• Semiconductors
  • Technology
Qorvo, Inc. logo
Qorvo, Inc.
QRVO · US · NASDAQ
111.01
USD
+3.73
(3.36%)
Executives
Name Title Pay
Mr. David Fullwood Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing --
Mr. Philip J. Chesley Senior Vice President & President of High Performance Analog 878K
Mr. Brent Dietz Director of Corporate Communications --
Ms. Debra Howard Senior Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer --
Mr. Steven Eric Creviston Senior Vice President and President of Connectivity & Sensors 1.03M
Mr. Robert A. Bruggeworth President, Chief Executive Officer & Director 2.32M
Mr. Douglas DeLieto Vice President of Investor Relations --
Mr. Grant A. Brown Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 1.31M
Mr. Paul J. Fego Senior Vice President of Global Operations 913K
Mr. Jason K. Givens Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary --
Insider Transactions
Date Name Title Acquisition Or Disposition Stock / Options # of Shares Price
2024-08-09 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 13 107.08
2024-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 18 107.08
2024-08-09 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 128 107.08
2024-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 144 107.08
2024-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 472 107.08
2024-08-09 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 15 107.08
2024-08-05 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 701 107.93
2024-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 388 107.93
2024-08-05 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2714 107.93
2024-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 12600 107.93
2024-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 3123 107.93
2024-08-05 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 1392 107.93
2024-08-05 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1527 107.93
2024-07-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 134 117.13
2024-06-17 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 112.36
2024-06-12 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 210 106.05
2024-06-06 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 15279 100
2024-06-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 921 0
2024-05-23 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4721 100
2024-05-16 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 36 99.91
2024-05-16 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 1181 99.91
2024-05-16 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 962 99.38
2024-05-16 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 625 99.91
2024-05-16 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 698 99.91
2024-05-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 12954 99.38
2024-05-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 2317 99.91
2024-05-16 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 63 99.91
2024-05-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular A - A-Award Common Stock 9725 0
2024-05-14 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 1408 98.35
2024-05-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 312 99.05
2024-05-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 3739 0
2024-05-14 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 542 98.35
2024-05-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 203 99.05
2024-05-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 17958 0
2024-05-14 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2372 98.35
2024-05-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2132 99.31
2024-05-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1618 99.05
2024-05-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 17208 0
2024-05-14 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 2666 98.35
2024-05-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 99.31
2024-05-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 1805 99.05
2024-05-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog A - A-Award Common Stock 14964 0
2024-05-14 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 1822 98.35
2024-05-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 1142 99.05
2024-05-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 78562 0
2024-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 16981 98.35
2024-05-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 22299 99.31
2024-05-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 7844 99.05
2024-05-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 19454 0
2024-05-14 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3181 98.35
2024-05-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 157 99.05
2024-05-08 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 941 97.36
2024-03-01 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 120
2024-02-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3027 114
2024-02-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 354 114
2024-02-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - S-Sale Common Stock 4253 114
2023-12-14 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 110
2023-12-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 365 105
2023-12-05 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 2418 97.67
2023-12-06 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - S-Sale Common Stock 10580 97.72
2023-11-27 RHINES WALDEN C director A - P-Purchase Common Stock 5000 93.19
2023-11-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 4627 95
2023-10-05 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 89 94.1
2023-09-06 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 662 106.95
2023-09-05 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - S-Sale Common Stock 500 108
2023-09-06 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - S-Sale Common Stock 500 107
2023-08-30 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2067 106.6
2023-08-22 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 8689 101.37
2023-08-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular A - A-Award Common Stock 5039 0
2023-08-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular A - A-Award Common Stock 439 0
2023-08-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 65 103.19
2023-08-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 1938 0
2023-08-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 285 0
2023-08-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 43 103.19
2023-08-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 9303 0
2023-08-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 1681 0
2023-08-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 4208 102.02
2023-08-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 332 103.19
2023-08-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 8916 0
2023-08-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 1681 0
2023-08-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 373 103.19
2023-08-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog A - A-Award Common Stock 7753 0
2023-08-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog A - A-Award Common Stock 1243 0
2023-08-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 152 103.19
2023-08-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 40702 0
2023-08-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 7315 0
2023-08-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 10757 102.02
2023-08-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 1617 103.19
2023-08-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 10078 0
2023-08-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 147 0
2023-08-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 6679 102.02
2023-08-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 33 103.19
2023-08-15 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 RHINES WALDEN C director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 QUINSEY RALPH director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 Nelson Roderick director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 Ho David H Y director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 HARDING JOHN R director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 7850 47.96
2023-08-15 HARDING JOHN R director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 7850 102.02
2023-08-15 HARDING JOHN R director D - M-Exempt Stock option (right to buy) 7850 47.96
2023-08-15 GARDNER JEFFERY R director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-15 BRUNER JUDY director A - A-Award Common Stock 2132 0
2023-08-09 Ho David H Y director D - F-InKind Common Stock 621 106.2
2023-08-09 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 8 106.2
2023-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 16 106.2
2023-08-09 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 127 106.2
2023-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 142 106.2
2023-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 472 106.2
2023-08-09 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 13 106.2
2023-08-07 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 460 106.88
2023-08-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 408 106.88
2023-08-07 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2028 106.88
2023-08-07 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 2421 106.88
2023-08-07 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 389 106.88
2023-08-07 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 11294 106.88
2023-08-07 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 377 106.88
2023-06-08 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1000 99.72
2023-05-26 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 100
2023-05-22 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 11218 93.84
2023-05-18 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 4304 95
2023-05-17 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 17063 90.73
2023-05-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular A - A-Award Common Stock 3844 0
2023-05-15 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 571 90.24
2023-05-16 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 36 93.02
2023-05-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 2499 0
2023-05-15 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 370 90.24
2023-05-16 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 77 93.02
2023-05-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 14739 0
2023-05-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2025 90.24
2023-05-16 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 624 93.02
2023-05-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 14739 0
2023-05-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 2518 90.24
2023-05-16 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 700 93.02
2023-05-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog A - A-Award Common Stock 10893 0
2023-05-15 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 1325 90.24
2023-05-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 64084 0
2023-05-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 14163 90.24
2023-05-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 2329 93.02
2023-05-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 1281 0
2023-05-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 284 90.24
2023-05-16 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 4034 93.02
2023-05-11 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 114 92.59
2023-05-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 1423 92.59
2023-05-11 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 877 92.59
2023-05-11 Stewart Frank P. SVP, Advanced Cellular D - F-InKind Common Stock 112 92.59
2023-05-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 242 92.59
2023-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 6562 92.59
2023-03-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 94.44
2023-03-01 GARDNER JEFFERY R - 0 0
2023-03-06 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 180 102.7
2023-03-01 GARDNER JEFFERY R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 4089 101.23
2023-02-23 RHINES WALDEN C director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 12471 14.34
2023-02-23 RHINES WALDEN C director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 12471 14.34
2023-02-15 CREVISTON STEVEN E SVP, Connectivity & Sensors D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 105.26
2023-02-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 105.26
2022-12-15 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 77 100.94
2022-12-13 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 3559 104
2022-12-05 Chesley Philip SVP, High Performance Analog D - F-InKind Common Stock 1887 97.19
2022-11-15 FEGO PAUL J SVP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2505 98.33
2022-11-07 Brown Grant SVP & Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 120 86.85
2022-10-05 Brown Grant Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 72 86.07
2022-09-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2413 85.42
2022-09-07 GARDNER JEFFERY R D - S-Sale Common Stock 1500 89.16
2022-09-05 Brown Grant Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 11094 0
2022-08-22 Stewart Frank P. VP, Advanced Cellular D - S-Sale Common Stock 1224 100.27
2022-08-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2438 110.18
2022-08-10 Stewart Frank P. VP, Advanced Cellular D - Common Stock 0 0
2022-08-09 Chesley Philip VP, High Performance Analog A - A-Award Common Stock 6389 0
2022-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 8644 0
2022-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 528 102.23
2022-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP, Connectivity & Sensors A - A-Award Common Stock 1282 0
2022-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP, Connectivity & Sensors D - F-InKind Common Stock 286 106.43
2022-08-09 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO A - A-Award Common Stock 1691 0
2022-08-09 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO D - F-InKind Common Stock 76 102.23
2022-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 1466 0
2022-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 31 106.43
2022-08-09 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 468 102.23
2022-08-09 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 1282 0
2022-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 37583 0
2022-08-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 1756 102.23
2022-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 4269 0
2022-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 949 106.43
2022-08-09 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 RHINES WALDEN C A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 QUINSEY RALPH A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 Nelson Roderick A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 Ho David H Y A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 HARDING JOHN R A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 GARDNER JEFFERY R A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-09 BRUNER JUDY A - A-Award Common Stock 2067 0
2022-08-08 Ho David H Y D - F-InKind Common Stock 341 106.09
2022-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 292 106.09
2022-08-05 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO D - F-InKind Common Stock 97 108.61
2022-08-05 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2000 108.61
2022-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 678 108.61
2022-08-08 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 2349 106.09
2022-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 2286 108.61
2022-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 7043 106.09
2022-06-16 Nelson Roderick A - M-Exempt Common Stock 4761 13.62
2022-06-16 Nelson Roderick D - S-Sale Common Stock 4761 95.26
2022-06-16 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 4761 13.62
2022-06-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3403 97.38
2022-06-02 GARDNER JEFFERY R D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 109.6
2022-05-31 GARDNER JEFFERY R D - S-Sale Common Stock 1000 110.57
2022-05-26 GARDNER JEFFERY R D - S-Sale Common Stock 5000 108.68
2022-05-18 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 1941 106.7
2022-05-16 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 4761 13.62
2022-05-16 Nelson Roderick D - S-Sale Common Stock 4761 104.45
2022-05-16 Nelson Roderick D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 4761 0
2022-05-16 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 4761 13.62
2022-05-16 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 6337 0
2022-05-16 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1360 104.81
2022-05-16 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 1033 0
2022-05-16 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 150 104.81
2022-05-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 6337 0
2022-05-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 1145 104.45
2022-05-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 773 104.81
2022-05-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 21079 0
2022-05-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 4685 104.81
2022-05-16 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO A - A-Award Common Stock 551 0
2022-05-16 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO D - F-InKind Common Stock 90 104.81
2022-05-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 259 105.25
2022-05-11 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 609 100.88
2022-05-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1294 105.25
2022-05-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1471 100.88
2022-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 6653 100.88
2022-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 5169 105.25
2022-05-11 Brown Grant VP of Treasury and Interim CFO D - F-InKind Common Stock 83 100.88
2022-04-02 QUINSEY RALPH - 0 0
2022-04-18 Brown Grant VP of Treasury & Interim CFO D - Common Stock 0 0
2022-02-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 861 131.78
2021-12-03 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1325 151.05
2021-12-05 Chesley Philip Pres. Infra & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 20012 0
2021-11-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 5135 160.85
2021-11-15 Klein James L Former VP & Pres. Infra. & Def D - S-Sale Common Stock 1909 160.85
2021-11-01 Chesley Philip officer - 0 0
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 1587 13.62
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 1587 13.62
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 1587 13.62
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 1587 13.62
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1587 180
2021-09-16 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1587 180
2021-09-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1909 182.26
2021-09-15 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2798 182.26
2021-09-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1187 185.16
2021-09-02 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1700 185.53
2021-08-30 RHINES WALDEN C director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 15390 11.68
2021-08-30 RHINES WALDEN C director D - S-Sale Common Stock 15390 191.29
2021-08-30 RHINES WALDEN C director A - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 15390 11.68
2021-08-18 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4868 181.8
2021-08-19 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 2843 178.3
2021-08-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4340 186.72
2021-08-17 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 3894 185.76
2021-08-16 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 1587 13.62
2021-08-16 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 1587 13.62
2021-08-16 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1587 186.72
2021-08-16 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1216 186.72
2021-08-16 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1216 186.72
2021-08-16 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1909 186.72
2021-08-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2714 186.72
2021-08-10 RHINES WALDEN C director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 QUINSEY RALPH director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 Nelson Roderick director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 Ho David H Y director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 HARDING JOHN R director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 GARDNER JEFFERY R director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-10 BRUNER JUDY director A - A-Award Common Stock 1136 0
2021-08-09 WILKINSON WALTER H director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2935 194.33
2021-08-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 6198 0
2021-08-09 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1906 195.02
2021-08-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 3305 0
2021-08-09 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1494 195.02
2021-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 775 0
2021-08-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 298 195.02
2021-08-10 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 4752 0
2021-08-09 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 462 195.02
2021-08-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 4752 0
2021-08-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 2350 195.02
2021-08-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 15804 0
2021-08-09 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 6657 195.02
2021-08-05 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 681 193.88
2021-08-06 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1083 194.76
2021-08-05 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 480 193.88
2021-08-05 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 480 193.88
2021-08-06 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 867 194.76
2021-08-06 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 867 194.76
2021-08-05 Ho David H Y director D - F-InKind Common Stock 458 193.88
2021-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 85 193.88
2021-08-06 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 164 194.76
2021-08-05 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2000 193.88
2021-08-06 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1300 194.76
2021-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 681 193.88
2021-08-06 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1312 194.76
2021-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 2299 193.88
2021-08-06 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3936 194.76
2021-07-06 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3938 195.67
2021-06-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1909 184
2021-06-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1909 184
2021-06-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1113 183.25
2021-06-02 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2270 182.92
2021-05-28 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 555 185.28
2021-05-26 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1668 180.19
2021-05-27 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1112 178.16
2021-05-24 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 10289 176.94
2021-05-25 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1240 180.74
2021-05-19 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 5920 165.75
2021-05-20 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 7615 174.64
2021-05-17 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 788 168.78
2021-05-18 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 662 172.75
2021-05-17 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 167.63
2021-05-17 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1910 168.78
2021-05-17 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 168.78
2021-05-11 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 17584 0
2021-05-12 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1841 172.01
2021-05-11 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3931 171.47
2021-05-11 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 14066 0
2021-05-12 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1473 172.01
2021-05-11 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 2769 171.47
2021-05-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 3298 0
2021-05-12 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 278 172.01
2021-05-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 490 171.47
2021-05-11 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 14066 0
2021-05-12 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 983 172.01
2021-05-11 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 2632 171.47
2021-05-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 17584 0
2021-05-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 2231 172.01
2021-05-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 3931 171.47
2021-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 59341 0
2021-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 6693 172.01
2021-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 13264 171.47
2021-05-12 BRUNER JUDY director A - A-Award Common Stock 271 0
2021-05-12 BRUNER JUDY - 0 0
2021-05-10 RHINES WALDEN C director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 5560 32.27
2021-05-10 RHINES WALDEN C director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (right to buy) 5560 32.27
2021-05-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1055 184.18
2021-05-10 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 251 184.18
2021-05-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 785 184.18
2021-05-10 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 524 184.18
2021-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1279 184.18
2021-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1279 184.18
2021-05-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 4956 184.18
2021-03-08 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1113 171.2
2021-03-01 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 97625 14.19
2021-03-01 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 28885 179.28
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 24737 16.75
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 35518 11.59
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 7049 14.19
2020-09-01 QUINSEY RALPH director D - G-Gift Common Stock 11000 0
2021-03-01 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 68740 179.77
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 67304 179.52
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 26886 11.59
2021-03-01 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 45288 14.19
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 7049 14.19
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 8632 11.59
2021-03-02 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 24737 16.75
2021-02-16 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1200 177.13
2021-02-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 178.19
2021-02-16 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1086 178.19
2021-02-16 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 178.19
2021-02-16 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 5000 178.19
2020-12-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1444 159.79
2020-12-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 156.77
2020-12-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1113 166.47
2020-11-16 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 147.84
2020-11-16 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 2880 147.84
2020-11-16 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 147.84
2020-11-16 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 4000 147.84
2020-11-12 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 200 148.6
2020-11-09 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 4300 151.625
2020-09-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1440 125.77
2020-09-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 123.59
2020-09-08 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 114.21
2020-09-08 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1114 114.21
2020-09-08 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 114.21
2020-08-21 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1324 131
2020-08-19 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 3894 132.32
2020-08-20 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4868 130.63
2020-08-17 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1440 131.4
2020-08-17 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 2002 131.4
2020-08-17 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 131.4
2020-08-17 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4555 131.4
2020-08-18 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4340 134.59
2020-08-07 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 462 135.23
2020-08-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 131 135.23
2020-08-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 152 130.97
2020-08-07 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 693 135.23
2020-08-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 801 130.97
2020-08-07 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1050 135.23
2020-08-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1300 130.97
2020-08-07 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 866 135.23
2020-08-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1040 130.97
2020-08-07 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3148 135.23
2020-08-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3509 130.97
2020-08-05 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 6095 0
2020-08-06 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1083 133.62
2020-08-05 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1256 131.25
2020-08-05 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 4876 0
2020-08-06 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 867 133.62
2020-08-05 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1031 131.25
2020-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 1143 0
2020-08-06 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 164 133.62
2020-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 195 131.25
2020-08-05 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 4876 0
2020-08-06 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1299 133.62
2020-08-05 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1520 131.25
2020-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 6095 0
2020-08-06 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1312 133.62
2020-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1507 131.25
2020-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 20571 0
2020-08-06 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3936 133.62
2020-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3683 131.25
2020-08-05 WILKINSON WALTER H director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-06 WILKINSON WALTER H director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2347 133.8
2020-08-05 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 RHINES WALDEN C director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 QUINSEY RALPH director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 Nelson Roderick director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 Ho David H Y director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 HARDING JOHN R director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-05 GARDNER JEFFERY R director A - A-Award Common Stock 1524 0
2020-08-03 Ho David H Y director D - F-InKind Common Stock 881 128.15
2020-07-13 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 113.15
2020-07-06 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3938 110.3
2020-07-02 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1440 109.15
2020-06-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1440 106.56
2020-06-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 110.71
2020-06-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 110.71
2020-06-08 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1328 116.08
2020-06-05 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 2100 35.9
2020-06-05 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2100 116.379
2020-06-05 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 2100 35.9
2020-06-03 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 2000 35.9
2020-06-04 Nelson Roderick director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 1000 35.9
2020-06-03 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 2000 35.9
2020-06-04 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1000 112.82
2020-06-03 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 113.215
2020-06-04 Nelson Roderick director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 1000 35.9
2020-06-01 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 5000 104.74
2020-05-15 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 4000 94.03
2020-05-14 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - S-Sale Common Stock 1736 95.84
2020-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 3500 94.38
2020-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 2550 95.56
2020-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 5630 96.45
2020-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1915 97.53
2020-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1637 98.55
2020-05-12 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 16468 0
2020-05-12 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3344 101.9
2020-05-12 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 14970 0
2020-05-12 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 2485 101.9
2020-05-12 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 3742 0
2020-05-12 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 557 101.9
2020-05-12 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 9980 0
2020-05-12 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1216 101.9
2020-05-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 19961 0
2020-05-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 102.76
2020-05-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 4387 101.9
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 59880 0
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 2483 101.29
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4727 102.65
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 7218 103.43
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1105 104.15
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 400 105.18
2020-05-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 13384 101.9
2020-05-11 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 2221 103
2020-05-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 511 103
2020-05-11 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 520 103
2020-05-11 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1623 103
2020-05-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 2737 103
2020-05-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 10252 103
2020-04-14 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 90
2020-03-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 93.95
2020-03-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1328 87.69
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 5100 31.08
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 104674 30
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 19253 92.88
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 49030 93.84
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 28516 94.82
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - S-Sale Common Stock 12975 95.58
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 104674 30
2020-03-06 QUINSEY RALPH director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 5100 31.08
2020-03-04 RHINES WALDEN C director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 10064 17.25
2020-03-04 RHINES WALDEN C director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (right to buy) 10064 17.25
2020-02-21 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 5000 100.83
2020-02-14 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 4000 109.96
2020-02-13 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 2000 110.15
2019-12-16 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1906 114.76
2019-12-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1328 109.16
2019-11-25 WILKINSON WALTER H director D - G-Gift Common Stock 10000 0
2019-11-22 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director D - S-Sale Common Stock 500 101.99
2019-11-15 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - S-Sale Common Stock 4000 104.4
2019-11-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 104.4
2019-11-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 104.4
2019-11-13 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 248 102.58
2019-11-11 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 222 104.04
2019-11-11 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 174 104.04
2019-11-11 Ho David H Y director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 5100 35.9
2019-11-11 Ho David H Y director A - M-Exempt Common Stock 5560 32.27
2019-11-11 Ho David H Y director D - S-Sale Common Stock 10660 102.22
2019-11-11 Ho David H Y director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 5560 32.27
2019-11-11 Ho David H Y director D - M-Exempt Stock Option (Right to Buy) 5100 35.9
2019-11-11 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 55 104.04
2019-11-11 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 89 104.04
2019-11-11 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 217 104.04
2019-11-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 606 104.04
2019-11-11 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 606 104.04
2019-11-07 WILKINSON WALTER H director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2762 101.71
2019-10-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 77.7
2019-09-16 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 76.69
2019-09-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - S-Sale Common Stock 1328 75.98
2019-09-04 HARDING JOHN R director D - S-Sale Common Stock 2347 72.06
2019-08-22 WILKINSON WALTER H director D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 74.25
2019-08-15 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 347 70.13
2019-08-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 69.93
2019-08-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 69.93
2019-08-15 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 1577 69.93
2019-08-13 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1000 71
2019-08-13 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 1000 71
2019-08-13 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 4201 69.55
2019-08-13 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 2139 70.67
2019-08-13 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 10263 71.66
2019-08-13 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 689 72.24
2019-08-12 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1018 69.39
2019-08-12 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 186 69.39
2019-08-12 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1371 69.39
2019-08-12 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3640 69.39
2019-08-09 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 500 69.85
2019-08-12 Nelson Roderick director D - S-Sale Common Stock 500 69.03
2019-08-06 QUINSEY RALPH director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-07 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 866 70.77
2019-08-08 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1040 72.06
2019-08-07 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 693 70.77
2019-08-07 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 801 72.06
2019-08-07 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 131 70.77
2019-08-08 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 152 72.06
2019-08-07 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 286 70.77
2019-08-07 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1050 70.77
2019-08-08 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1300 72.06
2019-08-07 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3148 70.77
2019-08-08 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3509 72.06
2019-08-06 WILKINSON WALTER H director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 SPRADLEY SUSAN LOUISE director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 RHINES WALDEN C director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 QUINSEY RALPH director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-05 QUINSEY RALPH director D - F-InKind Common Stock 1140 68.15
2019-08-06 Nelson Roderick director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 Ho David H Y director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-05 Ho David H Y director D - F-InKind Common Stock 705 68.15
2019-08-06 HARDING JOHN R director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 GARDNER JEFFERY R director A - A-Award Common Stock 2935 0
2019-08-06 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 2201 0
2019-08-05 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 195 68.15
2019-08-06 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 8804 0
2019-08-05 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 828 68.15
2019-08-06 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 9685 0
2019-08-05 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1255 68.15
2019-08-06 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 11739 0
2019-08-05 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1507 68.15
2019-08-06 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 13206 0
2019-08-05 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 940 68.15
2019-08-06 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 35216 0
2019-08-05 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3682 68.15
2019-07-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 70.56
2019-07-05 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 3938 68.97
2019-06-17 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 61.71
2019-06-17 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 61.71
2015-05-21 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - G-Gift Common Stock 1200 0
2016-08-25 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - G-Gift Common Stock 1200 0
2017-09-19 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - G-Gift Common Stock 1080 0
2019-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - S-Sale Common Stock 3000 74.84
2019-05-15 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - S-Sale Common Stock 1914 72
2019-05-13 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 713 71.05
2019-05-13 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 539 71.05
2019-05-13 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 164 71.05
2019-05-13 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1270 71.05
2019-05-13 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - F-InKind Common Stock 3103 71.05
2019-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 12719 72.22
2019-05-14 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO D - S-Sale Common Stock 13112 72.82
2019-05-10 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 184 0
2019-05-09 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller A - A-Award Common Stock 3225 0
2019-05-10 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 497 75.15
2019-05-10 Harrison Gina VP and Corporate Controller D - F-InKind Common Stock 256 75.07
2019-05-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 440 0
2019-05-09 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense A - A-Award Common Stock 12904 0
2019-05-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 1567 75.15
2019-05-10 Klein James L VP and Pres. Infra. & Defense D - F-InKind Common Stock 839 75.07
2019-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 485 0
2019-05-09 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products A - A-Award Common Stock 17204 0
2019-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 2553 75.15
2019-05-10 CREVISTON STEVEN E VP and Pres. Mobile Products D - F-InKind Common Stock 1508 75.07
2019-05-10 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 364 0
2019-05-09 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations A - A-Award Common Stock 8601 0
2019-05-10 FEGO PAUL J VP, Global Operations D - F-InKind Common Stock 1042 75.15
2019-05-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 495 0
2019-05-09 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer A - A-Award Common Stock 14914 0
2019-05-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 2105 75.15
2019-05-10 Murphy Mark J. Chief Financial Officer D - F-InKind Common Stock 1169 75.07
2019-05-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 1354 0
2019-05-10 BRUGGEWORTH ROBERT A President and CEO A - A-Award Common Stock 1354 0
Transcripts
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to Qorvo, Inc. Earning Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello everyone and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 fourth quarter earnings call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to read -- to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com, under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing and other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 fourth quarter call. I'd like to begin by reminding our audience that we issued a press release last week announcing the date of our upcoming Qorvo 2024 Investor Day. The event will be held June 11. It will be webcast for all audiences and it will begin at 08:30 a.m. Eastern. Our last Investor Day was in 2018, and we're very excited to discuss in detail our expanded opportunities and our enthusiasm for the future. Across our businesses, Qorvo is at the forefront of global secular macro trends, including mobility, connectivity, electrification and datafication. These macro trends are enabling new applications and new user experiences, many of which are made accessible to you by the company's Qorvo supplies and the devices we enable. Our customers continually seek to improve key performance parameters such as power out, current consumed, talk time, battery life and time between charges. This is happening across our markets in aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer, infrastructure, industrial and enterprise. It is increasing customer focus on power efficiency, throughput, functional density, form factor and other areas where Qorvo delivers a significant competitive advantage. Complementing this, legacy technologies are transitioning to more advanced technologies like active electronic scanning systems, advanced power management, force sensing touch sensors, RF MEMS, and a range of system-on-a-chip and system-in-a-package solutions to improve performance and enhance functionality. Also, new connectivity protocols are being adopted across our businesses, including 5G advance, DOCSIS 4.0, Wi-Fi 6, 6E and 7, Matter and ultra-wideband. Qorvo is driving innovation to enable these trends, while expanding our capabilities and product offerings to target a growing set of opportunities. Now let's turn to the strategic highlights beginning with HPA. HPA returned to year-over-year growth in the March quarter, supported by strong sequential growth in defense and aerospace and continued improvement in end markets other than base station. In defense and aerospace, we're very pleased to have completed the acquisition of Anokiwave in the March quarter. The Anokiwave team brings robust capabilities and high-performance integrated silicon ICs for intelligent active array antennas. Their commercially proven portfolio includes, silicon beam-forming ICs and IF to RF conversion solutions which are complementary to our transmit/receive RF front ends for SATCOM, D&A, 5G and other beam-forming applications. Record annual and March quarterly revenue in D&A was driven by large defense programs and SATCOM growth. The D&A content opportunity for Qorvo is especially strong in phased array, where our solutions can enable transmit/receive elements. Phased array radars can contain hundreds, up to tens of thousands of transmit/receive elements per system, underscoring the multiplier effect for Qorvo. Adding to this, we are developing more highly integrated placements that combine Anokiwave solutions with our existing RF and power management IC portfolios. Design wins for the quarter spanned airborne and shipborne radars, SATCOM applications and solid-state PA products. We secured our first design win for BAW-based filter bank solution that enables new architectures for large defense customers. In low earth orbit SATCOM applications, we are engaged to supply multiple Qorvo products including LNAs, switches, mixers and BAW multiplexers to support ubiquitous, non-terrestrial connectivity. Turning to power management, we are investing to expand our reach in markets where Qorvo enjoys long-standing customer relationships such as consumer, D&A and mobile, while also targeting more fragmented and more diverse industrial markets. During the March quarter, we secured a motor control design win and a power tool platform with a leading manufacturer of residential and commercial lawn and garden products. We also secured new PMIC designs at new and existing solid-state drive customers. Looking more closely at power management opportunities in mobile, there are increasing requirements for compute and processing power in the device that are creating new growth vectors for Qorvo PMICs. The opportunity is significant in both volume and content, and we are able to leverage our exceptional customer and ecosystem relationships. Qorvo is a recognized leader, delivering RF solutions, addressing customer challenges related to efficiency, functional density and power consumption. Our RF power management portfolio includes envelope tracking, average power tracking. Beyond RF power management, there are incremental power management opportunities in the phone where Qorvo is leveraging our expertise to reduce current consumption, improve battery life and better accommodate more data-intensive use cases. We have very strong power management IP that can be extended across markets, making our PMIC portfolio an engine for diversification, growth and profitability. We are also extending our reach in broad markets by building out more ways to engage with existing and new customers, such as our recently launched QSPICE analog and mixed signal circuit design and simulation tool. QSPICE has gained quick traction with engineers by providing them measurable improvements in speed, functionality and reliability of circuit simulation. Since its launch, QSPICE has surpassed 20,000 unique downloads. In power devices, customers continue to transition from silicon to silicon carbide and design activity for Qorvo remained strong in our target markets. We continue to secure design wins for high-density server power supplies and added a second Tier 1 North American server OEM during the quarter. In infrastructure markets, Qorvo is leading the transition from DOCSIS 3.1 to DOCSIS 4.0 with a broad portfolio of products. DOCSIS 4.0 will increase the efficiency of existing infrastructure and significantly enhance the user experience. DOCSIS 4.0 will support download speeds of up to 10 gigabits per second and increase upload speeds by 4 times compared to DOCSIS 3.1 to 6 gigabits per second. In our base station business, customers continue to award Qorvo design wins, however, we expect the demand environment to remain weak. Longer-term, we are very pleased to have been selected by a European-based OEM to support their 6G development efforts. Turning to CSG, we are supporting increasing number of applications requiring the security and precision location awareness of our ultra-wideband solutions across mobile, consumer, automotive and other markets. In mobile, our ultra-wideband placements are among many Qorvo's solutions supplied to Samsung in support of their Galaxy S24 flagship brand. In consumer markets, recent wins include a robotic lawn mower that leverages Qorvo's ultra-wideband to provide the precision location accuracy required to enable this application. In automotive, customer engagements are expanding to enable a range of applications that leverage Qorvo's ultra-wideband radar capabilities. Automotive applications for ultra-wideband technology include secure access and digital key, as well as kick sensors and the reliable detection of both intrusion and occupancy. During the quarter, customer activity included an ultra-wideband design win enabling secure access for an EV manufacturer in North America. In other automotive applications, we were selected to supply automotive Wi-Fi 6E solutions in support of a different North American EV OEM. We were also selected to supply our V2X solution for an automotive OEM in Europe on a platform ramping in calendar '25. For an EV OEM in Asia, Qorvo was selected to enable their 5G network access device with six solutions, each of which contain our low-band, mid-high-band, ultra-high-band, diversity receive, average power tracker and high-performance BAW filtering. Production for this program begins this year and the win is noteworthy as this 5G reference design will be marketed to additional automotive OEMs and Tier 1s. For Wi-Fi markets, we continue to roll out new technologies and solutions. We are migrating our newest and most advanced BAW technology across our Wi-Fi portfolio. We launched 6 GHz Wi-Fi 7 filters using our next-generation BAW and we will soon launch Wi-Fi 7 iFEMs that combine our next-generation BAW with our PA, switch and LNA content in a single placement. We also ramped our newest Wi-Fi 7 long non-linear FEMs for a Tier 1 network operator in the US and we sampled next-generation, high-efficiency Wi-Fi 7 FEMs aligning with a leading mobile Wi-Fi chipset. Connected home applications, we began sampling our next-generation Matter SoC and we secured a design win with a leading network operator in the US to supply our BLE/Zigbee SoC to remote controls for home gateways. In force sensing touch sensors, we expanded our engagements in trackpads and other consumer applications. In ACG, Qorvo is unique in our opportunity to drive growth across major smartphone OEMs. Our largest opportunity remains dollar content gains at our largest customer. We have clearly invested to grow this account to represent a larger percentage of Qorvo's revenue and our continuing investments today reflect our confidence in our multi-year growth opportunity. Within the Android ecosystem, mass market smartphones are set to transition to 5G through the decade. We are the primary RF supplier to the Android ecosystem and our strong roadmap and multi-year collaboration positions us to benefit as the Android ecosystem continues to transition to 5G. During the quarter, Qorvo supported Galaxy S24 launch with our low-band, mid-high-band, ultra-high-band, secondary transmit and receive, tuning, Wi-Fi and ultra-wideband solutions. This highlights the strength of our portfolio and the breadth of our opportunity at Samsung and we are pleased to support them across their flagship and mass market 5G smartphones. For mass market Android 5G smartphones, we see strong pull for our recently launched low, mid, high-band PAD. Qorvo's LMH solution reduces surface area by 40% by combining in one placement the low, mid and high-band main PAD content traditionally offered in two placements. We have expanded customer engagements to include the top four China-based 5G Android OEMs and volume shipments are set to commence this calendar year. To broadly support all customers with best-in-class portfolios, we continue to advance new technologies across our products. We are proliferating our next-generation BAW technology across high-performance discrete and integrated solutions. We also recently released a next-generation LRT SAW process to complement our advanced BAW and SAW processes in select bands. The first module combining our LRT SAW and BAW filters will support a flagship launch later this summer. In summary, the increasing emphasis on throughput, efficiency and size in Qorvo's markets is growing the content opportunity and demand for better performing, smaller, more highly-integrated RF and power solutions. For customers in automotive, consumer, defense and aerospace, industrial and enterprise and broad markets, we are leveraging core strengths including our manufacturing scale, system-level expertise and advanced packaging capabilities to expand our RF and power product portfolios and deliver outsized growth. For customers in the mobile market, we are addressing new product categories and expanding our SAM across tiers from the flagship tier to the mass market 5G tier, to capture a growing percentage of the total opportunity. And with that, I'll hand it off to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon everyone. Revenue for the quarter was $941 million, non-GAAP gross margin was 42.5%, and non-GAAP diluted EPS was $1.39, all exceeding the midpoint of our guidance range. Revenue for fiscal Q4 increased approximately 49% year-over-year. As communicated last quarter, improving customer demand in HPA supported a return to year-over-year growth. HPA revenue grew 24% year-over-year in the March quarter, driven by a stronger than anticipated performance in our defense business. In ACG, revenue grew 56% year-over-year in the March quarter, supported by strong content on multiple, large customer platforms. In CSG, we delivered 50% year-over-year growth and our fourth consecutive quarter of sequential growth due to strength in Wi-Fi, automotive and other areas. Consistent with our prior comments, non-GAAP gross margin of 42.5% for the March quarter reflected a higher percentage of Android 5G mass market product, which was manufactured during periods of lower factory utilization. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the quarter were $253 million. We continue to invest in new product development to drive multi-year growth across our businesses. Alongside our growth oriented investments, we're investing to upgrade the core systems and processes we use to run our business. This multi-year initiative is intended to extend our competitive advantage and enable us to scale growth in diverse dynamic markets. Our goal is to increase operational efficiency, unlock internal data to leverage new software capabilities, including AI, and support our broad-based growth objectives. We expect this initiative will span approximately three years and we will present the spend in other operating expense on our non-GAAP P&L. As we progress through the project, we will provide related expense guidance on a quarterly basis. Turning to the cash flow statement, in fiscal Q4, we generated operating cash flow of $202 million and capital expenditures for the period were $33 million. Notable cash flow items that occurred during the quarter included the closing of the Anokiwave transaction recorded in investing cash flows and payment of the termination fee associated with a long-term silicon supply agreement recorded in operating cash flows. We repurchased approximately $100 million of stock at $112 per share in the quarter, which brought our total for fiscal '24 to $400 million at an average price of $101 per share. The rate and pace of our share repurchases considers several key factors, including our long-term financial outlook, free cash flow, debt maturities, alternative uses of cash and other relevant strategic considerations. This approach ensures that our capital allocation strategy balances future growth with the return of capital and aligns with our underlying goal of delivering long-term shareholder value. On the balance sheet, as of quarter-end, we had approximately $1.5 billion of long-term debt and over $1 billion of cash and equivalents. Regarding balance sheet presentation, the 2024 notes are classified as current and will mature in December. Subject to changes in the interest rate environment and other factors, we currently expect to retire these short-term notes later this year. In line with the expectations shared during our previous earnings call, we successfully reduced our net inventory balance over the period. We ended the quarter with a net inventory balance of $711 million, a sequential decrease of $16 million. For the full year, revenue was $3.8 billion, non-GAAP gross margin was 44.5%, and non-GAAP EPS was $6.21. In fiscal '24, we had two 10% customers. Our largest customer represented 46% of revenue, up from 37% in fiscal 2023, and our second largest customer was consistent year-over-year at 12% of revenue. Turning to our current quarter outlook, we expect revenue of approximately $850 million, plus or minus $25 million, non-GAAP gross margin between 40% and 41%, and non-GAAP diluted EPS between $0.60 and $0.80. Relative to March, we expect June gross margin to reflect a higher percentage of Android 5G mass market product that was manufactured during periods of lower utilization. As these higher cost inventories sell through, it paves the way for future gross margins that reflect increasing levels of utilization. We expect gross margin in the June quarter to be the low point for the year and improve substantially in the September quarter. We continue to expect full year gross margin to improve modestly year-on-year. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the June quarter will be approximately $260 million with variability related to the timing of program development spend and other factors. Our OpEx guidance for this quarter includes approximately $5 million of other operating expense related to modernizing our core systems and business processes. During fiscal '25, we expect to record approximately $40 million of expense related to this project, with quarterly variability related to the achievement of progress-based milestones. Below the operating income line, non-operating expense is expected to be between $6 million and $10 million, reflecting interest paid on our fixed rate debt offset by interest income earned on our cash balances, FX gains or losses along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax rate for fiscal 2025 is expected to be within a range of 10% to 12%. We project this will increase over time due to changes in tax legislation such as the global minimum tax and other factors. Regarding the divestiture of our Beijing and Dezhou assembly and test facilities, we made significant progress towards achieving operational readiness and completing other work required to close the transaction. This is a further step in our ongoing efforts to reduce capital intensity and we continue to expect the transaction to close this quarter. We are efficiently managing a complex supply chain, including internal factories that are critical differentiators for each of our operating segments, and this will remain an ongoing focus. We'll leverage internal manufacturing where it uniquely differentiates our products and outsource production where we maintain a strong network of foundry and OSAT partners. Qorvo is well-positioned to capitalize on multiple long-term growth drivers within each of our three operating segments. We're excited to share more during our upcoming Investor Day in June and we look forward to your participation. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Ruben Roy with Stifel.
Ruben Roy:
Thank you very much. Hi, Grant, I wanted to see if you can -- you had some commentary in the press release on sort of the guidance and how to think about the guidance for June, but was wondering if you could provide a little bit more detail on kind of what's going on with ACG and the defense after the strong quarter you saw in March, and if you could maybe just walk us through the moving parts in the three segments as we think about the guidance for the June quarter?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Thanks for the question, Ruben. I'll start off with the June quarter guide overall and then we can get into the segments. The sequential decline in the June quarter revenue guidance primarily reflects the ramp patterns at our two largest customers at ACG. And then, within HPA, the seasonal timing of large defense programs and a slower rollout of DOCSIS 4.0 as we've talked about previously. ACG is expected to decline -- just to break it down, ACG is expected to decline in the high single digits in June. HPA will decline in the low double digits. And CSG is expected to be approximately flat. Looking back at ACG, we don't breakout customer percentages by quarter. But I mentioned in my prepared remarks that our largest customer represented approximately 46% of total fiscal '24 revenue, which was up from 37% in '23 and 33% in fiscal '22. So, follow that, those increases there increase our revenue exposure to the seasonal ramp patterns we have with our largest customers, and that's impacting the June quarter. Looking at HPA, it's a similar seasonal dynamic. We have successfully grown our revenue base in defense and aerospace, and this represents the largest percentage of HPA revenue and actually set a record in fiscal Q4. While we expect our D&A business to grow year-on-year in fiscal '25, program timing and seasonality is having an outsized impact on the sequential performance in June quarter, just given the relative size within HPA. Looking at gross margin, we expect a substantial improvement in September as we sell through all the high-cost inventory or the vast majority of it, I should say, in June and we continue to expect full year fiscal '25 gross margin will improve modestly over '24.
Ruben Roy:
That's great. Thank you, Grant, for that detail. And I guess as a follow-up, in the press release also you talk about your view about modest growth, seeing -- expecting modest growth '25 over '24. Just wondering, I know you don't provide longer-term guidance in any meaningful detail, but 90 days into the New Year, has anything changed with the way you're thinking about? Because I think you said you were expecting -- it would be reasonable to expect growth in fiscal '25 over '24 last quarter. So, just wondering if there's been any changes in how you're viewing the growth or inventory levels or sell-through demand would be helpful. Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Sure. No change to our view on inventory -- channel inventory, especially within the Android area, it looks relatively clear. I think June will be the last quarter. We'll really be talking about the high-cost inventory and the underutilization impact associated with that. So that's maybe one change that we haven't spoken to in the past as far as timing goes. In terms of fiscal '25 in general, it's a little early to provide any detailed quarterly guidance. But absent any macro-related disruptions, we do expect to grow both revenue and gross margin modestly in fiscal '25 on a year-over-year full fiscal year basis. It's worth pointing out that given the timing of the content gains at our largest customer and the success in the defense market, as I mentioned earlier, our revenue seasonality will be more closely aligned to those annual ramp profiles. So that's clear in our Q1 guidance, but will also be included in our full fiscal year. In terms of the shape of revenue across fiscal '25, we do expect strong sequential growth in September, some modest sequential growth in December, and then that revenue profile will reflect the sequential growth in defense. That begins in September and even stronger in December. So, we may be slightly unlike fiscal '24, we'll have a bigger December than September is our current expectation because of the strength there in defense. On gross margins, we expect substantial improvement in September, as I mentioned, roughly flattish in December and then down slightly in March. So, again, a similar seasonal profile. Overall for the year, probably implied a full fiscal year gross margin for fiscal '25 in the mid-40%s.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas.
Karl Ackerman:
Thank you. Grant, I want to follow-up to the gross margin question that you just spoke about. I guess, is the lower gross margin guide driven by seasonally stronger Android sales in June? And then, while gross margins increased in September, does that suggest Android is weaker in the second half? I ask because while your peer this evening said that China Android rose 40% year-over-year in the first half, there have been some conflicting data points on Android demand in the second half. So, if you could clarify that, that would be helpful.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. So, in terms of gross margin, I think, in any given quarter, it's heavily dependent on mix, as you're pointing out, right? There's variability by end market and product category. But as I look at the manufacturing costs associated with what we're selling, any underutilization impact is going to be impacted by when the products are manufactured and where they're manufactured. So, for Qorvo, when matters, because the utilization rate at the time it's produced, and the where matters, because of where the products that contain higher content from external foundries or OSATs are less impacted by our internal loadings. So, for June, our gross margin guidance really reflects, I guess, primarily three things. First, we're actively selling through the higher-cost inventories burdened by the underutilization. This is somewhat of an artifact of past underutilization. The second is that we see the typical seasonal decline in our largest customer, as I mentioned, and those products contain higher levels of external content. And then third, we expect a seasonal decline in the defense programs like most of our high mix, lower volume businesses. These are accretive to gross margin. So, it's heavily mix dependent. I pointed out June will mark the low point as we actively sell through that remaining high-cost inventory. And again, that really reflects the inefficiencies caused by those underutilized fabs that were whipsawed by a massive inventory correction. We believe we're well past the worst of those utilization levels and as we sell through the material, it will pave the way for higher gross margins I commented on for the full fiscal year color I talked about earlier. For September, if we pivot to that, we expect gross margin to improve substantially as three headwinds reverse; the seasonal ramp will reflect more external content, the defense revenue is expected to grow sequentially, and the underutilization impact should fall to less than or around 100 basis points versus the, call it, 300 basis points that we experienced last quarter.
Karl Ackerman:
Yeah, very clear. If I may just sneak a quick one. And you mentioned about recovery in defense. I was curious your thoughts on silicon carbide. I did not hear that -- any comments in your prepared script. I know that the industrial market is going through a downturn, but any thoughts on recovery of the silicon carbide business or whether the macro has influenced your own success in silicon carbide whether it's in industrial and/or defense? Thank you.
Dave Fullwood:
Hey, Karl. This is Dave. I can take that one. So, Bob, you had commented on some of this, but we've had some good success there in data centers and that part of the market actually looks quite good. We've talked in the past, too, about some of our success we've had in areas like solar that's being heavily impacted by the interest rate environment. And so that market is extremely soft right now. So, it's kind of a mixed bag when you look at our silicon carbide business. Still quite a small business. So, we're growing into new markets, and so there's lots of opportunities there. The sales funnel is growing and strong, but the end markets are really dependent on some of the interest rate environment that we're experiencing.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Ed, are you there?
Edward Snyder:
Yeah. Sorry about that, guys. A couple of questions, if I could. Last quarter, we had some discussions about content growth and strength in the second half. I know you haven't guided that to this quarter at all. I just want to get an update, if possible, now that you've had a chance, most of those wins have been awarded and you're probably working on qualifying it? Any alteration at all in terms of how strong you think it'll be in the second half in terms of content or revenue growth without guiding? I'm just trying to get a feel for if anything's changed.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Hi, Ed, it's Bob. Thanks for the question. And we're very confident in our outlook with our largest customer. We're confident, as I said last time, in gaining share this year, and still very confident in our outlook for -- in FY '25 gaining share, FY '26 gaining share, growing revenue. Still feel real good about both of those.
Edward Snyder:
Good. And then, you closed the Anokiwave deal and most folks, if you look at their product line, it's pretty much a carbon copy of everything you'd need for a millimeter wave to a mobile platform. And there's been some news of recently that there seem to be a win with that. Is that -- my impression was when that was first announced that it was going to be an infrastructure play. Does it have a mobile play to it? And how confident you are that it's going to gain any traction given how weak normal wave has been in the mobile business for a while?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Ed. Good opportunity to clear that up. When we made the acquisition, our focus was actually on defense. The infrastructure market is pretty volatile, but we still think there's a play there, but it's primarily on the defense side. We don't have any plans at this time to bring it into the mobile phone business -- mobile part of our business.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Srini Pajjuri with Raymond James. Pardon me, your next question comes from Chris Caso with Wolfe Research.
Chris Caso:
Yes, hi. The first question, I just wanted to clarify a comment that you made, you talked about revenue and gross margin up in fiscal '25, but you said modestly. And I just wanted to make sure that -- was that modest comment meant for revenue and gross margin up modestly or just gross margin?
Grant Brown:
Thanks for the question, Chris. It was for both.
Chris Caso:
Okay. So, both revenue and -- so, okay, so that's clear. As a follow-up on that, I wanted to talk about the changes to capital intensity that you were taking. Can you give a little more color on that, and kind of where the targets might sit when you're done with that program, and kind of what you're doing to achieve that?
Grant Brown:
Sure. So, from a capital intensity perspective, I still think that we'll be spending CapEx in and around that 5% target level. As we look out over time, it could vary based on capacity required to support customer demand, but that's our current target.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Srini Pajjuri with Raymond James.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you. Bob, in your guidance for fiscal year revenue to be up modestly, obviously, you said previously that you expect your largest customer to grow year-on-year this year. So, the rest of the business, I'm just curious, given, I mean, we've been weak in broad market -- not broad market and non, I guess, smartphone segments for a while. They seem to be lumpy, but some of them are coming back. So, I'm just curious as to what's the outlook for the outside of your largest customer, what's causing you to be a bit more cautious here? It seems like you're kind of -- you're sounding a bit more cautious than last quarter. So, I'm just trying to understand what's giving you that pause?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Let me take that one and then Bob can fill in terms of the latter part of your question. I think for fiscal '25, generally, we're optimistic. We do expect to grow. We're going to expand gross margin as we currently see it. I think we're having success at our largest customers and that's creating more seasonality, which you're seeing in June. But on the whole, the year will be up. It also creates an opportunity for us to grow in our defense business, where we're seeing some recent congressional budget approvals, as well as some of the foreign aid packages, which is driving our order activity there. So, we're seeing a strong tailwind on the defense business in the fiscal second half. So that would, for us, begin in the December quarter and follow through into March again. Those are some of the drivers we see. And I don't know, Bob, if -- I think we missed the last part of your question, I think was in around confidence at our largest customer?
Srini Pajjuri:
I was just wondering, I guess last quarter you definitely sounded a bit more confident about the next year or two at your largest customer. Looks like that hasn't changed. And given your view on your largest customer, I would have thought the fiscal year guidance would be up more than just modestly. So, I'm just trying to understand what's kind of giving you that pause outside of your largest customer.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We still believe we're going to grow in the Android ecosystem, to be clear. So, again, we didn't comment on the full year last time. The only comment I made was I wanted to correct some noise that was in the market about we had lost a socket potentially at our largest customer and I want to make that clear. So, I'm sure that came across clear. However, when we look out over the year, I mean, there's a lot of things to judge for the year. I think it's great that we're able to provide you some color, at least how we think of things today. But I'd say, if anything, we're being somewhat conservative, just given what's going on. As you know, our Android market in China, quite honestly, it's going to be flat quarter-over-quarter to slightly up, but we're very cautious on China and the economy turning around there, where they're actually doing well is in some of the export market. So, just given everything that we see going on globally, interest rates, you see what's going on with the Fed in our own country and going around the world, I think it's prudent to take a conservative view when we give our outlook, whether it's the number of units at our largest customer or what's going to happen to end demand with consumers. We're just being cautious, but we're confident we can grow. And I think that's how I'd leave that.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thanks, Bob. If I may have a follow-up on gross margins. Grant, obviously, you're talking about improving gross margin in the second half of the fiscal year. I guess, how do we go from -- I think you're exiting the fiscal year, maybe in the high 40%s -- mid to high 40%s. How do you go from mid to high 40%s to the previous, I guess, peak levels of 52%, 53%? And what's the plan to -- I mean is it a function of revenue or are there any other initiatives that are in place to get us back to that gross margin level?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Thanks for the question. So, utilization is obviously critical, and it's improving. And we've spoken quite a bit about it. But maybe just to put that into context, the utilization across our US fabs is actually currently up 20 percentage points versus Q1 a year ago. So, looking at just a simple average across our wafer fabs, the percent utilization went from the 40%s to now the 60%s, and all that hasn't flowed into the P&L yet. So, we still have meaningful opportunity to improve and reach more optimal levels, call it, in the 80%s or higher across the board. We've talked a bit, as a specific example, to our WiFi business in CSG, which is facing the underutilization here in our North Carolina gas line, each of those products is coupled to the fab that was designed and qualified. And so, we can't move production overnight. But over time, we can optimize this. So, load balancing across our factory network is always being evaluated, and it's a potential for opportunity there. But beyond just utilization, we are taking active steps to improve gross margin. If you look at it maybe by business or maybe from a manufacturing perspective, in ACG, specifically, we're managing our portfolio to better match cost with the product tiering. So, to align Android's entry tier, our new low, mid, high integrated products are a great example. This is not a single product, but actually a family of products that are better optimized for that segment of the market. In HPA, we expect our high mix, lower volume businesses generally carry higher gross margins to be among our fastest-growing opportunities. Defense is a good example. I've spoken to that, where we expect a strong fiscal second half and for growth to continue well beyond this fiscal year given the budget approvals and the order activity we're seeing. CSG, I just mentioned the WiFi business, but it's our highest growth opportunities there are in products that run in high-volume external silicon partners. So, overall, business mix will play a role in margin expansion over time. Those product lines will grow faster and they'll become a bigger portion of our revenue mix, less susceptible to underutilization, of course, because they're externally sourced. From an overall manufacturing perspective, we expect to benefit from continued die size reductions, wafer size increases, and we can continue reducing our capital intensity. We're continuously looking at factory footprints for opportunities to optimize and consolidate our operations, and you've already seen us take steps there such as divesting our Farmers Branch facilities as well as our Beijing and Dezhou facilities. So, we have a lot of opportunity to get there. It's not simply utilization, but obviously, that's a big part of it.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Thomas O'Malley with Barclays.
Thomas O'Malley:
Hey, guys, thanks for taking my questions. So, on the last call, you kind of talked about the shape of the year being very similar year-over-year if look at fiscal year '24 and fiscal year '25. With June coming in a bit lighter, could you just update us on how you're seeing the shape of the year? Does that peak a bit higher in the September, December period just because Q1 was a bit weaker? Any color on what you're kind of seeing in terms of the shape of the year being similar? Or does that change at all with what we're looking at in June?
Grant Brown:
Sure. It's similar to fiscal '24. As I mentioned, we do expect, unlike fiscal '24, that we'll have a larger December than September and then down seasonally in March. So, in that regard, it's slightly different than what we saw in fiscal '24. But generally speaking, the September, December quarters will be our largest within the fiscal year.
Thomas O'Malley:
That's super helpful. And then just to put a nail in the coffin here, but just on the Android business into the June quarter, so you're talking about better China, but also you don't have a flagship launch in the June quarter from another large customer. When you net that out, do you see the ability to grow kind of sequentially into the June quarter? It's just hard to know the various growth rates. I know you have some idea of size, but any color you could give there on the Android business, just June specifically?
Bob Bruggeworth:
June, most likely for -- hi, this is Bob. June most likely is going to be flat to up with the Android ecosystem. As you pointed out, we're coming off a big flagship ramp at our second largest customer with tremendous content. We're offsetting that with growth outside of them.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.
Christopher Rolland:
Hey, guys. Yeah, just working through that gross margin thing, we're talking about like 500 basis points or 600 basis points for September. Is that roughly the magnitude to get to that gross margin expansion we need?
Grant Brown:
I think you're in the right ballpark, Chris. I gave a rough estimate for the year. So, I believe you backed into it properly.
Christopher Rolland:
Okay. Great. And I have no other questions. Thanks.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Peter Peng with JPMorgan.
Peter Peng:
Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Let me go back to that modest revenue growth. Are you expecting growth across all segments? Or are you expecting some decline in certain segments?
Grant Brown:
For the full year, we are expecting growth across all segments.
Peter Peng:
Got it. And thanks for that. That's helpful. And then, I think, last quarter, you talked about smartphone shipments, low single digits, and 5Gs kind of in that 10%-plus range. Has that view changed? And is that -- I guess, the full year guidance, is there just more conservatism there? So maybe if you can answer?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. No change in the outlook. We're still thinking low single digits for the overall market. And like you said, 5G growing greater than 10%.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Tim Arcuri with UBS.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi. This is [Aman] (ph) jumping in for Tim. We're hearing from some of your peers some inventory built at your largest customer in March. Are you seeing a similar trend? And then, how should we think about growth in largest customer as we progress through this year? And do you have visibility in terms of content growth as we look into next calendar year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
This is Bob. And what I can tell you is that we don't see any channel inventory between us and our largest customer. And the reason is pretty straightforward. We ship directly to their manufacturers. So, this has come up maybe a year or so ago, and now come up now, and we don't see anything like that.
Unidentified Analyst:
Thank you.
Operator:
That concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us tonight. We appreciate your interest in Qorvo, and we look forward to speaking with you during our Investor Day on June 11 and at upcoming investor events. Thank you, and I hope you have a great evening.
Operator:
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Hello, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call for Qorvo. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's Fiscal 2024 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's press release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing; and other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 third quarter call. I would like to start by complementing the team for delivering another solid quarter. The demand environment in the December quarter improved versus our November outlook, and this is reflected in our strong performance. Looking at our business from a high level, Qorvo is capitalizing on secular trends, including connectivity, sustainability, and electrification. These trends are playing out over many years and they are fueling the transition to new technologies and new standards like 5G advanced, WiFi 7, [indiscernible], DOCSIS 4.0, and others. As a result, customers across our businesses are increasingly seeking higher levels of efficiency and performance, where performance is measured in power out, talk time or time between charges. Qorvo is central to these transitions, and we are critical to enabling these capabilities. We leverage unique competitive strengths to supply our customers best-in-class solutions that enhance efficiency, increase throughput, and reduce form factor. We are a preferred supplier with leading products and a robust technology roadmap and we are positioned favorably for broad-based growth across our three operating segments. Now let’s turn to our strategic highlights, beginning with HPA. Customer demand in end-markets, excluding base station is improving and supports our view for a return to year-over-year growth in HPA in the March quarter. In defense and aerospace, we want an expanded radar design with a major DoD contractor and we received new standard product orders in support of several large domestic and international ground-based radar systems. We also enjoyed increasing demand for our solid-state PA products and for our switch filter bank products across multiple customers and programs. There are multi-year secular trends driving our D&A business, including the trend of one-to-many, and the transition of mechanical systems to active electronics scanning systems, both of which increased requirements for more advanced systems-level RF solutions. Earlier today, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Boston-based Anokiwave. Anokiwave is a leading supplier of high-performance integrated silicon ICs for intelligent active array antennas. We are excited to have the Anokiwave team join Qorvo and expand our offerings for defense and aerospace, SATCOM, and 5G applications. In power management, we are extending our reach in markets where Qorvo enjoys a strong presence, such as wearables, and other consumer products. Our most recent award is a PMIC chipset with multiple placements for wearable and charger at a leading Android OEM. Complementing this, we begun to see a rebound in SSDs for PC and enterprise markets. We are continuing to expand upon our strong position, with an additional power management win in support of a leading manufacturer of laptops. Lastly, our recently launched QSPICE, circuit simulation software was honored as the design tool and development software product of the year, at the 2023 Elektra Awards. In power devices, we're shipping into power supplies for blockchain applications, and design activity in data center continues to be strong. We are also seeing increased activity in circuit protection, where our JFET technology brings unique advantages. In automotive, design activity remains strong, not only for onboard chargers, but also for other emerging applications and electric vehicles. In infrastructure, Qorvo is leading the DOCSIS 4.0 upgrade cycle. We commence volume shipments of our newest DOCSIS 4.0 hybrid power doubler in support of multiple cable OEMs. In the cellular base station market, inventories continue to be consumed and we expect demand conditions to remain soft through calendar year 2024. Turning to CSG customer activity for ultra-wideband is increasing in secure access automotive applications. We're also seeing new applications for ultra-wideband in automotive, including presence detection and other radar-based sensors. This momentum builds upon our recent wins in ultra-wideband, including an in-vehicle car access platform and a flagship Android smartphone launch. As we demonstrated at CES, we are actively involved in a wide array of enterprise and connected home solutions, leveraging [radar] (ph) and ultra-wideband for applications such as door locks, smart lighting, and indoor navigation. In force-sensing touch sensors, we received the first production orders for an automotive supplier in support of a leading career-based automotive OEM. We are seeing increasing traction across a growing set of customers and markets, including automotive, laptop trackpads, wearables, and smart home. In WiFi, design activity and collaboration remain strong across reference designs, customers, and operators. Within the Android ecosystem, the demand environment for mobile WiFi is improving with the normalization of Android channel inventories. In access points, WiFi 6 volumes continue to grow with certain provider rollouts in India. In WiFi 7, Qorvo secured design wins across operator, retail, enterprise, and mobile segments. In ACG, we commenced shipments in support of the spring 2024 flagship smartphone launch by the leading Android smartphone OEM. On our last earnings call, we highlighted our content gains in the flagship tier. In addition to the ultra-wideband, Qorvo content this year includes, the low band, mid-high-band, ultra-high band, secondary transmit and receive, tuning, and WiFi. We are ramping up now and building upon our momentum with a broad set of design wins in this customer's high-volume mass-market portfolio. Android mass-market smartphones are set to transition to 5G through the decade. In our collaboration with Android customers on their long-term product roadmaps positions Qorvo to be a primary beneficiary as these new 5G units [indiscernible]. To that end, Qorvo was recognized by the top four China-based Android 5G OEMs with 2023 awards for innovation, quality, supply, technology, and strategic partnership. To simplify 5G adoption and sustain our position as the leading global strategic supplier to Android OEMs, we continue to launch new architectures and new products that enhance performance and reduce form factors. During the quarter, we expanded customer sampling of our newly launched main path, LMH pad. This highly integrated solution is optimized for mass-market smartphones. It combines in a single placement, the low, mid, and high band main path content traditionally offered in two placements. This reduces surface area by 40%, simplifies design, and accelerates time to market. In addition to developing highly integrated solutions with increasing levels of functional density, we're also advancing technology in our high-performance discrete portfolio, including our BAW filters. During the quarter, we received purchase orders for discrete BAW filters using our recently released next-generation BAW technology. During the quarter we continue to bring channel inventories down and now our shipments are more closely aligned with end-market demand. We are also seeing incremental improvement in end-market demand in the Android ecosystem. For calendar 2024, we expect total smartphone units to grow in low single digits, with 5G units growing over 10%. To compete and win, we collaborate with customers on their three-year product roadmaps and we supply them industry-leading solutions. We enjoy our position as the preferred strategic RF supplier for all the customers we serve in the Android space, and we are very well positioned to benefit as their portfolios continue to transition to 5G. In summary, demand for Qorvo's products has improved, primarily due to our proactive efforts to align channel inventories with end-market demand and content gains on key customer programs. We are delivering customers industry-leading products and technologies, and design activity remains robust. This positions Qorvo favorably for continued strong content and durable long-term growth. And with that, let me hand the call over to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the quarter was $1.074 billion. Non-GAAP gross margin was 43.8% and non-GAAP diluted EPS was $2.10, all exceeding the midpoint of our guidance range. Revenue increased approximately 44% year-over-year and continue to benefit from significant content gains at our largest customer. As communicated last quarter, ACG achieved year-over-year growth in September, CSG achieved year-over-year growth during the September quarter, and we expect HPA to achieve strong year-over-year growth in the March quarter. Regarding gross margin, a larger portion of December revenue was manufactured internally during periods of lower utilization, which led to higher unit costs compared to the September quarter. Factory utilization is improving and the impact from underutilization in factory-related variances continues to moderate. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the quarter were $234 million. We continue to invest in new product development as it is a critical catalyst for driving multi-year growth across all three business segments. Alongside these growth-oriented investments, we continue to launch productivity initiatives across the enterprise. These initiatives also spanning multiple years, are designed to support future growth, augment productivity, and enhance profitability. In total, non-GAAP operating income in the quarter was $237 million or 22% of sales. Non-GAAP net income was $206 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $2.10. Turning to the cash flow statement. We're pleased to report that during the December quarter, we generated a free cash flow of $467 million, setting a new quarterly record for Qorvo. Our capital expenditures for the period were $26 million and we repurchased approximately $100 million of stock at $94 per share. The rate and pace of our share repurchases consider several factors, including our long-term financial outlook, free cash flow, debt maturities, alternative uses of cash, and other relevant strategic considerations. This approach ensures that our capital allocation strategy balances future growth with the return of capital, and aligns with our underlying goal of delivering long-term shareholder value. On the balance sheet, as of quarter end, we had approximately $1.6 billion of long-term debt outstanding and over $1 billion of cash and equivalents. Regarding balance sheet presentation, the 2024 notes have been reclassified as current and will mature in December. Subject to changes in the interest rate environment and other factors, we currently expect to retire these notes later this year. In line with the expectations shared during our previous earnings call, we successfully reduced our net inventory balance over the period. We ended the quarter with a net inventory balance of $727 million, a sequential decrease of $113 million. In terms of days of inventory, this represents a decrease from 138 days in the September quarter, to 118 days in the December quarter. This reduction reflects our commitment to efficient inventory management, and we expect continued improvement in the March quarter. Turning to the current quarter outlook, we expect revenue of approximately $925 million plus or minus $25 million, non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 42%, and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.20 at the midpoint of the revenue range. Relative to December, we expect March revenue to reflect a larger percentage of higher cost inventories previously manufactured internally during periods of lower utilization. As these higher cost previously manufactured inventories sell through, it paves the way for future gross margins that reflect increasing levels of utilization. We currently expect to have sold through most of these higher cost inventories and associated costs by the second half of this calendar year. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the March quarter will be approximately $245 million, with variability related to labor-related expenses and the timing of program development spend. Below the operating income line, non-operating expense is expected to be approximately $10 million, reflecting interest paid on our fixed rate debt, offset by interest income earned on our cash balances, FX gains or losses, along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax rate for fiscal 2024 is expected to be within a range of 11% to 13%. In December, we announced a new partnership with Luxshare related to the divestiture of our Beijing and Dezhou assembly and test facilities. Upon the closing of this transaction, Luxshare will acquire each facility's operations and assets, which includes the property, plant, and equipment, as well as the existing workforce, to enable the seamless continuity of operations. Qorvo will continue to maintain our sales, product and test engineering, and customer support employees in China. We believe that adding Luxshare as a strategic partner will strengthen our position to serve our customers globally. As it relates to our manufacturing strategy, this is a further step in our ongoing efforts to reduce capital intensity. This move aligns with previous actions, including the closure of our Florida manufacturing operations and the recent sale of our Farmers Branch facility in Texas. We are efficiently managing a complex supply chain, including our internal factories, which support all three operating segments and will remain an ongoing focus. We will leverage internal manufacturing where it uniquely differentiates our products and outsource production where we maintain a strong network of foundry and OSAT partners. Qorvo is well positioned to capitalize on multiple growth drivers within each of our three operating segments. We are confident that our investments in our technology portfolio, product development, and advanced manufacturing will broaden our addressable market, diversify revenue, expand margin, and accelerate growth. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
Certainly. Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Today's first question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi. Thank you so much for taking the question. I have two questions. The first one on content growth for this year. Bob, obviously you guys did a really good job last year in gaining content, not only at your largest customer but across the board. I know it's a little bit early, but curious how you're thinking about your potential to grow content this year, again, at the largest customer, as well as on the Android side. You gave great color on your career-based customer, but curious how you're thinking about the year across the board? Thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Toshiya, thanks for your question. And it does seem there's some reports last night have created some confusion about our business. So I think it's best I go ahead and address it now that you gave me the opportunity with your first question. Based on our known design wins and engagements with our largest customer, one of our competitors, I think, it's been named Qualcomm, we don't believe they're competing on any of the sockets we're engaged in, they did not win any sockets that we've been in, nor do we see them challenging our share in any of the sockets we're competing for or investing in at our largest customer. In fact, you can ask them. We're quite confident, they would tell you the same thing. Now specifically to ultra-high band, we've made it clear on past calls, it was a multi-source socket, and we were the only company that consistently won over the last three years. We've never had 100% share of the ultra-high band. In fact, you can look at teardowns of the latest iPhone and see Qorvo won the ultra-high band in the Pro and Pro Max models. I know, I've said and many of our teams said consistently that this is a performance driven customer and we're winning based on multi-year engagements, our technology investments, and clearly our product performance. And we expect to grow with our largest customer in FY 2025 and grow even more in FY 2026. I wish I could give you more specifics, but I think that answers your question, Toshiya.
Toshiya Hari:
Yes. I appreciate the color. Thanks, Bob. And then as my follow-up, one for Grant on the gross margin side. I think three months ago you had shared the underutilization charge of, I think it was 550 basis points for the September quarter. Curious what the headwind was in December, what's embedded in your March quarter guidance? And more importantly, as you progress through the year, how should we think about the trajectory of gross margins? And sorry, one last one. The Luxshare deal, how should we think about that potentially benefiting gross margins medium to long term? Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Sure, Toshiya. Let me try and take all those in order. So the first one in terms of the impact from the underutilization charges, it's about half, maybe a little less than half of what we had previously reported. And as I pointed out, we'll be working through those higher cost inventories over the balance of this year and should clear them in the second half. So that should give you a sense of the timing there. There's a lot of moving factors that influence gross margin in addition to underutilization. So the timing of where something was built, when it was built, and then in any given period when it's sold. In the September quarter, for example, we had a relatively high percentage of product mix that was manufactured at external silicon foundries and then processed at third-party OSATs versus a higher percentage in the December and what we anticipate in March to be manufactured internally during prior periods of lower utilization. So there's this lag effect I described last quarter. The underutilization in past periods obviously conferred in the products sold in future periods. But beyond March, no change to our guidance of returning to 50% plus gross margin over time. We have line of sight to get there. Once we sell through the high-cost inventories, as I mentioned, it's encouraging on the utilization front as it's improving and will continue to execute on further productivity opportunities as well. I've commented in my prepared remarks that we expect to have worked through all of that as I mentioned in the second half and that'll clear the path for margins that reflect higher levels of factory utilization going forward.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Ruben Roy with Stifel. Please go ahead.
Ruben Roy:
Thank you. Bob, first of all, on the unit assumptions that you have for the year, low single digits, I think you said for the total smartphone market and then 5G, 10% or so. How are you thinking about sort of non-China Android and China Android as you think about your mix going forward. It would seem like you're doing quite well, obviously, in Korea and elsewhere. Just wondering kind of where you think things shake out with China Android as you kind of progress through calendar 2024.
Dave Fullwood:
Hey, thanks for the question. This is Dave. I'll take that one. So as Bob mentioned, as we said before, we enjoy a really strong position as the preferred strategic supplier for all our Android customers. We engage with them on multiple years out on their product roadmaps. And it's really a special seat at the table that we have as their leading global supplier. They care deeply about our products, our technology, but also the quality and the supply assurance that we deliver. And we've been that trusted supplier for all of our Android customers for many, many years. And the one thing we've learned is, you have to be there for them over the long term. You can't just come in and out of a market and expect to gain any meaningful share. So at our China customers, as Bob mentioned, we received top supplier awards for innovation, quality, supply, strategic partnership for 2023. And that includes awards from Honor, OPPO, Xiaomi, and Vivo. And we're also proud of our position in Android outside of China as well. Bob highlighted the great content in the new Samsung Galaxy S24. For multiple years now we provide a full lineup of ultra-high band, mid-high band, secondary transmit path, low band, tuning and Wi-Fi and this year we added ultra-wide band. We're also excited to receive initial purchase orders for our next generation mid-high band with integrated diversity receive. We announced that product a few quarters ago, and we have our first purchase orders for a US-based Android customer. And this part brings a new level of integration for size and performance, leveraging our latest filter technology for BAW and SAW. And we've also got a lot of other great content on that phone that we're excited to tell you about in the future as well. We believe we're best positioned to grow with our Android customers as their products continue to transition to 5G over the coming years. And we've got a lot of great new opportunities in content we can address with ultra-wideband, touch sensors and power management. So we feel really good about our position really across the entire Android ecosystem.
Ruben Roy:
That's great. Thank you for all that detail. Quick follow-up for Grant on the Luxshare commentary. How are you thinking, Grant, about sort of longer-term CapEx? Clearly, this is part of sort of the longer-term strategy around CapEx, but if you could speak to that. I know the deal is going to close first half of 2024, so maybe a little bit early, but has anything changed, I guess, with the strategy around CapEx and cash flow assumptions that you have as you think about sort of the next 12 to 18 months?
Grant Brown:
Sure. The cash flow question, I think -- as we look forward, as I've always said, we'll follow the P&L. So, largely that'll be dictated by our -- by the growth that Bob mentioned in fiscal 2025 and 2026. In terms of our CapEx as a percentage of the top line, we do expect it to continue in that 5% or less category. If there are capacity additions made, it will be in response to demand and the capacity required to serve it. As it relates to the sale of Beijing and Dezhou, we're really excited to partner with Luxshare as we transition those sites. The agreement is over multiple years, and there is obviously some benefits there for Qorvo as the volume increases, and we found a great partner to help reduce our capital intensity and we're confident in their ability to provide the cost improvements that we'd expect over time in a rather similar relationship to what we incur today cost-wise at those locations.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charity -- I'm sorry, Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder:
We're not at charity just yet. A couple things. Bob, thank you very much for clearing that up [indiscernible] I really appreciate that, that creates a lot of confusion. Maybe we can shift gears in a little bit, on the Android market I know [indiscernible] very well in China and the whole inventory suggestion, that's all I think fairly clear now. But when you get back to the normal run rate here, the content game seems to be shifted a little bit. The Chinese suppliers have picked up a little bit, but they don't seem to be threatening you in modules. And now you're talking about these very high integrated modules which would separate you from any other competitors. I think only [Skyworks] (ph) even has that part yet. So one, content wise, by combining all that into a single module, it must be -- the sum of the parts isn't quite equal to the individual pieces. Is it a content decline just on average or are you pulling in content that you may not have had before or are they paying for a premium? So I'm just trying to get an idea of how that shakes out when China finally gets back to a normal run rate? And then I had a follow up, please.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, this is Dave. It kind of depends. So when you -- Bob mentioned our low-mid-high, and so that's a combination of what used to be the mid-high band, which we generally enjoyed a pretty high share of that. And the low band, which we had good share, but we shared a lot of that with some other competitors. But when we integrate the low, mid, high altogether, obviously, we can pick up some content there overall as we support customers with that platform. You also have to look at the different SKU strategies that our customers have. So depending what markets they serve, there may be more or less filter content. So we work with them, as Bob mentioned and I mentioned as well, on their long-term road maps to help architect, to support their solutions across those different tiers. So whether they're doing a global SKU or they're doing regional SKUs, we can tier the product along with that to fit the need that they have there.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then if I could, you historically haven't sold discrete filters in quite a long time for lack of memory. I know you're doing it now. Is that why -- well, first of all, maybe give us some idea of where those are going. Is that mostly into WiFi? I mean who, where, what? And is it driven mostly by the fact that you have capacity in Texas to support that, whereas you're not seeing maybe as much in some of the modules that you did before? And then -- yes, let's just do that one.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yeah, and it's an interesting one. So we've been in the discrete filter market. It's just not been a huge business for us because we focus more on the modules, as you said. But it's a very good performing module. It is for 5G, not for Wi-Fi. And I like to use an example, as customers even in that tier of the market are paying for performance. They want the latest and greatest technology from us. And even on a very base product, like a discrete filter, they're still looking for performance. So we're pretty excited about those products.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes, thank you. Two, if I may. A question first for Grant. With shutdowns of your Florida facility, which I believe was historically SAW, and the sale of Farmers Branch, but also expansion of your Richardson facility, I guess, why wouldn't gross margins exceed 50% on a lower revenue base than the prior peak as 5G unit volume continue to grow from here?
Grant Brown:
Sure. So, those are all productivity enhancements, and then as we talked about, it's largely a utilization, a function of utilization. So in addition to just shuttering some of those facilities that you mentioned, we're also producing significantly smaller die. And so we have effective capacity that has grown regardless of the number of wafers. So you can get more die out of a given wafers. So there's productivity there. And I would say there's a lot of productivity opportunities for us looking forward as we work into that across the board. So, there's productivity initiatives that we still have to do, and in terms of why we haven't achieved 50%, it's, again, largely a utilization issue.
Karl Ackerman:
Sure. Thanks for that, Grant. I guess, Bob, you also mentioned that 5G units would grow over 10% this calendar year. I'm curious if that is done predominantly in mid-range across maybe the China Android OEMs, or is that only from Korean and US OEMs? If you could give us some color on the constitution of the 5G unit growth in calendar 2024, that would be very helpful. Thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, thanks for the question, Karl. It's primarily the Android ecosystem, so it would include all the Android manufacturers, because we're seeing some of -- in China, the manufacturers that are not [indiscernible] also moving into 5G. So it's a broad comment across the Android ecosystem is what we see driving most of that growth.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Srini Pajjuri with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you. I guess on your March quarter outlook, pretty solid guide by the way. Bob, just trying to understand the puts and takes by different segments. I think you said HPA is going to grow nicely in March quarter, which seems to imply that the smartphone business is probably seasonal. But based on what you said, it looks like Android is coming back a bit and your content is increasing. So I'm just curious as to why it's not better than seasonal as we look into the March quarter?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Hi, Srini, this is Grant, I'll take that question. We don't guide specifically by segment, but our views are incorporated in the total guidance. I will give a bit of color on each. In APG, we expect substantial year-on-year growth despite the typical sequential decline associated with our largest customers fall ramp, partially offsetting that seasonal decline is healthier channel inventories and improving smartphone unit demand in China, as well as the flagship launch by our largest Android customer. In HPA, we also expect year-over-year growth across all the businesses except base station. From a mixed perspective, the more capital intensive end markets we serve, such as base station and some others, including infrastructure, face headwinds due to the interest rate sensitivity of those customers and some of those larger build-outs. Consequently, defense and aerospace now represents over half of the HPA top line, making that segment a bit more sensitive to the timing of some of those defense programs quarter-to-quarter. In CSG, we also expect year-over-year growth in the March quarter, supported by our WiFi revenue, which we've talked about. It'll be up meaningfully from Q4 last fiscal year. And then slower than expected ramps in IoT-related areas are expected in March, probably persisting through the first half of 2024. Although the auto market appears to be weakening, in general, our secular opportunities there lie in the automotive connectivity areas which are supported by the growing adoption of 5G, WiFi, [indiscernible] and ultra-wideband. I think Dave commented on earlier. We've already announced some significant design wins there in CSG for automotive and smartphone. And we're targeting additional areas including industrial enterprise and smart home.
Srini Pajjuri:
Great. That's great color, Grant. I appreciate that. And then Grant, on cash flow, very, very strong here. Obviously, you had a little bit of a headwind in the first half with working capital. Now I think that has become a tailwind, but quite impressive nevertheless. Can you talk about how you are thinking about cash flow going forward? I think you mentioned CapEx is going to be relatively small and you also suggested that inventory might come down again. So just want to hear your thoughts on cash flow generation going forward. And then what are the uses for the cash going forward? I guess it looks like you made an acquisition and obviously you've been buying back shares. So if you can talk about that, that would be helpful. Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Sure. In terms of cash flow next quarter, as you point out, there's a few puts and takes. I would expect CapEx to be up. It's going to follow the level of support for the top line and our capacity additions there for our customers' demand. So I would expect that to be up in the March quarter, but remain on the year under our limit of around 5% well under. The monetization of our receivables is something that I expect will continue. That's been a significant tailwind last quarter, along with the reduction in inventory balances. So, now you're starting to see that come down as we're able to sell through inventories rather than purchase as much new material. So, that helps cash flow. Looking forward, as I've pointed out, rate and pace of our buyback will fluctuate. It's dependent this year on our maturing 2024 notes, which we'll look to take out by December, and then obviously we'll be continuing to grow throughout the calendar year and into fiscal 2025. So, overall, we should see some improvement, but on a quarter-to-quarter basis in March there's some additional items there.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Matt Ramsey with TD Cohen. Please go ahead.
Matthew Ramsay:
Thank you very much, guys. Good afternoon. I guess my question is trying to dovetail some expectations the market is increasingly having about AI adoption in clients or handset devices, particularly flagship ones, and dovetail that Bob with your commentary about visibility to maybe accelerating content gains for you with your large customer. And what I'm trying to understand a bit more is, you guys -- as AI, I guess, proliferates over the long term in the handset market, do you view that in and of itself as a driver of TAM or RF content for your company, or is it more that the resources in the phone are going to get jacked up a lot in terms of compute and memory, et cetera, and that puts additional constraints on RF where your company can distinguish itself through R&D and taking out things like cost and board space and power, et cetera. I'm just trying to figure out what you see driving the visibility of content as AI presumably comes into these devices.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, this is Dave. It's early days, as you know, with AI, but it's pretty exciting. I think you hit on a lot of the key points already. I mean, definitely it could be a catalyst that can help improve the replacement rate as people want to upgrade to take advantage of the new AI capabilities that show up in phones. It should drive more data over the network, and that of course means more and better RF. And then as you pointed out, it's going to be more computing processing power in the device which is going to put more pressure on the rest of the phone. And so that translates into performance. And it could be in the RF, and we can deliver better and better RF and lower power consumption to help solve those problems. But also we can deliver power management. And there's a lot of areas in the phone to address with power management that we can use our IP there to help, again, reduce current consumption, improve battery life, and make more room to run the AI on the phone. But it's early, and so we have to see how this plays out. But definitely, we're looking forward to how AI can help drive the smartphone market further.
Matthew Ramsay:
Got it. Thanks for the comments there. That's helpful. I guess as my follow-up, it's just a quick one. I know you guys didn't discuss financial terms or whatnot, but you did announce an acquisition today. Maybe you could give us a little context around the technologies that you're bringing in, the people that you're bringing in. Just any color there would be helpful. Thanks.
Grant Brown:
Thanks for the question, Matt. This is Grant. I'll take that one. We're really excited to bring the Anokiwave team on board here at Qorvo. They bring a highly experienced talent in RF silicon antenna and phased array systems to our D&A group. The technology will complement our existing product portfolio, the beam forming capabilities especially, where we can leverage those with our advanced packaging capabilities. In terms of the deal, we didn't announce the terms as you mentioned, but we do expect to close this quarter and the impact is factored into our guidance. Initially, it'll add revenue in the low single digits per quarter and be slightly dilutive to EPS, but accretive to gross margin and all of that's factored into our guide.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Chris Caso with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.
Chris Caso:
Yes, thank you. I wonder if you could speak to seasonality for the rest of the year and recognize that you only want a guide for one quarter. But with, I guess, some of the inventory corrections, certainly in the mobile business, looking like it's behind us. Is the expectation to kind of return to normal seasonal patterns? And then, how does that apply to the non-mobile businesses, which I guess are still going through some degree of correction?
Grant Brown:
It's a little early to comment with any specificity on what would be our fiscal 2025 or the balance of this calendar year largely. But absent any macro-related disruptions, as I pointed out, we do expect to grow and improve our gross margins year-on-year. It's worth pointing out that given the content gains and success we're having in our largest customer and the success in our defense and aerospace areas, our revenue seasonality were closely aligned to those customer programs and ramp profiles. So, as we anticipate that quarterly profile or the shape of revenue across 2025, we expect it to look very similar to 2024. Beyond 2025, we're proactively investing, focusing on diversifying our business and pursuing substantial customer platforms where we have the technology to win and the customer engagement to justify that product development.
Chris Caso:
That's helpful. As a follow up to that, if you could speak to the CSG and HPA businesses? And could you give us perhaps an update on what you think are longer-term growth rates for those businesses. There's a lot of different moving parts in there, and I know through this correction, perhaps some of the expectations may have changed in that. What's your outlook for those business as we look over the next two years or so?
Grant Brown:
This is Grant, I'll take that one too. I would think of Qorvo's having a portfolio of diversified businesses that contribute to the revenue line. No change to our long-term growth metrics that we've commented on in the past. But if you decompose the business, about two-thirds of it is ACG, and this is primarily the smartphones and other cellular devices, including tablets and wearables, that we've largely commented on already. The other third of our revenues composed of our HPA and CSG businesses and HPA over half of that business is now defense and Aerospace and then CSG over half of that business is WiFi currently. It hasn't always been the case and HPA base station used to be significantly larger. Those have better than corporate gross margins typically, and so that's an area where we still have a lot of opportunity, but it's underrepresented in HPA at the time. Between HPA and CSG, there's smaller portfolio businesses that range from $25 million to $75 million annually or so, and they address market opportunities in a billion. So there's a lot of room to grow there, substantiating our comments on the strong double-digit growth rates. Our largest investments are aimed at very large customer programs, as I pointed out, in ACG for fiscal 2025 and beyond. We're looking to scale our defense and power franchises within HPA, and we're building our UWB and Matter business and CSG, and all combined, this collection of businesses brings the diversification and some financial resiliency, since they're rarely, if ever, all in phase. It's also interesting to note that in each of our operating segments, the largest businesses all benefit from our shared internal manufacturing capabilities. Our more nascent businesses rely on external capital, and over time, we expect to grow the less capital intensive simply because of the relative growth rates in those smaller businesses.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Thomas O'Malley with Barclays. Please go ahead.
Thomas O'Malley:
Hey, good evening guys. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask kind of a broader 30,000 foot view question on Huawei's entry into the Android market. Can you just talk about what your internal estimates are for Huawei smartphone penetration in calendar year 2024? And just how that impacts your outlook for Android, particularly as you get into the back half of the calendar year in 2024.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Dave, we also add revenue, what we currently do.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, revenue is very low, near zero or at zero at this point with Huawei. But that's a good question. I think the performance of the phones that are out there, the newer ones, I think is pretty widely known. People have done performance evaluations and there's definitely some performance challenges on those phones. So we don't think that they could export them to other markets. They probably have a very difficult time getting carrier approval. So we think they're limited to China. And so, if you look at their performance to date, since the May 60 ramp, we think they did about $30 million in calendar year 2023. If you take the last four months of data and you start to project that forward, you can see an incremental 10 million to 20 million units added in CY 2024. So that's kind of how we're sizing it right now, and that's all built into our models.
Grant Brown:
Yes, there was probably some pent up demand from Huawei users, so we'll have to see how that plays out and how sustainable that is. But in any case, any of those numbers you use, it's really not that significant when you think about a 1.2 billion unit smartphone market. So it's not that meaningful to us on a grand scale of things. And when we think about our China customers, the ones I mentioned earlier, they have pretty meaningful market shares also outside of China. And that's where a lot of the growth is coming from that Bob talked about as the market converts to 5G because most of China has already moved to 5G. So for us, we look at that as a great opportunity to work with those customers to continue to grow and that 5G comes into our market, because we're really not present today in the 4G portion of the market.
Thomas O'Malley:
Helpful. And since that one wasn't your favorite, I can give you a bit of a layup now. But just if you look at the competitive environment in Android at the high end. Your competitor is talking about having a bit more capacity and maybe going after that market. Can you remind us of your competitive positioning there, particularly in BAW filters, and why existing customers go with you? And if they were to enter the market why you think that you'd keep the share profile that you have today? Thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
You're referring to the Android market?
Thomas O'Malley:
The Android market.
Robert Bruggeworth:
I think I commented on this earlier. I mean we've been working with these customers for a very, very long time. In fact, I was just in China last quarter, sat with all of these customers talking about our long-term roadmaps and we mentioned the awards we got. I mean, there's a lot of trust and relationship that's been built up over the years. So we're very confident that we'll continue to enjoy our leadership position there. And other competitors, I mean, they may come and go, but we feel confident we'll maintain our leadership position there.
Operator:
Thank you. This does conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on the call tonight. We appreciate your interest, and we look forward to speaking with many of you at upcoming investor events. Thanks again, and have a great evening.
Operator:
The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator:
Welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 second quarter earnings call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing and other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 second quarter call. Revenue, margin and EPS were all above the high-end of our outlook provided during our August earnings call. Customer demand during the September quarter improved versus our August guidance. The primary driver was a large smartphone customer ramp. In addition, channel inventories of Qorvo components across the Android ecosystem continued to be consumed with OEMs indicating inventory levels are approaching historical norms. Channel inventory digestion is allowing Qorvo to ship more closely to end market demand, even as pockets of channel inventory remained in markets such as base station. We have worked closely with our customers to address inventories, while continuing to deliver highly-differentiated products. They have rewarded us with new opportunities and new design wins and this underpins our expectations for growth this year and beyond. Across our three operating segments, Qorvo enjoys multi-year technology upgrade cycles supported by global macro trends, including connectivity, sustainability and electrification. New protocols and new technologies are offering improved performance and enhanced functionality and Qorvo is critical in enabling these capabilities. This is playing out in aerospace and defense, automotive, base station, broadband, connected home, power devices, power management, smartphones, Wi-Fi and other markets. Where the performance is measured power out, data throughput, talk time, battery life or distance between charges, customers increasingly require higher levels of power efficiency, integration and functional density. To enable their future architectures and deliver successive improvements in our next-generation products, they rely on Qorvo's best-in-class technologies and solutions. In HPA, we are a strong beneficiary of the trends in our defense and aerospace business towards what we call one to many. Put simply, Qorvo's technologies are supporting higher customer volumes requiring more electronics and higher levels of integration. This applies to unmanned vehicles like drones, upgrades to existing radar systems, low earth orbit satellites and other applications. Lastly, we are leading the transition to DOCSIS 4.0, and broadband and we continue to deliver base station customers increasing levels of functional integration for their 5G massive-MIMO deployments. Looking at our power franchise, we offer a highly-differentiated solution with our silicon carbide JFET architecture. Our technology offers the lowest RDS(on) which translates into faster battery charging, longer battery life and lower current consumption for applications like EVs, solar inverters and data centers. These are relatively new markets for Qorvo that are early in the transition to silicon carbide and offer significant growth. We also offer a differentiated portfolio in power management, where our initial wins have been in SSDs, power tools and appliances and we are leveraging our unique IP to expand in the defense, infrastructure, smartphones, wearables and other markets. In CSG, new technologies are transforming user experiences in automotive, connected home, enterprise, industrial and other markets. Ultra-wideband is a critical focus area and we're very excited about recent developments. Ultra-wideband is in the very early innings of adoption and we are seeing exciting opportunities, giving expanded smartphone adoption, multiple in-vehicle placements and an array of new capabilities such as ranging and precision location for indoor navigation. Wi-Fi is another primary driver and the transition to Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 is very early-on. Wi-Fi 7 devices recently launched by Qorvo's customers are offering breakthrough advances in speed, latency and network capacity. Qorvo also offers components and full system solutions that incorporate Bluetooth Low Energy, Zigbee, Thread and now Matter. Matter is a recently launched technology overlay, essentially a common language that improves interoperability across smart home devices regardless of protocol or manufacturer. It is supported by iOS, Android and major smartphone platform providers and it's widely expected to simplify and accelerate the adoption of smart home devices. It is also early days for our force-sensing touch sensors. These are ultra-sensitive MEMS based sensors that enable new use cases and enhanced device functionality. We have broad engagements across automotive smart interiors, trackpads, true wireless headsets, smartphones, wearables and other consumer applications and our opportunities are expanding, as customers engage with our technology and develop new use cases. Looking at ACG, fewer than half of the Android smartphones this year will be 5G. Android 5G units are expected to grow in the low double-digits for several years. That's a big growth opportunity for Qorvo as we move from very little content in 4G phones to significant dollar content in 5G phones. Another driver is 5G Advanced which leverages new releases of the 5G standard. 5G Advanced smartphones will include additional transmit and receive and satellite bands favoring Qorvo's product and technology portfolio. 5G will migrate to 5G Advanced over time and bridge us to new development efforts and new content required to accommodate 6G frequency spectrum at the end of the decade. Big picture, Qorvo enjoys a range of opportunities supported by multi-year upgrade cycles. Many of these transitions are very early on and Qorvo is recognized by customers as a leading technology innovator. We've made great progress developing new technologies and winning customer designs. With that said, we want to make it clear that our end markets have not yet turned and our outlook does not contemplate a significant change in the macro-economic environment. The customer demand environment for Qorvo is more a reflection of strong design win activity and the early actions we took to improve channel inventory. When end markets recover, that will represent an additional driver of growth for Qorvo. Now, let's turn to some quarterly highlights. In defense and aerospace, we increased shipments of X-Band transmit and receive FEMs and secured first orders for our 50-watt PAs in support of new LAN-based C-band radar programs. We introduced the world's highest power Ku-band satellite communications amplifier, which enables an 80% size reduction and is optimized for multiple applications. We also received a large production order for recently launched cell-to-satellite solutions. These solutions incorporate advanced technologies from across our aerospace, base station and mobile portfolios to enable low-earth-orbit satellite connectivity. In infrastructure, we were selected by Tier-1 base station OEM to supply switch LNA modules for next-generation 5G massive MIMO radios. We also continue to lead DOCSIS 4.0 broadband upgrade cycle with production orders from multiple customers and broad-based design wins. For power management markets, we released QSPICE, a significant improvement over current industry offerings for analog and mixed-signal circuit design in simulation. QSPICE improves the speed, functionality and reliability of circuit simulation, extending the value Qorvo is providing designers. Since its launch, the tool has surpassed 15,000 unique downloads. In automotive applications, we were selected to support a major in-vehicle car access platform by a leading German automotive Tier-1. This multiyear program has a lifetime value over $250 million, marking a major milestone for our ultra-wideband portfolio. Within this program, Qorvo will supply ultra-wideband solutions for in-vehicle applications for a leading German automotive OEM. We also secured a design win from another leading German automotive Tier-1 to supply V2X solutions for communications platform launching this year. Lastly, we were selected to supply forced sensing touch sensors that enhance smart interior functionality and a recently launched EV from a Korean based automotive OEM. Complementing the large ultra-wideband win in automotive, Qorvo was selected by the leading Android smartphone OEM to supply ultra-wideband for their Spring 2024 flagship launch. It's worth noting that the ultra-wideband wins in automotive and Android markets are significant as these two customers represent the largest volume opportunities in their respective markets. To extend our reach, we're sampling ultra-wideband solutions across fleet management, logistics, agriculture and other applications, leveraging our precision location capabilities to advance operational efficiencies. In Wi-Fi, we secured multi-year design wins with Tier-1 network operators in US and in India. These wins support next-generation wireless infrastructure for retail, enterprise and home applications. Across the Android ecosystem, we increased shipments of our highly integrated modules in support of Android smartphones from the high tier through the mass market. Notably, we extended our strong share position with the leading Android smartphone OEM in their flagship smartphone. In addition to the ultra-wideband win, we are also selected to supply the low-band, mid-high band, ultra-high band, secondary transmit receive, tuning and Wi-Fi. Lastly, we expanded customer sampling of our recently launched mid-high band pad. Qorvo's newest integrated architecture leverages next-generation BAW and SAW technologies and advanced packaging to combine main path content with receive paths commonly included in the diverse receive modules. This and other highly integrated Qorvo architectures for the Android ecosystem, free board space and improve efficiency to support future 5G form factors and content like flip and fold architectures and transmit and receive non-terrestrial network connectivity. I want to thank the Qorvo team for continued operational excellence. We have moved aggressively to reduce channel inventories by securing broad-based customer design wins. In the December quarter, our outlook reflects the seasonal profile of a large smartphone customer ramp as well as healthier channel inventories across most markets. In the March quarter, we expect revenue to be more closely aligned with end-market demand. Longer-term, we expect revenue, growth and margin expansion and product mix favors our higher growth investment business. And with that, I'll hand the call off to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the quarter was $1.1 billion. Non-GAAP gross margin was 47.6%, and non-GAAP diluted EPS was $2.39, all exceeding the high end of our August guidance. Revenue increased approximately 70% sequentially and benefited from significant content gains at our largest customer. Consistent with our guidance, factory production levels improved but remained below historical averages. During the quarter, the impact from underutilization and factory-related variances was approximately 550 basis points versus approximately 800 basis points last quarter. The increase in gross margin above the high end of our August guidance range was largely the result of revenue upside and product mix. A larger portion of September revenue was manufactured at external silicon foundries and processed at third-party OSAPs. By comparison, our December and March revenue will reflect a larger percentage of higher cost inventories manufactured internally during periods of lower utilization and a lower percentage of products manufactured at external silicon foundries and OSATs. Beyond this fiscal year, we continue to see a clear path back to 50% plus gross margin initially during specific quarters and then on a full year basis. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the quarter were $246 million, slightly higher than our guidance due to performance-based incentive compensation. We are investing in new product development and targeting multi-year growth opportunities across all three segments. In addition to growth-oriented investments, we're also investing in enterprise-wide productivity initiatives. These multi-year efforts will support future growth and enhance profitability as we upgrade, modernize, and standardize around the latest tools and best practices. In total, non-GAAP operating income in the quarter was $279 million for 25% of sales, which increased from 7.2% last quarter. Breaking out operating margin by each segment, ACG was 34%, HPA was 17%, and CSG was negative 27%, which includes the impact of the biotechnology division. During the quarter, Qorvo Biotechnologies generated $0.5 million in revenue and reduced operating income by approximately $7 million. Just following quarter-end, we successfully closed the sale of the Omnia Biotechnology business, and will continue to sell BAW filters to support the acquirer. Non-GAAP net income was $236 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $2.39. Moving on to the cash flow statement. Free cash flow was $64 million, and CapEx was $29 million. During the quarter, we repurchased $100 million worth of shares at approximately $103 per share. The rate and pace of our repurchases is based on our long-term outlook, free cash flow, low leverage, alternative uses of cash, and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet. At the quarter-end, we had approximately $2 billion of debt outstanding with no near-term maturities and $707 million of cash and equivalents. Consistent with our expectations and commentary from the prior earnings call, our net inventory balance was reduced in the period and ended the quarter at $840 million, down $78 million sequentially. Looking at days of inventory, this represents a decrease from 210 days to 138 days. Turning to our current quarter outlook, we expect revenue of approximately $1 billion plus or minus $25 million, non-GAAP gross margin between 43% and 44%, and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.65 at the midpoint of the revenue range. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the December quarter will be $235 to $240 million. Below the operating income line, non-operating expense is expected to be approximately $10 million, reflecting interest paid on our fixed rate debt offset by interest income earned on our cash balances, FX gains or losses, along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax rate for fiscal ‘24 is expected to be within a range of 13% to 15%. We expect our inventory balance will decrease again in the December quarter. In terms of channel inventory, the environment continues to improve, with Android OEMs indicating inventory levels are approaching historical norms. Outside of the Android ecosystem, there are smaller pockets of channel inventory that will take longer to digest. We continue to forecast fiscal ‘24 revenue above fiscal ‘23. For the full fiscal year, fiscal ‘24 non-GAAP gross margin is expected to be 44% or slightly better, with variability primarily tracking utilization and mix. Qorvo enjoys multi-year growth drivers across all three of our operating segments. We offer a broad portfolio of technologies and capabilities, and we are uniquely positioned across leading customers and large markets. We expect continued strength on large customer programs, and we are investing to drive outsized growth in diverse businesses to broaden our market exposure and accelerate growth. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Tim Arcuri of UBS. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi, thanks for taking my question. This is [Iman] (ph) jumping in for Tim. Just looking into fiscal 2025, I actually think about the trajectory of gross margin as utilization starts to come back, is there a certain level of revenue we should be thinking about for our core loan to be back at that 50% range?
Grant Brown:
Sure, I'll take that. This is Grant. Thanks for the question. There are a large number of factors that can influence gross margins such as revenue mix and input costs including utilization impacts. So I wouldn't think of it in terms of an absolute revenue level. Some products carry a higher gross margin than others due to the nature of that business or end market. For instance, looking at our base station product line, which is generally accretive to gross margins, but with base station demand weaker, coupled with the excess channel inventories we've been talking about there, this is currently a headwind to margin versus historical levels. Product mix can also impact gross margin based on where it's manufactured. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, for instance, last quarter we shipped a higher portion of products that were manufactured at external silicon foundries and processed at third-party OSATs, and those products are not impacted by our internal factory utilization, which as we've mentioned, is running below historical averages. Aside from product mix, unit cost is the other half of the equation. It's a bit more complex given that input costs can affect gross margin on a lagging or leading basis. For example, historical underutilization will create higher unit costs in that inventory and as it's sold in future period, that impact lags. Alternatively, in anticipation of lower future demand, production volumes can be cut and utilization will fall. And in that sense, the impact tends to lead those anticipated changes in demand. So there's a number of factors that impact gross margin. I, again, wouldn't think of it in terms of an absolute revenue level, but rather a time of us to move through our high-cost inventory, return utilization levels back to normal, run the factories efficiently, and we'll be on a path back to 50% plus.
Unidentified Analyst:
Thank you.
Operator:
The Next question comes from Gary Mobley of Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead.
Gary Mobley:
Hi, guys. I wanted to pick up, Grant, with your detailed response to the last question. I know in your prepared remarks you said gross margin throughout fiscal year ‘25 will, at times, be above 50%. So I presume that would be in your seasonally strong periods. And -- but did you say that as well 50% or above is the target for the full year or just the specific few quarters of seasonal [peakness] (ph)?
Grant Brown:
Sure. I said that I think it will achieve 50% on a specific quarter before it achieves 50% across the whole year. And that's somewhat macro dependent and obviously the volumes will dictate at what levels we return to a utilization where that's possible.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. And, Bob, you mentioned, I think, in describing the fourth quarter of this year in line with market conditions. And so your full year guidance implies no more than a 10% sequential revenue decline in the fourth quarter. So how would you call the seasonal trends in the fourth quarter? Are we talking about mid-single-digit, I think which is usual, or perhaps as much as double-digit percent declines?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure, Gary. I'll talk to -- at least the high level, just make sure we're clear on what we typically see in the fourth quarter, which as we've said all along, typical anymore isn't typical because it seems every time we're faced with something different from losing our second largest customer to COVID hits to various economic factors. What my comments were around is, given the current economic outlook, we're not expecting our markets to rebound. And as we work through all this general inventory that we talked about, we're going to hit the, what we think is the end market demand. Now, end market demand typically, and what we're forecasting now is -- what we see is our largest customer's rent continues to come down in March. We have a seasonal, usually the weakest quarter for our China Android business in March, and some of that is offset by a ramp at the largest Android customer that we have. So, as far as percentages go, I'm not going to call percentages, I'm just telling you that from our view, that's the dynamics that are driving most of our business. We -- Grant commented that our ACG business is growing year-over-year. Our CSG business will start growing this quarter and will be up in March. And really the lagging business for us is our HPA business and we've talked about what's going on there with primarily what used to be our largest business in the infrastructure side and we're not seeing that now. So when you integrate all that, we're still comfortable we're going to be up significantly in March year-over-year, and we're comfortable we're going to be up for the fiscal year ‘24 over ‘23. I don't know, Grant, if you want to add anything to that, while I’ve given all the moving pieces.
Grant Brown:
Sure. No, I think you covered it, Bob. I'd say, maybe 10%, but certainly not 15%, right? We're committed to the comments, any macro-related disruptions aside, that we see growth in fiscal ‘24.
Operator:
The next question comes from Karl Ackerman of BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes, thank you. I have a clarification and a follow-up. I guess, just given the content gains in your largest customer, is it fair to say that customer now exceeds 50% of your revenue in the quarter?
Grant Brown:
We won't comment on any customers within the quarter, but we'll sum it up on the 10-K. The only thing I'd say about 10% plus customers is that we did have more than one in the quarter.
Karl Ackerman:
Thank you for that. For my follow up, MediaTek suggested that 5G units should grow double-digits next year, certainly above overall smartphone unit expectations of low singles. Most of your exposure to incremental gains in 5G do come from China Android OEMs. I was hoping you could address how you think Huawei does or does not impact your China Android opportunity, both near-term and longer-term? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I'll take the first part of that, Karl, and I'll let Dave take the second part since he was just recently in China. Actually, a large part of our growth for 5G Android is still at the largest Android manufacturer being Samsung. The second point I would like to make is, you're right, we do have China exposure in 5G, but most of that is actually in the export market for what they're trying to do to build their brands outside of China. So just keep those two facts in mind. Dave was just in China just a couple weeks ago, and I'll let him talk a little bit more about that and what [at least] (ph) we're seeing, talking to all of our customers there, along with your comment about Huawei.
Dave Fullwood:
Yeah, thanks, Bob. And so, maybe I'll start with Huawei and kind of size what we're seeing for you. And prior to the ramp of the new phone that they just announced, they were doing about 2 million units a month. And so we've seen a typical premium tier phone ramp where that peaked up. Last couple of weeks of data, we're actually seeing that come back down. So they may be on the other side of that ramp. But if you look at the incremental growth that we see over what they were shipping previously, it's -- on an annual basis, it's about 10 million to 20 million units. So that's a pretty good growth for that customer, but it's not that meaningful when you look at a total market size of about 1.2 billion smartphones per year. Now, when it comes to our China customers, as Bob said, a large part of their business and a lot of their growth is coming from overseas business and so we're very well represented across our China OEM customers and certainly in that overseas business, that's where we see a lot of the higher share and growth opportunities. So it's not just a China domestic situation that you have to look at. You have to look at that overseas business. And many of those customers have pretty significant market share in a lot of those overseas markets.
Operator:
The next question comes from Toshiya Hari of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi. Thank you. I just wanted to follow up on the China Android market. I guess specifically, what kind of trends did you see in the September quarter on a sequential basis? And what's embedded in your guidance for December? And related to that, we've been getting more questions about the competitive landscape in China. You guys have pretty good visibility and obviously you've got good relationships with your customers. As you think about models coming out in 2024, any concerns around market share, how should we think about gen-to-gen content growth, particularly as it pertains to your OEM's export business? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Dave, you want to handle that?
Dave Fullwood:
Yeah, sure, Bob. Let's see, where to start. The China customer base in the export market as well as in the domestic market, they've got some pretty compelling products. As Bob said, I was just over there a few weeks ago, I got to meet with all of our customers. Our relationships continue to be very strong. They place a very high value on what we bring. And they all reinforce that Qorvo is their main global strategic supplier for RF. So we have deep discussions with them on roadmaps to align their needs to our product plans. And they're very highly engaged on our new low, mid, high S-PAD platform that we announced a couple quarters ago. Additionally, they're looking at expanding their business with us in other areas such as power management, sensors, and the L2 wideband. So the overall market, as Bob mentioned, the channel inventories are approaching normal, many of those customers are getting to pretty healthy levels. So as we've been saying all along, what was a headwind is now becoming a tailwind. So we're starting to see that growth. We had our largest bookings quarter in over two years. So our customers have now gotten past the concern about inventory and they're looking forward now and starting to place orders more aligned to what their true production plans and unit demand is. So that's certainly improved a lot. Now having said that, as Bob mentioned also, we're not anticipating any major rebound in the end market. We're just excited about the design wins that we've had and the inventory in the channel being cleared out and that's driving a lot of our growth as we go forward.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. And then as a quick follow up outside of mobile, some of your broader analog peers have talked about signs of weakness or clear signs of weakness in industrial and parts of automotive. I think comms infra has been weak for a couple of quarters now. But I guess the question is, outside of mobile, what kind of trends are you seeing, and what sort of trajectory are you assuming as you sort of progress through the December quarter and go into March outside of mobile? Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Sure, Toshiya, this is Grant. Let me take that one. We don't explicitly guide by segment, but the views for each of those businesses is factored into our total guidance. I'll try to provide you a little bit of color there and then Dave can jump in and add. We have a pretty diverse collection of businesses that serve a number of end markets, and they're not all in phase. As Bob pointed out last quarter in fiscal Q2, ACG returns to the year-over-year growth that we expected, and we'll continue to see that for the rest of the year. And then this quarter, our fiscal Q3, we forecast our CSG segment will return to year-over-year growth. And then finally, in Q4, we expect HPA to return to year-over-year growth. So the businesses are a bit out of phase, if you want to think of them that way. Just continuing with HPA as an example, directly to your question, if you look inside of HPA, there's various trends within each end market. It probably won't surprise you, but the base station market being weak, is an example. Our revenue is down over 50% year-over-year for the last four quarters. A few years ago, actually, we hit $200 million in that business before the Huawei ban and the 5G base station rollout slowed. But outside of China, only 25% of that mid-band 5G infrastructure has been built, so there's a lot of opportunity. But that's one area where we continue to see some meaningful headwind and market weakness. Beyond that though, there's also the broadband area within HPA. We have a very strong position there, high level of share, but the DOCSIS 4.0 upgrade cycle may be a bit slower and there could be some pockets of inventory in the very end products there. So the situation within infrastructure is very different than, say, our defense and aerospace group where we're benefiting from significant strength and expect to grow in fiscal Q3 and fiscal Q4. So, there's a lot of cross currents there when you get into the details, but this is why we maintain a diverse set of businesses. And a lot of them share the same manufacturing footprint, which creates the operating efficiencies, but also scale and the diversification on the top line.
Bob Bruggeworth:
What I'll add to that is in the cellular IoT market, actually we saw this turn about two quarters ago down. So with CSG coming back, as Grant pointed out, growing next quarter, that's -- we're not expecting the IoT -- cellular IoT business to come back. That's been down for us and we've been working through inventory in that segment as well. So I think that's been some commentary as well.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, I think you mentioned automotive as well. And we're growing from a pretty small base there. So Bob talked about a lot of the design wins. We're pretty excited about the growth opportunity there. So that's all new programs. It'll be ramping over the next couple of years to help drive that growth for us. But it's coming off of a relatively small base. So we're not as exposed there to really maybe see some of the things you're seeing from some of our peers.
Operator:
The next question comes from Ruben Roy of Stifel. Please go ahead.
Ruben Roy:
Yeah, hi, thank you. Bob, I wanted to ask about the ultra-wideband marketplace. I think in the past you've had a few system wins in the Android ecosystem for ultra-wideband. I don't know if they were characterized as flagship back then, so maybe if you could talk about the [roll-out] (ph) opportunity in smartphones specifically that you're seeing and then expanding outside of handset? Again, in the past I think you've characterized the market as several hundred million dollars of opportunity. You're talking about a $250 million lifetime opportunity in the auto win. So has anything changed? Are you seeing accelerating development? And if you can give us an update on how you characterize the opportunity, that'd be great.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thanks, Ruben. Extremely excited about what the team's accomplished and some big wins in ultra-wideband. One of the Android phone manufacturers, Google, we've been in for a couple generations now. So we've talked about that and that's -- you can get teardowns, I think from our comments who the next one is. What surprised us about ultra-wideband is, again, I think we said this a year ago or more than when we first acquired Decawave, that we were on the original platforms in our largest customers phones with the RF front-end for ultra-wideband. And what we believed was going to happen is it was going to take off in phones first and automotive second. What's actually happening is we're picking up a lot more in the automotive side and handset seems to be trailing it, at least in the adoption. Now, as you know, it takes a little bit longer to get to market in a car, so they're out winning platforms now and building those in. So our expectation is we're going to lead in design wins in automotive, but phones are going to come up fast. And Dave mentioned earlier in his comments that we're working with many of the other Chinese handset OEMs to introduce ultra-wideband. The thing I want to point out is in the Tier 1 German manufacturer that we won in, the current win is now to support a German Tier 1, but they will take that same platform to other US and other manufacturers around the world, that platform, plus we've been working with others on platforms that will also go into the automotive areas. So we see a lot of opportunity there. And placements in automotive can go from five or six up to nine or 10. So they can be big wins depending on how they adopt to use the ultra-wideband in a car. And it's more than just, ‘keyless entry.’ And I think that's what's really exciting about the opportunities there. So if I look at that and I look at handset, also a couple quarters ago we talked about ultra-wideband and access points -- Wi-Fi access points for indoor navigation, which is another exciting opportunity. And we're just seeing it now going into other types of products, we're working with various manufacturers, OEMs, for other things in your home that need that kind of technology. So we're very excited about the things that are going on there. Really appreciate your question.
Ruben Roy:
Thank you for all that detail, Bob. I have a quick follow-up for Grant. Just in terms of inventory, and I see the on-balance sheet inventory coming down, ahead of hopefully and potentially a growth year next year. Do you have sort of a target level either in DOI or dollar for inventory or how you're thinking about that as you go forward post December quarter?
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure, and we usually have commented on our target around four turns. So high threes to four would be a pretty typical range for us to look to achieve.
Operator:
The next question comes from Edward Snyder of Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. First, a housekeeping. Can you give us a percentage of revenue for each of the three businesses? Sorry, if I missed that. And then, Grant, if I take a look at your China revenue over the years, actually, it looks like if you exclude the arrow when you were over shipping and the arrow when you're under shipping, your average is probably close to $250 million to $300 million a quarter. And I know you did about $150 million last quarter. We haven't seen the [cadence] (ph) for September yet, but doesn't it suggest you're dealing with maybe $100 million, $150 million of inventory burn per quarter? I'm just trying to bracket those numbers.
Grant Brown:
Yeah. Sure, Ed. I can help you with the percent of revenue, but we haven't commented on the China revenue in the quarter. ACG was 77%. HPA was 14% and CSG was the balance of about 9%. And yeah, we haven't commented on what a normalized level of Android revenue or China revenue would be outside of the comments we've already made, but I don't know if there's...
Bob Bruggeworth:
All we'd add is we are still under-shipping to end demand best we can tell. But we're coming up near the end of it.
Edward Snyder:
Right. But when it snaps back to something more normal, you said inventories are normalizing, and I know demand changes year-over-year, but given your kind of incumbent position as a preferred vendor for most of those phones being sold...
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. We've been -- and maybe this will help -- as we bring it down, that means revenues do go up. I mean, it's not -- we haven't been shipping. So we've been up the last two quarters.
Grant Brown:
Yeah. And maybe, Ed, I would also make the distinction between channel inventory and our own inventories. So channel inventories, we think, are relatively healthy, maybe even earlier than we had commented on in the past where we thought it would take until December. So that's an improving situation. Our own inventories as we're selling through them requires us to achieve the mix shift that we're going to see in the second half. So we'll start selling through our own high-cost inventories in Q3 and Q4 largely and we do expect growth in Q3.
Edward Snyder:
When you said you saw the largest bookings in two years in the last quarter and normally those bookings are for what, a year out or so, I know it varies, but...
Bob Bruggeworth:
No, not a year ahead.
Edward Snyder:
Yeah.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Normal lead times for us.
Operator:
The next question comes from Srini Pajjuri of Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you. Just a clarification on the China business, either Bob or Grant. I think one of the comments is that, yeah, the inventories are coming down and businesses from the trough levels is growing sequentially. But at the same time, I think, Bob, you said in your comments about the March quarter, you're expecting China to be seasonal. Given that inventories have kind of pretty much normalized, I would have thought China would be better than seasonal in March. So just if you can give some clarification on why it will only be seasonal in March?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Because what I meant was from a demand perspective, in March, that's typically a seasonally low point for China. That's what I said.
Srini Pajjuri:
Okay. But, doesn't mean that your business is going to decline seasonally in March quarter -- your China business?
Bob Bruggeworth:
What I also said is we've come -- we pretty much cleared out most of the inventory. So we are seeing growth, which is what I just said to Ed this quarter in our Android business in China.
Srini Pajjuri:
Got it. Got it.
Grant Brown:
Yeah. Maybe I'll restate what Bob had commented on earlier. Just in terms of next quarter, we do see growth in Android. But March, we do expect to see the typical decline there, which is on the other side of our largest customer's ramp and March is also historically a seasonally low point for handset sales in China. So those two factors are somewhat offset by the largest Android customer and their timing of phone launches, plus the fact that the channel is healthier. So with all that said, we do think it will be better than typically seasonal. But again, it's anyone's guess as to what seasonality means.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Our largest customer has the largest impact on March. So let's see how their sales do.
Srini Pajjuri:
Got it. Got it. Makes sense. And then this year has been in terms of the content expansion for you, Bob, it's been pretty impressive. And I think some of those content gains also came from share gains. So as you look out to the next six to 12 months, how are you feeling about, because I do get this question about sustainability of some of the content gains from this year. So if you could help us maybe to the extent you have visibility, how should we think about your content gains both in premium as well as in the mid-tier.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. I can speak to the high-end phones. And I'll start with our largest customer because it's been questioned before. But our growth this year and our largest customer really speaks to the strong position we have there, and we are one of their trusted suppliers as well as the investments we've been making to deliver them these great technologies and products. This year, we grew mostly from new content and gained some share in sockets that we held for many years. So we feel good about that. Now remember, they are a performance-driven customer. We're winning where we're bringing strong capabilities and have consistently done well. Now if you look at the available TAM there, we remain underrepresented. So clearly, that's a target of growth for us, and we'll continue to invest to be able to win there. Now that's also regardless of the baseband they decide to use. We enjoy multiple opportunities to grow our content not only in the areas where we've been strong in the past, but also in areas that will be new sockets for Qorvo. Again, that's about our largest customer. In my prepared remarks, I talked about the leading Android smartphone manufacturer and our ability to continue to gain share there. and we talked about ultra-wideband along with all those types of components. Dave also spoke about in China and bring out our new technologies where we've integrated the mid-high band plus the diversity received into that module. That's going to be the ability to grow there as well. Dave also talked about ultra-wideband in some of those handsets, some of our sensors, power management. So I think as we look across the portfolio, we feel pretty good at our ability to continue to grow our dollar content in handsets whether it's a flagship premium tier or the mass market.
Operator:
The next question comes from Vivek Arya of Bank of America Securities. Please go ahead.
Vivek Arya:
Thank you for taking my questions. For the first one, you were guiding December sales down 9% sequentially or so. I thought the original intention was to kind of stay flattish. The large customer, I imagine, should be flattish. And I think one of your competitors mentioned a sharp ramp in terms of their China shipments getting into December. So I'm curious, Bob, what is leading you to kind of guide sales down when some of these big customer trends seem to be growing sequentially? Or is it just conservatism? Or is it noncellular market that's guiding that outlook?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Vivek. And I know I've said this before, but I'll remind you and the audience, we ship a majority of our parts that are not on the motherboard. So the timing of when we see the ramp is different than maybe you're talking about a baseband customer, I don't know. They're on the motherboard. A lot of what we have goes to the flex circuits. So they build those ahead of the motherboard. So our timing can be different. So I just want to make sure that. That's also, if it's the baseband customer, if you remember, they had an inventory build that they blamed at that customer. We didn't see that build. So therefore, we naturally follow the progression of the builds. They may have had a pause. And as you point out, the inventory will go down, then they would see a quick ramp up. So I can't comment on their business, but I can tell you the timing, we typically lead the ramp because of how much product we have on flex circuits, which is different than most of the products that are on the motherboard.
Grant Brown:
Maybe, Vivek, I'll just pick up from there. In terms of our prior discussion around the December quarter, the flat comment was relative to $1 billion Q2, and we've just exceeded that by $100 million. So to Bob's point on timing, plus or minus a couple of weeks that our largest customer can make a very big difference. But those two quarters combined are still ahead of where we were communicating previously. So on the net, a positive trend in the top line.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. Makes sense. And then on gross margins. So December, 43.5%, I guess, at midpoint. March, I guess, seem to be implying closer to 41%. And I think the explanation you're giving is that because these two quarters, you are using your internal high cost inventory. So does that impact get over by March as we start conceptually thinking about modeling gross margins from June onwards. What is that starting baseline that we should keep in mind? Is it low 40s? Is it mid-40s? I understand you're not going to give guidance for next year, but I just don't know how to think about what is normalized gross margins as we start thinking about your next fiscal year?
Grant Brown:
Sure. And, now some of this depends on the inventory, as you pointed out, that we're carrying the high unit cost inventory that we sell through and the mix of that in the March quarter. Some of this also relates to the utilization within the March period as we start to look forward to the demand that we see in the coming year. So it's a difficult or complex question to answer prospectively. But nonetheless, in terms of the gross margin for the March quarter, as I mentioned, our full year guide of 44% and now saying a bit better than that could imply that we have upside to the March to what you've just described. And then in terms of our fiscal '25, it's going to be a gradual continuation from there upwards, I would expect, because the June quarter is still seasonally weaker for us as we head into the larger ramp in September from a seasonal perspective. So hopefully, that gives you at least some idea of how we're going to track into fiscal '25. Maybe going back to some of my prepared remarks, I did say that I believe we could achieve 50% gross margin at first on a quarterly basis and then subsequently on an annual basis across an entire year when we get through the inventory as well as return utilization levels to more normalized levels.
Operator:
The next session comes from Chris Caso of Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.
Chris Caso:
Yes, thank you, good evening. The question is on cash flow and on your ability to start ramping the cash flow again once the market comes to a fuller recovery? I suppose that's going to depend a lot on what the CapEx needs are and for how long. And so if you could talk about that, the kind of expectations for cash flow and for how long you can kind of keep the CapEx at lower levels, so you can drive some cash in the next cycle.
Grant Brown:
Sure. So obviously, we'd expect cash flow to improve materially given the improvement in the P&L. It's a bit of a lagging indicator as we collect receivables. So we should see that. I wouldn't expect anything different in terms of our guidance on CapEx at around 5% of sales or less. Again, that can fluctuate, of course, but I wouldn't expect too much difference there from a free cash flow perspective.
Chris Caso:
Okay. Thank you. Just as a follow-up, if you could talk about the competitive environment some and one of the things that was noted with the Huawei phone that came out as there was some Chinese RF there, and it's a very different architecture from the phones that you're supplying into your China customers. But I guess the question is, are you seeing anything different with regard to the capabilities of some of the local Chinese suppliers that would have some effect on the market?
Dave Fullwood:
Yeah. I think from a capability standpoint, I mean, we don't see anything out of the norm. I mean there's certainly some key technology areas that they're definitely behind in. And so -- and I think if you look across the phone, even outside of the RF, there's probably a lot of areas that the technologies behind and maybe even up to years behind. So I think from a competitive environment, we don't see any big change just because of that Huawei phone ramp.
Operator:
The next question comes from Blayne Curtis of Barclays. Please go ahead.
Blayne Curtis:
Hey, thanks for squeezing me in. And I apologize if you said this earlier. But in terms of the September quarter, mobile came in a bit better than you were expecting. I believe the expectation was that you weren't going to see much Android growth. Can you just clarify if that upside came from Android to your largest customer? And I don't know if you gave the percentage [of two 10%] (ph) customers? So are you willing to give those out?
Grant Brown:
Yeah. Thanks, Blayne. This is Grant. No, we didn't give out the percentages. We'll do that annually, but I just did mention that we had two. In terms of the quarter, the upside in revenue was largely driven by ACG and it was predominantly our largest customer, but not entirely so.
Blayne Curtis:
Got you. And then I wanted to ask, just follow back up on that gross margins. I'm trying to understand, I guess, your mix has shifted dramatically to this largest customer, and I'm just trying to figure out if that, how much of an effect does that have on your gross margins, the customer mix versus the utilization of your fabs? Does that have any impact or not?
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. So maybe if we just look at bridging Q1 to Q2, so there is 470 basis points of improvement there sequentially. Of that, maybe 2.5% was moving from the 800 basis points of underutilization to 550 basis points. So there's 2.5% and that was largely anticipated in the guidance of 45% to 46% for Q2. And then that leaves a little over 200 basis points left. Now that included some quality and other items, but it was primarily the product mix that I mentioned in the prepared remarks, where we are producing that product on silicon foundries outside of Qorvo’s factory network and then processing them at OSATs that are third parties. So, that doesn't carry the same burden as the higher cost inventory we'll be selling in the second half.
Operator:
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on today's call. We appreciate your interest in Qorvo and we look forward to speaking with you at upcoming investor events. Thanks and have a great night.
Operator:
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation and you may now disconnect.
Operator:
Greetings and welcome to Qorvo Inc. Q1 2024 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Douglas DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you, Mr. DeLieto. You may begin.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 first quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provided supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing; and other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone to Qorvo's fiscal 2024 first quarter call. Revenue, margin and EPS were all above the midpoint of the outlook we provided on our May 3rd earnings call. End market demand in the June quarter was consistent with our expectations. Within the Android ecosystem, channel inventories continue to be consumed and Qorvo continue to undership to end market demand. We expect continued reduction in channel inventories in the September quarter and we see Android channel inventories normalizing by calendar year end. In other markets, relative strength in the areas like defense and aerospace and automotive was offset by inventory consumption across consumer markets and weak demand in 5G infrastructure. In some of these markets, we expect inventory consumption to extend into next year. Qorvo has worked diligently since last fall to aggressively drive down channel inventories in multiple markets while at the same time prioritizing new product development and securing customer designs. This has enabled us to drive growth in large customer programs and it positions Qorvo for incremental growth as end markets recover. As we have stated in the past, Qorvo's growth targets by segment or for strong double-digit growth in Connectivity and Sensors, double-digit growth in High-Performance Analog and mid-to-high single-digit growth in Advanced Cellular. Design wins during the quarter in HPA were diversified across customers and markets and included large defense programs extending multiple years. In Connectivity and Sensors, design activity span a variety of applications including highly-integrated IoT connectivity solutions, Wi-Fi 7 RF front ends and force-sensing touch sensors. We have a broad range of growth drivers in CSG and we are pleased with our increasing design activity in new growth areas like Sensors and ultra-wideband. Overtime, we see HPA and CSG contributing increasingly to growth, diversification and margin expansion. In Advanced Cellular, design activity continued to be favorable across all leading smartphone OEMs. We are growing our content and next-generation 5G smartphones at our largest customers and we are capturing new content in the Android ecosystem as 4G units transition to 5G and enter our SAM. In calendar 2023, approximately 45% of Android smartphones will be 5G and we expect Android 5G smartphone unit growth to post double-digit CAGR for several years. Now let's turn to some quarterly highlights. In automotive applications, Qorvo was selected by an automotive tier-one to supply ultra-wideband connectivity for upcoming EV launch by US-based manufacturer. We are pleased with this win and the growing content opportunity in automotive where the ultra-wideband content inside the car will typically include five to seven placements plus one placement in each key fob. We also secured touch sensor design wins enabling force level detection in a range of smart interior applications including center console, door panel, steering wheel and display. These are multiple design wins totaling multiple billions of dollars. In Automotive Connectivity, we were selected by a leading automotive antenna supplier to provide cellular V2X front end modules and BAW coexistence filters for use by a major European-based OEM. Lastly, we expanded our automotive footprint with an automotive radar design win to supply or receive amplifier for a major US-based automotive OEM. Qorvo's automotive opportunities include DC to DC converters, onboard chargers, smart interiors, RF front ends for 5G, Wi-Fi and V2X connectivity, radars and ultra-wideband secure car access for key fobs and in sidecars. In Wi-Fi, we secured several Wi-Fi 7 design wins with access point providers for our Wi-Fi 7 BAW filters enabling full coverage of 2.4 gigahertz, 5 gigahertz, and 6 gigahertz bands. We also began sampling tier-one customers for our next-generation Wi-Fi 7 FEMs which paired with multiple chipsets. In our Connectivity Systems business, we were among the first to achieve Matter 1.1 certification for our concurrent connect integrated solutions for gateways and devices. This expands our market opportunity and support of top smart home ecosystem customers whose installed base exceeds $150 million home networks. In silicon carbide, we booked a multi-million dollar customer order for silicon carbide power devices supporting AI servers in other data center applications. Design win funnel for Qorvo's silicon carbide power devices is increasing and we continue to expand our supply base to support our customers. In addition to the previously announced supply agreement with SK Siltron, we also have agreements in place with Wolfspeed and Coherent. For broadband applications, we extended our leadership in DOCSIS 4.0 with customer sampling of our 1.8 gigahertz hybrid power doubler. This solution delivers more RF power with lower-power consumption than competing solid-state solutions. In Cellular Infrastructure, we released a highly-integrated 3.4 gigahertz to 3.8 gigahertz, 8W PAM that simplifies 5G massive MIMO system design. We also began sampling the industry's first C-band discrete BAW band pass filter for 5G small cell radios. For defense communications, we began sampling the industry's first 2 gigahertz to 18 gigahertz transmit receive front end module, delivering 10W of transmit power. This highly-integrated wideband solution integrates the PA, switch, LNA and Limiter. It leverages Qorvo's advanced packaging and process technologies to maximize power efficiency in a miniaturized footprint. The form factor and functional density of our solution is especially critical given the trend in our defense and aerospace business of one-to-many. In addition to manned aircraft, there will be many more drones. In addition to large keyhole satellites, there will be many more LEO satellites. These future communication systems and system upgrades incorporate more electronics requiring greater integration across higher volumes. With smartphone OEMs, we began sampling Android smartphone customers, Qorvo's newest highly integrated PAD, which combines in a single placement below, mid and high-band main path functionality that is currently offered in two placements. This new architecture reduces surface area by 40% to meaningfully simplify design and decrease time-to-market for massive 5G phones. This follows on the heels of our announcement last quarter that we began sampling a mid, high-band PAD that combines the main path and diversity receive content for the mid and high bands. Both placements leverage a broad range of Qorvo process technologies, including our newest BAW and SAW filters. Lastly, we commenced customer sampling of our next-generation antenna tuners, which deliver best-in-class linearity, the industry's smallest solution size and compatible with all major chipsets. I want to thank the Qorvo team for continued operational excellence. We have made significant progress clearing channel inventories while developing new technologies and securing new design wins that enhance our customers' products and expand our addressable market. In the September quarter, our outlook primarily reflects new products ramping at our largest customer. Later in the year, we expect Android revenues to reflect a healthier channel in Qorvo's shipments that are more closely aligned with end-market demand. We are very encouraged by customer design activity we've seen so far this year, we expect revenue growth and margin expansion as product mix favors our high growth investment businesses and we are positioned for incremental growth as end markets recover. And with that I'll hand the call off to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the quarter was $651 million, non-GAAP gross margin was 42.9% and non-GAAP EPS was $0.34. Relative to our expectations as provided on our May earnings call, results exceeded the midpoint of guidance despite the macro-environment and channel inventory reduction efforts. Consistent with our guidance, factory production levels improved modestly, but remain below which created an underutilization impacts during the quarter of approximately 800 basis points. The sequential improvement in gross margin and upside to the midpoint of our guidance was due to higher production levels and product mix. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the quarter were $233 million approximately in line with our expectations. We continue to invest in new product development that targets multi-year growth opportunities across all three segments as well as in the teams that directly support our customers. In total, non-GAAP operating income in the quarter was $47 million or 7% of sales, which increased modestly relative to last quarter. Breaking out operating margin by each segment, ACG was 11%, HPA was 17% and CSG was negative 20%. During the quarter, Qorvo Biotechnologies reduced CSG operating income by approximately $2 million. As a reminder, we are currently in the process of seeking strategic alternatives for this business. Non-GAAP net income was $34 million representing diluted earnings per share of $0.34. Moving onto the cash flow statement. Free cash flow was $5 million and capital expenditures were $39 million. During the quarter, we repurchased $100 million worth of shares at an average price of $96.81. The rate and pace of our repurchases is based on our long-term outlook, free cash flow, low leverage, alternative uses of cash and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet. As of quarter-end, we had approximately $2 billion of debt outstanding with no near-term maturities and $744 million of cash and equivalents. Cash benefited from the sale of our Farmers Branch campus, which was completed during the quarter. Consistent with our expectations and commentary from our prior earnings call, our net inventory balance ended the quarter was up $121 million to $917 million driven by the seasonal ramp at our largest customer. Turning to our current quarter outlook, we expect quarterly revenue of approximately $1 billion plus or minus $15 million, non-GAAP gross margin between 45% and 46% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of approximately $1.75 at the midpoint of the revenue range. Our outlook contemplates the current demand environment, further consumption of channel inventory and seasonal factors. Our non-GAAP guidance for fiscal Q2 excludes any costs related to the divestiture of the Biotech business but includes ongoing operating expenses until it has divested. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the September quarter will be approximately $240 million. In addition to growth-oriented investments across our product and technology portfolios, we are also targeting enterprise-wide productivity initiatives. We're simplifying and rationalizing processes and upgrading the core systems we use to run the business. We will present these productivity investments as non-GAAP other operating expenses. These multiyear efforts will support future growth and enhanced profitability as we upgrade, modernize and standardize around the latest tools and best practices. Below the operating income line, non-operating expense is expected to be approximately $10 million, reflecting the interest paid on our fixed-rate debt, offset by interest income earned on our cash balances, FX gains or losses, along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax-rate for fiscal '24 is expected to be within a range of 13% to 15%. We expect our inventory balance will decrease in the September quarter as we support a seasonal ramp at our largest customer. In terms of channel inventory, the environment continues to improve. Inventories of our components in the Android channel were reduced during the June quarter by approximately 20%. This follows greater than 20% reductions in the prior two quarters. We anticipate channel inventories will continue to decline this quarter. Later this calendar year, we expect Android channel inventories will normalize. Outside of the Android ecosystem, there are smaller pockets of channel inventory. They will take longer to digest. For the full year, there is no change to the full fiscal '24 commentary provided last quarter. To reiterate, we forecast fiscal '24 revenue will be above fiscal '23 and expect to benefit from strong dollar content growth at our largest customer. For the full year fiscal '24 non-GAAP gross margin is expected to be approximately 44% with variability on a quarterly basis primarily tracking utilization and mix. During the second half of the fiscal year, we expect sequential declines in gross margin during Q3 and again in Q4, primarily related to utilization and mix. Non-GAAP operating expenses for Q3 and Q4 are expected to be approximately $240 million to $245 million per quarter with variability related to the timing of product development spend, investments in core systems and related productivity initiatives, incentive compensation based on our expectations for improved financial performance, the timing of the Biotechnology business disposition as well as other items. Qorvo enjoys multiyear growth drivers across our three segments. We are leveraging a broad portfolio of technologies and capabilities to grow content this year on large customer programs and we are uniquely positioned across leading customers in large markets. We're investing to drive outsized growth in diverse businesses to broaden our market exposure and accelerate growth. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.
Karl Ackerman:
Yeah, thank you. Two questions if I may gentlemen. First, could you comment on your ability to secure gallium and germanium substrates for your products? And I guess what are your thoughts on the ability to pass along higher substrate costs if that were to occur going forward?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Thanks for the question, Karl. This is Grant. We currently do not believe the export ban will have a meaningful near-term impact. It took effect yesterday, as you know, but it was communicated well in advance and I credit our ops and sales team for acting quickly to access the supply needs and communicate with customers and suppliers, and ultimately for increasing our raw material coverage with our direct suppliers wherever needed but we have not observed any notable changes in our customers' behavior or supplier lead times. We remain in close contact with our suppliers and they have assured us of their ability to support our demands down to individual purchase orders on committed delivery dates. In terms of pricing, we had again, haven't seen anything abnormal there as of today.
Karl Ackerman:
Very helpful. I guess, if I could just maybe zoom out for a second. I was hoping you could -- you could discuss the timing of the automotive design wins you've mentioned in your prepared remarks across many applications really, silicon carbide, ultra-wideband, force-sensing. My understanding was that automotive represented kind of a mid-single-digit portion of your sales. I could be wrong, but that clearly appears to be expanding. So could you comment and whether maybe your automotive business doubles for you by 2025? Thanks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Karl. This is Bob. Appreciate the question. As you well know, the nice thing about automotive is when you win, you get great visibility for multiple years, unlike the smartphone industry where today we get a little bit of visibility, but you have to then earn it the following models, where in automotive, as you pointed out, you go out several years. We've got great visibility at this time, we're not sizing it, but I think based on the volume of opportunities that we shared in my prepared remarks plus in the press release, it is our expectations as you pointed out, as we move out into calendar year '25 and '26, it will become a much more meaningful part of our business. But as you pointed out, we're already participating in some of the automotive applications today. I will comment the electric vehicle manufacturers do seem to move a little bit more, a little bit faster than the traditional gas engine manufacturers, but we do look forward to continue to report our progress.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Ruben Roy with Stifel Nicolaus. Please go ahead.
Ruben Roy:
Thank you. Bob, if I can follow up, right where you left off on auto. Can you talk about or characterize the types of automobiles where you're winning? Is it sort of flagship versions or flagship autos or mid-tier high end or across the board? And at this point, is there a way to think about content per auto in dollars?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thanks. I'm going to have Dave get into some of the details on that, Ruben?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, and you can imagine some of these products that we're talking about, they're going to start in a higher tier of the auto from ultra wideband for the sensors that are going into the cockpit. Electric vehicles certainly are focused there, but even some of the higher-end gas-powered vehicles. And over time, we expect that to go down market. On some of the connectivity side there, that can go more broadly across the portfolio and the OEMs because there you're talking about connectivity within the vehicle, connectivity from vehicles outside of the vehicle. So some of those are more driven by the governments, and those requirements are going to be across all vehicles regardless of the tier where that model sits.
Ruben Roy:
Got it. Thank you. And as a follow-up, Grant, I caught the operating margin numbers you gave for the segments. I don't know if I missed this, but I don't have it. Can you give us the dollars or kind of the performance for the segments in the June quarter? And then, obviously, you've got strong content gains at the largest customer driving, the September revenue expectation, but if you can give us any granularity on how you're thinking about the other segments as you proceed? Any changes to how you're thinking about those segments through the rest of the year? Thanks.
Grant Brown:
Sure, Ruben. Revenue by segment was $412 million for ACG, $140 million for HPA and $99 million for CSG. In ACG, our fiscal Q1 is the lowest seasonal point for those largest customers. But despite that, the top line for ACG was approximately flat or down about a percent or so. Both HPA and CSG saw sequential growth in the quarter, up 5% and 21% sequentially. As I commented in the prepared remarks, operating income was 11% just for ACG, 17% for HPA, and then negative 20% for CSG, which was a notable sequential improvement for CSG. We don't guide by segment, but looking out into September, the primary driver is the content gains at our largest customer within ACG. Revenue is not supported by existing inventory. It's built and shift in line with the seasonal ramp, so it's not burdened with those higher costs of some of the Android inventory, for example. So that benefits gross margin and has been factored into our, into our guidance.
Ruben Roy:
Appreciate it.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Operator?
Grant Brown:
Operator, next question please.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Operator, are you there?
Operator:
This is the operator. Is the question over?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, please. Next question please.
Operator:
Just a moment. Our next question comes from the line of Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Gary Mobley:
Hey, guys. Wasn't sure if was getting my question in. Good afternoon. I was observing that your first half of fiscal year '24 appears to be running about 3% above your -- your May commentary and -- or about $50 million. What's driving that minor variance and is there anything to call out that may be offsetting that?
Grant Brown:
Sure, thanks, Gary. Good. It's a good question. I think it's fair to say that the quarter played out better than we had forecast when we provided our May guidance. If you, if you look into that revenue, it was strength in the areas that we had, that we had talked about. So at our largest customer and then within having cleared some of the channel inventory, we're still benefiting to a modest degree there, but generally speaking, the quarter played out better. In terms of the drivers on maybe the EPS beat to go a little further than just revenue that was primarily gross margin improvement which was partially driven by the revenue upside, but was also a factor there of lower factory variances, including utilization, better utilization and continuing cost reduction efforts. Those were partially offset by some inventory-related charges and typical price erosion along with inflation. But generally speaking, the quarter was better than -- than we had forecasted in May.
Gary Mobley:
Got it. Thanks, Grant. And so you're guiding the September quarter revenue at about $1 billion dollars, which takes us back to a similar level to the June quarter of fiscal year '23 when gross margins were 450 basis points higher. And I presume the difference today is that you would, you just have too much inventory and you just can't fully utilize the manufacturing operations. But under -- my question is under what circumstances can we see a return to that 50% gross margin?
Grant Brown:
Sure, we still have visibility to 50%. As I pointed out on the call, we have about 800 basis point headwind from utilization in the prior quarter and looking forward, we still have those same issues from a utilization perspective, as you pointed out on inventory. I think as we clear the channel inventory across the Android and utilization returns to a level in which we're shipping to end market demand, we should have a clear path back towards the 50% gross margins we've enjoyed in the past. Those are really two-fold, there's the inventory we have on hand, which is already burdened with the cost of that underutilization in the past. And then there is the forward-looking utilization within the current quarter as we meet future demand or build product for future demand. Both of those can weigh on the quarter and are in that 800 basis points that I quoted. The underutilization of current period can, if it's extreme, it can hit as period charges and we've experienced some of those as well. So it's really, as we re-synchronize our factories to end market demand, we should have a clear path back.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Srini Pajjuri with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you. Bob, on the Android inventory, you seem pretty optimistic that it's going to normalize by end of the calendar year. So I guess as we look out to the March quarter and next calendar year, what's the, I guess, in the strategy for, I guess, whether you call it refilling the channel or maybe just trying to think about how the seasonality might get impacted once the inventory normalizes.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Srini, for your question. And we are getting pretty comfortable with the progress we're making, and as both Grant and I have commented, the team has done a great job of managing the inventory down, working with our customers, working with some of our distributors to do that, and our expectations are that we should be able to, by the end of the calendar year, things will normalize. And then, obviously, as that happens, we're not expecting end demand to change at all from where we are. In fact, as we sit here today reporting the most recent quarter, and we were a quarter ago, our numbers for units of Android phones, smartphones has not changed. So we think things are stabilizing some. Yes, the market's been down here a little bit up there, but overall. So as we look out into '24, calendar '24, fiscal '25 for us, we're not ready to make any calls on what's going to happen with the macro economy and things like that. But clearly, as we've come down to normalized inventories, that headwind turns into a tailwind. So we'll watch how that plays out.
Srini Pajjuri:
Yes, that's great. And then maybe one for Grant. Grant, you kind of highlighted underutilization as one of the issues with the gross margin. But I guess the other issue is the high-cost inventory. So I guess at what point that stops to become a headwind to your gross margin and maybe potentially a tailwind.
Grant Brown:
Sure. We haven't commented beyond fiscal '24. So I won't do that here. But in our guidance, with a sequential drop in Q3, you start to see some improvement there. And then in Q4, again, you start to see even more improvement as we sell through some of the channel inventory. Now gross margin will be sequentially down in the sense that we're selling through some of that inventory, but we do expect to resynchronize utilization towards the end of our fiscal year and into fiscal '25. But we haven't commented specifically beyond that.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya with Bank of America Securities. Please go ahead.
Vivek Arya:
Thank you for taking my question. Bob, you are sounding more confident about the top-line growth, but since the last time Qorvo reported, there has been kind of this pronounced slowdown in China. And even if the Android customer inventory might be getting cleaned up, your large customers still has China as an important end market. So, I'm curious that in the last call you suggested that December sales could be flattish, right, and March would be down just kind of seasonal, is that still the right way to think about December and March or do you think we should be reflecting any macro effects that we're seeing by way of sell-through and just consumer demand?
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Vivek. This is Grant. Let me take that one. Beyond the specific September quarter guidance that we just provided, there is no change to the fiscal '24 commentary that we provided last quarter. So as Bob pointed out, our expectations for sell-through and in the channel remain the same. Absent any macro-related disruptions, which we're not predicting, we do forecast to continue to think fiscal '24 revenue will be above fiscal '23 as you mentioned, and we're benefiting from some strong dollar content growth at our largest customer and then later in the year, we will benefit from the actions we've taken in connection with our customers to clear that channel inventory. To be clear, we are calling for very modest growth on the year, which is consistent. But in fact, our forecast does not anticipate a significant rebound in the Android units. The Qorvo specific situation as we process through the channel inventory and then return to shipping to end market demand. Beyond revenue just for the year, there's also no change to our fiscal '24 non-GAAP gross margin, still expected to be approximately 24% plus or minus with some variability on a quarterly basis tracking utilization and mix, which I've already talked about. This is important to understand. Mix will shift seasonally over fiscal Q3 and even more so in fiscal Q4 towards higher-cost inventories and utilization is also important, as I pointed out, because it supports that incremental forward-looking demand but also because severe underutilization can lead to the period costs as I mentioned earlier. We've been very transparent there and continue to expect those sequential declines in gross margin and that's factored into our 44% guide. I covered OpEx a bit in my prepared remarks but it's important to note that we are investing for the future. We're investing in large customer programs where we have the technologies to win. We're investing in diversifying businesses like silicon carbide, UWB, Matter, SoCs and power management. And finally, we're investing in ourselves by upgrading our core systems and numerous productivity initiatives. So on the whole, there is no change to our fiscal '24 guidance and our view of the market remains the same.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks, Grant. Very helpful. And then on gross margins -- Apologize if you had answered this before, but again from the last call I think you had mentioned December could be down 100, 150 basis points, and then March would be down another 200 to 300 basis points as you work through some of the higher priced component inventory. What would make that component inventory cost go down, right? I imagine there has been more inflation overtime. So I guess this is just a long-winded way of asking that as we start the next fiscal year, what is the right baseline of gross margins we should think about, is it that 43%, 44% level as you're exiting March, is at the average level that you have in this fiscal year? What is the right way to just think about the baseline level of gross margin as you enter the next fiscal year?
Grant Brown:
Sure. I might think about it two different ways. I wouldn't characterize Q1 of fiscal '25 as baseline revenue, but I think it's appropriate to build off of what you are modeling in Q4 of fiscal '24, but we haven't provided explicit -- explicit guidance to that.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Tim Arcuri with UBS. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst:
Hi. This is (Evan) [ph] calling in for Tim. I had just one question from me, just wanted to ask about the US phone market for iPhone has potentially changed the trajectory of the recovery on the Android side because I know that the iPhone market, the used phone market is going substantially. So I just wanted to try to get a sense for it if that sort of, like a headwind to the recovery on the Android side?
Grant Brown:
The iPhone refurbished market has been around for quite a long time. So at least when we model that coupled with everything else that we do in our normal research for phone usage, different segments, all those things that we feed into our model, we've taken all that into account for all the comments that we've made this evening, last quarter, the quarter before that and the quarter before that. So it's all in our calculus already.
Unidentified Analyst:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Matt Ramsay with TD Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.
Matthew Ramsay:
Thank you, guys. Good afternoon. There's a couple of calls going on at the same time, so I apologize if I missed a little, but guys I heard all the comments going into the back half of the year regarding inventory in the handset market and also your sales potentially getting better with the large customer. I wanted to ask on the Qualcomm guys mentioned tonight not having a license to ship into Huawei for 5G and there's some pretty well-documented reports about HiSilicon doing a modem with SMIC for some of those phones and it's uncertain about volumes, but could you guys tell us if you're -- would be allowed to participate in those handset builds, and if you have sort of export license to do so? Thanks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Matt, thanks for the question. I don't believe there's any company in the USthat has a license to ship to Huawei for 5G phone. They become a very small customer of ours, so there's no real impact from that perspective. And as you pointed out, we'll see if they are successful or not, won't impact our business at this time.
Matthew Ramsay:
Got it. No, that was my assumption, but I had a few people ask me to clarify that. I guess as my follow-up. You guys have spent a lot of time talking about diversification of the company outside of the wireless market and it's not lost on us through the press release and some of your communications that the first bunch of bullets was about things in the auto market and in aerospace and defense and a bunch of markets, silicon carbide, a bunch of things outside of the handset market. But there's also been some pretty dynamic macroeconomic conditions in all of those markets as well, like, nothing is really immune from the macro. So maybe you guys could give us a little bit of an update outside of the handset market, how inventory for the company is overall. Customers in the channel. Are there any -- it's well-documented what the inventory headwinds are the gross margin and the recovery in your handset business and we all follow that closely, but are there anything that we should know about outside of the handset market from an inventory perspective where do you feel like things are relatively clean there? Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Sure. This is Grant. Let me take -- Maybe the two-part question and then I'll ask Dave to step in if I miss anything. The question about the growth drivers. If you look at or think about the phases of growth that we're looking at right now, you could -- as we've commented on return to shipping and to end market demand is relatively near-term. Beyond that, we continue to work with our customers and believe that we'll benefit as the volume levels return. So beyond just shipping to end market demand, we should see some growth and return to normalcy over the coming years. And then maybe beyond that, even into the longer term, we should see the benefits from the investments we're making, that would be sort of beyond 5G, and you're looking into the migration to DOCSIS 4.0 within HPA, the one-to-many phenomenon bought commented on in defense and aerospace will continue within CSG, there's the move to WiFi 7 and among many other things that we're investing in and expect to see growth there. In the near term, inventory to that piece of the question, we are seeing pockets, which we've talked about before in base station and partially in WiFi in some consumer areas, which will take longer for us to work through versus Android. And Dave, I don't know if you have anything further.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, nothing to hit it right, Grant. And the inventories in the channel for most of the components outside of Android, we'll probably be on a similar cadence, maybe into early next year other than base station. We don't have as good a visibility into our customers' end markets and how much inventory may be there that they need to work for. So that's probably a little bit of uncertainty for us.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna. Please go ahead.
Christopher Rolland:
Hey, guys. Congrats on the great guidance. And sorry, if these were answered, but December, did you still expect that to be flat revenues, flattish from September, any other thoughts on seasonality moving forward? And then, Grant. I know you expect revenue to grow fiscal year-on-year. Any chance that EPS could grow as well or is that a little too far of a long shot?
Grant Brown:
Sure, thanks, Chris. And I'm glad you asked the question actually on December. So when we made the comments to a flattish December, it was on our -- previously anchored to our last quarter guidance. So I would expect that right now, given that we're not anticipating significant growth in fiscal '24 that I'd pouch that with the comments we made last quarter, it could end up being slightly down to flattish. And then, of course, some seasonal decline in March. Potentially less than normal as we clear the channel. So, that question hadn't been asked. I'm glad you went there. In terms of EPS, I have given majority of the P&L but haven't commented specifically on -- on annual EPS relative to fiscal '23.
Christopher Rolland:
And then I thought it was interesting you mentioned silicon carbide, I believe, it was for AI servers, if I got that right, and is that like DC to DC or into power supplies? Or any other detail there would be great, if I got that right.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, you got that right. It's for power supply in the servers, and of course, AI and any kind of applications like that is going to drive demand there. So that's good for us, but yes, that's a strong market for us as we grow our silicon carbide business.
Operator:
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder:
Thank you, guys. Thanks a lot. Based on everything you've said here, a bit stronger than expected guidance in September and everything you said about Android, you're not expecting a rebound, et cetera. That suggests that the extra strength is coming from the content gains at your largest customer, and doesn't that imply, given your share and all that, that you're going to see, well, year-over-year in content is going to have to be up much more significantly at 40% overall, have I got that math right?
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Ed. I think you are consistent with what we've been saying, we're going to have significant content gains at our largest customer. And as I've said in other public forums, that's primarily in products that we already participated in, where we've been able to grow our share as well as they are adding content.
Edward Snyder:
Right. So that was my second question because you have been clear the content gains are kind of a mix of both. Share gains and new content. Does that mean that we will see you in sections, the RFP that we haven't seen in the past when we talk about new content or is it just additions to areas you've been very strong in previously? And how sticky do you feel the share gains will be over the next year or so, especially the ones that you're taking from other folks, just curious?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yeah, thanks, Ed. Again, what I've said publicly is, which I know it's hard for many of you to find, in the antenna tuner space, almost some of the other small components that are in there that, quite honestly, a lot of you missed, they are not on the motherboard, they are on various other flex circuits and things like that. Gaining there and in the ultra-high band we've talked. It's PA and BAW filter, we've been in for about three years. So that's the area. So it's really in those two areas primarily.
Edward Snyder:
Those areas that, you guys actually have been quite strong and they're expanding given all the new connectivity going on here makes sense. And we highlighted every antenna tuners. I think you're up like 12 to 15 in the last model, plus a couple of impedance tuners too. So that's generally what we're talking about in most of the gains?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Your numbers, not my number. I'm not going to comment on the units, number of units per phone. I will say you're in the right area. And I'd also point out, we publicly said the last couple of quarterly calls as well that we still believe there's lots of opportunity for us to grow with that customer. We look forward in the coming years.
Edward Snyder:
Great. Thank you, Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to the management for closing comments.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Well, thank you, everyone for joining us on today's call. We appreciate your time and look forward to speaking with you at upcoming investor events. Thank you and hope you have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Operator:
Greetings, and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Q4 2023 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Douglas DeLieto, VP, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2023 fourth quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provided supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing; and other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. Qorvo’s fourth quarter results were consistent with the outlook provided during our February 1st earnings call. Looking at our end markets, the quarter played out largely as expected, with lower end market demand in some markets, primarily those with consumer exposure and channel inventory consumption with the majority of that being in the Android ecosystem. We made significant progress clearing channel inventory. At the same time, we continued to introduce new products and secure new designs, positioning Qorvo to best support our customers as end markets recover. We are seeing increased strength in customer design activity across our businesses, and we are confident in our ability to grow. In High-Performance Analog, we enjoyed relative strength in power devices and defense markets, offset by our management markets with consumer exposure and inventory digestion at infrastructure OEM. We continue to enjoy broad-based multiyear design win activity that we see contributing to long-term growth. In our Connectivity and Sensors Group, relative stability in automotive during the quarter was offset by continued inventory draw-downs and weak end market demand for Wi-Fi enabled products and cellular IoT. Design activity was strong across a variety of applications, including smart home, precision location, indoor navigation, Automotive Connectivity, automotive smart interiors and enhanced human machine interfaces. In Advanced Cellular, total Android revenue was up sequentially on the strength of a large customer flagship ramp with record Qorvo content. We believe March was a low point for China-based Android quarterly revenue, and we expect total Android revenue will grow sequentially in June, while channel inventories continue to be consumed. Design activity during the quarter continued to be favorable across all leading smartphone OEMs. Now, let’s turn to some quarterly highlights. In High-Performance Analog, Qorvo was selected by an industry leader to supply cell-to-satellite solutions that combine a variety of technologies, including multiple RF components and BAW-based multiplexers. These solutions enabled low earth orbit based space-to-terrestrial connectivity, helping to provide cellular coverage in the hardest to reach geographies. We achieved a milestone with the delivery of our first prototype RF multi-chip modules to BAE Systems under the SHIP contract with the U.S. Department of Defense. Qorvo is leveraging our state-of-the-art production capabilities in our Richardson, Texas facility to advance heterogeneous packaging integration and enables significant savings in power, size, weight and cost. This early milestone showcases the speed and efficiency of our collaboration with our program partners. It is a critical first step towards the goal of reestablishing U.S. leadership in microelectronics and accelerating the modernization of microelectronic systems for next-generation phased array radars, unmanned vehicles and satellite communications. In our power device business, we booked a multimillion dollar follow-on silicon carbide inverter order for residential and industrial solar application. The Department of Energy forecasts solar power will make up more than half of new capacity in the U.S. in 2023, and the market for silicon carbide inverters is expected to achieve double-digit compound annual growth rate through 2026. This win complements our ongoing business in automotive charging applications and data centers. In our Connectivity and Sensors business, we were selected to supply ultra-wideband solutions across multiple verticals, including a next-generation smartwatch, supporting secure car access, Wi-Fi access points, enabling indoor navigation and an additional 2024 flagship Android smartphone. Of note, ultra-wideband design activity for in-car applications has ramped up significantly. We are a member of the Car Connectivity Consortium, and we are proud to be a contributor to the Digital Key Plus program for the Android ecosystem recently announced by BMW. With Digital Key Plus, BMW drivers with compatible smartphones can unlock or lock their car and start the engine without having the key and without removing the phone from their pocket. In Automotive Connectivity, we collaborated with automotive OEMs and leading third parties to advance smart antennas and next-generation shark fin architectures. We also expanded design engagements related to 5G network access devices with automotive Tier 1s. In sensors, we secured a design win to supply force-sensing touch sensors in support of a premium true wireless headset for a leading European OEM. The headset will leverage the ultra-sensitivity of Qorvo’s MEMS-based sensors to enable a new industrial design. In Wi-Fi, we secured our first Wi-Fi 7 BAW filter design win and we expanded sampling of our Wi-Fi solutions, enabling full coverage of 2.4, 5 and 6 gigahertz bands for smartphones and consumer and enterprise access points. In Advanced Cellular, we supported the ramp of a Korean-based smartphone OEM’s flagship smartphone with multiple Qorvo placements, including low band, mid-high band and ultra-high band pads as well as secondary transmit, tuning and Wi-Fi. We are pleased to support this customer broadly in their flagship tier, and we are seeing expanding opportunities as they migrate their mass market portfolio to integrated 5G solutions. Across the Android ecosystem, Qorvo was awarded broad-based design wins in support of flagship, mid-tier and mass market 5G devices at the top 5 Android smartphone OEMs. To support new designs, we shipped our first samples of our newest mid-high band pad to an Android OEM, addressing this customer’s most challenging performance and size requirements. This is the industry’s most highly integrated front-end placement. It combines main path and diversity receive content for the mid and high band. And as we said previously, this product integrates nearly 2 times the BAW filter content in a smaller footprint than existing main path only, mid-high band pad architectures. It leverages the reduced size and enhanced performance of our newest BAW and SAW filters. We expect the first smartphone featuring this solution to launch in calendar 2024. Across the business, we’re leveraging investments in best-in-class technologies, introduce differentiated products that delight our customers. We have many growth drivers in our portfolio and design activity has been strong. In HPA, design wins secured in the March order span a variety of applications in aerospace, battery management, defense radar, electric vehicles and renewable energy systems. In CSG, we secured new business in automotive connectivity, indoor navigation, smart home and wearables. In ACG, we enjoyed broad representation across all leading OEMs and we are increasing our content in the highest volume flagship phones. We believe we have room to grow at our largest customer, including BAW-based content, and we are a leading supplier to the Android ecosystem where the transition to 5G supports long-term content gains. Last year, approximately 40% of the roughly 920 million Android smartphones were 5G. And we see Android 5G smartphone unit growth achieving a double-digit CAGR for several years. Over time, we expect HPA and CSG to outpace the growth rate of ACG, increasing our total growth rate and driving leverage as mix increasingly favors our high-growth investment businesses. I want to thank the team for continued operational excellence. We are introducing new technologies and launching new products to align with the industry’s growth drivers and broaden our market exposure. We are seeing increasing strength in customer design activity across our businesses, and we expect improved financial performance supported by content gains and large customer programs. And with that, I’ll hand the call off to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. As a reminder, our references today will be to our three operating segments
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
I guess my first question, hoping you could talk a little bit about full year ‘24 revenue. Grant, you gave good color on gross margin and OpEx as well. But how are you thinking about the top line in fiscal ‘24? And if you can kind of provide context around or color around the three segments, that would be super helpful. And then I have a follow-up.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Toshiya. I appreciate the question. This is Grant. In terms of the full year fiscal ‘24 guidance, based on our current view and barring any macroeconomic deterioration, right, we’re not forecasting a significant jump in handset unit sell-through. In fact, we actually believe smartphones to be down year-over-year, but 5G phones to be up in the 5% to 10% range. So, that underpins our overall fiscal ‘24 view for ACG. We do expect some growth in HPA and CSG as well, especially as the year progresses. But generally speaking, not a terribly aggressive back half of the year. That said, just walking through the quarters, margin will follow mix, as I pointed out in my prepared remarks. Although there is no change to our view of returning to 50% in the gross margin line, it’s unlikely in ‘24. If I take it quarter-by-quarter beyond the June quarter guidance, our fiscal Q2 in September, we would expect revenue to be up approximately 50% sequentially. Again, this is driven by strong content gains and to a large seasonal ramp. Gross margin will also be up in the neighborhood of approximately 400 basis points quarter-on-quarter as mix begins to favor some newer products, which are less burdened by those higher unit costs associated with underutilization. In the December quarter, our fiscal Q3, we expect revenue to be approximately flat and continuing off of September. Gross margin will be down 100 to 150 basis points as utilization begins to ramp down following that large seasonal ramp and mix begins to modestly shift to some of that higher cost inventory. And finally, in the March quarter, our fiscal Q4 of calendar year 2024, we expect Android to be a higher percent of our mix, but decline less than might be historic seasonality due to a clean channel and returning to shipping to end demand. However, gross margin will be down 200 to 300 basis points quarter-on-quarter as mix reflects that higher cost inventory. As I mentioned in the prepared remarks, beyond June, I gave some color around OpEx for the year, which would exclude Bio in the $240 million to $245 million per quarter, with some of the variability there related to product development spend and other items. Generally speaking, we have a good degree of confidence in content for our September period. And then as we clean the channel in the Android ecosystem in ACG, we feel comfortable of returning to shipping to end market demand. Tax rate is probably in that 13% to 15% range, consistent with the fiscal ‘23. And we believe share count will be approximately 100 million shares or less.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
Grant, thanks for that very explicit fiscal year ‘24 revenue guide. It’s quite helpful. But I wanted to ask about something one of your competitors was talking about this evening. That is some subseasonal shipments to their largest customer, I presume Apple, their modem-only customer. I’m wondering if that factors into your guidance or is factored into your guidance, what maybe some of the undercurrents going on there, how that made impact to you from a competitive standpoint or just from a customer-specific standpoint?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Hi. This is Bob. Gary, thanks for the question. And as you know, we don’t normally talk a lot about our largest customer. I think what I can say is ACG will be down quarter-over-quarter. So we are expecting from a smartphone revenue to be down. And historically, it is a lower quarter for our largest customer. So, I don’t know why -- whoever said whatever you just said. But I think we have a real good handle on the market. We talk a lot about our model and how things work. So, we feel good about what we’ve said for sure, no doubt.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. Do you mind if I ask a follow-up?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Absolutely. Go ahead, Gary.
Gary Mobley:
All right. So I guess the $64,000 question is what will the new normal look like with your Android customers, once they’re through draining their excess inventory? What’s your best feel based on design win traction? Do you think you can achieve a new revenue high at some point in the future in your Android customer base specifically?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Gary, thanks for the question. And as you pointed out, always forecasting the future is quite difficult. Here’s what I do know. If we go back and look at where we’re gaining share and what we’ve been talking about, the great work we’ve done in the Android ecosystem, whether that’s Samsung and Google and already what we believe we’ve started to win in ‘24. And as you know, what we’ve been facing are these headwinds with not shipping up the demand and reducing the inventories that Grant went through, the 20% last quarter -- or two quarters ago, 25% last quarter that. As that comes and we continue to gain share there. I believe we can get back there or better. No doubt about it. But again, you have to forecast our largest customers done quite well in gaining share in some of their markets. So, the good news is we’re positioned, and I think this is what’s important. We’re the only strategic supplier of the top six Android manufacturers, and we’ve got a great business that we’re growing with our largest customer. So, when we look at it from that perspective, what we’re convinced is we can continue to grow.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Vivek Arya from Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Bob, I’m curious, what do you think is the visibility of kind of retaining this new content over the next several years? Because customers in the market have a habit of making different architecture decisions every year. So, as you start ramping this new content, how do you think you are able to sustain it over the next few years?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I think what’s interesting, Vivek, is, I mean, over time, we’ve done a pretty good job of holding in the areas that we’re winning nice share and growing, and as they add content in those areas, we’ve done well. So as we look out, we feel pretty good about things. And I even commented and Grant did as well that we believe we can continue to grow content at our largest customer, whether it be BAW-based or our discrete components that we sell there. So, we feel good about the outlook there for multiple years.
Vivek Arya:
And for my follow-up, do you think this was a competitive win, or do you think this is a new technology that customers are adding in this area? So, is this expanding the pie, or do you think this is kind of a competitive win from something they might have been using from somebody else before?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I think I answered this question last quarter, I believe, on a similar topic, and it was both. We’re gaining content through both share gains as well as, to your point, making the pie bigger. Both.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Karl Ackerman with BNP.
Karl Ackerman:
I guess, based on your comments on channel inventory realignment for Android, why wouldn’t channel inventory be aligned with sell-through by the end of the June quarter, given the further improvements that you’re seeing? And as you address that question, how would you characterize the inventory balances and timing of reaching normalized inventory in your infrastructure and IoT businesses?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. This is Dave. I’ll take that question. So in the Android ecosystem, you’ve got to remember, we ship a lot of products into a lot of different customers. So, it all depends on their program ramps, how well their phones sell through relative to their expectations. So, in some cases, you’re right, we’re going to be in pretty good shape by the end of the June quarter. In other cases, it will probably take a little longer, depending on the customer and their business. So -- but as Grant said, by the second half of the year, we definitely see the Android ecosystem. We should be clear of all the channel inventory and back to shipping to true customer demand. Base station is going to take a little longer. I think some of those customers built up more inventory during the tight supply conditions of last year. And so it’s just going to take some of those customers longer to burn that off. So, we see that probably taking through this calendar year and into the early part of next year.
Grant Brown:
Hey Karl, this is Grant. Let me jump in there. And maybe if I take it up a level. Our view on channel inventories is incorporated in our guide. So, our 50% increase in the September quarter is predicated largely on content gains. Sequentially, we would expect the channel to begin clearing and us to begin shipping to more normalized demand later in our fiscal year. Again, it doesn’t incorporate anything aggressive in terms of unit growth. This would be simply a return to what could be considered somewhat normal, and that would be incorporated in our guide. So, you can make at least the quantification of it based on that.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Edward Snyder, Charter Equity.
Edward Snyder:
You guys seem very confident about gains in the fall. Bob you said both share gains and new content. Maybe we do a little bit further down to the share gains aspect. Is this areas that you’ve not before because you guys tend to focus on specific areas, and there have been some kind of back and forth in a couple of slots, or is it going to be something completely new? And then, you mentioned kind of an all-in-one, mid-high band, DRx, et cetera. Watching that -- the channel has been looking at that for some time, it’s been attempted in the past, but there’s too constrained. It sounds like more Android guys are open to that. Question there is, all in one -- it gives you more defensible position because you’re one of the few companies that have actually built an all-in-one, but doesn’t it also compress the total ASP or the total revenue available versus selling separate modules? Can you give us a feeling on how that tradeoff works? And then, I had a follow-up, please.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Thanks, Ed. And as you know, for our largest customer, we won’t talk about any future architectures, but I’m sure once you turn down the phones, you’ll see where we want. And as I said, we’re very confident in our ability to continue to grow there. And Dave, do you want to take out of the work that we’re doing there? Second part of his question.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. Ed, you referred to it as an all-in-one. And what we talked about on the bullet there was a solution that combines the mid-high-band plus the diversity receive. So that diversity receive, that’s all new content for us. We don’t traditionally service that part of the phone. But in general, we’re supporting our customers, I think, with a very high performance, small size is what they’re looking for. So that’s creating a lot of value as well. So we don’t see it as an ASP issue. It’s a very high-performance small-sized solution that’s going to drive.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then, if I could, you took another charge on the silicon supply agreement. I understand things are slow here. On my calculations, you probably have what you’ve got maybe $60 million to $70 million left on that. Any feelings about how that will play out? I mean, you used your deposit to offset the cash cost this quarter. Will that continue if you’re underpurchasing from that supplier? I’m just trying to get a feel for how that plays out the next several quarters.
Grant Brown:
Sure, Ed. This is Grant. I’ll take the question. Quarter-on-quarter at a high level, our revenue outlook for fiscal ‘24 hasn’t changed. If anything, it’s actually improved. What has changed would be our current forecast of mix over the out years in that contract, right? As you understand, wafers aren’t fungible, once they’ve been fabricated and our demand profile is complex. The supply agreement covers multiple products, technologies, customers across multiple years. So, there’s a significant mix impact. Furthermore, we can’t order wafers for products that haven’t been defined yet. So there’s a timing element as well. But since we have to place those well in advance, we have to make sure we manage our inventory accordingly. And we’re comfortable with our current inventory based on forecasted demand. So, we’re applying our prepaid deposit, as you mentioned, to the wafers that we don’t believe we’d ultimately need. And we know there’d be continued variability in the mix over the remaining life of the agreement. It could be better, it could be worse. But this is something we analyze each quarter and we’re continuing to work with the supplier in that case to stay aligned.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Matt Ramsay with Cowen & Company.
Matt Ramsay:
Obviously, really appreciative of all the additional fiscal ‘24 detail and guidance color, and I know there’s content things that are happening. But I guess I just want to think about philosophically right now, giving all that additional detail and guidance on a per quarter basis all the way through the fiscal year. I mean, we -- a lot of us are listening to MediaTek commentary out of Asia. Just got off the Qualcomm call listening to their comments, where, certainly, it seems like a lot more uncertainty in the handset market all the way around at your largest customer in terms of volumes and in terms of the market recovery in China. So I guess the question I have is really just about the choice to give all that granular detail right now through the next four quarters and the level of confidence sort of underpinning those estimates, just given all that’s going on in the macro despite the content gains you have. Thanks.
Grant Brown:
Yes. Sure, Matt. This is Grant. Let me take the question. First off, we usually give some color around the forward fiscal year as we start it. So it’s something that we do as a matter of practice. I think it’s extremely helpful, in this case, given the volatility in the market. So I hope that it’s helpful for you as you’re putting your models together. In terms of the quarter-by-quarter guidance, it’s so specific to the margin profile given the mix of products and the inventory balances we’re carrying, that I wanted to make sure that we were upfront and helping people understand the margin is going to follow that mix and to a degree the utilization associated with those customer ramps. So, it’s important to understand that it will vary on a quarter-by-quarter basis. So, I wanted to make sure that we gave as much color as we could there. Underpinning our overall view, again, is nothing overly aggressive from a recovery or a step function jump in handset unit sales. So, I don’t want to be overly conservative, but there’s nothing aggressive there. As we’ve said, we’re really looking to just clear the channel inventory. We’ve been working aggressively to do so. And I think we’re making a lot of progress there. As we return to normal in the channel later in our fiscal year, we should see some incremental improvement just simply being able to shift to what would be considered end market demand.
Matt Ramsay:
As my follow-up, it’s great to see the inventory in Android coming down. I think you guys mentioned 20% reduction last quarter and then another 25% reduction now. So maybe just could you level set us on an absolute dollar terms or maybe a unit terms of where you see the inventory that needs to still be worked through in the Android community or how much of a drag is it still for another couple of quarters? If there’s any kind of quantification there, that would be helpful as we think about maybe modeling beyond the inventory burn over the next couple of quarters? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Matt, I’ll make a couple of comments and then turn it over to Dave. But we really don’t want to get into giving dollars and units and all that because it moves around based on future demand. I think what we can say is that we’re going to continue to reduce the channel inventory. So, we have a ways to go. And what we said was we’ll reduce it this quarter and probably continue to reduce in September. It’s probably going to take till December on the overall channel inventories. And I think we were one of the first saying, hey, we were going to do this, to your point. And I can’t speak for the others that you’re listening to, but we started a throttle back on this a long time ago and others are just seeing it. I also think our lead times are much shorter than theirs, which is why we saw this before they did and saw now coming back differently. Coming back in a sense, not the market’s coming back, that we’ve made significant progress on reducing the inventories in the channel. So, the headwinds are subsiding and slight tailwinds are going to be behind us as we start shipping into the end demand, even though it’s significantly lower than what we saw a year ago. So, I think I captured that. Dave, if you want to add any color to that, feel free.
Dave Fullwood:
No, I think they’re all good comments, Bob. And we did see that the Android sales, we think that bottomed in December and our sales into China bottomed in March. And so, as Bob said, we’ve still got some work to do to clear that inventory in the next couple of quarters, but we do see that improving already. Bookings are up. Customer demand is coming back. And so, it’s only a matter time at this point.
Operator:
The next question comes from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO Capital.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I actually had -- Matt asked a good question, just simply along those lines. On the gross margin side, Grant, is that largely a factor of utilization? Could you please quantify for us because -- and it’s not under your watch, but gross margin performance has been pretty volatile. So, just help us understand, is utilization at its lowest ever or in the recent past? And so, is that the biggest driving factor that gives you the confidence on the gross margin side?
Grant Brown:
Sure, Ambrish. This is Grant. I’ll take the question. Yes, by far, in the Pareto, underutilization is the largest item. I think last quarter, we quoted over 900 basis points, and it’s -- in this Q4 period just ended, it was approximately 1,000 basis points. So very consistent headwind there from an underutilization standpoint, again, the largest factor. That underutilization plays into higher unit costs that we’re carrying for the products that we have in inventory. As those work their way through the P&L, be it COGS, you’re going to see that continued pressure from underutilization going forward for some period of time, which was the comments we made last quarter as we began to talk to fiscal ‘24 and reinforced by my guidance today. So, underutilization, to your point, is by far the largest item. The next item, which I’ve commented again on before is the headwind associated with inflation. We’re seeing in the neighborhood of 80 basis points, maybe 100 basis points there. So, a distant second to underutilization.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay. Super helpful. And we all appreciate the details. Just real quick on the assumptions for the plus 50% Q-over-Q growth. Is that largely inventory normalizing -- because you pointed out that demand continues to be uncertain. Is that largely driven by some sense of normalization on the Android side and then the second factor being the content gains at your large customers? Is that the right way to think about it?
Grant Brown:
I would turn that around. Very little expectation of the channel clearing in time for the September quarter, very much dependent on content gains and a large seasonal ramp.
Operator:
The next question comes from Ruben Roy with Stifel.
Ruben Roy:
Grant, I wanted to just talk a little bit about HPA and CSG in terms of how you’re seeing the rest of the year play out. You mentioned that you’re not very aggressive, but you do think there’s going to be some growth progressing through the year. So, I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the pricing environment in those markets. There’s been a lot of discussion around pricing, when things were tight last year and how you’re thinking about that as we flow through this year? And then also if you could just comment on where we are in inventory and when you think that normalizes when we get back to sort of your longer term kind of growth targets for those two businesses. That would be great.
Grant Brown:
Thanks for the question. I’ll take the first part. I’ll let Dave comment on pricing. In terms of our HPA and CSG businesses, we would expect to see strength in defense and power devices within our HPA business that will grow over the course of the year. And then in our CSG business, we’ll see growth in Wi-Fi business and then the other connectivity elements, including UWB. So a strong sense and confidence on those businesses given where they’re standing today and the growth trajectory over the year. Dave, if you don’t mind comment on pricing.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. I mean certainly, the pricing environment that you referred to a year or two ago is a little different now, but we don’t see anything out of normal from what we see in the market. And we’re pretty excited about in 5G entry. I think Bob mentioned that only 40% of Android phones last year had converted to 5G. So, we still got a long way to go there. We see that growing at double digits for the next several years. And that’s all new content for us because we really haven’t participated in the 4G entry space for many years. So, as customers start to migrate more and more of their portfolio to 5G, that’s all new opportunity for us. So, we’re pretty excited about that growth opportunity as well.
Grant Brown:
Ruben, maybe I’ll give you just a little bit more color here on the segment revenues in Q4, and then I’ll compare it to a year ago, just for reference. HPA in Q4 was $133 million in revenue, CSG was $82 million in revenue and ACG was $418 million. If you look back one year at the March quarter in our fiscal ‘22, HPA was $211 million, CSG was $179 million and ACG was $777 million. So as we get back to those levels of growth we would expect over time, we should see some forward progress throughout the fiscal ‘24 year.
Ruben Roy:
That’s great. Thanks for that perspective, Grant. I appreciate the breakout for Q4 before the K came out. If I could, just really quickly, Bob, on -- I guess, following up to Ed’s question on ASP. With all the content kind of moving up, to kind of the BAW filter content in one of your placements, is $5 to $7 still the right way to think about kind of the ASPs in a typical 5G handset or do you think at some point we start to push that higher with the value being added?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. I think your number is probably on the low side. If we look at the average smartphone, it’s much higher than that. But we see that pretty stable over time. I mean, of course, there’s going to be ASP erosion, but the conversion from 4G to 5G is going to be a big driver to offset that. And there’s also new content. Wi-Fi 7 is going to add new content. We talked about our BAW filters there, but also as you look backwards in time, in a lot of cases, Wi-Fi 5 and prior, there wasn’t even a FEM involved. And so Wi-Fi 6 and now Wi-Fi 7, there’s opportunities there for us with our FEMs and our Wi-Fi portfolio, and we’re well represented across all the reference designs there. And then even in 5G, there continues to be new capabilities, new requirements coming in 5G advanced. And that’s going to increase complexity, increasing the performance requirements. And in a lot of cases, there’s new content opportunities there as well. So, all that’s going to be easily enough to offset any ASP erosion that we see.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Srini Pajjuri with Raymond James.
Srini Pajjuri:
Bob, just a question on China. I think you’re guiding for sequential growth in second quarter, June quarter. So, I’m just curious, it’s slightly more optimistic than what we heard from some of your peers. Is this driven by the smartphone side, or is it more non-smartphone business that you’re seeing, a little bit of a pickup there? In general, if you can talk about what you’re seeing in China because there’s been a lot of expectation? I think we’re still kind of not seeing a whole lot of pickup since the reopening. So, any comments there, I think, would be helpful.
Bob Bruggeworth:
100% agree with your last comment. We’re not seeing any pickup either. What we’ve been making clear now for the second quarter now, we continue to reduce the channel inventories. So, as you do that, we’ve reduced the inventory. Customers do need to order some parts. So, all we’re saying is in our revenue, we’re going to see an uptick. That has nothing to do with end demand. It means we’re signaling we’re heading towards the bottom of cleaning up the channel. I think Dave just mentioned that our bookings were up strong. In fact, we had the largest bookings in China for almost two years now. So, all we’re showing is the momentum is changing, not in the end market, not in the end market. We don’t disagree with anything that you guys have heard from others. It’s -- we’ve done a very good job over the last two quarters of significantly reducing the channel inventory. So, all we’re saying is we’re starting to see that bottom. And as I mentioned earlier, the headwinds are subsiding and the tailwinds are starting to come. But that’s not an end market comment. That’s a comment about our revenue.
Srini Pajjuri:
Got it. And thank you for that clarification. And then, Grant, on the gross margin, I know a lot of questions have been asked about utilization. If I take your, I guess, guidance, it looks like you’re going to exit the year in low-40s. So I’m just trying to bridge the gap between that and your long-term model. So, is it primarily utilization, or are there any other factors that are going to, I guess, help you get to that 50% plus levels?
Grant Brown:
Sure. It’s really the two factors, right? There’s both utilization and mix. So, as we’re selling newer products that didn’t run through the factories when they were underutilized, obviously, they carry better unit costs, and you see that in gross margin in the September quarter. In the December and March quarters, you start to see more sell-through of products that we have already on the shelf and that incorporates higher unit cost due to prior underutilization. So it’s a bit of mix and utilization.
Srini Pajjuri:
Okay. Is there any revenue level, Grant, that you think you need to get to before we see a 5 handle on the gross margin side?
Grant Brown:
I wouldn’t say that it’s a revenue. Again, it goes really back to mix. It depends which products we’re selling through and what kind of contents are in those products. So it’s not an absolute revenue level, but again, really related to mix. Sorry, just to follow up on that. I do feel confident in the path back to 50%. As I pointed out earlier, in the Pareto of gross margin, it’s dominated by underutilization. So really, in terms of the path back, it’s just a question of filling up the factories in order to get there.
Operator:
The next question comes from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik:
Grant, I have two questions. How do we look at kind of the strategic exposure to your largest customer? You said fiscal ‘23, Apple was 37%, Samsung 12%. It sounds like based on the content gains this year, you will grow those percentages, both these customers. And historically, Apple in terms of profitability has not been kind of the best exposure name. So how are you balancing content growth with profitability?
Grant Brown:
Sure. Well, as Bob pointed out, high degree of confidence in our content there. We’re fully supporting all of our customers, that one of course, as well. As we look forward, we’ve never guided to any particular customer as a percent of revenue. So, I’d hesitate to do that now. But as we mentioned, we do feel good about our positioning there. In terms of managing profitability going forward, as I pointed out in my prepared remarks, we are -- heavily investing in multiyear opportunities at multiple customers. And those R&D dollars are spent today for revenue in the out years. But we feel like we’re positioned to win. We have the technology in place to do so. And we’re confident in our development and the investments we’re making.
