Wilkin - UBS Global Asset Management:
Thank you and good afternoon. I was just hoping – I think maybe John is probably the best equipped to answer this. I was just curious if you could put a little more color on the lost sales of $5 million to $10 million in the quarter and how you're confident that that's not business that's going elsewhere? I understand maybe you're slow to be able to ship the revenue. It's just when I think about researchers doing experiments and ordering product, they're doing it as they need to do the experiments, right? And so how is this not leading to lost business as opposed to a delay?
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer:
Okay. Well, we're very close to our customers, number one. And through this launch of the system, we've been monitoring customer satisfaction pretty closely. And we have the ability to, let's say, flex a little bit about where products can go. And so if I think about what the impact has been, it's just added time for us to get products shipped. And the adoption has also caused us a little bit of problem with backorders. The combination of those two things has caused what we're thinking about in this $5 million to $10 million range. But in terms of, do we think we're going lose the business? We don't believe we will. Bookings are strong and, as I said, we're staying very, very close to our customers.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah...
Scott Wilkin - UBS Global Asset Management:
Go ahead, Christine.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Scott, I would also add that a lot of this is instrument-related and there it's not so much the day-to-day I need more consumables for my experiments that I really need that instrument. And for us, the larger instruments need to not only be delivered but also accepted by the customers, et cetera. And so as the timeline gets pushed out, it can push sales from one period to the next.
Scott Wilkin - UBS Global Asset Management:
I see. So what you're saying is, you expect the backorder to persist through Q4 and it's more instrument-related so it's not a daily consumable issue.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Some level could persist. Since this quarter-end, we have been tracking it in great detail every single week and see with each passing week it's getting better and better. But there's a fair amount of demand. I guess that's the good news in it.
Scott Wilkin - UBS Global Asset Management:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We will hold for one moment to see if anyone else wants to queue up. And that looks like all the questioners that we're going to have for today, so I'd like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Okay. Great. Thank you, Andrew. And thank you, everyone, for joining us today. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you again for your participation in today's conference. This now concludes the program and you may now disconnect your telephone lines at this time. Everyone have a great evening.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group
Analysts:
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Q2 2015 earnings financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, today's conference may be recorded. I'd now like to turn the call over. Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer, the floor is yours.
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Thank you, Nicholas. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our financial future performance, and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the floor over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Net sales for the quarter were $506.1 million, a decrease of 5.7% on a reported basis versus the same period last year sales of $536.8 million. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 4.2%. The difference in growth rate represents a currency headwind to reported sales of more than $53 million for the quarter. During the quarter, we had growth across many of our key Life Science and Diagnostic markets, most notably in our Digital and real-time PCR product lines, as well sales of diagnostic products for autoimmune and diabetes testing and quality controls. If we look geographically, the quarterly top line growth was led by strong sales in the U.S., Latin America, and China, offset by continued competitive challenges for our diagnostic products in Europe and Eastern Europe. The reported gross margin for the second quarter was in line with our guidance at 55.2% and essentially flat when compared to 55.4% last year. On a sequential basis, the decline in margin is primarily reflective of changes in product mix as well as additional expense related to an increase in sales of royalty-bearing products. For the quarter, the total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to prior acquisitions was $7.3 million, which compares to $8.1 million in the second quarter of last year. SG&A expense for the quarter was $192.8 million, down slightly from the year-ago period. The decrease in SG&A spending is the combination of a sizeable currency benefit, which was partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in bad debt reserves in some of our smaller emerging markets, contingent consideration expense of $1.3 million, and a one-time cost of $1.9 million for the termination of a distributor. Also recorded in SG&A is $1.9 million for the amortization of intangibles related to acquisitions. Research and development expense in Q2 was 9.2% of sales or $46.5 million compared to $55.7 million last year. The year-over-year decrease in R&D spend is a reflection of timing as well as the finalization of some major instrument products coming to market, specifically our new D-100 for A1c monitoring and the new IH-500 for the midrange blood typing market. Changes in foreign currency rates also had the effect of lowering R&D spend. Going forward, we expect R&D to continue to be 9% to 10% of sales. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in a net expense position of $665,000 compared to a net income position of $3.1 million in Q2 of last year. This change versus last year is largely related to higher foreign exchange hedging costs as well as lower dividend income. The effective tax rate used during the second quarter was lower than expected at 28%, reflecting a decrease in tax reserves related to statute lapses in the U.S. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, we anticipate the full-year tax rate to be in the 31% to 33% range. Net income for the second quarter was $28.4 million, and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.97. This compares to net income of $31.6 million and $1.09 per share in Q2 of last year. The year-over-year decrease in net income is substantially related to the top line currency headwinds I mentioned earlier. Now looking to the segments, Life Science reported sales for the second quarter were $170.6 million, essentially flat when compared to last year. However, on a currency neutral basis, sales grew an impressive 8.6%. These quarterly results reflect strong growth in both real-time and digital PCR products as well as our cell biology products. In addition, sales of western blotting instruments and reagents performed well during the quarter, led by good demand for our new imager, the ChemiDoc Touch. On a geographic basis, sales to the U.S., European, and China markets posted sizable increases for Life Science. Our Clinical Diagnostics segment posted quarterly sales of $332.1 million compared to $362.9 million last year, a decrease of 8.5%. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales for the Diagnostics group grew 2.2%. This growth was led by performance across many product lines, most notably our BioPlex 2200 assays and our quality control products. On a geographic basis, sales to the Americas were especially strong for Diagnostics during the quarter, as well as good continued momentum in Asia. This growth was partially offset by a continued decline in Europe. With the newly launched instruments for diabetes monitoring and blood typing, we hope to ramp up growth in several non-U.S. markets during the second half of the year. Now moving to the balance sheet, as of June 30, total cash and short-term investments were $727.6 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was $38.5 million compared to $29.5 million last quarter and $77 million in Q2 of last year. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is substantially related to lower customer collections resulting from the decrease in reported sales and includes approximately $40 million of currency headwinds in receivables. EBITDA for the quarter was $77 million, or just over 15% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $32.2 million, which is a slight increase both sequentially and year over year. Our full-year expectation for CapEx has been in the $130 million to $140 million range. Given the year-to-date spend of around $60 million, we may likely be at the lower end of that range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $32.1 million, about flat with the first quarter. For the remainder of the year, we expect depreciation to increase, reflecting the successful implementation of our second deployment of SAP. The decrease in total depreciation and amortization when compared to the year-ago period is largely related to currency. And now moving to the outlook, at the beginning of the year we laid out our guidance for 2015, and that is for currency neutral sales growth of around 3%, full-year gross margins in the 55% range, and an operating margin of 9% on a currency neutral basis. We also highlighted that strengthening of the U.S. dollar against our major currencies could actually result in a top line currency headwind of $175 million to $200 million, and consequently a decline in year-over-year reported sales. And while we do have some natural hedge with our expense mix, we guided that this sizable revenue headwind could negatively impact our projected currency neutral operating margin by as much as 150 basis points for the full year. As you can see with our first half of the year results, the currency impact is certainly significant and negatively impacted sales by more than $97 million and operating profit by around $21 million. Even so, we are pleased with our year-to-date performance in a somewhat mixed geographic market environment, and today are maintaining the guidance given at the beginning of the year. Currency neutral sales growth for the first half of the year is 2.8%, just shy of our guidance, and we are cautiously optimistic that newly released products for the diagnostic market will help to accelerate growth in the second half of the year. And from a profitability standpoint, both gross and operating profits are running slightly ahead of expectations for the first half of the year. But we believe much of this better than expected margin is a matter of timing. Remember from historical experience that our margins tend to drift down as we move through the year and ramp up spending for new projects. I would also remind you that the third quarter historically can be choppy for us, primarily related to seasonality outside the U.S. And given the current business environment challenges in Europe, seasonality this year could have a heightened effect. And now we're happy to take your questions.
Operator:
And our first question will come from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is open. Please proceed with your question.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks, good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Hi, Brandon.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Christine, in the last several quarters, you've been pretty good by giving a core EPS number ex-discrete items. If we back out the three one-timers in the period, do you have a cleaner EPS number for us?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
I should have known to do that. I don't, and remember the tax rate was also lower than expected. So you can probably do the calculation yourselves. And on a regular basis, we look at 32% – 33% as the base tax rate. I think the lower than expected tax rate picked up about $0.07 for us in the quarter. But as far as the math on some of the one-timers or the more discrete items in SG&A, you can probably do that math.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay. And then I don't know if John Goetz is there, maybe one for him, probably this is best for him. But I know you completed the SAP rollout in North America. Could you speak to the benefits enabled by that deployment with the platform? And to what extent did it affect 2Q revenues at all?
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer:
I'll take that. This is John. Yes, we rolled out our second deployment at the beginning of July, and we're still, I would say, in the stabilization mode with that particular rollout right now. We're still assessing what effect it might have had in terms of top line, but we know this to be a usual situation having had some experience with D1. And so far in terms of any benefit that we might get from D2, that's still down the road for us.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
And I agree with John that it's difficult to know what the revenue impact may have been on the second quarter, Brandon. We did let many of our customers in the U.S. know that we were going to be going live the first week of July. And so if some of them may have placed orders in advance of that, that wouldn't surprise me, but it would be hard for us to decipher exactly how much that was.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Sure, and then one for John Hertia. With respect to the IH-500 launch in the U.S., could you speak to the opportunity there in that low to mid-volume market in terms of total hospitals or number of units? And I would love to hear your perspective on just the general trend in blood donations and how you think that affects really the market growth.
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
So a couple things in there. The first thing to point out is that the IH-500 was launched outside of the U.S. So that's for...
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay.
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
...our international markets. Later this year, we're hoping to introduce the IH-1000 in the U.S. along with our gel product line. We're hoping to get that in the fourth quarter, which is targeted towards particularly high volume laboratories. The IH-500 is targeted toward smaller to medium size hospital blood banks or small donation centers, and it's the largest part of the segment that we didn't (16:05) addressed before, and we're really looking at the opportunity for growth.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super, okay, one more for you. You called out the BioPlex 2200 assays as a growth contributor in the second quarter. Were there specific assays or recent launches that were I'd say outsized contributors to that dynamic?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Maybe three things. First we introduced over the last six months an HIV antibody antigen test, a fifth-generation test, which was just FDA approved for use in the U.S. We approved a vitamin D test, and both of those are beginning to add to the panel. And we've seen a lot of growth in our MMRV test, which is for measles. And with the measles outbreak in the United States, that stimulated the interest in a lot of new systems.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Super, I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Matthews with RAM Partners. Your line is now open. Please proceed with your question.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Hi, can you hear me?
Ronald W. Hutton - Treasurer & Vice President:
Yes.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Hi, Jeff.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Great. Hi, everybody, a couple questions. Number one, the bad debt reserves in emerging markets, I'm trying to square that with your comments that your weakness sounded like it was more in Europe. Was this just because of currency issues or what?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So one of the sizable ones, for example, was in Greece. So technically, that is Europe. Maybe I'm remiss to call it an emerging market. But that was certainly one of the countries where we increased our reserves given what's going on.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Got it. Okay, that makes sense. And then the Asian growth in diagnostics that you called out, does that include China?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Yes.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
So the part of Asia that's still a bit of a challenge for us on both sides of the business is Japan.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay, all right. And it sounds like SAP round two went well. Where are you in the whole process, and what are the next steps?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Sure, so we went live with our second deployment in July, which is basically bringing in the rest of the U.S. for Diagnostics and also bringing in our Life Science group. And I think the implementation, the go-live went pretty smooth. We'll be going through our first close here pretty soon. So the team right now is focused on what they call hypercare, making sure people who are new to the system, we more than doubled the number of users on the system, know how to use it. They're using it properly, et cetera. If all continues to go well with that, shortly we'll be able to roll into beginning to do the design and blueprinting for Europe. And Europe, as we've talked about in the past, is extremely complex, with 40 entities and more than 10 systems, et cetera. And so they'll be spending the better part of all of 2016 really working on that design and implementation. And barring any bumps in the road, we're hoping to start to go through a series of deployments in 2017 in Europe.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay. And just, Christine, can you frame it in any way as far as any initial indications you've seen from the deployment, any information that you're getting from it or the speed at which you're getting information that ultimately this is going to make your life a lot easier relative to your earlier expectations? Is it better than you might have thought it could be or is it as you thought it could be, or are there disappointments in it?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Good question, Jeff. I think overall it's probably even better. There are always challenges along the way. But you may remember that when we did our first deployment in April 2013, we created a shared service center for all the back office accounting transactions, AR, AP, things like that. And now with the second deployment, that team was ready to catch the ball, and that transition went well. And frankly, having it all in one location helps with the close process, it helps with the analysis process, it helps with the audit process, and so that's great. But frankly, I think the bigger benefit is to the business itself and the ability to operate more efficiently, to have that visibility in the supply chain and from planning and ordering right through logistics. And then that of course directly helps our customers in terms of our ability to service our customers. So I think a lot of good news all the way around.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay, great. And then I would normally jump off and come back later, but I'll just ask the question I was going to ask now anyway. I guess for Norman or John, I don't know how you pronounce it, Theranos or Theranos getting FDA approval for the herpes test. What does those mean long term for the industry in general and Bio-Rad in particular, if anything? Thank you.
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
So it's obviously I think an open question. Obviously, Theranos has a very interesting business model. There's some discussion about whether this opens up really a new category of patients that want to be diagnosed. It is more of a newer patient model. I think we've seen a number of things in the past several years leading towards more point-of-care and more of what I guess I would call patient-centric model, and I think this is just one piece of it. I think we'll see how this plays out over the coming years.
Jeffrey L. Matthews - RAM Partners LP:
Okay, thanks.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with Leerink Partners. Your line is now open. Please proceed with your question.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Hi, this is actually Kevin in for Dan. Good afternoon. Could you guys comment on the pricing pressure and dynamics in Europe given the weakness in the diagnostic market?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Sure, Kevin, this is John Hertia. I would say the pricing pressure has stayed pretty constant during the course of the year. We have some mature markets over there in diabetes and immuno-hematology, and that's where we're seeing the majority of the price compression. You're also seeing some lab consolidation in France, and that's adding to it. We're hoping with the introduction of two new systems in those areas where we're seeing price compression, the D-100 for diabetes and the IH-500 for immuno-hematology, we'll be able to reverse that trend. And so far, the recent indicators have been pretty good.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Great. And to that point, do you think those launches and your upcoming launches as well, can those launches make the Diagnostic business go from a low single digit growth to a mid-single digit?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Probably not in the near-term timeframe, but it can't hurt.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Sure.
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
We just can't quantify exactly what the percentage rise that we get out of that yet.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Okay, got it.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
And so we're sticking to our 3% currency neutral growth for the year, and that's across the board. But I think that is what we're targeting for Diagnostics as well.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Okay, and just one last one. Could you provide an outlook on the Chinese and European academic markets given the macro?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
Say that again, we didn't quite get the question.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Yes, could you just provide your outlook on the Chinese and European academic markets?
John Hertia - EVP & President-Clinical Diagnostics Group:
I think that as we've seen, especially in China, that they've backed off their budgets a little bit in China just in general. And it's still obviously growing at an above-average rate. I think the interesting part for us is that it seems that Europe is doing very well, and that's been a very pleasant surprise for us. I would say, by the way, that also you've got a resurgence of interest in funding in the NIH and some of these new initiatives, precision medicine funding. They're talking about continuing to ramp up NIH funding. So I would say that it seems that the outlook in the life science tool space is pretty decent.
Kevin C. Chen - Leerink Partners LLC:
Okay, I appreciate the color. Thank you.
Operator:
And our next question is a follow-up from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please proceed with your follow-up.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Maybe for Christine, I believe in the first quarter you mentioned a drag in the diagnostics business from older deferrals ahead of new product launches. Did that persist in the second quarter, or was there any catch-up benefit for normalization?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
I would imagine at least early in the first part of the quarter, it did continue to persist. The D-100 was launched for a good portion of the quarter, so that's probably going away, but the other part of the demand is on the blood typing side, and we just launched the IH-500. So a part of it probably persisted and probably contributed during the quarter and it's...
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
So is it fair to say it's still probably a net negative dynamic then?
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Probably, yes.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Okay, and then one for John. So at a high level, it's been about a year since you took over the COO role. I'd love to get just a progress report on the areas of the business where you've been focused on and what your priorities are as you look out the next six to 12 months.
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer:
Okay. As you probably know, we have made some organizational change here, carving out our supply chain into a separate entity globally. And so one of the things that we're focusing on here is in the area of cost of goods and all of the things that go into that number, from sourcing raw materials to looking at our manufacturing plants, how many we have, whether those can be consolidated, where we have products that limit themselves to one particular plant or not. So there's a lot of analysis going on in that particular area, and I'm pretty well focused on that one. In addition, we've consolidated all of our selling organization into a single global entity. And while that may not give us a lot of let's say strategic change, but it will certainly allow us to I think get a good handle on setting goals and objectives in a more classically uniform way. So those are a couple of areas that I focused on. The groups led by Shannon Hall and John Hertia are focusing on delivering and developing new products into their areas. And we still look at our business as two segments, Clinical Diagnostics and Life Sciences, and we consolidate all our results there, and so we hold them responsible for that. So I guess those are my first comments. And maybe lastly is to really ensure that as we roll out ERP to the rest of the company, I think Christine touched on it. Europe is going to be a big hairy project, and we're already planning and gearing up for that, even though we're in hypercare for deployment too. So that's what keeps me busy.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
That's very helpful. Just as a follow-up, to what degree do you have any additional cost actions or cost takeout planned for the balance of the year? At the end of the year, last year, you closed one. You shut down one unprofitable product line and closed a couple of facilities. Is there anything embedded in your guidance for additional actions like that? And to what extent do you see room for additional opportunities there say in the near term?
John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer:
No, not in the near term, Brandon.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC:
Fair enough, thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And with no further questions in the queue, I would like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Okay, great. Thank you, Nicholas, and thank you, everyone, for taking the time to join us today. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect. Have a good day, everyone.
Executives:
Ron Hutton - Vice President, Treasurer Christine Tsingos - Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President John Hertia - President, Clinical Diagnostics Group Norman Schwartz - President and CEO John Goetz - Chief Operating Officer Shannon Hall - President, Life Science Group
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies Jeffrey Matthews - Ram Partners
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Q1 2015 Earnings Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] I would like to introduce your host for today’s conference call, Bio-Rad Vice President and Treasurer, Ron Hutton. You may begin, sir.