Atif Malik:
I understand. And then on the power devices, silicon carbide, and I understand you’re growing from a small base and the multiple million dollar order on inverter side. How strategic is this business to Qorvo? How are you investing your R&D dollars towards this business? And could this be a 10% type business maybe in a couple of years?
Grant Brown:
Yes. We think it’s a very strategic investment for Qorvo, right? It’s similar to a lot of the other compound work we do. We have a differentiated solution with our JFET technology. We have a lot of customer demand. And in terms of the investment there, I think it’s well placed. We do expect to grow significantly. And as you’ll see in the 10-K, we will be paying a contingent payment to the shareholders of United Silicon Carbide, which reflects a lot of success in that business that we’ve seen since we’ve taken it over.
Operator:
The next question comes from Harlan Sur with JPMorgan.
Harlan Sur:
You guys are set to ramp into new smartphone models across your customers in the second half of this year. I appreciate the new and higher content gains. How are the pricing trends on like-for-like components on these new model ramps either versus prior generation or on a year-over-year basis?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. I don’t think we can comment on a like-for-like. I mean, every generation, there’s always new challenges to solve. And so, we’re just excited about the content gains that we have. As Bob mentioned, in some cases, that’s new content, in some cases, it’s share gain. And that’s probably true as you look across the customer base, similar story plays out.
Harlan Sur:
Okay. Perfect. I believe it’s spread across both, your HPA and Connectivity segments, but wanted to get your views on the broadband access markets, cable, fiber-to-the-home. On the infrastructure side, where are we in the DOCSIS 3.1 upgrade cycle? Seeing lots of activity on DOCSIS 4.0. On the gateway side, hearing Wi-Fi 7 home gateways may be starting next year. So, the team has multiple tailwinds here. What is the team’s sense on timing? And then more near term, like what’s the state of the access market’s demand wise? And are you guys also burning through excess inventories here?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. I think the timing of what you said, I think that’s pretty consistent with what we’re seeing, and we do see a lot of new design activity in the newer standards, and we’re very well positioned there with our technology. And to your point, we do see some inventory challenges there as well that we’re working through. So, we think that’s relatively near term, but there will be a little bit of challenge there to get through in that business.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing comments.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us today. We appreciate your time. We look forward to meeting with you at upcoming investor conferences. I hope you have a good night. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. This does conclude today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a great day.
Operator:
Greetings, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Third Quarter 2023 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo’s Fiscal 2023 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or any -- or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our Investor Relations website at ir.qorvo.com under Financial Releases. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Grant Brown, Chief Financial Officer; Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing and other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. Qorvo delivered fiscal third quarter revenue and EPS above the midpoint of our outlook provided during our November 2nd earnings call. In High-Performance Analog, quarterly revenue reflected year-over-year growth in defense, broadband and power. Our power business posted a strong quarter with robust design activity for our silicon carbide power devices. Offsetting this were power management markets with consumer exposure in infrastructure where customers are working down elevated inventory levels. In our Connectivity & Sensors Group, the quarter reflected lower end market demand and channel inventory consumption for Wi-Fi products partially offset by strength in automotive. Design activity was strong across customers and products, including ultra-wideband, matter and sensors. Use cases continue to proliferate their benefit from precision location, indoor navigation, seamless connectivity and enhanced human machine interfaces. Lastly, in Advanced Cellular, Qorvo participated broadly across customers’ portfolios. The macro environment weighed on overall smartphone volumes across customers, and revenue reflected channel inventory consumption within the Android ecosystem. Design activity continued to be strong across customers and product categories and supports year-over-year content gains at our largest customers. Now, let’s turn to some quarterly highlights. In High-Performance Analog, Qorvo began sampling a radar power solution that combines a high-voltage power conversion PMIC and silicon carbide power switches to control a GaN RF power amplifier. The solution reduces the size by up to 30% in D&A radar systems while expanding Qorvo’s content opportunity. We also expanded our SHIP state-of-the-art RF packaging contract with the U.S. government to develop multichip modules that combine digital optical devices with Qorvo’s mixed-signal RF. In aerospace, we delivered a multichip solution that includes Qorvo’s high-frequency BAW filter as well as a GaN PA for low orbit satellites and other applications. The solution supports cellular satellite links, and we have secured new designs. The opportunity for Qorvo is notable given the trend in defense and aerospace applications of one to many. That means rather than one jet, there will also be many drones; rather than one geo-satellite, there will also be many LEO satellites. At the same time, new capabilities are being added to existing platforms that require increased semiconductor content and higher density and more advanced packaging, all areas where Qorvo is strong and is investing to advance the technology. In cellular infrastructure, we commenced preproduction shipments of our first integrated PA modules, or PAMs, to a Tier 1 European infrastructure OEM for 5G massive-MIMO base stations. We also began sampling our next-generation PAM, which delivers market-leading efficiency for 5G massive-MIMO installations to the leading European infrastructure OEMs. For broadband infrastructure applications, we sampled a CATV power doubler amplifier that maintains linearity and extends bandwidth to enable higher throughput DOCSIS 4.0 capabilities with industry-leading power efficiency. Deployments of DOCSIS 4.0 are scheduled to begin this year and Qorvo is very well positioned as the industry leader. In CSG, we expanded our Wi-Fi content at a Korean-based smartphone OEM to include Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 designs and we ramped Wi-Fi 7 FEMs for access points and routers for our smart home ecosystem customer. We also commenced sampling 5 gigahertz and 6 gigahertz filters. These filters leverage Qorvo’s next-generation BAW process and enable worldwide Wi-Fi 7 frequency coverage. There is increase in customer interest related to multi-link operation, which is a key attribute of Wi-Fi 7 and enables higher throughput and lower latency. Lastly, we began volume shipments of MEMS-based sensors, enabling an enhanced HMI experience and true wireless stereo earbuds. Qorvo sensors were selected to replace legacy capacitive touch sensor technology. Design activity for sensors continues to be strong across markets, including automotive. We are working with leading automotive Tier 1s and have secured automotive smart interior design wins in more than 25 vehicles. In Advanced Cellular, we secured multiple design wins across Android OEMs in support of 2023 devices. During the quarter, we commenced the production ramp of multiple components for the leading Korea-based smartphone OEM’s flagship platform. We have increased our content significantly year-over-year. We are broadly serving this customer across our portfolio and continue to support the migration of their mass market phones to integrated 5G solutions. At a U.S.-based Android OEM, we were selected to supply multiple solutions, including ultra-wideband, antenna tuning and BAW-based antennaplexing in support of their 2023 smartphone launches. Lastly, Qorvo was recognized by multiple customers. We were presented with Honor’s 2022 Golden Supplier Award, and we received quality awards from Vivo for discrete switches and amplifiers and highly integrated solutions. Before handing the call off to Grant, I want to make a few high-level comments to frame our outlook, both in the near term and further out. At our largest two customers, we are very confident in our ability to grow year-over-year content, and that includes this year. In 2023, we expect growth in BAW-based content as well as other content growth. Equally important, we enjoy a range of opportunities across all of our customers in the future years. Qorvo is supporting the highest volume flagship phones while supplying integrated 5G solutions as mass market portfolios migrate to 5G. Fewer than half of the Android devices were 5G in 2022 and the migration of 5G is expected to extend over many years. We are unique in Advanced Cellular in the breadth of our customer exposure and in the depth of our product and technology offerings. Our long-term view of ACG continues to be mid- to high-single-digit growth driven by multiyear content gains. In particular, we see expanding market for our BAW technology. Productivity gains in our Richardson, Texas fab have enabled a doubling of our BAW output. We intend to put that to good use as we continue to capture designs and grow our BAW content in flagship phones. We expect the long-term growth rate of HPA and Connectivity and Sensors to outpace Advanced Cellular. Our view for HPA is double-digit growth. And in CSG, we expect growth in the strong double digits. Key growth areas supported by recent wins with silicon carbide devices in EVs and solar inverters, MEMS sensors and notebook track pads and automotive smart interiors and ultra wideband in automotive and Android devices. These and other investment businesses are securing new designs that extend our opportunity in large growth markets. In the near term, the team is performing exceptionally well while navigating extraordinary events. Factory loadings have been reduced, and we are bringing down channel inventories. We are also actively managing the expense line while sharpening our focus in support of targeted growth. We are working to accelerate revenue related to our Omnia BAW-based biosensors by exploring options for the associated Omnia test hardware, meaning the Omnia desktop test unit and cartridges that contain our BAW biosensors. The technology has been proven commercially, and we are engaged with a diverse set of customers. Qorvo remains at the forefront of connectivity, sustainability and electrification. We enjoy exceptional customer relationships, and we are a key enabler of future architectures. These architectures continue to favor higher levels of performance, integration and functional density to deliver the successive improvements in each market’s next-generation products. Our customers value Qorvo’s best-in-class products and technologies, and we are securing broad-based design wins in high-growth markets. As volumes recover, we are positioned to deliver long-term growth and robust free cash flow. And with that, I’ll hand the call off to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. As a reminder, our references today will be to our three operating segments
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
You gave really good color on channel inventory, but I was hoping to ask a follow-up there. So, channel inventory as it relates to Android, I think you said, was down more than 20% in the December quarter. I guess, how do you see that evolving over the next couple of quarters? And I guess, more importantly, on the non-Android side or the iOS side, what’s your current assessment of channel inventory and how that plays out over the coming quarters?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. This is Dave. I’ll answer that one. So first, we’re not going to comment on the iOS side of the inventories. And Grant already mentioned the Android. I think when we look at the overall channel inventories and when we refer to channel inventories, we’re talking about all of our components that are out, whether they’re in our distributors or at the end customers. And so, on balance, overall, it’s down about 20% across the entire business, not just within the Android ecosystem. If you look just within our distribution channel, it’s down about a third in the December quarter. But as Grant mentioned, we still have a ways to go in there. So we expect to continue reducing that across this quarter and then into the early part of FY24.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. And then, as my follow-up on gross margins, you’re guiding the March quarter to, I guess, 40, 41%, which is essentially flat sequentially. Can you speak to where your utilization rates are today? And as you continue to work down inventory and the overall industry continues to work down inventory, what cadence should we be thinking about for the rest of the calendar year? Do you think you can exit kind of in the high-40s or even close to 50% calendar ‘23, or is that a little too optimistic at this point? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. Toshiya, thanks for the question. I’ll touch on margins here, and I’ll try to cover all of it, both in Q3 and then looking beyond that into fiscal ‘24. For fiscal ‘23, the primary driver of gross margin continued to be under utilization and inventory-related charges. In Q3, it accounted for about 920 basis points of headwind or in that neighborhood, and it’s expected to remain there in the March quarter, hence the flat gross margin guidance. Inflation across direct costs were approximately 80 basis points in Q3 and again, expected to remain there in Q4. As we stated earlier, in Q3, there was a supplier quality issue representing approximately 30 basis points of headwind in our Q3 period. So kind of walking through that pareto, you can see the dominant factor is clearly underutilization. To your question about getting back to 50%, it’s unlikely in fiscal ‘24, although it depends on your view of the macro economy and a number of other variables. However, underutilization creates a lingering impact due to timing. And so, as volumes fall, those inventory balances will reflect higher per unit costs. And simply put fewer units moving through a fixed cost factory collect more cost per unit. So, we saw this heading into the December quarter, and it will carry forward into fiscal ‘24. The rate at which that high-cost inventory flows through the P&L will obviously depend on variables like our future utilization or product mix including a ramp of revenue over the course of fiscal ‘24, but -- although the precise timing is uncertain, the reduction in channel inventories is very encouraging, and it’s a necessary first step. If I do look out over the course of fiscal ‘24, I could see potentially that 920 basis points of margin get cut in half, again, subject to your view of the revenue trajectory throughout the year.
Operator:
And our next question is from Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas.
Karl Ackerman:
I was hoping you could discuss a little bit more commentary regarding your outlook. You certainly gave much commentary across the P&L for March. But within that outlook, could you discuss the order of magnitude decline between your segments? I’m just trying to have a better understanding of what’s occurring, I guess, in the legacy IDP segment, which appears driven by some maybe some inventory overhang within Wi-Fi, IoT and maybe telecom infrastructure. And then as you address that question, what are your assumptions for your mobile revenue in China in the March quarter, which I believe was guided to 10% in December?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. So, let me start with our view of the segments in the March quarter. If we go back to kind of comparing our current March guide to our thoughts last November, there’s a bit of variance in HPA and CSG. Instead of flattish, there will be rather modest declines there in dollar terms for our guide. Biggest driver, of course, is ACG. If you consider the size of our largest customer relative to ACG revenues in December and that customer, excuse me, is seasonally down in March and June, it’s a sizable headwind, and that really dictates the path of our top line. In terms of our China-based smartphone OEM revenue, it came in largely in line, just a bit above 10%.
Karl Ackerman:
Understood. I guess, just -- maybe just to follow up on that with regard to the China Android OEMs. It sounds like they came a little bit better. Should that remain at a similar level of revenue on a mixed basis in March? It sounds like it’s going to be improving. And I guess, to the extent you could talk about the recovery process or how you see the recovery process for the balance of the year, I guess the question I would like to understand is, given some of the new -- the opportunity in premium-tier Android flagships you’ve announced this -- today, it’s certainly great to hear. But I guess, if you could discuss the level of confidence you have in demand returning for mid-tier handsets, the balance of the year, would be super helpful because I ask because two very large Korean memory OEMs this week indicated the smartphone market could bifurcate between good demand for flagships, you have weaker demand for lower mid-tier models. And so if you could just kind of comment on, I suppose, the production approach and your design approach for those markets, if they do bifurcate, it would be very helpful. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. Let’s -- if I decompose it, I’ll start and I’ll let Dave tackle the different tiers of handset models. In terms of revenue, as we look forward into the guide, we would expect our China-based smartphone OEMs in dollar terms to be roughly flat but overall, our Android revenue to be up. And then as we look maybe deeper into fiscal ‘24, without going into too much detail or attempting to guide at this point given the overwhelming impact of macroeconomic factors, I can shape it a bit for you and provide some of the drivers. In terms of revenue beyond the March quarter, we would expect June to be roughly flattish. It could be a bit higher, a bit lower depending on your view of the economy or China’s reopening. We don’t have terribly ambitious expectations for the reopening at this point. We’re playing a bit conservative with our view. From there, I would expect September to see significant sequential growth and then December and the March 2024 quarters to be back to strong annual growth from there. Dave, I don’t know if you mind commenting on the tiers.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. So, as Bob mentioned in his remarks as well, we’re seeing really nice content growth in the premium tier. So, we’re well represented there. And of course, we’ve always been well represented in the mass tier year as well, 5G. And so there’s still a lot of room to go in terms of conversion to 5G. So the rate and pace of that may not be as quickly as we would have liked, but it’s still a lot in front of us. So we expect to see that mass here still moving to 5G over time.
Operator:
And our next question is from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
I want to start by asking for some clarification on what Grant just mentioned regarding the sequential revenue comps and year-over-year growth looking into the first half of next calendar year. Was that in reference to CSG or the business overall?
Grant Brown:
It was a business overall.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. Thank you for that. And any change in view on the purchase commitments from your foundry and suppliers? Are you -- do you anticipate utilizing all those commitments, or might we be looking at some additional write-downs there just given the dynamics?
Grant Brown:
Yes. No change to our view. As you’ll remember, we restructured the agreement last quarter to better align our view of demand with supply and are working with that partner on an ongoing basis.
Operator:
And our next question is from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Several questions actually. First off, it sounds like the competitive environment, especially in China and maybe in Samsung is getting much more difficult. We’ve gotten lots of feedback of BackSan [ph] being a major competitor in switches, fielding high-band modules, competing in ultra-wideband, which wasn’t the case two years ago. And I know they’ve been out there slugging away for some time and now it seems like maybe the political environment in China is favoring them more. First off, are you seeing that? Are they becoming more aggressive? And number two, are the margin expectations for the Chinese anywhere close to what we come to normally expect from your normal western competitors? And if not, wouldn’t that affect ASP -- is it affecting ASP or should we expect the ASPs to decline? And then I have follow-up, please.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Hi Ed, thanks for the question. As far as the Chinese competitors, they’ve always been there. We’ve always seen them. I think what is overriding everything is the highly integrated modules that require premium filter performance, particularly for those that are being exported as well as for -- within the China consumer market. So, we still feel very good about our position there with our integrated modules, whether it’s ultra high-band. What we’re doing, obviously, with mid-high as well as the work that we’ve done, improved significantly the performance and cost in our SAW filters for low pads. So we feel real good about how that’s positioned. And from a pricing perspective, we haven’t seen significant changes there, Ed. I think there are some areas we’re actually raising prices. In some areas, yes, there’s a little bit of competition, but we always have that. So, we haven’t really seen a change in the market.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then on that same note about increasing, it sounds like the MEMS business is -- you’ve been working on MEMs forever and now they’re showing up. And the ASPs, I don’t know you’re looking to fuel them as tuners and we’ve tracked that business pretty closely from the time, but it sounds like you might be seeing a significant increase in ASPs to the extent that you want the -- industry starts adopting MEMs. And maybe if I could flip that over, it sounds like since Samsung organize the handset division, now that you’re using open market modules, the actual -- content in ASP for those modules seems to have dropped significantly, whether it be the mid-high band or the low band. And I’m just talking about the flagship, of course, because the master is a big step-up going to modules. So I just try to get at my arms around what the overall, let’s say, year-over-year or year over two years ago, content picture looks like from the Koreans point of view in terms of redesigning that front end? And then what kind of trends in products like MEMs, do you have that are bucking that trend? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Thanks, Ed. I’ll take the MEMS and let Dave speak a little bit more about your comments about the standard products that we’ve been selling that are highly integrated -- integrating in all the filters. As far as MEMs goes, we’re still very early on in that, Ed. As far as the RF MEMs go, as you know, we’ve been working on that through the acquisition of Cavendish Kinetics and really just beginning to roll that out. And yes, they are paying for that. We don’t expect that to go broadly and replace all of our antenna tuners. It gets you a DB or so. And people that are willing to pay for it will pay for that. That technology is -- costs a little bit more per function. But you get -- you pick up a significant improvement in the performance. And then second, we’re also -- our pressure sensor MEMs, we’re doing extremely well there. I commented in my opening comments about being in over 25 different vehicles. So people are starting to implement and track pads across -- all of the major OEMs are now looking at it, we’re engaged with them. We’re just seeing that proliferate in the watches and various other devices. So, it’s very early on also in its life cycle. So, we feel real good about that. And I’ll let Dave speak a little bit about your question about some of the Korean manufacturers and what we’re seeing there.
Dave Fullwood:
Yes. And while the architectures are similar, especially that particular customer that you mentioned, they’re still very demanding from a performance standpoint. So they have their requirements and you have to meet their requirements to win that business. So, we’re very focused on that. We work very closely with them on the advanced architectures years in advance to meet their needs. So, I wouldn’t think of it necessarily as a standard product. It’s still very demanding sockets.
Operator:
And our next question is from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
On the first one, gross margin and then how your balance sheet inventory affects that over time. So, you mentioned gross margin, I think, 41% for March, and June sales are flattish. I imagine gross margins are probably flattish also. And then I heard that you could recover about half of the 900 basis points of underutilization. So, it suggests gross margin somewhere in the mid-40s in the back half. But how do I align that with the inventory that you have on your balance sheet? Where do you see it going over time? And does that impact how the gross margin progression happens in the back half of the year?
Grant Brown:
Hey Vivek. Thanks. This is Grant. I’ll take your question. Yes, you’ve got it in terms of gross margin, and the answer on inventory is rather simple, right? As that inventory begins to get sold and flow through cost of goods sold, it will drag with it those higher costs per unit associated with underutilization. So, I would expect the inventories to trend down over time, subject to normal seasonal ramps at large customers where we do have to build inventory in advance of those sales. So over time, it will come down, again, offset by some of those growth-oriented builds that we do at seasonal periods of the year.
Vivek Arya:
Grant, the reason I asked the question is because I heard before on the call that you think channel inventory normalizes later in the calendar year. I’m hoping I got that right. So, if channel inventory doesn’t normalize until later, how will your balance sheet inventory start to get back to more normal levels?
Grant Brown:
Yes. They’re not necessarily sequential. They can happen simultaneously depending on the level of demand. Although you’re correct, I think the first stage of that would be a reduction in the channel inventories, increase in order activity from our customers pulling through our inventory, along with, as I said, the offset and builds for large customer ramps, but they’re happening somewhat simultaneously, not perfectly sequentially.
Vivek Arya:
Understood. And then for my second question, you mentioned content gains at your top two customers. Are these competitive wins, or is this new term? Like is your gain somebody else’s loss of content, or is it just new capabilities that customers are planning to add? And kind of related to that, just given the nature of these customers, do you expect to retain this content in the following years? Like, are these multiyear programs or the visibility is only there for the first year? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Part of the questions we can’t answer, but I will tell you that the -- it is both content and share gains at our largest customers -- our largest two customers.
Vivek Arya:
Which can continue, Bob? So these are like multiyear decisions or...
Bob Bruggeworth:
Can be and some are, some aren’t. So, we’ll see.
Operator:
And our next question is from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Maybe I just want to start, you’ve been kind of giving how large your largest customer or 10% customers are. Just trying to get a starting point for some of these moving pieces in December.
Grant Brown:
Sure. So, our largest customer is a significant portion of ACG revenues, usually representing about two-thirds of that business, if not more, in certain periods. And then, our second largest customer, we haven’t commented on, but it generally hovers around that 10% mark. And certainly, with some of the growth we expect there could be more.
Blayne Curtis:
Got you. And then I guess, following up on Vivek’s question, just sort of trying to gauge the magnitude of these content wins you’re speaking to. You talked about being able to double capacity at Richardson, I’m assuming you have given the pullback in Android, some excess capacity already. So, I’m just kind of curious the time frame in terms of doubling that capacity if you have that on your horizon.
Grant Brown:
Sure. Let me talk to that. I think just at the highest level, there isn’t a BAW placement that we can’t fully support at any customer. Our Richardson facility is really the key takeaway there. We’ve driven some significant gains for the reasons I mentioned earlier in the prepared remarks. But the productivity gains, the overall die shrinks, the move from 6 to 8 inches, and then, of course, the successive generations of BAW filters that we’re running through that factory lend themselves to a significant increase in capacity. So, as we look at Farmers Branch, the need for that, I guess, over time has been somewhat of a safety valve in case any of those initiatives didn’t come to fruition. But given the success of the team there, we’re able to support all the BAW-based processing we need out of our Richardson facility.
Operator:
Our next question is from Matt Ramsay with Cowen.
Matt Ramsay:
I guess, I was going to ask you and I’ll swap the order because they kind of build on Blayne’s last question. But in the BAW filter space, any changes in the competitive landscape there? I think one of your U.S. competitors has made a decent amount of progress on their BAW road map internally in the last couple of years, and it seems like some products might be a little bit closer to impacting sort of the market. So, any -- it sounds like you’re really confident in what comes in content gains to the last couple of answers that you’ve given, but any competitive dynamic changes with your primary competitors on BAW.
Grant Brown:
Yes. No changes to our primary competitors. And to the earlier follow-on regarding the capacity at Richardson, that is something that we can do over time, not necessarily this year. But that’s something that we have the ability to do in subsequent years to add on to the effective capacity there at Richardson. But again, I just want to make sure that’s clear that we do have to take steps, add equipment, et cetera, in order to make that possible. It will be in the out years, but it’s really a comment around Farmers Branch and supporting the ability for us to do that in the future given our ability to sell the Farmers Branch facility.
Matt Ramsay:
Got it. Thanks for the clarification there. As my follow-up, obviously, given how big it is in the revenue, most of the focus of the call here has been on the mobile and smartphone markets. But I wanted to ask quickly on the wireless infrastructure side, there’s some -- I don’t know if they’re correlated, but similar inventory dynamics that are happening. If you guys have any commentary about the inventory build up there? Has it come down? What -- timing of any potential reacceleration? Is it similar, too, on the mobile side or longer or shorter? Just any context there would be helpful. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. And I think that’s pretty well known. We’ve seen inventory build up there, and that’s certainly been impactful to our infrastructure business. And it will take some time, we think, for that to bleed off throughout the year. So, it’s probably similar, but may even take longer than what we’ll see in mobile.
Operator:
And our next question is from Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Rajvindra Gill:
I just wanted to break down the commentary about September and December and March, if I could. So just the commentary about significant sequential growth in September off the flat June. What’s driving that commentary is seasonally September is higher, but can you maybe frame it in terms of relative seasonal patterns? Is this also be aided by more of a significant rebuild by these customers plus share gains? Just any commentary around qualitatively, what’s specifically driving the September commentary? And then December and March being up year-over-year, obviously, December and March of -- December of 2022 and March of 2023 are relatively easy compares in terms of the revenue. So, just kind of thoughts around December and March would be helpful. Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Yes, sure. So, as we look into September, again, I would just reiterate, we’re not providing any official guidance into fiscal ‘24, but we’re attempting to shape it just a bit given some of the macroeconomic uncertainty. And obviously, the macroeconomic situation will inevitably dictate the trajectory of revenue. But just looking at some of the drivers that we see seasonally, there is a significant ramp in the September quarter, so. And as Bob stated, we feel as though we are well represented on large platforms across all of our largest customers. So, continued strength at some of those customers as the channel inventories be in clearing will occur as well as a large seasonal ramp gets to a sequential increase in September that’s pretty substantial off of a rather low base as we’re talking about a roughly flattish June. So, that’s the primary driver, call it around September. And then into December and March, you’re right, the comps get relatively easy. But with the channel inventory picture clearing up by the end of the calendar year, as we talked about earlier, it should provide for a restocking, if you will, or us selling into potentially demand even at just recurring to normalized levels.
Rajvindra Gill:
Got it. And for my follow-up, regarding your conversations with the Chinese OEMs and the Korean OEMs, what is the kind of expectation as it stands today in terms of their customer forecast for calendar ‘23 going into calendar ‘24? Obviously, calendar ‘22 was kind of a horrific year in terms of units. Are the forecasts relatively conservative off that very challenging 2022, are some OEMs more aggressive in their forecast plans. There’s more capacity coming online for a variety of different smartphone components. Does that enable new product ramps? Just any commentary in terms of what the customer feedback is and forecast. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Dave, would you like to take that?
Dave Fullwood:
Yes, sure. So, the customer sentiment and their forecast is very cautious. And I think until -- we’ve seen some early signs of life in China and the smartphone sell-through. First few weeks of January were promising, but we need to see a couple of months of that. I think our customers do as well before they really start to gain confidence there. So right now, the purchase order patterns, their forecasts remain very cautious through the rest of the calendar year. Does that answer your question?
Rajvindra Gill:
Oh yes, it does. Thank you. I appreciate it.
Operator:
Our next question is from Chris Caso with Credit Suisse (sic) [Raymond James].
Chris Caso:
Question is regarding CapEx and cash flow and both on a shorter-term standpoint on how you plan to manage that as we still burning off inventory here. And then a bit longer term and kind of we’re hearing from you is that it sounds like from a capacity standpoint, you may be set for a little bit, so what can we expect there? Can we expect that as the market normalizes in this inventory start -- had burns off and had some benefits to revenue that we see that flow through for cash flow performance?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. So, we don’t guide specifically to the balance sheet or cash flow, but I’ll try to give a little bit of color on the drivers. So, having now collected on sales in prior quarters, our cash flow will likely start to follow the path of the P&L, obviously. As we look forward, we still expect to generate free cash flow, and CapEx should be in the 5% to 7% range of sales, representing discipline there and some reduced CapEx intensity as we move forward, having invested in our facilities over the prior years, and looking forward, will be largely capacity driven as we see demand and obviously, improvements in our performance and technology required. But generally speaking, I’d be looking for the cash flow to follow P&L.
Chris Caso:
Got it. Okay. Just a follow-on. And again, a lot of the discussion has been on the cellular portion. For the non-handset part of the business, I guess what I heard is some of the infrastructure products that there’s still some inventory to burn off. But what would you say more generally would be the inventory situation for the non-handset part of the business? Is this a situation where this is a little bit slower to come back as compared to the cellular business, or what’s the view of that -- those businesses as you proceed through the year.
Grant Brown:
Yes, it definitely varies. So, the infrastructure business is probably going to be slower to recover. We’ve got Wi-Fi, a lot of that’s consumer-facing. That is probably very similar to what we see in the smartphone space, but some of that’s also more operator and enterprise-driven. And so, we saw that occur a little bit later. So that will probably take a little bit longer to recover. And then our power management business as well, it’s very consumer-facing with power tools and solid-state drives and other types of devices like that that are more consumer-oriented. So, they’ll go probably very similar to the way the smartphone market goes.
Operator:
And our next question is from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar:
I wanted to ask about an earlier question that was asked about December growth and March growth. I know you said year-over-year -- the question was asked in reference to year-over-year. But did you mean to say that or is it possible that those businesses -- given the falloff in revenues and units, is it possible that those business could -- your businesses could also work sequentially in this time frame, or will they follow a seasonal pattern?
Grant Brown:
Are you referring to our fiscal ‘24 or our just announced December and this March?
Harsh Kumar:
No, no, fiscal ‘24.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Fiscal ‘24. It’s a little early to comment on that. Certainly, from a year-over-year standpoint, the comps are relatively easy and it’s with a high degree of confidence, we believe we’ll be able to grow. The degree to which would determine whether it was sequential or not, I think it’s a bit premature to comment on. Overall, we still are encouraged by fiscal ‘24 and believe that it will be above fiscal ‘23.
Harsh Kumar:
That’s fair. And then I wanted to ask about your gross margins. Your revenues came down for the guidance for March, but your margins are kind of hanging in there. You mentioned a couple of things, small things, the 80 basis points and 30 basis points issues. But what’s the reason why your margins are able to hang in here?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I think, generally speaking, if I look back over the productivity gains that we’ve made over multiple years, we’re still seeing those in our margins today, even though the volumes aren’t in the factories. 900-plus basis points of headwind from underutilization is significant. I don’t want to understate that. But in terms of productivity and the work that our operational teams have done is really speaking to the strength of those gains and our ability to hold margins at 40%.
Operator:
And our next question is from Joe Moore with Morgan Stanley.
Joe Moore:
You talked about changes to your foundry agreements. Can you just speak generally to the cost of foundry wafers? Do you see that continuing to rise? And if so, are you able to pass that through to your customers? And if it reverses, do you anticipate having to pass declines on to your customers? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Joe. And actually, with some of the capacity freeing up, we’re not seeing the increases that I know we saw some of that earlier last year, last calendar year, earlier in the year, so we’re not seeing it. In some cases, to your point, we have been able to pass that on to our customers. And again, as we’ve always said, pricing set by the competition, if we all raise prices, we all get an increase; we all don’t, we don’t get an increase. So we’ve been able to pass some of that along. But as Grant pointed out, the inflation is impacting us in our COGS, about 80 bps. So we’re not able to pass it all along, but there’s other inflation in there, not just foundry parts.
Operator:
Thank you. And our next question is from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik:
I have one clarification and one question. When you guys talk about channel inventories to normalize later this calendar year, are you talking about China Android or total Android or total smartphone?
Dave Fullwood:
Well, we’re talking about total smartphone inventories, but even some of the other markets that we mentioned earlier in one of the previous questions. We see elevated inventories, not just in smartphones, we see it in a lot of the other markets as well.
Atif Malik:
But, when are you expecting China Android inventories to normalize?
Dave Fullwood:
It all depends on how well the phone sell-through in the end market. Like I said, January -- early indications in January or it’s improving. If that continues through February, March and into calendar Q2, then, of course, our inventory is going to be burned off much more quickly. But we’re not forecasting that. We want to see that sustained before we get too excited about that.
Atif Malik:
Understood. And then, is it possible to break out or comment on how big the silicon carbide power device business is as a percentage of HPA sales?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. We haven’t given that information. What I can tell you is we’re very pleased with the acquisition. And I think when we -- I know when we file our Q, you’ll see why I say that. But it’s been a tremendous acquisition. But I’m sorry, we haven’t sized it. It’s probably bigger than what most people think. It’s smaller than what some other people think. But we haven’t given any of that revenue out yet, but we’re very pleased with it. It’s profitable and it’s doing a fine job.
Operator:
And our next question is from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO Capital Markets.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I just had one question, Grant. Thanks for providing that down 20% comment. I’m just struggling with how does it help us? And I ask with reference to what are we talking about? Are we talking days, months, what is normal level? And I know it’s harder in the more diversified areas. But in the handset side, you should be able to kind of quantify and tell us, all right, at the peak, it was x weeks, x months and here we are, and then we think if there’s some kind of normal pattern, this is what normal level looks like.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I think that’s a great question, Ambrish. The issue always is when you look at your days of inventory in the channel, you have to understand what’s the sell-out. And so far, and I think I said this last quarter as well, when we work with our customers and we go through all the math, they reduce their production, we reduce ours. And unfortunately, their sell-out has been lower. So, you have to look at it. Now again, Dave’s mentioned a couple of times on the call, the first three weeks so far in January, at least we can speak to the data that we get, and I think all of you get, the actual sell-out is up, and that’s a good sign. But we’re not going to get into the game of naming numbers like this because it all depends on the future output of what they sell out. So, we’ve got a little ways to go. That’s why I think we’re being careful on our comments around June, but we feel very good about September. So, we roughly think it’s in that time frame.
Ambrish Srivastava:
So handset inventory cleaned out by September and the rest, as you said, others will take longer. Your best guess at this point is by December that should clean out as well, right?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Well, we’ve got different parts of the business. In the Wi-Fi area, it’s going to follow because we’re in a lot of the Android phones with our Wi-Fi products, it will follow more of what I said for the handsets. Then Wi-Fi that’s in some of the retail and some of the industrial applications, things like that, that may take a little bit longer. We don’t always get a good read there. It’s a smaller part of our market, not as much data is published. But I think on the infrastructure side, what Dave talked about, that is going to take a little bit longer. The area of our power management that goes into the SSDs, and that’s a call on the PC market. So, you guys follow that. We’ll see how that goes. So it’s going to be all different ones. But the major part of our business is the handsets, as you know. And I think we’re giving you as much color as we can as we project forward.
Operator:
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on today’s call. We look forward to speaking with you at upcoming investor events this quarter. Thanks again. Hope you have a good night. Thank you.
Operator:
This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Operator:
Greetings, and welcome to the Qorvo Second Quarter 2023 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2023 second quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statements contained in the earnings release published today as well as risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, CFO; and Dave Fullwood, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. Qorvo delivered fiscal second quarter revenue and EPS above the midpoint of the outlook provided during our August 3 earnings call. As we indicated on our call, Qorvo's business is now organized into three segments
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. As a reminder, our references today will be to our 3 new operating segments. High Performance Analog or HPA, Connectivity and Sensors Group, or CSG, and Advanced Cellular Group or ACG. In our upcoming 10-Q, we will provide historical financial information, which has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect these new operating segments. Additional historical information will be made available in our fiscal Q3 10-Q and fiscal 2023 10-K. I'll now turn to our latest quarterly results. Revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2023 was $1.158 billion, $8 million above the high end of our guidance. HPA revenue of $228 million was up 8% sequentially and 47% year-over-year, driven by strength in defense and non-consumer related power products, including silicon carbide. Connectivity and Sensors revenue of $143 million was down 6% sequentially and down 19% year-over-year due to weaker consumer electronics spend, primarily for WiFi-enabled products. Finally, advanced cellular revenue of $787 million was up 17% sequentially, representing a strong seasonal ramp and year-over-year growth at our largest customer, but down 15% year-over-year reflecting lower smartphone unit volumes within the Android ecosystem. On a non-GAAP basis, gross margin in the quarter was 49.2%. The quarter benefited from product mix effects offset by higher inventory-related charges and the beginning of planned reductions in factory utilization. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the quarter were $233 million, $7 million lower than our guidance due to OpEx discipline, the timing of product development spend and lower employee-related expenses. Versus last year, operating expenses were up $10 million primarily related to additional headcount and higher design and development costs associated with our power management and ultra-wideband businesses. In total, non-GAAP operating income in the quarter was $338 million or 29.2% of sales. Breaking out operating income by each segment. HPA was the most profitable segment this quarter at 35% followed closely by Advanced Cellular at 34% and connectivity and sensors was negative 7%. Non-GAAP net income was $276 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $2.66. This was $0.11 above the midpoint of our guidance range. Free cash flow was $220 million. Capital expenditures were $47 million, and we repurchased $160 million worth of shares during the quarter. Today, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized a $2 billion share repurchase. This authorization will replace the prior authorization, which had a remaining balance of approximately $350 million as of October 1. The rate and pace in which we repurchased shares is based on our long-term outlook, low leverage, alternative uses of cash and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet. As of quarter end, we had approximately $2 billion of debt outstanding with no near-term maturities and $914 million of cash and equivalents. We modestly reduced our inventory balance in the quarter to $841 million despite seasonal product ramps in the macroeconomic environment. Now turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect quarterly revenue between $700 million and $750 million. Non-GAAP gross margin between 43% and 44% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $0.50 to $0.75. Our current view of the second half of the fiscal year reflects ongoing weakness across end markets, primarily in consumer-related areas as well as a more acute inventory correction at our Android smartphone customers than was previously predicted. We expect sales to China-based Android smartphone OEMs to represent approximately 10% of total revenue during the December quarter. We expect this will mark the low point in our Android-based customer revenue and in the March quarter, we continue to project Android base revenue will grow sequentially. At the volume levels assumed in our guidance, we expect our inventory position to remain elevated, but improved by the end of the fiscal year as we undership normalized demand and reduced factory utilization. Simultaneously, we are cutting costs in our factories to offset the impact from lower volumes. Unabsorbed fixed costs will impact gross margin in the second half, and we currently expect non-GAAP gross margin for the full fiscal year to be approximately 47%. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the December quarter will be down approximately $5 million to $7 million sequentially, reflecting continued cost discipline across the organization and lower variable compensation, offset by continued investment in growth areas. Below the operating income line, other expense will be approximately $15 million, reflecting the interest paid on our fixed rate debt offset by increasing levels of interest income earned on our cash balances, along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax rate for the balance of the fiscal year is expected to be between 14.5% and 15% due to the absolute level and geographic mix of pretax profit, including FX-related gains within high tax jurisdictions as well as the impact of a U.S. tax law change related to R&D capitalization, among other factors. Turning to our operations. I'd like to highlight the great work our teams have been doing to improve productivity. As an example, in our Richardson facility, we have significantly increased the effective capacity of our BAW filters within the same factory footprint. This has been achieved across a number of initiatives spanning product development, filter design, process engineering and manufacturing efficiencies. Successive generations of Qorvo's BAW technology have and will continue to meaningfully reduce die sizes and increased die per wafer. Manufacturing efficiencies such as the move from 6-inch to 8-inch wafer diameters as well as ongoing processing advancements will further increase effective output. The combined effects of these achievements will allow our Richardson facility to support significant revenue growth. Looking forward, we have the ability to approximately double our BAW output within our existing footprint in Richardson. Despite the macroeconomic challenges impacting customers, our long-term outlook remains positive. Product performance requirements continue to increase in our end markets and connectivity and electrification trends are accelerating. We have grown our opportunity set across markets, customers and product categories while maintaining our commitment to technology leadership, portfolio management, productivity gains and reduced capital intensity. This has supported strong financial performance during a challenging environment and positioned Qorvo exceptionally well for long-term increasingly diversified growth. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari :
I guess I had a question on your business in China. Can you kind of provide some context as to how significant your revenue in China was in the quarter? I think based on what you guys reported last quarter, China was about 1/4 of your business overall. How did you do in the September quarter? And what's the outlook going into December and in the March quarter?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thanks for the question. I'll take that one. The China-based revenue in the quarter was down approximately 20% quarter-on-quarter and about 45% year-on-year, just to put it into perspective. Looking forward, as we commented in the prepared remarks, we're looking at that Android-based China revenue down to approximately 10% of the overall revenue for Qorvo. So a substantial decline both quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year.
Toshiya Hari :
Got it. And then as my follow-up on gross margins, probably for you, Grant. I guess based on your full year commentary on that, will the implied gross margin trajectory into March is probably down a little bit off of that 43.5% guide you how should we think about the path to for you to get back to the 50% or 50% plus? I know you're going through a very sharp production, you're cutting utilization rates. But the pace and timing at which you can improve gross margins in calendar '23. If you could provide some context to that would be super helpful.
Grant Brown :
Sure. Related to gross margin, as you pointed out, it's heavily influenced by both mix and the utilization impact. Currently, the dominant headwind is the underutilization, which is generating over 700 basis points of headwind. So we have a clear path back to 50% gross margins beyond that utilization impact from the demand that we're seeing today. We don't typically report utilization by factory, but I think it would be a meaningful metric just to cover very quickly by location. As an example, for instance, if we look at utilization in Germany, it supports our broadband business, which has actually seen some strength. So the utilization there is doing okay and the migrations to the new DOCSIS standard is helping support that factory in the volumes. Alternatively, if you look at our North Carolina Gas fab, for instance, it's running very low levels of utilization, which impacts our margin in the WiFi business for CSG. Larger sites like Oregon and Texas are also underutilized given the unit volumes we're seeing from customers as they work through the inventories and the soft demand environment and similarly, our assembly and test operations in China remain underloaded as well. All of this underutilization creates costs that go unabsorbed into a higher inventory volume and negatively impacts the margin. I would expect that to resolve as volumes return and we'll have a clear path back to 50% as that factory mix and volumes both return. In terms of margin, there's obviously a lot of moving parts there and other factors, but the underutilization is the primary one.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley :
I want to pick up on the last line of questioning. And you seem to insinuate that there is a path back to 50% gross margin when these underutilization charges sort of work their way through. But is there a natural resolution or path to the situation or might management have to make some decisions on in terms of defensive realignment with the manufacturing footprint?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure. There's a number of opportunities for us to improve margin looking forward. We are reducing costs in the factory today, primarily variable costs. We can alternatively look at the utilization that we can bring down, which we've commented on previously, the underutilization, as we see it today, is something that will resolve as we're under shipping and under building to what would be a more normalized demand environment. So as that returns to normalcy, I would expect the underutilization to leave itself. The other items in gross margin, and there are others, but they are much less significant. For instance, inflation is one where it might be running approximately 50 basis points to 100 basis points as a headwind today. But again, it pales in comparison to the utilization impact. There is pricing, which factors into it, but there's nothing that we're seeing there outside of what we expect in historical norms. So again, going back to utilization, it ultimately relates to the volumes we see and the volumes we're seeing right now from customers and the demand levels are intimately related to the macroeconomic effects we've talked about.
Gary Mobley :
Okay. I appreciate the comment that China Android handset OEMs might represent only $70 million to $75 million of your December quarter outlook. And I presume the Android handset customer base overall would represent somewhere between $200 million to $250 million in the same quarter and assuming that, that is the bottom, I'm curious to know how does the other portion of the business trend looking out into the March quarter?
Grant Brown :
Sure. You're right. There is weakness beyond simply Android. I mean the -- both the consumer and the enterprise spending on our customers' end products has continued to be a challenge. Our customers have had to reset their production to adjust to the lower levels of demand and certainly the inventory that they're carrying. It varies by end market, certainly. And the inventory challenge in the Android ecosystem is probably the most impactful. But we are seeing it in our WiFi business as well. We're seeing it across both access points, routers, we're seeing it in power management products for power tools. We're seeing it in SSDs, which is another area that's seen some weakness in looking out forward in time, I expect, again, those would be similar stories and that they will recover and the volumes will return.
Operator:
Next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya :
For the first one, I was -- you gave a 47% gross margin number for the full year. That kind of suggests March sort of flattish in terms of sales and gross margin. Just wanted to see if you could kind of clarify that? And then Bob my question is, what does the recovery look like for Qorvo? Because when I go back to before the 5G cycle started, your quarterly sales were in the $750 million, $800 million level. Last few quarters, they jumped up to 1.1, 1.2, but that was in hindsight above demand. So does the recovery mean you get to somewhere in the middle of where you were pre 5G and where you were in the last few quarters? Or you think you can exceed the recent quarterly run rate?
Grant Brown :
Thanks for the question, Vivek. This is Grant. Let me take the first part, and then I'll let Bob address your second question. I mean, first and foremost, we won't guide into March formally, but we did comment on the Android-based revenue, which we do expect to be up in the March quarter. And then in terms of our largest customer, seasonally, you would expect that to be down. So there's some offsetting effects there. We'll have to see how that plays out. The rest of the business, we expect to be approximately flat to slightly up in certain different areas.
Bob Bruggeworth:
This is Bob. Thank you for your question. Yes, you're correct that there has been some inventory build, but I want to also point out that we're not anywhere near the number of 5G phones that we expected to be at our number now is pushing closer to 600. And if you recall, when we started the year, we thought it was going to be closer to 700 plus. So that's a pretty big drop, and that's what built up the inventory. And so it's still our expectations to get past where we were at that $1.1 billion, $1.2 billion over time. We've got a lot of growth drivers in our portfolio today, each of the business segments, and we've talked about this. As far as the event cellular, we still believe we can grow in that mid- to upper single digits, we still believe we have room to grow at our largest customer and a lot of BAW content as we look out over the years. Then if I move into what we're seeing in the high-performance analog business, we've got several growth drivers there. We think defense is going to be a good business for multi-years. We follow that up with what we're seeing in the infrastructure and what we're bringing to that market segment with our GaN modules that we spoke about here. We're excited about the 5G rollout in India because that's going to be supported primarily out of our European customers. And if I look at the power market that Grant talked about today is a little bit off because of what's going on in the data center market, along with the electrical power tools and things like that, but we're taking that product into multiple markets right now and expect that to grow very nicely. And then our power device business. We just talked about the agreement we signed with SK Siltron to bring on -- they've been a good supplier to us. We want to formalize that. So we've got multi-suppliers and we've seen tremendous growth out of that, and we continue to add to our sales funnel on that. And then if I go to the connectivity and sensing, we believe that's going to be our highest growth. And we've talked before on calls about the success we're having in ultra-wideband to what we're doing with Matter and our development kits. We know Wi-Fi is going to come back both for the handset as well as the access points. So we haven't backed away from our longer-term plans.
Vivek Arya :
Very helpful. And maybe for my follow-up. I think on the last call, you had highlighted $110 million charge, if I recall correctly. I was curious what happened to that? Was it paid? Was it negotiated? Any other charges we should be aware of? And is there any obsolescence risk on the inventory that you have?
Grant Brown :
Sure. Thanks for the question, Vivek. I'll take the silicon question from last quarter and then I'll roll it forward to this quarter. If you remember, there was a $110 million charge last quarter. In the K that we filed, there was $2.2 billion of total purchase commitment liabilities that we had of which $1.4 billion was related to this particular silicon agreement. It currently stands at approximately $800 million, which remains on that particular agreement. Given the demand that we are including in our guidance, looking forward, we were able to work with the supplier in that case, in order to better match the supply coming in with the ultimate demand in our silicon. So overall, a very good story, very solid partnership in working through that particular agreement.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas.
Karl Ackerman:
I wanted to maybe first start off with a question for either Bob or Eric. To what extent is Qorvo under-shipping demand in the December quarter, particularly in handsets? And related to that, clearly, volumes are impacting your utilization and margins. But I guess our ASPs on older generation devices coming down by a similar amount as we think about the December quarter guide?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Eric is not here. But Dave, representing our sales and marketing, will address your question, if that's all right.
David Fullwood :
Yes. And thank this is Dave. I'm not sure how much -- we can say how much we're undershipping demand. It's a combination of weak demand in the market, especially in the Android ecosystem on top of the inventory that's built up in the channel that's being run off. We don't see pricing as a factor there. It's all more about the units and the inventory.
Karl Ackerman:
Got it. Understood. Maybe just to switch gears, if I could. Certainly somebody away from mobile. You did mention that silicon carbide agreement today. I was hoping you could quantify the size and/or capability of revenue you could support with your silicon carbide offering now that you signed this long-term supply agreement with SK Siltron, and/or the rest of your suppliers?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you for that. Again, we've got three different suppliers that supply us the raw wafers, and we've got even more that do the epitaxial, so this is a portion of that. We haven't disclosed even the baseline business, how large it is this year. All I can tell you is it's growing significantly, and we're very pleased with that acquisition. It's coming up on its first year anniversary and very pleased with how it's contributing to the overall performance on the top and bottom lines. But we're excited about the business. We've got a great product offering there. I ran through a number of the different applications we're in, and we just continue to add to the sales funnel on that business, and we just want to formalize with one of our suppliers in the longer-term agreement.
Operator:
Next question comes from Tim Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri :
I just jumped on late. So I just kind of wanted to get a sense of China and sort of how you see things progressing if you're willing to speak beyond June -- sorry, beyond calendar Q4, how do you see the inventory digestion trending beyond December, do you think that March, there'll will still be some residual -- or is December the worst of it?
Grant Brown :
We did cover the China revenue, the percent of sales and the percentage that it will be down both quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year, which are substantial. In terms of the inventory and the time it will take the process through the inventory, we haven't made a formal statement about that, but we have commented that Android-based revenue in China is expected to be up in the March quarter. We haven't provided formal guidance, but we do expect to see some increase in March.
Operator:
Next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder :
I want to dig into the -- you mentioned the mid-high band that combines with the transmit and the DRx into a single module and a smaller footprint than what we had previously for the mid-high band. I'm assuming your performance has allowed you to reduce the size and addition of a few other things. Is this the new Phase 7E module that I think a lot of your -- especially your Android customers have been kind of clamoring for to try to reduce the footprint and maybe even the cost to them of the RFFE or is this done for a particular customer so any guidance or any color you can provide on how widespread the attraction of that part might be would be helpful to start with and then I have a followup.
David Fullwood :
Yes, Ed, this is Dave. The Phase 7 LE is a different solution. So we talked about that earlier this year, and we've ramped that with Honor. We've got lot of new customers, POs in hand, we'll start shipping more that in the beginning of next year. The product you referred to that combines the mid-high-band, main and diversity path, that's a new product that will ramp probably in 2024. So that's more targeting high-performance, small form factor applications, really leverages Qorvo's strength, optimized size and performance. And so we're working with some leading customers on helping them define that architecture and drive that solution.
Edward Snyder :
Great. And then a follow-up. I mean, your inventory problems appeared last year at this time pretty much. And I know it's impossible to tell it's difficult to even understand how much inventory relative to demand and seems to have happened subsequently to that to make things worse. But we've now gone for 12 months and it's not getting better, it's getting worse. So what point or is there a point where you start writing off some of this inventory? Or is it all standard product. They'll sell just as well in the 2024 phones as it did or targeted for last year's and this year's fall. So I'm just trying to get a grasp of how long you're going to go with it before or is it just selling through?
Grant Brown :
Thanks for the question, Ed. In terms of inventory and what we're writing off or reserving against, it is up significantly. So that will be in our gross margin in our non-GAAP gross margin. So we are seeing that today. If we believe anything was excess or obsolete, we would have included it in that. So there's no expectation that there was something we missed. I would also point out that we're doing the things that we can do to help manage that by reducing utilization in the factories. We're working with customers and suppliers. We're ordering less raw materials, for example, and being selective where we choose to add value to inventory looking forward, I tend to look at finished goods, and it's about 20% of our total now. It typically runs higher than that. So that tells me that we're doing a good job. At least on a historical basis of managing the situation tightly and in terms of what we choose to build knowing that we're going to make sure there's demand to consume it. So we're taking the steps that we need to take today and we're reserving against the excess and obsolete as we see it.
Edward Snyder :
And if I could follow up on one more, is on your largest customer, it might be a bright spot. Certainly, it looked like it from the report for the first quarter et cetera. Is your content up or down or flat relative, just generally speaking, to where it was last year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sorry, that's not anything we've ever disclosed in the past. I know you guys have a lot of fun trying to find a lot of our small parts that are in there. And yes, we enjoyed a nice ramp with them in the last quarter. And quite honestly, we're going to be down probably at all our major customers, obviously, including our China-based customers in December have factored all that into our outlook. But we were up year-over-year in the September quarter with our largest customer.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Matt Ramsay with Cowen.
Matthew Ramsay :
My first one, I was just kind of -- apologies if this has been asked, we were listening to you guys on Qualcomm at the same time. But one of the comment that their team made was not only a weakening in smartphone demand overall, but also a move that from customers in all geographies and tiers to carry a lower level of inventory. And it sounded like that move had accelerated in the recent weeks and you guys are kind of going through this inventory correction with the China customers. And I wonder if you've seen across the board that kind of trend, even an acceleration and lowering inventory levels at most of the customers.
David Fullwood :
Sure. This is Dave. So I mean I think that's natural, right? Anytime you get into this type of environment, people are going to start to reduce their inventories because the demand is not growing. So I think that's a natural reaction. And sure, we see some of those similar trends. But I also want to mention that we have a pretty close relationship with all our customers. They forecasted a lot of this business, they placed purchase orders. So we're working with each of them to kind of work through the inventory, whether it's sitting in our factory or sitting in our distribution channel or obviously sitting in our customers' shelves. We work through that with them on a case-by-case basis to make sure that, that inventory gets consumed. So in those cases, they're often willing to take more inventory on their shelf to heal those problems.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I would only add to that, Dave, that it's broader than just quote our China-based customers, just to be clear. It's broader than just our handset customers as well. We talked about WiFi, whether it's access points or in the phones. But I just want to make sure for audience, I understand it's broader than what we're just seeing in handsets.
Matthew Ramsay :
Thanks for Bob, that was pretty consistent with the messaging from San Diego as well. As my follow-up, Grant, I know this new segmentation and you guys talked about the historicals being disclosed when the Q comes out. But in the guidance that you've provided for December, if you could talk maybe a little bit more specifically about the new segment directionally, that would be helpful.
Grant Brown :
Yes, sure. So the segments directionally will follow a lot of what Bob's comments were previously, right? We do expect them to be down sequentially into December. You get now a good look at the profitability by each of those different segments in terms of HPA, it just recorded a 35% operating margin. ACG recorded a 34% operating margin, which wasn't far behind and then a slight loss on our CSG business, which is our highest growth biggest investment area. I should say, base investment area -- sorry, biggest investment area relative to revenue. I should qualify that.
Operator:
Next question comes from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava :
I had a quick follow-up on the segments. So what's the connectivity segment operating margin was negative. What's kind of the normalized target for this, Grant? And then I had a quick follow-up on.
Grant Brown :
Yes, sure. So it's relatively new. But putting all the pieces together, I would expect it to be profitable. We're going to drive that business, both in terms of the top line to increase the scale, so it can absorb the cost structure that it's got as well as looking at the utilization in the factories. So it's building a lot of WiFi parts that come out of our Greensboro fab, which is highly underutilized at the moment. So it's constrained in that regard from an overall unit perspective.
Ambrish Srivastava :
Got it. Got it. And then real quick on the Android business. I know you put out your China revenues in your filings. But what was the peak for the Android handset revenues going back a year or even higher before that.
Bob Bruggeworth:
So is your question on China based Android or including our other customers that are Android based.
Ambrish Srivastava :
I think it's a good point you raised. It's just the Android customer base, which is causing banks or the biggest downshift in the trajectory of the business.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I can't speak to Android specifically off the cuff, but I can tell you that our China-based business as a percent of total revenue was approaching 50% at the peak. A good portion of which was Android.
Operator:
Next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis :
And I guess a little repetitive, everybody has bounced around tonight, so I apologize. But obviously, Android needs substantial correction. I was just kind of curious on that other customer. There's been a lot of concerns, but I haven't seen anything concrete in this guide that is down sharply, have you changed the way you're looking at that customer baked in any conservatism. Obviously, there's manufacturing issues that's in the news as well as concerns about their annual cuts.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Blayne, it's Bob. I made a comment earlier that we were up year-over-year with our largest customer, but I also commented that in the December quarter, we're expecting to be down at all of our large customers, including our customers in China. And we also believe across our customers that their flagship phones are not immune to what we're seeing out there. The end consumer almost no matter what market segment we're facing, and we've got multiple products for more than just handsets, we're seeing it decline. So that was some comments I made earlier.
Blayne Curtis :
And then you made the comment that Android is up in March. Obviously, Samsung always has their ramp then and a good quarter for that customer. Would you still expect the VOX to be correcting inventory? Or is the comment that Android is up in March because you're through that inventory and even the VOX could be up?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I think, number one, I'm glad you brought up our Korean customer and what's going on there. I mean, we also commented that we picked up a Low-Band PAD in their marquee phone, and we're pretty happy about that. That's new content we've never gotten. We did get the Low-Band PAD and some of their high-volume phones, but we hadn't been in the marquee phone and we've got a lot of extra content there. So yes, as they launch their next level phone, we're going to do extremely well. And it's our expectations today that what we're seeing from China. Now again, we have to remember, are there rolling lockdowns, what's going to happen. But based on everything we see today, we do expect to be up there. But when you integrate all that with our largest customers, typically down, we're seeing some other weakness in other consumer businesses as we adjust the inventories, that's why we're not predicting March yet. But Blayne, I think we are at the point where we feel just like we said last quarter, this was going to be the low point December for our Android-based customers.
Operator:
Next question Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.
Christopher Rolland :
Bob, you just stole some of my thunder there around the Low Band PAD win that you had there. Perhaps talk about that opportunity in low band. Is this expanding for you, do you think? And then just more generally, maybe you can talk about the content growth opportunity that you guys see per 5G unit as we move into 2023 more generally?
Grant Brown :
Sure, I'll take this one. Good question. And it's definitely a content game for us. We've never had the low band on their flagship model before. As Bob mentioned, in some of their master 5G phones last -- this past year, we did get some of the low-band sockets, but this is new for us in the flagship. So this will actually be the highest content we've ever had in that phone model. So we're pretty excited about that starting early next year. As far as additional content, it's hard to say. I think it's consistent with what we said in the past. I will say there's one area that I think is another exciting opportunity for us as we move into WiFi 7. There's been a lot of cases in WiFi 6, where the PA that's integrated in the SoC is sometimes good enough performance and they don't need an external fab. But we don't see that happening in WiFi 7. So we've got great WiFi FEM socket win on a major Asia-based chipset platform provider on their reference design with our fans. So we're really excited about that. That's definitely going to be a growth opportunity as forward.
Christopher Rolland :
And then as we all kind of piece together what's inventory digestion versus true lower demand, maybe this could be a helpful way to address that. I think you gave a global handset unit number for 5G. I think you were at like 625 or something like that for the year. Where do you see that now on perhaps reduced demand?
Grant Brown :
Sure. We commented that we think it will be approximately 600 million units now for calendar '22, so down approximately 25 million units coming out of December.
Operator:
Next question comes from Raji Jill with Needham & Company.
Rajvindra Gill :
And again, I joined late as well, so I apologize if this question was asked. When we're looking at calendar '23 in terms of the overall market, I'm just curious to see how -- what the Chinese handset customers are thinking about a recovery year looks like in calendar 2023. The designs for phones are six to nine months in the future. So I'm just wondering, is there any feedback that maybe you could provide of what a recovery year could look like in calendar '23 off a 600 million kind of 5G market this year? Any thoughts on that?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I think what's important, and it's a good question and if I could answer that, I know a lot of you would be super impressed if I was actually accurate. I think what we focused on is the design activity, to your point, that we've been working on. And we're quite encouraged by the number of new phones and obviously, our design wins that are there and the amount of content that they're putting into their phones. It's just what you're really asking is the number of units and let's just go through their markets. The China consumer is at an all-time low right now. Everybody had hoped after President, she was elected to his next term, they'll back away from the Zero COVID policy. We haven't seen that yet. So what's the China market going to look like? They're a major export market. A lot of that is Eastern Europe. The war in Ukraine doesn't look like it's slowing down. So we have to factor that in. And then you put in place, they're strong in Europe as well, you look at inflation and what they're seeing over there. So until a lot of those things get under control, they're not leaning forward, okay? What they are doing is continue to design new phones. We work with them on that. We get those wins. Many of those are some of the same products we're shipping today. Many are some of the new products that we've also talked about. So very difficult to project '23. What we feel good about is our design wins, our market share is consistent or higher as we go forward. The number of units, we'll just have to wait and see.
Rajvindra Gill :
Got it. Understood. And for my follow-up, last quarter, you were cutting utilization to kind of stoke the inventory burn. I don't believe you quantified it. You might have quantified it on this call. But I'm just curious, how are you thinking about ramping down the utilization rate at your internal fab and kind of what the impact would be on the margin front.
Grant Brown :
Sure. Thanks for the question. I touched on it a bit earlier in terms of utilization by location. And there are different businesses which impact different factories in various ways based on product mix that we see running through those factories. So in aggregate, it's difficult, if not misleading, to quote a particular number. And we haven't done that in the past for that reason. But I can say that underutilization is significant. It's having a meaningful impact on our gross margin to the tune of greater than 700 basis points. So adding that back, as I talked about earlier, gets us on path to our 50%-plus gross margin looking forward.
Operator:
Your next question comes from Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh :
Just wondering, I know you talked about by March quarter, we start to see some growth. Hopefully, you got that right. But is that predicated more on ex China growth? Or how are you seeing that? Because as you mentioned, might be some of the COVID could continue into next year, right?
Grant Brown :
Yes. Let me clarify that a bit on aggregate. We're not commenting on the March quarter in terms of whether it would show growth. But on a customer basis, seasonally, we would expect our largest customer to be down. We do expect Android based business to be up, and there will be some offset between those two that were not forecasting at this point publicly. And the rest of our businesses are expected to be approximately flat with some specific strength on the areas Bob touched on earlier.
Vijay Rakesh :
Got it. And then on the inventory side, I was wondering if you could comment on what the channel inventory levels were or where you see it exiting December versus normal levels? And similarly, where you think customer handset, customer OEM inventories are on the RF components side?
Grant Brown :
Yes. I'm sorry, was the question referring to China or…?
Vijay Rakesh :
In general, what is channel inventories, what are you seeing in terms of RF component levels and same on your customer. Where do you think inventories are as you exit the December quarter, let's say.
Eric Creviston :
Yes. It's hard to put a number on it because it varies by market and even by customer and product area. In some cases, we have customers that are reasonably healthy in terms of the inventory they're carrying. And others, they've got a lot of inventory that they've got to work through and then in some cases, we have distributors in between that is kind of a mixed bag as well.
Bob Bruggeworth:
What I'd add to that is, unfortunately, every quarter, the -- our customers are chasing demand down for the various global effects that we talked about, 3 major things
Operator:
Thank you. I would like to turn the floor back to management for closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth :
We want to thank everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again at upcoming investor events. Thanks again, and hope you have a good night.
Operator:
This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.
Operator:
Good day, everyone. And welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Q1 2023 Conference Call. As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody. And welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2023 first quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statements contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, Interim CFO; as well as Eric Creviston; Philip Chesley and other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks Doug, and welcome everyone to our call. Qorvo delivered fiscal first quarter revenue and EPS above the midpoint of the outlook provided on our May 4th earnings call. In IDP, June revenue was broad based across markets with strength in power, defense and infrastructure. The diverse markets served by IDP are exposed to an expanding list of long-term drivers, including enterprise, smart home, automotive connectivity, electric vehicles, battery powered tools, infrastructure, and defense radar, and comms. In Mobile Products, June revenue was diversified across customers and product categories. Qorvo grew year-over-year excluding China based customers while securing noteworthy design wins and content gains across customers and high volume platforms. Qorvo is exceptionally well positioned in cellular applications with a long-term outlook supported by growing content and integration trends. Now let's look at some of the quarterly highlights. In ultra-wideband, we completed MFi certification of interoperability of our ultra-wideband solutions with the Apple U1 chip used in supported iPhones and Apple Watch models. This will enable developers to create innovative new products and accessories that interact seamlessly with their environment, leveraging the full power and precision of UWB technology provided by Qorvo. In MEMS-based sensors, Qorvo commenced shipments of force sensors, which enhance industrial design and improve trackpad uniformity and reliability in a recently launched consumer laptop. The content opportunity and trackpad applications typically includes four MEMS sensors. For Matter-enabled applications, we launched a new development kit for gateway and connected devices. Qorvo’s Matter solutions streamline commercial development of smart home applications, including home hubs, mesh lighting, security, speakers, and other connectivity and sensing applications. In automotive connectivity, we secure WiFi 6 design wins for an infotainment system at General Motors. We also validated WiFi 6 placements on a reference design for a car automotive WiFi chipset supplier. In biosensors, we obtained FDA emergency use authorization of our Omnia diagnostic test platform using BAW technology for COVID antigen detection. This expands upon the previous EUA to include the significantly larger point of care testing market outside of labs, such as physician offices, urgent care, retail pharmacies, employee health testing, and other locations that operate under CLIA waiver. In power management, we rewarded our first design wins to supply enterprise class PMICs for data center applications. This achievement includes multiple customers and builds upon our strength in consumer applications. Our power management offerings leverage a unique architecture that delivers measurable innovation and value, and that is helping to extend power management into other markets, including defense. In automotive power applications, Qorvo was recognized with an innovation award from American Axle & Manufacturing for superior efficiency using our silicon carbide devices in power conversion applications. We also secured a silicon carbide win with a leading solar inverter manufacturer, serving the U.S. and Europe, expanding beyond our position and residential energy storage. In defense and aerospace, we are recognized by Raytheon Technologies with their premier award for performance and overall excellence in both collaboration and technology and innovation. We also initiated a strategic alliance with a large U.S. defense prime for package development and assembly, leveraging our advanced microwave module assembly facility in Richardson, Texas. In mobile products, we expanded our content at a Korean based OEM with the first shipments of our low band pads to this customer. We also commence the volume ramp of the industry's first complete main path solution for Phase 7 LE supporting multiple mass market programs at Honor. Qorvo’s RF fusion for Phase 7 LE enables broader operator coverage and reduces implementation area in customer devices. For U.S. based Android OEM, we ramp shipments of our mid-high band PAD, antennaplexer with integrated LNA, ultra-high brand DRx, antenna tuners, and ultra-wideband solution in support of an upcoming smartphone launch. Both the ultra high-band DRx and the antennaplexer with LNA represent new product categories for Qorvo. Lastly, we received our first production order for MEMS-based antenna solutions in support of a high end gaming smartphone. These are the first volume commercial orders of our MEMS antenna solutions, which increased efficiency and improved throughput. Before turning the call over to Grant, I'm pleased to announce a new organizational structure, Qorvo is now organized into three segments
Grant Brown:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Following up on Bob's comments about the new org structure, when discussing results for fiscal Q1, we'll refer to the operating segments that were effective during that period, Mobile Products and IDP. Our forward-looking comments, however, will refer to the new operating segments, connectivity and sensors, high performance analog and advanced cellular. Beginning with our fiscal second quarter 10-Q, our historical financial statements will be recast into the new operating segments. With that said, I'll now turn to our June results. Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2023 was $1.035 billion, $10 million above the midpoint of our guidance. Mobile Products revenue of $733 million was down year-over-year and sequentially, reflecting the impact of global macroeconomic events on smartphone volumes, primarily within the Android ecosystem. Infrastructure and defense products revenue of $302 million was up double-digits year-over-year, driven by strength across power, defense and infrastructure. On a non-GAAP basis, gross margin in the June quarter was 50% in line with our guidance. The quarter benefited from stronger product mix, offset by higher than typical inventory-related charges. On a GAAP basis, gross margin – impacted by a long-term capacity agreement. Amidst widespread supply constraints during the second quarter of last fiscal year, we entered into a capacity reservation agreement with a silicon foundry supplier. Ongoing events, including COVID mitigation efforts in China, the war in Ukraine, global supply chain disruptions and other factors have negatively impacted the global demand environment within a short period of time. Consequently, customer demand no longer supports the minimum purchase commitments for the agreement. We believe this situation is not normal and does not accurately reflect the performance of our ongoing business. A complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures can be found in our press release, and additional information will be available in our upcoming 10-Q filing. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the first quarter were $234 million, $11 million lower than our guidance, due to the timing of product development spend as well as employee-related expenses. Year-over-year, operating expenses were up $18 million, primarily related to recently acquired company OpEx and new product investments, partially offset by lower incentive compensation. Non-GAAP operating income in the June quarter was $284 million or 27.5% of sales. Non-GAAP net income in the first quarter was $238 million, and diluted earnings per share of $2.25 was $0.12 above the mid-point of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the first quarter was $273 million. Capital expenditures in the quarter were $43 million and remain concentrated in areas where we see continued demand for our differentiated technologies. Free cash flow was $230 million, and we repurchased $350 million worth of shares during the quarter. The rate and pace in which we repurchased shares is based on our long-term outlook, low leverage, alternative uses of cash and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet. As of the June quarter end, we had approximately $2 billion of debt outstanding and $859 million of cash and equivalents. Now turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1.120 billion and $1.150 billion, non-GAAP gross margin between 49% and 50% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $2.45 to $2.65. We ended the June quarter with $847 million of inventory, reflecting seasonal new product ramps and the macroeconomic factors previously discussed. Our current view of the second half of the fiscal year reflects lower demand, and we will reduce factory utilization to improve our inventory position. These actions will impact gross margin in the second half, and we currently expect non-GAAP gross margin for the full fiscal year to be approximately 48%. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the second quarter to be approximately $240 million, below the operating income line, other expense will be approximately $16 million, reflecting the interest paid on our fixed rate debt, offset by interest income earned on our cash balances, along with other items. Our non-GAAP tax rate for the full fiscal year is expected to be approximately 11.25% due to the absolute level and geographic mix of pre-tax profit as well as the impact of a U.S. tax law change related to R&D capitalization, among other factors. Despite the broadly recognized macroeconomic challenges impacting our industry and our near-term view, Qorvo’s long-term business outlook remains positive. Connectivity and electrification trends are accelerating, and product performance requirements continue to increase. We are expanding our opportunities across markets, customers and product categories while maintaining our commitment to technology leadership, portfolio management, productivity gains and reduced capital intensity. In addition, we believe our new business group structure better aligns our organization with our end markets and highlights the strength of our broad product portfolio. We are well-positioned for long-term diversified growth and remain focused on free cash flow as we navigate the current environment. That concludes our formal remarks for the quarter. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we’ll take our first question from Matt Ramsay with Cowen.
Matt Ramsay:
Thank you very much. Good afternoon, guys. I wanted to ask some questions, Grant, on some of the commentary that you gave there at the end of your script around some potential for lower revenue levels and some compression in gross margin in the second half of the fiscal year. If you guys have any quantification of any of those things in particular the drivers of that, is that some of the sort of well-documented mid-tier Android weakness that that some of your peers have talked about? Are there other things going on there? Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Yes, Matt, I think you got it. It all starts with those macroeconomic events that we mentioned that are impacting everyone, right? For Qorvo, as you pointed out, the important driver there is the 5G phones in the areas that you mentioned. Earlier this year, we set up a $750 million in calendar 2022 and then revised that in May to between $650 million and $675 million, where the revenue impact to us was approximately $250 million in the June and September quarters. Since then, as you mentioned, the macroeconomic environment has worsened. Android-based customers that pulled back and the channel inventories have grown. So now, we see fewer 5G units in calendar 2022 as overall demand continues to reflect those macro pressures. In total for Qorvo, I touched on it in my prepared remarks, but the weakness that we saw there implies a fiscal second half is down approximately 10% from the first half. But that said, we currently expect the December quarter to be the low point for our Android-based business. I realize that’s a lot of detail there to hit your question, but I hope that provides some context around the margin guidance of 48% for the full fiscal year. I really want to be clear, right? We’re taking active steps to improve our inventory position and lowering utilization in order to align with the demand.
Matt Ramsay:
Yes. Thank you for that, Grant. I appreciate all the detail there. I know that’s a lot of information to get out. As my follow-up question, I wanted to ask about the charges that you guys took against sort of prepaid or reserve foundry capacity. I think it was $110 million that was taken in the June quarter and excluded from the non-GAAP results. If you could maybe walk us through what commitments weren’t met, which product lines or segments those might have been in? And just the decision to exclude those from the non-GAAP results, like what were the puts and takes on a decision like that? I know the macros and unusual things are going on now, but it seems like also more akin to normal sort of business operations with customers on inventory builds and digestion than sort of one-time items. So I’m just kind of curious around the puts and takes there. Thank you. Appreciate it very much.
Grant Brown:
Yes, sure. In terms of the charge itself, right, maybe I’ll start there and then I’ll talk about the GAAP-only treatment. But the charge itself, I think we’ve appropriately accounted for the impact both present and future. As you mentioned, it represents about $110 million charge and touches all the elements of that long-term supply agreement that share the same root cause, right? The existing material and the incoming material, the deposit – purchase commitment liability that, more directly to your question represents the view of the impact over the remaining life of the agreement. We actually continue to place POs with the supplier for material that supports our current order levels, and we’re working with them to negotiate the terms of that agreement. Based on that, we determined it wasn’t representative of our ongoing business and decided that it wasn’t going to fall into our non-GAAP cost of goods sold.
Operator:
Thank you, sir. Next, we’ll hear from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks for taking my question. I’m curious to get your sense for the remaining amount of RF component inventory among your Android customers. So I appreciate that you have given a high-level outlook for the second half of the fiscal year, and you mentioned December could be the bottom. So is it based on the expectation this all clears up in December? Because March tends to be seasonally weaker. So are you saying March is going to be above December? I’m just curious how to think through the trajectory and think through how much inventory is still left in the channel.
Grant Brown:
Yes, sure, Vivek. Let me try to put some comments around it. But I think given the nature of the events that are impacting that channel inventory, being macro and out of our control, it’s hard for us to pin it down precisely. But given that backdrop with COVID lockdowns in China, the war in Ukraine, high inflation and all the other global macroeconomic challenges, obviously, we do see the inventories higher than normal, especially within the Android ecosystem. And most of the companies that we’re selling to there were planning ordering and producing for much higher growth than the industry is currently experiencing. So it will take some time to bleed down that inventory, which is again why we’re bringing factory utilization down to respond throughout our fiscal year, but we’re not putting an exact time frame on it at this point.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Vivek, this is Bob. I’ll just add a little color there. I mean, clearly, our customers are continuing to order from us, and we’re continuing to ship to them, and we’re making adjustments. But when we said it’s the Android ecosystem is what’s bottoming in December, it’s coming back up in March, but I mean not to the levels it have been. So we still have ways to go there, just to be clear.
Vivek Arya:
Understood. And Bob, just as a follow-up kind of longer-term, the industry seems to have a tougher time dealing with the China Android customers. Like every few years, there’s inventory issue comes up because, right, they all hope to gain a lot of share from each other, order a lot of components and then there is this inventory buildup. What do you think you can do or are doing to help kind of diversify away from that dynamic? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I think, first of all, a little bit of a different view on this year is a little bit different from the perspective of their end market. I think we all expected at the beginning of the calendar year that the China market itself for 5G would grow very nicely as well as their export market for 5G, particularly in the Southeast Asia as well as into Eastern Europe and Europe. As you well know, things kind of changed with all the lockdowns within China. They have trouble even making phones, let alone people going out and buying phones. So that kind of shifted pretty significantly. And then when you layer on top of that the war in Ukraine, which starts to impact some of our Chinese-based customers, someone like Samsung, who Europe is one of their larger markets, clearly, what’s going on there, the slowdown that we’re seeing. So a little bit different dynamics. But I think what is important it is that I think we’ve got a good handle on this. I don’t think anybody was able to forecast the lasting impacts of COVID and the lockdowns. Now with that said, with the three business segments we have, it is our goal, if you look at how we laid out the growth rates for each one of these, we will over time significantly improve the diversification of our business outside of handsets in general. And that’s one of the things we’re setting out to do. What we’ve done is to accelerate our growth and accelerate the development of technologies and new products for other markets. So that’s some of the steps we’re taking. But I think this year is a little bit different than what we’ve seen in the past out of our Chinese customers. Thank you.
Operator:
And next, we’ll hear from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo.
Gary Mobley:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. So much of the discussion so far is focused on the mobile-related business, but maybe if you can give us an update on your view on how IDP is trending from both a demand perspective and supply perspective?
Philip Chesley:
Thanks, Gary. This is Philip. So IDP is doing well. We posted both quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year revenue growth. It really is somewhat market dependent. I will say that in our Defense and our Power segment, we continue to see strength. On the base station business, we do see some inventory buildup in that end market. It’s actually kind of interesting. You have kind of two dynamics that are playing in that market where, in some cases, there’s oversupply. In other cases, they can’t get enough product in. So making that end market a little bit murkier there. But in Defense and Power, clearly, we’re seeing a tailwind in those businesses.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. And so I presume the resiliency that you’re seeing in your September quarter primarily relates to an iOS build or product cycle, but maybe the Android weakness is really manifesting and can’t be disguised in the December quarter. So my question is, what does that Android business bottom out at as a percentage of revenue in the December quarter? Just trying to think about the base off which it bounces.
Grant Brown:
Sure. Let me start, and then maybe Bob or Eric can fill in some more of the details. I think in terms of the December quarter, we would expect it to be below what we were talking about last quarter on the call. So certainly, it’s coming down from what we talked about as a low point there expected in December. And that cuts across our Android-based customers in general. And Eric or Bob, if you add any more color on the market itself.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, this is Eric. We’ve got – it’s an interesting dynamic because the team has done a great job actually of capturing design wins in Android, and we’re launching a couple of major flagship phones, beginning to ramp in the December quarter and into March. And so we’ve got great content and share gains there. The only question is units, right? And that’s going to be about the rate and pace of this inventory turn down, which is pretty hard to predict. So we’ve got a strong tailwind in terms of content and share gains, but just a massive headwind right now in digesting the channel inventory.
Operator:
And moving on to Blayne Curtis of Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Yes. Thanks for taking my questions. I had two. Just for the September quarter. I know you’re going to guide for the new segments, which we don’t have. But just any color – because obviously, you’re talking about this weak second half of the fiscal year, but then you’re growing in September. I think in the press release you called out better defense and power, but I was wondering if there’s any other moving pieces you can steer us to for September.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Blayne. And I kind of touched on a little bit, but we’re ramping in two handset manufacturers, both here and the North America. That’s driving good growth. Also, as you pointed out, our defense business is strong. Our power business is strong. We’ve got a few other smaller segments that are also doing well. And what’s off is the Android ecosystem that we’ve been talking about, and we think we’re going to drop a little bit more in December with that.
Blayne Curtis:
And then I just wanted to ask you in terms of the – obviously, the chip stack needs to be fully fine. But just kind of curious, as you take a longer-term view, you’re starting to talk more about defense. I’m just kind of curious if you can have any thoughts as to what that could mean for Qorvo.
Philip Chesley:
Yes, Blayne, this is Philip. We’ve been partnered with the U.S. government for many years, right? I mean you’ve seen the releases from ship programs, the STARRY NITE, which is 90-nanometer GaN development. So for us, this partnership is kind of a natural cadence that we have in our business. When we look at the CHIPS Act, I think, for us, it expands the opportunities that we have. I think the good news for us is that we have a lot of relationships already. And we’re looking at areas where we can basically expand kind of what we’ve done in the past with the CHIPS Act.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I’ll add to that, Blayne. We’re also a trusted foundry I want to remind the group for filters, GaN and high-performance gas products that support everything that Philip said. So I think we’re going to be able to participate in that. And it’s yet to be defined the actual process and the allocations and things like that. But as we continue to learn, we’ve been very active in the CHIPS Act.
Operator:
Thank you. Moving on to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi, good afternoon. Thank you so much for taking the question. I had a follow-up question on inventory going forward. You talked about taking action here. Can you remind us how you would characterize normal inventory on your balance sheet, whether it be in dollars or days? And where do you expect to be exiting the calendar year or the fiscal year given some of the actions that you talked about?
Grant Brown:
Yes, sure. In terms of inventory, we normally think of it as turns. So ideally, we would be operating at approximately high 3s to 4 turns was what we would consider more normal. Obviously, where we’re sitting today is off the mark. And that – or that’s, I guess, going to be reflected in the utilization and gross margin going forward. So in terms of where we expect to end the year in dollar terms, right now, I predict it to be down. But again, I’m not going to guide that far out on the balance sheet at this point.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. And then my second one is more of a clarification. You talked about the second half being down 10% half over half. Was that fiscal or calendar? And was it down 10% for the entire company, which is for mobile?
Grant Brown:
For fiscal first and second half, and that’s for the entire company.
Operator:
Thank you. Moving on to Edward Snyder of Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. A couple of questions, if I could. So you’ve got this inventory sitting out there, and you’ve had it really since probably this time last year, when trying to slow down, you shift Phase 7, which is the new out there. What do I say about the obsolescence of the inventory in general? They’re sitting a lot of finish because I know you don’t know how much they have. But given that it’s not moving to China very quickly, what’s to prevent larger write-offs as we move further into Phase 7? Number one. And number two, why are you calling December the bottom? I mean we – and really a series of unfortunate events that were very unpredictable with the inventory issue and COVID issues, recession issues. But it’s kind of been a moving target. We’ve been expecting the bottom now for almost a year, and we haven’t seen it. And by all indications, if you look at the recession data and all the other metrics and then to stuff, it doesn’t look like seem close to bottom yet. So what gives you confidence that December is going to be your bottom on this? And then I have a follow-up. Thanks.
Grant Brown:
Yes. Let me start with the inventory, Ed. So obviously, we have a robust process. We go through every quarter, right? And if there was anything in excess or obviously lead at quarter end, we would have taken the charge inside the quarter. But I mean, to put that into a bit more context, right, if you set aside the charges related to the long-term silicon supply agreement and look at EV on a non-GAAP basis, we recorded double the normal inventory reserves on our mobile business in Q1. So we are actively reviewing our inventory and taking action there from a reserve standpoint. In terms of obsolescence, I don’t know, Eric, do you want to comment on architectures?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, yes, sure. So we’ve got a pretty good view, of course, into the design win pipeline and to certainly to the extent we can control the rate and pace to the new platform, of course. But also very importantly, we’ve got the exact same components being designed in across the board across Android. So there’s – we don’t have like custom one-off parts that might get strand or so forth. We’ve got quite a bit of opportunity to continue designing in that inventory into handsets when the volume comes back.
Operator:
And moving on to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I just wanted to make sure I understood the charge with respect to the LTSA, the reason you're not including it in the, excluding it from the per forma, is it something that you don't consider to be normal course of the business should be that assume that there's a big chunk of can that is not addressable to the company anymore?
Grant Brown:
No, I wouldn't make that conclusion. If you look at the charge itself, there is a purchase commitment liability that stretches far into the future, right? The length of the contract. And so that entire charge would be coming out in the quarter. And that's certainly not reflective of our operating business this quarter. Generally speaking, the situations that led to the charge are also not indicative of our business, right? The time in which we had originally signed it, there was a massive silicon shortage. And today we're seeing a significant draw down in demand due to some very large impactful macroeconomic factors. So neither of those things are reflective of our business and management's view, and we have excluded it for that reason.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Another point, it is a multi-year agreement. Make sure you understand what Grant was saying. It's not, just this quarter that was the charge. It's over multi years, we looked at this.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Right. And that's why I asked over multi-years. Should we assume that there's a chunk of pen that has gone away, but I guess I understand it's a combination of supply demand. I just had a quick follow-up and I just want to make sure I got this right. When you talked about channel inventory, did channel inventory grow in the quarter, so is the trending continuing to trend higher? And then are you revising down your 5G units estimate, because you had revised it down prior quarter. I just wanted to know where you stand on those two fronts. Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah, this is Eric. Channel inventory did grow in the quarter. Again, we continue to see outlook for 5G units dropping lower than we had thought before. And as Grant said, we were in the $650 million to $675 range just now looking closer to $625 million, others, you know, are seeing maybe $600 million. So again, it's not a crystal ball of course, but we continue to see a general softness there.
Operator:
And next we'll hear from Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Raji Gill:
Yes. Thank you for taking my questions. I appreciate it. Just two questions as well. One on the gross margins and you talked a little bit about this before, but it implies margins are going to kind of drop to kind of 46% a little bit under that for December and March. And if you go back, you haven't got to see that level of margin in say in three or four – three and three and half years at a much lower revenue level. So wondering if you could maybe elaborate a little bit further in terms of how much the utilization you're dropping. What's happening kind of with pricing as well. Any thoughts there would be helpful?
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. So in terms of the back half, I mean to average into the 48%, I would say, probably 47% is maybe a better estimate to start with. I know that will lead you a little bit ahead of a 48%, right? And so, there's some error in that forecast, because we typically only provide a quarter guidance, it's looking out longer. But in terms of the utilization, if you look at what we had said last quarter our gross margin should have been approximately flat to ticking up marginally and the delta between that and what I'm talking about today is almost entirely utilization based. So this is a conscious decision on our part to lower utilization and response to demand and adjust our inventory balances.
Raji Gill:
Got it. And for my follow up when you're indicating down 11% in the second 10%, sorry from the second fiscal half versus first fiscal half. It implies that the revenue over the next, those two quarters are going to be down closer to 30% on a year-over-year basis. So just wondering if you could kind of give us a sense in terms of the demand landscape. I understand that the China lockdowns have had a major impact, but just wondering kind of any more insight in terms of what's happening there in terms with respect to demand overall demand. Are there any signs that the Chinese economy is stabilizing, any kind of stimulus that's happening to increase consumer spending there and just remind us again, what percentage of your revenue is coming from the China market? Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. So to put that into perspective, our China-based customers were down approximately 45% plus on a year-over-year basis. So that provides some context to the number, right. And that's all in relation to the macroeconomic factors we talked about, with the war in Ukraine, the COVID mitigation efforts especially, and I just mentioned, around China, it's the largest producer and consumer of 5G phones. So this had obviously a sizable impact on our top line, as we experience the inventory correction, we expect in the second half of our fiscal year.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. And this is Eric, looking at the way you laid it out there, sort of exaggerates what's happening in the market because we are bleeding down inventory. So we're under shipping to the market demand for our component significantly during these next few quarters to get that channel inventory brought down.
Operator:
Thank you. Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler has our next question.
Harsh Kumar:
Yeah. Hey guys. Quick question. Bob, what do you think your exposure to China OEMs in handsets today as a percentage of revenue, let's say for the June quarter and where do you think you'll end up when all this is done with respect to call it the inventory flushing out and call it either the December or March you pick what you want to give me. But where do you think you'll bottom out in terms of your exposure to Chinese guys?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah, let me take that one. I think, it is more or less mid-30% typically as a percentage of overall sales and probably bottom out around 20% of our overall sales.
Harsh Kumar:
Okay. Very helpful. And then my other one was a simple one. Has – have you guys started to throttle down the gross margin utilization or is there a plan to throttle down the utilization in the September quarter? Or is that something you plan exclusively in the December and the March quarter?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah, if you look at our guidance for the September quarter, that does include the impact of us throttling down utilization.
Operator:
Thank you. Next we'll hear from Chris Rolland with Susquehanna.
Chris Rolland:
Hey guys, thanks for the question. And this one's probably for Grant. So sorry, back to the charge again, if I understand it correctly, this is $110 million charge and it represents stuff that you did, I guess, in the past, but also charges that you took in the future. Is there any way to kind of break that up between the two and does this go, were you thinking there are cuts all the way to 2025 or is this just near term? Any other details there in terms of past versus future would be great?
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. Why don't we save that for the 10-Q, there'll be a lot of additional detail that will come out and it'll provide all the background with the agreement as well as the breakout on the $110 million charge.
Chris Rolland:
Okay. I thought I was look looking at something, I don't know if it was the 10-Q that was talking about $1.4 billion to 2025. So in terms of the charge that you did take what –like what percent of those wafers or dollars of that $1.4 billion would that represent?
Grant Brown:
I'd rather not get into it until you've read the 10-Q. It'll lay out pretty explicit detail exactly the, the charge. The $1.4 billion would be the aggregate total amount of purchase commitment that we have the $110 million is the amount of a particular agreement that we feel. We couldn't live up to according to the existing terms, which we're negotiating now with the supplier.
Operator:
Thank you. Next. We'll hear from Harlan Sur of J.P. Morgan.
Harlan Sur:
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. This is just a follow-on from one of the previous questions around utilization, so it declined in June, it looks like utilizations are declining in September, and I assume that it's also heading lower in December given sort of the rough fiscal year outlook. Would you guys consider December quarter to be the bottom of your manufacturing utilizations?
Bob Bruggeworth:
We're not guiding at all to utilization. It's a complicated function of which products and which factories in our network are loaded with a given mix for our customers in any particular time period. It's not something that we typically provide any color on.
Grant Brown:
Yeah. I just want to point out with cycle times being what they are and what we're running in Q4 would be for Q1 and all those kind of things. So I don't want you to draw any false conclusions on how things are looking, and I think we'll leave it at the guidance we gave you on the gross margin.
Harlan Sur:
Okay. Thanks for that. And then it looks like you guys have revisal looking at your guys 10-K and comparing to the 10-Q, so on the purchase commitment exiting the March quarter over a multiyear period of time, I think you guys had about $2 billion in purchase commitments, $900 million for this fiscal year. Obviously that's being revised lower. You took the $110 million charge, looks like you guys revised the value in terms of timing. I'm just wondering, was there also renegotiation of the pricing on that committed supply on this?
Grant Brown:
Yes. Let me try to clarify on that point. That’s for a multi-year timeframe. So if you look at our cost of goods sold over a multiple years, that number, it might help you put that number into perspective.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Let's just compare last K or last Q with what. We didn’t issue the K yet.
Grant Brown:
Yes. The Q we haven’t. For this quarter, we haven’t issued the Q yet.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. So why should always comparing.
Operator:
Thank you. Moving on to Tim Arcuri with UBS.
Tim Arcuri:
Thanks a lot. I wanted to also ask about this charge. So just in the continuum of all the agreements you have, it seems relatively small and specific to one particular agreement. Yes, you were saying that it’s because demand is broadly lower. So I’m wondering is the conclusion maybe that there’s a design win that you thought you’d get that you didn’t get. And that’s why this particular agreement is being revised down. I would think that if it’s because demand broadly is softer, that you’d be revising multiple agreements down.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Oh, no. Great question. So let me cover that one really quickly. It’s all tied together. So the weakness that we see in the second half us dropping utilization in our factories and this long-term supply agreement are all attached to the same set of root causes, which are the macroeconomic factors that we tied in before. The contract itself is a multi-year agreement. And the charge represents the impact all over that contract period. So it’s all represented in that 110 million for the life of the agreement.
Philip Chesley:
Also want to add that we are currently negotiating this and just keep that in mind as we cover this. But again, it’s the Android ecosystem weakness that we’ve been talking about.
Tim Arcuri:
Okay. Okay. Got it. And then, I guess just a quick question on customers. I mean, obviously you had a 10% customer, but I wonder if you had a second 10% customer in the March quarter? Sorry, June.
Grant Brown:
Yes. It’s the best place I’d point you to would be K for our largest customers. We don’t report them on a quarterly basis.
Operator:
Thank you. Next we’ll hear from Srini Pajjuri with SMBC Nikko Securities.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you, Grant. Pretty solid free cash flow number, despite lower GAAP, I guess, net income. If you could just help us reconcile that. And then the bigger question is maybe for Bob. Bob given, the inventory correction and also the macro uncertainty. How should we think about your CapEx going forward? I mean, I know these are longer-term decisions, but I’m just curious if there’s any change to your CapEx plans?
Grant Brown:
Yes, sure. Thank you for pointing out the free cash flow. I think, it highlights our discipline around cash flow and us managing the business to generate free cash. Obviously, there’s some strength in the quarter and then some discipline around CapEx, right, which is something that we’ve carried over the last number of years actually. Looking forward, I don’t expect there to be any change. I’ll start and then if Bob has anything to add on your second question. But going forward, no expectations for change there. We’re still looking forward CapEx to be in line or lower this year than last year. And generally speaking as we look out in time, it should be around 5% of sales.
Bob Bruggeworth:
So I think the follow-on to answer your question longer term, we’re not making any change in our CapEx. We believe that this too shall pass the world will return to growth. Predicting when is everyone’s pointed out will be a challenge. But from our macro view while also point out we continue to make great progress and I’ll use some of our broad filters as an example where we have made tremendous progress over the last three or four years to be able to double the capacity by actually reducing our [indiscernible]. And we continue to work on those things. So when you get a downturn like this, we continue to work on those things. We don’t stop any of that engineering work to improve our productivity. So over time, yes, we’re going to be able to as Grant pointed out, continue to expand our business, while running at a very low CapEx compared to what we historically won brand years ago.
Operator:
And moving on to Brett Simpson of Arete Research.
Brett Simpson:
Yes. Thanks very much. Bob, I wanted to ask a bit more about IDP and the growth that you see in next few quarters. You’ve been delivering double-digit revenue growth after a difficult prior fiscal year. And maybe within IDP, just the defense opportunity that you see in front of you. We’ve seen some big contracts being awarded to some of your customers like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin for things like stingers and javelins. And there seems to be a big reboot in munition builds that has to happen in the defense part of the business. So to what extent are you seeing a benefit from this and any more details you can sort of share with us on your outlook for defense and aerospace in particular, that’d be very helpful? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Brett. I’m going to delegate to Philip as he can’t wait to talk about his business.
Philip Chesley:
Thanks, Brett. I think I appreciate the question. I think when you look at our defense business, there are a lot of real strong tailwinds that we see occurring. And that goes from our GaN process technologies as defense space moves in the radar segments from LD Moss to GaN. We’re well positioned there. We see it both at our foundry. We see it in our standard product business in defense as well. So this isn’t just a story of what’s happening in the geopolitical environment today. This is really, there’s some long-term drivers of growth in that business. We’re also doing SAM expansion. We’re looking to build this business, our defense business into an RF and analog play. We’ve moved some of our power management technology into that market as well as our chip program, which does the advanced packaging that we have in Texas. We’re seeing a lot of really good opportunities in that space. So I think that defense with the increased semiconductor spin in the RF side, the SAM expansion that we’re doing with our chip program as well as what we’re doing in some of the other analog segments, it has a lot of positive challenge right now.
Operator:
Thank you. And moving on to Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh:
Yes. Hi, thanks guys. Just quickly on the – I know you mentioned the December quarter bottom just wondering as you look at that wouldn’t it be kind of we are already hearing high RF inventory and high handset inventory, but wouldn’t be a challenge for the China handset guys, especially with the head of an iPhone ramp to kind of run through their inventory
Philip Chesley:
Yes. In aggregate, that’s true, right. We’re building for a seasonal ramp. We are seeing strength in our defense and power businesses, as well as our bio business that Bob talked about earlier. So from a seasonal perspective that’s correct.
Vijay Rakesh:
Got it. And then, obviously there’s also some of the domestic China RF suppliers who seem to be gaining share on the 5G handset side. Can you, is that a challenge or is that factoring into some of the outlook that you see are seeing?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, this is Eric. I’ll take that. Yes, it’s not a significant challenge. If you look into those suppliers, they are gaining some traction. We can say they aren’t, but they’re discrete players and discrete functions which, the market for that is extremely low tier iPhones. And we continue to have the playbook. We have everything in house, every filter switch PA packaging, power management, antenna, tuning, everything you need in one roof. And we put those into very highly value added miniaturized modules, which aid and especially if you look at 5G handsets, I mean, it’s really required that use this type of technology. So yes, some progress in some component areas, but nothing that is particularly meaningful as of now.
Vijay Rakesh:
Thank you. Moving on to Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik:
Hi, thank you for taking my question. I have a question for Eric. Eric on the way up, last year into strong demand, the RF front end attach rates, two apps process, there was a bit of a headwind for you guys because of supply constraints and now on the way down, should we expect you guys to kind of benefit from those kind of another headwinds in the past so attach it or stand [ph] into to apps process or it doesn’t any matter?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, it’s an interesting question. I’m not sure there’s any particular correlation other than to your point when we were constrained, it created opportunities for others that’s a good point. And we’re certainly coming out of that constrained environment. But at the end of the day, it’s about who’s got the best products, right. And it’s product by product and handset by handset, the decisions are being made. We’ve got a very competitive product portfolio, a strong R&D pipeline, incredibly talented team working on these things. And we think we’ve got every reason to believe that the gains and share that we’ve been enjoying, especially in Android we want to continue.
Atif Malik:
Thank you. That’s all I have.
Operator:
We want to thank everyone for their questions and we will conclude the conference at this time. We’ll turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us today. We appreciate your interest and we look forward to seeing you at our upcoming investor events. Thank you and have a good night.
Operator:
That does conclude today’s conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2022 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Sarah. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2022 fourth quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statements contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Grant Brown, Interim CFO; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; Philip Chesley, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. Qorvo delivered fiscal fourth quarter results above the midpoint of our outlook we provided on February 2nd earnings call. Demand drivers were broad-based across end markets, including 5G, IoT connectivity, defense, and power. Both Mobile Products and IDP grew year-over-year and sequentially. In Mobile Products, revenue was diversified across customers and supported by content and integration trends. Of note, Qorvo more than doubled revenue year-over-year at Samsung with growth across multiple product categories. We also expect content gains as the year progresses across on Honor smartphone portfolio with opportunities spanning multiple products and technologies. In IDP, revenue was broad-based across markets and included our newly added high-voltage silicon carbide solutions. We were pleased to see IDP return to year-over-year growth, driven by infrastructure, power management, and other markets. IDP enjoys an increasing number of long-term drivers in growth markets, including automotive connectivity and electrification, defense radar and comms, power management, comms infrastructure, and others. Now, let's look at some of the quarterly highlights. In Mobile Products, we increased shipments to Samsung for mass tier and flagship 5G smartphone programs. Qorvo products included RF Fusion, WiFi 6E FEMs, antenna control solutions, and RF power management ICs. We were recognized by Honor as their only core strategic supplier in the RF category, and we received the first production orders for our next-generation RF Fusion solutions. At multiple China-based smartphone OEMs, we secured design wins covering a range of products, including complete main path and secondary transmit solutions supporting multiple basebands. In ultra-wideband, we were selected by an existing ultra-wideband customer to supply our first system in a package, or SIP, for multiple upcoming smartphone models. Our ultra-wideband SIP strengthens our product portfolio and offers customers a complete solution that integrates our SoC, RF front-end and software. Qorvo's ultra-wideband offerings received a higher percentage of FCC certifications last year than competing solutions, and design activity this year has been robust. In automotive sensors, we received a design win to supply MEMS-based touch sensor solutions for smart interiors at one of the largest US based automotive OEMs. Moving to IDP. In power devices, we continue to see strong design-in activity as silicon carbide technology expands across multiple markets. During the quarter, we received a multimillion dollar order for a new silicon carbide power device solution for circuit protection and EV charging stations. In power management ICs, we achieved another quarter of sequential and year-over-year revenue growth, driven by solid state drives and motor control solutions for power tools. In automotive connectivity, we received our first design win for a highly integrated V2X FEM, enhancing performance and extending range in the short thin application for a leading European based automotive OEM. In infrastructure, the business returned to year-over-year growth and we secure design wins from multiple leading OEMs for massive MIMO small signal applications supporting C-band deployments in the US. In Wi-Fi, we sampled our first wall-based Wi-Fi 6E filter, reducing form factors for CPE tri-band mesh networks. We also began ramping the industry's first enterprise wideband FEM covering both Wi-Fi 6 and 6E for enterprise CPE customers. This new FEM enables configurability in RF chain management, increasing capacity and maximizing throughput. In low-power connectivity markets, we secured design wins for a multi-protocol, low-power wireless SoC, integrating BLE, Zigbee and Thread. These wins enable remote control applications for our leading Korea-based TV OEM and leading US based MSO. In support of the matter connectivity protocol, we expanded customer engagements with retail and service providers to integrate matter into Wi-Fi gateways. Matter is an open and universal smarthome protocol expected to simplify and accelerate the adoption of seamless and reliable wireless connectivity. In both mobile and IDP, Qorvo's markets are supported by multiple long-term secular trends related to connectivity, electrification, sustainability and our increasingly digital lives. The Qorvo team continues to do a fantastic job supporting customers, while adjusting the challenges related to the war in Ukraine, supply constraints and COVID lockdowns in China. While challenges persist, they are temporary in nature and not structural. Qorvo remains laser focused on the opportunities ahead, introducing new technologies, launching best-in-class products, entering new markets and expanding our customer engagements. As an example, take Samsung, where we had previously been underrepresented and where we -- where the combined opportunity extends for years. Of note, our customer diversification in mobile is unmatched and affords Qorvo an expanding set of opportunities as 5G continues to grow. Adding to that, an increasing percentage of Qorvo's revenue exposure is to higher growth end markets. These include IoT connectivity, power management, power conversion, and defense, all of which are forecast to grow long term in the double-digits. So, while we navigate these challenges, our current views suggest June is the bottom with sequential growth in revenue resuming in September. I'm proud of how the team is staying focused, advancing technology and supporting our growth. With that, I'll now turn it over to Grant Brown, who I'm pleased has accepted the role of Interim CFO. Grant has been with Qorvo for many years, most recently as Treasurer. Before that, Grant led our tax and FP&A departments as well as other management roles. He has been a key contributor to Qorvo's growth and he has extensive knowledge of our business. I am confident, Grant, the finance and IT teams will continue to execute on Qorvo's ongoing financial and strategic priorities. And with that, I'm glad to hand it over to Grant.
Grant Brown:
Thanks Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to start by thanking Mark Murphy for his leadership and many contributions to Qorvo. Working alongside Mark and Bob for many years, together with the strength and experience of our finance team, has enabled a smooth transition. Turning to the quarter, Qorvo's revenue for the fourth quarter fiscal 2022 was $1.166 billion, $16 million above the midpoint of our guidance. Mobile Products revenue of $865 million was up both year-over-year and sequentially on 5G content gains and higher flagship volumes. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue of $301 million was up double-digits both year-over-year and sequentially, driven by broad-based strength across the product portfolio and customer base. Non-GAAP gross margin in the March quarter was 52%, in line with our guidance. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the fourth quarter were $229 million, up $15 million sequentially due to seasonal payroll effects and increased spend related to technology infrastructure. Year-over-year operating expenses were up $21 million, primarily related to recently acquired company OpEx, new product investments, and technology infrastructure, partially offset by lower incentive compensation. Non-GAAP operating income in the March quarter was $377 million or 32.3% of sales. Non-GAAP net income in the fourth quarter was $340 million. And diluted earnings per share of $3.12 was $0.18 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the fourth quarter was $346 million. Capital expenditures in the quarter were $51 million and remain concentrated in core areas such as BAW and GaAs, where we see continued demand for solutions that include these differentiated process technology. Free cash flow was $295 million and we repurchased 327 million of shares during the quarter. We continue to repurchase shares based on our long-term outlook, low leverage, and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet. As of the March fiscal year-end, we had approximately $2 billion of debt outstanding and $973 million of cash and equivalents. In our GAAP financials as part of our annual assessment, we recognized a $48 million impairment of acquired goodwill. Regarding inventory, we ended the quarter at $756 million, which is near the higher end of our historical range. The inventory balance will be reduced over time. But while supply and demand and macro factors persist, our inventory is expected to remain elevated. Looking at the full year, Qorvo reported strong results, having achieved record revenue and earnings per share. During fiscal 2022, we reported revenue of $4.6 billion, up 15.7%; gross margin of 52.4%, up 30 basis points; operating margin of 33.4%, up 120 basis points; and earnings per share of $12.35, up 26.8% from the prior year. Qorvo's full year fiscal 2022 performance demonstrates our ability to provide differentiated solutions for our customers' most challenging technology and product needs. As connectivity and electrification trends accelerate and product performance requirements increase, we're expanding our growth opportunities through technology leadership, portfolio management, sustained productivity, reduced capital intensity and broadening market and customer exposure. Now turning to current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1 billion and $1.50 billion, non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 50%, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $2 to $2.25. Forecasted revenue of $1.25 billion at the midpoint, incorporates our current view of the COVID lockdowns in China, the war in Ukraine and existing industry supply chain constraints. We estimate IDP revenues of approximately $300 million, reflecting strong year-over-year growth and in line with our commentary last quarter. Since the COVID lockdowns occurred at the end of March, we are revising our forecast of 5G handsets in 2022 to between $650 million and $675 million, which represents a reduction of 50 million to 75 million units. Given our share in average content, we expect the impact to Qorvo to be approximately $250 million. This revenue impact is expected to occur over this quarter and next as we adjust to demand and responsibly manage inventories. We project non-GAAP operating expenses in the June quarter to be approximately $245 million due to the impact of acquired company OpEx, higher employee related expenditures and investments in product development, including high performance BAW based integrated products. Below the operating line, other expense will be approximately $17 million, and our non-GAAP tax rate in the current quarter is expected to increase to approximately 9.5%, up from 7.7% in fiscal year 2022. Capital expenditures are projected to be approximately flat on a sequential basis as we continue our discipline around capital intensity while expanding BAW and GaAs capacity in support of long-term supply agreements, with multiple customers. As we have discussed on past earnings calls, looking at our business by end market helps to highlight our long-term growth drivers. As a leading supplier of advanced cellular solutions for smartphones, we're positioned for years of content expansion as advancing technology standards drive RF complexity and integration trends. In broader connectivity solutions, we anticipate strong double-digit growth as connected devices increase and use cases proliferate. We have broad exposure across high-growth IoT markets, including industrial automation, connected home, wearables and automotive, where our product portfolio features a unique combination of technologies. Finally, we anticipate double-digit growth in infrastructure, defense, power management and power conversion as 5G deployments increase outside of China, defense budget mix to higher performance electronics and requirements increase for power semis, supporting renewable energy and electrification trends. At this time, please open the line for questions. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Harlan Sur with JPMorgan.
Harlan Sur:
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. On the last call, the team was pretty confident given your pipeline of new customers and content gains in mobile, combined with the sustained strength in IDP that you guys would get back to year-over-year growth in September. And I know the COVID situation in Eastern European conflicts are new dynamics. You guys talked about sequential growth in September with a lower 5G TAM outlook. So, taking all of this into account, do you guys expect to get back to year-over-year growth in the September or December quarters?
Grant Brown:
This is Grant. I'll take that one. Yes. Thanks for the question. Given the temporary issues you mentioned and as we already discussed, we're -- limiting visibility across the industry prevent a precise view of timing. And so given the inventories and the situation in China related to the COVID lockdowns, we're not providing any longer term guidance until the continuing uncertainty around the world clears. Thank you.
Harlan Sur:
Okay. I appreciate that. I guess, along those same lines, I know the forward outlook is a bit cloudy, but you do have some visibility on customer ramps, design wins? And like I said, IDP is sustaining pretty strong strength there. And I think you're anticipating double-digit growth for IDP this year. But do you guys anticipate with the pickup in the second half? Are these driving back the 52% gross margins?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Eric, do you want to talk about and you guys talk about the business and--
Grant Brown:
Then I'll do the gross margin.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, yes. This is Eric. I'll start. Yes, I think we're very confident and pleased with the content gains that we're seeing and we're broadly diversified across all customers adopting our fully integrated portfolio of RF solutions and more and more WiFi content coming in and advanced tuners. So, the portfolio we've put together over the past several years is really maturing nicely. And so when we look at the second half of the calendar year, there's no content gain issues at all. There's content. It's really come down to how many units end up getting sold through, especially at 5G where, of course, the RF content is greater on just resolving all the issues today with getting materials and also getting consumers, especially in China, back to buying phones right now. So, lockdowns are really affecting end market demand. So, -- and of course, that's as we said, pretty hazy and hard to predict the second half. But content-wise, we're very pleased with the design wins we have now.
Philip Chesley:
This is Philip, on the IDP side. IDP is well-positioned in multiple market segments that are growing double-digits. And so if you look at our power management business, which I'll break into kind of two pieces, our programmable power business, we continue to see strong design-in and win and revenue growth for that business. We have a unique digital power architecture that allows us to really add a lot of value in the motor control space, and we see that really driving our business going forward. And then on the united silicon carbide and the silicon carbide technology, we continue to see really strong design-in funnel as well as revenue opportunities in that space. That's one. On the defense side, we see that business not only with short-term tailwinds, we see that with long-term tailwinds as well. And if you look at the continued penetration of phased array radar systems in that segment, when you use phased array radar, you tend to use GaN. That's where we're positioned. So we see growth there. We have our ship program, which is really bringing packaging back to the United States, specifically for RF and defense programs. That's the growth driver for us. So we're positioned well there. And automotive, again, I don't think I have to outline the growth that we see there. So we like where we're at, and we foresee really strong future for the business.
Grant Brown:
That's great. So let me tackle the gross margin piece of the question. We ended the year on a pretty strong note having achieved a 52% gross margin in Q4. Sequentially, June is typically our low point. So the decrease there is very much anticipated as we see a shift to some lower margin mix within mobile. But beyond June, I certainly expect that mix to improve throughout the year, but be tempered somewhat by lower utilization as we balance that customer demand and manage our inventory. Factory utilization will respond accordingly and likely leave some fixed costs unabsorbed. But once the near-term issues aside, there is no change to the long-term dynamics around margins. Certainly, our products are highly differentiated, and our customers value the performance advantages we help them achieve. From a cost perspective, the multiyear productivity gains that we've achieved still remain, and those benefits will be increasingly evident as volumes return.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question will come from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Great. Thanks so much for taking the questions. I had two as well. My first one is on your business in China. I think based on your filings, China was about one-quarter of revenue in the December quarter. Curious how big or how small that region was in the March quarter and what you're assuming for June. And I guess, most importantly, what your thoughts are into the back half as your customer base recovers from these lows. And you've talked about some of the wins at Honor, so if you can kind of speak to that as well, that would be great.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I'll take the first part first. Toshiya, the business in China was down slightly as a percent of sales quarter-over-quarter. So just give you that. I'm not going to quantify it that much. One thing I will tell you is, though is Samsung is getting about as big as China right now at the levels we're at. And as far as things go forward, I mean we're planning on it staying pretty much at historical lows. The last two quarters have been the lowest for us is China as a percent of sales since we formed Qorvo, to be quite candid about the math. So looking forward, we're not expecting a significant bounce back anytime soon. Grant mentioned already, we've got to work through some channel inventories and things like that. Their business has really slowed down, and you know what happens when they're expecting more business, and things like the shutdowns and consumer confidence in China's way down, their export market has also been impacted. Europe is not exactly firing on all cylinders right now as well. So, we've got to work through that. So, as we look forward, we're expecting it to stay low and possibly even lower than what it is now. But as far as the excitement that we have on the growth opportunities at some of those customers, I'll let Eric speak to that, it's just units, not content.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, similar to what I said previously. Great relationships and very long-term roadmaps together, they're helping to drive our roadmap. We're responding to that. And as Bob mentioned earlier as well, great to see Honor coming back as well. They've kind of worked through the inventory that they inherited from Huawei beginning to now move to best-in-class integrated solutions. And we've got great relationships there. We've known those guys for years since they were in Huawei. So, really pleased to be bringing them back their business in the second half of the year. And notably, they'll be the launch RF Fusion. So, they're starting with the best and latest and greatest technology from Qorvo. And so that will definitely be a tailwind in the second half for China.
Toshiya Hari:
Great, that's helpful. And then quickly, as my follow-up, on the inventory side of things, guys noted, inventory was up on your balance sheet on a sequential basis. I think you guys talked about inventory potentially staying elevated for the next couple of quarters. But if you can kind of confirm how we should be thinking about the cadence of any inventory drawdown on your balance sheet going forward, that would be helpful. And then if you can kind of also speak to how you would characterize customer inventory, both smartphone inventory and component inventory that would be helpful. Thanks so much.
Grant Brown:
Sure. Let me take that one. As you pointed out, we ended the quarter with about 118 days' worth of inventory, which is near the high end of our range, around 81 to 125 days historically. So, as we look to work down the balance, we'll do so over time. But as you pointed out, while the supply and demand challenges persist, our inventory is expected to remain elevated. It is important to consider, however, that we understand why it's up and we have visibility into the demand that will consume it. In terms of your question specifically, I might try to answer it by comparing raw material and WIP. As you'll see when we file our K, those will be up, but they're based on our firm orders and supported our largest customers' demand. Certainly beyond that, you'll see increases in our inventory related to supporting our new acquisitions in some growth areas such as power and defense, so healthy growth on the inventory side there. I think Bob touched on already the channel inventories in China, so I won't.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes, I can add a little more color around China channel. Of course, we've got a mix in China of direct customers and channel customers as well. And we're working hard to maintain that channel and healthy levels of inventory as part of why we guide the way we do. But at this point, there's still -- the component inventory is still a bit elevated over historical best-in-class timeframe. Again, we're managing it with the customers and working hard to make sure everything gets consumed and that we don't overbuild of course, supply more into it. And I think handset channel inventory itself in terms of the finished good handset is relatively healthy. It's a little hard to say with these significant near-term changes, of course, and disruptions in the supply chain, but that's really just a China local situation.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Blayne Curtis from Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. Maybe just on IDP, I think, obviously, you saw a nice recovery in March. Just curious on the flat outlook, I think you had previously talked about it kind of continuing to improve. So just a tease through the different segments or any color as to the flat guide in June?
Philip Chesley:
Yeah. So Blaine, this is Philip. So I think, when you look at the flat guidance, I wouldn't take that directionally in terms of the rest of the year. We continue to see strong demand. I think that we still do have some supply challenges in IDP. And some of that is really regulating what we can ship in the Q1 time frame. So I think that's probably the biggest story in terms of that number and that flat quarter-over-quarter guidance.
Blayne Curtis:
Thanks. And then I just wanted to revisit the gross margin, the 200 basis points. Is that more of that maybe some premium products are down and the mix is negative, or are you seeing in terms of new ramps, lower margin on those? And I guess just -- can you just help us a little bit with the recovery through the year? Is it something that will come back to the 52 range fairly quickly, or is this something that's going to have to work throughout the fiscal year?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. So on gross margin throughout the year, we expect it to increase and improve as the mix over the balance of the year. Yields have been very good and -- across the year. And as we look forward, we will have some utilization that will leave some fixed costs unabsorbed in the factories, and so that will weigh against the mix improvement over the course of the year. But certainly, we expect it to trend up.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Joe Moore with Morgan Stanley.
Joe Moore:
Great. Thank you. I wanted to ask in terms of the thinking about the full year for mobile products, and again, I know you're not guiding beyond June, but just to sort of understand the dynamics. Understanding that 5G handsets are lower than you thought, they're still up well north of 100 million units since last year. You've talked about good content gains. Like I would think you would get pretty good growth out of mobile products with that dynamic, assuming handsets are only down slightly. Is there something I'm missing in that in terms of connecting inventory from last year, inventory from this year, as this is very back-end loaded? Just again, I'm not looking for guidance. I'm just trying to understand what the drivers are of the full year and making sure I understand them. Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, I think you're really right on the money. We've got all the right underlying business factors, right, great content, growing content, 5G will be growing year-over-year to your point, it really does just come down to managing the inventory levels. So we've said it's a bit elevated right now. So that's what we have to work down. But otherwise, no other particular headwinds.
Joe Moore:
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks. Eric, it sounds like most of your problems in China primarily, if not exclusively, demand-driven, right, versus lack of supply? And if not, how would you split those up between the two? And Philip was defense your largest segment again this period? And then I have a follow-up. Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. So starting out in China, first of all, I agree all of our issues are in China. And in China, it's -- right now, it's hard to separate demand from supply, right? Frankly, because our internal supply is in pretty good shape and set customers have other supply issues here and there. But with the lockdown, their ability to produce just getting people to their factories, getting supply chain moved throughout the country as various cities are going in and out of lockdown, many people have printed this. I mean it's a challenging environment and getting the supply chain to work smoothly is really challenging right now. So, that becomes a demand problem for us only because our customers can't keep their factory running in some case. But then on the other end of that is they do produce phones. A lot of consumers are being very, very cautious right now in China. I mean it's a challenging environment for folks as large cities are being completely shut down for weeks at a time. And it's not an environment where consumers are feeling frothy by any means and buying the latest and greatest 5G handsets. So, it's a that we're in right now as we set us on a structural change. It's a period in time and we have to get through it and get to the other side.
Philip Chesley:
Ed, this is Philip. So, we don't disclose individual segments, but I will say that defense came in very, very strong, healthy and it has a very healthy backlog to it. But it's not the only business. We see a strong backlog, as I mentioned in our power management business. We see strong backlog in our WiFi business, automotive. It's pretty much most segments, we see strong growth. And so I think as we look forward, it will be a fun battle between which ends up being the biggest segment over this coming year.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And as a follow-up, if I could, Eric, to you. Samsung is growing nicely. It sounds like it's all playing out their reorganization of the handset business and then move to modules. Can you provide us any kind of color on what they were as a percentage of revenue? And is most of the gain that you're seeing now going to be in the -- from the flagship line, or can we expect that the mast is now really kicking in or getting a much bigger contribution from that. And then Grant, nice talk to you again, bud. A couple of questions. Sounds like you have a mutual problem of utilization. Doesn't this ICE Farmers Branch for now? I mean if you're going to be dealing with utilization through the rest of the year, what are your plans for Farmers Branch regard to bringing that on for BAW. I imagine mostly it's a BAW still factory. So, if you can provide some color on that. I appreciate it. Thanks.
Grant Brown:
Well, Ed, three questions, I think if I understood them all, but I think Eric will go first right.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, you laid it out well in your question, Ed. Samsung is going very well for us. And part of it is their realignment of their product portfolio and their technology strategy lining beautifully with our roadmap. We've had, as you know, very good long-term relationships there. So, the pump was primed, and we're really excited to ramp across our full integrated module portfolio as well as power management, tuners, and so forth. So -- but it's not just in the flagship tier. In fact, I mentioned last quarter that we're beginning more in the mass tier, and then we'll be adding throughout the year, new models will be ramping in. So just the beginning. It's a very strong first couple of quarters here of the new business ramp with Samsung, but it's all coming in line with what we had hoped it would for the year.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Ed, in your question on size of Samsung, we did have two 10% customers. You also read indicate that we had two for the year, and I think you'll see who it was. I think you've got a good feel for our business, Ed. So, I'll let Grant talk to you about Farmers Branch.
Grant Brown:
Sure. Thanks. And on Farmers Branch, we don't have any or anticipate bringing Farmers Branch on line, but it really depends on a number of those global issues we already discussed and how those play out. It's a multifaceted decision, as I'm sure you understand, and not entirely volume-based, right? It's a function of die shrinks, yields and efficiently using, Richardson.
Operator:
And our next question will come from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri:
You just spoke to what's going to be in the K customer-wise, I wonder if you can give us for the fiscal year, what's your largest customer was as a portion of revenue?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah, it will be in the K. It will be in the K.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. Okay. And then I guess, I wanted to go back to a question about September. I know you don't have a lot of visibility. But would you agree that normal seasonal for mobile products is up about 20%? And I guess within that, maybe can you talk about what the puts and takes are around that if things do open back up in China? I mean, I would think that, that would be a tailwind to a normal seasonal 20% just given how depressed tune is. Can you just talk about that relative to what the normal seasonal is?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. I don't -- frankly, I'm not sure there is such a thing as normal seasonality anymore, honestly. I mean, we don't have the repeatable ramp patterns that we used to have. And we have so many -- such a diversified customer base and seeing people move in integrated modules, but timing of large product ramps that can impact it significantly. We have some products that are built in subassemblies that they can go on to main boards, which affects the timing ahead of the ramp. There's just too many variables. So I can't really comment on what normal seasonality in September means anymore.
Operator:
And we'll now take a question from Matt Ramsay with Cowen.
Matt Ramsay:
Thank you very much. Good afternoon and thanks for taking my question. I had a follow-up question on Samsung. It sounds like the Galaxy 22 going forward, there may be a fairly significant shift from the in-house baseband toward San Diego. And I wonder -- it was interesting to juxtapose that against the commentary that you guys made. My understanding, at least from the San Diego crew is that they're pulling a decent amount of RF attach with that new share that they're getting. Maybe you could address your relative position in content on the internal baseband platform and the one at Qualcomm going forward in the Galaxy S22 given the change there? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. We can't comment on Samsung's strategy for basebands, obviously. I can comment on our content, and we have content across all tiers and all basebands that ship into Samsung. So, of course, it varies model to model. But with such a broad portfolio we have from power management through antenna tuning and all the RF bands of coverage, there's content on every single baseband platform that they should.
Matt Ramsay:
Got it. No. Thanks. I appreciate the sensitivity there. As my follow-up, I was interested to hear, I guess, more expanded commentary in the script about some of the different IoT protocols around Zigbee, Thread matter. And I wonder, like -- could you give us a little bit of flavor? I mean, we all follow what's going on in 5G because of the big numbers per unit, but what the sort of RF content and the connectivity content trends are in that IoT market just from a content per unit. It's a very diverse space, but just trying to understand the TAM growth there and the content per unit growth at some of these new protocols rollout? Thank you very much.
Philip Chesley:
Maybe Eric and I -- this is Philip -- will may be attacking this a little bit. But we think matter is important. We think that this is kind of the standard that's going to help kind of drive interoperability across different IoT segments in the home. We see that content and the connectivity piece of that growing nicely for us. We see both -- we see that both on the WiFi side, but also on the Bluetooth, the Zigbee and the Thread side. And we're seeing actually more and more where you need kind of both in each of these applications. So, we're pretty bullish on that segment over time. We think that's going to grow nicely. And so I don't know if that answers your question, but maybe Eric, you want to add?
Eric Creviston:
Yes. Yes. Looking at it from our perspective with ultra-wideband coming in as well, it's a key enabler to a lot of these IoT ecosystems. And when you look they are actually getting quite meaningful. Several of these verticals, whether it's access points either in the enterprise or in the home, as well as kind of wearable applications, which affect your interface with the IoT wearables for the audio and then also just all the compute platforms, and each of these can be hundreds of millions of units. So, when you put them together, you're looking at a market that's quickly approaching mobile in terms of scale. And we think ultra-wideband is going to be a key enabler for various reasons. I mean the precise location will add all kinds of feature sets to a lot of these ecosystems and the way they interact with each other. But also, it's a very low-latency high data rate connection, and that's got a lot of applications in smart home. You want to reduce latency for gaming applications, for example, or audio applications. So, I think across all of Qorvo, we've got a lot of pieces of the puzzle coming together in what is emerging as a very large market.
Operator:
And we will take our next question from Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.
Christopher Rolland:
Hey guys. Thanks for the question. Some of our contacts in Asia have talked about Chinese handsets, maybe de-specing their 5G phones kind of eliminating some of the sub-6 RF, making them a little bit more simpler, almost like 4G plus, I was wondering if you guys had seen this in any segments, this change in any segments, maybe even mid and low and in China and whether there are any effects for you guys?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, I don't think that, that's a trend. To the extent something like that has happened, it would have been a reaction probably to the shortages that we were experiencing in supply last year. I mean we were -- as we've talked about last year, we were having a hard time to keep up with demand. And so we had some of our customers go to kind of fall back to skinny-down architectures, discrete architectures, and things because that's what they could get. I don't think that's a trend by any means.
Christopher Rolland:
Great. And then also, you guys had great free cash flow in the quarter. I was just wondering how you guys are seeing M&A right now with kind of the market sell-off here? Are there any kind of fat pitches here, so to speak, or conversely, just remind us on kind of your cash return strategy?
Bob Bruggeworth:
From an M&A perspective, I think we pointed this out before and demonstrated it. In IDP, we look for tuck-in acquisitions. And the latest one we did was United Silicon Carbide where we thought we were better owner, help them scale and grow that business. And we'll continue to look at opportunities like that that are out there. And in mobile, for the most part, we've acquired technologies, whether it was the RF, MEMS in Cavendish or you look at what we're doing with ultra-wideband. It's a great new technology that we thought we were a better owner could scale that. So from an M&A perspective, I don't see any changes on the horizon. And when we see good opportunities that we think we're a better owner and we can drive good cash flows off of the assets that we acquire, that's what we're going to look to do. I'll let Grant talk a little bit about other uses of cash.
Grant Brown:
Yeah. Thanks, Bob. So generally, the approach to capital allocation is something of an ongoing exercise and balancing the needs of the business, i.e., working capital, et cetera. And then we looked at internal growth, so CapEx, R&D, then external growth, M&A, as Bob touched on, and then finally, some return of capital, which we do in the form of repurchase. So acquisitions are a bit opportunistic exercise and have to be evaluated case by case, but generally looking for a good fit, strategy and culture.
Operator:
And our next question will come from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik:
Hi, thank you for taking my question, and welcome, Grant. Grant, I have two questions for you. You talked about $250 million revenue impact from lower 5G smartphone units from COVID lockdowns spreading over June and September quarter. And I was curious if you could further elaborate how much of that impact is in June versus September. And the reason I asked that question is because your peer yesterday was baking in most of the impact only in the June quarter. And then I have a follow-up.
Grant Brown:
Yeah, sure. So I think Eric touched on the fact we can't separate supply and demand impacts. But as you pointed out, in aggregate, we're looking at $250 million. And I'd also point out that's after the COVID related lockdown, so you're right to cite it in June and September. It's probably heavier in September than in June and primarily affecting our China based OEMs.
Atif Malik:
Great. And then as a follow-up, it sounds like you and Mark were very much aligned on key initiatives like gross margin expansion at Qorvo. Are there other areas that you think Qorvo can improve upon?
Grant Brown:
Yeah. I'd say Mark and I are very much aligned on gross margin. I would say in terms of what drives the business, ultimately, it will be free cash flow. So looking at our capital intensity, continuing to drive that. I'd say productivity enhancements, whether it's in COGS or OpEx, is another area where we see very much eye to eye. And certainly, the predictability and control of our internal finance operation and forecasting going forward are areas where, in addition to many others, but at least those are top of mind.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Raj Gill with Needham & Company.
Raj Gill:
Yeah. Thank you for taking the question. Just a follow-up from Atif's question on the $250 million impact over those two quarters. So even despite that reduction in revenue related to the decrease in 5G smartphones, you still are expecting sequential improvement off that trough base in June. Is that correct?
Grant Brown:
Yeah. Our current view is that we expect to return to growth in September over June, but we're not providing anything beyond the detail I already talked about in the 5G.
Raj Gill:
Right. Right. What's driving the sequential improvement if you're seeing kind of a fairly big drop-off in terms of your mobile revenue related to the reduction in because that's where a lot of your RF content exists?
Eric Creviston:
I think it comes down to -- we talk to all of our customers. We get a combined view from our customers what products they're planning to ramp and of course, when we're looking at our total revenue, we're looking across all of our customers, not just our China customer base and looking at timing of handset ramps and where we expect the impacts to be and how we expect them to kind of deteriorate and be less meaningful in certain ramps than others. I mean we put that together and that's the outlook. So--
Raj Gill:
Got it. I appreciate it. And just one quick follow-up on IDP. You mentioned that you're seeing some growth in the infrastructure business. So I was wondering if you could kind of elaborate there in terms of development interaction on the GaN base stations. Thank you.
Philip Chesley:
Yes. So, we continue to see the C-band deployments in the US and in Europe, really most places outside of China. I think China is still a bit of a wildcard. They're continue to be really more focused on the macro side right now. But with the infrastructure spending that we expect to happen in China this year, we'll see what happens in that market. For us, we have a strong footprint really in the small signal and a growing footprint in our GaN PA business. But I think really what's exciting about that business for us is that when you combine those two and you add the module capability that we have in station market where we can integrate all this technology into kind of a small form factor, higher performance solution, that's really the end game of where we're going with this business. So, we like where we are today. And obviously, a lot of work to do. We can't really control the C-band deployment piece of it, but we're working hard with our customers to deliver the innovative solutions to them.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh:
Yes, hi. Just -- a lot of the questions have been answered, but just a last couple here. Are you seeing any elongating replacement cycles on 5G in China? And also, as you look at this inventory kind of picking up in the March quarter, and I think I'm not sure if it stays flat into June or it goes up, but any risk of a write-off on the inventory side at all? And that's it. Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Starting with the China replacement cycle, it's a little hard to say. I'm not sure if you're referring to 5G over 5G or -- 5G replacing 4G?
Vijay Rakesh:
Yes, 5G handsets.
Eric Creviston:
So, replacing a 5G with a -- yes. So, like somebody buying their second 5G and if that's longer than it would have been in 4G, or is that what you're referring to?
Vijay Rakesh:
Yes. Yes.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, I think that's really hard to sort out at this time. There's no reason to believe the cycle will be any different. If anything, pace of innovation, new applications need for faster data rates and better coverage and so forth and new ID factors and all that. If anything, I would expect that it would be at least is short or shorter. I think it's too soon, especially with all these other disruptions we've talked about to try to nail that down.
Grant Brown:
Yes. And I'll take the inventory one. If there was any excess or obsolete inventory at quarter end, we would have written it off during our standard quarterly review. We monitor it closely and follow a very robust process. So currently, our view of forecasted demand supports the consumption of existing inventory.
Vijay Rakesh:
Great. Thank you.
Grant Brown:
Thanks Vijay.
Operator:
Our final question will come from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks. Sorry for the follow-up real quick, though. Eric, I just wanted to drill down a little bit more on Samsung because that's your big growth engine this year sounds like overall. And I know there was a bunch of questions the last one, so I'll try to keep it to one. In terms of growth, are you seeing most of your gains this quarter, next quarter and maybe through the rest of this year, in the flagship, as it moves to module -- I'm sorry, in the mass tier as it moves to modules, or is it equally distributed between flagship and the mass tier?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. So I personally don't look at that split, so I can't answer it analytically. It's -- we've got a portfolio of products selling into a portfolio of phones. I think just based on the numbers and the scale of it, I would have to say mass tier is probably driving the growth. But, of course, the opportunities in flagship are very attractive as well. Just obviously, the volume numbers are lower in that tier. But I think across all those tiers, we have everything we mentioned, we've got power management, we had advanced tuning coming in as well as band coverage and highly integrated modules across every band. So I think -- well, Wi-Fi, too. I should have mentioned Wi-Fi. It's another great growth area for us now across all of their Wi-Fi baseband suppliers. So it really is broad-based.
Edward Snyder:
I mean based on that answer then, it sounds like for the first time in memory, they're using the same -- generally the same components for both mass tier and flagship where previously the flagship is all custom. Is that a fair assessment?
Eric Creviston:
In some cases, sure, yeah. I think that yeah, the difference between a flagship and mass tier will be less than it has been in the past. That's true.
Edward Snyder:
Great. Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks Ed.
Grant Brown:
Thanks Ed.
Operator:
And that does conclude today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn things back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We thank you for joining us today. We appreciate you interest and we look forward to seeing you at our upcoming investor events. Thank you, and have a good night.
Operator:
And that does conclude today's conference call. Once again, thanks, everyone, for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q3 2022 Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Cody. Hello, everybody and welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2022 third quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Philip Chesley, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I will turn it over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug and welcome everyone, to our call. Qorvo delivered fiscal third quarter results above the midpoint of the outlook we provided November 3 on our earnings call. Demand during the quarter was broad-based across markets, included multiple new product categories, including 5G transmit diversity, ultra-wideband Wi-Fi 6E and 7 power management and other power solutions. In Mobile Products, Qorvo game content in flagship and mass market 5G devices. The fundamental challenges and increased complexity lifting 5G content are being driven by network efficiency and carrying requirements for the device architectures. In addition to new 5G bands, requirements are increasing for carrier aggregation, band combinations in both the transmit and receive to maximize bandwidth to and from the device. These are long-term trends impacting 5G devices independent of tier. In addition, new industrial designs like foldable phones are increasing RF challenges demanding more advanced antenna management systems. Lastly, because Qorvo’s smartphone portfolio includes cellular RF, ATP mix, Wi-Fi in emerging categories like ultra wideband and MEMS based sensors, Qorvo can participate broadly across OEMs, product tiers and chipset providers. Qorvo offers a broad portfolio of key enabling technologies and Qorvo stands to benefit as connectivity continues to proliferate. More critically, Qorvo is leveraging the same competencies that placed us at the forefront of connectivity to grow in new markets. In IDP, revenue increased sequentially and growth was broad-based across markets. The integration of United Silicon Carbide is proceeding well and enhancing our opportunities in higher voltage applications that demand maximum power efficiency. These include EVs, charging stations and renewable energy systems. Now, let’s look at some of the quarterly highlights, starting with mobile. For a Korean-based smartphone OEM, we ramp shipments in support of flagship and mass market smartphone launches. We expanded customer sampling of highly integrated main path solutions as well as secondary transmit solutions, which increased content as these architectures are adopted more broadly. In ultra-wideband, we achieved an important strategic milestone, supplying our first complete ultra-wideband solution in an Android smartphone. This speaks to the strength of our core technology and highlights the opportunity across the Android ecosystem. For industrial and enterprise applications, we introduced a fully integrated module combining our ultra-wideband chipset with Nordics BLE solution to address a wide range of industrial and enterprise applications. In Wi-Fi, design activity continues to be robust. For mobile applications, we have secured new Wi-Fi 7 chip-on-board reference design engagement and began customer sampling of Wi-Fi 7 FEMs, offering superior performance and design flexibility. For home and enterprise applications, we ran Wi-Fi 6E FEMs for mesh networks and released 5 gigahertz iFEMs with BAW filtering for tri-band applications. In cellular infrastructure, Qorvo was selected by a base station OEM to supply 3.4 to 3.8 gigahertz 8 watt GaN power amplifier modules for massive MIMO 5G deployments in Europe. We see infrastructure market strengthening in 2022 worldwide, with significant growth in the rest of the world, excluding China. In automotive, Qorvo was selected to provide cellular V2X connectivity for a leading Europe-based automotive OEM. In power, we secured design wins to supply silicon carbine for onboard chargers and DC-to-DC converters in support of leading automotive OEMs in Europe and in Asia. Sales of PMICs for video processors and solid-state drives were strong as were sales of motor control solutions for battery-powered tools. To expand our power franchise, we are combining our power management and silicon carbide technologies to deliver superior levels of power efficiency and high-power applications. Our first products are for the defense industry and we are broadening the portfolio to serve additional markets, including infrastructure and automotive. In bio, we were awarded a $4.1 million follow-on contract with the NIH RADx initiative supporting a COVID flu combo assay and a COVID antigen pooling application. We also signed a channel partnership agreement for distribution in the U.S. and submitted a clear waiver application to the FDA to expand deployment in point of care settings. In both mobile and IDP, Qorvo is capturing diverse opportunities supported by multiyear secular growth drivers in 5G, IoT connectivity, defense and power. We are operating well and expanding the markets we serve while investing to sustain product and technology leadership across our portfolio. And with that, I will hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob and good afternoon everyone. Qorvo’s revenue for the fiscal year 2022 third quarter was $1.114 billion, $9 million above the midpoint of our guidance. Mobile Products revenue of $848 million was stronger than expected on higher flagship volumes. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue was $266 million, with infrastructure and programmable power management up sequentially and year-over-year. Non-GAAP gross margin in the December quarter was 52.6%, 35 basis points above the midpoint of our guidance on better than expected mix and yields. This was the company’s fifth consecutive quarter above 52%. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the third quarter were $214 million, down $8 million sequentially on lower incentive compensation and timing of development programs. Year-over-year OpEx was up over – was up $20 million on new product and technology investments, including recently acquired company OpEx partially offset by lower incentive comp. Non-GAAP operating income in the December quarter was $372 million and 33.4% of sales. Non-GAAP net income in the third quarter was $330 million and diluted earnings per share of $2.98 was $0.23 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the third quarter was at $117 million, reflecting payments associated with the long-term supply agreement discussed on last quarter’s call. As mentioned then, we believe supply agreements allow us to advance our differentiated technology position and simplify our long-term planning. Qorvo is building longer term and more collaborative partnerships to provide our customers supply assurance and to address their product and technology needs. Capital expenditures in the December quarter were $50 million and remain concentrated in core areas such as BAW and GaAs, where we enjoyed a differentiated position and see continued growth. Free cash flow was $67 million and we repurchased $302 million of shares during the quarter. We continue to repurchase shares based on our long-term outlook, low leverage, and other factors. Turning to the balance sheet, in December, Qorvo issued its first investment grade note. The proceeds from this $500 million 3-year note were used in part to retire our $195 million term loan. As of the December quarter end, we had $2 billion of debt and $1 billion of cash. Our net debt to EBITDA increased to over 0.5 turn. Now, turning to our current quarter outlook, we expect revenue between $1.135 billion and $1.165 billion, non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 52%, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.94 at the midpoint of guidance. Our March quarter revenue outlook reflects an improving supply situation, high-volume smartphone launches and stronger IDP volumes. Forecasted revenue of $1.150 billion at the midpoint is up 3% sequentially and 7% year-over-year. We expect mobile to be flat sequentially and up around 5% year-over-year on flagship and mass tier phone launches and content gains and a more stable supply demand situation. We project IDP to return to year-over-year growth in the March quarter, with broad-based demand supporting revenues over $300 million. Our March quarter gross margin guide of approximately 52% results in full year fiscal ‘22 outlook about 30 basis points higher than last fiscal year. We project non-GAAP operating expenses to increase in the March quarter to approximately $232 million due to increased investment in core technologies and new capabilities as well as early calendar year payroll effects. For the full fiscal year, our OpEx is projected to be just over 19% of sales, down from close to 20% of sales last fiscal year. Below the operating income line, other expenses will increase to approximately $17 million on the additional net debt. We project our non-GAAP tax rate in the current quarter to be approximately 7.5% and the full year rate to be 8.2%. Capital expenditures are projected to be around $55 million in the March quarter as we manage spend to intersect demand and support long-term supply agreements with multiple customers. We are still supply constrained in some areas and forecast to remain so beyond our fiscal year end. We continue to expand BAW and GaAs capacity along with some assembly and test to support growth. In summary, our results exceeded the midpoint of our December quarter guide. Our March quarter guide is consistent with our previous comments, including sequential growth in the March quarter. At the midpoint of our current quarter guide, for fiscal year ‘22, we expect revenue growth over 15% and operating margin over 33%. We project our full fiscal year EPS to be approximately $12.18, up 25% year-over-year. Looking beyond this fiscal year, Qorvo is well-positioned to serve secular growth trends in connectivity and power and to deliver growth in earnings and free cash flow. As mentioned last quarter, looking at the business by end market highlights Qorvo’s growth potential over the next several years. We expect solid growth on our advanced cellular products for smartphones as 5G mix grows, RF complexity increases and content expands. On broader connectivity solutions, we expect strong double-digit growth as connected devices increase and use cases proliferate. And finally, we expect infrastructure, defense and power markets to support double-digit growth as 5G build-outs picked up outside of China, defense spend mixes to higher performance electronics, and requirements increase for power semis to support electrification trends. Now Cody, would you please open the line for questions?
Operator:
Absolutely. Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will take our first question from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi, guys. Good afternoon and thank you so much for taking the question. I guess my first question is on the supply front. Mark, I think you mentioned that supply constraints eased a little bit, but you also noted that you expect supply constraints to kind of stay around beyond the current quarter. Can you kind of elaborate on what you saw in the quarter and what’s embedded in guidance going forward? I think last quarter, you talked about gallium arsenide capacity constraints, which are internal to Qorvo and then also match that issues on the part of your customers, but if you can kind of describe what you are seeing from a supply perspective that would be helpful?
Mark Murphy:
Sure. I will start and others can add. Yes, during last quarter’s call, Toshiya, we are in the midst of the most disruptive supply chain effects in the past 2 years. And these effects impacted and added further complexity to the demand picture. We provide the best view we could and we have seen it play out largely as expected. To your specific question on supply chain effects, they did moderate in the quarter and we expect the supply environment to continue to improve through this quarter and the calendar year. So, specifically on businesses, we are still seeing some chipset shortages in Wi-Fi, which impacted that business. In the defense supply chain, there is still some disruption COVID-related and then there is other pockets here and there, but Toshiya, it did improve as we expected. And even though we expect some continued supply disruptions in the March quarter, we expect it to be less than the December quarter.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Toshiya, this is Bob. The only thing I’ll add is we have made significant progress in bringing on our capacity in our gallium arsenide and we are in pretty good shape there. We have made good progress there. In our IDP business, some of the silicon supply in our connectivity business there, along with some of our power management systems business there, we still see tightness there. So that’s been impacting us. But as Mark pointed out, we do expect things to improve through the quarter and throughout the year.
Toshiya Hari:
Yes, that’s great. Thank you so much for the context. And then as my follow-up, for the March quarter, I think the guidance you provided for both mobile and IDP is pretty consistent with what you had guided to 3 months ago. I am guessing though, the mix, particularly within mobile may have changed, may have evolved over the past 3 months. Can you speak to what you are seeing in sort of the respective regions in mobile, in the U.S. and Korea and broader China? How you see those regions playing out? And as a quick follow-up to that, any sort of guidance on fiscal ‘23, I know it’s early, Mark, but any revenue looks or gross margin guidance on fiscal ‘23 would be super helpful as well? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Yes, Toshiya, this is Eric. I will start with the mix in mobile. No particular meaningful changes we expected when we had our earnings call last quarter that we would see strength in Korea due to a lot of new design wins on ramping platforms across mass tiering and flagship as well. And those are playing out very consistent with our expectations. We did see a bit of mix shift within our China customer base. It’s clearly looking back into the December sell-out data in the channel. There was some mix shift between them. So far, we are early in this quarter, but it’s beginning to moderate back to normal. So really not any significant changes versus what we expected.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. And Toshiya, on the outlook beyond this fiscal year, we will plan to provide more on our fiscal ‘23 and the rest of calendar ‘22 on our next earnings call. What we can say is based on what we guided, we know this March ‘22 quarter is stronger than typical and that’s based on the timing of phone launches, content gains and the profile of IDP demand.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Karl Ackerman with Cowen.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes, thank you. Good afternoon. Two questions, if I may. First, a clarification. May you comment on the overall revenue contribution, your largest customer contributed to in the quarter? And I have a follow-up.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Karl, as you know, we don’t report quarterly what we do with our largest customer, you’ll find that when we report the K at the end of the year, we will clearly give you what our largest customer was.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes. I try my luck. I appreciate that.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Karl, we are consistent though.
Karl Ackerman:
That is true. Hey, on the guide, one of the concerns from investors is that capacity constraints may limit the adoption of 5G handsets this year. While you have less control over the number of 5G phones being sold, I was hoping you could discuss the content opportunities you see collectively from UWB wins, design engagements across Android midrange as well as what sounds like share gains in Wi-Fi for flagship devices. So if you could just discuss that that would be helpful. Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. So I guess the first part of it regarding chipset constraints affecting the amount of 5G, I think to the extent that there are chipset constraints in the modem side of the business, I would assume those suppliers are going to prioritize 5G and latest technologies. So we doubt that’s going to be a major factor. When we look at, for example, our China customer base, they are still well under half their shipments are 5G. So they have got a lot of 4G shipments, especially in the export market, that will be more impacted probably than the 5G, I think. So yes, looking forward, we’re really pleased with the 606 launch and a lot of content that we talked about last quarter beginning across integrated modules and tenant control, but also, of course, UWB. It’s a great foothold for us gets our software stack proven, and that makes it a lot easier to go across the rest of the Android ecosystem. And we are already talking about wins in the consumer home devices for UWB, Xiaomi, for example, with their connected home products. And we’re beginning to put the whole Android space together for UWB. So that’s great. And then in addition to that, the integrated modules generally, power management, we definitely see both APT, average power trucking and ETIC power management systems, getting a lot of traction from Qorvo. And then lastly, of course, our antenna control solutions continue to be strong, transitioning to NIM based – NIMs based as we exit the next fiscal year. So, a lot of – yes, a lot of potential areas for strength throughout the year.
Karl Ackerman:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We will hear next from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks for taking my questions. On the first one, just to clarify, I thought Mark, you said that March is stronger than typical. So what does that say about June versus seasonal trends?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Vivek, it’s a good question. And as I answered the earlier question, we’re going to refrain from talking about next fiscal year in any sort of detail until we finish this fiscal year. I think it’s just in this environment, it’s too early to call the June quarter. It really depends on volumes and some of the supply situation that we’ve discussed earlier. And as you point out, given the strength of March, we may see a sequential decline in June. But again, it’s too early to call. And in any case, we would expect a return to year-over-year growth in September if that were to happen. So that’s all I’ll say at this point.
Vivek Arya:
And the follow-up to that, just a clarification on inventory if my model is right, it is up to, I think, over 114 days or so. I imagine the supply chain is tight everywhere, but what’s happening with your balance sheet inventory? And how should we think about your – the direction of that inventory, what that implies for utilization and its impact on gross margins over the next several quarters?
Mark Murphy:
Sure, Vivek. And you’re right on. It’s about 115 days. So as you point out, we ended the quarter at over $700 million of inventory. I think the first thing I would say is this was in line with our forecast. And when viewed historically, it’s high, but it’s within the range of experience that we’ve had. Having said that, given our focus on cash flow and capital returns and risk management, it’s certainly higher than we want it to be and higher than it’s run over the past 1.5 years or so, we have clear line of sight in bringing it down. It’s elevated for a number of reasons, including build heads for ramps that you’re seeing now and sustained volumes and flagship and also content gains in flagship and mass tier and the increases in IDP and there are other demand factors such as supply/demand alignment in China as some share shifts there. But we’re working through those. We understand why it’s up. We forecasted it. We have a plan that rolls off over the next few quarters, and we expect more normal turns as we move through the year.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Hi, thanks for taking my question. I’m going to try again on June a little bit. I expect you don’t want to give a number out. I guess Qualcomm just guided it down in June is talking about just down. Maybe you could just talk about, you have a lot more higher exposure to Android market. So maybe without giving us an actual amount, can you maybe just talk about that Android market? Obviously, there is some new ramps in terms of new modems from some vendors that you should do well with. You’re clearly growing in March. It may not be the same iOS story that others are indicating. I just kind of try to – if you could walk us through the kind of moving pieces for June, that would be helpful?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Eric, do you want to take it? Because I mean we have two parts to our business plan. We have our IDP business and our mobile. So I think we will let Eric talk a little bit about the mobile side.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. I think to your point, Blayne, the Android ecosystem is pretty exciting right now. and growing, especially growing exports. It’s not just a China story by any means. And high-end products from Google, for example and in Samsung, obviously, we believe it’s going to be a very good story for us this year. And our alignment there will start out – you’re beginning to see the phones come to market. You’ll see a portion of the content, I think throughout the year, we will continue to grow content as more devices move out from them. So that will be a good story for us this year. And we mentioned Wi-Fi earlier as well. Wi-Fi across the Android ecosystem has really opened up for us since you had a 6, 6E and 7, it’s getting harder, the filtering is definitely getting harder, and they are implementing it with chip-on-board front-end solutions instead of fully integrated modules. So that’s a very good trend for us. And we’re seeing broad traction across Android with very complex Wi-Fi front-end modules now. So all of that goes to what we think is going to be a good year for us in content growth in Android.
Blayne Curtis:
Okay. I guess my follow-up, I did want to ask about the growth you’re forecasting in IDP for March. I think the connectivity part of IDP has been kind of flat to down. So I know supply has been a big issue. Can you talk about the drivers for that double-digit sequential growth for IDP for March?
Philip Chesley:
Blayne, this is Philip. Yes, so we are seeing really strong demand in most of our end markets. If you look at the cellular infrastructure side of the business, what you see is really the deployments moving into the U.S. and into Europe. We are strongly positioned in those segments. And so we’re seeing some of those tailwinds. When you look at our defense business, defense and aerospace business, again, we continue to see big programs coming in that we’re positioned well on. And so we are excited about what that business looks like going forward. And then on power, we continue to see a lot of strength both on the programmable power management side of the business, but also on the United Silicon Carbide side of the business. And we kind of lumped those two together. We feel that we have a real strong advantage both from a technology and product side of the United Silicon Carbide side, but also as we put the silicon side of power and create system-level solutions for our customers, we see a lot of opportunities for SAM expansion in that market as well. So we feel we’re positioned well and we like where we are right now.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Blayne, I would just add that as Philip said, the growth is broad-based and virtually every business line in IDP is up sequentially and year-over-year. The exception is Wi-Fi. And that’s related to some of the chipset issues we talked about earlier. But we expect that business to pick up in FY ‘23.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to go back to the next question and a double-click on the inventory topic. Are the days of inventory up primarily because of you anticipating some good growth in fiscal year ‘23? Or is it up in relationship to some of your long-term supply agreements? And maybe you can give us a little more detail on how you plan to roll off that inventory.
Mark Murphy:
Sure, Gary. It’s not related to the supply agreements. It’s a combination of one, to support the growth that’s in front of us. And we’ve talked about the flagship in last year and the success we’ve had there and the strong – the atypical growth profile you see here in March. So they are absolutely demand factors. There is a demand realignment in China. And we’ve all seen that. We feel great about our position in China. And over time, on the other side of that alignment, we’re in a great position, and we’ve got agreements in place that will support the demand and working down that inventory. So we’ve got a good plan. We’ve got the guidance I’ve given before on our target 52% gross margin, that is still something we adhere to, and we’re working to expand off that. And then we will provide you more guidance in the next earnings call.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. As my follow-up, I wanted to ask about some of the emerging revenue opportunities. Perhaps on the silicon carbide side, can you give us a sense of where you may be on annualized revenue run rate as we perhaps exit fiscal year ‘22? And then on ultra-wideband, is there an opportunity here in the automotive end market? I know that hasn’t necessarily been a big end market for you, but should we think about EWB as being primarily smartphone-centric for Qorvo?
Philip Chesley:
So yes, this is Philip. So yes, so Gary, I’ll take that. So in terms of United Silicon Carbide, I don’t think we are giving out specific kind of revenue numbers on that business. But I can tell you that the number of opportunities that we see coming in to our sales funnel is impressive. And we feel like we have a real significant opportunity there. When you think about the world as we electrify as we go towards more carbon-neutral systems, energy efficiency is one of the key factors that’s driving that, right? And with that drives this power need to look at compound semi type solutions. And really, that’s in our wheelhouse at Qorvo, right? That’s what we do. And so we feel really good about that business and the opportunities continue to scale. On UWB, I’m going to pass that over maybe to Eric.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. Sure. When we did the acquisition of Decawave, I know one of the key markets we talked about was automotive, and that certainly hasn’t changed. There is no question that next-generation key files will be EWB based and that will grow throughout the years, up to 7 UWB points in each car plus one in each key file. So it’s going to be a great market. In terms of units, of course, it’s a couple of hundred million a year sort of automotive units. So for us, anchoring in the handset is super exciting. When you look at the 1 billion to 1.5 billion handsets available and anywhere from three to five accessories for each one before we even start talking about connected home things. So it’s going to take some time for a new technology like this to roll out. There is a lot of activity in the standards bodies. Now everybody is on board. It’s clearly happening. So that’s a broad area. We also – we mentioned one of our strategic highlights was around a module combining our UWB with the Nordic BLE and targeting a completely different segment, which is sort of enterprise and industrial IoT applications. And there is hundreds of use cases for these sorts of devices around the enterprise for asset tracking and also in industrial applications for similarly asset tracking and other things like tags. But – so it’s a broad – it’s really a broad, broad market and applications really based on a very similar radio architecture. So there is a lot of leverage in our core technology development in UWD both in the software and in the hardware.
Operator:
Thank you. We will now move on to our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. I’ve got a couple, Mark. It’s clearly, there is a large overshoot on shipments to the Chinese OEMs last year. You guys are shipping everything you use your hands on, I guess, in March and June and then we had an overshoot. It was reflected in last quarter’s guide in this quarter’s inventory. I know you don’t have hub inventory with any of the Chinese, so your visibility into what’s actually happening there is very limited. But you’ve already got a quarter now underneath your belt. What do you – given that one quarter with the burn rates going on, what you see now when do you think you’ll get more back to a normal inventory level and your shipments into China will start reflecting really sellout versus what we’ve seen so far, which is just we will take everything they can get. And then, Eric, if I could, given there are big changes in Samsung’s phone business with Broadcom out now and then move to modules in the mass tier, can we expect Samsung will break the 10% revenue level for Qorvo this calendar year? And as kind of a sub-question, given all these shifts, who do you think you are taking share from, especially in the mass tier given that was more of a quasi-discrete design, you’re gaining there? Who do you take it from? And then I have one for ADP.
Mark Murphy:
So I’ll start, and then Eric can even add more color on the China channel. But I think we’ve got better visibility than you may think, and we’re certainly monitoring it very closely. There were actually some positive signs in the December quarter sell-through is decent. We’ve been looking at the phone and phone inventories and they are actually very healthy. So it’s just a matter of some of the components kind of working its way through, and we’ve got an eye on how that will play out. And we’re certainly mining the channel and adjusting our own manufacturing as a result. We’ve also got these long-term agreements, and that’s as intended, helpful in managing the process. I cannot overstate how excited we are about the market long-term. So we’re optimistic about that growth, the exports that they do and then and on our position serving it. So we will work through this over the next couple of quarters and being, I think, in decent shape by sometime in the summer.
Eric Creviston:
And regarding Samsung, it’s a broad family of products. As I touched on earlier, there is a lot of BAW content. And I think you’ll see us kind of starting out in flagship and expanding towards – excuse me, starting out in more mass here and expanding towards flagship as the year progresses with heavy BAW content but also – the power management aspect is also very, very significant and antenna tuning, which we’ve always been quite strong that will continue to be strong and then Wi-Fi, as we’ve been mentioning, the chip-on-board trend. So I’m not going to speak specifically to who we’re taking share from, but we’re – it’s not any one thing. It’s a broad product portfolio alignment, which has been in the works with Samsung for some time. It’s going to see it finally come to fruition.
Edward Snyder:
You think you’ll break 10% with Samsung this year, calendar year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, we had two 10% customers in the quarter, but that’s all I’d say.
Operator:
Thank you. We will now move on to our next question from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Hi. Mark, I wanted to come back to the cash flow statement and balance sheet again. Your free cash flow as a percent of sales, you surprised us delivering double digit for my model almost flows I had to go back to 2018 when you actually had a single-digit free cash flow to sales number. So, I get the inventory increase and then payables went down quite a bit as well after shooting up the quarter before. Is that kind of related to the obligations that you talked about or securing supply in advance? I just wanted to make sure I understood all the moving parts for free cash flow to sales being 6%-odd versus the double digit that you have been posting for several quarters.
Mark Murphy:
No, you have got it, Ambrish. It’s – as I talked about last quarter, we signed this long-term agreement, which had a considerable payment to make, which we made in the December quarter. And so as you pointed out, there was an increase in payables, which I mentioned last quarter, and then we paid that out in the December quarter, and that was disclosed in the Q filing as well. And then as a number I have noted, our inventories were up. So, excluding these two effects, we have what is our normal very strong free cash flow generation. And we have talked about the nature of both of those. And so I would expect free cash flow this year to still end up near $900 million and then I would expect it next year to grow.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay. Got it. And I had a quick follow-up on inventory, Mark. So, I am just trying to make sure I understood. When you are talking about there has been realignment, we are aware of that. My head is not in the fan. I want to make sure I understand what you are talking about. You are talking about customer change from what was a lot of shipments, well, a big market share at Huawei and then everybody else was trying to grab that market share. So, that’s been one shift. The other has also been some sort of kind of like a bifurcation in low end versus high end. Is that what you are referring to, or is there something else? And is there a risk of a write-down coming on the inventory side?
Mark Murphy:
No. And if there were a risk, we would have written stuff off in the quarter. Our view, and Eric can expand on this, I will bring it back to our last call. We had a substantial dislocation in supply and created pockets of components in the supply chain. And so that’s one factor. And then concurrently, you have a demand factor where you have both a realignment amongst OEMs in China and some share shift associated with that. It will shake itself out here and it’s ongoing. And no matter what scenario plays out, we think we are fine. I would say a third factor has been over the past few months, there probably has been some macro effect to end consumer demand and pick up and lock down. So, there is probably that factor though we are not as concerned with that because end phone demand is actually pretty lean. So, I think Ambrish, it’s just a case of this will settle out. We have got agreements in place. We have got firm orders. We have line of sight on the inventory working down and believe we will be in a good spot in several months.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Perfect. Got it. Thanks for all the clarification.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.
Christopher Rolland:
Hi guys. Thanks for the question. I think last call, you guys mentioned that maybe you were opening up Farmers Branch again. Just wanted to confirm that was happening that that’s ramping and where might utilizations go there as we move through the year?
Mark Murphy:
It’s a good question, Chris. And of course, we are continuously looking as to whether we need investment or not. And there has been some reduction in loadings because obviously we have got some inventories and we are rightsizing the factories. But in the case of Farmers Branch, yes, we are still planning to turn that on and utilize that in fiscal ‘23.
Christopher Rolland:
Great. And secondly, Qualcomm, I think has an ultra BAW product coming, maybe working into parts of your market there. I know you guys really haven’t seen too much there so far, but have you seen a little bit more over the past few quarters? And would you expect or are you preparing for more competition in ‘22? Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Well, we haven’t seen a lot, frankly, at this point. And so I can’t comment on competitiveness and so forth. I think we are continuing head down, pushing hard to advance our technology and already sampling 7 gigahertz band integrating a lot of it in the modules, which will be shipping soon. And then as we have talked about many times, it’s not just about what frequency you can get to with the filter. It’s about how well you can combine them working in multiplexing and combining multiple fitter technologies together in the same module and there is a lot of complexity going on. So – but there is – it’s a very valuable and a key part of the communications market. So, there is going to be a lot of people investing in it and trying to build the capability.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Raji Gill:
Thank you for taking my questions. I appreciate it. The gross margins continue to be resilient in a challenging environment. I think last quarter, you mentioned that you were benefiting from premium products, better pricing power and maintaining utilization of your factory network. Wondering how to think about margins as you migrate to a better demand supply dynamic throughout the year? And also, update a little bit more about the pricing situation as you kind of move upstream with respect to your products?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Raji. I will start. We have been talking about this 52% level for several quarters. And GM, gross margin is going to move around quarter-to-quarter, of course, based on customer, product mix, business mix, yields, factory loadings, price and other factors. We do believe that the current business setup of the products we have got, our footprint, productivity efforts and so forth, support this 52% level. But we are definitely working to improve that over time. I think all I can say is we are going to try and do the same things we have been doing, applying that same discipline of investing in the technology to maintain leadership, actively managing the portfolio where we are in and producing products where we are valued most. I would add that some of the new areas we have talked about today, power, defense, UWB, they all have favorable gross margin profiles. We are driving productivity. That’s especially important in this period where there is pockets of inflation. And then we – the last question about Farmers Branch, we are always looking for ways to make sure we are supporting the business in the most capital-efficient way. And that should hopefully allow us to sustain and expand from here.
Raji Gill:
Great. And for my follow-up, you had mentioned that you expect 5G infrastructure build-outs to begin to kind of reaccelerate throughout the year outside of China. I wonder if you could elaborate further in terms of what you are seeing specifically, which region. And you were very successful in China with the penetration of your GaN base stations and your dominance in GaN technology. So, I want to get a sense when you are thinking about the build out outside of China, how that is affecting your kind of IDP business and kind of your market share position in GaN?
Philip Chesley:
This is Phil. I will take that question. So, when we look at the overall market this year – or this calendar year, what we see is kind of China being similar to what it was in last calendar year. But really, where we see most of the real deployments and growth is in Europe and in America. And we spent a tremendous amount of time and energy creating a family of technologies and products that really are kind of optimized for those markets. We see our GaN technology is a critical piece to that, same with kind of our small signal product families that we have. And so we like how we are positioned. And we right now, if you were to look at kind of backlog and where things are in that business, we are excited about that. So hopefully, that answers your question, Raji.
Operator:
Thank you. We will take our next question from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik:
Thank you for taking my questions. And Mark, I hate to beat you on the China demand realignment commentary. But when you guided the December quarter last year, you broke out the supply impact as well as the demand impact. And my question is for the March quarter guide, are you seeing similar demand or supply impact or no because March quarter is in line with what you were thinking last year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. We – last earnings call, we broke out with the specificity we could. And it is the March quarter is playing out as we expected. I will say that there is – there are both supply factors still, there are demand factors still. And that balance is probably more equally distributed now than it was then. It was certainly a predominantly a supply issue than, but we still have both, and it’s also reflected in our guidance.
Atif Malik:
Great. And then another question on supply, if you are expecting supply to improve through the rest of the year, does that lower your competitors’ ability to bundle RF front ends to processor as the supply eases?
Eric Creviston:
I am not sure there is a direct correlation to that necessarily. I mean a lot of things to go into the customers’ buying behavior. And there are certain times when there are bundling factors, of course, but I don’t think this is necessarily a main theme of it. I mean it’s a broad market and we are selling across many different basebands. And so yes, it’s a bigger picture than that, I think.
Operator:
Thank you. And I will take a follow-up from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thank you very much. I had a question on IDP. I have to say I am a bit confused by your silicon carbide power business at all. I know you guys acquired United, but maybe you could articulate what the strategy is here. Again, I get – I understand what you are doing again, you are a huge supplier in defense. That’s a U.S. based business really with U.S. based suppliers, what used to be your biggest competitor kind of dropped by the wayside, Wolf’s now. But on silicon powers is the other way around at this point. They are going about to build turn on their new New York fab, which will make them the largest silicon carbide device power manufacturer on the face of the earth and the cost basis is 50% lower than anybody else. So, you are buying wafers from them more than likely, maybe one of the folks and you are going to pay twice as much as they are paying and they are addressing this market on a scale and a cost wise that even STMicroelectronics are going to have a problem with. So, is it that you are selling sick power into niche markets that want to diversify away from them? I don’t understand the marketing game of this at all because you are going to be an under-scale player purchasing materials from the guys who are producing the devices on a scale that you can’t compete with. So, maybe you can articulate what do you think this is going to do for Qorvo? How does it fit in with your model in the long-term? Thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Well, there is a lot there.
Bob Bruggeworth:
You should just go home.
Edward Snyder:
You can pick and chose. Pick what you want to answer in that.
Bob Bruggeworth:
In five minutes, I don’t know if I could get to all of that.
Edward Snyder:
And then I have a follow-up.
Bob Bruggeworth:
So, Ed look, I think that when we look at the business, okay, and we look at it from a capability perspective, what we like about our silicon carbide technology is one, we have a leadership position in efficiency in the specific technical areas that drive that efficiency, and I think that’s important. And I think that capability is why you see the business having quite a bit of traction. I mean you can see it in the release, there is announcements about onboard charging wins in automotive and DC-to-DC. I think the other piece to it is that when you look at the technology that we have, we can generate about twice the revenue per wafer – silicon carbide wafers than our competition can. So, we – because of that advantage, we feel like we have the ability to use a more of a foundry model as opposed to an in-house model right now. And when you look at specifically the silicon carbide substrate supply, what we see is more and more investment in that area, and we see more and more entrants coming into that space, which we think will make that more competitive over time. So, I mean those are some of the economic dynamics that we see, okay. I would also say that, again, silicon carbide is in our wheelhouse. We are a compound semiconductor company, right. We have a lot of those relationships. So, I hear you, I understand your view, but we think there is a real opportunity there for us. And the market, let’s just talk a little bit about the market. It’s a very, very large market. And even what you may be calling niche and I would assume maybe you are talking outside of automotive, you look at IT infrastructure, you look at other areas, it’s still a very, very large opportunity. And so we feel like we have the opportunity to build a meaningful franchise. And then when you combine that with our programmable power management, where I can build systems, I can put that into module capability, which is at the core of what we do. We feel like maybe we have a better shot at it than you are giving us credit for right now. But that’s short and sweet. And I guess one last thing, I have been an executive in the power business and analog and I have been doing this for 25 years plus. And I think there is something there, I really do. I am excited about it. And I think it can be a meaningful franchise for us here at Qorvo.
Edward Snyder:
Great. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. And that does conclude today’s question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again at upcoming investor conferences. Thanks again. Hope you have a great night. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And that does conclude today’s conference. Thank you all for your participation.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q2 2022 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. .
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Todd. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's Fiscal 2022 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results.
In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; Philip Chesley, incoming President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; and James Klein, outgoing President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. The Qorvo team delivered an exceptional September quarter with revenue and EPS at all-time highs. Strength during the quarter was broad-based across customers and supported by new product launches. In Mobile Products, the multiyear migration of 5G continues to drive RF content and integration trends. What began in top-tier flagship phones is now playing out in the mass market, where the RF content increase is greater on a percent basis than in flagship devices. Qorvo enjoys broad exposure to mass market designs to customers like Honor, Oppo, Pixel, Samsung, Vivo and Xiaomi. As a preferred supplier with leading products and a robust technology road map, Qorvo is well positioned as 5G devices and Android ecosystem contribute increasingly to the growth in the RF TAM.
In other connectivity markets, ultra-wideband adoption in smartphones is serving as the infrastructure for a growing ecosystem of ultra-wideband-enabled devices. The opportunity set spans mobile, automotive and IoT markets, creating a strong foundation for growth over the coming years. In WiFi, the adoption of WiFi 6E and the performance limitations of smaller node CMOS-integrated PAs are driving the migration to chip onboard FEMs and iFEMs like ours. In WiFi and other markets, Qorvo's products and technologies are at the forefront of multiyear upgrade cycles, enabling new ecosystems and use cases and transforming the user experience. Now let's look at some of the quarterly highlights in our end markets, starting with mobile. For Google, we commenced shipments of mid-high and ultrahigh band PADs, antenna tuners and multiple connectivity solutions to support the ramp of their recently announced Pixel 6. For an upcoming Korea-based 5G mass market smartphone platform, we received the first production orders for our mid-high and ultrahigh band PADs, WiFi FEMs and multiple high-performance discrete solutions. In mobile WiFi, we secured a WiFi 6 FEM design wins with multiple top-tier smartphone OEMs and began sampling WiFi 7 FEMs, enabling higher data rates and improved performance. In ultra-wideband, Qorvo is advancing technologies for a diverse ecosystem of proximity aware connected devices. We secured an ultra-wideband design win to enable real-time device tracking and other location-aware applications in home mesh networks, and we were selected to supply ultra-wideband solutions for enterprise access points as well. We also expanded our engagement with a leading provider of consumer IoT products across a broad set of connected home devices, including smart speakers, point control fans and air conditioners. In automotive manufacturing, Qorvo was selected to supply ultra-wideband and ZigBee solutions with ConcurrentConnect technology to an automaker in Korea, streamlining automation and manufacturing. In other connectivity markets, we began sampling a WiFi 6 iFEM covering 5.2 gigahertz and 5.6 gigahertz, and featuring an integrated BAW filter. Qorvo's 5 gigahertz iFEMs enable higher capacity and improved efficiency and reduced form factor. In broadband, we begin sampling a triple output DOCSIS 3.1 amplifier module supporting network upgrades for major cable operators in the U.S. and in Europe. In infrastructure, design win activity was strong across OEMs, including small cells and base stations. Wins included all of the RF transmit and receive path content, including BAW filters for 5G small cells at a major base station OEM. We see infrastructure markets picking up in 2022 with Qorvo's SAM growing year-over-year. The SAM for Qorvo outside of China will post significant growth next year and support a strong double-digit CAGR through 2025. In aerospace and defense, we expanded our product portfolio with an industry-leading 125 watt S-band power amplifier module and a 1.8 kilowatt L-band radar pallet for commercial and defense radar applications. In RF-based biotechnology testing, we received our first commercial orders and commenced shipments of our Omnia antigen test platform. During the quarter, the NIH RADx variant task force conducted an external study that demonstrated the performance of our Omnia antigen test platform in effectively detecting COVID variants, including the delta variant. Although this is a new market for us, we believe we bring a novel technology that offers unique and real value as the world moves to more testing protocols, including for flu A/B and other seasonal pathogens. Our platform offers a unique combination of accuracy and speed at the point-of-care with improved process flow, including real-time wireless delivery of results. We have seen its benefits in our own operations as part of our protocol for our own internal testing. After the quarter closed, Qorvo acquired United Silicon Carbide, an innovator in silicon carbide power devices and a pioneer in silicon carbide JFETs. The combination will further differentiate Qorvo's power portfolio, enabling more highly integrated power device solutions and expand our addressable market to include higher voltage applications that demand maximum power efficiency such as electric vehicles, charging stations and renewable energy systems. We welcome Chris Dries and his team and look forward to helping them accelerate the growth in their business. For Qorvo, our ability to deliver more power more efficiently and using less current helped put us at the center of the digital transformation. We are eager to expand these competencies as global markets move to electrification and renewable energy. Qorvo's technology portfolio is best in class. Our product position is strong. Our end market exposure is expanding, and we are operating very well. Yes, we are seeing constraints, and we are working closely with our customers and our partners. Mark will have more comments about the operating environment, and we look forward to discussions during your question and answers. Big picture, we see the industry working through this as it always has. For Qorvo, we see a business with unique competencies and expanding set of growth drivers, and we expect a continuation of double-digit growth over several years. Before handing the call over to Mark, I'm pleased to welcome Philip Chesley as President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group. Philip has a proven track record, growing global semiconductor businesses with experience in RF, power, data communications, automotive, industrial, aerospace and defense. We are very pleased Philip has joined Qorvo to lead our IDP team. I also want to thank James Klein. Since the formation of Qorvo, James and the team have more than doubled IDP revenue while creating a recognized industry leader. We thank James for his many contributions to Qorvo and wish him the very best. James will remain with us through November to help ensure a smooth transition with the change in the IDP leadership. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. In the September quarter, Qorvo delivered the strongest quarterly revenue and earnings in the company's history. Qorvo's revenue for the fiscal year 2022 second quarter was $1.255 billion, $5 million above the midpoint of our guidance and $195 million or 18% higher than last year's September quarter. When comparing September quarter numbers, recall that our fiscal year 2021 was a 53-week fiscal year, and the September quarter last year was a 14-week quarter versus this fiscal year's more typical 13-week quarter.
Mobile Products revenue of $996 million was up 32% year-over-year on the continued growth of higher content 5G smartphones. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue of [ $260 million ] was slightly below expectations due to reduced supply from outsourced assembly and test operations in Malaysia and elsewhere. As expected, IDP was down year-over-year due primarily to last year's strong infrastructure build-out and the 14-week quarter. We expect IDP to return to year-over-year growth in the December quarter and growth to accelerate in the March quarter. Non-GAAP gross margin in the September quarter was 52.4%, above the midpoint of our guidance despite supply chain disruptions that worsened through the quarter. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the second quarter were less than expected at $222 million or 17.7% of sales. The sequential and year-over-year increases in OpEx were driven by technology and product development expenses associated with key growth programs and recent acquisitions. Non-GAAP operating income in the September quarter was $435 million and 34.7% of sales. This was the fourth consecutive quarter of operating margin over 33%. Non-GAAP net income in the second quarter was $385 million, and diluted earnings per share of $3.42 was $0.18 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the second quarter was $245 million. Our working capital includes an increase in payables associated with a long-term silicon supply agreement. The largest of these PADs is a deposit, which we expect to recoup by the end of the agreement in calendar '25. This agreement is structured -- this agreement is a structured way to advance our differentiated technology position and simplify our long-term planning. Furthermore, it's only one of a number of examples whereby Qorvo is building longer-term and more collaborative partnerships to provide our customers supply assurance and meet their product and technology needs. Concurrently, our customer relationships are broadening and strengthening, allowing us to invest with more certainty. As we have indicated previously, the challenges the industry is currently experiencing are driving more constructive and longer-term relationships that we see enhancing the overall durability and value of the business. Capital expenditures in the September quarter were $47 million, lower than expected on spend timing and an earlier-than-expected reimbursement for a portion of our government-funded work on advanced packaging. Free cash flow was $198 million, and we repurchased $223 million of shares. Over the last 2 quarters, we've purchased $523 million of shares, which was 110% of our free cash flow. We continue to repurchase shares as our outlook is positive. Our free cash flow and ability to sustain investment in technology and growth is strong, and our leverage remains low. On the balance sheet, cash and debt remained largely unchanged from the prior quarter at $1.2 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively. In the December quarter, our cash is projected to decline, following payments associated with the previously mentioned agreement and with our acquisition of United Silicon Carbide. Now turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1.09 billion and $1.12 billion, non-GAAP gross margin between 52% and 52.5%, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.75 at the midpoint of our guidance. Our December quarter revenue outlook reflects broad-based challenges in supply, impacting Mobile and IDP and near-term weakness in demand, principally in Asia. Starting with supply, we have several areas of constraint. Our external supply chain is still recovering from disruptions in September, including shutdowns in Southeast Asia. Beyond that, [ select ] materials, products and production capacity remain tight. These are industry-wide issues affecting all suppliers, and our customers are challenged in producing matched sets for products. For example, in smartphones, even where channel inventory for certain parts is healthy, customers lack silicon chips to produce phones. This, in turn, creates changes in demand that add to constraints on our own production as we work to adjust mix. Mix changes are part of our business, but in a normal environment, Qorvo can move swiftly to respond and capture demand. These supply-driven gaps are making recent demand softness in select areas, such as our Asia smartphone customers, harder to quantify. We see the industry working through this situation with some supply effects beginning to moderate this quarter and supply/demand alignment improving more broadly through the March quarter. Given these supply and demand effects, we now see 5G smartphone volumes coming in below $550 million in calendar '21. Qorvo's December forecasted revenue of $1.105 billion at the midpoint is down 12% sequentially and up slightly year-over-year. We forecast Mobile revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $830 million at the midpoint, down 17% sequentially and flat year-over-year. In the March quarter, we expect Mobile to be up slightly sequentially as the typical seasonal decline is offset by improved supply and demand. In IDP, we project revenue to increase in the December quarter to $275 million and the segment to return to year-over-year growth. We expect IDP to be over $300 million in the March quarter. Our December quarter gross margin guide of 52.25% at the midpoint is up versus the view we provided last quarter despite a more challenging supply/demand environment than expected. We see our technology and product mix and operating and capital efficiency yielding a gross margin above 52% for the fiscal year. We expect the March quarter to be around 52%. We project non-GAAP operating expenses to increase slightly in the December quarter to approximately $224 million, reflecting higher investments in core technologies and expanding capabilities in new businesses, including the addition of the United Silicon Carbide team. We now project our current quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate to be between 8.5% and 9%. Capital expenditures are projected to exceed $70 million in the December quarter as we work to intersect demand and support long-term supply agreements with multiple customers. Currently, we are supply-constrained and project to remain so through our fiscal year-end. We continue to expand BAW and GaAs capacity as well as biosensor production capacity to support our growth projections for fiscal 2023. In summary, we expect year-over-year revenue growth in the December quarter, though less than we had expected previously. The current supply challenges and near-term demand weaknesses -- weakness are acute, but more temporary than durable. We expect supply effects to moderate starting this quarter and improved supply/demand alignment early next calendar year. For full fiscal year '22, we expect revenue growth over 15%, gross margin over 52% -- excuse me, we expect revenue growth over 15% and gross margin over 52% and operating margin of approximately 33%. Looking beyond this fiscal year, we expect double-digit growth to continue as Qorvo's premium technology, product portfolio and operating capability support 5G, WiFi, IoT, defense, power and other growth markets. Overall, we are investing to grow Mobile and IDP at or above market. Looking at our business by end markets instead of operating segments helps highlight the strength of our portfolio and market position. On advanced cellular RF front ends for smartphones, Qorvo's technology and product breadth is world class. We expect this part of Qorvo's business near $3.3 billion this fiscal year to deliver high single-digit to low double-digit growth as increasing RF complexity and integration trends support years of content expansion. Next, looking at other connectivity beyond cellular solutions for smartphones, qorvo enjoys exposure across multiple wireless protocols and serves industrial automation, connected home, automotive and other high-growth IoT markets. This fiscal year, connectivity solutions spread across our Mobile and IDP segments combined to approximately $700 million and can grow in the strong double digits. Finally, defense, infrastructure and power solutions support multiple long-term [indiscernible] growth drivers. These include the multiyear build-out of 5G infrastructure, increasing semiconductor spend in defense and worldwide demand for power semis driven by mega trends like electrification. We expect to sustain long-term double-digit growth in this business from a base of over $600 million this fiscal year. Our December quarter is off of what we expected previously, but still guided up year-over-year as is our view of the March quarter. We expect the business to strengthen through the second half of our fiscal year and contribute to a record full year performance, including earnings growth over 20%. Longer term, the outlook is bright. Qorvo is exceptionally well positioned to deliver earnings and free cash flow growth, serving the large and growing need for more efficient power and greater connectivity. Now Todd, would you please open the line for questions?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
I have two, if I may. My first one is probably for Mark. The 17% sequential decline you're guiding to in your Mobile business for December, probably hard. But can you sort of break that down into supply factors and demand factors to the extent possible?
And then on the demand side, you talked about weakness in Asia, but if you can elaborate on that, that would be super helpful. And then I got a quick follow-up.
Mark Murphy:
Sure. So Toshiya, we decreased our December number about $150 million, as you can see, and about $135 million of that was in Mobile, where we went from roughly [ 9 65 to 8 30 ] in the December quarter. The balance of the decrease was IDP. IDP is the most straightforward. It's all supply in IDP. So just keep that in mind.
Of the $135 million roughly in Mobile, as we characterize supply constraints, which is our suppliers not having supply for us, our customers not having the chipsets, thus not able to build their product and use our product, and then finally, our own internal constraints, we see up to $100 million that we would characterize as supply related of that $135 million. The balance, so $35 million we would view as net demand. Some demand is up and we're able to intersect that. But some demand is clearly down, and I think that's well publicized, particularly in parts of Asia. So broad brush strokes were 3 quarters or less down on supply in Mobile and one quarter or more related to demand. Now if you add in IDP, which is all supply, then that proportion is stronger. So that's our view, Toshiya.
Toshiya Hari:
Great. And then as my follow-up, you guys talked quite a bit about having constructive longer-term conversations with your customers. You also talked about your long-term silicon supply agreement. As you kind of compare and contrast the visibility you have today versus 3 years ago, 5 years ago, I mean, how would you characterize the key differences? I'm sure you've had long-term agreements in the past, but how much bigger are they as a percentage of your backlog? And how enforceable are they going forward relative to history?
Steven Creviston:
Toshiya, this is Eric. I'll take that. I think one of the silver linings in this environment is how constructive the conversations have gotten in terms of much longer term. So not just 1 or even 2 years, but in some cases up to 3 years of discussions about how we're going to outline both our technology and supply road map to our customers' product road maps, their markets and what they expect to ship. And first, there's no crystal ball. It's not perfect, but at least we have ranges of alignment and sort of volume bars, share windows and things like this that we can talk both to our customers and to our suppliers.
And I think for suppliers, it's a great benefit to them and us to have more stability. And for our customers, of course, supply assurance is paramount, and for us to have more confidence in our growth of the businesses is, of course, very important as well. So it's a very different environment driven by all the factors we've talked about already on this call.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Vivek Arya of Bank of America. .
Vivek Arya:
For the first one, I'm curious, given the supply constraints in the industry, does that change the competitive landscape in the RF side in some way as we look at next year? So for example, one of your competitors can bundle their apps processors and modems along with the RF side. Do you think that gives them perhaps an advantage from a competitive perspective as we look at next year?
Steven Creviston:
This is Eric. I don't think so. Technology decisions are still critical to enable next-generation phones, and best-in-class RF is still going to win in the front-end section. So I don't think we're competing against people that have advantages of bundling across the boundary, if you will, from the apps and modem side to the RF side really.
And I think, again, just as in the last question with Toshiya, I think the long-term visibility we have and kind of planning our technology road maps, we're getting no signs that there's any change, if you will, in terms of the bundling or the architectures that would change that.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Vivek, this is Bob. Thanks for your question. I think the other point that's interesting is that a lot of the things that our customers are waiting on are from some of those very people you mentioned. So I think we need to keep that in mind. It's not us. The primary reason is we have the parts. We can get the parts for them. They've been saying, as we've mentioned many times through last quarter as well as this quarter, the challenges our customers have with [ match sets or kitting ], whatever vocabulary you want to use, that's been their bigger problem, is in SoCs, not with RF front ends, at least not from us.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And then on the acquisition that was announced, I was hoping you could give us some more color in terms of what is the right way to reflect that in the model. And our sense of the silicon carbide and the power semi space is -- of course, it's in front of a very large growth opportunity in autos and industrial and so forth, but it's a very capital-intensive space, right? And a number of the established players have margins well below your corporate average. So what's the right way to think about the strategy? And is it going to be accretive over time for you?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Let me take some of the financial elements. Vivek, and I'll turn it over to James. First of all, we're not in the capital-intensive part. We're in a device manufacturing part. So that's the expertise, and we're leveraging our silicon carbide -- again, silicon carbide knowledge and which will be an advantage here. So that's maybe the first thing is realizing that this is -- these are things that we can foundry and source the material.
There'll be more disclosure on our Q tomorrow, but it will be over $200 million that we're paying for United Silicon Carbide. And it is dilutive initially, but we expect that to be accretive maybe at the end of next fiscal year, and we expect it to be a significant business for us several years out. James?
James Klein:
Yes, this is James. So as you stated, we like the aspect that it gets us into several fast-growing markets like electric vehicles, industrial power and data centers, maybe longer term, even in things like circuit protection. We see it in current year expanding our addressable market by almost $1 billion. And we think that, that certainly continues to grow at a high growth rate as we go over the next several years.
We do believe that we have industry-leading performance in efficiency and in die size. So we think when we compare those differentiated type capabilities with our existing power management capabilities, we really do believe we have the ability to continue to grow and scale the business.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis of Barclays. .
Blayne Curtis:
I just want to go back on the supply issues. If you look at the shipments from the 2 major modem companies, I guess, they're up and you're seeing a correction. So I'm just kind of curious, there's a couple of ways that could happen. Just kind of curious if now in retrospect, did you ship more RF than maybe modems in the first half of the year and that has to correct? Or just kind of curious to your thoughts on that. I know you probably haven't seen Qualcomm sky, but at that MediaTek, they're not seeing a sharp of a decline in December. Just kind of thoughts between the disconnect there.
Steven Creviston:
Blayne, this is Eric. Yes, it's a good question. And I think to a certain extent, there's some of that, and I think a lot of it comes down to mix as well. I think we did a good job of responding to customer demand. Now we still have several parts where we're on allocation as well and chasing and behind, of course, as we talked about. But for the most part, we did a pretty good job of satisfying customer demand. But what happens is as the mix shifts, I mean, they're essentially taking every baseband chip they can get, regardless of which RF it's on. So yes, it could be that net-net, we shift a bit ahead up to this point.
Blayne Curtis:
Okay. And then just your perspective on -- go ahead.
Mark Murphy:
Well, I was just going to add, Blayne, that, listen, we're disappointed with the December guide, but I think it's also to reinforce our commitment to keep the channel healthy and give you a guide best we see on the supply/demand fronts.
But it's never easy, but admittedly, it's more difficult than usual environment right now. I do think it's important with this adjustment to step back, not lose sight of how good a business we've got. For this fiscal year, we called down, but that was -- and we missed, but there was an aged consensus that, clearly, the supply environment worsened through the quarter, particularly in mid- to late September and then these publicized weakness and demand emerged. We see things improving. We think December is as bad as it gets for us, and we see improving in March and broadly. We had given a guidance range of 15% to 20%. And with this 2.5% adjustment for the year, we're down at the lower end of that range. So we're still in the range that we had provided. Yes. Listen, our gross margin outlook is intact around 52%. OpEx is in control, and we're investing in the future of the business. That's both traditional parts of the business and newer parts of the business. And in the end, we're taking EPS roughly a dime above $12 to roughly a dime below $12. And so there is a bit of a correction there, but I would say it's the right thing for us to do. If we look into next year and beyond, we're just -- feel great about our position. Premium technology and products, serving attractive end markets, growing double digits, and we expect to grow double digits. We're operating well, sustained margins over 52%, expanding operating margins. So a lot of talk about the positive beyond this quarter.
Blayne Curtis:
And I guess when you look at your supply constraints on the constraints on your business, you did grow inventory in September with that level of sales. So I guess I'm looking at our sales down teens. So I guess I'm kind of wondering, I guess, did the supply situation get that bad between September, December? Or is there another factor there? I'm just trying to understand those moving pieces.
Mark Murphy:
No, we're -- it did get worse in mid- to late September, Blayne, for sure. And that's what we've tried to explain. And first, it was the supply environment, which has been tough for 1.5 years, almost 2 years now. The supply environment got worse. And then demand over the past 3 weeks or so has deteriorated.
But our work -- and some of that inventory is just, again, it's mix match of sets and so forth like that. But having said that, our inventories are okay. I mean our turns are at the high end of historical range. And even with the slowdown, the turns will be within the normal historical range. So we -- yes, this is why we're dealing with this now. And again, we think it's a short-term issue that we work through and are in better shape in the March quarter.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Karl Ackerman with Cowen and Company.
Karl Ackerman:
For your December quarter outlook, are the bottlenecks you described, at least for Mobile, are they concentrated in the Android ecosystem?
And then if I may, just as a follow-up, if you could highlight whether the growth trajectory of Android into December is better or worse than your guide of down 17% for Mobile. That would be very helpful.
Steven Creviston:
Yes, Karl, this is Eric. I don't think we can break them up between ecosystems like that and give any more color given the concentration of the ecosystem. So...
Karl Ackerman:
Okay. If I may then, just going back to this acquisition you've made in silicon carbide. I understand that most of UnitedSiC's products are aimed at high-voltage server and in general industrial power supplies, where you have some pretty good customer overlap today. But could you discuss your plan to go to market for UnitedSiC and whether they have existing relationships with Tier 1 automotive OEMs?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So today, you're right, I mean it's predominantly -- it's, I would say, on the lower voltage scale, and it's in power supplies around automotive and data center applications. If you look at how we plan to take the business on a go-forward basis, certainly, we'll use our channels to expand substantially. As you know, we've got a broad base into the automotive and in many other places like the defense market, we'll be able to take this technology over the long term.
We'll also be scaling the technology up in voltage, which will allow us to enter other parts of the automotive space, motor controls and things like that on a go-forward basis.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
I wanted to pick up with some line of questioning on the acquisition. James, your core competency historically in wide-bandgap semiconductor materials, correct me if I'm wrong, has been in GaN power or -- I'm sorry, GaN RF. And so United Silicon Carbide's core competency, of course, is in silicon carbide, and the company has always outsourced manufacturing to X-FAB. And so my question is, is the plan to eventually bring in the manufacturing internally, leveraging some of the Qorvo's historical wide-bandgap processing capabilities.
And then related to trying to penetrate the automotive market, it has been important so far for car OEMs to align with silicon carbide providers that are vertically stacked with BAWs, materials and power devices for supply chain security. And so my question is, as a matter of strategy, is that the intent long term for this business?
James Klein:
Let me take the second one first. Certainly, we'll use our very large and strong supply chain to make sure we supply that. And of course, we have expertise also in very high power packaging. So we'll combine that with the power control that we have from the [ Active-Semiconductor ] acquisition that's been a couple of years ago now, and we really intend to take this business much more into a module play, where we'll have that integrated capability. And of course, we'll use our supply chain to make sure we've got a stable supply of raw material and the ability to manufacture the wafers and things like that.
As far as moving it inside, we'll certainly, as we go over the period of scale in the business, we're going to take a hard look at what makes sense and what doesn't make sense. I think there's parts of that process that maybe we'll adapt well to some of our internal capabilities and some that may be a bit more of a challenge. And I think we'll just look at that as we go through the next several years as we scale to see what makes the most economic sense go-forward basis.
Gary Mobley:
Got it. And correct me if I'm using a wrong term here, but the prepayment of wafer...
[Technical Difficulty]
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sorry, Gary, the question?
Operator:
Looks like we lost Mr. Mobley. I'd like to go to the next question. .
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure.
Operator:
Next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Eric, it's clear that Qualcomm is gaining some share in the low and mid high in the low end China and Samsung's mass market. How can you be sure that some of your demand weaknesses in share loss in a few slots in that area? I know they don't participate as much in antenna tuning, but just trying to figure out how you figure that out given some of their gains.
And then Mark, I'm really puzzled by the SiC power acquisition, buying wafers from premium foundry through X-Fab will work if -- it would seem if it's like the industrial market or more of a diversified analog, but you face a huge disadvantage in scale against [ ST ] Infineon and especially Wolfspeed's new foundry in New York. So I'm just curious, where do you see this going? What levers do you think you can pull or lever do you have for this new acquisition to get you into EVs because it isn't going to be cost. And given the size of the fab and the fact that they'll be fabbing on wafers, you came and get the 200-millimeter wafers, you're going to be facing a big issue in terms of scale too. So I'm just trying to get a little bit more clarity on what markets to address you might think. And then I have one final question for James before he leaves.
Steven Creviston:
Okay. I'll start with the question about share and how we can be certain about our share gains or losses, and it's fairly straightforward for us. I don't think there's a phone platform of any significance that we don't have content on. So we know exactly how many phones every model are being built, and so we know exactly what our share is. We do all the teardowns and figure out what all the other slots are if we don't really know. And it's easily trackable. And I can assure you that it's not a share issue at all.
In fact, we're excited, as we exit December quarter and go into March, I think we've got some very nice content pickups with Samsung, in particular, new platforms that we're really happy about that tailwind. But right now, to your question, I think we're quite certain of our share position, especially against Qualcomm or, frankly, any other supplier.
James Klein:
Ed, this is James. I'll take on the acquisition question. So for us, that technology benefit there is low loss and, therefore, smaller die size. We agree, competitive market, but we are sort of the high-end performance side of that side of the market. So it's going to take that customer set that's really, really looking for a high-performance part.
Now go-forward basis, we'll take both the power management things that we have in the prior acquisition and our packaging capability, and we'll move more into a module space. And again, we'll do that selectively, where we see parts of the market that are really going to be driven by performance. So we're not trying to take on the world.
Edward Snyder:
So you're going to be high-performance application specific in the module side of it, but you did mention EVs quite a bit and all EVs you've built into big modules [indiscernible]
James Klein:
Well, there'll be high-performance applications in that space as well.
Edward Snyder:
Okay. And then I hate to see you go. I know it time to retire. Everybody's got that time, but I'll miss coming down and bugging you. But before you get off and push off into the prairie, I had a question about your 5G. You guided -- or the guide for IDP was outside of China, you're going to expect to see growth. But given how pervasive China was for the 5G infrastructure business and how it's not coming back and the U.S. looks to be a lot more skittish about -- what's the long term -- long term next year on 5G for IDP? Will you get back to the point where the 5G MIMO stuff is at parity where you were in China? Or do you expect that to be a longer haul?
James Klein:
Yes. I think on 5G specific, I suspect it will be a bit of a longer haul. But I will tell you that I'm really pleased with the progress we've made. We've had wins, significant wins outside of China in that MIMO space. We begin getting out our first integrated modules or what we call PAMs, power amplifier modules, and really pleased with those wins and the performance that we have there.
If you do look at our -- the core -- the IDP business minus the infrastructure side, this year, we'll grow north of 20%. And so it really is the story for us. It is just the lack of deployments going on in China. If you look at that base station business outside of China, it's actually growing way up over 30%. So it really is a story for us about slowdown in China is the IDP story. The rest of the business is doing very, very well. And on your comment about my retirement, I want to say a few words. First of all, I really wanted to thank the Qorvo team for all the work over this past decade or so. They've done just an absolutely tremendous job, and we've been able to accomplish a tremendous amount. I also want to thank Bob for all of his leadership in building Qorvo. I have a lot of pride associated with the company that we've built. And I want to thank Bob for, I guess, guiding us through that, maybe dragging us. But I want to thank you very much. And third, I want to thank Philip for accepting the challenge to lead the IDP team. I'm really confident that he's going to do a great job in the future with the organization. So I want to thank him for joining us.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Christopher Rolland of Susquehanna.
Christopher Rolland:
I did want to kind of go back to Blayne's earlier question. So Qualcomm did post some very impressive RFFE numbers. They're now at about $1.2 billion a quarter and probably going up from there. And they actually said that their supply constraints were lessening and had been better than initially expected. So I did want to circle back on the differences between you and them and what you're seeing here in December. I think you guys did say it could be a timing, it could be an inventory issue. But I'd really love to flush the rest out here. Is there a difference tied to more MediaTek modem-centric customers or different OEM customers here? Is there anything else that would mark the difference between the two?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Chris, this is Bob, and I'll make a few comments, and obviously let Eric add some color. But without seeing what they said or understood, it's a little bit difficult. But I believe in that number you gave, there is the millimeter wave front ends that they do sell to our mutually largest customer. And if they broke that out, that probably would be helpful. And yes, we do see them out there. We don't see them on any MediaTek platforms, that's for sure. But we sit alongside them. They don't have the entire RF at the same customers, as Eric already outlined. So I think we've got a pretty good handle on what's going on. So yes, they have more RF content, I would say, at our largest customer. That's a fact. So that could be part of it easily.
But Eric, if you think there's anything that I may have missed.
Steven Creviston:
No, just maybe the distinction. I'm not saying Qualcomm is not doing well. They've got some drivers, of course. I think my response to add is that I know it's not at our expense. So we're not losing share to them, if that was the question.
Christopher Rolland:
Yes. And indeed, the millimeter wave is a big portion for sure. And then I did want to switch to M&A for a second, and congrats on the acquisition. It's this Union Silicon -- United Silicon, sorry, and Decawave. These two appear to be somewhat niche businesses. And I guess my question is, do you guys have a desire for more broad-based businesses or even a catalog business, whether it's analog or microcontroller or mixed signal, something like that? And what is your desire to move in that direction?
Robert Bruggeworth:
So let me start with, Chris. by -- I appreciate the question. And I think we've said before, we'll never telegraph the areas that we want to go after, that's for sure. I think Eric would probably take exception and I'll let him talk about it, but calling ultra-wideband a niche is probably a different view than what we have, that's for sure. We think that is a nice growth area. And I'll let Eric speak to that because I think what we demonstrated with the bullets in our press release and my own comments, I think this is proliferating a lot greater than what most people thought. But Eric?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. And maybe to kind of take a step towards your question. I think we're always looking for opportunities that allow us to leverage our scale in Mobile and then use that same technology at an unfair advantage everywhere else. We're in smaller markets, right? I mean that's one of the advantages we have with our corporate structure. So we fit that perfectly. The mobile phone itself, of course, is going to drive billions of units. But around that, the [ wave ] 5, 6, 7 things that talk to those billions of units, right? So the whole connected home ecosystem and so forth, it's -- it will be a major franchise over time and continuing to expand into industrial, some of the things we talked about in the press release, there's industrial, things like auto manufacturing autos themselves. So certainly not a niche business to Bob's point, and we're thrilled with the progress that we're making with ultra-wideband today.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. And I would -- this is Mark. I would just add that we're looking at this several years out, and they're most definitely not niche businesses at that point. I mean the TAM that we see associated with the $1.6 billion or so acquisitions that we've done over the last several years. I'm including this recent $200 million plus on United Silicon Carbide. We see that TAM at about $5 billion. We see that TAM doubling to $10 billion or more over the next several years. So we expect these businesses to be material and enjoy that growth, which is significant. And that's not including Biotechnologies.
Christopher Rolland:
Very good points. Congrats on the acquisition.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Chris.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Rajvindra Gill with Needham & Company.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Raj?
Operator:
Our next question comes from Rajvindra Gill with Needham & Company.
Unknown Analyst:
Can you hear me?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes.
Denis Pyatchanin:
Great. This is Denis on for Raji. So I just wanted to ask you guys a question regarding the comment you made about mass market handsets and the content increases. Could you provide some more color, please, about what you're seeing -- how much of a difference you're seeing in percent? I think you mentioned that it was higher versus the high end kind of 5G handsets. Can you guys please talk in a little bit more detail about that?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. Looking at the RF content in -- as 5G proliferates down, we've said there's like a $5 to $7 increase from 4G Advanced Pro, for example, up to the 5G. And what we said previously is -- what's interesting is we see that $5 to $7 consistent as the phones go down. So on a high-tier phone, high-tier smartphone, you might be looking at $30 to $35 RF bomb. You're adding $5 to $7 to that. That's a good growth. But as you go down into the mid-tier, you're adding that $5 to $7 on top of maybe $13 or $10 in some cases, right? So I think that was like the interesting kind of content growth story as you go down.
Some of the fundamental RF challenges in 5G that drive a lot of complexity around filtering and multiband, multimode operation, received diversity requirements going up, transmit diversity coming and so forth. All of that are sort of independent of tier because they're not -- a lot of them aren't driven specifically by consumer features and things that you see. It's driven just as much more sort of network infrastructure efficiency in economies driven by the provider -- the carriers. So I think that's the essence of the comments we made in the past that you're asking about.
Denis Pyatchanin:
That was perfect. And then for my follow-up, I just wanted to ask you regarding the gross margins. You mentioned that kind of gross margins are holding above this quarter despite challenges. Can you discuss the chief drivers of this resilience in the gross margins, please?
Mark Murphy:
We've covered that at length in previous calls, and it's the same factors, which is what we had hoped would happen. So we have premium products and those allow us to price better and compete where we most want to compete. We've maintained the utilization of our factory network. We continue to drive productivity programs aggressively. And it's these and other factors that have contributed to the gross margin quantum improvement and then the consistency we're seeing.
Operator:
We'll take our last question from Ambrish Srivastava of BMO Capital Markets.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I had a question on the demand side. What are your assumptions for the Asia market in the March quarter? Are you assuming a snapback? Or what is embedded in your guide for what you think about that market?
And then you made a comment on holding back to keep the channel healthy. Can you talk a little bit about -- give us some color on what the channel inventory looks like? And for my follow-up, Mark, given all the tightness, you have kept cap intensity very low for a while. Does that change in fiscal '23?
Steven Creviston:
Right, Ambrish. So first of all, looking at the Mobile market, you asked about Asia, specifically in March. I mean, clearly, I think as you saw from our guide, this is not a normal year, right? We're booking seasonality in our projection in March going up. So I think that there's no normality here to the seasonality. So we're expecting that it will be roughly in line, growing a bit over December quarter most likely.
Ambrish Srivastava:
And the channel inventory?
Steven Creviston:
Sorry, the channel inventory. Yes, that also varies dramatically by part numbers as we talked about. We have -- somewhat we're back up to healthy levels, for sure, others that were still actually hand-to-mouth out there or even constrained on -- in some cases. So there's a wide range. But we've been saying, I think, over the past quarter or two that we're beginning to see channel inventories begin to get healthier. In some parts, we've definitely gotten there, and that's where we're making sure that we don't over-ship into the channel to Mark's point.
Mark Murphy:
Ambrish on your...
Ambrish Srivastava:
[indiscernible] Go ahead, Mark. Sorry, go ahead.
Mark Murphy:
I was going to answer your CapEx question, but if you had a follow-up.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I did have a follow-on. Eric, we've heard the memory guys talk about builds at the -- in the VOX complex. Is that specific to the memory, guys? Or are you seeing that kind of manifest in your business as well? [indiscernible]
Steven Creviston:
Inventory. Did you say at VOX, the local Xiaomi? Is that what you said?
Ambrish Srivastava:
Yes. Yes, because the memory guys have called that out, without taking the names, but they've talked about -- and the desire to take share.
Steven Creviston:
Well, one thing which I don't think we've touched on this call yet, we do see very, very lean inventories in the finished goods channel. So in terms of phone inventory in the channel from Vivo and Xiaomi, we don't -- we see pretty tight discipline there. We don't see overbuilds and phone inventory building up. I'm not sure if you're asking that or whether they're building up a stockpile of memory chips, I don't know. I can't...
Ambrish Srivastava:
Well, on the component side, if you saw anything on the component side that...
Steven Creviston:
No, I don't think they're intentionally doing that. They're dealing with mix shifts due to supply changes week-to-week, which baseband they can get depend on which ones they can ship. So yes, so I think that's the key factor.
Mark Murphy:
And Ambrish, on your CapEx question, it's still our long-term goal to keep our capital intensity as low as we can as we grow and stay around that mid-single digits as a percent of sales. Now that will move a bit up and down as we're going through various investment cycles. But that's the long-term goal.
I do think it's important to call out that our CapEx is staying at sustained levels and through this weaker period in December because we see on the other side of it, and it's -- we're only talking in the March quarter, where we see things rising. We see next year as being a good year. And so we need to invest capacity to realize that growth potential.
Operator:
At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to management for closing remarks. .
Robert Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again at upcoming investor conferences. Thanks again, and have a good night.
Operator:
This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Q1 2022 Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. And now at this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much Cody. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2022 first quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; and Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group, as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn it over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome, everyone, to our call. First, the Qorvo team delivered an exceptional June quarter. Revenue, gross margin and EPS were each above guidance. Customer demand during the quarter was broad-based and included recently released product categories including 5G diversity receive modules, MEMS-based touch sensors and Wi-Fi 6E FEMs to name a few. Our R&D teams are relentlessly advancing technologies that enable more complete, integrated solutions and increase differentiation. We are partnering with leading customers, serving them where we are most valued and introducing new products and technologies that expand our addressable markets. We are pleased with ongoing design activity. We are locking in wins and we expect the demand environment to remain robust. In the smartphone market, 5G devices are adopting new architectures and adding functionality that enhance performance and create new challenges related to current consumption, or space and handset design resources. To address these challenges, handset manufacturers are selecting more highly integrated solutions that deliver superior performance. For Qorvo, the content opportunity in a 5G device increases by $5 to $7 when compared to a 4G device. We expect handset units to grow 5% to 10% this year with 5G doubling to around 550 million units. In 2025, 5G units are expected to be approximately 80% of total units. In other connectivity markets, new applications are proliferating, supported by generation over generation advancements, in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, Thread, ultra-wide band and other wireless protocols. And a growing number of applications, multiple wireless standards coexist and operate concurrently. As an example, one of the largest smart home providers recently integrated numerous low-power wireless protocols into its distributed Wi-Fi 6 router, creating infrastructure for seamless whole home operability. We expect this integration trend to continue. Our expertise in areas including product design, software support and system solutions enable us to simplify our customers' product development efforts, while significantly enhancing the end-user experience. Outside of connectivity markets, the expanding opportunities are driven by a diverse set of underlying upgrade cycles. Brushless DC motors are replacing larger, less efficient conventional DC motors. Solid-state drives are replacing slower and less reliable hard disk drives. And touch sensor solutions are replacing less functional traditional buttons. We also expect RF-based biotechnology testing will enable central lab performance at the point of care. We expect our first commercial orders for our Omnia test platform by the end of the year. Turning to the June quarterly highlights. In 5G handsets, customer demand for highly integrated modules is expanding. During the quarter, we launched our next-generation complete main path solution, which includes low-band, mid-high band and ultra-high band modules, offering higher output power and enhanced MIMO support for upcoming 5G phones. For the diversity path, we began sampling our first 5G DRX, a sub-6 ultra-high band placement, offering best-in-class receive sensitivity. These main path and diversity path solutions integrate filtering and amplifiers that were formally discrete, helping our customers to save board space, improve device performance and accelerate product development efforts. Also during the quarter, we announced the interoperability of our family of ultra-wideband products with Apple's U1 chip and the nearby interaction protocol. Qorvo's ultra-wideband solutions provide a superior level of accuracy, reliability, latency and security when compared to traditional technologies like Wi-Fi, BLE and NFC. In addition to remote access to our cars and homes, ultra-wideband will enable new applications in the connected home, indoor navigation, contactless payment, factory automation and other use cases. With more in-house software capability from our recent 7Hugs acquisition, we now offer a complete solution, and we're working with customers on products combining our ultra-wideband hardware with our latest software release, shortening their time to market. We see a growing set of applications for our ultra-wideband solutions and customer design activity is accelerating. In Wi-Fi for handsets, we secured new reference design engagements with our Wi-Fi 6E FEMs. These chip-on-board FEMs reduce insertion loss and enhanced handset design flexibility versus system-in-a-package solutions by enabling placement closer to the antenna. Leading Android manufacturers are moving from system and package placements to best-in-class RF solutions and Qorvo is winning on the strength of our product design, performance and customer support. In automotive, we achieved record revenue, up more than 80% year-over-year in support of automotive OEMs in the U.S., Europe and in Asia. Growth was driven primarily by the increased demand and expanding connectivity requirements for Wi-Fi, VDX, LTE and 5G. Content growth was also included our touch sensor solutions, which automotive OEMs are using to enable smart interiors. This is a new growth category for Qorvo, and we have secured design wins in support of multiple automotive customers. To enhance the functionality of our touch sensor solutions and foster new use cases, we've integrated infrared capabilities, a milestone achievement for our sensor team. For the smart home, we partnered with a leading supplier of home mesh networks to introduce the first Wi-Fi 6 router with integrated BLE, Thread and Zigbee multi-protocol operation. This leveraged our ConcurrentConnect technology. We also secured a BAW filter design win with a leading supplier of high-end audio speakers to support the pairing of Bluetooth Low Energy and Wi-Fi 6. As a member of the Connectivity Standards Alliance and an early participant in the upcoming matter connectivity standard, Qorvo stands to benefit as multi-protocol, seamless interoperability drives IoT adoption and growth. In power management, we released a 40-volt motor control solution that supports the ongoing transition to higher voltage battery power tools. Demand for our motor control and power management products has been very strong, driving growth in applications from appliances and battery power tools to enterprise compute, laptops and gaming. We are seeing demand for brushless DC motors expand into lower-cost power tools and smaller appliances, given the advantages in efficiency, size and reliability. We are also leveraging the configurability of our power management solutions to address new applications in defense and other markets. In infrastructure, we increased shipments to multiple OEMs in support of 5G sub-6 gigahertz massive MIMO and macro deployments in the US, Japan, Korea and Canada. We also achieved initial design wins supporting a massive MIMO deployment in India, and we secured BAW filter design wins for 3.5 gigahertz and 4.9 gigahertz 5G small cells with a major China based OEM. New product launches, including GaN integrated PA modules for massive MIMO systems and a family of high-efficiency power amplifiers for 5G small cells serving densely populated areas. Across our markets, there are strong secular tailwinds. Connectivity is proliferating and complexity is increasing, which is expanding our growth opportunities. We supply best-in-class products. And our investments in new product areas and differentiated technologies are extending our technology leadership and broadening our reach. As our June results and September guidance demonstrate, end market demand is broad-based and robust, and our outlook is strong. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fiscal year 2022 first quarter was $1.110 billion, $30 million above the midpoint of our guidance and $323 million or 41% higher than last year. Mobile products revenue of $836 million was up 79% year-over-year on the growth of higher content 5G smartphones. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue of $274 million was down year-over-year due to especially strong infrastructure demand during the June 2020 quarter, but the segment was up sequentially as Wi-Fi and programmable power management growth continued and infrastructure growth resumed. Non-GAAP gross margin was 52.5% and above our guidance on more favorable mix and pricing, improved manufacturing yields and lower inventory charges. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the first quarter were $216 million or 19.4% of sales and in line with expectations. Sequential and year-over-year increases in OpEx were driven by technology and product development expenses associated with key organic growth programs and recent acquisitions. Non-GAAP operating income in the June quarter was $367 million and 33.1% of sales. This was the third consecutive quarter of operating margin over 33%. Non-GAAP net income in the first quarter was $323 million, and diluted earnings per share of $2.83 was $0.38 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the first quarter was over $341 million and CapEx was $65 million, consistent with the level of spend we've discussed previously to support our outlook. Free cash flow was $276 million, and we repurchased $300 million of shares. The first quarter share repurchase was the largest dollar amount since an ASR in the March quarter of 2016. Since the company's formation and through the June quarter, we have repurchased $3.7 billion of shares at an average price of approximately $71. On the balance sheet, cash decreased to $1.2 billion, following the close of our next input acquisition and the share repurchases. That remained unchanged at approximately $1.7 billion. Our leverage remains low. Our revolver is untapped, and we have no material near-term maturities. Yesterday, Fitch initiated a credit rate out in Qorvo at BBB+. This, along with S&P's upgrade of Qorvo to investment grade in April, highlights the quality of Qorvo's business, the strength and durability of our cash flows and the financial discipline we've maintained. Now turning to the current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1.235 billion and $1.265 billion; non-GAAP gross margin between 52% and 52.5%; non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $3.24 at the midpoint of guidance. Our September quarter revenue outlook reflects sustained and broad-based customer demand, driven by multiyear technology upgrade cycles. Qorvo revenue of $1.250 billion at the midpoint is up 13% sequentially, 18% year-over-year and approximately 27% year-over-year adjusting for last year's 14-week quarter. As a reminder, our fiscal year 2021 was a 53-week fiscal year, and the September quarter last year was a 14-week quarter versus this fiscal year's more typical 13-week quarter. We forecast mobile revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $985 million at the midpoint or up 31% year-over-year and 18% sequentially. In IDP, we project revenue to decline slightly to approximately $265 million in the current quarter on defense program timing and continued supply constraints. We expect IDP sequential and year-over-year growth to return in the December quarter. Our September quarter gross margin guide of 52.25% at the midpoint is 55 basis points higher than last year's second quarter and reflects our ongoing portfolio management and sustained strong operating performance. In the second half of the fiscal year, we currently expect gross margins to remain around 52%, resulting in full year gross margin above 52%. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the September quarter to approximately $233 million on added labor and other development expenses associated with recent acquisitions and key growth programs. At the midpoint of our September quarter guidance, operating margin is forecasted to remain over 33% for the fourth consecutive quarter. We now project our current quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 9%. Capital expenditures are projected to increase to around $75 million in the September quarter as we work to intersect demand and support long-term supply agreements with multiple customers. We are off to a strong start in fiscal 2022, and we are well-positioned to continue delivering premium technology to an expanding set of customers in 5G, Wi-Fi, IoT, defense, power management and other growth markets. Now I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Blayne Curtis with Barclays. Please go ahead. Blayne, we're unable to hear you. Please check your mute function. [Operator Instructions]
Blayne Curtis:
Sorry about that. Nice results and guide. I'll work better on the mute button. But the -- maybe just a high level, you talked about the strong growth you're looking at in mobile, up 16% or sequentially. Just kind of curious, I think the Android market is still growing. You're seeing a nice mix of 5G. But I think a lot of people are kind of seeing more flattish trends in the back half of the year, you seem to be doing a bit better. Maybe just walk us through the puts and takes in the mobile guidance for September?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Blayne. Eric, do you want to take that one?
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Yes. We're continuing to see really strong design activity for our highly integrated full main path solution. We introduced Fusion21 more capability, more band coverage and more MIMO support in particular. We’ve entered diversity market, as you saw in our strategic highlights. And really, a lot of the activity in next-generation 5G phones is around antenna management. So that part of our business, which has been strong for some time, continues to see a lot of design interest and customers asking us to even step up and take maybe a larger role in terms of determining the antenna control, the interfaces, the tuning and the antenna flexing and so forth in and out of the antenna. So really, as you're looking to build the next generation of 5G handsets, we're just real pleased with the way our portfolio is lining up to the key challenges that our customers are having.
Blayne Curtis:
And then maybe a question for Mark, just on gross margin. You had thought maybe the June quarter would be a bit lower. Can you just walk us through what came in better for you? And then, as you look out -- I guess, you're kind of talking about more flattish for the rest of the year, any kind of puts and takes to that. I mean I know IDP is down, but I guess you're saying it should come back, so that should help?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Blayne, you pointed that one of the issues is the -- we're delivering these sort of margins with a weak infrastructure business in IDP. So I think that speaks to the quality of the rest of the business. Yes, the June quarter, another strong beat and things are just going really well. I would say that a combination of the environment we're in, which makes -- can be challenging in the forecast, but also just our improvements are outrunning even our own high expectations. So we're doing -- the org is operating very well and we're in the right places and that's paying off. As it relates to the June beat, we did have the higher volumes, and that was favorable, it skewed favorable on the mix, those higher volumes relative to the guide. We're still supply constrained. So that allows us some tactical opportunities, either to types of products and price. And then, again, we're just operating exceptionally well. The product test yields are better than expected. Manufacturing costs are in control. We've got good utilization. So the fixed cost absorption is predictable or better than expected. And then we had other inventory charges, which were lower than expected. So again, really pleased with the quarter. Now we are guiding down a bit. We're still going to be up 55 basis points year-over-year. Some of that is -- we just believe that some of the price effects will begin to moderate a bit. The inventory charges we expect to be a bit more normal. But I think it's hugely important to keep in mind that we're stabilizing around 52%. And structurally, this is a better business than it was years ago. And that's -- so it's sustainable. It's been driven by a number of efforts on dimensions we've laid out before. We are definitively a leader across a number of technologies, have very broad portfolio, gives us flexibility in the products and the opportunities we pursue. We've actively managed the portfolio. We pick the right products. We've got broad customer exposure and pick the place where they're going to evaluate the most. You've always done a terrific job on productivity and the culture has matured here around cost savings and just getting more done with less and getting it done more efficiently, which benefits customers and all, and those are ongoing. And it's allowing us to manage risk better, which I think has proven in this last 1.5 years. And that we're being very disciplined about our capital spend as we are picking up spend, but it's to serve what we believe is a very clear and compelling outlook.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks for taking my question. For the first one, I think last quarter, Bob, you gave us this, kind of, 15-ish percent sales growth for the full year fiscal 2022, was hoping you could update that number? And just give us some perspective on what that range implies for the back half of the year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sure, Vivek. Thank you for the question. Actually, I think it was Mark that gave it, but I'll go ahead and give you my answer for the year. Last quarter, when we gave you the year, we were giving you guys an idea that we thought we could grow about 15%. And I think now it's safe to say, we're going to grow well north of 15%, but probably less than 20%. So I'd put it in that range now, Vivek, and really pleased with how the mobile business is running, how the team is going on. Mark mentioned that supply constraints, the team is managing the complexity of the business with the constraints that are out there that all of you know about. But clearly, we're not demand constrained. It's on the supply side, Vivek. So obviously, if we can continue to do an extremely good job. We'll keep you updated.
Mark Murphy:
And maybe I'll just add to Bob's comments, Vivek, on maybe to give a little sense of the profile. As Bob said, we see revenue now between 15% and 20% versus around 15%. If we look at the year, we look at second to third quarter as being flattish, maybe down if the macro situation erodes. But right now, we're not seeing that. We're still in a supply constrained environment. We do, as I mentioned, see IDP growth resuming in the third quarter sequentially. But the business will still be less than $300 million in the December quarter. That would imply then that mobile is down a little bit sequentially. And the fourth quarter is just too early at this point to really call definitively. We think that IDP will be over $300 million in the fourth quarter, so continuing to grow through the year and then mobile be down a bit seasonally. We do, just our gross margins to be clear, see those leveling out around 52% in the back half for a total year of a little over 52%.
Vivek Arya:
Very helpful. And then for my follow-up, I was hoping you would give us your perspective on the China smartphone market. How much of your mobile business is exposed to the Chinese smartphone makers on an aggregate? How much of it is 5G versus 4G? And what have you seen recently? There have been kind of mixed data points about sell-through and some deceleration in units, perhaps more to do with export markets than anything else. But just give us your overall perspective on the China smartphone market level of exposure, 5G versus 4G and any trends that you're seeing there versus your expectations 90 days ago? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Vivek, this is Eric. Yes, so we're very pleased with our business in China and working with the major OEMs there, to continue to help them build out their 5G portfolio. And as you pointed out, their market is not just China domestic, but also, to a large extent, international shipments now in exports. So they've got a broad and growing portfolio of really leading-edge technology handsets and doing very well in Europe, for example, and other places. So it's a vibrant design opportunity for us, using leading-edge technologies, continuing to stick with the road map around highly integrated products that we're supporting and very much adopting our antenna control solutions and so forth. So the environment for design, in terms of relationships and so forth is fantastic. The product portfolio turns over fairly often, which gives lots of opportunities for new functions and new integration levels and features and so forth, which is always great for us. So in terms of recent slowness in the sell-through, you see some noise in the data. It's still great sell-through. The 5G phones are on track this year. The vast majority of what we're shipping to our Chinese customers today is 5G components and, of course, the sell-in into China domestic as well as vastly 5G already. But even for the export market, they're transitioning rapidly to 5G. So it's a great opportunity for Qorvo going very well.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Karl Ackerman with Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes. Good afternoon. I had a clarification question and a follow-up. My clarification question is, how many 10% customers did you have in the quarter? And my second question is on IDP. Some of your peers in the supply chain have noted Wi-Fi modules for auto and industrial electronics are seeing lead times extend, as part availability is in tight supply. I was wondering, are you able to fully meet demand and are conservative on broader supply chain constraints? Or are you also seeing tightness for substrates in your IoT business? And if you are seeing tightness, what steps have you or could you take to alleviate some of those constraints over the next couple of quarters? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Maybe, I'll start and then, James can, kind of, round out the answer. On the number of 10% customers, Karl, we tend not to do that during the quarters and give you the disclosure in the full year. But I will say, just like last quarter, we had a number of 10% customers and an additional customer that was very close. So I think I can say that we have -- for our space, a relatively broad customer set. On the business and constraints in Wi-Fi, in particular, IDP would be growing and it's Wi-Fi and programmable power management and some other areas, IDP will be growing sequentially, but we've got, I'd say, the supply constraints are in actually three areas. We've got some internal constraints. As you know, we have in-house capacity for certain components, and we're tight there. We've got external and that can be either incoming material and/or outside service providers and there are some constraints there. And then finally, the third one, we do have some, what I would call, maybe kidding issues where a customer may not be able to get all their parts, so it impacts our demand, sort of, a derivative effect for us. But with that, James?
James Klein:
Yes, Karl, and I think all of that Mark talked about is on a little bit different time line. We -- to start at the back that some of the kitting things appear to be getting better. And so I think as we go into our Q3 and Q4, those start to get better. We are bringing on internal capacity that really does start to help us as we go into the end of the calendar year. And the same note on our supply constraints from outside, those start to get significantly better as we go into our fourth quarter with some improvement in the December quarter as well. So as Mark talked about, I think that really allows us to move back into starting to grow in Q3 and Q4 for IDP. Now there's a couple of other things that are going to help us get back into growth as we enter the back half of the year. Part of that is we get beyond a really, really high growth that we had last year in the first two quarters with base station. And so that will be part of what allows us to get into that growth area. But also, we see significant strength and pretty good visibility as we go in the back half in power management and in our Wi-Fi business. And the base station business continues to distribute or have a recovery.
Karl Ackerman:
Very helpful. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
Hey guys, thanks for taking the question. I'll ask a two-part question, because I think the answer may be the same. Curious to know your largest customer, I think, is expecting some lower unit volumes, some supply chain constraints. And I'm wondering if you factored in those extraneous factors into your September quarter guide to presume you have. And then as well, are you sort of walking back the second half or even the second quarter gross margin guide a little bit because of perhaps some additional customer concentration?
Bob Bruggeworth:
No, I -- actually, Gary, I would say our gross margin guide is up for the year. So, yeah, the profile may be a little bit different. Yeah, we exceeded in the second quarter, but I wouldn't read into that, yeah. And then on the -- we guide with what we believe is our best read on the demand and any of these isolated supply chain constraints and we get the best view we can. And I can't add any more than that.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. Just my follow-up question, I wanted to ask about these lower inventory charges. These lower inventory charges have been a tailwind for you guys for several quarters now. I understand it's a supply constrained environment. Are those lower inventory charges a function of just the demand environment exceeding supply? Is it as simple as just less obsolescence and being able to sell perhaps some products that were borderline obsolete?
Mark Murphy:
I think, it starts with we're operating better and better matching what we're building to customer demand. And, yes, the tightness in the market can help clarify that. But I think we've just, over the years, they've gotten better operationally, and that's helping us. We've seen our inventory charges sort of trending down. And I'd say, at this point, yes, we just probably need to do a better job of building it into forecast and that it's a more durable level, which we're, of course, happy about.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll now take our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. So your margins are looking excellent. And I know you broke down a bit, Mark, on how that's all shaking out between operational efficiencies and mix. I mean, with IDP down and the margins up, it was certainly, I think, kind of, surprising. Is that largely due to the mix coming out of mobile? Because given what's happening in China, which I know is very large for you; we're seeing a lot more antenna tuning. We're seeing a lot more demand for BAW, both products, which are accretive to global margins. So I'm just trying to get an idea, is this driven largely by what's -- the technology evolution and the Chinese phones, coupled with better operational performance? Or is there something else going on? And then I have a follow-up.
Mark Murphy:
I think you've got it directionally correct, Ed. I mean we've got, of course, some highly differentiated discrete parts. But a big move here for us is the move to integrated modules, more sophisticated modules and then just our operational performance and driving cost out, better utilizing our factories, getting FX cost absorption, spends in control. And then just having a good road map to drive cost down and pick the right places to compete. So it's a collective effort, right? It takes early R&D many years ahead of time and having an advantage in design and good portfolio management. And then at the end of the day, we got to be able to produce things efficiently and everyone is doing a great job across the board, and you're seeing the results.
Edward Snyder:
And if I could maybe dig in with Eric a little bit on mobile. When you merge with -- when TriQuint and RF Micro move way back when we were on the road, you were talking about not really wanting to put a tiger team on the largest customer at the point, because you didn't want to get the revenue concentration. At that point, if you took a snapshot of what happened back then, you were spread around 20% for each of the major groups, including IDP, which you seem to be happy, but now it seems like we're kind of returning back to that kind of a model with multiple 10% customers. What I'm wondering is, with the push of 5G into lower-cost phones, which is capturing more of the discrete market, is that going to change? Because if you look at China as a total, it must be a very large portion of your total revenue? Or are you counting in 10%? I mean is the blend across China, if you had multiple 15% customers, which of the box guys, doesn't that expose you to the swings in China, maybe a little bit more than would you be comfortable with?
Eric Creviston:
Well, I guess, we -- first of all, to differentiate our business in China with our Chinese handset OEMs is not, as we said, by any means, entirely China domestic consumption, of course, right? I think roughly half their volumes are now being exported around the world and selling into high, mid and even ultra-high tier phones across many countries today. So I think that the biggest thing that's changed me over the five or six-year period you're referring to is how much like their phones are becoming like the true flagships of the world, implementing the latest features and sometimes ahead of the bigger guys, if you will because they're fast, they've got a portfolio that turns over, they're shipping all over the world. So adopting our new highly integrated things like 5G DRx modules like the dual connect modules and a lot of what we're doing in the antenna systems, I mean that's -- they're early movers in that new technology. And I think that's -- again, we're very, very pleased to be working with these guys.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso:
Yes, thank you. Good evening. My first question is on the supply constraints. And if you give us some sense of, for how long you expect these constraints to last? Obviously, the mobile business has a seasonal aspect to it in the first half of the year. I imagine the answer would be different for IDP. And perhaps as you catch up on some of these constraints, does that affect the seasonality of the business such that if you're catching up on supply, we kept some better than seasonal quarters as you're able to catch up with some of the demand that you perhaps weren't able to fulfill?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Chris, this is Bob. Thanks for the question. Like I said earlier, the team has worked extremely hard to manage through all this complexity and to forecast what's unknowable at this time would be quite challenging. And I'm pretty pleased with how the team has been running the operations and chasing demand and product mix and James and Eric -- James and Mark both talked about put our customers and matching things up and everything like that. So I think there's been a lot of smart people out there that have forecasted this thing that's going to go on for years, some say quarters. And I think it's not in our place to forecast this. What I can tell you is today, we are clearly capacity constrained on demand. James pointed out, we're adding capacity. Our suppliers are adding capacity. And we'll have to see how some of these great products that we support in both IDP and mobile continue to sell. Mark also commented about the global situation and what's going on and how the world recovers. And as it spikes with what's dealing with the virus, we've got to factor all those things in. And for me to sit here and give you a specific date, I think, would not be smart on our part. But what I do feel good about is the progress we are making and the demand just continues to grow. And I think that's what's important.
Chris Caso:
Got it. Thank you. As a follow-up, perhaps you could talk a little bit about uses of cash and the cash flow has improved pretty nicely last year in this. You spoke about repurchases in your prepared remarks, now that you're generating this cash, what are your plans for it?
Mark Murphy:
Chris, I'd say that our plans are, we're going to operate as we have been, and we've been a pretty balanced company around deploying capital. We're thrilled with the June quarter the start to the year, $276 million of free cash, and we actually deployed $467 million. So, I'd say, very strong deployment out of the gate. If you look at last 12 months, we generated $1.2 billion of free cash. We deployed about 80% of that, of which three-quarters of that was on repurchase. Now, keep in mind, beginning of the year last year was everyone was hunker down at COVID, so I think 80% is pretty good, all things considered. And then the last eight quarters, we've generated $2 billion of free cash. We've actually deployed $2.1 billion, and 60% of that was repurchased, about 40% -- while 40% was acquisitions. Now, we just got out of the quarter where we -- the ninth quarter was active semi. So if you included that, we actually had deployment of about 50% acquisition, 50% repurchase. So I think we're going to -- the whole management team is focused on long-term free cash flow generation. So we believe we're going to continue to grow free cash flow. We think we will this year. Our priorities, organic investment, continue to have a technology lead. We've got build the capacity we need for the markets that we feel confident about. And then, we look at inorganic opportunities where it makes sense. And we've been fairly active. Of the $1.2 billion that we spent on acquisitions in the last nine quarters, we're really excited about the markets that we have exposure to. We think that we've brought on over $4 billion of TAM with that, that's conservative, and that's excluding Bio. And then several years out, we would see the TAM being north of $10 billion for what we bought. And again, that's excluding Bio, which is an exciting completely new market for Qorvo. So I think we'll continue to look at things that make sense for Qorvo on markets, customers, technology differentiation, financials, of course, and then as we know, culture matters.
Chris Caso:
Yes. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. You'll hear next from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri:
I had two as well. I guess, Mark, the first question is on gross margin. I think you've beaten the last four quarters by about 200 basis points. Each of those quarters and then even before that, you were beating by about 100 basis points. So I guess the question is, like, is this just consistent conservatism? Or is there something that's kind of surprising you intra-quarter that's making it better? I mean, if I apply that same level in September, you'll do 54%, which is like 70% drop-through. That's like super good, given that it's a down IDP quarter. So I'm just trying to handicap your guidance versus the fact that you've been beating by a lot during the past four quarters? Thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Tim, I alluded to this earlier. We admittedly haven't been great at forecasting. Fortunately, it ended up on the right side. And we -- I think, that I certainly would not add 200 basis points. You can't do that, because we're trying to obviously refine things. I would say that, yes, this has been a very difficult period, this past year, a year-and-a-half to forecast. And the market's tightened up quickly. And of course, there's a lot of operational considerations. So I think you've got to factor some of that in that, that it's been difficult to forecast. You tend to in periods like this be a bit more conservative or more cognizant of the risks, I should say. But the other thing is we're just -- the improvements that we're making, we had great expectations and we're doing even better. And it's just embroiling us to do more of the same. Our operating leverage, which is one of your points, does slip as we look out to the December quarter and March quarter. But you've also got to consider that, that's on very difficult comps the prior year. And at the time, when we were putting up those numbers, we said that it really showcases what the business could do, but we guided down. So -- and we did come down some, as you know, as you see here. But again, I'll repeat something I said earlier. I think it's important to keep in mind that we've stabilized around 52% and that the business is structurally better than it was.
Timothy Arcuri:
Awesome, Mark, Thank you. I guess my second question is really on the shape of the business for fiscal Q3 and Q4. It might be splitting hairs maybe a little bit, but the comments seem to imply maybe a little below seasonal in mobile products for fiscal Q3 and fiscal Q4. Is that supply constraint, maybe some concern around China? And I guess maybe a different way of asking the question is if the constraints didn't exist, how much better would fiscal Q3 and fiscal Q4 be, like is it having a material effect on the guidance? Thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah, Tim, it's Mark. I think as you go out, we're in the September quarter, trying to give you guys a sense of the profile. It's -- I think we have a decent view on December. As you know, it starts to -- it's a ways out. There aren't many companies, if any, guiding out in March. I'm trying to give you just a sense of things. On the supply constraints, we are clearly supply constrained at the moment, and it gives us confidence in the near to medium-term demand. And we feel confident in the long-term demand just given our market position. Now there are some green shoots around the, sort of, pricing has moderated a little bit, a few less expedites. We see some channel, it's lean to the point of unhealthy, and we see a little bit of that recovering. So I think those are signs, early signs that the industry will work through this. And at this point, I think it's prudent just to – we've given you the best view we can.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Ambrish Srivastava from BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Hi, thank you. Mark, I just wanted to come back to the longer term gross margin. And you actually have been very candid about the uneven performance on that front as well as on the free cash flow side. So kudos to you on that admitting it and then delivering on it. But I just wanted to come back to the structural changes. Could you just remind us what are the big heavy lifting? I know it's easy for us to just model it out. But it's 500 bps versus where it used to hover around, and obviously, the business is bigger. But can you just help us understand what are the changes you've made that has allowed you to structurally be 500 bps above where you used to be? And then I had a quick follow-up, please.
Mark Murphy:
I think we've talked about this for years and going back to the Investor Days. And it sounds repetitive at this point, but, I mean, it starts with both the companies that came together were technology leaders in their own right on some different products and created an enterprise that was going to be a leader as 5G hit. And it took a few years to get legs under the org. But that technology advantage and this wide suite of technologies to serve customers' problems is foundational to the rest of it. And we continue to maintain that lead. And then that gives us the opportunity to make good calls on where to play, where to compete, where the customers are going to value us most. So we've been very active in portfolio management. Yeah, we've driven productivity, and we've talked about that over the years, the wafer size expansion, the die shrinks, the myriad of other productivity programs, not only in the factories, but in R&D and other areas. And then, we've been very mindful about capital spend. Our CapEx as a percent of sales was almost 20% at one point. We've driven that down to mid-single digits, expect it to stay around there. And hence, the -- as 5G hit our factories of have gotten loaded, we're getting great fixed cost absorption costs are in control. And then we've got this great pipeline of products that Eric's talked about and James. So it's all those things, taking all the people in the company. And that's allowed us as, I think, structurally higher gross margin.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Got it, got it. And then my quick question on the gross margin. I just wanted to make sure I understood this. You mentioned pricing as one of the factors in the reported quarter. But then you said the pricing environment is -- I'm not sure I caught the term, but whether you meant that pricing is not as strong as it was in the reported quarter or pricing is not really that much of a factor in your guidance for price erosion?
Mark Murphy:
It's still very constructive environment. And, yeah, the market is still tight. I was just saying on a relative basis, it's less tight than it was a couple of quarters ago. And, yeah, it's still a very constructive environment. I mean we're still -- Eric and James and talk -- and Bob can talk about long-term agreements with customers, and that's still going on. I was just making a relative comment, Ambrish.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Got you. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Chris Rolland with Susquehanna. Please go ahead.
Chris Rolland:
Congrats on the quarter and thanks for the question. You guys had a lift in your own internal inventories in the quarter. And I was just wondering, was that just a service upcoming demand? Or do you guys plan to have a little bit of a buffer there, or maybe even use it strategically. Just wondering what that was about?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. We're -- we've been performing really well in inventories, and we're near -- working capital overall were near historic lows. And then on inventory itself, we've -- we're still close to four turns. We went down a little bit, as you mentioned. But it's in part to support seasonal ramp or primarily to support seasonal ramp. I mean, we're basically -- as we make it, we ship it.
Chris Rolland:
Yeah. Okay. And then from recollection, I think you mothballed one of your facilities. Is there a point here in the cycle here where you would open that up again and start filling that up?
Mark Murphy:
I think you're referring to Farmers Branch. And, yeah, that is one of the aspects of trying to grow capital efficiently, and we would expect to utilize that facility next fiscal year.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll take our next question from Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh:
Hi, guys. Thanks for letting me ask the question. Just looking at -- I know you talked about 2021 about 550 million 5G handsets. Just wondering what your take would be on 2022 if you -- to take a stab at what 5G units should look like? And my follow-up, just if you could give some color to what the puts and takes would be to the content growth on 5G handsets looking out? Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. So this is Eric. Yeah, we're not commenting formally on 2022 yet. At this level, once we get through, we'll be at still under half of the handsets of the shipping or smartphones that are shipping will be 5G. We did say that we think 5G will be up to 80% by 2025. So you can maybe connect out there and make an estimate.
Vijay Rakesh:
Got it. And in terms of the content growth opportunity into next year?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah, yeah, it continues. And some of the -- what our advanced features this year drop down into the other tiers as you go forward, right? So you're getting a lift not only on the, say, 250 million a year of additional phones, but also the other 5G phones that are shipping are also having higher content. So that helps to support the overall TAM growth.
Operator:
Thank you. And that does conclude today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us tonight. We look forward to speaking with you again at upcoming investor conferences. Thanks again, and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you. That does conclude today's conference. We do thank you all for your participation and you may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Q4 2021 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2021 fourth quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP -- non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; and Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group, as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn it over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks Doug, and welcome everyone. Qorvo concluded our fiscal 2021 with an exceptionally strong March quarter. Quarterly revenue, gross margin and EPS were well above guidance. Our performance was driven primarily by 5G smartphones and Wi-Fi 6 and 6E. Demand was broad-based across customers and design activity suggest continued strength in fiscal 2022, supported by multi-year trends in wired and wireless connectivity markets. In smartphones, the adoption of 5G is driving demand for higher value content. Device architectures are increasing in complexity, as higher frequencies with wider bandwidth are added, transmit is introduced in the diversity path, MIMO architectures are adopted and new received path featuring carrier aggregation. This is placing a premium on Qorvo's highly differentiated semiconductor technologies and enabling us to supply an expanding portfolio of products to industry leaders. For calendar 2021, we expect 5G smartphones to double versus last year. Within these phones, we expect the RF content to increase $5 to $7 per phone when compared to 4G, including in the mid-tier. Turning to the March quarterly highlights, Qorvo achieved record shipments of low, mid-high and ultra-high band main path solutions and Wi-Fi 6E FEMs in support of leading Android OEMs. On the design front, we continue to expand our content opportunity with the leading Android OEMs by securing complete main path solutions and secondary transmit in the diversity path. In Ultra-Wideband, Qorvo was selected by a leading provider of consumer IoT products to integrate Ultra-Wideband into a broad set of connected home devices. More customers are looking to add Ultra-Wideband to their products to take advantage of its superior location accuracy, security, and latency compared to other wireless technologies. Customer interest in Qorvo's Ultra-Wideband solutions has been robust, and we continue to see adoption in smartphones as the catalyst for expanding ecosystem of connected devices that includes associated peripherals, automobiles, consumer, industrial IoT applications. Finally, mobile, we're very pleased to have been honored by Samsung with the best quality award recognizing Qorvo's innovation and outstanding performance in support of their Galaxy product family. In IDP, Wi-Fi revenue, including Wi-Fi 6 was a record. The rate of adoption of Wi-Fi 6 is outpacing the adoption we experienced for Wi-Fi 5 and the rollout is forecasted to span multiple years across enterprise, retail and service providers. Qorvo are seeing a strong attach rate given the performance advantages we enabled related to range, efficiency, signal integrity, and form factor. To that end, we recently secured the entire bill of materials in support of a major U.S. MSO gateway. We also released multiple 5G -- 5 gigahertz iFEMs that deliver improved band isolation and enhanced capacity and range in tri-band Wi-Fi 6 home mesh networks. In broadband, MSOs are increasing downstream and upstream data capabilities by upgrading to DOCSIS 3.1 infrastructure. During the quarter, we expanded shipments of DOCSIS 3.1 GaN power amplifiers to major U.S. MSOs offering greater efficiency, longer range and increased bandwidth to maximize upstream and downstream data connectivity. In automotive, Qorvo has for years been successful supporting the increased demand for in-vehicle infotainment. During that time, we've expanded our automotive portfolio and engage with customers to enable the transition to connected car through cellular V2X. In the March quarter, these efforts helped to generate the first production orders for our cellular V2X front end modules and BAW coexistence filters to support the leading European automotive OEMs. Of note, Qorvo's high-frequency BAW coexistence filters also enable the concurrent operation of cellular V2X and Wi-Fi. In programmable power management, customer demand has been strong and supported two trends. First, the transition to solid-state drives is ongoing, primarily in laptops and gaming consoles. During the quarter, Qorvo's programmable PMICs continue to support this transition with expanded shipments to and new engagements with multiple leading solid-state drive providers. Second, the transition of brushless DC electric motors is accelerating, enhancing efficiency and a broad set of consumer products, including power tools and appliances. Qorvo increased shipments with motor control solutions during the quarter, supporting multiple major consumer brands. In Defense applications, the shift to higher frequencies, the adoption of phased array radar and the proliferation of GaN are among the trends supporting demand for Qorvo's products. For radar applications, we released a reconfigurable dual band GaN power amplifier MMIC for the S and X bands, enabling more compact next-generation radar systems. Over 30 million miles away, the successful landing of NASA’s JPL Mars Perseverance rover was supported by our components integrated into the rover's descent radar. In Infrastructure, we continue to ramp shipment during the quarter to a base station OEM in support of U.S. C-band massive MIMO deployments. And we captured initial design wins for massive MIMO deployments in Canada, Japan, and Korea. Qorvo brings decades of technology leadership in wireless infrastructure, and we are leveraging the full breadth of our GaN power and small signal portfolio to support OEMs on upcoming 5G deployments. We have strong customer engagements. We are investing in critical enabling technologies and design activity remains robust. We see tremendous opportunity in 5G infrastructure globally over the next four to five years, as deployments continue to rollout. After the quarter closed, we received an emergency use authorization from the FDA for Omnia COVID-19 rapid antigen test, which leverages high-frequency BAW sensors for high sensitivity and specificity. Qorvo began efforts to use BAW sensors to develop diagnostic test solutions in 2013, in a manner similar to how we leveraged our BAW filters to achieve superior frequency selectivity in RF applications. Now with the authorization from the FDA, we are preparing to scale production to help support ongoing public health efforts. To that end, Qorvo was awarded a contract with the National Institutes of Health through the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics or RADx initiative. With $24 million from the Biological Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, the award is helping to advance the production and market launch of our Omnia diagnostic test platform. Also after the quarter closed, Qorvo acquired NextInput, a pioneer in the emerging field of force-sensing solutions for the next-generation of human machine interface. NextInput will be part of the mobile products providing MEMS-based sensors and innovative products for customers in existing and new markets. They have shipped tens of millions of MEMS-based sensor solutions to leading manufacturers of smartphones, wearables, automobiles, and other applications. We see multiple opportunities for their solutions to augment or displace capacitive touch and mechanical buttons with smaller, more reliable, and air-tight solutions are applicable to any surface, including glass, polycarbonate, aluminum, and carbon fiber. We welcome the NextInput team to the Qorvo family, and we are excited to expand our technology portfolio and accelerate the deployment of the technology to our broad customer base and new markets. Before handing the call over to Mark, I want to acknowledge the entire Qorvo team for their commitment to supporting our customers and keeping the world connected. Qorvo is enabling multiyear upgrade cycles in existing markets and introducing disruptive technologies, including Ultra-Wideband, RF-based biotechnology testing and MEMS-based solutions. We expect broad-based end market demand for our products and another year of strong financial results. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fiscal 2021 fourth quarter was $1.073 billion, $33 million above the midpoint of our guidance and up 36% or $285 million versus last year. Mobile Products revenue of $808 million was up 45% year-over-year on the growth of higher content 5G smartphones. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue of $265 million was up 14% versus last year, led principally by robust Wi-Fi demand. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021, we delivered our third consecutive quarter of gross margin over 50%. Non-GAAP gross margin was 52.6% and above our guidance as less favorable mix was more than offset by better-than-expected price, manufacturing costs, and inventory charges. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the fourth quarter were $207 million or 19.3% of sales and in line with expectations. Sequential and year-over-year increases in OpEx were driven by technology and product development expenses, associated with recent acquisitions and other key growth programs. Non-GAAP net income in the fourth quarter was $315 million, and diluted earnings per share of $2.74 cents was $0.32 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the fourth quarter was $403 million and CapEx was $77 million, in line with our expectations. CapEx for the year was $187 million and below 5% of sales. During the quarter free cash flow was $325 million, and we repurchased $175 million of shares. On the balance sheet, cash increased to $1.4 billion and debt remained unchanged at approximately $1.7 billion. Our leverage remains low. Our revolver is untapped and we have no material -- near-term maturities. In April S&P upgraded our credit rating to investment grade, reflecting the steps we've taken to profitably grow the business and maintain a strong balance sheet. Before turning to the outlook, I will comment briefly on the past year. Qorvo's full year fiscal 2021 performance realized what was envisioned at the time of the merger, to create an enterprise that's able to serve customers technology and product needs when connectivity trends accelerated and as product performance requirements increased. Qorvo's commitment to R&D, active portfolio management, sustained productivity, and capital discipline positioned us to serve our customer's needs, expand supply chain partner opportunities and improve financial results. In fiscal 2021, Qorvo delivered revenue over $4 billion; non-GAAP gross margin over 52%; non-GAAP operating margin over 32%; and free cash flow over $1.1 billion. Qorvo's free cash flow has increased five-fold over the past four years. We are committed to build on this and are investing and executing to do so. Now, turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1.065 billion and $1.095 billion. Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 50%. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.45 in the midpoint of our guidance. Our June quarter revenue outlook reflects sustained and broad-based customer demand driven by multiyear technology upgrade cycles. In mobile, demand for 5G is adding RF complexity and driving higher content. We forecast mobile revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $810 million at the midpoint or up 73% year-over-year. In IDP, we project revenue of approximately $270 million in the current quarter, sustained by Wi-Fi 6 demand and other markets. Our June quarter gross margin guide is approximately 50%, reflecting seasonal patterns and less favorable mix. That is up a 140 basis points versus last year on higher volumes, active portfolio management and pricing, and continuous productivity efforts. We expect our June quarter gross margin to be the lowest gross margin quarter of the year. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the June quarter to around $214 million, on added labor and other development expenses associated with recent acquisitions and key growth programs. At the midpoint of our June quarter guidance, operating margin is forecast to be over 30% for the fourth consecutive quarter. We project our current quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate to be between 9% and 10%. Capital expenditures will remain around $70 million in the June quarter, as we work to intersect projected demand and support long-term supply agreements with multiple customers. For our full year fiscal 2022, we forecast approximately 15% revenue growth on an increase in smartphones volumes in the range of 5% to 10%, a doubling of 5G handsets, sustained Wi-Fi demand and growth in other markets, including power management and defense. We project full year of gross margin to be approximately 52%. We expect OpEx to increase sequentially through the year and remain below 20% of sales for the full year. This level of OpEx is in line with what we laid out years ago and supports Qorvo's ongoing product and technology leadership in existing markets, while funding investment in newer areas, such as UWB, biosensors, power management and MEMS. We forecast other expense to drop slightly on lower interest expense, but remain above $60 million. We see CapEx around 5% of sales. So, up on an absolute basis, as we add capacity intersect known and high confidence opportunities. We expect free cash flow to grow year-over-year modestly due to slightly higher CapEx and working capital build. Based on our strong free cash flow performance in fiscal year 2021 and our fiscal year 2022 outlook, along with our substantial balance sheet capacity and other factors, the Board of Directors has authorized a $2 billion share repurchase program. Amidst the pandemic, the Qorvo team executed well in serving customers and advancing technologies critical to a more connected world. Entering fiscal 2022, we are well-positioned to continue delivering premium technology to an expanding set of customers in 5G, Wi-Fi, IoT, defense, power management, and other markets. In closing, I'd like to join Bob and thanking Qorvo employees again for their contributions over this past year. Now, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Blayne Curtis of Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
[Technical Difficulty] my question and nice results. I want to ask you on IDP. You mentioned many, many positive drivers. I think the business, it's kind of flattish here. Just kind of curious if there's any areas that are going the other way for you? And I guess, do you expect that to reverse as you move through fiscal 2022?
James Klein:
Yeah. Thanks, Blayne. I mean, we certainly have had a great positive year as we exited the year and grew a 38%, mainly driven by really strong demand in wireless infrastructure. But also a great year in Wi-Fi with consecutive double-digit growth quarters, and both defense and power management also having really strong years. So, I'm really pleased with the results of our fiscal 2021. We've been pretty public about the slowdown in the wireless infrastructure business in the back half of last year. And we certainly see that continuing as we go through the first half of this year. We think it will start to pick up in the back half of next year, as deployments in China start. And then certainly we expect C-band to start to rollout in the United States, as we get into the back half of the year. So, overall, I would expect base station to start to pick up a bit, but I think if you look at full year for IDP base station will actually probably be down a bit and we'll see significant growth in some of the other markets.
Blayne Curtis:
Thanks. So, maybe just a follow-up to that. In the market, the fiscal outlook to the top line, do you think IDP can grow this fiscal year?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah, Blayne, I'll take that one. Yeah, based on the guidance I gave you, you'll see that we are expecting IDP to grow, and it'll be in the lower end of the range that James typically gets, he gets 10% to 15% per year. And we'll be in the lower end of that range, given the dynamics, James mentioned. We expect to see lackluster infrastructure build out in the first half. And we're expecting that to pick up in the second half, but we're also seeing -- in his business, just great opportunities to continue in Wi-Fi, power management is growing strongly. The defense business is strong and durable, so, still a great year for his business ahead of us.
Blayne Curtis:
Thanks. Appreciate it.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Blayne.
Operator:
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Bill Peterson of JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Nice job in that quarterly execution and guide and thanks for giving the color on the full year. I just wanted to come back to infrastructure. It sounds like most of this may be more related to the market delay, timing, maybe perhaps of China build outs. But I guess, just try to understand, the competitors of your business, just really bad. It's just a delay in the market, or is it mixed as it relates to more macro versus massive MIMO, any color you can give on why we're sort of slow to start at the gate in infrastructure?
James Klein:
Yeah. Thanks, Bill. I mean, definitely, the market has slowed down. I think it's been pretty public across many of our customers and our competitors, as we've seen these deployments and tenders delay in China. The other thing that's happened a bit is mix. And again, we've talked about that over the last couple of quarters as the mix has shifted a little bit from 64 element array to more macro-based stations and more 32 element array. Now that said, I am very happy with the portfolio that we have. We continue to invest in the technology, in both in the GaN side for power and in the small signal side. So, I'm happy where we are and I think we continue to make progress there. And we're in the very early stages. So, this is just beginning. We've had one year in China. We're just starting really in the U.S. and the rest of the world. So, this is going to be a multi-year trend. I think we're positioned very, very well with the portfolio we have. And, of course, we're obviously not going to sit still, we're going to continue to drive that business forward and invest in technology and make sure that we're able to do what we did last year with the early rollouts in China.
Bill Peterson:
Thanks for that. And then maybe for Eric. The mobile growth is applied, I guess, to be faster than a 50% based off of James is coming in at a bit less. So, within that growth outlook, where do you see the most growth coming from? Is it -- with these sort of full main path wins in the Android camp? Is it, further -- I mean, including further adoption of the dual transmit, UWB? Where do you see the -- what's driving the most growth within your business in this fiscal year, I guess at a high level?
Eric Creviston:
Right. Well, certainly in the near-term and currently where we are today, the full main path solutions are just getting a lot of traction. That brings a lot of dollar content with it, especially as we look in the forward -- looking in the future and see all the new bands coming and so forth. But also just all of our -- complexity around the antenna, it comes with all of that as well, right? As complexity goes, there's a lot more antenna tuning and antenna plexing and so forth. So, that's still a strong market for us and Wi-Fi as well. The 6 -- 6E rollout has been really good for us. So Wi-Fi has been growing and one of the faster clips of all our product groups as well. UWB, a lot of excitement about that, for sure. Lots of design activity across all the verticals. We announced the design in consumer IoT space, which is pretty big for us. It's going to drive growth second half of the year. And so, it's going to be picking up throughout the year. It's not driving the growth now, given its scale, but as we exit the year, it'll be a bigger contributor.
Bill Peterson:
Thanks for that.
Operator:
Thank you. And we we'll take our next question from Karl Ackerman of Cowen.
Karl Ackerman:
Yes. Thank you, gentlemen. Mark, if I could start with you first. I think your prior directional outlook for June contemplated supply constraints, and it would seem that supply constraints were lower than you anticipated between you and China handset OEMs. Is there a way to quantify the amount of revenue that may be pushed into the second half of this calendar year, given the supply constraints you've seen so far today?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. Karl, I'm not going to add any more to the current guidance. It’s our best view, considering the constraints we have and what we believe we can deliver and work with customers. Part of the benefit we had in the fourth quarter was just a tremendous job. The ops team has done, and then the work we've done with customers, to expedite product to them. So, we were able to, both produce more product and get them more product. And you see that come in a number of forms. We had more favorable absorption. We had some better pricing. Our inventory charges are actually lower than we thought. So, a number of -- number of positives, again, in the fourth quarter, just showing how well we're serving the market and working with our customers closely. So, it gives us a lot of confidence in the next couple of quarters that demand is very firm, which is why I felt comfortable giving preliminary full year view. And we'll just continue to do what we've been doing, and managing our inventories closely, watching the channel. Both of those are very healthy and the behavior from customers suggest that it's long-term demand and they're looking to partner with this more closely.
Karl Ackerman:
I appreciate that. Maybe if I could -- then as my follow-up. You spoke about the full year outlook for fiscal 2022. And so really appreciate that. You also spoke about the growing opportunity within mobile in fiscal 2022 with regard to the main path solutions. And so, in that context, last call you indicated that your cost basis on your integrated modules is not where you'd like them to be today. I was hoping you could discuss what progress you've made on improving factory efficiencies or outsourcing initiatives that may drive improved yields from here, as we think about that progression towards sustain mid to -- low to mid-50s gross margins. Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. I guess, Karl, if the question is, what are we doing to sustain margin? I mean, first of all, it's a very complicated equation, right, on all the things that go into making the gross margin. I think what I'd like to do is just start with our fiscal 2022 guide is for margins to hold up. Let's start with the fact that in fiscal year 2021, we increased gross margin over 400 basis points versus fiscal year 2020. So, I'd say sustaining at these levels is pretty good. And I think you've got to remember that some things will go against us in 2022 that went with us in 2021, notably, the pricing environment is very firm now. And that is likely to loosen a bit and still be healthy, we believe, but we'll not be as tight as it is at the moment. And we believe our inventory charges -- we have to assume they'll kind of pick back up to normal levels. And we've got to remember just how hard this stuff is that we do. So, I can go on and on. Now, there's plenty of good that's going on to offset the bad in fiscal 2022. I mean, we're continuing to drive productivity. The portfolio management continues utilization. We've got some room, and we'll continue to invest as we need to, but keep that utilization high. All the things we've talked about over the years. And so as a result, we just -- we have a view now that we can sustain margins these levels. Of course, over time, Karl, we've said -- we aspire to expand our gross margins, and I think it runs through the same things we've been doing. We will continue to be a technology leader, allows us to do the hardest parts. We'll pick to play with customers with those hardest parts where our value get recognized. Productivity's as good as it's ever been in the company and we're driving even more there. And then, we're just going to be very circumspect about any capital build. So, we're optimistic that over time, there'll be some opportunity.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll take our next question from Craig Hettenbach of Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes. Thanks. Just to follow-up on Ultra-Wideband. Just -- can you talk about the breadth of design activity? And then, is there a way to think about it over the next year or two kind of a revenue level that would be kind of reasonable to reach for that technology?
Eric Creviston:
Sure, Craig. Yeah. This is Eric. The design activity is really, really broad. It is very good that we completed the 7Hugs acquisition and brought the entire software stack, which really enables us to work across a very broad array of applications. So, engaged with multiple mobile handset providers, of course, to leverage that channel. But then also the -- all the things that talk to the mobile phone, like the consumer IoT devices, of course and also automotive. And then, just a bunch of industrial IoT sort of applications around robotics and AR, VR and navigation, indoors, and those sorts of applications. So, really broad. But the team's done a great job of doing all of this with a unified hardware and a unified software stack for the most part, with very few variations. So, tremendous productivity coming out of that organization to cover such a broad number of verticals. And in terms of the outlook for it, we said before we believe we can get it to a couple hundred million dollar revenue business within a few years, nothing has changed there by any means. And we're super excited about the opportunities it’s bringing.
Craig Hettenbach:
Great. And then as a follow-up for James, I mean, to be able to grow IDP at the low end, the 10% to 15%, even with roughly a quarter of the business down. I know you talked about there's Wi-Fi strength and programmable power, but any other contexts in terms of -- some of that growth to drive the 10%, even with the infrastructure headwind.
James Klein:
Yeah. And I'll lead off with those ones that we spoke about. I mean, we're seeing very strong demand in Wi-Fi 6. And Mark and Bob both had hit that in their prepared remarks. And so, we've got a performance advantage there. And I think, customers are seeing that and we've been able to scale that business very significantly. On top of that, we've got 6E just coming right on the heels of Wi-Fi 6. And so, we're releasing products into 6E and we've also have our first production orders in 6E. So that'll contain the sort of layer on growth there. Power management, great trends there. It continues to grow and well up into the double digits. And that has done that quarter after quarter. So, it'd been a very nice acquisition for us as a company. And defense as well, we've got, again, nice trends inside the defense business. Now, on top of that, the automotive business is really starting to kick in, as we go into this year. And cable TV has also started to grow broadband business, because of deployment of DOCSIS 3.1. So, a lot of growth drivers that we have inside the business. As you said, diversification is working for us. It's helping us offset some of the market challenges that we're seeing with the rollout of infrastructure in China.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll move to our next question from Vivek Arya of Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks for taking my question. For my first question, very impressive performance on the gross margin side for the last two quarters. Almost, right, you beat expectations by almost 200 basis points. But now when I look at your June guide, you you're essentially guiding the flattish mobile and IDP sales. So, Mark, I'm curious, what specifically about mix will drive gross margins down by 250 basis points? Then, what I would really like to understand is why is there so much variability between your initial outlook versus, right, what you have reported? Then, should we assume your gross margin outlook this time is also conservative like it has been in the last two quarters?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. I think we do our best to forecast very complicated business. And I think our forecast history, as far as our ability to meet commitments, is clear. I think, we've had 17 quarters, or so. It depends on what you do with the hurricane in Florida several years ago as to why that's ruined the streak or not. But we do our best to give a good read. And -- but there's a lot of things in the mix, any given quarter. And so, what's most important to us is, can we forecast it well and meet commitments? And I think we -- you can argue that we're kind of missing it on the high side. But I'd say that we have it in control and can continue to improve the business, because we know what's going on. The second thing is, it's indisputable at this point that all the work we've been doing has led to a higher quantum. So, we've just -- we've increased gross margin, particularly over the past year and had stabilized it before. So, the R&D investment and portfolio management productivity and reducing capital intensive, it's all paying off. To your point, we continue to work on growing the business in the right areas and working on our cost curves and picking and choosing where we're going to compete and bring the most value to customers. And over time, we think that the variability that we have will moderate. As it relates to the June quarter, we're -- we are down. And we're -- I said actually that we'd be down in the 49s, and the drivers are the same. We assume that price will moderate somewhat sequentially. We do have some product mix effects. And then, we have some favorability from -- in this case, the March quarter that -- yeah, that's not going to repeat. We had some favorable absorption in the factories, and then we had some inventory effects that we have to assume we might return to normal levels on inventory charges. So, that explains the sequential decline. I'll finish my comments with that. Remember that's an increase versus the soft guidance I gave you before. So, we've -- our view is actually improved on the quarter. We're driving more productivity than we thought. We have a little bit better price than we thought, because the market's still very firm. And then, there are a number of other factors. But listen, we're pleased to guide at 50% number and we're -- we have confidence in that result.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks a lot. Very helpful. And my follow-up for Bob or Eric, is when I look at the implied guidance on the mobile side for the next fiscal year, right, like 17%, 18% or so year-on-year, given you want to grow double-digit in IDP. That suggest about the same growth or somewhat of a deceleration from last year. And given the doubling of 5G smartphones, I'm curious, why can't you grow faster in mobile? And the real underlying question, and that is, what are your views about the competitive landscape because of the industry so supply constraint? I'm surprised to hear you talk about loosening of price, unless you think something about the competitive landscape could change. So, just give us some more color about the competitive landscape? And why you think pricing would start to loosen up if the industry so supply constraint right now? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Vivek, this is Eric. I'll take a stab at it. So, first of all, in terms of the growth -- first of all, 5G doubling year-over-year and an additional 250 million phones on top of the 250 from last year, right? So, in terms of growth rate, it's approximately the same, right? And so that's -- so we're saying growth consistent with last year, being able to sustain at this level is good. We have other growth drivers coming on top of that as well. But of course, as we enter the year, we take a relatively conservative look. I think it's still a pretty strong guide for the year. In terms of pricing -- I think in terms of loosening, Mark was indicating is that, we've had very firm pricing in the March quarter, extremely tight markets. We're going to continue to push the price curve, while maintaining, of course, relationships and design strength that we have. Mark indicated long-term agreements with customers are coming into play, which is great for us and for customers. It's just an incredibly constructive environment for building a long-term business. That's profitable for us and helps our customers make a lot of money too, because of the advanced technologies. So, I think it's a very constructive positive environment. We're not indicating anything about weakening pricing necessarily.
Robert Bruggeworth:
The only thing I'd add, Vivek, is if you look at some of the other companies that do play in our space and see what they've guided quarter-over-quarter. I think we're starting out on a much stronger foot than they are. And we'll see how well we deal with the constraints that both Mark and Eric have talked about, and we'll see how much of that we can capture. I also think one of the few they're gaining some year outlook as well. I'll leave it at that. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll take our next question from Gary Mobley of Wells Fargo.
Gary Mobley:
Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about the Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E product cycles. You mentioned, I believe a minute ago, double-digit percent sequential increases as you finished up the second half of the fiscal year. And you mentioned as well Wi-Fi 6E just really starting to ramp up now. So, my question to you, James, is, how material now is this Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E product cycle maybe measured in absolute dollar terms, percentage of IDP revenue, or how it ranks relative to prior Wi-Fi cycles?
James Klein:
Well -- yeah, I'm not going to, obviously, scale the revenue down at the individual areas. But what I will say is, we are early in. And we -- Mark talked about that. We've probably only seen about a 15% or so adoption in Wi-Fi 6 and very, very early in 6E. So, I think those kinds of growth rates that we're talking about are something that we do expect to continue to accelerate as we go through the adoption curve. It's probably going to take another three or four years for Wi-Fi 6 to build out. And we're already working on 7. So, I think, this is a business that will continue to drive. As far as overall size of IDP, I've talked about many times. I love the diversification of the business. And we're going to ebb and flow a bit. And so, that kind of guidance that I constantly give of these businesses, all being about a quarter of the size. I think, as you average through a long cycle, it stays pretty much in that span.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. Appreciate that, James. My follow-up for Mark. I appreciate the fact you haven't filed your 10-K yet. But can you share with us the specifics on any greater than 10% customers for the year?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. Gary, I would just say that we normally don't give much detail on that. And you'll see the full year numbers in the K. We had one full year, as we look at it now. We had a number of 10% customers in the fourth quarter. And another one that was actually very close and approaching 10%. So, very good diversified revenue in the quarter.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll take our next question from Eric -- I'm sorry -- Edward Snyder of Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
James, so China's moving from MIMO, which is what they built out in the urban environment. I think everybody knows now to suburban and rural to macro. Why should we believe there should be any rebound in demand for anywhere close to what you saw originally for GaN, given that you're going from 64 to macros are much smaller cells. And then, the same kind of spirit of things, you -- the Chinese built out on an industrial policy, either good from the government, the U.S. doesn't do that at all. U.S. carriers actually have shown ROI for their build out, which calls into question, how many MIMO stations will actually deploy, given relatively modest improvements you get in performance versus the incredibly higher costs for this. So, I'm just trying to -- I know it's slowing down now that you guys have forecasted that and it's actually happening now. But if I'm looking out to the end of this year, why do you confident that you'll see a big rebound and it will be in China, or is in C-band in the United States? Is it mostly MIMO or just building out anything? Thanks. And I have a follow-up.
James Klein:
Yeah. Thanks, Ed. So, we didn't talk about a large rebound. We start -- we said that it would start to accelerate as we get into the back half and the U.S. deployments will start to pick up. I do believe that the overall market, as we look at it this year, will be down and -- in sort of those single digits of addressable market and that sort of -- has everything into play, that has deployments in U.S. and the configurations that our customers are telling us about, and deployments in China and of course, the rest of the world. Going forward, though, there are tremendous amount of base stations still to be deployed. And the China deployments during the first year were relatively low. So, I do see just tremendous content pickups for us as we go through this five-year deployment. It's important, Ed, to know that, if you go back to 4G, a 64-element array is still about a 10X content pickup for us, a 32-element array is not -- a little bit more than half of that. So, these are big, big content gains for us in the business. And so, it's really a content story. And as you play that out and deployments around the world, it continues to be a growth business for us. And of course, GaN is a new technology for us. We couldn't access the power amplifiers as we went through the 4G cycle and now we've got great products and great technology allows us to address that whole segment.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then, Eric, if I could. So, you have long said that you would enter the transmit diversity path as it made sense for your filter business, typically with regard to BAW. And it sounds like you've done that, congratulations. But does that limit you? I mean, this would be like n77 Wi-Fi combination for a coexist, or are all the subsequent bands open to your solutions? Are you cherry picking on that? And then, if I could, also on the Ultra-Wideband, it looks increasingly like -- Apple's got their own solution doing their phone and NXP is taking a lot of the handset side of the business, the Android world. And is it fair assumption to say Decawave is really going to be focused mostly on the other side of it, the IoT side of it, all the devices that talk to the handsets? I mean, other than Google, should we expect to see you much in the Android handset side with UWB? Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Let's -- I'll take those in order. So, starting with the transmit diversity path. Yeah. That's a rapidly growing space for us. As you indicated, we had forecast that it would be. And it's not finding -- it's limited to the content we have today. Today is relatively kind of discreet placements. And going forward we'll see complete, what we call dual connect modules more and more going from the upper tier down in the dual connect modules, we have the complete transplant and receive path for the bands that they do transmit on, right? And those bands are throughout the mid and high band frequencies. We'll say so. So, it's a great growing category. Again, we're going to bring all filters to it. We're going to bring integration to it. Best-in-class GaA PAs and everything we have in the main path. So, that's a great new category for us. And of course, supported by -- just more band within the uplink and trying to get more video through the networks and higher data rates and so forth. That's really what's driving that as we've been talking about for years actually. On UWB, I think when you say -- you're seeing NXP primarily in Android house, that's kind of a legacy comment, which I acknowledged. Obviously, Decawave, wasn't in a position to really address the mobile market and that's why they took the path, they did it as Qorvo. Of course, we're targeting the mobile market directly. And to your point that is Android. And so, the current state of play at least, Apple is doing their own. But we expect that we will be engaged and represented in production in the Android ecosystem, not just in all the accessories, but also in the mobile part themselves. There's really no part of the UWB ecosystem that we feel like we can't address and we are addressing.
Operator:
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Toshiya Hari of Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking the question and congrats on the strong results. Mark or maybe Eric, I had a multi-part question on long-term supply agreements. You both spoke to this in your prepared remarks. But curious, are you signing long-term agreements, both in mobile and IDP, or is it primarily IDP? I guess that's part one. Then part two, just for context, roughly what percentage of your future revenue will be tied to long-term supply agreements? Are we talking 5%, 10%? Is it 25%? Just a rough a ballpark number would be helpful. And then I guess most importantly, how should we think about the level of commitment on the part of your customers in terms of both volume and pricing? And I asked the question because historically, maybe not specific to Qorvo, but in the industry broadly, the suppliers would have to be committed to a long-term agreement, but the customer is always have the flexibility to push or cancel purchases. So, just curious how the contracts are constructed. Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Maybe I could start and then Eric take it, or Bob. So, first of all, I don't think we want to give a number at this point on percent, because it's -- there's a lot in flight, a lot's been done and a lot is still in flight. So, I think that's a number that we would be changing and just is not practical at this point to give it. The second thing I would mention is that, the nature of the agreements we get and so forth is going to determine the level of investment we make and shape our CapEx decision. So, yeah, another -- they're intertwined to Vivek's earlier question on gross margin and what we want to do here going forward. We're working to strike deals that will be best for our customers and best to maintain stability on our business, so we can invest for our customers. And so I would leave it at that. Eric or Bob …
Robert Bruggeworth:
The only thing I would add, Toshiya, there for both business units and to Mark's point they're growing. And clearly, there are a lot more confidence in the outlook because of them than we had in any of the years before. We did have some smaller long-term agreements, but it is a growing part of our portfolio. And we think it's a very good thing and so to our customers. I think that's the really important part as Mark pointed out.
Toshiya Hari:
That's great. And then a quick follow-up, a simple one on NextInput. You guys talked about the rationale in your prepared remarks. I think that was pretty clear. But can you speak to some of the financial implications, how much we're paying, the revenue accretion, the margin profile, vis-à-vis the corporate average. Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. Toshiya, just -- on the dollars, you'll see a subsequent event note in the K and this was over $150 million, closer to $175 million, actually. So, you'll see that in the K as a subsequent event. It's a creative pretty quickly, like within the first few quarters of our ownership. And the gross margin profile is favorable to the company and given the scale, of course, the operating margins weaker just because the OpEx. But it's certainly a business we're excited about and investing -- we're going to be investing heavily in.
Operator:
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Chris Caso of Raymond James.
Chris Caso:
Yes. Thank you. I guess, my question is about the seasonality that's implied in the mobile business based on what you've guided. And it would appear that, that the seasonality is more muted than we've seen in years past. First, is that interpretation correct? And if so, why is that the case? Is it -- perhaps a function of your business, the geographic nature of the business now, it being different than when it is in the past? Is it that -- some business was pulled forward into the first half of the year? Could you give us some more color on that, please?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. This is Eric. I'll be happy to talk to that. I mean, the fact is we are in a supply constrained environment. So, customers would be happy to get more potentially, but we're working through our supply chain and growing its capabilities throughout the year. And so, it's not a typical demand profile that you might see. This is really a function of how much we can get out right now.
Mark Murphy:
I maybe -- just to talk to the full year guide I gave as well. Yeah. A couple of things to add. One is, keep in mind, this is a first look. So -- and the first half of the view is obviously a lot clearer Chris, then the back half. And we're -- I think that's just the nature of providing a high-level view. There are obviously a lot of positive factors going into the year. Demand is firm. It's more of a supply constraint environment. And the growth drivers in the business are intact with the near-term exception of infrastructures as we've discussed. You've got -- the economic recovery is underway, but we know how quickly that can turn. And then, there's just pockets of supply chain risks, which we're managing very well, but acknowledging that they're there. So, I just want that to be clear in this initial look The second thing on the guide is just talking about -- maybe giving a bit of shape to it. And specifically September quarter looks firm as well, expect revenue to be up, probably around $50 million or so sequentially versus our June guide. The gross margin, we see increasing, being between 51% 52%. So, increasing 100 to 150 basis points, probably closer to 150 basis points as we see it now. And we'll get more -- one last thing OpEx, we see going up about $10 million sequentially. And again, that's some salary increases plus the addition of NextInput, and then just increased investments in our other growth opportunities and recent acquisitions. We'll get more color through the quarter or on our next earnings call.
Chris Caso:
All right. That's very helpful. I'm glad we got in before the call ended as well. But just -- the follow-up. If it sounds like supply constraints are a factor that potentially -- could affect the revenue as you go through the year. Could you give us some sense of -- kind of timing and magnitude of getting more supply out there? And I guess the trick is getting the supply out in time for your customer's launch schedules?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Chris, this is Bob. Obviously, quite challenging to even define that. I think we've given you a pretty good view. As Mark's already outlined somewhat of a profile of the year, along with what we're thinking for the year. It is dynamic. And collectively, we all spend a lot of time with our customers working through their other constraints, so that they can complete their bill of materials. So, there's a lot of churn in our business as we -- they figure out what they can get from certain suppliers. We adjust, but we can make, and there's just a tremendous amount going on out there. And to really size that and let you know, dollar wise, would be quite -- not really useful in my mind, because if we could produce more -- they may not want it, because they can get it from someone else. So, we gave you what we believe is an unconstrained view of -- excuse me -- a different way, a constrained view of what we think we can get and support along with what our customers can get. And we're in almost daily communications with them. So, I feel good about the outlook, that Mark's provided.
Mark Murphy:
Just one, I need to make one correction, Chris, I made a mistake here and just want to make sure it's clear for the calls up. Our actual sequential will be up between 100 and 150 actually going June to September. But just -- not 50 as I mentioned, but between 100 and 150. So, I'm sorry about that. And hopefully that clears that up.
Operator:
Thank you. And this concludes today's question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it over to management for any closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us this evening. Qorvo will be presenting at multiple Investor Conferences in the coming weeks, and we invite you to listen in. Thanks again, and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen for your participation in today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q3 2021 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please, go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks, James. Thanks very much, everybody. Welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2021 third quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; and Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group, as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and thanks to everyone for joining our call. Qorvo exceeded our third fiscal quarter guidance on revenue, gross margin and EPS. Our performance was supported by multi-year technology upgrade cycles and was broad-based across markets and customers. The Qorvo team is executing very well and we are pleased with our operating performance. The growth drivers in Qorvo's markets are supported by durable long-term trends. In smartphones, 5G units are set to approximately double year-over-year. 5G also presents opportunities beyond smartphones, with advanced network capabilities for more data, lower latency and machine-to-machine communications. We expect our technologies will be increasingly critical to cloud gaming, connected car, industrial IoT, remote medicine, smart homes and other growth categories. In Wi-Fi, we are early in the rollout of Wi-Fi 6 and industry analysts expect rapid adoption to continue. Our next-generation front-end modules and BAW-based filtering products are optimized for higher frequency and wider bandwidths of Wi-Fi 6 and 6E, enabling faster upload and download speeds, increasing capacity and improving efficiency. Across our markets, complexity is increasing as functionality is added within shrinking form factors, while more demanding next-generation specifications must be met. This is favoring higher performance, more densely integrated system solutions from proven suppliers with large-scale manufacturing expertise. Take, for example, the migration to dual-transmit architectures beginning in the premium tier of smartphones for 5G. Dual-transmit architectures require integrated transmit and receive filtering in the traditional receive-only diversity path. This requires better performing, more functionally dense solutions, making high-performance BAW multiplexing a proven differentiator. Industry analysts estimate there were over 250 million 5G phones sold in 2020. For 2021, we forecast approximately 500 million 5G phones. Within these phones, the front-end content is increasing $5 to $7 versus 4G, including in the mid-tier, where content can approximately double. The addition of 5G is driving a shift from discrete products to higher-value content, including our highly integrated solutions. For the 5G reference designs ramping now, Qorvo was the first to integrate filters, switching, power amps, LNAs and CMOS control in fully shielded compact solutions. In doing so, we address customer size, performance and time-to-market challenges. Demand has been strong for these complete main path solutions, and customers are increasingly sourcing all three, including the low, mid-high and ultra-high band placements. When combined with our PMICs, tuners, antennaplexers and dual connectivity modules, Qorvo offers customers a compact front-end solution with minimal placements delivering world-class performance. As a result, we enjoy increasingly collaborative relationships with our customers. During the quarter, we were recognized by two leading Android manufacturers with highly selective annual awards. Qorvo was the sole RF supplier to win vivo's Excellent Quality Award for 2020. And we were the sole electronics supplier to win OPPO's esteemed Joint Development Award. We're extremely proud of both honors. As I referenced earlier, during the quarter, we increased shipments of our complete main path solutions across the leading 5G basebands. We also secured new design wins for our next-generation complete main path solutions in support of upcoming Android 5G launches. For the diversity path, we launched our first generation of dual connectivity module for the mid- and high bands and commenced shipments to the leading Android smartphone manufacturer. We also released a next-generation BAW process, which reduces insertion loss, increases bandwidth in ultra-high band and Wi-Fi 6E applications. In mobile Wi-Fi, we began production shipments of our Wi-Fi 6E solutions to top Android OEMs, increasing capacity and lowering latency in a range of smartphones and mobile devices. In Ultra-Wideband, we extended our capabilities to include open, fully supported system solutions, enabling ultra-precision location applications in mobile, IoT and automotive markets. During the quarter, we increased our Ultra-Wideband customer engagements in a broadening range of consumer applications, including tracker tags, smart speakers, smart TVs and other smart home appliances. Customers and channel partners are evaluating a broad range of applications, and we continue to believe Ultra-Wideband adoption in smartphones will be the catalyst for a growing ecosystem of connected devices. We see Ultra-Wideband proliferating quickly and representing an exciting opportunity for Qorvo. In IDP, we're very proud to have been selected by the National Institutes of Health for its Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics initiative, or RADx, to add COVID-19 testing capacity. In this program, we will use our Omnia test platform, a complete test solution enabled by Qorvo's high-frequency BAW. This platform is currently pending Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Qorvo's antigen testing has demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in clinical studies. That means it's capable of producing accurate results with very low levels of false readings. We believe this BAW sensor technology may be able to deliver a new approach to diagnostic testing, ultimately providing central lab testing accuracy at the point of care. Elsewhere in IDP, we continue to support a broad range of multiyear trends, including 5G, Wi-Fi 6 and 6E, GaN defense, radar and comms, programmable power management, C-V2X, automotive Wi-Fi and ultra-wideband. Our team has done an outstanding job developing products and ramping production to support initial 5G base station deployments in Asia. Today, we are in the early stages of multiyear rollouts and we have strong momentum as 5G continues to deploy. We've been selected by multiple OEMs to supply GaN PAs in addition to our small signal components and modules, and we see the focus on power consumption, bandwidth and higher frequencies supporting the continued migration to GaN PAs. During the quarter, Qorvo secured design wins with multiple base station OEMs to support 5GC band in the U.S., for which the spectrum auctions are in the process and initial deployments are expected later this year. We also received the Best Comprehensive Performance Award from ZTE, recognizing our 5G portfolio and customer support during the initial rollout of 5G base stations. In defense, we achieved strong growth in domestic radar and communications applications and game defense products for international radar programs. In connectivity, we ramped shipments of our 5-gigahertz Wi-Fi 6 BAW filters and sampled our 6-gigahertz Wi-Fi 6E front-end modules for routers and gateways, maximizing throughput and range for high-bandwidth applications such as video conferencing and online gaming. Demand for our Wi-Fi 6 solutions has been strong across MSOs and retail segments. And we see continued strength as Wi-Fi 6 deployments are still in the early phases. In the connected car, we were selected to supply 5G LTE, C-V2X and Wi-Fi automotive qualified products to multiple OEMs, including Audi, BMW and Volvo. In low-power wireless, Qorvo was selected to supply the leading television manufacturer our low-power multiprotocol SoC and custom software, enabling a solar charging remote control. Before handing the call over to Mark, I want to say a word about Qorvo's workforce. The team delivered an outstanding performance in the December quarter. They adapted quickly in a dynamic environment and helped support exceptional results. I'm extremely proud of their responsiveness and dedication to our customers' success. As 5G, Wi-Fi 6 and 6E, ultra-wideband and other connectivity protocols are rolled out globally, Qorvo is well-positioned to delight customers and expand our technology reach. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fiscal 2021 third quarter was $1.095 billion, $35 million above the midpoint of our guidance, up 26% or $226 million versus last year and up approximately 11% sequentially, adjusting for the 14-week September quarter. As a reminder, our fiscal year 2021 is a 53-week fiscal year, and the September quarter was a 14-week quarter versus a typical 13-week quarter. In the December quarter, mobile products drove the sequential growth, with revenue of $826 million on seasonal demand effects and the ramp of higher content 5G smartphones. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue of $269 million was up 30% versus last year on robust Wi-Fi demand and double-digit growth from defense, programmable power management and IoT markets. Non-GAAP gross margin in the third quarter was 54.4%, which was above our guidance due to better-than-expected volumes, price and mix and lower-than-expected manufacturing and inventory costs. The combination of strong end market demand and our ongoing efforts to improve the portfolio drive productivity and carefully manage inventories yielded record results. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the third quarter were better than expected at $194 million and 17.7% of sales, largely due to timing on development programs. As a result, we forecast OpEx to pick up in the March quarter to levels previously guided. Non-GAAP net income in the third quarter was $357 million and diluted earnings per share of $3.08 was $0.43 above the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the third quarter was $404 million and CapEx was $36 million, yielding free cash flow of $368 million and free cash flow margin of 33.6%. We repurchased $160 million of shares during the quarter. As discussed on the last earnings call, we retired our 2026 notes during the quarter. We also called the remaining 2025 notes. We ended the quarter with $1.7 billion of debt and $1.2 billion of cash. Our leverage remains low, our revolver is untapped. The weighted average maturity of our debt is late 2029 and we have no material near-term maturities. With our financial flexibility, we can focus on developing technology, supporting customers and making prudent organic and inorganic investments that support long-term earnings and free cash flow growth. To that end, we continue to advance our BAW, SAW, GaN, GaAs, packaging and other core technologies and fund UWB, programmable power management, biotechnologies, MEMS and other promising areas. Turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $1.025 billion and $1.055 billion, non-GAAP gross margin of 50.5% to 51% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.42 at the midpoint of guidance. Our March quarter outlook reflects sustained broad customer demand stemming from multiyear technology upgrade cycles. In mobile, demand for 5G is adding RF complexity and driving higher content. The breadth of our customer base and firm demand signals provide confidence and stability in our outlook. We forecast mobile revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $770 million at the midpoint or up over 35% year-over-year. In IDP, we project revenue of approximately $270 million in the current quarter, sustaining strong double-digit growth driven by Wi-Fi 6 demand and other markets, even as 5G infrastructure build-outs remain uneven. Our March quarter gross margin guide is in line with the gross margin outlook discussed on our last earnings call and up over 100 basis points year-over-year at the midpoint. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the March quarter to around $207 million. At the midpoint of our March quarter guidance, operating margin is forecasted to be over 30.5% for the third consecutive quarter. Our operating margin outlook for the year is 31.5% at the midpoint, clearing the lower end of the margin model we laid out previously. Qorvo was built for the integration of advanced technology trends critical to customer success in 5G and other growth markets. With broad and robust end market growth, we're now leveraging a more focused footprint. Our product portfolio is better matched to customer needs and our culture of continuous improvement is thriving. We project our current quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate to be below 7.9%, with our year-to-date earnings and March quarter EPS guide, our fiscal 2021 EPS estimate is over $9.40 per share at the midpoint or up nearly 50% year-over-year. Capital expenditures will step up in the March quarter as we work to intersect near-term demand and support long-term supply agreements with multiple customers. We still forecast CapEx to remain below $200 million or less than 5% of sales in fiscal 2021. Currently, we project free cash flow of approximately $1 billion this fiscal year. As the December quarter results and our March quarter outlook show, Qorvo continues to operate well through a challenging period while delivering premium technology to a broad spectrum of customers in 5G, Wi-Fi, IoT, defense and other growth markets. In closing, I'd like to join Bob in thanking Qorvo employees again for their continued efforts during this time. Now I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question today from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
Hey guys. Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on a strong quarter and outlook. I wanted to first point out your strong relative performance to the rest of the smartphone market in your mobile business, calling out what appears to be 11% to 12% growth in that business for calendar year 2020 even after adjusting out for the extra week. And, of course, I think it's a backdrop of a declining smartphone market. So my question is, to what extent was that driven by 5G content growth? To what extent is driven by overall market share? And how does -- how do those variables impact your outlook relative to the smartphone market in calendar year 2021?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Gary. That's a good question. I'll go ahead and let Eric address that. Thank you for your compliments.
Eric Creviston:
Sure, yes. As Mark had said in his opening comments, Qorvo was built for 5G. I think the complexity of the RF front-end and the new handsets is driving a need for integration, which just naturally drives towards our strengths, given that we have all the leading technologies in-house. And I think the team has done a really good job of bringing the right technologies to maturity in time and then integrating very well and building the right relationships with all of our customers to help them achieve their goals with what they're trying to do with their products as well. So it's coming together really well. We've got the tailwinds of the content growth. And it's not, by any means, over. As you know, we're in the very early innings. And we've got new generations of virtually all of our technologies coming out throughout this year to get even stronger as we enter next year.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. I had a follow-up question for Mark. Hopefully, at some point in this calendar year, we'll all be resuming our normal activities in traveling for work and whatnot. And with that in mind, how should we think about your OpEx progression when we start moving more freely? And in what ways have you benefited? In what ways might have step up at some point?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Gary. We've, obviously, incurred some additional costs. There are some inefficiencies as everyone is experiencing. But as you know, everyone is also benefiting from less travel, which can be material. So a lot of it washes out. I think as we look forward and as we've talked about over the years, we're going to continue to work to get the best operating leverage we can. And we're running at about 20% of sales OpEx for a year. We would expect next year to be at that -- those levels and maybe slightly below. We're never going to be the lowest OpEx company in the space because as you heard, we're -- the DNA of this company is innovation, so we're going to likely be several points higher than what I would call best-in-class as it relates to just costs. So I think that's what you can look forward to as we go forward on an annual basis.
Operator:
Next, we'll hear from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes, thank you. I just had a question on the smartphone market overall that Mark, you made a comment about firm demand signals. We know broadly, capacity has been pretty tight. And so just what are some of the things you're looking at in terms of monitoring those demand signals? And how much also does the step-up in 5G kind of help in driving that growth?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Craig, maybe I'll start. We've got very -- as I mentioned, very firm demand signals. Pricing is a bit firmer than normal as a result. And we see -- out to the June quarter, I'd say, we're pretty confident. And we'll see how demand shakes out post Chinese New Year. But demand signals are strong and the channel's very healthy. And as you can see, our inventory levels are very good. We spend a lot of time -- fortunately for us, we've got a very broad customer base. So -- and given our position in the market, so we see the space across customers and products and -- have very good visibility. So it explains why very early last year, we called 250 million 5G handsets and that's about where the number ended up. Further, we not only use our rigorous internal assessments, but we use external views to balance that and we make the best call we can. We were about 3% off on this particular quarter, but we're generally close. And so, we feel good about the guide we have in the March quarter, 10.40. And then we would think that we'd be somewhere near 1 billion if markets hold up in the June quarter.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. Appreciate that color. And then just as a follow-up, with Decawave on board for a few quarters now, I'd just love to get your thoughts in terms of how that acquisition is playing out. I know it's mostly design stage today. But relative to the reason to kind of buy that and the market opportunity, just what you're seeing. And what are some of the milestones to keep in mind for ultra-wideband as we go through the year?
Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. I'll be happy to take that. We're thrilled so far with the integration of the team and the response from customers as well. It's playing out, at least as good, or better than we had hoped. They're the pioneers of the technology and just a fantastic organization for design and development. We're bringing the scale and the customer relationships to really take it to the top tier. So we've got -- and then of course, the acquisition of 7Hugs to give the entire software stack has been a huge addition as well that's helping us. So, all that's working really well. We're continuing to invest and hire more and critical resources that are enablers to cover all the opportunities. But one of the things that has happened since we closed the acquisition nearly a year ago now, is just much more interaction with the mobile handset providers. Of course, that's the channel that we bring. Everyone is looking to put this UWB into the next generations of handsets, so we're seeing the uptake we're expecting. And then a lot of people are lining up with devices that are going to talk to those handsets as well, right? So a lot of consumer electronics, smart home and so forth devices that we're talking to. And then the base of the revenue today is industrial IoT basically, and that's continuing to grow and perform at least as well as what we had expected. And then we'll have auto coming in on top of all of that, so we're engaged as well with all the leading auto manufacturers. So it's a lot. We've got a lot going on, but the design activity, the reception is strong and really, I think, adding the software stack to the equation just really takes it to another level in terms of what we're going to be able to do for the industry.
Operator:
We'll now hear from Karl Ackerman with Cowen.
Karl Ackerman:
Good afternoon, gentlemen. Thank you for taking my questions. I have two. First, just on gross margins. I understand that volumes are working against you in March but mix does not appear to be a factor. And so I guess, are there competitive factors at play or maybe other manufacturing costs that I'm not fully appreciating that is influencing your outlook?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So Karl, this is Mark. The outlook is basically on top of what I talked about last quarter. So we've become pretty good at being able to forecast where we're going to be. Now, I think we got to acknowledge that we missed by quite a margin this December quarter. So I think you need to understand that in order to understand the March quarter. So the March quarter really isn't a surprise where it's landing. It's more of the December quarter was much stronger than we expected. And we're really pleased about the December quarter. I want that to be clear. We've talked about our approach over the years and what we're striving to do about investing in technology, actively working the portfolio, driving productivity, exercising capital discipline. And the December quarter shows what's possible with the business. And it's years of hard work. It's just excellent execution by the team. And it's those things intersecting with favorable market conditions. So just about a lot went right in the December quarter and the result is that 54.4%. So volumes were stronger and more importantly, stronger than we expected and the outlook stayed strong, so that helps us sustain loadings and the associated fixed cost absorption. Spend control remains excellent, which is especially noteworthy, given the tough operating environment that our operations team has to work with. I mentioned earlier, the pricing environment is a bit, I guess, more favorable than normal. The market's tight. We're doing the best we can to serve customers and the time that they're expecting us to get them product. And then mix, we continue to move towards integrated modules and that's helping us greatly. And our particular advantage in mid, high-band and BAW-related integrated products is pulling in some other integrated modules into wins. So we're benefiting greatly there. And then we've got, of course, other highly differentiated products that are helping. And then there are another -- a number of other favorable items in the quarter, favorable yields. We had lower inventory charges than we expected and a number of other items. Again, generally, things went the right way. As we look forward to the March quarter, we do expect gross margin to drop to about where I said. We guided to 50.5% to 51% today. That's up 100 basis points year-over-year, which is what we've been striving to do is show margin expansion, but we're down sequentially due to a number of factors. We're trying to keep inventories low, so that will keep a check on absorption. We're ramping some lower margin products, so currently we're just still working down the cost curve on those. They're important longer term. But that -- some of those products are coming into the March quarter, and then that actually continues on into the June quarter. And there are some other mix dynamics as well, including some less defense in the March quarter and some other things. And then we just can't assume that all these other things go our way as they did in the December quarter. We had -- the pricing environment may probably turn to a more normal state. The inventories write-offs will probably be more normal and we've assumed that. So we feel good about the -- about what we did, comfortable with the guide we have and I'll leave it at that.
Karl Ackerman:
Very helpful, Mark. For my follow-up, with results and an outlook this strong that you've just described, the elephant in the room is about sustainability, with some investors arguing that this is a peak. But I'm not asking you to discuss your peers, but it would be very helpful if you could share your perspective whether your order book is outstripping your ability to supply near-term? And then second, how you are managing the demand pull from multiple customers across multiple markets because as you described, there appear to be quite many of them across both smartphones and IDP with Wi-Fi 6. So if you could discuss those, that would be very helpful. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Karl, this is Bob. I'll do my best to answer your question because as usual, it's not as simple as what many people from externally believe when you're working in the business. Number one, yes, there is tightness in the supply chain. I think it's quite well-known in the industry that silicon is constrained, whether that's in the communications industry or automotive. So in many ways, that is a governor on what's going on in this situation. We've been very fortunate that our team has excellent relationships and agreements with our suppliers externally and feel pretty good about how we've done that. And I'm quite confident we left some revenue on the -- out there for us still to get. But Mark mentioned in his opening comments that we've been getting long-term agreements with our customers, so that they feel pretty confident in their demand. And when we do our market model, which Mark also talked about, and we feel we have a pretty good handle on the market based on our comments all the way through last year, that many people believed that it was not going to be turning out the way we projected in just the number of 5G handsets. So when we look at our market models, the orders we already have, the migration, as you've already commented on 5G more than doubling, looking in at Wi-Fi, looking at Wi-Fi 6, pod in every room, going from two streams to three streams, that being 2.45 for communicating to the client and then for the backhaul using a third stream, which adds a lot of content, if it's eight channels feeding it back to the main access point. So when we integrate all this and look at our customer orders, we feel pretty good about the commitments they're making to us. And I want to remind everyone, the sudden change at Huawei, who was not using best-in-class components. As you guys remember, we talked a lot about how that they've started to -- and rightfully so, because of the U.S. government tried to use local sources. While the people that are picking up their share are using best-in-class components, which is what we said Huawei would have done if it was available to them. So when we look at everything that's going on, as Mark said, we feel good. We can already comment on June, which he did. So I think as we lay out the year, we'll see how sell-throughs is in Chinese New Year and all those conditions in a pandemic and the vaccination, but we feel good about what we're communicating today, very good about it.
Operator:
Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs has our next question.
Toshiya Hari:
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question and congratulations on the strong results and the strong outlook.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Toshiya Hari:
Yes. Maybe first one for Eric. And I guess, Bob, you sort of kind of addressed this in your response to the prior question. But just curious, how are you guys thinking about seasonality in your mobile business? It's clearly a very odd year with supply constraints and new products being introduced later than usual and other moving parts. But to the extent you can comment, how are you thinking about -- I mean, March, obviously, you're thinking better than seasonal for your mobile business, but what about June and potentially September? And then I got a quick follow-up.
Eric Creviston:
Right, right. Yes. As you pointed, the March seasonality clearly is muted from normal. And to Bob's point, it's really going to depend upon supply in the near term, not just our own, through our supply chain network but the rest of the bill of material that our customers have to get. So it's really going to be sort of a demand -- or excuse me, a supply limited climate, at least for the next few quarters. And then once things are fully opened up again, we're extremely bullish about the opportunity, of course, for 5G to take off. And so, that's why we still think even in the worst case, we'll see 5G double this year.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. Thank you. And then as my follow-up on gross margins, Mark, great job in December. To your point, you've got multiple moving parts, and I guess, margins can be very lumpy on a quarter-to-quarter basis. But when you think about calendar 2021 in its entirety or maybe fiscal 2022, I realize it's kind of early, but how are you thinking about gross margins? It’s pretty clear that structurally and through cycle, you're doing a lot better. But can we sort of extrapolate the trajectory that you've been on? Or are you sort of approaching peak-ish kind of levels as it relates to gross margins? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Toshi. It's this time of year, because we're a March fiscal, we sort of get these calendar 2021 or calendar year fiscal -- next fiscal year question, so I appreciate that. And as you say, it's a bit early, so we expect to provide more details on our next earnings call, when we'll wrap up fiscal 2021 and start fiscal 2022. But maybe before I get into gross margin or margins overall, maybe just talk a little bit about fiscal 2022. As we sit here today, for the most part, demand's firm, as Bob and Eric have talked about. Our business is broad and you see that reflected in the December results, March quarter guide. And then we all know that the markets that we serve, 5G, Wi-Fi, defense, IoT, other markets, we obviously expect those to grow multi-year. We believe that Qorvo's technology and products and our ongoing customer engagement positions us really well in those markets. So we've talked about feeling very comfortable about the June quarter, as Eric just mentioned, kind of more of a supply constraint situation than demand constraints we see at this point. We're reasonably confident for a near $1 billion quarter. And again, we'll see what happens on the other side of Lunar New Year end keep watching the channels but keeping an eye on it. On the rest of the P&L, as you can imagine, while the rest of the year and certainly, the rest of the P&L, it's just a lot more difficult to give anything. We're in our planning cycle now. There's just a number of factors. What happens to the outlook, the effect on loadings and absorption, mix effects in the business yields, inventory, so forth. And then just on the OpEx side, investments we want to make in the future. So any number of factors are going to impact the results and we just need to finish the planning. We've given a March guide and we've given a June revenue guide or revenue indication, supply constrained. I think on the June quarter, we actually see margins going down a bit. We actually see the June quarter gross margin below 50%. We see operating margin below 30%. And again, that's price, mix, cost factors. But I would say for the year, we still expect, clearly, operating margins to be above 30%. We cleared that this year. We're committed to continue to work to expand operating margins. And I think we'll say that for this call and provide more detail on the next call.
Operator:
Next, we'll hear from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thank you very much. Eric, you're shipping a lot of main path modules, tuners, I guess, some ET and a one-off received DRX. Are you in production on antennaplexers now? And when do you expect to be in productions on Transmit DRX? And secondarily, was the Transmit DRX part of your $5 to $7 TAM increase for 5G for yourself or for the industry? Or is it going to be incremental to those numbers? And if I could, James, it sounds like infrastructure is cooling again a bit. I'm particularly curious about the build-out. There's been a lot of feedback that China is slowing because they go to the rural areas, and the US has not quite picked up yet. Is that kind of the trend you're seeing here? And if so, do you anticipate when the US starts building out C-band? Are they going to be using a lot of GaN or do you think they'll -- GaN or MIMO actually and see if -- or will we expect to see kind of a little bit of a whole form? Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Okay. This is Eric. I'll go first. And we're actually in production already with both of the categories. You mentioned antennaplexers with multiple customers, and we expect, of course, that portfolio to continue to grow out. And we've got multiple generations of BAW in process right now to continue driving those over the next couple of years. And then the -- as you called it, TX DRX, it's what we call the dual connect modules. And we've referenced dual connect modules in some of our discussions. There's a marquee crane handset that's launched recently. You'll find we're providing the dual connect module capability there. So to your point, that's really exciting because it gets us into that diversity path, which typically has been RX-only. It's typically been SAW filters and heavily competitive. We've -- with this year, looking at multiple TX channels that warrants, you're looking at BAW filter content and the higher frequency range. So it's a really interesting new category that's emerging and we're happy to be leading off with it.
James Klein:
Yes, this is James. Our base station business is on a pace to set all-time record for fiscal revenue for the year. So we'll be up about 60% full year over full year with the guide that we provided today. It was driven mainly by strength in deployments in Asia and the adoption of massive MIMO antennas where GaN has been selected many, many times over LDMOS. And, of course, we've been able to support many of the major frequency bands that have been rolled out in China. Looking ahead, I think you're pretty close. Deployments will slow during the first half of the calendar year, and then we expect those to start to accelerate in the second half. And additionally, with the C-band auctions nearly complete in the U.S., we do expect deployments to start later in the year, and we do expect those to include both massive MIMO antennas and GaN power amplifiers. And then, obviously, we're in the early stages of 5G deployment, and we expect those deployments to continue both in China and around the world as we go through the next several years.
Operator:
We'll now hear from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar:
Yes. Hey, guys, congratulations on a solid results, solid guide, so we appreciate the execution. There's been no normal in this year with respect to revenue and seasonality. But I think your guide for March is less seasonal than typical March. I was curious if you could point to the factors maybe relative to what you guys are assuming for China in March versus U.S. business? That was question number one. I had another one.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Thanks, Harsh. I mean, typical seasonality, as you know, is the IDP business roughly flat. That's roughly what we guided. The mobile business seasonally down. We're not going to break it out in geographies or customers. But, obviously, our mobile business is not going to be off as much as normal. I think we do know the timing of marquee phones just maybe shifted a little bit from prior years, and then layering on top of that, the China business is doing well. And like we said in our comments already answering questions, we'll see how Chinese New Year goes. But that's the way I'd like to answer that.
Harsh Kumar:
That's fair. And you guys, in your press release, had a comment on low band, mid-band, ultra-high band in Android and the wins you guys are seeing. I was curious if you could elaborate what, kind of, phones you're seeing this in, and if you expect this functionality to make it to mid-end 5G phones by some point in 2021 this year?
Eric Creviston:
Yes. So Harsh, this is Eric. In fact, primarily, we are shipping these into 5G phones today. As 4G became more complex over the past couple of years, the move towards integration began to take off. And then when 5G emerged, there really was no looking back for our customers that are bringing out new high-performance handsets. So a lot of the main path, including ultra-high band, the low-band and the mid-high band, we're selling fully integrated modules, in many cases, all of them into the same handset to support the 5G ramps right now.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Raji Gill:
Yes. Thanks and congrats as well on the great momentum. Just a question, again, on the infrastructure. You guys really had, kind of, strong dominance in GaN, base stations that have kind of been riding that wave. Wanted to get your update on GaN proliferation across the other base station vendors outside of, say, ZTE in China, what would the adoption rate is outside of that customer? And how do you think about the competitive landscape? It does appear that one of your other competitors on the LDMOS side are starting to ramp their GaN solution. I'm wondering how we think about those dynamics as we go into the second half of next -- of this year and going to next year as well.
James Klein:
Yes. Thanks for the question, Raji. We -- this is James. We're definitely engaged across really all of the major OEMs and what most would consider even Tier 2 OEMs with GaN programs and being incorporated into both macro and massive MIMO antennas. And we've got production shipments that have occurred into numerous of those OEMs. So I would say adoption is pretty broad across the industry. And we're obviously very bullish about our technology. We've got a tremendous amount of products. I think last time I counted, we have over 200 products that are released in our GaN technology, covering a broad range of frequencies and markets and everything like that. We've been in GaN for well over 20 years and continue to focus on developing the technology and bringing new capabilities in and really focused on scale and cost. So I'm certainly very confident about where we stand with the technology and excited about all the markets that are adopting it going forward. So I think, long term, it's going to continue to be a great thing for IDP and for the company.
Raji Gill:
For my follow-up, regarding RF content increases, last year, there was a significant increase from 4G. Wondering how you're thinking about the content increases this year as there are more 5G smartphones in the marketplace. So the upgrade cycle is still strong, but it's coming off a little bit of a higher base. So how do we think about the RF content gains and from a dollar perspective year-over-year, say, versus -- 2020 versus 2019? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
So at the -- I assume you're referring to the smartphone space, right, the mobile space, yes?
Raji Gill:
Mobile, yes.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. So in terms of 4G to 5G transition, no real change in the outlook. As Mark said, I think, or Bob at the beginning, we said across tiers anywhere from $5 to $7 worth of additional content when you pick a 4G phone and then make it 5G-capable. We think that's holding out this year as well. And so, the main difference is, you'll have another 250 million handsets or so layered on to the TAM versus what we had this year. But no change in the actual 5G adder that we're forecasting.
Operator:
Our final question will come from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Yes. Thanks for taking the question. Nice job on the quarterly execution and guide. First question for Eric in Mobile. You mentioned that you have the new dual transmit. I wonder how the design win pipeline is beyond this customer, how should we think about this being proliferated across the mobile ecosystem? And additionally, for Mobile, you've talked about antennaplexing, less spoken about Decawave today, but there's other drivers too in the business. I'm hoping you can help break these in terms of the opportunities you see as we look out through the year.
Eric Creviston:
Right, right. So when we look at just the coming year, if you will, it's going to be highly leveraged towards BAW-based products. In particular, our R&D team is bringing us a fresh technology on a regular cadence now, we're taking that into highly differentiated discretes as we talked about with antennaplexers but then also those can help make multiplexers as well that sell not only in discrete but enable these highly integrated modules. So we're going to be focusing on places where we can take that BAW technology and leverage it into larger modules to a large extent. And then continuing to really leverage our franchise around the antenna, we are clear leaders at helping our customers manage their antenna networks, whether it's tuning or we've got impedance tuning, we have aperture tuning. We have the antennaplexing that we've talked about. And it's getting to be more and more of a problem for our customers as new GPS bands and new bands are added in C-band and CBRS spectrum and so forth. So there's a lot of work around that antenna, and we've got a lot of very unique capability to bring technology but also modeling and app support there. So these are large opportunities for us in the near-term, really leveraged on the complexity of 5G and our basket of technologies, which is broad and unequaled in a lot of ways. The UWB, we look at, is more of a driver in the next two years to three years, really, where it begins to get to the scale because we're starting very, very low now, of course, as an industry, and just beginning to take off. But no question in our mind, that's going to be a large driver. If you look out two to three years from now, it's going to be a big part of our business.
Bill Peterson:
Thanks for that. And then secondly for James, and just apologies, it's somewhat of a multi-part question. But first, unpacking the near-term, you've called for, I guess, a flat guide. And I think earlier, you mentioned defense down and maybe weakness in infrastructure. So what's growing? Is it automotive and Wi-Fi? What's directionally growing? And then if we think about the full year or fiscal year, should we still think of the market environment as a 10% to 15% grower? And I guess within that, should we still think of GaN as outgrowing that trend based on what you're seeing as infrastructure and defense kind of returns to growth as we move through the year?
James Klein:
Yes. Thanks, Bill. As far as current quarter we're in, a lot of strengths going to the quarter. Certainly, as Bob talked about, defense will be off a bit. But our Wi-Fi business is growing very nicely. Our Power Management business is also growing very nicely. And several of the other markets like our broadband business as well. So quite a few of the underlying markets driving the business. And if you kind of look history for the first three months of the year compared to those same three months of last year, we're up almost 47%, I think. And almost all of those underlying businesses are up double-digits. So we've got a lot of strengths. We ebb and flow a bit as we go for quarters -- through each quarter. But I would say, pretty significant strength in our Wi-Fi business as Wi-Fi 6 continues to roll out. As far as long-term, I'm still very confident of the underlying trends in the business, and we'll have some unevenness as we go quarter-to-quarter. But the things like the adoption of GaN and the proliferation of massive MIMO, the rollout of 5G and Wi-Fi 6, all those are great trends that I think will continue to allow the business to grow.
Operator:
That will conclude today's question-and-answer session. I will now turn the conference over to management for any additional closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us this evening. Qorvo will be presenting at multiple investor conferences in the coming weeks and we invite everyone to listen in. Thanks again, and have a good night.
Operator:
That will conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q2 2021 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's Fiscal 2021 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance about the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Joining us today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; and Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn it over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and thanks to everyone for joining our call. In our second fiscal quarter, Qorvo outperformed our updated guidance on revenue, gross margin and EPS. Strength was broad-based across customers and supported by multiyear technology upgrade cycles. Both businesses had strong year-over-year growth, supported by new product launches, 5G and WiFi 6. In Mobile Products, the transition of 5G is fueling a shift from discrete products to higher-value content, including integrated modules in flagship and mass market 5G smartphones. Driving growth, Qorvo is leveraging our deep technology portfolio and pursuing opportunities throughout the front end, at the antenna, in the main path, in the diversity path and across the frequency spectrum. At the antenna, the introduction of new bands and band combinations is creating significant design challenges for OEMs. Qorvo solves these challenges with a range of products, including an expanding portfolio of antennaplexers. In the September quarter, we increased volume shipments of our BAW-based antennaplexers solutions to multiple Tier 1 OEM smartphone manufacturers. In the main path, Qorvo's highly integrated 5G solutions include low-band, mid-/high-band and ultra-high-band modules. Customer design activity has been robust, and we expect our main path solutions to grow across customers as demand for integrated solutions expands throughout the high-volume mid-tier. In September, we expanded shipments of our complete main path solutions across multiple Tier 1 Android smartphone OEMs. In the diversity path, the adoption of dual transmit architectures is creating new requirements for integrated transmit and receive filtering. This is especially meaningful for Qorvo because our dual connectivity modules leverage many of the technology advantages we enjoy in the main path, including high-performance BAW multiplexing. We said previously, we anticipate approximately 250 million 5G smartphones in calendar '20, with that number approximately doubling in 2021, and that remains our view. In ultra-wideband, we see adoption in smartphones as the catalyst for a broad ecosystem of connected devices. Similar to Bluetooth, smartphones will be the hub, connecting to multiple peripherals. The technology will enhance how we interact with our media, lighting, appliances, automobiles, digital wallets and a range of other applications in and out of the home. It will also transform how we locate equipment and production pieces on the factory floor, even how we interact with coworkers. In the September quarter, we acquired 7Hugs Labs, a pioneer in ultra-wideband software and system solutions to enhance our capabilities in UWB solutions and accelerate adoption across mobile, IoT and automotive ecosystems. The combination of our hardware technology with their software expertise positions Qorvo to accelerate the development of broad ultra-wideband ecosystem expected to reach billions of devices in the coming years. 7Hugs brings a highly skilled team with vast experience in UWB applications and a portfolio of intellectual property. We're excited to welcome them at Qorvo to build on their success and accelerate growth in ultra-wideband. We also signed a partnership with a leading design services company, Sigma Connectivity, to develop advanced UWB solutions and assist customers in the creation of breakthrough applications, leveraging the unique capabilities of UWB. For wide area applications like asset tracking, Qorvo enables long-range, low-data rate connectivity via cellular IoT. We offer a broad portfolio of discrete solutions as well as highly integrated modules for CAT-M and narrowband IoT through our partnership with Nordic Semiconductor. In WiFi 6, we enjoyed broad-based content gains across both businesses in support of the leading suppliers of smartphones, tablets, mesh networks, gateways, smart speakers and virtual reality headsets. Before turning to IDP, Qorvo was recently granted a license to ship certain mobile products to Huawei. Our December guidance currently contemplates no Huawei revenue as we work with the customer to understand the impact on the license. Now turning to IDP. Wireless connectivity revenue more than doubled year-over-year. WiFi revenue was broad-based across products and customers and supported by the rollout of WiFi 6. Customer demand for our front-end modules and BAW filters was especially strong in support of CPE and retail applications. Looking more closely at content opportunities, our shipments to the leading connected home platform provider included WiFi 6 FEMs, BAW filters and multi-protocol SoCs. Also for next-generation WiFi gateway, we were awarded the entire RF band in support of the leading North American multiple system operator or MSO, including the 2.5 and 5 gigahertz FEMs and a variety of filter products. The FCC recently approved new spectrum for WiFi 6E, and Qorvo is actively supporting leading OEMs in the design of 6E platforms. WiFi 6E will continue to increase the capacity and lower the latency of next-generation platforms, creating a new class of products and applications. In defense and aerospace, Qorvo was the exclusive RF recipient of the multiyear U.S. government SHIP program, recognizing our leadership in advanced semiconductor packaging. This program will continue to advance the state-of-the-art in packaging targeted towards a broad range of applications. Also of note, we advanced the performance of defense phased radars with 150-watt 2.9 to 3.5 gigahertz power amplifier using our industry-leading GaN process. In power management, growth was driven by the transition of solid-state storage in client devices such as laptops and enterprise computing and data centers. Demand has also been strong for our motor control products as brushless motor technology continues to gain share in a broad range of consumer products. Our Programmable Power Management business is performing very well across diverse markets as we help customers enhance product performance, reduce weight, improve reliability and bring market -- bring products to market faster. In automotive, we began sampling a second-generation automotive cellular V2X FEM that integrates the PA, LNA, switch and BAW coexistence filter to solve critical system-level challenges. In wireless infrastructure, we were awarded multiple design wins in support of 5G massive MIMO deployments, expanding our customer base for GaN amplifiers. Within that, we commenced shipments of GaN amplifiers supporting massive MIMO C-band base station deployments first in the U.S. and then other regions globally. We also launched high-performance BAW filters for Band 41, 5G small cells and repeaters to help enable 5G and WiFi coexistence. Next calendar year, we see continued year-over-year growth on global 5G deployments. The deployment of 5G base stations and the upgrade to 5G smartphones are expected to span multiple years. In IDP, our 5G growth drivers include content gains in small-signal devices and GaN PAs in massive MIMO, and the adoption of GaN PAs in macro base station deployments. Before handing the call over to Mark, I want to thank the Qorvo team for a standout performance in a tough environment. Our design teams are releasing best-in-class products. Our application engineering and sales teams are engaging closely with customers to solve their most complex RF challenges, and our global operations team continues to excel. I'm extremely proud of the team for their outstanding efforts and ongoing commitment to our customers' success. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fiscal '21 second quarter was $1.060 billion, $45 million above the midpoint of our updated guidance provided on September 8. Following our updated guidance, customer demand continued to strengthen, and we were able to support some of that demand within the quarter. Mobile Products revenue of $754 million exceeded our expectations, driven by seasonal demand effects and the ramp of 5G smartphones. Infrastructure and defense products revenue of $306 million was down sequentially as expected but up strongly year-over-year in support of the ongoing buildout of 5G networks and the deployment of WiFi 6. As a reminder, our fiscal year 2021 is a 53-week fiscal year, and our September quarter was a 14-week quarter versus a typical 13-week quarter. Our last 14-week quarter occurred in the period ended October 3, 2015, during our fiscal '16, which was the last 53-week fiscal year reported. Non-GAAP gross margin in the second quarter was 51.7%, which was above our updated guidance due to better-than-expected mix and favorable manufacturing cost variances. Our efforts to improve the portfolio, drive productivity and carefully manage inventories continue to yield favorable results. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the second quarter were $219 million, higher sequentially on the additional week, incentive compensation and other labor costs. Non-GAAP net income in the second quarter was $282 million, and diluted earnings per share of $2.43 was $0.29 above our updated September guidance. Cash flow from operations in the September quarter was $281 million, and CapEx was $44 million, yielding free cash flow of $237 million. We repurchased $105 million of shares during the quarter. During the quarter, we took steps to reduce our cost of debt and further improve our financial flexibility. We renewed our unsecured credit facility at more favorable terms and extended it to 2025. We also increased our term loan to $200 million and raised $700 million through a new issue of unsecured notes maturing in 2031. After the quarter closed, these proceeds and cash on hand were used to pay down our notes maturing in 2026. Today, our debt balance is under $1.8 billion, and cash is approximately $1.1 billion. Our leverage remains low. Our revolver is untapped. The weighted average maturity of our debt is 2029, and we have no material near-term maturities. With our financial flexibility, we can focus on advancing technology, supporting customers and making prudent organic and inorganic investments that support long-term earnings and free cash flow growth. To that end, we acquired 7Hugs Labs in the second quarter to support the ongoing development and adoption of our ultra-wideband products and solutions. This acquisition enhances Qorvo's software capabilities and is an important step in realizing the potential of UWB. We see a wide array of applications emerging with ultra-wideband technology and have significant customer engagement on the design of new products and solutions. We expect UWB to contribute meaningfully to Qorvo over time. Turning to our current quarter outlook. We expect revenue of approximately $1.060 billion plus or minus $15 million, non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 52.5% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.65 at the midpoint of guidance. Our December quarter revenue outlook reflects seasonal demand effects and demand for multiyear technology upgrade cycles. In Mobile, demand for 5G is adding RF complexity and driving higher content, and we forecast Mobile revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $790 million. We suspended shipments to Huawei in mid-September in accordance with Department of Commerce regulations. And although we've since received a license for certain mobile products, we've assumed no sales to Huawei in our current outlook. In IDP, we project revenue of approximately $270 million in the current quarter, reflecting the timing of base station deployments. We forecast IDP to sustain strong double-digit year-over-year growth through the balance of the fiscal year with this infrastructure demand picking up in the March quarter. We expect continued strength in defense, WiFi and power management due to durable underlying trends. While considerable economic uncertainty remains with the ongoing effects of the pandemic, currently, we expect end market demand to support full fiscal year double-digit revenue growth for Qorvo. Our December quarter gross margin guide of approximately 52.5% reflects volume growth and ongoing efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of our business. Specifically, we've invested early and adequately in the technologies that markets need, focused our product portfolio on where we can best serve customers, gained productivity across our operations and reduced our capital intensity. We believe our work to keep our inventories and cost structure low will help us sustain over 50% gross margin through the balance of the year, fiscal year. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to decrease in the December quarter to around $205 million as we return to a normal fiscal quarter length and other personnel costs decrease. We expect other expense to decrease to under $20 million on lower net interest costs. We project our current quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate to be at or below 8%. We still project capital expenditures to remain below $200 million in fiscal '21 and focus on areas that advance a differentiated position for Qorvo to best serve customer needs such as BAW and GaN. Currently, we expect free cash flow to be approximately $900 million this fiscal year. As of September quarter results and our December quarter outlook show, Qorvo continues to operate well through a challenging period while serving customers in 5G infrastructure and smartphones, WiFi, IoT, defense and other growth markets. In closing, I'd like to join Bob in thanking Qorvo employees for their continued efforts during this time. Now I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. We'll take our first question from Karl Ackerman with Cowen and Company.
Karl Ackerman:
Very solid results. I guess for my first question, I know you're having a record year for IDP, and it's great to see the sustained margin improvement. I know you don't provide a quantitative outlook beyond 1 quarter, but I was hoping you could talk about the opportunities you have in IDP next year and perhaps whether you think that segment can grow year-over-year.
James Klein:
Yes. Karl, this is James. Thanks for the question. I think the underlying trends for the business are where we said they've been for the last several quarters. We've got a great position in 5G with the rollout of massive MIMO, with the adoption of GaN and the adoption of higher frequencies. I think those are all very good trends for us, and we've got great momentum coming out of this first year of deployments, predominantly in China. WiFi 6 continues to roll out. We've had a string of record quarters for that part of the business. And again, I expect that to continue. And as Bob mentioned, we see 6E coming right at the end of that string of results and really allows for another opportunity to update hardware. And then our defense business just continues to provide a very solid base to the business with really some of the same underlying trends that we've seen before with the adoption of GaN and phased-array antennas coming to play in that market. So overall, I think we're positioned very well for the business to continue on this 10% to 15% trend that we've been on for several years.
Karl Ackerman:
Very helpful. And if I may, for my follow-up, you have a record amount of cash on the balance sheet, and you're going to generate record free cash flow this year. Your recent capital allocation priorities have centered on IP-focused M&A. What are your thoughts on buybacks and/or perhaps a dividend given your robust multiyear outlook?
Mark Murphy:
Karl, this is Mark. No change in our capital allocation message. We have -- our primary source of capital return has been share repurchase, which, as you can see, we did about 44% of our free cash flow this quarter. If you remember, we were -- since we're doing an updated guide, and we were also on the capital markets, we had periods of the quarter we were unable to repurchase outside of the 10b5-1. So -- but we still view share repurchase as our capital return source. To your broader question on our capital returns overall, we've -- I want to point out that we reached a milestone this quarter, and that the last 12 months, free cash flow margin of the business reached about 25%, which is noteworthy in our view. And we've generated about $860 million of free cash over the last 12 months. We've deployed about $700 million of that to acquisitions, and we've repurchased over $400 million worth of stock. So we've deployed $1.1 billion on $860 million of free cash. And then the last six quarters, we've deployed even more. We've generated $1.2 billion of cash. We've bought about $1 billion worth of companies, and we've repurchased about $700 million worth of stock. And since inception, we've returned to shareholders 113% of our free cash flow or $3.1 billion at an average price of $63. So we've had a successful capital return plan, and we continue to look at acquisitions. We've done 5 now in the past 6 quarters. We continue to look at where it makes sense, in markets, customers, technology. As you've mentioned, we've been focused on bolt-ons, which we've done 2 bolt-ons for James' business and technology additions, which we've done 3 of those. And we're feeling very good about what we've done, the capital we've deployed and have a lot of confidence going forward. Of the five that we've done over the past 1.5 years, we feel very strongly they serve important and growing markets. We've been able to integrate them very quickly, and the teams are thriving within Qorvo. They're performing as or better than expected. And then finally, we're -- as you can see from the 7Hugs, we're investing in the assets we've acquired. So feeling good about both deploying capital inorganically and then feel our capital return has been strong to shareholders.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Congratulations on the very strong results. I had 2 as well. For my first question, I wanted to ask on the ultra-wideband opportunity long term. Mark, I think it was you, you talked about contribution from this business potentially being meaningful over the long run. Just for context, how big could this business be over the next, call it, 2 to 3 years as a percentage of Qorvo's revenue? And how are you thinking about the relative size of revenue contribution between mobile, IoT and automotive? And then I've got a quick follow-up.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Thanks, Toshiya. This is Eric. Just to talk about ultra-wideband, how big it could be, we haven't really set public numbers for what the internal revenue for ultra-wideband might be. But as you know, there's very few players in the area, and the Decawave team that we've acquired really pioneered the latest version of ultra-wideband, the impulse radio type, which is what gives it the capability of proximity awareness and internal navigation and so forth. So we see those as being the key real opportunities for ultra-wideband going forward. And as Mark said, we think that proliferation in the mobile phone will become sort of the infrastructure of the hub for many, many applications like consumer IoT, smart home. Of course, automotive, you will access your car from your phone. And even in industrial IoT applications as well there'll be opportunities there. So it's just a very target-rich environment. And we have said that we expect within 4 years, kind of in calendar '24, it's somewhere between 2 billion and 4 billion units. Again, very limited number of people supplying that market. We think we have the broadest approach to the solution. We have the ability to not only serve the mobile phone but all the accessories that talk to the mobile phone as well as automotive and all the industrial IoT verticals. So we're really excited about the capability and the growth prospects for the business, for sure.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Toshi, as far as IoT revenues, they're very meaningful, but we have not broken those out, but it is sizable and growing very nicely. We're very pleased with that. And our automotive business today is reasonable size but also growing very nicely and should grow substantially over the next few years.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. And then, Mark, as my follow-up on gross margins, great job here. And then, I guess, into the December quarter, you're guiding margins, I think, up 80 basis points sequentially despite IDP revenue being down, which should be a headwind for mix. What are some of the puts and takes in terms of gross margins in the quarter? And I guess more importantly, going forward, I think you talked about sustaining 50% or higher in the back half. But when you think about gross margins on a multiyear basis, where is the ceiling? Or where's the potential for Qorvo given some of the initiatives in place?
Mark Murphy:
So Toshi, as it relates to the December quarter gross margin, as you mentioned, we're forecasting 52.5%, so 80 basis points up. You're correct in that we've got an increased mobile mix, but there are many forms of mix, one of which is product mix. So we've got some favorability there. About half of that 80 basis points is actually mix effects. The other half is manufacturing costs continue to be a tailwind for us and just outstanding performance by the ops team. We've got higher volumes, of course, which is helping us on absorption, but we've also had very good test yields, which we forecast to improve. And then we've had excellent spend control. And then -- and all these things have been contributing. We expect that to continue to help us in the December quarter. Since I am talking -- before I talk to a longer-term margin trend, Toshiya, I'll mention that we do expect -- as you see in our business sometimes, we do expect gross margins to decline actually in the March quarter. Some of that will be mix effects. We expect lower volumes in the March quarter. So we'll have some absorption effects and then -- and some other factors. And we expect gross margins to go down about 150 basis points or so from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. Longer term, we continue to -- we've -- it's taken us a number of years to sort of get things aligned in the company. And I would go back to the merger where there was a recognition that we needed to get the best-in-class technologies and the ability to scale them to serve what was going to be a multiyear technology trend, and we're here. So it started from efforts to invest in the right technologies. We had several years of working on the right portfolio of products. And then we also had several years of getting the operations in order and driving productivity, rightsizing the footprint and then being very diligent or more circumspect about capital spend, which continues to trend down as a percent of sales, we've been able to reduce our capital intensity. So a multi-disciplined effort within the company, and we're going to continue to do those things. We still have room in the fab network -- factory network to expand volume, so we could still get better absorption. Paul and his team are doing a remarkable job on productivity, driving -- still doing 6- to 8-inch conversions in BAW, 4- to 6-inch in GaN. Micro-BAW has been introduced and is growing as a share of our products. And again, excellent job on cycle times, spend control and a raft of other productivity projects. So -- and then finally, we're leveraging our supply chain partners better. So when you add all those things, premium technology portfolio, active product portfolio management, driving productivity throughout the org and then reducing the capital intensity of the business, we think we're going to be able to sustain or expand gross margins as we go forward beyond fiscal '21.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Nice job on the quarterly execution and guide. I'd like to try to understand where you saw upside in September. At the time you preannounced, you cited better smartphone demand. You called it pretty broad-based, but that even appears to have come in better than expectations. I guess how broad across the 6 major smartphone customers you have, including Huawei? Where do you see the upside there? I think you also saw a little bit of upside in IDP relative to your expectations. And I guess looking at December, compared to your prior view of somewhat flattish and now you're calling for some nice mobile growth, what's driving that upside relative to your prior view? Is that coming from -- I guess is Android still sequentially increasing like it did in September? If you can help us understand the upside, that would be great.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Bill. It's Bob, and I appreciate your questions. As far as the upside, after we gave the guidance in early September, it was broad-based, but it was not Huawei. And I've said that, I think, in a couple of other public forums. And it was broad-based across our other 5 customers that you said the big 6. Huawei was not one of them during that period. We saw a little bit of upside in IDP. And as James pointed out, our WiFi business is doing extremely well. And that was a little bit of that and a little bit of defense, a little bit here and there. But overall, business is running extremely well. And our operations team did a good job of keeping up with some of that demand. So real pleased with that. Eric, do you want to take the second part of Bill's question there?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Looking into December and that strength, it's again not Huawei, as we said. But other than that, it's really pretty broad-based across Android as well as iOS. But also within Android, China is still continuing to look very strong. We're still in the very early innings of the 5G rollout, and there's a lot of subs there. So it's really fairly broad-based in the current view.
Bill Peterson:
Yes. And I guess maybe the second question for James, and I think earlier you said that the 5G infrastructure should start to improve after December. But I guess for the composite of the business, assuming you have better visibility across areas like defense and longer-term opportunities, how should we think about the seasonality of that business? Should we assume WiFi still sustains into the first half of next year based off work-from-home trends and other factors? Just trying to get a feel for how you see that business trending here in the next couple of quarters.
James Klein:
Yes. Thanks for the question, Bill. As Mark said last quarter, and I think we're tracking pretty close to that, you'll see us -- Q3, we've already said 270. I think Q4 will be very similar to the mark -- to the range that Mark talked about last quarter. And then we'll see that growth start back in Q1 of next fiscal year. And as I said before, I think the underlying markets really support our ability to grow at 10% to 15% and perhaps somewhere in the high range of that, we'll see. We had an absolutely great first half. If you look at our first half of this year compared to the same period last year, we grew 55%. And the year-over-year growth rate for the quarter we're guiding now is about 30%. So we've got some very, very nice trends going on in the business. We've got great technology. Really, really strong partnerships with our customers. So I think we're going to go through some lumpiness with the deployment of 5G, and then it's going to pick right back up as we go into our fourth quarter and into the first part of our FY '22.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Securities.
Vivek Arya:
Congratulations on the strong results. First question, I'm curious what your sense is of the sell-through of 5G smartphones across your customer base and what that says about seasonality for the March quarter. A part of me say that, look, we are in the early stages of 5G that -- and March, the 5G strength and content gains can continue. So that would argue for perhaps a more measured seasonality going into March, down 8%, 9%. But then you had set a strong second half that maybe it could be more traditional seasonality, down something in the mid-teens. I'm just curious, what side are you leaning towards? And just conceptually, what is your sense of sell-through in 5G smartphones?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Vivek, it's Mark. We're not going to give detailed guidance on March but maybe make a couple of comments here. I think the most important thing is that we believe the technology upgrade cycle for 5G is multiyear in both handsets and infrastructure. So -- and that applies to broader connectivity trends as well which we think are durable. So -- but there is a lot of uncertainty still on the broader market on the rate and pace of the rollout and maybe in the immediate term. And then, of course, we've got the associated effects of the pandemic, the global economic recovery and other factors. I would add that the pickup in 5G and work from home and other demand factors are actually straining parts of the supply chain. And as you said, we do need to watch sell-through. I mean fortunately for us, our inventories are good and our -- and we've also got -- the supply chain inventories are lean. And we're focused on doing everything we can to meet customer needs. But to your -- directly to your question for March, we think it's reasonable to assume some sort of decline over what's a very, very strong December. We would say 10% or more sequential decline would -- is a view we have currently for our guide. And then we would expect, as I mentioned, Vivek, gross margin to decline sequentially 150 basis points or more on lower volumes, some mix effects and other factors. We would still be up on gross margin year-over-year 100 basis points or more. And then we would expect OpEx to be flat to up as we continue to invest for the long term. But I would leave it with we -- again, we view this as a multiyear secular trend and are investing appropriately.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. Very helpful, Mark. And then for my follow-up, what do you think about the competition from Qualcomm? They spoke about a 50%, 60% plus kind of growth rate in their RF front-end business. Is that apples-to-apples to what you sell? Are you starting to see them in more places? Do they have some kind of advantage because they're able to bundle some of their RF components with the 5G modem and the strong position they have on the 5G modem? I'm just curious, has the competitive landscape changed for you from a Qualcomm perspective from what you're seeing right now?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Thanks for the question, Vivek. I don't think there's really been any change. We've talked a bit about this before. I think different companies view the RF TAM differently or what they choose to put into their RF business. And in the case of Qualcomm, they got a lot of other features and functionalities that they include that aren't addressed by the RF community generally. So power management pieces, I think they're probably benefiting quite well from the initial rollout of millimeter wave. In that there, we believe, at least, including a great deal of functionality and content that is not RF at all by nature. So it's just a question of what they put into what they call RF, I think, more than anything else. In terms of their attach rate and true RF components under their baseband, we haven't seen any real change in that dynamic there. We're -- our customers are looking for best-in-class RF components, and the vast majority of the actual RF content is not generally addressable by them competitively, at least in the mass market. So there's a lot of opportunity, and we haven't really seen the dynamic change.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar:
First of all, solid congratulations on tremendous performance. So I'll pick it up right where the previous question was. So with respect to millimeter wave, my understanding is the traditional sub-6 players in the RF are not there yet, including yourself, so that remains an opportunity. Do you think it's a matter of coverage, it's a matter of time before you're able to play in there? Or is -- there's just not a use for your technology over there? Or is it some other industry dislocation type thing where the baseband change happened and you have a shot to get in? Just some color would be appreciated.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Thanks, Harsh. This is Eric again. When we look at millimeter wave, I think it's important to realize, I mean, Qorvo is certainly a technology leader in millimeter wave. The work that James and his group has been doing for decades to provide millimeter wave in incredibly high-performance situations is second to none. And our customers have validated that. If we go up and do component-level evaluations of various functions in the millimeter wave front end, there's no question, there'd be a huge advantage to the system at going with our technology. So the question is really the rate and pace of the rollout and seeing how the economics play out. I think as of now, we're sort of testing the waters in millimeter wave. So customers are employing sort of easy-to-use integrated solutions. They don't have the best performance. But for now, the real question is whether there's any infrastructure to talk to. There's rollouts, of course, across dozens of cities, but they're incredibly limited in terms of coverage area and real-world dynamics of getting the signal in and out in a reasonable way. And the cost of employing the infrastructure and being able to be mobile, but they need device on a millimeter wave network. There's just a lot of questions that haven't been sorted out. So I think it's great that it's being tested. As an RF company, we would be thrilled if it becomes mainstream, and we would love to participate in it. I think customers have all evaluated our technology. It's really a matter of waiting to see if the need really survives the first 1 or 2 generations.
Harsh Kumar:
Understood. And then for my follow-up, do you see RF content increasing again next year associated with 5G after this initial wave of 5G content uptick? And if so, like, what would be some of the big broad drivers? Is it just the same as expanded bands, expanded channels and things of that nature? Or do you see something else happening?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So see, there's probably two ways to think about it. So we said the units for 5G we expect to roughly double again next year, so from 250 to 500. But on that doubling, the content increase is staying at roughly the same at $5 to $7, depending upon the tier and the exact model, right? So in that sense, you're seeing the units are same. But then longer term, I think you're going to see the same dynamic that's driven 4G. So we're still very early in the 5G cycle. There are new bands still coming. And within the bands, they're trying to find ways to use more of the spectrum. And so there's going to be a priority on higher technology to monetize all that spectrum and get the data out of it that 5G promises. We're also just beginning to see these dual connect modules where we've got dual transmit antennas now for 5G, and some of these are really challenging, frequency allocations and the bands that they want to transfer on simultaneously. That's going to add an awful lot of complexity and challenge for RF, which will drive even more value there, I think. And so we're investing in the areas that we think are going to be our customers' toughest challenges. So as the RF gets harder and more complex and more valuable, we're going to be positioned to provide the best technology to solve the problem.
Harsh Kumar:
Congratulations.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gary Mobley:
I want to ask about the different moving pieces in the China smartphone market. You mentioned you have perhaps a limited license with Huawei tied specifically to their handset business. I think some others have commented that they as well have received a limited license from the U.S. Commerce Department. And so curious if they have their supply chain sort of shored up to feed into their mobile handset business. Or do you -- I'd like to hear your opinion on whether or not they perhaps could lose share and how Qorvo could benefit as your market share at alternative customers may be higher. Any thoughts there.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes. Thanks, Gary. Number one, as you pointed out, our license is for certain mobile products, not IDP. So you're correct, let's get that clean. And we're working with the customer. But I think we pointed out on our last quarter call that we're very fortunate that we have the same products that we sell to all these customers, and they go with multiple basebands. So from a supply perspective, we're very fortunate with our inventories that we sell the same components to all these guys. And the mobile team has done a fantastic job of designing products that will work across customers and across basebands.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. As my follow-up, I wanted to ask about Huawei again, but on the GaN power amplifier side, I believe they've been pretty much the driving force of that portion of your business as a lead customer in China. But I'm curious to hear your thoughts on the adoption of some non-Huawei 5G RF players.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes. We haven't shipped GaN to Huawei for quite a long time, well over a year, over a year. So we've been seeing tremendous growth in our GaN business, as James loves to talk about, and I'll let him go through that, to multiple customers, as I said in my opening remarks. But I can tell James would love to answer this. So James, go ahead. The show is yours.
James Klein:
Yes. I mean adoption has really been broad-based, Gary. So we see pretty much all of the OEMs, and I guess I can say all of the OEMs, have programs related to GaN. Multiple of those OEMs have those products into production and typically in a massive MIMO construct, so relatively high content in all of those. We've got wins across, again, multiple of those OEMs that are supporting both deployments in China and in other parts of the world. So I think adoption is going very, very good. We had a great GaN quarter. We tied our record from the quarter before. And we've almost quadrupled our GaN business from period -- the same period last year. So I think those trends are just like we have projected that 5G is really going to drive MIMO and higher frequencies, and that's going to drive the adoption of GaN. We're very focused on scaling the technology and continuing to improve the performance and -- so that we can continue this ramp as we go because we very much are in the early innings of 5G deployments around the world.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
I had a question on the gross margin and really from a mix perspective within mobile, any context you could share in terms of perhaps some of the tailwinds that integration is helping as well as maybe the BAW business increasing as a percent of total as you go out in time?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Craig, we typically don't break out mix in detail, but you're correct. I mean what's helping us is this ongoing trend of integration, and particularly BAW-related modules. As you know, our largest fab is Richardson, so largest cost structure. So volumes and continued growth in BAWs is important, and that's helping. And there are other products where we have highly specialized technology that is helpful in the mix as well. But certainly, BAW and -- both BAW and other integrated modules is a part of the favorable mix.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. And then just a follow-up for Eric. In terms of integration within mid-range phones or mass market, can you talk about perhaps kind of where we are in that cycle, if you will, in terms of -- that's been an important growth driver, but just how much more do you see that in terms of the market moves towards integration and how much does 5G also play a role in terms of the need versus discrete parts?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. It's a good question. As you know, 4G sort of grew up discrete, and as it became more complicated and more bands, integration became required really to fit everything into the space. And 5G is essentially launched with fully integrated modules. And to date, I don't believe we're aware of any design that's going discrete. It's just very, very, very complex. And once you're used to having a highly integrated fairly miniaturized compact RF solution, it's really hard to undo that and go to discrete solutions because you still have to do all of this on multiband operation and multiplexing and so forth. So it's very hard for a phone customer to match these things on the phone board. So if not 100%, the vast majority of 5G phones are continuing to use fully integrated solutions.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
If I could, Eric, between Bob's comments and the details from our own teardowns, it seems as if most of the strength you're seeing in your businesses are the main path modules in -- and probably tuners, which both have been very good. But Skyworks is doing very well in diversity, even with the new transmit versions, and there's been a huge increase in antennaplexers at Apple, which seem to all have gone to Broadcom. I know you've got the technology to play in all these areas, but we really haven't seen a lot of it just yet. Will we see more participation from Qorvo in these areas as these technologies move into the Chinese phones? Or do you think, because you've only really shifted in the last year or so, to focus more on all these other, I would say, lucrative but lower ASP stuff than the big mid-/high-band? Is it just a matter of time that you think you might make inroads into the non-Chinese OEMs? And then Mark -- go ahead. Please.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So I think that since we formed Qorvo, we really had a focus on looking at the full architecture because we've got visibility into it and investing in the key technologies that are going to solve the customers' toughest problems. And you're right, we've got tremendous expertise around the antenna systems, not just tuning, but also multiplexing and antennaplexing and switching and LNAs and all the things you need to make the antenna networks work. And you know that's getting to be more and more and more important regardless of the tier or the customer base, right? But also the advanced power management that we have, which is a very specialized power management to help in these high-modulation standards, we're going to continue to invest in that. We think there's new opportunities there. Our BAW filtering, we believe we're second to none now. And we're not slowing down. We've got many, many more improvements and steps-up in performance and cost, as well reduction for BAWs. So that's going to be the anchor of a whole suite of modules, as you're indicating, even the receive modules that have transmit capability in them. And then all of the main path modules will continue to rely heavily on BAW. So I don't think we're limited at all of where we play. It's a target-rich environment for us. We're kind of prioritizing our investments to where we think we'd get the best ROI. I think it's going really well. And we're going to continue to build out the portfolio and continue to play in more and more areas as we see them being attractive.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then, Mark, if I could, and I had a short one for James, too. But Mark, last time, Qorvo hit 51.5-ish gross margin was June of '15, revenue was about $670 million. It's about 60% higher last quarter. And unlike at '15, you're now shipping a lot more GaN, BAW and tuners, all of which carry very good gross margins. Is the difference in revenue to gross margin something structural in the fab? Or is it more of a reflection of Qorvo capturing all those filters and passive devices that used to be supplied by the discrete component vendors that are now being rolled into your big modules because obviously it increases your ASP but maybe dilutes margin a bit more. And I know that was the vision when Qorvo was formed, that you guys could start capturing a lot of this other discrete content.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Ed, I'm not sure exactly what your question is. Your figures are correct in that historical data, but we've invested a lot in the business since then. And as you know, there were efforts to rationalize the footprint, make it suited to how we want to take the business forward and, as Eric just said, a lot around active portfolio management. We're at a point now where we've steadily increased gross margins from a low September '16. And we feel good about -- well we feel great about the technology and the business. As Eric talked through, we're making the right product decisions that are best for our customers and for us. The operations team is performing very well and there's a lot of runway on productivity, and we'll continue to -- that will continue to hopefully be a tailwind on margins or should be. And then we've got -- we're reducing our capital intensity. And all that points to we should be able to sustain these levels, and over time, don't see why we shouldn't be able to expand margins.
Operator:
Thank you. This concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'll now turn it back to management for closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us on our call tonight. We'll be presenting via webcast at upcoming investor conferences, and we invite everyone to listen in. Thanks again, and have a great night.
Operator:
This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, everyone. Welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Q1 2021 Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2021 first quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses, or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website at qorvo.com, under Investors. Joining us today from multiple locations are; Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll hand it over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone. Qorvo began our fiscal year with an exceptional first quarter. Quarterly revenue, gross margin and EPS were each well above guidance. IDP returned a robust year-over-year growth and represented a record percentage of total Qorvo revenue. Infrastructure was especially strong. We increased our support for 5G specifically sub-six gigahertz 5G massive MIMO deployments. And we achieved record GaN product revenue, also contributing were multi-year defense programs and the continued ramp of Wi-Fi 6. In the smartphone market, demand was more resilient than anticipated and 5G smartphones represented an increasing percentage of total units. Looking more closely at 5G, we’re in the early stages of a multi-year upgrade cycle supporting growth across both businesses. In mobile products, we’re benefiting from the need for more and better RF fueled by higher front-end integration and increased complexity. This includes the move to higher frequencies, the addition of new band combinations and the adoption of dual transmit architectures to support 5G. Content expansion and increased complexity supporting 5G architectures favor our design expertise and technology at scale. We’re securing broad based design wins for our most highly integrated low, mid-high and ultra high band solutions, in some cases supplying customers the entire main path. We’re seeing increased demand for a broad based multiplexing solutions across a range of baseband, across a range of band combinations. Both smartphone units are forecasted to be down over 10% year-over-year. RF content expansion in 5G devices of approximately $5 to $7 is mitigating the impact of fewer units. For the year, we continue to expect approximately 250 million 5G smartphones globally. In infrastructure, our opportunities in small signal devices like LNAs are growing in line with the increase in massive MIMO antenna elements while revenue related to GaN PAs is added content. Our GaN leadership and infrastructure is built on decades of advanced technology development, commercial experience in other markets and proven ability to scale. Globally, we expect 5G base station deployments to outpace the initial deployments of 4G with over three quarters of a million deployments this calendar year growing to more than a million in 2021. In the U.S. and Europe, we see deployments picking-up next year, adding to this multi-year investment cycle by the carriers. This will drive strength in IDP given our technologies, design capabilities, and operational excellence. In the June quarter, infrastructure revenue was a record and we secured record design wins in support of ongoing 5G base station deployments. We also began sampling GaN amplifiers for upcoming C-band spectrum allocations in the United States. It's been over a year now, since we added our programmable power management business and the team is doing a great job of driving growth across diversified markets. During the June quarter, we ramped the programmable power management solution, along with a Wi-Fi 6 front-end module for the leading drone manufacturer, enabling longer flight times, greater range and larger payload. We also ramped shipments of programmable power management and motor control solutions, improving the efficiency of solid state drives in places like data centers and enabling brushless motors used in a range of consumer products. In the future, we see opportunities for our power management technologies in defense, in other markets. We delivered a strong quarter in GaN for the defense market, led by radar programs, and we signed several long-term agreements with the defense firms firming up our expectations for double-digit growth in defense this fiscal year. We were also awarded design wins for an integrated GaN multi-chip broadband transmit receive module and a 50-watt GaN power amplifier for defense radar programs. These wins are notable as Qorvo supply more integrated solutions into the defense market. In connectivity, we experienced continued strong demand for Wi-Fi 6 products, including front end modules and BAW filters. Driven by work from home trends, we commend shipments of our integrated ultra-low power multi-protocol Zigbee, BLE and Thread IoT solutions supporting one of the largest providers of smart home infrastructure solutions. We requested an emergency use authorization from the FDA for COVID-19 antibody testing using Qorvo bio technologies platform. This innovative device features unique sensor technology, and it's designed to address the needs of medical clinicians for rapid and accurate results. On the same technology platform, we also received initial production orders for our biosensor platform for high sensitivity vetinary point-of-care applications. Turning to mobile products, we supported multiple production ramps, and benefited broadly from integration trends at multiple customers. Revenue was diversified across categories, including modules, integrating PAs, switches, BAW install filters, as well as antenna flexors, antenna tuners, and specialized RF power management. We were selected by leading Korea based smartphone manufacturer to supply a highly integrated high-band solution for this year's flagship smartphone. We're also supplying an Innovative antenna flexor solution that addresses antenna network complexity and optimizes system efficiency for an upcoming foldable smartphone. Across our customers, we are engaged on the most critical 5G challenges and enabling them to introduce innovative new designs, enhance performance and bring products to market faster. At multiple Android smartphone manufacturers, we captured the complete main path, including low band, mid-high band and ultra-high band modules for upcoming 5G smartphone launches. We supported customers across all major chipset providers, and notably began production shipments in support of leading customers using Mediatek’s 5G baseband. In ultra wideband, we commenced high volume shipments of our UWB solutions enabling superior accuracy and reliability in contact tracing and social distancing applications for numerous customers globally. As an example, we're working with Kinexon, whose SafeZone tag is being used by the NBA and the NFL in their training camps. Qorvo’s UWB technology delivers a short burst of energy spread over a large bandwidth to precisely measure the distance between ultra wideband enabled devices. We’re interacting very closely with the mobile community and we’re actively engaged across other applications, including automotive and IoT. In power management, we increased shipments of mobile power management solutions, driven by the adoption of 4G, 5G dual transmit and the associated complexity it introduces. Across our markets, Qorvo is advancing a range of best-in-class technologies, supporting our customers with a broad set of high performance and highly integrated solutions, our R&D investments, and product and technology roadmaps are aligned closely with our customers and with long-term market drivers. The same can be said for our recent acquisitions. The June quarter marked our first full quarter for Custom MMIC and Decawave and just over a year, since acquiring Active-Semi. The integration activities are progressing nicely, and the teams are performing extremely well. Before handing the call over to Mark, I'll briefly address some of the active measures we continue to take in light of COVID-19. Qorvo is operating under enhanced safety protocols to keep our employees and operations safe while supporting our customers. In addition to social distancing practices, temperature scanning and restrictions on travel and site visits, we conduct rigorous screening and quarantine processes for suspected or confirmed cases. Thanks to these and other efforts, we've experienced no material disruptions in our business or operations. Our design teams are releasing best-in-class products. Our sales and application engineers are designing our solutions in our customers next generation products and our factories are operating well. I'm extremely proud of the Qorvo team and thank them for their ongoing efforts. In summary, we're pleased with our financial and operating performance in the June quarter, and we’re confident in our outlook for September. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon everyone. Qorvo’s revenue for the June or first quarter of fiscal 2021 was $787 million, $57 million above the midpoint of our guidance on stronger than expected demand in both our Mobile Products and Infrastructure and Defense Product segments. Mobile Products revenue of $468 million exceeded our expectation as handset demand remained more resilient and global supply chain disruptions less impactful than we anticipated at the time of our guide. In the September quarter, we expect mobile to increase sequentially driven by new handset launches and increased content due primarily to the adoption of 5G. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue increased to $319 million, over 40% of the company's revenue as the ongoing build out of 5G networks drove demand and we successfully ramp new GaN products. During the quarter, IDP returned to robust year-over-year growth and we expect IDP to sustain healthy double-digit year-over-year growth through the year with strength in 5G, Wi-Fi and Defense. Non-GAAP gross margin in the June quarter is 48.6%, which was 110 basis points over our guidance due to lower than expected manufacturing costs and favorable mix effects. Our efforts to improve the portfolio and drive productivity are yielding favorable results. And we expect this progress to continue as we’re forecasting approximately 50% gross margin in the September quarter. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the June quarter were $179 million and lower than expected due in part to spend discipline on discretionary activities. Non-GAAP net income in the June quarter was $175 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.50 was $0.37 above the mid-point of our May guidance. Cash flow from operations in the June quarter was $214 million and CapEx was $30 million yielding free cash flow of $184 million. We repurchased $75 million of shares during the quarter. We continue to invest ahead of customer and market needs while sustaining responsible capital return. During the June quarter, we raised over $300 million through an add-on to our 2029 unsecured notes, augmenting liquidity and further extending the weighted average maturity of our outstanding debt to October of 2027. Our leverage remains low and we have no near-term maturities. We ended the quarter with $1.1 billion of cash and an untapped $300 million unsecured revolver. With this financial flexibility, we can focus on advancing technology supporting customers and making prudent organic and inorganic investments that support long-term earnings and free cash flow growth. As Bob mentioned, our recent acquisitions have been integrated quickly and are performing well. On ultra-wideband, we see a wide array of applications emerging with this wireless technology, and have significant customer engagement on the design of new products and solutions. We expect this business and our MEMS technology acquisition to contribute meaningfully to Qorvo over time. Our other recent acquisitions are already accretive. Custom MMIC, a bolt-on to our IDP segment exceeded plan in its first full quarter and further strengthens our defense and aerospace franchise. Programmable power management is serving customers advanced power management needs, is delivering in line with our expectations and is on track to grow revenues strong double-digits this quarter versus the same period last year. Turning to our current quarter outlook, we expect revenue between $925 million and $955 million. Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 50% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.90 at the midpoint of our guidance. As mentioned in the guidance section of our press release, our fiscal year 2021 is a 53-week fiscal year and our September quarter is a 14-week quarter versus a typical 13-week quarter. Our last 14-week quarter occurred in September of 2015 or fiscal 2016, which was the last 53 week fiscal year reported. Our current quarter revenue outlook reflects the additional week, strong sequential growth in mobile and over 50% year-over-year growth in IDP. And mobile demand for 5G is adding more complex parts and driving higher content. And we forecast revenue in the current quarter to be approximately $640 million. In IDP, we project the business to be approximately $300 million in the current quarter reflecting the timing of base station deployments. We do forecast IDP to sustain strong year-over-year growth through the year, as infrastructure demand remains robust and defense Wi-Fi and power management strengthen. While there is considerable economic uncertainty associated with the ongoing effects of the pandemic, currently, we expect end market demand to support full fiscal year revenue growth for Qorvo. Our September quarter gross margin guide of approximately 50% reflects volume growth and ongoing efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of our business. Specifically, we've invested early and adequately in the technologies that markets need, focused our product portfolio on where we can best serve customers, gained productivity across our operations and reduced our capital intensity recognizing that a potential impact to our demand and supply chain remains, given the uncertainty due to the pandemic, we believe our work to minimize inventories and reduce our cost structure will help us sustain approximately 50% gross margin through the balance of the year. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the September quarter to approximately $207 million due to the additional week in the quarter, higher personnel costs including raises increased product development activities, and the resumption of some discretionary spend. Excluding the additional week, OpEx will be closer to $196 million for the quarter and we expect OpEx to remain below that level for the balance of the year. Other expense will increase to over $20 million driven by the full-quarter effect of the net interest charge from debt added in June. We expect our current quarter and full-year non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 8%. We project capital expenditures to remain below $200 million in fiscal 2021 and focused on BAW, GaN and other areas which advanced is differentiated position for Qorvo to best serve customer needs. As the June quarter results and our September quarter outlook show, Qorvo continues to operate well through a challenging period while serving customers in 5G infrastructure and smartphones, Wi-Fi, IoT, defense and other growth markets. In closing, I'd like to join Bob and thanking Qorvo employees for their efforts during this time. Now I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We'll hear first today from Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo.
Gary Mobley:
Hey everyone, thanks for taking my question. Wanted to ask about how that extra week in the September quarter may impact your seasonal expectations for the December quarter, mass works out correctly. That might be roughly a $60 million impediment to what would normally be a seasonally up December quarter, so maybe if you can help us think about that December quarter?
Mark Murphy:
Gary, it’s Mark. You’re right, the effect is about is over $65 million, adjusted the quarter, September quarter would be around $873 million or so. And so even without the additional week, it's still a very strong quarter for us. We're up over 10% sequential for that adjusted number. And we're going to be just under 10% year-over-year.
Gary Mobley:
Okay. As my follow-up, I wanted to ask about sort of the emergence of the mid-tier in 5G in particular in China. And so maybe if you can just walk us through under a scenario where the sub-$600 portion of the smartphone market becomes the leading driver in the second half of the year for 5G, mobile handset sales in particular in China, how this plays out for Qorvo?
Eric Creviston:
Sure, this is Eric, I'll be happy to take that. We've said previously, and it's still true today that we were seeing this $5 to $7 worth of content for any 5G phone that's holding even as you go into the mid-tier, you're coming-off a smaller base of content, obviously but the 5G adder is still roughly the same. So as a percentage it's actually quite a bit more of an increase and while you might expect that there could be less integrated, more discrete implementations to save costs, the fact is that most of the band combinations and requirements are the same. And so the fully integrated solution just offers an awful lot of value with time to market given all the complexity, and so we're seeing just a lot of design activity across the tiers. We brought out our Fusion 20 this year, absolutely industry leading best-in-class performance, highly integrated, full-band coverage, low-band, mid-high and ultra-high bands, integrated shielding, so the parts are already shielded, you put them down, you don't have any sort of issues with interference, integrated the LNAs now as well. So when you look at that capability, just a few placements have a complete 5G phone, RF section regardless of the tier is a very, very compelling offering.
Gary Mobley:
Great, appreciate it. Thanks guys.
Operator:
We’ll hear next from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Yes, hi. Congratulations on the results in the strong guide. My first question is a follow-up to the question on China. And it sounds like you have a lot of wins that are now across multiple devices for the four main path. But I guess in the past, you've had really good content in phones. And sometimes the phones don't sell as well. So try and get a feel for the breadth of your design wins. Maybe in which cases you might just hasn’t been high in some cases or other parts. Try to get a feel for the breadth of your design wins here for the phones launching in the back half of the year in China?
Eric Creviston:
Sure Bill, this is Eric again. It's actually quite broad, with our Fusion 20 portfolio, we're talking about this year, we're engaged with every single 5G baseband, our parts are universal, so they can be used with all the 5G basebands on the market today, we're engaged with every Android customer with this portfolio. In some cases, we’re doing maybe just the ultra-high band section or the high-band or low band, but in many cases, we are looking at the full solution. The very same parts are seeing design traction broadly across all 5G Android customers.
Bill Peterson:
Okay, thanks. Thanks for that color. My second question is for James, James huge upside I was hoping you could help us understand where the upside came in June and where you see the upside here in September, I presume infrastructure but if you can rank, you said defense was strong and some of the other areas, help us rank where the upside was coming from and expected to come from here in the September quarter?
James Klein:
Yes, thanks Bill. In the first quarter, we continue to have significant ramps in both 5G and in Wi-Fi 6. We supported both of these markets with a really broad set of products, including GaN power amplifiers and driver modules, integrated front-end modules, BAW filters and numerous discrete products, and we supported a broad set of customers in both of those markets. GaN power amplifiers are a great example of one of the ramps, we brought a broad set of products to the market to support 5G different frequencies, different power levels and supporting different customers. And our GaN revenue for the quarter doubled from what it was at the same time last year. Wi-Fi 6 products were also doing very well in both the retail and set top box markets and we believe a large part of that is due from work from home. So we've seen strength particularly in the high-end retail space. Defense stayed a good foundation for the business. And as we move into Q2, we'll see a similar type story, we will continue the ramp in Wi-Fi 6, defense will also pick-up quite a bit again based on some of those long-term supply agreements that Bob talked about in his earlier comments. The base station business itself will also be very strong in Q2, we will start to see that come down a bit in Q3 as we finish calendar year 2020 deployments and then we expect that to ramp back up as we move into our fiscal Q4 to support the calendar year 2021 deployments.
Operator:
We’ll move next to Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar:
Yes, hey guys, another one for James, James you’re very popular today. How come all of a sudden this massive explosion of growth? Did you just have like a series of design wins that that kicked-in all -- did you just have a series of design wins that kicked in all simultaneously? Or was it one or two customers that that predominantly drove the upside?
James Klein:
Yes, it will. Thanks Harsh for the popularity. I appreciate it. As I've been saying for the better part of a year as I expected us to return to growth in about a year. And I couldn't be more proud of the broad team here of designers and sales teams, and the manufacturing folks, it really allowed us to recover the business from what was obviously a significant downturn for us about a year-ago. So we've been projecting this, I think it's fairly broad based. Massive MIMO or 5G rollouts have been a really positive for us and I talked about in the past that we see content games about 10X on a MIMO base station compared to conventional macro. Now, that uplift is because of element count and because also we now can supply the GaN power amplifiers where in the past those would have been LDMOS, so we've picked up a tremendous amount of content in 5G and that's really helped drive the growth. But we're setting records in our Wi-Fi space as well. With Wi-Fi 6 coming on board over the last couple of quarters, this was our third consecutive quarter of double-digit quarter-over-quarter growth in that part of the market. Defense is a good foundation, and we don't talk about it relatively small business but our power management business is doing very, very well exceeding our expectations and growing in strong double-digits on top of everything else. So I think we've just got a great portfolio, some great technologies and the markets have aligned fairly well for us.
Harsh Kumar:
Okay, and then my follow-up question for Mark or Bob, margins of 50% truly, truly fantastic to see that and you're actually calling. I think if I heard it correctly, that neighborhood for the rest of the year, correct me if I'm wrong there. But what again, the uptick of roughly 140 basis points, how much of that is mix and how much of that is just simply straight-up utilization?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, hi. So Harsh, I think first of all, we're really pleased to hit a milestone which you know has been bugging us for some time. Yes and I think if you go back couple of years, we had had a lackluster mobile handset volume period. And then we had Huawei and then we had the pandemic. And so there were just a series of headwinds that kept us from that milestone. Took us a bit longer than we thought, but we were confident, we’re going to get there. We feel that we're doing the right things. And we're going to continue doing these things, investing in the technology, managing our portfolio the right way to where we're most valued by customers, driving productivity very hard. And I've got certainly compliment Paul Fego and his team for just a tremendous job doing all the things around cycle time improvement and the wafer expansions and we shut down a facility and seamlessly and dye shrink, so I can go on and on. But we're seeing those results and the numbers, so it's real. And we're making real progress despite the headwinds we've had. So and then finally, we've reduced capital intensity. And you've seen that pretty dramatically for us. We're not constrained in growth. We've just been very selective about what we're doing and being smart about how we expand and get more out of the assets that we have. On the walk from Q1 to Q2. It's partly we still have some period costs Harsh, we still have Farmers Branch period costs and we have some idle equipment. So the higher revenue helps us in the sense of those period costs are a smaller percentage of higher revenue. So that helps us a bit on the margin, most of the rest of it is lower manufacturing costs. So my point earlier about Paul and his team, excellent spend control, this higher volume gives us better absorption and the mix is such that we have good absorption. And then finally, we had very good test shields as we look from this new forecast. Now, as we look out rest of the year, our inventories are in a really good spot. Our inventory only ticked-up a little bit, sequentially for the first quarter, and our terms are sort of historical levels, so they don't look bad. I'm never going to say we're pleased with our inventories. But they've been managed and the channel is very healthy. So that's important. So that gives us confidence that we're running the operation lean. We have a little bit of flexibility. But there's a healthy tension in our business between trying to keep costs down and trying to keep inventories low, trying to keep the fabs level loaded. I mean there's a healthy dynamic that occurs here that we think we've been playing okay. So having said all that, if the market holds up and the mix is what we think it will be then or favorable, we believe we have a high degree of confidence in 50%, approximately 50%. If the market softens in the back half or somewhat worsened than anticipated on mix, then we would be on the South side of 50. But we feel good, we're in that neighborhood and we intend to stay there and actually expand margins.
Operator:
And from Morgan Stanley, we will move to Craig Hettenbach.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes, thanks. On the wireless infrastructure front, can you touch maybe on just the competitive landscape, particularly you’re positioning within GaN, is that helping, is that market really starts to take-off, what you're seeing competitively?
James Klein:
Well, I think -- this is James, the dynamic is fairly similar to what we talked about in the prior quarters. Our focus right now is just making sure that we've got best-in-class technology. And we continue to innovate and drive technology, improved performance with our GaN and then really focused on scale and driving up our manufacturing capabilities, getting our yields up. And I think we proved that in this quarter. And again, next quarter that we were able to go through a pretty aggressive ramp on these sub-5 gigahertz deployments, sub-6 gigahertz deployments. So that's been our focus, we will continue to focus that way. I think on the small signal side, we've got a great set of competitors there as well. And we're doing the same thing. We're just continuing to focus on innovation, bringing more highly integrated modules to play, bringing BAW filters as an example into our mix in the infrastructure side. So I would say competition has been fairly stable and we're just focused on being able to bring innovative new products to the market and ramp them quickly.
Operator:
Got it. Thanks. And then just a follow-up on the smartphone side. As it relates to 5G, can you talk about just what you're seeing from an antenna tuning perspective, and how that plays into some of your expectations around content?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure, we've got as you know a lot of presence there all around the antenna structures and with 5G not only because of the higher bandwidth, but also new bands, some coming in, and even higher frequencies and the implications of running in dual transmit mode where you're running on multiple bands at the same time. When you put all that together, the antenna issues that our customers are struggling which is continue to get exponentially worse every year, especially with 5G. So we're seeing just a tremendous amount of interaction. We've got absolutely the best team in the world working on these solutions. And it's not just the antenna tuning, but also just the routing around all of these advance antenna structure, so an awful lot of like multiplexing in and out what we're calling antenna flexors, there's just a lot of activity there. And of course, as you know, this is part of the industrial design. So it's not sort of part of the modem proper. It's done after the fact is they're just getting the phones to market. So it's usually on a very tight time schedule and working with some very unique expertise, we've got a great team in the field and a great team in product design bringing absolutely state-of-the-art solutions to really a very serious problem that our customers have.