Ron Hutton:
Thanks, Kevin. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans, and expectations, our financial future performance and other matters. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I’d like to turn it over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine Tsingos:
Thanks Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Norman Schwartz; John Goetz; Shannon Hall, President of our Life Science Group; and John Hertia, President of our Clinical Diagnostics Group. Net sales for the first quarter of 2015 were $472.8 million, a decrease of 7.2% on a reported basis versus the same period last year sales of $509.3 million. This decline reflects the anticipated strong currency headwinds, which represented a negative impact on sales of nearly $44 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 1.4%. During the quarter, we experienced good currency neutral growth across many of our key markets and product areas, most notably in our Life Science segment, as well as certain products and markets in our Diagnostics segment. Sales growth in the quarter was partially offset by continued weakness in the European diagnostics market, as well as challenges in the Asia-Pacific region, both of which posted a decline in currency neutral sales versus last year. Offsetting these tepid regions was solid growth in the U.S. and selected emerging markets. The reported gross margin for the first quarter was higher than expected at 57.1% compared to 54% last year. This strong margin is primarily the result of a favorable product mix and improved manufacturing efficiencies, as well as savings associated with product lines that were discontinued during 2014. Also contributing to the higher margins, amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was lower at $6.8 million, which compares to $8.3 million in the first quarter of last year. SG&A expenses for the first quarter were also lower at $188.6 million or 39.9% of sales, compared to $202.3 million or 39.7% of sales last year. This lower SG&A expense during the quarter benefited from the strong U.S. dollar. Also, when comparing to last year, remember, that during the first quarter of 2014, we recorded an accrual of $9.8 million related to the FCPA matter. Excluding the currency benefit and the FCPA accrual, SG&A spending increased approximately $5 million versus last year. This increase is substantially the result of personnel-related costs, typically associated with our first quarter. Total amortization of intangibles related to acquisitions recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.9 million. Research and development expense in Q1 was in line with expectations at 10% of sales or $47.2 million, which compares to $52.5 million or 10.3% of sales in the first quarter of last year. The decline in spending, both sequentially and versus last year, is primarily a matter of timing of various projects. R&D expense also benefited some from currency translation, but to a lesser extent, as much of our spend is denominated in U.S. dollars. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $7.7 million, compared to $5.9 million of expense in Q1 of last year. This increase in net expense versus last year is largely related to higher foreign exchange hedging costs. The effective tax rate used during the first quarter was in line with our guidance at 33%. This rate continues to include the expiration of the U.S. federal R&D tax credit, which typically has lowered our tax rate by 2 percentage points. Excluding any discrete items that may occur during the year, we continue to expect the full-year effective tax rate to be in the 33% to 35% range. Net income for the first quarter more than doubled versus last year to $17.8 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.61. Life Science sales in the first quarter were $155.9 million, a decline of 3.4% on a reported basis. However, on a currency neutral basis, sales grew an impressive 4% when compared to last year. This growth was driven by continued strong demand for our Droplet Digital PCR products, as well less strong sales of process chromatography media and our cell biology products. On a geographic basis, Life Science sales were particularly strong in the U.S. On a currency neutral basis, Europe and the emerging markets also posted gains. This growth was partially offset by slower sales in the Asia-Pacific region. Sales of Clinical Diagnostics products were $313.6 million, compared to $344.3 million last year, a decrease of nearly 9% on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, year-over-year sales were up slightly for the Diagnostics Group, highlighting a currency headwind to sales of more than $31 million. This slower overall growth reflects continued competitive and pricing pressures, especially in Europe, partially offset by good double-digit currency neutral growth in China and the emerging markets. From a product standpoint, sales of quality controls and autoimmune testing products continue to grow nicely. Of particular note, demand for our BioPlex 2200 instrument and assay continues to gain momentum as many customers around the world adopt this system. Today we have more than 50 assays available for the BioPlex. And during the first quarter, we experienced increased demand for our measles tests, given the recent outbreak in the U.S. Moving to the balance sheet. As of March 31, total cash and short-term investments were $710.7 million. Net cash generated from operations during the quarter was just over $29 million, compared to $40 million last quarter, and $66 million in the year-ago period. This decrease in cash flow versus last year is primarily the result of lower customer collections resulting from the decrease in reported sales, which includes more than $30 million of currency headwinds in receivables, as well as increased employee-related payments are associated with various 2014 incentive plans. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were slightly lower than expected at $27 million. As with much with our results, currency translation also impacted CapEx, essentially lowering the reported amount by approximately $7 million. Our full-year expectation for CapEx remains in the $130 million to $140 million range, as we continue to invest in our global ERP system. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $32.3 million. On our last earnings call, we laid out guidance for 2015. That is, for currency neutral sales growth of around 3%, full-year gross margins in the 55% range and an operating margin of 9% on a currency neutral basis. We also highlighted that strengthening of the U.S. dollar against our major currencies could actually result in a top line currency headwind of $175 million to $200 million, and consequently a decline in year-over-year reported sales. And while we do have some natural hedge with our expense mix, we guided that this sizable headwind could negatively impact our projected currency neutral operating margin by as much as 150 basis points for the full-year. As you can see with our first quarter results, the currency impact is certainly significant, negatively impacting sales by nearly $44 million and operating profit around $10 million. Still, despite the relatively slow sales growth start to the year of 1.4%, we are maintaining our guidance given at the beginning of the year. And as we move through 2015, we have numerous new product launches in the queue including a new diabetes monitoring system, the D-100, and a new mid-range blood typing instrument, the IH-500, both of which should help fuel diagnostics growth outside the U.S. in the second of the half of the year. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Christine, with respect to the gross margin experience in the first quarter, any chance you could break down the components of the improvement between mix and the cost savings actions that you took last year? And really is it sustainable over the coming periods in that context it would make your full-year guidance seem somewhat conservative, if that’s the case?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure, great question. So I think that without breaking out the detail of each individual component, Brandon, quite a bit of the improvement is more about sales mix in the quarter and about some of the efficiencies that we had manufacturing in the quarter. And it's always tough to predict sustainability of things like that, especially as you know, sales mix changes through the year between instruments and reagents and different products groups et cetera. And then certainly the decrease in amortization for a little over $1 million, $1.4 million or something and some savings from the discontinued product lines from last year obviously sustainable. But I think the vast majority it's hard to say sustainable when it relates to product mix and efficiencies in the quarter in terms of manufacturing side.
Brandon Couillard:
Helpful. And if John Hertia is there, with respect to the diagnostics business in the period. Could you elaborate on the trends that you're seeing in Europe. Is this largely still a function of the lab consolidation activities that are going on in France, and if there is any new competitive dynamic that’s playing out here, in terms of the competitive landscape in any particular product areas?
John Hertia:
Sure. I think you have the picture pretty correct. There is still consolidation in both clinical and transfusion labs in Europe, particularly in France. And I'd say pricing pressure has been pretty stable during the - pretty consistent during last year and this year.
Brandon Couillard:
Realize that France dynamics are going on for several years. I mean, how far in the process do you think we are? Are we in the eighth inning, or the third inning of their eventual wind down of the lab base?
John Hertia:
It feels like it's more in the later innings. We just hope it's not going to extra innings.
Christine Tsingos:
But I think the market is aware of some of your new products that you're about to launch in Europe.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. And then, maybe one for Norman. In the press release, you alluded to a new globalized management structure and future operational efficiencies. Could you elaborate on exactly the steps you've taken, and perhaps quantify said efficiencies?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Obviously it's hard at the moment to quantity those efficiencies, but we've been working on this for a while, and I guess this is really the kind of the final step with the appointment of John Goetz as Chief operating officer, and there is two probably significant pieces of this. One is the worldwide globalization as a sales organization, which was under kind of a bifurcated management before, and the second is the globalization of our supply chain. So including procurement, manufacturing and logistics, there are obviously some real benefit to that in terms of kind of utilizing certain sites, centers of excellence that kind of thing. I think we can get at some of those efficiencies going forward. And obviously on the procurement side, being able bundle up purchases little better and negotiate. I think those are the places we’re going to see it come from.
Brandon Couillard:
Super. I'll hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Jeffrey Matthews with Ram Partners.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Hello, can you hear me?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, we can hear you.
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, hi Jeff.
Jeffrey Matthews:
I just want to get up to speaker. On the spending incentives related to 2014 that you booked in the first quarter, was there anything different about this year's level versus prior years? I don't recall it ever being called out before but I just might not have been remembering.
Norman Schwartz:
You're talking about the kind of the year-over-year comparison of expenses?
Jeffrey Matthews:
I think, Christine mentioned that there was - there were personnel - in the SG&A line, there were personnel costs related costs in Q1 that related to 2014?
Christine Tsingos:
Yes. So I think from time to time, Jeff, we do bring it up, because the first quarter is generally when we are doing the merit increases. We’re paying out incentive plans or commission plans from the prior year royalties, things like that. And so Q1 is generally a cash flow challenge, if you will. And as we peel back the onion just looking at that SG&A without the accrual from last year and without the help of currency, because remember as it makes our sales lower and it makes also expenses lower rates, it’s kind of netted out to about $5 million, and much of that can be traced to employee-related costs that are typically associated with our first quarter.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Got it. And without getting too granular, is it outside the normal realm, or is it a pretty much in the ballpark of how it generally tends to look in a normal year?
Christine Tsingos:
So compared to last year, it definitely is more sizable, because we turn back the clock to ‘14, many of our internal plans were not and the payout was lower this time in March of ‘14 than it was in March of ‘15. But having said that, it’s certainly in line with other years where we have paid kind of at the target of the bonus of the [indiscernible].
Jeffrey Matthews:
Okay. That makes sense. And then, secondly on GnuBIO. You're spending pretty heavily on that. And I just wonder - and not that that's a bad thing. I just wonder what your visibility is into when and if that there might be a product on the market. Is that a two-year thing, three-year thing or sooner possibly?
Norman Schwartz:
We’re hoping to have something on the market in 2016. So we've got some development work left to do to get that ready to go, and then of course traverse through the FDA. So it's probably a 2016 event.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Has there been any significant positive or negative surprises along the way versus what you might have thought originally when you've actually made the acquisition recognizing that it was not a product on the market already in that typical of a Bio-Rad acquisition?
Norman Schwartz:
No, I think it has been moving along at a pretty steady pace. They seem to be solving the problems and just kind of getting to the issues. So far it seems to be on track and pretty much what we expected.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Great. And then, my third question and last one is, about the gross margin. And again I know, this is a quarterly number. It's one number covers 90 days. But does it - is there anything in there directionally that you can see that is a result of the work you've been doing on the ERP side, that’s potentially the sign of kind of efficiencies that are working their way through or is it strictly just one quarter's worth of mix and amortization [ph]? Thanks.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. Again it's really hard to break those down. All we can give you is kind of anecdotal information or people seem to the see it as a tool for increasing productivity. But I think the - kind of if you looked at the schedule of gains, it's probably still on the lower end of - it’s probably not our biggest gainer there.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Sure.
Christine Tsingos:
I think, Jeff, that remember, typically one of our strongest margins is the one we post in the first quarter and as we move through the year and the instrument mix changes. We can see that margin trend down a little from the first quarter, as it was in our last year which was a little different. But typically, that's a pattern that we see. It’s hard to trace to the ERP, but certainly as Norman mentioned, that will be one of the pockets of benefits as more of the organization comes up on SAP.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Okay. And many thanks. And if you don't mind, if I just ask one more, and then I will jump back in the queue and get back on later and ask it. You talked about some new products coming. Is the new product flow this year heavier than it’s been in past years would you say?
John Hertia:
For diagnostics, definitely. We've had a couple of years since we’ve introduced any major systems. And this year, it will be - we are in the process right now of rolling out the D-100. This is our diabetes system in Europe. And hopefully later on, depending on the FDA in the U.S., we'll be releasing kind of a mid-sized immunohematology system, the IH-500, which will go into Europe first and then migrate around the rest of the world from there. And then we're also looking at introducing the IH-1000, which is our large immunohematology system along with the reagents in the - maybe the last quarter of this year for the U.S. too. So, three pretty good sized system introductions.
Jeffrey Matthews:
And John, would you say that your customer base is looking forward to it?
John Hertia:
They have been waiting. Yes.
Jeffrey Matthews:
Okay. Thanks very much and good luck.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
Brandon Couillard:
Thank you. John, just one follow-up on the blood typing launch in the U.S. Have you developed a pricing strategy for how you're going to proceed in the U.S. with an automated platform? The peers in this duo-poly market generate gross margins in north to 70%. Is that your expectation that initial revenue contribution will be at a gross margin level above your composite average?
John Hertia:
Hard to say. It's just still pre-launch. So much of it is based on the velocity of the instruments at the beginning, and it will be a trickle-in effect. We won't get systems placed until the last quarter of this year. And as you know, in diagnostics you place the systems in the regions growing top of that. So it will probably be a situation where revenue and gross margin momentum will build as we roll it out.
Norman Schwartz:
But our strategy is not normally a pricing strategy. It's a value strategy.
Brandon Couillard:
Got you. And then, with respect to the vitamin D kit launched on the BioPlex 2200 just recently. Is there an opportunity for LabCorp and Quest to potentially adopt that? I believe they already use alternative platforms, mass spec and other immunoassay system, but I know you've got a big installed base with both of those accounts of BioPlex systems.
John Hertia:
There is always the opportunity, yes.
Brandon Couillard:
Okay. Fair enough. And last one, Norman. Any update on the M&A pipeline? It's been about a year since you did a deal. Would you say - given your focus is internally and with ERP perhaps another dilutive deal is unlikely in the near-term?
Norman Schwartz:
Probably. Yes. Obviously we've got, as always, two things that we're looking at, and I think our focus is on something that has sales and revenue. Net sales and profit.
Brandon Couillard:
Very good. Thank you.
Operator:
And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the conference back over to our host.
Christine Tsingos:
Can you just poll one more time, please?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And I'm not showing any questions at this time.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. Thanks Kevin. Thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today, and hopefully we'll be seeing you soon. Bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s presentation. You may now disconnect and have a wonderful day.