Operator:
Move next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. Couple of questions. Eric congratulations on the antenna flexors, is this your first production launch of that and why should we expect margins on that part to be exceptional given it's probably just ball on a package and is this driven by the 5F bands being added especially dual transmit which kind of makes up everything in the antenna side of it. And then James, GaN doubling year-over-year which is surprising, could you help clarify or remind us to. You do not have a license to ship GaN directly to Huawei, is that correct and you do have ZTE as a customer again and then if I could mark on the (inaudible) gross margin, you said is productivity efficiency in production. But it would sound like given the modules you're shipping in the module into high-end smartphones now that includes just about everything and James's increased use of both GaN and BAW, would mix start becoming a bigger issue in the move to 50 plus percent gross margin or is it used on Boeing for a while? Thanks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Hey thanks for your question. Eric, why don't you take part one? James, you can take part two and Mark, you'll take part three.
Eric Creviston:
All right, sounds good. This is Eric here and yes, as you pointed out, antenna flexing is relatively new for us. It is a category that's it's really, as I just said in the previous answer becoming really critical for our customers. It comes down to really the filter R&D, and we’re really hitting our stride now in terms of the team getting out the latest technologies and band coverage, we've got very cost effective and very high performance BAW filters across every single band, even going up into higher frequencies. And so then, we developed the capability of multiplexing those into very high order. multiplexers is driven by our main path modules, and then it's a short step from there into the antenna flexing business, essentially leveraging all of that work to get the multiplexing capability, that really comes down to absolute state-of-the-art in BAW filter process technology. That's what's enabling this. And as I said, we've got a lot of experience around the antenna sections of our customers phones. So we're very well placed to help them there.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks Eric, James?
James Klein:
Hey, so we weren't surprised to see GaN double at all. We've been planning and ramping-up for quite some time. And again, I got to go back to really congratulating our team on the work that they've done. But the direct answer to Huawei is no, we don't have a license and our deliveries to Huawei are pretty much not material at this point in time, and that's a IDP comment. We’re engaged with virtually all of the rest of the Tier-1s and Tier-2 in the space. I won't talk about what we do with any particular ones. But we do see all of those customers moving towards massive MIMO solutions. All of them are engaged in GaN. And so we’re as confident as we ever have been that the technology will continue to proliferate. And that we will see big content pickups in the space. And that that will not just be a China story, but that'll continue as 5G proliferates around the rest of the world. So this is we think a long-term trend for us over the next four or five years as the networks get deployed everywhere in the world.
Mark Murphy:
To add-on gross margin. Yes, I hate the single one-out is more important than the others because it's, I mean, it really does take all this to expand the margins in our view and so we spend a lot of time on productivity and Ops and all the programs over the years and great efforts there, it’s a critical part of getting there. We’ve also as you know have gone through a lot around right sizing our footprint and making sure that incremental CapEx dollars are directed at the right place and we're getting good return for those. But to your point, specifically on mix, that's why it's related about the investments you make in technology and when you make them and how you make them and we feel like we've put ourselves in a good position to compete where we want to compete, and that's where customers will value us the most where we bring the most differentiated products. And that's the portfolio management. So we do have, it's difficult quarter-to-quarter depends on the comparison quarter and as to how big an effect mix plays from quarter-to-quarter, but over the time here, over the long-term that we've been expanding our margins and we expect to continue to expand our margins. Mix is playing an important role.
Edward Snyder:
Thank you.
Operator:
We’ll go next from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso:
Thank you, I guess first question would be what we should be thinking about with regard to seasonality for the December quarter. And there's a few differences this year with the extra week that you have in the September quarter. In addition, some of your peers have talked about seasonality, the timing differences because of a flagship, the different timing of flagship ramp this year. Qualcomm talked about it in their call this evening. And is that a factor for you? We should be thinking about with regard to the December quarter?
Mark Murphy:
Now Chris, it's Mark. I'll take that and then maybe just provide a bit more color on the year. It's been a tough year for everyone. And there remains a lot of uncertainty. So I'll provide some general comments realizing that there's still a lot of risk and we can't be too specific. I would certainly point everybody as always to the risk factors in our K which includes the pandemic and trade. But on the second quarter, we did put up a very strong guide, and we've been very clear that included that extra week for our 53-week fiscal year, because excluding that, it's still a very strong guide. And as we said as Gary asked at the beginning, we're over $870 million for the second quarter. As we look at December, we expect December to be down on an absolute basis, of course. But on an adjusted basis, we would expect December to be roughly flat with the September quarter. And it's a function of a few things, you've got IDP is going to be over $275 million through the back half each quarter, but it's timing of infrastructure projects. And then in mobile, we'll see this normal seasonal ramp into September, and then you'll have a normal March seasonal downtick as we have a plan now and so where December falls in that is tough to call at this point. But we think it's probably going to be roughly flat to the September quarter adjusted. As I mentioned, we expect to grow full-year. I think as folks are thinking about that, keep in mind, we've got one this extra week, I laid out the acquisition impact year-over-year on last quarter's call. So you have that, and then we've had this good start to the first half of fiscal 2021. But I think given all the uncertainty in the outlook and broader macro, I think it's prudent to call below 5% year-over-year. I talked about just kind of filling things out. We've covered gross margin, now called approximately 50% in the September quarter and then approximately 50% through the back half. And again, that's going to be, that's going to be above or below that based on the strength of the broader economy, our end-markets and the mix of the business.
Chris Caso:
That's very helpful. If I get return to gross margin a bit and just the avoidance of doubt, are you talking about 50% gross margin through the end of the calendar year, not the fiscal year, I assume.
Mark Murphy:
That's good question, Chris. And I'm glad you asked it. I was talking about the fiscal year.
Chris Caso:
Fiscal year? Okay, well then that leads to another question which is the elements of strength which allow the gross margin to stay high in the March quarter despite seasonality and then does that provide a runway for continued gross margin improvement as you go into fiscal 2022?
Mark Murphy:
Listen, we're constantly working, Chris to expand gross margins and covered at length in a previous question. It depends on how well the markets hold up of course and our ability to absorb costs of our factories and spend there. We're doing a good job of keeping CapEx down. So our footprint, we're very sensitive to that. And then it matters. Are we investing in the right technologies? We think we’re. We have the right capabilities to develop the most advanced products customers want and then do are we managing the portfolio in a way that we're winning business and the sockets we want to that are going to bring the most value to customers and hopefully with that, carry the margins.
Operator:
We’ll move onto Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay, thank you very much, Bob, I had a question on the total 5G units for the year, I thought I heard you say 250 million that seems to be in the high side. And I haven't seen what Qualcomm said that. So I was wondering if that is indeed the number you gave us, where are we year-to-date and so how much is remaining, and I'm assuming majority of that is bulk of that is China. And then follow-up for James, IDP is doing really well, good to see it return back to growth and you seem pretty confident for the remainder of the year. It would be helpful if you could please give us a rough breakout of what the business looks like today in terms of other end markets, or product categories, however you choose to delineate within the business? Thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
James, I'll go and take the first part. In my prepared remarks, I did say that we expect 250 million smartphones globally this year consistent with what we said, when we reported our March results. We have seen many analysts that also cover the industry bringing their numbers up. We feel pretty good about it. As far as the amount of subscribers to-date, it's tracking in line with our model to potentially even slightly ahead. So we still feel very good about our number of 250 million units this calendar year for 5G and obviously significant growth as we look into the next year. James?
James Klein:
Yes, typically I don't want to break it out in great detail. But certainly base station business remains to be about a quarter or so and growing at a pretty rapid pace as we go, defense is about a quarter. Our IoT business is about a quarter and then we have various other markets that we serve, represent the rest of the business. Definitely we’re growing faster this year in the 5G space around wireless infrastructure, so that that will start to take a larger and larger part of the business as we go through the year.
Operator:
And from Needham & Company, we'll move to Raji Gill.
Raji Gill:
Yes, thanks for taking my questions. Just going back to the great traction in GaN. I’m wondering if you could describe kind of the market towards GaN adoption in China as well as outside of China, the shift from away from LDMOS to GaN base stations. What's been the traction there? Obviously, you're kind of well positioned with the major Chinese base station vendor. What's your positioning or your view on GaN adoption outside of China and your ability to kind of leverage your technology in those markets?
James Klein:
Yes, great, great question. Probably the best way to think about GaN adoption today is, one very, very broad based really across all of the customer base. All the OEMs are evaluating GaN or implementing GaN in some version or the other. What's driving big adoption today is really the 5G deployments that are using Massive MIMO antennas. So antenna element counts are significantly up. And for the first time, I think last year, we saw Massive MIMO antenna actually become a larger amount of the transceivers than macro. And the vast majority of those are using GaN today. So I think that's what's been driving the adoption is 5G in the shift to Massive MIMO. It is definitely broad based in what's going on in China. I would say most of the base stations that are getting deployed with this 5G rollout in China are using GaN, especially those that are in frequencies up around 2.6, or 3.5, which is a good share of what's getting deployed. If you go to the rest of the world again, pretty much every OEM Tier-1, Tier-2s are in progress of designing GaN solutions into their portfolio. So I do think that this trend will continue. And how many base stations are of what configuration as we go out over the next four or five years, I don't think it's completely clear. But we definitely do see GaN as a continued growth for the business. And we do see that MIMO antennas will also continue to adopt in an ever increasing rate. And I think that'll hold for the whole world.
Raji Gill:
Yes, thanks for that and just a follow-up on the GaN. So here my understanding is your expertise is kind of low-power sub-10 watt, wanted to get a sense in terms of your roadmap to high-power or high wattage and what the competitive landscape exists in those markets? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, today we've got products in the base station market that serve both the eight and 16 watt slap. So I would say, that's certainly where we've centered our focus today. And really because that's where we seen the biggest part of the market. We also are working on additional technology developments that will really help us compete more heavily in really two aspects in base station one, much higher levels of integration, which we see coming and then also to be able to get into the high power spots in macro. So we’re developing those technologies and certainly expect to play in those parts of the market as we continue to expand. Now from a power perspective, you can tell from our defense related comments over the last few quarters that we definitely have experienced in very, very high power. We started in the defense business, we've developed very high voltage and very high products, high power products for years. So we understand how to deal with the thermals, how to deal with the high current loads, those sort of things. So definitely, we will move in that space. We wanted to make sure we were focused on MIMO because we saw that as the biggest content gain in the market.
Operator:
And at this time, I'd like to turn things back to management for any closing remarks.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thank you for joining us on our call tonight. We will be presenting via webcast at upcoming Investor conferences and we invite everyone to listen in. Thanks again, and have a good night.
Operator:
And that does conclude today’s conference. Again thank you all for joining us.
Operator:
Good day, everyone, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Fourth Quarter 2020 Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo’s fiscal 2020 fourth quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses, or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website at qorvo.com, under Investors. Joining us today from multiple locations are; Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and thanks to everyone for joining our call. We will begin today with a look at our March quarter and highlight what drove our performance in both Mobile Products and Infrastructure and Defense. We will discuss COVID-19 and cover some of the steps we have taken to support our employees and customers. Then Mark will provide additional details on our financials and operations. Qorvo delivered a very strong March quarter. Revenue was $788 million, driven by broad-based demand in 5G handsets and infrastructure, defense, Wi-Fi 6 and IoT. Gross margin was 49.6%, up sequentially and year-over-year. During the quarter, we completed two acquisitions, Custom MMIC and Decawave. Custom MMIC expands our leadership in GaAs and GaN RF products for defense and aerospace, while Decawave positions us as a leading provider of ultra-wide-band solutions for proximity awareness, secure payments, and secure access for smartphones, automotive and IoT. We’re pleased to add Qorvo scale to both of these well-established high-performing teams to build on their successes and accelerate their growth. Looking broadly at the March quarter, our performance reflects an exceptional effort by the entire Qorvo team. Our employees have demonstrated extraordinary spirit and resilience, and I’m proud of their ability to excel in a challenging and dynamic environment. We said on our January 29 earnings call that we expected the impact of COVID-19 to extend beyond the March quarter and affect both supply and demand. On March 3, we updated our guidance as macro conditions worsened. To safeguard our employees and operations, in January, we began to take precautionary measures. We then activated a cross-functional COVID-19 response team as part of our global business continuity plan. The success of our early efforts in Asia served as a model for our global operations. We enacted best practices and implied enhanced safety protocols worldwide. That included temperature scanning, social distancing protocols, travel restrictions, and a rigorous screening and quarantine process for any suspected or confirmed cases. While our factories and engineering labs remained open, we successfully transitioned thousands of employees to work from their homes. We have experienced no material disruptions in our business operations, thanks to these and other ongoing efforts. We are maintaining product development schedules, our design and engineering teams continue to develop breakthrough technologies, and our customer engagements are strong. With that as context, I will recap our business performance by market. In mobile, shipments of our 5G solutions grew sequentially and 5G design activity continued to increase. Qorvo’s highly integrated and high-performance 5G and LTE-Advanced Pro Solutions are helping our customers to enhance performance, reduce product footprint and accelerate products to market. We are especially pleased with content gains in 5G. Products like our 5G ultra-high-band solutions are being adopted across customers and on all leading 5G chipsets. During the quarter, we helped enable Samsung’s Galaxy S20 platform with a broad set of high-performance and highly integrated components. These include our mid-high-band and ultra-high-band 5G solutions. We also provided a leading manufacturer of 5G smartphones, the complete main path, including our low, mid-high and ultra-high-band integrated solutions, as well as our Wi-Fi front-end module, switches, tuners for their recently launched 5G smartphone. Our view on early adoption of 5G is unchanged. And although our overall view of smartphones is for a decline of over 10% in calendar 2020. We still expect 5G smartphones this year to be in line to slightly below what we guided in early March. Contributing to future growth, the demand for data analytics, remote management and system level optimization within the wide area industrial applications, such as meter reading and asset tracking, is driving the need for global long range connectivity via cellular IoT. Qorvo enjoys broad exposure to cellular IoT, ranging from our discrete portfolio of RF solutions to our highly integrated modules through our partnership with Nordic Semi for high-volume Cat-M and narrowband IoT applications. Also, the need for proximity awareness and enhanced wireless security is driving the adoption of ultra-wide-band for Context-Aware Applications, including secure payments and secure access for smartphones, automotive, and IoT. We’re enjoying increased demand as the market develops and we combine Decawave’s breakthrough technologies with our scale and customer reach. Our current generation of ultra-wide-band products going into production this year features the marriage of Decawave’s state-of-the-art radio technology with our front-end to enable, enhance, angle of arrival capability. In cellular infrastructure market, shipments of GaN high-power amplifiers and small signal components increased sequentially in support of sub-6 gigahertz 5G networks. Demand for Qorvo’s products has been robust, driven by the ramp of massive MIMO antennas. We are engaged with multiple customers with our GaN amplifiers and we are well positioned to benefit from this multi-year technology upgrade cycle. In our connectivity and broadband businesses, we accelerated shipments of Wi-Fi 6 solutions and secured cable amplifier design wins to support increased data to the home. During the quarter, we expanded the global customer base of our Wi-Fi 6 solutions, including our front-end modules and BAW filters. In defense markets, we sampled our broadband 100 and 130 millimeter – 131 millimeter wave power amplifiers. These products expand our portfolio of GaN-based solid state amplifiers for millimeter wave applications, including SATCOM radar, and electronic warfare. We’re seeing strong growth, driven by multi-year defense programs and the acquisition of Custom MMIC further expands our capabilities in this market. In programmable power management, we enjoyed growth in data center, computing and gaming consoles with our differentiated solutions. Qorvo’s programmable ICs reduce solution size and cost, improve system reliability and shorten system development time. We serve a broad range of industrial, commercial and consumer markets, and current demand is especially strong, driven by data centers. After the quarter closed, we introduced our high sensitivity point-of-care diagnostic test platform and cartridges, utilizing acoustic resonator technology for veterinary applications. Qorvo’s diagnostic platform has the potential to improve veterinary diagnostics by delivering central lab performance to the veterinary clinic at point-of-care. For the June quarter, the environment remains challenging and fluid. While constraints to global supply are limited, the impact of global demand remains unclear, given the uncertainty around the magnitude, duration, and geographic reach of COVID-19. We are confident, however, that the long-term secular drivers in our end markets remain compelling. We believe our technologies and operations are more important than ever, as we support global deployments in 5G handsets and infrastructure, along with defense, Wi-Fi 6, and IoT. We’re also adding new capabilities in programmable power management, ultra-wide-band-based precision location and point-of-care diagnostic testing. We are operating well, focused on keeping our employees, partners and communities healthy, while supporting our customers. I’m proud of the team and thankful for their efforts and helping the world stay connected. And with that, I’ll hand it over to Mark for more color on Q4 and our outlook for June.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo’s revenue for the fourth quarter was $788 million, $18 million above the midpoint of our updated guidance and driven by stronger-than-expected mobile demand. Mobile revenue of $556 million, exceeded our expectations, as mobile and handset demand was greater and global supply chain disruptions less impactful than we anticipated at the time of our early March update. We expect mobile to decline sequentially in the June quarter, due principally to COVID-19-related demand effects. IDP revenue improved sequentially in the March quarter to $232 million on infrastructure and Wi-Fi growth. We expect IDP revenue to increase again in the June quarter, returning to strong year-over-year growth on 5G infrastructure demand, the ramp of Wi-Fi 6 and sustained strength in defense. Non-GAAP gross margin in the March quarter was 49.6%, with better-than-expected manufacturing costs and favorable mix effects. Now we expect a sequential decline in gross margin in the June quarter, our efforts to improve the portfolio, rightsize our manufacturing footprint and drive productivity are yielding favorable results. As a result, we expect year-over-year gross margin expansion in the June quarter, despite a top line adversely impacted by COVID-19 and trade effects. Non-GAAP operating expenses in the March quarter were $181 million, in line with expectations and up due in part to recent acquisitions. Non-GAAP net income in the March quarter was $185 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.57, a record fourth quarter result for Qorvo. Cash flow from operations in the March quarter was $214 million and CapEx was $35 million, yielding free cash flow of $179 million. We repurchased $125 million of shares during the quarter. Our full-year free cash flow for fiscal 2020 was over $780 million and approximately 24% of sales. Free cash flow growth will continue to be a focus of this management team and we will provide an updated free cash flow target in the context of a broader financial outlook once our full-year view is clear, Our free cash flow generation underpins a strong credit profile. We have ample liquidity and low leverage. We ended the quarter with $750 million of cash and untapped revolver and no near-term maturities. The weighted average maturity of our outstanding debt is June of 2027. With this financial flexibility, we can focus on advancing technology, supporting customers and making prudent organic and inorganic investments that support long-term earnings and free cash flow growth. On that note, during the March quarter, we completed the purchase of Decawave, a pioneer and leading supplier of ultra-wide-band solutions; and Custom MMIC, a leader in the high-performance GaAs and GaN products. With Decawave, we see a wide array of solutions emerging with this wireless technology, and we expect the business to contribute materially to Qorvo over time. Custom MMIC fits perfectly within our defense products business, and is on track to be accretive this year. Both of these acquisitions were quickly integrated and our new colleagues enjoy the full support and capabilities of Qorvo to help develop products and serve customers. Turning to our June quarter outlook. We expect revenue between $710 million and $750 million, or $730 million at the midpoint. Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 47.5% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.13 at the midpoint of our guidance. Our revenue range for the June quarter is wider than normal, reflecting more uncertainty in our markets and the broader economy due to the effects of COVID-19. While we believe the near-term demand picture is clear enough to provide June quarter guidance, there is too much uncertainty around out quarter demand and potentially global supply disruptions to provide a view on Qorvo’s full fiscal year. In the June quarter, we expect continued robust mobile 5G growth, though on lower base handset volumes and a return to year-over-year growth for IDP. More specifically, for mobile, we expect June quarter sales to decrease sequentially, with parts of Asia, partially offsetting weakness in the rest of the world. Our current outlook has smartphone units decreasing over 10% for the calendar year. However, we still see 5G-enabled handset demand for calendar 2020, in line to slightly below what we guided in early March. For IDP, we project June quarter sales to increase sequentially on 5G infrastructure customer demand and the ramp of Wi-Fi 6, as investment in the latest wireless infrastructure to support connectivity is more important than ever. On gross margin, our June quarter guide of approximately 47.5% is down sequentially due in part to lower volumes that was mentioned up year-over-year. We expect the ongoing effects of COVID-19 to weigh on our utilization. That, along with the – with continued throughput improvements we’ve made in Richardson, afford us the flexibility to defer further investment in Farmers Branch until additional capacity is needed. We are continuously monitoring the demand and supply effects of COVID-19 and are sizing our inventories and cost structure accordingly. With uncertainty in the demand profile, we intend to maintain lean inventories, both in-house and in the channel. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the June quarter to approximately $187 million on higher personnel costs, including incremental costs associated with the full quarter effect of recently acquired businesses. Net interest expense will increase slightly on a lower average cash balance and lower deposit rates in the June quarter versus the March quarter, which benefited from higher deposit rates and had the deposit balances over $1 billion prior to closing Decawave and Custom MMIC. We expect our June quarter non-GAAP tax rate to be between 8% and 8.5%. We project capital expenditures in the near-term to remain consistent with spend over the last several quarters. In fiscal 2020, our spend was $164 million, or just over 5% of sales. Our spend in fiscal 2021 will remain focused on BAW, GaN and other areas, which advance a differentiated position for Qorvo to best serve customer needs. As the March quarter results and our June outlook could show, Qorvo is operating well through a challenging period, while helping customers grow in 5G, Wi-Fi, IoT, defense and other critical markets. In closing, I’d like to join Bob in thanking Qorvo employees for their efforts during this time. Now, I’ll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we’ll go first to Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar:
Yes. Hey, guys. Thank you. And I hope everybody in the Qorvo family is safe and congratulations on excellent guide in these very uncertain times. Mark, I have one for you on gross margin. Your December to March revenues were down, call it, 90 something percent. You’re down a little bit in June, but your December to March gross margin stayed relatively flat within 30 basis points, but there’s a material decline here in June. Could you maybe help us understand if inventory build or lack of it is the factor here? Or what else is going on maybe?
Mark Murphy:
Well, I mean, there’s a lot in that question, Harsh. I think what I’ll start with is on the third to fourth quarter, we were about 100 basis points, a little over 100 basis points better than we thought we would be. Yes, that was split. About half of that was favorable manufacturing costs and about half of that was mix. As far as third to fourth quarter, sequential, it was largely driven by more favorable manufacturing variances. As we move into the June quarter, we end up with lower volumes and then the manufacturing costs are not as favorable. And then we have some product mix effects that are dragged as well. So, I think the overall message, Harsh, is we continue – nothing has changed in our story here. We’re actively working to continuously improve our gross margins. Despite trade effects and COVID, we’ve been making progress and you see that in our results. And as far as on inventories – yes, on inventories, Harsh, I’m never going to say, we’re satisfied with inventories where they are, but we’re in a reasonably good position. If you compare our inventory levels to historical levels and then also compared to others that we’ve seen in the space, inventories were up sequentially as we thought they would have been. But as I mentioned, the turns are on the better side of okay, historically speaking, and then our channel remains very, very healthy. Yes, we’re continuing to work inventories to keep them in line, despite the uncertainty. And we certainly want to do our best to balance keeping inventory levels low, while ensuring that we are not constrained part of the supply chain.
Harsh Kumar:
I appreciate that, Mark. And my follow-up, you talked about very strong sort of growth or sort of talking just generally very strong trend in 5G handsets. I was curious if we could talk about the customer breadth that you have, both in what you’re seeing is shipments, particularly I suppose that’s China and then also your design wins that you have racked up for the year? Thank you.
Steven Creviston:
Hi, Harsh, this is Eric. I’ll take that. I can tell you that the vast majority of the work we’re doing these days, both with our new product development and also engagements with customers is around 5G. Of course, there’s still some LTE-Advanced going on as well. But customer portfolios are largely changing over to 5G across the Board, and we’re seeing the transition now down into the middle Tiers of the handset portfolio. Interestingly, there’s the same kind of $5 to $7 worth of content increase, whether you’re going off of $20 to $25 base for a very advanced 4G smartphone or whether you’re coming off of $5 to $7 baseline from a mid-tier smartphone, you’re still seeing roughly the same absolute dollars. So as you go down the portfolio, you see the percentage increase to the 5G content has really increased significantly.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Karl Ackerman with Cowen.
Karl Ackerman:
Hey, good afternoon, gentlemen. Two questions, if I may. Just first on some of the acquisitions you’ve made. I was curious, what revenue contribution are you assuming for both Decawave and Custom MMIC in June? And as it relates to Decawave, should we expect new design wins across automotive and mobile to filter into the model later this year? And maybe just touch on the level of design activity for your ultra-wide-band solutions and customer engagement with that technology?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Maybe, Karl, I’ll start with – I’ll just start with the revenue picture. And I’m not going to – we’ve done four acquisitions over the past year. Yes, they’re all tracking in line with expectations. They’ve all been successfully integrated. Decawave and Cavendish, we’ve been clear that they’re dilutive transactions. They have revenue, but they’re technologies that we’re investing in. So they’re dilutive. The programmable power management business, which were effectively on a year at this point, we’re lapping that acquisition, but that business and Custom MMIC are both accretive. And so two different types of acquisitions that I’ve grouped the four in two. I’m not going to breakdown each acquisition each quarter and what it’s contributing and not. Yes, they’re all, obviously, they were reflected in the March update. When we provided that, that was considered. They’re obviously contemplated in the June guide. What I can give you is that in fiscal 2020, these acquisitions were, in total, around $60 million of revenue, that includes programmable power management and the others. In fiscal 2021, we expect those to be over $110 million, combined. So, hopefully, that provides you some perspective.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. This is Eric. I’ll talk a bit about the Decawave and ultra-wide-band outlook. As we mentioned last quarter, we strongly believe that the unique capabilities with the impulse radio ultra-wide-band for very precise location capability, as well as proximity awareness and security would lead to becoming ubiquitous in all mobile handsets. And then from that point the mobile handset becomes the infrastructure and ties you into your smart home and your automobile and a host of other applications. And I can tell you our enthusiasm has only grown since then. So since we’ve integrated the Decawave team, the interaction with the mobile community has certainly increased. And we’re strongly engaged across both platform providers, as well as handset OEMs, working to get them enabled as soon as possible. But Decawave came to us with a strong pipeline to begin with across many other applications, such as automotive and IoT. So we continue to see that portfolio grow. The engagements are strong and growing across like asset tags, smart home controls, various sort of industrial IoT applications, and notably, the ability to have precise location and proximity awareness is quite applicable when you look at contact tracing sort of applications for COVID-19, it complements the BOE approaches, which are being rolled out first, of course, by providing a much, much more accurate distance measurements between folks. So we have multiple customers already adapting the tags or IoT things they were doing to include the contact-tracing capability as well. So that’s also, of course, driven a strong uptick with several customers that are already in the pipeline for Decawave.
Karl Ackerman:
That’s very helpful For a follow-up, if I may. In your prepared comments, you highlighted you offered the complete main path for a 5G smartphone, that really stands out and highlights the breadth of your offering that I don’t think anyone else can match. Do you see the market evolving, where smartphone providers want to increasingly integrate the main path, that will enable you to have an expanded role over the next few years? Thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thank you. Yes, I think we mentioned a quarter or two that, frankly, it’s a bit ahead of our expectations. We expected more of the portfolio to remain discrete that the fact that the size is such a premium in today’s handsets and the complexity of 5G has made it such that really integration is quite helpful to the customer. It helps with performance, as well as size and enables them to include other features. So there’s no going aback. We don’t typically see things or reverse and go back to the screen. So we’re running as fast as we can to complement our already complete line of integrated solutions with the latest bands and capabilities and new features and so forth, with new performance, higher-performance, smaller filters and so forth, adding to the benefit there. But we think it’s a trend that is absolutely central to providing customers what they need for 5G.
Operator:
And we’ll go next to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Jamison Phillips-crone:
Hi, guys. This is Jamison Phillips calling in for Ambrish. Thanks for the question. So first, I was hoping you guys could talk about the guidance and beyond that, so it’s very strong given environment. I was hoping you would give us some color on how you think about seasonality after the September quarter and beyond?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Jamison, this is Mark. Yes, I mean, and asking for any additional guidance beyond the June quarter, I think, we’ve just got to acknowledge that we’re in unprecedented times. The global economy slowing down and every company is wrestling with the risks and their outlook. So I simply can’t be specific beyond what we’ve provided for the June quarter. What I can say is that, we believe in the growth potential of our markets, more broadly, the demand for connectivity and this requires more and better RF. On our business, specifically, we’re operating well and this current backdrop is highlighting how well we are operating. We have a good balance sheet. We’re serving customers with the best technology and products and we’re sizing the business appropriately. So as a result, we’re able to provide what we believe is a solid guide for June. Beyond June, it’s tougher to see. Currently, as we look to September quarter, we see top line growth probably high single digits percent or maybe a bit more. We expect gross margin to be up, but modestly, in part, because utilization is weighing on us more than we had planned it would. And then finally, OpEx. You could expect to see around the levels through the year as we guided for the June quarter. But beyond that, yes, there’s just not enough clarity in the market. I think, we’re in good company with most companies that are not providing full-year guidance. I want to mention that risk factors are very important here. COVID-19 trade and other risk factors need to be considered. And those risk factors make it a particularly difficult time to forecast.
Jamison Phillips-crone:
Okay. Thank you. That’s very helpful. And then my follow-up is, I was wondering if you could touch based on your 10% customers and how you’ve seen it grow, I guess, year-over-year, I guess, you’re in year change between now? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
We had two 10% customers and – that they can change. But – so I can’t really give comps year-over-year and all that, I typically don’t. But we had two 10% customers this quarter and that’s all I typically say.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Yes. Hi, nice job in the results and guide amidst this pandemic. My first question. You mentioned trade a few times, but I was hoping you can elaborate more on that. Did you see this result in any pull-ins from customers, particularly in China? Did you see more, let’s say, demand you would expect from Huawei, for example? Are you expecting this to go beyond Huawei? I’m just curious on what impacts your discussing when you think about your June outlook, as well as the second-half outlook as well?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Bill – and Bob will build on this. I think that the reason I mentioned trade a few times, and certainly as we’re looking at year-over-year comps, the trade effects have been – have had a substantial impact on us March quarter year-over-year, and it remains a risk factor in our business. Though I wouldn’t say that, yes, that the primary contributor to the current outlook is related to the effects of COVID-19. So just to be clear there.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Not much really to add, Bill. I’m sure a lot of you saw the recent Department of Commerce order. And after extensive review by our legal team, we feel the rules are not applicable to our products. That doesn’t mean something new might come out, and I think that’s the other thing. When you think about this, there is a lot of saber rattling between the two countries right now and we’re being cautious. But we didn’t see any pull-ins or anything like that. As a result of any of this, we’re seeing it that, we’re seeing demand – end demand of customers like Mark talked about. Our channel is very healthy between us and our customers. And I personally had very high-level meetings alone by a video with our customers in China. And I feel real comfortable with their inventories of our products and how their sell-through is going.
Bill Peterson:
Okay. Thanks for that. That makes sense. Next if you could – you didn’t discuss it, but we think about millimeter wave in phones, and I know you discussed it last quarter. But it feels that you guys keep making progress on that. I was hoping you could give us an update on your millimeter wave opportunities and if you see this as a potential revenue driver later this year or early next year?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. I’ll cover handsets. I’m sure James would love to jump in as well and talk about infrastructure. Really, not a lot of change quarter-over-quarter. We continue to advance the technology and work on product demonstration vehicles and so forth. This is the year, where there’s going to be some commercial roll out. It would give the chance to prove the business case and really tackle a lot of the infrastructure concerns with millimeter wave. We like our technology. We think we can really help in terms of efficiency around the antenna and signal quality and so forth. It’s really going to come down to the business case in the network environment.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Speaking of networks, James wanted to pick up.
James Klein:
Yes. Bill, from my perspective, millimeter wave is still a really small part of the overall roll out of 5G. Certainly below 6 gigahertz is the majority and today, that’s really in China. We’ve seen an uptick in the roll out of sub-6 gigahertz just in the last period and we expect to be well on track with what we’re doing in China.
Operator:
And we’ll go next to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi, guys. Can you hear me okay?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, sir.
Toshiya Hari:
Okay, great. Bob, you talked about the smartphone market in calendar 2020 potentially being down 10% year-over-year in your remarks, and I fully appreciate the lack of visibility today in the marketplace. But assuming the market does come in, sort of consistent with that outlook, do you think, given the strength in 5G, the relative resilience of 5G and given some of the socket wins that you guys are aware of, you think you can grow the Mobile segment in calendar 2020 in that sort of backdrop?
Robert Bruggeworth:
First, let me comments – both Mark and I both commented, it was over 10%, just to be clear, and we’ll really have to see how the year plays out to answer that. I mean, the percentage of 5G phones now is, obviously, going to be a lot greater. And there’s a lot more dollar content that Eric has talked about that $5 to $7, whether it’s mid-tier or high tier. So definitely, the opportunity is out there. We think there’s going to be a nice TAM this year in 5G, a lot of growth there. We’ll see how it plays out.
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. And then as a quick follow-up. Mark, great job on the free cash flow generation and the year. You obviously kind of stayed away from giving guidance for fiscal 2021. But based on your CapEx commentary and the intention to be disciplined there, given that you did have multiple acquisitions in the year, I would think CapEx stays kind of around 5% of revenue, M&A may be less aggressive and that would leave room for buybacks. But how are you thinking about the balance there for the next couple of quarters? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Toshiya, we’re pleased with what we’ve done on free cash flow as it relates to improving it. We’re not pleased that we’ve reached any sort of final result. It’s more of a waypoint for us. So we’re pleased with that. As far as as CapEx levels and capital allocation priorities, nothing has changed in the story there. We’ve said that we would be moving down towards 5% to 7% of sales going forward and there’s no change there. We got to 5% a bit faster than, than we thought. But I think you can attribute that to, in part, the discipline and consistency of the team and enforcing capital discipline. So I can’t give you a percent of sales, because then you’ll back into the sales, I give a number. So, I said the next few quarters will run around what we’ve been running the past several quarters, so it could be $40 million, $50 million at most. As far as capital allocation, we’re still below our leverage target. We’re still actively looking at acquisitions and nothing has changed there around seeking value, creating acquisitions, principally technology assets for the mobile business and bolt-on van [ph] technology for IDP. And that’s what you’ve seen us do over the past year with over $1 billion worth of acquisitions. We never provide – have provided rate and pace on the repurchase. We did repurchase $125 million in this last quarter. For the full-year, we repurchased $515 million in addition of the $1 billion we spent on acquisitions. We’ll report in the June quarter that we repurchase some shares, I can say that. But amounts and future repurchases will be a function of the opportunities that we have for cash, our leverage, our latest view on the outlook and other factors.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. Mark, you mentioned unfavorable mix in June is one of the factors that’s pressuring gross margins. But with mobile down and IDP up, shouldn’t we see the opposite effect, or is there a mix issue with IDP? And if I could, James, think guidance last quarter was that IDP would return to growth year-over-year in the March. It looks like you just missed that mark. Was this a shortfall in area? And then also did you get clearance to sell 5G products to Huawei? And I’m sorry, but Eric, real quick, it sounds like your revenue mix is moving heavily to Korea and Asia, is that a trend we can expect to extend in the next calendar year? And how would you characterize the uptake of Samsung’s baseband and more importantly, your content on it relative to the other basebands you support? Thanks, guys.
Robert Bruggeworth:
All right. Mark, do you remember the first question, it’s a five-part question. It was mix in June and…
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Yes. So – and it’s a good question and a nuanced one. I – I’m not sure if you picked up. I did say, it was a product mix, specifically. So you are corrected that the IDP business is going to be a higher percentage of sales in the June quarter. But that aside, mix effects overall are the smaller part of this compared to just the manufacturing variances and and the lower revenues.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Mark. James, there was a question about year-over-year growth in IDP just being off by just a slight little bit and can you sell 5G components to Huawei?
James Klein:
Yes. Let me handle the Huawei one first. So we are shipping some products that are exempt from restrictions to Huawei, but they’re immaterial in the amount of IDP’s revenue in the fourth quarter and in our guidance in Q1. And we currently have not received any licenses to ship products from the IDP portfolio to Huawei. As far as year-over-year growth, and Mark had said last quarter that it was a long put, and we got awful close. I think, we’re headed for a really nice Q1 and be able to get back into year-over-year growth. Now we did have a really nice Q4 as well, as Mark and Bob talked about. We ended a great year in defense, where we had year-over-year total growth for defense business. We began the ramps in both 5G and Wi-Fi 6 with a broad portfolio of products, including GaN. GaN is a great example there. We brought a lot of products and different frequencies and different power levels to the market and we almost doubled our GaN last quarter and I suspect we’ll do it again. So overall, really pleased with the growth that we had in the quarter and looking forward to Q1.
Steven Creviston:
Yes, Ed, I’ll talk about your questions on mix Korea, in China, as well as alignment with LSI and so forth. So yes, certainly, in the near-term, the mix towards Korea and China is is pretty real. That’s because two factor, really. First of all, when you say Korea, a year ago, we’re just turning the corner and realigning our portfolio with Samsung, that’s gone tremendously well and it does continue to get better and better. So as they’re adding more content, adding more premium content, a lot of that is addressable by us. So we expect that trend to absolutely continue and it’s a good thing. We want to continue to grow with Samsung and align across mass here, as well as integrated – or excuse me, as well as their premium tier and bring full integrated content to both of those tiers, as well as advanced tuning to power management. So great alignment there. It should become mixing that way as we’re catching up and then even getting better with our share. And then China as well. I mean, that just affected. Our customers are doing so well. If you look Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi, really mixing towards 5G. We’ve got complete portfolio to support them. They’re serving not only China domestic, but they’re also exporting more and more. So we’ve got a lot we can do to help them across our portfolio. So naturally, yes, we’re sort of mixing that way, because they’re doing really well in the market currently. So that’s good. Regarding LSI, Samsung’s own baseband, we love working with the guys. Of course, great partners. We’re aligned well. But I don’t think there’s anything particularly different there versus all the baseband manufacturers. We’re winning content in pretty much every category we sell across all the baseband manufacturers. So it’s good and we absolutely want to support them all.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Hey, guys, thanks for taking my question. Just kind of curios, two things. The shape of the 5G, you kept your number and Qualcomm kept their number. So obviously, the mix of 5G is higher. I’m just kind of curious how if you look at March and what you’re expecting in June? How the shape of that deployment looks versus three months ago? There has been a lot of talk about potential delays and kind of just curious what you’ve already seen. And then can you just comment on how big China was in the March quarter? That’d be helpful as well.
Mark Murphy:
Blayne, could you clarify, was that – when you said shape of 5G, was that an infrastructure question or ancillary question?
Blayne Curtis:
Ancillary question, sorry. You said you kept your 5G number effectively, you said in line to slightly below. So that number was 2.50 if I remember, kind of just curious…
Robert Bruggeworth:
That’s correct. That’s what we said in March, correct.
Blayne Curtis:
What you’ve seen in the first-half year, March and June and kind of the shape of those deployments, if it’s the same or has it changed a bit?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So I guess, we don’t generally break it down by quarter necessarily. I think the key thing is, we’re seeing each region come into and come out of this virus-related demand and supply scenario differently. So it’s a little challenging to model, I think, what’s very clear is, first off, the calendar year has significantly impacted. And for every person that doesn’t buy a 4G phone in the first-half, when he goes to buy one in the second-half, it’s more likely he’s going to buy a 5G phone. So we think if there’s any sort of silver lining, which it really isn’t much of a silver lining. But the good news for our industry at least is that, phones that don’t sell in the first-half will come back as more 5G content in the second-half more than likely.
Blayne Curtis:
Gotcha.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Blayne, on China, we typically don’t break that out. It’s material, as you know. It ended up being less as we ended the quarter and reported it than it was in our guide. I can say that. And then if you wanted to know about Huawei, specifically, it held up a bit better than expected, but it was, I’d say, in line with what we said not a material part of our March quarter variants, and it remains a fraction of what we used to have with that customer in the past. We expect that customer to remain under 5% in the June quarter.
Blayne Curtis:
Excellent.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Srini Pajjuri with SMB – excuse me, SMBC Nikko Securities.
Srini Pajjuri:
Thank you. A couple of questions, one on mobile then one on IDP. First on 5G. Eric, maybe you can talk about what sort of content expansion you’re seeing in early 5G designs? And as we go to the second-half, I’m guessing, there’s still some flagships that will be launched. And also, you’re probably going to seem much more in the mid-range and even in the low-end. So I’m just wondering how that content expansion might change as we go into second-half?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. We’re – we talked in the past about what’s driving the 5G content. And, of course, there’s much tighter requirements on filtering. There’s more bands generally added to the phone. There’s also dual connect scenarios where the phones have to work on 4G and 5G at the same time, which drives a lot of content around the antennas, both tuning and switching and filtering and so forth, to pull all that off. And so, as I mentioned earlier, in the call, I think, we’re – we see about a $5 to $7 increase in content per handset. And that’s relatively constant, whether you’re adding it to a premium smartphone or a mid-tier smartphone. I’m sure, as we get into mass tier later on, there’ll be some more fine-tuned regional designs. But for now, we’re seeing, as it continues to mix down through the portfolio, that dollar content ATTR is remaining pretty consistent.
Srini Pajjuri:
Got it. And then on the IDP, we’ve been hearing a lot about China being very aggressive in terms of roll out. I believe, they’re talking about almost 0.5 billion base stations, I’m sorry – 0.5 million base stations this year. I’m just curious, obviously, your guiding for growth IDP next quarter. I’m just trying to understand how that plays out for you guys? Do you see that in one quarter? Is it – do you expect that to continue for the rest of the year? I’m just trying to understand how that roll out in your business?
James Klein:
Yes. Definitely agree with over 0.5 million base stations deployed. We think the number will be closer to 600,000, if not, perhaps more. How we play is, we’ve got obviously a broad range of customers in the space. And as we talked about in prepared remarks, we’re ramping both GaN and small signal components into that broad set of customers. So definitely going to continue to be a growth engine for us. As far as how it continues, we definitely think deployments continue in China throughout the year with additional tenders offered, and then it will pick up again in the first part of next year as they do additional sets of deployments. We’re also expecting, as we get into next year, the deployments to start to pick up in the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri:
Hi, thanks, Mark, now that we’re done with fiscal 2020, can you give us how big your largest customer was in terms of percent of revenue?
Mark Murphy:
I won’t do on the call, Tim. I mean, we’ll be releasing the K, and you’ll see that in the SEC financials there when we report that.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. And then I guess, I had a question on Huawei. So I think you just said that they’d be like less than 5% for for June. So that implies that is going to get cut basically more than half Q-on-Q. I guess, the question is, in fact, if you look at their annual report, they have more than 110 days worth of inventory, it was up like 35 days year-over-year. They’ve obviously seen some of these restrictions coming. So they seem to be ordering ahead of all these restrictions. So I guess, the question is, like, what sort of shelf life does the stuff that you’ve shipped to them have? Because you’re one of the only ones that – you’re the revenue with them has sort of re-expanded and breach that 10% range again, but it’s coming down in June. So I’m just wondering, is that the beginning of inventory digestion, or you think it’s just weak smartphone sell-through? Thanks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Tim, I want to make sure I understood your question. Number one, Huawei was not even close to 10% customer in March, not even close. And year-over-year, you guys will be amazed at the growth that this company has put up less walling. They’re not a significant customer. In June, they’re even less. So I don’t understand your question. Second, when you say shelf life, I’m not sure I understand. We deal with Huawei and I talk to them. They don’t have our product stockpiled somewhere. I can tell you that. So I’m not sure how to answer your question.
Timothy Arcuri:
That was good. That was the question. So thank you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Okay, good.
Operator:
We’ll go next to Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Raji Gill:
Yes. Thank you and congrats on the solid results. Just wanted to get a sense from you in terms of adoption of GaN base stations relative to LDMOS. In the 5G infrastructure deployment in China and how your differentiation in that technology is going to lend itself to perhaps more market share gains throughout the year?
James Klein:
Yes. We’re seeing rapid adoption of GaN across numerous customers in that space and certainly in sub-6 gigahertz space. We believe we differentiate in a broad set of areas. I think, we’ve got great performing technology that we’ve had in place for the better part of 20 years. We’ve got fantastic reliability. And we’ve been continuously adding feature sets and scale over the last couple of years in preparation for this wrap. So I definitely do believe that we’ll continue to grow at or faster than the rate of the market.
Raji Gill:
And you touched upon Wi-Fi 6, the adoption there and it’s getting certified. What are some of the major applications that you’re seeing now for Wi-Fi 6 in your products?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes. Wi-Fi 6 started with flagship smartphones, and I’ll let maybe Eric talk about that. But it’s clearly stimulated the CPAE [ph] of the business to integrate Wi-Fi 6 in their designs. And we see that happening really across the Board with high-end retail, but also in the MSO roll outs. It’s accelerating. Service providers are also adopting the distributed technology and bringing Wi-Fi 6 to – into that part of the market. So for us, it’s very, very broad brand. We bring a great set of front-end modules and filtering capability to the space. And I think we’ll continue to have a significant amount of success in the market.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes. And on the mobile side as well, yes, we’re seeing good traction. In fact, it was – it’s rapidly mixing. Our Wi-Fi business is rapidly mixing towards Wi-Fi 6. And especially as you move and add the new 7.2 gigahertz capability and so forth, we do have a lot of unique capability to bring to that. We participate specifically on the chip on board part of the market, not the SIP part of the market. And so, yes, it’s growing rapidly now. And I think the higher bandwidth and so forth is a key feature.
Operator:
And that concludes today’s question-and-answer session. I’ll turn the conference back over to today’s management for any additional or closing remarks.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thank you for joining us on our call tonight. We will be presenting via webcast at upcoming Investor conferences, and we invite everyone to listen in. Thanks, again, and have a good night.
Operator:
And that concludes today’s conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Q3 2020 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, John. Hello everybody and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2020 third quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statements contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses, or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website at qorvo.com, under Investors. Sitting with me today are; Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug and welcome everyone. Qorvo delivered record EPS in the December quarter driven by strength in our end-markets of 5G, Wi-Fi and Defense. I am especially pleased with how our team is engaging with customers to enable breakthrough products and contribute to multiyear technology upgrade cycles. In Mobile Products, the acceleration of 5G is driving demand for Qorvo’s high-performance and highly integrated solutions. Carriers are bringing advanced 5G services across new frequency spectrum and that’s driving greater complexity, enhanced designs as board space remains constrained. Qorvo is solving that complexity by integrating the industry’s broadest portfolio of technologies and advancing the state-of-the-art and functional integration. Looking at December, we enjoyed significant design win traction for our BAW-based multiplexers across a range of band combinations including our hexaplexers and our recently launched micro BAW-based quadplexer. These are multiplexers enable advanced carrier aggregation and they are critical to next-generation higher data rate applications. We also secured multiple design wins to supply low, mid-high and ultra-high band solutions for next-generation 5G smartphones. These are highly integrated and high performance 4G 5G solutions enabling customers to reduce product footprint, enhance system performance and deliver products to the market even faster. Design wins for our ultra high band FEM were broad based across customers and made with multiple 5G cellular chipsets. Qorvo’s solutions deliver highly differentiated performance at higher frequencies as we expand our content in the next wave of 5G smartphones. Consistent with what we said last quarter, we continue to expect approximately 300 million 5G handsets in calendar year 2020 adding approximately $2 billion to the mobile RF PAM. Turning to IDP, our GaN customer engagements broadened during the December quarter as we ramp GaN high-power amplifiers and small signal components at a third major OEM in support of 5G massive MIMO deployments. To support China Mobile’s deployment of 5G small cell, we ramped our newest BAW filters at a top-tier infrastructure OEM. We also introduced breakthrough GaAs FEMs addressing the more demanding requirements of second-generation 5G millimeter wave base stations. In our Connectivity business, we enjoyed a rebound in demand driven by Wi-Fi 6 and supported by recently released GaAs and BAW processors. Customer demand for our newest Wi-Fi 6 FEMs was broad based and support CPE, retail and mobile applications. For the Connected Home, we began sampling the industry’s first radio solution combining Zigbee, Thread and Bluetooth Low Energy SoC with a Wi-Fi 6 FEM to enable next-generation distributed Wi-Fi networks. For the connected car, we introduced a complex – excuse me, we introduced a complete V2X front-end solution, featuring our recently released 5.9 gigahertz Wi-Fi coexistence BAW filters, which are quickly gaining traction among automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers. Finally, we continue to expand our customer base in the programmable power management end-market, shipping power management ICs into datacenter solid state drives for two of the top three storage providers. After the quarter closed, we signed definitive agreements to acquire Decawave, a pioneer in ultra-wideband solutions for mobile, automotive and IoT applications; and Custom MMIC, a leading supplier of high-performance GaAs and GaN MMICs for defense and aerospace applications. Adding Decawave establishes our position in the emerging market for ultra-accurate, ultra-secure short range location solutions. Custom MMICs expands our portfolio of high-performance GaAs and GaN solutions for the defense and aerospace industries. Looking forward, we see both IDP and Mobile Products growing year-over-year in the March quarter on the strength of our broad technology portfolio and strong underlying trends in our end-markets. And with that, I will hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the third quarter was $869 million, $19 million above the midpoint of our guidance and driven by stronger than expected mobile demand. Mobile revenue of $662 million exceeded our expectations on Asia-based customer demand including 5G solutions. IDP revenue improved sequentially to $207 million on strong Defense volumes and remained down year-over-year due to export restrictions on infrastructure products. We expect IDP revenue to increase again sequentially and return to year-over-year growth in the March quarter on sustained strength in defense, the ramp of Wi-Fi 6, and broader 5G infrastructure customer demand. Non-GAAP gross margin in the December quarter was 49.3% with better than expected manufacturing costs and favorable mix effects. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $176 million, which were at the low-end of our guidance range. Non-GAAP net income in the December quarter was $221 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.86, $0.19 over the midpoint of our guidance. Cash flow from operations in the December quarter was $301 million and CapEx was $41 million, which yielded free cash flow of $260 million. Our free cash flow through the first nine months of fiscal 2020 was over $600 million, exceeding any prior full fiscal year. We repurchased a $125 million of stock in the quarter and completed an opportunistic $200 million add-on to our 2029 unsecured notes issued earlier in the quarter. During the December quarter, we completed the purchase of the remaining equity in Cavendish Kinetics, an RF MEMS company, further strengthening our technology portfolio for switches, tuners, and other products. As Bob mentioned, following the quarter end, we signed definitive agreements to acquire two companies that we have been evaluating for extended periods. With both companies, there is excellent strategic alignment and cultural fit. Decawave, a pioneer and leading supplier of ultra-wideband solutions adds to Qorvo’s RF technology leadership and opens up access to a large new and rapidly growing wireless market. Custom MMIC, a leader in high-performance GaAs and GaN MMICs solutions for defense and aerospace markets is a bolt-on to IDP’s core business. The combined purchase value of these two acquisitions is approximately $500 million, which will be funded from existing cash on hand. Our guidance assumes both transactions close in February and the financial impact slightly diluted to earnings in the near-term is reflected in our March guidance. Turning to our March quarter outlook, we expect revenue between $800 million and $840 million or $820 million at the midpoint. Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 48.5% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.55 at the midpoint of our guidance. Our revenue outlook for the March quarter reflects continued robust mobile 5G demand and a return to year-over-year growth for IDP. For Mobile, we expect March quarter sales to decrease sequentially but with less than normal seasonality. For IDP, we project March quarter sales to increase on sustained strength in defense, the ramp of Wi-Fi 6 ramp and broader 5G infrastructure customer demand. While Qorvo's current near-term outlook is strong and channels are healthy, trade and other factors including potential demand and supply chain effects related to the coronavirus concerns contributed to challenges and uncertainty forecast in the outlook. On gross margin, our March quarter guide of approximately 48.5%, is down sequentially consistent with comments I made during our last earnings call. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the March quarter to approximately $185 million on higher personnel cost including payroll effects and incremental cost associated with acquired businesses. Net interest expense will increase with our notes add on a lower cash balance following acquisitions. We expect our March non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 7.5%. On capital expenditures, we project less than a $190 million this fiscal year and remain highly disciplined on adding capacity. Our free cash flow forecast for the year is now over $700 million. As the December quarter results and our March outlook show, Qorvo is helping customers grow in 5G, Wi-Fi, Defense and other markets by solving their challenges with best-in-class technology, award-winning quality, and supply dependability. With that I'll turn the call back over to John for questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Karl Ackerman with Cowen & Company.
Karl Ackerman :
Thank you, gentlemen. I have two questions if I may. First question is on margins. So, I get the seasonal softness in the March quarter. But as you finalize the consolidation of SAW Fab in Greensboro – to Greensboro, your 5G ultra-high-band PAD FEM content likely proliferates across the top 6. Mobile OEMs later on this year and IDP returns to growth in the back half, why can’t operating margins approach 30% by the end of this year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Karl two – this is Mark, two effects on operating margins in the March quarter. One is – and I’ll start with OpEx, as I mentioned, OpEx is going to increase sequentially due to a number of factors, payroll effects and the incremental cost associated with the acquisitions. Moving up to gross margin, consistent with what I said last quarter, we will see a sequential decline in gross margin, which is typical around seasonal product mix effects. So, yes, this is very much in line with what I said last quarter, about a 100 basis point or so decrease sequentially.
Karl Ackerman :
Got it. Thank you. And for my follow-up, regarding your March outlook, it seems your base assumptions call for a slightly less seasonal decline in that – I guess, a seasonal decline in your largest customer, but a sizable uptick at China handset providers and maybe some stability at your Korean customer, given all design wins you alluded to last quarter and of course earlier today in your prepared comments. First, am I thinking about at that the right way? Second, how should we think about the revenue opportunity from China handsets? I think, for the overall industry, would you endorse content from mainstream handsets advancing from $1 to $2 to like 6 bucks? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Karl, I’ll take the beginning of that from a perspective of just looking at a year-over-year, both businesses are returning to growth year-over-year, that’s great to see. In our IDP business, sequentially it’s growing very nicely. So that’s also offsetting some of the seasonality. It’s typically flat to up slightly. So that’s doing well. And in our Mobile business, very pleased with how much we are offsetting year-over-year the decline that we’ve seen at Huawei and it’s broad based. So we are seeing strength across the customer base. But I’ll let Eric add a little more color to the specifics of the customer base that you ask about.
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Yes, as you referenced the 5G rollout in China, it’s very much on track and content gains there associated with more bands and wider bands and multiple carrier operation and so forth is leading to an expansion of dollar content, as well as units a bit higher than we had originally planned. In terms of dollar content opportunity that you referenced, it’s not at all unusual means, 5G handsets. You see total dollar content in the $10 to $12 range and they tend to buy as much as that as possible from one supplier. So, we have many handsets in China, we have $8 to $10 worth of order content.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari :
Hi guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the strong results. My first one was IDP. You guys talked about Wi-Fi 6 and GaNs and defense contributing to growth in the March quarter. Can you kind of help us quantify sort of the magnitude of all three on a relative basis? And if you can speak to sustainability beyond the March quarter for those three buckets, that would be helpful. And then I have a quick follow-up.
James Klein:
Yes, this is James. Now the year-over-year growth will be relatively small, but considering we lost one of our top customers just a few quarters ago, I am really pleased with the efforts in the team to return back to growth. So quickly, I think it does demonstrate the underlying strengths of the products that we have in the markets that we serve. Defense, low-power wireless and power management will all have double-digit year-over-year growth quarters in March. Wi-Fi, as we talked about with the ramp of Wi-Fi 6 is returning and it will have a high single-digit type growth rate and then other markets that we serve I think will be a mix of up and downs. Still it’s at the phase of deployments in base station, we are starting ramps and starting to recover, but with loss of Huawei, we are obviously still significantly off of our all-time highs in base stations.
Toshiya Hari :
Got it. And then, my second one is for Mark. In terms of free cash flow, it looks like for the full year, you are thinking free cash flow margins of 22-ish percent based on your Q4 revenue guide and your full year free cash flow commentary, which I think is the highest free cash flow margin since the merger. I guess, importantly, going forward, do you feel like there is more upside from there? Or is this as good as it gets? And to the extent, you do think there is more upside? What are some of the levers that you can pull to improve margins? And then sort of related to that, as you continue to build cash, how are you thinking about cash usage between organic investments, M&A and shareholder return? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
There is a lot in that question, Toshiya. I’ll work through it. So, yes, we are really pleased with the progress we’ve made on free cash and it’s been an absolute focus for the company. We’ve gone from $224 million free cash flow in the year, up to we are now forecasting over $700 million in just a – in a number of years here. And, we reached close to 30% basically – right, almost on top of 30% in the quarter on free cash flow margins and I think that’s an objective we set some time ago for the full year. So, we are not going to – as you say, we are going to be closer to 22%, but we continue to see the ability to expand free cash flow margins. And it’s – nothing has really changed. I’ve gone through this in previous calls. We are pursuing a model in investing in a way to achieve stronger and more sustainable free cash flow generation over time and that comes from investing in the right technologies of which you see some of that in the acquisitions we announced today. It’s selecting the right products and having a rigorous portfolio management process which we have executed on. It’s driving productivity in operations and sourcing and I can’t say enough about the job the ops team is doing in meeting customer quality expectations and on-time delivery and doing it efficiently. And then the ops alignment with the business is as good as it's ever been in the company. So, seeing great things there. And then, finally, we are just focused on reducing capital intensity. And all those factors have helped with margin expansion. On gross margin, specifically, there is room to run we believe. We are still not at the utilization levels that we had hoped this year. The infrastructure market softness has impacted us in a couple areas in the network, particularly, Texas GaAs, GaN in Oregon. We, in the fourth quarter or in the December quarter, we had period cost in Florida. As I think Karl mentioned, those do drop off in March. But we still have some period cost associated with farmers branch and some small period costs elsewhere. And then, over time, we expect IDP to improve as a percent of the overall mix. And I’ve talked about portfolio management and operations productivity and so forth. So, I believe in the ability of our business to grow the top-line. We have a number of levers to expand margins. We are focused on spending capital only when we need to and then, driving free cash flow growth which allows us to make prudent investments either for accretion or technologies. And finally, you asked about capital allocation. Basically, in the last 12 months, we’ve generated $754 million of free cash flow. We’ve repurchased $689 million of shares. So, over 90% returned to shareholders. And then over this time, we’ve also completed the purchase of two companies over $500 million. That’s not including the two we announced today. So, we will continue to again, drive free cash flow growth and then, look for investments that makes sense for Qorvo. We’ve set technology investments for both Mobile and IDP and then bolt-ons for IDP is typically how we look at things. And then what - depending on our leverage and other factors, we will return cash to shareholders.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.
Harsh Kumar :
Yes, hey guys. Congratulations. Fantastic execution and congratulations on that cash flow number. I know you guys have been focused on that. I want to put you on a spot here, Bob. You had a pretty strong Mobile, March guide and you are also – you are basically saying pretty good strength in 5G, pretty good design win traction. I take that to be that this strength in March, the better than seasonal strength in March is not going to come at the expense of the rest of the year. Historically, June, September, December have all been much better quarters. Could you just maybe, to the best that you can, I know it’s a tough one, but best you can provide us some color.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, maybe, Harsh, this is Mark, maybe I’ll step in and we are going to provide more information on FY 2021 at the next earnings call. As it relates to June, we are not going to provide detailed guidance in that quarter either. But I think maybe this is a time to talk about rest of the June quarter. Now, we feel good about the March quarter. This coronavirus concerns and first our thought was those affected in the region, but we’ve been revisiting our outlook based on those concerns. We are comfortable with our forecast and feel that we’ve adjusted for what we perceive now as some risk. But we’ve been keeping a close eye in that situation including extensive checks on the supply chain. To-date, we’ve seen no material impact to our supply chain or what demand signals. However, the situation is evolving. So, we have reflected some added risk as I mentioned to our March guide including, as you’ll notice a wider range of outcomes. So, to your question, likewise we are thinking about potential effects into the June quarter and even though our channels are lean, we are concerned about how this plays out, because we just don’t know. As it stands now, we would estimate the June quarter to be between $750 million to $800 million of revenue. But again, it’s early. There is a lot of uncertainty around that. We will provide a more detailed update at a later date and a fiscal year 2021 view on our next earnings call.
Harsh Kumar :
That’s fair. I appreciate the color that you gave. As a follow-up, the strength in China that you guys are seeing, maybe one for Bob or Eric, what kind of customers is that coming from? Is that coming from the Tier twos? Or is that also, to some extent, coming from Huawei at this point?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Right, yes, it’s primarily throughout Asia, so Korea and China, as well. And we are relatively high in 5G handsets or still entering the channel for now. We are beginning to also see our large customers in China. So Vivo, Oppo, Xiaomi for example bringing 5G further down into the portfolio with some of the handsets that will be launching in the March quarter.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson :
Yes, thanks for letting me ask a question and great job on the results and guide. Maybe first one for Eric. In going back to your Analyst Day from 1.5 years, I guess, maybe closer to two years ago, you talked about some unique advantage of your BAW relative to other filter technologies, net BAW and so forth. You've been discussing ultra-high-band wins n79 in particular. And also, recently you're talking about traction with your new micro BAW. I guess, can you give us an update how your BAW is helping you win relative to competitors against both in tranche, as well as new entrants for some of these 5G-specific bands? And I guess, in terms of our content, you've been talking with us about antennaplexing, and we haven't heard as much about that recently. But, how has that been playing out? And then, I guess how can you meet the demand in that given your portfolio - your BAW portfolio? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Right. Yes. Thanks Bill. The technology roadmap has continued to progress for us since we formed the company. We’ve really made just a ton of progress in improving the performance of our SMR BAW filters and also our ability to integrate them into modules and also together, to make antennaplexers in a high-level, multiplexers and so forth. So, that’s maturing and getting more and more competitive every single month. In addition, of course, at the same time, the market is asking for higher performance, more bands are being added it seems every quarter. Wider bandwidth, multi-channel operation and so forth. So, there is plenty of challenges to be met with the filter technology and it’s frankly a pretty target-rich environment right now for these opportunities. So, I think it’s fundamental technology combined really with our ability to integrate it with also very, very good power amplifiers for example in the ultra-high-band opportunities. The power amplifier efficiency and power levels are very important to accomplish. And then, of course, our leadership in switching technologies and putting all those into high-level modules together. It’s very similar to the fundamental trends we talked about for several quarters now. We are just continuing the march on driving the investments into the core technologies to make it better.
Bill Peterson :
Okay. Great. And I guess the next question, I guess, both you and James can chime in. On the top of the millimeter waves, obviously, some of your competitors are talking up the millimeter wave opportunities. It appears like you and your closest competitor are really still focused on sub-6. I guess, for the Mobile side, what unique and different solutions could you bring to the market? What are the key hurdles to address? What are the key base technologies, power amplifiers, switching filters and so forth? And I guess, James said, what he spoke to it a little bit earlier in the prepared remarks, but how do you see the growth of the millimeter wave and the impact to his business and some of the unique, I guess, things that he can bring to the market as well?
Eric Creviston:
Yes. So, thanks. I’ll start. This is Eric and so, the unique strengths that we bring to millimeter wave and in the Mobile side is really leveraging the work that James has done in the infrastructure side and defense applications, developing advanced Gallium Arsenide processes for millimeter wave operations. So we have released new commercial versions of those processes and have introduced those to multiple handset manufacturers and platform providers. We are building prototypes to help demonstrate the capability of mobile millimeter wave and showing out what could be done in terms of thermal dissipation and power efficiency and battery life and so forth. But, at the end of the day, I think, the big questions is whether the business model is going to close on it, I think there is a lot of challenges in millimeter wave in a mobile application. By definition, you are moving in a mobile application and the path loss is quite high millimeter wave. So, we will see. We are certainly getting us demonstrations out there. You are seeing carriers put up a millimeter wave in multiple cities and we are going to be participating in helping to validate the markets.
James Klein:
And Bill, this is James. And as far as infrastructure is involved, I mean, we are certainly engaged very similar to what we showed in our Analyst Day, almost a couple of years ago about how we see more and more of those systems using GaAs-based front-ends getting away from pure silicon solutions, because it’s just a much more efficient implementation. But we also are also seeing fixed wireless come on board and the last mile, if you call it, and we’ve released some products this last quarter to start to address those kind of parts of the market. And again, kind of leading the industry inefficiency based on those GaAs processes in particular, some of the smallest gate links that we’ve released in production. So, really, high frequency focus type activities. I also want to add to the BAW question, we talked about how BAW is enabling inside Mobile, Eric did, but it’s also been a big benefit for us in the Wi-Fi market. We’ve released iFEMS in the 2.4 gigahertz and we’ve been sampling those at 5 gigahertz as well. We are also using our new 5 gigahertz processes to release products in the automotive space and into small cells and base stations. So, we are using our filter technology to really allow us to compete in several different markets and for me particularly, in the higher frequencies.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Seth Gilbert:
Hey, this is Seth Gilbert on for Tim. Just, I guess a follow-up to one of the earlier questions. June is usually up something like mid-single-digits quarter-over-quarter and September is usually well into the double-digits quarter-over-quarter. So, just curious of this much new higher base for March. Is this sort of right way to think about seasonality is as we look on to June and into September? Thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. Seth, this is Mark. I reluctantly go to June because of the coronavirus concerns and I gave a revenue number there. The only thing I would add just to make sure, folks are appreciative of it. We tend to go down from our March to June at on gross margins. So we would see the revenue guide I gave and then we would see a gross margin in the 47, somewhere between 47 and the high 47s – low 47 to high 47. So, and then we have OpEx increasing. But beyond that, I am not going to talk about September. I am not going to give detail on fiscal 2021. I would just say that we believe we are investing in the right areas and selecting the right products, building the right capabilities to support growth in the market and we expect to grow and then, we are driving for free cash flow generation. And I will provide more in the – during the next earnings call.
Seth Gilbert:
Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso :
Yes. Thank you. I guess, first question is about the content opportunity between the premium tier and the mass tier phones when the transition of 5G and I guess, in the 4G generation, most of the content was in the premium tier phones and that was – if I look at your total content opportunity, that was the largest part of your mix. Does that shift somewhat as you move to 5G, because you are moving those mass tier phones from such low content to something? How does that changed your sort of mix exposure of the total revenue between sort of premium tier phones and mass tier phones. Obviously, realize mass tier phones represent more volume?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Right. That’s an excellent question really and I mentioned a little bit ago seeing – not unusual to see $10 to $12 worth of our content and sometimes even higher in some of our China-based handsets which are primarily mass tier that are at the higher end today. But that’s what’s driving down into the mass tier as we speak. And so, if you look at kind of percentage increase from 4G to 5G, it’s much, much higher there. It’s more like a 2X in content now and as we’ve talked about before, it’s not only adding the 5G proper, if you will, content, but also bringing all the 4G up to higher levels of capability as well in each of those 5G handsets. So, to your point, we see content increases in the premium tier for sure. But as a percentage of the total there, more on the order of, call it, 20%, 25% of content increase, where in the mass tiers seeing more like a double or even more of content. So it does tend to mute the mix effect slightly I would say as we go into 2020.
Chris Caso :
Yes. It’s helpful. Thank you. As a follow-up, you’ve talked a little bit about ultra-wide band and obviously, you did an acquisition in there. I guess, how important is ultra-wide band to you in terms of revenues today? And I guess, where do you see it going not just within handsets, but also opportunities for ultra-wide band in IoT types of ICs, how significant could that be?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Right. It’s another good question. We – as you probably know, we are the leading supplier of ultra-wide band front-ends today into the mobile handsets although it’s a relatively small market today, but it’s really just emerging and I think between the fact that, it’s now beginning to penetrate mobile handsets, we believe it will eventually be absolutely required in every handset. That combined with the fact that the connected car consortium has adopted the technology for future keyless entry systems. We think this is really just the very beginning of an inflection point. We are absolutely thrilled to be adding Decawave, a fantastic company. Great people, great technology. They’ve been at this 15 years really pioneered as we said the technology. And so, we see beyond the automotive and the mobile applications, we think a whole host of both consumer and industrial IoT applications are there as well. So, when we look forward by 2024 modeling, it’s $2 billion to $4 billion worth of additional TAM and we think there will be just a few people positioned to capture it. So, pretty exciting.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Ed Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Ed Snyder :
Great. Thanks a lot. Eric, on China, how much of your strength there, I mean, is from – I want to general post to different factors that are affecting China, because it’s obviously becoming a very big part of your business. But – so, if you could maybe give us some idea of the – how much of it is coming from 5G content upside versus 5G be pushed into more phones than we expected versus OEMs moving their old 4G Phase 2 designs to modules. So, 5G content versus units versus the shift to modules in 4G, if you could and what percentage of your revenue do you think you are getting from China at this point? And then, James, it sounds like Defense is not only acting as you expected, but also leading the charge. Maycom just announced on their call last night they are finally getting to again on silicon carbide. So, I am trying to get an idea of how sticky are the applications for your GaN on SiC in both 5G base stations? And then, if you could talk some degree about how that applies to Defense too? And then I have a follow-up. Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Right. So, regarding the first part of your question, the strength we are seeing throughout China right now is largely driven by 5G content. That’s the primary driver. I think I spoke in the last quarter about seeing the need for more like, dual signaling capability for example, driving additional switching and antenna work. And then, I forgot what, all three of the categories at the bottom would be the modules in 4G-only handset. That’s probably the least impactful. Right now, the insight is heavily driven by 5G and mostly content more than units.
James Klein:
This is James. So, I mean, certainly, we believe, we’ve got great technology with our GaN and have been doing very well in the Defense market and we are seeing GaN grow well north of what the market is growing. And so, we also continue to make investments in scale and in reducing our cost, we think are key enablers to that technology to continue to proliferate. As far as stickiness, I mean, obviously, in Defense, that market is characterized as long cycles in programs. And so, I would consider that a very sticky market. In base station, we are seeing the trends go just about like what we’ve talked about for the last couple of quarters. We are seeing massive MIMO systems to deploy and we are also seeing GaN take significant share from LDMOS. And so most of those are great trends for us and we are capitalizing on those trends and I think it’s a good part of how we are going to able to turn the business around fairly quickly.
Ed Snyder :
Thanks a lot. And then, for my follow-up, Eric, if I could, Broadcom announced the supply agreement with Apple – like, I can’t remember this week or last week. And I know it’s probably more of a frame of your empathy slightly is $15 billion et cetera. Last time they did this which is some years ago assuming two or three years that fall that agreement were marked by lack of content for Qorvo in there. So, how does this change the landscape or does it at all in your view irrespective of they keep the business or not and what does that do for the mix of your – not just your BAW, but your revenue, does it shift more to China in the upcoming two years or so or do you even have any indication of that?
Eric Creviston:
Well, frankly, it doesn’t have any particular impact on our investments today. We are picking our battles and investing in areas where we think the highest win probabilities are. It’s a target-rich environment right now for integrated modules, as well as for discrete components based on BAW technology. As I said, we’ve got lot of advancements coming in the BAW technology and well placed great relationships across the industry and across all base band manufacturers and tiers. So, the announcement itself and our understanding of what it includes does not impact our current best plans.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis :
Hey guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just curious on the deals you said it closes in February. Is there anything you can wrap around that in terms of revenue and OpEx contribution? And then I have a follow-up, thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Blayne, we will provide more. It’s not a material amount of revenue and it’s an increase in OpEx. It’s all reflected in our guide and it’s dilutive in the near-term.
Blayne Curtis :
Got you. And then, Mark, I know this is preliminary guidance. Just a little confused on the seasonality here. You are seeing all the strength in China. Usually, Apple is not stepping down as much in June. I am just trying to understand what you are baking for sequential decline in June?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Blayne, I am not going to go any more detail. What we’ve provided is our best view given current demand signals and then adjusted for some risk factor in what is a very uncertain situation at the moment. So, doing our best to provide you at least a directional call that far out. I think the concern as we sit here today is, right now, the channel is lean and healthy. The demand signals have not been yet been affected. But we do have the Chinese New Year will wrap up and people will take stock of what’s going on with this health situation in China and elsewhere. So, I think, we are just being mindful of that and providing some sort of directional view for you. But in the June quarter, it’s still a story of what you’ve heard on the call today about 5G-related handset growth, content associated with that growth, continued Wi-Fi growth, Defense strength and infrastructure recovery.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes. Just first question is for Mark just on the acquisitions. I think you said immaterial to revenue. But you said, was it $500 million in terms of total cost to both?
Mark Murphy:
Yes.
Craig Hettenbach:
Could you maybe just help frame just kind of the opportunity over the next couple of years in terms of how maybe sizing like that that business in terms of where you see it potentially going?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, I mean, most of the purchase price is associated with the Decawave acquisition. In fact, over two-thirds of it. So, over three quarters of it. So, the – and that is a technology investment as Eric said, it’s a technology for a market that we think is a several billion dollar market in a number of years. And that’s going to take time to develop and it’s largely immaterial revenue and dilutive. The smaller acquisition, Custom MMIC is a Defense bolt-on in the very easy to integrate right in James’ wheelhouse on defense products, advanced technology defense products. We see in the – for the part of the March quarter that we haven’t integrated. It will provide about $3 million of revenue that quarter. And on a full quarter basis, it will be roughly $5 million or so for the near-term and it’s accretive immediately.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Raji Gill with Needham & Company.
Raji Gill :
Yes. Thank you. A question on the RF infrastructure market wins. When do you expect that to rebound? Any color in terms of what you are seeing with the mobile operators in terms of deploying these base stations across the world that are some regions that are trying to catch-up, others starting to slowdown? Any color there in terms of RF infrastructure would be helpful.
James Klein:
Okay. This is James. So, we definitely are seeing deployments gone predominantly today below 6 gigahertz predominantly in China. What’s helping us and talking about recovering our business is we are seeing massive MIMO continue to take more share if you want to talk that of that share of base stations and that’s a big content – big for us. About 10x of what we would have in macro base stations. So that’s driving the recovery. I think the absence of Huawei is obviously a challenge in the industry, because it’s about 50% of the share. But as we said in Bob’s prepared remarks, we are ramping with our third customer in that space. So I think that will fuel to recover the business. Deployments, look about our own track, little bit of share mix changes in the last quarter. But it appears that they were somewhere in that 400,000 or so base stations that were deployed last year and it looks like that will grow about 50% this year. So somewhere in that 600,000 base stations deployed. MIMO content will probably to go up to maybe 20% last year, 30% or greater this year. So, positive trends and we urged yesterday about some frequency allocations in the U.S. and we hope that that will also spur development to push forward in the United States.
Raji Gill :
And I’ll follow-up you talked about GaN taking share against LDMOS base station. What’s driving that transition? What’s the catalyst for that?
James Klein:
Yes, three-fold, one is the move to higher frequencies in GaN’s performance manages higher frequency. Also broader bandwidth, so to say with 5G and again, GaN has a better ability to deal with those higher or broader frequency levels. And then in some cases, just higher output power. But in general, the technology is very well suited to move in these directions that we’ve talked about before of higher frequency and broader bandwidths.
Operator:
Our next question comes from – excuse me - Srini Pajjuri with SMBC Nikko Securities.
Srini Pajjuri :
Thank you. A couple of clarifications. Mark, maybe you can talk about how many 10% customers you had in the quarter and also, if you could give us what percent of the mix in mobile was China in the quarter?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, so, we had two 10% customers in the quarter and I don’t break out by region or sales by quarter.
Srini Pajjuri :
Got it. And then, is it fair to say that Huawei is still kind of minimal on the mobile side or did it grow in the quarter?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Huawei was one of the 10% customers actually and it was stronger than we expected along with the other Asia-based handset producers. I said on the call – the last call that we expect that Huawei to be about 5% in the second half. They were larger than that in the December quarter. So, that statement is still correct. It’s just that the – obviously the waiting is not uniform across the second half. So, we expect them to be about a 5% customer in second half. Obviously, largest portion of that in the December quarter. I think it’s important to note here that that we are seeing broad based strength related to 5G across Asian handset producers and importantly, across all chipset producers. And I think the March guide drives home that point.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Securities.
Vivek Arya :
Thanks for taking my questions and congratulations on the strong results. First one, I am curious what does the shape of the 5G handsets rollout look this year? Is it kind of more balanced first half, second half? Is it more 60%, 70% back half weighted? When I look at the 300 million or so market size, it’s much higher than what others are in that closer to 200 million. So I am just curious how you are seeing the 5G rollout? What you have seen so far? And what do you think the shape of the year looks like for the market?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I would say, it’s pretty uniform across the year. Obviously, we are getting to a very strong start. The concerns that Mark had about coronavirus and so forth might impact demand and supply. We will see how it goes. But I wouldn’t have any other more specific comment on profiles.
Vivek Arya :
Okay. And for my follow-up, there has been some concern about the base of wireless deployments. We heard that from Xilinx and Texas Instruments. I am curious if you would notice any of those slowdowns? And I apologize if you answered this already, but what are you baking in for your base station sales going into the March quarter? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, I mean, what’s really been driving our recovery is again massive MIMO. For us, as we get that shift, we get about a 10x content lift. So I think if we were only in macro or only looking at a macro view, I would say, yes, we would see the deployments going slower and the business being slower. But because of content pickups, and on top of let’s now being able to compete in the power amplifier slot with GaN, I think that’s what’s really fueling, maybe a bit difference with us in some of the other folks in the business. Now that said, we are still way off our historical highs from where we had been a year ago or so. So, a long way to go before we recover from the restrictions on being able to shift to Huawei, which again I’ll restate as about 50% of the market at this point.
Operator:
That concludes today’s question and answer session. At this time I will turn the conference back to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks for joining our call tonight's. We hope to see many of you at our upcoming investor events and we look forward to speaking with you on our fourth quarter earnings call. Thanks again and have a good night.
Operator:
This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Second Quarter 2020 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations of Qorvo. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much. Hello everybody and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2020 second quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses, or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website at qorvo.com, under Investors. Sitting with me today are; Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks Doug and thank you everyone for joining us. Qorvo delivered another outstanding quarter as our technology investments, portfolio management and operational discipline continue to yield strong and consistent results. Upside during the quarter was attributable to new product cycles across our largest customers. In Mobile products, the trend toward integration is driving our industry and integration is all the more important with the interaction of 5G. Qorvo is securing significant content in 5G smartphones with our premium technologies and are highly integrated modules, enabling our customers to enhance system performance, overcome design challenges and bring their smartphones to market faster than ever. In IDP, our markets are supported by secular trends including the deployment of 5G, as well as the proliferation of IoT, the adoption of Wi-Fi 6 and the performance advantages of GaN technology in defense, broadband and massive MIMO base station applications. Looking at our September quarter by business, our performance in Mobile Products was driven by multiple customers and product segments. Samsung was a standout, as we expanded our participation in their mass market phones. Qorvo's broad portfolio of enabling technology coupled with a robust supply chain and solid product execution is allowing us to solve our customers most challenging problems across all tiers of their portfolio. To that end, we're enjoying significant traction with our four largest customers in China, designing our low, mid-high and ultrahigh band solutions into their upcoming 5G smartphones. Our wins are broad-based and our solutions are mated with all the major chipset providers including SLSI, Qualcomm, MediaTek and HiSilicon. In Mobile Wi-Fi applications, we are ramping our recently launched Wi-Fi 6 FEMs in support of multiple leading China-based smartphone OEMs. Turning to IDP, in our defense business, we are lead participant in a U.S. government program to advance state-of-the-art an RF integration packaging and test. We are also increasing our GaN opportunities with the U.S. branch and we secured wins for our GaN amplifiers and integrated front-end modules for X-band and Ka-band defense radar and communications programs. In Infrastructure, the ramp of 5G appears to be rolling out faster than the ramp of 4G. Activity is primarily in the sub-6 gigahertz frequencies and Qorvo's GaN technology is increasingly the technology of choice. During the quarter, we secured new GaN design wins for sub-6 gigahertz massive MIMO deployments expected to span multiple years. Among China-based carriers, it's been widely published that China Unicom and China Telecom will share cell sites to accelerate 5G deployments. This development will drive the need for broader band and higher power amplifiers favoring Qorvo's GaN solutions. GaN enables operators to drive more power through smaller form factors and achieve better performance at higher frequencies. In IoT, the ratification of Wi-Fi 6 is a catalyst for the industry and design wins for Qorvo's Wi-Fi 6 solutions are building. During the quarter, we launched the world's first Wi-Fi 6 dual-band front-end module and the world's first Wi-Fi 6 iFEM for CPE applications, expanding our product portfolio for retail, enterprise and network operators. In automotive, we commence production shipments of our Wi-Fi FEM supporting multiple automotive OEM platforms. And notably, our V2X coexistence BAW filters for 5.9 gigahertz were recently selected by a top automotive OEM for models shipping next calendar year. With the continued expansion of IoT devices and smartphone control, Qorvo is uniquely positioned to combine Wi-Fi 6 iFEMs with advanced filtering and multiprotocol SoCs into highly integrated solutions, reducing time to market and supporting smaller end devices. We expect many of today's gateway devices and voice assistance products to incorporate all of these technologies, enabling in-room control of the entire smart home. In programmable power management, Qorvo is at the forefront of multiple trends, including the trend towards brushless D.C. motors. During the quarter, we expanded our portfolio of integrated motor control solutions for brushless motor applications. Our power management solutions enable smaller, lighter devices that charge faster and operate longer with between charges. On the design front, programmability enables our customers for lower product development costs and reduced time-to-market. We expect to leverage our scale to drive growth in power tools, light goods, industrial equipment and other product categories. Finally, after the quarter closed, we completed the acquisition of Cavendish Kinetics expanding our technical leadership in switching and tuning. We intend to optimize and scale our RF MEMS technology for smartphones and ultimately apply to other growth segments. In summary, Qorvo is combining best-in-class products and technologies with operational excellence to drive solid sustainable results. We're encouraged by customer design activity and we expect the strong December quarter as we support our customers next-generation product cycles. And with that, I'll turn it over to Mark to provide additional color on the September quarter and our outlook for the December quarter.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks Bob and good afternoon everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the second quarter was $807 million, $52 million above the midpoint of our guidance and driven by stronger than expected mobile demand. Mobile revenue of $623 million exceeded expectations that our largest customers and demand strengthening through the quarter. IDP revenue of $184 million was down sequentially and year-over-year, primarily due to the effects of export restrictions. As mentioned last quarter, we expect IDP revenue recover through the year on increasing defense volumes, the ramp of Wi-Fi 6, and broader 5G infrastructure customer demand. Qorvo's shipments to Huawei in the September quarter exceeded expectations and sales at Huawei ended the quarter at approximately 5% of sales. Non-GAAP gross margin in the September quarter is 46.5% at the end of our guidance range with better than expected manufacturing costs, partially offset by higher inventory charges. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $167 million in line with our guidance. Non-GAAP net income in the September quarter was $181 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.52, $0.22 over the midpoint of our guidance. September quarter cash flow from operations was $173 million and CapEx was $38 million, yielding free cash flow of $135 million. Qorvo's first half fiscal 2020 free cash flow of $342 million is on record pace. And we expect to maintain strong free cash flow through the fiscal year. We repurchased a $165 million of stock in the quarter and our net leverage at quarter end stood at 0.4 net debt to EBITDA. After quarter end, we issued $350 million of 10-year unsecured notes to opportunistically lower our long-term cost of capital. Following the quarter, we also completed the purchase of the remaining equity in Cavendish Kinetics, an RF MEMS company for $203 million, further strengthening our technology portfolio for switches, tuners, and other product applications. Turning to our outlook, in the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we expect revenue between $840 million and $860 million or $850 million at the midpoint. Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 48% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.67 at the midpoint of our guidance. Our revenue outlook for the December quarter reflects continued robust mobile demand supported by an increase in 5G handset volumes and a return to sequential growth for IDP. For Mobile, we expect December quarter sales to increase sequentially and return to growth year-over-year as 5G handset launches with our integrated solutions and a healthy channel support strong demand. For IDP, we project December quarter sales to increase on a higher defense business volumes to Wi-Fi 6 ramp and broader 5G infrastructure customer demand. While Qorvo's current near term outlook is strong and channels are healthy, trade and other factors contributed challenges and uncertainty forecast in the outlook. On gross margin, our December quarter guide were approximately 48%, it is up 150 basis points sequentially on improved mix and lower inventory charges. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to increase in the back half of the fiscal year to between $175 million and $180 million per quarter due to operating costs of recent acquisitions and increased product investment costs related to growth in 5G. Following our recent debt issue, interest expense will increase sequentially approximately $4 million. We expect the December quarter and fiscal 2020 non-GAAP tax rate to be 8.2% or lower. On capital expenditures, we continue to project spend of less than $200 million this fiscal year and remain highly disciplined on adding capacity. Spend remains weighted towards improving our BAW and GaN capabilities. As of September quarter results and our December outlook show, Qorvo is operating well as 5G, Wi-Fi, defense and other markets strengthen. As a result of our market outlook, operating performance, free cash flow forecast and other factors Qorvo's Board has authorized a new $1 billion share repurchase program. With that I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] The first question will come from Karl Ackerman with Cowen. Please go ahead with your question.
Karl Ackerman:
Hey, good afternoon, everyone. And thanks for letting me ask the question. I guess, two if I may. First on Huawei, I guess what's implied in your outlook for December? I guess do you think it's more appropriate to exclude revenue associated with infinity or how should we think about Huawei? And I have a follow-up.
Mark Murphy:
Karl, this is Mark. So Huawei is somewhat consistent with what we had given guidance on the last call. So on $52 million variance we had in second quarter to our guidance roughly a fifth or $10 million of it was related to Huawei. So Huawei was rather than what we thought would probably be 3% or 4% of sales ended up being closer to 5% of sales. As far as third quarter, we typically don't breakdown guide by customer, but on Huawei what we said last quarters we expect that Huawei to be less than 5% per quarter going forward and we expect at this point for Huawei to run about, what it ran in the second quarter, so close to 5%. We expect the second half to have Huawei at less than 5% of sales or around 5%. For the full year, we still project Huawei to be less than 10% of sales compared to 15% of last year.
Karl Ackerman:
That's helpful. I appreciate that Mark. Shifting gears to China handsets. May you provide a bit more clarity on your opportunity to sell mid and high band PAD to China's handset OEMs? I guess are these contracts set in place today? We heard from the Korean smartphone manufacturer last night discussing the strength in China handsets some of those OEMs procuring more memory not only ahead of China's tariffs, but also due to strong demand. Are you obviously levered well to the China handset OEMs, but do you think the strength will prove to be favorable due to trade or are there other factors we should consider? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
This is Eric I'll address that. We have seen a significant increase in design activity on 5G with our Chinese customers. And we're not seeing a particular increase in overall units planned for the December quarter or March or going forward, but they are aggressively shifting the portfolio from 4G to 5G. The vast majority of R&D resources are being put on 5G phones right now. And when you go to the 5G phones in China, across the board, they're going to fully integrated 4G solutions to support that. So, you get increased RF content due to the higher levels of integration and taking 4G to LTE Advanced Pro and in addition you get the additional content from of course the new 5G bands and even higher than we had expected requirements for multicarrier operation and so forth to support non-standalone operation. So, put all that together and even on flattish units, you can see how the RF content can increase. In Qorvo, in particular, we're really pleased with our position there; leading customer to the customer base and clearly, when it comes to the integrated solutions, mid-high band, in particular, we're getting the vast loin share of that business.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.
Harsh Kumar:
Yeah, hey guys. Congratulations on very strong results. I guess today being Halloween, thanks for making it fun and not terrifying. Hey guys on a serious note both your results in guide are significantly -- very significantly better than The Street. And we just wanted to kind of understand where is the outperformance coming from. Are you -- do you think you're taking share in the new models of 5G? Is it mostly China 5G that you're taking share in or is the tide rising for everybody and you're benefiting with it? Or is there something going on perhaps in the U.S. market, just some color would be appreciated and I've got a follow-up.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Harsh thanks for your commitments. I appreciate that. As I said in my opening comments, for the September quarter, it was really driven by three largest customers. So, as you know our three largest customers are in three different continents, so we'll just leave it at that. And as we look forward in the guidance and I think Eric's answer to Karl's question about what's going on in China in 5G is where -- I think it's two steps. One is the dollar content for 5G phones is significantly increased over 4G phones and then also as we've talked over the last couple of calls that we felt integration was key and being able to integrate the components that are needed for 5G phones. We do believe we're taking some share there from discreet players. So, that's really what's going on. You're seeing the integration coming together in the 4G portion of a 5G phone, plus for 5G and that's what's really driving. It's the dollars per handset. And then second -- the second area is we are seeing great growth at Samsung. In my opening comments, I talked about expanding into their mass tier phones as well. And we're driving a lot of business there and that's going to be up very nicely year-over-year as well.
Harsh Kumar:
Thanks, guys. And then, for my follow-up, within spitting distance of your higher gross margin that you put up in December 2018, 49.5 I think was the number. How do we think about gross margin? I think, your commentary suggest gross margins will be up from here. And also, what's interesting is, when you went from call it $775 million in June to $807 million in September, your margins didn't go up that much, but when you go from September to December, they're jumping up quite a bit. Is that just integration and the new 5G products kicking in? Or is there something else also going on?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. So, Harsh, this is Mark. I'll provide a few different answers on this question around. First, the quarter sequential up – second to third quarter up 150 basis points. Two things driving that. One, we have around $10 million worth of inventory charges, what I'll call, excess inventory charges in the second quarter. Three primary drivers, one, we had some excess parts on older generation handset products. Two, we had a very isolated quality issue in the non-core market. And then, three, we were unable to repurpose a portion of a customer-specific product. So, as our practice, we took those charges and they're in our non-GAAP results. Second, third quarter, we're up 150 basis points. One is -- a major driver there is the inventory charge not repeating. And then secondly, we have a more favorable product mix, second to third quarter. Third to fourth quarter, I'll take this opportunity to address – we'll see what we typically see third to fourth quarter and that is, we'll see gross margin decrease third to fourth quarter down 100 basis points or more. Again, as we've seen in previous years and this is really a function of seasonal mix. And then, just the effects of fixed manufacturing costs on lower revenues.
Harsh Kumar:
Understood. Thank you, guys.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO. Please go ahead.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Thank you. Mark, may we'll just continue the line of questioning with you. So based on the comments and what you've done in December, would March be a worse than seasonal quarter, or you expect March to be seasonal? And then, I had a follow-up please.
Mark Murphy:
So, Ambrish, I assume you're talking about the top line or…
Ambrish Srivastava:
Yes. Sorry, top line.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Because you addressed the gross margin.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. So, it is a -- the year outlook has certainly improved for us from our over a quarter ago and I think you see reflected, of course, in the September and results in December guide. The handset replacement cycle seems to stabilize. There is a clear picture in China and we got increasing 5G demand. We've got Wi-Fi 6 adoption starting. Our defense business is doing well. We've got growth in various IoT markets. There's great pull on our technologies, as you heard Eric talk about. And lastly, this important point the channels are healthy. So we feel good about the December guide. But it's confidence, we aren't in December yet, there are some challenges and uncertainty as we go further out, right? And so we're taking a very disciplined view on expanding the business. The rate and pace of 5G adoption will modulate China trade, we have to admit, remains a source of concern and if there are supply constraints around that situation could that bleed over into our customer demand. So, right now, as we see it, we see second half revenue being roughly in line to down slightly versus what we did in the first half. And since you've got the December guide using that midpoint, that would be a March seasonal decline of around 15% sequentially.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay. That's very helpful. Yes, sorry, go ahead.
Mark Murphy:
And then while I am at it, I talked about gross margin gets down 100 basis points or more, which is typical for our business to have a sequential decline. I've mentioned higher OpEx in the second half in my comments and the higher interest expense. Because it’s the segment level, I won't go into much detail here but mobile will be up sequentially in the third quarter and returned to growth year-over-year, it'll be down the fourth quarter seasonally sequentially and then up double-digits year-over-year. And then on IDP, we'll see very strong growth sequentially in third quarter, again Wi-Fi, defense, broader infrastructure demand, expected to strengthen through the year and then we're hoping to see year-over-year growth return on IDP but that's tougher part.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay. I was going to say thanks for the transparency that's a lot more, but really appreciate it as always. Quick one, since you've been on Board, Mark, you've been very focused on free cash flow. And I just wanted to tie that buy back as well. So is there a target that you are willing to give for the year for free cash flow and then the share buyback, is there a timing on that, please? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. There is no timing on the buyback. And as far as just -- I'll make some comments historically over the past 12 months, we've generated over $755 million of free cash flow. And over that time, we've repurchased $716 million, so well over 90% of our free cash flow we have repurchased shares. Over this time, we've also deployed over $500 million with the purchases of two companies. So we're certainly -- we're generating more free cash flow than we had been and we're doing a good job of smartly investing in organically and then returning sizable amounts to shareholders. On the capital return, at this point, given the market outlook, our operating performance, free cash flow forecast, other factors, we were out of capacity -- we didn't have much capacity left, so the Board approved a new billion-dollar program and I'm just not going to comment a rate and pace at this point other than to say, we'll continue to buyback shares.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay, that’s good enough. Thank you very much.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead with your question.
Toshiya Hari:
Hi, guys thanks so much for taking the question, and congrats on the very strong results. Mark, you talked about your mobile business returning to year-over-year growth in the quarter. And this is, obviously, in the phase of overall smartphone unit’s been down, Huawei obviously becoming significantly smaller customer on a year-over-year basis. And you guys, I think losing a fairly sizable stock at a big customer. So, I guess the question is what's driving the year-over-year growth? Is it all 5G? Is it -- you guys having better presence at Samsung and some of those mainstream cues? Is it something else? If you can talk about some of the drivers on a year-over-year basis for the quarter that would be great. Then I have a follow-up.
Mark Murphy:
I mean, it's broad customer engagement. China and 5G helps, but I don't really think it's a technology story for us and I'll turn it over to Eric.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. We've got as you know a very broad portfolio, just a growing list of opportunities across all of our customers, including our largest customer as well. From the main path integrated transmit modules and so forth for both low band and mid-high band and evermore increasing ultrahigh band activity, but also around tuning in around the antenna elements, a lot more signals trying to come and go from those two antenna elements. And so I think that's just an opportunity, it’ applies across the board. But really as we said a standout really has to be Samsung, I think we've traditionally been a very strong supply there. We got out of line or got of out of alignment with the product roadmap and their architecture for a cycle or two, but we're fully back in alignment across, not only the flagship or marquee tier, but also the mass tier of handsets there and just real pleased with the alignment we have and enjoying building that business back again.
Toshiya Hari:
Great. And then on gross margins, Mark you guys have done a great job over the past several quarters, executing to margins. Can you remind us what some of the initiatives are in place today that hopefully gets you to 50% over the medium-term? And if you can kind of provide a bridge to 50%, whatever the timeline is that would be great. And then shorter related to that, can you give us an update on what your thoughts are on Farmers Branch from the timing perspective and how that could potentially impact CapEx? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. So Toshiya we're, obviously, still working to achieve 50% or more. We believe it's an achievable target. And as I think Harsh mentioned, I'll remind you that we're at 49.5% about this time last year. And as far as -- I won't do a specific walk as there's just too many variables, but starting with our December guide as a baseline at 48%, we would expect volume growth for many of the reasons that Eric mentioned and James can talk about, we expect volume growth. And so we'd expect to see better utilization. I mean this year, the volumes had certainly been lower than we had originally anticipated and then the mix has sort of weighed on our in-house capacity. Next calendar year, we're also having a consolidation of our fabs, largely complete and most notably Florida will be closed and those products rolled into Greensboro, so those cost effects will subside. Also over time, we would expect the mix at IDP to improve and be a larger part of Qorvo, certainly compared to December quarter guide this 48% baseline that I talked about. And then we're doing a lot of product portfolio management as well. So that'll improve that mix and that's the purpose of our select and high-tech investments. Finally, we are operating, I'd say as well as we ever have and that's allowing us to drive I would say better productivity than we were even before and to the extent we're doing above inflation price erosion that would be incremental benefit to gross margin. As far as farmers branch, our current view given the outlook and efficiency gains that we've seen in Richardson, we won't need farmers branch at scale until late next calendar year or even the following year. As we've mentioned previously and I think James and I mentioned this when we were in New York in September, due to these gains and the flexibility we have at Richardson and that's a great fab. It's allowed us to revisit our original manufacturing concept in Texas. And we've gone from what was going to be a copy exact idea of the farmers' branch do more of a single fab concept for the whole Dallas area. And yes, that allows us to be capital and cost-efficient and it positions us well for the long-term.
Toshiya Hari:
Thank you for the details and congrats again.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan. Please go ahead with your question.
Bill Peterson:
Yes, hey guys and thanks for letting me ask a question and nice job on the results and guidance. My first question is in mobile. And I guess I was hoping that Eric can sort of level set us. You've talked about an RF TAM increasing next year by about $1 billion. It sounds like some of the 5G opportunities are coming in may be a little bit sooner than expected as you talk about the December. But I'm trying to give a feel for how you think the RF TAM should grow in the next year in the shape of the ramp. Our assumption is that it will be somewhat second half weighted, but -- and then within that, how should we think about your business, especially how it relates to the design wins you've had, you talked about the four large China makers, if you can help level set the market context as well as the shape of your business in 5G? Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Thanks Bill. Yes, we've been saying since our Analyst Day in 2018, we expected about $1 billion increase in the RF TAM in calendar 2020 due to 5G ramping. And it certainly looking like it's going to be conservatively greater than that much closer to $2 billion probably and it's equally weighted from at least our view currently between more units than we had originally expected and more content per unit. So we got both factors affecting it pretty significantly. And the higher units are really driven by this really rapid adoption and switchover of the handsets in China. It's clear from what we're seeing there that the 4G handsets that are going to be released are going to be dropping significantly in the very near-term. Whether there's coverage or not, consumers are going to be buying 5G handsets knowing that the network will be available at some time during that time they own that phone. So, they're getting a real jump on it. Obviously, Samsung as well as transitioning their portfolio rapidly to include 5G content. So, that increases the number of 5G handsets well above the $200 million or so that we had originally modeled a couple of years ago. But then in addition to that, as I said, it looks like across the Board all the 5G handsets so far without any -- going the other way. They're all going to fully integrated 4G systems inside them. And part of that is just to get the size. I mean these are really cramming also a lot of functionality into these handsets, so there may be integration for that, but it also get some market faster and improves performance. So that integration trend all the base content with 4G also has content and the last adder is the requirements from China Mobile and so forth for band coverage. And so having N79 in every phone for example, the requirements for dual signaling and so forth, these are now being put in every single 5G handsets. So all that's coming together to increase the total TAM and see why tuning well above we had not previously.
Bill Peterson:
Okay. And thanks for that and -- moving to James businesses, it is obviously seeing really rapid growth that's accelerated here in the last few quarters including the guide. I mean you talked over the potential return to year-over-year growth. But I guess with Huawei significantly lower -- did you have an of sort of -- you mentioned you're prodding out your wireless infrastructure coverage customers, but how should we think the growth of that business as we look in the next year with March maybe returning the growth. And then progressing to the next year given that we have Wi-Fi 6 defense and then additional customers for the infrastructure?
James Klein:
Bill, this is James. Thanks for the question. And the restrictions of Huawei have definitely limited our ability to grow in the near-term. However as Mark say, we hope to return to year-over-year growth in Q4. We're going to take a good step in that direction in Q3 with double-digit quarter-over-quarter growth. Longer-term, we remain really positive about the underlying trends and the markets we serve and that includes the adoption of massive MIMO and 5G the adoption of GaN and several different markets, and the Wi-Fi 6 coming on and IoT in both automotive and in the connected home. And that the addition of power management is also improved our long-term outlook. In fact that business grew quarter-over-quarter about 40% and is very much on pace to how we looked at prior the acquisition. So with all that combined my expectation is that we will return back into double-digit growth mode as we get down into out years.
Bill Peterson:
Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. Your next question will come from Chris Caso with Raymond James. Please go ahead with your question.
Chris Caso:
Yes, thank you. Good evening. First question is that, there's been some lingering concerns since the trade restrictions were put in place that the Chinese OEMs and Huawei in particular would backslide into discrete RF solutions either because they couldn't get access to U.S. components or because they were worried that there wouldn't be able to in the future? Your results don't seem to point that direction, but can you address that concern? And if you can also address, if it's feasible without highly integrated components? Do you think that even in they chose to do that, it would be possible to do a 5G phone even for domestic Sub-6 in China without these highly integrated components?
Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. We have seen of course customers experimenting with full discrete solutions and even trying to go as far as to build a handsets without any U.S. connector content for example. Those experiments are out there. You'll see them in the field. I think that experiment was enough to really fully validate the fact that you can't make it competitive handset without using U.S. content. And further really you can't build a compelling handset without going to integration because the solution size is so large and power-hungry and poor performing that it really degrades the selling factor for the handset. So experiments happen, it confirms the thesis and generally people are returning to integration in full force.
Chris Caso:
Well, thank you. As a follow-up to that, perhaps if you could clarify the restrictions on what you can and can't ship to Huawei both in the handset and the base station side, is it only the restriction only on 5G, does it apply to 4G also? And actually one of the experiments you refer to that we've seen did use fully integrated 4G without discreet 5G solutions, so perhaps is that suggestive of you can't ship the 5G solution?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Chris, this is Bob. And I think we addressed this in the last call as best we could. And I wish I could get into a lot of details. It's quite complicated. We spent a lot of time making sure that we comply with all of the legal requirements that we can't ship to Huawei given the export restrictions. The restrictions are such that we are able to ship components that go into their phones. We have shipped components that go into their infrastructure side, but I don't think I can get into really serious discussion without a lot of help and understanding from a lot of people on what is good and what is bad to ship. I think the important thing is, we are able to ship to them. We are fully in compliance with the export restrictions that are required to support them.
Chris Caso:
All right. Got it. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.
Craig Hettenbach:
Great. Thanks. In the IDP business, I know you've talked a lot about kind of aerospace defense and then infrastructure. Can you touch on just kind of the broader based IoT business, kind of the scope of that business today and opportunities that you're seeing?
James Klein:
Yes. This is James. So the market in general is still maturing. Several different standards have been competing Wi-Fi, ZigBee, BOE, Thread and NB IoT. We're positioned pretty well across all of those different aspects of the market. Our strategy is effectively been to title supply in the connected home and in the automotive space. Our automotive business although is small, is growing at a very nice clip and in fact, grew well into the double-digit range year-over-year in this current quarter. Wi-Fi has been a bit weak over the last couple of quarters as we have reported, but we are showing signs of recovery. The Wi-Fi 6 standard release in October and it's fueled our second quarter in a row, a very strong design wins and we think that's a great sign that that business will return back into growth mode fairly soon.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. Thanks. And just a follow-up question for Mark. Appreciate the color on just some of the OpEx, with the RF MEMS acquisition. Can you share just from a revenue perspective, how that settles out?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So I'll give an update Craig on both -- so both our acquisitions. So on the recent RF MEMS business, that's not financially accretive in fiscal 2020 and that's reflected in our guide. So it's an increase in OpEx and there's no income accretion there. On the Programmable Power Management business, I think it was last call, I said, the $50 million of revenue in our fiscal 2020 and slightly accretive. As James mentioned, that's very much on track. It's delivered on expectations in the September quarter and our guide reflects the previous guidance I gave around that business.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead with your question.
Ed Snyder:
Thanks a lot. Eric, you talk a lot about the move to -- rapid move to Phase 6 in China now. I know the experimental last year isn’t high-end enough. Sounds like they're going in mass toward 5G, which I guess is to be very expected. But that poses a problem here, because if the handset volumes are growing in mass to this and you have to buy these modules from [Indiscernible] or yourself. How does that work with Huawei? I mean, if -- are these components not covered by the band? Is Huawei being left out of this shift? Or this is on the substitute for these products? And then, James, if I could, you're guiding up next quarter, led by defense, and you call out GaN and X Band expand. Are you looking at production now with some of these larger systems like Spy 60 [ph] or Gator [ph] or is it more development work? And if it's a former, can you give some kind of color on the run? I know this stuff has been in development for many years now, but some of these are very large systems with bit unit volumes in the long-term. Just trying to get a feel for how defense will play out over the next long-term, actually, next 12 months or so. And then I have a follow-up.
Eric Creviston:
So to your first question about Huawei and highly integrated modules, while staying completely consistent with export regulations, we're able to ship the highly integrated modules across all frequency bands to Huawei's handset division. And Jim will take second part.
James Klein:
Yeah. Ed, for defense, so the defense business has been solid growth engine for us. I think it really going to have a nice back half and fuel the recovery, you talked about earlier. GaN related -- there are numerous production programs for GaN. We announced one this quarter that was the arrangement with Lockheed Martin on Q-53 and again you can read what that system is. But there are numerous other production programs using our GaN capability.
Ed Snyder:
Okay. And then, Eric, looking back, you talked about ultra-high band wins, which we, kind of, see dabbling about last year, so I know it's showing up here. But then also you talked about higher content 5G then you'd expected. Is there something being added to the 5G section or you're talking more of the halo effect of 5G on 4G, for example, in the tuners antenna plexus, that sort of things? So I'm just getting my arms around, given the faults you're seeing on the bands and the tear downs, what additional -- actually pure 5G content could you be talking about when you say that 5G content is higher than anticipated? Thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah. Great question, Ed. The halo affect with 4G was largely contemplated. I think that's on track for the most part. Additional tuning is definitely higher than we had expected. But I think the primary new content in 5G proper are brands like, as I mentioned, as an example, in 79 being acquired across all China handsets, not just China Mobile, for example. The requirements with the dual signaling for non-stand-alone operations so you have to be build a transmitter on 4G and 5G at the same time. Once that was fully incorporated into the architectures, it turned out to take more switching more complex RF than was expected. And by the way we don't see any of this going to away. Even if China immediately went into standalone 5G, all the architectures we're seeing are going to keep that dual signaling mode. They'll use that 4G carrier to transmitter even more data on. So, we don't think that this is just sort of a onetime blip in content. It's going to continue to ratchet up from here going forward.
Edward Snyder:
Great. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. The next question will come from Timothy Arcuri with UBS. Please go ahead.
Timothy Arcuri:
Thanks a lot. Mark I guess my first question can you give us a sense of your largest customer how big they were maybe in the quarter? And maybe not -- if you don't want to give us numbers, can you talk about like year-over-year how much they grew or didn't grow? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
No, Tim we had one 10% customer in the quarter and I can't give details about that specific customer's growth.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. Awesome. And then do you have any sense maybe James about if you have any forecast that you're sort of thinking about for the global 5G handsets builds for mostly obviously sub-six next year? The numbers are all over the map, there is somewhere at 175 and some people talk about 300. Can you help us think about what sort of a global TAM will be so we can think about how big things could actually be a for next year in a 5G? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
I'll speak to the handset side and then let James chime in on the infrastructure side. I mentioned earlier we had baselined around a $1 billion in the TAM for the calendar year 2020 and that was roughly $200 million handsets at $5. So, we're projecting that back in 2018 even or earlier. And so what we're seeing now is maybe not quite $300 million, but approaching $300 million in terms of units likely. And the content being a little above $5 as well -- probably $6 or $7 worth of additional content. So, that's -- we're as we said much closer to $2 billion now based on customer forecast to us and the architectures we see ramping next year.
James Klein:
On the base station said, we see about $1 billion of TAM being added and it's all associated with 5G add-ons. And most of that is attributed to the adoption of massive MIMO. We expect over the next several years of somewhere in the range of 30% of the base station deployed will use massive MIMO technology. And as I've talked about before that's about 10x content gain for us in each one of those base stations.
Timothy Arcuri:
Awesome. Thank you so much.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question will come from Raji Gill with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.
Raji Gill:
Yes, thank you. And I echo my congratulations. You mentioned in terms of the portfolio of the Chinese handset customers moving to 5G from 4G. But I've fairly seen a -- I guess a jump in the actual units rather the RF contents going up. To the earlier question about the TAM, I'm just wondering if this -- the replacement cycle that you're expecting to see in 5G will actually also result in higher incremental units with the overall Chinese handset market? And how do we think about that? When do we expect maybe like unit growth to start to kind of increase as a result of the transition to 5G?
Eric Creviston:
So, we're not modeling an increase in unit growth going forward. We did see replacement cycles moving out that was part of a bit of a drag over the last year. They're stabilized now for the time being at least. We are modeling them necessarily kicking back. If units go up that means replacement cycles have got to be shortening and we're not modeling that over all.
Raji Gill:
So this is just primarily going to be driven by purely RF content gains to support 4G but also the new bands?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah, that's right exactly. So the total number of handsets more than being 5G versus 4G without more units and then 5G hasn’t going to come through.
Raji Gill:
Okay. And then for my follow-up question. I guess, it is to the earlier question about the risk of Huawei and other Chinese handset OEMs using non-U.S. filter company. You’d mentioned that there is some experiments out there, but the results are that there's a push back to an integrated solution. Knowing the fact that these RF designs are pretty much have already been locked in for the phones next year, if you look at it 2021, is there potential risk that these OEMs will move to more of a same architecture ID without integrated power amplifier versus TAM ID architecture?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Number one, I want to make sure we understand that in China, let's understand the export phones as well. So for anything they're exporting, they're going to compete with obviously Samsung and others, so they're going to make sure we buy the best RF. And as you all know, the RF does influence dropped calls, battery life, things that we as consumers recognized and judge phones by. So that's important distinction. Second, even in China they're building their brands and want to make sure that they can compete with Huawei, and so far we have not seen any one that is willing to sacrifice, if they have the ability to buy from U.S. suppliers to sacrifice performance and tarnish their brand. The other thing I just want to caution you on is that there are many phone designs that are still left to be done in the second half of this year and their direction at least in the architectures we're seeing are still with the integrated products that we've been talking about.
Raji Gill:
Very good. Thank you for the insight.
Operator:
Thank you for the question. We've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call over to management for any further or closing comments.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thank you. We want to thank you everyone for joining us on tonight's call. We help to see you at upcoming investor meetings and we look forward to speaking with you again when we report our third quarter results. Thanks again and hope you have a good night. Operator
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo Inc. First Quarter 2020 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Todd. Hello, everybody and welcome to Qorvo's Fiscal 2020 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. Qorvo delivered a strong June quarter with double-digit growth both sequentially and year-over-year in revenue, EPS and free cash flow. Our strong performance was driven by several factors
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the first quarter was $776 million, $36 million above the midpoint of our May 21 guidance, driven by stronger-than-expected mobile demand. Roughly half of the favorable revenue variance in the quarter was from the shipment of select products to Huawei in June which commenced following an extensive legal review. Sales to Huawei were 22% of total revenue in the June quarter compared to approximately 14% during the same period last year and 15% for our full year fiscal 2019. For the June quarter, mobile revenue of $556 million was driven by double-digit year-over-year growth with several of our top customers. IDP grew year-over-year to over $219 million due primarily to higher demand for infrastructure products. Non-GAAP gross margin in the June quarter was 46.2%, 70 basis points above our guidance due to favorable mix and manufacturing productivity gains. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $168 million, below our guidance on lower personnel costs and effective cost control measures. Non-GAAP net income in the June quarter was $165 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.36, $0.21 over the midpoint of our guidance and up 42% year-over-year. June quarter cash flow from operations was $257 million on higher income and favorable working capital effects. CapEx was $50 million resulting in free cash flow of $207 million, a record level for the company in the first quarter. This free cash flow performance reflects our improved operating capabilities and ongoing capital discipline. During the quarter, we completed the purchase of Active-Semi International, adding rapidly growing power management opportunities to our diversified IDP portfolio. Both the integration and business plans are on track. We repurchased $100 million of stock in the quarter and we modestly increased net debt. Turning to our outlook. In the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we expect revenue between $745 million and 600 -- $765 million, or $755 million at the midpoint. Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 46% to 46.5% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.30 at the midpoint of our guidance. Our revenue outlook for the September quarter reflects typical seasonal ramps at our largest customer, offset by a significantly lower sales to Huawei compared to the June quarter. For the full fiscal year, we currently project our sales to Huawei will fall below 10% of Qorvo's total sales. Although we have filed for a license and are taking other proactive steps to address our ability to sell products to Huawei, the scope, duration and long-term financial impact of the restrictions remain unclear and difficult to predict. For IDP, we project September quarter sales to decline due to these restrictions. But recover through the year as the infrastructure market picks up with other customers and Wi-Fi and other markets strengthen. For mobile, we expect September quarter sales to increase sequentially with higher revenues from seasonal ramps offset in part by significantly lower sales to Huawei. For the fiscal year, we project mobile to be down approximately 10% second half compared to first half due to trade effects and seasonality. On gross margin, our September quarter guide of 46% to 46.5% is roughly flat compared to the June quarter. Lower volumes enhance weaker-than-previously forecasted utilization are weighing in on gross margins. Non-GAAP operating expenses are projected to decrease slightly in the September quarter to around $166 million as cost control benefits are offset by investments in growth programs and the full quarter addition of the Programmable Power Management business. We expect OpEx to remain below $170 million per quarter for the rest of the fiscal year. We expect the September quarter and fiscal '20 non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 8.5%. On capital expenditures, we are projecting spend of less than $200 million this fiscal year as we continue to be highly disciplined on adding capacity. Spend remains weighted towards improving our BAW and GaN capabilities. The June quarter was challenging with the abrupt disruption of sales to an important customer and other evolving market conditions. But Qorvo responded well and delivered a strong quarter of double-digit year-over-year sales growth and record first quarter earnings and free cash flow. Certain aspects of our markets remain unclear so we are taking a measured view. Specifically, as it relates to Huawei, we have reduced our outlook to include only modest sales of Mobile Products. On the infrastructure side of the business, we expect a pickup in business from other customers but this will take time and we have a recovery in IDP modeled in the second half of our fiscal year. As we demonstrated this quarter, we have the products, technologies and operating capabilities to help navigate these evolving market conditions. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. We will take our first question from Chris Caso of Raymond James.
Christopher Caso:
I guess the first question on Huawei. Perhaps you could clarify the types of components that you're permitted to ship, which components you're not, where you're trying to get the licenses? And then with respect to what you're shipping now, perhaps you could talk about with what your shipping in the September quarter, how that compares to what you have been shipping on a dollar basis to Huawei in the beginning of the year so we can sort of calibrate the -- that exchange?
Robert Bruggeworth:
I'll take the first part. Mark, if you want to take the second part. I think in the opening comments; you gave them a little bit about that. Chris, thanks for your question. Let me start with the export regulations are extremely complex. The companies like ours with global supply chains, where those shipments of particular products are restricted depends on a variety of factors including builds and materials, manufacturing flows for each component, things like that. It really requires a detailed part by part analysis. And unfortunately, I think it goes beyond the scope of this call to go into a lot more detail. I will tell you, before turning in any of the parts that we are now able to ship, we do a very detailed analysis as appropriate, consulting outside counsel, get legal advice, even work with government officials for guidance on the export rules. And as Mark has said in his opening comments, this is an ongoing process. So those parts that we don't feel comply as we commented, both Mark and I, we have applied, with the encouragement of the U.S. government officials, applied for a license from the Bureau of Export Enforcement to expand the number of parts we can ship for both mobile and IDP. As of now, I don't believe the U.S. government has issued any licenses so far. So for us to predict or even estimate when licenses will be granted will be extremely difficult. In the case of the Mobile Products, it's been clear that some of those products we can actually ship in volume. As it goes for IDP, we've cleared some products but the shipments have been extremely limited in volume and in dollars. So I hope Chris, that gives you an idea of what we are able to ship.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So Chris, I just -- I think I provided enough detail in my opening comments. But just to may be provide more directly here. We sold $172 million of product to Huawei in the first quarter. The vast majority of that was pre-ban. As I said in my opening comments, roughly half or about $18 million of our variance to our guide was Huawei post-ban. We would see levels about that level. So certainly, less than 5% of our sales is what we have modeled going forward and that would be principally mobile.
Christopher Caso:
Okay. That's helpful. And I guess with the uncertainty going forward on whether or not you would be able to get licenses, perhaps you could address what you're -- what the risk would be of ultimately being designed out permanently if not just for perhaps Huawei trying to reduce exposure to U.S. vendors or perhaps, they would have to? And I guess in other words, what are the substitutes for what you can provide to Huawei? Are there substitutes available? How difficult is this? And therefore, kind of how sticky is -- are your design wins despite all of the restrictions that are in place?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Let me take a shot at that, Chris. That's a pretty complicated story to answer. Number one is you all know they're having trouble competing outside of China. So those designs are actually were picking up another customer. So I'll make my comments somewhat to the China market. In those design wins that we already had; we are keeping those. We are also picking up design wins on those parts that we can continue to ship for them. I think the thing I'd like to point out is we supply premium technologies. And customers like Huawei and other customers from around the world like our technologies. So I'm not sure I'm in a position to comment at Huawei's product strategy or their supply chain. That's a great question for them, to be quite candid. As Mark said, we've modeled out for you what we think we can gain and what's in for the fiscal year. So I don't know how much more I can add. What I do believe is if we do are granted a license, we will be able to continue to expand our design wins and grow our business.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Bill Peterson of J.P. Morgan.
William Peterson:
My first question is in mobile. Certainly I hate to bring up the Qualcomm thing again, it talks about a lot more design wins with the vast majority using the RF. On the other hand, you also have discussed winning the RFs in the Chinese customer, which I assume would be Huawei in fact. But I guess can you give us an update on your 5G engagements, your design win pipeline for phones? And especially phones that use Qualcomm motors that are going to be launched later this year and into 2020. I guess where are you seeing the most traction in the new sub-6-GHz? And I guess they talked about reported advantages of designing around the antenna. How should we think about them as a competitor as we look out over the next 12 to 18 months?
Steven Creviston:
Sure, Bill. This is Eric. So we are seeing an acceleration really in 5G activity throughout China, certainly not just Huawei, but all of our leading handset customers in China. A lot of excitement about the rollout and it's definitely accelerating, as Bob mentioned in his opening comments, both in terms of licenses and infrastructure rollout. But in terms of all the exciting new devices that are coming out. So we are seeing broad-based activity across all customers and across our entire product family. Certainly antenna management, advanced power management and highly integrated modules covering low, mid, high and ultrahigh band frequencies. So it's a very active design cycle. Now we do see multiple 5G basebands ramping. And of course Qualcomm is doing well there. We do see large opportunities for content shipping on all the base bands including Qualcomm.
William Peterson:
Okay. Thanks for that. And I guess based -- this is a question on IDP. We saw sequential decline here in the June quarter and you're calling for that again in September, followed by improvement in the back half. I guess all that in, how should we think about growth for IDP this year? And I guess specifically, amongst infrastructure versus Wi-Fi and defense and so forth?
Robert Bruggeworth:
So let me talk a lot about current quarter. We did have a strong base station quarter in the current quarter and we are well-positioned with most of the major OEMs. That strength has come because of 5G deployments, to follow-up on Eric, because we are seeing strong demand from massive MIMO products and we do see GaN continuing to take slots particularly in those massive MIMO slots. So base station did have a strong quarter. As far as projecting out further, we have experienced several weak quarters of our IoT particularly our Wi-Fi part of that business. We believe that still delays associated with the rollout of AX and a little bit to do with trade activities and repositioning of supply chains. We had a very strong design win quarter in that part of the business. So we are starting to see indications that we are coming out of that and that we should have a strong back half. So we are expecting that back half. And we also have talked in the past about our defense business being a bit lumpy. But it does look like we are positioned to have a very strong back half in the defense business. On top of that, Bill, I think we are starting to see some early indications of the infrastructure business, the supply chain starting to adjust. We are -- we do have some of our other customers that will begin ramps soon with massive MIMO products and that will start to fill in a bit. Predominantly though, the decline that we've experienced this quarter and next quarter are associated with our lack of ability to ship to Huawei.
Mark Murphy:
Bill, maybe just to help a bit with the profile of IDP. Clearly had a sequential decline in the June quarter. We expect another sequential decline in the September quarter. Expect the business to return to sequential growth in the December quarter. As it relates to year-over-year, the business still grew in June despite the issues with Huawei. However, in the September quarter, we do expect a decline year-over-year for IDP and then IDP returning to growth in the back half year-over-year.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Raji Gill of Needham & Company.
Rajvindra Gill:
I appreciate it. I just wanted to get a sense from you in terms of are you seeing any competitive solutions for your HBT solutions and your FinFET from Asian customers? We've seen some commentary out of some FE houses that are qualifying and ramping with new Asian customers. I'm just wondering if that -- if you're seeing any competition from your main products as it relates to the China trade war and any risk in China trying to in-source where possible?
Steven Creviston:
This is Eric. At least I can speak for the mobile business. We sell very few discrete power amplifiers or HPT solutions. The vast majority of what we are selling is combined modules that include filter and advanced switching capabilities. So at least I haven't seen a competitive element there with the GaAs HPT supply.
Rajvindra Gill:
Okay. And on the 5G side, there has been one competitor who basically indicated that there would be a little bit of a pause with regards to China, the build out in 5G, after a lot of deployment or a lot of orders of massive MIMO deployments. But that seems to differ from what you're saying in terms of China's ramp. Just wanted to get a sense, has there been an overbuild perhaps or is there other factors?
Robert Bruggeworth:
This is Bob, I'll go and take that. From our conversations with carriers there and what all you can see; I don't think there's been a slowdown in base stations. In fact, there's another round coming out for an even larger RFQ for additional base stations late this year, I think it's November. So we are not seeing any slowdown in the rollout on the infrastructure side.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Carl Curtis of Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
May be just on the Huawei impact of $172 million, is there any way to kind of gauge how much of that impact is IDP? I'm just trying to understand these moving pieces. I know you said the base stations had a good quarter. So I assume that in June even though you stopped shipping to Huawei partially in the quarter, that business was still up. I'm just trying to understand.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. In the June quarter, base stations still had nice growth year-over-year, well into the double-digit range. And so the other end of the question, as far as amount of revenue by business units split out, we don't split it out.
Mark Murphy:
We don't provide that.
Steven Creviston:
Details down that level by business unit.
Blayne Curtis:
Got you. And maybe I could ask you the other way, you're looking for some slight growth at mobile into September. You talked about seasonal ramps. Can you maybe give us a little more color as to where you're getting that growth? And obviously, a part of Huawei, you're offsetting there, so I'm just kind of curious if you can talk geography -- by geography or whatever color you can provide will be helpful.
Steven Creviston:
Sure. This is Eric. The growth in mobile in September quarter is driven by normal seasonality of flagship ramps going into the second half across multiple top-tier customers. And again, it's muted significantly then by the Huawei sequential effect.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Toshiya Hari from Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
I was hoping to better understand your September quarter revenue guide on a year-over-year basis a little bit better. I think if we take the midpoint of your guide, your revenue is expected to be down about $130 million. How much of that is Huawei? How much of that is your biggest customer in the U.S.? Active-Semi obviously is up. I'm assuming non-Huawei IDP is up. If you kind of walk through some of the pluses and minuses on a year-over-year basis, that will be helpful. Then I have a follow-up.
Robert Bruggeworth:
This is Bob. I'll take it on a high-level. I mean, primarily in our largest customer, we are roughly flat year-over-year. Huawei is the largest part and we are down a little bit in China. If you remember last year at this time, we talked about the China market was doing extremely well and we were taking a conservative view on it which was accurate. So in essence, it's Huawei and China.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, over 2/3 of it is Huawei, Toshiya
Toshiya Hari:
Got it. Thank you. As a follow-up, Mark, in terms of gross margins, you guys are guiding September essentially flat sequentially despite IDP being down sequentially and the seasonal ramp in mobile is typically dilutive to gross margin. So I guess there must be some operational improvements going on beneath the surface. So if you can kind of speak to some of those points. And more importantly, I guess going forward into the back half of the fiscal year, before the Huawei ban, you guys have talked about sequential improvements and hitting 48% for the full year. I'm assuming that's no longer the case. But if you can talk about your expectations going into the second half, that will be helpful.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, it's a good question, Toshiya. So we are absolutely undertaking, obviously, all the productivity efforts we can. And we are making great progress. I mean, the disappointment here is that we were set up for a very good year on gross margin and there is a couple of hundred million dollars of revenue hit that we've taken versus our May 7 guidance has really reduced the utilization in the factory network. I addressed gross margin on the May 7 call. And as you said, I said we expected the gross margin being about 48% for the full year. Right now, we did beat in the June quarter by 70 basis points. As you mentioned, I guided the September to be largely flat. That's the negative utilization effect offset by productivity gains and then some positive mix effects. Now for the full year, our view at the moment is between 46% and 47% gross margin.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Edward Snyder of Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Eric, there's a lot of talk about substitutes for your off-components in China, I'm sure you've gotten tired of the question. But our own ship level teardown of Huawei's latest phones, it looks like it's Full Filter, Amp, Switch Modules and envelope trackers for you and modules and tuners for Skyworks. First of all, are any of the advanced phones coming out of China from many of the OEMs moving back to the street architecture or are they all kind of moving to this same kind of basic high integrated modules that Apple's been using for years? And secondly, when you're moving to 5G, especially in regard to the antenna and some of the interface between these two, does this become more acute or less acute as you're trying to handle all the new bands? And then James, if I could, real quick, it sounds like your defense is on the tear in the second half of the year. Is that primarily gains due to GaN on new slots and is defense now back to being the largest group?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Eric, do you want to take the first part?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. So regarding the architectures at our leading customers in China, certainly outside of Huawei, the trend is clear. The acceleration of 5G is driving even more demand for higher levels of integration, trying to get the LTE Advanced Pro packed in the smallest possible. We have had several customers that have actually added bands to their 5G platforms as we were late in the development cycle. They're adding even more of the ultrahigh bands in there to address more carrier requirements and so forth. So that only drives towards -- to the first part of your question, more integration. And into the second part of your question, yes, it's definitely becoming more acute, more difficult to manage the antenna interface with all the new bands being added on top of everything that was in there before. So we don't see anything other than an acceleration of all the trends we've been talking about for a couple of years now. And if anything, even more confidence in the TAM expansion next year.
Robert Bruggeworth:
So as far as defense, yes, the businesses is striking and poise to have a really great back half. It's pretty broad-based growth but I would say GaN is basically playing a much larger role there. And so most of the growth I think will come from our GaN-based products. Really, broad-based both domestic, international platforms and across a broad range of frequencies. You saw that we have product wins down in the S and C-band but also up in X and all the way up in the millimeter wave frequencies. As far as being the largest product line, I'm thoroughly guided all that level. But yes, probably towards the end of the year, it will be at close if not the largest business segment that we've got inside IDP.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then Mark, if I could, real quick. I know utilization is down obviously because your revenue is down here. We used to talk a year or so ago about BAW. There's a lot of competitors talking about BAW, Skyworks was mentioned several times. Qualcomm's brought investors to last quarter, talking up BAW and winning all that stuff. So maybe you can give us an update if you could on just your position in that area as regard to Richardson? I know your utilization is going to be down here, but are we talking higher than what it was earlier this year? Any kind of profile at all on how much either utilization has come out Richardson on BAW or what percentage of revenue you expect to be seeing from BAW filters?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. I think, Ed, what I would say is that we are confident in our operations plan in Texas. We've done a lot of things there to position that plant, Richardson along with Farmers branch to be a tremendous asset for us going forward and we believe it will be. Yes, this revenue hit we've had was particularly hard because we were seeing a lot of BAW activity around Phase 6 and there were some other product movement that is going to lower utilization rates in Texas for the next year or so. But we see, yes, the same trends continuing that Eric talked about, increased complexity, you have the density of the RF modules and more stringent requirements on bands and so forth. So we see, in the product roadmaps we have, a greater use of BAW and we see utilization improving in the levels we'd like to see it beyond this year.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Ambrish Srivastava of BMO Capital Markets.
Ambrish Srivastava:
I have a quick one for you, Mark. Actually, I have two for you. The quick one is was there any Active-Semi in the reported quarter? You said that IDP was higher on a year-over-year basis. But does that include any Active-Semi. And my follow-up is very strong free cash flow in the reported quarter. It's -- I know it's very uncertain and thanks for trying to give as much clarity as you guys can, so really appreciate that. But would you be able to provide us with a guidance on free cash flow for the full year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. On free cash flow for the year, we do believe we will have free cash flow growth for the year. Combination of sustaining decent income despite this sales drop relative to our previous view. We are exhibiting good cost control, good working capital management and good CapEx discipline and expect to see free cash flow growth. First question.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Active-Semi.
Mark Murphy:
Active-Semi. There was Active-Semi in the IDP business, Ambrish. It was a small amount. IDP still grew year-over-year if you exclude that.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Ruben Roy of Benchmark.
Ruben Roy:
I had a quick follow-up, a quick clarification for Eric. Eric, you mentioned either working with or having design wins with the various baseband manufacturers for 5G. I'm wondering if you can clarify, you said you had design wins out there in actual handsets with the group of folks that have 5G modem technology. And then also wondering about the qualification process. How does that work? Is that qualification for your RFs by baseband manufacturer or by that handset OEM or a combination?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. Yes, just to reiterate, we can confirm that we have design wins, and in fact in production with 5G content across multiple basebands in China including Qualcomm. And the process, as it works today, really, we are in the leadership position of defining a lot of the RF content and placements and interfaces and so forth. So the integration happens largely between RF's team and our customers directly.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Vivek Arya of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya:
I had two actually. For the first one, I think Bob, you mentioned Huawei was about 22% of sales and that is including the disruption. I'm curious how much would that have been without the disruption? Because it just seems a very high number. Did you sense that there was kind of pull forward of sales into June? Because I realize, I think for September, you're saying is going to be less than 5%. I'm just trying to understand how it was such a large number for your June quarter?
Robert Bruggeworth:
I think, Vivek, if you remember last quarter when I talked about Huawei, they grew their share in the first quarter of 50%. And if you actually look at a lot of what's been published this last quarter, I think they drove their share even more in China from 31% to about 38%. So they were taking significant share. I'll also remind you last quarter, we talked about that our business was growing with Huawei. We were gaining back share that as you recall we didn't price our ETP mix low and we knew we were going to miss a generation. We thought it was right, it was right. So they were gaining share, we were gaining share. Remember last year, we were 15%. So 22% doesn't seem like a big number to me. And to answer your question, yes, it would've been more. But they're taking share. We were taking share. It was a great story.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. Makes sense. And then Bob for my follow-up, how much RF content are you seeing in the 5G phones in China? And when you look at the design, is it a winner take all kind of approach or is it that your share in those 5G phones is similar to the share you had in the broad 4G market which was in the 20%, 25% range or so? Just how much is the RF content and the lift you're seeing and how is the share -- your share doing in those designs?
Steven Creviston:
Vivek, this is Eric. I'll take that. It is, at this point in time, exceeding our expectations. As I said, even more bands are being added sooner than we expected. And so we are confident in what we've been saying at least $1 billion in TAM expansion next year driven by 5G which includes not only the new 5G bands but also upgrades to the 4G part of the phone to be compatible with that. So all told, we are expecting at least $1 billion of TAM expansion. When you look at that at the handset level, some of the sort of higher tier within that tier 5G handsets that are coming out of China can routinely have $10 to $15 worth of RF content. And we are definitely getting our fair share. I think there are various models but it does seem that our share of the total RF will be expanding as we add 5G.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Christopher Rolland of SIG.
Christopher Rolland:
Back to the Huawei at 22%, that was some great color on them gaining share there. I guess that means that most of that revenue contribution was from handsets and not sort of a large spike in infrastructure there. Is it kind of your opinion that that was actually natural demand, not an inventory building on their part?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, Chris, that's a good point. The growth that we saw quarter-over-quarter at Huawei also was for a lot of the IDP massive MIMO which is our GaN plus, our high performance GaAs process. So that was a portion of it. I took Vivek's question more on the handset side, so I apologize for that. But no, we saw a very nice growth in that side of the business where in my opening comments I talked about how GaN is taking share from LDMOS and that's a very good example of one of the customers were doing that. And as James alluded to and Mark in his comments, we are taking some of that same technology now and we've been working with other customers and they're just ramping behind where Huawei was. It's not we moved resources; Huawei was clearly leading. We were the leader who's adopting the technology. That did drive a large part of our growth and a larger percentage of Huawei being for the total company.
Christopher Rolland:
Got it. And I guess playing into those infrastructure comments as well. As we look at HPRF and when we move from 4G to 5G, there's definitely new players here and new materials as you kind of move away from LDMOS as well. Any idea of who your biggest competitors are in 5G? And any early indications on what you think your share of that market is?
Steven Creviston:
Well, I mean first of all, we do definitely see MIMO architecture starting to get more and more share away from macro. So we talked about that trend last quarter. And I think that trend still continues. And in fact, a number of MIMO channels will probably eclipse macro channels this year. And then a percentage of base stations are certainly trending in awards, the number is probably 30% or so being macro -- being massive MIMO base stations. As far as competitors, we really compete at all of the major OEMs for the entire RF chain, both receive side and all the way through transmit side. And so each component is a bit different depending on what individual company's strengths are. Among the power amplifier side, it's predominantly been a competition between the LDMOS conventional players and then the few of those that have GaN capability. And as Bob talked about, that transition to GaN is going fairly rapidly, moving away from LDMOS and into GaN
Operator:
We will take our next question from Craig Hettenbach of Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
You've mentioned the traction in the Samsung A series and just curious kind of as you think about kind of the mid-tier portfolio there, kind of where you are today and how that could progress as you go forward?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. Thank you. That's -- it's a really exciting story for us and we are really excited what the team's been able to do there to work closely with that key customer. We had been out of that series really for several generations as we focus more on the flagship tier and they were going with less integrated solutions for the most part in that mass tier in the A series. So working with them on architectures and so forth over a couple of years, you're seeing the culmination of that now where they're beginning to look at just like all the rest of our customers looking at moving up the integration curve and adopting new technologies and things which align with our portfolio really well. So this is the first step into it. We've been present there all along in antenna tuning of course. But this gets us into the main path in some of the medium or chunkier bits of revenue in that tier.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. Thanks. And just a follow-up question from Mark on the back of the strong free cash flow. How are you thinking about kind of buybacks versus potential tuck-ins like Active-Semi?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, we continue to -- nothing's changed. We've been generating strong free cash flow. We will continue to look for bolt-ons for James' business and technology buys for Eric's business. As we said, thrilled to have the Active-Semi team in Qorvo and immediately contributing this quarter. And the integration is going well and plans are on track. To the extent we don't have opportunities, I've been clear about our leverage targets. We did tick up a bit and we continue to be buyers of the stock at these levels but I'm not going to comment on rate base.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Shawn Harrison of Longbow Research.
Shawn Harrison:
With the Farmers branch closure and the other -- or the Farmers branch I guess coming back online potentially next year versus the weaker mobile demand, does that cause some linger further into fiscal '21? And then also does the weaker mobile demand affect kind of the savings coming back as you consolidate facilities?
Mark Murphy:
The plans are right now still to have the facility contributing operationally in fiscal '21. In this sort of slower volume, we've taken the opportunity, I think we've talked about it a couple of times before to look at the plant configuration in a different way. So we are able to do what we thought would be more capital before with a lot less to achieve higher levels of capacity in the future. So we feel great about the facilities and capabilities we have in Texas. Great team and good leadership down there and we see that utilization improving over the next 1.5 years.
Shawn Harrison:
And then as a brief follow-up, considering all the 5G phone launches that could come out in calendar '20, how does that affect typical March quarter seasonality in mobile? I know it's been over the place the past few years. But do you see muted March quarter seasonality with new phone launches and 5G coming in?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. We are not going to get in too much detail on the quarters right now that far out. I mean, it's a very difficult year to predict. I will take the opportunity to mention that on the May 7 call, we gave a view that we thought revenue would be up 4% year-over-year in fiscal '20. A lot has changed since then. And there is the Huawei ban, there's other items that have impacted our outlook. So it's -- we're a few hundred million off on where we were on that view. Now it's a tough year to predict. And if the trade situation improves and handset releases are maybe better than we think, if 5G experience some demand -- or spur some demand and Wi-Fi 6 adoption accelerates, we could be better than that. But we are sizing for that more conservative outlook right now.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Vijay Rakesh of Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh:
Not sure if you talked about in the second half, if you're seeing any inventory issues in China on the handset side or how the revenue profile in the December quarter looks?
Robert Bruggeworth:
This is Bob, I'll go and take that. I think the last two quarters; we've talked about our own channel and how components are at -- from the days of supply historically low and they've remained that way. So we think the channel is pretty healthy. And most of the phones that are sold in China actually don't go through carriers. It's in their own stores actually. So from what we hear from them, it doesn't appear anything is building up.
Vijay Rakesh:
Got it. And just when you look at the complete landscape, I know we talked about the trade war and stuff. Huawei has probably been building a lot of some of the RF components I believe in-house from the HiSilicon side. Do you think with the continued tensions that they could source more of that in-house? It looks like some of the sourcing is almost up to 30% on the RF side from the HiSilicon supply base. I'm just wondering what your thoughts are.
Robert Bruggeworth:
James, can you address your infrastructure business and HiSilicon? I'm not aware of any.
James Klein:
Yes, I mean, we don't see inside HiSilicon direct manufacturing. They're still relying on the very similar supply base to the rest of the OEMs. Of course, our ability to get U.S. components is significantly different today. But for the most part, they're relying on very similar supply chain on the RF side.
Operator:
We will take our next question from Karl Ackerman of Cowen.
Karl Ackerman:
If I could go back to 5G infrastructure for a moment, you have a great portfolio. But you discussed the order progression for your massive MIMO and revenue opportunity that you see in fiscal '20 and fiscal '21. If we exclude China-based network operators, I guess it is less than half of your prior view of the $600 million to $700 million for fiscal 2020? And then I have a follow-up.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure. James?
James Klein:
Well, first, I'm not going to guide by individual company. So I mean we do see early rollouts going on in China. And as Bob talked about that earlier, we see that being on pace. There are multiple suppliers in China that will be buying for that business, competing for that business. I think the U.S. will follow with the rollouts and then likely to go into Europe and other places. Most of that commentary was below 6 gigahertz and we also see millimeter wave activity continuing to ramp up in the United States with demos on most of the carriers going on in multiple cities around the country.
Karl Ackerman:
Appreciate that. For my follow-up if I may, there have been several M&A announcements where companies have sought to acquire assets tangential to your own portfolio such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. And when we think about your desire to diversify beyond mobile, I'd love to hear your thoughts on capturing adjacent content areas within Wi-Fi and Bluetooth applications.
Robert Bruggeworth:
James, you already competing with Bluetooth.
James Klein:
We did the acquisition a couple of years ago and -- of GreenPeak and we've integrated that into our business and we continue to see that business doing well and I talked about IoT in the past. I think we see a significant amount of demand. And we offer a chipset there that really offers our customers the ability to be somewhat agnostic standards or to try to resolve down to probably a few standards that will compete in that place. And that's continues to be an area that I think we remain interested in adding capability in the company and will continue to look for acquisitions in that space.
Operator:
We have no further questions in queue. I'll turn it back to management for closing remarks.
Douglas DeLieto:
We thank everyone for joining us tonight. We hope to see many of you at our upcoming investor conferences and we look forward to speaking with you on our second quarter call. Thanks again and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2019 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Chelsey. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's Fiscal 2019 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and thanks to everyone average for joining us on the call today. Qorvo delivered a solid March quarter with revenue and EPS above the midpoint of our guidance driven by content gains, operational excellence and a broad market exposure to long-term growth trends, including 5G. I'm pleased with our financial performance and how our team and factories are operating. Yesterday, we closed to the acquisition of Active-Semi International, and we welcome the Active-Semi team to Qorvo. We are eager to leverage our scale, sales channel and customer relationships to accelerate the adoption of their programmable power management solutions. We are also excited to bring their power management technologies to our existing customers. Our efficiency is a critical requirement, and power management solutions intersect multiple growth drivers for Qorvo, including 5G base stations, defense, automotive and IoT. During the quarter, IDP continued to reap the rewards of our broad portfolio of key enabling technologies to drive growth. Infrastructure was especially strong led by 5G base station applications. We increased our support of 5G massive MIMO infrastructure deployments and secured new design wins across all anticipated sub-6 gigahertz 5G frequency bands. Qorvo is unique and that we're able to leverage the breadth of our defense and base station capabilities to address the demands of next-generation 5G networks from 6 gigahertz frequencies through millimeter wave. In millimeter wave applications, our experience enabling phased-array radars with leading-edge compound semiconductor technologies is helping us to support the higher frequencies and beam stirring requirements of next-generation cellular base stations. In connectivity, IDP won the entire RF front-end section for meshed WiFi access points by a leading manufacturer of WiFi home networking systems. We won on the breadth of our technology portfolio and our ability to supply superior BAW filtering and WiFi front ends. In automotive, we expanded our support of 5G and Cellular Vehicle-to-Everything for multiple automotive OEMs, and we now expect the commercial rollout of our front-end modules to begin in late 2019. Finally, in defense applications, we secured a design win to supply GaAs and GaN components to Lockheed Martin for a ground-based radar program for the U.S. Department of Defense. This multiyear win based on performance and reliability solidifies our leadership in GaN for defense applications. Turning to Mobile Products. We executed well on a challenging macro environment capitalizing on added content and integration trends at multiple customers. Qorvo's gains are being driven by leadership across product categories, including BAW-based dilutions, envelope trackers and tuners. We achieved record revenue for our BAW-based band 1/3 quadplexers and secured first design wins for our BAW-based hexaplexers solutions, enabling our customers to achieve higher orders of carrier aggregation in next-generation 5G handsets. During the quarter, we reached a significant milestone by supplying production volumes of our BAW-based mid-/high-band PADs to the world's top 6 smartphone OEMs. In addition, we received our first orders from customers for 5G variance for production this calendar year. And another standout example of Qorvo's leadership, we introduce the industry's first stand-alone ET PMIC capable of modulating the power supply at 100 megahertz for 5G New Radio operation. This allows customers to continue to select the most advanced best-in-class RF technologies for their devices. Our envelope trackers and antenna tuners are supporting some of the world's most popular wearable devices, enhancing connectivity and increasing battery life for this rapidly growing category. Finally, we sampled BAW-based 5G antennaplexers, enabling customers to utilize current antenna architectures for future 5G devices. Looking forward, design activity around 5G is accelerating, and that's expected to support a material uptick in the mobile RF TAM with an incremental $1 billion expected in 2020. 5G is being deployed with 3 distinct use cases
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fourth quarter was $681 million or $11 million over the midpoint of our guidance range. Mobile revenue of $443 million was supported by especially strong China and Korea-based customer demand. IDP revenue was $238 million, the 12th consecutive quarter and third year of double-digit year-over-year growth. IDP demand remained especially strong as the ramp of 5G base stations has begun. For the full year, Qorvo's revenue is near $3.1 billion and up 4% versus fiscal '18. We expect organic growth will continue in fiscal year 2020. Non-GAAP gross margin in the March quarter was 48.2%, 120 basis points above our guidance on lower costs related to inventory builds in support of our near-term outlook and improving manufacturing efficiency. Non-GAAP operating expenses were in line with guidance at $161 million and up sequentially due to higher personnel costs, including seasonal payroll effects. Non-GAAP net income in the March quarter was $151 million, and diluted earnings per share was $1.22, $0.17 over the midpoint of our guidance and up 14% year-over-year. For the full fiscal year, Qorvo's EPS grew 12% to $5.76. March quarter cash flow from operations was $187 million and reflected inventory builds to support near-term customer demand. CapEx was a year low of $35 million, resulting in free cash flow of $152 million. Full year CapEx was $220 million -- $221 million or 7% of sales. Our portfolio management focus and manufacturing productivity efforts are helping us reduce and better manage our capital requirements. We repurchased close to $300 million in stock in the March quarter for a total of $638 million in the year. Share repurchases totaled 108% of Qorvo's free cash flow in fiscal '19. During the quarter, we also repurchased $68 million of our remaining 7% coupon 2025 notes and added $270 million to our 2026 notes at a rate under 5.2%. We ended the quarter with $711 million of cash and $923 million of debt. Turning to our outlook. In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $780 million and $800 million or $790 million at the midpoint; gross margin between 45% and 45.5%; and diluted EPS of $1.30 at the midpoint of our guidance. In the June quarter, we expect IDP to post another quarter of double-digit year-over-year organic growth and to be up sequentially with the addition of Active-Semi. For mobile in the June quarter, we are forecasting robust sequential and year-over-year growth, including year-over-year growth in the quarter at our 3 largest customers. For fiscal '20, we currently forecast Qorvo revenue growth of roughly 4%, including $50 million from the recently closed Active-Semi business. We expect the Active-Semi programmable power management business will be accretive to gross margins and contribute a small amount to earnings in fiscal '20. As I mentioned last quarter, we are forecasting a sequential decline in gross margin in the June quarter due to mix and manufacturing costs. We expect higher gross margins through the balance of the year and currently project a full year fiscal '20 gross margin of approximately 48%. Non-GAAP operating expenses are forecasted to increase in the June quarter to $173 million on higher personnel costs -- higher personnel and development program costs as well as the addition of the Active-Semi power management business. We expect OpEx to remain around these levels through the year. We expect the June quarter and full year fiscal '20 non-GAAP tax rate to remain below 9%. On capital expenditures, we forecast spend of less than $250 million this fiscal year and weighted towards expanding and improving our BAW, GaN and GaAs capabilities. We're very pleased with how we ended fiscal '19, and we're encouraged by a strong start and improved outlook as we enter fiscal '20. In the March '19 quarter, we executed well on a challenging environment, which allowed us to deliver results above our initial guidance. We also continued to improve our technology and operations, further strengthening our competitive position. For full year '19, despite a softer-than-expected second half, we delivered another year of double-digit earnings growth. For fiscal year 2020, we currently project growth in revenue, earnings and free cash flow. This outlook reflects the strength we are seeing in a number of our end markets and the health of our distribution channels. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions]. And our first question will come from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Nice results. So I was curious, you've alluded to growth in your 3 top customers. I'm just kind of curious about that content gain. So can you just talk about the strength you're seeing particularly in the Android world, if you could just think about strength in the market units, maybe customer share gains and then the content story as well? Can you maybe just give some thoughts as to where all the strength is coming from?
Steven Creviston:
Sure, Blayne. This is Eric, and I'll be happy to talk about that. Of course, in the March quarter, we did enjoy a significant content expansion with both Huawei and our largest Korean-based supplier. We've been, I think, pointing to this for about a year. As we gain more content on the highly integrated modules, mid-/high-band in particular is a good driver for us. And those customers both did pretty well in the quarter, frankly. Part of our upside to our expectation was based on their sell-through. I think you're using that publicly in some reports. So the market is not terribly healthy, but we're in the right place with a lot of content gains, which is a tailwind right now.
Blayne Curtis:
And then I just want to ask you on the IDP side. Obviously, you've had a lot of strength from the infrastructure on 5G side. It looks like in the guidance, you're talking about organic up year-over-year but maybe down a little bit in June. Just kind of curious to your thoughts in the trajectory of that infrastructure business in the June and then really for the rest of the year.
James Klein:
Yes. I think we're guiding rather flattish, I would say, on the organic business as we go quarter-to-quarter. As we go through the year, I think we will continue to at least grow at market rate, which we're modeling at that 10% to 15% rate. The addition of Active is also going to help, but we believe that our management market is actually growing faster than some of our underlying markets.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Christopher Caso:
I guess just following up on some of your earlier comments. And perhaps you could talk about what may have changed in your view of the market since we've spoke in the last call. Obviously, we've seen some more cautious comments from others in the space. Was it really a situation where you just happened to be in the right sockets? And again, you made some production decisions with some capacity last quarter. Do some of the strength that you're seeing now affect some of those decisions you've made a quarter ago?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Chris, this is Bob. Thanks for your questions. As far as what's changed all along, and I think Eric said it quite well. He named 2 of the customers. You can throw in a couple others. We worked very hard to gain back share that we've lost over the years, and we've brought out extremely compelling product. And I'm extremely pleased with how the team is now supporting the top 6 handset manufacturers with mid-/high-band PAD. So we've done a good job there. And as Eric said, we're in the right places at the right time. We, like others, I think still -- we're taking much more of a cautious outlook in the second half. And I know you said some of those are seeing it now maybe, but I really think the team has done a good job of putting us in the right positions. And as far as the actions that we took with our factories, they were still the appropriate things to take. And as we said on the last call, if things continue to move well, we'll look at bringing back one of those factories in early 2020.
Christopher Caso:
Okay. And I guess with some of the strength that you're seeing now, perhaps you could talk about some of the factory utilization you're seeing now. I know you're taking some utilization charges on some of those facilities now. And perhaps you could walk us through that and the impact on gross margins as we go through the year.
Mark Murphy:
Chris, this is Mark. Yes, we're still not where we want to be, and the utilization is still weighing on us in fiscal '20. It's part of the reason that we're guiding to 48% for the year. But the outlook is improving. As you mentioned, we had a sharp downturn in the December quarter, and those actions that we took there, I think, are still relevant and underway. So the closure of Florida is still proceeding. Farmers Branch, we've slowed down spend there, and we've also dramatically decreased our CapEx spend. And I'll note that in the fourth quarter, that CapEx spend was the lowest percent of spend we've seen in several years, if not in the life of the company. And then I'd say furthermore and maybe more importantly, and you saw this in the margin in the March quarter, you're seeing productivity at the fabs pay off. We're getting shorter cycle times, fabs are more flexible. We're adjusting to demand better, so we're getting a lot more disciplined around our asset base, being very careful and deliberate about expanding that asset base and more aggressive in using it. So we think that with this discipline and then the growth that we're going to see, the actions we've taken run their course through fiscal '20, we're going to come out in fiscal year '21 with, we believe, continued margin expansion in part because of better utilization.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh Kumar:
First of all, congratulations on a very, very strong guide. I have a couple, but I'll limited it to two and then get back line. So Mark, when you look at the gross margin, you talked about this a little bit, do you see a pretty steady ramp to 48%? And I want to clarify, is it exiting the year at 48% fiscal 2020 or is it full year fiscal 2020? And how do you see the ramp happening from where you're guiding to in June up to the guide either for the full year or exiting the year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. It's good question, Harsh. I'm glad you've asked to clarify because the 48% is a full year number. So just to answer your question specifically, we're starting the year at just 45% to 45.5%. We said we'd be below 46% in the June quarter, and that's where we believe we'll be. The full year is 48%. The second quarter will be between 45% and that 48% average for the year. We're not going to call the quarter right now, but it'll be between those numbers. While I'm talking about the year, just to reiterate some of the guidance I gave in my comments, we believe we're going to be up about 4% on revenue year-over-year. And Bob alluded to this, but the first and second halves are actually about balanced revenue, which is a bit unusual. And then I gave comments on OpEx, how we're going to be in control through the year.
Harsh Kumar:
Awesome. And then my second question, maybe for Eric, Bob or Mark, you. So June quarter up huge. This is very unusual. Typical seasonality would not indicate that. I know history is out the door on this business this year. But maybe you can help us -- you made the statement all 3 top customers will be up in June. Are they just ramping earlier? The guys are all ramping earlier? Or is it something else that's going on that hasn't happened before?
Mark Murphy:
Just maybe just real quickly, I'd be clear, Harsh. That's a Top 3 customers year-over-year comment rather than a sequential one. But go ahead, Eric.
Steven Creviston:
Yes, sure, Harsh. This is Eric. I'll give some color on that. Similar to the trend we saw in March, as we are exiting March, we're beginning to see the acceleration. We're currently at least forecasting a full quarter of it this quarter based on customer forecast. A lot of high-end handsets ramping and a lot of content transition towards integrated solutions. Phase 6, in particular, of course, is helping drive you throughout the large Chinese players as well as at Huawei. We talked about the shared transition back our way with our largest Korean customer. And it's across a lot of different products
Operator:
Our next question will come from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Bob, you mentioned the RF TAM opportunity for 5G in 2020 was about $1 billion, and if I remember at your -- the Analyst Day, you're projecting about $17 billion total. So I just want to recheck my math, if you're talking about a 5% to 7% increase on 5G. James, did you experience any shortage in GaN this quarter that could have -- for raw materials that could have increased your shipments a bit because [indiscernible] is reporting they couldn't ship all that they had demand for? And then Eric, you mentioned Phase 6 is ramping. That was out last year in a number of phones, but they didn't sell that well. Has that changed? Or are you just seeing more Phase 6 in more phones this coming quarters or anticipating better revenue?
Robert Bruggeworth:
And as far as going back to Analyst Day, we're sticking with $1 billion. We still think it's pulling in since our Analyst Day, the ramp of 5G phones. I will remind you that I think handset volumes from our last Analyst Day are a little bit lower, so the RF TAM is a little bit lower as well. And Apple clearly didn't have the kind of year for that base for this year we were expecting. But we're sticking with $1 billion because we're seeing it pull in since our Analyst Day. And James, if you want to talk about GaN and the ramping that we're doing there.
James Klein:
Yes. First of all, for 5G on the infrastructure side, that also represents probably a $600 million or $700 million opportunity for us during year as well. As far as GaN shortages, we definitely are struggling a bit to keep up, so we've got strong orders across all of the frequency bands that are ramping now and doing our best to stay caught up, but definitely a little bit behind.
Steven Creviston:
And regarding Phase 6 traction, it's a bit of a mixed bag there. It's all up, but there's varying degrees of it. I think with Huawei in particular, we've seen a strong transition there in their top -- maiden P series phones. With the rest of China, it's pretty much on track with what we had thought. It's definitely well behind. We're in the early innings there, but we're also adding a lot of other content with ultrahigh-band as an example in other placements of envelope -- excuse me, antenna tuners and with the antennaplexers that we've mentioned as well. So there's just a lot of opportunities right now.
Edward Snyder:
Great. And then for my second question, sorry, Eric, your antennaplexers, we've -- Broadcom has talked about antennaplexers a year or so ago. We're starting to see them now. I know you refer to 5G, but this is bigger than just 5G, right? I mean 4G advanced, all the stuff going on with WiFi, the new GPS band. In and of itself, we should start seeing antennaplexers proliferate through most of these phone lines, even if we don't see a lot of 5G. Or do you still see 5G as a big driver for that? And do you see others besides you and Broadcom shipping these parts?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. You're absolutely right. It's really built on a base today. It's expected that fundamental trend of just more frequency bands coming into the phone and no room to put anymore antennas. And you're right, those aren't all cellular bands. It could be WiFi and new GPS bands and so forth. So it's that fundamental trend, which actually has been going on for a couple years. But as you add 5G, not only is there even more bands to consider, but also the power linearity and the requirements for loss are even higher. So there's a lot of value in those as well. So no, it's a trend that's been going on, and we only see it increasing from here.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Shawn Harrison with Longbow Research.
Shawn Harrison:
My congrats on the results as well. Two questions. First off, just back of the envelope math suggests at least I think in the full year guidance is kind of a flattish outlook for mobile, which maybe it's a bit cautious or you're assuming unit volume is down or anything that you could provide some commentary there considering what seems to be pretty big backlog of new products ramping here in the fiscal year.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sean, thanks for your question, and we are taking conservative view. I kind of commented that earlier for the mobile market. We still things smartphones are going to decline this year. As Eric commented, we're in a lot of exciting phones. It's early on in there. We'll see how the market acceptance goes. And for right now, we just want to make sure that we have a conservative view in the second half.
Shawn Harrison:
Okay. And then as a follow-up, just WiFi -- the AX kind of ramp, how do you see that here in fiscal '20 knowing it was delayed for a couple quarters?
James Klein:
Yes. I think it's accurate. It has been delayed a bit, and -- but things are starting to solidify there. I think we've received our first design wins in AX, and we do believe those products will start to ramp as we go through the rest of the year. And we also had a nice design win that we talked about in Bob's prepared remarks and in the press release today. We think that will also drive some nice growth as we go through the year in WiFi.
Steven Creviston:
And mobile for WiFi 6, we'll track a couple of quarters behind IDP, of course, as we'll get infrastructure out there first maybe, but we're also looking at revenues in the first half of calendar '20.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Rajvindra Gill with Needham & Company.
Rajvindra Gill:
Congrats as well. Just a question on IoT. You had mentioned a meshed networking design win. I was wondering if you could describe kind of your view on IoT and your product portfolio with respect to Bluetooth, low energy, WiFi and mesh and how you're kind of positioned in that market.
James Klein:
Well, first of all, let me talk a little bit about how we've done. So our IoT revenue was slightly up for the year. That was based on some of our automotive wins and also our position in low-power wireless. WiFi itself remains a little bit weak as the standard [indiscernible] as we just talked about previously, but the fundamentals are still very strong. In the overall IoT market, I think it's still maturing. Several different standards are competing for leadership. WiFi, ZigBee, Thread, BLE, NB IoT are really the largest contenders. I think we're positioned very strongly across those standards, and in fact, in a lot of cases, we're standard diagnostic because we have SoCs that can actually support different solutions simultaneously in their ecosystems. We're also moving into several other verticals with our technology like lighting, electronic shelf labeling and wearables. And so again, we see IoT as a significant growth driver for the company as we move forward.
Rajvindra Gill:
And for my follow-up question, on the long-term gross margin target of 50%, which you hope to achieve through cost reductions, mix improvements, factory productivity, as we kind of move into fiscal year '21, how do we think about that target now that you've -- would have been completed -- would have completed most of the fab transitions at Farmers Branch and Florida, et cetera? I'm wondering how you're thinking about the long-term target as well as now that we're seeing IDP, which is about 35% of sales, which I think is a record in terms of percentage of sales. Just any color there would be helpful.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. This is Mark. We're not going to guide fiscal year '21. But on your question, certainly, our target is still the clear 50%, and we very much believe we can do it. As you pointed out that we're focused on the right products and segments. And as you point out, there's a record mix of IDP in the business this quarter at 35%. Eric's focus on the most highly integrated products in mobile and BAW-related revenue is yielding a better outlook and better results. And then we're doing a lot of work on the fab side with -- [indiscernible] is showing this from Texas Instruments, and we have -- and there is a lot of stuff in-flight in operations that we're going to benefit from. We're benefiting from it now. You can see some of that actually in the large beat to the guide on the gross margin, but we think that's going to be additional help to have us clear that target.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
William Peterson:
Good job on the quarterly execution and outlook. My first question is on, I guess, Huawei specifically. Just wondering if you have any visibility on any potential for double ordering. We've seen other people in the supply chain speak to that either in 5G infrastructure or in smartphones. If you can speak how you see the channel specifically with that customer.
Steven Creviston:
Sure, Bill. This is Eric. I don't think there's really any risk of double ordering. In terms of maybe front-loading their plan a bit, that of course can happen, especially when they're picking up share in the market. There's no question about that, I think. And so it's hard to be clear about how much of it is due to one thing or another. We know that underlying all of this, they are seeing increasing in share not just in their domestic market, but also in exports, I think, going really for them. And in terms of our own business, we are clearly seeing a shift towards the higher end of our portfolio as well, which is adding dollar content in envelope tracking as well as in integrated PADs both for low and high band.
James Klein:
And I think on the infrastructure side, our deliveries appear to be generally matching the reported numbers of base station deployments. In fact, we're seeing strong strength across numerous of our base station customers. We've almost doubled our business in 3 of the top 4 OEMs year-over-year this quarter. The strength for us has really been associated with content gains, associated with massive MIMO and with our ability now to win the power amplifier slots because of GaN.
William Peterson:
Okay. The next question is related to 5G, and this is a two part question. It's nice to see you're actually speaking of orders in 5G already for calendar '19. So hoping you can quantify and just kind of give a feel for what the magnitude of that order. And I assume it's along the lines of these BAW filter base and so forth. You mentioned the ETP. If you can clarify what are you winning this year. Secondarily, in a competitive environment, obviously, Qualcomm has been out there making a lot of noise about attach. But I have the impression that a lot of the customers really want to work with you. And if so, what are they really searching for in terms of the performance or criteria, whether it be with the base components, power amplifiers, switchers, filters, so forth? What is your key competitive advantages?
James Klein:
Bill, this is James. Let me jump in real quick on the infrastructure before Eric goes to the handset. So for 5G, we'll see our base station business effectively double, and that is largely driven today by 5G deployments. Most of that is massive MIMO today and including GaN-based devices. And we'll also see our GaN revenue double as well as we go through the year, and we expect most of that is going to come from base station, although we've had some really key wins on the defense side as well.
Steven Creviston:
On the handset side, we did identify some early wins with some highly integrated PADs for 5G. We also have been getting orders already for more discrete sort of PAs in the ultrahigh-band space as well and some design wins there for the second half year. Definitely quarter-over-quarter, we've seen an increase in -- enthusiasm of our customers for launching products this calendar year with 5G on the label. We're still assuming it will be relatively minor in terms of volume, and the real big ramp will come next year. But antennaplexers, discrete PAs, filters and high-band PADs are all being designed now with 5G capability for the second half of the year. On your other question regarding Qualcomm, yes, there is, of course, a competitive nature to it there. We're quite comfortable with our attach across all of the RF front-end content. We sell a lot of products that they attach of Qualcomm. Everything is completely compatible, and customers are enthusiastic about using the best-performing solutions they can. That usually drives them towards the leading RF suppliers. The one area where there's clearly an overlap is in envelope tracking, especially if you look to 5G. This is a very critical point actually in the architecture. We announced, in fact, a stand-alone, kind of normal configuration for an envelope tracking power management chip, which allows you to then reuse normal architectures across all the RFFE. This is in contrast to Qorvo's -- or to Qualcomm's approach in which they are distributing the ET throughout the RF front end. So we think this is a very important market and area for our customers to be looking into closely, maintaining a competitive RF front end, and it's, of course, very important to the performance of the handsets. So we're very proud of the accomplishments of the team of getting this 100 megahertz capability proven and proving that you can actually have the RF front-end components a couple centimeters away from the power management and still get that kind of performance. In fact, there's a very detailed white paper on our website if you like to follow up on that more.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri:
Mark, I just wanted to confirm the loading commentary you said is pretty evenly loaded first half and back half. So that would sort of imply that the second fiscal quarter like it's up mid-single-digits Q-on-Q, which normally it's up like mid-20s. So I just want to make sure I know that you don't want to guide that far out, but just given that loading commentary, I just kind of want to make sure, is that right?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. That's actually correct.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. Great. And then can you talk about how much China, and you've given these numbers in the past, which is why I asked. But how much was China as a percentage of mobile products in March? And what do you think it will be in June?
Mark Murphy:
Tim, I don't want to get into the habit of providing all the detail. It's been significant percentage in March, and it's -- and China is actually increasing sequentially in June while Samsung is going down at going down just as part of normal seasonality. So hopefully, that provided you some color.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
I was hoping you could talk a little bit more about Active-Semi, a rough breakdown by some of the key end markets, how fast the company has grown over the past couple of years, how you think about growth going forward. And from a margin perspective, I think you guys talked about the business being accretive to overall Qorvo, but is there any potential for additional synergies as you integrate Active-Semi? And then I have a follow-up.
James Klein:
This is James. Let me talk a little bit about the business and then Mark maybe will handle some of the financial questions. We're excited about the opportunity that it brings to Qorvo. The acquisition addresses critical need for more efficient power usage in electronics. We believe our scale, Qorvo's scale, can expand Active's current business to fully address the $3 billion SAM that represents them today. We also believe that we can bring Active's technology to bear on our existing markets like base station, defense, automotive and IoT, which will further expand our SAM as we develop products in those areas. Integration is underway as we speak. We think it's going to be rather straightforward. It's a great cultural fit, and there's really minimal overlap in our portfolio. So I think from a revenue perspective, we expect, again, to be able to outpace the growth of our underlying markets, and they've been able to demonstrate that over the past 3 years if you look at their average CAGR. As far as synergies, again, minimal overlap, so we plan in relatively minimal synergies. Mark guided what the revenue would be in his prepared remarks.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So Toshi, yes, we guided 50 for the year. We believe it will beat that. If it delivers what we believe, we -- it's going to be accretive to the company gross margin. We paid cash for it, but for dilution purposes, assumed debt. And it would be slightly dilutive in June and then slightly accretive de minimis amount for the full year.
Toshiya Hari:
And just as a follow-up to that, so is it fair to say the growth profile of Active-Semi is similar to that of the classic IDP business?
James Klein:
Yes. Similar, but a bit better. And you asked about product categories, and they're really into two different areas. One is PMICs or power management ICs, and the other is in PACs or power application controllers. And both capabilities seem to offer significant advantages to their customers. The programmability has really helped them with time-to-market and also helped their customers with time-to-market, and that seems to have been a very nice discriminator in the areas that they're performing today.
Operator:
Our next question will come from Karl Ackerman with Cowen and Company.
Karl Ackerman:
Two quick clarification questions, if I may. Just going back to 5G infrastructure, you referenced some wins for massive MIMO. While that is ramping now, how do you see the dollar opportunity expand as macro shifts -- macro cell shift from LTE to 5G? I think you just mentioned $600 million to $700 million for fiscal 2020. Is that back-end loaded this year? And how do we see that ramping in your fiscal 2021?
James Klein:
Yes. So $600 million to $700 million opportunity for us as we go through this fiscal year. About $1 billion opportunity as we go into next fiscal year. And the ramp is an ongoing endeavor. As I talked about, we expect our base station business to be about double this year. And based on the TAM and our ability to win in the markets, we would expect it to go up about another for 50% as we go into next year, and we're not guiding that, but just our ability to win and what we see going on in the TAM. Now that's based on the transition from macro to massive MIMO and the significant content increases in RF as you make that transition. We talked about before an 8 to 12x RF content increase as you go from a macro base station to a massive MIMO base station. And adoption rates, somewhere in that 30% to 50% range of our base stations will have MIMO capability.
Karl Ackerman:
Very helpful. If I may go back to just mobile. How would you characterize your inventory across China handset OEMs? Because there seems to have been a near-term buildup of inventory in Q1, but I'm curious if your outlook implies a further component buildup or rather a drawdown from China handset OEMs. And if this demand is not ephemeral, why are you not restarting BAW filter production at your Farmers Branch fab?
Steven Creviston:
I'll take that question on inventory to start with. I'm glad you asked actually the channel inventory that we have. Our component inventory in the channel is at historic lows actually. That's one of the things over last year that we've been working really hard on is building systems and so forth that allow us to run at a very, very lean inventory in the channel. That's one of the reasons when we begin to see a turnaround like this, we see it immediately, and we absolutely are dedicated to maintaining that same discipline throughout this ramp, maintain incredibly low component inventory in that channel. Regarding Farmers Branch restarting, as we, I think, mentioned last quarter probably, we did a lot of work on transitioning from 6-inch to 8-inch wafers to get more productivity out of the Richardson fab. We're doing things with die size reductions. We're doing everything we can to meet increased demand with just a little bit of additional capital exposure as needed.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
A question on wireless and understanding your expectation is cautious into the back half just because of the market. For Qorvo specific, can you talk to just your dollar content kind of like-for-like in the back half of the year year-over-year and how you're feeling about that visibility.
Robert Bruggeworth:
I'll take it, Eric. So Craig, we're feeling really good about the work that we've done to expand the dollar content in the phones that are launching out. We've got pretty good design wins in the second half that we believe we can continue to grow our content. My comments were we're taking a very cautious view of the second half of the year. In our quarterly call last quarter, we talked about mobile roughly staying flat for the year and IDP growing double digits. We're kind of sticking with that. We've seen some of these guys start off a little bit strong in the beginning of the year and kind of wining over the back half of the year. But there's no doubt in our mind that the dollar content in phones is increasing year-over-year. The RF TAM per phone is growing. We also commented on 5G coming in a little bit faster. I commented that, that's $1 billion in 2020, and we're going to start to see some of that later in the year. Where we're being cautious is not in our content, it's in units.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. Appreciate your clarifying. And just as a follow-up in IDP, could you help maybe just frame the wireless infrastructure, not just 5G with this tremendous growth happening, but just overall a rough range of what exposure you have to wireless infrastructure in aggregate today?
James Klein:
I mean we are, I guess, broadly exposed to the market, whether it be macro or MIMO and pretty much any of the frequency ranges that are being deployed today, and whether that be a 4G continuing to add capacity or a 5G base station. A very, very broad portfolio of products, including all the receipt side elements in the RF chain, plus now our ability to produce the power amplifiers with advanced technology. So again, I would say very, very broad-based. We are seeing the macro side of the business relatively flat and significant growth in the -- in MIMO deployments.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
I had two as well. Bob, I just wanted to go back to this full year outlook. And I think you kind of justify the conservative on the unit side, but you did mention that you expect content to grow for you. Is that -- at every flagship customer? Is that at some flagship customers? And if there are any content shifts, what do you think is causing that? Is that technology? Is it pricing? Is it something else?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Vivek, I appreciate the question. I've tried, that's why I was very cautious in my comments to not talk about future architectures other than generically the RF TAM. And I think that, that expansion continues. I think you've been around the RF industry long enough to know nobody wins every socket every time, and that goes for us and all our competitors. Sometimes it's performance, sometimes it's delivery, sometimes it's share balancing. Rarely is it price because these guys mainly buy in the high and on performance. So all of that applies to my comments.
Vivek Arya:
Understand. And Bob, as we look forward to the 5G era, I think you mentioned about $1 billion opportunity at some time. What is the incremental content from 4G to 5G? Because when I go back to some of the very good presentations you guys have made before, it's about 5 to 7 incremental dollars as you go from 4G to 5G. So when you talk about that $1 billion, are you talking about the incremental? Or are you saying that it's $1 billion over the entire RF content in the phone, which could be over $30? So what does that $1 billion refer to? Is it incremental or is it the absolute RF content in 5G devices?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Vivek, this is Eric. As we talked about in our Analyst Day last year, we're attributing $1 billion of TAM increase in calendar '20 to 5G. And as we commented, that includes the uplift in 4G content to be compatible with 5G. So when you drop a 5G band into a phone as an example, the 4G has to be able to accommodate that, of course in the case there's filtering requirements, there's [indiscernible] and a lot of other parameters. So that's not specific 5G-only devices, but in order to build a 5G phone, that's the entire added content for the 4G LTE advanced pro upgrades to be compatible with 5G.
Operator:
Our last question will come from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh Kumar:
Mark, can I ask you, as you look at your gross margin profile, do you think as it builds towards the 48% for the full year, do you think you might be able to exit very close to 50% or possibly even slightly over that? Or is that kind of out of the pocket at this time?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. We're not guiding quarters, Harsh. If -- based on what I gave, we're starting at 45% to 45.5%. We have a full year of 48%. I said that the second quarter will be between those two. You do the math. You're in the high 40s in the back half. So this is very early in the year. We're coming off a very challenging 6 months, so I hesitate to give any more than we're just working hard in a number of ways to expand gross margin.
Operator:
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on tonight's call. We hope to see you at our upcoming investor presentations, and we look forward to speaking with you on our fiscal '20 first quarter call. Thank you, and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's teleconference, and you may now disconnect. Please enjoy the rest of your day.
Operator:
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Q3 2019 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, and hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2019 third quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website qorvo.com under Investors. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome everyone. Qorvo delivered a strong December quarter, with record EPS of $1.85, and record free cash flow of $261 million. Total revenue for the quarter was $832 million, above our updated guidance, and gross margin was in line at 49.5%. Our performance last quarter is especially noteworthy given that the smartphone market weakened considerably after we entered the quarter. Today, the outlook for smartphones is being affected by a range of factors, including trade tensions, and other macroeconomic headwinds, longer replacement cycles, and what may be a pause in demand ahead of 5G smartphone launches. Despite these factors, we believe our inventory in the channel is healthy, the adoption of BAW-based architectures across all leading OEMs continues and we're excited about our many market drivers. Investments in 5G are accelerating, the roll out of WiFi 6 is coming soon and IoT continues to proliferate. The robust demand we're enjoying for infrastructure solutions supports the outlook that 5G capabilities are coming sooner than our industry had originally expected. In China, carriers have been allocated spectrum for countrywide 5G networks using multiple frequencies, while in the US carriers are launching 5G services in select markets, with plans to go nationwide in 2020, using both sub-6 gigahertz and millimeter wave frequency. Early use cases in millimeter wave will include applications like point to multi-point broadband. In dense areas like cities, airports, sports stadiums, where bandwidth is typically constrained, users will be offloaded from LTE networks onto millimeter wave networks for a better experience at a much cheaper cost per bit for carriers. More broadly, 5G consumers will benefit from its ultra-low latency, which enables new applications like augmented reality, and mobile gaming that aren't viable on today's LTE networks. Next 802.11ax, also known as WiFi 6, will deliver speeds up to four times faster than its predecessor. WiFi 6 will leverage higher performance RF to integrate both 2.4 gigahertz and 5 gigahertz into one network, supporting more users simultaneously without interference. Similar to 5G, WiFi 6 will enable new use cases and deliver significantly improved coverage in high-density areas. Lastly, IoT is helping companies, individuals, and things make better decisions more quickly and RF productivity will always be central to IoT. We expect IoT applications to evolve to open standards, many with more than 1 radio. Similar to what we have in phones today, we'll have Bluetooth or Bluetooth Low Energy for short range, WiFi, Zigbee or Thread for local area and cellular connectivity for wide area networks. Qorvo is well positioned in each with products ranging from front-end to system level solutions with integrated firmware and multi-protocol support. Turning to the December quarter, in addition to our strong financial performance, which Mark will discuss in more detail, we're hitting our stride operationally. We leveraged our culture of lean and clean ramp initiatives to support multiple high volume ramps, while continuing to receive industry-leading marks for our customers on quality. In IDP, we posted strong growth in 5G infrastructure, supported by massive MIMO deployments. In mobile, we extended the commercial adoption of our BAW-based solutions to include additional marquee smartphone customers. Design activity was robust, supporting diverse markets, products and customers. In infrastructure, we enjoyed significant demand for our massive MIMO solutions from multiple OEMs. Qorvo offers base station OEMs a unique combination of GaN technology and decades of experience in phased arrays for defense, which is translating into significant massive MIMO business. The economics of this business are compelling, as a typical MIMO implementation has four times more channels, eight times to 12 times more RF content than a typical macro base station. There is approximately $1,200 of RF content in each of these base stations. In mobile, Qorvo continue to expand our customer reach of our BAW-based products across leading OEMs. We've been selected by a leading Korea-based smartphone manufacturer to support an upcoming marquee smartphone with a highly integrated mid-high band solution that features Qorvo's BAW-based multiplexer technology. We are also supplying the mid-high band PAD to Huawei for the Mate 20, and we anticipate increasing our content with this customer in their upcoming marquee smartphone launch. Our BAW-based wins are complemented by other high-value Qorvo components, including our industry-leading envelope trackers and antenna control solutions. On the design front, we're supporting robust 5G design activity at many mobile customers, primarily for ultra-high band, sub-6 gigahertz applications. We expect 5G smartphones to launch this year with rapid growth expected in calendar 2020. We're also continuing to see interest in our millimeter wave solutions for handsets, and we expect phones to be available as early as 2020. Whether the devices are fixed, nomadic or mobile, our deep experience in millimeter wave in the defense and infrastructure markets positions Qorvo to play a key role in delivering these solutions into the commercial markets. In IoT, we've expanded into new markets, including electronic shelf labeling. This next generation retail IoT solution replaces conventional price tags with LCD or E Ink displays to enable dynamic pricing and inventory control. A typical grocery store will have tens of thousands of these placements, this is just one example of how IoT is transforming industries. Also, during the quarter, NETGEAR selected us to supply both the 2.4 gigahertz and 5 gigahertz WiFi FEMs for their popular Orbi Voice distributed WiFi systems. We're expanding our footprint in the connected home by helping to deliver broader coverage and higher data rates to consumers. Over time, we see WiFi nodes proliferating in smart home from 10 today to more than a 100, and we envision multi-protocol pods in every room incorporating multiple low power radios. In automotive, we're broadly engaged with OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, and we've expanded our product offering to address multiple protocols, including satellite, WiFi, LTE, 5G and V2X. As increasingly complex coexistence requirements evolve in automotive applications, we see new opportunities for our BAW filters. In cellular IoT, we've commenced commercial shipments of LTE CAT M and narrowband IoT modules in collaboration with Nordic Semiconductor. These highly integrated systems are set to advance the growth of cellular IoT, and expanding markets like asset management, industrial automation and smart cities. In defense, Qorvo's secured a four-year contract with the US Air Force to develop new modeling and a simulation tool to accelerate advanced GaN designs for mission critical applications. Qorvo's GaN technology delivers high output power and efficiency, including at millimeter wave frequencies, making it the technology-of-choice for radar, electronic warfare and communication systems for defense applications. We also secured a multi-year production contracts supporting a large defense aerospace program and we're shipping production volumes of high frequency BAW filters. Despite the near term headwinds in mobile, I'm pleased with our operational performance and excited about our position in the markets we serve, including 5G, WiFi, IoT and defense. We believe our best-in-class technologies and operational excellence position us exceptionally well to deliver long-term growth and profitability. And with that I hand the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the third quarter was $832 million, $12 million above the mid-point of our November guidance. Mobile products revenue was $602 million, down 6% year-over-year due to weaker flagship phone volumes and a softer China domestic market. Infrastructure and defense products revenue was a record $230 million the 11th consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year growth. IDP is experiencing especially strong growth in infrastructure as carriers pick up the pace of their 5G investments. Non-GAAP gross margin in the December quarter was 49.5%, consistent with our November guidance. We've seen strong margin expansion so far this year -- fiscal year, driven by mix improvements in factory productivity, although lower mobile volumes will cause us to fall short of our original target for the second half of fiscal '19. Operating expenses decreased to a fiscal year low of $151 million in the December quarter on tighter spend control and lower employee-related costs, including incentive compensation. Non-GAAP net income in the December quarter was $234 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $1.85, or $0.15 above the mid-point of our guidance. Operationally, we're performing as well as we ever have and these results demonstrate that our focus on portfolio management and operating discipline are yielding stronger earnings and free cash flow. December quarter free cash flow from operations was $333 million and CapEx was $72 million, yielding record free cash flow of $261 million. We repurchased the $152 million of stock in the third quarter and ended the quarter with $650 million of cash. During the quarter, we initiated actions to improve our manufacturing cost structure in light of multiple factors affecting our near-term outlook for mobile products volumes. First, due to market and fab specific factors, we commenced a phased closure of our Apopka, Florida SAW fab and a transfer of production to our Greensboro, North Carolina fab. We expect these fabs to be completed by calendar year-end. We will continue to incur ongoing period costs at our Florida operation between $6 million to $8 million per quarter, which will be recognized in our non-GAAP cost of goods as we complete end-of-life product builds and other final production activities. By closing our Florida fab, we expect to gain production efficiencies for both SAW and GaAs devices from increased loadings at our North Carolina fab. As we stated before, our proven SAW technology is an important capability for Qorvo going forward. Especially for some of our most complex solutions utilizing both SAW and BAW filters. Our Florida engineering teams engaged in advance filter design and product and process technology development will not be directly affected by the fab closure. In fact, we are increasing investments in support of development activities by our engineering teams in Florida. Second, we have decided to idle our Farmers Branch, Texas facility, rather than move it from start-up to production. We will consolidate BAW resources and production in the near term at our Richardson, Texas facility, while preserving a flexibility to scale production in Farmers Branch to meet expected future growth. Ongoing period costs from the idled Farmers Branch fab will be approximately $5 million in the March quarter, and drop to approximately $3 million per quarter until the fab starts production. These expenses will be recognized as part of our non-GAAP results. We currently expect the Farmers Branch fab will start production in early calendar '20. Given the proximity of the Farmers Branch fab to our Richardson fab and the favorable start up yields we achieved in Farmers Branch, we believe Farmers Branch will play a critical future role by allowing us to scale our BAW production efficiently in response to demand. As a result of actions initiated in the third quarter, we recorded and excluded from our non-GAAP results $18 million related to Florida fab asset impairment charges and accelerated depreciation from changes in the estimated useful lives of certain assets. Over the next fourth quarters, we expect to record approximately $100 million of additional charges related to accelerated depreciation of Florida production assets, as well as employee termination and other exit costs related to Florida, Texas and other locations impacted by our restructuring actions. These restructuring costs will be excluded from our non-GAAP results and I refer you to our 10-Q filed today for additional details. Steps to right size our manufacturing footprint, along with targeted reductions in operating expenses and redirecting certain R&D resources, are together designed to allow us to pursue growth opportunities for IDP, sharpen our focus in mobile products on the highest value, most complex opportunities, and achieve earnings and free cash flow growth in fiscal '20. Turning to this quarter's outlook, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $660 million and $680 million, gross margin of approximately 47%, and diluted EPS of $1.05 at the mid-point of our guidance. We expect Mobile Products revenues in the March quarter will be down approximately 25% sequentially, with worse than normal seasonal declines being partially offset by content gains with the leading Korea-based smartphone manufacture. For China, while volumes are muted, we believe our inventory in the channel is healthy. We project IDP to be roughly flat sequentially on continued strength in 5G infrastructure market demand. Our March quarter gross margin guide reflects lower revenue, the effects of lower utilization, including the impact of Farmers Branch and Florida period costs, and less favorable product mix, partially offset by improved segment mix. Operating expenses are forecast to increase in the March quarter to approximately $160 million due to seasonal payroll effects and increased investment to support IDP growth. We expect our March quarter non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 8.6%. We expect operating cash flow to remain strong in the fourth quarter, helped by working capital management. CapEx is expected to decrease in the March quarter as we focus expenditures on IDP growth opportunities and priority mobile development programs. CapEx is currently projected to end the fiscal year at approximately $240 million and we expect free cash flow to exceed $600 million in fiscal '19. Despite substantial headwinds from a weaker than expected mobile market and ongoing macroeconomic instability, Qorvo delivered its best quarter ever on earnings and free cash flow, and IDP's outlook remains strong. We've taken decisive actions to address these conditions and we're continuing to invest to support growth in IDP's markets and do advance high value programs in mobile. Operationally, we're performing as well as we ever have, and with our technologies, we are uniquely positioned to take advantage of growth drivers in multiple markets, including the acceleration of 5G infrastructure investments, the adoption of BAW-based architectures by all leading OEMs, and the proliferation of new applications for the Internet of Things. Ultimately, we expect the emergence of 5G will drive smartphone volume and RF content increases. In summary, we achieved record results in the December quarter. We believe our position in broader connectivity markets remains compelling for future growth and we expect another year of record earnings and free cash flow in fiscal '20. With that, I will turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] At this time, we'll take our first question from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso:
Yes. Thank you. Good evening. I guess the first question is about some of the manufacturing changes and the impairments that you talked about, I guess first question of that is what's the cash impact of those restructurings as we go through the fiscal year and I assume that's included in your free cash flow target? And then from there, what sort of margin offsets are you expecting from that? Maybe you could walk through the pluses and minuses from a gross margin standpoint of those actions?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Chris. I'll let Mark address that.