Executives:
Ron Hutton – Vice President, Treasurer Christine Tsingos – Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President John Hertia – Executive Vice President, President, Clinical Diagnostics Group
Analysts:
Justin Bowers – Leerink Jason Lazarus – Intrepid Capital
Operator:
Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Q4 and Full Year Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Earnings Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Kay and I’ll be your operator for today. And at this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. We will conduct the question-and-answer session towards the end of this conference. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I’d like to turn the call over to Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Please proceed sir.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you, Kay. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management’s goals, plans, and expectations. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2014 as well as provide some insight into our thinking for 2015. With me today, our CEO, Norman Schwartz, COO, John Goetz, Shannon Hall, President of our Life Sciences Group, and John Hertia, President of our Diagnostics Group. Let’s start with a review of the quarterly sales or results. Today, we are pleased to report net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 of $598.2 million, a slight decrease when compared to the year ago period sales of $602.6 million. On a currency neutral basis, however, quarterly sales actually grew 4.5%. This dramatic difference represents a currency headwind of more than $30 million on the top-line. During the quarter, we experienced good currency neutral sales growth across many of our product lines, most notably in our life science group including continued strong sales of our Droplet digital PCR products and our cell biology product line. Our diagnostics group also posted good growth for the quarter with strong sales of our diabetes monitoring, autoimmune and blood typing products as well as quality controls. The consolidated growth margin for the quarter was 53.1% and compares to last year’s gross margin of 53.6%. This reported gross margin is lower than expected and reflective of approximately $8.4 million of one-time cost associated with the discontinuation of a small product line. Excluding this charge, the consolidated gross margin for the fourth quarter would have been 54.5%. In addition, during the quarter, we recorded a total of approximately $7 million in cost of goods sold for the non-cash purchase accounting expense related to prior acquisitions. This compares to $8.3 million of amortization expense in the year ago period. SG&A expense for the fourth quarter was $207.5 million or 34.7% of sales compared to $214.6 million or 35.6% of sales last year. The current quarter SG&A include $7 million of non-cash expense related to the reevaluation of contingent consideration for the acquired cell sorting and diagnostic sequencing technology. Offsetting this expense was currency translation, which effectively lowered SG&A on a reported basis by about the same amount. And finally in SG&A, the amortization of intangibles related to prior acquisitions in the fourth quarter was approximately $2 million and down slightly from a year ago period. Research and development expense in Q4 was 9.9% of sales or $59.3 million versus $55.8 million last year. This increase in R&D spending from last year is primarily the investment in the development of a diagnostic targeted sequencer based on our acquisition of new vial in April 2014. Also impacting R&D expense for the fourth quarter is approximately $3 million of one-time expense associated with the discontinuation of the small product line I mentioned earlier. The reported operating margin for the fourth quarter was 8.5%. If we exclude the $18.4 million of one-time cost associated with the product discontinuation as well as expense related to the revaluation of contingent consolidation, today’s operating margin for the quarter was more than 11%. Interest in other for the quarter was a net expense of approximately $4.8 million compared to $7.8 million last year. This improvement reflects reduced interest expense as well as higher investment income. The effective tax rate used in the fourth quarter was lower than expected at 14.7%. The results of the reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit for 2014 as well as a reduction in certain tax reserves and valuation allowances. Reported net income for the fourth quarter was $39 million or a $1.34 per share on a fully diluted basis compared to $30.1 million last year or $1.04 per share. Excluding the $18.4 million of one-time expense mentioned earlier, we estimate that fully diluted earnings per share would have been approximately $1.78 for the quarter. Our life science group reported strong sales for the fourth quarter of $223.7 million, a growth of 1.5% versus last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased an impressive 6.3% for the quarter. As I mentioned earlier, these quarterly results reflect continued strong sales of our digital PCR systems and consumables as well as our family of cell biology products. On a geographic basis, currency neutral sales grew across many regions for life science, most notably North America, China and Europe. Our clinical diagnostic group also achieved good sales for the quarter of $370.3 million compared to $377.9 million last year, a decrease of 2% on a reported basis, but growth of 3.6% currency neutral. These sales were led by continued strong performance in the quality controls and diabetes product line as well as solid growth for blood typing and BioPlex 2200 revenue. On a geographic view, diagnostic currency neutral sales for the quarter increased most notably in China, North America and the emerging market. Looking at the full year results, we are pleased to report annual revenues of $2.175 million, an increase of 2% versus last year on a reported basis. On a currency neutral basis, sales for the year grew 3.2% and ahead of the guidance we laid out at the beginning of the year. Our life science group posted annual sales of $728 million, an increase of 2.6% versus 2013 and growth of 4% currency neutral. The sales growth was fueled by continued strong sales of our digital PCR instruments and consumables. We also saw good annual growth in our cell biology and process media product. From a geographic view, sales in North America, Europe and China were the biggest contributors to year-over-year growth for the Life Science Group. In the year, clinical diagnostic sales were $1.432 billion, a growth of 1.7% on a reported basis and 2.9% on a currency neutral basis. This growth was fueled by continued momentum in quality control, autoimmune and diabetes monitoring products. On a geographical view, sales in North America, China and the emerging markets were the biggest contributors to year-over-year currency neutral sales growth to the diagnostics group. Total company gross margins for the full year were 54.2%, which compares to 55.3% in 2013. The decrease in margin versus last year is primarily the result of significant one-time charges in the discontinuation of small product line and the consolidation of some of our small manufacturing operations during 2014. For the full year, these one-time charges totaled more than $11 million. Also important to note, total amortization of intangibles and purchase accounting recorded in cost of goods sold for the year was $31.5 million. SG&A expense as a percent of sales was 37.2% for the year and higher than we estimated at the beginning of 2014, driven primarily by the $19 million FCPA accrual taking during the year. Other drivers of the higher expenditures when compared to the prior year were the results of increased spending associated with the addition of the GnuBIO business. And finally in SG&A, total expense for acquisition-related amortization was $8.4 million for the full year. Research and development expense in 2014 was $220 million or 10.1% of sales and compares to $211 million last year. This increase is the direct impact from the addition of GnuBIO as well as spending for new instruments for blood typing and diabetes monitoring. Looking to 2015, R&D expense as a percentage of sales will likely stay in at 9% to 10% level, as we move a number of investments through the development pipeline. Net income for the full year was $88.8 million versus last year’s net income of $77.8 million. Fully diluted earnings per share for the year were $3.05. The effective tax rate for the full year 2014 was 32.5% and higher than our 2013 full year tax rate of 30.8% due to both the increased operating profit as well as the mix of sales in higher tax jurisdiction. For 2015, we expect the effective tax rate excluding any discrete items that may occur, to be in the 33% to 35% range. This range assumes no federal R&D credit in 2015. If and when that is reinstated, our full year effective tax rate could decline by two percentage points. And looking at the balance sheet for 2014, Bio-Rad balance sheet remained strong. As of December 31, total cash and short-term investments were $698 million compared to $609 million at the end of last year. Net cash generated from operations during the fourth quarter was $40.2 million and $273.3 million for the full year 2014. Remember that during the fourth quarter, we paid $55 million to the U.S. government related to the resolution of the FCPA matter, which negatively impacted the quarterly cash flow results. However, despite this sizeable payment, cash flow from operations increased more than $100 million versus 2013. The year-over-year increase in cash flow as a result of the higher sales as well as lower interest expense and taxes paid. EBITDA for 2014 also remained strong at more than $300 million, which includes $90 million of EBITDA generated in the fourth quarter. Net capital expenditures were $40.3 million for the quarter and $120.8 million for the full year slightly below the $125 million to $135 million range estimated on our last call. Looking to 2015, we estimate that CapEx spending will be in the $130 million to $140 million range as we continue to invest in our global ERP system and facility. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $39.8 million and $150 million for the full year. Looking to 2015, we see several opportunities for growth on the top-line. The momentum we are seeing in many of our life science product lines is encouraging for future growth. In addition, funding for the research for research around the world seems to be improving. On the diagnostic side the business, we also see opportunities for currency neutral growth in many of our core businesses including new instruments for the blood typing and diabetes monitoring market. Offsetting some of this growth, we continue to face sizable challenges in the diagnostic market including an expected decline in Europe, which is fueled by price pressure in government tenders as well as laboratory consolidation in selected markets around the world. The combined result of opportunities and challenges leads us to the expectation of sales growth in 2015 similar to what we saw in 2014 that is around 3% on a currency neutral basis for the full year. With regard to margin, we are expecting to make solid currency neutral improvement in our profitability in 2015 even in light of another year of significant spending for new technologies in IT systems. During 2014, we dialed up focus on our many growing product areas where we have market leadership and as such, undertook numerous actions to consolidate smaller manufacturing operations and discontinued smaller unprofitable product lines. And while this resulted in some sizable one-time charges in 2014, we expect these actions to benefit operating profit by more than $10 million in 2015 and beyond. In addition, 2015 should also be a year where numerous technologies in new business investments become less of a headwind of profitability as sales of these products continue to grow. Having said that, it is important to note that, we will now include a full year of investment in the new biotechnology, which will offset much of that progress. And lastly, we will benefit from not having the FCPA related accruals that occurred in 2014. In some, our consolidated currency neutral outlook for full year gross margin is to be around 55% despite price pressure across several product lines and regions and our outlook for the currency neutral operating margin is to be around 9% for the full year. Now, before we get ahead of our sales, we need to include the impact of foreign currency and our outlook for 2015. As many of you know, Bio-Rad has always been a very global company in terms of both sales and operations and currency can have a significant impact on our reported results. More than 65% of our sales are non-U.S. dollar and we estimate that around 35% or 40% of our expenses are non-U.S. dollar. As such with today’s strong dollar environment, currency has a significant negative impact to our financial outlook. As I mentioned, our outlook for currency neutral sales growth in 2015 is 3%. However, using current exchange rate, currency could actually result in a revenue headwind of $175 million to $200 million and a decline in year-over-year reported sales. And while we do have some natural hedge with the non-dollar expenses, this currency headwind could impact our expected operating margin by 150 basis points or more and essentially mask the great progress that we are making with operating profit. In closing let me just say that despite what hopefully would be a temporary currency headwind on a result. We remain highly committed to focusing on ways to create greater operating leverage, while at the same time continuing our investments in new technologies and systems. It is through these new products and technologies and a more efficient footprint that we can improve our gross profit and it is through changes in our organizational structure and implementing new global IT systems that we can reduce our overall operating cost. All of which will ultimately contribute to moving our operating margin into the mid-teens is not better. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Please standby for your first question, which comes from the line of Brandon Couillard, Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi, this is Justin [ph] in for Brandon.
Christine Tsingos:
Hi.
Unidentified Analyst:
Would you give us an update on the U.S. launch of the new blood typing platform?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure, I’ll turn that one over to John Hertia.