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So, good question, Chris. The majority of the costs that I laid out on the charges, the GAAP charges are non-cash items, principally accelerated depreciation associated with the decisions on those assets, principally in Florida. So the vast majority are non-cash. Now, some of the charges laid out, which you'll see in the Q around terminations, those will be cash. But again, the preponderance are non-cash, and yes, reflected in our free cash flow guide. On a go-forward basis, I've tried to lay it out pretty clearly between the ongoing period costs in Florida, which will continue through December, and you should have experienced modeling those because those have been basically headwinds for us over the past year, but those will continue through December, and then, we'll have the added costs of Farmers Branch of $5 million this March quarter and then, decreasing to $3 million per quarter until that fab is started up. Right now, I believe it will be early '20, but for the rest of -- for fiscal year '20 modeling you should assume $3 million per quarter on Farmers Branch. And then, of course, for fiscal '20 through December, should assume the $6 million to $8 million for Florida.
Chris Caso:
All right. Okay. And just as a follow-up to that, perhaps you could take us through the thinking that caused you to take these actions? I know you don't take them lightly. How much of it is just the realization that -- how much of it is a reaction to the current market conditions and how much of it perhaps is looking forward that perhaps the state of the market before 5G actually hit?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Chris. Bob. Number one, we've been talking for some time now about our SAW capacity in Florida. We've talked about the charges that Mark had previously went through with you, how much it was costing us a quarter, and given some great work that the team has done in being able to bring up some of that in-house in Greensboro and consolidate some things, I think, it really is just a function of a lot of good work being done by the team, and being able to consolidate the operation and close the facility. We will be end of lifing a few of those products there that have been lingering on, but it's the right thing to put us in the right manufacturing footprint. On Farmers Branch, the team has done an excellent job there in bringing up the capacity. We're real pleased with the yields. I also think given the team and what they are now looking at from a market realities that I went through with the handset volumes in the smartphone and what's going on with replacement cycles, the overall demand in smartphones, it just made sense for us given looking at the programs that we've got laid out that we believe we're going to support between now and 2020 as Mark pointed out. It was the right thing to just delay bringing that factory up, it's still well within our plans to bring it up as Mark outlined.
Operator:
We'll go next to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Thanks for taking my question. Maybe just from a high level, I mean, obviously, smartphones are weak, but just any color, it's a pretty sharp drop in the March. So if you can give us any color? I'm assuming it's mostly China, but if you can walk us through. And then in terms of the offset, is there any way to think about, is that shared socket, I mean, and just trying to gauge how much of an offset that was for you? Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. Thanks Blayne. At a real high level, we are seeing our largest customer down, China down again this quarter, it was down last quarter, as we commented, we're taking a measured look at that. So it's playing out kind of as we've expected, but for this quarter it's going to be down more than we expected and that's being offset by -- we're seeing tremendous growth in Huawei as we've gained back share and have been talking about that for about three quarters, along with we're really starting to see the growth come back at Samsung that we've also talked about. So those things are actually offsetting a pretty steep decline, as you pointed out, in a couple of other places.
Blayne Curtis:
Thanks. I mean just curious, within IDP if you can think about how big 5G is today for you over the last couple of quarters? I mean you've been saying nice double-digit growth, just kind of understand what stage you are in terms of 5G, as some have seen some pretty big impacts early on, just kind of curious how much of this has been for you?
Bob Bruggeworth:
James, you want to take that?
James Klein:
Yeah. Great question. And before I answer, I'd like to take the opportunity to recognize the IDP team and the functions that support the business. We had a great quarter, record revenue, record profit and it wouldn't have happened without the great team that we've built supporting the business. So I just want to say thanks to the team. We're really excited about 5G and what the opportunities are it's bringing to the business. We see product ramps at several of our customers and the ramps are including these new technologies we've been talking about of massive MIMO antennas and GaN power amplifiers. As Bob stated, the content gains for us are significant, approximately $12,000 RF content in the each of the base stations with MIMO. On GaN, we're also ramping several customers to support these deployments. We have products in volume production that support 2.6, 3.5 and 4.9 gigahertz. In total, 5G represents a $1 billion opportunity for us. Today, It's a $600 million or $700 million market in 2019 and that will accelerate to about $1 billion opportunity for us in 2020.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh Kumar:
Yeah. Hey, guys. Thanks for letting me ask a question. Bob, can I ask you all puts and takes done between your large customer in China, is it fair for us to think that there is a chance you could grow in 2Q or is it too early to make that assessment, yet? 2Q meaning calendar 2Q.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Harsh, I appreciate you asking the difficult questions so early in the call, it is a little difficult for us to call that. I think we are being realistic in what we think is going to happen in the March quarter and it is a little too soon to call, but I do expect China to start to come back some. As Mark commented and I did as well, our inventory channels are pretty healthy. So I think as they continue to release some new phones, and again that's ex-Huawei just to be clear, and our largest customer, we'll let them decide what they're going to do.
Harsh Kumar:
That's fair. I appreciate any color you guys can give us on that. And then in the current quarter, in the March quarter, on a percentage basis, if you would have tried and compare and contrast China versus your large customer, one was a bigger factor relative to your thinking than the other, or did it just -- did they both go down quite a bit?
Bob Bruggeworth:
As we look at March, let's just say, they're both down significantly because we're having a really nice ramp at two other customers. I think I'll leave it at that.
Harsh Kumar:
Fair enough. Thanks, guys.
Operator:
We will go next to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Thank you very much. I just wanted to -- I was a little surprised, you're talking about fiscal '20 earnings growth and free cash flow. Is that a typo in the press release or what are you referring to in terms of how should we be thinking about free cash flow growth in fiscal '20?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. Ambrish, this is Mark. So this year, we expect to end free cash flow over $600 million. We are very early in our planning cycle, so I don't want to provide too much detail, but just to give you a sense of where we are at a high level and we'll go into a lot more detail in the May earnings call. But right now, we see, fiscal year '20 as being flattish to up slightly at the consolidated level on the top line, mobile flat, flattish year-over-year. But just really on the mobile side just too early for us to make a call on greater strength in the handset market. We do believe 5G is going to drive volume in both handsets and RF content, but there is little impact of that, we think, in fiscal '20 as we see it.
Ambrish Srivastava:
No. That makes -- sorry, go ahead.
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. I just was going to say, thrilled with what we see in IDP and continued growth there as that business nears a $1 billion revenue. Cost reduction actions we're taking are going to help next year on gross margins. Again, too early to call because we are still in our planning cycle, but as we see it, we do see expanding gross margins next year even with the burden of Florida and Farmers Branch, which I laid out earlier. Just trying to give you a sense of profile and you've seen this from us before, from fourth quarter to first quarter, we are going to be down on gross margin. So we should be -- we expect to be below 46% in the first quarter on gross margin and that's related to loading and mix, but the rest of the year, we see roughly back to what you saw in the back half of this year. So we feel great about the business and how we've been able to move gross margin and as we make these changes, and our portfolio changes take hold, we will be -- we expect to be targeting over $50 million and see over $50 million as we go forward. OpEx, we expect to be in control, maybe up slightly and taxes up a bit. On free cash flow, we expect -- we've had great progress on free cash flow. Last three years, we've nearly tripled it. Free cash flow margins have gone from 7% to over 20%, but we see a year next year of modest growth in CapEx, if any, and just focused on investing in the right technologies, selecting the right products and markets in which to compete, continuously improving the operations, and finally, reducing capital intensity.
Ambrish Srivastava:
Okay. Mark, thank you. And I don't want to be too tough on you. You have delivered on then one metric, on free cash flow to sales since you've been here. Maybe just a quick follow-up on IDP. Little bit -- we are hearing of so much weakness across segments, why is it that your diversified business is not seeing that? Give us a sense for the mix between 5G, comms, et cetera, and where are you seeing the drag, if any? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Let me talk about strength first and we'll talk about a couple of the challenges in the business. Certainly, seeing strength in the base station business, and I talked about that really driven by 5G. We've also seen strength in our broadband, our cable TV business and that's been driven by the strength in the DOCSIS 3.1 deployments. So both nice growth drivers for the quarter. On the headwind side was our WiFi business and we talked about that last quarter, several factors there. One is there has been a delay in the AX or WiFi 6 standard release, still some unrelated materials shortages and some impact of tariffs as some of our customers relocate their manufacturing outside of China, but we believe that business has found its bottom and is starting to recover back. And then, in general, our defense business is just lumpy as it's been for years. It's on -- the underlying foundations are very, very good and growing, but we do end up having up and down quarters in defense based really on large production programs.
Operator:
We will go next to Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
Taking the question. I want to first ask a question on mobile. Obviously, we understand the unit drags, but you've talked in the past about some opportunities in areas such as diversity receive, kind of [indiscernible] seen in tuning. And I guess we should think probably more 4X4 MIMOs. So presumably that should be a headwind, but I guess can you help us understand are these opportunities -- can they really fire in the fiscal '20, or are they going to be really beyond? I presume you obviously see more opportunities as 5G gets certain in the following year, but how should we think about content gains this year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. It's a excellent question. So you're right, we're still very enthusiastic about our investments and replacement in the markets, antenna tuning driven by the complexity of trying to get all the radios into the industrial design of today's handsets. That's fundamentally going to continue to be a very important market, especially as you add 5G. Envelope tracking power management as well is a great area for us and we see more and more adoption of our sorts of architectures. And in BAW-based modules, especially highly integrated ones, we will be in production with the top six handset manufacturers to share with integrated mid and high band module. So it's, great, especially as 4X4 MIMO, LTE Advanced Pro comes in, that's a lot of additional content. The headwind is of course units and as units are soft in the handset market or smartphone market overall, and the trend, at least, what we saw in the last quarter, is that it's really the high-end of the flagship models that have been slowing more than the overall market even. And of course, we're pretty levered to that. So I think that's where there is a little caution during calendar '19, but to your point, in '20, we see a very clear ramp of 5G handsets. In our Analyst Day, we mentioned, it's about $1 billion worth of additional market in calendar '20 due to 5G and we're not backing down on that at all. So despite the challenges in the TAM in CY '19, we see a clear path to solid growth in calendar '20.
Bill Peterson:
Okay. Thanks for that. And James, as we look out for this year and 5G is apparently starting, you kind of talked about some of the puts and takes. But assuming AX comes back, you have other IoT, local area short range, wide area and so forth, automobile coming eventually, how should we think about the growth for the fiscal year -- calendar '19 or fiscal year '20, If you can help us frame the growth opportunities? You have talked in the past about a market growth of 10% to 15%, trying to understand what we should expect for the Qorvo's performance in that?
James Klein:
Yes. So really no change Bill to what we've talked about. We've just hit our 11th in a row quarter of double-digit growth. We're certainly trying to do that again for next quarter. We still believe the underlying markets are going to grow in that 10% to 15% range, driven by those underlying market things like the adoption of 5G and phased arrays coming into defense, massive MIMO will come in to base station. And then just the general proliferation of IoT. So I think, we'll see that 10% to 15% growth in underlying markets and I'm still confident that we'll do as well as that, if not better, than those underlying markets.
Operator:
We'll go next to Rajvindra Gill with Needham Company.
Rajvindra Gill:
Thanks for taking my questions. I appreciate it. A question on the IDP, particularly on ADAS and self-driving vehicles. I want to get a sense of your competitive differentiation there and how you're thinking about the growth rate for that particular segment?
Bob Bruggeworth:
James, you want take the question on the automotive, how you are doing there?
James Klein:
Absolutely. So, we're heavily engaged with key OEMs and Tier 1s really across multiple different areas, WiFi, DSRC, cellular VITA X, LTE/5G, RF front ends, digital radio or satellite radio, and also co-existence filtering. Today, that represents about a $700 million SAM as we get into 2021 and we're we are really trying to support multiple customers and trying to move into all of those spaces. I think it's still relatively early in. We are definitely shipping into the automotive market, but the big uptick for us will be as we enter into 2021 and 2022 car year models.
Rajvindra Gill:
And just a follow-up on the gross margin. So I think it was mentioned that gross margin will drop below 46% in June, and then, there is an expectation of it ramping back up to where it was second half of last year. Wonder if you could elaborate further on that, is that basically, once this process has been done, you're starting to ramp the loadings at that one particular fab, can you maybe discuss a little bit about the expectation of the ramp in margins in the second half?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. We are experiencing what we've been thriving to do with the business all along and we've been very accurate by the way on our ability to forecast. We've hit -- excluding the Florida hurricane miss that we had, we've hit every gross margin forecast since December 16. So we feel great about our ability to understand what's happening in the market and the profile of the margins. Initially in the early part of the year, we have clearly the addition of that Farmers Branch period costs, then we just have mix effects and the lower revenues at the beginning of the year, and then, through the year, we see positive mix effects, both products and in James' businesses. His business continues to outpace the overall business, and then, those period cost effects have a lesser effect until at the back end of the year those period cost effects are minimal. So we've got, we believe a clear read on continued progression of an expansion of gross margin year-over-year. And it's about investing in the right products, continue to operate well and minimizing our capital footprint.
Operator:
We'll go next to Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Thanks for taking my question. Bob, on the competitive landscape, one of your competitors has mentioned a few times now about reclaiming the content that they lost last year and the other competitor is talking about entering the BAW filter market. So, I'm just curious how is your visibility around content in the flagship phones and just any insights on the competitive landscape?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Eric, you want to pickup that.
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Yes, we're still quite enthusiastic about our opportunities overall in the flagship space. As I mentioned, integration in the mid and high band is really driven by high order multiplexers, which are enabled by high performance BAW filters. We're well positioned or we are one of only two heavyweights in this space right now and we're competing on a level playing field here. There's a lot to be done. There's a lot of these products to be developed and we're working hard to get our engineering at scale to be able to fully staff all the opportunities, frankly. Regarding new entrants in the market, of course, given how attractive this segment is, the growth potential in margin within that space, so there is going to be people that are going to continually trying to enter it. We will just remind you of how many years it takes to get from a working technology to a filter product to a duplexer, then a high order multiplexer and all the other integration needed to enter the highly integrated mid and high band space, but there are a lot of other opportunities involved as well, discrete filters and so forth and WiFi and you really find it all over the phone going forward. So, it's a great space, we're trying to get our engineering capability scale to build a fully step up those opportunities.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And for my follow up, IDP has been a really strong success story for you, do you see opportunities to maybe think of M&A, et cetera, to expand that opportunity set as we get into more of the infrastructure built before you start to see the benefits of 5G on the handset side?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah. Thank you, Vivek. And appreciate your kind words about the work that the IDP team is doing to deliver solid results. And we've talked, I think, in many of the past calls that from an M&A outlook we do consider and have bought companies to support under James business in IDP. We will continue to look and do so. In the area of mobile, we continue to look at opportunities to bring in technologies as well as other companies. So we have a very active funnel, but at the end of the day, we want to make sure we bring in opportunities that we believe we're better owner and we can create and deliver shareholder value and we will continue to do so. So we did a very good job on the couple of these so far and we will continue to look.
Operator:
We go next to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Great. Thanks for taking the question. I think Qualcomm obviously the close partner for you guys, at the same time they have been pretty vocal about their ability to gain RF content into 2020 and beyond. How do you guys think about that potential risk from a competitive standpoint?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I will tell you, Qualcomm's a great company. As you pointed out, we do work with them, we do have a lot of products that sit beside there's, whether it's WiFi or cellular, so I'll let Eric, if you would like to address a little bit more than that, I mean.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. I think you're right. We do go to market together and in a lot of cases it will continue in the future. If you look at about 70% of the smartphone market, it's the top three OEMs and they tend to pick and choose the RF component and the baseband separately and do that integration. We see that continuing. So in other parts of the market, I know that they have aspirations, but I can tell you all of our customers are working with us to integrate our solutions onto all the baseband suppliers' designs.
Toshiya Hari:
Great. And then just as a follow-up. I had a question on gross margins as well. So, Mark, I think for the March quarter, you're guiding revenue essentially flat year-over-year. I think your gross margin is down about 100 basis points year-over-year. I think the mix -- the IDP mix is growing year-over-year, which should be positive for gross margins. So I guess what's the offset there, is it just utilization rates or is there something going on the pricing front? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, it's pretty easy to share. Year-over-year, it's the Florida and Farmers Branch period costs effect. So in the case of Florida around $8 million, and in the case of Farmers Branch, at $5 million in that March quarter, so $13 million total of headwind year-over-year.
Toshiya Hari:
And pricing is pretty stable?
Mark Murphy:
We're in the electronic space, so pricing goes down on a number of products and we work to replace those in future generations of more integrated, more advanced, better margin products.
Bob Bruggeworth:
So stated differently, no change in the normal pricing environment.
Operator:
We'll go next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. Eric, leaving your largest customer aside for a minute, you just announced a big win at superPAD at your Korean customer. You've got more gains coming in the superPAD BAW, which prepared at Huawei. You supply a lot of BAW into Phase 6, which is being deployed since the fall last year. There were a couple of the products we were talking about for BAW moving into next year and yet we're taking Farmers Branch out of the mix until calendar '20. So, even if your revenues down, one would expect that the mix of BAW would have improved significantly with all these big wins. I know unit volumes in China have been weak, et cetera, but I am still scratching my head about the Farmers Branch move and tepid guidance on second half of the year for BAW. I am missing something, is BAW-based DRx off the table now or what am I missing?
Eric Creviston:
So regarding the BAW-based area, actually, we are reevaluating the entry point in the market for that. As I mentioned earlier, we're just seeing tremendous need to staff a lot of the programs in the mid and high of the main path. As you can imagine, now that we've entered with all the top six OEMs, now there is a demand for many variants and variations in next generations and there are new basebands coming along, which we're being asked to pair to. So, there is a lot of work to be done there and we are doubling down if you will, to make sure we can fully staff those opportunities. To your point though, year-over-year our BAW-based business is going to grow very nicely. That doesn't change. The timing of when exactly we need Farmers Branch is depending upon exact products and the amount of BAW content in any one of them.
Edward Snyder:
Okay. And then James, if I could, you are the largest GaN manufacturer in the military in the world right now. You are now moving into the commercial side of the business here. You talk a lot about 5G growth and especially cellular infrastructure. How much of that is the GaN side of your business, because as an earlier question alluded to, seeing broad-based weakness at everybody from TI to Marvell to just everybody else. You're not seeing it, but then you're kind of unique in the world and that you've got GaN to drive, and there is maybe only one or two other guys you've been supplying that product. So I'm just trying to get an idea of how much of your strength -- I know military that way -- is coming from GaN in the 5G story?
Eric Creviston:
Well, certainly defense remains very strong position for us in GaN. And you are right, in the base station side of the market it is starting to significantly ramp as well and we are ramping products across all those frequencies that I talked about earlier, and products into multiple OEMs. But also inside of the 5G ramp, we also have a very nice position in things like LNAs and switches and driver amplifiers, so really the whole rest of the RF chain and that's what drives that potential content up to well over $1,000 in Massive MIMO antennas. We do expect that the number of Massive MIMO channels will actually eclipse macro channels in 2019. So it shows you a little bit of the growth rate there. And I didn't say it earlier, but I think we do see line of sight to a $1 billion run rate. So that's certainly the journey that we're on now.
Operator:
We'll go next to Timothy Arcuri from UBS.
Timothy Arcuri:
Thank you very much. I guess, Mark, the first question is, China was, I think, 30% of mobile products ex-Huawei last quarter. I'm wondering what that number was for December and maybe what you think it's going to be for March?
Mark Murphy:
Yeah. China revenue for the Company, ballpark, 30%, and then, we will be down sequentially in the business in China. Still up year-over-year.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. And you're just talking about mobile products, right?
Mark Murphy:
I was talking about the Company as a whole. Mobile products coincidentally also is now 30% of the mobile business and in the fourth quarter, we will be down both sequentially and year-over-year.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. Got it. Okay. And then, did you have a second 10% customer this quarter, I would think so?
Mark Murphy:
Yes, we did.
Timothy Arcuri:
Okay. Awesome.
Mark Murphy:
And then I'll just make a comment that in the March quarter we actually expect to have three 10% customers, which we have -- last time we had that was fourth quarter of '16 or March of '16.
Operator:
We'll go next to Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes. Thank you. Just a question on the mid-high band PAD. And if I think about the traction you had in last year's flagship phone, as well as upcoming Samsung phone, can you talk about just your ability to continue and build on that momentum, I mean what type of visibility you have in terms of future phones going forward?
Eric Creviston:
Sure. Yeah. We have obviously a lot of design momentum. We feel confident that we have no technology handicap of anything. We have got certain performance parameters that favor our technology. The complexity is increasing. And as I mentioned, we're being asked to support multiple basebands across multiple customers. So there's a lot of work to do, and in light of the challenging overall environment, of course, we're keeping our overall OpEx in check in and managing to -- at the same time bulk up our capability around the highly integrated BAW filter design modules. So, a lot of enthusiasm for a lot of customer diversification coming and product diversification coming as well in that category.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. And then just as a follow-up for Mark, with the buyback pace nearly doubling in the quarter or last quarter, can you just talk about remaining authorization and then how you are thinking about deployment of cash from here?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So Craig we had -- outside the ASR, we had record repurchases in the quarter of $152 million. I think the last three quarters have been the three out of the four largest repurchase periods outside the ASR. We have just under $700 million left in the authorization, expect to continue to make progress working that down as we see the free cash flow of the business continuing to be strong. And we see, frankly, the stock price being at a level that we would continue buying back our shares. Of course, we continue to look at M&A, continuing to keep tabs of the environment and as you know, the rate and pace is a function of many factors.
Operator:
And at this time, I would like to turn the call back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on tonight's call. We hope to see you at upcoming investor meetings. We look forward to speaking with you on our fourth quarter call. Thank you and have a good night.
Operator:
And again, this does conclude today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co. Thomas O'Malley - Barclays Capital, Inc. Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q2 2019 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Brad. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2019 second quarter earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone. I'm proud of the Qorvo team for delivering a strong September quarter, with both revenue and EPS well above guidance. Our products and technologies make Qorvo uniquely positioned to partner with our customers to develop their most compelling products. Our September quarter extends a strong start to Qorvo's fiscal 2019. We are investing in the right types of growth and a customer design activity is demonstrating that our technology competes at the highest levels. Operationally, we're making progress related to cost control and capital efficiency, including increased production of 8-inch BAW, continued capacity expansion to support GaN demand and the up-fit of Farmers Branch. We're doing a good job of growing our top line, expanding our margins and improving our return on capital. During the quarter, we supported a series of large product ramps and enjoyed robust design activity in both Mobile Products and IDP. The relentless demand for an improved user experience is fueling large macro trends, such as the deployment of LTE Advanced Pro and 5G, as well as the proliferation of the Internet of Things. These trends are creating new design challenges for our customers, requiring more RF content and placing a premium on performance, product and technology breadth, systems level expertise and integration. Qorvo is a leader as the industry moves to more highly integrated solutions, enabling wider bandwidths, increased data rates and enhanced system performance. In IDP, revenue grew to $218 million, led by strength in the base station market. IDP continues to connect and protect across a diverse set of defense and communications customers and applications. Qorvo's 28 gigahertz high power amplifiers were selected for 32-element phased array deployments, targeting large venues with dense cellular traffic, such as concert halls, convention centers and sporting arenas. Shipments of 5G solutions were a record in support of multiple leading base station customers. GaN based revenue increased 27% year-over-year, driven by broad market demand, including 5G infrastructure. Design activity for 5G base stations has been robust across geographies and customers. The emphasis is primarily on sub-6 gigahertz, while millimeter wave applications continue to gain traction. We're in the early innings of 5G, and the migration to higher frequency, increasing bandwidth requirements and deployment of massive MIMO favor Qorvo's technologies. As deployments of 5G base stations accelerate, our 5G product revenues are forecasted to be strong over the next several years. In IoT, new markets and applications continue to proliferate. Field trials are underway for cellular, vehicle to everything connectivity, and Qorvo is supporting multiple OEMs with our 5.9 gigahertz FEM, optimized for Qualcomm's cellular V2X chipset solution. We were selected by Continental, a leading Tier 1 automotive supplier, to deliver multiple solutions enabling always-on automotive connectivity to cellular networks around the world. And in connected home, we commenced shipments of a dual-band Wi-Fi iFEM powering Facebook's family of portal video communication devices. We also partnered with a lighting and IoT solutions company in China, enabling smart interior lighting products, which operate on ZigBee 3.0 and Bluetooth Low Energy 5.0 protocols. Among new product launches, we introduced the fully integrated system and package for ultra-low power wireless communications that's certified to ZigBee and Bluetooth product specs and delivers ZigBee Green Power energy efficiency. Turning to Defense, the deployment of phased array radars and higher frequencies of operation are increasing demand for RF solutions that leverage GaN, gas and other semiconductor processes. During the quarter, Qorvo enjoyed strong demand for our solid-state GaN Spatium high power products for electronic warfare and communications applications. In Mobile, revenue increased to $667 million. We supported the ramps of flagship smartphones. We increased our content on key customer programs, and we helped to enable early 5G smartphone designs. Qorvo's Mobile Products revenue is expanding across product categories, and our product and technology development efforts are opening up new opportunities for growth. During the September quarter, we enjoyed robust demand for our antenna tuners, ETP mix, BAW-based quadplexers and RF Fusion Phase 6 solutions. RF Fusion Phase 6 leverages Qorvo's premium BAW and SAW filter technologies to deliver complete main path coverage in two placements
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the second quarter was $884 million, $29 million above the midpoint of our guidance, up 28% sequentially and 8% year-over-year. Mobile Products revenue was $667 million, a 37% sequential increase and reflected strong seasonal ramps. IDP revenue was $218 million, another quarter of double-digit year-over-year growth, with particularly strong demand in Infrastructure. Non-GAAP gross margin in the September quarter was 47.7%, 20 basis points over our guide. Our margin outlook remains positive as we transition the mix of our product portfolio, improve factory utilization and drive productivity. Operating expenses were in control at $168 million, down slightly from our guidance. We expect OpEx to trend down slightly through the back half of the year, with full-year OpEx ending at approximately 20% of sales. Non-GAAP net income in the September quarter was a record $225 million, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $1.75 or $0.13 above the midpoint of our guidance. The earnings power of the business is increasing as we grow in the right areas and remain disciplined in capital and operating spend. September quarter cash flow from operations was near $215 million and CapEx was $70 million, yielding free cash flow of $144 million. CapEx is currently projected to end the year a little over $300 million and remains principally for BAW and GaN capacity additions at our Texas fabs. We repurchased $87 million of stock in the quarter and ended the September quarter with $558 million of cash and cash equivalents. During the quarter, we redeemed our remaining 6.75% notes, due 2023 and repurchased $436 million of our 7% notes, due 2025. Also, in the quarter, we issued $630 million of 5.5% notes, maturing in 2026. With these actions, we've lowered our interest costs and extended our average debt maturity to 2026. We are below our long-range – our long-term leverage target and retain significant financial flexibility to grow the business and return capital to shareholders. Turning to our outlook. In the third quarter of fiscal 2019, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $880 million and $900 million, gross margin to increase sequentially to approximately 50%, and diluted EPS of $1.95 at the midpoint of our guidance. We currently project Mobile Products revenues in the December quarter to be up slightly sequentially in support of seasonal phone ramps. For China, we see a relatively healthy channel, but given the strength from China-based handset manufacturers' year-to-date, we are taking a measured view on demand in the back half of the fiscal year. We expect IDP to post another solid quarter with strength in infrastructure, offsetting near-term weakness in Wi-Fi. On gross margin, our December quarter guide reflects ongoing progress improving the portfolio, utilizing our fabs and driving productivity. We expect gross margins in the back half of the fiscal year to average 50% or more. Operating expenses are forecasted to decrease slightly in the December quarter to approximately $165 million. We're maintaining a full-year non-GAAP tax rate forecast of approximately 8%. We expect operating cash flow to strengthen in the second half of the fiscal year on higher revenue, stronger margins and lower working capital. In the third quarter, CapEx is expected to peak for the fiscal year with BAW and GaN capacity investments in Richardson and the continued build-out of BAW capacity in Farmers Branch. So in summary, the September quarter was a record revenue and earnings quarter for Qorvo. Our portfolio strategy and operational improvements are yielding stronger and more consistent results. Looking ahead, our outlook remains essentially unchanged with full-year revenue growth around 10%, gross margin increasing to 50% or more for the fiscal second half and OpEx in control and ending at about 20% of sales for the full fiscal year. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time, we'll open the floor for questions. And our first question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
Happy Halloween. Congratulations. Stellar execution on the top line, but also congratulations on the margins. Mark, I had one for you. Just looking beyond sort of the second half fiscal that you talked about, now that your factories are mostly BAW, and now that you're kind of set with your share at some of the large Tier 1 guys, should we think of 47%, 48% to 50% as sort of the new range for you guys going forward? And I've got a quick follow-up.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And your question, Harsh, was around gross margin?
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
Yes, sir.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I mean, we're not giving quarter guidance. I would, certainly beyond the quarter we're giving – and we've talked about second half guidance for gross margin. I guess the question is, what should gross margin do if we execute on our plan? And we believe that we have the potential to expand gross margin going forward. And we believe there are a number of reasons. One is, we know this year that the SAW under-utilization is headwind for us, and we expect that to some effect in the near-term, which would include early next year. We also have, that will wane through this year and then into next year, so become a lesser effect on the business. We're also continuing to affect the mix transitions that we want to occur with BAW related revenue, GaN and other premium technology products, and that will have a positive effect. We are being very disciplined around capital, and as our capital efficiency improves through larger wafers, die shrinks and other things, we should see those effects help with the margin. And then there's, of course, other productivity, better yields, lower inventory charges, improved cycle times. I can go on and on. The team is working on a lot of things. I'd say, lastly, we are tightening relationships with our supply chain, developing selective partnerships, joint productivity programs and other things to broaden the scope of our productivity efforts.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
Great. And then maybe one real quick on IDP. We've heard from several other companies talk about weakness in a variety of different areas, infrastructure, generally from everybody has been positive, suggested by you guys as well. But there are other parts of your business in IDP that are broader. Maybe, Bob, you could take this one or somebody else in the IDP team, help us understand the different parts and pieces, the pluses and minus around those sub-segments in IDP?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Harsh, this is James. As you said, we did have a very strong base station quarter across all the OEMs. It was driven by strength in both 4G and 5G deployments, and we also saw a strong demand for small cell and massive MIMO products, including very early deployments for 5G. That includes material orders for GaN to support those MIMO deployments. And on top of that, we've also done very well with share gains, particularly in one of our European OEMs. So, very strong growth in base station. We did talk a little early about Wi-Fi. So, we have seen some effects in our Wi-Fi business that we think are relatively near-term. We think that slowdown has been based on the delays in the release of the AX standard. We also have customers experiencing some shortages in other materials that are affecting their production, and some impacts of tariffs as they transition some of their manufacturing locations. Defense, we're off a little bit of our record highs that we experienced back in the back half of last year, but that business is typically a bit lumpy. What I would say about both Defense and Wi-Fi, the fundamentals are both very, very strong. We do see that the technologies we have are matched very well with where we see both of those marketplaces going.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Thomas O'Malley - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. This is Tom O'Malley on for Blayne Curtis. In your prepared remarks, you mentioned a more measured view on demand from China into the December quarter. Can you kind of give us some puts and takes on where you're seeing that weakness from the high-end or the low-end and just give us a little more color there?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, this is Eric. I can give a little more color on that. We mentioned in last quarter's call that we had seen a very strong market year-to-date and that a lot of the high-end handsets had just launched and we are waiting to see how the sell-through goes there. Obviously, we've got a lot of content and a lot of the high-end handsets there. So, I think that's the area that we're most conservative on now. Just keeping an eye on it, as Mark said. Sort of a measured view to see how those sell out.
Thomas O'Malley - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Great. And then one quick other one and I'll hit on the margin point again. You guys, obviously, are seeing some great improvement here and this quarter a lot of that is obviously bringing your premium part through at the high-end and some premium smartphones. Can you talk about what that was like bringing that through and kind of what you're seeing going forward with that product?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry, Tom. I'm not sure we fully understand your question. I will say this, the ramping of our BAW facility is going extremely well. I commented on that before. I'm very proud of what the team's been doing and fantastic ramp in what we've seen and we're looking forward to continuing to grow our BAW-based business.
Thomas O'Malley - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Thanks, guys.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan. Hello, Mr. Peterson. Your line is open.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Sorry about that. I was on mute. Congratulations on the strong results and guide. Thanks for taking the question. I guess, coming back to China, and I think there's a view that the domestic China market is fairly weak, and you commented as your content tends to be in some of these flagships maybe global phones. But, I guess, as we look into next year and assuming unit volumes still kind of remain muted, what can drive content growth? Are you seeing further opportunities for diversity receiver antennaplexing? Or what are the areas where you can drive content further from here in China?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
It's a good question. I think the opportunities we see may be centered around integration more. As those customers look to pack more features in and, in particular, prepare for 5G capability, people are generally taking more of the handset portfolio up the integration curve. So, Phase 6, as an example, where we combine the entire main path into two placements, we think that's just a great opportunity for Qorvo to see that really penetrate further and further into the handset portfolio.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Great. And then secondly, for James. When we think about the GaN business, it says 27% growth and it sounds like you're gaining share as well. As you look at, I know that we're just at the very, I guess start of the 5G ramp, how should we think about the growth of that as we look into next calendar year?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, as I've stated many times, I mean we see that overall GaN market again, defense, broadband, cable and wireless infrastructure, that market is going to grow in the low to mid-20s. I think we'll do significantly better than that as we go forward. You saw that in this last quarter. That was driven a lot by Defense, but we are now really beginning the start of production deliveries around these 5G deployments and massive MIMO deployments. I think one thing I want to talk a little bit, while we're on massive MIMO is we definitely are seeing the OEMs start those deployments. Over the next couple of years, probably maybe three years, we expect that 20% or 30% of the RUs will be massive MIMO antennas. What that does for us, it results in about a 4x of the number of channels, about a 8x to 12x increase in content for us. So, that's going to drive a significant amount of GaN demand as we go through these deployments in 5G over the next several years.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ruben Roy with MKM Partners.
Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC:
Hey. Thanks for taking my question. James, I'd maybe just follow-up on that point around GaN and the 5G. Is that related to sort of the higher frequency base stations that you're looking forward to? Is that kind of the content growth that we could expect as those ship? Or are there additional content opportunities as we move over to those high-frequency base stations for 5G over the next few years?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
I would say that the content is certainly today, as Bob talked about in 6 gigahertz and below. In the out years, we believe millimeter wave will continue to gain traction, and we're certainly supporting multiple different millimeter wave opportunities around the industry. As far as the breakout of below 6 gigahertz, we're seeing strength both in Asia deployments and deployments in the U.S., and so you'll see a little bit of different frequency band selections. Predominantly, I would say, we play in a little bit of the higher end of frequency ranges, but it's relatively broad-based at this point.
Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC:
Thanks, James. And then a quick follow-up for Eric, just around the China commentary. Number one, can you remind us what your exposure to China is? And then number two, in terms of the commentary on the channel remaining relatively healthy; so it sounds like the component inventory is healthy? Or do you think it's a combination of component inventory and actual handsets out there? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, so in terms of Mobile exposure to China, it's about 30% of the business goes to China, not including Huawei, the broader customer base in China. And regarding the channel inventory, we've got visibility, a very clear visibility into our component inventory in the channel and we know that, that is quite healthy and in line. We don't have quite as good a visibility on the final handset that – a little bit of a delay, but our own component inventory is clear.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Christopher Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Thank you. A question regarding your capacity utilization – sorry – capacity expansion plan that's underway for next year. Can you talk a bit about the visibility on the design wins needed to fill that capacity and your level of confidence? How much is perhaps design wins that have already been won? How much are sort of high probability design wins? I'd imagine now that you're guiding to 50% gross margins, the goal is to keep it there. What's your level of confidence?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Chris, this is Mark. We're not going to talk about customer-specific programs and handicap those. What I can talk about generally is our expansion plans. I think we've talked at length about our utilization issues on SAW and we continue to work through those. We do believe SAW is a critical technology for us, and so we will maintain SAW capacity and we have good technology and we'll deploy that in Phase 6 and other areas, particularly in BAW-related applications. As far as gas (29:49) capacity, it is well loaded in Oregon and North Carolina. And then BAW capacity, you heard James talk about GaN, so we're fully loaded there, and then we've got our BAW capacity in Texas, which currently is production's all out of Richardson, and Richardson is at capacity. Currently, about 70% of our capacity in BAW is on 6-inch and 30% is on 8-inch, and we are undertaking over the next year between wafer conversions and bringing Farmers Branch online, bringing on more 8-inch. So, this time next year, we will have actually the reverse of what we have now, roughly 30% 6-inch and 70% 8-inch. And based on our current plans, which also include not only that wafer conversion, but also die shrink programs, yield improvements, cycle time, all these other things, we believe we have the capacity to meet what we believe is our revenue outlook. Now we're continuously reviewing that plan and update the spend plan when needed as we consider opportunities, the pace of tool conversions, new tool lead times, technology and process changes, and other factors, but hopefully that gives you some color as to our thinking on capacity.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yeah, that's helpful. Thank you. If I could just follow on with that explanation, and then based on what you said, it sounds like then the sort of variability in capacity, depending on how design wins go, would be the loading on the 6-inch fabs then and you would swing that higher or lower and therefore get the efficiency benefits of loading up the 8-inch fabs. Is that the right way to think about it?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
It's hard to say, Chris. It's just a very complex, continuously assessed situation, and it may – you could slow the conversion. You could slow various technology programs. You could accelerate them. It's just, you know, I gave you what our current view is sitting here on October 31, and we'll give you an update periodically as things change.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton with Needham.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi, guys. Congratulations on the nice results. Wanted to come back – I think in past calls, you guys had mentioned sampling custom mid-band, high-band PADs to multiple customers. As you look into 2019, what's your just sort of market share assumptions or what's your market share opportunity as you ramp both Phase 6 designs as well as the opportunity for other custom mid-band, high-band PADs into next year?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Eric. Yeah, I think we're working with virtually all of our customers with these product types, and there's – in terms of specific share, it will vary by customer of course and product type. But we're clearly one of only a few people that can do this, and when you combine it with our high-performance SAW, our leadership in tuning, switching and power management and advanced packaging, we really like our odds. We've got a lot to bring to the party. We're helping customers design fantastic products and helping them get ready for 5G. So, there's a lot of excitement around a broad portfolio of products for a lot of customers.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Great. And then just a quick follow-up for you, Eric. Looks like your business was, drove most of the upside in the September quarter. Just kind of curious, was that across the board, or was that primarily driven by the new platform ramps where you guys have talked about your content gains? I guess, I'm specifically trying to ask whether China actually grew with the business in September or whether it was really more the marquee phones launching for the second half.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I would say the growth was fairly broad-based across nearly all of our customers and skewed towards the marquee platforms, I would say.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks a lot. I'll start with Eric. How do you feel about – let's talk about 2019, anytime in the year is fine. BAW-based DRxs, you guys dabbled in that with Samsung, couple of years ago, but haven't done any since then. I think last quarter you mentioned that some of the BAW expansion that you're looking at in Farmers Branch is to accommodate what look to be increasingly-probable design wins in that. If you can maybe help, give us an update on that. And if you could talk, are we talking about one or two BAW filters? Or are we talking about more of that, because some of those modules can get very large. And then, James, if I could, IDP's infrastructures, your shipping GaN into MIMO, but what does that ramp look like specifically in Infrastructure? Because most of your GaN goes into Defense at this point. What does that ramp look like over the next several quarters? Do you expect to see significant increase? Or are you going to kind of status quote here as they evolve? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, picking DRx first. We continue to invest in BAW-based DRx modules. We see clear opportunities with the increasing mid and high-band DRx and as MIMO comes on-board and so forth. The one that's we're developing have combination technologies, but majority of which are BAW-based and we are seeing technical differentiation in some parameters. And so, we're still targeting second-half calendar year next year for first production.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Ed, this is James. So, let me talk about massive MIMO. So, we definitely are seeing strong order demands right now. For us, that's much broader than just GaN, because we're supplying the components that affect the rest of the transmit side plus the vast majority of all the components that go into the receive side as well. So, that demand is going today, and I talked a little about what we see content-wise. As far as the GaN portion of it as well, we do have significant production orders on the books now and we're in the process of building and producing those. And in that section of the – I agree with you that Defense is certainly still the strongest part of our GaN portfolio, but the base station is going to grow at a rapid pace and will outstrip the overall growth of GaN.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi. Thank you. James, you're doing double duty today on the call, and I'll come back to you with a question as well. What's the right way to think of the longer-term growth for the business? It's been very strong for you, guys, 20-plus percent year-over-year growth for several quarters. But these last couple of quarters, it's in the mid-teens, which is, again, nothing to scoff at. But if we look out ahead over the next few quarters, it sounds like base stations and GaN and – am I framing it correctly; those are the big drivers? And then, how to think about it. Is it the mid-teens grower? Or should we expect an acceleration. Then, I had a quick follow-up for you, Mark.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, so we're in line with what we shared at Investor Day. Growth is tracking those underlying markets and they're growing between 10% and 15%. And as I've said before, I think we'll do a bit better than that. The Defense and Wi-Fi have pulled back a bit. But again, I think the underlying trends are very, very positive in both of those markets. And once AX takes hold and some of our customers adjust their manufacturing plans, I think you'll see Wi-Fi start to take off again. But I think we'll grow just better than those underlying markets and, again, in that 10% to 15% range.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And just to be clear, James is talking about annual numbers.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Oh, yeah.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Going forward.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, annual numbers.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Yeah, right. That's what I was asking. Great. Thanks. Mark, just a quick one for you on the CapEx side. You said in the third quarter CapEx peaked. So, could you just remind us, so then we should then expect it to trend back to the longer term? And then, what is the longer-term intensity? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, so, we expect this year to be between 3% and 3.25%. So, given the guidance that we've given, that would put it just under 10% of sales for the year. And the CapEx as a percent of sales was down sharply last year to 9%. We thought it continue to go down, but as we said we brought some of this spend for Farmers Branch in, so we're just a little bit higher than we expected. We expect CapEx as a percent of sales to resume a downward trend next year.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thanks for taking my question. First question on gross margins. So, you had about 50% or so right now. How much more headroom is there? What are the drivers? And I think you mentioned, you still have some headwind from SAW, so how much is that? When can it disappear? Just the trajectory of gross margins over the next four quarters to six quarters?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, so we're not going to give guidance on gross margin, Vivek, beyond the current quarter and the next quarter, since we've given half year. What I can say is again, we're focused on investing in the right technologies and developing the right portfolio. We've talked about that at length; large markets, fast-growing markets, hard-to-do products. Secondly, we're maintaining utilization of the fabs, selective investments, driving down capital intensity. And then third, we're just operating better and with greater discipline and driving continuous improvement. Yeah, the lift in margins sequentially second quarter to third, it's up about 230 basis points. About half of that, well, a little over half of that is continued product and customer mix. And then the remainder is net lower cost. So factory productivity, lower inventory charges and partially offset by some price and also the adverse effects of – actually, sequentially the effects of SAW, the SAW underutilization are actually less in the third quarter than they are in the second on a percent basis, not on a – and an absolute dollar basis.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Got it. For my follow-up, maybe one for Bob. Bob, I understand you don't want to be specific about customers. But if you look back, typically when are decisions made around what content you will have at your various large customers? Because that does tend to swing a lot from year-to-year. So, just give us a sense for, at what point in the year – I assume it varies by customer – but at what point in the year, would you have good visibility on how next year would shape up? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, hi, Vivek. This is Eric. I think based on our past experience for the flagship OEMs or leading OEM, phone designs, we would typically see down select decisions six months to nine months prior to phone production.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Tim Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Thank you. I had two. First of all, Mark, I think you said that you thought that half of Mobile Products in the third calendar quarter would be China. Did that come in as about half? And what are you baking in for the mix in December? And then I had a follow-up. Thanks.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Tim, I don't believe we've given details on the mix within business in a quarter. But what I can tell you is, we had two 10% customers, one of which was a large China-based OEM. And then you know our largest customer, so.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Sure. Of course. Okay. And then I guess I had a question whether you thought that Mobile Products outside of your biggest customer, do you think that the other Mobile Products revenue was it up, down, or flat in September? And what are you assuming for it in December? Seems like it's probably going to be down.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
No, we -
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're not going to forecast by customer mix...
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, we're not.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
...and – sorry. We're not going to go there, Tim. I understand the nature of your question and why you're asking, but we're not going to give you that granularity at this time.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Hey, great. Thanks a lot for taking the question. Mark, you talked about CapEx and capital intensity potentially reverting lower next fiscal year and beyond. Given that backdrop, how should we think about cash usage going forward? If you can comment on M&A and shareholder return, that would be great. And then on shareholder returns specifically, have you guys debated a dividend internally at all? Thanks.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Toshiya, no dividend at this time. We do forecast strong free cash flow generation going forward and we certainly have the balance sheet capacity and cash flow outlook to grow the business, including inorganically, and return cash to shareholders, which now is done through share repurchase. We did buy, as I mentioned, $87 million in the quarter. Outside the ASR, I believe that's the third-highest quarter of repurchase we've done. We've done about $187 million in the last six months. So, higher than the free cash flow generated over that period. So, we've returned more than all of our free cash flow to shareholders.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then as a follow-up, one for Bob. Just given the trade tension between the U.S. and China, have you sensed any change in posture or operations among your Chinese customers in the form of pull-ins or projects being delayed or anything of that sort? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let me start with a little broader comment that we've assessed the impact on us from the different sets of tariffs that have been imposed by the U.S. and China, what's been imposed so far. And so far, all that's been immaterial on our business. James mentioned, we've got a couple in the retail space, non-handset that have been looking to move their supply chains. But as far as China-based handset customers, no, we've seen no change in their buying behaviors, patterns, what they're doing for their supply chains, et cetera.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Cody Acree with Loop Capital.
Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC:
Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Bob, maybe following on to that last question, you've been insulated by these program ramps in these mid, high-band wins. But to what extent are you factoring in or looking at a risk-based scenario of the broader market slowdown that we've seen echoed by many of the analog companies on a very broad base, with that working in and maybe eating into some of the secular growth drivers?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let me start with, Cody, I think as James has already pointed out, we think we've started to see some of that in his business. We've got some strength in some areas. The growth in 5G is offsetting some of the weakness that we're seeing. His Infrastructure business is strong, and yes, we've seen some in the retail area. As far as our Mobile business goes, we've modeled for the whole year. We didn't expect the handset industry to grow. We didn't expect the handset industry or consumption of handsets in China to grow either this year. It's been primarily around content. So, a lot of that thinking that now some people are seeing, we took a conservative view from the macro perspective earlier in the year.
Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC:
And then just lastly, in your Mobile business, the RF Fusion, RF Flex integrated products, can you maybe give us some color on percentage of your mix and how those integrated products have been growing, and maybe what your expectations are for the mid-term on that as a percentage of revenue?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. So today, the vast majority of our business into the China ecosystem, if you will, is the RF Flex parts, which are not as integrated. I think virtually all of our customers are now either in production or will be in production with a Phase 6 type of phone to test the benefits of the integration, performance and so forth. So today, it's relatively small, less than 10% of our sales into the China ecosystem. We expect it to grow significantly next year, as you can imagine, based on the traction we're seeing now.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Krysten Sciacca with Nomura Instinet.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet:
Good evening. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the great results. So as many of us know, a few of the marquee phone launches this year were a bit delayed or launched later than usual. Can you maybe just talk in a very general broad sense what you're seeing in terms of seasonality for this year for the December and March quarters versus what you've seen historically?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Krysten, I appreciate the question and understand why many investors might want to know that answer, but like I've said on prior calls, we're not going to comment on how future customer programs are running and things like that. I think we've given you guys enough color on at least the entire industry of our business with the guidance that we provided for this quarter, Mark's opening comments about what we expect to grow for the year. And I think that's really enough information that's needed at this time.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet:
Okay. Thanks. And for my follow-up, in the prepared remarks, you mentioned that for 5G, some of the prior 4G content will need a redesign. I was just wondering, if you maybe delve into that a little bit more and maybe discuss how much content that will – how much 4G – how much increase in content for 4G that will lead to for 5G handsets.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. Yeah, Krysten. This is Eric. I'll be happy to speak to that. We talked about this a bit at our Analyst Day as well and we've learned a lot since then, of course. We do see some brand-new bands coming into the handset, a lot of activity right now around 3.5 gigahertz bands and 4.9 gigahertz bands, which will be dedicated 5G bands. So, that's all new content. But when you put those in and you also look at taking the 4G in the phone fully up to LTE Advanced Pro – and that's going to be important for any 5G handset, because when it isn't in a range of a 5G base station, you're still going to want to – some sort of competitive throughput and so you'll see virtually all 5G phones have LTE Advanced Pro as a baseline. So, there you've got full 4x4 MIMO, 256 QAM, high-power amplifiers and so forth. So, we see 5G handsets having significantly more 4G content. And that's why in total in CY20 we think the effect of 5G on the RF10 for us is about $1 billion.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Srini Pajjuri with Macquarie.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Thank you. Eric, just to follow-up on the previous questions. Some of the U.S. carriers are talking about rolling out 5G on lower-frequency bands, I guess T-Mobile is talking about 600 megahertz and Sprint 2.5 gig. I'm just curious, in that case do you still expect incremental content, whether it's 5G or 4G, given that's these are lower frequency bands?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, it's a very good question. Yes, we do, although the effect is not as great, of course, in those bands as when you add completely new bands. But when you run the 5G modulation through that, it does affect what power amplifying, switching, filtering and everything around those bands and of course, it gets harder. It never gets easier when you're pushing more data through a phone in any band. So, we do see some impact from those bands as well.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Great. And then for my follow-up, Mark, I know you don't want to talk about customer-specific demand. But if I look at your March quarter implied guidance for fiscal 2019, you seem to be implying about down 10%, which is much better than the last two years. I'm just curious as to what's driving that better-than-seasonal guidance for the March quarter.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I'll let Eric answer that since this is a mobile-specific driver.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I think we've talked about opportunities with Samsung, in particular, where we have much greater content. We've talked for some time now about new opportunities with Samsung's phones, both this fall with ultra-high band as we've now discussed, and then a big step up in the spring launch with a much higher integrated platform there. So, that's going to be a bit of a tailwind for us in March.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Karl Ackerman with Cowen and Company.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Hi. Good afternoon, gentlemen. If I may, I'd just like to go back to the last question. I was curious whether your content uplift in March is exclusively focused on mid-range models or tie more to flagships, because I think your prior guide was dependent on ramping on a particular model at that key customer in the March quarter. And I had a follow-up, please.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, forgot exactly the way you phrased it. But if you're asking about the less than seasonal decline or the offset to seasonality maybe, it's a mix.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Right.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
One, the – probably the biggest driver is flagship content and then, but also a continued just migration towards more Phase 6 phones with our China customers, too.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Understood. I guess despite all the near-term consternation on automotive, it would seem your IDP business tied off automotive continued to scale very well with two notable design wins in the quarter. It would seem this business should do or should continue to grow above the segment average. So, I was hoping you could just talk about the content opportunity you see within your automotive business over the next 12 months and really just kind of how large you see that revenue opportunity for you over the next 12 months as well. Thank you.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Hello. This is James. So, we are seeing significant traction with our focus on the AEC qualified parts, particularly Wi-Fi, satellite radio and the VDX systems that Bob talked about in his remarks. We are – our Cat 4 and Cat 6 products are shipping into car models early next year. So, I think that's when we'll start to see the first really material revenue. And then, Cat 16 products will support 2022 models. So, we're still in a pretty long design cycle for the automotive business.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes. A question on 5G infrastructure, just given that's probably one of the stronger parts of the market right now. Can you talk about kind of your visibility into that market and how you kind of see it shaping up as you go through 2019?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Any specific to what you're talking about? Market in general or – I guess I wanted to clarify.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yeah, for 5G infrastructure. The inflection that you're seeing now just kind of how you're seeing that trajectory into 2019 and the type of visibility you're getting for customers into that as of right now?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I think we are definitely seeing the ramp beginning now. We've probably have been in the strong ordering pattern, certainly for the last several months. We're anticipating that to be strong for the next several years, very similar to what we saw in the 4G rollouts that we had several years back. So, sustainable. It looks well-behaved from our perspective as far as number of base stations are going to get rolled out. Now what's different for us this time than 4G rollouts early on is a content story. So, because of the massive MIMO that I talked about earlier, that drives significant content increase for Qorvo. And because of our GaN capabilities, we're now able to supply the power amplifier slot, which we weren't in 4G rollouts back a few years ago. So, again, I think it's normal ramp what we saw back three or four years ago and I think we'll be able to play in a much larger role, because of MIMO and GaN.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then just a follow-up question for Eric. I appreciate the comments on how you're seeing the China handset market. For Qorvo, specifically, you mentioned another 10% customer. Can you just talk about how you're feeling this from kind of a market share perspective and what type of momentum you're seeing in China?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, the second 10% customer has been a great customer for us this year. We've been building business through content gains and getting a higher presence on their platforms, both their flagship platforms as well as their mass tier platform. So, it's been a great story for us this year and, of course, we're overall the leading supplier of RF2 to all the other big suppliers in China as well. So, overall, it's been just a great, great year for us in China and a lot of excitement again about the new technologies that we're working on together for next year.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
We want to thank everyone for joining us on tonight's call. We hope to see you at upcoming investor meetings, and we look forward to speaking with you on our third quarter call. Thank you again, and have a good night.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co. Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. Mike Burton - The Benchmark Company, LLC Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Incorporated First Quarter 2019 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, it is my pleasure to turn the conference over to Mr. Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Chelsea. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's first quarter fiscal 2019 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone. Qorvo's solid June quarterly performance was highlighted by broad-based strength across our markets, customers and products. We enjoyed strong demand during the quarter in both Mobile and IDP, and the team did an outstanding job supporting large customer ramps, while securing new opportunities for growth. By business, IDP quarterly revenue grew 13% year-over-year to $207 million, while Mobile revenue for the quarter grew 7% year-over-year to $486 million. The June quarter represented an excellent start to fiscal 2019 highlighted by strong smartphone unit volumes in China, design win activity and operating discipline. Qorvo is laser focused on portfolio management in markets that value our capabilities and offer exceptional opportunities for growth. Within these markets, we bring key enabling technologies like BAW, SOI and GaN, a robust product development engine, manufacturing scale, and decades of industry know-how. Turning to IDP, quarterly performance was driven by record revenue in wireless connectivity and growth in base station solutions. IDP is reaping the rewards of portfolio management in diversified markets including the connected home, the connected car, Wi-Fi, base stations and defense. These are expanding markets underpinned by positive secular trends like the deployment of LTE Advanced Pro and 5G, the proliferation of gallium nitride, and the Internet of Things. IDP partners with industry leaders and wins with differentiated products and technologies. Revenue for IDP's IoT applications increased over 30% year-over-year. In Wi-Fi, we are a leading supplier of front-end modules for tri-band distributed Wi-Fi systems. In these systems, our BAW filters maximize spectral efficiency and our PAs increase power-added efficiency. As the IEEE governing body and the Wi-Fi Alliance work to extend spectrum for 802.11ax, our Wi-Fi portfolio is expanding to include solutions in the 5.9 to 7.1 gigahertz range for products ramping in the second half of 2019. In the connected home, we're very pleased to support the next-generation SONOS Beam soundbar with our iFEM, integrating a BAW filter for interference-free streaming. In the connected car, we are engaged with multiple OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers in joint development activities for next-generation automotive connectivity. Beyond the connected home and the connected car, our IoT opportunities are expanding to include a diverse set of emerging applications like electronic shelf labeling and commercial and retail lighting. In infrastructure, it's clear the demand for data is driving up carrier base station investments globally. They are deploying LTE Advanced Pro, networks to enable narrowband IoT and to build the foundation for upcoming 5G rollouts. We continue to see growth in small cells and massive MIMO and expect our business to expand as these markets develop. During the quarter, we extended our 5G leadership by introducing several new products for massive MIMO and 5G macro base stations. Our expanding 5G portfolio supports all anticipated frequency bands for 5G architectures up to 39 gigahertz. Given the superior performance characteristics of gallium nitride versus legacy silicon technologies, we see GaN proliferating in multiple markets including base stations. Our GaN solutions support massive MIMO deployments below 6 gigahertz. In China, demand is increasing for Qorvo solutions for the 3.5 and 4.8 gigahertz deployments anticipated in 2019. In millimeter wave, Qorvo's 39 gigahertz GaN front-end modules are powering the first commercially available millimeter wave fixed wireless access service which was recently deployed in Boston, L.A., Washington and additional cities to be added later this year. In defense, the demand environment continues to be driven by greater performance, increased efficiency and more highly integrated system solutions. Qorvo is the recognized leader in GaN for defense applications and a trusted foundry for the U.S. Department of Defense. Our GaN solutions deliver distinct customer advantages including higher power density, smaller arrays, lower power consumption and several orders of magnitude improvement in reliability from its current technologies. We recently introduced two highly integrated X-band front-end modules optimized for next-generation active electronically scanned array radars. Our newest GaN modules leverage Qorvo's scale and integration capabilities to combine four parts into one providing the smallest and highest performance FEMs for mission critical radar systems for customers around the world. Turning to Mobile Products, as we laid out at our Investor Day, Qorvo is repositioning our portfolio to target and win the highest growth, most complex opportunities. We're leveraging core enabling technologies like BAW and SOI to transform our business with a focus on our differentiated solutions. Today, we're investing to win in mid and high-band PADs, diversity receive modules, antennaplexers and RF Fusion variants for our low-band PAD. As architectures evolve, many of these products including antennaplexers and diversity receive modules offers opportunities to grow our BAW-based revenue. Qorvo also enjoys broad-based growth opportunities in antenna tuning and envelope tracking. We're developing our fourth generation ET technology and we see a long runway ahead, given the performance requirements of 5G and the challenges of its higher bandwidth and peak-to-average power ratio. In antenna tuning, demand for Qorvo's industry-leading solution is growing with the advent of LTE Advanced Pro, MIMO and 5G, very simply. New functionality is requiring that the antenna count go up, while the board space available for these antennas continues to be reduced due to industrial design factors. That requires antennas to be miniaturized which weakens their bandwidth capabilities and adversely affects antenna performance. Qorvo is the leader in antenna management and our antenna control solutions address these challenges to vastly improve the user experience. It's worth noting that this dynamic is no longer limited to premium-tier devices. Customers in China are adopting Qorvo's multiplexing and antenna tuning solutions, as well as our RF Fusion Phase 6 for their increasingly sophisticated flagship smartphones. We posted record revenue for our BAW-based quadplexers in China during the June quarter and we're very well positioned as the performance-tier smartphones increase in functionality and adopt more highly integrated Phase 6 architectures. Qorvo's RF Fusion for Phase 6 features our BAW and SAW filter technologies to deliver complete front-end coverage in two highly integrated placements. Just as we outlined at our Analyst Day, we see multiple avenues for growth in Mobile as global demand for data continues to acquire more and better RF. Before handing the call off to Mark, I want to say a few things about our recently announced changes to the operations team including the addition of Paul Fego. First, I'd like to thank Steve Grant and Jim Stilson for getting us to where we are today. Steve and Jim have been instrumental in creating our world-class manufacturing platform. Since we started Qorvo in 2015, Jim and Steve have led the charge to implement our global operations strategy, and together they've helped position us for the growth and opportunities that we see today. We appreciate their continuing contributions as Paul gets up to speed. Paul joined our team earlier this week bringing 35 years of global large-scale semiconductor manufacturing experience with well known and respected semiconductor companies. Paul's deep experience in front-end and back-end manufacturing with both high-volume and high-mix operations aligns perfectly with Qorvo's operational and business needs. He will lead the further consolidation of our global operations from wafer fabrication through assembly and test and we look forward to his many contributions as we continue on our lean journey. Looking across our entire organization, we believe we have the right people, products and technologies to capture an expanding set of long-term growth opportunities. We are positioned to be a primary beneficiary of global macro trends in LTE Advanced Pro, 5G, IoT and GaN. We're investing in the highest growth segments in the markets we know best and we're differentiating with technology to win across markets, customers and products. And with that, I hand the call over to Mark.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the first quarter was $693 million, significantly above the high end of our guidance range. Mobile revenue of $486 million was higher than expected across multiple customers and particularly strong in China. Mobile returned to year-over-year growth in the quarter which we expect to sustain through the rest of the fiscal year. IDP revenue was $207 million, the ninth consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year growth. Non-GAAP gross margin in the June quarter was 44%, in line with our guidance. Our margin outlook for fiscal year 2019 remains positive and unchanged from previous guidance, as we grow our top line, optimize our product portfolio, improve factory utilization and drive productivity. Operating expenses were $160 million, up less than expected due primarily to timing of program development expenses. Non-GAAP net income in the June quarter was $124 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.96 or $0.21 above the midpoint of our guidance. June quarter cash flow from operations was $75 million, reflecting inventory builds to support Mobile Product ramps. CapEx of $44 million was primarily related to BAW and GaN capacity additions in Richardson. We repurchased $100 million of stock in the quarter. Cash at quarter end was $334 million, down from year-end cash of $926 million due to the repurchase of the remaining $429 million of our 2023 notes and from increased share repurchases. Following quarter end, we completed a partial tender for $300 million of our 2025 notes and a $500 million eight-year unsecured notes issue at a coupon of 5.5%. With these actions, we've lowered our interest costs and extended our average debt maturity to 2026. We remain well below our net leverage target and retain significant financial flexibility to grow the business and return capital to the shareholders. Turning to our outlook, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $850 million and $860 million, gross margin to increase sequentially to approximately 47.5% consistent with previous comments, and diluted EPS of $1.62 at the midpoint of our guidance. On revenue, we expect IDP to post a stronger September quarter helped in part by the recent lifting of the U.S. Department of Commerce's ban on ZTE. For Mobile, we see sequential revenue up over 30% on seasonal ramps. On gross margin, our September quarter guide reflects expected progress on mix improvements and productivity gains partially offset by under-loaded SAW capacity. We expect gross margins in the back half of the year to average 50% or more. Operating expenses are forecasted to increase in the September quarter to approximately $170 million, principally driven by increased design activity. We expect OpEx to trend down in the second half, totaling less than 20% of sales for the full year. We're lowering our second quarter and full year non-GAAP tax rate forecast to approximately 8%. We expect operating cash flow to strengthen in the second half of the fiscal year on higher revenue, stronger margins and lower working capital. CapEx is expected to increase in the second quarter primarily due to BAW and GaN investments in Richardson, expansion of BAW capacity in Farmers Branch, and the purchase of a leased facility. Our CapEx for the rest of the year remains tied to design opportunities, tool conversions, new tool lead times and other factors. Currently, these factors point to moderately higher CapEx this fiscal year primarily driven by acceleration of our build-out of Farmers Branch as we gain confidence in our BAW-based revenue outlook. We believe this increase is for the right reasons, value-creating investments supporting our high-growth and high-margin businesses where we hold differentiated positions. As a result, our free cash flow forecast for the year is now expected to be closer to $700 million. So, in summary, we posted a first quarter well above our guidance. Looking ahead, we expect full year revenue growth around 10%, gross margin increasing to 50% or more for the second half, and full year OpEx below 20% of sales. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions. Operator?
Operator:
Yes, sir. And our first question will come from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
Bob, congratulations, a lot of good things happening in the quarter. Mark, I wanted to ask a question about your 10% full year growth forecast. You've obviously given us all the way through September. Can you provide us maybe some color on how we should think about December? Is that expected to be up? And then, any more color you can give us low/mid-single-digits whatever? And then, how should we think about March? And then I've got a follow-up after that.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure, Harsh. And we're not going to give specific guidance on revenue in the back half, but what we can say is based on what we see now, we do see a sequential increase second quarter to third quarter, so our September quarter to December quarter. As you would expect, we would see seasonality with a decrease into the March quarter. Normally, that seasonality has been sort of 10% to 15%. And if we were to right now call are we going to have on the high end of that or the low end of that, we would say that we'd probably have on the low end of that.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
This is very helpful, Mark. And then for my follow-up, historically, Qorvo has been sort of the third content guy at the large customer. But I believe this year, you are benefiting from a strong ramp in content. Would you be able to give us some idea, maybe some color on what kind of content you're looking at in terms of uptick? And also, does this mean that you're now quite possibly the number two supplier content-wise to the large guy?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Harsh, this is Bob. And first of all, thanks for your opening comments. We're not going to be able to answer any future comments about any of our customers for that matter. What I can tell you, Harsh, is what I am very proud of the organization and what we've done as far as developing the technologies and products that our industry needs. I think with the way we're positioning the portfolio today, we believe we can grow as fast as the industry or slightly faster than the industry, and I think I'll just leave it at that for this time.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question will come from Cody Acree with Loop Capital.
Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions and let me echo my congratulations. Maybe to that last question a bit differently, just the strength that you've seen in your mid and high-band PAD and you alluded to this in your prepared remarks, can you just talk about any other successes that you had and when you might expect those ramps – not just PAD, other mid type (21:23) and designs?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, this is Eric. I'll be happy to take that. We see backed by the general trends that we covered I think pretty thoroughly on our Investor Day of our customers looking to add a lot of band coverage and in particular, mid and high-frequency bands extending up to ultra-high band now looking at additional carrier aggregation requirements and multiple bands at once being covered there, and those are generally in the mid and high-frequency ranges because of antenna sizes and so forth, all of that really is driving a need for more BAW filtering and in more and more cases, we see those being integrated into higher level products, whether it's in Phase 6 which is our primary workhorse of the future for our China-based customers for the most part, all the way up to the highest tiers of the flagship phones, and it is also across multiple product categories. It applies to the main path obviously and also receive diversity path. For the same reasons, we think BAW has key advantages. And as we looked at sharing fewer and fewer antennas with more and more radios, antennaplexing as well is going to be of more importance. And there, again, that's really almost entirely BAW-based products.
Cody Acree - Loop Capital Markets LLC:
And Eric, thank you for that. Can you just delineate a bit of the health in China you're seeing in unit demand, and just any comments you have on some of the second/third tier OEMs and any pricing sensitivity that you're starting to see in that second/third tier market?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Right. So, overall, we – obviously, from our results last quarter, we had another pretty strong quarter with March. We're real proud of the team what we've created both in terms of product portfolio as well as applications and customer support throughout China. We're, if not the largest, we're very close, but in most cases, we're the largest supplier to all the leading handset suppliers throughout the region. And we've seen both I think a refilling of the channel in some cases, which is kind of in the lower and mid-tiers, but also a lot of our customers have brought out some fantastic new flagship products. And these are really compelling products. Industrial design is very, very good. The feature set is good and competitive and they're having a lot of success so far. So, still a little bit early. We need to see those handsets continue to sell on through, but at least in the June quarter, we saw pretty healthy uptick across a wide range of our customers and our product portfolio.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question will come from Ambrish with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi. Thank you. I just wanted to go back to the reported quarter and you had a very big upside on the top line, but I was wondering why there was no fall through on the gross margin side? And then, I have a quick follow-up, please.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Ambrish, so you're right that in the quarter with a higher revenue, the SAW utilization drag which we anticipated had less of an effect principally driven by that higher revenue. But we did have, as you can see, a higher mix on Mobile which goes against us. Within Mobile, we had a higher mix in China. And then, I would say also in IDP, and James can talk about this perhaps later, a bit weaker mix in IDP. So, the positives of the higher revenue and the lesser effect of SAW was offset by these mix effects both across the segments and within the segments. I would just note, Ambrish, we're in line with the guide and the September guide is in line with my previous comments.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Yeah, clearly, you are guiding for what you've said before. And then, just a real quick one on ZTE, when do you expect it to get back to the annual run rate that you had given last quarter, I think it was $40 million?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Ambrish, this is Mark. I'll take that one as well. For ZTE, we already see them returning to historical levels and we've got that built into our second quarter forecast and we've got it reflected into the rest of the year at those levels. Now, we've taken a bit more conservative view on parts of China just to make sure that our forecast remains intact there. But, the ZTE effects and the normal run rate of that business is back in and we're certainly pleased that they're a customer again.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I just want to add that was $40 million for the year, just to be clear.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
$40 million for the year, so $10 million a quarter, Ambrish.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Srini with Macquarie Securities.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Thank you. Mark, just to follow up on the gross margin question. I guess, as we move to the second half of the fiscal year, your guidance implies I think low 50% gross margin. I'm just wondering, is it pretty much a function of SAW utilization getting better and then BAW mix getting better? Are there any other puts and takes? If you can give us any color on that, that'll be helpful.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. The drivers for the margin expansion in the second half remain consistent with what I've talked about before. As the revenues grow, the impact of the SAW and the utilization becomes less impactful. Also, the costs related to that, we continue to work those down, so that helps us as well. And then, it's fundamentally driven by a change in more favorable mix, BAW-related content and then just continued improvements in the overall fab utilization.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Great. And then to follow up I have a 5G question maybe for Bob. Bob, I think in the press release you mentioned you have a new design win at 3.5 gig. I'm just curious where we are in the 5G cycle. Is that design win for 5G? And then, there's also a lot of talk about rolling out 5G in lower frequency band, for example in a 600 megahertz and also 2.5 gigahertz. So, I'm curious, if 5G gets implemented in lower frequencies, around 600 megahertz to 2 gigahertz, is there any incremental content? Or is it going to be similar to what we saw with 3G and 4G in terms of the absolute content? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Thanks, Srini. I think what's great is both James and Eric can answer your question. So, I think we're going to take some time and make sure that there's good clarity between two businesses because I did talk a lot about 5G in both of the businesses. So, if you don't mind, I think we ought to start with James and talk about 5G and some of those questions. Then, Eric, if you'll, pick that up after that.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Let me start by IDP and really talk about where we see the infrastructure going. We have recent design wins and key product demonstrations really around the world and I think these reflect our leadership position in 5G. There's pilot deployments going on in numerous cities and really across the broad spectrum of products, so all the way from very low frequencies that you mentioned earlier up to 39 gigahertz. The infrastructure rollouts appear to be on track for 2019, so that's probably a bit of an acceleration on what we've talked about in the past. We also see 5G rollouts driving some nice underlying trends like the proliferation of GaN to be used in massive MIMO systems. So, we are now shipping in volume power amplifiers into massive MIMO deployments that are intended to support the early rollouts of 5G systems. So, I would say in general, the infrastructure rollouts are somewhat ahead of what we've been discussing in the past.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
And on the Mobile side, there's a tremendous amount of activity. Of course, we're generally working with customers looking out two to three years which is well into the deployment of 5G. The 3.5 gigahertz ultra-high band design win that we mentioned is not 5G yet. It's notable though as we see that range which will become in 77 being one of the first bands to deploy 5G in commercial handsets from the road maps we see. And so, being an incumbent in that band we think is important at getting the content. When you look at 600 megahertz and you asked whether there's additional content, for example, if you roll out 5G, I think that's a really important question. People tend to talk about 5G as a bolt-on to 4G, in the early rollouts. It's really anything but when it comes to the RF; you can't bolt on something in RF. Anything you add impacts everything else that's there. So, if you take 600 megahertz to 5G, you're going to add more requirements on that band. It's going to have to be a higher performance band, but it's also going to affect isolation and so forth characteristics of other bands near that. So, as soon as we see 5G coming into the handset in any band, it will affect the content throughout the handset.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Burton with Benchmark.
Mike Burton - The Benchmark Company, LLC:
Hey, guys. And thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the results. Just wanted to follow-up on China for Eric, I guess, first. You mentioned it was strong in the June quarter. Can you help us size the Chinese OEM business for you? And what are your expectations for that business in both the September quarter, but also longer term if you could help us understand the content uptick with Phase 6?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So, in terms of sizing it, the China business excluding Huawei was over 30% of Mobile revs last quarter, so it's fairly substantial. And in terms of dollar uplift with the Phase 6, it varies from what the baseline is. For the most part with Phase 6, we're integrating the entire functionality into two placements. So, in terms of dollar opportunity for us, it raises us from some percentage of the total to the entire total. So, we are able to take all the main path content at least with the Phase 6 solution. And in terms of dollar content in total add, it depends upon what the customer is starting with, so it's really hard to identify a number with that.
Mike Burton - The Benchmark Company, LLC:
Okay. Fair enough. And then second one for James. A lot going on in your business for us. When you look ahead, how would you rank order your growth opportunities for the businesses? Are you starting – I mean, is it really kind of 802.11ax or the initial 5G deployments now or something else? And how should we think about that in the biggest opportunities for both this fiscal year and for next?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think you go back to those underlying trends that we talked about. We talked about the deployment of 5G which is driving significant content for us in our base station business. We're seeing that in this year as well. And we're seeing that with massive MIMO and small cell deliveries continuing to increase and actually becoming material in our base station business as we go through the year. So, I would say 5G is going to drive growth. On top of that, we'll also have significant growth in IoT and that will be both in the low-power side, our SoC portfolio that's going to support everywhere from connected home to retail commercial lighting to now this shelf tag opportunity we've talked about. And on the higher power side, it's going to support all of our Wi-Fi systems. So, those are growth drivers. And then on top of that, defense remains very, very steady growth engine and that's really driven by that other underlying trend we talked about which is the proliferation of GaN. We do see GaN growing actually significantly faster than what we had talked about the market doing. And we are winning in defense. We're winning in our broadband area. And as I stated earlier, we are now starting to win in the base station. So, first production deliveries are going out now for these massive MIMO GaN-based systems and that is becoming material revenue for us. So, again, to recoup, it's across IoT, it's across 5G and it's across GaN that's really the big drivers of growth in the business.
Mike Burton - The Benchmark Company, LLC:
Great. Thanks a lot.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ruben Roy with MKM Partners.
Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. First question for Mark, I just wanted to run through the OpEx commentary quickly. You mentioned some design activity driving the Q2 outlook up a little bit. Is that sort of broad-based design activity or sort of big customer related, if you can just kind of walk through that? And then, to get to the less than 20% for the year, that would imply some meaningful downticks in Q3 and Q4 and maybe you could just walk through what's driving those downticks in OpEx. Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Ruben, we've been clear that OpEx for us – much like our business is seasonal, OpEx can be seasonal. And so, there are a number of programs across the business, many different customers and it will fluctuate based on design cycles and size of programs and the amount of prototyping and so forth. So, some of that pushed out of the June quarter and we'll pick a little bit up of that in the September quarter, but it's just again more design activity that we foresee in the September quarter. And we just – and given our outlook on design activity, overall it continues to become harder and harder to make the decisions on what to spend money on. So, we're certainly trying to keep OpEx in check, but it will wax and wane based on seasonality.
Ruben Roy - MKM Partners LLC:
Okay. Thanks for that, Mark. And then, a question for Eric. Just on 5G, you guys talked a lot about that. But I'm just wondering, I've been hearing uptick in 5G commentary from a number of component companies. Would you say that there's been any sort of – has some of the design activity been pulled in there would you say? Or is it kind of in line with what you guys were thinking when we talked about it at the Analyst Day? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. We were the first to bring a 5G product to market. It's been well over a year now. So, in early 2017, we announced the first one. We've had dozens and dozens and dozens of engagements and we've been working on this quite a while. So, I guess, from our perspective and especially since Analyst Day, really, we don't see anything changing. Everything seems to be on pretty much the same pace it has been from the beginning.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Thank you. Just a question with regard to the CapEx and if you could talk about what's given you the incremental confidence to make that CapEx investment. Is that your overall weight of the business? Are there actual confirmed design wins that are supporting that CapEx? I mean, generally, if you could just help us to assess the risk that that CapEx will in fact be utilized as we go forward over the next year or so?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Chris, it's a good question and maybe it's easier to talk about in the general context of free cash. And we're there very thoughtful about CapEx, it's a very difficult decision for us and want to start with that, because we've been targeting $800 million of free cash, we gave a range of $700 million to $800 million. We're feeling now that given the CapEx view, it's going to be down to around $700 million, could be less, could be more, difficult to call at this point. And just for some color, the CapEx we thought we have this year was, on a dollar basis, about the same as last year which is $270 million and we thought this year would trend down as a percent of sales. Now, given what we've seen on BAW requirements in fiscal year 2020 and beyond and the level of design activity, timing of tools, which you know at this point is tight and other factors, we just thought it was best to accelerate expansion of Farmers Branch and get out ahead of that. This acceleration of Farmers Branch will require, we think, $50 million or more this fiscal year and so that we certainly didn't anticipate in the quarter. Now, some things we didn't anticipate either, right, like taking out the lease and a couple of other investments here and there, but you can normally, you have things that you can offset that with reduced expenditures elsewhere, but this is large enough that it's changed our CapEx view and our free cash view. Now, what do we get for the spend? Now, we had already planned to spend money expanding Farmers Branch, doing a lot of conversions at Richardson. And so, now we're projecting to spend around $200 million and that'll provide us about this time next year, we'll have 75% more wafer capacity than we have now. Now, when you layer in the die shrink that we're doing and other productivity programs, yeah, you end up with over 2x the amount of capacity by this time next year for that incremental investment. So, today, we're about 75% 6 inch; next year this time, we expect to be about 75% 8 inch. And we'll have – a lot of that will be at Richardson, of course, but then we'll finally have Farmers Branch up and running this time next year. Yeah, we're continuously updating this plan as we've done here. We're trying to spend only when we need to spend and what we need to spend, but while considering the opportunities we have in front of us, the pace of tool conversions that we can do, the new tool lead times, the technology and process changes we want to introduce and other factors. So hopefully that helps, Chris.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
That is helpful. I guess as a follow-on to that, the natural next question would be what does this mean for gross margins as we go into next year. And the benefit you're having in the second half of this year is filling up that BAW capacity that you had installed earlier. Can those gross margins be sustained next year in the 50% range despite the fact that you're adding this additional CapEx and... (42:03)
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Right now, Chris, and that's what's sort of prompting us to accelerate the investment. Our line of sight right now is that we'll continue to keep the fabs loaded excluding the SAW fabs we have in the near term. We certainly appreciate the pain of not having the fabs loaded. Long term, we still believe that below 10% of sales on CapEx is what we're going to have. And then on margin, it's fundamentally going to be driven by reinvesting in the right technologies and developing the right portfolio which we made clear at Investor Day, largest markets, fastest growing markets, hardest products to do. Are we going to maintain utilizations at the fabs which to your point are we making selective investments, are we driving down capital intensity which we believe we are. And then finally, are we achieving the operational discipline and continuous improvement that we want to see and where we think we're on a great track there with Bob's leadership, introduction of Paul and others.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Yeah. Thank you for taking the question. I wanted to follow up on CapEx as well. Mark, in your prepared remarks, you talked about an improved BAW-based revenue outlook. I was hoping you can elaborate on that. Is that more tied to adoption in China going forward, or is it higher market share at your largest customer, or both?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think, Toshiya, it's pretty much our view of adoption of BAW and our confidence in competing and it's widely ranging, right? It's Phase 6 activity we're seeing there, it's Wi-Fi, it's 5G, it's other areas and diversity. And so, I think Eric is probably the best to expand on it.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think Mark hit on the key points. It's really broad based and I think the increase in confidence in particular quarter-over-quarter is about our ability to address with BAW the adjacent segments of diversity receive and the antennaplexers, that's probably the biggest change quarter-over-quarter, and just looking at the timing of when we're going to need both high-volume samples, as well as volume production capabilities to support those markets.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then as a follow-up, we hear a lot about component shortages, and I think some of the passive components, MLCCs in particular, you're seeing significant tightness. Is there an impact on Qorvo from a cost perspective or in terms of your ability to ship to customers?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Bob. I'll go ahead and take that one. Number one, we're not seeing a disruption where it's impacting our ability to capture the revenue. We have longstanding relationships with many of these suppliers. We're not seeing any price changes. We continue to march down their technology road maps very much aligned with where they're driving the industry, and so far, so good, pleased with how the team has been handling this. You're correct, that tightness has been going on actually for quite some time and we've been taken care of and we appreciate that from our suppliers.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks a lot. Eric, I'm a little bit surprised to hear about Farmers Branch. Up in the past, you've said that you expect you can fill most of the big secondhand ramp in BAW out of Richardson, most of that actually on the 6-inch lines, which you had upside protection on that. Is that still the case, or are you expecting maybe that you're going to – a little bit sooner than it's possible. And if so, I know the qualification of that fab, you've got a preliminary one which is not the complete qual on it (46:10) and so you're probably talking several months here. You mentioned high-volume prototype runs followed by production. Is visibility in BAW on those type of products, which are very vertical, improved or changed significantly over the last several months that gets you rolling on Farmers Branch earlier? And then I have a follow-up for James, please.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let's say – I believe the beginning of your question was about the question, what's driving most of the growth in the BAW utilization and how it's going to be servicing Richardson and nothing has changed there in terms of the primary path. Marquee handset-based integrated modules with mid and high-band content, that is the bulk of the growth and that's what's driving it. What we're talking about here is now pulling in Farmers Branch by a quarter or two to where the CapEx falls into this fiscal year as opposed to next fiscal year essentially and that's timing just of our entry into these adjacent markets, diversity receive and antennaplexers basically.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah and just to be clear, Farmers Branch is not going to be operational for customer parts here this fiscal year, it'll be next fiscal year.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
All right. So, based on those comments, it sounds something like Farmers Branch is most of the adjacent markets, etcetera. Where are all the quadplexers that you're shipping into China going now? It's kind of split, isn't it? It's not coming out of Farmers Branch, is it?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Zero out of Farmers Branch. Everything that we're producing is BAW-based today. The BAW filters are being made at Richardson.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Perfect. Thank you. And then, James, if I could, it sounds like mix works against you this quarter. Was that more Wi-Fi, less defense in GaN? And if you could maybe, postulate a little bit, what does it suggest when 802.11ax finally shows up in handsets next year? I know it's been delayed a bit, but some of the flagship guys are going to have it in the phones and I expect 802.11ax start seeing a lot more use which will probably pull-through to your side of the business too. Would that affect your mix on a gross margin significantly if that were to occur faster than you thought? Thanks.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So, the first comment about mix in the quarter I think was largely correct. So, a little bit more in our consumer side products and a little bit less in our defense-based world so that mix works against this event. Defense has typically been a little bit lumpy for us, although on a great trajectory going forward. So, I think we'll get back to mix and we're pretty comfortable with how we'll execute towards the model throughout the whole year. As far as – 802.11ax has delayed a bit. And I think once 802.11ax does come online, it will be another significant growth driver for us in Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi has been doing great, but this will be that next big growth spurt. We are way out ahead of it. We're getting on reference designs, and in most cases, we're either primary or secondary on all of the 802.11ax reference designs that are out and we're also expanding the portfolio to encompass the new frequency bands that we believe are coming. So, yes, short answer is, yes. It will drive the next growth spurt.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yeah. Thanks for taking the question. My first question is for James and maybe piggybacking, it sounds like some of the IoT is coming in better. You're getting some sooner production for GaN and 5G, ZTE has come back. Should we think of this business being on track to kind of return to mid-teens type of grower this fiscal year, and then what will be driving that?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think we're still on track for what we said at Analyst Day which is our underlying markets are growing 10% to 15% and we believe we'll do at or better than what those underlying markets will do and it's certainly too early to call the year. Great start, as Bob stated in the first quarter, at 13%. And I think we'll just continue to track at above market growth rate as we go forward. What's going to drive it is, is that story we just talk about over and over and over. IoT is going to drive it, that's going to include Wi-Fi and our low-power systems. The base station market is doing very, very well for us, as I talked about earlier, and that's that proliferation of massive MIMO and 5G really starting to come on board. And then GaN is just continuing to be pretty aggressively up into the right. And so, those trends are very much holding true and I expect they will hold true for the year.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Great. And then my second question, assuming the positive growth trends continue in IDP, that would kind of suggest obviously you said earlier you expect further year-on-year growth in Mobile in the September quarter, but can you help parse out some of the unit demand versus content gains? And in particular, obviously, China came in better in the June quarter. Are you expecting, I guess, directional weakness based off of sell-through trends? Or help us understand why it seems to be modest growth overall in Mobile in the September quarter, if you could help us understand the puts and takes there, that would be great. Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Yeah, thanks, Bill. This is Eric. So, we still are not expecting much overall in terms of units in the market, so it's content growth primarily. Our handset customers in China, of course, are dealing with the domestic market which is clearly going down significantly year-over-year. They're making up for that with some pretty terrific progress in the export market. The content in those devices varies widely from region to region. So, it affects the projections for the dollar content mix. Going into the second half, we're basically kind of banking the shrink we saw in June, not expecting – not counting on that continuing. It very well might, but we're assuming at least that the China will be filled and demand will relax back down for now until we see differently.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thanks for taking my question. First one also back on June quarter and China. You beat your results by almost – the June quarter number by almost $40 million versus midpoint of what you had set before and you're saying China contributed a lot of that strength. What's your kind of visibility into sell-through trends there? Is there any risk of any kind of inventory adjustment as they go through the next two to three quarters?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Vivek, I guess, what I was trying to imply in my last answer essentially, we have very good visibility of our channel inventory now, so we are confident our channel inventory is healthy. In terms of handset inventory, that's a lot harder for us to gauge, right? We see the product announcements, we see forecasts from our customers. By the time we see sell-through, sometimes it can be late and that's why we're trying to be as conservative as we can here and hold our component inventory, the thing we can control, as tightly as we can.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Got it. And as my follow-up, I think in the past, you have mentioned BAW getting to 30% of the mix and then 50% longer term. Is that dependent on taking more share from your larger competitor? Or do you think that is essentially just a broader adoption of BAW across your customer base?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Vivek. This is Bob. It's really what we see in the market. We see tremendous opportunities for BAW. We've mentioned antennaplexers, diversity receive modules, we talked about mid/high-band PAD in multiple configurations to go with our Phase 6 and others that by discrete. So, we really see it much more of a market opportunity for us. I think again, the good news is we've now got our technology where it's as good as what we see out in the industry, in the market, and we've got people who now know how to make it, design it and sell it. So, we're gaining our confidence in our ability to participate in a great growth area.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach from Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes, thank you. I had a question on base station in particular GaN adoption. If you can just elaborate on what you are hearing from customers from a design perspective, and maybe just clearly there're some advantages, but also some push-backs around kind of costs. So just how you're seeing GaN develop as you go into 5G for base stations?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Let me talk specifically about us and how we're moving into the market. So, what's in front of us today is really a move into massive MIMO using our GaN power at plars (55:33). So, we've got production orders on the books and we're shipping, we see that as a fantastic growth opportunity for us to support that market. The very high power macro PAs that are also proliferating in the market are beginning too. We see those as opportunities that will start building in the pipeline next year. They will be focused largely above 3 gigahertz. So, in that 3 to 6 gigahertz range. And those frequencies in 3 to 6 gigahertz are largely driven around 5G. So those are in part driving GaN type solutions. But again, GaN is growing, industry models are showing in the mid 20s. And for us, we see our GaN work growing significantly faster than that.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then just a follow-up question for Eric. I know there's been a lot of focus on the China smartphone market, but just as you see things and then maybe this is in context versus a year ago or so, but just how you feel about your market share position within China and things to think about there going into the back half?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, I think we're certainly the largest RF supplier to the handset customers there in China and happy to be in that position and look forward to maintaining it again. The products that they're bringing to market are world-class and it's inspiring to see what they're doing to innovate and add value to their customer set. Again, they've dealt with their contracting domestic market and responded beautifully with a great job of exports. And so, we're happy to be a part of the market and we're investing to make sure we maintain leadership there.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Thank you very much. Just Mark, back on the question about China and Mobile, it sounds like it was about half of the Mobile business in June. Is it right to think that it will be down maybe 20% sequentially on a dollar basis in the third calendar quarter? And I guess on that, whether it's down 10% or 20% or whatever it is, it's a bit atypical for it to be down on a dollar basis in this third calendar quarter. Is that just because you saw channel refill in June and you're facing a tough comp next?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Bob. I'll go ahead and take that. Number one, your 50% is a little bit high, so let's just start with that. And yes, we are taking a very cautious outlook, but it is not going to be down quarter-over-quarter.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Okay, won't be down. Okay. Okay, then lastly on your big Korean customer, it hasn't been a great story for you, I think maybe misaligned on some architecture so far. But you should have some pretty good visibility in terms of what's going to start to ship next year. Should we begin to expect some more sizeable content gains there for 2019 and 2020 and if you can help us size that? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. This is Eric. Yeah, I think exactly as you said, it's how we see, we had a misalignment in our product portfolio with the direction they were heading a couple of years ago. We remain on track with the expectations we said previously. We'll begin to see a turn on our share this fall and then next spring a significant step up we believe in terms of our share, and then alignment from here as far as we can see maintains very, very good.
Operator:
Thank you. I would now like to turn it back over to management for closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I want to thank everyone for attending tonight's call. We hope to see many of you at our upcoming investor presentations and we look forward to speaking with you again on our second quarter call. Thank you and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's teleconference and you may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co. Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Karl Ackerman - Cowen and Company, LLC Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Fourth Quarter 2018 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Chelsea. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fourth quarter fiscal 2018 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone. The Qorvo team delivered a strong March quarter, with revenue and EPS above the midpoint of our range and record quarterly free cash flow of $227 million. The company is continuing to make broad strides operationally with strong commercial traction across products and customers. I'm especially pleased with the success we are achieving on BAW-based products, which we expect will lift factory utilization in the September quarter and beyond. For the 2018 fiscal year, IDP expanded margins and achieved outstanding revenue growth, up over 20%, while Mobile Products expanded margins and built a solid foundation for profitable growth. Looking forward, Qorvo is better positioned today to target and win our markets' highest growth and most complex opportunities, which in turn will drive us towards our target operating model. During the March quarter, the handset environment improved in China. We are seeing increased demand in the performance-tier for RF Flex and RF Fusion based solutions as well as for antenna tuning, discrete components and BAW-based multiplexers. Take for example our wins in Phase 6 architectures that include Qorvo's SAW and BAW technologies. Our Phase 6 RF Fusion solutions include both the mid/high-band and low-band modules, which provide complete front end coverage in two placements. In many cases, we're adding to our Phase 6 design wins with additional high value content, including our industry leading envelope tracking and antenna control solutions. Despite constraints in frequency spectrum, Mobile operators are mandating improved data throughput and more RF functionality in the same footprint in Mobile devices. To meet these demands, customers are requiring more highly integrated architectures with complex, more functionally dense RF content. These factors favor our device technologies, design capabilities and manufacturing scale, which enable us to drive content gains. At Qorvo, we're addressing the most complex customer requirement in the RF segments which are forecasted to grow the fastest, including ultra-high band placements, integrated mid and high band placements, antenna plexers, antenna tuning and diversity receive modules. We're investing in the highest growth segments and winning across products and customers. We're forecasting significant growth in BAW-based products across customers and our BAW factory utilization looks strong as we move into fiscal 2019. Weighing onto this, we will roll out die shrinks and wafer conversions to help manage the need for additional capital expenditures to meet increases in BAW demand. We continue to expect BAW-based products will represent around half of Mobile Products' revenue by fiscal year 2021. In IDP, March quarterly revenue was another record, up 26% year-over-year to $212 million. We successfully repositioned our product portfolio more than two years ago and we continue to be pleased with the results. IDP competes in diversified growth markets. We partner with the best in the business and we win with differentiated products and technologies. In defense, year-over-year revenue – year-over-year growth was led by strength in ongoing production programs and the continued adoption of GaN for high-power applications. In IoT, we continue to advance our Pod in Every Room vision with multiple 2.4 gigahertz, 5 gigahertz and BAW filter design wins with leading meshed Wi-Fi networking system providers. We also achieved record revenue in low-power wireless, led by our production ramp of our multi-protocol SoC for Samsung's remote controls. In infrastructure, the timeline for 5G deployment has accelerated and Qorvo is in close collaboration with customers by participating in dozens of 5G field trials and demos. During the quarter, we extended our 5G market leadership by adding the industry's first 28 gigahertz GaN on silicon carbide front end module for base stations. This follows on the footsteps of the industry's first 39 gigahertz front end module which we released last year. We also released the industry's first BAW filter to deliver a quadrupling in power handling capabilities for 5G massive-MIMO front end modules. 5G is coming across networks and Mobile devices and it's accelerating the requirements for gigabit LTE which will serve as the backbone for 5G. Gigabit LTE requires best in class, highly integrated placements and Qorvo is targeting the most complex and most valuable solutions, especially those that require BAW-based content. In both Mobile and IDP, Qorvo's addressing our customers' most critical challenge as the complexity of their products continues to increase. This favors superior performance as a differentiator and increases the value of enabling technologies like BAW and GaN. As we continue on our lean journey and become more efficient through operational excellence, we expect to grow the business with greater capital efficiency, by shrinking die sizes, expanding wafer diameters and leveraging our foundry relationships. In summary, Qorvo's solutions are enabling customers to achieve higher levels of performance and helping to transform the end user experience. We're targeting our markets' fastest growing and most profitable opportunities and we're gaining design wins across our customer base. We're poised to benefit from the strong secular trends in gigabit LTE, 5G, IoT and GaN and we believe we're well positioned for revenue growth, margin expansion and strong free cash flow in fiscal 2019. With that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the fourth quarter was at the high end of our guidance range at $664 million. Mobile revenue of $452 million was higher than expected on improving China demand. IDP revenue was $212 million, the eighth consecutive quarter of double digit year-over-year growth. IDP has a diversified and sustainable platform for long-term growth built on solutions for advanced radars and other electronic warfare defense applications, Wi-Fi and connectivity applications and GaAs and GaN products for wireless infrastructure. Non-GAAP gross margin for the March quarter was 48%, at the lower end of our guidance range on mix effects across Qorvo and within both business units. Our margin outlook for the full year of fiscal 2019 remains positive as we optimize our product portfolio, grow our top line, improve factory utilization and drive additional operational improvements. Operating expenses were $156 million, up approximately $5 million sequentially on higher development program spending and seasonal payroll effects. Year-over-year, OpEx was down $8 million from ongoing productivity efforts, including our September quarter restructuring activities. As with gross margins, our outlook on OpEx is on track with our long term model. OpEx will vary within the year on seasonal effects and the timing of development programs, but over time, we expect to continue driving OpEx down as a percent of our revenue. Operating income for the quarter was $163 million or 24.5% of sales, up 370 basis points versus last year. Non-GAAP net income in the March quarter was $139 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $1.07, $0.02 over the midpoint of our guidance and up 26% year-over-year. March quarter cash flow from operations remained strong at $259 million and CapEx decreased again sequentially at $32 million, which helped drive a second consecutive record free cash flow quarter of $227 million. We are committed to executing a model that delivers stronger and more durable free cash flows and our full year fiscal 2018 free cash flow of $583 million was a strong start to demonstrating that commitment. We repurchased $51 million of stock in the quarter and cash at quarter end was $926 million. Turning to our outlook, in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $645 million and $665 million; gross margin to decline sequentially to approximately 44%, reflecting near-term impacts of product mix and costs associated with low SAW fab utilization; and diluted EPS of $0.75 at the mid-point of our guidance. On revenue, we expect IDP to post another solid quarter of solid year-over-year growth in the June quarter, but decline sequentially due in part to recent U.S. Department of Commerce actions on ZTE. For Mobile, we see sequential and year-over-year revenues up slightly in the June quarter and an improving demand environment in China. On gross margin, we view the June quarter as a transition period and forecast gross margins to return to more normal levels in the September quarter. The projected June quarter gross margin decline of 4 points is driven by two principal factors
Operator:
Thank you, sir. Our first question will come from Harsh Kumar with Piper Jaffray.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
A couple of questions. Bob, seasonality in the handset space has been all over the place for the last few years. I guess there was a lot of fear and concern going into the June quarter. Can I ask you your viewpoint on the Chinese market and also your largest customers and the puts and takes there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, sure, Harsh. I'll take a very high level view on that, like, we don't really enjoy getting into customer mix. As I said in my opening comments, the China market did start to come back, but I also have to acknowledge the team did a really good job on designing in a lot of products. Our customers in China released a lot of new phones. So I think we're seeing – we went into the quarter with some pretty healthy being low inventory and that's kind of what the uptake was. So we're kind of seeing that continue this quarter. I think our largest customers already spoke for themselves, so I think you guys know how that's going. So China market's looking okay. We're taking very cautious view on it. We've seen this play out before. We're trying to keep our inventories healthy, meaning light, low.
Harsh V. Kumar - Piper Jaffray & Co.:
Fair enough. And one for Mark. Mark, I heard your comments. Is it appropriate to think that the gross margin effects are primarily temporary just that SAW is coming down faster, BAW has maybe not – is not going to ramp in the June quarter? Would you give us a sense of timing when BAW will ramp? And then also you gave some numbers first half – you gave full year margin I think of 49%, but you also gave another number 49% and I missed that. Would you just clarify what that was? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So, Harsh, to your first question, what you are seeing is what you mentioned. We are – and it's starkest in the June quarter, you're seeing the transition from legacy, less advanced products and more SAW related content to a portfolio that's more BAW related and other advanced technologies and as well as GaN, continued growth in IDP. So you're seeing that transition play out and it will improve our margins both because of the more favorable product mix, but also the favorable utilization effects, of course, with our largest fab. Also in the June quarter, as I mentioned in my comments, we are experiencing the costs of the underutilization in our SAW capacity. And because it's a relatively low revenue quarter for the year, those period costs impact us the greatest. And that effect, while it persists through the year, fiscal year 2019, it goes from about 200 basis points effect in the beginning of the year here down to, it can be as low as under 1% later in the year. As far as the year margin guidance, we do expect to come off of this 44% gross margin in the June quarter quickly. The September quarter will return to more normal levels, which I would say be 47%, 48%. And then in the back half of the year, as I mentioned in my comments, 50% or more, and that should give you the profile for the year.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe you could just talk about this BAW ramp in terms of your visibility. Obviously, it's harder to manufacture tens of thousands or millions of units. And I know the issues two years ago with the low-band PAD, I'm just kind of curious your visibility and your ability to manufacture these BAWs. And is there anything left on your side that you still need to accomplish before the ramp in the second half?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, good question, Blayne. I think first, that factory has done a fantastic job of supporting all of our customers' ramps over the past years with BAW-based products. So we feel real good about that. So second, to your point, a few years ago, we had a very valuable lesson, that we did, a lot of lessons learned. We started something that we call our clean launch programs for our large customers and key products. And that actually was extremely successful this past year, past fiscal year 2018, as we ramped many products for many customers at extremely high volume. So with that as kind of the background, we're feeling pretty good about the work that's going on in our BAW factory and we don't anticipate any problems with ramping BAW products.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Thanks for that. And maybe if I could just ask about the tick up in OpEx, I think last time you had a big tick up, it was due to some projects or some tape outs or such. Why the tick up in June? And maybe if you could just talk about how long that should you think comes down to second half, is it a couple of quarters and then comes back down?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I'll make a high level comment, Blayne. If you really look at it, it's typical that a lot of our design activities are in the beginning of our fiscal year and then tail off at the end of the year. But I'll let Eric go through what drives that.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
No, that's exactly right. The high volume fall flagship launches in particular and maybe getting to the first half of your question to really validate quality and yield and performance, we run a lot of volumes in still the prototype stage to fine tune the process and make sure that we're clean for the launch.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And I would just add that, Blayne, as I mentioned in my comments, OpEx can be seasonal depending on various activities. But we absolutely are committed to this aggressive portfolio management and in part because we very much want to get more efficient with our OpEx and drive that down to below 20% of sales.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Blayne, this is James. Some of the OpEx increase is IDP, obviously, with the growth we've experienced, we are definitely hiring in the R&D area in multiple product areas and we'll continue to do that as we go through the year. So part of that increase is ours.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Thank you. Good afternoon. Just a follow-up question on SAW, and it sounds like what you're talking about is once the revenue ramps that's kind of on the area of 100 basis points headwind to margins. Is there anything else that you can do to eliminate that over time, any way to rationalize that capacity or eliminate that longer term drag on – of SAW on margins?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, it's a good question, Chris. We've done a number of things already and we've done our best to size our footprint for what we believe we need to serve customer needs and continue to maintain a great capability that we've got. So we've already taken some actions. You will notice in the GAAP results we did impair some assets associated with SAW capacity and you'll see that as a large charge about $38 million, $39 million in the GAAP results. We will continue to make sure we right-size our asset footprint and maintain the resources – and balance that with maintaining the resources we need to maintain this capability, because it's important for our product launches, particularly as we see this Phase 6 where you're seeing combined SAW and BAW. So we think we need this capability long-term.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay, great. Just as a follow-up to that, in your prepared comments, you talked about greater capital efficiency. Could you expand on that a bit? And I suppose what you just mentioned on SAW is probably part of that, but over time, what effect does that have on free cash flow generation as a percentage of revenue as you take those actions?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, we've had a great story the past year-and-a-half on free cash flow. Our CapEx as a percent of sales couple of years ago peaked at close to 20%. This past fiscal year that we just closed out we were under 10% of sales. And on a dollar basis, we expect 2019 to be at about those levels or less. That's – in addition to just improving operating cash flow, this CapEx trend has certainly bolstered free cash flow growth. We were – in the past three quarters, we've generated $600 million – over $600 million of free cash flow. In the past two quarters, individually, we've generated more free cash flow than we did in all of fiscal year 2017. So we are absolutely committed to continuing this. We do believe the capital intensity of the business is something we can continue to drive down and we're doing that in a number of ways, from better forecasting and planning our capital needs to – we've talked extensively about wafer expansion projects, four to six, six to eight, to die shrink programs which a number of those are still underway, of which BAW die shrink is an important program which you'll hear more about at Investor Day and just as aggressive portfolio management which we're undertaking, which – we talked about SAW capacity earlier. So I see some runway left in getting our CapEx as a percent of sales down over time. And of course, with revenue growth and expanding margins see the operating cash flow improving.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Great, thanks so much. I wanted to ask about IDP. Very nice growth acceleration in the quarter. Curious what drove that in Q4. And related to IDP, you talked about ZTE in your guide. If you could quantify that that would be helpful. And I guess Huawei is probably your biggest customer in IDP as well. So if you can provide some thoughts on the risks associated with that account as well that would be helpful? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Toshiya, this is Bob. I'll go ahead and take ZTE. For the company, it's a little bit over $40 million for the year kind of number, so kind of a $10 million run rate, that will size it, the majority of that is IDP. As far as Huawei goes, I'll let James talk about it. It's a big customer, but not anywhere near as biggest, but go ahead, James.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. For Huawei, they are one of our top five customers. And of course, we'll see how that goes. I mean, it's certainly too early for us to call anything. We'll continue to support the customers we have and look forward to seeing how it all works out. For ZTE, we do see that as a short-term issue. My belief is that either of those issues will be worked out with the U.S. government or the natural demand will shift to the other OEMs. And we're well positioned really across that whole OEM structure. So I see this as working itself out over the next couple of quarters for us and returning back to normal levels. Growth for the quarter, particularly strong in Wi-Fi, combining our best in class power amps with our BAW coexistence, band-edge filters and the integration capabilities have really allowed us to get a lot of traction in this marketplace. We're focused in the high performance slot both consumer and enterprise. And the recent product releases we have are really laying the foundation for ax allowing for high throughput and thermal efficiency that's going to be needed for that kind of traffic level. So, great tremendous activity out of our Wi-Fi group. We also grew our low-power wireless business to record revenue and that was a second growth driver. And then defense has been particularly strong really across all major submarkets, radar, EW, comms and reaching a broad set of customers. As an example, our revenues through the distribution was also very, very strong, demonstrating the broad applicability of our products. We also had strong production programs in defense. I think that added to it as well. And with the recent passing of the defense spending bill, with over 17% increase in spending, we think that gives us a very nice tailwind. So broad based really over three key markets.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Okay, great. And as a follow-up, I had a question on BAW. You guys reiterated your fiscal 2021 target 50% of Mobile. I'm curious, what was the number for fiscal 2018? And over the next couple of years, should we expect a relatively linear progression or more of a back half kind of hockey stick inflection in fiscal 2020 and 2021? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. For BAW-enabled revenue, Toshiya, we were under 25% in fiscal year 2018, kind of mid 22%, 23%. In fiscal year 2019, we expect about 30%. And as Bob mentioned, about half the Mobile business in fiscal year 2021 will be BAW enabled.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question will come from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes. Thank you. I had a question on the China smartphone market. You talked about kind of that market's been leaned out and they're starting to recover, but also looks like perhaps some company-specific strengths. So can you talk about maybe your market share position or where you feel that's kind of shaking out and the implications to your growth in that market?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. This is Eric. I'll take that. Regarding the March quarter beginning to see some strength, we did mention in the call last time that we were being very, very careful with inventory so that when the growth began to come back we would see it immediately. And I think it probably came back a little sooner than we expected. But in addition to that, with the very tight inventory controls that we have as well as our largest customers, we saw – we actually grew sequentially in the March quarter as it turned out with China and see a lot of that strength continuing on into this quarter. But, of course, we're being cautious and as always trying to make sure that we maintain that low channel inventory both of our own inventory as well as customer inventory. In terms of share in the transition, the majority of the market today is still Phase 2 and in Phase 3 components. We see throughout this year a continued transition towards the higher levels of integration and performance going up in three, five phases and we're beginning already to get production orders for our Phase 6 system. And Phase 6 does an awful lot. It's a big step up, a much higher level of integration, higher band coverage, higher output power capability, MIMO and so forth. And for us, of course, it's also an opportunity, because with all the filters integrated, we can get the lion's share of the value (32:46). So there's a big transition for us this year not only in our marquee smartphones, but also in the performance-tier in China picking up higher content with that integration.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then if I could have a follow-up for Mark just around inventory, the inventory increased, just how are you thinking about that as you go into the back half of the calendar year, and how you might want to manage inventory?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Nothing unusual in inventory, Craig. I mean, we use inventory to maintain loadings in the fabs. And then in the case of SAW, we make sure our cost reduction plans are effectively executed. So nothing unusual about what you're seeing in inventory. We'll see inventory continue to build a bit in this upcoming quarter, and then, as happens, begin to tail off through the larger seasonal revenue periods.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yeah. Hi, good afternoon and thanks for taking my question. My first question is for James. I guess, if you imply the guidance for the June quarter, it's roughly probably a $20 million decline and I guess maybe possibly $10 million from ZTE. But I'm curious on what the decline is outside of that sequentially, acknowledging that there's still strong year-on-year growth trends. But then looking ahead for the full year, how should we think about growth in that segment? I guess you could assume some of the ZTE's business goes somewhere else, but how should we think about the overall yearly impact? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Hey Bill, this is Bob. I want to make sure we understood the question, because I think James is going to be down $10-plus-million quarter-over-quarter. So I know you threw out $20 million, so I want to make sure we're addressing the right part, but that's roughly...
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
The $20 million is to get to – the guidance for Mobile actually increases year-on-year...
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're not guiding individual segments, but ZTE will definitely come out in the kind of levels Bob talked about in quarter-over-quarter. And we had a very, very good Q4 as well. And so you see a little bit of leveling between the 26% year-over-year growth in Q4, you'll see that level out a bit in Q1. As far as the full year, I think we've got continued great things going on in our underlying markets, and we talk about those six markets. We'll talk about more of those when we get into New York. And we've got great tailwinds in trends like the adoption of GaN, the move to 5G, what we see going on in the IoT space. We model those markets to still grow in that 10% to 15% range and we expect to do at or better than those underlying markets.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And I just want to make sure to take care of some housekeeping here. On ZTE, it does affect our revenue. It is included in our guidance in the June quarter. We've also considered it for the full year, so no more ZTE effect beyond what you see in the current guide. It also impacted slightly the margin in this June guide. Also, we do adopt 606 revenue standard starting in this first quarter. For us, not a material effect, so no concerns there. We're already at sell-in versus sell-out, so for us that was not an issue. And then customer-owned inventory, we have some issues in the company, but it's very manageable and again, not material to our business.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Actually my second question is also for James. The GaN business has obviously – it looks like it's been going well and there's some opportunities in 5G, I guess, as we look through this year. Can you quantify the run rate for GaN exiting last year and how we should think about the revenue growth rate or run rate as we exit fiscal 2019? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
It's more than just the infrastructure side, Bill. I mean, when we look at GaN, it's into multiple products. But I think we can tell you it's not hundreds of millions. It's not single digit millions. It's a pretty decent percentage of James' total portfolio. But it is one of the faster growing segments that James does have where we've invested in some capital to continue to support his growth there. But go ahead, James.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I mean, I – it's double digit part of the organization today. It's largely in defense broadband and in satellite communications. The base station revenue for us will become more material next year as we see macro and massive MIMO base stations, including 5G move into production ramp. We've got a great process portfolio, a great product portfolio. We're leveraging our packaging innovation and in some cases even stealing shamelessly from Mobile to really drive our packaging cost down. And we have, therefore, the cost and the scale to differentiate in the market. We've also had a couple of really great product releases in GaN this quarter, so one of those established a record level of output power. We think that's very material in some of our defense space. And then we also released first to market with the film in the other really key millimeter wave band for 5G at 28 gigahertz. So in general, I think we see GaN business continuing to grow. We modeled the market to grow at about 25% and I think we'll continue to pace that same kind of growth level with GaN.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thank you for taking my question. Bob, I'm curious how sensitive are your second half sales to the success of one particular model of the flagship phone versus another? What happens if for example depending on pricing the demand shifts to say the OLED models versus the LCD models because I think that's sort of what tripped up the industry in this last generation. So I'm just curious what kind of assumptions you're making on the kind of mix that you might see.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. The comeback in the assumption what I've said in the past will hold true today. We will not speak about any upcoming phones that not have been announced, have not been in the market. So I'm very sorry, I can't help you with that question. It's a good question, but like past times when it's been asked, I'm not going to be able to help you. When it's in the market, we'll see what happens.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question will come from Karl Ackerman with Cowen.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen and Company, LLC:
Hello. Good afternoon. I had two questions. For my first question, I did want to circle back on inventory. I was hoping you could describe how you would characterize your own level of modules in the channel, given what appears to be still a mismatch between production builds and sell-through of higher-end smartphones. And, I guess, maybe the follow-up to that, would you expect to see the inventory overhang abating at the end of your June quarter, or perhaps could that percolate into the September quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry, Karl. I'm not sure we fully understand your question. Number one, our channel between us and most of our customers is direct. So, we ship it, they build it, et cetera. So I'm not sure what you're meaning. For those customers that we support through distributors and reps in China, we think our inventory levels between us and them are very low as I said in my opening answer to a question around this. So I'm not sure if that addresses your question or not.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen and Company, LLC:
Fair enough. I guess maybe as a side question, if I may, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the millimeter wave opportunity, now that you have just launched a 5G base station 28 gigahertz module, and particularly whether you expect to see revenue in calendar 2019? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, we've experienced revenue already in what we would call the last mile applications and we do expect to continue to have that. These are largely demo programs that are getting rolled out in the major city areas around the country. So we have revenue in those markets. I think broader proliferation will start to happen in next calendar year and then really take hold in 2020. Still a lot of speculation about below 6 gigahertz 5G and millimeter wave 5G and I think we'll place our bets in both and see how that plays out over the next couple of years.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ambrish with Bank of Montreal.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Thank you very much. I had a couple of clarifications for you, Mark. Just on the free cash flow and gross margin, and they're both kind of interrelated. On the gross margin front, you're keeping your guidance intact versus what you've said in the past. And your free cash flow comes down just a touch if I got it correct between $700 million to $800 million versus $800 million that you had given before?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Ambrish, what I say before our target that I stated before was $800 million, and that very much remains $800 million. I mean, I'm going to be going for over $800 million. But I'm giving you a guide for the year. And it's difficult sometimes to predict when we're going to need CapEx spend or to Craig's earlier comment on working capital management. So there is a risk factor applied to my guide there.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. And then for my margin question, I just wanted to make sure I understood the margin ramp up in the back half. So I get the underutilization charge and that will reverse. But the – half of the impact from the 400 bps this quarter is – in the guided to quarter is from product mix. How does that get corrected by itself, or is it mostly in Mobile, or is it IDP? And how does that transition through the year? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Ambrish, just to clarify, so you're right, half is costs associated with utilization, half is associated with the mix. On the mix, so 200 basis points, about 50 basis points of that is truly Mobile versus IDP mix within Qorvo. So just more Mobile business. And then about 100 basis points is mix within Mobile, so higher volume of legacy products relative to advanced or newer products. And we do expect as we've talked about before and we've reinforced in this call, we expect that to reverse and new products to drive up margins going forward. And then, the other 50 basis points is just some other smaller factors, including a little bit of IDP impacts and including the ZTE effect which we talked about earlier.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks a lot. I'll start with Eric. It sounds like you've landed quite a bit of content in Phase 6 platform. Can you give us an idea of generally where that goes for like the base case? I know the base case maybe a super PAD, but then you've talked about upside cases, include envelope tracking, tuning and maybe antenna plexer. So just in general, are we talking like the base case $1 to $2 in total content going to $8 to $10 or just help us quantify maybe what that is. And then for James, Cree announced the acquisition of Infineon's RF business which gives them a direct channel right into the wireless infrastructure OEMs that you're addressing in some of your things. And given that they're the supplier to you for silicon carbide, does this change the dynamic at all, because prior to this, they really weren't a big supplier there, so now they can both supply you and compete with you? I'm just curious, how that affects or does it affect your view of it? And then I have a follow-up with Mark, please.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Go ahead, Eric.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So in terms of the dollar content opportunity for us specific to China, if I understood the question right, as we move through these phase architectures from two through six, we see probably the largest single step between generations going from sort of the three, five to the six. But there's also a broad range of different applications in different dollar content implications. As I mentioned, we've got MIMO implemented, Power Class 2, higher power across really all the bands. We have more bands integrated. We have 40% smaller size, which obviously commands a premium in the ASP. And then we have some applications which are actually looking to bring UHB in as well. And so there's a broad range of ASPs, but significantly higher dollar content over what's shipping in the market today.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And Ed to your question about the supply chain from Cree, we actually have multiple supply chains to support James' business. Cree is as you pointed out one of them. I think we have excellent relationship with them. They made it clear to us they will continue to support us. So it's our expectations we will continue to have multiple supply chains to support James' business.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Okay. And then Mark, if I could, question kind of on CapEx. I know it's not a – it's going down again here too, but if you look at your mix coming up here between the Phase 6 wins, which has got a lot of BAW associated with it, of course the superPAD is your largest customer, and you got the quadplexers now shipping into China with the new phones there. I mean, BAW sounds like it's on a steadily increasing pace and that kind of dovetails with your guidance. When do you expect, or do you expect that you'll have to ramp Farmers Branch at some point? And can you just remind us where you are on that, is it qualified, is it production ready? Are you guys still working on it? And then if I could, I don't know if Steve's there, Steve Grant there, but if not, maybe Eric can handle this one. Along the same exact lines, you've shipped BAW to your – high performance, high frequency BAW to your largest customer in the past on six inch. How confident are you that you can supply the needs, especially your largest customer, using just six-inch instead of having to move to eight inch. And if you have to move to eight inch, what kind of risk are you looking at in terms of yields? Do you feel comfortable whether there's something you didn't have volume production before? Thanks, guys.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Ed, as far as the ramping on six inch and eight inch et cetera, you're correct, Steve's not here, he'll get into this I'm sure at the upcoming investor conference in May, later this month. But we're very confident in our yields what they've been running on six inch as well as on eight inch. So we will have production coming through this year on eight inch. We'll go through a little more detail on that at the Investor Day, but Ed, we're up and running on eight inch and we've talked about that in the past. Mark?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Ed, we're still obviously trying to do everything we can to avoid additional CapEx dollars. But the CapEx dollars we are spending are majority BAW. And that's despite efforts to convert more six inch to eight inch and die shrink programs will help. But Farmers Branch is not going to be needed this year. We'd be able to get it ready to go. And certainly the yields and what's being produced there in test is very good. So we're ready and we'll turn it on when it's needed maybe as early as next year.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question will come from Krysten with Nomura Instinet.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet:
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. The first one is just a housekeeping question, were there any 10% plus customers for the quarter? And approximately what percentage of revenues were they?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Krysten, one 10% customer.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura Instinet:
Okay. Thanks. And then following up on that particular customer, I know in prior conference calls, you've noted that this upcoming refresh will be one of the largest content gains gen-over-gen. Has anything changed in that, or do you still see that to be true?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think, Krysten, the way I think I'd like to answer that is we're still very confident in our BAW-based designs. I talked a lot in my opening comments as well about answering questions that we continue to expect a significant BAW ramp this year. We're supporting multiple customers and really look forward to second half of the year.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.:
Hi, thanks for taking my questions. First question for Mark. Mark, what changed on the gross margins coming down in the second quarter? The SAW underutilization, is it something on your side, or is it a change in the customer product mix? And then I have a follow-up.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, by second quarter, I'm assuming you mean second calendar, the June quarter. So, yes, just to remind folks, we've got two factors occurring. One is mix related issues and the other is, Atif, as you point out, these costs associated with SAW capacity underutilization. No problem with the parts other than we don't have enough SAW to sell. It's simply an accounting convention. When we experience abnormal levels of utilization, the fixed cost cannot be allocated to unit production so they need to pass through as period costs. And that's the effect you're seeing most pronounced in June, in part because through the year, its highest level is in June and then we have our lowest revenues. So on a percent basis, of course, it has the largest effect.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.:
Got it. And then a follow-up for Eric. Eric, if I look at the teardown of a phone that's already out, Galaxy 9, there is a combination of mid and high band PAD in that phone and architecturally the Korean handset maker is not too far behind the U.S. handset maker. But with respect to Chinese handset makers, how far behind you think they are in terms of adopting something similar where the mid and the high bands are getting combined? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, thank you. That's a great question. And I think that's fundamentally what's driving this significant shift in the Mobile portfolio throughout this year. We're finding that highly integrated modules that combine coverage for mid and high frequencies and allow you to very elegantly at a low loss support carrier aggregation combinations across all of that. They really help customers get to market with the leading edge handsets and that's applying widely to many customers in many segments. And really when you look at our Phase 6 solution, that's exactly what that is as well. You've got a low band module and then you got a mid and high integrated module, so solves all that complexity. So I think throughout this year, as we exit this year, you're going to see a lot of different instances of handsets from different customers and different tiers adopting similar technology.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question will come from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi, guys. I had two questions. One, Mark, if I heard you right, I think you said you're looking for 9% to 10% growth in fiscal 2019. Just wondering from a broad brush, can you give us sort of what are the biggest drivers? Is it sort of the ramp of mid band, high band PADs? Is it China coming back? Is it continued growth in IDP? What are the biggest drivers?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I'll just say generally, Quinn, we're experiencing good design win momentum across our customer base. And of course, and then many of the things Eric talked about, Phase 6 is a good example. And so we've seen our strength in China improve even further. And then, of course, James' business, a small sequential decline in the June quarter, but still year-over-year growth, and then that growth picks back up again to double digits in the rest of the year.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then as my follow-up for Eric, it sounds like BAW-based products are 22% or 23% of your business in fiscal 2018, expect to be about 30% in fiscal 2019. If I just take consensus estimates, it feels like your BAW-based products go from about $500 million in fiscal 2018 to somewhere around $700 million in fiscal 2018. I guess I would think with the custom mid band, high band PAD and Phase 6 products ramping, you'd have a heck of a lot more than $200 million of growth. Can you help me reconcile that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry. I'm not sure I understand all of the questions. We've given you a lot of data out there and that's your model. I'm not sure how to even begin to answer that. We always have a lot of moving parts that are out there. I think we also mentioned in the last call we weren't participating in some high volume products that use SAW which is why we've got a fab utilization problem. So I'm not going to get into modeling every bit of Eric's business. I'm sorry. I can't help you with that one.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from David Wong with Wells Fargo.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Thanks very much. If I'm correct, your 9% to 10% fiscal 2019 growth suggests that in the second half of this calendar year your Mobile Products should grow year-over-year. And if that's right, can you give us some idea of how that is split between content growth and unit growth?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, David, just a clarification. I mean, Mobile returns to year-over-year growth actually in the June quarter. So that's noteworthy, maybe we should have mentioned that earlier, so thank you for the question. As far as the content growth, we are experiencing content growth, but I'll leave it to Eric to go into any details.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. It's a tough question to answer. Certainly, in terms of handsets, we're not counting on unit growth in the industry. It's content that's growing our TAM. Within our own business, certainly for the most part, that's also the case. We're selling fewer parts that have higher content at a pretty dramatic ratio, although there's other parts in the market like ET and antenna tuning which will be growth drivers as well, which are driven by a lot of unit growth as well.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay, great. And in IDP, if one backs out all the ZTE effects, would you actually expect to continue to see 20-plus-percent growth through fiscal 2019 in IDP?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, as I said earlier, we model those underlying markets 10% to 15%. I expect it will do at or better than that. Still very, very bullish about the business. Mark mentioned earlier design wins. We had fantastic design win last year. We were actually up 20-some-odd-percent year-over-year. So I think business is strong, but right now we're modeling it 10% to 15%.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Great. Thanks so much.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, David.
Operator:
All right. Thank you. Our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with UBS.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Thank you. Mark, I'm still trying to figure out the mix of the Mobile business for March and June. Can you give us maybe a little bit of clarity on either the percentage of revenue from the largest customer or maybe from China in March? And then what is modeled for June? Thanks.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
No. I mean, I'm not going to give you percentages on our largest customer other than they're a 10% customer. We had a – as I mentioned, for the June quarter, well, we talked about the March quarter and strengthening in China, which was stronger than expected. We're seeing that continuing into the June quarter. And then furthermore, we just have the sort of transition period whereby we've got more legacy products and later generation or older products in the cycle here that are in the mix in the June quarter. We expect that to turn through the year, of course, with a number of handset launches and our product portfolio is a higher margin portfolio through the back half of the year.
Timothy Arcuri - UBS Securities LLC:
Got it. Okay. And then I'm just wondering bigger picture, if you look at there's just been so much chop in the supply chain for some of the big smartphone customers. And I guess from a big picture, is there a change in the way that they're managing inventory, maybe extending some of the programs that they have with contract manufacturers and sort of how they hold inventory on their own balance sheets? And does that impact the sort of seasonality in your business as you look to the back half of the year? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think it's best to really ask the contract manufacturers what's going on on their end. I think I've mentioned before a lot of our large customers are on hubs. We ship into them. They pull from that and build phones and ship them. So you'll have to ask them what they're doing with their subcontractors. I'm sorry we're not able to answer that anymore.
Operator:
All right. That concludes the Q&A portion of today's call. And I would now like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you very much for joining us tonight. We believe we are better positioned than ever to capture our markets' highest growth and most complex opportunities. We expect this to drive content gains across products and markets. We look forward to meeting with many of you during upcoming marketing trips and we hope to see you at our Institutional Investor Day in New York on May 23. Thanks again and good night.
Operator:
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas Toledo - Vice President, Investor Relations Bob Bruggeworth - President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Murphy - Chief Financial Officer Eric Creviston - President, Mobile Products Group James Klein - President, Infrastructure and Defense Products
Analysts:
Krysten Sciacca - Nomura/Instinet Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Chris Caso - Raymond James, Mike Burton - Longbow Research Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Harsh Kumar - Piper Jaffray Vivek Arya - Bank of America Craig Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Atif Malik - Citigroup Blayne Curtis - Barclays
Operator:
Good day, everyone and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Q3 2018 Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas Toledo, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas Toledo:
Thanks, very much, Rebecca. Hello, everyone and welcome to Qorvo’s third quarter fiscal 2018 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today’s release and on today’s call we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide the supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo’s Mobile Products Group and James Klein, President of Qorvo’s Infrastructure and Defense Products Group as well as other members of Qorvo’s management team. And with that, I will hand the call over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug. Qorvo delivered an exceptional December quarter, with revenue and EPS exceeding our guidance range. In infrastructure and defense, quarterly revenue grew 20% year-over-year to a record $203 million led by strength in defense, IoT and GaN. In mobile products, revenue increased sequentially to $642 million led by a very strong ramp in support of our largest customer. The December quarter played out largely as expected. IDP’s business continued to strengthen, while smartphone ramps were consistent with our expectations. Beginning late in the quarter, demand trends in mobile deteriorated at our largest customer and also in China. This weakness is impacting our near-term expectations and is reflected in our guidance for the March quarter. As we look forward, we expect continued robust growth in IDP in 2018 and in mobile we are gearing up for an aggressive ramp of a custom mid/high-band PAD in the second half of the calendar year. This is the most valuable and highly integrated placement in mobile RF representing what we call the integration hub in the main path of the RF system. This is a significant customer validation of our BAW technology and multiplexing expertise. Coupled with gains in antenna tuning and envelope tracking we expect this to drive another generation of year-over-year growth with these top customers. Across the mobile landscape, leading phone manufacturers and baseband suppliers are adopting more highly integrated mid/high-band architectures. This is increasing the customer demand for high order BAW-based multiplexing from industry leaders like Qorvo and we are migrating a greater percentage of our design resources to higher volume BAW-based RF solutions. To that end, we have sampled a custom mid/high-band PAD to another Tier 1 smart phone customer for our 2019 platform. In addition to these engagements with marquee customers, we have commenced production of our next-generation RF Fusion portfolio for Phase 6 architectures, including both mid/high-band and low band integrated fab modules. This solution supports all major cellular frequency bands and more efficiently enables key regional carrier aggregation combinations. In both premium and performance to your smart phones, mobile products, is targeting the most valuable opportunities with the highest barriers to entry. Premium filters clearly fit within this category as do antenna tuners, envelope trackers, antenna plexers and our integrated mid/high and low mid/high solutions featuring our BAW filters. In China, mobile operators are requiring improved data throughput across a larger percentage of smartphones this year. China Unicom and China Telecom recently mandated Band 1 and Band 3 downlink carrier aggregation and handsets above RMB 1,500 for the mass market for higher tier handsets that was greater than RMB 3,000, China Mobile recently mandated Band 40 and Band 41 downlink carrier aggregations. Phones with these features are expected to be available as early as the middle of this calendar year. Supporting our long-term outlook, we see a broad slate of new applications emerging in cellular IoT, which can support billions of incremental units. Qorvo recently announced the co-development of the industry’s smallest low power system-in-package module with Nordic Semiconductor for global LTE-M and narrowband IoT applications. This opportunity includes the PA, switch, controller dye as well as model design and manufacturing, including our proprietary integrated RF shielding. Finally, we now expect the first 5G smartphones will launch as early as the first half of calendar 2019. 5G will enable new used cases by expanding data throughput, reducing latency to near zero and enabling massive machine-to-machine connectivity. 5G will require more complex and more valuable RF solutions than 4G, continuing the ongoing expansion of the RF TAM. Qorvo is uniquely positioned to accelerate the transition to 5G. We offer the industry’s broadest portfolio of RF products and we intend or reintroduced the industry’s first 5G RF front-end nearly a year ago. We are helping to find 5G standards as a delegate to a 3G PC and we are collaborating closely with the leading wireless infrastructure manufacturers, network operators, chipset providers and smartphone manufacturers on their 5G programs. We are extremely pleased with what the mobile products team has done to deliver the industry’s most valuable mid/high RF placement. We validated our ability to capture the industry’s most attractive RF placements and we have line of sight through expanding content on marquee smartphones. Turning now to IDP, we are enjoying broad-based growth supported by the Internet of Things, the evolution of the wireless ecosystem, the deployment of GaN, the emergence of 5G and other secular macro trends. These are long-term trends capable of supporting continued above market growth. In fact, our design wins this quarter were up over 40% compared to the same quarter last year. In the connected car, IDP is supplying the front-end module for Qualcomm’s cellular vehicle to everything reference design delivering superior performance to support low latency transmission in the 5.9 gigahertz intelligent transportation system band. We also secured a major win with a Tier 1 automotive supplier for a LTE network access device. For the Smart Home ecosystem are forming around voice assistance and products that support multiple protocols are becoming the norm in the marketplace. Qorvo is the only company to support Thread, ZigBee 3.0, ZigBee RF4CE and ZigBee Green Power in a single radio. We are advancing this trend by meeting our multi-stock, multi-protocol system-in-package with the HUMAX Chorus Voice Assistant. In defense, from both domestic and international markets, electronic warfare and missile defense have become top of mind in the industry. IDP participates heavily in both applications and we are at the forefront of the technology shift to GaN-based phased array system architectures. Our GaN products and the Spatium high-power amplifier family continue to ramp. The focus on high-value sockets and technologies has resulted in greater than 50% year-over-year growth in our defense business. In infrastructure, we are also helping the lead migration to GaN to improve the performance of LTE-based stations and small cells. As LTE moves to higher frequencies above 2.5 gigahertz, the incumbent technology of silicon LDMOS is unable to achieve the level of performance required. GaN is becoming the technology of choice for transmit amplifiers at all major base station OEMs. In Wi-Fi, CPE, the proliferation of distributed Wi-Fi networks coupled with the needs for more bandwidth is driving rapid growth in both consumer and enterprise solutions. And IDP is a primary beneficiary winning on both performance and integration. Our broad portfolio of power amplifiers, front-end modules, switches, LNAs and filters continue to win and 802.11ac sockets and positions us well for the 802.11ax wave coming this year. Overall, IDP has delivered 9 out of 10 sequential growth quarters since we repositioned our portfolio to target defense, base station, automotive, smart home, IoT, Wi-Fi and optical markets. Our outlook for IDP is one of continued growth with the annualized revenue run-rate quickly moving towards $1 billion. In both mobile and IDP, our technology mode and rich product offerings enable us to target the most attractive opportunities as measured by the technologies required, competitive environment, value creation and other critical metrics. We are delivering best-in-class products that help customers achieve higher levels of performance and we are targeting opportunities where we have a distinct advantage with both technology and scale. Calendar 2017 was an excellent year for IDP. In mobile, we made significant advances in the business in terms of technology, cost and portfolio management. As we look into calendar 2018, IDP is positioned for continued growth and margin expansion and mobile is set to support the industry’s most valuable RF solutions. With that, I will turn the call over to Mark.
Mark Murphy:
Thanks, Bob and good afternoon everyone. Qorvo’s revenue for the third quarter was $845 million exceeding the midpoint of our guidance by $5 million. Mobile revenue of $642 million was driven by product launches at our largest customer. IDP revenue of $203 million reflects continued strength in defense, including advanced radars and other electronic warfare products and in connectivity including Wi-Fi and emerging IoT applications. This was the seventh consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year growth in IDP. Non-GAAP gross margin in the December quarter was 48%, 50 basis points higher than our guidance, a sequential increase of 60 basis points and a year-over-year increase of 370 basis points. We expect continued progress on gross margins as we optimize our product portfolio and drive additional operational improvements. Operating expenses were $151 million or 17.9% of sales, down $7 million sequentially on ongoing productivity efforts and development program spend timing. We are ahead of schedule with OpEx reductions, but by no means are we letting up on our focus on getting more efficient. We have additional productivity initiatives underway to sharpen R&D spend and lower SG&A. Operating income for the quarter, was $254 million or 30.1% of sales, up 200 basis points sequentially and 480 basis points versus last year. Last year, we committed to achieving quarter in fiscal year ‘18 with an operating margin exceeding 30% and we delivered on that commitment in the December quarter. This is a particularly noteworthy accomplishment when you consider that mobile volumes and fab utilization have fallen short of our expectations this fiscal year. We are pleased that our broad-based efforts are yielding results and intend to continue our disciplined approach to controlling costs and improving margins. On net income, I will start with our GAAP results. In the December quarter, a GAAP loss of $33 million was impacted by tax expense resulting from the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Specifically, we incurred a $96 million net tax expense, which was largely the result of the immediate taxation of cumulative foreign earnings and which was partially offset by revaluing net deferred tax liabilities on a lower U.S. tax rate. I encourage you to review our forthcoming 10-Q filing for the additional disclosure on taxes. Non-GAAP net income in the December quarter was $220 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $1.69 or $0.09 over the midpoint of our guidance. December cash flow from operations increased to $270 million helping to drive record free cash flow of $225 million. Capital expenditures decreased sequentially to near $45 million and we expect CapEx to end the full fiscal year below 10% of sales, down from 18% of sales last year. We are committed to a model of higher margins, lower capital intensity and greater free cash flow and we are demonstrating clear progress towards those objectives. Cash at quarter end was $841 million. And with recent tax legislation we can more freely deploy cash for investments in growth and repurchasing shares. In the December quarter we repurchased $80 million of stock. Turning to our outlook, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $645 million and $665 million, gross margin to be flat to up 50 basis points sequentially and diluted EPS of $1.05 at the midpoint of our guidance. We expect a quarter of over 20% year-over-year growth in IDP and project IDP to be over 30% of quarter’s revenue in the March quarter. For mobile, this guidance reflects our current view on near-term demand for our customers’ flagship models. In the March quarter, we expect gross margins to increase sequentially by up to 50 basis points due primarily to reduce volumes of low band PADs and an increase mix of our higher margin IDP business. Operating expenses are forecast to increase slightly to approximately $153 million on development program spend and seasonal factors including payroll taxes. Free cash flow is expected to be around $200 million. We expect our fourth quarter non-GAAP tax rates to remain below 8.5%. Based on our outlook and our current interpretation on recent U.S. tax law changes, we project our fiscal year ‘19 non-GAAP tax rate to be 10% or lower. Our efforts to leverage our technology position and improve the operating performance of our business are paying off and we expect to sustain this progress. In fiscal year ‘19 we expect robust IDP growth to continue supported by trends in defense IoT and GaN. As Bob mentioned we are hitting key milestones to realign the mobile product portfolio from lower to higher margin products and securing design wins in the industry’s most attractive segments. We expect to see significant benefits from these efforts starting in the second half of this year – calendar year. As our product mix and overall fab utilization improve, we expect gross margins to continue to expand. We project significant improvements in utilization on our BAW fab in Richardson, our gas fabs and our China assembly and test factories. This will be partially offset by lower utilization rates in our SAW fabs as we migrate resources to bolster recent successes and future opportunities in BAW and more selectively compete for SAW-based opportunities. With a more focused product portfolio, restructuring efforts taking full effect and productivity remaining a priority, we also expect OpEx efficiency to improve further. We are on track to achieve the operating margin target we laid out at Investor Day last May of 33% by fiscal year ‘20. With more profitable growth in mobile and robust growth in IDP, expanding operating margins and lower levels of CapEx we are targeting free cash flow of $800 million in fiscal year ‘19. So wrapping up in the third quarter, we posted another quarter above guidance and delivered strong operating leverage. While our near-term revenue outlook has been impacted by weaker demand signals from our largest customer end from China, we see gross margins improving up to 50 basis points and strong free cash flow in the March quarter. In fiscal year 2019, we expect our premium mobile products and continued strength in defense, IoT and GaN to support revenue growth, margin expansion and greater free cash flow in fiscal year ‘19. With that, I will turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your first question will come from Krysten Sciacca with Nomura/Instinet.
Krysten Sciacca:
Congratulations on the quarter. Thanks for letting me ask the question. I just want to clarify one point in particular. So far for the super-PAD did you say that you are sampling at an additional marquee customer?
Bob Bruggeworth:
As far as mid/high band PAD as with one of the bullets in the press release as well, we did begin sampling another Tier 1 customer a well.
Krysten Sciacca:
Okay, thank you. And then further ramp at your largest customer in the second half of calendar ‘18 do you expect those content gains to be let’s say more or less than what you saw in this past ramp?
Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. I will take that. We are currently projecting we will have the largest actual generation-over-generation content increase we have seen driven by many product categories and then we see tuning continuing to increase, envelope tracking as well as BAW-based product.
Krysten Sciacca:
Great, thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Krysten.
Operator:
And next we will hear from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson:
This design win is a terrific result after a lot of effort. I guess the question is how should we really think about seasonality, I know it’s difficult to provide out-quarter revenue guidance, but how should we think about seasonality beyond the March quarter with the second half in mind? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes, Bill, at this point, we are not going to give guidance beyond the March quarter. I don’t think we can make any changes yet about seasonality, because we haven’t gotten customer demand signals yet and we are actually in our plan process at this moment. So we will provide more detail around both fiscal year ‘19 and about seasonality during the May call.
Bill Peterson:
Okay. Let me try different angle, I guess, you mentioned that you expect the China Telecom/Unicom lowering the price points as you should increase carrier aggregation, you talked about the middle of the year. I guess how should we think about tax rates of this and if we consider ETP tuning at ISMs in China, how should we think about your content growth opportunities in China I guess specifically this year?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, this is Eric. I will take that as well. We look at the attach rate of the Band 1/3 cloud plexer to enable carrier aggregation going from about 15% – maybe 15% to 20% as we exited CY17 up to about 50% attach rate based on the guidance of the carriers for any handset over RMB 1,500 to require the capability. So, that’s such a pretty significant step up and gets us back to where we were frankly in 2016 with the attach of that component. And as we look forward as you mentioned, ET is moving into that tier where we are seeing a lot of design work with our customers for our Phase 6 solution. We are the first to market with that solution and ramping into production now. Phase 6 does several things for our customers. It increases the integration level, which speeds their time to market. It also reduces the size by at least 40% and in most cases about 50% of their current design and it increases the output power at the same time enabling Power Class 2. So, we do all of that in fewer placements by integrating the vast majority or in some cases all of the filter content into our two-placement solution that does all that for the front-end. So, we see that integration factor and the Phase 6 opportunity for us is being a very key content for us throughout this year.
Bill Peterson:
Okay. Thanks.
Operator:
From Raymond James, Chris Caso.
Chris Caso:
Yes. Thank you. I guess the first question with regard to gross margins and the impact of utilization, given what you are expecting in China as well as the high/mid PAD where do you think you get the utilization exiting this year of the BAW facilities and what impact does that have in the gross margin?
Mark Murphy:
Are you talking this calendar year Chris or are you talking fiscal year?
Chris Caso:
For the calendar year?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. So we are not going to give specific guidance on gross margin not far out. I will make a few comments on gross margin. This will certainly help the Richardson fab in particular. But I will get to that in a moment. But our December quarter we were up again 50 basis points. So excluding the hurricane effects in the September quarter and we would be five out of our last five gross margin guidance. And if you look at our guides the five previous before five ago, we didn’t do so well. So we have certainly – we have certainly become more predictable and that’s the positive allowing us to get more productivity, better visibility and so forth. We have also had obviously steady progression on gross margin from what was the low in the second quarter of ‘17 of 42.8% to our current guide which is 48% to 48.5%. So we are really back at levels that we were back in fiscal year ‘16. So again undoubtedly we are getting better forecasting and we are clearly getting better on improving the business since we are up 500 basis points from trough to the midpoint of the current guide. All this has been an environment of weak volume, it’s been with the low margin low band PAD and has been candidly in a company that was still working its way through a transition. So if we look where we have been and we think about the progress that we have made, we have great confidence about the gross margin as we look out. Fabs are running exceptionally well. We have got capacity available that we are going to fill. The fabs are competitive and ready for business. The technology investments we have made are allowing us to move into the markets that are most attractive and we are securing wins now. And then you have got a management team that’s absolutely focused on gross margin and free cash flow and exhibiting the right behaviors. So the market of course Chris is going to dictate at the end short-term utilization of the fabs. But we do expect to at least in a quarter touch 50% in fiscal year ‘19, that’s certainly what we are working through as we are building our plan now. And I am confident that we will certainly be above 49% for the year average. And that contemplates Richardson, our largest fab moving up over 80% utilization in the next 6 months as well as increased utilization in gas as I mentioned in my comments and over 80% utilization in our back end operations. The one headwind is what I mentioned during my prepared remarks about our SAW utilization going down. On average fab utilization should be a positive effect going into ‘19.
Chris Caso:
Okay, that’s very helpful. My follow-up question was actually going to be on SAW and if perhaps you could clarify some of those comments, I mean it sounds like that with the success in BAW there would be a less emphasis in SAW and that’s understandable given the margin structure there, but as we get into the second half of the calendar year, should we expect SAW to actually be down year-on-year where would be some shift from SAW to BAW because of some of these in design engagements or is that just sort of less emphasis from a design win perspective going forward?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Our current projection would indicate SAW will be down year-over-year in the second half. We are investing in a lot of key technologies in SAW which will help enable many different products that are coming, but with majority of those products that we are going to focus going forward on products that combined BAW with SAW to really make unique product offerings and leverage that asset further.
Chris Caso:
That’s helpful. Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Chris.
Operator:
From Longbow Research, Mike Burton.
Mike Burton:
Hey, guys. Thanks and congrats on the design wins. First, I guess maybe for Eric, could you talk about the China market and maybe inventory levels at the end of 2017, you guys had been a relative gainer as you have got back on track at Huawei. What percent of sales were the China OEMs and how do you expect that to trend in Q1, obviously down, but we saw MediaTek this morning guiding for shipments down about 30%. I am wondering if you kind of subscribe to that sort of that level?
Eric Creviston:
Yes. So, we are doing our best to maintain tight control of the channel inventories. And so we are following the volumes as they come. You see that in our guidance essentially. To answer your question specifically, in the December quarter, the China guys were roughly 20% of our revenue and that’s of course lower than historically. And looking into March, we are consistent with our guide, we are following the directions and taking our judgment to their current plans and trying to make sure that first and foremost we keep the channel tight, so that whenever the end-market recovers we will see that demand immediately.
Mike Burton:
Okay. And then maybe a two-parter for Mark, just the low band PAD trajectory obviously you have talked about it being down in Q1 and you’ve spoken in the past about being able to migrate to – you are going to migrate to a new low-band PAD with in-source filters. When is the timing of that migration and can you help us size kind of the margin impact for that? And then also the second part is just the shape of CapEx and OpEx going forward, I am just curious if that’s – if you can help us understand that relative to the high-band PAD win and also the potential for a new customer next year? Thanks.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, on low-band PAD, I think all I will say in that is it we have continued to make improvements of the product. There have been some changes in the filter, slight filters required by the customer and that’s helped a bit, but mostly it’s just improved manufacturing efficiencies and improvements in that product over time. Yes, it’s still a net drag on the business, so as it sort of tails off in the portfolio, yes, there is a positive mix effect associated with that and that helps us into margin going forward. As far as the outlook on CapEx, we are making great strides in becoming less capital intensive. We are doing everything we can to leverage the foundry network where we can and then where we have unique device requirements that require our own production. We are being very thoughtful about what we add and of course driving all the productivity programs you have heard before. And that’s helped us achieve this lower CapEx profile as we see going forward. This year will be below 10% of sales CapEx. Next year, we think will probably be below 8% of sales on CapEx. And one example is we are going to be able to increase our BAW capacity 70% from current capacity to fiscal year ‘20 at only about $80 million of spend. So, a lot of positive things there on CapEx, which of course when you combine it with the growth we expect and the margin expansion we see a very strong free cash flow story. Again, we are in the midst of the planning process, Mike, so I am not going to give specific dollar guidance on OpEx, but what I will say is Bob and part of his productivity drive is really working the organization become more efficient on OpEx. And we have seen great progress this year as evidenced by this quarter actually, where we were at 17.9% of sales and really at a $600 million run-rate number. Now of course, you are not forecasting that, But what I will say that in – we are striving to build a plan that’s certainly below 20% of sales on OpEx for not fiscal year ‘19.
Mike Burton:
Great. Thanks.
Operator:
Next we will hear from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company. Your line may be muted, please see.
Quinn Bolton:
I am sorry can you hear me?
Operator:
Yes.
Quinn Bolton:
Great. Thanks. Hi guys congratulations on the next December results, wanted to ask a question on your comments about SAW utilization dropping in the second half of calendar ‘18, a read into that that your low band patch share is declining, I mean is there a socket change going on the low band patch site that’s behind that lower SAW utilization? And then I get a follow-up. Thanks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. Quinn thanks for the question. I think it’s best to say that our utilization is going down. Yes there is some percentage in share shifts in the low band PAD. I think what is important is that as Eric has already mentioned and I commented in my script that we are shifting our resources to what we believe is a more attractive profitable, but in the same time we still see plenty of opportunities to utilize the technologies that we developed in SAW where we can leverage both BAW and SAW. So I think that’s the best way to answer that.
Quinn Bolton:
Great. Thanks Bob. And then just a question on Samsung, they tend to have a stronger March quarter obviously, you guys are guiding March down reflecting your largest customer and what you are seeing in China, just wondering if you could give us any sense as you look to the next marquee platform at your large screen customer, what do you see in terms of your content in that ramp as we look in the March?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, this is Eric, I will address that and actually I will talk maybe Huawei at the same time. Throughout last year we had talked about we had gotten a little out of step with Samsung and as well as with Huawei. We began to turn the corner with Huawei in their fall flagship launch. I think that’s clearly demonstrated now. We are also committing to increasing our content from each platform forward with Huawei. So we will have greater content in their spring lunch and even greater in next fall beyond that. So, we have begun the turn with Huawei, but we have also been clear that we don’t expect that to be the case with Samsung in this launch. So the spring cycle for Samsung we are not expecting any growth in content, not expecting much help there. However, second half of this year both in the last year and in their second half flagship launch we do expect to turn the corner and start to see meaningful change in share and particularly large opportunities for Samsung. And in their spring next year launch we did mention we have sampled a second custom mid-high band PAD to know the marquee customers as an example. And I think James would love to talk about Samsung as well.
James Klein:
Yes. I want to talk a little bit, Samsung is becoming a very strong customer for IDP and we mentioned in the press release how we have had a great design win with their remote controls, that’s really with our of the ZigBee, so great win for that organization. And on top of that we are also starting do very well with their infrastructure business. So you are seeing us supply into things like their demonstrations that are going to go into the Olympics next month and also into other 5G trials.
Quinn Bolton:
Great. Thank you.
Operator:
Moving on we have from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Thanks a lot. Mark, looking if I could touch on real quick, how should we be thinking about the margin improvement when it comes to your low band PAD over one of the old one, are you talking hundreds or thousands of bps or is there even a new one on the horizon in terms of production or has most of that being coming from peeling off of the old one. And then Eric you mentioned you called out ET a couple of times as an area of growth this year, is that just more OEMs adopting ET or spreading it to 4 months, are you starting to see or expecting to see some demand for more ET up from carrier aggregation in production this year? And if I could maybe James, 802.11ax appears to have some fits and starts in the handset side of the business on your side are you seeing this coming in size of next year or so, was it just beginning of where do you stand on the ax ramp? Thanks guys.
Mark Murphy:
James and I will let James go first.
James Klein:
Yes. We will go first on ax, so we are seeing that ramp I believe this year. We already have the products that are going out now. Standard is not released, but the products that are in development to support that standard are in development now. The pullout of the products that we released last year, were in support of start of the evolution towards that. So, we are doing very well in AC today and we think we are positioned very well for the 8x ramp is going to happen during this calendar year.
Eric Creviston:
Yes. Regarding envelope tracking, the market there continues to be very exciting. It’s enabling many things not just lower current consumption, but also higher output power in many markets as we talked about as you can imagine content increasing due to performance improvements, also the dual uplink when we get to that point will require additional envelope tracking content. So, we are seeing content increases with the OEMs and baseband partners we are working with now, but in addition to that, we are engaging quite meaningfully with the new baseband partners, which will add potential revenues this calendar year.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, Ed, it’s Mark. On the low band PAD between versions we have now there is between 5 and 10 points margin difference, but as we have said even the improved one is still well below the mobile average margin. And these low band PADs are going to become a less important part of the portfolio going forward. I think we are going to be as Eric said we have a very capable SAW design team outstanding technology. We have proven our ability to compete in the most difficult low band PAD placements and ramp at the highest volumes with the most difficult customers. So, it’s not a case of not being able to do it, it’s a case of where do we want to spend our time and it’s really about for us with this confirmation of our technology on BAW ball as it relates to mid/high band really focusing resources there. And I think it’s important to note that our revenue mix over time is pretty dramatic and its helping us drive our margins as we look out. So, in this year, it will be less than 25% of mobile’s portfolio will be BAW related revenue. Next year, fiscal year ‘19, we view that being over 30%, in fiscal year ‘20 it’s over 40% and in fiscal year ‘21 it’s nearly half the mobile business is around BAW related opportunities, some of which will require the SAW filter content as well. So, I think that’s the story today as aggressive portfolio management.
Edward Snyder:
Just a quick follow-up, I am a little confused, Mark, because the SAW comes out of Florida and that’s not a BAW fab which you saw there. You started a SAW fab in North Carolina and all your BAW comes out of Richardson and then you got Farmers Branch as a backup. So, I know we will be talking about it’s kind of an either/or, so are you saying you are putting BAW capacity into Florida and what does that mean for Farmers Branch, because you haven’t really started production there?
Mark Murphy:
No, Ed. Just to be clear and try to make it clear in the comments, we will have our utilization and our SAW capacity will go down and it will be a headwind in fiscal year ‘19. That is what we are currently planning and we are – we will plan to fill the capacity that we have over time with more selective SAW opportunities.
Bob Bruggeworth:
But to be clear, our BAW production will be in Richardson as well as Farmers Branch in the future.
Operator:
And from Piper Jaffray, we will hear from Harsh Kumar.
Harsh Kumar:
Yes, hey, guys. Great job on free cash flow on meeting your gross margin goals. Quick question, Bob, if I go back to the December quarter, could you give us a sense of magnitude of – sorry the March guide, can you give us a sense of magnitude between your largest customer and the ramp and all the public stuff there. That’s been talked about in China, what were the factors? And then second question as my follow-up was the super PAD or the mid/high PAD that you are talking about, is this additional TRAM, because there is some confusion about whether it’s brand new content or it replaces some of the things, maybe you could just explain or shed some color on it and if you can maybe ASP if possible?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Harsh, I want to make sure I understood your first question in our March guide, December results yet. Yes, I think it’s safe to say that it’s our largest customer along with China. There has been a lot of things in the press as you have already reported out there. I think we wanted to make sure as you understood how much it impacted us since many of our customers have reported, I think it’s best we not get into a lot of details, but it’s primarily our largest customer in China is why we are guiding down in March. IDP is flat to up slightly in the single-digits, but IDP is continuing to do well just like last quarter. Eric, you want to take the TAM question?
Eric Creviston:
Yes. I’ll try Harsh, not exactly sure how to answer the question, it’s not brand new TAM for the market, it’s a particular function within advanced smart phones that has grown pretty dramatically in terms of capability and content generation over generation and we believe it will continue. We mentioned calling it the integration hub. It’s got essentially all of the main path mid and high-band functions within it and we see over time how it can grow and actually take over other mid and high-band functions, for example, in the diversity path. So, it’s a great deal high-value, very high performance sort of heartbeat of the modem.
Harsh Kumar:
Got it, thanks. Thank you.
Operator:
From Bank of America, Vivek Arya.
Vivek Arya:
Thank you for taking my question. What is the sustainability level of maintaining the socket in future years, because some of this content was with the different suppliers, now it’s flipping over to you guys, what were the factors behind the win and then importantly what is the visibility in maintaining this content as you go out in time?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Vivek, let me first say, it’s nice that we are able to demonstrate the capabilities. Second, as you well know, not all funds are created equally and utilized the same architectures. So, I want to take a little bit issue with you on that. What I can say is yes, we are working on future generations and more importantly we are also working on these opportunities at other customers. So, I do believe we are at the beginning of the growth here. I think as we said all along when it was just a single BAW filter or few BAW filters in a module, we were able to compete when things got to higher order multiplexing, yes, we were behind and we talked over the last several quarters about how we have to first improve the resonator improvement performance, then work on how we can design multiplexers and then how we can put multiple multiplexers in a module along with PAs and switches what have you. I think what’s important is we now have demonstrated that capability. We are in the game and it’s our belief that we are going to be able to continue for multiple generations and more importantly of multiple customers.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. Very helpful, Bob. And as my follow-up if you look back at the low band PAD example, there were some initial growing pain from manufacturing and a gross margin perspective. Obviously, this is a very different product, but I am just curious to know, what’s your level of confidence in yield and margins as I imagine this is a significantly more complex product than low-band PAD?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes, fair point. I mean, it is a very complex product. However, the process itself has been very well rung out as you can imagine. We did have a very high volume ramp of the high-intensity BAW content product a couple of years ago that went incredibly smoothly and very, very well. So far, our 8-inch wafers in BAW are yielding at least as good as the 6-inch ones were. The entire manufacturing line seems to be running very well. We are already running quite high volume samples of the product to prove out manufacturing variances with credit quality issues and so forth. So, we are doing everything we can to assure smooth ramp. There is no recent belief it won’t go very well.
Vivek Arya:
Got it, thanks and congratulations on these sockets.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Eric Creviston:
Thanks, Vivek.
Operator:
Next, we’ll hear from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig Hettenbach:
Yes, thank you. Just following up on the comments of Huawei in the fall in terms of regaining some momentum, any thoughts as you kind of transitioned into the spring in terms of do you see carry through there or how are you thinking about Huawei for 2018?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I mentioned earlier that we turned the corner on the fall 2017 flagship. We have clear visibility into increasing content on the spring flagship launch. And we are very excited about the engagement so far for the next fall flagship launch, but we believe we have the capability of significant share gains there as well.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it, thanks. And then just a follow-up on the super PAD just given the confidence in terms of the ramp in the second half, is there anyway for you to gauge in terms of relative spread of that business for you versus what’s available or any of the context in terms of how you viewed the opportunity into the back half?
Eric Creviston:
It’s a great opportunity. It’s not many people are able to pull off this way of sophistication and this level of performance and be able to manufacture in high volume and high yields. I think we are seeing a lot of customer for this type of product. Now that we have demonstrated the performance ability and going forward, I think just to add to what Bob said earlier, we see a lot of reasons and ways for us to differentiate the capability as power levels go up. We have a lot of power handling capability in our filter technology and so we are well aligned I think with the future architectures.
Craig Hettenbach:
Got it. And then I am sorry if I could just slip one more in, in terms of how you will get the percentage of customers, so for the December quarter what’s your largest custom in any of the 10%?
Bob Bruggeworth:
There is one 10% customer, Craig.
Operator:
And the next question will come from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari:
Great, thanks for taking the question and congrats on the win. You guys talked about design wins and IDP being up 40% year-over-year in the quarter. Can you maybe provide some color there if you could point to one or two or three key contributors there from an end market or end product perspective that will be helpful? Then I have a follow-up.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Okay, thanks. So as you said really strong design win again this quarter, 40% year-over-year and really the same story is our revenue growth led by defense and IoT, strong design wins combined with the funnel really gives us pretty bullish outlook for the business for future growth. Couple of specific examples, are things that we talked about in the press release you saw our design win with Samsung on TVs and so that’s a nice future growth prospect for our low-power wireless business. And then we have also had a string of nice design wins inside the Wi-Fi business as well.
Toshiya Hari:
Great, thank you. And then the second one is for Mark, clearly, you guys are doing a great job in improving free cash flow here and going forward, how should we think about capital allocation over the next couple of years in terms of how you guys prioritize investments versus capital return and perhaps M&A? Thank you.
Mark Murphy:
Yes, you are right. As evidenced in the December quarter, the guide in March and then the outlook for ‘18 is the free cash flow generation has been very strong and we expect it to continue. We have been clear that we intend to maintain a 1.5x debt to EBITDA ratio. So, we are currently fine there. We are actually under that. So, no need to pay down debt possibly take-out the 23 notes in this calendar year for some lower cost financing, but other than that, we would like to sustain those levels of leverage. So with that and with the greater flexibility on cash, with the new tax law, we have got both significant balance sheet flexibility and capacity. We have been clear that our first priority is to invest in the business, which we have been doing. And we believe we are going to be a lot less capital intensive going forward. So, that frees up even more of its operating cash flow to be fall down into free cash flow and then we will look at M&A activity. And I am really excited about what James has done with the IDP business, lot of growth factors in that business, so certainly keen on bolt-ons that are where we are focused and so always looking at opportunities in James’ business to bulk up and diversify core of overall. And then to the extent, our leverage is okay and there is no immediate acquisition, then we will return cash to shareholders.
Toshiya Hari:
Thank you.
Operator:
From Citigroup, Atif Malik.
Atif Malik:
Hi, thanks for taking my question. If I look at the American smartphone maker, the number of models or SKUs, they are putting out are doubling this year from our 4 models versus 2 last year. So when I look at your content being up over last year, this year how should we think about the unit impact that they are more models and from the volume diversification and maybe you can help out just providing the top line growth expectations for this year and I have a follow-up?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I am really sorry, but any future predictions that our largest customer architectures number of phones etcetera. I am sorry we are going to stay away from that. I am sorry we can’t help you with that, maybe you can ask them tomorrow.
Atif Malik:
Sure. Just RF top line growth the market growth 10% to 15%, are you expecting your top line to outperform?
Mark Murphy:
Yes. We are still looking at the long-term RF market as 10% to 15% opportunity in mobile due to all the drivers that we have spoken about many times, really driven by the demand for mobile data. So we are thinking this calendar year obviously off to bit of a slow start and I think closer to the low end of that in terms of total market. And in terms of our own growth we are committed to growing at or ahead of our market while expanding gross margin and really focusing on cash flow as we go.
Atif Malik:
Great and then follow-up.
Mark Murphy:
I am going to jump in for IDP, so we will have another 20% growth year as we close out FY ‘18 with strength in IoT and defense. Again, we are going to stay focused on our high growth markets. We model those underlying markets to grow at an average of 10% to 15% as well. And I expect it will grow at or greater than those growth rates.
Atif Malik:
Great. And then the follow-up, I mean Qualcomm has announced a memorandum of understanding with a major Chinese smartphone manufacturers Oppo and Vivo on the RF front and can you just talk about the impact of this on your China opportunity? Thank you.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. We don’t see any obvious impact certainly nothing immediate and obviously Qualcomm is already a supplier into that market with various filters and ET and so forth. So like we understand the motivation for the announcement, we don’t think it necessarily has any implications on us.
Operator:
And next we will hear from Blayne Curtis of Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just want to ask you on this mid/high band PAD, just if you can just walk us through when this got determined and then just try to get your visibility give a very specific free cash flow number, just if you can think about any sensitivities to that, obviously and other generations mix is mattered in such, kind of just any indications of what your visibility is and what the put factors could be in terms of what that and when could be?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yes. I don’t think we can really give any more detail around the mid/high band PAD other than just say we are progressing forward. It’s on track. The team has done just a fantastic job developing an incredibly competitive product and we can’t really get into anymore detail.
Blayne Curtis:
And then just I wanted to go back to gross margin and BAW utilization, it’s a nice result to see gross margin up a little with the top line coming down, are you starting to build filters ahead of this win for the second half?
Bob Bruggeworth:
No Blayne, we are not. We will be soon not now.
Blayne Curtis:
Okay.
Operator:
And that does conclude today’s question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I want to thank everyone for attending tonight’s call. We look forward to meeting many of you at upcoming conferences. And we ask that you save the date of May 23 for 2018 Investor Day. Thanks again and good night.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen that does conclude today’s presentation. We do thank everyone for your participation and you may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura/Instinet Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo Q2 2018 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas Toledo, Vice President of Investor Relations for Qorvo. Please go ahead
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, very much Kathy. Hello everybody and welcome to Qorvo's second quarter fiscal 2018 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide the supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based on non-GAAP results. For complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com under investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products group as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug. Qorvo delivered a very strong September quarter with both revenue and EPS exceeding our guidance range. In Mobile Products, revenue was $630 million with 38% sequential growth. Qorvo supported the ramps of leading marquee smartphones and increased our dollar content on key customer programs. We also benefited from an improved demand environment in China with the launch of flagship devices at Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo and others. At Huawei, we supported the Mate 10 with BAW filters, antenna tuners, RF front end modules and our envelope tracking power management solution. At Xiaomi, we shipped more than $9 of RF content including our highly-integrated RF Fusion products into their top-tier Mi Mix 2 and we were honored to receive their partnership award. We expect our design momentum at both accounts to continue in next-generation flagship models. In IDP, revenue increased 21% year-over-year to a record $190 million with standout performance in the defense and connectivity markets. IDP is targeting double-digit year-over-year revenue growth across a broad set of customers in defense, base station, automotive, smart home IoT, Wi-Fi and optical. Customers in these target markets require differentiated products with higher levels of integration, higher power, lower noise figure, better linearity and greater efficiency and this is where Qorvo excels. IDP has been putting up robust year-over-year revenue growth and our design wins in the September quarter point to another strong quarter in December. We're very confident in our long-term growth prospects given the underlying macro trends of IoT, 5G and GaN. In both mobile and IDP, Qorvo is benefiting as the increasing demand for data is ratcheting up the complexity, driving integration and increasing RF content. The depth and breadth of our technology portfolio position us uniquely to selectively target the most attractive market segments based on the competitive environment, market or customer exposure, technologies required and the value we can bring. Take for example our success in Wi-Fi/ISMs. A few years ago, we saw this as a category we could disrupt by combining our market-leading BAW coexist filters with our Wi-Fi front-end modules. That's playing out today and we see continued growth ahead for our Wi-Fi/ISMs across retail, CPE and mobile devices. The same is true with our industry-leading envelope tracking power management solutions. We recognize the market opportunity for advanced power management over a decade ago, built a robust IP portfolio and we're now expanding our product offerings to support not only cellular but also Wi-Fi applications. In the September quarter, we launched our ET PMIC for Wi-Fi supporting a wearable device. This is an industry first and we have additional opportunities ahead. Likewise, Qorvo's early innovation in antenna tuning is paying off today. The tuning content in marquee smartphones will nearly double this year and we expect this segment will continue to outpace the overall RF market. Qorvo enjoys a strong leadership position and we have multiple opportunities to expand our content across new and existing customers. In GaN, Qorvo is an industry pioneer and technology leader and our investments in GaN are supporting exceptional growth. In fact, our GaN-related revenue in the September quarter doubled year-over-year. We've also seen our opportunities grow tremendously in IoT. Qorvo's IoT revenue in the September quarter increased by 50% versus last year. During the quarter, we secured an RF front-end module design win supporting the Tile tracker family. We also secured multiple design wins for automotive IoT applications supporting top automakers with content per car up to $7. In China, we enjoyed strong demand with the deployment of 900 megahertz narrow band IoT infrastructure. Qorvo's narrow band IoT solutions optimize performance and power consumption in high-volume low-power IoT applications. Finally, in defense we secured multiyear design wins with a major defense contractor for high power, high-efficiency gas components supporting several advanced radar applications. All of these achievements represent strategic investments made by Qorvo that are paying off today. Looking forward, let's cover a few examples of what we see driving our growth in the future. As we've indicated before, we're leveraging a unique set of capabilities to target the most promising growth opportunities within the largest profit pools. In infrastructure, we've expanded our product portfolio to include a line of small signal products that support the 600 megahertz band 71. This makes Qorvo the only supplier to address all 5G frequency bands from 600 megahertz through 39 gigahertz. We also expanded our family of GaN discrete transistor products, with a GaN-on-silicon carbide dual-transistor module. The new module enables base station customers to achieve ultra high levels of power efficiency and reduce costs versus traditional process technologies. Finally, we're on track with a custom development program integrating multiple BAW multiplexers with PAs, switches and LNAs. We believe these technologies and design capabilities will enable Qorvo to pursue the most attractive segments of the RF market. Qorvo's BAW delivers lower loss, higher Q and superior power-handling capability, making it optimal for enabling carrier aggregation and we expect BAW will be increasingly favored as operators require better power-handling with the move to Power Class 2. Finally, with the migration of 5G, we expect the bands using BAW today will continue to use BAW and some SAW bands will move to BAW. We view this as the inevitability of BAW. We're developing and bringing to market a number of exciting BAW-based products for the main path as well as diversity path and we expect to increase our BAW based revenue as industry requirements favor our higher performance products. Simply put, BAW growth outpaces filters, filter growth outpaces RF and RF content will outpace smartphone units. With that as a backdrop, it's noteworthy that what sets Qorvo apart isn't any one best-in-class capability, it's the entirety of our product and technology portfolio. We see that as increasingly powerful as the discrete functions are integrated into single placement modules. Our customers are moving towards increasingly complex, more highly integrated placements and Qorvo is focused on operational excellence and product and technology leadership to best address our customer's needs. In the September quarter, the Qorvo team executed extremely well, expanding product portfolios, generating design wins and earning the enhanced customer trust that accompanies the clean launch of key customer programs. We strengthened our business processes to drive productivity while also investing in sustainable long-term growth in competing for the industry's most complex and most valuable placements where technology wins. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Mark.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's revenue for the second quarter was $821 million, exceeding the midpoint of our guidance by $11 million. Mobile revenue was $630 million, was driven by growth at our largest customer and stronger China business. IDP revenue of $190 million reflects continued strength in defense including advanced radars and other electronic warfare products. And in connectivity, including Wi-Fi and emerging IoT applications. Gross margin in the quarter was 47.4%, a sequential increase of 10 basis points and a year-over-year increase of 460 basis points. Gross margin in the quarter was negatively impacted by the after effects of Hurricane Irma, which caused an isolated air contamination issue in our Florida fab. The operations team in Florida did a remarkable job to quickly identify root cause and bring the fab back up without any customer impact. Excluding these costs, gross margin in the quarter would've been above our guidance. While as expected, overall fab utilization weighed on margins in the quarter operationally, the business is performing exceptionally well supporting customers through seasonal ramps. Operating expenses were $158 million, down on ongoing productivity efforts and spend timing. Operating income for the quarter was approximately $231 million, or 28.1% of sales, up 660 basis points from the prior quarter and 530 basis points versus last year. During the second quarter, we took certain actions, including a head count reduction program, to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies. As we've discussed, we're focused on achieving consistent operational excellence and continuously improving our effectiveness and efficiency. We believe a disciplined approach to managing our product portfolio, containing costs and driving a culture of continuous improvement will lead to greater sales growth and profitability and help us maximize free cash flow. Non-GAAP net income was $198 million. Diluted earnings per share was $1.52, $0.09 over the midpoint of our guidance. Second-quarter cash flow from operations more than doubled sequentially to $220 million. Capital expenditures decreased to $68 million as we wrap up recent expansions, tool conversions and other investments to support future growth. Cash at quarter-end was $575 million. We repurchased $57 million of stock in the quarter and intend to continue buying as part of an ongoing commitment to return capital to shareholders. Let's turn to our outlook. In the fiscal year 2018 third quarter, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $830 million and $850 million, gross margin of approximately 47.5% and diluted EPS of $1.60 at the midpoint of our guidance. This guidance reflects our view on near-term demand for our customers' flagship models and continued strength in IDP. Sequentially, we expect gross margin to remain roughly flat, primarily due to mix effects. We expect gross margin expansion to resume in the March quarter and into next year, with improving mix, ongoing productivity efforts and increasing fab utilization. Operating expenses are forecast to remain flat at approximately $158 million for the December quarter. Our outlook also reflects a recent event at a supplier. In mid-October, one of our laminate suppliers had a fire and shut down production. We quickly launched a recovery plan to minimize the impact of the event. Thanks to close and collaborative working relationships with customers and our other qualified suppliers and the exceptional efforts of our engineering, operations, quality and sales teams, we don't expect any major customer impacts. Our estimate of revenue and cost impacts of the event have been factored into today's guidance. For the remainder of fiscal 2018, we forecast revenue to decline less than seasonally December to March. In the second half, we expect double-digit year-over-year growth, with gains on new mobile platforms and continued strong IDP growth. OpEx is forecast to be down in dollars from fiscal 2017, as we continue to drive towards our operating model of 20% of sales or lower. We project CapEx to trend lower through the rest of the year, ending the full year below $300 million or less than 10% of sales. So wrapping up, in the second quarter, we delivered another quarter above our guidance. For the second half, we're forecasting a return to double-digit year-over-year growth, with expanding operating margins and increasing free cash flow. Our technology investments are paying off; our operations are running well and ready for growth; our operating costs are in control and declining; and our free cash flow is strong and improving. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow up. Okay. And we'll take our first question from Mike Burton with Longbow Research.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First on the – good to see recovery in China in the September quarter. Do you think your outperformed the market in calendar Q3 due to those ramps that you mentioned? And then looking to December, do you expect the market overall to be up? And do you expect to be in line or better than that as those ramps continue to play through? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Hey, Mike. This is Eric. I'll take that. We did have strength in the September quarter on China design wins in flagship products primarily. A lot of chunky dollar content across power amplifiers, switches, tuners, Wi-Fi and so forth, as we mentioned, and the Xiaomi win is just one example. So as those ramped up to begin filling their lines of distribution, we did see a bump in September. Going into December, we're continuing to be pretty cautious in terms of what we think the forecasted actual sell-through of those units will be in December. We still see generally in China a mix toward the mid-tier which as of now, still doesn't require carrier aggregation, so little dollar content. The growth we are seeing in units is really heading towards India. Again, prices in RF content similar to mid-tier handsets instead of the flagships. So it's really very similar to what we saw last quarter but with a bump in September due to the ramp of these new flagships with a lot of Qorvo content.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Great. Thanks. And then also for Eric, was Samsung a 10% customer in the quarter? And what are your expectations for them going into Q4? I think usually they're down pretty hard in Q4 but just hoping you could help us detail your progress with them?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, Mike. This is Mark. They were not a 10% customer in the quarter.
Operator:
Okay. We'll go to our next question Krysten Sciacca with Nomura/Instinet.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura/Instinet:
Hi. Good evening, guys. First question, did you have any other 10% plus customers for the quarter?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
We did have a 10% customer. Our largest customer was 40%.