John Hertia:
So the U.S. launch of the new blood typing platform, so we’ll be introducing in the later part of this year, a blood typing platform has been available in the rest of world called the IH 1000, it hasn’t been available in the U.S. because of the FDA we’re going through FDA registration and approval right now. We also will be launching this year Justin on the IH 500 in Europe and parts of Asia-Pacific, which is also a new blood typing platform that’s sort of a logical extension of the IH 1000 name targeted for the sort of mid-market blood typing segment.
Christine Tsingos:
I think Justin in terms of the model, the expectations is entering the U.S. market comes later in the year, and so it’s probably a bigger impetus growth in 2016, but we’re hopeful that will get that FDA approval this year.
Unidentified Analyst:
Got it. Very helpful. Moving towards the ERP, will you quantified the expected impact on the P&L from the ERP expenses in 2015?
Christine Tsingos:
Sure, I think for spending on ERP for the project itself, the spending in 2015 should be pretty similar to what we’ve spent in 2014 and that’s kind of $25 million to $30 million range in terms with the expense and around $40 million in terms of capital. The one thing that I would keep in mind is we are right now scheduled to go live with our next appointment in the July, August timeframe, in which case we’ll take on some depreciation expense and that will probably be an incremental $5 million to $10 million between depreciation and support during ’15. So net-net with the go live we may pickup $10 million of additional expense with the project spend itself should remain fairly flat year-over-year.
Unidentified Analyst:
Got it. Thanks. Speaking of go live, we comment on which business divisions or geographies will migrate onto the new platform?
Christine Tsingos:
Of course. As a reminder first go live was in April 2013 and it was a smaller portion of U.S. business that included our U.S. diagnostic sales and a smaller division. Deployment number two, which as I mentioned we’re hoping to go live in July and August, and brings in the rest of the U.S. and actually North America and what that means are more about our diagnostics operations in the U.S. as well as our life science operations in the U.S. and some of our selling entities in Canada. And once we complete that then our plan is to move into the European theatre, which is a very difficult implementation for us, its several deployments, but one that probably have the greatest benefit and payback for us and that will be our focus on late this year and certainly throughout ’16.
Unidentified Analyst:
Got it. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And the next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard, Leerink. Please proceed.
JustinBowers:
Hi, good afternoon. This is Justin on for Dan. So just in terms of the EBIT guidance for 2015, what’s baked in there?
ChristineTsingos:
So I think what baked in there is improvement from some of the consolidation that we’ve done improvement from some of the underwater businesses if you will, becoming less underwater. It’s also baked in an incremental probably $13 million to $15 million of spend is related to GnuBIO. But so tremendous amount of progress in savings taking on some additional spend with GnuBIO and assuming a 3% currency neutral top-line gets us to this operating margin of around 9% and then using current exchange rates, it takes us backwards because of the translation.
JustinBowers:
Okay. So, the 150 plus FX impact is factored in there and you’re using current spot rates.
ChristineTsingos:
Right. So, the 150 debt is really kind of what happens to that 9% margin as currency rates stay where they are – that 9% margin goes to 8 or lower, because $175 million, $200 million sales are not recognized or on a reported basis, they are not there and it’s just translation.
JustinBowers:
Okay, understand. Thank you. And then in terms of GnuBIO and kind of the dPCR synergy there, can you just give us an update on your efforts there?
John Hertia:
Well, we continue to make progress on the – with the GnuBIO platform, it certainly still underdevelopment, a tremendous amount of synergy between the Droplet technology that we have developed and acquired few years ago and in this operation, so it’s a – we really been able to leverage that pretty well. Again making progress, we continue to – there is obviously still work to be done to get to a product probably take us most of this year.
JustinBowers:
Okay. And then it’s the first time we mentioned cell bio and process media is a kind of source of strength and why also could you just kind of talk about what you’re seeing in that – in those product lines.
John Hertia:
Well, I think that especially in the cell bio area, this is an area we started investing in few years ago and I think that what you’re seeing today just represents some momentum that we’re starting to achieve from these many products and the new thing that we’re just introducing, so I think that’s what you’re seeing.
JustinBowers:
Okay. And it sounds like China came in especially in life sciences a little better that what you are talking about in the last quarter. Can you just talk about what you are seeing in that geography and maybe just how things are trending in the first quarter?
John Hertia:
Well, I think last year, little bit of hiccup early in the year when China was kind of doing their corruption crack down and it’s kind of spooked everyone there and in terms of buying and that slowed us down quite a bit. And I think then we kind of probably pull back a little bit on our outlook. But seem to comeback especially at the end of the year really well and we ended up the year in a good position. I think we continue to have momentum in China both in the life science area and in diagnostics.
JustinBowers:
Great. And just one last one thought on capital deployment.
ChristineTsingos:
Sure, so as I mentioned in the scripts, our expectation for CapEx in 2014 is that $130 million to $140 million and that includes about $40 million, $45 million of capital spend for this project to roll out SAP on a global basis. Within our CapEx, we also have our reagent rental, the instruments that we place on the diagnostic side, and that varied from year-to-year but generally that’s $40 million to $50 million range is the portion that relates to that and then the remaining third is more either facilities, investments or maintenance type CapEx.
JustinBowers:
Alright, thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And the next question comes from Jason Lazarus, Intrepid Capital. Please proceed.
Jason Lazarus:
Hi, guys, thanks for taking my question. Almost everything has been asked really around ERP system. Is it still expected cost $300 million?
Christine Tsingos:
Yes and it could be more. A lot of the unknown is as we rollout other parts of the world, complexity of this implementation both unwinding systems that are already in place, as well as bringing our international operations on to this standardized system. It has and we’ve learned our lesson through these past years that it’s often harder than we originally anticipate and these projects, the majority of the cost is human capital, whether it’s outside capital or own people working on the project. So that’s – that’s my caution that I think $300 million is probably a minimum to assume for the project and we are continually working to be a decision as we can. But we are about to embark on the most difficult faces of the project as we take it outside of the U.S.
Jason Lazarus:
Understand and appreciate the extra color on that. Can you tell me how much of that has been spent so far? And I have a good idea, but some more concrete figures would be helpful?
Christine Tsingos:
We are probably a little over half way through that amount and again, the ultimate total will be the ultimate total. But depending on how you want to measure it, we did a lot of upfront work before we really started the project. If you want to include that amount of money, then we’re probably further along in the stand. But the true project itself is probably around $150 million to $170 million.
Jason Lazarus:
Okay. That’s all I got. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] You have no questions at this time.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. Thank you, Kay. Thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today. We appreciate your interest in your support. Bye-bye.
Operator:
Thank you for participation in today’s conference. This concludes the presentation. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Executives:
Christine A. Tsingos – Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Norman D. Schwartz – Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman Ronald W. Hutton – Vice President and Treasurer
Analysts:
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome and thanks for joining the Third Quarter 2014 Bio-Rad Laboratories Earnings Call. My name is Ryan. I'll be the operator on the event. And at this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, however, we will be opening the lines to facilitate questions and answers. (Operator Instructions) And as a reminder, we are recording for replay. Now I turn the call over to Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer.
Ronald W. Hutton:
Thanks Ryan. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, and expectations. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we are pleased to report net sales for the quarter of $530.6 million, an increase of 5.1% on a reported basis and versus the same period last year sales of $505.1 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 4.3% when compared to last year. During the quarter, we experienced good currency neutral sales growth across many of our key life science and diagnostic product lines, including sales of our digital PCR instruments and consumables, as well as our blood typing and autoimmune testing products. On a geographic basis, sales in the emerging markets in China showed good growth for the quarter. The reported gross margin for the quarter was slightly lower than expected at 54.4% and compares to 56.3% in the year ago period. The current quarter gross margin was negatively impacted by $3.1 million of one-time cost associated with the consolidation and closing of some of our smaller manufacturing sites in Europe. Excluding these shutdown related costs, the gross margin for the quarter was in line with our guidance at 55%. We would also remind you that the gross margin in the year ago period reflected a $2.9 million, one-time benefit related to a correction in the valuation of finished goods inventory. And finally, the total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to prior acquisitions was $8.1 million for the quarter, which compares to $8.2 million in the year-ago period. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were $202.6 million or 38.2% of sales compared to $202.2 million and 40% of sales last year. The current quarter SG&A also includes a $9.6 million accrual in connection with the final settlement of the previously disclosed investigation related to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Also included in SG&A this quarter is $3.5 million of favorable impact due to a reduction in the valuation of the purchase consideration for GnuBIO . And finally, quarterly SG&A includes $2.1 million for amortization of intangibles related to prior acquisitions. Research and development expense in Q3 was 9.9% of sales or $52.8 million and essentially flat compared to last year. This comparison reflects a decline in spending associated with the completion and launch of new products in the life science space, which were offset by approximately $3 million of incremental spend for the development of a new diagnostic sequencing platform based on the GnuBIO technology. Going forward, we expect R&D expense to continue to be around 10% of sales. Excluding the one-time expenses related to the consolidation and closing of manufacturing sites and the incremental FCPA reserves, as well as considering the benefit from the reduction in acquisition purchase valuation, the operating margin would have been approximately 8% for the third quarter. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $10.8 million, which includes an additional $2.4 million of accrued interest associated with the resolution of the FCPA matter. The total net expense of $10.8 million this quarter compares to $34.3 million of net expense in the year ago period. When comparing to the prior period, remember that Q3 of last year included costs of $15.6 million associated with the redemption of our 8% subordinated notes. The effective tax rate used for the third quarter was approximately 49% and primarily the result of the relatively low pretax income combined with losses in certain foreign locations where no tax benefit is expected and the additional FCPA related penalties which are not tax deductible. Given this high quarterly tax rate and assuming no reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit during the remainder of the year, the effective tax rate for the full year 2014 will likely be in the 36% to 38% range. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, our best estimate for a Q4 rate is 32% to 33%. Net income for the third quarter was $11.5 million, which compares to a net loss of $7 million in the year ago period. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.39. Excluding the additional accrual of $12 million for the FCPA matter, we estimate that earnings per share for the third quarter would have been $0.73. As you’re probably aware, yesterday, we announced the final resolution with the U.S. government regarding past violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act related to certain of our international locations. As such, we will pay $55 million during the fourth quarter, an amount which has been fully reserved for. Over the past four years, we have conducted a thorough investigation and implemented numerous new policies and practices to help prevent something like this from happening again. We are pleased to finally put this matter behind us. And now for certain segment information, life science reported sales for the third quarter grew an impressive 6.1% to $172.8 million. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 5.5% versus last year. Sales of our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and consumables continued to do very well. Growth during the quarter was also helped by strong sales of process media, protein separation products, and traditional amplification consumables. On a geographic basis, life science sales growth in Europe, North America, and the emerging markets was particularly strong during the quarter and was partially offset by continued headwinds in Asia-Pacific and Japan. Life science sales in the China market also showed good growth during the third quarter that are still challenged on a year-to-date basis. Our clinical diagnostic group posted strong sales of $354.7 million, an increase of 4.7% compared to last year. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 3.9%. This growth was primarily fueled by good demand for our blood typing and autoimmune testing products, including solid growth in sales of BioPlex 2200 assays. On a geographic view, diagnostic currency-neutral sales for the quarter increased most notably in the emerging markets, Asia-Pacific and China. The growth was tempered somewhat by a challenging economic environment in Europe and Japan, where sales declined versus last year. And now for a quick review of the balance sheet, as of September 30, total cash and short-term investments were $703 million. Cash from operations during the quarter was sizable $91 million and more than $233 million year-to-date, which compares to $98 million for the first nine months of 2013. This significant improvement versus last year is primarily the result of improved collections, as well as lower interest and income taxes paid. Adjusted EBITDA also remained strong at $77 million for the quarter. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $27.3 million. Given the year-to-date run rate, our full year expectation for CapEx is now slightly lower in the $125 million to $135 million range. And finally depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $37 million. Moving to our outlook for the remainder of the year, we continue to anticipate full year currency neutral sales growth of around 2.5% and in line with the guidance set at the beginning of the year. However, it is important to point out that given the significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar we wouldn’t be surprised to see sales growth for the year fall below the 2% level on a reported basis. For the fourth quarter alone, the difference in September exchange rates versus currency neutral exchange rate could result in a sales headwind of more than $23 million on a reported basis. In terms of growth and using current exchange rates, reported sales in the fourth quarter could be flat to down compared to last year. On our last earnings call we stated cautioned in our ability to achieve our guidance of an 8% operating margin for the full year especially considering having a year-to-date margin of just over 6%. Today we reiterate that caution. And if we couple that with a likelihood of sales challenges in the fourth quarter resulting from the current exchange rate environment, the full-year operating margin on a reported basis maybe closer to 7%. As has been our practice in prior years, we will share our thinking and outlook for 2015 in February during the fourth quarter earnings call. And now we are happy to take your questions. Ryan?
Operator:
(Operator Instructions) And our first question here comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. Good afternoon.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Hi, Brandon.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Christine, maybe I missed this, but just to make sure, excluding all the one-time items, FCPA and the one-time revaluation benefit et cetera, did you say EPS in the quarter would have been more or like $0.73?
Christine A. Tsingos:
So, for the $0.73 what we used were the FCPA matter, and that was it. So, I always I’m hesitant to do this, Brandon, because we report on a GAAP basis, but there were kind of three big one-time items in the quarter. There was cost of $3.1 million in cost of goods sold for some manufacturing shutdown. There was the incremental $12 million for the FCPA accrual. And then we also had a benefit of about $3.5 million in the purchase evaluation as the earn out for GnuBIO. The $0.73 estimate is really just excluding the $12 million for FCPA, the $3.1 million cost of manufacturing shutdown is kind of offset by the $3.5 million upside and you know what we don’t like to go down that pro forma route. So…
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
That’s helpful.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Okay.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Thanks. That’s helpful. And then Norman or Christine, could you take a moment and just elaborate on some of the internal changes that have been made in terms of like centralizing a number of the functions globally, and how that might position you better for the ERP rollout? And then secondly as a corollary, should we anticipate any material cost savings from some of the actions you’ve taken to date such as consolidating a number of these manufacturing sites in Europe?
Ronald W. Hutton:
Yeah, okay. So in the organization, we have been moving to kind of a more globalized structure over the last few years, and this is kind of a final step as we appointed John Goetz as Chief Operating Officer and basically put all the operations in John’s hands, and at the same time, we took that opportunity to globalize some of the manufacturing operations, and the logistics have been worked on, so that all kind of came in under there. And then, globalized the sales organization which had been somewhat globalized in the past, but this completes that globalization. So those are the kind of the basic changes that we made. It does prepare us well for the next phase of the implementation of ERP . And of course we do expect to be able to kind of mine a lot of cost savings and kind of both effectiveness and efficiency out of the organization. You can imagine in manufacturing we’ve got many, many manufacturing sites around the world to be able to kind of reposition those as centers of excellence. And on a logistics front, there is just a lot that we can do to drive logistics costs. I mean there are just a lot of places that we have that we can mine.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Yeah, so it’s probably too early to estimate or quantify the financial benefit of some of the odd changes Brandon in terms of globalizing, logistics, supply chain, sales et cetera. Obviously we believe there is upside there, but I think it’s too early for us to quantify that impact. Having said that, just from the locations -- that manufacturing locations in Europe that we’ve been consolidating and shutting down this year, incremental operating income in 2015 from those actions is at least $3 million, probably in the $3 million to $4 million range. So that’s beneficial, and then of course as we continue to roll out ERP and with the next deployment , there is probably some benefit. Not likely needle moving if you will, because as we’ve always said that the biggest benefit for us resides in Europe. And as we move SAP through Europe, we’ll start to see some real measurable results, but each of these is a little bit of an incremental add in the right direction.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Super and then one more. In terms of the life science business, I mean pretty remarkable results in the context of what we’ve seen elsewhere in this space in the period. Could you give us some color and more granularity on the trends geographically in the life science business? And then kind of what you’re seeing out of China in particular will be helpful?
Norman D. Schwartz:
Okay, so if we take – the U.S. has done well, our North America has done well this quarter. And I think Europe continues too -- it seems to be on a rebound from last year. I think those are the two biggest areas of contribution to that growth number. And certainly, China continued to move along. Although, I would say that we are a little bit cautious about China given what some of the other people have reported, and we’ll have to see how that plays out for the rest of the year.
Christine A. Tsingos:
I think from life science on a year-to-date basis China is still fairly, fairly flat. The pipeline going into Q4 seems pretty good for life science in China, a lot of that demand around the digital PCR is global demand that we’re seeing. The other thing in the quarter we had a good process media quarter and that’s kind of a lumpy business. So some of the growth was driven by ordering in the process media side.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Super, I will hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Operator:
(Operator Instructions) And our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Leerink.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi, this is Kevin (indiscernible) I’m filling in for Dan Leonard today. I just have one quick question. Could you please clarify the currency impact for the 4Q? I briefly caught it was 2.5% growth offsets – some of the other Asian region. Could you please just clarify that?
Christine A. Tsingos:
You’re talking about for the outlook.
Unidentified Analyst:
Yes please.
Christine A. Tsingos:
I think that on a currency neutral basis, we’ve guided to 2.5% for the full year and I think we reiterate that guidance. In the fourth quarter, it’s clear that exchange rates are very different today. So on a reported basis, the growth rate could be much lower. And if we just kind of look at forecasted sales for the fourth quarter and we measure those using currency neutral rates versus currency rate. The difference is it’s more than $20 million. So that on a reported basis could affect the growth rate for the year.
Unidentified Analyst:
Got it. That’s helpful. Thank you very much.
Christine A. Tsingos:
You’re welcome.
Operator:
And we have no other questions in queue.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Do you want to ask, some more time please?
Operator:
(Operator Instructions) Looks we have some follow-up coming through from Brandon.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Great, thank you. Christine, I don’t know if John’s actually there on hand or not, but in terms of the diagnostics business. Could you speak to some of the drivers of the growth in the period geographically and in particular and blood typing, do you think you’re gaining share from competitors in the U.S. in terms of the growth you’ve seen there recently.
John Goetz:
Hi, this is John, I’ll take that. In the blood typing arena our growth primarily came out of Europe and Asia Pacific, which is a good sign for us, it’s been pretty flap sledding there recently. And so having those uptick a little bit in this quarter was good. Yeah, I don’t see is taking share in the U.S. at this time. Outside of that product line our autoimmune business did pretty well and that was a generally overall geographically speaking pretty even around the world. Beside from that, I think that’s it.
S. Brandon Couillard – Jefferies LLC:
Super, thanks.
Operator:
All right. We have no other questions in queue, so Christine I’ll pass back to you for any closing comments.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Okay, great. Thank you, Ryan. Well, thank you everyone for taking the time to join us today. Bye-bye.
Executives:
Ronald W. Hutton - Vice President and Treasurer Christine A. Tsingos - Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Bradford J. Crutchfield - Executive Vice President and President of the Life Science Group John Goetz - Executive Vice President and President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group Norman D. Schwartz - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Analysts:
Daniel L. Leonard - Leerink Swann LLC, Research Division S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Quarter 2 2014 Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Patrick, and I'll be your moderator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Ron Hutton, Vice President and Treasurer. Please proceed, sir.