Krysten M. Sciacca - Nomura/Instinet:
Okay. Thank you. Excellent. And then moving on to the automotive design win you mentioned in your prepared comments, can you kind of describe what exact functionality that design win was for? And when we should expect to see that to start to really show up in revenues? I know that sale cycles can be a bit long there.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, this is James. We're really focused on key aspects in the automotive being Wi-Fi, LTE chipsets and SDARS. The particular design wins we talked about were LTE-based and, again, we would expect revenue to begin later this year, early next year.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Cody Acree with Drexel Hamilton.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe, Eric, if we could go back to China real quick. It sounds like there's some puts and takes that are maybe not giving you the best visibility but if you look at it on an annual basis, maybe calendar 2017, calendar 2018, what are your expectations for growth? You're getting flagship design wins that are giving you some dollar content but then you're going to get a shift towards these mid-tier products that are lesser and then you're also getting growth outside of China that's probably also lesser dollar content.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, we think that the trend is clear. I mean, timing is always hard to nail down but the trend is very clear just as it is with all of our markets. There is an ongoing demand for more data and that does fundamentally drive the complexity in the RF and the value, as we've talked about many times. Currently, the lack of requirement for carrier aggregation, I mean, that's just a current cycle sort of situation. It's not long term, we don't believe. And as an example, today, carrier aggregation is only required this year in handsets over RMB 3,000 and if that returns to handsets over RMB 1,500, as is the current proposal, that would take the market requirement from 15% CA enabled up to 50% CA enabled. And of course, that's a trend that we'd very much like to see. We believe at some point next year that that requirement will come back. That combined with our customers looking at – more and more looking at exporting into higher-value parts of the market, requiring more carrier aggregation for even EU SKUs. And India, as it transitions to more premium tiers, our China customers are ready to capitalize on that. The India spectrum, actually, is quite fragmented and so as they demand higher data rates to compete with the rest of the world's carriers, it's natural that they'll need carrier aggregation. The frequencies are higher. It's going to be BAW-based quadplexers for India well. I think that's a real exciting market as a matter of fact. Not only our China customers, but Samsung and others are doing well in and we think India could be as much as $1 billion opportunity for RF in calendar 2020. So the long-term trends are very much intact.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
So do you have a swag (22:52) at what the longer-term CAGR is for that type of customer basically?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So I think, in general, it's growing roughly in line with our overall CAGR. I don't have an exact number off the top of my head but in the 10% to 12% range still.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hey, guys, wanted to address the timing shifts that you had mentioned. If you look at the consensus guidance or consensus expectations on the Street going into the call, you guys are guiding about $50 million or so below that level. I know you don't have access to all of our models but can you give us any sort of sense, how much revenue we may be talking about was affected by timing shifts from, perhaps, December into March? And then second question for Bob, you guys – cutting heads here to streamline expenses which is good to hear long-term, but I think you've talked about some very important projects. You've got this custom module development for your largest customer. I think you guys have also acknowledged that you're not spending a lot today in diversity receipts (24:00), so it seems like there's some pretty big opportunities that you could have diverted those resources towards. Any reason why you didn't shift those resources to some of those projects?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Thanks, Quinn. The first part of your question was I think you were expecting – I think you said $890 million and we gave you $840 million. And number one, I think we exceeded last quarter by about $10 million but let's not split hairs there. And IDP is tracking exactly as planned, so it's little bit off in the mobile area. And I'll let Eric talk about a little bit about it and we'll address the second part of the question
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. It is clear that the outlook for mobile in Q3 is lower than previous expectations. We've talked about it. It's related to flagship product sales or at least our take on the forecast for those, what we're expecting, it's across multiple customers, not just one customer. I think it's pretty clear and public now that our largest customer has a delayed overall product cycle compared to past years; that, that clearly has an effect. And many are speculating that it's affecting the entire market because a lot of the premium handset buyers are waiting to get their hands on the very latest models and they want to try those before they decide, regardless of what they buy. So we feel at least like there's been a general push out during the cycle.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Maybe, Quinn, just to close the loop on revenues. So it is a difficult quarter to forecast for the reasons that Eric and Bob mentioned. And then as we look out into March, as far as what sort of seasonal dip we see, more muted than normal so right now we're calling low- to mid-single digits on a decrease from December to March. And then as far as OpEx, we are not changing any priorities on our programs. In fact, we would view this as narrowing the focus on the most valuable opportunities we have. The company's matured in its merger. We're on a common system now. We've got – done a lot of work around defining processes and making them more efficient, reducing defects. And it's just allowing us to be more efficient. So we're at the point where we can take some more targeted actions that don't interfere with our growth plans and we did that. We ended up – at the end of the day, we'll have net about 300 people that are reduced in the company. About 200 of those are cost of goods folks and 100 are in the OpEx category. And as I mentioned in my comments, we continue to see OpEx specifically as a percent of sales to trend down. This year we believe we'll end between 20% and 21% of sales. And then next year see that drop.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Ambrish Srivastava.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi. Thank you very much. Could we get to the gross margin, please? I just want to make sure I understand this. In the fiscal third quarter, revenues are up but you're guiding it down. And I think you alluded to a mix issue, but – so that was my first part, what mix issue. And then a related question is, sounds like – are you backing out from the 50% target that you had given exiting the fiscal year? And if you are, then how should investors think about the trajectory of the gross margin expansion that you said it will start to expand beyond March? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Okay. So let me – this is Mark – I'll take the questions in the part. So first, on the second quarter, we reported 47.4% and as you mentioned, the guide is relatively flat. If you add back the Florida issue we had around air contamination, you end up – we were at really 48% normalized margin. And the decrease from that 48% to the 47.5% that we guided, so 50 basis points is primarily related to the increase of our low-band PAD in the mix, which we've been clear about before. I've never indicated that the margin expansion that we have planned would be linear, and this is an example where we're increasing but modestly. And in fact, if you normalize the margins, second quarter we are down but, again, because of mix. Talking gross margin more generally, we absolutely are not backing off on our target. For the year, we don't foresee ending the year at 50% as we had hoped but I will say that from – this is our fourth consecutive quarter of a gross margin increase and as we mentioned, we expect to increase that again in December and then again in the March quarters. And excluding this Florida effect in the second quarter, we've made or beat our gross margin guidance in each quarter over the past year. So the important thing is that we're able to forecast. We understand the drivers. I'm certainly not saying it's easy but we do believe and there are things out of our control, as Florida indicated, but we do have a handle on what's going on. We're not pleased with the gross margin, as I said last quarter. Not where we want to be, not where we expected to be. But we do see a roadmap to 50% as we talked about before. How we're going to get there? We're going to get there through volume growth, which as you heard in our Investor Day, we do expect to outpace the market. We expect that volume growth to be on our better margin products. BAW enabled revenue specifically, which we've talked about the criticality of that in both mix and loading our fabs. Tuners, PMICs and then IDP as a mix of the business generally, has been increasing and that helps us on the margin. Utilization, we've talked about, is our biggest drag on margin and I'm happy to say that we believe we've reached the low point in this second quarter and forecast improvements on utilization through the rest of this year and into next year. Finally, we've got a number of productivity projects that are still underway. Improving yield, shrinking die, traceability of projects, and then of course, the wafer expansions that we've talked about before and then reduce the capital intensity associated with that. So, again, confident in our ability to reach that target and actually exceed it in time. And for the rest of this year, we do expect margin expansion from December to March.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. Thank you for answering a difficult question and you should be given credit from recovering from the trough. Thank you.
Operator:
Okay. We'll take our next question from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Yes. Great. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one, Eric, I was hoping you could give us an update on the development efforts at your largest customer, which you talked about last quarter. How do you feel about that opportunity today relative to three or six months ago in terms of actually winning that business? And in terms of timing, when would you and when would we do we know whether or not you actually do win that business?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Thanks for the question. We're very excited about the opportunity. We believe we continue to be on track. We've learned a tremendous amount as we've gone through this development. It's improving our technology and our design capability and our prototyping and we're delivering high-volume samples today. And so we continue to believe we're on track. It's not over until it's over. And to answer your question, it's roughly the end of the calendar year approximately that we should have more clarity on that. In the meantime, as we commented earlier as well, the outcome from this in terms of technology and design capability and so forth, is going to impact a lot of other programs as well. As we see, generally, the industry's toughest most value problems are centered around enabling CA in the mid and high bands and driving higher levels of integration there. So this is a very, very important product. We're still quite confident that we're on track and it's going to grow well beyond that with the capability it's bringing us.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Okay. Great. And then as a follow-up, we've all heard quite a bit over the past couple of days in terms of how market share in the modem market could potentially change going forward. I was hoping you guys can remind us how different your opportunity is with the Intel SKUs as opposed to the Qualcomm SKUs. Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, it's an interesting question to think about. Now if you step back from it, the fact is we're developing a full complement of RF solutions with all the functionality needed for the entire RF front end and driving, of course, particularly on the advanced carrier aggregation based systems that are kind of in the premium tier. And we really, we make those up with all base bands out there, so Qualcomm, Intel, HiSilicon, MediaTek, Samsung, LSI. I mean, we're engaged in winning revenue and delivering production on all those platforms today. So on one sense, we're agnostic. We are a supplier to the entire industry and the RF is selected, in many cases, separate from the base band. Having said that, if you look at what's in the market today, it's clear that we have very good alignment with Intel and we do enjoy working with them and I think our ET track, in particular, has been a real success there.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Karl Ackerman with Cowen.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Hi. Good afternoon, everyone. I have two questions. First question is on inventory. Could you describe how you would characterize your own levels of modules in the channel given all the ramps of new flagship devices you're seeing across your top customers? And I guess given that your top three customers in mobile are ramping various devices, is there a greater propensity for you and your customers to engage in longer-term contract agreements with you on a quarterly basis that would increase your backlog and visibility more so than you have had historically? And I have a follow-up, please.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let me take a shot at that, Karl. As far as our major customers and how we do business, and I commented this on the last quarter as well, we have what we'll call schedule share agreements where they project their demand out for about a year and we react to that. So from agreement perspectives, yes, we've got contracts like that but the backlog – it's visibility for a year. And we know it's going to change week-to-week because we, as consumers, don't know when we're going to buy phones. So that's the predominant share of our market today. It's done that way with our high-volume large customers. So, as far as the ramps go with maybe some of our customers in China, they are getting more sophisticated as their phones get more complex and they need to ensure that capacity is in place and things like that. So we are getting, now, much better visibility out of that set of customers that two years ago, we sure didn't get. So overall, I'd say yes it's improving and it's that perspective of understanding their plans, the issue is as always, how successful are the phones when they get launched to market?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
I would just bring – Karl, maybe just bring it to a tactical level. Part of the reason our utilization has been poor, one of the factors is, we are very much trying to drive our own inventory levels down. So focusing on not loading the fabs for the purpose of inventory and all those associated risks and cash strain. And then also, related, we do see we're watching the China inventory channels very closely and those have gotten more healthy through the year. So we're pleased about that development.
Karl Ackerman - Cowen & Co. LLC:
I guess as a follow up to that then, and this really is to your longer-term margin profile. I do understand that margins were a bit challenged due to some one-offs this quarter and, of course, your current margin outlook is for 50% gross margins and 30% op margins. Though about two years ago you had articulated being able to expand gross margins toward even up to 55% margins. Now that China smartphone is beginning to improve after a tumultuous first half and you're increasing shift more of your manufacturing onto larger sized wafers next year and, presumably, the headwind on this low-band PAD abates, I guess what is inhibiting you from achieving that target over the next year or two?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
No, I think, Karl, you've laid out the drivers that we believe will be able to achieve the target. Back in that period there was a lot of discrete BAW and as you heard Eric say, the requirement for CA dropped and we've seen that BAW market get weaker than we expected. We expect tremendous BAW growth over the next several years and that's going to load our largest fab, which is our largest drain on margin. Furthermore, we continue to make, just as we have from our last low-band PAD version to this one, continual improvements in manufacturing yields and just the way we do the product to improve the margin in that product. And those are certainly factors that will help us going forward on margin.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Thanks, guys. I guess one for each, if I could, and I'll just put them out there and we can answer them in order. Bob, you mentioned the net ET PMIC for Wi-Fi. Is that in the mobile group or is that James' group? James, what's your GaN split between defense and cellular infrastructure? I know you're more heavily weighted to the former. Are you getting much traction in the cellular side of it? And if you could maybe give us an overview of where you are on most of your Wi-Fi CPEs but are you doing anything with the iFEM side of the business? And then, Eric, your tuner content seems to be ramping fairly rapidly. How much of that correlates to the big increase we're seeing in antenna count in the flagship models? And how much is just a wider spread of bands or a quest for better performance on existing bands? And could you maybe update us on the Wi-Fi iFEM business, which seems to be taking off? I know the Chinese OEMs were moving into it – and are moving into already shipping into production there you must be. And what do you think the chances are of that product moving into your largest customers? And then finally, Mark, I know in a perfect world – what's your best guess on – in a perfect world if the gross margins are down on utilization at Richardson and Richardson doesn't budge forever, how much of a penalty did you take this quarter? I'm just trying to get an idea of what it could have been if you were running at more normal levels. I know you said it bottomed this quarter but just trying to get a quantitative number on what you're suffering due to Richardson. Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Ed, thanks for your questions and appreciate you giving me the easiest one. The ET PMICs that I mentioned for Wi-Fi is in the cellular group, so I appreciate that one. James, if you want to address the GaN split, CPE infrastructure, defense; how many different places we sell GaN, that would be helpful for him.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
And I'll do Wi-Fi as well.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
That'd be great.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Ed. We continue to see strength with GaN as we reported it doubled year-over-year. I think we'll see that trend moving forward into the next quarter. Largely been driven by defense, cable TV and our VSAT business. You ask when base station revenue will become material, and we see that in the next year or so as our products in both macro and Massive MIMO base stations, including early things for 5G move into production ramp. If I go into the Wi-Fi side, what's really driven the business is, you mentioned iFEMs, has been our work in iFEMs and being able to integrate some great technologies into a common box. That's fueled tremendous amount of growth in the connectivity business as well. That business was up 81% year-over-year. So fantastic growth in that product set for the company. We're also laying the long-term foundation there as we transition to ax, and we believe our products will really enable that high throughput and the thermal performance that's required for the next standard coming along.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Eric, do you want to pick up on Wi-Fi as well and then move into the tuner question?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Absolutely. So the Wi-Fi for mobile, the industry traditionally was served through system in package in which the Wi-Fi iFEMs and filters and so forth would be sold to a module integrator. And that's still were the flagship of our – couple of our largest customers are. And the China market, as you indicated, it moved a little faster towards disintegrated that system in package and buying the integrated front-end modules from us. And certainly for the flagship devices coming out of China today that are running 2x2 MIMO, they're typically using a pair of iFEMs for high-performance. Now your question is the – when might that penetrate our largest customers and their marquee handsets? I think in order for that structural change to happen, it's going to be driven by technology like LAA. Whenever the Wi-Fi and the cellular start actually commingling more directly and sharing antennas and amplifiers and so forth, especially in the 5 gig area, that's where I think we could see a disruption that might change that architecture. Then, let's see. The first question you asked was about the tuner content going up. We are very pleased with the tuner business. It's going very well for us. It's driven, as you said by the increased antenna count, in particular to support MIMO. But complicated and actually increased further beyond that by the antenna sharing as well. So once they're adding more antennas but there's only so many antennas they can add. There's just not that much physical space. The transition to these full screen displays has made the area for antennas even less. So they're adding antennas but they're doing their best to add the fewest they can. So they're sharing antennas as much as possible between Wi-Fi and cellular, as an example. And when they do that there's a need for a couple of things, not just increased tuner content but also these antenna plexers so that you can multiplex signal in and out of a given antenna element to various places. So there's just a tremendous amount of work and innovation going on right now. We have a fantastic team of applications engineers and designers working to help our customers really manage these antenna networks. It is where a ton of value is being generated right now in the industry.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Eric. Mark, the question about Richardson impact to gross margin?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. And, Ed, there is a lot of variables in this and a lot of complexity in the network. The gross margin impact of our utilization on the fabs is around 200 basis points in the quarter and so more than offsets that depreciation benefit we talked about last quarter. And Texas, as you know, is our largest fab. So it's over half of that.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Operator?
Operator:
Okay. We'll go to our next question. Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yes. Hi, I guess first off, a near-term question. If we think about just the December quarter, you talked about continued strength in IDP but I guess the sequential point of view, can you give us a feel for the sequential growth for IDP and, I guess, mobile products?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Give us a sec there, Bill.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And, Bill, just to be clear, are you talking just for the quarter?
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yes, just for the quarter or I guess within embedded in the guidance, what kind of sequential growth, I guess, are we looking at for IDP?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Mid-single digits.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, that the business grew, you know, over 20% in the second quarter and we're expecting similar year-over-year growth in the third quarter.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Terrific. So I guess that probably puts us on track to maybe perhaps exceed our 15%, I guess, prior target you mentioned in the last quarter from a year-on-year point of view. I guess the details will come out in the Q in terms of operating performance but can you give us a feel for how we are relative to the model of 60% gross margin, 30% ops?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, I'll just make a general statement that James has managed to be well ahead of his model. And, in fact, in this quarter, he actually exceeded 30% operating margin in the business.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And we're expecting him to do it again next quarter.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Terrific results in that segment. Great.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
Okay. And we'll take our next question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thanks for taking my question. Maybe one for Bob and one for Mark. For the first one, if my math is right, I think you're guiding March to roughly $70 million, so definitely better than seasonal. Is that based on firm orders? Because March often tends to be seasonally quite soft, visibility is perhaps not as great. So I'm just wondering, Bob, what are the assumptions underlying that. And for Mark, on the gross margin side, I think you mentioned gross margins will be flat in December because of mix but if your largest U.S. customer is perhaps weaker and IDP is better and I assume you recover some of the fab issues, shouldn't gross margins be up sequentially in December? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Vivek, I need to ask a clarifying question for the March quarter. What did you say you had, revenue...?
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Basically because you're saying second half will be up 10%, so I'm just sort of trying to – I hope my math is right, but if -
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, what we said is second-half, year-over-year, would be double digits. And then we also said, Vivek, that we'd be down December to March low- to mid-single digits.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Right. That's what I'm wondering that March you're guiding but visibility and other things tend to be seasonally softer. So is your forecast based on firm orders or is it based on some other assumptions?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Vivek, number one, I want to make sure. We don't agree with your $700 million, $70 million or whatever. I couldn't hear you correctly. So we think we're going to be down mid-single digits when we look at March versus December and that's based on, as always, our judgment of our customer's forecast. And as I said, the majority of our business is run off scheduled shares so from a visibility perspective, provided the marquee phones sell as well as they do, the marquee phones that we know it our largest customer. The ramp of that profile is different than what we've seen in prior years. They've announced that. I'm sure tomorrow they'll have more color on it. So factoring in all these things, that's how we get to we think we're going to be down mid-single digits in the March quarter.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And then, Vivek, on the margin, as we all know, this is unusual seasonality and so the fact of the matter is that lower margin product is larger in December than it was in September, unlike last year. And, then as far as IDP, yes, the IDP growth is going to help as far as mix but there's also mix within IDP. So when it all shakes out, the dominant factor here is the mix of mobile products, sequentially.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Srini Pajjuri with Macquarie Capital.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Thank you. Hi, guys. A question on China. You mentioned you're seeing more progress in BAW there. Is there a way to think about how much BAW or what's the penetration of BAW in the premium segment, Bob? And then are you still running into TC-SAW, SAW-based solutions there or are you seeing any of your BAW competitors also competing in that market?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. This is Eric. So there are some discrete BAW solutions which of course we are providing. So just to be clear, we didn't indicate that we were seeing an increase in BAW currently. What we are saying is we're forecasting when we return to the BAW penetration that was there last year, which was driven by carrier aggregation requiring quadplexers, which were primarily BAW-based, right? So if you go from a carrier aggregation requirement of about 15% in the market this year to 50% next year, that roughly triples the opportunity, let's say, for those BAWed quadplexers. And that's really the opportunity we're referring to.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
I guess my question was more about the Huawei win that you mentioned, Eric, I'm guessing that has some BAW content in that. So I'm just curious if that's a new BAW design that you won against TC-SAW or if you're displacing the existing BAW suppliers out there?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, no, it's existing BAW bands.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Chris Caso with Raymond James.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Good evening. I just wanted to follow-up with some of the comments on BAW and capacity utilization. Perhaps you could talk about what you think would be the profile of the improvement utilization as you go through. And I know there is conviction in that utilization improving over a three-year period. What do you expect to be the profile of that? And, importantly what would be the driver of that? Eric, you had mentioned this potential for carrier aggregation on 15% of the TAM to 50% of the TAM. Is that something that you think is achievable over the next year?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, so I think the drivers of that are the carrier aggregation attach that we've talked about. Also Wi-Fi, we have the BAW in our coexistence filters for Wi-Fi. Some of these antenna plexers that I mentioned are BAW-based, as well. And then of course, it's the custom module that we're working on today that has a tremendous amount of BAW content in it. So there's several things that are going to layer in and, again, the trend is clear that the timing of each of those is a little harder to predict but there's clearly a trend towards layering on a lot of different opportunities in BAW.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And then, Chris, just as that BAW-enabled revenue increases and we've talked about before, we're less than 25% now. We're going to be closer to 30% next year and then that expands in the planning horizon. That loads Richardson, specifically, and then Farmers Branch. By mid next year, we would expect to be 80% or so loaded if our plans play out as expected. And then it becomes a case of just very carefully managing our CapEx. And as we need additional capacity, we're doing it in the most cost-effective way, which the wafer size increase, the die shrink, all these other things we believe will reduce the capital intensity of the business going forward.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And just as a follow up to that, I think you said 80% number on your plans, does that contemplate BAW penetration at your largest customer or would that be additive to that?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
I'll just leave it, Chris, in order to get the utilization that we want, we're going to need BAW-based revenue without a doubt. And we also need to continue to do well in winning SAW-based business and GaAs-based PA products and other things. So we are absolutely focused on increasing our profitability with high-quality products.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Atif Malik with Citi.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.:
Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. The first question is on seasonality. Understand March quarter is better than seasonal because of the push out of the flagship customer. Do you think that the June quarter seasonality could be below seasonal because of the impact of that phone on the Korean customer launch every year?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're not giving March guidance. We're not going to give June guidance, for sure.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.:
Okay. Fair enough. And then, Mark, I have a question on gross margins. I absolutely agree with Ambrish earlier that you guys have made a lot of progress in the gross margins but then you guys keep on running in new excursions, whether it's laminate supplier issues. What is it with your manufacturing process or is it complicated with BAW and SAW and everything? We don't hear about these issues from other RF makers. Maybe they're also having these issues but they're not talking about it on their call. But what is it about your manufacturing process that could help us get more comfortable with these excursions in the future?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, I think just very quickly there's an important distinction. Last year you could argue that it was something in our control. And we had a bad quarter, some manufacturing excursions and looked at ourselves and really cleaned up our processes and it's paid off. And we have been running much better. The ramps this year are going very well. And the two instance we mentioned here, in the interest of disclosure, wanted to make sure folks understood it, I would say these are out of our control. One is literally an act of God, the Hurricane Irma, where interestingly, in the days after the hurricane after the fab was back up and running, there were some defects associated with sulfur compounds on the wafer or on the wafers, on the metal layers of the wafers. And it turns out it was decaying vegetable matter and conventional fab air filtration wasn't sufficient. And so we changed some very good root-cause analysis and recovery action by the team. Changed the filtering and then just natural dissipation, the problem went away and we did not impact the customer. That's the important thing. And then this fire at a laminate supplier, again, out of our control but what it speaks to is the good operational excellence on our part, had some qualified suppliers, we mobilized, worked with our customers, worked with these other qualified suppliers and as we see it, we're on track to have a minimal impact from this event.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes. Thanks. I wanted to come back to this opportunity on the mid- and high band with Apple and it looks like your competitor, at least in one of the versions of the current phone, is shipping. And so they've gone through all the processes and trials and sampling. So does that change at all your thinking in terms of what the prospects are as you go into next year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Not at all.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Okay. And so on the IDP business, which is running 20%, can you talk about some of the sub-segments in that space in terms of where you see is driving the really robust growth?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes, as I talked earlier, our connectivity business was very strong with what we were able to do in Wi-Fi. And we had a great quarter in the defense business. Substantial growth really across all our major sub-markets
Operator:
And that concludes today's question-and-answer session. I will turn the call back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you for joining us tonight. Qorvo is leveraging our industry-leading product and technology portfolio to target the most valuable opportunities and the largest profit pools across our diverse growth markets. We thank you for joining us tonight, and we look forward to meeting with many of you at upcoming conferences. Good night, and thank you.
Operator:
And this does conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Wills Miller - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Vijay Raghavan Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo Fiscal 2018 First Quarter Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would now like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations for Qorvo. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Melinda. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's first quarter fiscal 2018 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And, with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Hello everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2018 first quarter conference call. On our call today, we'll discuss our quarterly performance and provide an update on market dynamics. We'll address these dynamics within the context from our longer-term goal of creating a more profitable and diversified company that's built to outpace underlying markets. In the June quarter, the Qorvo team executed well with revenue and EPS at the high-end of our guidance and continued progress toward achieving our margin targets. On the revenue line, IDP was a standout with record revenue of $184 million, up 22% year-over-year. IDP's repositioned product portfolio is targeting the highest growth opportunities. As the June quarter unfolded, demand was stronger than expected and the organization worked hard to support our customers. In Mobile Products, June quarter revenue was in line with expectations, reflecting the growth at Samsung and a modest demand recovery in China. Looking to the September quarter and beyond, we're confident in our content gains at large customers and we expect mobile revenue will track the ramp profiles of marquee devices. Across both Mobile Products and IDP, we're developing highly integrated single placements and highly differentiated discrete solutions for industry leaders. We are expanding our product and technology portfolios to deliver greater functionality and superior performance in miniaturized form factors and we are addressing our industry's most complex architectures, where performance wins. Our highest priority initiatives support our growth and margin targets, with an emphasis on BAW-based opportunities. We are converting to larger diameter wafers and we are shrinking dye sizes. It's our intent to reduce BAW cost and increase asset throughput and BAW utilization as a primary driver of our gross margin performance. We've launched multiple BAW 5 based discrete and integrated solutions. And we expect the market will continue to require more BAW filters as consumers demand more mobile data and as carriers work to increase the capacity of their networks. Of note, in Mobile Products, we continue to be pleased with our progress on a development program with our largest customer for a module that combines multiple high order BAW multiplexers. As we discussed at our Analyst Day, this is our single largest opportunity for driving growth and utilization. And we're on track for this development program. Looking at our June quarterly performance by segment, Infrastructure and Defense grew 22% year-over-year and 9% sequentially. Since repositioning IDP to focus on secular high growth markets, we've absolutely been hitting our stride. We've seen eight consecutive quarters of strength and the sales funnel continues to expand. In base station, we launched the industry's first GaN on silicon carbide 5G front-end module for the 39 GHz frequency band. The module's compact design integrates two powerful GaN mimics and uniquely addresses the complex challenges faced by telecom equipment manufacturers designing next-generation millimeter wave systems. In addition, we helped advance the development of 5G with a newly launched portfolio of ultra-high performance 28 GHz solutions. These hybrid solutions draw upon Qorvo's process expertise in both GaN on silicon carbide and gallium arsenide to deliver leading-edge performance in miniaturized footprints. It's also worth noting that we're seeing an increase in customer pull for our high-power BAW for the 3.5 GHz band for 5G massive MIMO antennas. Our defense business was also particularly strong. GaN and BAW have been a big part of this strength, growing over 25%. We are experiencing significant growth with our ongoing multi-year defense contracts, supporting programs like F-15, F-16, and the F-35. In fact, first quarter revenue with our largest defense customer more than doubled year-over-year. In Wi-Fi, IDP grew greater than 50% year-over-year. Of note, during the June quarter, IDP launched new BAW filters that enabled triple the range for smart home and enterprise applications. These new bandedge and coexistence Wi-Fi filters deliver robust coverage across the entire allocated spectrum and are half the size of earlier generation solutions. IDP also supported the transition to 802.11ax as customers implemented our recently released portfolio of BAW filters and 2.4 and 5 GHz FEMs. These newest Qorvo Wi-Fi solutions provide the high throughput and extreme thermal efficiency that are critical to high density 802.11ax connectivity. Our customers are quickly filling the Wi-Fi sales funnel and we continue to expect robust growth in fiscal 2018. Mobile Products also drove growth in IoT, supporting a range of applications, including automotive, asset tracking, meter reading, agricultural, industrial, and even the large bicycle sharing services in China, all with mobile M2M solutions. On the design front, we were selected by the leading China-based smartphone OEM to support a marquee device ramping this fall with Qorvo power amplifiers, premium filters, high performance switches, and an ET PMIC. We've also secured design wins for a broad suite of BAW 5 products, including quadplexers for carrier aggregation, Wi-Fi Sense for Oppo, Xiaomi, LG, ZTE and Nokia, and a Wi-Fi coexistence filter for a marquee smartphone platform. We helped enable a new smartphone entrant in the Android ecosystem, winning more than $12 of Qorvo content in a smartphone expected to ship very soon. We're also recognized as a partner by the China Mobile 5G Innovation Center, formalizing our alliance with China Mobile and defining what 5G can make possible. And we were honored by Vivo with their Innovation Technology Partner Award. Now for the open market, we released a broad family of premium BAW 5 filters and quadplexers that are critical for enabling the continued proliferation of carrier aggregation and high performance Wi-Fi. We also commenced shipments of our next-generation antenna tuners which reduce the complex design challenges related to band proliferation, the deployment of carrier aggregation, the implementation of MIMO and the popularity of new features like shrinking bezels and dual cameras, which require the already limited board space available for antennas. Across our Mobile Product platform, we're offering leading-edge solutions that compete on performance, not price. A long-term market trend is migrating to more functional, higher content performance tier phones and we expect this trend will drive growth in not just BAW filters, but also in envelope tracking, switching, antenna tuning and amplifiers. So at a high level looking at both Mobile and IDP, Qorvo is a recognized global leader serving a diverse set of markets, products and customers with an expanding portfolio of innovative solutions. In the current quarter, we're forecasting strong sequential revenue growth, primarily on the strength of mobile content gains on marquee platforms, modest improvements in the China market and continued strength in IDP. We have booked record sales of GaN solutions. The market for our switches and tuners is robust. We're advancing the design, performance, and breadth of our filter and multiplexer portfolios. And the broad strength of our product and technology portfolio is enabling Qorvo to grow content on multiple future generations of marquee platforms. We're building our industry's most highly integrated RF solutions and we're targeting the most complex and most profitable opportunities. And, with that, I'll turn it over to Mark for commentary on our financials.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo revenue for the first quarter was $640 million, exceeding the midpoint of our guidance by $10 million. The variance was driven by our IDP business of $184 million with stronger than expected demand for defense, Wi-Fi, and broader IoT products. Mobile Products revenue was in line with expectations at $456 million. Gross margin in the June quarter was 47.3%, a sequential increase of 110 basis points and 30 basis points above our guidance. Operating expenses were $166 million and operating income for the quarter was approximately $137 million. Non-GAAP net income was $114 million. Diluted earnings per share was $0.87 or $0.07 over the midpoint of our guidance. First quarter cash flow from operations was down seasonally to $104 million, but approximately 75% higher than last year. Capital expenditures were down sequentially to $124 million and will continue to decline as we wrap-up recent expansions, tool conversions and other investments to support future growth. Cash at quarter-end was $513 million. We repurchased $32 million of stock in the quarter and intend to continue buying as part of an ongoing commitment to return capital to shareholders. Let's turn to our outlook. In the fiscal year 2018 second quarter, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $800 million and $820 million, a 27% sequential increase at the midpoint; gross margin of approximately 47.8%, up 50 basis points from the prior quarter; and diluted EPS of $1.43 at the midpoint of our guidance. This guidance reflects seasonal effects at our largest customer and modest improvements in the China market, but continued strength in IDP. Operating expenses are forecast to remain flat sequentially as productivity improvement are offset in part by R&D related to custom product development for our largest customer. For full year of fiscal 2018, we forecast revenue to strengthen from the September to December quarter followed by a seasonal decline in March. We project double-digit year-over-year growth in the second half with a stronger China market, gains on new mobile platforms and continued above market IDP growth. With our current top line outlook and efforts to minimize inventories, utilization rates are lower than expected. We still see opportunities for gross margin expansion through improving mix, yield improvements and other productivity efforts and lower than previously projected CapEx spend and depreciation. OpEx is forecasted to be down in dollars from fiscal 2017 and in the full year between 20% and 21% of sales. We're modeling an 8.5% tax rate. We've lowered our view on CapEx for the year from around $400 million to less than $300 million to take into account improvements in fab yields, successful wafer size conversions, progress on dye shrink programs and a near-term focus on improving utilization. Projected CapEx for the year is less than 10% of sales and over 800 basis point drop from last year. And combined with operating cash flow, we expect this will lead to a tripling of free cash flow in fiscal 2018. The view we laid out at Investor Day is intact. We have the technology and product portfolio to address industry trends; the advanced design capabilities to engage on the most difficult RF product development projects; a world-class manufacturing footprint capable of supporting low-cost, double-digit growth; and an organization committed to operational excellence. In IDP, we have a broadly diversified, high-growth business leveraging our technologies, including BAW, GaAs, and GaN, and serving IoT, 5G and other emerging markets. In Mobile, we're competing on the most advanced slots at the most challenging customers for the most valuable parts of the RF TAM. We're focused on BAW-based revenue because BAW filters are increasingly required to meet customer performance requirements for the most attractive part of the RF TAM. Our core BAW technology and production capability provide a significant competitive advantage that we're leveraging to win higher margin, performance-driven designs at leading customers. While the exact timing of customer technology adoption is hard to predict in the short-term, over time, the trends of more advanced filtering and more integration are inevitable. We strongly believe the comprehensive nature of our products and technology portfolio anticipates where our industry is heading and enables us to best support our customers' requirements for performance integration and cost. Our mid to long-term growth and margin expectations are unchanged. We intend to outgrow the market, expand annual operating margins 10 points by fiscal year 2020, and plan to generate substantially more free cash flow going forward on stronger operating results and lower capital intensity. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll go to Toshiya Hari, Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Great. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Mark, sorry if I missed this. But I think three months ago, you guys talked about growing top line double-digits year-over-year in fiscal year 2018. Is that still intact today or have you made changes? And if so, what's changed over the past three months?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So good question, Toshi. So our full year right now looks to be not far off what the current external view is of our full year, so between 4% and 5%. Again, if you look at our first half, it's been a weaker China than we expected. And most of the variances relate to the slower pick-up in China and rest of year view on China. Some marquee phone effect but really the – that's the smaller effect. And we believe the worse is behind us at this point. As we mentioned in our opening comments, we do expect a sequential increase September to December. And at this point, we see a bit of a less than normal seasonal decline in the March quarter. And so if you look where the year has been, a bit softer out of the gate in the first half followed by a double-digit year-over-year growth in the second half, you get a full year that's in the 4% to 5% range.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Got it. Very helpful. Thank you. And then my second question on IDP, very nice growth here. Acceleration from last quarter to this quarter despite a higher base. Bob, you've kind of walked through some of the end markets, but I was hoping, if you can elaborate on the one or two things that really drove growth in the quarter and if you can talk to sustainability in those businesses going forward, that will be great. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I would like to, but I believe James would love to.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So I'd let him have his moment. He's earned it.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're particularly strong in Wi-Fi. Combining best-in-class power amplifier technology and our BAW filters and integrating those have allowed us to get significant traction in the market. And we're focused on those high performance slots and also on the transition to ax. So in that market, we believe that we'll be sustainable. And as Bob mentioned, we grew 50% year-over-year in Wi-Fi. Defense also has been particularly strong really across all of the submarkets inside defense and broad reaching inside our channel as well. GaN and BAW have been the big part. Both grew over 25%. And we also experienced significant growth on our multi-year defense contracts supporting the programs that Bob mentioned earlier, and particularly proud of the ability to double our largest customer in that space year-over-year. And again, I think, we see with defense a long-term sustainability in that part of the market.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, James.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC:
Thank you.
Operator:
And we'll next go to Vivek Arya, Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Wills Miller - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Hey. This is Wills Miller for Vivek. Thanks for taking my questions. Given your commentary regarding your marquee phone, as it pertains the September quarter, should we assume above seasonal growth in December quarter and if so by how much?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
As far as our comments have been is that we are expecting December to be up quarter-over-quarter compared to September. We're not guiding at this time December, but we believe it's going to be up.
Wills Miller - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
That's helpful. And then, maybe can you just talk about the demand environment and how it's shaping up in China in the second half and just kind of some color on how visibility is there around inventory?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Eric, you want to take that?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. We mentioned in the prepared comments a modest recovery in China. I think that's a good way to characterize it. We're clearly seeing units turn around and begin to pick up well, seeing channel inventory coming to healthy levels this quarter. The only drag on it is the mix is towards lower content phones so far in the cycle. So we're seeing less uptake in particular of like carrier aggregation and super high performance Wi-Fi components and so forth. So we expect as we go through the year, we'll see more flagship models released, which will bring those features back in. But we're glad to see the units turning around. It's definitely becoming a healthy sequential growth for us coming out at this point.
Wills Miller - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
That's helpful. Thank you.
Operator:
We'll next go to Edward Snyder, Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Thanks a lot. First off, Mark, your CapEx guidance has declined a bit. What does that say about Farmers Branch? Have you brought that up? Is it in qual? Are you slowing down? Can you give us some color on specifically where you are with that ramp for the qualified line? And then, James, it sounds like a great quarter here overall. Are you seeing a demand for – I know the Wi-Fi was very strong and there's been a lot of push for modules on the mobile side of it. I know that Eric's group is starting to look at the iFEMs. Are your customers looking at any of that type of product or given that you're such a higher performance, higher power solution, is it still mostly discrete or are they talking about it now, period? And then one for Eric, if I could. In terms of the profile for next year, I know it's too early to tell because you haven't been awarded wins, et cetera. But in general, all else being equal, is your confidence on say antenna tuners or LNAs or BAW filters higher heading into next year in terms of growth prospect by technology from where we are right now?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Okay. Let's go ahead and take these. Mark, do you want to take the Farmers Branch, our plans there?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah as we continue to get the qual lines done at Farmers Branch, we're moving quickly on that. We want the facility ready for when we're going to need it, which is going to probably be fiscal year 2019. And it's again going very well. The yields there are in line with what we have in Richardson, which is outstanding. So I would say it's going better than expected. Steve Grant would say it's going absolutely as expected. And so, great job by the team there and it's going to be ready when we need it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Mark. James, he wanted to know about iFEMs in your market, where it's more performance?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Ed, the growth in Wi-Fi was particularly in our retail space. I wanted to clarify that, and largely with some of our customers in Asia. The uptick of iFEMs has been very positive in the market. So, as Bob talked about earlier, we are seeing integration. We are putting BAW inside those integrated FEMs in some cases. And we do have FEMs out for both 2.4 and 5 GHz.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks. Eric?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So, in terms of confidence looking into next year, saw new product ramps. Certainly, BAW is going to be critical for us and we're working on some very complex BAW modules with high order multiplexers in them. Our confidence continues to grow every single week that we get closer in the development. We're really getting outstanding performance out of these modules today and delivering in relatively high volumes considering where we are in the program. So very excited with what the team is doing. We're confident that's going to lead to tremendous growth in our BAW-based revenue next year. Tuners overall are just a fantastic opportunity for us. It's one of the largest growth areas in our available market. And we've got a lot of generation over generation technology improvements coming and the market demand or the need for the improvements is greater than ever with more antennas coming into the handsets, new case designs, MIMO and so forth. And it's not just in the premium or flagship tier. We're seeing it now move well into many of our China customers, down into their portfolio as well. We had a lot of expertise there, so our confidence is quite high in that growing as well next year.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
And then if I could, your competitive environment in tuners is quite a bit different than it is in most of the other areas that you compete into. And I know there are folks starting to sell it. I know you guys landed head-to-head with Skyworks and a few others guys. You've landed slots in what would traditionally wouldn't be considered your strong area. Can you give us a thumbnail sketch of the competitive environment in that versus today versus say filters? And then if I could, Mark, it – Bob highlighted a number of progress points on BAW, both in quadplexers and filters in the open market and how you guys are landing more slots there. Clearly that's coming out of Richardson at this point. Can you just give us idea, as utilization moved up there, as the unit volumes pushed it back down, where are you with regard to that? And if you land the marquee parts that you've been talking about for next year, you're absolutely going to have to have Richardson display that. Are you not? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Okay. Eric, first part.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
All right. So regarding the competitive environment in tuners, it is different, as you point out, from other parts of the radio, primarily because you're working with the customer as part of his case design, electromechanical team. And so it also has got quite a bit of applications experience required. So our many, many years in this industry and I think we've got the industry's best talent by far working in this area. The intimacy we built with our customers to help them, I think, is a key competitive advantage for us and I think there are a few that can replicate that.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Mark, utilization, BAW and Richardson?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Ed, the utilization in Texas is – at Richardson is not what we want it to be. It's not what we expected it to be. The slow start in China has weighed on that facility's utilization. And as you know, with the (27:53) conversion going on there, it's actually – I don't want to say made the problem worse, but certainly on that metric it's worse and that we – just more output for a given input. So we are – that is part of the reason that between that and yields improving and other things, we don't need the same level of spend that we needed before. I think we knew that that the capital intensity of the business would go down. That's been accelerated a bit here. So that's why we've called the forecast down. I think it bears repeating Eric's comment that BAW is BAW growth and these advanced modules requiring BAW, absolutely critical to our growth plans. It's critical for our margin expansion plans, not only because of the higher margin BAW product mix, but the increased utilization has a tremendous effect on our margin going forward.
Operator:
And we'll next go to Harsh Kumar, Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey, guys. Hey. A question to you, Bob, for your large – you've got a pretty large sequential increase in the mobile side. Some companies give a ratio called the coverage ratio. I suspect it pertains to how much orders you have hard on the books. Is there anything like that that applies here? And then you also mentioned a full year guide of between – call it metric of between 4% and 5%. I'm trying to spread it out and maybe if you could provide some color on how much is typical March seasonality in your viewpoint that would be helpful.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Thank you, Harsh. As far as backlog coverage and things like that, in some ways, that's really outdated. We're on a lot of schedule share programs with many of our customers. And I think the main point here is we've got visibility to the demand that we're very comfortable with what we guided. So let's leave it at that way, some customers that book and some of it's schedule share, Harsh. And the second part, normal seasonality – again, there's a large range. Sometimes it's down 15% or more, sometimes a little bit less. So this time, we're thinking it's going to be maybe double-digits, but not up towards 15%.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Understood. And then for my follow-up, I just wanted to say pretty tremendous job on gross margin execution guide that's been going up. I guess my question is it's going up again in September. What would you say is the biggest thing that's driving? Is it just the revenue ramp? And then also are we – is 50% still in the site to be hit some point in time this year?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Good questions, Harsh. And I would – we're not giving – on the walk to September, there's a lot of puts and takes, some positive as you can imagine, some negative. On the positive side, we've got just continued productivity improvements, so it's much of what I talked about before. We have low-band pad ramping, which is headwind, but this generation of low-band pad is more profitable than the last generation. That's a positive. And then, finally, as we were – just our normal course of accounting activities and as we were spending for all these conversions, it arose that that converting SAW processes from four to six and BAW processes for six to eight just depend on we could reuse a lot of the tool sets and equipment. So, based on this, we evaluate useful life and adjusted depreciation schedules to reflect this which we had to do. So, it's a large percent of the process tools for – the conversions are reused up to 90%. On the negative, we've got – June to September we have an increased mobile mix. So, just the business mix is unfavorable against gross margins sequentially. Again low-band pad though it's – this particular version is higher margin than the last. It's still lower margin than much of our average margin. And then you heard the question from Ed and the utilization in the fab network, specifically Texas, is really weighing on us. So, puts and takes, but that's the summary.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Thank you, Mark. Appreciate it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
We'll next go to Mike Burton, Longbow Research.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Hey. Thanks, guys. So I was just wondering if – sorry if I missed it, but if you could just repeat your 10% customers for the quarter. And then can you provide some more color on your progress with Samsung? You sounded very confident in getting them above 10% on a previous call. I was curious how they tracked for you, both last quarter and your expectations for the rest of this year?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
We had two 10% customers in the quarter. One is 27% and the second was...
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Samsung was 10% and...
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Outlook for the year on Samsung?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
11%.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Okay. So...
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So the outlook for our business with Samsung is we continue to actually make a lot of progress there across multiple tiers. There's a lot of opportunity for us opening up now, more next fiscal year, but early in the fiscal year and they are mass tier programs, which had a lot of volume. We've always had switch participation there, but a lot of opportunity now opening up in integrated modules for both the mid and high-band and low-band for that matter. And we've got similar trends as we do with Huawei, where we've got a little lot out of sync with them last year. We're coming back into focus now. I think, Huawei, even much sooner than Samsung, you're going to see significant turnaround in our share there.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Thanks. And then, Mark, on OpEx going forward, what are the puts and takes as we look past the September quarter on the OpEx side? Thanks.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Mike, we expect OpEx to continue to trend down on a dollar basis. It's just due to a number of productivity programs underway. The whole organization is being trained on Lean, better documented processes and things like that. Working on improving or prototyping efficiency and then this depreciation benefit I talked about earlier. There's a little bit that goes down into OpEx and going forward that helps a bit. So we're just expecting to get much better leverage off of our fixed cost base going forward. And that's driving us to close the gap with our peers.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Great. Thanks.
Operator:
Craig Hettenbach, Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes. Thanks. Yeah. Mark, I just had a follow-up question on gross margins. I wasn't clear if you're saying kind of 50% target for March is on track or there is puts and takes for that to play out?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Craig, for asking the question. And, Harsh, I apologize for not getting the back half of your question. We certainly still – it remains our target. But since we're nor providing fourth quarter 2018 guidance, I'll refrain from making a commitment. What I can say, Craig, is that we continue to make progress and expect to be over 50% as BAW mix increases and the Texas fabs are fully utilized. I think related remind you that our operating margin model is 30%, so gross margin 50%, OpEx 20% for an operating margin of 30%. We expect to be over that actually this year in the December quarter. So we're making progress down to the operating margin line. I expect the gross margin progress to continue. But, again, as we said a couple times here BAW is critical to making that happen.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. Appreciate the extra color. And then just any thoughts on capital allocation. It looks like CapEx is coming down a bit. I mean, historically, you've done buybacks and some tuck-ins, but how you're thinking about best use of cash here and updated thoughts on M&A opportunities.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. We do have, Craig, decision to make on the free cash flow. We're committed to continue to return it to shareholders just as we communicated at the Investor Day. We'll first look at it, are there any acquisitions, inorganic growth that makes sense. IDP is a business in particular that we would look at opportunities there, at bolt-on technology or markets. But we're comfortable with our leverage and barring any acquisition opportunities would likely return cash to shareholders.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Craig.
Operator:
Bill Peterson, JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for taking the question. There's been some fears in the market about pricing, people being more aggressive on pricing. I guess with some of the wins you have at the leading Chinese maker as well as the other smartphone manufacturers in China, how should we think about your design wins and with BAW or iFEMs or some of the other content gains you have? How is pricing and what's the impact to gross margins on some of these newer platforms? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Right. We're really focused on the premium tier and driving towards highly integrated solutions with few competitors. And in that market, you really win or lose by having the product ready on time and meeting the performance requirements. So pricing isn't as much an issue for us in that market.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Very good. And then maybe switching to IDP, James, continued great results in IDP and you talked about some of the near-term dynamics. I guess embedded in the 15%-plus year-on-year growth which looks beyond even I guess the next quarter or two, what would be some areas of, let's say, outperformance and then what would be any areas that could be holding it back? Thank you.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think we'll see a similar story as we go through the rest of the year, significant strength in our defense business and in our IoT part of the business. IoT will really be both around our Wi-Fi products, but also what we call low power wireless. We're seeing a very nice growth here with the GreenPeak Technologies that we brought into the company about a year ago. So really against those three areas, any headwinds would be some pressure on our base station business in predominantly in China and a little bit of headwinds on our traditional long haul optical business. Base station we're modeling to be down between 5% and 10% year-over-year for the full year. So that's a bit of a headwind for us. Long-term that markets, the trends still look very, very positive as we see GaN aggressively moving in, 5G coming on board, massive MIMO systems getting deployed. All those we think are very, very positive trends. Same thing with optical. I think, as optical begins to rebound, we believe we've got some of the best performance technology in the market for next-generation drivers in long haul metro and those will continue to drive growth in that business.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Terrific color and great results despite those headwinds. Thanks.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
Cody Acree, Drexel Hamilton.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Yeah. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe, Eric, if we could go back to China and just, I'm just trying to better understand the delta between last quarter's conviction that you were thinking about a 10% annual growth and now 4% to 5%. It sounds like it was largely around China. So I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what changed.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Thanks. It is largely China. As we mentioned, the recovery is taking off slowly in terms of units, but what's more important to us is the actual mix towards the higher end of the portfolio. We're heavily levered towards carrier aggregation and high performance Wi-Fi, envelope tracking sort of solutions which many of our largest customers in China are clearly designing in and moving forward with, but it's in their more premium part of their handsets. And I think in general, people all over the world, but in China in particular are waiting to kind of see what happens with our largest customer's ramp this year, decide what competitive looks like in that premium tier, and then decide which exact models they're going to release and roll out after that. So we've taken a relatively cautious stance on how the units are going to continue to go on China. Once they do turn it on in full steam, a large part of our fiscal year will potentially be behind us. So that's kind of the color behind the guide.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Eric, do you think that there has been some structural share loss in China or is it just related to kind of a shift in timing of some of these programs?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Share loss in as much as the mix is more towards low-end, which doesn't use as much of our products. I mean, in any one product segment we compete, I don't think there is any issue there with that. The handset mix is more towards lower end. If that continues, that will add up to share loss.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
And then lastly, in years past, we have had your largest customer at times really front-end load their build for their launch. This last season, it seemed to be a little more paced, a little more measured demand build pacing with what they were seeing as demand. If we go back into kind of the 6S what was very front-end loaded, they got into problems I guess. What are you expecting this year as far as that largest customer's build pattern?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry. We're unable to comment on anything that's actually not been announced publicly. So we've given you our guidance and that's the best we can do.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Okay. Thanks.
Operator:
And we'll go to Ambrish Srivastava, BMO Capital Markets.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi. This is Kulin Patel calling in for Ambrish. Thanks for taking my questions. On the balance sheet, inventory tick up a bit in the June quarter. What's driving that and how should we expect that to trend in the September quarter and I guess throughout the year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
As far as the inventory buildup, it's pretty much seasonal for us. If you've studied us over the years, we typically build inventory in June to support a big September ramp. And given our guidance, we expect to consume that in September and we've also made comments that we're expecting a strong December. So we're expecting inventory to come down over the next few quarters.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. And how much of your mobile business was from China? I think in the last quarter you mentioned it was 35%.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So excluding Huawei, it's about 30% of mobile in the June quarter.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. Great. Thanks.
Operator:
And Chris Caso, Raymond James.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yes. Thank you. Good evening. Just the first question on the – your comments on adjusting the depreciation schedule. Could you clarify that a bit in terms of what's the timing of that adjustment? What's the magnitude of the adjustment on margins?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. The timing of the adjustment – hey, Chris, I think you need to put your phone on mute. We're getting a bad echo here. Timing the adjustment would be this second quarter you'll see it. We actually put it place this fiscal year, but only had an effect on – small effect on OpEx in the first quarter. $0.01 or so on EPS was considered in our guide. And then in the second quarter you begin to see the effects of that on gross margin. It's 150 basis points give or take on gross margin. And then one quick comment while I have the floor here. Just on the free cash flow and the use of cash, I just want to make it clear. I'm not going to indicate rate and pace of the buyback, because there is – could be acquisition opportunities or some other location of cash or other issues, which my impact the timing of the use of that cash. We assume for guidance purposes in our EPS that we just offset dilution. I wanted to make that clear.
Chris Caso - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you. And just as a follow-up, if you talk about that the – you said that the BAW opportunity at your largest customer was on track. Could you clarify what on track means? Any kind of update you could provide there and what potential timing we would have a more substantial update on that on whether or not that project may go forward?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
There is very little color we can add. On track means we're competing head-to-head and we still have every reason to believe that we can win a portion of the business. And in terms of clarity, we've increased throughout the year. It will likely be end of this calendar year, maybe a little in the next year before we have full clarity.
Operator:
Quinn Bolton, Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi, guys. Just wanted to follow-up a couple of comments. First, the less than seasonal decline in March, Bob, was that really being driven by the timing of marquee phone wins or were there some other dynamic leading you to believe that March could be better than seasonal this year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think integrating all the customers – what we talked about as some of the wins that we've got in the back half of the year. We talked about China. We talked about the shift of what we see going on there. We've talked about coming back at Samsung. We talked about coming back at Huawei. I think layering all that in, that's why we made the comment.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. And it sounds like as part of that, it does anticipate sort of this more positive mix shift in China going from sort of the low end back towards the premium phones sometime into the December and March timeframe?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
That is correct.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Great. And then just one for James. You mentioned the 39 GHz and 28 GHz solutions for 5G. It wasn't clear if those are PA-based solutions? Are they filter-based solutions or just give us a little bit more color on what you're supplying for the 5G massive MIMO antenna arrays?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. For reference, there is a couple of nice press releases that we did before at MTT that will kind of give you a little bit more detail about what's in there. Basically PA-based films and mixed technology in some cases where we're integrating both gallium nitride and GaAs just for those high frequency ranges.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Great. Thank you.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
But not discrete power amplifiers, more integrated solutions.
Operator:
And Srini Pajjuri, Macquarie Securities.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Thank you for taking my question. Bob, just a question on the BAW opportunity that you talked about. Given that you still don't know for sure what your market share might be, why CapEx now, because that's a large customer? The opportunity could be pretty significant.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I'm sorry. I didn't understand totally the question. Would you repeat the last part?
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Yeah. Yeah. I'm just curious as to why reduce CapEx when you don't have visibility into how big the BAW opportunity for next year could be?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I think those are two separate things. As far as – CapEx is not related to that project. I think Mark outlined things are going pretty well there. We've got Farmers Branch still on track to support significant growth in FY 2019. We're cutting back. We're making the transition to 8-inch. It's going extremely well. We've talked prior about our dye size reductions, things going well there. So those aren't even related.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Okay. Fair enough. And then a question on the content expansion, Bob. Can you give us an idea how much content expansion you're expecting in the second half of this year? And then if there is a significant difference between different SKUs? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry. As I commented earlier, we're not able to comment on anything that hasn't been made public yet. Sorry about that.
Operator:
And David Wong, Wells Fargo.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Thanks very much. Can you give us some idea on the degree of visibility you have on these very big jumps that you're seeing? Do you have some bookings extending into December deliveries? Have you got forecast through December or perhaps even into the March quarter yet?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. As far as, David, with several of our customers, yes, we have bookings through December and if someone changes business it actually goes out a year, so depending on the particular business. In mobile, for our large customers, we have visibility in their production plans for well over the next year. And that's what we actually quote book orders on. So we have good visibility into what their plans are. But just like you, we don't have great visibility into how many of their phones they are actually going to sell. But as far as what their plans are, we have very good visibility.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Great. Thanks very much.
Operator:
Blayne Curtis, Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I apologize if this is already asked. But just into the September quarter, just curious what the bigger driver, you're seeing a big step up in mobile. Just curious between marquee smartphone and the recovery in China that you noted, what's the bigger driver for that sequential growth?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Thanks, Blayne. As far as the majority of the driver, it is the launch of new phones. I'd make that pleural, if I could. And then the second part would be the recovery in China.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Helpful. And then maybe, Mark, just on the change in the depreciation schedule, maybe I missed this. Just curious. What was the prior length and what is it now and when was this implemented?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. It's a mix of assets, Blayne. So, yeah, it's a difficult question to answer. You'll see the disclosure in the Q, which we'll file tomorrow. I have given you the highlights. And I think it's important to realize that while we haven't done the review and back in yet in the fall, when we gave our original guidance, again, lot of puts and takes. Some things have gone our way. This happen to be an accounting justification that was – better matches the lives of those assets with our use. And some things have not gone our way, specifically the BAW, utilization in Texas, which is actually – the effect of that is 200 basis points or more. So that's it on that.
Operator:
Vijay Rakesh, Mizuho.
Vijay Raghavan Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Yeah. Hi, guys. When you look at the BAW ramp, can you give us a percentage of what percent of June quarter was BAW filters? And if you look at the September quarter, what's the mix of BAW and so we can get an idea of the BAW ramp? And also the depreciation expense...
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. We don't give that level of detail quarter-to-quarter.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Yeah. Okay. And the depreciation expense just following back on Blayne's question. Is that going up or down with the adjustment? And the second part was on the fiscal 2019 ramp on the Farmers Branch, is that the eight-inch ramp for fiscal 2019? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Farmers Branch, as far as what we're qualifying in Farmers Branch today and the line that we're qualifying is eight-inch, so that factory will be all eight-inch. And the Richardson factory, it was originally pulled up on eight-inch tools for six-inch diameter, so about 90% of those tools were converting to eight-inch, as we ramp. And as far as Blayne's question, the depreciation, it will be going down on the assets that were currently in place, as Mark pointed out various different lives. And that's taking affect this quarter from a gross margin perspective.
Operator:
And that does conclude today's question-and-answer session. I will now turn the conference over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you for joining us tonight. Qorvo is at the heart of the systems and technology that connect the world, both wired and wirelessly. We've build a strong foundation on innovation and we're targeting our industries' most complex and most profitable opportunities. In fiscal 2018, we anticipate strong operating performance highlighted by revenue growth, margin expansion operating leverage, EPS growth, and a tripling of free cash flow. Thank you, again, for joining us and have a good night.
Operator:
And that does conclude today's conference call. We thank you all for joining us.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC
Operator:
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc., Q4 2017 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations for Qorvo. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Dana. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's fourth quarter fiscal 2017 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group; as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And, with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Hello and welcome, everyone, to our fiscal 2017 fourth quarter call. March quarterly revenue was approximately $642 million. Gross margin expanded 190 basis points sequentially to 46.2%. And we achieved EPS above the midpoint of our provided range. For the year, we delivered revenue of approximately $3 billion, representing 16% year-over-year growth, driven by 23% growth in IDP and 14% growth in Mobile Products. We're very proud of what the Qorvo team delivered in fiscal 2017 and we're excited about our opportunities for continued growth in fiscal 2018. Qorvo offers the industry's broadest portfolio of products, technologies and integration capabilities. And we are rapidly introducing new products that enable increasingly advanced and complex architectures. We are building a business that best addresses where our markets are headed. In fiscal 2018, we expect continued strong revenue growth and margin expansion. In both Mobile Products and IDP, we are expanding our product portfolios to deliver superior performance and increasing functionality. This is translated into large design wins and has given us greater confidence in our growth drivers. Specifically, we expect to expand our dollar content at our largest customer later this year. And we are forecasting expanding dollar content at our second and third largest customers, as next-generation flagship and mass market platforms are launched. Operationally, we continue to make progress on our conversion to eight-inch BAW and six-inch temp-comp SAW. And we are on track to significantly reduce our BAW and SAW filter die sizes. We've completed multiple operational initiatives to reduce cost and enhance productivity. And we expect to see the benefits of these accomplishments in fiscal 2018, supporting an improvement in our return on invested capital. Looking to Mobile, Qorvo is a leader across multiple categories with exciting growth opportunities from the transceiver to the antennae. We are improving the RF performance of our customers' devices with highly integrated solutions, complemented by our expanding portfolio of highly differentiated discrete components. We recently launched our BAW 5 based products and customer poll has been strong. Our first BAW 5 shipments commenced in the March quarter with our industry-leading RF Fusion for Wi-Fi iFEMs, supporting Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo. We are broadly integrating BAW 5 filters across the portfolio. In Mobile Wi-Fi, we are combining our BAW 5 filters with our Wi-Fi front-end modules. And we expect recent design wins will translate into strong growth. We believe the performance advantage of Qorvo's iFEMs will ultimately prove disruptive for the costly SiP architectures in use today in many marquee smartphones. The breakthrough performance of Qorvo's BAW 5 resonators and our proven design capabilities have received customer validation. That's led to close collaboration with a key customer to support a major custom product development project. We are combining multiple high order multiplexers with PAs, switches and low noise amplifiers to participate in the industry's most complex and most difficult to address product category. We're extremely pleased to have earned this opportunity. It requires a multi-year commitment. And we're competing to win. It's opportunities like this that we expect will drive BAW-based revenue to represent approximately 40% of Mobile's revenue in fiscal 2019. Now turning to premium tier smartphones, we're enjoying strong demand for RF Fusion for cellular. In the March quarter, we added ZTE to the list of customers buying our full suite of RF Fusion solutions, combining low-band, mid-band and high-band placements. These highly compact solutions cover multiple modes and bands and require more temp-comp SAW and more BAW. For the performance tier, design activity for RF Flex has been robust across Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, Xiaomi and others. During the March quarter, we achieved full certification of the first single placement, integrated module, covering low, mid and high bands on a MediaTek reference design. To be clear, this module integrates all major RF functions required in the main path, including amplifiers, switches and filters for low, mid and high frequencies in a single Qorvo placement. Among our highly differentiated discrete solutions, Qorvo's ET capabilities are also driving growth. Our envelope trackers significantly enhance power efficiency and improve battery life. This is a unique competitive edge and we expect solid year-over-year growth, with growth accelerating in the second half. We're also forecasting strong year-over-year growth for Qorvo switches and tuners. During the March quarter, we secured multiple design wins at Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi and others, in support of our performance tier smartphones. We also released our third-generation configurable impedance tuner for multimode, primary and secondary antenna applications, including 4x4 MIMO. Similar to envelope tracking, we expect our switch and tuner revenue will expand this year with significant growth in the second half. Turning to Infrastructure and Defense, Qorvo continued to connect and protect with robust year-over-year revenue growth reflecting the successful repositioning of our product portfolio to target high growth segments. This is the seventh consecutive strong quarter for IDP, with key wins across all end markets and customer design wins pointing to another year of above market growth. IDP is a vertically integrated, diversified business with a strategic focus on six secular growth markets
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. In the fourth quarter, Qorvo delivered continued year-over-year growth, higher sequential gross margin and EPS in the upper end of our guidance range. Our fourth quarter non-GAAP revenue was $642 million, a year-over-year increase of 6% or approximately $35 million. Mobile Products revenue increased 2% year-over-year to $474 million. IDP revenue increased 18% year-over-year to $168 million on continued growth in defense, Wi-Fi and IoT. Qorvo revenue for the full fiscal year 2017 exceeded $3 billion, up 16% versus fiscal 2016. This exceptional growth reflects our strong technology position, broad market product portfolio, and growing supply capabilities. We expect our technology and product pipeline to continue to drive strong revenue growth in fiscal year 2018. Gross margin in the quarter was 46.2%, a sequential increase of 190 basis points. We expect our positive gross margin trend to continue into the June quarter. Operating expenses were in line with expectations at $163 million and operating income for the quarter was approximately $133 million. Non-GAAP net income was $112 million. Diluted earnings per share was $0.85 or $0.05 over the midpoint of our guidance range. We ended fiscal 2017 EPS at $4.57. Fourth quarter cash flow from operations remains strong at $247 million, over 50% higher than last year. Capital expenditures were $166 million, primarily related to timing of filter capacity additions. Free cash flow was $81 million and cash at quarter-end increased to $545 million. We returned $51 million to shareholders in the quarter under our $500 million share repurchase program. We intend to continue buying as part of an ongoing commitment to return capital to our shareholders. Let's turn to our outlook. In the fiscal year 2018 first quarter, we expect non-GAAP revenue between $610 million and $650 million, gross margin expansion to approximately 47%, a tax rate below 10%, and diluted EPS between $0.70 and $0.90. This guidance reflects normal seasonal effects at our largest customer and weaker than expected near-term China demand. Operating expenses are forecast to increase sequentially approximately $5 million, in part to R&D related custom product development for our largest customer. Our view on full year fiscal 2018 remains positive. We forecast revenue to strengthen through the year. We expect strong revenue growth, along with higher BAW based product mix, higher utilization rates and ongoing productivity and quality improvements to help us achieve our 50% gross margin target exiting fiscal year 2018. We expect OpEx efficiency to continue to improve and forecast operating expenses to be approximately 20% of sales for the year. We are resolute in hitting our operating model of 30% operating margin during the fiscal year 2018. Our non-GAAP tax rate is projected to remain below 10%. CapEx spend in 2018 is currently forecast to decline to around $400 million, as we complete our expansion to support multi-year above market growth for our filter-based products. With strong revenue growth, expanding gross margins, improving OpEx efficiency and lower CapEx, we expect free cash flow to double from fiscal year 2017 to 2018. In summary, for the fourth quarter, we again delivered on our financial commitments. We also made progress on positioning the company for growth and margin expansion. Our newly released BAW 5 technology has immediately gained commercial traction in cellular, Wi-Fi and other applications. This technology, along with our proven design capabilities, is providing us the opportunity to work on the industry's most complex integrated modules and enabling us to participate in the largest and most attractive markets in RF. IDP's portfolio continues to grow more attractive with broad-based exposure to many high growth markets, including 5G, Wi-Fi, automotive, and other IoT. Though we're a bit slower out of the gate than expected due to near-term softness in China demand, our forecast outlook for the full year of fiscal 2018 looks good. Operationally, we continue to make solid progress on yield improvements, wafer size conversions, capacity rationalizations, sourcing initiatives and other productivity efforts to drive margin expansion. We are serving our customers better and performing more consistently and efficiently in the process. We are on track to meeting our operating margin target of 30% and, as mentioned, expect to double free cash flow in fiscal year 2018. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll go first to Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Hi, Bob and Mark. I had a quick question. I think I want to take you back to last quarter. You had issues in China with two models that didn't come out. Curious if the guide for June has some of that impact. Have the models started to ramp or come out? Is the issue that you're talking about in this call in China – is that different or similar or part? And is there some optical impact? Because we're hearing from a lot of optical companies that are sort of struggling in China as well. Could you just clarify some of that for me?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Harsh, it's Mark. So, the guide we gave in June was 7% to 10% sequential growth off of the 6.30% midpoint we had for the March quarter. So that would have been 6.80%, 6.85%. As you can see from our guide now, we're $50 million, $55 million off that.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Sure.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
The vast majority of that is China and it's China Mobile specifically, China Mobile our business. About $30 million of it is related to inventory, not at our distributors, but at the end manufacturers that we were unaware of from December. And we became aware of it just recently. And, as a result, it's a $30 million variance to what we thought June would be as the market works through that inventory. Additionally, we talked to you about handset delays. One of those handsets – one of the regional models actually ended up getting canceled. So that was a $10 million impact. And then the remaining $10 million was just we didn't see the recovery after Chinese New Year that we typically had seen. And that was accountable for about $10 million of the variance.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Got it. Mark, extremely helpful. I'm going to switch over to technology. Bob, you mentioned a lot about winning in BAW. You're winning at a lot of the Chinese guys. Are you winning also at what we would consider as your typical U.S.-based tier 1 guys? Also, when can we expect shipments of some of these BAW wins to come in? And then, you mentioned BAW could potentially be going to 40% by, I think you said, fiscal 2019, which is like a year and a half out. Could you give us an idea where it's at today, if possible, so we can try to size the expansion there? And then, last question, you mentioned that you're doing a custom project with somebody to combine PSR up (23:06). Are we talking about PS&R up (23:09) from the same chip? Just any color would be helpful.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
All right. Harsh, I'll do my best to answer that. And I'm sure Eric would love to chime in. So let me start with opening comments I made. About 40% of the mobile revenue in FY 2019 or 40% of mobile revenue in FY 2019 will be BAW based. Today, it's under 30%. And we talked about this on the last call and growing in 2018 and growing to about 40%, based on the products that we're working on and the wins that we have. And, Harsh, that's what gives us the confidence to go ahead and continue to invest the capital in BAW. As you know, we made large investments in FY 2017, as Mark outlined, to our capital expenditure in this FY 2018. We will continue to expand our BAW. And, as we mentioned on the prior calls, that we need to get all that qualified before we can really ramp it in FY 2019. So, we have to put the capital in place about a year ahead. And we talked about Farmers Branch. So that's pretty how much all that's going. As far as BAW revenues go, yes, we talked a lot about BAW 5 going into Wi-Fi, also into the cellular. So, many of the phones made in Korea, as well as in China, so, broad-based. The product that I talked about in my opening comments was one of the most challenging and complex that the industry has really seen, is taking very complicated multiplexers that are BAW based, putting them in a module, with power amplifiers, switches and LNAs. Some of those, obviously, Harsh, are on different technologies. So, I hope that answers your question.
Operator:
We'll go next to Ed Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Thanks a lot. A bunch of questions. Let's stick with the BAW topic since we're on it already. Last time we spoke, Bob, you were backing off the expansion of Farmers Branch. Is that back on? Are you spinning that fab up now or is it still all just Richardson? And on your 40% of revenue for mobile, how many of those designs that would drive that number are, one, in heading for production now versus what you're working on? Just trying to get an idea of the visibility of that revenue, versus, I know, there's a ton of projects out there that are pulling in BAW, but they're not – they're still in the design phase.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, Ed, let me clarify what we implied with Farmers Branch is we put in a single thread of line that we were bringing up in the factory and qualify. That's what's in place and that's what we're working on right now and it's going extremely well. We're seeing distributions in the processing parameters and they're very similar to what we're seeing in Richardson. So that's going well. The capital that we're talking about spending this year will be going into Farmers Branch. So, we're not backing away from that. What we said is the timing of when we're in production will most likely be in FY 2019. That really hasn't changed. And the capital that we spent mostly in winding up right now is finishing the buildout of Richardson. So hopefully that's helpful. And then, Ed, I believe the second question was what percent or coverage do we have of that 40%. Don't have that at my fingertips, Ed. What we did talk about was the BAW based products, some of our high-band products that are going into various customers in China and Korea that's driving a lot of that growth this year and then the following year will be that continuation, along with others, that I talked about.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Great. And then, Eric, if I could, you led off the conference call talking about Wi-Fi modules, which is a brand new area for you and one of your competitors. Most of the time you've been supplying components to other aggregators like Murata. And I know you guys have been working on this for a while. It sounds like you're continuing on that progress. Could you give us an update? Are you just looking at designs that you're working on? It sounds like you've got a couple of your customers who are getting kind of excited about pulling your quality. When do you think you're going to see production revenue on that product, if at all? And then, Mark, if you could, I think you said you're going to grow revenue in fiscal year 2018. Last quarterly call you were talking about double-digit revenue for the year in 2018 over 2017. Is that still your target, double-digit revenue or have you kind of backed off that? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Do you want to take the Wi-Fi first? Mark, the follow-up.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. Yeah. We're very excited about the Wi-Fi portfolio and have been now for a few quarters for sure as we've seen it outgrowing a lot of our other products. The actual concept of taking our leadership in BAW coexist filters and combining it then with power amplifiers, which is in LNAs, that's sort of one of our first Qorvo products. It came about from the merger. And so we started that development about two years ago. And we're already shipping those, previously. Over the past several quarters, we've been ramping that business. Now the opportunity, though, is to take our BAW 5 technology, which is really groundbreaking for that and put that in the modules. And that's what is now beginning to ramp into production. And you're right. We are seeing just a lot of adoption for that. It really, in some ways, simplifies, lowers the cost and increases the performance in Wi-Fi when you do away with the SiP and go with our solution. So the Chinese manufacturers in particular – some of our leading customers there are really moving that way very rapidly.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And before handing it off to Mark, I mean, Ed, also in James' business in IDP we're seeing the same phenomenon with people wanting to take that coexist filter and put it into the same module. So, we're also – that's beginning to drive our growth there with BAW 5. And I mentioned that in my opening comments as well as it's in the press release.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, Ed. It's Mark. Still see growth of double-digits in fiscal year 2018. With the slow start in China, I'd say it's closer to 10% at this point. And as you can imagine, there's a lot of – back half of the year, not great visibility on timing and mix, but we still see 10% as a number that we're preparing to build to, based on industry reports and customer demand signals. With that, you can imagine that we would have a sizable ramp June quarter to September quarter at the over 30% sequential growth. And then you'd see a peak in the December quarter and then you'd see normal seasonality in the March quarter down.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Mark, I just wanted to follow up on that commentary that you're providing for fiscal 2018. Gross margin, given the fact that you don't have great visibility on the mix as well as the ramp, why and how are you feeling comfortable that you can deliver on the trajectory that you laid out a couple quarters ago?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Ambrish, we feel great about the trajectory and the best data point is actuals. And we've beat our gross margin target in the December and March quarters. And even if you add back the issues we had in the September quarter, we were actually very close to our guide there. So, we're in control and steadily increasing our margins. We have a guide with another 80 basis point margin expansion and we see that expansion continuing through the year. As you say, there's a lot of issues with mix and customer ramp timing. And in order to get these productivity or get these margin expansion benefits, there's a lot of productivity programs in flight. But we're doing very well. We still have visibility to 50, but as you point out, there are a lot of risks.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. And you should be commended on hitting the two quarters on the gross margin. I wanted to just – and I'm just struggling with this and I'm sure others on the call are as well to try to compare your results with Skyworks. And we all get it. One quarter is not a barometer, but now two quarters the divergence between your results and theirs is huge. Is it a mix issue at your specific program that you're in? Is it a pricing or content that you're losing that you had anticipated earlier on? Just trying to get a better sense and any perspective along those lines would help. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Cody (sic) [Ambrish]. And you're right – oh. Sorry, Ambrish. Sorry. You're right about that. It is hard to judge us on one or even two quarters because I think when we look out over the last four quarters, our fiscal year growth of 16% – I think that compares very favorably. The last call when we talked about June, we did share with you guys that we've lost a little bit of share at Huawei. On this call, I did talk about gaining that back. We talked about at Samsung – quite honestly, we said we were going to grow our dollar content, but we didn't think we were going to grow our share. So if you recall, they did talk a lot about their growth at Huawei and Samsung. So that must be what's driving their growth today. But, again, we're confident in our growth. I look at the first two fiscal years that we've grown as a company. We've grown very nicely double-digits and we just said we're going to do it again. So, we're not really trying to compare ourselves to Skyworks. We're saying we're going to grow as fast as the market and sometimes faster. So, we feel good about what we're doing.
Operator:
We'll go next to Cody Acree with Drexel Hamilton.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton:
Thanks for taking my question, guys. Maybe just on the Chinese side, can you just talk about maybe the overall percentage of revenue that China made up, for Mobile specifically? And then what is your level of visibility into the excess inventory situation? I guess what's your degree of confidence that this gets cleaned up in a relatively short-term?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Hey, Cody. This is Eric. I'll take that. Percentage of Mobile revenue total China was about 35%, including Huawei, and Huawei was just over 10% of Mobile rev. So, open market China was about 24%, certainly lower than it traditionally is. And then the other question about the visibility into the inventory, yes. So essentially what's happened is, through a lot more closer examination of the sell-through of the channel and looking at GfK reports and so forth and working with the customers – that's where we've uncovered the extra inventory that was being held over. As we began to go through April and saw actual recovery in the end unit of handsets, we saw that our recovery wasn't following. And that's how we were able to peel down and find the extra inventory. I think now we've had enough detailed discussion with our customers, and it's really limited to really just a couple of customers there, that we're expecting a lot stronger ending to the last calendar year. I think we've got very, very good visibility both into the inventory as well as the new models and our design content, which continues to grow and how the rest of the year is going to unfold.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton:
I guess, Eric, are you doing anything differently now to make sure that you guys don't get surprised like this with excess inventory?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
There's always opportunities to improve. There's better data there always improving the visibility into that market as it gets bigger. So, we're changing systems and adding tools continuously to try to learn from each of these and tighten up the controls going forward.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton:
And then, lastly, I guess, any issues of pricing that's maybe played into this, particularly in China?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
No, not at all.
Operator:
We'll go next to Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes. Thanks. First question, just following up on China and really the trajectory of the market, understanding some of this is inventory digestion but we're also hearing just kind of the end growth has slowed a bit. And then you actually have Apple into the back half of the year, which probably soaks up some units. So, could China stay relatively muted as we go through the year because of those dynamics?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Eric. I'll take that as well. I think we continue to see a lot of exciting trends going on in our customer base in China as we're working very closely with the architectures going forward, going from Phase 2 to 3 to 5 to 6. We continue to see the opportunity to lead there and bring more and more differentiation, actually more dollar content. We see the content itself increasing as they're looking to export to various regions and adding those bands and also adding more carrier aggregation complexity and so forth. But what's uniquely exciting, I think, for Qorvo is as we've progressed through each of these phases of architecture, we have the opportunity to bring in a lot of our leading filter technology like BAW 5, as well as our SAW and TC-SAW portfolio, adding multiplexors and seeing how we can increase our ability to help the customers get to market more quickly. With MediaTek as an example, it kind of leads those phase architectures from 2 through 6 as I mentioned. Every generation we've seen a closer interaction and we believe we've gotten into more and more of a leadership position there. One example of that. We just announced that we've achieved full certification of the first fully integrated module for a MediaTek reference design. That includes all the RF functionality of the main path. It also has a mix of SAW and BAW filters in it covering low, mid and high. Extremely high performance, at least a 40% size reduction and it, of course, helps customers get to market very rapidly. You place the part and you're ready to go. So, overall, the trends – in terms of units we see increases. In terms of content, we see increases and more and more we see that favoring our technology portfolio.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Okay. If I can ask a follow up. You talked about increasing content in the flagship launch in the back half of the year. Any context around that? I know it can differ depending on baseband SKUs. So is that a call in terms of where you're seeing that play out or what gives you the confidence in terms of growing content in the 8?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, from what we have visibility into in terms of our content and the architectures and so forth, we have confidence in growing dollar content. And that comment is not tied to any particular split of their platforms.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Timothy Arcuri with Cowen & Company.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Thank you. First question. China was down it looks like about 40% in March quarter-on-quarter. What is embedded for China in the June guidance?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
For China, the June guidance, it's roughly flat, Tim. It's roughly flat, Tim.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Okay, Mark. Awesome. Thank you. And then I had a question about this custom BAW product at your largest customer. They had a three-year deal with one of your competitors. So is this just beyond a three-year window or is this incremental to what they're doing with that tier? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sorry, don't know much about their deal to be able to be specific. I don't even know when their quote deal started. I only know what we're working on, to be honest. Sorry about that, Tim. I don't know, Eric, do you have anything you can add?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
No. We can't really discuss anything along those lines. We're very excited about the work we're doing though. The complexity of the module is phenomenal. It's got more than a dozen BAW filters in it, highly complex combined with all the other RF functionality. It is the single largest opportunity in our space and we've had a long road competing for the right, I think, there to get the technology competitive, get our high order multiple extras (39:50) working and then demonstrate fully functional modules. All that's behind us now. We're in the running for the real business.
Operator:
We'll go next to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey. Thanks for taking my question. Mark, I just wanted to go back to the comments about the growth for the full year. I'm just kind of struggling to get there. Maybe you can help me. Just if September's up 30% plus, it's just hard to get to 10%. I guess you've typically not grown in December but I'm just trying to make sure I understood your comments correctly. It's plus 30%, really closer to 40% or 50% to kind of get there.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Blayne, we don't have the total demand signal all the way out through the year, as I tried to make clear. There's still a mix of business. There's still timing of rollout of programs, all sorts of factors. We do believe that September will be over 30% sequential from the June quarter. We do believe, at this point, that December will be a bigger quarter than September. And then we'll see a normal seasonal decline off of – more or less off of December into the March quarter.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Okay. Thanks. And then just on the OpEx side, I wanted to understand, also. You had one of these OpEx costs for a specific product before and I just wanted to know, is this something that you get the plus $5 million and then it comes back out later in the year? It's just tape out costs or expedite costs or is that the new, kind of, baseline OpEx to grow off?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Well, we, we should stay. And I'm not going to make an OpEx call on every given quarter through the year. We've given full year OpEx guidance. That would suggest we'll stay below $170 million. I mean, this is an investment worth making. So, we're working OpEx down in other areas in order to fund this. And we'll keep OpEx in control. On a year-over-year basis, OpEx as a percent of sales will go down. And I would anticipate that it would go down in future years.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Got you. And then, I think I got this from your free cash flow doubling, but just, in terms of CapEx, for June and the rest of the year, what's the right range? You had talked about less than 10% of sales, but what's the right range?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. There's a lot of – we can modulate CapEx spend based on certain requirements of capacity and again, customer rollout and so forth. And so, I hesitate to give a number on a given quarter. Plus there's just timing of payments and things like that. We paid a bit more in fourth quarter than we thought and gives us more confidence that our actual spend in 2018 will be 400-ish. But I'm not going to call a quarter.
Operator:
We'll go next to Mike Burton with Longbow Research.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks for letting me ask a question. So, just wanted to finish, sort of, the loop here on China. It sounds like what you said was that you're actually expecting, kind of, flattish in June. I'm just curious. As you look at the second half, following this inventory correction, it sounds like we might be coming – or through the worst of it. How do you expect, based upon your projected ramps with those customers, for that to progress? And September, presumably, I would expect some growth there before your largest customer kind of eats up all the supply on the channel.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
You want to take that, Eric, or do you want me...
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, we are projecting continued growth throughout the fiscal year until the normal seasonality in March.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, Mike, we are seeing the end demand, as Eric pointed out, increasing now. It's just we're depleting that inventory that was at our customers actually in their factories. So, the demand has already started to pick up.
Mike Burton - Longbow Research LLC:
Okay. And then, also on – sorry if I missed on 10% customers, but then I presume that Samsung was beneath that. I think in the past, we talked about some expectation to get Samsung back over 10%. Based upon your visibility in the second half or next year, how is that progressing and some opportunities, maybe if you could talk around that, maybe some high-end, or mid-tier, or low-end? Thanks.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. Maybe on the percent customers, so we had one 10% or better customer in the March quarter. One was very close. And then, in the June quarter, we expect three 10% customers.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think Eric wanted to talk a little bit about Samsung. It was one of the bright spots going forward, so.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. So actually, Samsung and Huawei both were 10% customers for Mobile in the March quarter. The opportunities at Samsung do continue to grow. We actually grew sequentially in March and we'll grow again sequentially with Samsung in June. So, we have a solid position there, but we're not where we want to be. So we're really focused on turning that around and gaining significant share. We see opportunities to do that certainly by the next flagship launch. Also, some really nice opportunities opening up in the mid-tier in the portfolio, as it begins to move as well towards our strength and really adding complexity and higher performance. So, we're happy with the business with Samsung. We know we can do a lot better and we have visibility into how we're going to do that.
Operator:
We'll go next to Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hey, guys. I just wanted to see and get a little bit more detail. You talked about this custom product. I think they're your biggest customer that has BAW, PA, multiplexer switches. Sounds kind of like a high-band PAD, so what's different for you to call it out? Is it kind of the combination of mid-band and high-band? Or is there some other functionality? Can you give us any more details?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. I'm sorry, Quinn. We can't. What I can tell you is that we're excited in the work that we put in in the last couple years of developing an improved BAW 5 process, the work that we've done with the resonator performance demonstrating our ability to design. We talked a lot about hexaplexers, et cetera. That's why we're calling it out. We feel very good about the engagement that we have with our customer on the application. And it's driving some of our OpEx expenses as well. And I think it's worthy of the investors to know that we're out there fighting hard for the hardest product to be produced in the industry for RF, but a very valuable part, very significant dollars per unit, but we're developing it and working hard to go get it. And we thought it was important for investors to understand that.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then, Bob, you talked about 40% of mobile product reviews in 2019 would be BAW-based. Does that include any assumptions for this customer who had – if you got that socket, would that be something that drives upside to that 40% figure you gave for fiscal 2019?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Eric. I'll take that. There's multiple ways to get there. There's a lot of growing opportunity for BAW and our BAW 5 has got a lot of adoption again across many cellular slots, as well as Wi-Fi, working it into even the China ecosystem as we mentioned. So, there's a lot of ways to get there. There's no question it's a lot easier with this module, but we can get there I think either way.
Operator:
We'll go next to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Hi. Great. Thanks for taking my question. Can you guys hear me okay?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Okay. Great. So, my first question is on content. Bob, you talked about growing content not only in Europe at your top customer, but also your number two, number three customers as well. But recent teardowns, some of them at least would suggest otherwise. And I realize teardowns can be spotty and oftentimes even misleading. But if you can help us reconcile your comment with some of the teardowns, that would be helpful. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, that would be quite challenging when you consider how many fund models our number two and three customers have. But we have a very strong position at Huawei in the mass market phones which usually don't get torn down. And we feel pretty good about that. I also commented that it was a second-half phenomenon. So these phones haven't even been released, some of them. So, I think, from that perspective, it's hard for me to say if you're comparing to what's already shipping and I'm talking about things that are launching in the second half. But we are confident in our ability there. And when we talk about our Samsung, Eric went through the mass tier and how things look there for some phones that they're going to be launching later this year, we feel good about our content there. Also, we said we're going to grow our content. So I don't know if your question was over share or dollars. We're looking at dollars that we can drive and we don't always have visibility into who's winning what on every RF application. But we feel good about our ability to grow our dollars at our second and third, along with our largest customer in the second half of the year.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Okay. Got it. And then I had a follow-up on gross margins as well. You're guiding June quarter margin is up 80 basis points despite revenue being flat to down. Can you kind of reiterate what's driving that? And then, Mark, I think you were kind enough to provide a bridge a couple quarters ago – a relatively long-term bridge for gross margin. So if you can help us understand what drives your margins from 47% in fiscal Q1 to 50% exiting the fiscal year, that would be very helpful. Thanks so much.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. On the first question, going from 46% to 47%, it's a function of just continued traction, number of productivity projects, better yield, higher quality, items such as that. And then on the visibility to 50%, same factors are at play that I laid out, I believe it was November, and three major buckets. Manufacturing-related activities, wafer conversions, yield improvements, other items improve utilization across the fab network and that's happening through the loading which should occur in the second half and then the consolidation of some excess capacity into places like Oregon for GaAs and Texas for GaN. And then just a raft of supply-chain sourcing initiatives in silicon and other areas, gases and chems, and other areas make up the difference along with a number of other productivity programs. And that mix – it changes in any given period, but it's roughly the same as I laid out then.
Operator:
We'll go next to Srini Pajjuri with Macquarie Securities.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Thank you. Hi, guys. Just want to go back to that custom product comment. Given that you said it's roughly 12 filters and PAs and other RF components, I'm guessing the ASPs are pretty healthy? And just going by the number of units that customer ships, I would've thought that that 30% sequential growth is actually conservative. I'm just trying to understand if you expect the supply into 100% of the volume or you expect the supply into only certain SKUs? Any color on that would be helpful.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. This is Eric. We should clarify that. This product is in development now and targeting a production launch next calendar year, second half.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
So that's next calendar year. It's not impacting your September quarter in 2017?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Correct.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Correct.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Okay. Just wanted to make – thank you. Thanks. And then maybe you can help us understand the 30% sequential growth in September then. Is it primarily because of the seasonality at your largest customer, or you expecting China to also recover in September?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Clearly, the timing of marquee smartphones definitely impacts our September quarter, so that'll be the majority of it. But as Eric's already commented, we're expecting continued growth at Samsung. I talked about some of the work that we're doing at our Huawei along with some of the rebound that we saw. We said we're already starting seeing end demand in China as well. So, all will be drivers. And let's not leave out IDP. James is having a really good start to the fiscal year as well. So we're expecting IDP to grow. And, James, you want to talk a little bit about that, feel free.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
I'd love to talk about it. We did have a great year, particularly strong in Wi-Fi, combining some of our best-in-class power amplifiers, our BAW coexist manage (53:09 filters and our integration capability has really led us to get significant traction in the market. So, we're focused on those high-end solutions of our customer and enterprise and we're laying the foundation for this new Wi-Fi 802.11ax standard coming through. I also have to mention defense. A very strong year in defense. GaN was a big part of this, growing over 25%. And we're also seeing significant growth with our ongoing multi-year defense contractors. Of note our largest defense customer over doubled in FY 2017 from FY 2016, so that's a great accomplishment for us. The defense market is a place where our brand promise really comes true. Innovation, scale, speed, product leadership, those have really been the key for us growing in that part of the market.
Srini Pajjuri - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.:
Okay. Got it. Thank you. Then maybe one final question. Bob, obviously you've been talking about BAW and the investments in CapEx, et cetera. It looks like your utilization is around 60% today and if I look at the China market, LTE is mostly penetrated. And the frequencies are fairly high and advanced 39 and a bell (54:35). I'm just curious as to why you're not seeing more demand for BAW filters in China today. Obviously, you're expecting that to change going forward, but I'm just curious given that there is definitely a need. And then as you look out to next year, what do you think will change that make the customers switch from TC-SAW and SAW to BAW next year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
First, let me say a couple things. One is you are correct. Our utilization is low and it's actually lower than what you said there and that's part of what's going to drive our margins as we continue later on. But we've got a couple things going on there. We are seeing demand increases but as we're doing that we're continuing to reduce our die sizes as well as expand our diameters from 6 to 8. We're just really in the beginning of that as well. But just want to make sure that we're clear that we're seeing the demand increases but we're also expanding the capacity, so utilization doesn't quite go up as you pointed out. But I'll let Eric talk about the end market.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. So, we are definitely seeing demand for BAW in China, both for Wi-Fi coexist filters as well as for advanced multiplexors and, in some cases, even for other discrete filters. So, what's really going to drive it going forward is the increased complexity and as there's more demand for higher levels of carrier aggregation across more bands so there's more loss. Then the insertion loss of the filters is more important. So, high-performance filters have a premium and the new multiplexers that we're just bringing out right now on BAW 5 are seeing a lot of adoption. They'll be ramping into production later this year.
Operator:
We'll go next to David Wong with Wells Fargo.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Thanks very much. With the expansion of your BAW footprint in revenues, can you give us some idea of what proportion of the incremental BAW-based units are going into new sockets for you as opposed to replacing your own non-BAW products?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, we can say – in Wi-Fi, I would say it's a little different phenomenon. We're picking up the PA portion, the LNAs and the switches, matching them up to our BAW. So, let's get that one out. For Wi-Fi, it's similarly growing the other way. And then, clearly, as Eric talked about the multiplexers for carrier aggregation and things like that, that's all new revenue for us. I have to think about the other ones. Eric, I don't know if...
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. David, did you say replacing our other non-BAW products? Is that what you said?
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
That's right. Yes.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. I don't think that's much of a factor at all. In my mind, I can't come up with any case of that. So, we are replacing our older BAW with our new BAW, but mainly expanding the market. The new BAW is significantly higher performance than our previous. So that's allowing us to kind of bring more functionality and higher performance to the market.
David M. Wong - Wells Fargo Securities LLC:
Okay. Great. Thanks very much.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Bill Peterson with JPMorgan.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yes. Thanks for fitting me in. I guess when thinking about the, let's say, other products, such as tuning, diversity receive, some of the Wi-Fi parts you've been speaking about, how should we think about the revenue growth opportunities? And where – I would say what would be the highest growing? And trying to square away your comments to get to like a 10% year-on-year fiscal year growth and how much of a contribution these are going to have within that?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. That's a big topic. And, of course, as you know, one of the unique opportunities we have is that we can compete everywhere. So, we have the full suite of technologies needed to address each of these markets and we are trying to align on our best opportunities, not just in terms of dollar growth but also in terms of profit growth and differentiation. So that's where the BAW 5-based products really rise to the top there. And so, our Wi-Fi integrated modules – we already talked about BAW 5. Those are going to be large growth leaders this year. As we focus on higher order multiplexers and then integrating those into modules, one of the cases is the one for China we mentioned with the MediaTek certification. That's got a lot of dollar content. It does have a BAW-based multiplexer at the heart of that thing. So that's going to drive dollar content, a lot of differentiation and profit growth. And then we have these big chunky modules like Bob mentioned, this customer product we're working on that also drive not only a lot of revenue dollars, but an outsized sort of differentiation or profit potential there to leverage the BAW technology. Tuners, though, are another dramatic growth opportunity for us. That's also outgrowing our overall market. We have a highly differentiated position there many years and successive generations of pushing the limits of what can be done. And tuning is really beginning to increase its complexity and its value in the handsets. If you look at 4x4 MIMO, obviously you've got four antennas. There's a lot more tuning challenges. But what's not so obvious is you can use the tuners to actually increase performance in MIMO sort of applications. So, tuner is another great, great growth market for us. And then, of course, as well our envelope tracking power management, very unique opportunity there to enable much better battery life in very complex phone frontends.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Thanks for that color and I'm going to switch over to IDP. Excited to hear Jim as well. I guess you exited the year with a fairly significant Jan growth and now you're speaking about new opportunities in Wi-Fi. Maybe a sneak preview into your May Analyst Day, but how do you rate your growth opportunities this year within IDP? Thank you.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes. I mean looking forward – we're currently forecasting double-digit growth again in IDP, pretty similar story, strength in IoT, strength in defense. We're going to maintain our focus on these six high growth markets that Bob talked about earlier
Operator:
And with no further questions in the queue at this time, I'd like to turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you for joining us tonight. Qorvo is leveraging our unique combination of competitive strengths to address our markets' most complex, most rewarding and fastest-growing opportunities. We're expanding our product portfolios to deliver superior performance and functionality. And our customer engagements are becoming increasingly more collaborative. In fiscal 2018, we expect strong revenue growth, margin expansion, operating leverage, significant EPS growth, and accelerating free cash flow. Thanks again for joining us. Have a good night.
Operator:
And that does conclude today's presentation. We thank you for your participation.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q3 2017 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, VP of IR. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much. Hello everybody, and welcome to Qorvo's third quarter fiscal 2017 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group, as well as other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug. Hello and welcome everyone. I'm happy to report Qorvo's fiscal 2017 quarterly financial results. Revenue for the quarter was approximately $825 million. That's a significant increase of 33% year-over-year, driven by strong demand for our integrated solutions and highly differentiated discrete components. We hit our gross margin target increasing 150 basis points sequentially. OpEx was 19% of sales, better than our long-term model. And EPS was $1.35, a company record and at the high end of our provided range. The December quarter featured multiple business achievements for Qorvo. We supported the launch of the world's marquee smartphones and leading China-based OEMs, and delivered record quarterly revenue in IDP, driven by WiFi, defense, infrastructure, Internet of Things, and other growth markets. We did this while qualifying cutting-edge technologies for top customer programs, introducing over 100 new products and achieving key milestones on operational initiatives. I'm extremely proud of what the team delivered to position Qorvo for anticipated double-digit revenue growth in fiscal 2018. I'm extremely pleased to report that we achieved breakthrough performance in our BAW filter resonator performance, and now we are competing on the most complex BAW-based product opportunities. Our BAW 5 process achieves a 40% increase in Q factor for improved insertion loss and a 20% increase in coupling factor to provide wider bandwidths. We now expect sales of BAW-based products will increase from less than a third of Mobile revenue in fiscal 2018 to approaching 40% in fiscal year 2019. These products will include discrete BAW placements as well as highly integrated front-end integrating BAW and, in some cases, BAW and SAW. Looking more closely at Mobile, our new BAW 5 process delivers exceptional performance improvements, which our team began working on more than a year ago. The results are clear. Our resonators are now on par or better than anything available from anyone in the industry today. We validated this to our internal benchmarking as well as through key customer feedback. We released a number of solutions utilizing our BAW 5 process in December, including multiplexers and RF Fusion for cellular and WiFi. We commenced sampling and received our first BAW 5 production orders for a key handset design win for our RF Fusion for Mobile WiFi. Qorvo's RF Fusion for Mobile WiFi solutions combined our industry-leading BAW coexistence filters with our WiFi PAs, switches and LNAs. We believe RF Fusion for WiFi will be disruptive to today's costly SiP architectures and smartphones, as carriers introduce License Assisted Access or LAA. Qorvo is a leader in coexist filters and LAA requires additional coexist filtering in 5 gigahertz band. We're also forecasting strong growth for RF Fusion for cellular across all frequencies. During the quarter, we secured multiple design wins for complete RF front-end systems combining low, mid and high-band RF Fusion placements in support of smartphones and connected devices. These solution sales command up to $10 of Qorvo content and we expect them to represent an increasing percentage of Mobile revenue, given customer design activity and the breadth of our product portfolio. We've also secured a mid-band RF Fusion win in support of a flagship smartphone ramping this year. For the high band, our solutions operate up to the ultra high-band 42 (06:03). That is a clear competitive strength that's supported by our recently launched GaAs HBT5 process, which we believe delivers the industry's best performance. Finally, it's worth highlighting our move into diversity receive modules. With the proliferation of carrier aggregation, the diversity receive market is growing rapidly. Historically, this market has been served by SAW and more recently temp-comp SAW. However, customer designs are calling for enhanced performance and smaller system-level solutions and this favors the breadth of our filter portfolio, as well as our technology leadership in high pro count switches. Customer requirements are increasingly favoring performance, integration, and system-level optimization and we see no company better positioned to satisfy the market. Frankly, our challenge isn't can we compete, it's where do we compete. We build a business that best serves where the industry is headed. We've got the right products. We're investing in innovation to expand our technology moat and we're enhancing productivity through a culture of lean and continuous improvement. We've moved GaN products from Greensboro to Richardson to consolidate GaN fabrication in Richardson. We migrated new GaAs-based designs from Greensboro to Hillsboro and we brought up our newest GaAs process, HBT5. We are well on our way in our transition from 6 to 8-inch BAW and from 4 to 6-inch temp-comp SAW and we have begun work on significantly reducing filter die sizes in both SAW and BAW. Finally, we're continuing to add state-of-the-art assembly and test capacity in our facility in DeZhou, China. Turning to Infrastructure and Defense, Qorvo continued to connect and protect in the December quarter across high growth markets, including IoT smart home, automotive, GaN for Defense, GaN for base stations, optical transport and WiFi. We're enjoying broad-based growth since we repositioned our portfolio focus into higher-growth segments where differentiated products create value for our customers. We're benefiting from our broad market exposure, scale advantages and extensive portfolio of internally developed technologies, which we use to drive differentiation versus our competition. IDP continues to establish winning positions in high-growth segments with differentiated product offerings in radar, electronic warfare, base station and WiFi. Customers are increasingly looking for higher levels of integration and IDP continues to pace the industry with product releases that address the needs across the market. In base stations, we're focused on high-growth opportunities like the implementation of massive MIMO and the transition to GaN technology. This includes Qorvo's GaN high-powered PAs for ultra high band 42 (09:09) and 3.5 gigahertz, which we're shipping in production today. In 5G, we announced last week that Qorvo was the first RF solution supplier to join China Mobile's 5G Innovation Center. Qorvo is unique in our combined leadership in mobile devices and infrastructure applications and this positions us to accelerate the creation and delivery of market-leading 5G solutions. We are also a full voting member of the 3GPP standards body advising on 5G RF solutions. We supported dozens of 5G field trials with global infrastructure providers and we expect to be a critical link in the seamless connection of billions of things to deep cloud-based computing power and advanced analytics. As next-generation 5G networks are deployed, we see expanding opportunities for growth. Autonomous vehicles will generate and receive massive quantities of data. Every home appliance will be a candidate for connectivity and individuals will live increasingly connected. Qorvo is strategically positioned to be both an enabler and a beneficiary of the explosive growth in data by delivering the broadest range of 5G connectivity solutions. In WiFi, as I indicated earlier, we released our next-generation of integrated front-ends. Key to our success on the enterprise and retail side, we launched a broad family of new 802.11ac FEMs enabling smaller, more efficient routers, gateways and other network devices. For the smart home and IoT, we introduced the industry's first multi-protocol SoC to integrate ZigBee 3.0, Thread and Bluetooth Low Energy protocols in a single chip for sensors and actuators throughout the home. We also announced the partnership with ubisys to deliver the first IoTivity platform on a multi-chip radio. Through this partnership, Qorvo will help simplify wireless communications across various devices by integrating a ZigBee 3.0 and Green Power-based smart home network within the IoTivity framework. During the quarter, IDP enjoyed broad-based design win activity, highlighted by a complete RF solution win with content above $5 at a leading WiFi router OEM. Multiple GaN wins for radar, electronic warfare and wireless infrastructure and the adoption of BAW filters in automotive applications. Looking forward, as 5G field trials and Pre-5G deployment gains traction, the move to phased-array architectures and emphasis on broader bandwidth and higher frequency will favor Qorvo's comprehensive family of GaN PAs. Across all of IDP's diversified markets, we are releasing new products at an aggressive pace and we're building a broad-based pipeline of highly differentiated solutions with long production tails. IDP is a double-digit growth business that's highly diversified and is closing in quickly on our target model of 30% operating margin. It's among the largest in its peer group and is consistently generating superior financial results. Essentially, it's a diversified analog company operating within Qorvo. In March, the impact of a few customer delays on revenue can't dampen our enthusiasm for fiscal year 2018. Qorvo has won significant share on these flagship programs and we expect to benefit as the programs roll out. Current expectations are for these builds to begin in March and hit significant volume in the June quarter. In fiscal year 2018, we expect double-digit year-over-year revenue growth driven by continued broad-based growth in IDP and increasing demand for our Mobile Products, including multiplexers, diversity receive modules, WiFi, RF Fusion and RF Flex. We're also forecasting year-over-year content gains in marquee smartphones, driven by low-band PADs, envelope trackers and tuners. In closing, I'm extremely proud of what the team delivered in the December quarter to position us for anticipated double-digit revenue growth in fiscal year 2018. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Mark.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo delivered a strong December quarter of exceptional growth, higher gross margin consistent with our guidance, lower-than-expected OpEx, and EPS at the top of our range. Qorvo's third quarter non-GAAP revenue of $825 million increased 33% or $206 million year-over-year on strong handset RF content and broader market growth. We had two 10% customers in the quarter, the largest at approximately 37% of revenue and the other, Huawei, at approximately 11%. Mobile Products revenue increased 34% year-over-year on content growth, a low-band PAD ramp and strong Asia customer demand. IDP revenue increased 29% year-over-year to a record $169 million on growth in wireless infrastructure, WiFi, defense, IoT and other markets. Qorvo's robust growth in the quarter and year-to-date reflects our strong technology position, broad market product portfolio and growing supply capabilities. We expect our technology and product pipeline to continue to drive double-digit revenue growth in fiscal year 2018. Gross margin in the December quarter was 44.3%, a sequential increase of 150 basis points and reflecting improved manufacturing yields. We expect gross margin to further improve in the March quarter on seasonal mix effects and ongoing productivity and quality efforts. Operating expenses were better than expected in the quarter at $157 million on lower development expenses and personnel costs. We achieved better-than-model OpEx at 19% of sales and expect cost reduction activities now underway to sustain model or better performance in fiscal year 2018. Operating income for the quarter was approximately $209 million or 25.3% of sales, a 250 basis point sequential improvement on higher gross margin and lower OpEx. Non-GAAP net income was $177 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.35, at the top-end of our guidance range and up 31% year-over-year. Cash flow from operations was $220 million on income growth and lower working capital. Inventory turns remained near historic highs with days of inventory at 79. DSOs improved to 46 days. Capital expenditures were $137 million in the quarter, principally addressing the need to support projected premium filter demand, particularly BAW. As Bob mentioned, we expect BAW-based products to increase from less than a third of Qorvo's Mobile business in fiscal year 2018 to approaching 40% in fiscal year 2019, as performance requirements and the need for integrated modules increase. Free cash flow was $84 million and cash at quarter-end increased to $496 million. We returned $67 million to shareholders under our recently announced $500 million repurchase program. We intend to continue buying as part of an ongoing commitment to return capital to shareholders. Now, let's turn to our outlook. In the fiscal fourth quarter, we expect non-GAAP revenue of between $610 million and $650 million, gross margin of approximately 46%, tax rate of 8% and diluted EPS between $0.70 and $0.90. This guidance primarily reflects a greater than historical sequential decline in the March quarter, as two of our leading customers in China and a Tier 1 customer in Korea delayed flagship smartphone launches. The increase in gross margin is consistent with earlier guidance. OpEx is forecasted to be up less than 5% sequentially on development program timing and seasonal payroll effects. We expect CapEx for fiscal year 2017 to total around $500 million, down from earlier estimates. Looking out to the June quarter, we currently are forecasting normal seasonal sequential growth. As we move past June through fiscal year 2018, we expect revenue to strengthen as new programs launch and plan to end the year with double-digit year-over-year revenue growth. We expect this double-digit growth, along with increased BAW-based product mix, higher utilization rates, and ongoing productivity and quality improvements, will help us achieve 50% gross margin exiting fiscal year 2018. We expect OpEx efficiency to continue to improve and project OpEx to be below 20% of sales for the year. Hitting our operating model of 30% operating margin remains our objective during fiscal year 2018. Our non-GAAP tax rate is forecasted to be below – remain below 10%. CapEx spend will remain elevated in fiscal 2018, but is expected to be down from previous estimates to around $400 million. With double-digit revenue growth, expanding gross margins, improving OpEx efficiency and lower CapEx, we expect free cash flow to double from fiscal year 2017 to 2018. In summary, we delivered on our financial commitments during the December quarter. We also made progress on positioning the company for growth and margin expansion. We validated our core BAW technology and design capabilities for the market's most complex integrated modules. With our premium filters, PAs, ETP mix, switches and other device capabilities, and our packaging technologies, we're positioned to address the widest range of advanced mobile applications. With our PAs and BAW filters, we expect our iFEM products to allow us to grow above market in WiFi. Our position in GaN is providing us opportunities in a number of other high growth IDP markets. We believe we are well positioned to address where the markets are headed. Operationally, we continue to make progress on yield improvements, wafer size conversions, capacity rationalizations, sourcing initiatives and other productivity efforts to drive margin expansion. We are focused on achieving strong revenue growth, improving operating leverage and driving free cash flow. With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Operator:
We'll go first to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi, this is Kulin Patel calling in for Ambrish. Thanks for taking my questions. You mentioned a delay with three of your major customers for flagships. Are we expecting them to ramp in the June quarter and is it fair to assume that June should be up strongly, potentially up double-digit year-over-year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, as far as the – my opening comments, what I talked about was the flagship phones will begin to ramp in March, but they're really going to be in high volume in the June quarter. So, you have to see if the amount that we're going to be up in the June quarter, but again, we do expect those phones to launch late in the March quarter, but really hit high volume in the June quarter.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. And my follow-up, you mentioned BAW will be one third of Mobile in fiscal 2018. How much is it in the fiscal 2017?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Eric. BAW content in the Mobile Products Group was just under 30% of revs in FY 2017.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
All right, thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Harsh Kumar with Stephens. Please go ahead.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Mark, I was wondering if – you had given a bridge for gross margins that spanned out several quarters into the future. You talked a little bit about it in the commentary. I was wondering if those rough guidelines are still intact for basically June and September and beyond to get back to 50%.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, they are, Harsh. And we gain confidence, of course, that we hit our target in the third quarter. What happened we thought would happen. We were up about 250 basis points related to the yield improvements and better quality performance, and then we lost a bit on mix. So, we were up net 150 basis points. As to our projection to the fourth quarter, we're going to pick up about 100 basis points associated with better mix, principally lower low-band PAD volumes, and then we think we're going to get about another 50 basis points on cost-related activities. So, again, up just north of 150 basis points to 46%. And then on a – looking out, Harsh, to the June, September, December, March quarters, in the June quarter, we're thinking probably in the – between 46.5%, 47%; closer to 48% mid-fiscal year; and then again our target is to be around 50% exiting the year.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Great. And then, as a follow-up, Bob, if I can ask you, just going back to the previous question because I think that's the big issue today with the stock, why – if these phones will ramp in June in full volume, roughly when would you start to ship these products to these customers timing wise? What is the lead time here and why would you not see a large balloon-up, if you will, in the June timeframe?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. So, we'll begin shipping components into these during this quarter, just much later in the quarter than we had anticipated into March. And so, then the growth in June, we do expect overall and in our China business in particular to recover nicely in the June quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, I think, Harsh, to add a little more color to that, what we're saying is I do expect significant growth in the June quarter. I also think we're being a little bit cautious on one of our larger customers. To reemphasize what Eric said, we're pretty bullish on our China customers and what's going on there. I think it's quite well-known our Korean customer and what's on their plate (26:12) out there, I think we're being a little bit conservative. But we do expect June to see significant growth quarter-over-quarter.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Very helpful, guys. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Cody Acree with Drexel Hamilton. Please go ahead.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Thanks guys for taking my question. And maybe just to follow-up there, maybe give us a range of what you would consider normal seasonality. If we go back last four years, I think you've been anywhere from up 4% to up 26% in the June quarter. So, maybe a little narrowing down, if you could.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Cody, I would say – and this is Mark. In the June quarter, we would say March to June up to 10%, between 7% to 10%.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
And then, I guess also with your Korean customer, your larger competitor had made some comments that a ramp at that same customer would have a positive effect in the March quarter, offsetting some of their normal seasonality. I guess can you help us maybe square the comments with what you're seeing today?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure can, yeah. This is Eric. I think we all know that the delay of the new flagship is out there and the timing is a little uncertain there. I think we have a bit of a company-specific issue in that the North America SKU of the legacy model, which was intended to backfill that, was heavily based on Qorvo content. We have a lot of dollar content on that particular SKU, and the fact is the backfill has not been happening. So, that particular SKU of the legacy platform has been reduced considerably more than the other SKUs basically. So, we're disproportionately affected by that, while waiting for the new launch to take place.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
I see. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Steve Smigie with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Thanks. This is Vince Celentano on for Steve. I was wondering if you can tell us, as far as the total Chinese smartphone OEM market, what was that as a percentage of revenue in the most recent quarter? And going forward in this calendar year 2017, where do you think it can grow to?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Mark, do you want to handle at least what it was this quarter?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. For China, ex-Huawei, it's less than 40% in the quarter. And if you go on, I'll get more specific numbers.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. And for Mobile, of course, yeah, so it's in the 30% range for the December quarter results, and we see that being flat to down as a percentage slightly in the March outlook.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And then for the year, I think it's a little too soon to call, because now you're asking us to guesstimate how well some of the marquee phones are going to do. But if your question is, do we believe we can grow in China in this calendar year, the answer is absolutely.
Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay, thanks. And then overall how's the inventory look in the China channel for mobile?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. We don't see any particular concern there, other than these models that the ramp has been delayed on. So, of course, there's inventory that's sitting there waiting to ramp these phones. But otherwise, it's nothing of concern.
Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thank you very much.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you, Vince.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Vince.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Quinn Bolton with Needham. Please go ahead.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Thank you. I just wanted to come back to the Korean customer, and wondering if you could talk about any potential content gains on that platform, as it ramps late March into the June quarter?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, I think if you're referring to generation-over-generation platform gains, we're kind of expecting stability there amongst all the RF suppliers for the most part. So, it will depend about SKU to SKU maybe, but overall we think it's pretty stable.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
So, your content – dollar content gen-to-gen is flat or your market share or share of content is stable relative to your competitors, but grows with the new generation? Just trying to clarify.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I was referring to share between the competitors (30:45).
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
So, you should grow with the overall content in that phone?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
That's right.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Correct.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. Great. And then, the second question, just obviously you guys had used outsourced SAW filters in the low-band PAD this current generation. Wondering if you could give us any update on where you are in terms of ramping that SAW capacity. You mentioned the ramp of the 6-inch wafers in Florida. Are you going to get that production qualified and think you can source internally those SAW filters for low-band PADs here in calendar 2017?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let me try and answer this the best way I can, Quinn. We're making very good progress on qualifying what we're bringing up in 6-inch in Greensboro. In fact, we talked about bringing up the (31:29) SAW there for customer shipments. So, we're making very good progress on that. We are starting to in-source filters that we had bought externally and they'll be in production most likely next year, 2018.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
In high volume. We'll have some volume in 2017, but the real margin improvement that we want to see is going to be 2018.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Okay. Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
And just, Vince (sic) [Quinn], to tie off on that one question for you, the Mobile business, China, ex-Huawei, is 30%. And as I mentioned, Huawei is an 11% customer. So, it's 41% in Mobile ex or...
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Including.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
...including Huawei.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes, thank you. Just following up on the China customer delay, any read-through there on that market? Is it taking a pause? Is there anything from an inventory kind of burn through before they launch new products?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
It's always a tricky time to talk about China when you're right in the middle of the Lunar New Year cycle. So, we'll know a lot more here in a couple more weeks when people come back and we see what the sell-through was. But in this particular case, we had two handset models, one with each of two of our largest customers. One had a critical component that had a supply shortage and delayed the ramp. The other one had a qualification issue. Both were non-RF-related and certainly not related to us. But they're just the kind of things that happen. They happen to be units that have a lot of RF content that we had the majority of and the sort of volumes that run into millions a month. So, it created a bit of a hole in the March quarter.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thanks for the color there. And then as my follow-up, on the diversity receive side, you guys really haven't played there to-date. So, just kind of if you can give a little bit more context in terms of what's changing and your visibility into the type of business that you can do on that front.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. It's a very exciting product category for the industry, of course, and we have had some success there in a flagship phone last year. We basically have that choice of where to compete. We've got so many opportunities in BAW-based and even SAW-based power amplifier and integrated RF Fusion projects and we haven't really kind of dove in with both feet on the diversity receive module, but it is a $1.5 billion industry and growing at least as fast as the rest of the mobile TAM. And the shift we are seeing is really a need for higher performance in that category as our customers put even higher band counts in their phone and more carrier aggregation. There is a need for higher performance diversity modules and I think that's where we've got an opportunity. So, we're again going at it in a bit of a metered pace, because we do have a lot of opportunities to invest in, but picking and choosing the areas we think we can differentiate with performance and in particular bring our BAW filter technology into the diversity module and in some cases, we'll have diversity modules with a mix of SAW and BAW as well to optimize for various market opportunities. So, we're very excited about it and we'll begin to see traction in FY 2018. I think FY 2019 is when it will become more meaningful.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Chris Caso with CLSA. Please go ahead.
Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC:
Yes, thank you. Question is regarding the gross margin target and I guess you guys have talked about where you expect to be at varied points during the year. Could you talk about what steps you need to take in order to get there and I guess specifically, how dependent is that 50% target on revenue growth in getting some leverage on the higher revenue?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Chris, fortunately not much has changed in our view. Last quarter, we gave it a walk and the initiatives that we were undertaking continue and will continue through the end of fiscal year 2018. So, what I said last quarter was about 100 basis points we get from wafer diameter and other manufacturing yield-related issues, about 150 basis points from utilization-related benefits and that has some to do with volume, obviously and the rationalizations we're doing in the plants. And then, about 150 basis points associate with supply chain and other productivity initiatives. And that's largely the same roadmap for the expansion now. It's a bit more balanced across the three now than it was, but largely the same, Chris.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
The other thing I'd point out, gross margins are guided to go up and revenues are down to support what Mark is talking about.
Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC:
Okay. As a follow-up, you talked in the past your BAW fabs have been underutilized, but BAW is increasing as a percentage of the total now. As you exit the year and you hit what I think you said was 40% target for BAW, what does that do to the utilization rates of the BAW fabs?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Chris, the 40% is in fiscal year 2019, but we expect the BAW-related fab, which is Richardson 6-inch and 8-inch to be over 80% in fourth quarter of fiscal-year 2018. Currently, it's closer to 50%, 60% and so, we expect that to expand. And we're actually – yeah, there were some developments through the quarter to figure out how to optimize the capital spend and customer ramps and so forth and we're actually able to do a conversion to 8-inch faster than we expected. And as a result, the CapEx profile will be a bit less in the short term and the need for Farmers Branch will be pushed out a bit.
Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC:
Helpful. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Thanks a lot. First, Eric, you were talking about DRx box (38:29) and you have played there very sparingly and only used BAW. It sounds like you know – is it primarily still going to be a BAW game for you and you augment it with SAW as necessary and why the big change here? Is it upload carrier aggregation doing this or is it the lot of phones moving to more modules from discrete? You seem to be busier than all get out on the – all the other products, too. So, attacking this market seems like might be (38:52) asking more than to maybe have engineering capacity for. And then you mentioned, Mark, you mentioned that you're running about 56% BAW, are you still adding capacity Farmers – to Richardson and do you expect it to layer on much more as you go through the year or do you think you're good for the year as it stands right now?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Hey, Eric, take the first part.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, thanks, Ed. Again, we simply are seeing a drive towards – really it's the proliferation of a carrier aggregation modes into the open market in particular, where customers want to go to market fast with a lot of different versions. And we believe that we can help a lot with the loss in the front-end especially in the carrier agg mode with the BAW filters. Although, in some of those applications, not every single band has to have BAW and in some cases SAW might be better suited. So, we'll use that to complement, as you said, the BAW. And you're right, we have a lot of opportunities without even doing the diversity receive, but there's several places where I think with the BAW differentiation it just makes sense to do it to help the customers' performance.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And, Ed, your question on BAW capacity, we will continue to add capacity as planned. Mark commented that we throttled some of that back through some of the things that we've decided to do through the last quarter on how to get the capacity in place going to 8-inch faster, but again as we commented in the – or I commented in my opening comments about how much we expect our BAW-based revenue to grow in FY 2019, which is really calendar year 2018. We pretty much have to have that in place and qualify up on 8-inch this year. So, we're going to continue to build that out to support revenues in calendar 2018.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
To that end, Bob, nobody assigns design wins a year ahead of the actual production and you're talking out more than the year. So, is it safe to assume that a lot of your projections on BAW or everything that you're seeing with carrier aggregation and even the white-box in China is starting to move much more complicated front-ends? Driving demand for open market, BAW whether discrete or modules is that what's making you so optimistic about here or do you just see product roadmaps in some of your larger customers just pulling a lot more of this product in? You think with the new BAW 5, you're going to be more competitive?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, I think it's both, Ed. Really our largest customers, but in particular maybe the open market is where we see the fastest growing part of that segment. And we're just really thrilled with the performance of the BAW 5 and especially in the higher order multiplexing sort of applications, but also in WiFi. We mentioned LAA coming in WiFi. We know that's a couple of years off, but people are already beginning to think hard about that and that's really going to drive significant increase in BAW content even for WiFi there in the 5 gig band. So, just an awful lot of opportunities. We've got great technology now in a lot of places to take it.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Your largest customer – your largest competitor in BAW has excess capacity, I would say significant relative what they've had in the past here. Are you seeing them in China, whether it is the China, Inc., the big boys there or white box or is it still pretty much your market in BAW? And just to touch again, DRx, are you going to offer any DRx products that don't use BAW?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, let's answer first one first. We don't see any significant change in the competitive dynamics in the BAW market with our largest competitor there. I think it's status quo and we've got the opportunity to take the enhanced technology out and go in several directions with it. So then, the second question was about the DRx module. Again, the roadmap is not firm. I don't want to rule anything out. It is possible we could do some that don't have BAW in them, but given our resource constraint, as you said, it makes sense to focus on areas with the highest differentiation. I would say, the other aspect here is that we are moving towards full system solutions at a lot of cases in which we've got the majority, if not all of the mainline content. And so, when we're in those positions, customers are happy to bolt on diversity receive in other items from us like WiFi. So, these opportunities are kind of disproportionately easier to capture maybe once we have the rest of the full solution. That's probably another dynamic change that you're seeing in terms of why we're getting more excited about DRx now.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Just maybe a comment, add a bit on this capacity on BAW. So as I mentioned, between 50%, 60% now, we expect to be around 80%, you know, by this time next year and next calendar year, March quarter of 2018. And a few things that the migration from 6-inch to 8-inch, as I mentioned we figured out some things to do there that we can increase capacity with – more efficiently. And it's allowed us to push out the Farmers Branch tool installs. And then, there's just a wide range of customer opportunities on BAW that will diversify the revenue and allow us to better load what capacity we do have. Diversity receive, as Eric mentioned, increased use of BAW in WiFi. There is, of course, a large customer socket opportunities and then – which are more BAW intensive. And, of course, there is even faster-growing market for BAW in China, which we're very well positioned. So, feeling great about the technology and where it stands and the capacity plan associated with it.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
My apologies. Last question, I'll get back in the queue. So, this time next year, I'm sure we'll be talking about upload carrier aggregation a lot more given the impact this is going to have on the front end there. It would seem to be the case given the power requirements and the ET requirements, et cetera, on this that your hand would be strengthened as we move into that. I'm sure you're looking at those designs right now actually competing for these designs since they'll be in production next year. So, how does that look preliminarily here? Is it a narrower market for suppliers because of the power thing or does that still going to be off board and not really affect who you're seeing in competition for those slots?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think it absolutely narrows the field and it's not just upload carrier aggregation. We're seeing move to higher frequency bands. We're getting out to an early lead in the ultra high band, band 42 space as well with the advanced Gallium Arsenide. We're seeing LNAs become more important across the board because of all of that complexity as well. So, we've got some technology there and our tuners, especially as we go to advanced antenna systems and potentially 4x4 MIMO and so forth, our tuner content continues to be a very key asset for us and very differentiated. All of these things come together and as customers look for suppliers to provide more and more of the entire RF front-end system and more of those differentiators, you have the better.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Vivek Arya with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thank you for taking my question. Bob, I just wanted to revisit this roughly $90 million or so delta between the midpoint of your outlook and what the consensus expectations were, especially because that's such a big contrast with one of your peers who raised their outlook for March. Now, from what I heard on the call, there were three factors. One was not backfilling the U.S. SKU for your large Korean customer, second was China, third was delay in the new Korean phone. I know we're getting a bit granular, but is there a way to help us understand these three different factors, especially what can come back in June and where there is still some uncertainty? I just want to make sure I get it right as to what are these company-specific factors versus sort of market-specific factors.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Vivek, I'll give you a little more high level again and allow Eric to add some more color. And number one, when we look at things at a very high level trying to compare us to any one competitor given our current product mixes and different phones we go after and different marquee phone launches, if you really look at the last three or four quarters, none of us have really been in sync. So, let's just put that aside. And then to what we were trying to get across through our press release along with our opening comments was what you said about our two customers in China, their phones are delayed. Eric outlined earlier why they're being delayed. It's not because of us, it's not because of RF. It is being delayed. And what I said was they would begin in the month of June in production and really hitting high volume in the June – sorry, in March they would begin production, in the June quarter we would see significant volume. And that's the two phones that are primarily driving us in China. And as we talked about with our largest customer in Korea, we had very large dollar content. I think it's pretty well known in the North American SKU and, quite honestly, they haven't seen the sell-through in one of their phones that they expected. And we're seeing coming down off of that, coupled with the delay in their next marquee phone. So, when you put all that together, that is the bulk of the delta that you're looking for.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Got it. And then on gross margins, the prior thinking was that it would perhaps take a product redesign to improve margins for some of the sockets you had at your largest customer, which would have been perhaps harder to do for this year's product. But I think, Mark, from what you're describing, it sounds like just supply chain efficiencies, manufacturing changes and perhaps some better mix of BAW can get you to your target model for gross margins. Did I not understand the prior issue? I'm just trying to understand, what has now changed to get you back to model this year in gross margins versus actually waiting for a product redesign effort?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, let me make sure I answer it this way. You're correct about making major changes to the filters themselves within the module. What we have been doing is working hard to improve the yields on the current filters that we have in there. So, I want to make sure when you say getting to our gross margin target, what Mark talked about is in March, which is very consistent with what we said before. So, in our mind, no change. So, if we said something that implied that, I apologize for that. But we're making the progress that we set out. That's why we hit our gross margin goal that we set and guided to in December. That's why we believe we're going to be up in March, as Mark outlined, with mix being down of the low-band PAD this particular quarter and, as he outlined, we're still on track for 50% in the March quarter. So, Mark, if you want to add some color to that, feel free.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
That covers it. We're continuing to make a number of improvements to the manufacturing process for low-band PAD filters and modules. It's going to remain, as it's in our product portfolio, one of the lower-margin products but a good product and a high technology product.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Great. Thanks for taking my question. I had a question on IDP, 29% growth on a year-over-year basis is, obviously, very impressive. If you can kind of elaborate on some of the growth drivers there, and how sustainable that growth rate is going forward that would be great. And kind of related to IDP, when you talk about your gross margin bridge for the overall company, IDP doesn't really come in, at least you guys don't talk about it explicitly. But if IDP continues to outgrow Mobile, should that provide a tailwind for gross margins as well?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
You want to take the gross margin question first and then I'll go?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. I mean, part of my – Toshiya, a number of the operational improvements that I mentioned affect both businesses. So, part of that is in – benefits IDP, but you are correct that to the extent that IDP is able to outgrow Mobile, we would see a favorable mix effect on gross margin.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, this is James, let me talk about the growth. It was really broad based. We've positioned the business in six rapidly growing markets, that includes smart home, automotive, optical, defense GaN, base station GaN and WiFi, and we're really winning significant slots in all of those growth segments. In this quarter, WiFi led the way. We talked a little bit about some of the design wins in WiFi. But defense, base station and automotive also had great quarters. I'm excited, going forward – you talked a little bit about going forward both in automotive and IoT. In automotive, we see up to $10 of content going forward. In IoT, our acquisition of GreenPeak has really been a game changer for us. It gave us access into the really high growth IoT market, and the new products that were released this year in CES, we really think, are going to create significant growth going forward. GaN-based products also continue to do very well across all the markets that we address, defense, broadband and base stations. We'll increase our GaN revenue over 20% this year. And to be honest, next year I expect it to be significantly better than that. On a go-forward basis, I think you can model IDP growth to be in line with what we say in the company, 10% to 15%, and we'll just keep pushing forward.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. And then as my follow-up, I had a question on OpEx. Clearly, you've done a great job managing OpEx at kind of current levels. Can you remind us some of the initiatives, what kind of initiatives you have in place today, and when you talk about sustainability in OpEx going forward, are you thinking in absolute terms or as a percentage of sales? Thank you.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, Toshiya, a number of initiatives. We're certainly spending a lot of time on development costs for new products. And are we working most efficiently with our customers? Is our design cycle as efficient as it could be? And a number of other efforts to make sure our R&D costs are as low as possible. That is the largest part of the cost stack in OpEx. In sales and marketing and G&A, being very disciplined about labor costs and being efficient as we grow will certainly benefit given the growth rates of the company that will naturally decrease OpEx as a percent of sales. And we're working to keep it flattish on a dollar basis is the goal and just get that natural operating leverage going forward. So, my guidance for fiscal year 2018 is to be at or below model, which is 20% of sales and OpEx, and that would require that we, on a dollar basis, are keeping those costs contained.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Bill Peterson with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yeah. Thanks for sneaking me in, and good job on the gross margin execution. Maybe just more of a near-term question on IDP, obviously, we'd assume most of the drop-off is in Mobile. In the March quarter, what kind of sequential or year-on-year growth should we be expecting for the IDP business?
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're expecting to be flat, or as we say, flattish.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
And again, that will represent again a fourth quarter in a row for us to be substantially up year-over-year. And so it's going to really wind up for us a great year where we'll grow up in those mid-20s, and I think our strategy is working. I couldn't be happier with the technologies we've got, the products we have, the team we have. And so, in general, I think we're going to wrap up a great year and be prepared for that kind of good growth again next year.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Thanks for that. And it sounds like you're still confident in the overall 10% to 15% year-on-year growth. So, then I guess in terms of the overall picture with – to get to your double-digit growth for fiscal 2018, what's embedded in terms of your expectations for smartphone growth to be able to achieve the – I guess, in this case would be close to double-digit growth in the Mobile Products business?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
We're basically modeling smartphone growth itself to be up very little, kind of low to mid single digits and the overall handset units themselves actually flat to maybe even down a bit as feature phones really taper off. So, we're not embedding any drastic assumptions about units. As you probably know, our TAM is really driven by the content story and growing a number of bands and a number of CA combinations. WiFi is also, we believe, growing even faster than the smartphone RF TAM currently, and we think we have got a great opportunity there. And also, I think really just the mid-tier, especially in the China-based handset market, those guys are really generating some pretty big volumes now and still growing rapidly and they're really adding a lot of RF content, especially as they look to export models. So, the whole story of the dollars per handset on average growing, that's really what's driving the TAM into the double digits year-over-year.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay. Thanks for the color.
Operator:
Thank you. It is now my pleasure to turn the call back over to Qorvo management for any closing or final remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you for joining us tonight. Qorvo is building a business that best serves where the industry is headed. We're building a broad-based pipeline of highly differentiated discrete and integrated solutions, and we're enjoying robust design win activity. We expect to drive double-digit revenue growth in fiscal 2018 and with it margin expansion, operating leverage, robust EPS growth and accelerating free cash flow generation. Thanks again for joining us and have a good night.
Operator:
Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect at any time and have a great day.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc. Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc. Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc. Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc. James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.
Analysts:
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd. Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q2 2017 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks very much, Robbie. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's second quarter fiscal 2017 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings statement published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website at qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2017 second quarter earnings call. Revenue for Qorvo's fiscal second quarter increased 24% sequentially and 22% year-over-year to approximately $864 million. Revenue was above our quarterly guidance provided August 2, reflecting broad-based demand. Gross margin for the quarter was approximately 43%. Within the quarter, we experienced lower than expected manufacturing yields during a steep product ramp to a large customer. To protect our long-term customer relationships, we did everything we could to assure supply of high quality material to the customer while working through the internal yield issues, and this significantly impacted our gross margin. Operating expenses were $172.9 million, in line with our goal of 20% of sales. On the bottom line, earnings were $1.29 per share, an increase of 19% versus our prior quarter. Mark will walk you through additional details in a moment and provide a bridge to our margin expectations. In the meantime, I'll update you on some other major initiatives currently underway. During the September quarter, we brought up and released our TC-SAW process in Greensboro, ahead of schedule, giving us the ability to support additional customer demand this quarter. We are increasing the mix of 6-inch TC-SAW in Florida while moving all gas capacity to Oregon, transitioning all GaN products to Richardson. We're also ramping our new assembly and test facility into Dezhou, China. In Richardson, the organization has done an outstanding job, releasing our most advanced next generation BAW process, which delivers a significant improvement over our prior generation in key performance metrics. We've also brought up and are now designing products on our new 8-inch BAW line in Richardson. We are enjoying broad-based demand for BAW filter solutions and we expect the ramp of new customer programs to improve our utilization rates in calendar 2017. Notably, we continue to enjoy strong demand for our BAW-based multiplexer solutions and we have delivered module prototypes containing our BAW-based hexaplexers. Looking at quarterly performance by segment, Mobile Products grew approximately 22% year-over-year and 29% sequentially to a record $706 million. Mobile Products supported the launch of highly popular, premium tier smartphones. And in the performance tier smartphones, we enjoyed strong demand for our RF Flex solutions. In Wi-Fi for handsets, Qorvo's RF Fusion for mobile Wi-Fi delivered customers a unique, highly integrated solution combining our high performance BAW filters with our Wi-Fi front-end modules. In China, Mobile Products is benefiting as smartphone manufacturers migrate from three-mode to full-mode devices. By the end of this year, we expect more than half of all 4G smartphones manufactured for the China market will be full-mode. Our largest customers in China are looking for ways to introduce fewer models with higher levels of RF content to provide broader coverage of additional geographies as they move towards more of an export market. Huawei stands out as an excellent example. They are adding more RF content to their smartphones as they build their global brand. Huawei was one of two 10% customers for Qorvo in our fiscal second quarter and they are our largest customer in China. Finally, the expanding market requirements for carrier aggregation and the upcoming deployment of 5G favor our unique combination of competitive strengths. Only Qorvo delivers a comprehensive portfolio of filters, switches, amplifiers, envelope trackers, LNAs and tuners with the scale, integration capabilities and system level expertise to supply a complete portfolio of highly integrated solutions. Looking at IDP, revenue grew 22% year-over-year and 5% sequentially to $158 million as our focus on higher growth segments continue to bear fruit. We're very pleased with the performance of IDP, in particular the revenue growth, the initiatives to target faster growing market segments, and the rate and pace of new product introductions. IDP has enjoyed a series of very strong quarters and is closing in on its margin model of 60% gross margin and 30% operating margin. IDP is a recognized global leader with a product and technology leadership strategy that leverages internally developed, best-in-class technologies to provide our customers with differentiated performance solutions. IDP is highly diversified and competes in a $3.8 billion serviceable market that's forecast by industry analysts to grow at a compound annual rate of 17%, nearly doubling to $7 billion by 2020. In September, IDP released 49 new products including power amplifiers for small cell, dual and quad linear drivers for optical applications, LNAs, and filters for automotive and integrated front-end modules for Wi-Fi. The continued aggressive pace of product releases is creating a broad-based pipeline of differentiated solutions with long production tails across our portfolio of markets. IDP's strong performance last quarter was across all major market segments, highlighted by growth in wireless infrastructure, Wi-Fi, Defense & Aerospace, as well as the IoT. We've seen a continued recovery in the base station market and we enjoy broad-based market share across all OEMs. This helps buffer IDP from the ups and downs experienced by any one customer. Our view on the overall base station market is cautiously optimistic. We are continuing our focus on the markets' higher growth segments with an emphasis on the transition of base station power amplifiers to GaN technology and the implementation of massive MIMO. In connectivity, IDP enjoyed growth in both Wi-Fi and low power wireless. With the acquisition of GreenPeak, Qorvo is a recognized leader at ultra-low power short range RF communications. We are expanding our low power product portfolio to include highly integrated RF systems on a chip for the connected home and the Internet of Things, and our target markets are growing faster than 40%. In Wi-Fi, our growth was supported by continued wins in both the retail and set-top-box market segments. In transport, growth was driven by strength in our cable TV products to support the rollout of DOCSIS 3.1, our traditional long-haul optical driver business and ramping data center interconnect products. Qorvo's transport business is at the forefront of the buildout of infrastructure to keep pace with the ever-increasing demand for data, and we continue to see an expanding set of opportunities. In Defense, our growth was driven by international and domestic GaN on silicon carbide sales and a major ASIC program ramping. Design wins for our GaN on silicon carbide devices have been exceptionally strong in the market segments that are growing at over 25% per year. In summary, the Qorvo team did an excellent job delivering 22% year-over-year growth and achieving our goal of operating expenses at 20% of sales. At the same time, we made progress advancing core technologies and developing highly integrated Qorvo solutions for large customer opportunities in 2017 and 2018. It's clear, we have work to do on our gross margin and we're taking steps to address it. We continue to drive toward our operating model including above revenue growth and operating income above 30%. Now, before turning the call over to Mark, let's view our achievements and our comments today through the prism of Qorvo's long-term strategy. Qorvo's growth strategy is based on three core principles. First, leverage our differentiated technologies and product leadership to achieve operational excellence, capture value, and deliver superior financial results. Second, drive the integration of our two predecessor companies to achieve as Qorvo what neither could achieve alone. Third, prioritize the use of cash on investments that grow our business, return capital to our stockholders through share repurchases and supplement growth in IDP through M&A. Our long-term view of the RF industry envisions more modes, more bands, more complexity and more RF, all driven by the ever-increasing demand for data and the limited frequency spectrum available to support that demand. In Mobile Products, only Qorvo can deliver a complete suite of multi-mode, multi-band solutions, combining premium BAW and temp-comp SAW filters, SAW filters, broadband power amplifiers, high probe count switches, high performance LNAs, envelope trackers and antenna control solutions. And Qorvo is the only industry participant positioning itself to supply internally developed, internally manufactured, and internally assembled system level solutions serving all major cellular frequencies. We see growing demand for low, mid, and high frequency RF solution sales in the performance tier, as new cellular bands limit board space and pressure our customers' product development cycles. In the premium tier, we anticipate demand from multiple customers for highly compact, single placement solutions combining coverage of mid and high frequencies. To be clear, this will require more TC-SAW and BAW, a distinct advantage for Qorvo. At IDP, our investments in internally developed best-in-class technologies, our sharpened focus on higher margin, higher growth markets and our introduction of hundreds of new products annually are combining to support excellent growth opportunities. These opportunities are underpinned by large secular trends extending into the foreseeable future. They include high speed connectivity, the Internet of Things, the connected car, data centers, and the proliferation of phased array technology. In wireless infrastructure, cable TV and defense applications, we expect our GaN technology to be increasingly disruptive. So, from a high level, Qorvo has assembled the technology, products, people and resources to deliver best-in-class, highly integrated systems level solutions. We are investing in highly differentiated internally sourced technologies, best-in-class products, adding manufacturing capacity to keep pace with customer demand, and we are leveraging our unique combination of competitive strengths to drive above-market growth. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Mark.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Qorvo's second quarter non-GAAP revenue increased 24% sequentially and 22% year-over-year to $864 million. Mobile Products revenue increased 29% sequentially and 22% year-over-year to $706 million on continued RF content growth, the ramp of a key customer product, and strong Asia customer demand. Infrastructure and Defense Products revenue increased 5% sequentially, and 22% year-over-year to $158 million on higher wireless infrastructure, Wi-Fi, Defense & Aerospace and IoT. We believe Qorvo is well positioned to continue to outpace the market growth due to our strong technology position, comprehensive product portfolio, and broad supply capabilities. Gross margin was near 43% and most negatively impacted by manufacturing yield issues on our highest volume part in the quarter. Manufacturing yield issues on this part, a low-band PAD module, were related to soft filters from a single fab. The impact was contained within Qorvo and yields have stabilized in the fab, which will help support even stronger customer demand for that module in the third quarter. During the third quarter, we do expect margins to improve on more stable production, however, higher mix of the low-band PAD will partially offset the improvement. Operating expenses were at our target 20% of sales or $173 million. During the quarter, we had higher expenses to support ongoing development programs, higher sales commissions, and the full quarter effects of our GreenPeak acquisition. Operating income for the quarter was approximately $197 million, with margins negatively impacted by the gross margin effects discussed. Non-GAAP net income was $170 million and diluted earnings per share was $1.29. Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow. Cash increased to $469 million. Cash flow from operations was $250 million on income growth and efficient working capital management, particularly inventories. Capital expenditures of $120 million are largely addressing growing premium filter demand through SAW investments in North Carolina and BAW investments in Texas. We yielded $130 million of free cash flow in the quarter. During the quarter, we repurchased $91 million of shares and today, we announced the approval of a new $500 million share repurchase program. We intend to commence buying under this program when our window opens as part of an ongoing commitment to return capital to shareholders. Now, let's turn to our business outlook. Qorvo currently believes customer demand supports the following non-GAAP expectations for the December quarter
Operator:
And we'll take our first question from Ambrish Srivastava with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi. Thank you very much and I do appreciate the color, the longer term trajectory that you're providing. But just near term, I just wanted to focus on the gross margin. You have a gross profit – if I look at what you've guided to versus what you reported, it seems like a negative impact from higher revenues. Am I reading that correct that this is a negative margin business that you're winning incrementally? And then I had a follow-up.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Well, Ambrish it's – this is Mark. So, it's a mix issue. So, if you look at what we reported in second quarter, we reported roughly 43% gross margin. We pick up more than 200 basis points related to the yield issues that we had on our largest runner. We pick up another, less than 100 basis points, but more inventory and yield related issues on smaller products. Now we lose 100 basis points related to higher volumes of a lower margin product mix, especially the one part. And that's increasing to about 1.5 times the percent of our business mix that it was in the second quarter.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. And so my quick follow-up then is related to your guide. I'm not sure if I caught it correct, that improvement that you're seeing in the current quarter, is that – and the margin, is that from the high volume customer being down sequentially or is there a structural improvement in your gross margin?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
It's a structural improvement.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
So that customer will still be up Q-over-Q, right?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yes.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Strong business.
Ambrish Srivastava - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. I will cede the floor. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd.:
Hi, thanks for taking my question. This is Vinay calling in for Craig. I wanted to go back on gross margins, right. You're calling for 150 bps of sequential improvement and continued improvement going forward, right. Like, just want to figure out what line of visibility do you have there, and in terms of the various actions you will take because I understand the mix perspective, but what confidence do you have that the yield issue that you faced last quarter will be behind you as we go forward?
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Mark again.
Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd.:
Sure.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
So we have very good visibility. So the walk I did initially walks to 200 basis points sequential improvement, combination of a better yield in the third quarter, fewer associated inventory write-offs, and then we lose some ground related to the higher volume associated with the lower margin part, so just a mix issue. So that's a 200 basis point sequential improvement. We gave a range of 100 basis points to 200 basis points to deal with the fact that, listen, we're doing record volumes and we want to make sure that we meet our commitments and we have good line of sight to what the midpoint would be, 150 basis points. As far as the longer term view, we've done a great deal of work to walk back up to margins that we used to be and how are we going to get there? And as we've pointed out in several calls including today, we have a large number of initiatives under way which begin to bear fruit – well, they've benefited us recently, but they continue to bear fruit through 2018 as our facilities are more mature, as they're fully loaded and our product mix turns over to higher value parts. So we feel confident in the business model and our gross margin objective in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd.:
Got it. That's helpful. For a follow-up, wanted to talk about China smartphones as a group, right. Like you talked about the long-term confidence in that region with more phones being full mode, that's helping you guys with the long term. But can you just talk about some of the trends that you saw in September? Did that group grow in September, and what are your expectations for China smartphones in December?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
This is Eric. I'll take that.
Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd.:
Sure.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
We did have yet another fantastic quarter of growth with our China-based customer set. Of course Huawei was a 10% customer for the company, but beyond Huawei, as well with Oppo and Vivo and many others in China, we did benefit from the trend of higher dollar content in the RF. We are expecting exiting the year that over half the phones consumed in China will now be full mode phones. We're also seeing many of our customers looking to export and reducing their SKU count, which of course those two things together drive up our content further as we look into next year. So for the December quarter, specifically to your question, we're remaining cautious on China and being careful for any inventory pockets that might be out there. We see some customer-specific issues, but our products are used across all of our sets. So we expect to work through that in December and then back to growth next year.
Vinay Jaising - Morgan Stanley India Co. Pvt Ltd.:
Got it, very helpful.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Ed Snyder with Charter Equity. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Thanks a lot. A couple of questions here. Eric, have you identified the problem with the TC-SAW filter and has it been corrected? I understand you can't correct it real-time because you're in production with your largest customer. But if they were to say to you, hey, we'll take a break, we can recall this part, would your yields on that part snap back to more traditional levels? And then maybe, if you could walk us through the bigger picture, Bob. You guys were at over 50% gross margins a couple times in the last 18 months or so, and it seems have lost the recipe, besides the TC-SAW part and low-band PAD and all that, I mean it was coming on, lowering – it was dropping before then. What are the problems that you face since that time that are causing you such angst in the margin profile outside of the yield issues, and what is it going to take to get back on track? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Okay, Ed. I'll start with the issues. So we did identify the fact that our yield was lower than expected. To go a little deeper than that, it's specific to the die-level yield within the SAW and TC-SAW manufacturing process. I should be clear it's not related to a design issue. In fact it's not even related to the filter resonators themselves. It's really contained within the die singulation process and wafer level packaging. The fact is we had a very steep ramp, the volume was heavily loaded towards the back of the quarter. Our die-level screens that we have in place in the factory did not catch the issue and so we found it once we had assembled the modules completely and were well into production. Our top priority of course was protecting our customers' lines. We made sure that they had good material; it resulted in a great many modules that needed to be scrapped at the finished good level. However, by now we have produced, as you can imagine, tens of millions of the part. We understand the problem very well. We now have new die-level screens which are targeting the issue and working effectively. So, I think it's behind us. To your point, we can't make changes in the actual manufacturing process now that we're in production, we do have some ability to make incremental improvements from here which we're going to do. But products that we release from this point forward will have improved manufacturing process and not be subject to this yield at all.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
And Ed to your second question, getting back to the 50% gross margin, longer-term, Mark clearly walked you through all that. But if you kind of look at what's been going on in our factories, we have our BAW factory full and then we have our SAW factory full, and then we have our BAW factory full, and then we have our SAW factory full. So, we talked last quarter about our BAW factory was way under-loaded from optimum and that is – a large part as you know, Ed, it's a very good margin product family and quite honestly we missed that. And we also talked last quarter that some of our initial multiplexers weren't yielding real well and that's still in that mix but we're committed to get back to the 50-plus percent. IDP continues to do extremely well. The balance of the Mobile portfolio outside of this one product family does extremely well and we've got one area we got to go to work on.
Edward Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
So, I mean, it looks like the revenue profile from all of our checks and what you said and everybody else says looks excellent for all the RF semi companies in terms of the business that you're chasing now. I know you guys are busy to get out to Skyworks, so is Avago. But I guess the big question, Bob, is the loading on the BAW factory dropped. You have been expanding it even recently in anticipation of better utilization and content wins next year. How can you be sure that you aren't making the same mistake this time that was made when you expanded capacity and didn't get the business last time?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
But, well, clearly, Ian, we've got a lot more learning as the companies come together and I think if you look at our top line and what we've done already, just the second half, in driving the growth, our product execution has significantly improved. We're making great progress. I think also you're starting to see the market for BAW based products to expand much greater than just one customer so the risk that we look at whenever we make this investment is actually going down over time because we have a larger customer base to sell BAW based products.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Great. Thanks. Thanks so much for taking my question. First, can you maybe share with us your preliminary expectations for content growth going into 2017 at your U.S., Korean and Chinese customers? Should we take history as a guide for next year and assume content growth in the teens or are there inflections you need to 2017 that could lead to a potential acceleration?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So for the Mobile side, I'll say that we see a continuation really on a relatively consistent slope if you will, more in the 10% to15% range in terms of just the overall TAM growth and that is completely driven by content growth. We are not counting on unit growth at all. And so it's a continuation of the thing that we've been seeing this year, no real discontinuities.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Let me talk – I'm going to jump in and talk a little bit about IDP growth. There's exciting things really going on in several of our key markets over the past year or so. We've positioned the business to take care of some of those trends. Trends like connected car, connected home, the proliferation of phased arrays or Massive MIMO, and the development of 5G. So as an example GaN has been a great growth story for us. Our capabilities have allowed us to capture key markets. Things like DOCSIS 3.1 for cable TV and base stations where they're moving the broader bandwidths and higher frequencies. Also, another area for us is IoT, particularly the connected home. Our system-on-a-chip capability brings some real advantages to our customers. We offer benefits in multi-protocol, power consumption and range and in the next few years this will be a $1.5 billion market for us.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Great. And then as my follow-up, I had a question on M&A. You've talked about M&A in the past and specifically your focus on the IDP side of the business. Just wanted to confirm if M&A is still a focus for you guys, and if you can remind us what conditions you would look for in an asset or a business as you filter through potential deals, that would be helpful. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Sure. Thanks, Toshi, and a couple things. One is, Mark said in his comments as we generate cash M&A is absolutely one of the areas that we look to put that to work. Last quarter we talked about the acquisition we made with GreenPeak for the low-power wireless and that fit a lot of the criteria that we use when we look at an acquisition
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens. Please go ahead.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, guys. I just want to clarify something you said earlier. Your largest customer will be up in December, and if that's the case I'm just curious if you could provide us some color on what is affecting the December guidance that we just had slightly $40-something million down, curious, any color on that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Harsh, last quarter we explained to the group that we were – I know some were surprised at our guidance and we said we were still taking a conservative stance in particular on China, and we saw tremendous upside from China during the quarter, which is why we exceeded our revenue guidance, so we're taking in general for our Asia customers a conservative view and we're expecting them to be down significantly quarter-over-quarter. We are expecting IDP to be flat to up slightly but the majority of that drop is with our Asian customers.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Have you seen that in the orders or is that just your conservative viewpoint? And then as my follow-up, I think your CFO gave the peak of the yield issue as I think the December quarter from what I understand. Now I know your largest customer revenues will come down in March seasonally. How should we think of that interplay between margins and revenues falling off as we go forward from December quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks Harsh. Mark will take the gross margin. As far as your question on orders, typically in Asia, we see strength in the beginning of the quarter and then it drops off as we head towards Chinese New Year. So we're taking conservative view. We'll see. These customers are not very good at giving great forecasts and usually within lead time. So we're not "fully booked" for the quarter, but I think we did the right thing in assuming that business was going to be down.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
That's fair.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, and Harsh, it's Mark. So you'll see the reverse of the effect on the mix that you see in the third quarter. You'll see the reverse of that in the fourth quarter, so again, the improved yields that we see in the third quarter are partially offset by this mix drag on the higher volume of that low-band PAD, as that low-band PAD decreases in the fourth quarter, we'll see 100 basis point to 200 basis point margin lift from that.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Mike Burton with Brean Capital. Please go ahead.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Hey, thanks for taking my questions, and thanks for the detail on the margin expectations. Bob just mentioned the multiplexer yield issues. Did I hear you correct that those yields are now up or satisfactory and is that part above or below corporate now and should it be going forward when it is at satisfactory yields? 2930
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Okay, great. And then definitely early here, but as we look forward to the March quarter, can you remind us just kind of some of the seasonality for Qorvo now, I mean especially after, with GreenPeak and some of the changes in the model. How should we be thinking about on initial basis seasonality for Qorvo, and any color that you might want to add to that, Bob? Thanks
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you. From an IDP perspective typically, roughly flattish going into that March quarter, a little too soon for us to call, but usually it's typically around flat. But as you notice when you look at what's transpired over the last few years, Q1 for the Mobile business is usually down pretty significantly and it's been trending much closer to 15% primarily as our largest customer ramps down significantly and it all depends on the timing of one of our other Asian customer's ramps, but I think it could be 15% in Mobile definitely.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Great. Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Bill Peterson with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Yeah, and thanks for taking the questions and thanks for providing the gross margin walk. Actually, first one for James. Can you level, set us on the size of the GaN business now in terms of let's say an annual run rate, I mean where this could go in let's say the balance of the year, in fiscal 2018?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Let me give you a couple of data points, let's first talk about base station. We see in the next three or four years probably 50% of the slots being GaN based so you guys can and look at what that market size is but that's a very large opportunity for us. We continue to put investment dollars in there, focus for us is really performance and trying to drive cost out. As you know, we're on GaN on silicon carbide and we believe that's the performance play that will win the slots there and then our focus now has really been on driving cost out. We're first in the industry to get to six inch and we're also doing a tremendous amount of work on very low cost packaging for that marketplace, so about 50% in base station. And then on the Defense side we see that market somewhere being around $350 million or so in the next few years as well. We're very well positioned on Defense side, number one in the market. Both of those segments are growing above right around 25%. Defense is perhaps a bit faster but both very, very healthy. Now on top of that also is our cable business, maybe not the most rapidly growing but we have great market share and GaN really is the semiconductor of choice especially for these DOCSIS 3.1 products that we've got out on the market now.
Bill Peterson - JPMorgan Securities LLC:
Okay, thanks for the color and then switching back to Mobile. I guess, now that the new flagship's out from your largest customer, obviously the tear downs are just indicating larger content in maybe one model type and then effectively not in the other. Can you just remind us what your sort of blended RF content is, this generation compared to say last year's generation?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I'm not sure we're going to be able to give that to you right now. I apologize for that. What we can say is – we continue to grow there, continue to grow revenue dollars per handset each year, so we're in pretty good shape from that perspective.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Timothy Arcuri with Cowen & Co. Please go ahead.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Thank you very much. I had two. First of all you're talking about a 50% margin target longer term. I think I was looking back at my notes, so I think we used to talk about margins possibly pushing 55%. So I guess the first question is sort of what happened to that 500 basis points? Was there some permanent loss from these issues you've been having?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. As far as the gross margin targets, when we presented one time back November a year ago we talked about driving our margins between 50% and 55%. I think what Mark and I have both said today is we're still comfortable with getting better than 50% gross margin, so that's still in the realm of possibilities.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Okay. Thanks. And then I guess I wanted to ask on the trajectory to get back there. You had talked about it taking like six quarters, but is it really – is it a SKU-based issue so that when you move this low-band PAD SKU off, when you cycle that through, that's when the margins are going to really come back, so it's probably a bit more back-end loaded as you kind of look out the next six quarters?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Okay. First, I want to make sure we understand, we talked a little bit about this I think last quarter when we talked about that program. Our expectations are it's a multi-year program so it does continue to live on, as you will, greater than 12 months. Many of the things that Mark talked about are, if you will, also a little bit out in time so when you couple those two things, yeah, it starts to really pick up on the out quarters. Plus, as we also talked about loading of our factories, next year is when we expect that we're going to be very well loaded in our SAW facilities along with our BAW facilities and we actually haven't enjoyed that.
Mark J. Murphy - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Tim, I think it's important to note that the path to 50%-plus does require that we have more BAW-based content. It's better. It's higher-value business, we're solving more difficult problems so the price point's better, and again, our lowest utilized fab at the moment is our BAW fab in Texas. So once we load that we're going to get tremendous benefits on the absorption and then we also get the benefits on mix.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Thank you, Mark. Appreciate it.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Co. Please go ahead.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi Bob. Hi, Mark. Wanted to follow-up on the gross margin; if I could go back to last quarter you guys sort of guided down gross margin I thought mostly because you had to use outsourced SAW filters and some of the high volume runners. This quarter you're talking about having some yield issues on the SAW process that you've talked about. So, I'm just trying to get a sense, are you still buying a lot of SAW filters externally and just not getting good margin on the pass-through, or have you been able to in-source that production and as you tried to ramp the in-sourced production you ran into this yield issue? And so we've had sort of a changing impact on that gross margin?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Quinn, we are still buying a tremendous amount of filters. Last quarter we talked an awful lot about filter independence, and as far as – we're still continuing to add to our design resources. Mark talked a little bit about the OpEx increase. We're adding designers and continue – because we see a lot of opportunities to reduce our costs through that. The part that we're talking about, yes, it does use outsourced filters, but it also had some of our internal filters in there, and that's the yield issue that Eric talked through. And I think we commented last call, but I'll make it clear again. This is a product that we're not able to change the process, nor the product design for its multi-year life. So we're going to have this for a while. What we do believe is that the low-band PAD market is a good market for us. We will have the right cost structure, and we'll remain competitive.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Just a follow-up on that, Bob. Obviously, you've got a near-term yield issue that you've identified and you fixed. When you fix that yield issue, does that go away and the overhang really is just the fact that you still use a fair amount of outsourced SAW filters, or can you not improve the yields in that particular PAD for the life of that product?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, Quinn, this is Eric. I guess the detail on that is, we have certainly addressed the issue at the module yield level which is the big dollars, of course, of fallout. We're going to continue to run this product for its lifetime with sub-par line yields in the factory, if you will. Now, of course, the volumes will tail much lower next year and so forth as the new handset ramps to replace the current one, as we have new products that are brought up, they expect to – we expect those to yield as they should. So, yield highly and improve the margin going forward.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. Great. And then, just a quick one, in the past quarters you've given us a percent of revs from your largest customer, just wondering if you can provide that again this quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I'm sorry, Quinn. Could you repeat it? It was a little bit garbled. I thought it was something about our largest customer?
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
In past quarters you've given us the percent of revenue from that largest customer and I don't think I caught it. I apologize if I missed, but I don't think you gave that percent of revenue from your largest customer this quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
All right. We'll give you that in just a second.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, it's roughly 40% of Mobile.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, it's a little over 30% for the company then.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. Thank you.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Steve Smigie with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thanks a lot guys. I was just curious, and I believe you guys commented that you would expect to see double-digit revenue growth going forward and I just wanted to make sure I heard that right. And would that be sort of each quarter or on an average over some period of time you get double-digit revenue growth?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
I guess, we didn't really break it out. I think what we're very comfortable in is we can grow the business next fiscal year double-digits.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And then sort of following up on a previous question, not necessarily for a particular customer but overall it seemed like you'd been getting roughly 20% dollar content increase from one generation of phone to the next. So sort of generically speaking across the platforms you're winning, does it seem reasonable as we look forward in the coming year, that you'd expect to see sort of that 20% or a little better, or a little worse? Any thoughts on that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. For the Mobile side, I think that is a possibility. We're seeing a trend towards full solutions and really this is across all tiers, both in our RF Flex portfolio as well as RF Fusion. We have customers now asking us to do a complete reference design, everything from the transceiver to the antenna essentially and of course Qorvo is unique in having that capability of having all those products and the system architecture and even power management in-house. So we do see great opportunities to actually see some phenomenal content growth across especially if you look at our kind of Asia customer base the Tier 2 customers in Asia which are driving now a great deal of the units in the industry. So I think as you average that out we can continue to see those kind of content increases.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
And this is James. That content story really holds for multiple markets. I mean, things, if you look in the Wi-Fi spaces we move to 8x8 MIMO, we see big content growth in the base station market as Massive MIMO comes along. That's also a significant driver for us in content. So that is really holding true for us in several of the markets that we serve. Auto is another example. We're moving from traditional SDARs to now content with LTE and even more in the future. We expect probably 350 million connected cars in the next few years.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Yeah. Just to follow-up on the – Quinn, the question you asked. So, top customer 35% of total Qorvo revenues. Two customers that are over 10% share – or 10% of our mix, the total there is 46%, the combined top two and then the top 10 customers are 63%.
James L. Klein - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thanks.
Operator:
And we'll take our final question from Curtis – or I'm sorry, Blayne Curtis with Barclays. Please go ahead.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question and sorry to go back on the margin – but just trying to understand what – last call you talked about all of these issues in terms of yield particularly on low-band PADs. So I'm just trying to figure out, I mean, I'm assuming you knew that ramp was coming so I guess what went against you, were the yield issues greater than you expected and just trying to understand the timeline there.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah. Blayne, this is Eric. Yeah. The yield issue that we're reporting and talking about today is actually entirely different than what we were talking about on the last call. The last call we were ramping just beginning volume and seeing sort of garden variety normal ramp issues working on – kind of tuning out of the filters themselves and getting them in spec and so forth. And then as we said late in the quarter once we got into volume we began to find parts that were out of spec essentially that were not caught in the die-level screens.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
I got you. And then I'm just curious as you said that you had picked your quadplexer yields and I'm just kind of curious as you look forward to hexaplexers and closing the gap in terms of the lead there, when do you expect to have those shipping in volume next year?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
So, the question is when do we expect to be shipping hexaplexers in volume?
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Yes.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, so the first part of your question on the quadplexer yields, just confirming again that we have got those straightened out, that's shipping on our baseline process. The new advanced BAW process which we just released will have the quadplexers shipping first half of next year and currently expect hexaplexers to ship second half of next year also on that advanced BAW process.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
And I just want to ask you one follow-up question on – one of your Japanese competitors has been talking about improved SAW. Just kind of curious, your perspective BAW versus improving TC-SAW. Do you think, particularly as you move to these carrier aggregation combinations, do you see any combination where a TC could insert itself?
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
I think we see a lot of opportunity for modules that have both technologies in them and of course we're agnostic pretty much to which one wins, but there are some conditions in which some bands are getting tougher that were traditionally SAW or TC-SAW that we see BAW moving into, but I think the opportunity of putting both technologies into a module is unique for us and that will help address some parts of the market.
Operator:
And we do have time for a final question from Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Yes, thanks for fitting me in. You got a lot of questions on execution, but my question is, as you work with your top customer, how do you think they feel about the Qorvo supplier engagement? Do you think they're getting fulfilled properly as they ramp their flagship, what are your thoughts on the future opportunities, they talked about shortages? Thanks.
Steven Eric Creviston - Qorvo, Inc.:
Yeah, thanks, great question. And I think the relationship is very much intact. We worked very closely together as you can imagine and the Qorvo team obviously we never liked to have these sorts of issues, but I'd tell you the entire manufacturing team really buckled down and focused and did some incredible work to make sure we're able to recover from the material that was taken out of the line and still keep up with demand. So I think overall again, it's not the situation you want to have, but you can really learn a lot about each other and actually gain some trust through these sorts of situations.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Okay. Thanks. That's all I had.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you, Ian.
Operator:
And I'll now turn the program back over to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - Qorvo, Inc.:
Thank you for joining us today. Qorvo is at the center of a growing global framework interconnecting people, places and things, and we are uniquely positioned as complexity drives higher levels of integration, narrowing the playing field, and supporting superior financial results in the future. Thanks again and have a good night.
Operator:
And this does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect and have a great day.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co. Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC Wayne Loeb - Cowen & Co. LLC Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker) Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q1 2017 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations for Qorvo. Please go ahead.
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations:
Thanks very much, Keith. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's first quarter fiscal 2017 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Mark Murphy, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's fiscal 2017 first quarter earnings call. Revenue for the June quarter increased 4% year-over-year and 15% sequentially to approximately $698 million. Revenue was above our quarterly guidance provided May 4, reflecting strength in Mobile in China, a large customer smartphone ramp and growth in IDP's broad markets. During the quarter, we saw customer demand coming strong than expected well within lead times and we worked hard to keep up with the demand. Our customers called on us and the Qorvo delivered. Gross margin was 48.2%, reflecting low-band PAD business exceeding expectations with higher than expected costs. Also, lesser than impact, but in the mix, early yields on high volume quadplexers for China were below plan. In both examples, these were high volume products. Operating margin was 24% and operating expenses were approximately $169 million. The sequential increase in OpEx reflected higher R&D expense, increased variable compensation expense and the addition of GreenPeak Technologies. The company's higher R&D expense reflects increased investment in the designers of high-performance filters, SAW and BAW process engineers, and associated material costs for prototypes. During the June quarter, we completed our $500 million ASR, retiring an additional 400,000 shares. Qorvo's June financial performance and September guidance provide context for two major initiatives underway
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Bob. Qorvo's non-GAAP revenue increased 15% sequentially for the June quarter to $698 million. Mobile Products revenue increased 18% sequentially to $547 million, and Infrastructure and Defense Products increased 6% sequentially to $151 million. Qorvo had three 10% customers, the largest at approximately 29% of revenue representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Our other 10% customers during the quarter were Huawei and Samsung. Gross margin was 48.2%, impacted by low-band PAD business, exceeding expectations with higher than expected costs. Upon transition to more integrated modules with Qorvo-produced filters and completion of our fab conversions, we expect gross margin to expand. Operating expenses increased to $169 million, on higher R&D expenses to support ongoing development programs in premium filters, higher variable compensation expense, and the addition of our GreenPeak acquisition. In the September quarter, we expect to achieve our OpEx goal of approximately 20% of sales, and we expect to sustain that performance through the December quarter. Operating income for the June quarter was $168 million or 24% of revenue. Net income was $143 million and earnings per share was $1.08. Turning to the balance sheet, total cash and short term investments was $447 million. Cash flow from operations was $59 million, reflecting the working capital build associated with higher first quarter sales and our September quarter outlook. Capital expenditures increased to $130 million, primarily to address growing premium filter demand. During the June quarter, we completed our $500 million ASR, retiring an additional 400,000 shares. $250 million remains available under the $1 billion program authorized last November. We continue to make progress on opportunities to improve our growth and profitability. In the quarter, we acquired GreenPeak, a producer of low-power RF devices, expanded our capabilities to serve IoT markets. Our BAW products are closing in on state-of-the-art performance and we're on a measured pace to add capacity needed to meet expected customer demand for premium filters. As Bob mentioned, a large number of productivity projects are underway including conversion to 8-inch BAW wafers in our Texas fab and 6-inch SAW on our Florida fab. Conversion of our North Carolina fab, to TC-SAW and SAW, consolidation of our gas capacity in Oregon, migration of GaN from North Carolina to Texas, an additional Mobile Products assembling and test capacity in China. We expect these new product capabilities, capacity additions, and productivity initiatives to help us sustain above market growth and drive margin expansion. Now, let's turn to our business outlook. Qorvo currently believes customer demand supports the following non-GAAP expectations for the September quarter. Quarterly revenue between $820 million and $850 million, gross margin of approximately 47%, diluted EPS between $1.35 and $1.45, a tax rate of approximately 10%. Our September quarter guidance reflects strong broad-based demand, we expect gross margins to remain near the second quarter level through the year on low-band product mix and while our fab conversions are underway. We expect OpEx to trend down through the back half of the year. We project CapEx to remain elevated as we align capacity additions with stronger customer demand for premium filters and our integrated modules. With that, we'll open up the call to your questions.
Operator:
We'll take our first question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens. Please go ahead.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey. First of all, let me ask for clarification on the September guide. Should we think that most of your growth is coming again from Mobile, like almost all of it in the September guide?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Harsh, that's correct. Most of the growth we are seeing is in Mobile. There will be some growth in IDP, but I think, most of the growth is coming from Mobile.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Okay. So, you are expecting IDP to grow as well a little bit?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yes.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Okay. Thank you. And then, I wanted to ask about gross margins, we've already started to get questions on that quite a bit. So, I think the "as people say in this business," the high watermark was somewhere around 50%, 51%, Bob. We're at 47% now and you've got a bunch of initiatives going and I think, you mentioned in your script that it will start the reverse and go up next year. Will you be going up from a base of 46%, 47%, where you are at or are you thinking you can possibly start to climb up from the 50%s and then move up from there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yeah. Harsh, thanks for the question. I just want to clarify, we've got a lot of initiatives and we are working on them. We have a one product if you will problem today. That we've got to reverse and we'll continue to work hard to drive that and it all comes down to how much of that product we sell can influence the gross margin percentage as you can well imagine. So, it's got a lot of content that is not internally in our fabs, we don't see the benefits of it from a contribution margin, so that does play into it. When we have our Analyst Day, we'll outline and quantify a lot of those activities to help you model next year where we can get to on the gross margin.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Vivek Arya with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thank you for taking my question. So, Bob, maybe just to follow up on that gross margin. I just want to clarify, the lower gross margins that you are seeing is just because you are outsourcing a certain component, so this is really a near-term company specific issue that can be corrected. This is not the sign of some industry-wide pricing dynamic, right. I just want to get that clarified explicitly.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Sure. Sure, Vivek. So, let me start with, IDP is doing very well. Their margins held in there, no problem there. The majority of Eric's business did very well. You're right, we have one product. I will be candid with you, it's also not yielding fantastic, but for the most part, you're correct, it is a product related, not an industry structure issue. I would agree with your assessment, Vivek.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Okay, very good. And then, as my follow up, when I look at the September quarter outlook, I sort of fell out of my chair when I saw the upside versus some of the Street expectations. But I'm curious, is there a pull forward of demand just because we are reminded of last year when the industry went through a lot of turbulence. So, you're nearly $120 million above Street expectations. First, how much is GreenPeak out of that, and then do you think there is any pull forward of demand? And the last part of that is how to think about December quarter season now given that you're having such a strong September quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yeah. Number one, GreenPeak's in that $6 million, $7 million a quarter, so that's not driving all the growth. Like we said, most of the growth is coming out of Eric's business. I don't think we're seeing the pull forward. We've talked a lot about that. We still have a lot of demand that we're running hard to keep up with given the guide we even gave. As far as December goes, let me put it another way, Vivek, I think the growth that we're seeing this quarter as well as into December will be how well marquee phones sell. I think our own view is China, we're tempering our outlook for the second half of the calendar year. So, as we look into December, depends on to your question, how much of the demand is pulled in that we might be able to capture because we're all out right now. We ran very hard in the June quarter. We're running pretty hard still staying through this quarter. So as we look at things today, we're not seeing a pull forward and as we look at our customer forecast and our own expectations for in particular China market, we could see December up.
Operator:
Thank you. We're going next to Ambrish Srivastava with BMO Capital Markets.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Hi, thanks for taking my question. This is Kulin Patel for Ambrish. My first question is on the increasing R&D spending particularly for filter designers, what drove the increase in OpEx for R&D given that you already have what seems like a mature BAW and SAW product?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Eric, do you want to take what drives filter designer and...
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, we have talked many times about that portfolio shifting towards more filter based products and we do continue to see that trend and in fact if anything, accelerating through all tiers of the market now, customers asking us to integrate at a higher level and include more filters and Bob mentioned our drive towards filter independence and making sure that we have the ability to design and manufacture at least the lion's share, if not all of those filters internally, so that includes regular SAW as well as TC-SAW and BAW. And so, we will continue to need more R&D bandwidth to develop the processes, but then also to develop the products and integrate them into our portfolio.
Kulin Patel - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Right. Thanks. And for my follow-up, how much growth do you see for China for your Mobile business in the quarter?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
In the June quarter, it was pretty strong and in the September quarter, we see it continuing. As of now, the market is quite healthy and we are returning back to our kind of normal share that we should have been at earlier in the year already. So, we're kind of seeing that compound effect probably and then added to the fact that the dollar content overall continues to grow as we see more and more five-mode and six-mode 4G phones being shipped into the market.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Cody Acree with Drexel Hamilton. Please go ahead.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Thanks guys for taking my questions and congrats on the progress. Maybe Mark, if you could, give a little bit of stratification on some of those initiatives, the gross margin drivers that you guys have layered initiatives in in the past and been able to make pretty significant and sometimes rapid progress especially when it came to yield. So I guess can you just maybe talk about the timing of some of those major buckets of initiatives?
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah, I think Cody, look, right now, we'll give more specifics at the November Investor Day, but we see a path to above 50% gross margin with both the trends in the business, specifically a move to more BAW mix in the future and then also all the initiatives underway which you heard about. We're in the early innings in the number of those initiatives. So within the next several quarters, those will be completed and we expect, as you know wafer conversions 4-inch to 6-inch and 6-inch to 8-inch provides a significant benefit on throughput and then we'll be over some of the yield issues that we're having.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
And maybe the follow-up then on yields. Bob said that those just weren't trending where you had expected. I guess, what's the opportunity to improve those in the current spends and how quickly can those yields improve?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Hey, Cody, this is Eric. It's a little tough to answer that. They can improve tremendously. The rate depends upon exactly how we get from here to there. Part of the nature of these products is that they ramp into very high volumes very rapidly, and so sometimes by the time you realize there is a yield issue, you already have an awful lot of product in the pipeline. That's why we are here. So we can improve them over the course of several quarters is probably the best way to answer that.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Mike Burton with Brean Capital. Please go ahead.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Hey, guys. And thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on a strong top line and bottom line. You've obviously got a growth coming from a bunch of products with Wi-Fi and as well as the multiplexers. But I'm just curious if you could break out for us or give us a sense how big those businesses are now, where do you believe they can grow to, and then the effect on gross margins and operating margins for both of those products. Obviously multiplexers you talked about having some yield issues, but just kind of overall at a steady run rate, what kind of gross margin profile do we expect?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yes. Mike, on the multiplexers, the quadplexers in particular for China, I'd be embarrassed to actually quote the gross margins, and we expect those to be significantly above the corporate average. And Wi-Fi is in family with the corporate average. We do fairly well there in general. And then obviously ones where we build the RF Flex for the Wi-Fi, that does have a better than company average margin.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Okay. And then also – sorry if I missed this, but you talked about some more R&D spend. Just kind of thoughts of OpEx trending forward during this fiscal year.
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yes. What you'll see Mike, you'll see OpEx in the second quarter on a dollar basis about in line with what you saw in the first quarter. But on a percent basis, will be down towards our long-term target, which is 20% of sales. And then you'll see OpEx on a dollar basis begin to drop off through the second half as some spending we know falls off and productivity programs continue.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Hey. Good afternoon, and thanks for taking my question. I also wanted to ask about gross margins just to make sure I understand you guys correctly. So in the quarter, what were some of the surprises that drove the miss in gross margins and what's causing the leg down in the September quarter despite the huge ramp in revenue?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
You want to take that or you want me to?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Well, again, it's primarily a single product problem and it's a low-band PAD problem where we have significant outsourced filter content. And that was a large volume product in the first quarter and it actually becomes larger in the second quarter as another low-band PAD family product comes on. So that's the effect you're seeing in first quarter and second quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
So, Toshiya, we expected better costs as well as our yields didn't hit where we expected to be at this point in time.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Okay, great. And as my follow-up, I wanted to ask about BAW. You talked in your prepared remarks about utilization rates in your BAW business being suboptimal today. Could you maybe provide a bit more granularity here and also comment on when you expect utilization rates to be at or above optimal levels in BAW? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Sure. Thanks, Toshiya. What I said was we were not at optimal levels today and we've added capacity and we're continuing to add capacity as we expand from 6-inch to 8-inch and adding 8-inch in the Farmers Branch and quite honestly it's going to be the timing of new marquee phones that we're launching in, in calendar year 2017.
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
And I'll just add that we're going to pace that investment as we get clarity on customer demand. We feel very good about the customer demand and the quality of our product. So we're comfortable making early commitments, but the actual construction spend pace will be determined by our clarity on wins.
Operator:
And we'll take our next question from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Yes, thank you. Just a question on the yield issue and as it relates to gross margin. You talked about gross margin staying here through the year. Do you have line of sight as to just the cost issue part of this, or any other color you can have in terms of how you maybe deem conservative or not as to kind of the recovery from this?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yes. Again, it's a little hard to tell the rate and pace of recovery. There are certain things that could move the needle actually relatively quickly. We're planning on it being a longer haul, as I said a couple quarters, to fix the issue, again, primarily because there's a lot of volume in the line early part of the ramp. So I think we're now well in, in terms of the number of parts produced. We understand the yield issue quite well. And so I don't think there is a lot of uncertainty from this point forward other than how rapidly we can implement the changes and get it through the pipeline.
Craig M. Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
Got it. And then as my follow-up, in terms of capital allocation, you did GreenPeak, which is kind of tuck-in; you've been fairly aggressive buying back stock. So big picture, how you view best use of cash here in terms of your own stock versus attempts to diversify the business?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Mark, you want to take that?
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yes, it's a good question. I guess I'll start with buyback. We've repurchased $1.3 billion of shares in the last five quarters, and we have $250 million remaining on our $1 billion authorization. I'll add that we currently expect to continue buying our shares under that authorization. We're interested obviously in a thoughtful capital allocation framework. That will consider organic growth opportunities, including CapEx needs which we just talked about on BAW. Those are very high-return projects, relatively low risk from a project execution standpoint. So those would be early priority on spend. We're always looking at acquisition opportunities that would fit well with Qorvo, but I'll add that we're not capacity constrained from a balance sheet standpoint to doing those, but there's a very high bar on return requirements for allocation of capital to those opportunities. And then we plan to be regular steady buyers of our shares as part of this thoughtful capital allocation framework and that's what we've done.
Operator:
Our next question is from Ed Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks a lot. Eric, you said you were surprised by that gross margin on the low-band PAD coming in here and the several comments that intimated both there was a cost and a yield issue. Yield I get I suppose because you can always get surprised, but can you explain what happened on cost? It was at the SAW filters? Did they raise prices to you? Was it not BAW pricing? What changed from the time that you did the prototype and you bid the part and won the part to the time you started producing the part that smacked margins as hard as they were? And then, as a follow-up, you've got a gazillion programs going on here. You're moving to 8-inch in BAW in Richardson. Are you starting an 8-inch in Farmers Branch? Are you ramping an 8-inch? Meaning, is it already up and running moving to 8-inch? You have 6-inch in TC in Florida. You're launching, I'm assuming, a 6-inch TC and a SAW in North Carolina, moving GaN to Texas, moving GaAs to Oregon and a new PAD facility in China. Maybe you could take a few minutes to just walk through what the impact of some or all of these are on the margin issues, maybe none, maybe some, and whether it's utilization whatever, because as I'm sure most of the other guys on this call were getting flooded with gross margin questions even before the call started. So any help would be appreciated.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
All right, I'll take the easiest one. We're starting out in Farmers Branch on 8-inch. So we will start with what we believe will be our lowest cost there, and again, we'll qualify the line in 2017 and be ready for production in 2018. As far as what's going on in the packaging assembly and test facility, again that's one of the largest premerger synergies that we talked about is because a lot of the legacy work is outside assembly houses, and in fact given the volume we're running right now, we have a lot of work on the outside and that's why they're bringing up. And we had our grand opening in Dezhou just a few weeks ago, and as we in-source that, that is a significant cost savings for us. As far as, yes, in Greensboro, we're starting in 6-inch with standard SAW and temp-comp SAW and it's a significant margin improvement over what we're paying outside, I'll say it that way. But it will take time to get those into the market and designed into current product. So, again, much more of a 2017 story than a 2016 story. And as far as, you know the diameters and you can do the math on what the savings is from 6-inch to 8-inch and we'll give you a lot more color on the timing of that at the Analyst Day. But, again, most of these things really take hold in 2017. I know you had a question for Eric as well.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yes. We probably can't say much about the outsourced content to your question other than to say that it's a source that's clearly not a long-term viable candidate. There's not much flexibility in the near-term in terms of pricing and what we can do with that supplier. Internally, though, the yields are related to some specifications at the end product level, but also to your point, this is the first volume to ramp very hard in the new 6-inch TC line, and we're definitely working out a lot of issues in there as well that's contributing certainly to the issue.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thanks a lot. Guys, I was wondering if you could comment on what you think your total dollar content gains were for premium phones say this year versus last year – and I know there are tons of SKUs and stuff, but a rough assessment for the flagship phones?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
What I do feel confident in is we grew our dollar content. Clearly at one of our customers you guys know we grew significantly more dollar content as they released phones throughout the year. If I look at our top three customers, we've expanded our dollar contents. And to your point, it really gets down to mix on SKUs, but I think in aggregate, we've definitely increased our share as well as our dollar content.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay, great. And I just wanted to follow-up on Vivek's question a little bit around seasonality. So you talked about growing in December. Does that growth suggest anything about how it might look into March? Typically you have a pretty steep dip. And so I'm just wondering if this is being pull forward somewhat, does that suggest a more shallow March or would that trend more normally?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
So, to be clear, I don't believe I acknowledged there's any pull forward. I said if there was, then it could impact December. But right now we don't view it as demand being pulled forward. I think if you look at what happened last year, and I think it's pretty widely known that some of the marquee phones didn't quite sell as well into the December quarter, which impacted December and slightly in the March. So I think it all does come down to if you're asking what December and March are going to look like. As we said, China, we seem to be getting back to our normal share levels there, so that's where the strength in the China market that we see. We see it continues to migrate from 3-mode, to 5-mode and 4-mode. So that's dollar content. We think that China market is doing well, but we have a conservative view in my comments for December. And to your point, typically, March is down seasonally, and I don't think that's going to change from any other year.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Chris Caso with CLA (sic) [CLSA] (38:48).
Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC:
Thank you. Just a follow-up question with regard to China and the comments, and I think you've talked about tempering your expectations, yet the revenue growth is strong. So if maybe you could clarify more specifically what your expectations would be for China as you go into the September quarter, how much of that is dialed into your growth expectations, and then perhaps into the December quarter as well?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
So we do have growth in China dialed in that's based on actually very strong backlog at this time in order activity and visibility into the dollar content expansions that our customers are asking for these phones. However, the majority of the growth is not driven by China this quarter. It's driven by other large customers in marquee phone ramps.
Christopher Caso - CLSA Americas LLC:
Okay, great. And as a follow-up, we've heard I guess different commentary from different folks with regard to inventory levels at customers now as you're going into the seasonally stronger period of the year. I guess two questions on that. One is, although you took a hit from some inventory reductions back starting in last December quarter, do you think those still persisted in the June quarter, such that you're shipping below customer consumption? And at this point as we go into the September quarter, do you think those inventory reductions are now complete?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yeah. I'd rather just make this comment at a very high level. Typically, we ship into our customers well before they start selling because they build up their inventory to go. So typically in June, we would typically be under shipping what they're selling. So, what I can say is specifically about our business, we saw what was coming, we took actions in December, a little bit in March, but we were pretty much clean starting in June.
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. And Chris, I'll add that, our turns did increase about 10% and then our inventory levels did go up about $30 million, but that was, as you can see now, to prepare for the September and follow-on quarter.
Operator:
And our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with Cowen & Co.
Wayne Loeb - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Hello. This is Wayne Loeb for Tim. It appears that some major smartphone markers are now second sourcing their modems. Can you comment on your relative RF share, when attached to an Intel versus Qualcomm high ended modem?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Sorry, we are not going to be able to comment.
Wayne Loeb - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Okay. I will try one more thing then. On envelope trackers, are you seeing some traction there. It seems like some other non-Qualcomm modems do not yet have an envelope tracker, are you seeing some traction or any attachment to that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
I think Eric would love to talk about ET PMICs.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. We've been in production for several generations now. We do continue to see increased traction, really across all tiers in the market and with several baseband manufacturers.
Operator:
Thank you. We'll go next to Atif Malik with Citigroup.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I have a question on gross margins, as well your peer Skyworks guided flat margins on revenue growth in September, you guys are guiding down gross margins. I understand there's no structural change in the pricing environment. But can you comment on maybe parts of the market like low-band PADs, which are more commoditized. And if you can also help me understand why you would be chasing low-band PADs if you have been stronger in the mid-band and high-band historically?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Go ahead, Eric.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, sure. I want to say quite clearly that this is not a pricing issue. I also actually take issue in saying low-band PAD is a commoditized business. I don't think that's the case at all, especially these high performance low-band PADs with temperature-compensated SAW filters in them. These are very high performance products, very few people can manufacture them. It's not commoditized and there's not a pricing issue going on here at all. Because they're incredibly hard to manufacture, we're having some yield, ramping a new one and associated with again our new wafer line in it. So, why we're in the low-band PAD business? It's actually a premium product category and we see a lot of customers now asking us and giving us the opportunity to do the entire RF frontend. You need to have low-band, mid-band and high-band, all the switching and power management so forth to be able to do that. So it's an important part of the portfolio, it's going to be a very powerful part of the portfolio as well going forward.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Great. And as a follow up, Mark, can you talk about the full fiscal 2017 CapEx expectations for the year?
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. We're going to be about, if I recall, about 15% of sales for the year, if we maintain our pace of spend. Just to be clear, I mentioned that if we don't have the clarity, we'll certainly slow down the spend. So, I'd say I don't expect it to be any worse than about 15%.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Co.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Thank you. I just wanted to follow up on that BAW capacity question. You mentioned a couple of times on the call that you're not at optimal levels. I'm just wondering, are you referring to the fact you're underutilized currently or you guys are running full out and you need to add capacity in the near-term to meet demand? And then I've got a follow-up question.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Quinn, we are not running at capacity or nowhere close to that. So I would tell you, we're under loaded than from optimum.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Got it. Okay, great. And then, just coming back to the gross margin, obviously, you talked a lot about the low-band PAD. I was wondering if you could make any comments about sort of the China product gross margin especially as you ramp the quadplexers, hexaplexers, is the mobile product going into China carrying sort of corporate or at least mobile product average gross margins? Is there anything you can distinguish in terms of gross margin contribution from China versus some of the premium customers?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
So there's really not a large difference. There's a wide – not a wide range – but there's a range of gross margins for the different product types that sell into China. In general, the portfolio, especially the newer products are basically in line with the average mobile portfolio margins.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Yes. Thank you. Just wondering here on the revenue guidance has a range of $30 million versus in the past you gave us specific targets. What's some of the sensitivity there? What percent booked are you to get to the midpoint?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
We have a great new CFO, who thought that maybe we ought to be able to provide you guys with more of a range, because of his experience and looking at our past performance that it's probably more prudent to do that. And I think you also noticed one of our competitors also gave a range, who typically gave a point. So, we just thought it would be good to give you the clarity there in the range. And as far as booked for the quarter between our backlog, customer forecast, things like that, we're in good shape.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Good shape. Okay. Great. And then just a clarification on gross margins, low-band PADs impacted by the sourcing of filters. Sounds like you've got multiple products, multiple models. I mean, can seasonality in the coming quarters ever cause a more favorable mix shift later this fiscal year or are we really waiting for the fiscal 2018 manufacturing efficiencies and filters that come online?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
This part, as you said seasonality or sell-through of the end customers' products can definitely impact our percentage of gross margin, absolutely.
Operator:
Our next question is from Blayne Curtis with Barclays. Please go ahead.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Sorry for another gross margin one. Just wanted to clarify. So the gross margin was weaker in June, and then in September it's down a little bit more. It sounds like two issues, you have an issue on multiplexers, and then you had this low-band PAD. I was just trying to understand what the impact was in both quarters? Did you quantify it? And then just understand what's the bigger driver between those two?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yeah, Blayne, the quadplexers had a larger impact in the June quarter than the low-band PAD and the low-band PAD has a bigger impact, much bigger impact this quarter, and the quadplexers we've taken some actions and made some progress.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Got you. And then just a follow-up in terms of the yield issues, has that impacted any delivery dates or what's your lead times? And then, in terms of fixing these issues, do these require redesigns of any of these parts which then need to be re-qualified on phones or is it something you can you do on the fly in a given model?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Pretty detailed question. Yeah, so I would say, yield issues of course, we're working through those and assuring a continuation of the supply. Organization is working really, really hard to do that. In terms of redesign, not expected at all, potentially test program changes and so forth that, of course, we coordinate with our customers. But these are things that can happen relatively quickly.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Right. And holding up any phone shipments?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Right. No.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
None.
Operator:
Thank you. Our next question is from Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho. Please go ahead.
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Yeah, hi, guys. Good guide here. Just going back on the gross margin question again. As you guys (48:59) for the fiscal 2017 I guess, but as you look at pulling the filters in- house, I know one of your peers is sitting on a lot filter inventory and then obviously the Japanese OEMs all have a lot of filter exposure, filter supply there. Does that create more filter pricing pressure? What's your thoughts there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
I'm not sure I fully understood the question on...
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
I'm just wondering, as you pull your filters in-house, and there is obviously more excess filters in the supply chain, does that increase pricing pressure on the filter side?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. I'm sorry, I guess, we're having a hard time following why pulling the filter products inside would create excess inventory of filters and create pricing pressure. It would go the opposite way I think in...
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
...in discrete.
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Yeah, yeah.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. Discrete filters are becoming a very small part of the market. The trend is that the filters are being integrated into higher level functionality such as our fusion modules and so forth.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
And then when they're integrated, just to be clear, they're wafer level packaged opposed to packaged in a ceramic package, which is the way a discrete filter's sold.
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Got it. And you talked about 6-inch and 8-inch transition here, what do you expect your mix of 6-inch and 8-inch by the end of calendar 2016, if you can give us some idea there? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Yeah. As far as 8-inch BAW filters go, it's going to be a very low percentage, that's what we're converting to this year and again, as I've said, bringing up in Farmers Branch. And in SAW filters, as we continue to expand in Florida as well as bringing up the North Carolina facility, that mix will start to move to 6-inch a much larger percentage. Don't have the percentage off the top of my head again, we'll give you that at Analyst Day, but it will be a larger percentage 6-inch.
Operator:
Thank you. We have a follow up from Harsh Kumar. Please go ahead.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey, guys. Thanks for the follow-up. I promise no gross margin question here. I was curious, Mark, if you ever gave China as a percentage of sales for either June or what your expectation is for September?
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
I don't think we did provide that.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
Hold on a second, Harsh. Give us a minute we'll go through it. Hold on.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Okay. Then let me ask something else while you guys are looking at it. Mark and then, I think you mentioned that OpEx will fall as the back half approaches, can I ask you to clarify if it will fall as a percentage of sales or will it fall in absolute dollars from here?
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah, what I said Harsh was that it'll be about flat on a dollar basis in the second quarter, the September quarter and will drop as a percent of sales basis to about 20%. In the subsequent quarters, we expect it to drop on a dollar basis.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
So, next year it could drop on a dollar basis. Got it. Thanks. And then whenever you guys...
Mark J. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer:
Just to be clear, drop in the second half of this fiscal year on a dollar basis.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
And Harsh, excluding Huawei who is a corporate 2% customer, as you know the China business is about a third of the mobile business in the June quarter and a bit less than the third in the September quarter.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Thanks, guys.
Operator:
And we'll also take a follow-up from Ed Snyder. Please go ahead.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks. You mentioned GaAs moving to Oregon, Bob are you consolidating all GaAs fab in Oregon or will you still be split between Oregon and North Carolina? And then TriQuint started TC-SAW, it was the first one to actually produce that filters years ago and I know that one of your competitors kind of leapfrogged you in modules to your largest customer and so they are large in TC-SAW. But I'm a little surprised you guys are having yield problems with TC-SAW. Is it a new process, a new part, given your legacy and how long you've been in this technology? What's changed there that made this more difficult part, just the filtered stuff, forget the module? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
So, Ed, we are transitioning over time our Greensboro gallium arsenide as well as GaN and they will be focused on filters. And as far as the temp-comp SAW...
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. I think you hit on it earlier, we're doing a lot right now including adding factories in Florida and Greensboro and also going from 4-inch to 6-inch and managing issues of wafer breakage as well as parameter distributions, and as you really run more and more and more wafers to the new 6-inch line, you begin to see the full distribution. Also, I think the requirements at the end module are tougher, generation, regeneration, the requirements are getting harder. So dialing in these specifications at a very fine level is the issue.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
And I know you mentioned it, Bob, but to buy parts from the outside market like you're doing now because everybody outsources SAW at this point, even your competitors, you're buying a packaged part from them, which is large and more expensive, et cetera. When you go internally, it will be a wafer scale packaging, shouldn't we expect, and I don't know what the mix is, but I'm expecting you're using quite a bit of that product in some of your modules, low-band PAD, maybe diversity module. Shouldn't we expect to see a significant improvement in gross margin given the fact that one, you're producing and two, it's going to be smaller, more efficient part than what you could buy on the outside market already? And just if you could, maybe give us some idea of the timing of when you think you'll be independent in SAW?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
So maybe big picture Ed, certainly you're on the right track. We absolutely expect that when we can in-source these filter ourselves in our new larger factories that are well utilized, we will definitely see improvements in gross margin. And this is a multi-generational thing, this cannot happen overnight to completely eliminate outsourcing of the filters. We're starting on it, we're adding new capacity, adding the filter designers to be able to do it, it will take two or three product cycles to get there.
Operator:
And ladies and gentlemen, this will conclude our Q&A portion of the call. I will turn it to management for closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President, Chief Executive Officer & Director:
As always, we thank you for joining us tonight. Qorvo is a leading participant in large, healthy markets with unique competitive strength and improving visibility and to macro trends and large customer programs driving our growth. We anticipate strong demand in support of today's most popular devices and we're expanding our capabilities to develop new highly integrated solutions for large customer opportunities launching in 2017 and 2018. Thank you.
Operator:
And this will conclude today's program. Thanks for your participation. You may now disconnect, and have a great day.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products
Analysts:
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker) Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q4 2016 Year-End Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Douglas DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. DeLieto.
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations:
Thanks very much, Adam. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Qorvo's fourth quarter fiscal 2016 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter earnings call. Revenue for the March quarter totaled $607.1 million, exceeding our quarterly guidance, reflecting increased demand for our highly-integrated solutions and a return to growth in IDP broad target markets. Gross margin was 50%, up 210 basis points sequentially, reflecting crisp execution by the Qorvo team. Operating margin was 26.4% with operating expenses of approximately $143 million, reflecting reduced variable compensation expense. On February 17, we announced an accelerated share repurchase program and during the March quarter we were able to repurchase 10 million shares of common stock. We expect to repurchase an estimated 500,000 share in the June quarter as part of the ASR and we have $250 million that remain authorized for future repurchases. In Mobile Products, revenue was $465 million on the strength of content gains and smartphone program ramps. During the quarter, we launched an increasing number of highly-integrated, high-performance solutions that leveraged the breadth of our industry-leading portfolio of products and technologies. We enjoyed strong demand for our highly-integrated solutions led by products incorporating our premium filters. We expect these highly-integrated solutions will continue to drive our growth. Qorvo's expanding family of RF Fusion solutions stands out as an example. These tightly-integrated compact solutions leverage our BAW and temp-comp SAW filters, our low-loss, high throw-count SOI switches, and our high-performance, low-noise amplifiers to deliver performance that's unmatched by competitive solutions. In the China market, the deployment of carrier aggregation and the migration to full mode devices is increasing the demand for our RF Flex solutions, our BAW-based quadplexers and a broad variety of our antenna control solutions. Looking into calendar 2017, our customers in China are asking us to integrate our premium filters into RF Flex to reduce complexity and enhance smartphone performance as carrier aggregation proliferates and bands and modes are added. Again, this strongly favors our broad product portfolio and integration capabilities. In IDP, revenue grew 9% sequentially to approximately $142 million, reflecting a return to growth in IDP's broad target market. We indicated last quarter that IDP had repositioned its diverse portfolio of businesses to accelerate growth and we've begun to see the benefit of that sharpened focus. In automotive, IDP secured a significant design win with a Tier 1 automotive supplier, meaningfully expanding our opportunity in automotive infotainment systems at several European car manufacturers. Elsewhere, in connectivity, IDP leveraged the superior performance of our integrated solutions in efficiency, thermal dissipation, range and a number of other key metrics to secure the lead position on Quantenna's QSR10G Wi-Fi solution. This solution enables the industry-first 10G Wave 3 solution through a True 8x8 MIMO configuration for 5GHz networks and a 4x4 MIMO configuration for 2.4GHz networks. In Wireless Infrastructure, revenue grew by more than 25% sequentially, and we returned to more historic levels in our base station business. And again, we enjoyed increasing demand for Qorvo's high-frequency and high-power solutions across both infrastructure deployments and advanced defense application. Across all our markets, it's increasingly clear that Qorvo's industry-leading portfolio of RF products and technologies represents a significant competitive advantage. Qorvo's offering our customers a combination of performance and integration that's not been available previously, putting us in a favorable position to gain content and outpace our market. Equally important is our unique ability to match the optimum technology, or combination of technologies, to each customer's application without bias towards any one technology or architecture. Only Qorvo delivers a comprehensive product portfolio of filters, switches, amplifiers, PMICs, LNAs and tuners with the scale, integration capabilities and system-level expertise to supply an expanding variety of highly-integrated solutions. This is leading to deeper relationships with our customers, channel partners and carriers as they see greater economic value in maximizing spectral efficiency. To monetize their respective investments, they're seeking increasingly precise, highly-integrated solutions optimized to solve specific challenges related to the delivery of broadband data. Qorvo is unique in its ability to address that need. In both Mobile and IDP, Qorvo is leveraging our comprehensive product and technology portfolio to participate in the development of 5G standards to expand our growth opportunity. We are engaged in 5G field trials with infrastructure customers, and we are assisting in the development of key aspects of 5G next-generation wireless communication standards as a member of 3GPP. In 2016, 3GPP is set to make significant progress in defining 5G use cases. 5G will enable speeds comparable to fixed broadband, with ultra-low latency and the capacity for massive-scale networks, creating exciting opportunities in new markets, like wireless residential broadband, autonomous driving, robotics, virtual reality, urban sensor networks and other applications leveraging deployment of the global Internet of Things ecosystem. In IDP, we're introducing highly differentiated products that enable customers in high-growth markets to introduce products at record speed, and with higher levels of functionality. As an example, in automotive, our highly-integrated solutions maximize data throughput while solving the complex challenges related to spectrum congestion. The compound annual growth rate in automotive connectivity is forecasted to be 45% through the year 2020, and Qorvo's broad portfolio of RF solutions position us favorably for success. Across all our markets, it's our goal to deliver breakthrough RF solutions that accelerate the delivery of broadband data and create value for our customers and our customers' customers. We intend to leverage our broad scale, industry-leading product and technology portfolio and strong organizational discipline to achieve operational excellence, capture value and deliver superior financial results. We prioritize our uses of cash by investing in our business to drive growth, returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases and exploring opportunities for M&A to supplement growth in IDP. Since our earnings conference call last quarter, we repurchased more than 10 million shares of common stock, we made an acquisition to expand into the Internet of Things, we commenced production of 6-inch temp-comp SAW in Florida, and 6-inch SAW in Greensboro to support a marquee smartphone this calendar year. And we're in the final days of qualifying our 8-inch BAW process in Texas. Our BAW-based hexaplexer prototypes are demonstrating excellent performance, and we've begun to sample a highly-integrated RF Fusion that incorporates our hexaplexers. We see strong growth and increasing customer pull for these types of solutions in the coming years. We recently acquired clean room space near our Richardson campus to support customer demand for BAW filters, whether they be in discrete implementations, quadplexers, pentaplexers, hexaplexers, diversity receive modules or other highly-integrated RF solutions. The facility is already fully operational, and it's our goal to incrementally convert the facility to BAW in the back half of next calendar year to support customer program. As the industry's leading supplier of SAW, temp-comp SAW and BAW devices, we are adding capacity to keep pace with the increasing customer demand for our high, mid and low-band products. In fact, Qorvo will soon be in production with low-band PADs, mid-band PADs and high-band PADs all in premium tier marquee LTE smartphones. Before handing off the call to Steve, I want to say a quick word about our acquisition of GreenPeak Technologies, which just recently closed. GreenPeak is a recognized leader in ultra-low power short-range RF solutions with an expanding business and customers all over the globe, a great number of who are already purchasing high-power solutions from Qorvo. GreenPeak will become a part of IDP and will be run by Cees Links, their Founder and CEO. Cees Links is a recognized industry leader who was instrumental in the development and adoption of Wi-Fi technology. We expect GreenPeak's ultra-low power RF solutions and SOCs for the connected home and Internet of Things to nicely complement IDP's industry-leading portfolio of high-power solutions. We have not included any revenue from GreenPeak Technologies in our June guidance. In the September quarter, we'll have a full quarter of GreenPeak revenue, and we'll begin to include it in our guidance then. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Steve for a more detailed look at our financials.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Bob. Qorvo's revenue for the March quarter was $607 million, much better than typical seasonality relative to the December quarter. Mobile Products' revenue declined 5% to $465 million, while IDP showed continued strength as revenue grew 9% to $142 million. Content gains in the Samsung Galaxy were the largest driver of the healthy sequential performance in Mobile. Qorvo had three 10% customers, the largest at approximately 33% of revenue representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Our other 10% customers during the quarter were Samsung and Huawei. Gross margin was 50%, up sequentially from 47.9%, reflecting the absence of a couple of yield issues experienced in the prior quarter. Operating expenses remained relatively low at $143 million, driven by reduced variable compensation expense. Operating income was $161 million, or just over 26% of revenue. Net income for the March quarter was $143 million, or $1.04 per diluted share based on 137.5 million shares outstanding. Turning to the balance sheet, total cash and investments was $613 million, and cash flow from operations totaled $160.5 million. Capital expenditures were $84.4 million, primarily to address growth and demand for our premium filters. The company repurchased approximately 10 million shares during the March quarter, under our $500 million accelerated share repurchase program. As the actual purchase occurred about halfway through the quarter, the impact on the March quarter share count was about five million shares. We expect to repurchase an estimated 500,000 shares this quarter, as the ASR program is completed. The ASR is part of our previously announced $1 billion share repurchase program, approved in November of 2015. After giving effect to the ASR, approximately $250 million remain authorized under this program for future repurchases. We made good progress last quarter on significant long-term opportunities to improve our growth and profitability. We acquired a highly respected IoT firm, improving our SAM and growth prospects. We continue to improve both the fundamental performance capabilities of our SMR BAW process, and the capacity to produce to growing customer demand. Our acquisition of a former Maxim plant just a few miles from our existing operation in Richardson will provide low-cost clean room capacity for the next leg of BAW growth. We saw strong progress on large cost-reduction initiatives
Operator:
Thank you. The first question comes from Toshiya Hari from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.:
Hi. Good afternoon, and thank you for taking my question. And congrats on a very strong quarter. My first question is regarding your revenue performance, both in the March quarter and in the June quarter. You seem to be clearly outperforming the overall industry. You talked to content gains in the Samsung Galaxy. But were there any other things that led to this outperformance?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks for your comments, Toshi. And clearly, IDP had strong growth, as we touched on, in the infrastructure business, as long as the connectivity business in the March quarter for pretty good performance. Also, as you pointed out, we saw good strength from one of our 10% customers. I think it would be good – as we look at the June guidance, we are expecting both businesses to grow in June. But, I will tell you, the majority of the growth is going to be coming from the Mobile business. So, I'll let Eric talk a little bit about the growth.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Thanks, Bob. Yeah, I think in the June quarter, we are expecting to be up significantly, outside of our largest customer, in particular. And that's driven primarily by just the continued content growth in China. I think we're back on track with the next-generation solutions. We've announced RF Flex Gen-3 is already ramping into high-volume production. That's helping to carry some of the sequential growth.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.:
Okay. Thank you. And my follow-up is on the inventory situation. When I look at your balance sheet, I think inventory was up about $80 million on a year-over-year basis, while revenues were down about $25 million. Should we be concerned about your inventory level? Or do your current booking status support significant revenue growth, so that we shouldn't be concerned here? Thank you.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. I don't think you should be too concerned, but two things to think about here. One is, we are doing some advanced building in anticipation of growth later this year. And then secondly, I think our inventory levels are a little heavy and we can improve our turns performance and we expect to do so. I don't have a concern about excess and obsolete type risks. We monitor that closely. We just went through a quarterly review. And I don't have concerns there, but I think that is an area where we can improve and will do so.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Mike Burton from Brean Capital. Please go ahead.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Hey, guys, and my congratulations as well on the strong results, especially in this environment. Just following up on that second question first. Steve, if you could talk us through the puts and takes on gross margin with revenues heading up in the June quarter and then your thoughts about it going forward?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So, relative to the June quarter, we're back to expectations of 50%. As you might remember, that's pretty much where we've been running the last several quarters. Last quarter, we had a yield issue on a couple parts that knocked us down to just under 48%. In the absence of that, we're kind of back to where we have been at. And relative to the full-year, I'll offer a couple of things, since you ask. One is, we continue to believe our market is growing at a 10% to 15% rate and we believe we'll grow consistent with that. Second, I think we have with that growth rate a good opportunity to see fiscal year 2017 earnings per share getting pretty close to $5 a share. If all goes well, we might hit that $5; but I would say, if I were modeling, I'd say we'll get up into the neighborhood, we'll get pretty close to $5. And beyond that, I'm going to – gross margin and OpEx, that mix will depend on the type of business and opportunities we have as we go through the year.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Okay.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
And I'll add, I think tax rate should be about 10% and next quarter we expect shares to be about 133 million and we'll see what we do from there on.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Great. And then also, Eric, it sounds like the China is picking up for you guys in Q2. I wonder if you're already starting to see some progress that you were planning on making at MediaTek. And then just also if you could just clarify, I know you said that growing in Q2 but was China up or down for you guys in Q1 as well?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. Thanks, Mike. No question we're much happier with our position in MediaTek now than we were six months to nine months ago. We announced at Barcelona the RF Flex Gen-3 solutions which are aligned with both MediaTek and Qualcomm, frankly. And seeing a pretty good uptake. We saw – exiting the March quarter, we began to see China really take off. So they were okay in March, but they weren't really the factor that helped offset seasonality as much as Samsung was.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Mike, I would also point out, as we touched on last quarter, we've got to let you guys know that we felt that the antenna tuners and a lot of those solutions, because of the metal cases starting to proliferate in our Chinese customers' designs, that's a great opportunity for growth for us. So, it's not just the power amplifiers. It's also our high-performance BAW filters, as well as some of our antenna tuners.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Harsh Kumar from Stephens. Please go ahead.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Congratulations from me as well. Fantastic numbers. Question, Bob, for you. As you look in the back half of the quarter, you've given the June guide – Steve's kind of talked about the EPS for the year. As you look on the back half of the calendar year, how do you see the market? And then I've got a follow-up.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. As far as the market goes, we're modeling pretty much flat handset growth. We're expecting people to continue to migrate up into the performance phones, and as well as the marquee phones, and driving the dollar content will continue to increase. So, we still expect the RF TAM for the Mobile business to grow 10% to 15%. We've repositioned James' business to start to get in the double-digit growth rates. So, coming back to the infrastructure, we are expecting a pretty solid year as we go forward.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I just wanted to add, one of the exciting things in our business is the migration of the IDP business from a kind of a high single-digits growth rate to a mid-teens growth very comparable to what we see in the Mobile space. And this acquisition of GreenPeak is one more step in that direction.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Got it. And then – hey, Steve, I think you touched on it just very briefly. I think you were supposed to have a major event, with your cost reduction strategy with your move to China. I was wondering if we could get a small update on that as it relates to what's going on there?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Sure. Happy to. Most of the action is in the second half of the calendar year, as we can't really move parts that are in production. Our customers require us to start new parts in the location of manufacture. And so that means we're intersecting with major product launches, as is typical to happen in the back half of the calendar year. So that's when we'll start to see the flow of savings at the level we expect. So you'll see a little bit of the benefit this calendar year, and you'll see all of the benefit next calendar year. And we are on track for the second $75 million installment of our synergy expectations.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Edward Snyder from Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks. Eric, there was a long list of product groups that are now using BAW, everything from diversity modules to all-in-ones like Fusion. Is that impact...
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Could you speak up a little bit, Ed? It's hard to hear you.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Sorry.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I know it's hard to believe, but we...
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
I could. Let me speak in a normal voice, now. Check. Can you hear me now? You asked for it. Okay. So, Eric. So there's a long list of product groups now using BAW, everything from diversity to all-in-ones like Fusion. Did that impact your mix enough in Mobile to drive growth in operating margins? And do you expect that to occur or accelerate as we move through the year? And then Steve, you touched on there the PAD facility in China. Has much or any of TriQuint product lines – I guess it's mostly new Qorvo product lines, because you can't move old ones back there – what percentage are you in terms of moving to the PAD facility at this stage? And I have one for James.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I'll answer yours first. I'd say we're under 50% right now. And maybe closer to 25%. So it's a relatively modest portion, just because of the lead times to equip the factory, start the prototypes, intersect with customer product launches. So the vast majority of it will be second half of the calendar year.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
To the first part A, B and C of your question, the BAW product portfolio has filled out very nicely as you said. And we are shipping, in addition to the diversity receive modules now with BAW in it, several RF Fusion modules with BAW. And as you know, we released our first quadplexer for the China/CA market, also BAW-based. And traction in all of those has been very strong in March and continuing on into June, and certainly driving part of our growth. And as we've talked about, the gross margins on those are above our average, so that supports the expansion in gross margin. But of course, the growth being driven by that also helps the operating margin, to your point.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Okay. And then, James, most of – there was a nice uptick in your business this quarter. Was that most all 4G base stations? And was that spread evenly across your customers? Did you see more of a pocket of strength in certain areas?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
We had good growth in the wireless infrastructure, our base station business, and also in connectivity. As far as the base station side, it was really broad-based across the regions and across all of our top-tier customers in the space.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Quinn Bolton from Needham. Please go ahead.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi, guys. Let me add my congratulations. Bob, wondering if you could just comment about inventory levels at your largest customer. It seems like they've obviously seen lower-than-expected demand. And I'm just wondering, do you think that that supply channel here as you come out of March looking into June is fairly clean, or do you think that there's excess component inventory that you may have shipped in previous quarters that still needs to be worked off? And then I've got a follow-up for Eric.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Well, I don't think you're going to like my answer much. I think things are fine. We're in pretty good shape there. So not really much to add. Things look fine to us.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
The channel looks pretty clean from your perspective, it sounds like.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yes.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah, and you know and I'm sure you remember, we kind of took the medicine in the December quarter in terms of lowered expectations for that particular customer (29:30).
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Right, right. Okay. Great. And then for Eric, just obviously very strong growth in China here looking into the June quarter. Wondering if you'd give us some sense. Obviously you're ramping Gen-3 of RF Flex, but you also shipped some of the premium filters. Can you give us some sense? Is it fairly well balanced between RF Flex and filters? Or is one of those businesses much larger than the other? And then sort of a follow-on question to that is last year you guys saw a massive June quarter in China, and it ended up leading to some inventory accumulation effective in September to December. As you look forward right now, do you think that that strength in China continues in the back half of the year? Or is it hard to have visibility that far out right now?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, thanks for the question. For the portfolio that's growing in June in China in particular is very, very diverse. In addition to all the RF Flex and quadplexers and discrete filters and so forth that we're growing with most of the China suppliers, when we look at Huawei, that's a completely different set of dynamic. We also see them growing strongly in June, but based more on the RF Fusion portfolio, some of the more premium solutions in power management and so forth. So, really I think it's fair to say our entire product portfolio is involved in one way or the other with various tiers and manufacturers throughout China. You have to remember, of course, even below Huawei, the other suppliers there, the leading suppliers like Oppo, Vivo and Xiaomi, we have very good long-term relationships with these guys and they're looking to expand beyond just domestic consumption and export more, which is driving a need for more premium filters and more bands in their phones. So that just plays right into where we're investing. Regarding your second point, yeah, very good point. Last year, we also had a very strong start to June. I think that has caused us to be pretty cautious. We are being just as careful as we can to make sure we're looking at the total demand and watching for customers that might be double-ordering or chasing the same slots and so forth. So, we're watching that really carefully. I think another big part of last year was the MediaTek Phase 2 generation where we were, frankly, behind by one or two quarters and it was hard to catch up once we got there. So, this transition this time with Phase 3 and then looking into Phase 5 and Phase 6, at this time we look very, very well-aligned with MediaTek as well as the end customers.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Cody Acree from Drexel. Please go ahead.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Thanks for taking my questions, and congratulations, guys. Guys, on the BAW filter capacity, with Skyworks now pretty openly talking about having BAW filters in 2017. And of course, with them expanding their TC-SAW capacity, how do you see them changing the competitive landscape? And especially with all the expansion and filter capacity you've done yourself?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
As far as BAW filters go, I don't believe we see that changing the dynamic there. I think they're underestimating what it's going to take, I think the amount of IP, the capacity it's going to take. We're moving to 8-inch. The performance keeps improving generation over generation. Quite honestly, I'm not sure where they're getting the technology or where they even have a factory to produce it. We currently do know of suppliers out there that are limited in their ability to use BAW filters coupled with a SAW filter. And you pick either you want the BAW and transmit or receive. So we're certainly familiar with those things, but just don't see it. And as far as temp-comp SAW goes, high-performance filters, whether they're BAW or temp-comp SAW, continue to expand and grow. They are bigger than Qorvo in temp-comp SAW. We are expanding capacity for programs that we've already won. Like I said, we migrated to 6-inch. We talked in the February call about how we qualified the 6-inch process, and we're the first in the industry to do that. This quarter – in my opening comments I talked about how we're ramping temp-comp SAW in Florida. And again, that's for programs we've already won. But we feel pretty good about the capacity we're putting in place in BAW, as well as in SAW. So when I talked about SAW filters in Greensboro, that's really to insource filters that we're buying outside, that over time that will be a margin improvement as well.
Cody Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Thanks, Bob. And one for Eric. Eric, when you talk about major drivers like carrier aggregation or diversity receive, can you talk about where we are in some of those adoption curves? How much of the dollar content story are those kind of major applications driving the content story? And how much of that curve do we have left to go?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. That's a good question. I would say, generally, we're still in pretty early innings overall, in addition to the transition to CA, which – you know, half, let's say, of the 4G phones overall this year will have CA. And eventually, I'm confident, they'll all have it over the next three years to five years. In China alone as well, we think somewhere like a quarter to a third of even the Chinese 4G phones will have carrier aggregation in the downlink this year. So I think overall, we're still in fairly early innings. Remember, I think we talked about this at Analyst Day, it's a compounding effect of those with the reduced number of SKUs in the handset manufacturers' pipeline that drives the complexity up dramatically. And so that overall trend as well, we definitely see our number two and number three customer in particular driving towards more of a global SKU like our largest customer does. And that also is still in the early innings of development.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Ian Ing from MKM Partners. Please go ahead.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Yes. Congrats again on outperforming other smartphone suppliers. You talked about reference design exposure in China, places like MediaTek. What about trends towards captive basebands, Xiaomei and Huawei? Are there any implications here on RF Flex and RF Fusion? Thanks.
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Sure. Generally speaking, when you look at the value chain, the more basebands the better, from an RF guy's perspective, right? And so we like that. And in general, we're able to – we take common – to make the products that we're developing relatively common in terms of platforms. And then we can make relatively minor adjustments to customize for each individual, baseband platform or end customer. We don't see any of the vertical baseband guys looking to develop a completely new RF architecture, for example, right? And we're already addressing those architectures that our customers fundamentally want. So now it's only a matter of interfacing to those individual basebands. Relatively straightforward thing to do. And we're happy to do it. Doing very, very well with all the internal vertical suppliers.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Okay. So a bit of a neutral. Thanks. And then my follow-up is, you know, really nice June quarter guidance, $50 million of new revenues, flat gross margins. Just wondering about the earnings fall-through. I mean, is it really variable compensation coming back? Or are there some other factors getting to the EPS guidance? Thanks.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. Good question. We do expect variable comp to come back. That will lead to OpEx in the low-$150s million kind of range, maybe in the mid-$150s million, depending on the magnitude. It's unusual that we did not pay over the last six-month period, and so you do see kind of a contrast there, and I want to make it clear to folks to expect that. Otherwise, we did improve gross margins sequentially. A lot of that was due to yield differences. And then you have a bit more mobile in the mix, typically, in the June quarter. So all that leads to a guide of 50% gross margin.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Blayne Curtis from Barclays. Please go ahead.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. You talked a lot about your China customers up in June. Maybe you could just talk about trends at your two largest customers, what you're embedding into that June guidance? And then, Steve, I just wanted to follow-up on the OpEx. You said put GreenPeak in September. What's the visibility to the close date, I think you said within the quarter. And any guidance as to what to add in the September quarter? Or would you rather just leave it out?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So, with respect to GreenPeak, it just closed a few days ago, so we'll have some fractional impact in the quarter, and we'll report that when we report the results of this quarter. But from an earnings perspective, consider it de minimis either way. And then you're right, I would prefer to talk about GreenPeak financially when we guide the September quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
And Blayne, as far as our two largest customers, I'm not sure you know who they are. I know you clearly know who the largest one is, so I want to be careful. We're kind of splitting hairs maybe on this, but clearly our largest customer, we're being conservative in our guidance. We do believe it's down to maybe flat. We'll just see. They've got some pretty good selling products that we've got nice dollar content in, so down to flat for our largest – second largest depending on which one of those you pick. One's going to be down slightly and one's going to be up, so I gave you the top three. How's that?
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
I appreciate it. I guess the two largest in March. Obviously it changes, but yes. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Tim Arcuri from Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Thanks a lot. I guess the first question is, can you give us some sense in fiscal 2016 maybe what the percentage of your Mobile revenues came from Chinese OEMs?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Over the last year in total – are you including Huawei as a Chinese OEM or do you consider that global?
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Include them.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, so on the range of – Mobile business on the range of 40% probably including Huawei.
Timothy Arcuri - Cowen & Co. LLC:
Okay. Great. And then second question is on the share repo. You bought back 10 million shares in March. I know that some of that's going to spill over into June from kind of how it flows through the P&L, but you said that you're only going to buy back 500,000 shares in June which is down a lot. And that's still not even working through the $250 million that you have left on the repo, so I'm wondering why you're cranking down the repo so much in June. Is that related to the stock price? Or is there something else happening there? Thanks.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So, a couple things. The ASR that we initiated was initiated mid-quarter of the March quarter, and so we paid Bank of America $500 million, they tendered about 10 million shares to us. And since share count for a quarter is based on the average for that quarter, we get about half credit this quarter, half credit next quarter. Now the next point
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Atif Malik from Citigroup. Please go ahead.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Hi, thanks for taking my question and good job on the execution in the March quarter. Both questions for Steve. On the gross margin, you're guiding flat gross margins on 7% sequential revenue growth. How should we think about your long-term target model of 55%? Has anything changed on that? And then I have a follow-up for Eric.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So, I think the big drivers for us getting from where we're at, which is roughly 50% to our long-term model of 55% are really those big movers in the gross margin line we referred to earlier, moving BAW filters from 6-inch wafers to 8-inch wafers, SAW and TC-SAW from 4-inch to 6-inch. Both of those have an effect of taking roughly a third of the costs out of the die for BAW filters and SAW and TC-SAW filters, very significant reductions. We'll be consolidating our gas production into a single foundry over the next year and a half, insourcing, assembling tests for part of our Mobile business, the part that used to be – belonged to TriQuint, and each of these have a significant impact which is largely going to be felt in FY 2018. These will occur throughout the year, but the financial impact will be mostly in FY 2018, and then we also simply have the scale benefits of the kind of growth I referenced earlier. We have a fair amount of fixed costs, and we will see scale benefits as we continue to grow to the market at what we expect will be a 10% to 15% rate. So, I'm actually – short-term, I think we're going to fluctuate around, depending on the particulars of the quarter, but long-term, these are big, substantial items that don't involve new laws of physics. This is stuff we can do. We're well underway, and I think we are on track to get to the target model over time.
Atif Malik - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Okay. And then a follow-up for Eric. Eric, is it possible for you to quantify what percentage of the bands that are getting aggregated globally are using BAW or FBAR type filters?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Well, that's a pretty tough thing to do, actually, other than to say it's growing as a percentage of the total. It's substantial and growing, but that would be a really hard thing to do, looking at all the different band combinations that we're addressing across so many different platforms. But obviously, it's meaningful today. You can tell that by the investments and what's happening in the industry and it's continuing to grow.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
And there's no question, it's probably the highest growth rate area of our business right now, are the high frequency premium filters. We're doing very, very well.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. And even if you look at our Wi-Fi growth, which is – we haven't talked about that today at all, but we're also seeing very strong growth in our Fusion module for Wi-Fi, and that's primarily coming from customers that were doing chip-on-board implementations where they were using our BAW filter but maybe somebody else's FEM. And we've integrated all that together. So when you look at what the TAM or the addressable market effect is, of the BAW filters, it can be quite big.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question comes from Steve Smigie from Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Thanks. This is Vince Celentano on for Steve. I was hoping if you could elaborate a little bit more on your new GaN design win. Does it relate at all to the power amplifier market for base station? And overall, when do you expect revenue for these wins to start kicking in? And overall, what do you see as the potential revenue opportunity?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
So, several questions in there again, but good design wins in both the commercial and defense business, both power amplifiers, and yes, on the commercial side it is towards the base station. Not just design wins, but we have production orders in the books. And we are shipping into both of those markets today. Overall size of the market, I think the way I would say it is that market, we model it growing at about 25% year-over-year. We're the market leader there today, and I think we'll continue to grow at that rate and potentially even a little bit higher.
Vincent Celentano - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. Thanks. And in the past you've said your IDP division is roughly an even split between defense, connectivity, transport, and wireless infrastructure. Is that still the case? And do you guys have any insight as to the relative growth rates of each of these sub-segments?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
So, yeah, again, this is James. The relative size. I think that's still a good estimate, that it's broken into those four areas and relatively the same size. And the growth rates, as we've talked about before, probably single-digits or so, high-single-digits in defense. Our connectivity business or Wi-Fi business we see growing close to that 20% range. That's what the market's doing. And those are really probably the big drivers in the business. I will say that with moving our portfolio around we've repositioned into really some significant high growth areas. We've moved about 60% of the business into what we consider above average growth markets, and those are markets that are growing in the 20% kind of range. The addition of GreenPeak really substantially helps that. GreenPeak's markets targeted to grow at about 60% between now and 2020, and so very high growth as we move into the connected home and really start to see IoT take off.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question come from Edward Snyder from Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks a lot. Eric, Samsung came in a bit better than expected this quarter. I know you guys gained content, but they broke through the 10% barrier here. Was that better content than you expected, a better mix of SKU sales for them, or just higher units overall? And then how do you see things trending at Samsung, not so much on the GS7, but do you expect to continue gaining content above and beyond what you saw in the GS7 in the second half or 2017 with Samsung?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Hey, this is Bob. As far as Samsung in the quarter, they played out just exactly how we expected it. So we expected to gain the content. We talked about it in last quarter's conference call and it pretty much played out. As far as things go in the future, I'll let Eric address that.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Mine was easy, it was already done.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Samsung is really not unlike the rest of our customers, Ed. We have the same opportunities there working across multiple baseband solutions in their portfolio to really optimize the RF front-ends to cover more and more capabilities going forward. So when you look at the unique things we're bringing from a tuning and advanced envelope tracking power management, the full suite of BAW filters and so forth, the ability to integrate all of those into really highly compact solutions, I think Samsung is really just like all the other customers from the mid-tier all up to the highest tiers marquee smartphones where we have the opportunities to help them really do a lot more with higher performance in smaller space. So yeah, we think our opportunities there continue to get better.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Yeah. But on the highly integrated module, Skyworks offers that, too, and they've had some success. So what I'm trying to get to here is how much of what you've just experienced at Samsung is due to their SKU reduction moving to these high density modules from more of a regional, discrete architecture versus say gaining traction because you've got BAW, you've got nearly every technology that anybody could want, versus either Avago or Skyworks, and it may lead to just straight up content gains. I'm trying to get a feel for where that falls on the current performance and then what you're seeing – because you see the roadmap out for at least a year now – how does that look for the next two phone?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. That's what I was trying to address. I think we are well familiar with the content gains that we're seeing that's driving the overall industry to 10% to 15% growth. Because of the SKU consolidation, CMOS and so-forth. So I tried to highlight at the beginning, the things that we are maybe differentiated in where we're bringing something in addition to that. Tuning is a big area across our entire customer portfolio now where we really see that growing and we've got a lot of leadership there in bringing new solutions and envelope tracking power management as well. We're the only open-market solution for that. And we're seeing a lot of traction driving there. So, in addition to those fundamental drivers, we think Qorvo does bring a lot of unique things as well. That really helps us.
Operator:
Thank you. So that concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to send the conference back to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
We'd like to thank each of you for joining us tonight. We're launching an increasing number of highly-integrated RF solutions. We're seeing a return to growth in many of IDP's broad markets and we're excited about the long-term growth outlook for the RF market. We believe our systems-level expertise, integration capabilities, and comprehensive product portfolios of breakthrough RF solutions position us favorably to gain content and drive continued profitable growth. Thank you, and have a good night.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products
Analysts:
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Cody G. Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Timothy Patrick Long - BMO Capital Markets (United States) Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC Srinivas Reddy Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.
Operator:
Good day and welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. Q3 2016 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. And at this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations:
Thanks a lot, Matt. Hello everyone and welcome to Qorvo's Third Quarter Fiscal 2016 Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure & Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to our fiscal 2016 third quarter earnings call. Revenue in the December quarter was approximately $620 million, consistent with our pre-announcement issued January 7th. Gross margin and operating margin held in at 47.9% and 25.3% respectively. Operating expenses were down sequentially, reflecting less variable compensation expense and seasonally lower spending. Qorvo generated approximately $156.5 million in free cash flow and repurchased $250 million of stock to enhance shareholder value. In infrastructure and defense, revenue increased sequentially with improved performance in Wireless Infrastructure. We expect this business to recover further in the near-term, reinforcing our top line growth opportunities in calendar 2016. Our IDP team continues to sharpen its focus on the highest-growth segments in its diversified business portfolio. This focus drives alignment with the growth markets of the Internet of Things, connected home, connected car and the high-growth segments within aerospace and defense. By leveraging Qorvo's comprehensive product and technology portfolio, we are providing customers highly differentiated solutions, especially exciting in the growth rate of GaN solutions into many of IDP's key market segments, driving a compound annual growth rate of approximately 25% for the next few years. We expect growth rates in 2016 to be well above IDP's underlying markets and significantly above the legacy growth rates of our pre-merger multi-market organizations. In mobile, the increasing global demand for broadband data and always-on connectivity continues to trigger a dramatic increase in the requirements for mobile networks and connected devices. For smartphone manufacturers and network operators, it's become increasingly difficult to capitalize on this demand while also solving new challenges related to frequency crowding, as carrier signals are aggregated, distinct bands and protocols are operated in narrowly adjacent frequency bands, and popular new consumer applications increase the congestion on our networks. For all these reasons, it's increasingly clear that the most effective solutions available to network operators and device manufacturers are better performing, more highly-integrated RF solutions. In fact, if you were to examine the product designs in development for tomorrow's networks and devices, you'd identify an increasing requirement for world-class filters, switches, tuners and amplifiers, all tightly packaged in system-level implementations. This is tilting the competitive playing field in Qorvo's favor. Said another way, the RF suppliers with today's best performing, most tightly integrated solutions are at the forefront of the most challenging and most lucrative customer designs this year, next year, and extending well into 2018. As customers increasingly require more tightly-integrated, high performance system-level solutions, this is favoring Qorvo's comprehensive portfolio of premium products. In fact, this is why we became Qorvo. Now, one year into the creation of Qorvo, the roughly 7,000 members of the Qorvo team have much to be proud of. Looking at our first full year, compared to calendar 2014, revenue grew 12%. Gross margin expanded more than 400 basis points, and operating income increased more than 40%. In fact, the non-GAAP earnings we reported over the last four quarters equates to a little over $4.60 per share based on our Q3 share count of approximately 144 million shares. On the design front, Qorvo is growing our dollar content in the most highly-anticipated marquee smartphones launching this year at our three largest mobile customers. It's worth pointing out that in December, we released the industry's first six-inch temp-comp SAW wafers in our Florida fab, qualified six-inch SAW wafers in our Greensboro fab, and demonstrated our first eight-inch BAW wafers in our Texas fab. We can't overstate how important these achievements are. We see our six-inch SAW capacity contributing to growth and profitability in the current year, and we see our eight-inch BAW capacity doing the same in 2017. We've commenced shipments of our recently launch BAW-based quadplexers for FDD bands 1 and 3, an industry first. And we demonstrated BAW-based hexaplexer prototypes. We've also been selected to support a number of key cellular platforms with our next-generation Envelope Tracking PMIC. We've commenced production shipments in support of a large global smartphone OEM and have landed a number of large-scale wins layering on later this year. We've also recently expanded our shipments of antenna control solutions into the China smartphone market. Previously, Qorvo's antenna tuners and impedance tuners had been highly concentrated within a small number of high-volume marquee devices. So we're thrilled to be increasing our addressable market in China as these customers add RF functionality to support their expanding presence in the worldwide market. In IDP, December was an exceptionally strong design win quarter. Here's some of the highlights. We captured multiple key design wins for macro and small cell base station applications. We believe network capacity constraints will accelerate the adoption of small cell base stations and massive MIMO active antennas. Massive MIMO active antenna systems are driving a 10x increase in RF content in next-generation base stations. We continue to work on capturing new design wins as the market shifts from 4G LTE to LTE-A, LTE-Pro and eventually 5G. At this year's Consumer Electronics Show, we supplied a suite of critical microwave components for a 5G massive MIMO demonstration performed by a leading base station OEM. The demo featured Qorvo phase shifters, power amplifiers and switches. We also expanded our presence in the connected home with key design wins in gateways and access points, highlighted by our design wins in flagship products at both NETGEAR and LINKSYS. We continue to believe that the rapidly increasing number of connected devices represented by the Internet of Things will be IDP's largest growth engine. In defense, we are market leader in GaN, and we continue to experience strong growth with our GaN-based products. For example, we secured a multi-year win on a next-generation electronic warfare system using our patented Spatium solid state RF power technology with GaN MMICs with hundreds of system installations anticipated over the life of the contract. On the synergy front, we continue to be on target to achieve our goals, the largest of which include the increased in-sourcing of module assembly and increased in-sourcing of SAW filters. So for Qorvo, across all our businesses, we believe industry fundamentals remain strong. We are leveraging our comprehensive product portfolio of world-class RF solutions, rapidly introducing new products and technologies, expanding into the new serviceable markets, and enjoying very favorable design win activity. We are growing our dollar content at our three largest mobile customers in the most highly anticipated marquee smartphones being released this year, and we anticipate strong growth in IDP. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Steve for a more detailed look at our financials.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Thanks, Bob. In the December quarter, Qorvo's revenue decreased 12% sequentially to $620 million. Mobile Products revenue declined 15% to $489 million, due to a lower customer demand for existing business we'd already won. In IDP, revenue grew slightly to $130 million. Qorvo had two 10% customers, the larger at approximately 42% of revenue, representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Our second 10% customer during the quarter was Huawei. Gross margin was 47.9%, down sequentially from 49.7%. The sequential decline reflects lower yields in inventory adjustments. Operating expenses were approximately $140 million for the December quarter, down $17 million sequentially. The decline was driven by reduced accruals for bonus expense and seasonally lower spending. Operating income was $156.9 million, or just over 25% of revenue. Net income for the December quarter was $148 million, or $1.03 per diluted share. Turning to the balance sheet, total cash and investments were over $1 billion, and cash flow from operations totaled $218 million. CapEx was $62 million, primarily to address growth in demand for our premium filters. Finally, the company repurchased approximately 4.6 million shares at a total cost of $250 million and has $750 million remaining in its share repurchase program. We're proud of Qorvo's first full year performance and excited about the opportunities in the coming year. We're introducing an expanded set of new products, combining switches and filters, and leveraging our broad set of competencies, including BAW filter and gallium nitride process technologies. All of this is creating exciting new growth opportunities for Qorvo. With the first full year of Qorvo now in the books, I'm pleased to report the company exceeded its targets for achievement of an exit run rate of $75 million in synergies and is on track for the previously committed $150 million run rate reduction by the end of calendar 2016. The largest remaining task is migration of all mobile segment parts to the company's China-based assembly and test facilities. Now let's turn to our business outlook. Qorvo currently believes demand environment in its end markets supports the following non-GAAP expectations for the quarter ending April 2. Quarterly revenue of approximately $600 million, gross margin of about 50%, net interest expense of about $15 million, tax rate at approximately 3%, and diluted earnings per share of $0.90 to $0.95 based on approximately 142 million shares. Our March revenue expectations are slightly below our pre-announcement, reflecting an overall conservative posture, given the cautious environment, as well as the timing of new product ramps. We think calendar 2016 will be a strong year for Qorvo, during which we will continue to make progress on our target operating model, while building a robust and defensible technology moat. Actual quarter results may differ from these expectations and as such – and such differences may be material. We currently expect to report March quarter results on May 4th. Now on a personal note, I'm turning 60 at the end of this year, and I've always had it as a personal goal to retire by that point. December also fortuitously marks the end of our second year as Qorvo, and I'm proud to say we're on track to achieve the goals we have set for our first two-year period. It's been a pleasure being part of Qorvo, and helping to shape its course. The company is on a fantastic trajectory, and I'm really looking forward to helping with the transition to new CFO and participating in the company's success over the balance of the year before moving on to more personal pursuits. With that, I'm going to hand the call back to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Steve. Before opening the call to questions, I want to take a moment to thank Steve for the invaluable role he's played in creating Qorvo. Steve has been instrumental in shaping our organization. He's helped put Qorvo on a very solid financial footing, and he's assembled an outstanding finance organization. The entire Qorvo team is stronger as a result of his contribution, and we are all very happy for him, as he looks to spend more time with his family and friends. Until then he'll play a major role in the selection of his successor and will continue to serve as Qorvo's CFO while the transition to that successor is completed. And with that, operator, we will now take questions.
Operator:
Thank you. At this time we'll take the first question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thank you for taking my question. Bob, when I look at your implied fiscal 2016 sales growth it was modest, and we all know because of the demand weakness around your largest customer. My question is that as we look out to fiscal 2017, how fast do you think the total – your addressable market can grow, and do you think you can match that growth?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. Thanks, Vivek. FY 2016, as you pointed out, has been a solid year for us, but maybe not as strong as what we had liked. But clearly, we had a few headwinds in the infrastructure market, and as you pointed out in a rather large customer. So moving off of that, we are very confident in the IDP business growing significantly faster than its underlying markets. James and his team have done a great job of realigning their product portfolio to drive above industry growth there. So I think you're going to see a very nice rebound in growth, beginning actually in the beginning of our fiscal 2017. As you commented on the – in the Eric's business, in the mobile phone business, clearly we've got a cautious view in the next couple of quarters as we look out in our guidance that we gave for this quarter along with the beginning of the next fiscal year. With that said, depending on the timing of new program ramps and our confidence in the wins that we already have at our largest three customers, I do believe the second half of FY 2017 will be very strong and should be above the industry growth rates.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
I see. And maybe, Bob, as a follow-up to that, when you use the word cautious or conservative around demand, is it that your customers are building fewer units than you thought before? Is it comment on your content at those customers? Is it a market share? What is giving you that caution?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. Thanks, Vivek. Let me start with – absolutely customers are building less phones than what we expected just a month ago even. So some of that is demand. I think what's also important to know is we didn't lose any sockets over the last four months that changed our outlook for the December quarter over the March quarter. So it's more volume. And I think we're also being careful in the timing of new marquee phones that are ramping. This quarter, when you gained significant share depending on the timing of those ramps, can influence our outlook as well. So when I say cautious, I'm thinking about that as well.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Got it. Just lastly as a clarification, for Steve, in terms of OpEx trajectory, I think Steve you mentioned cost synergies, but when I look at your OpEx guidance in the mid-$150 million, that's sort of flat versus last March, unless my math is wrong here. So where should we see the evidence of cost synergies? Where can we see that in your reported numbers? Thank you.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Sure. So if you look at the last four quarters, revenue's growing about 12%, OpEx has been basically flat. And so there really have been two uses for the OpEx synergies. First is, we have grown revenue and kept OpEx totally flat and so that's an accomplishment. The second key thing is we've reinvested in R&D. So if you look line-by-line in OpEx, you'll see SG&A is down significantly, R&D is up, roughly to a push, right, in terms of total dollars, but a much more productive avenue of spending. Apologies to my friends in the SG&A world, but we prefer to spend money in research and product development, and synergy achievement has allowed us to do that and that's going to translate into a faster growth rate in the future.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Yeah. Thank you.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Great question.
Vivek Arya - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thank you.
Operator:
At this time, we'll take a question from Cody Acree with Drexel.
Cody G. Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
Yeah. Thanks guys for taking my questions and Steve congratulations on your retirement plans. Maybe just back to the guidance, and as you look at what has changed over the last few weeks, is it more around your largest customer? Or have you seen any material month-to-month, week-to-week linearity changes in orders, maybe on a geographic or on a OEM basis?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. I'd say, Cody, again, customer demands are always changing that we see. As far as units being produced, I think – again, I think we're taking a cautious view. I think we've learned a few lessons from December, and I'd rather not get into calling out any specific customers at this time. And I'd also couple with that my comments about the demand that we're seeing on our new marquee phone ramps, and being cautious on that outlook as well.
Cody G. Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
I guess, Bob...
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
The caution is in mobile, not in IDP, just to be clear.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Correct. Yeah.
Cody G. Acree - Drexel Hamilton LLC:
I guess, is it more a matter of caution and conservatism? Or is it based on maybe what you're hearing from some of your peers? Or have you seen some tangible change in order rates in the last few weeks?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I would say nothing has really changed. The industry always goes up and down as you well know, Cody. So I don't know what you're driving at. We guided to $600 million, we feel very good about what we've just said, and we'll update you at the end of the quarter.
Operator:
At this time, we'll take a question from Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First one, I think I understand the dynamics of the top two OEMs pretty clearly, but looking at the Chinese OEMs, can you talk a little bit about the size of that business in the December quarter? How that trended in that quarter, and your expectation forward in the March quarter? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Eric, do you want to take that?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. Sure.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I'm assuming that was mobile related, Mike?
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Yeah.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. So in general of course we're very excited about the year we're looking forward to in China, really beginning to catch up on our share, our attach (23:14) there. We're ramping into production this quarter our third generation solution, RF Flex solution for that market, it's CA capable, and sort of aligned with what Bob was saying, a lot of those phones are ramping after the Lunar New Year, kind of second half of the March quarter. So that's when – we've got to see the exact rate and pace of that, but there's no question that the train is coming and our share is going to be increasing there throughout the year. We're also expecting a pretty good year in China generally. We see the subsidies being increased from the carriers, and also the requirements for received CA coming in throughout the year, which is going to drive a lot of unique solutions that I think we're very well positioned to provide.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
James, do you want to add any color from your perspective on China?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Yeah. Mike, this is James Klein. We are seeing some rebound in the infrastructure market in China. I think overall we're up about 18% quarter-over-quarter in that part of the market. And I know we've talked about that for the last three or four quarters. And we're also seeing positive book-to-bill, and this is the first time we've seen a positive book-to-bill in that part of the market as well. So it looks like there's some recovery in the infrastructure side beginning to happen.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Great. And then turning to Steve, on gross margins, can you talk a little bit about the puts and takes for gross margins? What's driving the improvement in the March quarter and going forward? Is it utilization in March, or mix, and how should we be thinking about modeling margins on a contribution basis going forward?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I think margins have been roughly around 50%. Your mileage varies every quarter for 101 different reasons of mix and whatever goes on in the quarter. In the quarter we just completed, we had a couple of yield issues. And also December tends to be a higher quarter for excess and obsolete, as our customers in mobile separate the winners from the losers, and sometimes we've got to write off a little inventory from the losers. And so, that I think was a one-off kind of a 200 basis point hit to margins in the December quarter. And so it's really coming back to where we're running naturally, is around 50%. As you know our long-term goal is to move margins up to 55% and we are hard at work at both developing and implementing parts of our manufacturing cost reduction road map, including some significant changes in filter wafer sizes and significant activities there. And finally, our completion of our synergies, moving the former TriQuint mobile portfolio, assembly and test activity into China. So I think there's some good stuff on the longer-term horizon. Next quarter, I think we kind of come back to our current run rate which is right around 50%.
Operator:
At this time, we'll take a question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey guys. I wanted a little bit of clarification. I think you guys touched upon this earlier, marquee handsets, you see strong demand in the second half, Bob. I was curious if these designs have been won and also what kind of visibility do you have for that September, December quarter ramp?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. Thanks Harsh. As I said in my opening comments, plus we put in our press release, we feel very good about the design wins that we have in our top three customers, marquee phones that are launching this year. Some of those phones begin ramping later in this quarter and we'll see some others as you typically see launches throughout the year, and clearly they are in the second half. So I feel we have very good visibility into that. Again, I think timing of any marquee phone can vary, and when phones ramp at the end of the quarters, they can influence which quarter they fall in. Depending on also which subcons you're shipping into. But Harsh, we feel very good about the wins, and feel very good about the second half of fiscal 2017 for our mobile products.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Thank you, Bob. And then as a follow-up, maybe going to Steve, Steve you did a $250 million buyback. Was that basically on plan with what you were thinking going into the quarter, or did you get more aggressive because of where you saw the stock at? And, also, the $750 million that you were talking about, that you have left, Steve, is there a time fuse on it? Does it have to be done in a certain way? Would you just take us over those criterias?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I'd be delighted to. Well, I'd say that, second quarter pretty much worked out as planned and we do have some interest in sub-dollar costing concepts, but we're also opportunistic. So December was as planned. The formal buyback program has nine more months left to go. Now you and I both know that's the stroke of a pen with the Board of Directors but that's the current plan of record. And I do believe that at the current price when you look at the history consensus and the cost of our stock I think it's an attractive opportunity.
Operator:
At this time, we'll move to Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.:
Hi, thank you for taking my question. I have one short one and then a follow up. The first one is regarding some of the design wins that you've talked about at your three – the three largest mobile customers. Can you maybe provide some granularity as to where you've gained the content and by how much?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Well, I'll tell you what Toshi, I appreciate your question. We'll do our best without giving away too much competitive advantage, and I'll let Eric get little more specific but it's broad-based, and it's across multiple products that we offer to the market. So don't think of it as just power amplifiers or just switches or just tuners or just Diversity Receive Modules, et cetera. But it's pretty diverse. But I don't know Eric, if we can comment.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Good. Yeah, that's really the key point. There are certainly some, particular slots that are very high dollar value, but it's the real strength I think in the design wins and this goes across all three of the customers. The things we're looking to ramp this year is just the diversity of the applications that we're providing. As you know with our technologies we have in-house, we have access to virtually the entire RF Front End, and so we're able to architect complete solutions and more and more as we go throughout this year you're going to see more adoption of more like a complete solution from Qorvo. So it includes, as Bob said, not just the kind of traditional power amplifier and switch, and even filter markets, but antenna tuning is definitely continuing to increase and going down into the mid-tier now, so there's a lot of opportunity there. And we mentioned ET power management as well. We're starting to see ET kick back in and move into other parts of the portfolio and other base band suppliers. So you add all this together with the diversity modules and the RF Fusion modules and Flex and so forth, we just have a broad portfolio. And we're winning in each of those areas.
Toshiya Hari - Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.:
Okay, great. Thank you. And my follow up is regarding the Qualcomm-TDK joint venture, how do you view that joint venture from a competitive standpoint? I'm guessing the impact in the short-term is minimal if anything. But I was curious more how you viewed the landscape on a longer-term basis? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Thanks Toshi. I think on the long-term we would also echo your comments. And, in fact, it opens up opportunities for us. If you look at our – Qorvo along with our competitors, there's a couple of interesting things that we all perform across multiple baseband manufacturers and work with them. And on TDK, as you well know, has been working with several of those manufacturers as well and, quite honestly, it's hard for us to think that a MediaTek or, pick whoever else you want, is going to be able to share with them their front-end designs and their architectures when they know everything that they tell them is going to basically be given the Qualcomm and their RF360 front-end. So we actually look at this and go this is probably going to open up some opportunities for us. We've made our investments in our filters, clearly us and our two largest competitors buy from TDK and, quite honestly, we're just going to insource more of our own filters. We're bringing up 6-inch. So we think it's going to help our P&L as well. It's going to accelerate the movements that we're making there. But net-net, at a high level, nothing's really changed. That's been their partner since day one. They build their modules, build the – use filters, et cetera. So if anything, we're looking at it and going wow, this could open up some other doors for us.
Operator:
At this time, we'll take a question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks. Eric, yeah, you just said there were more adoption of complete solutions. What does that mean? Does that mean more individual components at your largest customers? Or are the second and third tier OEMs moving more to integrated parts like pads or flex or fusion away from the streets? And then James, you were seeing rebound in infrastructure. Is that predominantly in China? Or is it more widespread than that, and is it exclusively 4G? Or are you seeing a wider rebound?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Eric, go ahead first.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Sure. Yes, so what I was referring to Ed is, literally a transition where we're working with our largest customers, as well as some of the chipset providers as well to propose literally complete solutions. So we have Qorvo part numbers that span the entire RF Front End and it's a question just rate and pay to how soon we're able to bring each of the pieces in, and get them to fit with the exact configurations that each individual customer is looking forward essentially. But going from a mode where someone else's architecting the front-end and giving us specs, and we're responding to those, maybe influencing them to where from the very beginning they say okay, architect the full front-end for us that does X, Y, and Z. Okay. And base station recovery, I would say it's broad-based across the OEMs, some are little more than others. It's sometimes difficult for us to know exactly where our components go in to what market. But as we look at what our customers are saying, it would appear that that recovery is based somewhat in China. And then I didn't hear the second part of your question?
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Is it mostly 4G base stations?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, mostly 4G base stations. One other thing I would say though is we are seeing a significant amount of interest in LTE-A and LTE Pro. We're seeing our multi-MIMO or massive-MIMO system starting to get demonstrations happening. So there's a lot of other things that also show that that market in general is starting to gather some strength, and a little bit in small cell as well.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Great. And then, Eric, follow-up to you if I could. You mentioned in the prepared remarks that Envelope Tracking looks like it might be ramping. Can you remind us, was that material? Has ET been material through revenue line last year or so? And then it sounds like you're ramping in more than one major OEM, or these big, flagship product launches or I'm trying to get a scale of what this is, and I know you don't like to talk ASPs, but just give us an idea of what the revenue opportunity in a TAM kind of sense would be for Envelope Tracking? And then a follow-up on tuning if I could?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. So as you know, we had ramped ET pretty successfully into one of the leading OEMs a couple of years ago now. I don't remember the exact timing, but for the past several quarters those phones had ramped down and it's not been meaningful at all. So now it's being re-invigorated. We've got a new version coming out and we're ramping with one of our leading customers currently as we speak with that technology and it will be proliferating throughout their portfolio and potentially moving to other OEMs throughout the year.
Operator:
At this time, we'll move along to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thanks a lot. Sorry to beat a dead horse, but just in some of the, maybe shortfall, on the March quarter versus maybe what you're thinking a month ago, are you suggesting that it's the timing of the ramp here is just pushed out a little bit. So at the end of the day you just get it, it's just in a different quarter? Am I understanding that right or am I reading too much into it?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I'll take a shot at that, Steve. At a higher level, I would say it's the demand from customers first, and then the timing of the new product ramps. So I would weigh it a little bit differently maybe than the way you commented there.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay, great. And then just in terms of IDP, in terms of new products, particularly around gallium nitride, can you talk a little bit about how you see the power amplifier market developing there? How much you think you'll play in that, and gain versus LDMOS replacement timing?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Let me talk broadly about the power amp market for GaN. First of all, the fastest part of that market growth is really in the defense side, and there were obviously actively participating number one in the market, tremendous amount of products getting released. Really to cover a broad spectrum of low frequency high power all the way up into products that are covering K-band. So, great coverage for us in the defense side, great growth for us in the defense side and very broad based. In the base station, if you look at what's some of the forecasts around the industry, it's projected that GaN will overtake LDMOS as far as total size, somewhere in the next, maybe, three years or four years. So substantial growth in GaN, LDMOS will continue to decline. And that's driven by the trends that we've been talking about for the last several quarters, a continuing increase in bandwidth, the move to massive MIMO, all of those sort of things are going to drive GaN more and more into this marketplace. And as far as our positioning, we've got products out there released across multiple different bands and we're engaged with the majority of the top OEMs in the space.
Operator:
At this time we'll move to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to go back to the December miss. Your largest customer wasn't down that much sequentially, I was wondering how much of the Android world contributed to that $100 million miss in December.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Blayne, as far as expectations when we provided guidance to where we ended up, let's call it the non-Android part of the world.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Okay. And then just on the gross margin and then the related inventories, you talked about writing off some and then inventory still moved up. So just Steve, if you could talk about where you would like to get inventories to and if you could just quantify how much you did write-off in the quarter.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. The reason inventory didn't perform very well is we had a last minute reduction in the demand for our product. So we built the product and then we weren't able to ship it at the end of the quarter. So that's why our turns were up at 3.3, which is not anywhere near our expectations. We think turns ought to be north of 4. For sure, we think we can achieve that, but I would say the December quarter is somewhat of an anomaly due to the rather abrupt reduction in demand from a particular large customer. And in terms of the write-off, it was about $4 million. Rather bigger than typical, but not a huge amount. The 200 basis point miss in margins had a greater impact from yield than write-off of excess and obsolete, but it was a factor.
Operator:
Next question will be from Tim Long with BMO Capital Markets.
Timothy Patrick Long - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Thank you. Appreciate it. Just two if I could. Could you talk a little bit on the mobile business? You covered China pretty well. How do you think things are going in the non-China emerging markets for your customers? And then back to the cost synergies, it sounds like a little ahead for the first year. Just curious, to get to that $150 million through the end of this fiscal year, what does the linearity look like for that? Would that be more back-end loaded, or do you think we could see some of that coming in the earlier part of next fiscal year? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. This is Eric. So if I understood your question, it was about the non-China emerging markets, and that is an interesting question. I think that's something that's going to percolate throughout the year. We think roughly 50 million units of 4G smartphones could be consumed in that kind of emerging market outside of China. The majority of those will be provided by our current customers, of course, in a lot of the China brands. And one of the things that's interesting as China is moving towards five-mode or full-mode handsets, those customers are getting better and better at including really complex RF in there. And so when we look to these new emerging markets, instead of taking a traditional approach or doing kind of a real stripped down, low-cost phone, they're generally starting with their full-mode phones and adding the bands for those regions to them. And that's one of the things that's driving the antenna tuner demand we've talked about in China. Between that and the fact that they're also adopting very high quality global look and feel, if you will, handsets that have metal cases, for example, all the same things that drove antenna tuning into the highest tier, really that's where our China-based customers are taking their products for all of these 4G markets.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
And with respect to the timing of the remaining synergies, largely in the second half of the calendar year. While we talk about moving ex-TriQuint mobile parts, what it really amounts to is beginning new mobile parts in the factory that they're going to be tested and assembled in. And so it's the significant new product launches that happen in the fall that drive our ability to achieve those synergies.
Timothy Patrick Long - BMO Capital Markets (United States):
Okay. Thank you.
Operator:
Moving forward we'll hear from Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Yes. Thanks. Congrats on the earnings preservation despite the variable revenues. First question is on half year split. So calendar 2015 first half and second half split is actually about 50/50 in terms of revenues. Steve, in the past, you've made good calls in terms of splits. Just wondering if you have thoughts on this calendar year?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
I'm going to stay away from that this time. The merger of RFMD and TriQuint, the numbers are a little different. And then there's so much impact in terms of how successful certain large customers are with their launches that I'm not confident enough to give you a fearless forecast.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Is it between 45/55 and 50/50 then, or – that's been the range historically. I have to try.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. Yeah. I appreciate the effort.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
Okay. Well, I get a follow-up then. So...
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. For sure.
Ian L. Ing - MKM Partners LLC:
For James, IDT, base stations up 18%, that's a good chunk of that segment. So what actually declined a bit in the quarter and is that decline transient, James? Thanks.
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
We saw a little bit of a slowdown in our transport business and that was probably one of the biggest offsets. Some of that was associated with the normal decrease in our pricing as we go through volume cuts. Some of that, we think was a little bit of inventory correction in that part of the business. But I would say that was the most significant offset. And to tell you the truth, we had in that part of the transport business, we had a really strong first half in our cable part of the business and it's returned to sort of what I would call normal level through the back half. So it's between those two things that was predominate shift.
Operator:
At this time we'll take a question from Srini Pajjuri with CLSA Securities.
Srinivas Reddy Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC:
Thank you. Steve, a question on CapEx. It came down a bit in the quarter. I'm just wondering how we should think about the CapEx for the next few quarters? And also, if the Qualcomm-TDK JV, wondering if that will have any impact on your CapEx?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. So I'll answer the second question first. The answer is no. With regards to the first, you know I think that $60 million a quarter is a pretty fair run rate. It might be $70 million a quarter, but it's somewhere in that ZIP code and the majority of that will be for filter capacity expansion; some of the wafer size increases where we're moving SAW and TC-SAW from four inch wafers to six-inch; BAW from six-inch wafers to eight-inch and expanding our SAW footprint into the factory here in North Carolina.
Srinivas Reddy Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC:
Okay. Got it. And then maybe for Bob. Bob you mentioned that you were prototyping hexaplexers. Just curious as to when you'd think you'll be shipping them for production. And also a follow-up to that, as you go from discrete filters to quad and hex, what happens to your ASP? The question is, I mean, as you go from four discretes to quad, does it just quadruple or do you see additional increase in your ASP? Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Go ahead Eric.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
All right. So I'll answer the second question first. There's definitely a premium in the integration. A quadplexer is far more than just four filters put together. The circuit design, the ability to actually assemble them and maintain performance and so forth is critical. So there is a definite premium over just adding the number of filters together. And regarding the hexaplexer, that's really going to be determined by the need for 3CA and higher modes in the phones and to the customers we ship. We think we'll have readiness, second half of this year with the hexaplexers and so we could see production as early as this fall or definitely in calendar 2017.
Operator:
And now we will move to Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho. Please go ahead.
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Yeah. Hi, guys. Just looking at – you mentioned on the mobile side, there is a slight step down in demand. Just wondering was it – has it been slowing down all the last month or was it a step down? And also when you look at the March quarter, is your implied OpEx actually going up, sequentially?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Steve, you take the OpEx. But as far as customer demand goes, as Steve even commented about our inventory just a little bit ago, it came at the end of the quarter and kind of continued for a while. We believe we've seen the bottom. We're taking a cautious view on this quarter and as we look out into June and again, I think the big story here is our IDP business is returning to growth year-over-year. And from the perspective of the mobile business, we've locked down the design wins that we need to drive a strong second half in FY 2017.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. For OpEx, I think we're going to end up in the high $140 millions, maybe $150 million in the March quarter and then we'll go through our planning process of looking at subsequent year. We'll clearly grow our OpEx well below the rate of revenue growth, but we'll talk more about that next time we have a call and we'll have completed our annual planning process.
Vijay R. Rakesh - Mizuho Securities USA, Inc.:
Got it. And then when you look at your six-inch mix, as you ramp that where do you see that exiting 2016 on the SAW side? And if you can give us some color on how the eight-inch ramp looks on BAW, let's say exiting calendar 2016? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. As far the conversion for four-inch to six-inch, again, we disqualified the process. So we're getting those designed in and it depends on – sorry, the timing of new program ramps and things like that. But it will not be the majority at the end of 2016 as far as temp comp SAW six-inch goes in Florida, and then we're bringing up the six-inch in Greensboro that will be in production this year. As far as eight-inch goes, as I said in my opening comments, for BAW filters, we will be converting this year over to eight-inch and beginning the ramps in 2017.
Operator:
At this time we'll hear from Edward Snyder from Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks. To caution on your flagship phone shipping later this quarter, is that timing of a launch of all the models or are you more exposed to specific SKUs with a lot of content gain, so you don't know when those are shipping. And then Bob you just said that BAW would ramp on eight-inch in 2017, so essentially you'll be on six-inch in BAW for production in 2016. Is that – how should we you take that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
That's correct, Ed. On the BAW filters, we're on six-inch, we're bringing up the eight-inch line and now. We're qualified – get qualified with the customers and ramp in 2017, that's correct. And as far as the flagship phones, Eric anything?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. And it's not related to any specific SKUs, any geographical SKUs, Ed.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Okay. So it's just global. And then Steve, you mentioned (48:36)
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
...share gains coming on a new platform and the timing of that is already naturally back-end loaded in the quarter, then you have to be a little conservative about exactly how that ramp is going to go.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Yeah. And I know you you've added a few flagships to the phone (48:50), that's why I was trying to get to sort of the whole, whole ramp that maybe fall other side of the quarter. And Steve, you had mentioned yield problems, is that gas filters or SOI?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah. I'm not going to go into the details of the specifics, but they were – once in a while, you hit those. They were both confined to the quarter and have been resolved.
Operator:
And at this time, we'll take a question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey guys. Thanks for allowing me ask a follow-up here. Real quickly, Steve you mentioned $15 million of OpEx – I'm sorry, interest expense guide. How do we think about that on a full year number? Do we just roll that or is there something built in into that number?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
No that's a good go-forward number. That's a very reasonable number.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
So for each quarter, $15 million?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Yeah.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Okay.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
And yeah, that's a very fair number and that's why we wanted to make sure we guided it. I want to note that we only had half of a quarter's worth in December. So that's the jump, sequentially.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Got it. And then the second question was regards to the – previously, in a couple of quarters, you had margins as high as 51%. Now that IDP is starting to come back for you, how do you feel about, with all these cost cuts, I mean these in-sourcing actions that you've got going on, and maybe this IDP piece coming back strongly, how do you feel about the margin profile as you go out?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer:
Long-term, we have a goal to get to 55%. I think it's a goal founded on some significant cost reduction opportunities. And you're right, with IDP coming back, that's accretive to our overall margins and it'll be very helpful. For the quarter coming up, I think we'll be at 50% and there's lots of small puts and takes, but I think that's where the company is operating at roughly over the last four quarters or so. But again, I see a good opportunity for the company to get to 55% and growth in IDP is surely going to help.
Operator:
And that does conclude the question and answer session. At this time, I will turn the call back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
We'd like to thank everyone for joining us this evening. We are looking forward to seeing many of you at upcoming conferences and at Mobile World Congress in a few weeks in Barcelona. Thanks again for your time, and good night.
Operator:
Once again, this does conclude today's conference call. Thank you all for your participation.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
Analysts:
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC Adam Gonzalez - Bank of America Merrill Lynch Gabriela Borges - Goldman Sachs & Co. Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc. Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc. Srini R. Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC Amanda M. Scarnati - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker) Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Thomas Robert Diffely - D. A. Davidson & Co. Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc. Thomas Sepenzis - Northland Securities, Inc.
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo Incorporated Second Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I turn the conference over to your host, to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Douglas DeLieto - Vice President-Investor Relations:
Thanks very much, Corrine. Hello, everybody, and welcome to our September 2015 quarterly earnings call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as the risk factors associated with our business and our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, www.qorvo.com, under Investors. In fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our Fiscal 2016 Second Quarter Earnings Call. Qorvo's revenue in the September quarter increased approximately 5.2% sequentially to $708 million. In mobile products, revenue grew 5% sequentially and 19% year-over-year driven by large customer product ramps. In infrastructure and defense, revenue grew 6% sequentially and declined 13% year-over-year with wireless infrastructure down approximately $24 million versus last year. Supporting Qorvo's future growth across all segments, the global appetite for mobile data continues to expand placing a greater premium on the limited frequency spectrum available to support that demand. This is a global mega trend that remains early in adoption and it's bigger than smartphones or smartphone product cycles. It is favoring the leading suppliers of premium RF solutions and it will have far reaching implications on how we interact within our communities, access content and transact commerce. For smartphone manufacturers, the use case for smartphones continues to shift to more data intensive applications. The phone we once used for voice and texting, we are now using for streaming videos and media conferencing. Soon the cellular air waves will be home to immersive virtual reality content and other data hungry cloud-based applications. For network operators, the limited frequency spectrum they have deployed is their most precious asset. The continuing increase in the global demand for mobile data is driving network operators to seek new ways to optimize spectral efficiency and improve network capacity. Regardless of the device or application, the appetite for mobile data continues to expand and that's increasing the economic value of RF to our customers and to our customers' customers. To accommodate that demand and fuel our growth, Qorvo's investing in the industry's broadest portfolio of enabling technologies and products. We're putting an increasing number of highly integrated system-level solutions in our customers' hands, and we're working closely with leading wireless carriers and infrastructure OEMs to help them increase throughput and enhance their competitive positions. Qorvo today is at the forefront of multiple long-term trends. In mobile products, we're capturing new opportunities as smartphones migrate from feature and value 4G devices to premium 4G and performance 4G smartphones. These performance and premium 4G devices contain up to $20 of RF content versus $2 to $3 in the lower end devices. They represent less than one-third of the smartphones built this year and they're continuing to increase as a percentage of the mix as smartphone units grow. Those measuring generic smartphone unit growth are missing an important distinction. The greatest growth driver for RF suppliers is the RF content inside the smartphone and that's what's growing. We're adding new bands of coverage and enabling increasing levels of performance and that's driving unprecedented levels of functional density in Qorvo's most highly integrated products. Take for example the deployment of carrier aggregation, which is adding RF content first in the receive path and later in the transmit path. Carrier aggregation is being pulled by the carriers to help maximize their investments in frequency spectrum. This is increasing the content and the complexity in the device and that's creating new opportunities for RF suppliers. For Qorvo, this is placing a premium on our higher performance filters and switches, while also giving us clear visibility in the customer architectures that will be supporting the majority of the RF TAM growth in 2016 and 2017. We're also seeing a steady migration from 3-mode LTE to 5-mode and 6-mode LTE among smartphone manufacturers in China. Last year, it was estimated that fewer than half of the 4G devices were 5-mode, and we expect 5-mode and 6-mode devices to represent the majority in the next year. Again, this is incremental to the growth we're seeing in the RF TAM as 4G devices become a larger percentage of that total handset mix. Layering on top of that, Qorvo has introduced new, highly integrated solutions that incorporate multiple dollars of content, including filters, switches and PAs. These parts enhance performance and reduce product footprint. We've already locked down several wins, including at our largest Korean customer, and the ramps begin early next calendar year. As an example, we're combining premium BAW filters with high performance switches to intersect the growing market for diversity receive modules. The diversity market today is valued at approximately $1 billion and is dominated by lower performance SAW filter technology. It's expected to double over the next three years as an increasing number of these solutions require premium BAW filter content. We're also uniquely positioned to reduce cost and enhance our operating model. Our two largest synergy opportunities remain the in-sourcing of packaging, assembly and test, and the in-sourcing of SAW filters. We estimate these represent greater than $60 million in annualized savings. They're progressing on schedule and the benefit is expected to favorably impact results beginning early next year. Now before handing the call over to Steve for a review of the financials, let's look at some quarterly highlights. In mobile, we were very successful during the quarter securing expanded content opportunities on marquee smartphones launching in calendar year 2016 and 2017. We entered the BAW-based multiplexer market with a family of quadplexers for smartphones supporting carrier aggregation in China and Europe. Those parts are sampling at leading customers and we expect production volumes beginning in the spring. Collaborating with our leading channel partners in China, we also captured multiple reference design wins on next-generation LTE reference designs for multimode PAs, multimode transmit modules, switches, duplexers and multiplexers. In China, while we believe we've seen the underlying market fundamentals begin to rebound, we remain cautious and believe we've embedded conservative expectations in our forward guidance related to China-based handset demand. Qorvo has excellent long-term opportunities in China as smartphones continue to proliferate, as customers in China increase the number of phones they export and as the RF content in China-based smartphones continues to expand. Looking at IDP, we enjoyed strong design win activity and signed multiple long-term supply agreements in defense and aerospace. In connectivity, we secured multiple high value 5 gigahertz PA and filter slots. And in transport, we won an increasing percentage of DOCSIS 3.1 sockets leveraging best-in-class efficiency, bandwidth and power. One achievement of note in cable TV, Qorvo was especially strong where hybrid GaAs and GaN power doublers, saving operators 15 watts to 20 watts. These solutions mix and match our legacy technologies and capability and they're especially strong in power efficiency and needed in applications where power consumption is everything. In wireless infrastructure, Qorvo was an active participant in pre-5G and 5G demos at major OEMs and we sampled the five leading base station customers our breakthrough GaN high power amplifiers. We're also continuing to see incremental opportunities for growth driven by small cell deployments and the uptake of our SOI switches and GaN HPAs at leading base station OEMs. In China, we saw industry fundamentals begin to improve and believe base station customer activity bottomed in the September quarter. We're taking a cautious view on wireless infrastructure in our December guidance and expect the recovery to be gradual. Now, looking a bit further out in time, I want to spend a few minutes highlighting how our IDP organization has essentially repositioned itself to accelerate growth above what our legacy IDP businesses had achieved historically. As you know, IDP is structured around a diverse portfolio of businesses, all leveraging Qorvo's shared core competencies and focused on winning with premium products using highly differentiated internally developed technologies. To accelerate growth in IDP, we're increasing our focus on automotive, Internet of Things, data centers and Wi-Fi, and we're increasing our resources in those value streams. We're also targeting segments that don't appear to enjoy the same dynamic growth but have large niches that can be exploited with differentiated products based on Qorvo's technology. A few examples include Qorvo's GaN-based products in the base station market, in the traveling wave tube replacement to the defense and commercial markets, using our patent protected Spatium Solid State products. We're especially enthusiastic about GaN as a disruptive technology. We're continuing to penetrate the defense market with our expanding family of GaN-based products and we're increasing our leading market share as measured by strategy analytics. In automotive, we expect that by the year 2020, 75% of the automobiles shipped will feature connectivity. That would equate to a market of approximately 69 million cars and a CAGR of 45%. IDP is uniquely positioned in this market to deliver amplifiers and premium filtering solutions to tier one automotive suppliers. In telecom and datacom, Infonetics forecast 100G ports will grow to over 4 million units by 2020, a 75% CAGR driven by the expansion of cloud and hyperscale data centers. We fabricate our low power linear drivers by using proprietary semiconductor processes that push the state-of-the-art in power consumption and bandwidth. In Wi-Fi, where the CAGR is forecasted to be 18% through 2020, we're winning by enabling higher frequency performance and higher data rates and by solving complex spectrum congestion challenges with our market leading 5 gigahertz PAs and BAW filters. In the rapidly expanding vision of the Internet of Things, industry sources are forecasting over 25 billion connected devices by 2020, resulting in a 65% CAGR. This includes over 3 billion units for the connected home, which alone accounts for a projected $50 billion market for connectivity circuits. Many of these applications are undefined architecturally but will require RF solutions similar to what we provide today to the Wi-Fi and automotive segments. And finally, we look to pre-5G and 5G infrastructure upgrades. Ericsson has estimated that by 2020, communications infrastructure capacity will need to increase by a factor of 1,000. That's a staggering undertaking and base station OEMs are experimenting with infrastructure solutions that operate in the millimeter wave spectrum to help them achieve these goals. These solutions will require advanced semiconductor geometries and leading-edge packaging, which are areas where our internal research is focused today. The pre-5G market is being driven by carriers looking to optimize existing spectrum through the use of small cells, distributed antenna systems, MIMO active antenna technology and carrier aggregation. These systems are readily served by new Qorvo amplifier products, using our production proven GaN technology. In fact, we're already sampling these products today to leading infrastructure OEMs. So, looking from a high level, IDP is targeting the highest growth segments within their diversified businesses with compelling premium solutions using highly differentiated internally developed technologies. They're moving the organization forward from pre-merger levels, where both companies saw low growth trajectories, to today where we see IDP on a path to grow their business two times to three times those legacy growth rates. So for Qorvo across all of our businesses the industry fundamentals and our unique competitive positioning give us ample opportunity for significant growth. Our products and technologies are tightly aligned with customers, channel partners and carriers and our design win traction in our first year as Qorvo has been very promising, finishing the year extremely strong. Looking into 2016, we're confident we will expand our content across marquee smartphones and leading reference designs and will position to accelerate growth in IDP's target markets. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Steve for a more detailed look of our financials.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Thanks, Bob. In the September quarter, Qorvo grew revenue 12% year-on-year, $708 million when compared to RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. Year-over-year growth was led by mobile, up 19% to $578 million. In IDP, revenue declined 13% year-over-year to $129 million due to the $24 million year-over-year decline in wireless infrastructure revenue. Outside of wireless infrastructure, IDP revenue grew approximately 6% year-on-year. Qorvo had two 10% customers, the larger at approximately 41% of revenue representing the aggregate demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Our second 10% customer during the quarter was Huawei. Gross margin was 49.7%, down sequentially from 51.5% and up from 47.4% in the prior year period for RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. Product mix drove the sequential decline. Operating expenses were $156.8 million for the September quarter, down $2 million sequentially. Year-on-year, operating expenses grew at half the rate of revenue growth. Within OpEx, R&D grew 14% sequentially as we pursued major growth opportunities, while sales and marketing and general administrative expenses declined. I should say grew 14% year-on-year. The realization of synergies is allowing Qorvo to appropriately invest in product and process development, while driving towards our operating expense model. Operating income was $194.8 million, up 28% from the year ago period for RFMD and TriQuint combined. This strong growth was led by our mobile products business unit, which on a preliminary basis, achieved about 30% operating income, while growing the top line by 19%. Net income for the September quarter was $183.3 million or $1.22 per diluted share. This compares favorably to our original guidance of $1.10 per diluted share. Turning to the balance sheet, total cash and investments were $195.6 million and cash flow from operations totaled $168.8 million. Capital expenditures were $80.3 million, primarily to address growth and demand for our premium filters. Finally, the company repurchased approximately 9.1 million shares at a total cost of $500 million. This week our board authorized a new one year $1 billion share repurchase program, which we plan to implement on an opportunistic basis. In the nine months since Qorvo's formation, revenue has grown 25% from the same period in the prior year, while non-GAAP operating income has nearly doubled. We're proud of this performance and are excited about our opportunities in the coming year. Synergy achievement is on track, led by the consolidation of test and assembly into our China operations. We're introducing an expanded set of new products combining switches and filters and leveraging our broad set of competencies, including BAW filter and gallium nitride process technologies, and all of this is creating exciting new growth opportunities for Qorvo. Now let's turn to our business outlook. Qorvo believes the current demand environment and its end products support the following non-GAAP expectations for the quarter ending January 2, 2016. Quarterly revenue of approximately $720 million to $730 million, gross margin of approximately 50%, a tax rate of approximately 10% and diluted earnings per share in the range of $1.25 to $1.30, based on approximately 147 million shares. We think calendar 2016 will be a strong year for Qorvo and believe we will fully achieve our target operating model of 30% operating income over the full year, while building a robust and defensible technology mote. Actual quarterly results may differ from these expectations and such differences may be material. We currently expect to report December quarter results on February 4. With that, we welcome your questions.
Operator:
Thank you. And we'll take our first question from Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Hey. Thanks for taking my questions. First, can you help us understand the components that came in a little stronger for you in the September quarter? Was it broadly a little better or maybe concentrated on a single customer? And then looking at your December guide, you typically have your top customers seeing strength, your top Korean customer declining. I'm interested in what you're seeing from the Chinese OEMs in the December quarter? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Mike. From a overall business perspective, both the IDP business and the mobile business did a little bit better than planned. It was, I would say, a little bit broader based. In regards to China, I'll go ahead and let Eric talk a little bit more about this business for the December guide, but I think you have the moving pieces within our business fairly well understood as far as how you describe what was going on in December, but...
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. In China, for the mobile group, I think we are beginning to see some improvement. For sure, it's good, not great yet. But we're definitely seeing a bit of a rebound as Bob said. Inventory levels are definitely in check now. The 4G adds have been very, very stable so we're starting to see a pick up. Design win activity in particular is very, very strong right now. That's not going to affect the December quarter particularly. But early 2016, I think we'll see a really nice rebound.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Thanks. And then if I could sneak in a second. If – can you comment on your views of your relationship with Samsung and MediaTek? Bob, you said Samsung was a sore spot for you guys in 2015 and MediaTek held some great promise as it ramped its second gen LTE solutions. Can you update us on those relationships? And how you expect those platforms to develop for you in calendar 2016 versus the overall market growth? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I'd love to, Mike, but Eric would probably strangle me. I think he really wants to talk about this. This is a real bright spot in what he's worked on this year.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Well, yeah. Yeah, you're right. That's been a real focus area for us. And first of all, I want to point out, Mike, there's never been any issue with the relationships. So it hasn't been about relationships at all. In fact we're – we've had very long and deep relationships across all tiers of both of those companies. It's been about product placement and having the right products for them. And as you know, Samsung made the leap up the integration curve a generation earlier than we thought. We weren't ready as TriQuint and RFMD, but that's exactly why we formed Qorvo. We worked hard all year and I'm much, much more happy with the content opportunities we're going to see early 2016 with Samsung; and really, the same applies to MediaTek. We entered phase two a quarter or two behind our largest competitor. We're now a quarter or two further down the road. We're seeing tremendous design activity there and I think we're going to see the share come back to where it ought to be on MediaTek as well, early 2016.
Mike A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC:
Great. Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll move onto our next question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Adam Gonzalez - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Hi. This is Adam Gonzalez dialing in on behalf of Vivek. Thanks for taking my question. First, I just wanted to ask on the IDP segment, I know that there's been some varying views on the health of the China base station recovery. NXP and Freescale are saying it's weak. Xilinx is saying it's stabilizing. IDT is saying it's growing. What's your reality as you see it?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
James, would you like to take that?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Yeah. This is James. As Bob said, I think we saw it stabilize, bottom out in September, and we're starting to see signs of it picking back up as we go into this quarter. We'll see growth in that area quarter-over-quarter and it appears to be a fairly broad based return. We're seeing orders out of – growth out of most of the OEMs – so looks like it's the final stage. Now we're being pretty cautious on how quickly it's going to recover.
Adam Gonzalez - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Great. Thanks. And I guess my second question would be more on the mobile side. But is 10% plus, I guess the 10% to 15% long-term growth rate you've stated for that segment, is that still valid for calendar 2016? Or do you see that maybe slowing down to the lower end of that range? Just your thoughts on that. Thanks.
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
So, our view is that the market opportunity for us is in the 10% to 15% range. Over the next few years, we expect to be in line or better than that.
Adam Gonzalez - Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Great. Thanks.
Operator:
Next question will come from Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs.
Gabriela Borges - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Great. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the solid results. Maybe just a little more detail on the opportunities that you have for content growth if you could. Do you expect these to materialize over the course of the year or be more weighted towards the first half or the second half? And then to the extent you're willing to comment broadly on the degree of visibility you have into designs for the second half, that would also be helpful. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
All right. I believe that was mobile product centric or just...
Gabriela Borges - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
That's right. Yeah.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. Okay. Eric, go ahead.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Sure. Well, we could say an awful lot about that. The general trends that drove 2015 are going to continue into 2016, 2017 and 2018 where we're seeing just that incredible increase in mobile data and the complexity that's driving in the RF front end. Adding to that now, of course, carrier aggregation being brought in, in multiple bands and multiple regions, it's having a multiplier affect really. If you look at the complexity in those front ends, it takes so much R&D to get a phone to market that customers are trying to cover more markets with fewer models, right. And when you do that, that just fundamentally drives up the amount of RF in each model. And when you do that, the amount of complexity drives you to integration and that's exactly where we come in. And when you look at integrating all that complexity, it turns out there's a lot of switching in there and there's a lot of high performance filters and that's where we're well positioned. So it's really more of the same, just increasing in complexity and content over the next few years. It's not isolated to any one or two or three OEMs; it's across every tier. So you've got some people in the performance range that are growing to premium and global skews, but you've also got those that are going from regional 4G phones up to multi-regional or even global export phones. So across really all tiers and all OEMs. We think the opportunities for content growth are very well aligned with Qorvo's investments.
Gabriela Borges - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
That's very helpful. And just as a follow-up if I could on the BAW multiplexer technology. Maybe you could comment on what sort of interest you're seeing at the high end from customers, what the feedback has been and when you think this could mean material revenue? Thank you.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. The multiplexers were an important part of the portfolio to solve some very important carrier aggregation bands. We are seeing interest once again at all levels of the portfolio. At the higher end tiers, it's even higher orders of multiplexing than what we've so far announced. The ones that are in the market today are very well suited for more of the China and Europe, more regionalized skews, but we're developing as you can imagine hexaplexers as well and pentaplexers to complement the quadplexers we have on the market today. So we'll be seeing a lot of attention for those across all tiers.
Gabriela Borges - Goldman Sachs & Co.:
Thanks for the color. I appreciate it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll hear next from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, guys. I had a couple questions. My first one is, Bob and Eric, typically, you see a little bit of a bigger growth rate in revenues to the September quarter. I'm curious – I know that China is down and it looks like it's turning – but I'm curious, are there other parts that are moving? Is there perhaps an earlier build by one of your customers that's involved here? Is this the normal going forward or just a one-time deal?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Harsh, this is Bob. I'll go ahead and take that. I think you're right. We are taking a pretty cautious view in the China market right now. I think we've kind of beat to death in our last call that we thought they got a little ahead of themselves in the first half. And I think things happen, timing of new program ramps and all of that, but I think this is more of a one-off case right now and it's not our expectation this carries on into calendar 2016.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Understood. Thank you. And second question was – we get this a lot from investors – there seems to be a viewpoint that the growth rate in handsets are slowing down and that the China growth rate is slowing down. You talked about China may be bottoming out, but could you also talk about what your expectation of the growth in China is next year, two years out, however you want to take it? And then also how do you – the $1 billion buyback – there's not enough cash in the balance sheet so how does, Steve, how do you propose to fund that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Steve, I'll go ahead and take the first part and obviously, if I don't complete it, Eric will add some color. But, Harsh, I think we have to look at a couple different things. One is for the China market itself, you have to remember there are people that also produce phones that are not Chinese. And some of these players out there have had tremendous growth in the China market itself. Now what we do see is what we look at is the macro trends that I spoke about earlier of the shifts from basically dimes to dollars that we talk about as they migrate through their portfolio. What we're seeing is the China local OEMs are now starting to gear up for the export market. So they're gearing more towards regional skews and even some are going to global skews. I use somebody like a Huawei that will put in $15 plus into a phone. So that trend is continuing and we expect that to continue next year. And then also we have that trend from 3-mode to 5-mode for those phones that stay in China. So we do expect the RF content to continue to grow like we said earlier in that 10% to 15% range. But I will say the China export market continues to grow and that does drive the dollar content as well.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Got it.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
What was your other question, Harsh?
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. The buyback. How do you fund the buyback, Steve?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
How do you fund it? Well, the buyback is valid for a year and Qorvo is going to be very cash flow positive over that period of time, which is a good piece of the story there. And then if we elect to, we will opportunistically access the capital markets to supplement our cash flow from operations.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Great, guys. Thank you so much.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
Cody Acree with Drexel Hamilton will have our next question.
Unknown Speaker:
Hey. Thanks for taking the questions, guys. This is David on for Cody. I wanted to kind of get your thoughts on the adoption trends of RF Flex and RF Fusion, maybe where you're seeing the most traction. And then also knowing that, that customized solution will be a little bit different, what's a good ASP range to think about for the RF Fusion engagements?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. It's a bit of a complicated question actually because many customers are working with both for different parts of their portfolios. So in general, of course, the RF Fusion is – well, it's really being used in two different tiers. In the highest tier you're definitely seeing that, that level of high level customization integration where there's several specialized RF Fusion modules to cover an entire global skew. And then in the mid-tier, RF Flex is certainly picking up a lot of traction, of course, as people are going from more discrete solutions to a level of integration that helps drive some of the complexity up while still gives them flexibility for different band combinations. But then we also see Fusion coming into other tiers, like we mentioned a new product ramp into a wearable. And in this case, they're using Fusion as the vast majority of the RF content is fully integrated into one placement because it's a very compact high performance wearable solution where size is at a premium. So really there's a wide array of applications depending upon really the flexibility of what the end customer is trying to accomplish with the product.
Unknown Speaker:
Great. And could you maybe give us a little color on your capacity expansion plans for filters? And how we should maybe think about linearly over the next few quarters, what are the largest impediments to growing that capacity faster?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
This is Steve Buhaly. We do plan to grow capacity primarily in premium filters since that's where our demand is expanding most rapidly. And our typical pattern is to put new capacity in place during the first half of the calendar year. That's a little slower period of time and then to be well-positioned for the aggressive customer ramp that often happens in late spring, mid-summer. And we're looking forward to that this year as well.
Unknown Speaker:
Great. Thanks for the time.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll move on to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I guess just two quick ones. You talked about the visibility of the marquee handset. Just wanted to understand, I know there's been some debate with your largest customer, but just want to make sure whether that design is done. And how you feel in general with your content there if that was included in that marquee comment. And then if you could just talk about in general your view into March, the puts and takes, you talked about being conservative for China. I was wondering, as you look into March, what gets you – what are the puts and takes in terms of your other customers? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
All right. I'll take the marquee questions because that was in my opening comments and I'll let Eric and James talk a little bit about seasonality in the March quarter for their respective businesses. But I implied that to mean as there's only really a couple major players with some marquee phones and we're confident in our ability to continue to grow our footprint and expand our dollar content in their phones for 2016 and 2017 based on what we've got all lined up. Yes, there has been a lot of discussion out there about that, but it's really never changed in our mind. It's normal course of business and how we work with these guys, and we feel very confident in our ability to continue to grow with those accounts. So, James, you want to talk a little bit about seasonality in your business?
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Yeah. In IDP, really being so broad market base, we don't see the traditional seasonality that you maybe used to in Eric's business. And we'll – we should continue to see growth quarter-over-quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Eric, can you talk about...
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
And in mobile, as I think everyone knows, March is a tricky quarter there. So a lot of moving pieces there and it's typically down 10% to 15% for mobile, but it's – you've got one kind of major handset platform ramping down sharply sequentially and another one from another manufacturer ramping up sharply at the end of the quarter, and exactly the timing and volumes of those ramps make a huge difference in how the quarter ends up. But it's too early to say whether there'll be anything out of the ordinary this year. We certainly aren't aware of anything.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Inc.:
Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll now move onto Srini Pajjuri with CLSA Securities.
Srini R. Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC:
Thank you. Eric, just a clarification and then I have a question. So you said the Korean customer, your content opportunity is looking pretty good for early next year. Can you talk about what sort of product that is, whether it's pad, discrete filters or antenna switch module?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. The great news is it's literally across I think every product category we sell. We've got a wide range of products with great opportunities in that platform, literally discrete switches, discrete BAW filters, Wi-Fi products, diversity receive modules, power amplifier based pads and so forth. So we again, we've really focused on closing that gap on that platform and I think we believe the prospects are pretty good.
Srini R. Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC:
Okay. And then, Bob, just a clarification again to the previous answer. So when you talk about this content increase opportunities in the marquee phones, are you anticipating any share gains for you? Or do you think the RF content itself is increasing and you just participate in that content increase?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Well, I think it's clear content will continue to increase as the complexity that we talked about. And then we'll just have to wait and see how things end up. But I feel very good about our prospects and our ability to continue to grow.
Srini R. Pajjuri - CLSA Americas LLC:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll move on to Atif Malik with Citi.
Amanda M. Scarnati - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. This is Amanda Scarnati for Atif. On Qualcomm's call yesterday talked about 3G, 4G device shipments at about 10% year-over-year next year with device sales at low single-digits, which implied that ASP pressure for application processors. How should we think about gross margins for RF components in an environment where smartphone units are decelerating next year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Yeah. I think what's interesting is and I tried to address some of this in my opening comments that if you look at smartphones, they're growing, as you point out, single-digits, but the real story in our business is the RF content is continuing to grow and Eric spoke earlier 10% to 15% in his mobile business. And from an ASP perspective, given those kind of growth rates, we don't anticipate any change from the way the business is run almost the last two years. So, again, the RF content inside the phones is what's growing. And in China, they're going from 3-mode to 5-mode and 6-mode, that's significant increase in the dollars that are in a phone. So a little bit different in the space than the application processors.
Amanda M. Scarnati - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
And then just a question on the gross margins, there's about 100 basis point miss off of the guidance this quarter. Was there any impact from the transition pulling in RFMD's test and assembly? And how should we expect gross margins to trend going forward once that test and assembly is fully rolled in?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Yeah. So gross margins, I think fundamentally the company's running right around 50%, which is what we've guided for next quarter. Our mileage varies a little bit quarter to quarter depending on the particulars of the mix and I think that's what you saw in this quarter. We expect the benefits from our assembly and test consolidation to largely accrue in the second half of the calendar year as we intersect our customers' new products with our products tested and assembled in China. And so all – clearly, it's going to be a positive. There's plenty of other factors. I'll wait till we get closer to call it more specifically.
Amanda M. Scarnati - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (Broker):
Great. Thank you.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
You bet.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
Quinn Bolton with Needham & Co. has our next question.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Hi. Just wanted to follow-up, Eric, on the China comments. Obviously, I think you guys, on the last call, said that the China business, back in June, it increased by over $100 million quarter-on-quarter. Wondering if you can give us any sort of comments on what that business did sequentially in September. And then just from your script it sounds like you're starting to see recovery in unit shipments out of China, but you're guiding that business pretty cautiously. I assume that the delta there is you're going to continue to under ship consumption just to work down inventory levels. Is that the right way to be thinking about China?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. I mean that sounds about right. I think to characterize what we've seen, you're right. The first couple quarters of the calendar year, we saw tremendous growth and we definitely in retrospect shipped faster than the market at that timeframe. As we've gone through the second half of the year, we still see our largest customer there, who's now a 10% customer, considerably strong compared to the rest of the pack. And so we're very pleased to be supporting that customer. And then the rest of the pack has definitely slowed and most are not achieving their original goals that they set up for at the beginning of the year, but it's still good. Like I said, not great, but good, and it's going to return to more of a regular level.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Okay. Thanks for the additional color. And then one for Steve. Steve, I think in your guidance you're now guiding tax to be at 10%, sort of the lower end of your 10% to 15% range. Is that going to be a temporary sort of December quarter effect? Or does that carry into fiscal 2017?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Yeah. Well, it'll clearly pertain to the March quarter, right. We try to level set it for the course of the year. And as we look into the next fiscal year, I think I want to take a little bit of a hall pass on that as we've got some math to do on that. We are running through our NOLs and credits and yet on the other hand, we'll have more of our revenue going through Singapore for the full year. So I'm going to stick with the 10% to 15% for now for FY 2017. But I think it's fair to model 10% in for the March quarter as well.
Quinn Bolton - Needham & Co. LLC:
Thank you, Steve.
Operator:
Steve Smigie with Raymond James has our next question.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Great. Thanks a lot. Sorry if there's any repeat questions. But I was just curious if you guys could talk about architectures a little bit on the marquee phones where if you get your typical tear down there, maybe four boxes typically on a phone or something like that in terms of pads or whatever it may be, but then there's also lots of other filters and switches elsewhere in the phone. So as a company, as you guys gain content, can you have it stay in the same sort of four boxes? Could there be more or less than four boxes on the phone? Just talk about all the different variations that could happen out there. It seems like there's a lot of different ways it could go?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Go ahead, Eric.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
I'll take a shot at it I guess. You're right. There's a lot of different ways it can go. And so, what you tend to see, I guess, is there's a generation in which there is an integration around three or four kind of large elements and then some discretes around it. And the next generation, it generally stays roughly the same in terms of the number of highly integrated component. It's pulling in a lot of the stuff that was outside before but then you end up with a bunch of other discrete stuff around it a lot of times. So there's no real one answer on that, but I think generally the trend is for higher levels of integration overall and in particular, I think, at the kind of mid-tier of the market. They're adding an awful lot of functionality and they don't have the R&D or the bandwidth to glue together 50 different parts. And so, they're trying to get to higher levels of integration, fewer boxes, as you would say, at that tier of the market as well.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
But I think overall, Eric, I think people recognize there's different blocks. But I mean, there's a lot of content outside of those things. And that's where a lot of the growth that we've enjoyed over the years, still there's a lot of discrete switches and tuners and now we're getting into diversity receive modules and things like that. So, I don't want to over simplify it down to four or five boxes, but there is revenue there and that architecture does – and the lower end is moving more towards that. But there's still on the big global phones a lot of added dollar content outside of those boxes.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. It's a good point. It's not really just about the boxes, I guess that's what you're saying. Because if the boxes themselves have all kinds of different things in them but then also the discretes there are lots of different types. And there's opportunities to differentiate just as much on some of those discrete parts as there are in the big boxes too, right. So, yeah.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
That's great. Yeah. That's what I was looking for. Thank you. And then I'm not sure, have you talked about 2016 overall? And I apologize if that's been discussed, but typically you say some color like, hey, we're looking for such and such industry growth and we expect to grow above that. So I was just curious if you've commented on what you think the industry growth is for calendar 2016?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
We didn't comment too much on overall for the company, but I believe we might have had a question earlier on the RF content will probably grow in that 10% to 15% range in the mobile business and that's what we'll probably grow.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. Great.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Or slightly faster than that.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay. And my last question was just on mix of customers. So, obviously, there's the big guy in Cupertino and the big guy in Korea and then you've got maybe four or five big Chinese guys. How much is that of your mix? Or another way to ask it, how much business do you still get from like a Microsoft, Sony, HTC, all those guys down below there? And how important are those guys to continue growth going forward?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Steve, you want...
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Yeah, I'll take that. Our top three customers added up to about 60% of our revenue last quarter and then that's probably not out of line with the market structure. Of those three, Huawei is the one that we sell both IDP and mobile products to. And then below that you have a pretty large number, a very broad diversification of customers.
J. Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
Okay, great. Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll move onto Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.
Thomas Robert Diffely - D. A. Davidson & Co.:
Yes. Good afternoon. First, Steve, it looks like you're getting some very nice synergies on the operating margin line and the EPS line. Where are we as far as the initial goal of $75 million of cost cutting in the first and then second year?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Yeah. We're in good shape on both counts. As you know, we have a very detailed management process where we have a dedicated professional program manager who tracks all these things. And I expect to beat both of our $75 million commitment for year one and then a subsequent $75 million commitment for year two. We're in good shape for year one and in year two, it will be a bit back loaded, about two-thirds of that commitment pertains to this migration or in-sourcing of mobile assembly and test and the remainder is a pretty broad variety of items.
Thomas Robert Diffely - D. A. Davidson & Co.:
Okay, great. And then previously you talked about the – your plan to ramp up the BAW filters a little bit here in the first half of the year. Where do you see the health of the industry supply and demand of BAW filters? And what do the customers do right now that can't get access to BAW filters?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Well, a lot of questions in there, but I would say that the supply and demand are broadly in balance. The reason we had capacity in the late winter/spring is that it's a little bit lower demand period in the cycle and it's a good chance for us to add capacity for the next wave. For example, a lot of the diversity receive or carrier aggregation demand will be in the phones that launch in the fall and we'll want to have the capacity to support that as we approach it. But generally, I'd say supply and demand are fairly matched. I expect that'll continue to be the case. We build this capacity based on our customer forecasts and while there may be an error in an individual case, in aggregate, they tend to be pretty decent.
Thomas Robert Diffely - D. A. Davidson & Co.:
Okay.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
I might add to that, to your point about what happens when customers can't get it. I think the industry is beginning to understand the capacity curve and when the capacity is available. And some customers actually plan their production around the time they know they're going to be able to get their filters.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
And make longer-term forecasts and commitments to us.
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
That's right.
Thomas Robert Diffely - D. A. Davidson & Co.:
All right. Thank you. That's perfect.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you.
Operator:
We'll move next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Thanks. Thanks very much. So, a couple things, Steve, nice savings on OpEx this quarter. How do you expect that to trend the next quarter? And what's your plan for next year? Are you going to scale up with some of these CapEx expansions in BAW and in SAW? And then, Eric, the merger required blending a lot of people and a lot of different sites. You still have the Portland facility going. How is that progressing overall? Are you still working through it or is it pretty much finished in terms of organizationally? And how do you feel it's going operationally? Are you where you want to be? Or has it impacted execution, especially on some of your newer designs?
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
So, for my part, OpEx, I think this quarter and next will be in the mid-$150s million, so continue to be slightly down from what we just reported in Q2. And what was the second part of the question?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
CapEx, I think he said.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
What was the second part of the question, Ed?
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
I'm curious because your CapEx plans for, especially your filter fabs and then you have the pad facility, that I would expect OpEx to ramp up once those are installed in order to staff them and to actually do all the design work that you're going to need to (50:56).
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Well, most of that goes into our cost of goods sold line and by and large the implementation of that cost for bringing that online is coincident with them being used for production. So it tends to be reasonably well-matched.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
But I think we can say, Ed, yes, we will continue to invest in R&D but it will be a much slower rate than what we're expecting for the top line to grow.
Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer & Secretary:
Yeah. And consistent with our expectations of the 20% of revenue model that we have.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Great. And then on the merger?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. So thanks for the question, Ed. I couldn't be more pleased with the organization, frankly. As you know, the culture matches very good between the two companies. A lot of people have worked at each and so we had a lot of good kind of immediate synergies socially and culturally. And before close, we're able to already develop a new product development process that combined the best of both companies, a lot of lessons learned. So it was a great unique opportunity to kind of wipe the slate clean and come out with better practices and processes. We have combined several of our sites, and there's a little more to be done there, so far completely without disruption. I'm not aware of any execution issues that the mergers created. So it's a lot of fun actually. It's a great opportunity. These product cycles, it takes a while to feel the entire effect of them, but they're coming on strong.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
In fact, I would just add, we're holding this call in our San Jose office. That is consolidated between the two former offices here. And it's good to physically bring the teams together, and it's good to put the savings on the P&L.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
So like that leaves my next question, on the MediaTek reference line for phase two. As far back as February at MWC, we were talking with you about possible share gains there. And you seemed fairly confident about it through most of the year even when we met up several times since then. And it didn't turn out that way. It sounds like Skyworks got most of that thing. Is that just – that's not an execution issue then? That was just a product issue? I'm just trying to get my arms around what happened on what was supposed to be one of the big highlights of the second half of the year. I understand phase three is coming. You're going to do much better on that. There were a bunch of other gains. But I'm just curious then, if it wasn't execution, is it performance? Is it, what is it?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah, so that's one of the things I guess we keep maybe struggling to communicate correctly. Up until even this point today, we're still basically selling RFMD and TriQuint parts, parts that result from the merger where we're able to combine and bring the new org and new technologies together. We're really just beginning to release the first one. So the integrated FEM for Wi-Fi, the diversity modules and so forth. So phase two, especially March quarter, June quarter of the year, I mean that's where each of the two legacy companies basically were in their product cycles. And we didn't have an org focused on that as a matter of fact at RFMD and TriQuint as well was not really focused at all on that market. So, when we formed Qorvo, we organized around it. We've got a business unit dedicated to that market and MediaTek in particular. And so they've been really working hard all year and picking up a lot of momentum. You're right, not as fast certainly as we would've liked, but picking up momentum on phase two now significantly. And then we've been in line with phase three all along for the MediaTek platform.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I think – this is Bob. Sorry, Ed. At a little higher level, I mean our share on Qualcomm reference designs in China was significantly higher than our MediaTek. And as you know what's playing out there, that's also worked against us.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Yeah. So basically, it's more legacy product that you were competing individually from the companies for phase two, whereas phase three it will be the combined companies?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
That's a very good way to put it, yeah.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Okay. And then, Bob, that was my next question actually. You guys have gotten much closer to Qualcomm over the last year. Qualcomm of course hasn't been doing as well. But in the net of it all, is it a net improvement still for you both on the Wi-Fi side and on the LTE reference design side of it? Or because of their problems, it's kind of a wash?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Oh, net total revenues. I'd have to think through that and I think you've got the assessment right. We continue to grow the relationship with them into more than just, quote, PAs and filters and sitting on reference designs and working with them and then to your point, we're making great progress with Wi-Fi for the IDP side as well as the mobile side working with Qualcomm, but I don't think we've actually done any forward math to be able to answer that, Ed. As you know, what we're trying to do is be strong at each one of the platform providers and each one of our customers because they do tend to move around who's number one and two over time.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
And then along on the same lines, Bob. It's clear Qualcomm is obviously (55:43) the leg of their problems. But they're doubling down RF360, they've been showing PAM IDs around China and are playing into that. It sounds like they're going to make another gasp in this area. I don't expect it will turn out any better than it did for the first one, given well, I think when we think about the technology. Is your new relationship with them make you the go to guy if their solution doesn't work? Because last time, kind of the same thing, right? You guys were shipping them an amplifier for their first version of it when it didn't work out. So I'm just curious, because you did get closer to them last fall, if this falls apart and they're facing a – and they need to ship, will you guys be the first one they turn to, to try and stopgap the product?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Well, I can't say what'll happen in the future, Ed, but I think in the past, yes, we've worked very closely with them when customers wanted a different solution. And I think that's – an important point is, at the end of the day, the customers decide. I mean that's what really takes place and in our business you need to have very high performing, competitive parts. And we work with them, so that we make sure we understand the architectures and where things are going. But at the end of the day, it's as much the customer, but because we do work with them, we feel we've got that leg up and that opportunity and that's why we felt our share was so strong with them throughout the last year as you pointed out.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Okay. Final question. Sorry for so many. So I knew you guys had won a DRx module on the Note 5, which congratulations by the way, because I'm sure you had lots of competition for that slot. But then Samsung didn't actually field that phone, which is unfortunate. Obviously, you had to allocate the filter capacity for that part, and I would imagine, I don't know if that was BAW or TC, but the fact that it didn't ship, did that free up some capacity especially in the Florida facility? Or are you still impacted overall on filters?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
You want to take that Eric?
Steven Eric Creviston - President-Mobile Products:
Yeah. So as of now, at least, all of the diversity modules we are planning are based on BAW. So that was a BAW opportunity. Volumes weren't tremendous on those few that we were on. So it did actually allow us to have more capacity available for a lot of Wi-Fi coexist filters and other things that we are shipping into the China market in general.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research, Inc.:
Great. Thanks, guys.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you, Ed.
Operator:
We'll now move to (sic) Tom Sepenzis with Northland.
Thomas Sepenzis - Northland Securities, Inc.:
Hey, guys. I was just wanting to ask a kind of future question in terms of 5G, and how – is BAW capable of handling the millimeter wave type frequencies that the government is talking about potentially using at least in the cities in the 40 and 50 gig range? Or is that something that you have to redesign from the ground up to be able to handle those types of frequencies?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
I would say currently BAW today doesn't handle those frequencies, but certainly, there's tremendous amount of bandwidth available in the millimeter wave frequencies that could reduce that need a bit. And then we certainly have a significant amount of product available in power amplifiers and other type technologies that'll play in 5G. I think it's also important to remember that 5G, we always see as a layered on approach to what's in the existing content in the handset today.
Thomas Sepenzis - Northland Securities, Inc.:
Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Tom.
Operator:
And we'll take our final follow-up question from Harsh Kumar from Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Yeah. Hey, guys. Quick question. How should we think – so IDP has gone to the blender here in the last call it six months. How do we think of IDP in 2016? What would be a good, normal long-term growth rate for IDP for us to think about?
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Good question, Harsh. I'll go ahead and let James talk about it because in my opening comments I talked about how he's tried to reposition – not tried, but he has repositioned his product portfolio to drive growth out of what we – typically seen was the single-digits. We'll begin to see that this year, but go ahead.
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Yeah. In – we've traditionally talked about the business in that five- to seven-point growth range. I think what you heard from Bob today is that we're repositioning to get that to be able to grow two times or three times that rate. That'll start as we go into 2016. In fact, it's started now. So I think you'll start to see our growth rates pick up as we go into next year and certainly as we move into 2017 and 2018.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens, Inc.:
Understood, guys. Thank you very much.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thanks, Harsh.
James L. Klein - President-Infrastructure & Defense Products:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
It appears we have no further questions at this time. I turn the conference back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth - President & Chief Executive Officer:
Thank you for joining us this evening. It continues to be clear that in any market environment, the global appetite for mobile data continues to expand. That's placing a greater premium on the limited frequency spectrum available to support that demand and expanding the economic value to our customers of Qorvo's premium solutions. We appreciate your time and look forward to meeting with you at our upcoming investor conferences and at our Analyst Day on November 17. Thank you.
Operator:
And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation.
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Qorvo Q1 2016 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Doug DeLieto. Please go ahead, sir, Vice President of Investor Relations.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Catherine. Hi everybody, and welcome to our June 2015 earnings call.
This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as the risk factors associated with our business in our annual report on Form 10-k filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect our operations and financial results. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or other items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, www.qorvo.com, under Investors. [Operator Instructions] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our fiscal 2016 First Quarter Earnings Call.
Led by strength in Mobile Products, Qorvo's June revenue -- quarterly revenue increased 6% sequentially and 23% year-over-year when compared to the combined revenue of RFMD and TriQuint in the June 2014 quarter. We were please to see Mobile Products grow 12% sequentially and 35% year-over-year as we continue to successfully capture a broad array of opportunities supported by long-term trends. In particular, the global demand for broad-based data continues to proliferate while front-end complexity and the performance requirements for RF solutions continue to expand. The strength in Mobile Products was sufficient to offset a sharp sequential decline in wireless infrastructure related to a pause in LTE base station deployments. Outside of wireless infrastructure, IDP revenue grew approximately 9% versus last year. Within this opportunity-rich environment, Qorvo is winning by leveraging our expanding portfolio of products and technologies and offering highly-integrated, system-level solutions to customers, channel partners and mobile operators. As a broad measure of success, our Mobile Products grew, surpassed its operating model of 30% operating income on a preliminary basis. That's all the more impressive when you consider our Mobile Product portfolio in June consisted entirely of legacy RFMD and TriQuint parts. And we've yet to insource legacy TriQuint assembly, our largest cost synergy. We're designing and developing an increasing number of differentiated system-level solutions that integrates our legacy capabilities, and these Qorvo parts will drive growth and improve profitability next fiscal year. Some early examples include our BAW-based high-band RF Fusion, which secured multiple design wins during the June quarter; and our recently introduced BAW-based RF fusion iFEM for mobile WiFi, which was announced last quarter and has already received production orders. These products demonstrate what our organization can achieve by leveraging our combined core competencies. There will be many more to come. Within IDP, we saw a sequential strength across all our markets other than wireless infrastructure. In particular, I'd like to highlight some of our achievements in WiFi and GaN applications. Qorvo is the leading supplier of RF GaN, and we have released over 100 GaN products during the past 18 months in both high-power and high-frequency applications. We offer the industry's broadest portfolio of GaN capabilities with advanced low-cost packaging techniques, and we are transitioning to 6-inch wafers this year. With over 15 years' experience, Qorvo is the only GaN supplier at manufacturing readiness level 9, and we are recognized globally for environmental robustness and industry-leading reliability. We continue to see strength in both the cable and defense and aerospace markets, where Qorvo is the GaN leader. We also sampled GaN custom macrocell power amplifiers to major base station customers, and we continue to see GaN as a disruptive technology displacing silicon LDMOS, which is the dominant technology today. During June, GaN-related revenue increased 30% compared to the same quarter last year. In WiFi, the design pipeline, especially for 5 gigahertz in the enterprise WiFi space is very strong. Qorvo is expanding our strategic relationships with the major chipset providers as well as the leading suppliers of enterprise equipment. In automotive, Qorvo was recently selected to be the preferred supplier of 4 out of 5 RF components in a next-generation automotive antenna. Leading participants from across the mobile daily ecosystem are engaging Qorvo to contribute more broadly and more strategically to industry growth given our ability to deliver best-in-class system solutions. As we've discussed previously, we assigned multiple NDAs with leading customers, and in the June quarter, we pursued additional opportunities to layer on incremental revenue and removing aggressively to move these programs from the prototyping and sampling phase to production. We're also working closely with the world's leading mobile operators to improve spectral efficiency and help them to maximize their investments in their available spectrum. We are engaged with dozens of operators, and we continue to add to our carrier program. Because Qorvo offers a comprehensive suite of products in the industry's broadest portfolio of enabling technologies, we are uniquely positioned to implement system-level solutions that leverage both active and passive semiconductor content without a bias for any one technology or approach. With all major technologies under one roof, we can match the optimum technology to each customer's application balancing the tradeoff between performance and cost. We're in the early innings of the deployment of received carrier aggregation, which improves spectral efficiency. This is an important trend in the migration towards global and superregional devices. It's placing a significant premium on higher performance filters and switches, and it's giving Qorvo excellent visibility in the leading smartphone architectures for 2016 and '17. As carriers focus increasingly on spectral efficiency, we also see transmit carrier aggregation driving RF content, first, in China and migrating elsewhere. Longer term, the global wireless industry is working towards a goal of 1 gigabit per second speed on the downlink and the uplink. Another significant driver for the RF TAM is the migration from 3-mode to 5-mode and even 6-mode devices. Last year, it was estimated that less than 40% of 4G devices in China were 5-mode, and we expect 5- and 6-mode devices will represent the vast majority within the next few years. Looking at diversity receive modules, an increasing percentage of these solutions are expected to combine premium BAW filters with high-performance, high-throw-count switches, 2 areas where Qorvo maintains a competitive advantage. This market is valued at approximately $1 billion today and has forecasted to expand to approximately $2 billion over the next 3 years. So the increasing global demand for data is driving an exponential increase in RF complexity, in RF content. While the trend towards superregional and global devices means greater performance and more functionality needs to be packed in the smaller-sized implementations. The arrival of 5G projecting in the 2020 time frame will bring more advance and likely higher frequencies and even tougher RF challenges extending the long-term revenue growth opportunities for Qorvo. Pulling back a little bit closer in, there are moving pieces impacting industry demand and our September guidance. First, the LTE base station market is soft. This is a continuation of what we saw in the June quarter, and we expect wireless infrastructure to be down sequentially in the September quarter. For context, the infrastructure market provided about 1/3 of IDP revenue in March. It dropped approximately 40% sequentially in June, primarily to a pause in LTE base station deployments. That said, the wireless infrastructure market remains a great market, where Qorvo can do extremely well. We're looking forward to the return of the wireless infrastructure market and bringing out new GaN and SOI products to support this market and a continued global rollout of 4G networks. Second, we've seen a slowing among handset customers in China. Qorvo has secured excellent growth opportunities in China, and China, Inc. was our largest customer in June if you combine all China-based brands. We currently believe some customers in China have a few weeks of excess inventory to work on, and this too is reflected in our September guidance. While the China market has great fundamentals, it can be choppy, and we're seeing a bit of that now. At a high level, looking across our businesses, we are very much looking forward to the release of several marquee smartphones throughout the remainder of this calendar year, and long-term industry fundamentals are strong. Design activity is robust, engagements are expanding with customers, channel partners and carriers, and we're on track to achieve our financial model. We're proud of our accomplishments in June. We expect to finished the calendar year very strong. We believe calendar 2016 will be an even stronger year and the best indicator yet of what Qorvo can achieve. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Steve for an in-depth review of our financials.
Steven Buhaly:
Thanks, Bob. In the June quarter, Qorvo grew revenue 23% year-on-year to $673 million when compared to RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. This above-market growth was led by mobile, up 35% to $551 million. IDP's revenue declined 13% to $122 million driven by a sharp decline in base station opportunities.
Outside of wireless infrastructure, IDP revenue grew approximately 9%. Qorvo had 2 10% customers, the larger at approximately 33% of revenue representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Our second 10% customer during the quarter was Huawei. Gross margin was a record 51.5%, up sequentially from 50.4% and up from 44.8% in the prior year period for RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. The improvement in Qorvo's gross margin is primarily attributable to favorable product mix and synergies. Operating expenses were $159 million for the June quarter. Year-on-year, operating expenses grew at half the rate of revenue growth. Within this, R&D grew 19% as we pursue opportunities in a healthy growth market, and all other operating expenses were flat. The realization of synergies is allowing us to grow investment in product and process development while making solid progress towards our operating expense model. Operating income was $187.8 million versus $103.2 million in the year ago period for RFMD and TriQuint combined. This dramatic improvement was led by mobile, which on a preliminary basis, achieved over 30% operating income while growing the top line by 35%. Net income for the June quarter was $168.5 million or $1.09 per diluted share. This compares favorably to the original guidance of $1 to $1.10. We've been Qorvo for 6 months now, and there's a lot to be proud of. Revenue is up 33% over the combined TriQuint and RFMD revenue a year ago. The most exciting part is the growth in operating income, up 178%. Synergy achievement and operating leverage are driving real improvements in our business. We continue to make good progress on achievement of our synergy goals and expect to exceed them in both years. Looking forward, we see significant opportunities during calendar 2016 primarily in gross margin. We have a dedicated team and process focused on executing the cost reduction opportunities presented by the merger. Total cash and investments was $558 million, and cash flow from operations totaled $141 million. Capital expenditures are $89 million primarily to address continued growth in customer demand for our premium filters. The company repurchased approximately 602,000 shares at a total cost of $50 million. Now let's turn to our business outlook. In Qorvo, we've created a new leader in RF that can outpace the growth rate of our underlying markets. The total addressable market for mobile RF is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 10% to 15% over the next few years driven primarily by unit growth of 4G phones and the associated increase in RF content and complexity. It's noteworthy that Q1's year-on-year revenue growth of 23% easily exceeded this despite significant headwinds in the base station market. With the product portfolio serving the faster growing parts of our addressable market, we're excited about our growth prospects and feel we can exceed the industry's growth rate. Achieving 28% operating income reflects good progress towards our full year goal of 30%. Add in the substantial synergies yet to come, we feel confident we can hit our model while making substantial investments in the process technologies and great products that sustain and enhance our competitive advantage.
Qorvo currently believes the demand environment in its end markets supports the following non-GAAP expectations for the quarter ending October 3:
quarterly revenue of approximately $690 million to $710 million, up 4% at the midpoint; gross margin of approximately 50% to 51%; a tax rate in the range of 10% to 15%; diluted EPS in the range of $1.05 to $1.15 based on approximately 155 million shares. Actual quarterly results may differ from these expectations, and such differences may be material. We currently expect to report September quarter results on November 5.
With that, we welcome your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] And we'll go to Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya:
Bob, when I look at the September guidance, it's a miss of about $40 million-plus or so. Could you help us quantify how much is the further weakness in IDP? How much is that excess inventory in China? How much could be weakness or any content changes at your large U.S. and Korean customer? I think we really need this kind of detail to give us more comfort around what caused the miss and whether it's a short-term event or whether there is something else here.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Vivek, thanks for your question. As far as changes to the outlook, again, we didn't guide for the September quarter until today. So I don't know that I can bridge to what was in your mind, but I had tried to size in my opening comments how significant the Wireless Infrastructure business is for us. And it's well over off -- well over $20 million, almost $25 million from a high that we saw just a couple of quarters ago, so it's a very significant number. So obviously, no growth there. It's at least $25 million of some of that growth and some of the slowdown that we've seen in China that we believe is going to be bleeded off over the next few weeks and will pick back up and will be back on track in the December quarter. We feel pretty good about that. I don't know that I can size that because we didn't give any guidance for it, Vivek. But as far as content changes in any of the phones or major losses, I don't see anything changing in what our expectations are for what we felt we had won, what we had won and how we think it's going to play out for the rest of the year. So I don't see any content changes more just what's going on in the market in China and then what we said in the wireless infrastructure market.
Vivek Arya:
Maybe if I ask that question in a different way, which is of the 4% sequential growth that you're expecting, how should we think about growth in mobile versus the sequential growth in IDP, first?
Robert Bruggeworth:
I think that's a great question, Vivek. And again, that's why we spent some time explaining. Last quarter, if you remember, we said we thought that the IDP business will be down slightly. It ended up being down significantly, as Steve has pointed out, down about 13% quarter-over-quarter or thereabouts. And that was more than made up from the strength that we saw in our mobile business. This quarter, we're expecting IDP to be flat, so all the growth is in the mobile business this quarter.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And just lastly...
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sorry, Vivek, if I could, what I said in my opening comments is we are expecting the wireless infrastructure to be down, offset, if you will, by what's going on in Jiangsu's other businesses. So IDP is roughly flat.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And then lastly, in terms of OpEx. I think it was -- where are we in terms of the cost synergies that you had outlined before? And how should we think about the OpEx trajectory for the next few quarters?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Steve, you want to handle that. You have comments in your script.
Steven Buhaly:
You bet. I expect OpEx to continue to be in the $150s, probably mid-150s as we kind of average over the quarters. We did spend a bit in R&D as we pursued some additional opportunities that came to our attention primarily engineering materials, prototype materials type expenses. If you look year-on-year, or 6 months to 6 months, almost any of the comparisons, SG&A is flat year-on-year despite significant revenue growth. And it really reflects synergies offsetting inflation kind of cost. And R&D is up, less than our rate of revenue growth. And the synergies there are allowing us to pursue some of these opportunities, which we feel very good about.
Operator:
Next question comes from Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs.
Gabriela Borges:
Maybe just a little more color on the weakness that you're seeing in the China Mobile market. Is it primarily on the LTE side or on the 3G side? Any color whether it's compensated at a couple of customers and more broad-based than that, and if you have any sense anecdotally on when inventory could be back on more normalized levels.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thank you, Gabriela. Just in a high level, and I'll let Eric add in maybe a little more of the detail. I mean we're still very much enjoying growth in China. We think the market is, like we said earlier, in the very early innings of this migration to 4G. We're still seeing the trend of moving from 3 mode to 5 mode, 6 mode. So all the macro things that we see in China are all intact. The market is continuing to migrate 2G to 3G and some going 4G, so subs are being added. We feel real good about that. We did see a little bit of strength last quarter in our China market, and they're digesting some of that. But I'll let Eric talk maybe a little more.
Steven Creviston:
I think you covered the high points really well. Long term, nothing changed. We think that the China market is very much on track and one of our greatest growth opportunities. We think our content there is set to grow as well as our share opportunities. We did have a very big quarter last quarter in China. And prepped [ph], basically, all of the upside that we experienced through our expectations we did in China. And so consequently, we're kind of going through cooling-off here, digesting some of that growth. As we said, we think this is weeks, not months of a correction here. So by end of this quarter, we expect things to be back on track heading out of the quarter.
Gabriela Borges:
And maybe just a follow up then on the share position in China, maybe relative to 3 months or 6 months ago. Any update on how you feel the traction for products like RF Flex and RF Fusion are materializing with all of these to expectations? And how you feel about your position that were from the supply end as well?
Steven Creviston:
Yes, thanks for the question. We did the announcement in the earnings release that we are in production with RF Flex. Last quarter, we had said we had design ins on how we're already shipping production just as we were exiting the quarter, so we are seeing adoption of that. And we're having a lot of design and activity around Fusion both with our reference design as well as with the end customers there. So a great, great traction with the highly-integrated products, which gives us opportunity to address virtually all of the RF content in any of these handsets. And we already have many of the flagship devices there with the leading suppliers in which we have multiple dollars of content, so we see a good base and a lot of opportunity to grow from there.
Operator:
We'll continue on to Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Mike Burton:
So first, sorry, 2-parter. I'm hoping you can help us understand how your orders tracked during the quarter and into the September quarter so far that's causing the below seasonal guide for the September quarter. And then secondly, if there is some inventory in China, how do you expect the December quarter to look at this point versus normal seasonality? It rise -- it bounces a lot of -- bounces around quite a bit, but it's been right around the 5% range. And lastly, I guess just in line with that. At a recent conference call, you guys spoke about second half representing roughly 55% to 58% of the revenues for the year. I'm assuming that's changed a little bit. I was wondering if you could update us on that.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Mike. A lot of parts to that, and I'll take a stab at that. As far as orders tracked in the quarter, other than the surprise that we saw in the wireless infrastructure, things pretty much were on track. If you take the drop that we saw in the wireless infrastructure, I mentioned somewhere in the neighborhood of $25 million as an example, I mean, that's the difference between our guide and roughly an 8% guide quarter-over-quarter, which actually would be quite healthy this season. We typically expect the September quarter over June to be in the mid-single digits followed by something a little bit higher, the December quarter. And we actually think again the mobile business, that's pretty much how our mobile business is running. And what we're seeing is the lack of the infrastructure business. Well, like I said, we're seeing that down. So if you take with that down and add it to our guide over where we were a quarter ago, we're quite honestly tracking just like you said there. As far as the waiting between the 2 parts, I think we typically said more like 45%-55%. And Steve, you want to take?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes, I think 45%-55% is as good as any occasionally, and as in my prior experience at TriQuint, we would wander up into the 57%, 58%. I think though, long term, 55%-45% is a good metric to go with. And that's as good a guess as any.
Mike Burton:
Okay. And then also just looking forward at the carrier aggregations comments that you made. Just wondering on the timing from what you're hearing from some of your customers as to when these are going to happen. Obviously, you mentioned first on TD-LTE, but then looking forward to FDD. I was wondering if you could give us some visibility that you're hearing about when we would start to see that implemented into the high-end phones.
Steven Creviston:
So the comment I think you're referring to is on the transmit uplink side carrier aggregation, so I'll talk about that as well as on the receive side. So as you know, receive carrier aggregation is in the early innings but already beginning to rollout. And in fact, the premium tier, especially in the U.S. We think the receive carrier aggregation continues to proliferate globally and actually hit to China as well early next year. And then really what you'll get on the receive carrier aggregation side is a real proliferation of modes and band combinations as to try to build global SKUs, and that's one of the largest drivers for the RF TAM over the next couple of years. Now the comments on key TX or uplink carrier aggregation, we do see that actually beginning in China by the end of next year. And then from there, we'll begin to go out to the rest of the world over '17 and '18. So you're going to see most of the TAM driver and CA on the receive side for the next couple of years; and then on the transmit side, continuing after that.
Mike Burton:
Okay. And then sorry, just a follow up on my first question again because just kind of running the math here real fast. I think the 45%-55% implies a pretty massive December quarter. Was that comment really for how you expect the split to go on a go-forward basis? And then is the seasonal -- I mean are we expecting kind of a seasonal build of kind of in the mid-single digits, which then I think would put your year-over-year growth kind of flattish? Is that really kind of the right way to think about it at this point? Just any help there.
Steven Buhaly:
I think we're better off sticking to that as a general rule of thumb versus providing guidance for the fourth quarter, calendar fourth quarter. So please treat it as a general seasonality comment versus an attempt to guide the back end of the year.
Operator:
And we'll go to Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh Kumar:
So the question I had is I think the big concern around your guide today is about your growth rate being less than the other guides that supply to your largest customer. We've got a couple of those guys' report, those companies' report. Could you comment relative to your business with your largest customer if basically that business is up to your expectation and all is whole with that particular customer and the issues, first of all, are largely China and IDP? That's one question, and I have a follow up.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Sure. Thanks, Harsh. Eric, do you want to take part of that?
Steven Creviston:
Sure, yes. I would say just as Bob said earlier, there's no change in our content or expectations on any of the other platforms that we see ramping in the second half.
Harsh Kumar:
Great. That's helpful. And then the second question. I want to come back to the next question. I think The Street seem that investors want to triangulate on some part to the mist. Could you maybe tell us how many weeks of inventory is there in China? How much of a hit that was either in dollars or units and if it's 2G, 3G or LTE? And also maybe some similar commentary, how much of a hit do you think you're taking on the infrastructure side in your revenue guide?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Well, revenue guide, I've talked about the infrastructure side. What I can't answer is what The Street expected the infrastructure business to do, Harsh. But what I've said is we're down $20 million, $25 million over where we were just a couple of quarters ago. I bet The Street was expecting that to grow. That declined significantly. I think from normal seasonality, that's a normal seasonal growth for us if you take what The Street had us in at 6. 65 [ph] going to 7. 45. [ph] That's much more -- that's closer to double-digit growth, so that's a lot greater than the industry. So just the primary delta that we see is the infrastructure business. And just to be clear on the inventory in China, we said it's a few weeks.
Operator:
Our next question will be from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
So Eric, if orders outside of IDP were fairly normal, why the excess inventory in China? And why do you think it's weeks instead of months of a correction there? Is it -- is that what your customers are telling you? Are these on hubs? Just give us a little feel, if you could, on why you're so optimistic that it's not going to be a long-term correction? And then James, big hit obviously to the infrastructure, and it sounds like it's going to be flat. Why do you think it's going to be flat instead of down? Did the order patterns suggest that, that's firming up? And what other big areas of your business -- or do you have that kind of exposure to? I think Bob said it's like 30%. So if you just help everybody to understand what are the big chunks that go up to make up your revenue, that would probably be helpful too.
Robert Bruggeworth:
All right, James, you want to go or Eric go first?
James Klein:
You go ahead, Eric.
Steven Creviston:
Sure, yes. It is a little hard to track exactly where all the parts are going in China. Most of our parts are sold across multiple customers as well as multiple base bands in some cases, and yet, there are shifts between base bands and also between customers and then within models at your customers. It's not possible to track exactly where every part is going. So again, we saw a very, very strong June quarter in China and a very healthy ship in. And then we saw a lot of mix change at our customers. And I think some of them in particular ended up with a lot more inventory than they were planning by the end of the quarter, and they just have to digest through that.
James Klein:
Okay, Ed. Let me talk a little bit -- this is James. About wireless infrastructure. We're down, as Bob said, about 40% quarter-over-quarter. I think we faired a little bit better than some of our competitors in that marketplace where we were down about 40%. Go-forward basis, we think we'll be down a little bit again this quarter, but it does feel like it's bottoming out. We are seeing some positive signs from the market. And really, our focus right now is to make sure we're ready for when it bounces back. I mean we certainly see the demand will be there long term and come back, and there's no shortage of demand for the deployment of 4G around the world. So as far as other businesses, we had a record quarter in cable, optical and WiFi and automotive businesses were all strong. Our Defense business was relatively flat quarter-over-quarter, but that's typically been fairly lumpy for us. And we're expecting in the Defense side to have a strong second half. So to Bob's note earlier, I think again it really was a wireless infrastructure pause for us, and we feel like we're starting to see the bottom of that.
Edward Snyder:
I think we're almost kind of a similar -- a little bit of a decline, but such a steep decline in IDP in the June period, which is typically much higher gross margins than your cellular business. And your cellular business didn't -- or the consolidated margins didn't tail off here. Does that suggest that your blend in cellular has permanently increased to a higher margin? Is this the BAW business kicking in? Well, I know we talked about capacity expansions for the second half. Is that happening at this point now? And your CapEx is just more of the same in the second half? Just trying to get an idea of how the margin mix now between the businesses, especially with regard to BAW, is shaking out.
Steven Buhaly:
Your thesis is basically correct. We saw, as we had in other quarters, above-average growth in our higher-margin filters, premium filters, and switches portion of mobile. And overall, Eric and team and along with his friends at manufacturing has done a terrific job of improving the overall baseline margins in mobile. So between those 2 things, we were able to overcome the hit in the wireless infrastructure market.
Edward Snyder:
So it's safe to assume your consolidated margins are still lower than IDP. Correct?
Steven Buhaly:
That's correct.
Edward Snyder:
So once IDP comes back, and assuming that it does, then your consolidated margin profile will be a little higher than June given the steep drop in IDP. Is that a fair assumption? If we were to come back to...
Steven Buhaly:
Sure, that's fair. It will be accretive. Now mobile always has a capability of outgrowing James pretty handily, so your mileage will vary a little bit quarter-by-quarter. But again, your thesis is correct. Seeing the wireless infrastructure come back will be very helpful for our overall margin.
Edward Snyder:
And the last time we spoke about BAW capacity expansion, I think was -- in the December period, you were talking about doubling it by June. If I understand that's occurred now. It sounds like you're continuing to expand. When do you run out of space in Texas?
Steven Buhaly:
The big move next for enhanced capacity, and we're talking for the kind of handling the peak demand that we'd typically see a year from now will be a conversion of the substantial part of the BAW manufacturing line to 8-inch wafers.
Edward Snyder:
Historically, it's been a real nightmare. Where do you -- I know you guys have been working on it. Where are you on that? Any idea at all when you have 8-inch running?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Go ahead, Steve.
Steven Buhaly:
We have a pilot line in place. We're comfortable with the progress. We think our architecture may make life a little bit easier than some of the other architectures out in the BAW market.
Robert Bruggeworth:
We expect to be prototyping.
[Audio Gap] and things are on track.
Steven Buhaly:
And as you know, Ed, you'll not only get space savings, which has become more of an issue for us in the Texas side, and also get some fairly significant cost reductions. So we're pretty excited about it. It's an important program for us.
James L. Klein:
This is James. If I could add we're also transitioning our GaN to 6 inch in Texas, and right -- that's right on the tail of moving our PM to 6 inch at Texas as well, so quite a bit of transition.
Edward Snyder:
James, can you talk about how big GaN is for you now?
James L. Klein:
Well, I won't go into the detailed numbers, but we are #1 in the market in cable and in defense. We see both of those markets continue to grow pretty strong price. Defense is really our strongest near-term growth opportunity, and we're doing very well there both domestically and internationally. I think as we sample -- Bob talked earlier about sample of products into the base station OEMs, and we believe we're positioned well for revenue really to start in that market in 2016. So overall, very positive. I think we'll grow faster than what we see the GaN market predicted to grow.
Operator:
We'll go to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
J. Steven Smigie:
And just wanted to follow up quickly. So as we look out to December, is it possible you get something sort of in the $800 million revenue range? And if that's the case, does that require a recovery in the telco equipment business? Or could you do that in wireless?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Steve, as you know, we don't guide out 2 quarters. I think it's safe to say that we are comfortable with it as we can keep up with the industry growth rates. And it's obviously, we've stated our plans to grow slightly faster than that, and we're going to stay with those comments at this time.
J. Steven Smigie:
Okay. Fair enough. And you guys said you started to see a little bit of recovery in that telco business. So does that suggest to you maybe Q4 is the quarter -- I know that everybody is trying to get this across multiple semiconductor suppliers, but does it seem Q4 like a good quarter where you could see some of the bounce back from that sharp decline and/or maybe more Q1?
James Klein:
Well, again, I think it's important that we feel like we're seeing the bottom, and we're starting to see some signs that it's going to start picking back up. And I'm certainly not projecting that we'll be back into strong revenue in Q4, but I do feel like we're on the uptick and things are starting to get better. And I agree, a lot of reports whether it's going to be Q4 or Q1 or when that business returns.
J. Steven Smigie:
Is it fair to say that I mean -- obviously, dropped of sharply largely due to China, is it fair to think that might recover sharply? Or are we just at somewhat lower levels?
James Klein:
No, I think it's fair to think of this as recovering quickly, and that's really the genesis of my comments earlier about making sure we stay very close to our customers, and we're ready for the return.
Steven Buhaly:
If you remember the underlying expansion of 4G phones in China hasn't slowed down a whole lot, right? And at some point, those phones are going to need base stations to communicate with, and so we think that this is a disturbance, if you will, in the market caused by some extra activities versus a permanent reduction of demand for these products.
J. Steven Smigie:
Great. And if I could sneak one last one in. And Bob, I apologized because you already -- I already bugged you about Q4 and I'm going to have to push it by going into Q1. You sound like -- did it sound like you were saying in Q4, no reason you wouldn't see industry standards. So is that fair to sort of think at this point for Q1 that sort of seasonal or industry performance is what you'd expect in Q1 also?
Robert Bruggeworth:
As you well know and everybody else on the call knows, March is typically a down quarter, and nothing that we've seen is changing what we currently expect for the industry. I guess the primary thing I want everyone to understand is we don't feel we've lost any major sockets since the last time we talked to you. We haven't seen any opportunities that we thought we were going to win that we can still win or have won. From all of those perspectives, from the mobile business, we feel very good about our position, and we believe we continue to grow faster than the market this year as well as next fiscal year.
Steven Buhaly:
I'd add to that. I think '17 has every chance of being a great year than calendar 2016. We're going to see some truly integrated [indiscernible] shops, where you really bring switches and filters together, for example, to serve customer needs. And you're going to see us really starting to add to the COGS synergies as we move x TriQuint mobile parts into our new China assembly and test facilities, among other things. But that's the largest synergy that's yet to come. So I think calendar 2016, fiscal '17 is really going to have a lot going for it.
Operator:
And we'll go to Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho.
Vijay Rakesh:
And just a question on your second half. When you look at your September, December quarter, you said calendar September, December quarters, will mobile revenues show you a trend? Do you usually have December quarter stronger than September quarter? Or do you split equally?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Typically, we see mid-single-digit growth in September over June and pushing high single-digits in December. So typically, December is much larger than the September quarter in growth -- growth rate.
Vijay Rakesh:
Got it. And as if you look at your capacity that you're adding on the BAW side, what's your -- have you changed the expectations there? How much capacity are you adding on the BAW side for the year? And if you thought about next year as well.
Steven Buhaly:
Steady as she goes. We've completed the major ads supporting this busy selling season. As stated earlier, we're working on the conversion of substantial part of a manufacturing to 8-inch capability to support a year from now.
Operator:
We'll continue on with Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton:
Just wanted to follow up on the sort of split of revs between September, December. I think, Steve, back at TriQuint, you guys often sort of cautioned investors that the timing of the ramp of the largest customer if it shifted out a week and really sort of affect the timing of revs between September and December. I'm just wondering is that at all in play here for the September quarter guide? Or are you taking sort of a more cautions view on the timing of that ramp? Or is it what you might call a more normal ramp for the largest customer and really doesn't have any impact on the timing of revs between September and December? And then I've got a follow up.
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. So Quinn, your memory is excellent. I often do caution and I continue to caution that very large customers ramp timing can and has moved a week here and there and really pushes the sequential comparisons around. I don't believe that's a factor in our guide today, and doesn't mean it's not going to happen. But it means if it's going to, we don't know about it yet.
Quinn Bolton:
Got it. Understood. Okay, great. And then for Eric, you talked about the transmit to CA starting to drive content late in 2016. Just wondering if you might be able to give us some sense. What's the dollar content increases of phone implements transmit carrier aggregation?
Steven Creviston:
In the first wave of transmit carrier aggregation, it will be done interband, which means within the same band, and so there is minimal impact. Think of it as $0.50 or so of additional content. I mean that's still significant on the type of units we're doing. But when we get to the next phase after that, kind of 2017, 2018, that's where we'd begin to see multiple power amplifier pads, and you can easily get to $1.50 of additional content beyond that. So in the near term, the receive carrier aggregation driving more like $1 to $1.50 in content happening and then another $0.50 with the interband TX and another $1.50 on top of that with interband after that. All of that as China is also migrating from the majority today, 3 mode going to the vast majority being 5- or 6-mode over that same time period. That's why we're excited about being at the very beginning of a long-term growth in the overall TAM at China.
Quinn Bolton:
And Eric, just to -- another follow up on that. Would that mean if you have interband transmit carrier aggregation, you might actually have multiple PAs for frequency band or for frequency band range? Is that where the extra content comes in?
Steven Creviston:
That's exactly right. As well as additional content in the switches, of course, to drive that and filters and everything that comes along with it, basically. So there is a lot of things under the planning now. This is a big part of our work with the carriers and our program to work with the mobile operators and drive these requirements and understand the benefits of it and which bands we want to operate at the same time. We're helping to define what can be done, and of course, we're encouraging to make the RF requirements very stiff, make it really hard. And because we've invested technologies to enable that and look at the BAW's return on their investment when they do.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Tom Diffely with D. A. Davidson.
Thomas Diffely:
First, Steve, on the margin side. How much margin variance do you have inside of mobile? And is volume discounting the biggest variable there?
Steven Buhaly:
Sorry, your last comment was volume discounting?
Thomas Diffely:
I just wondered if volume discounts were the biggest variable inside of -- inside the mobile margin structure.
Steven Buhaly:
No, I wouldn't characterize this as volume discounting. Most of our higher volume -- many of our higher volume parts are custom, so there's not really a comparison like that. There is reasonable variation amongst our margins both by customer and by product and by product type, so there's not a really very easy answer there. So -- but yes, mix is a factor both within both IDP and mobile and between the 2.
Thomas Diffely:
I guess just on an absolute basis, a few hundred basis points variant is common or what kind of range would you expect inside of mobile?
Steven Buhaly:
It really depends on the mix. I can't give you a simple answer there. Too many parts, too many customers, too many products.
Thomas Diffely:
Okay. And on the BAW filter side, what's your view of just the market right now, the total market kind of the supply/demand equation were for BAW filters?
Steven Creviston:
Yes, we still see that. Of course, that's one of the most exciting parts of the market growing very rapidly. We do see a lot of potential new applications for BAW. We've talked about diversity receive modules, for example, the WiFi-integrated Fusion modules in which will be really anchored around our BAW filter capability. Again, working with the mobile operators, looking out further and further, we see a lot of bands that were traditionally done in SAW or TC-SAW that may require BAW going forward because we're trying to get more throughput out of the frequency range. So all this adds up to kind of more of the same. It's one of the fastest, maybe the fastest-growing part of the RF TAM for the next few years. And in terms of the supply, I mean we're just keeping up with demand. I mean it's a very rational market right now. We have pretty good visibility into the requirements. And we're keeping up, just keeping pace.
Thomas Diffely:
Okay. It sounds like your competitors are just keeping pace as well, so it's not -- you don't get periods of glut in the marketplace.
Steven Creviston:
That's exactly what it feels right now. It's a very good balance demand and supply, managing through a pretty high-growth market pretty well.
Operator:
And Cody Acree with Ascendiant Capital.
Cody Acree:
Eric, maybe with the excess inventories in China. Do you have a balanced view of 2G, 3G versus LTE?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. I think we're really talking about 4G here. 2G, 3G is, I think we said last quarter, de minimis to us less than 5% of revenues basically. So 3G is falling off pretty rapidly in terms of units being replaced by 4G. And the dollar content difference between 2G and 4G is dramatic. So really, what we're talking about here is wholly 4G in our case.
Cody Acree:
And are you seeing any positive or negative impacts of the baseband market share shifts particularly with some of the largest OEMs?
Steven Creviston:
Long term, it doesn't make that much of a difference to us. We have great opportunities on all of the basebands out there including the vertical ones and the major independent ones, of course. Now of course, in any given quarter, the mix between those bands and which customers are using them and which models you're in can definitely have a big effect. But it's not fundamentally because of the shift between baseband. It's more of just mix and churn in the market and how things end at the end of the quarter.
Cody Acree:
And Steve, just any timing on the layering in of some of the larger gross margin improvements, the insourcing or some of this new products coming out for next year.
Steven Buhaly:
It's a little bit -- a little too soon to say. But I -- right now, I'd just fly ratably through the year.
Operator:
And will now hear from Tim Long with BMO Capital Markets.
Tim Long:
Two questions, if I could. First, any new changes in the competitive landscape, particularly any traction at all with any of the CMOS players in the market? And then secondly, if you could touch on the other large vendors, Samsung, I mean they had been a double-digit greater than 10% customer. They are no longer, but it seems like the latest around the hands did have more content though. Could you talk a little bit about what might be happening with the other large handset vendor?
Steven Creviston:
Yes, this is Eric. I'd be happy to. So first of all, regarding the competitive landscape, no significant difference at all, and certainly, no change in terms of traction with CMOS and so forth. So overall, very, very similar landscape to what we've been dealing with this year. So that's on track. The question regarding Samsung, we talked, I think last quarter as well, we definitely see that as one of our greatest opportunities for growth. We're not at all happy with our share there this year, and we've got a lot of room for growth next year. We do think even on soft to down units that the dollar content, Samsung is going to grow nicely year-over-year. So we are really lined up with our investments, fully staffed, a lot of programs to capture significant value in handsets with that customer we'll be launching early next year.
Tim Long:
Okay, and what do you think the main challenge with Samsung for you has been this year making it a tough year?
Steven Creviston:
Yes, it's really that the architecture just that they made going to a higher loads of integrated modules did not favor RFMD and TriQuint products, and we basically missed the generation now. Of course, that's why we formed Qorvo, is to fix this problem. And now those are the exact products that we're focused on, and they're probably the best positioned best position to gain. And so we just -- they made the architecture shift a generation sooner than we thought they would. It's good news for us in the long run, but we've got to close those product apps in and get our fair share next year.
Operator:
And Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian Ing:
So Eric, earlier you mentioned the mix change led to some excess inventory at the China handset customers. Was that a shift between different types of SKUs or tiers?
Steven Creviston:
And I was referring not only of that, but primarily, between customers. It's pretty remarkable how volatile the actual customers' share can be, the winners and losers, so to speak. Within the quarter, it can change fairly significantly. And I think overall, again, we've got tremendous opportunities to grow with all these customers, but there's still a great variation between one customer to another or one model to another. So you can see this choppiness really affecting what you end up with in terms of inventory exiting the quarter.
Ian Ing:
So only some China OEMs are overinventoried right now, it sounds like?
Steven Creviston:
Yes.
Steven Buhaly:
Exactly.
Ian Ing:
Okay, great. And then my follow up. I mean you talked about some co-developed part showing up in the second half of this year. What levels of co-developments are possible each model here. I think initially you're talking about multichip packages doing some integrations there. I mean when are full monolithic parts possible and you can do just everything potentially out there?
Steven Creviston:
Well, yes, that's an interesting question. So the interesting thing about RF and especially the way we approach it is that each individual component has its own technology, which is unique to it. So we're not looking at monolithic integration as much as multichip module integration, right? Which gives us not only the best performance but the best flexibility to really customize the parts for each individual customer. And today, at Qorvo, we're very fortunate to have the broadest portfolio of those individual technologies, which allows us to address virtually every single socket in the market, right? So we're focusing investments on the ones that we think we've got most differentiation, obviously BAW filters, high-performance switching and high-performance power amplifiers, envelope tracking. These are the areas where we see leadership today. We're focusing first on these modules. We talked a lot about the high band RF Fusion awards in the press release. We're seeing a lot of traction for that. And what's exciting is it's not just a top tier flagship guys going with that kind of Fusion, which is full of capability module, but it's also going into the midtier and into many other handset customers and reference designs and even into China before we know it. So the Fusion level of integration, which is power amplifiers, switching, all the filters and power management, all integrated into one high-performance, small placement module. That is definitely the trend, and it's certainly an opportunity-rich environment for us now to execute on that.
Operator:
And we'll go to Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis:
I just want to follow back up. I think you said earlier in the call that no change to your context expectations in the second half. So to the extent that you can comment, I know it's always tough. We've already -- pictures of your largest customer's phone, and it looks like there's a high-band pad. So when you say no change to your expectations, could you comment on what you expect your content to be with your largest customer? Because obviously China is weak for you, but that seemingly should be going well for you.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Blayne, as you know, it's always difficult to talk about our largest customer. What I can tell you is that we have, between us, continued to gain share if you could have the 2 companies together year-over-year-over-year. It's our current expectation this year. It's our current expectation next year.
Blayne Curtis:
Okay. And then a similar comment. The opportunity for you in the second half was to gain share. You just talked about Samsung but also China, some of the MediaTek platforms and such. Does this inventory correction delay that? Or are you still able to gain some content with those customers as you look at December?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Eric, you want to take that?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. It's -- I guess I haven't thought of it as a delay because I mean any one in particular slot, everything is still on track. But with the inventory and the mix shift between slots, I guess, you could look at that as a delay. Not a significant change in the trajectory, just in sort of the timing of all those slots. Our content, growth opportunities on each of the platforms are still very, very high.
Blayne Curtis:
Great. And then I want to ask you, Bob, another tough question, so don't hate me. As you look out to next year, obviously, for the large platforms, you have to submit your parts already. How are you feeling about the road map that you have in place? Obviously, the combined parts are coming together now. Did you have the right parts in place in terms of performance to continue your content gains with the largest customer?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Blayne, not that tough a question, so I appreciate that one. And I wanted to clarify my comment on the prior question. I should have said content that we expect to build or grow our content this year and next year. And I would broaden this to not just our largest customer but many of the customers marquee phones next year is really where we get our technology road maps and capabilities between what was legacy TriQuint and legacy RFMD online. So we're feeling very good about next year's models that marquee phones that'll be launched. We're very good about our positioning for those phones.
Operator:
And at this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us on our first quarter call. Even as we achieved our initial synergies and deliver robust leverage, we believe Qorvo is just beginning to demonstrate what we're capable of. We're excited to build on our success as we introduce new products combining our legacy capabilities, outgrow our markets and realize the full run rate of our synergies and achieve our financial model.
Thank you, and good night.
Operator:
Thank you. And again, ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you all again for your participation.
Executives:
Doug DeLieto - Former Vice President of Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Corporate Development Committee Steven J. Buhaly - Chief Financial Officer Steven Eric Creviston - President of Mobile Products James L. Klein - Former Vice President of Infrastructure & Defense Products and General Manager of Infrastructure & Defense Products
Analysts:
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division Steven Smigie Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division Cody Grant Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division
Operator:
Good day, and welcome to the Qorvo Inc. Q4 2015 Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Douglas DeLieto. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Travis. Hi, everybody, and welcome to the Qorvo March 2015 earnings conference call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. You should also read and consider the risk factors associated with each of the businesses of RFMD and TriQuint in each company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risks may affect the operations and the financial results of the combined company. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, www.qorvo.com, under Investors. [Operator Instructions] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure and Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and good afternoon. I'm pleased to welcome everyone to Qorvo's Fiscal 2015 Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. Just 4 months into the merger of RFMD and TriQuint, Qorvo is accomplishing what our 2 organizations could not have achieved individually. In mobile devices, infrastructure and defense applications, Qorvo is uniquely positioned to connect people, networks and things, both wirelessly and over global wired networks. Our financial results for March and our June quarterly guidance clearly demonstrate the integration is progressing exceptionally well and the Qorvo team continues to find new ways to build upon our shared strengths. Our markets are robust and our new product launches and customer design activity point to significant revenue growth throughout calendar year 2015. In addition, we are confident in our ability to deliver a run rate exceeding $75 million in synergies exiting this calendar year, and we see a clear path to a run rate of greater than $150 million in synergies exiting calendar year 2016. Qorvo is leveraging our expanded portfolio of best-in-class products and technologies across growth markets and we're helping our customers to design, manufacture and launch their products more quickly and more efficiently. We're also capturing incremental growth opportunities across diversified applications that favor our process technology expertise, engineering and manufacturing scale, advanced packaging capabilities and other unique competitive strengths. It's worth noting that Qorvo offers the most complete product portfolio, targeting the highest growth segments of our market, including filters, switches and tuners. Qorvo is recognized globally in each of these categories as a performance leader and there's no company better suited than Qorvo to capture revenue in either discrete or integrated implementations. Whether you're talking about the Internet of Things, the connected car, wearables, tablets, smartphones, smart homes, radar, avionics systems or communications infrastructure, we've got more tools and a deeper set of skills, and we're capitalizing on our unique set of competitive strengths to deliver highly differentiated, high-value solutions to industry leaders and transformative growth markets. This positions Qorvo to outpace the rate of growth of our underlying markets and deliver superior financial results. Looking at the March quarter. Revenue increased 46% year-over-year to $634 million when comparing to RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. Revenue growth was led by mobile products, which grew 61% year-over-year. Qorvo's gross margin was 50.4%, operating margin was 26.8% and earnings per share were $1.11. Revenue gross margin and EPS were all well ahead of our original guidance. Supporting this strong performance, the demand for mobile data continues to explode. Qorvo is a leading beneficiary of the robust growth in data traffic and we enjoy strong participation in the highest volume, highest value devices across the mobile infrastructure and defense markets. In particular, I'd like to highlight some of our more exciting strategic achievements during the quarter intended to diversify and grow our revenue. Qorvo secured a design win with a major base station OEM with a 3.5 gigahertz MMPA who began field trials to support major operators in China, Europe, Japan and North America. Qorvo launched a broad family of multimode PAs and duplexer modules covering major cellular bands for the small cell base station market. We were selected as the primary supplier of 802.11ac 5 gigahertz PA for a next generation .11ac wave 2 chipset. We enjoyed increased design traction on leading mobile Wi-Fi reference design, including Wi-Fi front-end solutions, integrating active components and filters into a single placement. We launched production of our high-performance GPS LNA filter modules for a leading fitness wearable device manufacturer. We secured our first received diversity module design win in support of a flagship Android smartphone scheduled to launch in the second half of calendar year 2015. And finally, we received production orders for our RF flex solution, supporting a next generation octa-core 4G chipset, with shipments commencing in the current quarter. I'm quite proud of the Qorvo team and their ability to achieve these many accomplishments, while also executing on our internal initiatives targeting growth, diversification and margin expansion. Simply stated, it's our goal to drive revenue, diversify our revenue and earn more money off that revenue. To that end, we're making steady progress towards our goal of bringing up our second facility in China to in-source the assembly and test of legacy TriQuint products, and we expect to begin shipments in the December quarter. We're also leveraging our combined strengths to open new avenues of growth, many of which are coming in the form of highly integrated RF devices. Qorvo's Wi-Fi front-end solutions integrating active components and filters, and our received diversity modules are both excellent examples. In the case of our received diversity modules, we've combined 2 of the fastest-growing functions in RF, premium BAW filters and high-performance, high throw count [ph] switches and highly integrated compact single placements. This makes them unique in our industry and are intersecting customer demand at the right time, as smartphone manufacturers increasingly migrate from SAW to BAW to solve the interference challenges of higher band count and carrier aggregation. From a very high level, we believe we're just beginning to demonstrate the value of bringing our 2 companies together, and we expect to build on that as we realize the full run rate of our cost synergies and introduce new products and technologies we could not have achieved individually. In summary, our March quarterly performance, coupled with our June quarterly guidance and our expectations for a very strong calendar second half point to an exceptional first year for Qorvo. We're building momentum and we believe we can continue to build upon our financial performance in calendar year 2016. Qorvo is well-positioned to win more than our share of the industry's highest growth opportunities by leveraging our diversified product portfolio, systems-level expertise, R&D and manufacturing scale and internal assembly and test capabilities. We expect to continue to improve our financial performance as we invest in building a wider technology moat, supporting better-than-industry growth, greater diversification, a richer mix of new products and an expanding gross margin. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Steve for further color on Qorvo's financial performance. Steve?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Thanks, Bob. In the March quarter, Qorvo delivered a robust 46% year-on-year growth in revenue, $634 million when compared to RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. Growth was led by mobile, up 61% to $493 million. IDP reported revenue of $140 million, up 10% from the prior year quarter. Qorvo had 2 10% customers. The larger, at approximately 37% of revenue representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer. Gross margin was a record 50.4%, up sequentially from 49% for RFMD and TriQuint on a combined basis. The improvement in Qorvo's gross margin was primarily attributable to favorable product mix, improved yields and synergies. Operating expenses were $150 million for the March quarter. Synergy-driven reductions in G&A were offset by increased spending in R&D, for masks and filters designers. Operating income was $169.6 million versus $25.3 million in the year-ago period for RFMD and TriQuint combined. Net income for the March quarter was $167.2 million or $1.11 per diluted share on 150.5 million shares outstanding. This compares favorably to the original guidance of $0.80 to $0.90. Higher revenue and strong execution accounted for about $0.15 of the improvement from the midpoint of guidance while lower taxes contributed $0.09 and share count related to the timing of the merger contributed the remaining $0.02. Total cash and investments was $544.6 million and cash flow from operations totaled [ph] $138 million. Capital expenditures were $120 million, primarily to address continued growth in customer demand for our premium filters. Finally, the company repurchased approximately 760,000 shares at a total cost of $50 million. Now let's turn to our business outlook. In Qorvo, we've created a new leader in RF that can outpace the growth rate of our underlying markets. Total addressable market for mobile RF is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 10% to 15% over the next few years, driven primarily by unit growth of 4G phones and the associated dramatic increase in RF content and complexity. In calendar 2015, we expect the growth profile for the industry to mirror prior years, with March the only quarter down sequentially and revenue weighted growing heavily towards the second half over the calendar year. For the product portfolio serving the faster growing parts of our addressable market, we're excited about the growth prospects and feel we can exceed the industry's growth rate. At our Analyst Day last November, we increased our operating model goals to 50% margin and 30% operating margin. Achieving nearly 27% operating income in a seasonally weak quarter is a great start for Qorvo. Add in the substantial synergies yet to come and we feel we can hit these goals while making significant investments in the process technologies and great products that sustain and enhance our competitive advantage. Qorvo currently believes the demand environment in its end markets supports the following non-GAAP expectations for the June 2015 quarter
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
My first question, Bob, how should we think about seasonality in the back half? If you could give us some color around visibility, around content or design wins. I know in the past, when I look at the pro forma models, the combined companies have grown at least about 20% in the back half calendar year versus the first half. Is that still a reasonable expectation for this year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Vivek. Thanks for your kind words and your question. As far as seasonality goes, number one, we have very good visibility into the major launches of marquee phones from multiple customs -- customers throughout the back half of the year. As far as what the industry is going to perform and how many phones actually get sold and all that, tough for us to handle at this time. But I think a high-level premise of the seasonality that you typically saw between the 2 companies, not much of that has changed yet. We are just really releasing, as I talked about in my opening comments, some of the newer products that we believe we can layer on top of what we typically had done to change that profile. But as a starting point, Vivek, that's a great model that you threw out there. The real thing is what's the industry going to do and it's way too early to comment on that, but thank you.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
And as my follow up, maybe one on gross margins, almost 300 points better than we expected. I'm curious, why such a big delta? And now that you have achieved your long-term gross margin target in the weakest seasonal quarter, what's next, is it time to rethink the target model?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Yes. So first, it's tempting to take you up on that rethinking the target model, and we wouldn't be thinking lower. We'd be thinking higher. But just to be clear -- but that model is for full year. We like a little bit more time to execute against that and really deliver that on a full year basis. But your point's well taken. With respect to the margin in the quarter, I think one thing that helped that you might not have thought of is, this is the seasonally low period for mobile. And as you know, our IDP revenue has a higher inherent margin. And so the weighted average benefits from that in the March quarter. Also, a thing that was better than we expected was manufacturing yields, really stepped up in the quarter. A real tip of the hat to all our manufacturing team and the engineers who contributed as well. We saw some really good performance there. And then of course, synergies are starting to contribute to the model. And it's always a little bit of a question how quick they'll come in. But we did make some good progress in the quarter and I know you know this. But synergies tend to be cumulative as we go through the quarters and I think we're off to a pretty good start there.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
Okay, one last quick one, if I may. What is the right mix. If I look long-term off your Mobile versus the Non-mobile business and what role Bob do you think M&A could play in that? Because you have a very solid balance sheet. You are generating a good amount of cash. How do you put it to better use through diversification and non-mobile markets?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Vivek. As far as looking at the 2 businesses today, I mean, you guys can do the math and I won't embarrass myself by telling you the percentages. But it's quite clear that the mobile business is a little bit bigger than the IDP business and growing a little bit faster. So obviously, if we're active in M&A opportunities and looking at targets, they would tend to be more in the IDP-type of business [indiscernible] build that up. There are still areas of opportunities within the mobile business as well to acquire technologies or smaller companies that we can enable new products and things like that. So I would say we will and we are looking at opportunities in both businesses. But I think over time, if you listen to our talk about continuing to diversify our products, our markets and our technologies, that's going to tend to lean a lot more towards James' IDP business.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Looking at the June quarter guide, the mobile environment has definitely some areas of strength on the high-end with Apple and some weaker reports on the lower mid-tier. Would you describe the strength you're seeing in the June quarter as broad-based or is it more concentrated in China per se versus the top tier?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, thanks for the comments, Mike. At a very high level, I mean, what we are seeing is what's everybody knows, the RF market place is still extremely strong. It's really the macro shift to 4G. And I think most people know that a lot of that is being done in China through multiple customers. I mean, diversification across their end products and customers. So that's what's really starting to drive that growth.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then following up on Vivek's question, I know you're not going to raise your margin target yet for us. But I'm just wondering if we could -- what we should be thinking about for a contribution margin another seasonal strong second half. And that also, on OpEx side, Steve, I think you guys have spoken about a lot of the synergies really starting to hit in the second half. Any puts or takes we should be thinking about as we -- as we go on to the second half of this calendar year?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Yes, sure. On gross margin side, I think you should model a fall-through of 55%. I think we can execute to that. And with respect to operating expenses, we will see some synergies. We also may make investments. Those are really contingent on the level of business we're able to earn. And I think you'll see us continuing to drive towards our business model of 50, 20, 30.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Steven Smigie:
One thing you mentioned a few times is obviously the -- that LTE will be a big driver of success for you. Can you talk about what your mix is of LTE or 4G versus 3G at this point?
Steven Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. Speaking for mobile. We have, now, well over 95% of our revenues in 3G, 4G. We don't break out between them because we have a lot of components which are used in both. But it's clearly LTE that's driving due to not only the proliferation of LTE throughout China but also just the overall content growth in literally all the markets that are running LTE today.
Steven Smigie:
Okay, great. And you had mentioned a number of good Wi-Fi and other wins. Can you talk a little bit about how big Wi-Fi opportunity is for you? Or what is the percentage of revenue and how big do you think that opportunity can be going forward?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think what I will do, Steve, is since we've got Wi-Fi split between Eric and James, I'll let them talk about what's driving their business from a Wi-Fi perspective. Because we did talk about pretty exciting products for both groups in our prepared comments as well as in the press release -- James, you want to talk a little bit about Wi-Fi?
James L. Klein:
This is James. Thanks for the question. I mean, we're seeing 2 dynamics that are really helping us grow in the Wi-Fi market on my side of the world. The shift to 11ac has certainly been very beneficial for us and we're also seeing the carriers drive to more offload on Wi-Fi in high-density areas. So both of those dynamics are really helping us grow. Of course, we're excited about new set of product that we've got released and being on some key reference designs in 5 gigahertz or higher power areas. So it looks good so far.
Steven Eric Creviston:
And then on the mobile side, it is one of our largest growth drivers this year in terms of just the overall opportunity. It's about $1 billion opportunity out there in mobile Wi-Fi for us. And we're doing really, really well with some differentiated technology on the filter side. And the part that we announced as one of the strategic highlights is something very similar to RF Fusion and what we do in the cellular modem, but this is in the Wi-Fi front end for mobile in which we combine all the power amplifiers, switches and those differentiated filter components into a very compact, single-placement, high-performance solution, and we're seeing participation now across the major reference designs and we're confident that's going to lead to revenue in the second of fiscal year.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Steve, could you please remind us where we are on the BAW filter expansion and how much that had an impact on the quarter gross margins? You saw a really good margin but you named several things including synergies. I'm just trying to go figure on where you are and what the official line is on that. I know you said double BAW capacity between, say, December of last year to June 1, and then at NWC [ph], there was some talk about tripling it. Just want to get an idea of where you are, what kind of impact that had on the big picture. And then for Eric, in mobile, are you still shooting -- overall, are you still shooting to maintain a more even exposure to some of the bigger handset OEMs? I think we had talked at one point of like 5 20, 20% for Sam's, 20% Apple, 20% leading Chinese OEM, 20% white label. Is that still your goal and are you structuring the new company in order to achieve that by deemphasizing some guys and focusing more on others? And then James, real quick, TriQuint has a real strong offering in 5 gigahertz, Wi-Fi amp, some couple of years ago. But they seem to deemphasize that late last year. Is that where you're seeing your advantage in 5 gigahertz Wi-Fi? Or is this -- this new HBT 5 process that's helping out?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Ed. I appreciate you getting everybody involved. Steve, if you want to take the first one that had to do with that BAW filters expansion, and where we are on that ramp.
Steven J. Buhaly:
Thank you. Glad you remember that, Bob. In terms of BAW filter capacity, we are continuing to execute the aggressive ramp in capacity that we've been talking about for some time. We expect this phase to wrap up close to the end of this quarter in preparation for a seasonally stronger revenue period and higher demand period that we will see in the second half of the year. And we feel very good, it's going very well. As you know, it's fairly fungible. We're adding equipment as we go and increasing capacity somewhat linearly. So it's not like a Big Bang event. And it's going very well and we're very pleased with it. And I think we'll be well-positioned to serve the growth in demand that we expect to continue to see.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Does it have a big impact on margins this quarter, Steve?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Not really, no. A little bit, but not materially. We don't depreciate the equipment until it's put into service. And the bulk of equipment actually placed into service will be in the current quarter.
Steven Eric Creviston:
Right. So I'll talk about target exposure to customers, if I understood the question, right? As a -- just a high-level strategy, I suppose, we want to be broadly exposed to the market, which means we want the share of our revenue that each customer contributes to be roughly equal to the share of their opportunity. So we're not looking to overweight or underweight on any particular segment or customer. But probably, far more important than that, is we're operating to a very disciplined financial model. We're constantly seeking ways to grow the topline while improving profitability and that happens at the product level, not at the customer level. A lot of our products which are highly profitable cut across most of our customers, frankly. So we're looking for those opportunities. That's what we're prioritizing in our investments where do we get the highest profitability and the highest growth. And how do we continue to hit the financial model.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
James, you want to talk about a little bit of Wi-Fi and 5 gigahertz?
James L. Klein:
Yes, and I think it's important to notice, to think about this a little different. I'm going to really focus you on the CPE side. So we're going to talk about Gateway and enterprise predominantly. Our focus has been in this 5 gigahertz area. So we've recently released what we think are the industry-leading set of components and those PAs. And we continue to develop those products. So I -- not really focused on the back, on the past and us getting out, I think we are very, very focused on that market and we've got some great products.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
And does this have anything to do with HBT 5?
James L. Klein:
Well, as always, we continue to develop new next-generation technologies and focusing on investing and make sure that we've got the best processes in the industry. So that next generation of HBT will certainly play a role in this part of the market.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens Inc.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
A lot of semi-companies are missing numbers, so really good to see you guys doing so well. I want to go back to the gross margin. To Vivek's point earlier, it was almost 300 basis points higher. I want to kind of understand what if there was any role that the cost cuts played yet and what roles? And so continuation of that question is, what are some of the major things that are planned? I think you've sort of officially just upped your expectation for cost cuts to a little over $75 million. I want to understand what are some of the major projects that are underway, maybe the top 2 that -- if you want to highlight them.
Steven J. Buhaly:
Yes, sure. I would be happy to. I think sooner rather than later, earlier on, we should see savings in the supply chain. In particular, we do see some management efficiencies, if you will. And those are fairly -- we were able to get to those fairly quickly. I think a very significant initiative that will be partially in place this year, mostly in place in the second calendar year will be the migration of TriQuint's mobile parts into a new Chinese factory for assembly and test. We think that will be significant driver of improved margins and savings for us. So those are a couple of the bigger hitters.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Got it. And then, what about the margin question? The 50% or so margins that -- and then again, I'm not complaining because those are great numbers. But just want to understand, if cost cuts yet have played a function already or it's all on the [indiscernible]?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Yes. Some of the supply chain savings came in to effect, pretty shortly after the merger was effective, right? [indiscernible] helped us out a little bit, gave us some extra time to prepare. We did take advantage of that. And we were able to implement some of those savings almost immediately after the close. And so we did see benefit there and, as mentioned earlier, some business unit mix benefits with mobile being seasonally weak in the quarter. Some mix benefits within that, with the strength in filters and switches. Higher growing parts of the business. And finally, yields really got better. The team just did a really good job on driving waste out of the manufacturing process with better yield.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes. And Harsh, that may not sound like it but that was a lot of sharing back and forth between the 2 organizations on how to improve yields.
Harsh V. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Got it, got it. And as a follow up, if I can ask you, I think China was -- the data from China seems to be a little bit off in January and February. Your competitor mentioned that things picked up substantially in the March timeframe. Could you just comment on maybe what you guys are seeing at a ground level in the Chinese market, maybe relative to expectations and guidance for June and then even beyond?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes. I think, Harsh, the quarter pretty much played out as we expected, except near the end of March, things did start to pick up. We're continuing to see that. And that's what playing into our guidance. But I'll let Eric give a little more color, if you want.
Steven Eric Creviston:
I think that's pretty much it. We said in January, we expected to be kind of slow until we got through the lunar New Year and then it would pop up but with the late lunar New Year, we weren't sure how much exposure we'd see in March. But it did turn up at the very end of March to start picking up. We've seen that continue into this quarter and the year is still looking to be very much on track. There's a lot of excitement about growth there and the 4G rollout, as you know, the net adds have been running averaging about 20 million a month for 4G in China. So right now, the market's pretty robust. There's going to be a need for a lot more 4G handsets. And we've got a tremendous opportunity for content growth there.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Harsh, Harsh, I do want to point out that there was also some talk lately from a couple of people about a slight slowdown or a pause or a break or whatever you want to say in the infrastructure market. We actually had a very strong first quarter -- or excuse me, March quarter in the infrastructure market. And for the first quarter, we think that's going to be down, down some quarter-over-quarter. So we are seeing a little bit of a slowdown on the infrastructure side.
Steven J. Buhaly:
And I know we're in the community that believes it's an inventory issue. We think the underlying demand drivers are well intact. And it's a matter of timing and what we do expect a little bit of a burn-off period here in the June quarter. And we've incorporated that into our guidance.
Steven Eric Creviston:
And to reiterate that, that's in the infrastructure side.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Infrastructure side of the business.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Just wanted to follow-up on Harsh's question there about China. If look at the -- one of your big name partners [indiscernible] looks like they have a fairly soft first half but are talking about $450 million smartphone chipsets which implies a very strong second half, I think up over 50%, half on half. Just wondering, as you look past June, are you seeing sort of a similar strength in second half versus first half or do you think your growth is going to be a little bit more linear through the year? And then as a second follow-on question for Steve, Steve, you talked about that tax rate stepping up to a range of 10% to 15%. But then you made a comment about a higher tax rate long-term as you've now used up most of the NOLs. Is that higher rate 10% to 15%? Or do you think it could step up beyond 10% to 15%, say, 1 year or 2 out in the future?