Ronald W. Hutton:
Thank you, Patrick. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Net sales for the quarter were $536.8 million, an increase of 2.2% on a reported basis versus the same period last year sales of $525.3 million. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 1.1%. During the quarter, we had growth across many of our key Diagnostic and Life Science markets, most notably, in our Digital PCR product lines and sales of Diagnostic products in the emerging markets. Overall, the quarterly comp line was negatively impacted by continued competitive challenges in our Diagnostic products in Europe, as well as headwinds for Life Science products in the Asia-Pacific and China markets. The reported gross margin for the second quarter was in line with expectations at 55.4% and compares to 54% in the first quarter. This sequential improvement is primarily reflective of a favorable product mix. When compared to the year-ago period, the decline in gross margin as related to pricing pressure, we continue to experience in our Diagnostics business, especially in Europe. For the quarter, the total non-cash purchase accounting expense recorded in cost of goods sold related to acquisitions was $8.1 million, which compares to $8.5 million in the second quarter of last year. Good spending management during the quarter resulted in flat year-over-year SG&A expenses of $195.8 million or 36.5% of sales, which compares to 37.2% in the year-ago period. Also recorded in SG&A is $2.2 million for amortization of intangibles related to acquisitions. Research and development expense in Q2 was 10.4% of sales or $55.7 million compared to $51.8 million last year. The year-over-year increase in R&D spend is primarily related to our investment in new instruments for the Diagnostics market, as well as Droplet Digital technology and products. This increase also includes the newly acquired GnuBIO team. Going forward, we expect R&D spend to continue to be around 10% of sales. With the improved gross margin and combined with good spending management, the operating margin for the second quarter was 8.5% and significantly better than the first quarter of this year. As a result, operating income more than doubled on a sequential basis to $45.7 million. During the quarter, interest in other income resulted in -- a net income position of $3.1 million compared to a net expense of $3.9 million in Q2 of last year. This improvement versus last year is largely related to lower interest and foreign exchange costs, as well as additional dividend income typically associated with our second quarter. The effective tax rate used during the second quarter was 35%, reflecting the continued expiration of the federal R&D tax credit. Excluding any discrete items that may occur, we anticipate the full year tax rate to remain in the 34% to 35% range. Net income attributable to Bio-Rad for the second quarter was $31.6 million and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $1.09, this compares to $1.20 per share in Q2 of last year. And now for certain segment information. Life Science reported sales for the second quarter were $170.3 million, essentially flat when compared to last year. On a currency-neutral basis, sales declined 1.1%. These quarterly results reflect strong growth in both process media and Digital PCR products. However, sales growth during the quarter was negatively impact by weakness in some of our more traditional product lines for academic research. On a geographic basis, European sales continue to rebound nicely, and the U.S. market is showing some modest growth. Offsetting this performance were challenges in the Asia-Pacific and China markets, related to some local spending constraints, as well as the timing of revenue recognition. Our Clinical Diagnostics segment posted quarterly sales of $362.9 million, compared to $351.5 million last year, an increase of 3.2%. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales for the Diagnostics group grew 2.1%. This growth was led by performance across many product lines, most notably, our BioPlex 2200 assay and quality control products. Sales to China in the emerging markets were especially strong for Diagnostics during the quarter. This growth was partially offset by a continued decline in Europe. Moving to the balance sheet. As of June 30, total cash and short-term investments were $648 million. This minimal increase in cash balances from last quarter reflects $40 million of cash used for the purchase of GnuBIO. Despite the relatively flat sales in income, net cash generated from operations for the quarter was substantial at more than $80 million, which compares to just under $20 million in the year-ago period. This increase in the cash flow is the result of improved customer collections and lower interest payments. Additionally, the quarterly cash flow benefited from a onetime sizable tax refund of $20 million related to prior period. EBITDA for the quarter was also good at $91 million or 17% of sales. The net capital expenditures for the quarter was $34.7 million, which is an increase both sequentially and year-over-year. This increase relates largely to additional spending for our global ERP project, as well as an increase in reagent rental placements for Diagnostics. Our full year expectation for CapEx has been in the $140 million to $150 million range. Given the year-to-date spend of just over $60 million, we will likely be at the lower end of that range. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $36.3 million and essentially flat with Q1. As we look to the full year for 2014, we remain cautiously optimistic of achieving the currency neutral sales growth guidance of 2.5% that we laid out at the beginning of the year. For the first 6 months of 2014, our currency neutral sales growth is 2%. However, we are planning to launch more new products in the second half for the year, primarily for the Life Science market, which should help fuel growth. In addition, the headwinds we faced in the second quarter in the Asia-Pacific and China Life Science market appear to be more timing in nature. And hopefully, we will return to growth in that part of the world in the second half for the year. On the last earnings call, we revised our operating margin expectations for the full year to be around 8% on a reported basis, down from the original 9% outlook in order to include the addition of GnuBIO. Given the year-to-date margin of 6.3%, which includes the first quarter accrual related to our potential FCPA resolution, we're also somewhat cautious about achieving a full year operating margin in the 8% range. As you have heard us say many times in the past, with a fairly high level of fixed costs, our operating margin is affected more by what happens with top line growth. If sales growth does not accelerate in the second half for the year, the operating margin for the full year could be lower than our 8% goal. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with Leerink.
Daniel L. Leonard - Leerink Swann LLC, Research Division:
My first question, your comments around China are similar to what peers in Life Sciences have reported, but presumably you're 2 weeks smarter than your peers here. So I'm wondering if you're seen any green shoots that the issue in China is more timing than something more than that.
Bradford J. Crutchfield:
This is Brad, I'll take this question. I think, the situation in China in general is slower than it has been. I think it was particularly slow for Bio-Rad in the second quarter. As Christine pointed out, that was particularly more timing issues. I think, overall, I do see it improving in the second half for the year. And but certainly, I think, we're all seeing a much slower China than we've seen in the past.
Daniel L. Leonard - Leerink Swann LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then my follow-up. Christine, when is the second deployment of your ERP due to occur, to begin?
Christine A. Tsingos:
The second deployment is scheduled for some time in 2015, probably late spring, early summer.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Brad, another one for you. I will be curious if you've seen any changes or improvements in the competitive landscape in the PCR space? Has your primary competitor there been any more rational about pricing? And what were some of the legacy products or the more mature products that Christine mentioned in the script?
Bradford J. Crutchfield:
Okay. So, yes, I think in general we're seeing a lot more saner practice in the marketplace. I can certainly attest to that. And as Christine pointed out, some of the more traditional products around electrophoresis and Thermal Cyclers and even qPCR has been somewhat impacted. But it's important to note that we do -- a lot of our business in China is around our gene expression product line, and it's because we've had some slowness on timing in China, or there was some slowdown as a result of timing in China, it really had a disproportionate impact on these types of products.
Christine A. Tsingos:
That's a good point.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Christine, could you quantify the dollar amount from the drag in China and Asia more broadly as it relates to the timing and spending constraints? Just how much of a drag that was on Life Sciences?
Christine A. Tsingos:
Brandon, we don't usually talk about things in that detail, but it was enough for it to have a negative impact to their growth during the quarter.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
I guess, is it fair to say the segment would've been positive in terms of growth excluding these factors?
Christine A. Tsingos:
Probably.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Okay. Secondly, if John's there, would be curious if he has an update on the BioPlex 2200, and specifically, sort of the timing of when do you guys think you can get the vitamin D and HIV assays commercialized in the U.S. market?
John Goetz:
Yes, Brandon. I don't have an update for you on the timing on when we will be able to bring those into the market. They are in regulatory now, and your guess is as good as mine right now.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Okay. Last one, Christine, any update on the timing of the FCPA resolution?
Christine A. Tsingos:
Well, it's a good question. It's -- we're hopeful that we will be able to reach resolution this year, but these things just take time. I don't know, Norman, if you want to add anything?
Norman D. Schwartz:
No, I think that's fair.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We have a follow-up question from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Christine or John, could you speak to the Diagnostics business in the U.S. and how that performed in the period? And I don't know, if you're willing to go into this much detail, but if we backed out Europe, what would that business have grown organically in the second quarter?
Christine A. Tsingos:
So we're probably not going to try and guess what the rate was. I mean, the European business, as we talked about in the past is generally about 1/3 of the Diagnostic overall sales, and it was down year-over-year. So you can't help but feel that. I think on the Life Science -- on the U.S. Diagnostics business, I think it was maybe up slightly, but still also feeling some competitive pressures. And that's probably another 1/3 of Diagnostics and so when you have 60%, it affects your overall growth rate. If both of those were growing in the low single digits, then we would've seen a very different result.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
Fair enough. And then, Norman, looking back 2 quarters, I believe, you mentioned a key focus of yours this year would be bringing cost out of the manufacturing organization focus on better logistics and efficiency there. Any update on how those initiatives are progressing to date?
Norman D. Schwartz:
Yes. So I think that especially in the Life Science side, you've seen some -- we've seen some of the effects of that in the increase gross margins this year and for the increase gross margins. And then certainly in the logistics side, we're working on a lot of pieces of that puzzle. We haven't seen the effects so far, but -- because it's a longer-term project, but it's proceeding.
Christine A. Tsingos:
And I think there's opportunity in both manufacturing costs and logistics, Brandon. We've talked about trying to consolidate some of our manufacturing, especially on the Diagnostics side, especially in Europe where we've taken on a lot of the acquisitions over the years. And again, it just -- it takes time, when you're dealing with those larger locations and people. On the logistics side, it's something that we pulled together on a global basis now to really look at it globally. And I think that the benefit to doing it that way is the ability to find some real savings. But it's going to take time for this -- for the group to really come together, and in our current IT environment, it's not as easy to do as it will be in the future state with a single ERP, but both have upside.
S. Brandon Couillard - Jefferies LLC, Research Division:
And last one, Brad, in terms of the new products that are planned for the Life Science unit in the second half. Are these more of a 4Q phenomenon or should we see some benefit from those rolling out as early as the third quarter?
Bradford J. Crutchfield:
Well, I think you'll definitely see some more -- we'll see some impact in the quarter, and then the rest of the year. I mean, we're launching products around our imaging business, we have some have a new cell biology product. We have an extension into our Droplet Digital PCR system and a lot of assays. So it's -- these are things that tend to have a pretty good pent-up demand, so we're encouraged.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Let's hope the customers having the budgets.
Operator:
There are no additional questions in queue. I would now like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.
Christine A. Tsingos:
Okay. All right, everyone. Well, thank you very much for taking the time to join us today. We appreciate your support. Bye.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.
Executives:
Ron Hutton - Vice President and Treasurer Christine Tsingos - Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President Bradford Crutchfield - Executive Vice President, President, Life Science Group Norman Schwartz - Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer John Goetz - Executive Vice President, President, Clinical Diagnostics Group
Analysts:
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the first quarter 2014 Bio-Rad Laboratories earnings conference call. My name is Britney and I will be the operator for today. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions). As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. And at this time, I would now like to turn the presentation over to your host for today, Ron Hutton. Please proceed, sir.
Ron Hutton:
Thank you very much, Britney. Before we begin the call, I would like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations. Because our actual results may differ materially from these plans and expectations, I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Christine Tsingos, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Christine Tsingos:
Thanks, Ron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Net sales for the first quarter of 2014 were $509.3 million, an increase of 1.9% on a reported basis versus the same period last year sales of $499.7 million. On a currency-neutral basis, sales increased 2.9%. During the quarter, we had good growth across many of our key markets and product areas in our Life Science segment as well as certain diagnostic products. Sales growth in the quarter was partially offset by continued weakness in the European diagnostics market, which posted a decline in currency-neutral sales versus last year as well as continued challenges in North American research market, which was essentially flat versus last year. Offsetting these tepid regions was solid growth in the emerging markets, most notably China and Latin America. The reported gross margin for the first quarter was 54% compared to 54.3% last year and 53.6% in the fourth quarter of 2013. This margin is reflective of continued pricing pressure in our diagnostic business offset somewhat by a decline in royalty expense in our Life Science segment. Total purchase accounting and amortization expense related to acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $8.3 million compared to $8 million in the first quarter of last year. SG&A expenses for the first quarter were higher than expected at $202.3 million or 39.7% of sales compared to $185.9 million or 37.2% of sales last year. As expected, absolute spending is up year-over-year, primarily related to increased IT expenses, as well as increased personnel costs typically associated with our first quarter. In addition, during the quarter we recorded an incremental accrual of $9.8 million related to our ongoing efforts to resolve the previously disclosed investigation related to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Total amortization of intangibles related to acquisitions reported in SG&A for the quarter was $2.1 million. Research and development expense in Q1 was in line with expectations at 10.3% of sales or $52.5 million, which compares to $50.3 million spent in the first quarter of last year. The increase in R&D expenses is primarily for investment in cell biology and Digital PCR products, as well as new instrumentation for the diagnostic market. With a sizable sequential decrease in sales from the fourth quarter of more than $93 million, combined with a fairly flat gross margin and a high level of both fixed and one-time operating expenses, the operating margin for the first quarter was in turn significantly impacted and resulted in a 4% operating margin compared to 7% in the year ago period. Excluding the FCPA related accrual, the operating margin for the quarter was approximately 6%. During the quarter, interest and other income was a net expense of $5.9 million compared to $11.1 million of expense in Q1 of last year. This decrease versus last year is largely related to lower interest expense resulting from our bond redemption in the third quarter of 2013. The effective tax rate used during the first quarter was somewhat meaningless at 54%, primarily due to the low pretax income discrete items and the expiration of the U.S. Federal R&D tax credit. Given this high first quarter rate and excluding any discrete items that may occur during the year, we now expect the full year effective tax rate to be in the 34% to 35% range. Net income for the first quarter was $6.7 million and diluted earnings per share were $0.23. And now for certain segment information. Life Science reported sales in the first quarter increased to $161.5 million, a growth of 3.3% on a reported basis. On a currency-neutral basis, sales grew an impressive 4.6% when compared to last year. This growth was driven by continued strong demand for our Droplet Digital PCR instruments and reagents as well as the new NGC chromatography system. Our food pathogen and process media businesses also increased double-digit during the quarter. On a geographic basis, Life Science sales were particularly strong in Europe, China and Latin America. This growth was partially offset by continued slowness in the U.S. academic research market, as well as the government austerity program in Japan. In terms of profitability, the Life Science gross margin improved more than 150 basis points compared to last year, the result of a shift in product mix towards higher margin instruments and consumables as well as a decrease in royalty expense. Sales in Clinical Diagnostic products were $344.3 million compared to $340 million last year, an increase of 1.3%. On a currency-neutral basis, year-over-year sales grew 2.1% for the Diagnostics group. This lower overall growth is reflective of continued competitive and pricing pressures, especially in Europe, as well as a tough to compare with 2013 where the first quarter included a significant sale of diabetes monitoring instruments in China. On a geographic basis, Diagnostic sales in the emerging markets of Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe and Latin America were strong in Q1, partially offset by flat to down market in the U.S. and Western Europe. As you may now, we recently announced the acquisition of GnuBIO, an exciting new droplet-based technology for targeted sequencing in the Clinical Diagnostics market. GnuBIO has developed an innovative desktop platform that incorporates all of the functions of DNA sequencing into a single, integrated workflow. This new technology will leverage the tremendous knowledgebase we are growing in Droplet Digital PCR. While it will likely take a few years to bring this product to market, we are excited about the prospects for this potentially game changing technology. Terms of the acquisition include a payment of $40 million at the April 10 closing date, as well as contingent consideration for a potential incremental $70 million related to several development and sales milestones over the next three years. Moving to the balance sheet. As of March 31, total cash and short-term investments were $641.3 million. Despite the lower income in the first quarter, net cash generated from operations was substantial at $69 million compared to $24 million in the year ago period. This increase in cash flow is primarily the result of improved customer collections, lower interest payment and lower taxes paid. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were in line with our expectations at $25.8 million. Our full-year expectation for CapEx remains in the $142 million to $150 million range as we continue to invest in a global ERP system. And finally, depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $36.7 million. On our last earnings call, we laid out guidance for 2014, that is for currency-neutral organic top line growth of around 2.5%, full-year gross margins in the 55% range and an operating margin of 9%, which reflects our continued investments in new technologies and systems. Despite the relatively slow profitability start to the year, we are maintaining the base business guidance given at the beginning of the year. To this base guidance, we must now include the impact of our acquisition of GnuBIO. For the next several quarters, we will be investing heavily to bring this exciting new technology for the diagnostic market. As such, we estimate an incremental spend in research and development of approximately $5 million per quarter, which will be recorded in our Clinical Diagnostic segment. With the inclusion of GnuBIO in mind, we now estimate the 2014 full-year operating margin to be somewhat lower in the 8% range. And now we are happy to take your questions.
Operator:
(Operator Instructions). Your first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please proceed, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Hi. Good afternoon.
Christine Tsingos:
Hi, Brandon.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Christine, are you able to quantify the impact or the incremental impact the ERP investments on the P&L in the first quarter?
Christine Tsingos:
I can. So incremental, I assume, versus last year at this time, and what increase versus last year at this time is taking on the depreciation as well as the other support cost of the deployment that went live in April 2013 and that increment is about $3 million. In terms of the ERP project spend, it's flattish year-over-year and remember last year at this time, it was right before we were going live. I think that as the year goes on, you will see that increase in ERP spend year-over-year start to materialize.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay, I am not sure if Brad is there, but if he is, could you elaborate on the GnuBIO deal. What appeals to you about the system and sort of whatever commercialization timeline you are willing to offer at this point?
Bradford Crutchfield:
Okay. Yes, Brandon, I am here. Well, clearly the technology of GnuBIO fits very, very well with the technology that we got from QuantaLife and we commercialized PCR. Essentially, we have now, I wouldn't say we cornered the market, but we have a tremendous amount of capability in Droplet and the capability around GnuBIO is the ability to inject into droplets, the so called pico-injector. What that really allows us to do is a lot more flexibility and a lot more multiplexing. Specifically it's going to allow us to barcode droplets and then very, very specifically interrogate gene and sequence across very specific genes, certainly in numbers that are not anywhere near a discovery platform, but certainly in a targeted approach around, I would say, we are going to answer questions that have meaningful answers and will ultimately results in changes in treatment, of course. So that's what is driving this. It's a technology that's been proven. It's using a standard hybridization chemistry versus single base sequencing and so the great upside for us is just, we will integrate this into a single workflow where you start with genomic DNA and you get an answer. So we are very excited about it. There is a lot of work to do to get that cartridge bulletproof and then, obviously, the regulatory parts of that as well. Certainly something we wish to do within two years.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Super, and then one for Norman, I guess a two-part question. Could you give us an update on the progress you have made around the facility consolidation efforts that are planned for the year? And then an updated view around the M&A pipeline would be helpful.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay. Well, in terms of facility consolidation, I assume you mean really manufacturing operations.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay.
Norman Schwartz:
Actually we are working on that. we have completed one piece of that puzzle and there are a few further rationalization planned, as I think we talked about before, especially in Europe manufacturing. Also doing some work around streamlining our logistics footprint and we are continuing along that process. In terms of the M&A pipeline. Obviously, we just completed this GnuBIO acquisition. That will keep us busy for a little while. There always is few things in the pipeline but nothing I would say significant at the moment.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
All right. Super. Thank you.
Operator:
There are no further questions at this time.
Christine Tsingos:
You want to poll just one more time, just in case?
Operator:
Okay. (Operator Instructions). We have a follow-up question from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Please proceed.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Excellent, I will keep going. Christine, was there any impact of weather in the U.S.? Either in the Diagnostics business or in Life Sciences that you can put some numbers around?
Norman Schwartz:
We certainly can't --
Christine Tsingos:
Most likely. I think it's hard to quantify.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. It's really hard to put numbers around it. Obviously there was bad weather in the first part of the year in the U.S. Probably the government was shutdown for a few days. What the total effect was, we really haven't quantified.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay, and any update around the blood typing submission to the FDA?
John Goetz:
This is John, Brandon. No. we haven't had really any feedback yet. That just went in, in February. So we should expect to hear something probably in the coming months now.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay, but it's been submitted, though, at this point.
John Goetz:
Yes.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay, super, and then Christine, could you give us the total amortization expense in the first quarter?
Christine Tsingos:
Deal related or total, total amortization?
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Total.
Christine Tsingos:
Because when we talked about deal related and the $8.3 million in cost of goods and $2.1 million in SG&A that are related to prior acquisition and then you want me to break it out. I am looking through my cash flow statement. Amortization from depreciation, because I did mention in the script that the total depreciation and amortization was $36.7 million for the quarter. Okay, so it breaks out $25 million is depreciation and amortization is about $12 million.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Okay. That's helpful, and then in the Diagnostics business, maybe this is just one for John. How would you characterize the environment in Europe? Are the pricing pressures and competitive headwinds intensifying? And if you could give us a sense of the growth rate of the business outside of Europe would be helpful.
John Goetz:
Well, to your first question, Brandon, the length of tenders has had a pretty significant impact on pricing pressure, as few companies don't want to lose an opportunity where the business is being held up for three, four, five, six, seven years. We have even seen some tenders as long as 10, which is quite amazing. And I think I mentioned in the last call that the part of the business that seems most impacted by all of this is in our blood virus testing business where we really have suffered some setbacks there, which is really overall, (inaudible) our overall picture in Europe. Outside of Europe, and I think Christine has mentioned the emerging market growth has been really pretty good for us and thank God for that.
Christine Tsingos:
Yes, I think I will say that the developed world, North America, Western Europe, Japan, the growth is high single-digits.
Brandon Couillard - Jefferies:
Super. Thank you.
Operator:
And your next question comes from Jeffrey Matthews with RAM Partners. Please proceed, sir.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Hi. Thanks very much. Can you hear me?
Christine Tsingos:
Hi, Jeff.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Hi. In baseball terms, what inning do you think you are in, in the European consolidation?
Norman Schwartz:
In the European consolidation? Market consolidation or what we are doing?
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Well, actually, both.
Norman Schwartz:
Okay, cool. I don't know. Baseball is not really my game.
Christine Tsingos:
Early innings in the consolidation of our manufacturing sites. I will answer that part.
Norman Schwartz:
Yes, and we hope we are in fifth to sixth innings.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Let me put it this way. If you are rebuilding a classic car, Norman, is the engine in and is it up and running or what?
Norman Schwartz:
Yes. I don't know yet.
John Goetz:
We have some parts leftover.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Well, overall, do you feel more optimistic about where Europe is going or do the headwinds seem to be increasing?
Norman Schwartz:
I guess we feel it, at least I feel little a more optimistic that the last two years there have been a number of things, especially with the meltdown in the Spain, in Greece and those kind to things but that all seems to be stabilized. It's just slow going.
Christine Tsingos:
I think that's especially true for the Life Science segment. We have really chartered along with the rest of the industry and some of the discretionary spending in Western Europe and it's tough to eek out any kind of growth there and at least for the first quarter in our Life Science segment, they saw double-digit growth in Europe. Now some of that may be an easy compare but some of that is the spending coming back.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Right.
Christine Tsingos:
Unfortunately, offsetting that, our diagnostic business in Europe actually declined year-over-year on a currency neutral basis, and that goes back to what John was talking about a minute ago in terms of the really heavy competition we are facing in the tenders and pricing pressure that's not only coming from the competition but, frankly being put on by these government entities at the beginning of the tenders. So some of that offset each other a little bit but all-in-all, I think there is some signs of improvement in Europe.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Okay, great. Now my second question was about Russia. Anything happening to business there in light of what's going on?
Norman Schwartz:
No, nothing. It seems to be so far business as usual.
Jeffrey Matthews - RAM Partners:
Okay. Thanks very much.
Operator:
Okay, and there are no further questions at this time.
Christine Tsingos:
Okay. Well, as always, everyone, thank you so much for taking the time to join us and we look forward to seeing you soon. Bye, bye.
Operator:
Well, ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the presentation for today's conference. You may now all disconnect and have a wonderful day.