Steven J. Buhaly:
Why don't I take the tax one first. So what's going on in '16, we have 2 kind of contravening items. First, we're in the process of implementing a tax structure and RFMD, and it's similar to what TriQuint just had in place in the past where we had Singapore as our international headquarters and recognized the international revenue in that jurisdiction. And we won't have that in place until probably August 1. So there's a little bit of a higher than normal impact there. On the other hand, we still have some remaining NOLs. So those are offsetting each other to some degree. I think the rate beyond FY '16 is still an open question. Our [indiscernible] tax is entering and I have some work left to do. A lot of it depends on where revenue gets recognized, different jurisdictions, where we sell out, what the mix of products is. But I think that we'll-- it's hard to say. It's possible it could creep up just a little bit. But there's plenty of work left for us to do to get a better answer for you. So this year though, we feel like the cash rate will -- or non-GAAP rate will be in the 10% to 15% range.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Thanks for the additional color Steve.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Eric, you want to take it?
Steven Eric Creviston:
So I guess regarding the China question. We can't say a whole lot more than we already have. I mean MediaTek's pointing towards a good back half. We agree. As Bob said at the beginning, it's too early to call the back half. But some of the things to look for are continued 4G net adds. Also, I think the export market is going to be pretty important to our China customers this year. And of course, MediaTek's open to help drive some of that. We're very well-represented. We mentioned the strategic highlights, both new 4G smartphones for -- these are leading flagship smartphones that are launching now which will be in full production throughout the year. And which we've got multiple dollars of content and then in addition to that, our first RF flex. We just announced this in Barcelona. We've got production orders already. We're ramping shipments right now as we speak. And so we'll have a full half year the second half of the calendar year to be shipping that RF flex solution. So yes, a lot of things to be excited in there in that market.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Cody Acree with Ascendiant Capital.
Cody Grant Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
Eric, maybe on a road map basis, now that you've got the assets, the 2 companies put together, how is that impacting your longer-term roadmap for products and -- I think about from a maybe an RF Fusion or a module-integration strategy, how long does it take before we start to see some of those products on the market?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Yes. Thanks for the question. I can tell you, it's a very target-rich environment, right now. We literally have all the pieces we need now that we put the company together. As you can imagine, the things that we're selling right now are still basically the roadmap of the previous companies, the legacy companies. The diversity received modular, I mentioned in the strategic highlights, probably one of the first examples of a new product category that we're able to address as Qorvo which wasn't that attractive. Again, we're executing on this financial model. You looked at that model as separate companies, didn't really fit so much. But there's a couple of reasons why that's exciting to Qorvo. One is that it combines the best-in-class switching with also, now, filters and LNAs as well. And we think this is a great opportunity, it's about $1 billion segment today that should double over the next 3 years and we're essentially not playing it all until we have this launch this fall, obviously a design win we announced. So that's one example of a new product area where we think we can really differentiate by bringing BAW technology into that segment which is all SAW today. And there's a lot of other examples. RF flex infusion, as you know, we're really helping to drive the integration levels higher in the industry. We're working out multiple generations now with not only our key customers but probably more importantly, all of the major platform providers. And the trend is crystal clear, it's about integration, it's about enabling real proliferation of high-performance compact [indiscernible] systems and it's the core technologies we bring in switches and filtering, power management system architecture, that's what enabling it. So target-rich environment, we got a lot of opportunities, we're focusing on where we think we can grow and be the most profitable.
Cody Grant Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
And then maybe Eric, just following up on both tracking and carrier aggregation, can you just talk about maybe where we are and adoption of both of those technologies and are those helping you to gain share? Just how is that impacting growth?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Yes. So inflow tracking, as we've talked about, I think in Barcelona, is still kind of relegated to the very top tier. We are hearing more discussions with wider range of platform providers that'll be taking it down in the mid-tier. But that's going to take some time. It's really kind of a next year activity. So inflow tracking is important. But I wouldn't say it's a driver right now, unless it's separate in the very top tier. The carrier aggregation is quite a bit more prominent. That is everywhere right now. There's over 50 -- over 50 different combinations of carrier aggregation scenarios that we're now working to help enable with different band combinations and different carriers and so forth. And the thing that's common about all of them is it drives requirements for switching and filtering. So we're very, very actively engaged with carrier aggregation work right now. I'm sure you're aware, even uplink carrier aggregation is coming next year as well for China Mobile. So that's a definite driver in the design activity in what we're specifying our products in terms of capability.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll now take our next question from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Maybe for Bob or Eric. I'm just curious, as you look in the Junior Mobile business, you just talked about what's driving the growth. You typically -- your largest customer, you talked about 37% March. That's maybe a stronger decline than others have seen. So you saw that last year where you're then somewhere modest June. If you can just talk about some of the moving pieces, you mentioned China up. Any additional color there would be appreciated.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Sorry, Blayne, could you clarify the number you said. We didn't understand. I think you said 37% decline?
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Your largest customer is 37% in March, which was about a 30% decline. So maybe you saw a little bit timing-wise, a little more seasonality in March. It just kind of, as you look into June, what are the moving pieces to get to growth?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think you were trying to compare us to others and again, I think we've got an extremely diversified product stream to that large customer. And some go right to the supplier that builds the phones. Some go to the sub-suppliers. So there's timing differences all the time. And our ramps up and down with any customer, it doesn't matter. Many of them use different subs and things like that. So Blayne, I wouldn't read much too much into that, at least on that quarter. So what was the question after that? Sorry, I thought you were relating it to the June quarter.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
That wasn't really the main part of the question. I was actually just asking, you are seeing some nice growth outside of that customer into June. I was just looking for what are the big moving pieces there.
Steven Eric Creviston:
It's certainly in the Mobile business, it's China. It's what we've been talking about. It's the new platform launches. We're represented more on some of the reference designs where we previously represented a little less and overall content growth, unit growth in China.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
And then first, Steve, on the OpEx line, you talked about some nice synergies in terms of gross margin. From an absolute dollar amount, I guess, it seems like OpEx is down a few million into June. What's the right level to look at? I know you don't want to raise your long-term model here. But even with some growth in the second half, you'd be above that. When you look at the trajectory of just your absolute OpEx dollars, do you think it would grow off this space or you think you can still bring it down?
Steven J. Buhaly:
It's again dependent on the book of business we have. We're fundamentally going to drive for a full year 20% operating expense. And if revenue is not as good as we think we'll cut more. If it's better, we'll invest more. So I don't think you should look at a lot of growth. We'll be managing it carefully. But it will be dictated by the level of revenue that we're able to achieve.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
A couple of questions. Eric, could you see content gains based on the technology from both companies in the second half of this year? Or there was a 3 way -- there was a couple of 3 way in the A side last year. So given the timing of phone ramps, would those be brought to bear anytime in the calendar year here? And then on your DRX modules, they all have LNAs in them or you're also going to do passive devices like we've seen in the past where you just filters and switches on a module? And then, Bob, in the bigger picture, I'm sure you saw a lot of the action on the stock in the last couple of quarters, but especially the last quarter. There've been a lot of, though, concerns about declines in China, et cetera. Holistically, where do you think the bearish case on Qorvo is the most incorrect? I mean, a lot of you are still wondering about China, 2G, 3G, slowing down there. They're worried about maximizing content at some of the major OEMs. So if you just speak to where you think most people might have missed it on the downside of that, I'd appreciate it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think Ed I'll take that first, Eric can take a little bit of time to answer Ed's 2 other questions. I think, Ed, people are struggling with understanding that the RF market is growing, just high-level macro. I mean, if base bands go down, everybody thinks we're going to go down. But what they miss is, their base bands might be going down but they're shifting to 4G which needs more RF. So at a high level, it's still an extremely healthy market. I think the second area is, we sell a lot of parts quite honestly. Some of these filters are small as a grain of rice. And they're hard to find. When you look at some of our little switches and they're not identified, and you kind of go through this and people do teardowns and some of these phones we look at after they do their teardowns because we know we're in them, we don't look for it. And in fact, in many of these places, they're strengths of ours. We'll find 30% to 40% was not even identified in the teardown. So I think again, people have to first get their head around the complexity of what's in a 4G phone of not only integrated components. Even in highly integrated phones, there's a lot of discrete still out there. And we enjoy a lot of that business, Ed. So again, RF is a great place to be right now and we're enjoying it and we have the right products.
Steven J. Buhaly:
And I would throw in there, and it's a similar comment. I think our success in China has been underestimated. I think that, that's a diverse set of customers. It isn't quite as prone to the major event teardown, kind of press event. But going back to the pre-merger, both companies have had real success there. The units of 4G are growing like wildfire. And I just don't think the market fully understood both the volume increases and our success rate at that diverse set of customers.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
To that point, Steve, what is -- I mean RF Micro in the previous closure before the merger, we're kind of flattish in China and you grow through really well in, 4G and partly, because you had a big exposure to 3G and 2G nodes were declining. How -- where does that shake out this quarter? Do you still have a significant revenue in 2G, 3G or is it de minimis? And is China still flattish for you in this period? Or -- have you turned the corner and that 4G is just starting to show up as a big driver there even in that segment?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Well, I think, Eric, now he has 3 questions for you to answer.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
I pointed that to Steve so I'd give Eric a break.
Steven Eric Creviston:
Thanks for the try. So yes, I mean 2G is certainly de minimis in our business and the 3G entry for the most part is as well. Again, it's hard to break out. Because a lot of that 3G stuff is in the 4G handsets as well and a lot of our components are used in both modes. So it is a little hard to break it out. But to your point, there's no question right now that the 2G, 3G headwinds are lighter than they were the past couple of quarters for us. And we're getting -- starting to see more of the full content growth from 4G. So if I could move back to the first couple of questions. The content gain, second half, yes. So the product development cycle, as you know, are generally about 9 to 18 months and then with design-ins and ramp-ups, you're not looking at major impacts from new content gains from the merger this fiscal year. It's really next fiscal year when you're going to begin to see a full portfolio of Qorvo products. The diversity received module, which you mentioned specifically, is 1 example where we are, I think, able to capture some of the content gains from the Qorvo merger during this fiscal year. And to answer your specific question, about LNAs, as far as I know, at least I believe, everyone that we're developing will have LNA capability in it. And the reason for that is, we're really attacking the premium diversity received module market. So we're not going after the kind of just diversity received modules that have been the phones in the past. We're going after the ones that are in the high band count, high carrier aggregation requirements, types of applications where, one, you need really good filters and really good switches; and then also, two, you do need LNA, you need some active components in there. That makes it a very attractive segment for us.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
But doesn't that then suggest that competition for those parts, all the traditional competition, which is a lot of the Japanese firms are doing in the past is starting, is declining because they don't have a very strong, active offering. Or is it that bunch of people plus you and Skyworks and some new ones. Is it more competitive or less competitive? And are you seeing the Japanese increasingly aggressive in the amplifier side of it now?
Steven Eric Creviston:
No. Like I said, it's a target-rich environment. We're picking the ones where we think we have the most differentiation. So yes, we're going after segments where we think we have something really unique by definition. That means the competition shouldn't be as strong at it. And again, it's really just finding the intersection of where we have those differentiated strengths where there's also a problem our customer really, really needs to solve. And that's exactly the case in these diversity received modules.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
And final question for James. So you saw with one of your major competitors a very big increase in their non-mobile business, but specifically around Wi-Fi. Especially now that we're going to 2 by 2, 3 by 3 and I think even Broadcom's got a 6 by 6 design out there, as a reference now. Are you seeing as much of an uptick? Is it an area that you're starting to focus, as to mention, Wi-Fi here. And again, in the CPE side, seems to be what's driving a lot of the growth these days. So 2 questions, one, are you seeing a similar trend in your end demand? And two, how do you feel your position on the reference design? Because a lot of it is reference design at both, say, Broadcom and Atheros or any of the other vendors that you could talk to. Thanks.
James L. Klein:
So I would say, Ed, again, thanks for the question, we're on the verge of that. We've got some of our first key reference design wins in that area and were starting to ramp up production on those products now. So I think as we do get to the back half, we'll start to see substantial growth in that area. Certainly, that's where we're focused. We're really focused on supporting those reference designs and make sure that we have discriminating technology. So I think we'll start to see more and more ramp up in the back half, and it is a big focus area for us.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
So and final question. The -- I guess it's probably to Eric. So you -- correct me if I'm wrong, but you've enjoyed a tighter relationship with Qualcomm probably in the last 6 months or so, evolving relationship than you have in a long time prior to that. Is that starting to bear fruit in the reference designs? Do you see more traction in their general products? Or is it almost specifically focused on, I thought you would've use RF 360, how is the Qualcomm relationship evolving?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Yes, you're right. We've actually managed to have a good relationship with them. They still depend on us as well as other RF suppliers for the vast majority of their RF content on their reference designs and the products that they ship. So I think it really does scale with the overall opportunity. And it's not just Qualcomm specific but with each of the reference design houses. We have an increasing amount of attention these days and therefore, content that's coming along with it.
Operator:
We'll take our next question from Tom Diffely with D. A. Davidson.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Just a quick question on the filter side. Are you starting to see a blur in the lines between the TC-SAW and the BAW filters these days? And which of the 2 [indiscernible] the biggest incremental opportunity for you on a near-term basis?
Steven Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. I don't think there's really a blur in the line necessarily. I mean, there are more and more frequency bands coming on. And even with the existing bands, there are changes that are coming from the operators. We still work very closely with the carriers and helping to sort of influence the requirements for the filters. And there are some that are very well-addressed by temp-comp SAW, and some that are addressed by BAW and temp-comp BAW even. And we see in general, the ones that are going to be addressed by BAW are growing more rapidly. And those are the areas that we're primarily focused on.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Okay, so you're not seeing the TC-SAWs and migrate over into where BAW filters historically have been strongest?
Steven Eric Creviston:
No. In fact, we see several cases where BAW is taking what is more traditional SAW content. TC-SAW applies to a few bands areas specifically and very, very well. We don't see that changing. The overall trend is kind of between SAW and BAW. And the diversity received modules we've talked about several times today are an example of were able to take what's SAW before and replace that with BAW and actually add value to the customer.
Steven J. Buhaly:
Hey, Tom, it's Steve Buhaly here. Sometimes when you look out there, you see people talking about -- I've seen TC-SAWs encroaching and moving up to higher frequencies and all that stuff. Typically, the source of those are people who only have access to TC-SAW filter technology. And Qorvo, as you know, produces both those. We're a neutral party and will deliver the technology that serves the customer [indiscernible] best.
Operator:
That concludes today's question-and-answer session. At this time, I will turn the conference back to management for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
We thank you for joining us today for Qorvo's Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. Qorvo's a primary beneficiary of the exploding demand for mobile data and the increasing RF content in connected devices. We're outpacing our markets and expect to deliver strong operating leverage as we implement our integration plan and capture merger synergies. Thanks again and good night.
Operator:
That concludes today's presentation. Thank you for your participation.
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Qorvo, Inc. December 2014 Quarterly Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Now I'd like to introduce your host for today's call, Douglas DeLieto. Mr. DeLieto, you may begin.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Kelly. Hello, everybody, and welcome to the Qorvo December 2014 Earnings Conference Call. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. You should also read and consider the risk factors associated with each of the businesses of RFMD and TriQuint and each company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC because these risk factors may affect the operations and financial results of the combined company.
In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, qorvo.com, under Investors. Please note, the December results for Qorvo preceded the completion of the merger with TriQuint, and therefore, reflects only the financial results of RF Micro Devices. On today's conference call, we'll report the December results for RFMD and TriQuint separately. Then, we'll provide the outlook for the March quarter for Qorvo. [Operator Instructions] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggerworth, President and CEO; Steve Buhaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Creviston, President of Qorvo's Mobile Products Group; and James Klein, President of Qorvo's Infrastructure & Defense Products Group. I'm also joined by other members of Qorvo's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm very pleased to welcome you to the first quarterly earnings conference call for Qorvo. With the close of the merger of RFMD and TriQuint, we have combined 2 companies globally recognized for driving growth and innovation in the greater than $10 billion and growing RF industry. As Qorvo, our expectations are to accomplish what neither of us could have achieved individually. We are a highly diversified and growth-oriented company with greater than $2.3 billion in trailing 12-month revenue and unique capabilities in mobile devices, infrastructure and defense applications.
We've assembled a world-class team with a legacy of innovation and a sharp focus on superior financial results. Our expectations are to outpace the growth rate of our underlying markets and achieve our target operating model of 50% gross margin, 20% operating expenses and 30% operating margin. In the markets we serve, the demand for mobile data continues to expand, and Qorvo has a full suite of core enabling technologies necessary to help our customers accelerate their products to market. We have broad strength in premium filters, switches, low-noise amplifiers, power amplifiers, antenna tuners and RF power management, and we're able to offer our customers RF solutions that are highly integrated and highly differentiated, and therefore, much more valuable. We're leveraging Qorvo's best-in-class product portfolio, packaging expertise, process technologies and engineering scale to target new opportunities and expand our target market. Looking at just a few examples, we're leveraging our broad strength in high-performance filters, gas PA efficiency, LNA design, systems level expertise and internal assembly and test to expand our opportunities in mobile devices and network infrastructure. We're integrating filters and amplifiers for applications, including mobile devices, automotive and small cell. We're leveraging our WiFi and filter portfolios, coupled with our flip chip capability and manufacturing scale to create new product categories. Whether you're talking about mobile devices, radar, avionic systems or communications infrastructure like base stations, Point-to-Point radio or optical and cable networks, Qorvo is uniquely positioned to connect people, networks and things both wirelessly and over global wired networks. As our new tagline says so well, "Qorvo is all around you." And with that, we'll move to RFMD's financial results. And as Doug said earlier, the December results for Qorvo reflect only the financial results for RFMD. I'll report the December results for RFMD, then Steve will report TriQuint's December results and provide Qorvo's expectations for the March quarter. Looking at RFMD's December quarter, revenue grew 9% sequentially and 37% year-over-year to $396 million. CPG revenue was $342 million, and MPG revenue was $54 million. RFMD's 2 largest customers represented 40% and 14% of revenue. The larger of the 2 represents the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for 1 end customer. Gross margin for the quarter was 49.3%, and operating margin was 30.7%. Operating expenses were $73.8 million or 18.6% of sales. Non-GAAP taxes were approximately $12.8 million, and net income for the quarter was $108.4 million or $0.36 per diluted share, which compares favorably to RFMD's guidance of $0.33. Revenue, gross profit, operating income, operating margin and EPS were all record. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $296 million. Cash flow from operations was $72.1 million, and free cash flow was $51.4 million. DSOs were 49.4 days and inventory was $170 million with turns of 4.9. Net PP&E was $228.6 million and capital expenditures for the quarter were $20.7 million, with depreciation of $13 million and intangible amortization of $5.5 million. Before handing the call over to Steve, I want to congratulate both organizations for staying focused, continuing to take care of our customers and delivering such strong financial results. I credit both RFMD and TriQuint, not only for outstanding performance in December but also for the operational excellence and dramatic improvement in financial results demonstrated by both organizations over the past 18 months. In the March 2013 quarter, when RFMD kicked off its margin expansion initiatives, the stated goal was for 300 to 400 basis points of improvement. And the time since, gross margin expanded by nearly 1,500 basis points. As Steve will tell you in a moment, the dynamic was similar with TriQuint. Both organizations executed successfully on long-term initiatives to affect systemic organizational change, and those continued efforts underpin our organization today. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Steve, who will review TriQuint's December results and provide Qorvo's guidance for the March quarter.
Steven Buhaly:
Thanks, Bob. In the December quarter, TriQuint delivered a robust 27% sequential growth in revenue to $344.9 million. Compared to the same quarter of the prior year, revenue grew 29%, driven by demand for 4G phones and supporting infrastructure. The sequential growth was led by mobile, up 37%. TriQuint's end market revenue split was 73% mobile devices, 17% network infrastructure and 9% defense and aerospace. TriQuint had 0.1% customer at approximately 50% of revenue, representing the aggregated demand of multiple subcontractors for this end customer.
Gross margin was 48.8%, up sequentially from 46.6%. The improvement in TriQuint's gross margin was primarily attributable to improved deals and utilization. Operating expenses were $76.7 million for the December quarter, up $2 million sequentially. Net income for the December quarter was $89.6 million or $0.48 per diluted share. This compares favorably to TriQuint's original guidance of $0.40 to $0.45. Revenue, gross profit, operating income, operating margin and EPS were all records. Total cash and investments increased to $264.7 million during the December quarter. Cash flow from operations totaled $110.3 million while capital expenditures were $105.2 million, primarily to address continued growth in customer demand for our premium filters. Clearly, RFMD and TriQuint delivered terrific December quarterly results, and we're proud to be launching Qorvo on the strength of such exceptional performance. Similar to Bob's comments, I want to recognize the TriQuint team for the crisp execution and remarkable improvement in financial performance. Compared to the December period a year ago, gross margin dollars grew by nearly 70% and operating income tripled. The performance was phenomenal and we're eager to build on this solid foundation as Qorvo. Now let's turn to our business outlook. In Qorvo, we've created a new leader in RF that can outpace the growth rate of our underlying markets. The total addressable market for mobile RF is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 10% to 15% over the next few years, driven primarily by unit growth of 4G phones and the associated dramatic increase in RF content and complexity. The exploding demand for data, and therefore, data traffic are long-term secular growth drivers that favor broadly capable suppliers, such as Qorvoand support multiple, diverse growth opportunities across mobile products, wireless infrastructure and optical applications. Qorvo is uniquely positioned to enhance the smartphone user experience, help device manufacturers accelerate the market with better-performing products and help operators expand network capacity and more quickly monetize their spectrum investments. In calendar 2015, we expect the growth profile for the industry to mirror prior years with March, the only quarter down sequentially, and the revenue weighted more heavily towards the second half of the calendar year. At our Analyst Day in November, we increased our operating model goals to 50% gross margin and 30% operating margin. A quick look at RFMD's and TriQuint's results for the December 2014 quarter helps demonstrate why we're optimistic we'll achieve that goal. You'll find that information in our earnings release under the heading Selected Non-GAAP Results. While the December quarter is seasonally strong and our goal is for the full year, we're off to a great start.
We expect to make progress on our operating model this year while growing ahead of our markets and yielding significant free cash flow. Qorvo currently expects the demand environment in its end markets support the following non-GAAP expectations for the March 2015 quarter:
quarterly revenue in the range of $615 million to $625 million, gross margin in the range of 46% to 48%, a tax rate in the range of 5% to 10% and diluted EPS in the range of $0.80 to $0.90.
Actual quarterly results may differ from these expectations and such differences may be material. We're confident we can outpace our markets this year, and our revenue guidance for March implies greater than 40% year-over-year growth.
Before opening the call for questions, we've got a few housekeeping items. For those of you modeling revenue, please note that going forward, Qorvo will report 2 segments:
Mobile Products and Infrastructure and Defense Products. We expect to release our March quarterly results in early May.
With that, we'd like to welcome your questions. Kelly?
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll move first to Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh Kumar:
First of all, congratulations on the formation of Qorvo and your first call. Bob, as I look to your company now that you've had it for, let's say, a month -- 1.5 months, as you look at midterm, what do you think is your biggest competitive advantage relative to the, maybe, the 2 or 3 guys that you compete against actively in cellular?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Harsh. So from a cellular perspective, I would say much like my opening comments. I think there's 4 areas. I would talk about technology, products, internal manufacturing and some of our customer relationships. From a process perspective, I think we do have some industry-leading technologies whether that's access to SAW filters, temp-comp SAW filters. We talked about 0 drip. We talked about BAW filters. We talked about the work that we've done with SOI to lead the industry and continue to improve performance there as well. Also, outside of cellular, gallium nitride is clearly a technology that we're able to differentiate and gain business. So from the technology side, I think we've got, if you will, palliative technologies that our engineers can choose from to develop tremendous products that give us that breadth across all different tiers of smartphones or different applications whether that's WiFi, and also, in IDP. Again, using gallium nitride in some of those same technologies to take care of our customers in those areas. So tremendous product breadth by bringing the 2 together. But I think you're going to see as we come together and operationalize our 2 organizations -- growing the business there. Then when I talk about internal manufacturing, I think it has been a significant advantage for us and some of our competitors do have that, but we're going to be able to the insource a tremendous amount of work that currently was done outside in assembly and test as we bring up our second factory in China to improve our margins. So that also is something. It's a little bit different than we're going to be able to do. And then clearly, the customer relationships that we both bring are deep. We talked about the 3-way NDAs. Customers were excited about bringing us together. But again, we're able to engage where that customers' across their full product portfolios from their entry-level phones to their mid-tier, to their high-end smartphones. So I think we're going to be well diversified with a broad product offering with the right technologies, Harsh.
Harsh Kumar:
And as a follow up, I can't help but notice when I look at your numbers and TriQuint's numbers for December, you're already very close, and I know December is a big quarter. But you're not that far from some of your long-term goal. And you still have all the $150 million or more -- $150 million cost savings left. Is it conceivable that you could actually do better than your goal in the mid- to longer term?
Steven Buhaly:
Hey, that's a great question, Harsh. And as you remember, we raised those goals in November after noticing the same -- really critical trends in the business both -- across both businesses. And we think the prospects continue to be good for achieving synergies on the cost side to insourcing our assembly and test, working with our suppliers to get to Qorvo level pricing and a variety of other opportunities we have. So I feel real good about that. And then we actually have some really good opportunities from a revenue synergy standpoint. So I think there are good opportunities to have a good year this year, and an exceptional year in '17 as we see the full power of the merger come into play.
Operator:
We'll move next to Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya:
Bob and Steve, good December quarter execution. When I look at the March quarter guidance just too sort of nitpick, I know it's above Street estimates. But I believe it's down about 16% sequentially. That's sort of the lower end of the 10% to 15%. I'm wondering if there's anything more to read into that, or it's just nitpicking from our side.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Vivek. I think if you really look at what's going on in the marketplace today, if you look at some of the leading smartphone manufacturers, and you look at what they're going to be down, you look at our exposure there, and you look at timing of some other new program ramps, looking at the China market, et cetera, I think we're very comfortable with the guidance we gave. I think, again, if you look at it year-over-year, we are up greater than 40%. Clearly, that's more than the market, and we feel good about our position to grow this year.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And as a follow-up, if, Steve, you could you give us some sense of non-GAAP OpEx in Q1? And how you're looking at the trajectory over the next few quarters?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. I think non-GAAP OpEx will be down slightly from the prior quarter. It's a little higher than it would otherwise be because it is the first quarter of the calendar year. We have a lot of FICA expense that comes back into play. And then as you know, we've had a fair amount of performance vested shares and options that have either vested or being exercised in the first quarter, which also raises the FICA expenses as we match that W-2 income. So I think it will be down, maybe a couple of $2 million or $3 million sequentially. And then we'll see some opportunity as that FICA effects and washes out.
Vivek Arya:
Got it. And then finally on gross margins as my last question. As you look at the milestones to get towards your longer-term targets, what are sort of the near-term milestones we can track? What are some of the longer-term milestones?
Steven Buhaly:
Sure. I think the -- there's just a lot of blocking and tackling in getting the synergies driven into cost of goods sold. And Dean Priddy is doing a phenomenal job of organizing and focusing those projects and leading the execution of them along with the rest of the Qorvo team. So I think whether it's assembly and test or supplier cost reductions or some other consolidation opportunities across the whole Qorvo, it's blocking and tackling. It's a little bit of work every day. And so I think you'll see it show up over time in our gross margin, along with all the other factors in the business, whether it's a product mix, pricing. All those are elements, but you'll see those play out over the course of the next 18 months.
Operator:
We'll now go to Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Mike Burton:
Congrats on the great December numbers. Follow-up on Vivek-- just on the March quarter guidance. Just wondering if we could get a little more detail there. Is it down slightly more than seasonal? Were there any production issues that you guys can point to? I think there's been some talk about that, at least, at one of TriQuint's largest customers. And then maybe if you could help us understand how we should expect mobile versus infrastructure to play out. And then the last part of that one is really just the -- on China, you mentioned that Bob. Do you expect that to be down in Q1? And how big is China for you guys now?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Okay. Mike. We may not be able to get all these, but I'll do my best. I don't know of any production issues that are limiting revenue, so I'll just categorically say that. I know you asked about China. I think it'd be good if Eric and James comment a little bit about China business. So they can roughly size that for both mobile products as well as IDP. [indiscernible]
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Sure, I'll go first. So regarding China. We're looking at a very exciting year in China. The rollout of 4G, as you know, was quite strong in 2014, and we're in the very early innings there. So in general, we have a backdrop of a great growth and a lot of opportunities in China this year. The March quarter itself -- we're counting on basically flattish sales for our sales into China, growing in 4G, but we still have 2G and 3G business that is rolling down quite significantly.
Robert Bruggeworth:
James, any comments about China market from your perspective?
James L. Klein:
For us, like we expect -- into China, we just -- mainly for me by base station and the fill in of the rest of backhaul to have another strong year going forward. And so we expect continued strength in the marketplace.
Mike Burton:
Great. And then, if, Eric, if I could just follow up on RF Fusion progress. Skyworks talked a lot about what they're doing with their product, and I'm just curious if you're seeing any RF360 out in the marketplace as well. And if you could just give us an update on where RF Fusion is.
Steven Creviston:
Sure. Thanks, Mike. The Fusion, as we mentioned in the press release, we are ramping in the production with our first high-volume opportunity today. It's pretty exciting opportunity too. This product that's ramping actually supports 6 modes and 18 bands of operation, is carrier aggregation and ET capable, and it's just the beginning of a family of devices. We're engaged with many OEMs right now in various classes of models, mostly in the mid-tier for this RF Fusion category. And of course, as Qorvo, we have a lot to bring to the table. We're very uniquely positioned for these high-level integrated modules with, as Bob said, a broad family of filter technologies, literally, every type of technology we'd need for every band. And of course, leadership, and switching, and tuning and power amplifiers as well. So we're really excited about our Fusion, and I think we're getting some great traction.
Operator:
And from Ascendiant, we'll go to Cody Acree.
Cody Acree:
Congrats on the performance. Maybe back to gross margins. Could you talk about the puts and takes in the first quarter with the range getting all the way down to maybe a lower end or where maybe some of the expectations have been? And then as you look through the rest of the year, how big does facility consolidation play in your plans? And how long before you might make a decision on your gallium arsenide capacity?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. So the gross margin is slightly softer, primarily just due to a little bit of lower revenue in the period. And so I think it's a modest effect, and I think we continue to make progress this year towards a 50% gross margin goal we outlined earlier. I feel very good about that. And then in terms of facility consolidation, I don't expect that to be a meaningful factor during fiscal '16.
Cody Acree:
And then just to follow-up. If you look at where you're positioning China and you gave some percentages for some size. But as you look at the market share shifts from some of the larger international players and some of the local vendors, can -- maybe, Eric, can you just talk about some of the positioning you're having with the local vendors versus some of the more dominant global players?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. I'd be happy to. We're actually quite well positioned with the local suppliers. Of course, as you know, we've had a very long-term relationship with China. We've had a tremendous amount of R&D over there over the years as well as factory footprint and great relationships with, of course, with MediaTek as well as the Qualcomm resources there in China. So we work closely across all the reference design. I think what we're really excited about is -- especially the second half of this calendar year, a lot of the China majors are going to be growing, and the references on -- the ones we referenced in the press release will really start kicking in, in the second half. I think our overall attachment rate and share across kind of the leading reference designs for the China handset OEMs is only going to grow throughout the year.
Operator:
We'll go next to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Steven Smigie:
I'll have my congratulations on the great results. Can we talk a little bit about gross margin as we go into June? Because, obviously, as you've answered in the last call, we've kind of had a down seasonal quarter. But is it fair to argue you have a pretty decent pop into June, and we march up from there? I guess, does that tie into your comments about 50% for the year?
Steven Buhaly:
I don't really want to guide the subsequent quarter. And as you know, margin has a little bit of a correlation with revenue. But again, I think we're going to make good progress over the course of the full year towards our expectation of having a 50% gross margin over a full year period. So I think that -- so I think we'll make good progress, but I don't want to give you a specific number for the next subsequent quarter.
Steven Smigie:
That's helpful. And could you give us some color on what the gross margin might be by the 2 major business units?
Steven Creviston:
Just directionally, the infrastructure and defense tends to be a higher gross margin and a fairly similar operating margin, as you will see when we start reporting by segments.
Steven Smigie:
Okay. The last question was just a housekeeping item. As we look at that tax rate, is that sort of the rate we should be assuming that the one that you guided for the March quarter, is that what we should be assuming for Qorvo going forward?
Steven Creviston:
I think for this year, it's a decent modeling assumption. Beyond that, I would think we would level out more than a 10% to 15% as our tax position normalizes.
Operator:
We'll now go to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Eric, I know you've got a lot of 2G/3G in China. How much more do you have in China to go, given it seems to be pressuring your sales in that region, maybe offsetting some or a lot of your 4G? And how much of that 2G/3G, especially the 3G, do you think is share loss given your large competitor seems to be growing really well on 3G GaAs at this point. And then, Bob, you pointed to shares. Your largest customers is one of the reasons for a little more than seasonal down in March. Is that spread across both of your largest customers? So it's like overall demand for handsets, or is it more of a share shift thing between handset OEMs? And then I've got a follow-up for Steve, please.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So the transition of our China business towards 4G as of the March quarter, it plays out. The way it's looking right now, 4G will be more than 85% of our sales in China. So we'll -- at most of the headwind, they're past us. But I don't know if that's really a share loss as much as the overall trend in the industry there. We're seeing a lot of users, I think, converting directly from 2G to 4G. And -- so the dimes, the dollars conversion opportunity for us we've been talking about. So we're really focused in getting a lot of traction on the 4G side of the business there.
Robert Bruggeworth:
And to answer your question, what I was talking about was no secret that the largest player in the industry and the one that spends the most money announced that their handset units are going to be down pretty substantially. And my comment would be actually with our second largest customer quarter, if they're only going to be up this quarter, they just don't put as many dollars on the phone. Hope that helps, Ed.
Edward Snyder:
And Steve, March is normally a slower period, but do you expect maybe higher excess capacity charges at some of your plants in March, especially the Florida plant? Or is that about normal? And as a follow-up, Eric. Given now that you've got the BAW business under your belt and given the demand, and more importantly, the margins in your BAW products, would you expect that -- I would've expect that have a bigger impact on the next few quarters, especially given that Texas can add capacity incrementally. You don't need to put bricks and mortars in there. Are you not seeing that? Is it -- or is it capacity limit? Or you just don't have the demand for a widened BAW starting to -- I would think it will form. That's just your revenue growth but your margin profile in CPG more in the next quarter or 2.
Steven Creviston:
That was such a long question. I almost forgot what you asked me, Ed. Let me try. With lower revenue, we do have a bit of a few fixed costs in operations. And so gross margin does have a little bit of -- has a little impact about our little revenue, not the least of which you divide that fixed cost by a lower revenue number. So very modest effect, but there is an effect there.
Robert Bruggeworth:
I think, Ed to your question on the BAW filters and margins, clearly, as we ramp that, it will improve the margins of the business. No doubt about it. I think we've been just careful when making sure that you don't get too far ahead of yourselves in modeling how we expect to get to our 50% gross margin, which is our commitment to you guys, and that's what we're going to.
Edward Snyder:
I think -- okay. But TriQuint, it said, they're going to double capacity and their BAW plants starting, I guess, they give the guidance in October. And that will be completed by, say, the 4th of July. And you did about $480 million by the end of the year. And Steve, I think we talked about this previously, you're about 425 or you already added some capacity. And then we'll come on incrementally versus your large competitor BAW which has to put in a big brick and mortar facility. So if BAW is increasing every quarter because you're adding incremental capacity in Texas and the margin profile is anything close to what, I think, most people expect it to be, you would think -- I know as that sizes the revenue of kick for CPG that you would start seeing some of that. Before that, my question is, are you still capacity limited and that's why it's not having a bearing? Or is the demand profile slowing down a little bit? Or is there something else happening?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. I would say demand and supply are fairly well matched right now. And as you know, the peak demand, it tends to be in the fall. And so we're benefiting both from some incremental adds to capacity and the seasonality in the mobile business.
Robert Bruggeworth:
I would also add that we are continuing to diversify the customer base for that.
Operator:
We have JoAnne Feeney with ABR Investment Strategy -- has our next question.
JoAnne Feeney:
Congratulations. I just wanted to follow-up on the question about the LTE and comp infrastructure situation in China. Do you think it's going to be strong this year? I'm wondering if you could elaborate, and if you're seeing yet, any new orders come in for that buildout?
James L. Klein:
Yes. This is James. So we expected to have another strong year. I think we've guided in the past that we saw a big ramp going into last year, and we expected to be flat -- relatively flat this year. They're very, very strong year. We're also seeing growth in small cell and in GaN adoption. So those are both also helping us a bit. And now we're starting to see backhaul products come into play as well to affect both our optical and point-to-Point business. So in general, to reiterate, I think another strong year for us in infrastructure buildout in China.
JoAnne Feeney:
Are you seeing, though, any orders yet in the cading of [indiscernible] pickup? Some have commented that there was a bit of a slowdown at the end of the year. I'm just wondering if you're seeing anything concrete that suggests that's turning around?
James L. Klein:
I think, yes. I think nothing materially different at this point in time. I mean, generally, this time of year in China, with the new year, we see a little bit of a gap there. But I don't think it's anything different than we would have seen in other years.
JoAnne Feeney:
Okay, great. That's helpful. And then if we could just go back to the operating expenses this year and the merger integration, can you elaborate a little bit on the timing and what we might expect over the course of the year to delivering those savings from the merger that you anticipated? Is that something you expect still to get done in 4 to 6 quarters? Or has the progress you've already made largely gotten to where you think you need to be from the merger synergies?
James L. Klein:
Yes. Thanks, JoAnne. I think we'll make pretty consistent progress over that 4- to 6-quarter period. Some savings have been achieved pretty much right off the bat. Others take time to occur. One of the milestones for us will be integrating our 2 SAP systems and improving -- that we've completed that process successfully. But it'll happen over the process of time. And I think that it'll happen in the way that we meet our objectives of $75 million run rate savings after year 1 and the same after the second year. So again, Dean's running a very extensive collection of projects and many of those involve operating expenses of various sorts, and I think we're in good shape to achieve our objectives there.
JoAnne Feeney:
Great. That's really helpful. One final question if I could. I'm wondering if you're seeing any ASP pressures on your components in the handset space?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Eric, any comments on the pricing environment?
Steven Creviston:
No. I'd say, pricing is kind of a steady as she goes, nothing unusual.
Operator:
We'll hear next from Sid Sinha with Canaccord Genuity.
Siddharth Sinha:
Bob, RFMD and TriQuint in the past have had a good track record in consistently growing or maintaining intent in next-generation smartphones with the prior recreations. Since you stepped into 2015 and giving your current design win pipeline, would it be fair to assume that, that is still the expectation?
Robert Bruggeworth:
As far as this year, you're saying calendar '15 just to be clear?
Siddharth Sinha:
Yes.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes, yes. Eric, do you want to comment about smartphones and our ability to continue to expand our dollar content, given all these new toys you have to play with?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. I would be happy to. The trends, as you know, would be the exploding demand for mobile data. It's really driving a lot of opportunity in the RF front-end, and it's a great time in this industry. In particular, if you do have the ability to take all of the core components that are best-in-class and offer customers higher levels of integration. And so to the trend that you were referring to, we are able to do that, especially in a differentiated way. You just have access to a bigger piece of the market, and that's what we intend to capitalize on this year.
Steven Buhaly:
I'll just add in Eric's comment. I think we believe that most of the growth in the market over the next 2 or 3 years is going to come from highly integrated solutions, not from discrete components. And Qorvo's breadth of process and product offerings really play to our customers needs from our highly integrated solutions.
Siddharth Sinha:
Great. And then just any color on the IDP business for the March quarter? Is it sequentially going to be up or flat or down versus December? And then just looking out longer term, during the Analyst Day, you talked about a 5% to 10% annual growth rate for this -- for the IDP business. Is that still a fair growth rate assumption?
James L. Klein:
So 2 questions -- it's James again. We're expecting quarter-over-quarter to be relatively flat. And as far as the growth rate to model the business, we've typically said the mid- to high single-digit growth rates for the market.
Operator:
And we'll move on to Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian Ing:
Great. First question, just housekeeping. What part of share count should we think of from March? I get a 151 million on a straight conversion of shares. And what should the range be going forward as you manage the 4G?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. I think for the quarter, on a fully diluted basis, you should think in the range of 154 million, 155 million shares. And for the full year, I think, it might be just a little bit more than that. We'll give you more information as we go forward.
Ian Ing:
Okay. And question on premium filters. I mean, where are we with TC-SAW and BAW potentially getting into some previously unreachable bands? I noticed some tough bands to do like 25 and 41 in North America. I think some bands -- the specs are getting loose ends. Just where are you with getting in this previously unreachable bands?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. So that's really the highlight for the LowDrift and NoDrift filter technologies we're talking about. I think we're leading in the industry of giving our customers the ability to address those bands with both temp-comp SAW as well as temp-comp BAW now, and in fact, really NoDrift. That allows the filters to pass a lot more energy in the past band while still rejecting those very close, thin frequencies, and for the kind of inoperability issues you're talking about in coexistence of WiFi, and public safety bands and so forth. These are really, really tough requirements. And you're right, I mean, up until the time of our release of these filter technologies, the customers have had to back up power levels and so forth to meet those requirements. And we're going to allow our customers to have much better performance in their band of operation while still coexisting with those bands.
Ian Ing:
Do you have a sense of your coverage at this point of the bands out there? Is it 80% or 90% or something? Or...
Steven Creviston:
I think it's fair to say that we have the ability to cover 100% of the band. In fact, that what we have in production today, I don't have a good sense for it. But I think we have the ability to cover all the bands.
Operator:
N. Quinn Bolton with Needham has our next question.
Krysten Sciacca:
Congrats on the quarter. This is Krysten Sciacca for Quinn Bolton. Just one quick question for you. Given the supply tightness on the filter side, doesn't it -- do you guys think that you left any demand unfulfilled in December?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Question was, do you think with tightness -- was is in the filter capacity versus demand? Did we leave any revenue in December -- that we weren't able to capture in December? I believe that was the question. Is that correct?
Krysten Sciacca:
Yes. That's correct.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. I think we had tightness across several commodities, not just filters but also slides [indiscernible] for example, and our teams who are working really hard to align supply with demand. I think at the end of it potentially, a little bit, it would be very little. I think for the most part, as Steve said, we've kind of got some clarity now with supply and demand.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll move next to David Duley with Steelhead Securities.
David Duley:
Congratulations on a spectacular quarter. Just a couple of questions here. As far as your 2 largest customers, now that you've combined the company, do you see content increase capabilities with your integrated products for those 2 large IDM customers?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. We sure do, of course. And that's, of course, one of the primary motivations behind the merger was to put these 2 companies together and come up with a portfolio which is unprecedented, and our largest customers tend to benefit from that. And we've mentioned several times previously, there was -- we were requested to sign up 3-way NDAs even before we were able to close so that we could begin that development even sooner. But I think there's a lot of excitement across the entire customer base really, not just our largest customers but even in these 4G handsets in China and some of the lower-end reference designs. The trends are towards higher levels of integration. And we've been talking a lot today about filtering, and you think of these advanced, like really tough bands and some of the coexistence problems. And a lot of that surrounds just getting cellular to work next to WiFi. And even entry-level phones have to do that. So the opportunities to leverage the premium filters with all the other capabilities we have in integrating to higher levels, that really affects all tiers of our market.
Robert Bruggeworth:
James, do you want to add a little bit? Because it also applies to you.
James L. Klein:
I would add as well. I mean, we're seeing benefits in several -- of the different markets to be able to integrate. Example would be WiFi where we're able to address segments of the market that perhaps we weren't able to as separate companies. We're now able to put together some great amplifier technology filter and switching and that offer integrated solutions. So it's been a benefit really across multiple different market segments.
David Duley:
Would you expect your customer concentration with those 2 customers to go up, down, sideways, going forward, given that you seem to be able to pick up incremental slots from those guys?
Robert Bruggeworth:
I think at one level, you have to decide how well they're going to do in the market. Let's be honest. What I think -- as we see other players bring out LTE phones, and we've also discussed about the China OEMs also starting to build their brands, normally within China but outside of China. We've grown very nicely, both companies have in the past. So what we expected to be able to drive our share consistent across all the customers so our exposure will be more or less with the end OEMs' exposure as with the markets. But clearly, our 2 largest today, we believe, we can continue to grow with them and expand our content there. But I also want to make sure everybody understands, there's tremendous growth outside of the top 2.
David Duley:
And just as a follow-up housekeeping question, what sort of utilization rates are you guys seeing in your internal capacity for filters? And I guess, what other key power amplifiers, however you measure it? If you could just help us understand what the utilization rates are and how you're going to have to spend money going forward to address the growth.
Robert Bruggeworth:
I'll start with gas capacity. Both companies have been running very comfortably and continue to take on more business. So I can't expect to be adding gas capacity. As far as assembly and test goes, as we said earlier, part of the synergies was to insource the assembly and test of a lot of the product that TriQuint currently produces in our supply base. So from a CapEx perspective, RFMD has already started building a second factory in China. So as Qorvo, we will continue to do that, facilitize it, bring in equipment and insource that work. And it has a tremendous return, a quick payback, and you'll start to see that in the gross margins as we continue to bring production in the second half of this calendar year. Then as far as filters go, TriQuint had already been on an expansion plan in Texas as well as in Florida. And as Qorvo, we will continue to make those investments that we've already outlined, actually, to the -- on last quarter's conference call.
Operator:
We'll take a follow-up from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder:
Eric, I just wanted to go back to China again. Normally, how large was China for CPG last quarter? And maybe if you could give us kind of a guesstimate on the sequential growth in China. You may have seen it. You didn't see any decline in 2G at all. And then, Bob, we've heard a lot of talk from you and Skyworks and a bunch of other guys on integration, higher-density modules, which certainly seems to be the trend in architectures. When does that start showing up in performance? When do we start seeing your revenue or margins start to improve materially based on integration? I know a few people have taken -- a few lanes have take samples of a bit and some
[Audio Gap] So 1 out of 3 questions, you didn't hear them?
Robert Bruggeworth:
No. We've got enough to answer if you like us to start.
Edward Snyder:
Go ahead.
Steven Creviston:
So the first question was about our China business. It's roughly 25% of Qorvo mobile business today.
Edward Snyder:
And if you hadn't seen any 2G decline, Eric, would have it been up substantially? I mean, you talked about direct 2G to 4G and dimes to dollars, so you would not lead us to expect that we would see a significant uptick in China just based on the 4G migration. Sounds like there's been pressure, and you're not alone. But between 2G and 3G on blue skies [indiscernible] there were guys who supplied it. So could you just -- rough end, guesstimate what China would've been if you hadn't seen 2G decline?
James L. Klein:
No. Our 4G business was up about 10%. So yes. I mean, you would see a bit 10% on the 25% of the business. So it might affect it by a couple of points as a percentage of the total. 2G is just not a big business for the company these days, and it's really down to under 5% of CPG or mobile revenues.
Robert Bruggeworth:
And Ed, your question on margins and integration, I mean, both companies have been shipping power amplifiers with filters and various numbers of filters, and then over the time, we both have significantly improved gross margins. So I would point out that I think we've already started seeing that. And from an RF Fusion perspective, we're just in the beginning of that ramp as well, and as we've said, we expect our margins to increase as Qorvo.
Steven Creviston:
I think it will certainly help with the historic TriQuint pads and such to have of the advantage of using the internal test and assembly facilities in China.
Edward Snyder:
And then, Steve, while we're at it. You mentioned that you saw BAW pretty well balanced at least for TriQuint in terms of supply and demand this quarter. Does that change your expansion plans for Texas? Are you going to wait and see how the things develop. Obviously, I'm a little cautionary on the filter business. So if there was a full steam ahead [indiscernible].
Steven Buhaly:
No. It's pretty much what we expected, right? It's a seasonally weak period and then -- and that provides a little bit of relief. We're continuing to add capacity on an incremental basis, so we would remediate bottlenecks as we go along. And we expect to be ready to roll for a seasonally strong second half of the calendar year.
Edward Snyder:
How do you feel in TC-SAW? You have ample, you are short, you're really short? How was it?
Steven Buhaly:
TC-SAW?
Edward Snyder:
Yes, TC-SAW.
Steven Creviston:
TC-SAW is in a reasonable balance right now.
Steven Buhaly:
As you know, that was an area of shortage in the fall. Along with[indiscernible] I think we managed through it.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Yes. And then the thing I would to point out there is we actually spent a lot of time down there on some lean manufacturing. The team down there did a fantastic job of significantly increasing the output without spending the capital. So it's not always just about spending capital. It's more efficient use of the capital, and the team down there in Florida did a fantastic job in the December quarter.
Operator:
We'll hear now from D.A. Davidson's Thomas Diffely.
Thomas Diffely:
First question, getting back to your insourcing of the assembly and test. Is the main driver there cost? Or is it really capabilities that you have versus an outsourcing model?
Robert Bruggeworth:
Primarily is cost. Clearly, we also have some technologies that we have insourced that are not outside. Some of the shielding technologies that we do have is more and more of this highly integrated modules need shielding capabilities, so that customers don't have to place shields on their phones. But the primary driver is cost. We also pick-up cycle time in our ability to respond quickly to customers' fluctuations in their demand as well.
Thomas Diffely:
Okay. And is that specifically that can, I guess, is there a variable component that can ramp up and down with the cyclicality and fixed quality of the business?
Robert Bruggeworth:
It's for -- it's no different than what we historically have done. RFMD and even in down quarters, we're able to improve margins. So we're able to do a pretty good job of that. It's significantly cheaper than the outside as well. So even if you're not at full utilization, it's still cheaper to produce it inside.
Thomas Diffely:
Okay. Good to hear. And then second question on the competitive front, I'm curious more about the kind of the second-tier Asian competitor. Have you seen any progress that they've made on integrated solutions to date? Or are they still pretty much a point solution or a discreet solution at this time?
Robert Bruggeworth:
I don't know who you're talking about. I'll assume they've made no progress.
Thomas Diffely:
Okay. And then, I guess, on the same front, would you expect ASPs to remain fairly strong for integrated solutions until you get or if -- unless you would get more of a hungry competitor?
Steven Creviston:
Sure. There's no reason to expect anything to change in -- within the near term horizon for the integrated solutions. There's very few people capable of doing this, and we're all investing to invest to the R&D and so forth to expand the industry. So I think that's going to be the continuing model.
Operator:
Now we'll take a follow-up from JoAnne Feeney with ABR Investment Strategy.
JoAnne Feeney:
Just a couple of housekeeping items. I'm hoping you can help us out on the full year outlook for CapEx.
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. So CapEx, I think, will be normal CapEx rate over expenditure. For Qorvo's, probably going to be in the 5% to 6% of revenue. I think it might be a little bit higher this year, as we round out our investment in China assembly, and test and their premium filters. So if you modeled 7% to 8% of revenue for this year, I think you'd be in the ballpark.
JoAnne Feeney:
Okay, great. And then how about depreciation and amortization for the year?
Steven Buhaly:
Yes. So depreciation is probably going to run around $160 million for the year. And I guess amortization might be another $10 million. We don't report amortization on our non-GAAP results.
JoAnne Feeney:
Okay, perfect. And then with -- in terms of the new segment breakdown, I believe that's just a straight combination of the segments of the 2 companies. Was there any shuffling around between whether now the fund is mobile on the other one?
Steven Buhaly:
You're right, JoAnne. There is some minor shuffling, but it's in the rounding areas. So I think it's a pretty safe assumption to combine the 2 companies' Mobile Groups and the 2 companies' Infrastructure and Defense and that will be our segments going forward.
JoAnne Feeney:
Okay. So if it's sufficiently minor then, there's no need for you to publish historical data on that breakdown?
Steven Buhaly:
Correct.
Operator:
And at this time, I'd like to turn the conference back to management for closing remarks.
Robert Bruggeworth:
Again, I want to thank our team for the incredible journey we've been on and express how enthusiastic we are to build on our shared strengths and deliver superior long-term shareholder value. Qorvo is uniquely positioned to capitalize on the proliferation of 4G and capture the increasing RF content and connected devices. We intend to outpace our underlying growth markets, deliver robust operating leverage and continue to improve upon our strong financial performance. Thanks again, and good night.
Operator:
Again, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you, all, for joining us.
Executives:
Doug DeLieto - Former Vice President of Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Corporate Development Committee William A. Priddy - Executive Vice President of Administration Steven Creviston - President of Mobile Products Norman A. Hilgendorf - Former Corporate Vice President and President of Multi Market Products Group
Analysts:
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC Ian Ing - MKM Partners LLC, Research Division Krysten Sciacca - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RF Micro Devices Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Now I would like to introduce your host for today's call, Douglas DeLieto. Mr. DeLieto, you may begin.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Jessica. Hello, everybody, and welcome to our conference call. At 4 p.m. today, we issued a press release. If anyone listening did not receive a copy of the release, please call Samantha Alfonso at the Financial Relations Board at (212) 827-3746. Sam will e-mail a copy to you and verify that you are on our distribution list. In the meantime, the release is also available on our corporate website, rfmd.com, under the heading Investors. At this time, I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, rfmd.com, under Investors. In February, we announced a definitive merger agreement under which RF Micro Devices Inc. will combine with TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. in a merger of equals. On April 14, 2014, the new holding company, Qorvo, Inc., formerly known as Rocky Holding, Inc., filed a Registration/Joint Proxy Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC. The filing may be found through EDGAR on the SEC's website, which is located at www.sec.gov under file number 333-195236. We urge you to read the Registration/Joint Proxy Statement and other documents filed with the SEC as they will contain important information about the transaction. RFMD will be cohosting an Investor Day with TriQuint for institutional investors and financial analysts on November 18 in New York City, and we look forward to seeing many of you there. A link to the live audio webcast and presentation materials will be available on the Investor section of our website. [Operator Instructions] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I'm also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf, who lead our Cellular Products Group and Multi-Market Products Group, respectively, as well as other members of RFMD's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone. In the September quarter, RFMD continued to benefit from the increasing global demand for mobile data. Revenue grew approximately 17% year-over-year to $362 million. Gross profit was $174 million. Operating income was $100 million, and earnings per share were $0.30. Each of these were company records, reflecting sharp focus and crisp execution by the RFMD team and supported by favorable market dynamics. Across the mobile data landscape, consumers are demanding more bandwidth to support their data-hungry applications. Carriers are requiring greater throughput from their available spectrum, and device manufacturers are seeking greater functionality within the same footprint, with a bias towards broader network coverage in global and superregional flagship devices. In each instance, RFMD solutions are a key enabling technology. Dating back to the transition from analog to digital cellular standards, every increase in the efficient delivery of mobile data has depended on some combination of increased RF content, increased RF functionality or increased RF performance. We've seen download speeds rocket from kilobits per second to tens of megabits per second. And over the next several years, our industry is targeting 1 gigabyte per second. These increases have come through either new modulation schemes or increasing bandwidth. New modulation schemes embed more data in the available spectrum to deliver substantial increases in throughput. However, the higher data density requires enhanced RF performance. Also, innovation cycles require years, and the implementation of every next-generation technology introduces new complexity and new challenges for the device manufacturers, base station manufacturers and network operators. Between these generational cycles, from analog to 2G, from 3G to 4G and from 4G to 5G, additional bandwidth can be added to boost throughput. But this brings new challenges for device manufacturers, base station manufacturers and network operators, creating new opportunities for suppliers of RF solutions. In each case, RFMD helped solve these challenges, reducing system complexity, shrinking product footprint, extending battery life and enabling more efficient delivery of mobile data. RFMD is a leading supplier of both multimode and discrete power amplifiers, and RFMD is helping to deploy innovative new technologies like carrier aggregation and transmit MIMO, which combine independent channels of bandwidth to achieve higher data rates and help operators to monetize their spectrum investments. RFMD is also pioneering the development of new RF power management schemes like envelope tracking, which tracks and adjusts the voltage delivered to the PA in realtime to optimize efficiency and extend battery life. Of note, we're very early in the deployment of these enabling technologies. Nearly half of the world's handsets today are still 2G and contain less than $1 of RF content. That's increasing to several dollars over a multiyear period as handsets move from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G. As I said earlier, mobile data is enabled in 2 ways. The shift to next-generation air standards delivers greater modulation, while the introduction of new bands and new technologies like carrier aggregation increases bandwidth. In both cases, RFMD is a primary enabler, and our growth opportunities are expanding significantly as our content per handset goes from dimes to dollars. Whether you look at smartphones, consumer premise equipment or network infrastructure, customers are seeking the advantages of scale and broad system-level expertise as well as comprehensive product and technology portfolios to optimize system performance and improve our efficiency. These dynamics are expanding our growth opportunities across markets, customers and products, enabling RFMD to capture increasing content in a broad set of products and further diversify our revenue base. In the markets served by our Multi-Market Products Group, we enjoyed broad-based sequential growth and diversification through product and technology leadership. We are supporting the deployment of wireless infrastructure in China and around the world, and we expect the upgrade of 4G networks to be a multiyear expansion. WiFi continues its healthy expansion in devices and equipment, and we are still very early in the adoption of 802.11ac. We are capturing incremental growth in automotive, home automation and other broadband connectivity applications comprising the Internet of Things. We are targeting multiple applications that leverage our advanced gallium nitride technology in networks, systems and devices. So from a very high level, RFMD is both a primary enabler and a primary beneficiary of the exploding demand for mobile data. As the industry moves to cloud-based platforms and we target download speeds of 1 gigabyte per second, these RF connections are growing in importance, and the RF TAM is expanding accordingly. RFMD is supplying our industry's leaders the products they need to differentiate their devices, and we are enjoying very favorable design activity. Our revenue drivers are large, multiyear opportunities, and we see sustainable, long-term, diversified growth across markets, customers and product categories. Looking into 2015 and beyond, we expect revenue growth greater than the industry and EPS growth well ahead of our revenue growth. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dean.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. The September quarter was strong for RFMD with revenue, gross profit, operating income and earnings per share, all quarterly records. Revenue for the September quarter was up approximately 14% sequentially to $362 million. CPG revenue was $298 million, and MPG revenue was $64 million. The revenue strength was broad based and well diversified, and RFMD had 2 10% customers. RFMD is definitely benefiting from the opportunities brought by the exploding demand for mobile data. Gross margin for the September quarter increased to 48%. That's up 90 basis points sequentially and almost 12 points year-over-year. Operating expenses were $73.8 million with G&A of $10.9 million, sales and marketing of $16.5 million and R&D of $46.4 million. Operating income for the September quarter was $100.1 million, representing approximately 28% of sales. Non-GAAP taxes were approximately $10.1 million, and net income for the quarter was $90 million or $0.30 per diluted share based on 296.5 million shares. Moving to the balance sheet. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $241.3 million. Cash flow from operations was $58.7 million, and free cash flow was $39.4 million. DSOs were 54.7 days, and RFMD's inventory balance of $159.2 million resulted in turns of 4.9. Net PP&E was $207.1 million, and capital expenditures during the quarter were $19.3 million with depreciation of $12.2 million and intangible amortization of $6.8 million. Before moving to the guidance section, I'd like to make a few comments on the continued sustainability of our financial performance. Our revenue is being driven by the massive multiyear proliferation of mobile data. I feel really good about our near- and long-term growth opportunities. Our organization is excelling in driving product costs lower. Our efforts have driven improved profitability across all product segments. This intense focus on product costs will not change, and internally, the focus is only getting stronger. The entire RFMD team has come together with a goal to be the best, and the company has never been better positioned for revenue growth greater than the industry and EPS growth well ahead of our revenue growth. Now for the non-GAAP financial outlook and business commentary. In the December 2014 quarter, RFMD expects quarterly revenue of approximately $385 million. RFMD expects gross margin to be approximately flat sequentially. RFMD expects operating expenses to be approximately flat. RFMD expects a tax rate of approximately 10% to 15%, and RFMD expects diluted EPS of approximately $0.33. With that, I'll hand the call back to Bob for comments on our proposed combination with TriQuint.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Dean. Before we open the call up for your questions, I'll recap some of the progress we've made leading up to our proposed merger. On September 5, RFMD and TriQuint both held shareholder meetings, during which the shareholders of both companies voted overwhelmingly in favor of our proposed merger. We're very pleased with these results as they endorse our vision to create a new leader in RF. More recently, we announced our new company name will be Qorvo, and we will begin using the ticker symbol QRVO immediately upon closing. The name Qorvo is meant to convey our combined company's ability to deliver the core technology necessary to launch our customers' next-generation designs even faster. It also represents our commitment to keeping our customers at the center of all we do. Since announcing our proposed merger earlier this year, we have established cross-functional teams from across both organizations, and they are working seamlessly to ensure we hit the ground running. We are prepared for day 1, and we are preparing for day 100 and beyond. With each day of planning, preparation and alignment, we are building a clearer vision of where we're going and how we will achieve our goals. We have identified multiple projects supporting our expectations for revenue, cost and expense synergies. We have staffed each project, and we have mapped the actions necessary to achieve success. We are also identifying new opportunities for growth and new avenues for diversification, giving us additional confidence in our ability to achieve our value-creation goals and deliver on our operating model. At our customers' request, we've executed 3-way NDAs with multiple leading smartphone manufacturers. We are working together to drive higher levels of functional integration to help our customers accelerate products to market as early as next year. I am extremely proud of the progress we have made to date, which is all the more noteworthy when you consider the role RFMD and TriQuint have played to support the successful ramp of multiple new flagship devices. Regarding deal timing, we continue to anticipate the merger will close by calendar year end, and both of our organizations are fully prepared for a very successful day 1. And with that, we'll open up the call for your questions.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
Bob, there's been some concern about excess 3G handsets in China. I was hoping if you could, number one, give us some breakdown of what your 3G versus 4G exposure is within CPG. And Part B of that is if you could give us some color around how you see the supply and demand dynamic in China. I understand that you're more focused on content growth, but how you're seeing sort of the unit demand and supply situation there?
Steven Creviston:
This is Eric. Vivek, I'll take that. First off, your question about the split of 3G versus 4G within CPG overall, that's actually pretty hard to calculate because many of our components are used for both applications in switches and power amplifiers in particular. So we don't really try to split up between 3G and 4G. Overall, 3G/4G though is now about 90% of CPG revenues. And as you can imagine, 4G is certainly the quickest growing, so it's mixing more and more towards 4G all the time. And then within China specifically, we don't see any particular issues in terms of inventory builds. We do continue to see a strong mix shift towards 4G in that market as well. In fact, overall, we are kind of flat to down slightly in China in the last quarter but we did grow in 4G in China fairly nicely. So we're seeing the same kind of shift there and no particular concerns about inventory builds. But overall, it's a great opportunity. We think we're still in very early innings there, watching a huge subscriber base transition from 2G up to 4G over the coming years.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
Got it. Very helpful, Eric. And then one question on gross margin. The trajectory has been very strong. Just near term, I'm curious why you're guiding to sequentially flat gross margin even though you expect to grow sales, I believe, around 6% or so sequentially. And then more importantly, what are the longer-term drivers from here given that you have already achieved a lot of the goals that you had set for yourself after the combination with TriQuint?
William A. Priddy:
Well, we've achieved a lot of the internal goals -- I mean the goals that we had communicated externally. Internally, we continue to work hard to continue to make improvements in gross margin. I think the December quarter could be a bit of impact of mix to margins. I don't think it necessarily means that margins have peaked by any stretch. And in fact, I can put scenarios together where we could see margin improvement in the December quarter and beyond. But for now, we're saying 48% is a good number for the quarter.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
All right. And one last thing, just along those same lines. Is it fair to assume that the $150 million in cost savings that you had mentioned before is still sort of incremental to the pro forma performance we have seen so far from RFMD and TriQuint?
William A. Priddy:
Yes. We have not realized any synergies yet between the TriQuint and RFMD merger, so we're very, very comfortable with the $150 million number and specifically identified all those synergies. So I would continue to put a very strong check mark in that box.
Operator:
We'll go next to Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Eric, I just wanted to follow-up on that last question on your guidance for next quarter. You're not seeing an inventory build in China, but I'm wondering what your expectation is for your growth in Q4. If it's obviously, probably centered around one particular customer with another one that does a little bit of an inventory digestion. But I wonder what your expectation is for the Chinese market and some of the other OEMs.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. Thanks, Mike. As you said, it's certainly -- the growth we're seeing in the December quarter is certainly led by flagship launches, new products in the very highest tier that are driving a lot of RF content. We're expecting kind of more of the same in China, again relatively flat, up in 4G but down in the others. We're not counting on growth in China to hit our guidance in December.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then realizing it's a little early to talk about the March quarter, but given your increasing exposure to one of your top customers, I'm curious how to think about seasonality in March and going forward.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Mike, this is Bob. I'll go ahead and take a shot at that. Again, a little premature to be calling the March quarter. We've got Chinese New Year a little bit later than normal and what all is going to transpire. But from a planning perspective, typically running 10% to 15% is probably not out of the norm. It all depends on how diversified the business is. Some of the marquee phones, how long they continue to be successfully received in the marketplace. I think what's also of note is that we're -- from a gross margin perspective, back to the earlier questions, we're feeling pretty good about our gross margins being able to hold up even in a down seasonal 10% to 15% in the March quarter. So when we look at it all well and all, we'll have to see how it plays out, but typically 10% to 15%.
Operator:
We'll go next to Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
First of all, congratulations, tremendous execution over the last 2 years or so, guys. Bob, I had a quick sort of question on Qorvo. The joint company will have almost all parts of the RF functions and features under one roof. Do you anticipate having that capability will dramatically increase your ability to cross-sell other parts and also give you a tremendous ability to gain share relative to the other players?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Harsh. Appreciate the comments. As far as Qorvo is concerned, as you pointed out, we will have the various technologies that we believe are needed in the RF front end or the handset in particular. I guess is where the question was geared towards. And we are finding opportunities where there's pieces of business that neither of the companies would go after. But when we bring the things together, again, customers are asking to sign 3-way NDAs so that we can work on product roadmaps to help them launch their products even faster in the market. So clearly, there's opportunities for us to gain share. But I think what's also most important to understand is the -- what's really driving the growth for our industry is, what I talked about, the increasing bandwidth, adding the bands and that complexity and the major shift from 2G to 3G and 3G to 4G. That's clearly what's going to drive most of the growth. But yes, there's opportunity for us to gain some share as we come together and get our product and technology roadmaps aligned.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Great. As my follow-up if I can ask you, what is left for legally or otherwise, what is left for the combination to take place?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
We have received the, obviously, the shareholder vote. From a U.S. regulations, we're in good shape there. We are only waiting on the China's Ministry of Commerce approval. And it's the last step in our regulatory approvals.
Operator:
We'll go next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Dean, you saw a fairly steep increase in R&D this past quarter. I think in the past you said you were comfortable with your OpEx level and you could grow the top line without having increased it, unless of course you ran into some big design wins that would require it. Is that what we're seeing here? Is that increase tactical or strategic? And then, Bob, in the press release, you mentioned the 3-way NDAs with TriQuint and smartphone OEMs. I imagine those were executed midyear or so. Was that early enough to impact your share in content in 2015 smartphones, given the design cycles of different OEMs? Or should we expect more of a kick, if there is one, in 2016? And does that apply to all the 3-way NDAs or only to some of those? And then, Eric, you mentioned the ET shipments, which is very interesting that they're actually -- are those production, preproduction or Qual? And is this PowerSmart as in both the ET PMIC and the AMP? Or is it just the PMIC and are we going to rebrand PowerSmart to be something else? And how many basebands -- how many major basebands are you paired with there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
All right, Ed, appreciate your question. I'll go ahead and let Eric start with it in reverse and go through the product side first. Then I'll address your 3-way NDAs, and then Dean will finish up with our expenses.
William A. Priddy:
R&D. Yes.
Steven Creviston:
So the question on envelope tracking shipments, those are full production. So we shipped millions of units into, again, 2 baseband -- 2 different baseband solutions into flagship phones with one customer last quarter. And this was not PowerSmart, this is new envelope tracking, power management IC. And in all cases, we also had multimode power amplifiers attached to those converters as well. So it was a nice dollar content, kind of the heartbeat of those new platforms.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
And as far as the 3-way NDAs, Ed, with multiple customers, they are for platforms in '15 and '16. And unfortunately, I can't go into too much detail with them. They are NDAs. So Dean?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, Ed, the R&D expenses ticked up primarily in mass sets. And to answer your question, yes, there's -- we locked down some pretty key design wins this quarter. So feeling good about spending that money and getting the results.
Operator:
We'll go next to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
I was hoping you could talk a little bit about sustainability that you guys both commented on. As we look at dollar content gains, I think we saw, as you go from 2G to 3G, a doubling of the dollar content, and yet the economics of the industry didn't seem to work out that well. We're seeing at least another doubling of content here. Why is it more sustainable this time around versus the past cycle?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Sorry, Steve. I'd like you to explain a little bit more your point about the economics from 2G to 3G. I understand...
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Well, obviously, I mean, you've been able to get much better margins now versus in the past. So what's changed about that? And why is it more sustainable on the newer platforms versus what you had in the past, you had lower margins?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I'll let Dean talk a little bit about that, Steve. But I think if you look at maybe from an industry perspective, you're right, but we have had competitors that have enjoyed very good margins throughout this whole transition. I think what we've talked about over the last 18 months is our focus on driving cost out of our manufacturing processes and our cost of goods sold, and that's what really has started to change. That happens to coincide with the shift from 3G to 4G. But what really drove it is our work to reduce our cost.
William A. Priddy:
Steve, we also have a flexible sourcing model now that we started. We have adjusted our manufacturing footprint, and Bob talked about the relentless pursuit of product cost reductions. And in -- the business units are focused now heavily on product portfolio management and design for cost initiatives. So I'd say, we're just simply using best practices to bring the best products and technologies to the market with a relentless focus on achieving the lowest possible cost structure and -- we took out $150 million of cost over the past 18 months. So that's not coming back. And so that's going to be sustainable margin performance going forward.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
The only point I'd add, Steve, and Dean's opening comments were about this. The margin in all of our products have improved, but whether that's 2G PAs, 3G or 4G components. So we have worked, as Dean pointed out, on our costs.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Okay. Great. And then people asked questions, which I think -- around China, which I think were focused specifically just on that market. But my question here is more on the Chinese handset OEMs versus just China per se. And I was curious if you could talk about how their growth looks here into the end of the year? Because obviously some of those guys don't sell just into China market. And how it might look into next year also?
Steven Creviston:
This is Eric. I'll take a stab at it. I think it is interesting when you look at the dynamics in that market. In particular, the OEM structure over the course of this year, you are beginning to see more concentration around fewer, although still quite a few. So we've got 6 to 8 customers basically that make up about 2/3 of our business there now, where historically, of course, we would have 50 to 100 probably. And so that, I think, gives you a little more visibility. They can -- they have more scale. They can afford the R&D and so forth. And I think these are the ones that are really capitalizing on the 4G transition. And again, when you look at the subscriber base there, you have 1 billion subscribers, and very few are on 4G today, 50 million maybe. And so if you look at the net adds that are being posted every month, you see the 4G net adds just continue to grow significantly month over month over month. And yet we're still at very low penetration rate. So I think you've got a handful, 6 to 10 maybe can -- very big players in China, who are going to be even more significant year-over-year for the next 3 to 5 years on that trend.
Operator:
We'll go next to JoAnne Feeney with ABR Investment Strategy.
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
I just wanted to go back to one of the fundamental questions about the strength that you saw in December and in -- that you're seeing in December and you saw in September. First, can you give us a sense of how much unit growth of a ramp is contributing -- contributed in September and is contributing in December versus content gains in driving those revenue numbers?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So your question is from the handset perspective, the number of units or is it content gains? I'll let Norm talk a little bit about MPG but -- which also grew very nicely quarter-over-quarter. For what we saw in September and what we're seeing in December, it's primarily the content gains. The number of handsets have roughly been flat.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
And generally for the year, that's kind of our model. We're modeling handset units roughly flat. And then TAM growth of 10% to 15% on that based on content so...
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
Sorry. I was quite -- trying to clarify the ramp that we're seeing in the flagship product this quarter relative to last quarter. And how much of that driving the revenues is coming from the unit ramp versus the content ramp?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I don't think we've modeled that out, JoAnne. I mean, clearly, if it's a new flagship that's beginning its ramp and continuing to ramp. I don't know how to answer your question from that standpoint. So what we're seeing is there are other phones that are ramping down. These are ramping up, and we're seeing handsets roughly flat. So it's dollar content from our perspective.
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
Fair enough. And then I did want to get to the MPG segment. Nice growth there. Can you elaborate on what's driving that? And where you see that going over the next quarter? And how much of that is coming from base station versus other activities?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Sure. Thanks, JoAnne, this is Norm. We had really nice upticks in each of our major markets last quarter. WiFi was up more than 20% year-over-year. Wireless infrastructure stayed strong on the back of LTE buildouts in China. Cable TV had a nice pickup last quarter as well. So in each of our major areas, we had some nice increases. We also had some nice pickups in smaller categories, such as our GaN category with some radar products and foundry. And SmartEnergy was also up nicely. So really across the board, we had a very nice performance in all of our key markets. Looking forward to the next quarter, we do see some typical seasonality when I look at what -- how MPG has performed over the last -- the 3 prior fiscal years. We've had quarterly -- quarter declines in the December quarter anywhere from 6% to 10% kind of average decline, and we're expecting that as well in the coming quarter. Wireless infrastructure we expect to stay strong. We don't foresee any declines there, and we foresee pickups there, increases in calendar 2015, as we have a number of exciting new products that we just rolled out that are ramping in the March quarter for wireless infrastructure. So for the coming quarter, I do see, especially if you look at our -- some of our broad-based product areas such as our standard catalog products, the current economic concerns that people have around the world I think are affecting us in -- and some of our market categories for the December quarter. So we will see some impact on that in December.
Operator:
We'll go next to Ian Ing with MKM Partners.
Ian Ing - MKM Partners LLC, Research Division:
Back to this 3-way NDAs and the potential for some product next year. What milestones do you need now to get a better sense of the revenue synergies you can get with the TriQuint combination? And have you thought about the format that you could potentially share that with investors?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
As far as being able to share with investors, we typically don't try to telegraph our competition where we're working and where we're focused, so I want to be careful about that. I think as we get into the Analyst Day on the 18th, I think you'll hear Eric and James both talk about how we're bringing together the product and technology portfolios in the product segments that we're chasing. But I don't think you're going to hear us be that specific in calling our shots and drawing attention so that our competition can go react to that. So I want to be very careful in that, but...
Ian Ing - MKM Partners LLC, Research Division:
I guess at this point, I mean, you are more confident in seeing some revenue synergies with the combination? That's something you didn't call for it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
That's correct. I think, again, as we spend more time understanding where each other was heading and product segments that we didn't go after that now when we look at bringing together the 2 companies, clearly our large customers today have really recognized the value in bringing together the 2 companies. And that's why we're signing 3-way NDAs with them. So it's really the big guys driving a lot of that, but we do have other product areas that we're chasing. So Eric, do you want to give maybe a little more color.
Steven Creviston:
Yes. I guess, I would say that what it's really about is how to drive the industry faster. That's what these NDAs are about. The industry is trying to figure out how to cram more and more data throughput into these mobile devices, into smaller area and at lower power consumption. And they see the opportunity that Qorvo will have with all of the technologies in-house to maybe advance that faster than the industry was planning before. So rather than thinking about it as discrete products and discrete product segments, I think, think of it much more about how we can work with customers to drive the industry faster.
Ian Ing - MKM Partners LLC, Research Division:
And then my follow-up is the implications of Intel having a stake in Spreadtrum. Any implications on the reference design activity with Spreadtrum? I know cooperation is mostly on the apps processor side, but perhaps Spreadtrum might need some help on the baseband side. Any implications there?
Steven Creviston:
I wouldn't say there's a dramatic impact. I would say we've got great relationships with both Intel and Spreadtrum. And if this helps either or both be healthier and grow faster, it's good for us.
Operator:
We'll go next to Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Krysten Sciacca - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
This is Krysten Sciacca in for Quinn Bolton. Are you seeing any activity in India for an LTE base station buildout in calendar 2015?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
This is Norm. I would have to say that for -- from what we're seeing right now, we do not see a lot of activity, a lot of energy going into that today. There is certainly some activity. I've seen a lot more on the China LTE buildouts. And -- but everybody is expecting that India will be hot on the heels of China in building out LTE infrastructure because there's a large subscriber base there that's going to want the same benefits of 4G.
Krysten Sciacca - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then going back to China, if that segment was roughly flat quarter-over-quarter but the 4G business grew sequentially, what attributed to the weakness in that geographic segment?
Steven Creviston:
Yes. We're continuing to see the roll-off of 2G essentially. And some of that is converting to 3G, but most of it's converting directly to 4G.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] We'll go next to Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
I wanted to follow-up on Bob's earlier answer mentioning gross margins holding up despite the revenue decline. Dean, you continue to impress us there. Where do you expect gross margins to go longer term for RFMD stand-alone? You mentioned publicly the possibility of 50%. Is that a longer-term target, say, 2 years? Or can you talk to us about kind of a path to get there from here?
William A. Priddy:
Yes. Mike, I think I might have mentioned a 50% margin targeted at your conference and we have very clear -- RFMD has very clear line of sight to 50% gross margin. And it's not beyond the less than 1-year planning horizon.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then for Eric, on RF Fusion, you mentioned in the press release some new customer engagements there. Can you recap where we are on the product cycle? How many OEM wins and the shipment level trajectory?
Steven Creviston:
Yes, sure. It's along the lines of what we've been talking about today of driving the industry forward faster and the opportunities of bringing higher levels of integration with Fusion, where we integrate multiple power amplifiers, switches and all the filtering into single placement. So we're seeing really 2 categories for that now. We're engaged in multiple OEMs in both of these categories. One is where we really are doing kind of an all-in-one, where you have a relatively modest number of frequency bands and you want to put those all into one placement, sort of a mid-tier approach applies very well in China, for example. And so we're engaged with several OEMs to bring handsets to market using kind of all-in-one front-end solutions based on Fusion. The other category is where we're using Fusion for very high-end applications where there's many, many bands coming in the future. And generally, those are being put into groups where we'll have multiple Fusions, so multiple fully integrated modules for different bands. And there, as well, we've got several large OEMs we're working with to architect those solutions. They do take a little longer to bring to market. Obviously, these are very complex solutions. You have to really plan very well at the feature set that you're going to enable, which carrier aggregation modes, for example, and so forth. And so it does take a little longer to bring these to market, and we see the application for it. We see a lot of excitement for it, but it's going to take some time to kind of grow into it. We still believe production shipments in the March quarter are likely.
Operator:
We'll go next to Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Maybe one more question here on the model. So it looks like -- you mentioned earlier you did about $150 million of cost cutting over the last 18 months and another $150 million of synergies to come after the acquisition is complete. I'm curious, how much of that had to do with excess capacity? And wondering if now with this really robust market some of that capacity is necessary once again?
William A. Priddy:
Yes. When I look at the synergy opportunity, the 2 biggest items will be the fact that when the 2 companies merge, since RFMD currently outsources all of its filters, we'll be insourcing, if you will. There's a tremendous benefit there of margin stacking. And likewise, on the assembly side, RFMD currently does most of its assembly in-house, where TriQuint currently outsources most of its assembly. We'll be bringing that all in-house. So those 2 are really, really big items. And obviously, we'll be looking at the manufacturing footprint though. And I think it's too early to make any calls there. I mean, we're looking at a growth-oriented environment for the next several years. So it's way too early to be talking about changing the manufacturing footprint. But we will cut the rug to fit the room. So those are some of the big things, at least on the COGS side. And we've got several other things on the expense side as well. Like I said, all specifically identified and...
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Okay. So for some of the cost cutting you've done internally over the past 18 months, the capacity related ones you don't feel are necessary at this point? Or the improving market hasn't required you to maybe build some back up?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think what's interesting, maybe if we just step way back, if you look at over this transition where we've added capacity is in assembly and test, as Dean pointed out in our China operations. And what we took out was GaAs capacity, and we replaced it with silicon that we buy on the outside, whether that's SOI, silicon germanium, or CMOS. As you know, we use silicon technologies that have really been replacing the GaAs. So from a GaAs fab perspective and utilization, we really haven't seen much uptick over the last few quarters. So our margin improvement has come from where we started the conversation earlier was truly driving cost out of our manufacturing.
Operator:
And we'll go next to Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
A couple questions here for Dean, if I could. The flat gross margin guide's on a higher mix of CPG revenue in December. Does that suggest your amplifier revenue will increase in CPG over SOI? Because I thought that the margin profile of SOI was closer to MPG so that a big increase in the mix toward CPG on switches and antenna tuners wouldn't hurt that much. And if I could get the split between CPG and MPG on the quarter because it sounds like they both -- they grew well? And then I have a follow-up for Eric.
William A. Priddy:
Yes. I mentioned in the opening remarks that MPG was $64 million and CPG was the remainder of the $362 million. And Norm did mention that he expected MPG would be down some in the December quarter. So I mentioned that mix was the primary driver for the relatively flat margin. And it is possible that we'll also have some product sales that have a little more outsource content, which actually from a going-forward standpoint that may actually be a synergy going forward. So it's more of a near-term event.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Okay. And then, Eric, you mentioned that China was flat. Was that a unit or a revenue content -- comment? And could you remind us ASPs for your ET solution, where those fall? And then I have a question on antenna finish.
Steven Creviston:
So China was actually flat to down slightly, I said in September quarter. And that was $1 revenue comment. And I'm sorry, I can't comment on the pricing of the ET converter. There's very few of them in the market now, so very few solutions that are proven and shipping, and so the pricing is not that well established yet.
Operator:
And our last question comes from Cody Acree of Ascendiant Capital.
Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
Last night, TriQuint made a quick mention of some supply constraints in RF SOI, just wondering if you're seeing anything similar.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
This is Bob. I'm going to take that. I think the whole industry has seen some constraints in SOI. And I think we commented on this a little bit last quarter that the supply chain side of our team has done an outstanding job of keeping up with it on the sales and working with customers. The industry is tight. I think it's typical of when we ramp up for a strong December, and then brace for the decline in March that we typically see of 10% to 15%. The industry continues to add capacity of SOI. RFMD continues to grow the amount of production that we get out of that capacity, so I feel good about that. But I'd say, it was more of an industry perspective.
Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
And with the shifts with IBM planning to make a change to GlobalFoundries, are you expecting any impact on that supply base?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Obviously, it'll be time until that transaction closes. From our discussions with both parties, we feel very good about our position with them. We embrace the transaction. We think it's great for the industry, great for -- RFMD was one of their largest customers out of the facilities that we operate for SOI, in particular. All-in-all, we see it as a very positive sign for the industry and the continued expansion of SOI.
Operator:
And this does conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks for joining us this evening. RFMD is a primary beneficiary of the exploding demand for mobile data, and our growth opportunities are expanding significantly as our content and customers' devices goes from dimes to dollars. We are confident in delivering revenue growth ahead of our underlying markets, gross margin at the top of our industry, robust operating leverage and EPS growth that's well ahead of our revenue growth. Thank you, and good night.
Operator:
This does conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation.
Executives:
Douglas DeLieto – Vice President-Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth – President, Chief Executive Officer William A. Priddy – Chief Financial Officer Steven Eric Creviston – Corporate Vice President, President - Cellular Products Group Norman A. Hilgendorf – Corporate Vice President, President - Multi-Market Products Group
Analysts:
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc. Mike Burton – Brean Capital LLC Vivek Arya – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research Steve Smigie – Raymond James Anthony Stoss – Craig-Hallum JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RF Micro Devices Q1 2015 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode, and later we’ll be conducting a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. (Operator Instructions) And now, I’d like to introduce your host for today’s call Doug DeLieto. Mr. DeLieto, you may begin.
Douglas DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Greg. Hi everybody, and welcome to our conference call. At 4 PM today, we issued a press release. If anyone listening did not receive a copy of the release, please call Samantha Alphonso at the Financial Relations Board at 212-827-3746. Sam will email a copy to you and verify that your name is on our distribution list. In the meantime, the release is also available on our corporate website, rfmd.com, under the heading Investors. At this time, I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today’s release and on today’s call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, rfmd.com, under Investors. In February, we announced a definitive merger agreement under which RF Micro Devices Inc. will combine with TriQuint Semiconductor Inc. in a merger of equals. On April 14, 2014 the new holding company currently named Rocky Holding Inc. filed a registration plus joint proxy statement on Form S-4 with the SEC. The filing may be found through EDGAR on the SEC’s website which is located at www.sec.gov under the company name Rocky Holding Inc. We urge you to read the registration plus joint proxy statement and other documents filed with the SEC as they will contain important information about the transaction. Now in fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I’m also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf, who lead our Cellular Products Group and Multi-Market Products Group respectively, as well as other members of RFMD’s management team. And with that, I’ll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome everyone. We’re very happy to report that RFMD delivered an exceptionally strong fiscal 2015 first quarter. Quarterly revenue increased sequentially by 24% to $316 million, gross margin expanded sequentially by 500 basis points to 47.1%, and earnings per share doubled sequentially to $0.24. Revenue, gross margin and earnings per share were all significantly above the guidance provided on April 29. RFMD’s execution to a financial model has produced a dramatic improvement in operating results. Gross margin has expanded year-over-year by 12 full percentage points and operating margin has expanded year-over-year by more than 15 full percentage points. RFMD’s financial performance reflects a number of factors including favorable market dynamics, crisp execution by the RFMD team, and a broad slate of structural initiatives targeting growth, diversification and margin expansion. RFMD is benefiting from multiple long-term secular trends that are in the early stages of adoption, they are supporting a wave of connectivity and inter-connectivity that is playing out globally across a broad range of wireless air standards. We are connecting in our homes, in the work place on our (indiscernible) in our cars and up to the cloud and back, this is distinctly favoring our RFMD in our ability to deliver highly integrated and highly specialized solutions that simplify design, reduce complexity and shrink product footprint. In doing so, we are accelerating the time to market of some of the world’s most popular devices and delighting our customers. RFMD is increasingly responsible for the link that connects the cloud with the underlying devices and networks enabling our connected world. RF is a critical building block enabling the Internet of Things and this is growing our addressable content opportunities. Looking first at handsets, half of the world’s handsets shipping today average less than $1 of RF content and that’s increasing to several dollars over a multi-year period as the demand for data requires incremental RF content. Whether you look at entry level devices or flagship smartphones, the RF content is growing generation over generation across market segments and geographies. That supporting growth for high performance RF solutions that’s well above the growth rate forecasted for handsets, in fact we see nearly a $1 billion of TAM growth in cellular RF this year and more than $1 billion of growth in the cellular RF industry next year. Compounding this, RFMD is enjoying broad based design traction in new growth areas like antenna tuning, impedance tuning, diversity switches, power management circuits, highly integrated antenna switch modules and RF Fusion. We are very excited to bring to market RF Fusion, which is a highly integrated RF front-end solution containing the industry’s leading components in one very small placement. We continue to expand our customer engagements on RF Fusion, and we plan to commence production later this year. The cellular industry is in the early stages of rolling out new technologies like envelope tracking, carrier aggregation and later Transmit MIMO, all of these expand our content and add complexity to the device thereby increasing the demand for highly integrated RF solutions. In the markets served by RFMD’s Multi-Market Products group, the broadband connectivity is proliferating across tablets PCs, PC peripherals, routers and access points, consumer devices, automotive, industrial and home automation and medical applications. We are expanding our product offerings and leveraging our leadership position across multiple long-range and short-range wireless standards to target the incremental growth opportunities in these complementary markets. RFMD is also a beneficiary of rapid deployment of infrastructure, especially LTE infrastructure in China, which continues to expand the demand for MPG, higher performance base station components. So from a very high level, RFMD’s fiscal 2015 is off to a very strong start. We’re pleased with our financial performance in the June quarter, and our outlook for the year anticipates revenue growth, industry leading gross margins, operating leverage, significant earnings per share growth and strong free cash flow. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Dean.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon everyone. The June quarter was strong for RFMD with record revenues, record gross profit and record earnings per share. Revenue for the June quarter was up 24% sequentially to $316.3 million. CPG revenue was $261 million, and MPG revenue was $55 million. The revenue strength was broad-based and well diversified, and RFMD had two 10% customers. Gross margin for the June quarter increased to 47.1%, that’s up over 500 basis points sequentially, and 12 points year-over-year. Operating expenses were $70 million, compared to $74 million last quarter, with G&A of $11 million, sales and marketing of $16.5 million, and research and development of $42.6 million. Operating income for the June quarter was $78.9 million, representing approximately 25% of sales. Non-GAAP taxes were approximately $7.7 million, and net income for the quarter was $71.3 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, based on 294.6 million shares. Moving to the balance sheet, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $196.6 million. RFMD repaid $87.5 million of convertible debt during the quarter, and is now debt free. Cash flow from operations was $36.3 million, and free cash flow was $26.5 million. DSOs were 52.9 days and RFMD’s inventory balance was $142.9 million, resulting in turns of 4.9. Net property and equipment was $196 million, and capital expenditures during the quarter were $9.8 million, with depreciation of loan for an $8 million and intangible amortization of $7 million. Before we go to the guidance section, I’d like to provide some additional color on our much improved financial outlook. Which June gross margin above model and operating margin at model, you might be wondering what we anticipate going forward? The top line trends have been well established and we believe we are in the early innings of strong revenue growth. We are delivering product leadership and revenue diversification. 2G revenue now accounts for less than 10% of CPG revenue and 3G, 4G revenue continues to climb. RFMD’s comprehensive portfolio of industry leading products includes all the necessary building blocks to satisfy the industry’s most demanding specifications. We have streamlined our manufacturing footprint and we are laser focused on achieving the lowest possible call structure. In short, we’ve seen expanding TAM, coupled with much lower fixed cost and intense focus on all areas of products or costs. We believe the stage is set for continued strong margin performance at or above model, and significant leverage to the bottom line. Now, for the financial outlook and business commentary for the September quarter. RFMD expects quarterly revenue to increase to approximately $345 million. RFMD expects non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately flat to up 25 basis points sequentially. RFMD expects non-GAAP operating expenses to be approximately flat. RFMD expects a non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 10% to 15%, and RFMD expects non-GAAP earnings per share of approximately $0.27. With that, I’ll hand the call back to Bob for comments on our proposed combination with TriQuint, after which we’ll open up the call for questions. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Dean. We at RFMD have often said, it’s an exciting time to be in RF. Today, we can say, it’s an even more exciting time to be creating a new leader in RF solutions, a leader with expertise in mobile device, and complex infrastructure and global defense applications. By combining two companies with highly complementary products and technologies, we are creating a leading market participant with significant revenue growth opportunities, excellent customer and product diversification, unmatched access to critical enabling technologies with broad manufacturing scale. We see NewCo unlocking significant shareholder value over multiple years in the form of cost, expense and revenue synergies. Looking at our markets, we see increasing revenue opportunities in the deployment of new communication protocols in both handsets and in underlying networks to support them, this robust environment is increasingly favoring the RF suppliers that can meet our customers and platform providers’ most critical requirements relating to performance, cost, budget and scale. Our industry is early in the adoption of 4G LTE and 802.11ac and even earlier in the adoption of carrier aggregation and Envelope Tracking. The proliferation of these technologies will play out over many years followed by cellular transmit MIMO. For NewCo, this means exciting growth opportunities. NewCo will combine the industry’s most comprehensive product and technology portfolios with a relentless commitment to achieving the industry’s lowest cost. We were at multiple revenue tailwinds at our back and the combined benefit of best practices from both organizations. We will combine the scale advantages and intellectual capital of two large industry pioneers with the agility and first mover advantages of a recognized technology innovator. As an update, RFMD announced on June 17, the exploration of the HSR Act waiting period satisfied one of the conditions required to complete the pending business combination with TriQuint. The business combination is still subject to approval by both TriQuint’s and RFMD’s shareholders, other required regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. And we continue to anticipate successful close later this year. In the meantime, our companies continue to collaborate to prepare for the integration, we’re making tremendous progress, and we anticipate successful close this calendar year. And with that, we’ll open up the call to your questions.
Operator:
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) And our first question today comes from the line of Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
First of all congratulation Dean, Bob, not only a tremendous growth job, but also just tremendous job on balancing growth with some exceptional profitability. My first question on profitability, 500 something odd basis points of gross margin improvement, I’m curious how much more do you see on the horizon, just qualitatively, and then what do you think is the biggest driver, is it revenue growth or is it something else that will drive profitability in the future?
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Harsh. As you know, you never get to slice the ball in this business, because you only just finished your last quarter. But we continued our strength in our gross margin performance. You really have go back about five years to a turning point in RFMD when we began to shrink our manufacturing footprint. We shared the MDE facility, we’ve sold the fab in the UK, then we started talking about a lot of the cost savings initiatives that were best practices in the industry, global RQ, zero basing out (indiscernible) cost analysis and so forth. And when we aggregate all these things, we took about $150 million out of our manufacturing costs. So just that momentum alone is taking us to roughly the kind of margin level that you see today. And you may add, okay, what’s next on the horizon? Well we haven’t vanished all the cost efforts. Those are still ongoing, and we continue to add items to list, but what’s really important now is the proactive product portfolio management that’s being done in the business units; and also the design for cost efforts that’s being done by design engineering community. And I’m convinced that we will continue to be at, above our margin model for the remainder of this year, and let’s see where things go from there, because there is possibility for better performance than what we just posted.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, thanks Dean. And as my follow-up let me ask about China. There is lot chatter and again I don’t know if it’s correct or not, but there’s a lot of chatter that may be out to you folks, I’m doing as well, I just wanted to ask you, there is some sort of a number floating around $100 million LTE phone number do you have to have number to hit your internal targets or your margin targets at all?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Harsh, this is Bob. Let me share with those on the phone what we’re hearing. What we’re hearing is, we are seeing the migration of 2G, 3G phones to 4G phones. We are very early on in that adoption rate, very early in the process. And quite honestly, our margin performance as Dean said has really been through a lot of great work by the organization of taking cost out, managing their product portfolios and designing products for costs. So what we see is great tailwinds in our industry coupled with a lot of great work that our team is doing to continue to drive our top line and our bottom line in the future.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey guys, thank you and congratulation on a tremendous job.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Harsh.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Harsh.
Operator:
And next, we’ll move to Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital LLC:
Hey guys, congratulations; very, very impressive results and guidance. Just following up on that, you spoke about the strength being pretty broad based, I’m hoping you can help us understand how much of the sequential improvement you’re expecting in September is related to the top tier versus China, and how big is China right now versus the tier ones at this point?
William A. Priddy:
Eric, would you like to talk a little bit about the growth you’re seeing?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Sure, even in June we had actually totally upside to what we guided was due to high tier, actually in LTE smartphones, and we think that’s of course going to carry today end of September. We do expect China to be strong, but if you kind of rank the growth drivers for CPG, at least in September, the top two are going to be our top two customers, but marquee flagship phone launches which typically come out in the fall, and then China will be there as well adding some of the growth.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital LLC:
Okay, and then both (indiscernible) provided us some insight into – their insight into the December quarter, I know it’s clearly too early to guide for it, but given some of the ramps you are heading in your business right now and I wonder if you could provide us some of your thoughts on how to think about the December quarter and seasonality for the industry? Thanks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yeah, I’m not sure, exactly, Mike what they said as far as seasonality goes into the December quarter, but it’s currently our expectations. From an industry perspective, we do expect growth. So, obviously, as we plan to continue to grow as fast as the industry – or as fast as the industry and that’s our expectations at this time.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital LLC:
Great, thanks guys and congrats.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks you.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks Mike.
Operator:
And next from Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, we will hear from Vivek Arya.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch:
Thanks for taking my question. Great job on delivering gross margins and I believe exceeding everyone’s expectations, probably your own expectation I would imagine the cost synergies that you had outlined $150 million that RFMD and TriQuint getting together. Is that still incremental to what you are delivering right now? Or do you think that some of those might have been pulled forward in the performance that you’re showing? Or are those still incremental to the model?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Vivek, this is Bob and I am going to take that. I believe on last night, our colleague at TriQuint said that we’re absolutely committed, once we bring together these two companies to achieving the $150 million synergies, so nothing has been brought forward. It will be our additive to the results that we’re – both of us will be putting up for the year.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch:
Got it. That’s very helpful Bob. And then, second is you’ve mentioned growth in both the high-tier and in China. There is a concern that one of your larger Asian customers is not doing perhaps as well from a unit perspective. And I am wondering, if you could give us a sense for what you’re seeing it from a content perspective and how much of what you are hoping for growth in the back half is dependent on that customer? Or is it a more broad based growth profile that you’re seeing?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yeah, Vivek, I don’t like to comment on anyone customers you all know, but we’re expecting growth but our top customers dropped the balance of the year and it’s really as much about the dollar content increases that we’re seeing. Again of this major shift from 2G to 3G and 3G to 4G LTE, you know, driving a lot of content because we’re going from dimes to dollars, I mean, that’s really part of this and the unit demand for the year and handsets actually be flat in total units, but the RF content is going to be up significantly.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch:
Great, Thank you.
Operator:
And next up is Edward Slighter with Charter & Equity Research.
Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research:
Thanks a lot, a Jeez so over 47% which is rather surprising to be frank even what we’ve talked about last year, remind us how long is your cost reduction program been in play and is it fair to assume that further gains in the gross margin more mixed in cost reduction related from In & Out and then Eric, can you give us a general idea where your mix stands in terms of CPG, SOI versus GaA and should reassume the margins on your ETP mix or somewhere between say your GaS margin, your SOI switch margins, in your silicon but probably may be SOI, sorry for the questions but can you remind us is that product qualified on more than one base span at this point?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I will start within and try to remember all the questions along the way. Actually the margins not surprised us, I mentioned at Stephens conference earlier this year that our margins were tracking ahead of what our guidance was, so we knew the end that there was going to be a big quarter, great quarter from margins and yeah we’ve been talking now for two to three quarters that we fully expect RFMD to achieve the industry leading gross margins. So absolutely it’s not a surprise internally because we’ve had this goal now for quite a while. And yeah, a lot of the cost reduction efforts that have contributed primarily to the margin improvement. Also some of the tough decisions on manufacturing foot print and also the flexible sourcing strategy that we have. And the future are – definitely our product portfolio maintenance and management will play into the margin but we are going to maintain that and focus on product calls. I think you have to have that in order to continue achieving the industry leading gross margins. And just a couple of metrics to you, in the past five years our depreciation as percent of sales has gone from just under 10% down to about 4%, so we are actively managing our capital base along with the product call structure, and also it’s slight loss when you look at our balance during that timeframe and how much revenue we can now achieve on such a lower capital base for the company it’s a new day for RFMD.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Eric, do you want to address?
Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research:
The question is about mix between us, so I guess…
Steven Eric Creviston:
Yes, I unfortunately not able to break that up for you because more and more our products contains both as we move to high levels of integration we have many of our powers of our products, but also switches embedded in them and that trend is going to continue, so I think SOI is a important part of our portfolio, so question that differentiation we brought though SOI technology in commercializing that in the RF frontend and especially in switching and as you know in tuning has been phenomenal and that’s driven a lot of our growth (indiscernible) is doing really well and more and more the trend is about putting those altogether and adding filters as well into the complete footprint like RF Fusion. When we talk about ET power management I see – I’m not going to give you the specific gross margin, it’s a good margin product, accretive to our average. We do have qualified on multiple base bands and in fact for ramping productions today for multiple LTE base bands that will be shipping in production in this fall.
Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research:
To Bob one final one. Now that – your margins are strong as they are and I’ll imagine a lot of this additional gains will come, EPS will come from revenue growth. Are you going to allow OpEx to start expanding, to take advantage of what I imagine a numerable opportunities for design and what is that look like once you emerged with? Are you looking at – because there is number of opportunities would be facing when you have all the filers and housing all the stuffs that you have specially the integrated part, could be a – could be very significant, should we expect maybe OpEx to move a little bit up in our periods?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yeah, that’s completely independent, we’re going to continue to pull this for margin strain and we are going to continue to very tightly control operating expenses. So, I think what you see this quarter is probably what you can see throughout the balance of the calendar year and as we merge with NewCo. we have a status financial model 45% growth margins and 20% operating expenses as a percent sales. Now, we believe RFMD will be very near to that, if you take over $345 million guard in our operating expense – so for operating expenses will be near to that in the September quarter. As we become NewCo, we will be running ahead of that, however we have pointed out significant synergies that are achievable at NewCo, some of which will be realized in year one, some of the year two synergies. So our intent is to drive to a financial model, both here at RFMD that you’re seeing today and also as NewCo forms.
Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research:
How long is your cost reduction program been in place, actually been implemented?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yeah, like I said it’s been a journey where you start with some very tough decisions on manufacturing footprint but broad of the $130 million or so has been over the past 15 months.
Edward Slighter – Charter & Equity Research:
That’s fine. And then final question. Eric, SOI wafers, it’s pretty widely known at the very tight capacity issues right now, lot of guys are waiting for SOI products, how many sources do you have for SOI and how many are interchange and what’s your largest customers about, you can switch between different vendors without having to recall, thanks?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Thanks for the opportunity, our supply base has just done a fantastic job of supporting us in the ramp and in our business in SOI for that I appreciate, we do have multiple sources as you pointed out, we are able to qualify our products at multiple sources and shift them to multiple customers, so just team has done a great job of qualifying this, our customers have done a great job, I really do want to thank our supply base for allowing us to be able to grow and continue to grow our business going forward.
Operator:
And next will move to Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Great, thanks a lot guys and congratulation on the nice numbers particularly on the margin side. Just curious on the 150 of synergies, now both of you have had significant improvements already, are the thing that you were planning to get the synergies from the same thing or is it shifted?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
There has been no change.
William A. Priddy:
No changes.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
We also saw last night with (indiscernible) they had walk away with some revenue and I was just curious that you guys would potentially be walk away enough revenue to that magnitude that it might implement the revenue related to the expectations for the next couple of quarters?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I can’t comment specifically but I believe some of that with our foundry business but we’re not walking away from any business, we’ve got a 100 group as we’re going to get as much business as they can.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay.
William A. Priddy:
Yeah, I might point out that the margin structure on all of our products have improved because of the steps that we’ve taken across our supply chain and our manufacturing facilities I mean we’ve taken 40% or better out of the variable calls for wafer in our Gallium Arsenide facility so what might have been lower margin products to us, two to three years ago are perfectly good margin products to us today, so we are opened for additional business.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay. Last question just on $150 million, at this point what would you say is that the top driver in terms of synergy that you would expect to get? What will have the biggest impact?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Well in the NewCo area, there is the assembly where RFMD currently does, most of its assembly internal and I think that’s an opportunity for TriQuint since they do most of their or do their assembly external. So we will be bringing as much of that in-house as quickly as possible. Also on filters as we begin sourcing filters internally as opposed to externally and there is always – when we look at the manufacturing footprint, we’ll be (indiscernible) that hard and see what’s optimal for new NewCo. On the expense side, there are redundant positions and you don’t need to this or to that and – and so there will be some synergies related to redundancy and there is also savings related in areas like insurance and audit fees and so far. So we have specifically identified every synergies required to hit the $150 million and we would like to keep ongoing reserve.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
All right, that’s great. Thanks. Congratulations.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks you.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Thanks Steve.
Operator:
Next from Craig-Hallum, next we will hear from Anthony Stoss.
Anthony Stoss – Craig-Hallum:
Hi, guys. My congrats is on the gross margin front and I think in the last conference call, you’ve talked about the 75 actual programs in gross margins insurance. It looks like that we’re all hitting at the same time, so congrats there. Two potter, TriQuint talked about and raised their contribution margin last night from 50 to 55%, I love to hear where you think RFMD is at contribution margin right now? And then second part of my question is production capacity. I love to hear what you think you guys can get out of the plant now per quarter and also you’re CapEx plans? Thanks.
William A. Priddy:
Yeah, our contribution margin was at normally how this quarter (indiscernible) increase in gross margin quarter-over-quarter. Its margins begin to stabilize. The contribution margin is probably somewhere in the 50% to low 50% range, so it’s not that just similar from what TriQuint says yesterday. Regarding CapEx, where we’re targeting capital expenditures is primarily assembling task which is extremely quick payback areas and also some areas that we see – we’re going to be able to sit towards very, very quickly for NewCo and I can’t remember the third part of your question.
Anthony Stoss – Craig-Hallum:
Your production capacity right now.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Production – actually the utilization rate in our gas facility didn’t really change so much quarter-over-quarter. We can easily get out 30% to 40% more production out of that facility. So again, we’re able to achieve our margin targets without so much increases in utilization as it was pure cost reductions. So again we can get quite a bit more gallium-arsenide base revenue out of our existing bricks and mortar.
Anthony Stoss – Craig-Hallum:
Okay. And then somebody asked, I love to hear kind of your thoughts on your MPG Group in terms of demand, and what they are saying in growth?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yeah, sure. Hi, this is Norm. MPG has been holding steady with a couple of key growth drivers last quarter. Wi-Fi has continued this trend, we had some growth last quarter, and then have real strong backlog for this quarter as well. Nice mix there as well as we’ve get renewed CPG strength here, we’re about 50/50 mix in our Wi-Fi business between mobile and non- mobile business. Good activity with our reference design, partners and chipsets, so it’s a lot of new reference design wins for both mobile and for enterprise equipments. In our customer base in Wi-Fi it’s really nicely diversified as well. We were more concentrated a year ago, and now as we’ve got a nice healthy mix of customers throughout our Wi-Fi business. In wireless infrastructure, I think it’s the other market we should really mention right now, we had a strong pick up last quarter on the back of the LTE build outs in China. And that stayed strong for us, I noticed some noise about, maybe some choppiness in some orders, but for us this has been staying steady. We didn’t get too far ahead on inventory builds with the customers and the business is rolling right on into the current quarter. And we expect this to play out over the next couple of years, there is a lot of equipment to build out there.
Anthony Stoss – Craig-Hallum:
Good job, guys. Thanks.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Thank you.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Tony.
Operator:
JoAnne Feeney, ABR Investment Strategy has our next question.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Yeah, thank guys, and congrats again. I guess I’d love to get a more detail on the China, last quarter I think you said that China was in the low 20% range of your mobile business, I’m wondering if it’s still that way, and given your earlier comment about growth, next quarter being or this quarter being Jim, primarily by your top two customers, where you anticipate that settling, since it’s likely to be shrinking over time, and I’ll do a follow-up after that. Thanks.
William A. Priddy:
Norm, would you like to take that as far as the type of business and our outlook for China.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yeah, so China was certainly strong in the June quarter of course based on the rollout of the 4G systems, and when we look at the kind of China white box, it’s still roughly about 20% range. There are a few of the – like the top five China OEMs are really becoming much more like all the other global OEM. So we’re doing very, very well with them as well. We were talking about Huawei, Lenovo, Coolpad (indiscernible) Oppo those guys. They are really becoming global top tier OEM. So we are beginning to break them out separately basically. And hence we go forward, we really want to continue to drive to where our – split of our revenues aligns with their market share in the end markets. So it will depend of course if China continues to grow as a percentage of total, and those top tier OEMs continue to grow share in the market though, that will become bigger for us. But if not you know the top two we have, they will continue to be the top two. So it’s really, I think we’re broad based, our shares in each of these companies are roughly in line are the same. And I think with all the relation, with our businesses we have a very broad portfolio of products. So we’re not as well, so don’t get the shifts in architectures or platforms or tiers because we’re generally represented across all the tiers, all the platforms, and power, flyers, switches, tuners, power management. So a broad portfolio and that also helps us pretty much stay in balance in terms of just keeping our share of revenues aligned with the customers in market share.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
That’s very helpful, thanks. And then a question on visibility to the second half, TriQuint noted last night that they are very confident in their second half builds, but they have some uncertainty about exactly the timing of when they’ll shift components to their lead customer. So I’m wondering if you could talk about what you are seeing for visibility over the next couple of quarters, and it sounds like you are seeing strength a bit earlier than they are and perhaps you could explain why that might be the case?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
As far as visibility goes I’d say it’s pretty normal for what we typically see at this time of year, we’ve got the timing of some more key forms that are always picking off in the second part of the year and, from a visibility perspective we feel confident and what we’ve guided to and our outlook for the second half of the year, so, we kind of see things as normal.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Okay. That’s helpful. Thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks Julian.
Operator:
And next we'll take Cody Acree with Ascendiant Capital.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
Thanks guys. William, Mike and Rob. So no would have mentioned that infrastructure inventories looked pretty comfortable maybe could you talk about your inventory visibility in the handset market in China.
Steven Eric Creviston:
As far as handset inventory in China, we are not think we have been seeing is – what we are hearing is we’ve got this massive shift 2G,3G to 4G and what we are looking at it as a multiyear event that’s going on and for us it’s gone from dimes to dollars, macro trends we are not hearing anything but pay attention guys. This massive shift is going on and taking place, so please continue to support us.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
I guess Rob the China is typically proven to some booms and bust of the inventory around seasonal trends, the seasonal build especially times, when you’re seeing subscriber growth like this. So I guess to what extend do you see visibility at your OEMs and matched as a sell through?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
As Eric pointed out, we are playing with the major players, and I think Duckworth visibility. We see their production plans, we see what their sell-throughs are? We have meetings to talk about those things, I would say our relationship with them are no different than what we have with Samsung or other leading OEMs.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
And then there has been some speculation recently about maybe the Chinese governments getting a little tighter on regulatory approvals maybe not better protectionism in their light and I guess to what extend do you have any visibility or are you concerned about Chinese approval of the merger?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
No. We continue to see this transaction between try put in order can be closing in the second half of this calendar year just as we originally released in the press release.
Steven Eric Creviston:
We are moving right through the process right on schedule.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
And then lastly, maybe for Eric. Our fusion and thanks for the update there, could you maybe go through in compare and contrast our fusion to what you are seeing on Sky one and maybe even out of our 360 and how your customers are receiving that and looking at the different options?
Steven Eric Creviston:
Sure. I think the question on that the global trend its towards higher levels of integration. So you mentioned a couple of other solutions that’s out there and what we are really all trying to do is enable the proliferation of LTE and help our customers get to market quicker, with better performing and said that can match the global needs of mobile data. And so, we are integrating in a very high level, what we are going. We believe differently is starting with best in class component technologies. We have to say as part of the margin expansion we seem to tie this all in, it’s the fact that we have been ahead of the trends in the industry we’ve been investing per leadership at the component level. Now we brought a very differentiated products solutions. And that also as contributing toward what you are seeing in the financials today and taking those then working with customers with our architecture and systems engineers and advance packaging technology, its really bring out the world's smallest and highest performance RF front ends to the solutions, that what we believe we have with our fusion. The first as we said before that we spent the time getting the component technologies reflected in our doing the integration level with the best six customers now and many multiple hands that can easily be go into production soon.
Operator:
Next we’ll move to Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Hi, guys let me add my congratulations on the strong performance. Just Eric wanted to follow-up on that RF Fusion question. Can you give us some sense how many frequency bands are you typically supporting in RF Fusion and I’m sure you have a product family here, but I just trying to get some sense of the dollar content you might be looking at with RF Fusion.
Steven Eric Creviston:
Right, it is typically what we’re finding is – is the solution is well suited to the mid year we have of course 2G functionality in there and then between six and eight bands of 3G, 4G are generally included, in some solutions we have the ability to tap out where we have all the power suppliers internally, but we can tap out for external filters to make them bands specific. We’re really seeing a lot of excitement with the customers that the things they can do with us a very flexible, scalable solutions like this for the vast majority of the R&D is absorbed into this one single placement FOX and then they could still customize for different product and regionalization by adding different filters for example on the outside. So it will vary and but we think in general, it’s a very highly compact solution that means six to eight bands of 3G to 4G usually within the box.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Great. And then just Transmit MIMO is mentioned a couple of times in the prepared script. When do you see Transmit MIMO starting to be deployed and then I’ve got a couple of quick questions for Dean.
Steven Eric Creviston:
Yeah, we are already working with platform providers and a few lead customers to architect solutions and look at what the trade-offs are going to be, it is a very challenging problem for the RF space which is fantastic for us. We really like taking into these kinds of problems and again getting in front of them with advanced technologies to help enable that. So, to answer your question directly, I think 2017 is a probably the time when you could begin to see commercialization of Transmit MIMO.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Great. And just for Dean, it looks like the tax rate for this quarter somewhere in the range of 10% to 15% any change in your sort of tax rate thinking going forward I think it typically been more in the 15% range, so just wondering if you guys have done things as part of the cost reduction efforts to lower that tax rate?
William A. Priddy:
Yeah. Thanks for the rest of this fiscal year we’ll see something in the range of 10% to 15%.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Okay, and beyond – just looking into next year that sort of similar range or too earlier to call?
William A. Priddy:
Yeah, well beyond and you are assuming that NewCo is in existence and as you know there are so many variables at play there, you may see the tax rate temporarily tick up just a bit, but we’ve got lot of the opportunity for some significant tax paying strategy and I believe that our merger partner has done a very, very good job in those strategies already, so we fully intent to take advantage of that.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Great, thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you.
Operator:
Next we’ll hear from Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Yes, good afternoon. So obviously you guys have a very broad portfolio of products. I’m curious though do you believe that the switching is where you have the biggest competitive advantage, where you might get the most growth on a relative basis going forward?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Actually, I would say the most growth going forward is going to be leveraging all of them in one application. As we said, the opportunity for us is to take each of these differentiated component technologies and really create something very differentiated by putting them all together in unique ways for customers. I think that’s really the keys to the future growth.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay. So on the competitive front, is there any certain areas where you see a lot less competition on a component basis that gives you more of a benefit when you move to system or is there really just ability to have that complete system outperform your competitor’s compete system that’s the key?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Well, really the fact that we’re going to that complete system is really a key part of the competitive dynamics is very few companies can do. Especially when we get NewCo we combined truly best in class filter technologies across all the different types right (indiscernible) all within one house combined with the best in class switch technologies and power amplifier technologies with the systems architects that we have and the packaging capability that we get from both companies. And you just get to the point where there is very, very few people in the world that can do that.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay, thank you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Tom.
Operator:
(Operator Instructions) All right. Next we will take a follow-up question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hi, guys I wanted to ask a question that’s not short-term or not about the numbers. Let’s assume hypothetically you had a large competitor wanting to play in your space with lots of funds. How hard Eric or Bob will it be for somebody getting, given that you have to have competency in switches, peers, carrier rag, WiFi. Is it just about the money or the funds or is that just more – is that so prohibitive now with all these complexities.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think, Harsh in 2G I would say the barrier was a lot lower. 3G maybe a little bit higher, 4G much higher and now as we – now bring together as you pointed out all these different technologies and capabilities. It’s one thing to have a disciplined in one of them, but to bring them altogether and really understand, how to optimize the performance and leverage the advantage of each one of the technologies is pretty complex and takes a lot of learning. And it takes a large number of people, the good news for our industry is customers as they are pointed out, when you describe the RF Fusion, it’s not a one size fits all it has to be flexible and scaleable, so you also need a large group of very experienced RF talent, and quite honestly in the world today, there isn’t a lot of RF experienced talents and we’ve done a good job along with TriQuint and some of our other competitors are building up a strong team and it takes the team a large team to be able to enter this markets. We’ve seen several people over the years enter and exit the market and very few of us has stayed there the whole time and what it does take is the proper technologies on the right road map with the right team and the right customer relationships to be successful.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey Bob, as a twist to that question. Can I ask you, if there was a third party that offer to buy a bunch of these products from you guys in the industry and put it together. Is there a room, is there role for such guys are will company such as yourself and Skyworks in Avago was, but you can do this yourself.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Harsh, how much I understood the question. But, if you are asking what our industry a lot of margin sacking and getting between us and our customers, our current customer base, I am not so sure that model – business model would actually work.
Harsh V. Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Got it. No I think you answered my question. Thanks guys. Congratulations again.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you Harsh.
Operator:
Next we’ll hear from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Thanks. I will give you my second half of my questions. Dean, the cost reduction program that I believe you were right is that still in full swing now or now that you got most of your margin things you are kind of winding it down, I know you concentrating on cost, but I mean one of the questions is how much more can be squeezed out of that just give an idea where there is any arc of the curve. And then Eric on your ET program you said you qualified with two base line vendors now. Do you expect to shift product with two vendors say between now and the end of the year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I can answer that second one very quickly, yes. And I can only say I was part of the great team in the cost reduction efforts. They touch so many organizations and it's now also touching the design engineering community and throughout the company. So it's really been a companywide project. And you ask how far a long are we or what was the second part.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
The second part is how much you guys are in such a big gain in the gross margins and the program has been swing for like you said 15 months just over a year. So the big question is how much more capacity we had from cost reductions giving you right now. And so, I am just trying to get idea what you see it in the arc of the curve, I mean obviously, when you first started this all ahead of you now it would seen the most of its behind you.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes. A good part, a good part percentage of the $150 million in cost reductions is factored into the numbers now, not all of it, but a good percentage of it. But the second thing Eric mentioned that the product portfolio and what’s going on there I don’t think that’s been fully baked into our performance going forward and also I mentioned the design for costs. That’s a huge element of the suitability of the margin profile going forward. So, I mean we are continuously adding new projects to the cost reductions. I mean that the list of 75 to 85 may be little down now to 35 or 40 but each month we continue to add projects to the list. So we see it’s an never ending journey of the relentless pursue of cost reductions and the intersection of product leadership. We think that’s going to give RFMD the highest margin structure in the industry and we will sustain that.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
And final question TriQuint said several times now including the yesterday’s call that customers have actually asked them to work closely with you on product development and apparently if it’s a customer request it doesn’t fall under the anti-trusts provisions et cetera. Has that started in earnest or you working is it spread across all customers is it only a couple of them or they largely small and it has started in earnest so that just maybe a shorter time to market after the companies merged to get products that are combining both of your sweet of devices.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Ed we have find three way NDAs between our customers TriQuint and ourselves so that we can get our technology and product growth that’s a line for our customers as you have just commented it was they request not ours. I know a lot of people asked what was the customer reception like and I am talking leading Tier 1 OEMs have asked us to work together with three way NDAs so that they can take advantage of the bringing together on the technologies and architectures that we bring together that Eric start to talk about. So, it’s being embraced very well by the industry.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Thanks.
Operator:
And gentlemen we have no further questions at this time. I’ll turn it back to you for any additional or closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
We thank you for joining us tonight. RFMD is enjoying positive market dynamics creating sustainable long term opportunities for revenue growth and versification. We’re positioned better than ever to translate our diversified growth into superior financial performance. Thanks again and good night.
Operator:
And ladies and gentlemen should you like to access a replay of this call, you can do so by dialing 1888-2030-1112 and recording will be available from tonight at 8 P.M. Eastern Time for one week until July 31 again at 8 P.M. Eastern Time. And once again that number is 1888-203-1112. Again that does conclude today’s conference. We thank you for your participation.
Executives:
Doug DeLieto - Vice President of Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Corporate Development Committee William A. Priddy - Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice President of Administration and Secretary Steven E. Creviston - Corporate Vice President and President of Cellular Products Group Norman A. Hilgendorf - Corporate Vice President and President of Multi Market Products Group
Analysts:
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC Anthony J. Stoss - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division Philip Lee - JPMorgan Chase & Co. Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RF Micro Devices Q4 2014 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This conference is being recorded today. And at this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President, Investor Relations for RF Micro Devices. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Vincent. Hello, everybody, and welcome to our conference call. At 4 p.m. today, we issued a press release. If anyone listening did not receive a copy of the release, please call Samantha Alphonso at the financial relations board at (212) 827-3746. Sam will email a copy to you and verify that you are on our distribution list. Website rfmd.com under the heading Investors. At this time, I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor Statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends and our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our website, rfmd.com, under Investors. In February, we announced the definitive merger agreement under which RF Micro Devices Inc. will combine with TriQuint Semiconductor Inc. in a merger of equals. On April 14, 2014, the new holding company, currently named Rocky Holding, Inc., filed a registration joint proxy statement on Form S4 with the SEC. The filing may be found through EDGAR on the SEC's website, which is located at www.sec.gov under the company named Rocky Holding, Inc. We urge you to read the registration joint proxy statement and other documents filed with the SEC as they will contain important information about the transaction. Now in fairness to all listeners, we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I'm also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf, who lead our Cellular Products Group and Multi-Market Products Group, respectively, as well as other members of RFMD's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome, everyone. We're very pleased today to report strong financial results and outstanding execution by the entire RFMD team. Revenue for the quarter was in line with our guidance provided January 28, at $256 million while earnings per share of $0.12 was well ahead of guidance on the strength of robust margin expansion and operating leverage. Despite the seasonal decline in March revenue, RFMD's gross margin for the quarter expanded sequentially by 230 basis points to 42%. That's 2 percentage points ahead of our original guidance of 40%. On our quarterly earnings call, 1 year ago, we highlighted our goal to expand RFMD's gross margin by 300 to 400 basis points in 4 quarters. Four quarters later, we've nearly doubled that goal, expanding gross margin by 760 basis points. RFMD is executing on multiple long-term structural initiatives that are enhancing our operating model and delivering robust improvements on our financial performance. Today, we have greater than 75 initiatives underway that roll up into one comprehensive effort, spanning our entire organization. We are reducing our costs, in our fab, in our packaging and test facilities, across our supply chain and in how we design our products, and we're confident we can drive margins even higher. We're also confident in our ability to outpace our industry's growth rate in fiscal '15. One of the reasons for that is the market for RF Solutions is growing faster than the handset market. As an example, the dollar content available to RFMD in today's LTE and LTE-Advanced smartphones can easily exceed $10, versus $7 to $8 in the highest tier smartphones just a few years ago. That's significantly ahead of the year-over-year growth rate in smartphone units. That's due to a number of factors. First, smartphone manufacturers and carriers are acquiring more modes and more bands, as well as 802.11ac connectivity in order to maximize data throughput and better monetize the carrier's investments in spectrum and network capacity. To support these additional modes and bands, the industry is adopting technologies like envelope tracking, carrier aggregation and transmit MIMO, all of which expand our RF content opportunities further and add complexity to the device, thereby creating greater demand for our services. In terms of timing, we are beginning to support the volume ramps of many of this year's most popular devices, and we expect this to accelerate into the September quarter with the ramp of this year's marquee smartphones and tablets, weighted towards the back half of this calendar year. We're seeing a similar dynamic play out in midtier phones. The 3G feature phones of yesterday are evolving to include additional LTE bands, and this is increasing the RF content by $2 to $3. In developing geographies, the migration from 2G voice only phones to higher dollar content 3G entry devices is increasing our content opportunity in the entry-level by as much as 2 to 3 times, depending on the band count and the addition of WiFi. What's even more exciting and is a much larger opportunity for RFMD, is the deployment of 4G TD-LTE in China. RFMD has historically enjoyed a very strong presence in China, with both customers and channel partners, and we're in the very early stages of the deployment of TD-LTE. We enjoyed meaningful revenue related to multi mode TD-LTE devices this quarter, and we see the increasingly, rapid -- we see that increasing rapidly to tens of millions of dollars per quarter, across a broad portfolio of PAs, switches and antenna-tuning components. In fact, one large multinational customer based in China, RFMD has secured as many as 10 of our parts per phone, in support of their upcoming flagship smartphone launch. The demand we're seeing today related to 5-mode TD-LTE is ahead of where many industry analysts had forecast, and some of our largest customers are telling us there could be more than 150 million TD-LTE devices produced this year. Supporting this view, TD-LTE is driving significant new investment in wireless infrastructure. According to the China News Service, China Mobile aims to install 500,000 new base stations in 2014, and another 500,000 by 2016, driving up demand for MPG's range of base stationed components. So our end markets are growing, and the RF PAM is growing even faster. There are distinct, long-term growth drivers that favor RFMD, like TD-LTE in China, two-by-two MIMO WiFi connectivity in smartphones, additional LTE bands and feature phones, additional 3G bands and entry smartphones and the advent of new cellular technologies like envelope tracking, carrier aggregation on the downlink and later, carrier aggregation on the uplink. More specific to RFMD, we're capturing additional content in new categories like antenna tuning, impedance tuning, diversity switches, power management circuits, highly integrated receive modules and soon, RF Fusion, a complete RF front-end solution for 4G world phones and tablets. RFMD is also positioned to capture additional growth created by the Internet of Things, which is beginning to add sensing, processing and connectivity capability to nearly any object imaginable, and encompasses a broad array of global macro trends like embedded connectivity, wearable technology, the connected home, automotive WiFi and others. RFMD is capturing broad opportunities in Smart Energy and home area networks, with our ZigBee and WiFi solutions, and we're at the forefront of new standards in development, like the sub-1 gigahertz standards enabling long-range mesh networks and the 802.11p standard for automotive networks. We are enjoying broad-based design win activity in WiFi for both mobile and non-mobile applications like routers, access points, set-top boxes and televisions. We see double-digit growth opportunities in WiFi, especially where device requirements favor RFMD's performance leadership. So looking at our diversified growth opportunities, our diversified product portfolio and the multiple efforts underway to expand gross margin and enhance our operating model, we are confident in delivering revenue growth ahead of our underlying markets, gross margin at the top of our industry, powerful operating leverage, robust EPS growth and strong free cash flow. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dean.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Consistent with January guidance, revenue for the March quarter was $256 million. CPG revenue was $203 million and MPG revenue was $53 million. RFMD had 2, 10% customers. Gross margin for the March quarter increased 230 basis points sequentially and 760 basis points year-over-year to 42%. Gross profit totaled $107.6 million. RFMD has an intense focus on gross margin. We're employing advanced analytics to make material reduction in our manufacturing footprint, our cost structure and our fixed asset base. We're achieving multiple points of benefit as well as more predictable margin profile. How much more benefit do we see? Back in December, I made a statement at an Investor Conference in New York, that we have an internal goal of having the highest gross margin in our industry. Today, we believe RFMD is on a path to industry-leading gross margin. Again, that is the highest gross margin in our industry. We challenged our organization to be the best, and we're very pleased with the progress they're making. We anticipate significant gross margin expansion in the June quarter, and longer term, we believe the actions we're taking will continue to drive multiple points of margin improvement. Returning to P&L, operating expenses were $74 million compared to $74.6 million last quarter. With G&A of $10.2 million, sales and marketing of $16.2 million and research and development of $47.6 million. Operating income for the March quarter was $33.6 million, representing approximately 13.1% of sales. Other income was approximately $0.5 million, and non-GAAP taxes were approximately $0.8 million. Net income for the quarter was $33.4 million or $0.12 per diluted share, based on 289.5 million shares. Moving to the balance sheet. Cash, cash equivalents for short-term investments totaled approximately $244 million. Cash flow from operations was $31.7 million and free cash flow was $24.4 million. DSOs were 49.8 days, and RFMD's inventory balance declined by $10.6 million, resulting in terms of 5. Net PP&E was $196 million and capital expenditures during the quarter were $7.3 million, with depreciation of $11.7 million and intangible amortization of $7.5 million. As an update on our convertible debt, RFMD retired the remaining principal balance of $87.5 million of convertible notes on April 15, and today, RFMD is debt-free. Regarding our proposed merger with TriQuint, we have submitted our HSR application to the FTC, and we have filed our S-4 with the SEC. We anticipate filing with Moscom very soon. Now for the financial outlook and business commentary for the June quarter. RFMD expects quarterly revenue to increase approximately 19% sequentially to approximately $305 million. RFMD expects non-GAAP gross margin to expand sequentially by approximately 150 to 200 basis points. RFMD expects non-GAAP operating expenses to be approximately flat sequentially. RFMD expects a non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 15% and RFMD expects non-GAAP earnings per share of approximately $0.17. And with that, we'll open the call up to your questions. Thank you.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
First, Bob or Eric, can you help us understand where in the June quarter you're seeing the outperformance versus your normal seasonal patterns, is it more China versus Tier 1s, or something else and any comment about the shape of the rest of this year? Are you benefiting from anything that might be getting pulled into the June quarter that you might not normally see out in September?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Mike, as far as what's driving the growth, I think as I touched in my prepared remarks, it's pretty broad-based, we're seeing it across a number of different areas, but clearly what we're seeing in the TD-LTE market with the expanding dollar content and then, not just being PAs, but also being the work that we've done with switches and antenna tuning. So it's not just a PA comment, we're just seeing an expansion in the RF content there. But we're still seeing the 2G voice-only phones also migrating to 3G. We're also seeing that midtier phones starting to add, the feature phones starting to add LTE. So when we look at it, it's very broad-based, that's we're starting to see it. But I would say the initial ramp up that we're seeing right now is primarily LTE, TD-LTE and again, more than just PAs, it's PA switches, and antenna tuning like that. And further out through the year, we're just going to have the watch as further marquee phones are launched. Several of them are lining up, and one of our major customers continues to release "marquee phones" throughout the year, so we'll just have to see how the sell-through goes. WiFi is also being added into the phones, and we're starting to see that as well, and our business is continuing to grow in WiFi for mobile. So again, it's not just the cellular components, but also the WiFi. Right, Eric, or Norm, add any more color, need be? That good?
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
And then, Dean, great progress on the margins. You stated before the expected 45% gross margins by the end of next year, can we get an update on that, or if not, maybe can you help us with the, how we should expect gross margins to trend, going out past June and likewise with OpEx, flat or into the June quarter, how do you expect that to trend with the RF fusion launching in the second half?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, we see another improvement in gross margin past the June quarter. So we're getting pretty good visibility off the hill into how the margin profile is beginning to shakeout. And it's really how well the organization has done in responding to the -- our challenge for margin improvement. And we've broken it down into buckets, like our manufacturing footprint, our flexible sourcing model, our relentless pursuit of cost-reductions, including design for cost and filing our product portfolio management. So it's really a broad-base, across the entire organization. The margin improvement initiatives are working, and I think we're going to continue to work throughout the year.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
I wanted to ask a question, Dean, on the gross margin uptick, perhaps in the big uptick in the March quarter, relative to what you were thinking, and then also again in the June quarter. If I had to say, what was the one big thing that drove it more than anything else, or maybe the 1 or 2 big things that drove it?
William A. Priddy:
In fact for the March quarter, it was the relentless pursuit of cost reductions throughout the supply chain. To some extent, we're beginning to see the benefit of our design for cost initiatives, but they're more towards the back half of the year. Product mix may have helped a tad during the quarter, but more than anything else, it was a very, very good work that our sourcing organization's done on getting calls out of our products. For instance, in our wafer fab, our variable costs for wafer has declined 40% year-over-year. And that's because of our war on gold, our war on chemical usage, and other activities within the fab. So it's really an across the board effort from the organization. We're also seeing the full realization of sizing our manufacturing footprint appropriately and did see some improvement in gross margin because of our CMOS PAs as well.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Got it. As my follow-up, if I can ask you, I know the merger's going to happen soon and the numbers will change dramatically, but assuming that's -- put that aside for a second, would your growth, with your OpEx where you're at, how much revenue can you support in your organization, with this level of OpEx in keeping that flat?
William A. Priddy:
We can support significantly higher revenue growth. We have manufacturing capacity. It takes significant amount of our manufacturing outsource silicon, and I would say it could easily top $100 million per quarter of additional growth.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
Hey Bob, you mentioned very strong pickup in TD-LTE, should we expect that to sustain, even in the back half? And I think maybe what we are all trying to get a sense for is that, how much of the growth you are seeing right now could be like the first major step function in China, that perhaps stays up the back half, or really how much of this growth is sustainable, and how should we think about seasonality as we get into the back half of the year?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Vivek, great question, and I think Eric would like to answer them.
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure. So regarding TD-LTE, I -- really, it's just getting started now. We're beginning to ramp up in the March quarter, just to put [indiscernible] into the quarter. We'll have a full quarter shipment this quarter. I looked at the models for the year. What we're hearing from our customers and it's really about a 1/3 of the annual demand that China Mobile is targeting and others, we ship in the first half, which we tell you, we should still see a pretty good second half of growth on TD-LTE. As you probably know, recently that's changed significantly with China Mobile requiring 5-mode phones on the network, and we also see a lot of other networks uptick in TD-LTE. So I know on the call last quarter I commented a target of 50 million TD-LTE handsets for this year, and you heard in Bob's prepared remarks now, our customers are telling us to expect more than 150 million TD-LTE, and it could be, in fact much higher. And we see the growth really continuing on through next year as well, because a lot of the, not just the carriers, but the large China handset OEMs, see this as a real opportunity to take the main stage with smartphones and see tremendous financial growth coming from these adoptions with the TD-LTE into their portfolio.
Vivek Arya - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division:
Got it. Very helpful. And I'm wondering where you are with your ultra low-cost CMOS power amplifier, and I'll ask other question what I'm at it, which is, Skyworks formed this joint venture with Panasonic on the NDC software's doing around. Wondering if it changes the competitive landscape in any way for you guys?
Steven E. Creviston:
So first off, with the 2G CMOS TA, that continues to go very well, as a percentage of our TD portfolio. It's growing significantly. Over all, as we've been saying for the past couple of quarters, 2G continues to decline in general, but in the March quarter our 2G CMOS pay was actually flat, and in fact, up slightly, so as a percentage of the overall 2G, it's going quite nicely. It's ramping into the Tier 1s now and so forth. So that's continuing to go well and that's, I think, and also a contributor to the margin expansion, as we said it would be. The second question was about the Skyworks/Panasonic joint venture. Yes, I think that makes a lot of sense. I don't think it has any negative implications on us, we do source them parts from Panasonic today, of course, and we'll continue to. We have a supply agreement there. We see, of course, our plans with our merger, we see that there is indeed to help customers with higher levels of integration being able to codevelop and coproduce the filters for at least some of the filter bands within your products, can definitely help you optimize the products and -- so we think it makes perfect sense.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
So 2 each, right? Eric, you mentioned the 2G, the 3G business was flat this quarter, but you said it was ramping into top-tier OEMs, does that suggest that you expect that to either remain flat or move-up in the out periods? And as you see more this 4G, et cetera, I mean, they all require 2G amps. Are you finding -- are you getting any traction with the CMOS parts into some of the more sophisticated -- or are still doing GaAs there? And then just along the same lines, how do you expect to beat Samsung, now they've launched GS4G, expect up flat or down year-over-year, and has the mix moved away from GaAs to SOI at Samsung? And then, Dean, you guided for 10% to 15% non-GAAP tax rate last quarter. It was 0% this quarter -- it certainly helped the net income number. Did I just push out of quarters or was something else going on there? And you've always said that you'd get better leverage on OpEx. Looks like that's happening now. Should we be modeling relatively flat this year, given what you just said about the incremental growth in the top line, being another $100 million or so?
Steven E. Creviston:
I will attempt to take care of this and be the quarterback here. Eric, question was on the CMOS PAs, making progress at the Tier 1s, and how that's going, and then also, I think as he related into some of the higher tier phones, and what's going on with SOI and GaAs, and talk about your old portfolio, and then Dean will take the financials.
Steven E. Creviston:
I think it's also a question sprinkled in there on Samsung as well.
Steven E. Creviston:
Correct.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So starting off the 2G CMOS, just be clear, I said that overall, the 2G portfolio is still declining sequentially, but our 2G CMOS PA was flat sequentially. So it increased as a percentage of the portfolio. We do see it ramping throughout the year, and some of that, as you said, is potential placements into other 3G entry handsets, although so far that has not happened yet. A lot of the 3G entry handsets are adopting multi-mode, multi-band power amplifiers with 2G included. So we do expect to see continued adoption and ramp up in 2G CMOS PA even outside of the 3G entry tier. And then on Samsung generally, that was a -- in fact, a highlight of our March quarter, in fact we grew nicely within in the March quarter on their new platform ramps [ph] , we're positioned very nicely across the portfolio, all the expense providers and all product functionality, too. Discrete PAs, Multi-mode PAs, both APTN, ET, antenna switches, discreet switches, infinituners, and even power management ramping as well there. So we have a very broad and healthy relationship with them, and we're definitely expecting to grow.
William A. Priddy:
Yes, and regarding the tax rate, you remember this was the end of our fiscal year. So it was a true-up for our cash taxes. So we got just a little bit of a benefit, given where we were going into the quarter. Looking at next fiscal year, I do believe the tax rate is going to increase. We'll have the cash taxes that we pay, which has been predominantly in international entities, and given the level of profitability that we expect to generate, there's also the possibility that we could be paying some cash taxes here in the United States as well. I mean, obviously, we're going to do everything we can to minimize our cash taxes, but I think that the 15% is a good going-in position for fiscal year '15. Regarding advances, you may have already seen the highest expense for the year. Especially given that the payroll taxes and all that hit the hardest in the March quarter. I think the June quarter will be relatively flat-ish, but we could actually see a small decline throughout the rest of the year.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Great. And then for my second question, if I could, real quick, on the Panasonic/Samsung, I'm sorry, Skyworks/Panasonic filter thing, you were probably Panasonic's second-largest customers in filters. I know you have an agreement with them, the announcement said they were going to close in the third Q, or planned on it, and I know you'll close with TriQuint around that time. But the transition, once you're part of a new co., to starting sourcing filters from them, may take a bit longer. Is there -- how confident do you feel that your source of filters from them, could they do TC-SAW? And then one of the guy, I guess, obviously besides TriQuint, that's got a good source of that, will remain uninterrupted and will it impact your design plans for early 2015 or so, or you're just not worried about at all, based on what you think you can get from TriQuint?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Ed, this is Bob. Number one, it was not a surprise to us what transpired. Number two, as we put in place our supply agreements, we had anticipated the potential of someday that, not staying part of Panasonic, so we're not worried about any supply interruptions. And just, we commercially have done business where we bought from Skyworks in the past, Skyworks has bought from us in the past, and if we need to buy from them in the future, we would. But again, I think the most important thing is, this was by no way a surprise to us. And again, as we set up our own sourcing agreements with them, we're not worried.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Cody Acree with Ascendiant Capital.
Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
Maybe, Eric, if you could, to the extent that you can, in CPG, could you give us some degree of breakdown, particularly maybe what -- how the market share and percentage of revenue in China? And then, newer products like your aggregation envelope tracking and some of your antenna control solutions, just give us a sense of how that shakes out?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, hi Cody. We're not going to be able to break out in all the different product categories. I think we can give you at least what the China business was, as a percent of the Cellular business. We're really not going to get into all the different categories. I mean, what's driving our growth, as I said in my opening comments, is everything that's in the Cellular business, to what's going on in MPG and we're just seeing broad-based growth in various components. But you want to give your China business?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, in the March quarter, as CPG, first thing it's just CPG revenues China was in the low 20% range, between 20% and 25%.
Cody G. Acree - Ascendiant Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
And, Dean, on the gross margins, you got multiple initiatives you're still working through, some of those are longer tailed. I guess, if you kind of have to characterize what inning we are in, in that margin expansion, how much do you think there is left as you push through '14 and into '15?
William A. Priddy:
Well, like we commented, we've -- we don't plan to stop improving margins until we have the highest margin structure in the industry. There is obviously, at some point, trade-offs between -- in our growth rate and margin structure. But, when I look at the list, I mean, we have 75 active projects that we're tracking in the company. We're in various stages of executing on those projects. Yes, we had several pretty big things. Now we've got a lot of little things that do add up though, to nice cost reductions with margin expansion. So I think we're still on a very steep curve though, regarding our margin improvement profile.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of JoAnne Feeney with ABR.
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
Question for you on your view of unit growth this year, versus your content gains, and then the usual ASP decline that we eventually see in all semiconductors. For the third parties, are estimating about 19%, 20% unit growth in smartphones, heavily weighted towards the low end. Obviously, you're seeing a lot of RF content gains. So I'm wondering, what you think about this year, in terms of the unit growth as a contributor to your growth, versus the content gains? And then, how much should we expect to see individual component prices either through integration or just through natural pricing pressures decline year-over-year?
William A. Priddy:
Well first off, responding to the cellular market, at least. In total, the unit growth is roughly flat for the year that we're modeling. So all of our growth would be attributed to content gains, essentially. If you said that where there is growth, adjusting higher RF content phones like LTE and TD-LTE and so forth. So it's all content gain from here.
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
Okay. So you're including feature phones and low-end phones, I was referring just to smartphone unit growth, which has been estimated to be somewhere around 20% for the year?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, I think that's correct. But I think what Eric was communicating when we look at our total RF TAM, which we have to include all of that, what we analyze is the overall market is going roughly be flat, and the TAM is going to be growing, and that's roughly out of the addition of RF content. You're in the ballpark for what that category of funds will do, but we look at every tier to look at our total business, and that's why in our prepared remarks, we talk about 2G, voice moving to 3G entry and plus for us, that's a tripling in dollar content. That's pretty meaningful to us as well. So we kind of look at that whole thing. And then also the addition of WiFi, we also consider that.
JoAnne Feeney - ABR Investment Strategy LLC:
Okay, perfect, really helpful. And then back to the follow-up on the gross margin and others have been asking, what is it about RF Micro Devices that makes you confident that you can achieve industry leading gross margins? Is it ASTs, is it your particular mix versus the others? Do you feel like you have an advantage in the manufacturing side, Why did you have confidence that you can do better than the rest of the companies here?
William A. Priddy:
I think the discipline and the process that we've instilled in the company. We talked about the 75 different projects that we're actively tracking. We're talking about taking some of the hard, strategic steps over the past 3 to 4 years or so, for instance, selling our MBE facility, selling our GaAs fab in the U.K., adopting a sourcing manufacturing model and just when we take into account what we expect to be average ASP erosion, and look at the cost structures that we expect to be able to achieve, through our sourcing and our own manufacturing, the result is what we believe will be the highest margin structure in the industry.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Anthony Stoss with Craig-Hallum.
Anthony J. Stoss - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division:
Bob, if you wouldn't mind talking a little bit more on the TD-LTE 4G base station, following up on the comments you made, I'd love to hear your view on just the growth rate of that segment for your business. Also, are you able to pick up any more in the gross margin side there, given the 75 different projects you have? And then secondly, on the IOT, I'd love to hear your view on how you think RFMD's going to attack the market, what products you might be launching into the IOT?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
All right, Tony, I think, as we haven't heard from Norm, he'd like the jump in and respond. Thanks for asking about his business.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
TD-LTE is a -- is very exciting right now for us in the wireless infrastructure category. We've had some very strong growth last quarter, double-digit quarter-over-quarter growth for us. And this is in an area where we sell a wide variety of products, gain blocks, power amps, triple gain amps, attenuators, switches, in an area that's traditional strength for RFMD and above average gross margins for MPG. So it's a strong category, and we see legs in this throughout 2014. There's quite a ways to go yet with the installations for China Mobile. So it's continued strength there in TD-LTE for us in wireless infrastructure, we also mentioned Internet of Things. Our initial foray in the Internet of Things is with WiFi, where we see a lot of people using WiFi because it works. But we're also seeing a lot of new activity in ZigBee, and ZigBee being adopted in categories where perhaps they don't need the hefty data rates you can achieve with WiFi these days. But they may still need a front-end module or an external power amplifier to extend the range of those ZigBee devices. And since they operate, the ZigBee operates in the same frequency band as mo band WiFi, we're able to very beautifully adapt our WiFi products for ZigBee applications, which supports appliances and other home networking applications, and automated meter reading and smart grid applications as well. So we're seeing very good activity throughout the industry in that area.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Just a quick first question for Bob, and then one for Eric. Bob, I think on the last call, if I'm not mistaken, you sort of thought that the company could be positioned to grow 10% year-on-year in fiscal '15, given the better-than-expected gains for June, I assume you're still comfortable with that. Just wanted to touch base on that expectation?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks for asking, Quinn. We are absolutely comfortable with that. It's still our intent to grow faster than our underlying market, and as I said on the call last quarter, greater than 10%.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Great. And then for, Eric, I know you talked a lot about TD-LTE strength, seems like the China 3G market, especially quad core, and maybe even octo core platforms, you're still seeing pretty good strength. Are you seeing, good attach rates there, on some of the 3G platforms? Or is your growth in China predominantly from the TD-LTE phones?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, that's a good question. Actually, we see great attached tests to all the 3G platforms as well. I think, why we're talking so much about TD-LTE is that it just frankly, exploded over the past couple of months in terms of the demand and the outlook for the year. So it's layering on top of the 3G platforms as well.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Christopher Danely with JPMorgan.
Philip Lee - JPMorgan Chase & Co.:
It's Philip Lee on for Chris. You highlighted LTE as a major driver, can you comment on your current split?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I guess, how we've done really in the past, which is 2G to 3G, 4G.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, so 2G as a percentage of revenues and CPG is becoming less meaningful now, but it's down under 15% of CPG, so 85% of the business is in 3G and 4G combined, but we haven't been breaking 3G and 4G out, separately.
Philip Lee - JPMorgan Chase & Co.:
Got it. And as a follow-up, moving beyond the June quarter, do you see more of the growth being driven by China, with the TD-LTE stuff, or with the flagship phones from your top 2 customers?
Steven E. Creviston:
Actually, if you look at our year-over-year growth that we're projecting, it's about half from our marquee smartphones, if you will. And the other half would be attributed to the 4G transition into low tier or basically, TD-LTE in China.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Maybe if you could just talk, just as far as your outlook, I apologize if this was covered, but between CPG and MPG, the entire business up 19%, are you seeing any -- is it CPG is seeing stronger growth, you mentioned base stations and assuming that carries forwards for MPG, but if you could give any color between the 2 segments, that would be helpful.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, Blayne, we're seeing growth in both business units. Last quarter, we commented MPG would grow, and they did, and we're expecting them to grow this quarter as well as CPG, and CPG is going to grow a little bit faster than MPG this quarter.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Great. And then maybe, Eric, if you can talk about, you talked about a 3 or actually you mentioned about a 3X content between 3G versus 2G. You make the same comparison, TD-LTE versus 3G, any way that you could frame how much additional content, PAs, and then maybe switches and filters as well, if you can highlight all 3, that would be helpful.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, I can't really break out between each of these product categories, although well for you here, but the transition from 3G versus 2G was of that tripling of content that Bob referenced, and it's about another doubling then, from there to get to the TD LTE content. For the most part now, we're building 5-mode phones with 10 bands, there are some that are adding even more content and more bands of course, but on average, we're seeing in the $4 to $6 worth of RF content for TD-LTE. And that's the total RF content, so that includes filters, switches and the power amplifiers.
Blayne Curtis - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
And I guess, pre-deal, is that PAM all -- can you address the entire TAM, I guess is, what I'm trying to figure out is, your addressable PAM pre-deal for PAs and switches, versus including the filters as well, which is obviously a great tailwind once you do the acquisition?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, that's correct. So today, the way the architectures are being put together, especially since this is a relatively new requirement, they're still fairly discrete. They're a multi-mode power amplifiers, where they cover some of the band, then there are satellite power amplifiers, and then, antenna switch module, and several discrete switches as well, and potentially antenna tuners, but the filters are generally not included or integrated into our products today. So to your point, we are not addressing any of filtered TAM today. Longer-term, obviously, with the merger we'll have that content and be able to operate in higher levels of integration to address that market, too.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Something we could look out a little bit in the future here. You've obviously had great numbers here, and you still have some Skyworks and TriQuint as well, I think, so it seems like the industry, overall, is doing quite well as we've expanded here, something like 43 bands, just trying to get a sense of how long does this continue? I think we've talked in the past, maybe expands 100 bands, or something like that. So how quickly do we expand to the next set of bands, and is that going to be soon enough that you can keep the big dot [ph] content trend going here?
Steven E. Creviston:
Well, it's not just about bands, although that is a key driver, but it's also just about bandwidth and being able to get more data through the pipe, if you will, and so that's what drives multi-mode operation as well, like the 5-mode bands that we're talking about, the China Mobile as an example, to allow people to have a big pipe into their mobile device, but also being able to roam across geographies and so forth. And so we see continued expansion, this would go on for some time, of the available bandwidth getting into the mobile device. Some of that is band-related, some is mode related, but then you have also carrier aggregation mode. So the carriers, having the capability of pumping a device to and from a mobile device, over multiple channels, is another big trend, which will again, add RF content, and switching and even in power amplifiers as well, driven by that trend. And then the next step beyond that, we talk about antenna tuning, and then just general tuning, with impedance tuning and so forth, to really extend the battery life and lower the actual operating temperature of the device. That is really just getting started, I think. The tunability in these handsets is something that, 5 years from now, will look totally different. I think that would be a much bigger market. It's just getting started. So it's not just about band proliferation it's about solving that total system problem for the customer, and that's was really driving a solution like RF Fusion, because it is getting so complicated to put all this together, and do system architecture and have the ability to make that very compact and easy-to-use for the customers, and that trend as well, is really just beginning. So we think we're still very early stages of a long-term growth trend here for the RF industry.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
I did want to follow-up on the RF Fusion. It was going to be my next question, anyway. And so as you look at the R&D investment, you have to make here, does it become a little bit more of a high-stakes bet in a sense, where if you have to put all this stuff together for a particular RF Fusion Solution, are you making a big bet that, hey, these are the bands people are going to want, or is it more you're working closely enough with customers that there isn't a flexibility there that it's not really a bet in that sense?
Steven E. Creviston:
That's a great question. And it may be surprising, but actually it's not the big bet you might expect it is. You may recall, over the past couple of years RFMD has already begun marketing complete reference design. So we been working closely with customers to really optimize the system architectures and build solutions. Now were just taking it to the next level, in terms of packaging technology, to really make it compact and in a single footprint. So a lot of the R&D that we've been spending for several years has really been in anticipation, and set us up to deal, to drive us across the goal line.
Operator:
That concludes our question-and-answer session for today. At this time I'd like to turn the conference back to management for any closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us tonight. RFMD is executing on multiple, long-term structural initiatives that are enhancing our operating model, and delivering robust improvements in our financial performance. We are confident in delivering revenue growth ahead of our underlying markets, gross margins at the top of our industry, powerful operating leverage, robust EPS growth and strong free cash flow. Thanks again, and good night.
Operator:
Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to listen to a replay of today's conference, please dial 1 (800) 406-7325 or (303) 590-3030 using the access code of 4678178, followed by the pound key. This does conclude the RF Micro Devices Q4 2014 conference call. Thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Bob Bruggeworth – President & Chief Executive Officer Dean Priddy – Chief Financial Officer Eric Creviston – Corporate Vice President & President, Cellular Products Group Norm Hilgendorf – Corporate Vice President & President, Multi-Market Products Group Doug DeLieto – Vice President, Investor Relations
Analysts:
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc. Steve Smigie – Raymond James Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research Mike Burton – Brean Capital Mike Walkley – Canaccord Genuity Vivek Arya – Bank of America Merrill Lynch JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson Blayne Curtis – Barclays
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RF Micro Devices F3Q 2014 Earnings Conference Call. (Operator instructions.) This conference is being recorded today, Tuesday January 28, 2014. I would now like to turn the conference over to our host, Mr. Douglas DeLieto, Vice President Investor Relations of RFMD. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks very much, Lilly. Hi everybody and welcome to our conference call. At 4:00 PM today we issued a press release. If anyone listening today did not receive a copy of the release please call Samantha Alfonso at The Financial Relations Board at 212-827-3746. Sam will email a copy to you and verify that you are on our distribution list. In the meantime the release is also available on our corporate website www.RFMD.com under the heading “Investors.” At this time I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today’s release and on today’s call we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We’ve provided supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain non-cash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends in our underlying performance. During our call our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website www.RFMD.com under “Investors.” In fairness to all listeners we ask that each participant please limit themselves to one question and a follow-up. Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I’m also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf who lead our Cellular Products Group and Multi-Market Products Group respectively as well as RFMD’s management team. And with that I’ll hand it over to Bob.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome everyone. On today’s call we’ll focus on RFMD’s new operating model and the enhanced financial performance we are already delivering. RFMD has achieved more than 500 basis points of gross margin expansion in three quarters and in the March quarter we’re guiding for additional margin expansion to a gross margin of 40%. This coming year we anticipate additional margin expansion, operating leverage and earnings growth as we execute on the long-term structural initiatives we’ve put in place. I’ll cover many of these initiatives and Dean will provide more color later in the call, but first let’s take a look at the December quarter. Quarterly revenue was down approximately 7% sequentially. During the quarter we saw gradual erosion in order activity and customer pulls fell short of their forecasts. The reductions in demand were primarily related to the very low end in China where RFMD has the majority share as well as progressive weakening throughout the quarter related to our two largest customers. Despite this shortfall in revenue, RFMD delivered a quarterly record in gross profit and achieved our EPS forecast of $0.13, reflecting the changes we’ve incorporated into our operating model. On the balance sheet cash flow from operations was a very strong $70 million and free cash flow was $55 million. Looking forward, customer order activity is strengthening. We anticipate double-digit revenue growth for the next fiscal year with 40% gross margin for the entire year. Our confidence in our financial performance is tied closely to ongoing design win activity related to the industry’s marquee smartphones and tablets for which volume ramps will begin in the spring, accelerate in the September quarter and continue into the December quarter. On our quarterly conference call nine months ago we committed to 300 to 400 basis points of gross margin expansion by the end of March, 2014. In just three quarters we’ve already delivered 530 basis points of expansion and we’re not done. In March we anticipate gross margin of 40% and our internal goal is for industry leading gross margin with more predictability and less volatility in operating results. To achieve our margin targets we’ve implemented a flexible sourcing strategy that is reducing our gas and silicon costs, and we’ve added assembly capabilities that have reduced our packaging costs. We are reducing our usage of precious metals in our manufacturing processes and leveraging our new higher-unit volumes across our supply chain to reduce costs. Against this backdrop we are forecasting annual revenue growth of approximately 10% supported by multiple growth drivers. RFMD’s underlying markets continue to expand driven by global macro trends, like the internet of things which can be viewed as a massive, overarching movement comprising multiple high growth trends including embedded connectivity, connected home, automotive WiFi, and wearable technologies just to name a few. To accommodate the increasing requirements for always on broadband data, the top tiers of our market are adopting new technologies like envelope tracking, carrier aggregation], and transmit MIMO that increase our dollar content opportunities. The carriers are deploying TD LTE and LTE Advanced as well as driving more LTE content in mid-tier smartphones, while in developing geographies consumers are continuing to migrate from 2G voice phones to high dollar content 3G entry smartphones. Setting apart the RFMD story we are also capturing incremental content in new and expanding categories like antenna control solutions, power management circuits, diversity switches and a variety of new products integrating filters and duplexes. At a very high level, RFMD is executing on multiple opportunities to increase our dollar content generation over generation in the world’s leading smartphones and tablets while materially enhancing our operating model. In the March quarter we anticipate another quarter of margin expansion and year-over-year improvements in operating income and earnings per share. While the launch of marquee smartphones and tablets is weighted towards the back half of this calendar year our visibility in the design win activity gives us confidence in delivering double-digit revenue growth, gross margins of greater than 40%, expanding operating margin and significant EPS growth. With this RFMD expects to deliver robust growth and operating income as well as return on invested capital well above our cost of capital. And with that I’ll turn the call over to Dean.
Dean Priddy:
Thanks Bob, and good afternoon everyone. Revenue for the December quarter decreased 7.1% sequentially and increased 6.4% year-over-year to $288.5 million. CPG revenue was $238.7 million, down 6.6% sequentially and up 7.2% year-over-year. MPG revenue was $49.8 million, down 9.8% sequentially and up 2.6% year-over-year. During the quarter we had two 10% customers and saw significant growth at our new largest customer. Gross margin was 39.7% and gross profit was a quarterly record of $114.6 million. Three years ago on our quarterly earnings call in April we highlighted our plan to expand RFMD’s gross margins by 300 to 400 basis points by the March F2014 quarter. One quarter ahead of schedule we’ve already delivered 530 basis points of margin improvement. This is the direct result of our intense focus on cost reduction and our ongoing efforts in support of multiple gross margin expansion initiatives. These are structural changes in various stages of implementation that target fixed and variable costs. They will impact margins favorably in the March quarter and beyond and our longer term goal is industry-leading gross margins. Let’s look at how we’ll achieve that. First, RFMD’s flexible sourcing strategy is providing multiple points of benefit. Over the past few years we have reduced our manufacturing footprint and our fixed asset base significantly. We sold our MBE facility and our gallium arsenide fab in the UK and we’ve expanded our external sources of supply. We’re better able to balance internal and external resources with fluctuations in demand, and this supports a more predictable margin profile. The combined capabilities of our gas fab and our external foundries satisfy the full breadth of our customers’ performance, size, and cost requirements. Second, we have installed and qualified additional assembly capacity in our Beijing facility. We’re seeing a margin lift today as we reduce our reliance on external suppliers, and we’ll get an additional lift as our internal assets are fully loaded. Third, we’re seeing continued adoption of our ultra-low cost CMOS power amplifiers in next-generation handset platforms for emerging markets. We’ve seen an initial lift in margin as many smaller customers have migrated and we anticipate further margin expansion as our largest customer for CMOS PAs migrates to our ultra-low cost product. We also anticipate a benefit as we commence shipments to an additional tier one customer. As part from these margin improvement goals that is much further than these three items our organization has identified over 75 initiatives to continue improving gross margin, and we are executing on these initiatives today. We believe these initiatives will support sustainable and more predictable operating results. Returning to the P&L, operating expenses were $74.6 million compared to $75.1 million last quarter with G&A of $10.7 million, sales and marketing of $15.9 million and research and development of $48.0 million. Operating income for the December quarter was $40 million representing approximately 13.9% of sales. Other income was $300,000 and non-GAAP taxes were approximately $3.9 million. Net income for the quarter was $36.4 million or $0.13 per diluted share based on 287.9 million shares. Now moving to the balance sheet, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $205.5 million. Cash flow from operations was $70.4 million and free cash flow was $54.8 million. DSOs were 45.3 days and RFMD’s inventory balance declined by $8 million, resulting in turns of 5.3. During the quarter we repurchased approximately 200,000 shares of stock at an average price of $4.99. Net PP&E was $200.7 million and capital expenditures during the quarter were $15.6 million with depreciation of $11.1 million and intangible amortization of $7.2 million. Capital expenditures included investments in assembly and equipment to reduce precious metals usage. Also, RFMD made a [multi-million] dollar investment to secure BAW filter capacity and now has secured access to SAW, temp comp SAW and BAW filter capacity from multiple sources. Now for the financial outlook and business commentary. RFMD expects quarterly revenue of approximately $250 million to $260 million. RFMD expects non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 40%. RFMD expects a non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 10% to 15% and RFMD expects non-GAAP EPS of approximately $0.09 to $0.10. Some additional color on our March quarterly outlook
Operator:
Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions.) Our first question comes from the line of Harsh Kumar with Stephens, Inc. Please go ahead.
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey guys, first of all congratulations on realizing the 40% goal, it looks like you’re guiding to it in March. Bob, I still wanted to understand the $30 million odd gap in the December quarter. Is this China business on the low end of things, is it the culprit? Is it something that you passed on or is it something that just deteriorated? And do we expect it to come back; and then if it does come back, how does it affect the margins when it comes back?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Harsh, two major points in the revenue decline. One was clearly the very low end in China, which as we roll out our new latest generation ultra-low cost CMOS PA that will have a positive impact on the margins. So we still look for that. I want to remind you as well as everybody else the 2G market is declining. It has started to decline significantly and we are expecting that to continue next year. However, as I said in my opening comments a lot of that is migrating to 3G entry. But I also want to let you know that quite honestly at our two largest customers, they weren’t as strong as what we were expecting for the quarter quite honestly. And I think now that they’ve both reported I think some of you guys have seen it as well.
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, got it – very helpful, Bob. And then my next question was in the press release and even in commentary you talked about sort of the 10% revenue growth rate hurdle and your comfort level with 40% margin. Can I just get you to clarify if we can take that as guidance and sort of model to it, or these are just [hots] or should we just sort of go ahead and put Excel models to this?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Harsh, I’ll let Dean talk a little bit about the model and how we should look at things because we also commented on OPEX as well. But clearly we are absolutely confident in achieving the 40% gross margin. I think that we can do that without the growth of double digits. It’s clearly what we’re expecting to be able to deliver based on the forecasts that we get on all the programs that we believe we’ve already locked in. But Dean, I don’t know if you’ve got any other modeling you want to give Harsh?
Dean Priddy:
Yeah, we’re not only confident in revenue growth for F2015, we’re very confident in margin expansion. We go back to last quarter’s conference call; we mentioned that we felt that our margin expansion initiatives weren’t nearly as tied to revenue as in the past years – and more specifically said they really weren’t tied to revenue. The three big initiatives were not revenue-based and we’re in varying stages of recognizing the full benefit of those. The fab, yeah, we’ve recognized that full benefit but the ultra-low cost CMOS PAs, we’re definitely still in those lower innings of the ballgame in terms of that ramp. And in terms of the assembly capacity in Beijing, yeah, it’s had a positive impact this quarter but we still have quite a bit of capacity there that we’ll be utilizing as we transition from external sources into our internal supply. And this coupled with the 75 or so odd other projects that we’re working on, and all the work that we’ve done on modeling should cost analysis, best of breed benchmarking, zero based analysis, (inaudible) time analysis, total cost of ownership – I mean we’ve focused the organization on improving gross margin. And we’re getting that margin today and we expect to get that margin next year, something with a 4 in front of it; and we don’t intend to stop until we reach industry-leading gross margin.
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey guys, I’m really excited for your prospects. I’ll get back in line, thank you so much.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Steve Smigie with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Great, thanks a lot and my congratulations on the good margin performance. I was hoping you can talk a little bit about the 40%, as you said some number with a 4 in front of it and lots of initiatives; but you also said 40% for the year. Should I think that 40% is the minimum for the year and there’s room for that to be potentially nicely above 40% as we move throughout the year?
Dean Priddy:
Yeah, if you remember last quarter we said that we would grow our margins in this, the December quarter which we obviously did with over 300 basis points of improvement. We also said that we would grow our margins up in what would be a seasonally down quarter so we’re still guiding to that to get to 40% gross margin. We said that we would at some point during the year, during one quarter achieve 40% gross margin last quarter. This quarter we’re changing that and we’re saying that we can achieve 40% gross margin for the entire year. So could it be higher than that? Obviously it could be we are committing to full year 40% gross margin.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay. And then sort of back to Harsh’s question and looking at the double-digit growth here, what would be different and what should we expect this year to hit that? I mean is it as you talked about the strong June and September quarters, really strong sequential growth or is it maybe March of next year is less seasonally down to get to that double-digit growth? Is there something particular you think is a more likely scenario there?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Steve, this is Bob. Number one we didn’t talk much about the profile but we’re coming off a year where we’re growing significantly north of 10% year-over-year this fiscal year. And this quarter from a profile perspective, it all gets down to the timing of these key marquee phones for the most part. And I really don’t want to get into that too much more than I said in my opening comments, but you know, they kind of begin in the spring and accelerate through September, and keep ramping through December. So how you want to model that, I wasn’t really making any comments about next March’s seasonality. You know, what is seasonality anymore? It’s seemed to vary over the last three years quite significantly, and again, it gets back to the timing of the marquee phones.
Dean Priddy:
Yeah, one thing that we do know is that we’re going to be very well represented in the marquee phones from what we know today. So we do have the growth drivers in place and obviously a lot of it will depend on how well these phones do in the marketplace.
Bob Bruggeworth:
As well as the tablets.
Dean Priddy:
As well as the tablets, exactly.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay, last question if I could – you talked about the marquee phones, well represented. Should we be assuming that you’ve got a marquee one coming up here sort of in the middle of the year? Is there any chance that we should see the dollar content gains there for you guys as the industry looks like most of you guys should be having?
Dean Priddy:
I don’t think we’re going to comment on individual phone’s dollar content at this point, whether it increases or not; however we do know that we’re very well positioned to grow our revenues as the phones launch and ramp production. So we’re not going to say anything specific about any particular phones at this point but we do feel confident in the revenue growth profile.
Bob Bruggeworth:
And we do continue to expand our dollar content in marquee phones. So don’t take what Dean said as we’re not, it’s just I don’t know which phone you’re talking about, which customer and I don’t want to get into code. But we continue to expand our footprint within smartphones and even broader than that.
Dean Priddy:
We’re simply not allowed to talk about that kind of thing. That’s really what I was saying.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay, great. Thanks.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Thank you, hey guys. A couple questions – BAW relationship, is this similar to how you set up the duplex relationship from last year in terms of the arrangement you have in securing capacity? And why BAW? What are you going to use BAW for?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I’ll take the beginning of this and I’ll let Eric talk about the applications. But from an investment perspective I’m not sure how much you understood about the prior investment but I will say in one sense we made a significant investment to secure capacity, obviously source of supply and competitive pricing. And I’ll kind of leave it at that, but Eric can talk about the applications of where we will and are already using BAW.
Eric Creviston:
Sure, I’ll be happy to. As you know, Ed, there’s really a growing demand for filtering of all types with all the new bands and modes that are being integrated into the advanced handsets, and we also see opportunities for various partitioning scenarios – so filtering combined with power amplifiers for example or combined with switches, or completely integrated modules which have all the functionality in it including all the bands and the filtering. So what we’re really trying to signal and make sure you’re aware of is there will be no product segment that we’ll be shut out of. We have all the technologies to be able to address all the product segments that we see coming.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
So you said multiple sources in your commentary – I think, Bob, you said that on the technologies. You talk about multiple sources to derive each of those technologies but not multiple sources for every one of them. Specifically in regard to BAW there are only a couple of guys who actually make it, maybe two in the three and a half in the world; and then TC-SAW, again there’s only two or three guys to do it. Are you suggesting you have multiple sources for BAW?
Eric Creviston:
Yes.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay. And then to your double-digit guidance, you sound very confident about the growth – not just that but the gross margin. But Dean, you said that you don’t need the double digits to hit your gross margin profile. Am I assuming that for the whole year or are you going to have to… I mean it sounds like you’ve got good visibility in some design wins. Are you going to have to land those and they’re going to have to sell? Is the product mix for the design wins favoring your gross margin profile? So in other words, now that your other 70 projects are even in the works and you still have these design wins which I would expect to be some big phones, would your margin profile improve on that because of the product mix that you’re selling into that?
Eric Creviston:
I think the first order, we have to remember there’s ASP, average selling prices do tend to go down, so we would need some of those just to offset that. But I think in a very high level it’s not as mix-dependent. It is we’re reducing our costs.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
So most of the gross margin upside is based on all these initiatives you’re doing and probably less so on revenue growth. For example, if tomorrow we woke up and you sold no gas and you substituted all that gas revenue for SOI revenues it would be reasonable to assume your margins would move up nicely, would they not?
Eric Creviston:
Provided we dealt with our gas assets that we weren’t using and assembly capacity and all the other things, which is exactly what we would do because that’s exactly what we have been doing. So yes. We’re not looking for a mix shift to be able to drive our margins. The team has done a fantastic job of reducing our costs in each one of the operations, and Dean outlined some of the techniques that we’re using.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Yeah, it sounds superb. I mean you guys exceeded expectations and we’ve talked about it, everybody’s talked about it over the last nine months or so but this is quite a bit of an upside. I just want to get an idea. RF Micro is not the same company you were two or three years ago in terms of your mix shift, your product lineups. When you were (inaudible) UC I guess it was 2000 and who knows, I can’t remember – ’11 or ’12 when you announced [Fenon] and SOI and all that. I mean your mix shift and just technology itself with SOI has picked up significantly in that timeframe to where, Eric, what do you think your mix in terms of wafers are at this point or product between silicon and gas?
Eric Creviston:
Bob mentioned last quarter, he just gave color on that. We’re shipping far more content in silicon versus gas today and there’s no question that the trend for that will continue. And like you said one of the exciting things is it’s not a matter of transition from one technology to another that’s driving the margin improvement. We’ve got a full portfolio now with CMOS, SOI, silicon (inaudible) and gallium arsenide all shipping in production now, and we’re driving costs out in all of those. So it’s not a matter of transition from one to the other – every one of those technologies’ costs are going down year-over-year now.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay, final question. Dean, is it reasonable to assume there’ll be a little ebb and flow in maybe some of your share with some of your biggest customers this year, maybe not overall, in aggregate? But leaving aside how popular or unpopular the marquee phones and their sales your share at those customers, do you expect to either gain share at both customers or keep your own, or maybe like I said some ebb and flow where some go down and some go up?
Dean Priddy:
Given our design visibility today we would expect to gain dollar content and share.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay, thanks guys.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Burton with Brean Capital. Please go ahead.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital:
Hey guys and all my congratulations on the margin improvement. I was wondering, Eric, if you could give us an update on the progress in envelope tracking. Obviously Qualcomm’s is in some of the teardowns. Have you begun to ship your own solution or when should we start to see that ramp?
Eric Creviston:
Thanks, Mike. Yes, we’re of course ramping in production and shipping high volume of the power amplifiers for envelope tracking, both multi-mode, multi-band power amplifiers as well as various individual bands’ envelope tracking power amplifiers that go on the Qualcomm-referenced design. And in addition to that we are in production now with our own power management IC, our own envelope tracker if you will. So that is in production now. It’s I think relatively low volume certainly compared to the Qualcomm volumes these days but we see it picking up significantly through this calendar year.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital:
And is that something where the opportunity really is more on the fact that your power amplifiers are more likely to be attached to that? Or is it more like you see it as a significant revenue opportunity going forward?
Eric Creviston:
The majority of the opportunity is in selling the rest of the referenced design. It’s not just power amplifiers but the opportunity to have switching – there’s very advanced switch modules for carrier aggregation and so forth there; and also tuning in the platform. It’s a nice revenue opportunity. It’s certainly a nice margin opportunity in the tracker itself.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital:
Okay. And then a couple to Dean, just following up on the margin side. How should we look at, you’ve helped us in the past with contribution margins going past the March quarter. And then sorry if I missed this but can you give us an OPEX forecast for how calendar ’14 will trend?
Dean Priddy:
Yeah, we can see the contribution margin somewhere north of 50% or so on improvements in revenue. And in terms of expenses we stated we’re going to be managing to a financial model, which our longer-term model is 20% of sales. I think you’re going to see a significant closure from where we are today to that closer to 20% of sales by the end of our calendar year or the end of our fiscal year, either one. So very tight expense control, flat to perhaps down.
Mike Burton – Brean Capital:
Great, thanks guys.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Walkley with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.
Mike Walkley – Canaccord Genuity:
Thank you. To get to your double-digit growth without talking about customers, maybe you can talk about within RF’s different areas you feel best about gaining content share this year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah, I think from the perspective of cellular and MPG, we’ll kind of take them separate but I know one of the areas of growth continues to be our WiFi business. So Norm, do you want to talk a little bit about that, and Eric, I guess you can talk about cellular growth?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Sure, thanks Mike. Yes, WiFi is really a key growth driver for us and continues to be. We had solid growth throughout this current fiscal year and we’re really seeing a strong uptake in the CPD category, the routers and access points, set top boxes and that category; and strong momentum in the current quarter where in the March quarter we’ll see quarterly growth in MPG largely driven by WiFi along with a couple other categories. So we see the WiFi momentum really continuing to drive solid growth for MPG in the coming fiscal year. Eric?
Eric Creviston:
Sure, in cellular of course one of the main drivers that we see in the year is going to be LTE adoption across multiple tiers. There’s several drivers I guess I could highlight. First off, the LTE handsets driving from regional LTE to more of a global LTE footprint, so they’re usable in more regions – so that’s driving higher band counts of LTE and it’s in many different systems. And then of course TD LTE – that’s really just emerging going from just a few units last year to somewhere well north of 50 million units this year. And this quarter I can tell you we’re seeing dramatic design and production ramp activity for TD LTE handsets for many of our customers in China. So we expect that to be a real exciting environment that’s going to drive growth as well. And then as carrier aggregation rolls out that definitely drives more content, more advanced switching which we’re very much in the heart of. It’s one of our major growth drivers throughout the year, supporting switch content and tuning for carrier aggregation systems in LTE.
Mike Walkley – Canaccord Genuity:
Great, thanks. And just more on that, you’ve done a great job of getting a lot of share of switch content and tuning. What do you think your share is now relative to competition for the switch market?
Bob Bruggeworth:
I’ll go ahead and take that. Number one, I think today the market is continuing to expand significantly as we see again the complexity that Eric just talked about being launched into more phones. And today we would still say we’re the majority of the share – not all. We’ve been pretty open about that but clearly we have the largest share and continue to invest in next process nodes and technologies to continue to drive performance. That’s one of the differentiators out there. Second is with some of these complex systems having very close and intimate relationships with those customers so that we can design and optimize for their handsets. So right now number one and we plan to stay number one and continue to invest in the technologies to maintain that position. That’s just on some of the antenna control solutions. When we look at switches I think it’s a surprise to many of you, if you open up the phones they’re not usually identified in teardown reports the number of switches that are being used in these complex phones, and you know, doing a lot of the routing and various routing to different antennas and things like that. So switches ultimately continues to be a place where we have significantly improved are market share and are probably getting close to number one.
Mike Walkley – Canaccord Genuity:
Okay, thanks, and one last question from me. You guys mentioned tablets as a growth opportunity this year, and some of our survey work started to show carriers being more aggressive in subsidizing tablets, especially with LTE connectivity. Are you seeing an increased attach rate for LTE in tablets versus just WiFi only as part of the growth next year?
Eric Creviston:
Yes, we certainly are. I think it’s not been as rapid as at least I would have thought. I personally use a cellular-enabled tablet, I don’t know how other people live without it. But I think if people really learn the LTE throughput rates and what you can do, and how it compares to having to log onto a WiFi network every single time I think the adoption will go much, much higher. It’s still roughly 25% penetration of cellular into the tablets; WiFi of course is everywhere and that’ll stay that way. But we do see it increasing in the future significantly.
Mike Walkley – Canaccord Genuity:
Great, thanks for taking my questions and great job on the margins.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to get back to this goal of I think double-digit sales growth. The thing that I find curious is that when I look at high-end smartphones demand is clearly slowing down. We saw that in the results at Apple and the trends at Samsung have also been somewhat sluggish, and those are your two largest customers. And the China market is supposed to be extremely competitive. You just reported that some more lead-quarter guidance is also somewhat below expectations, so my question is why are you setting such a high bar for your business in the next fiscal year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Well, I appreciate you saying it’s a high bar. We look at a lot of the growth out there, and I think whenever you look at some of the products that we’re offering that also include the filtering you may be underestimating the amount of filter growth that’s required in a lot of these phones as they bring them out. I think you also can see that each generation of smartphone continues to expand in the amount of RF dollars available to us. I’m not disagreeing with your comment that the number of handsets is slowing down but the RF dollars that are going into them continue to increase. LTE is also moving down into the mid-tier which again is a lot of volume, so it’s not always just the high-end phones. We also just talked about LTE growing in some of the other connected devices such as tablets. So we’re seeing a lot of growth in other areas that maybe aren’t just the top guys. Another reason for growth for us is just we already have a decent amount of volume with some of these players and quite honestly when you look at our year-over-year growth it will continue to be pretty significant because we didn’t have a lot of content in prior generations.
Dean Priddy:
Yeah, and Vivek, I may provide a slightly different answer to your growth question. We internally don’t think that the 10% or double-digit year-over-year growth is that aggressive. However, if you were a bit skeptical and you wanted to model something in the single digits, if you look at the margin expansion that we expect to get as well as the tight expense control with flat to down expenses, I think you’re going to see superior earnings power based on even less than 10% growth. So I think when you do your modeling I think you will probably like what you’ll see in terms of EPS growth year-over-year, even if you are a bit skeptical on the double-digit revenue growth.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Understood, very helpful. And as a follow up, I think you had mentioned the goal to get to industry-leading gross margins, and I know that you’re not giving specific guidance but what is industry-leading gross margins? Is it 42%, is it 45%? Just as we think about RFMD over the next number of years what is our aspirational gross margins you can get to and how much of that conceptually comes from your internal operational improvements versus just top line growth?
Dean Priddy:
At the beginning of this year we internally set a goal for ten points of margin improvement, and that was basically off of 35% gross margins. So that is our internal goal. We’ve already achieved half of that and we have initiatives in place that we believe will give us the additional five margin points. Now obviously some revenue growth and increased utilization of some of our facilities are going to help that, maybe even get us to that goal faster. But we’re looking at the one- to two-year plan here in order to converge on that company-wide goal of 45%.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
And one last question if I may. I think you had alluded to getting access to BAW filter capability. From what Avago and TriQuint have said publicly they seem to have the best yield, the best products in BAW and FBAR. Are you starting to see other sources with good enough capabilities, competitive capabilities to what Avago and TrQuint have?
Eric Creviston:
This is Eric. I would say yes we are but I’d also remind you it’s not about the filter technology by itself. We won’t be selling filters alone so it’s about how we combine at a system level. And we have clear leadership in the performance characteristics of several switches and power amplifiers for example, but also the system architecture – bringing filters together in different ways if you will to satisfy the end customer’s needs.
Vivek Arya – Bank of America Merrill Lynch:
Got it, that makes sense. Thank you so much, I appreciate it.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of JoAnne Feeney with ABR Investment Strategy. Please go ahead.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Yes, thanks guys. A question for you on the low end China weakness – I’m wondering how much more exposure do you have to that market as a percentage of your revenues? And is that a good sort of cash cow type of business, or are these really low margin sales that you’re going to be quite happy to get rid of?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Sorry, did you say Huawei MTT? I want to make sure we get the customer collections we’re talking about?
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
No, I didn’t specify the customers but you remarked that part of the shortfall in sales was due to weakness in low end China handsets. So I’m wondering how much more exposure do you have to the low end? Is this a business that’s a good margin business or is this something you’d rather get out of?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Yeah, today that business as I said is declining. Part of that also is the market is declining significantly and 2G only is migrating to 3G entry. That is a market we really like and like the margins. On the 3G entry market as Dean said we’re early on, only about the second inning in transitioning our gas PAs as well as some of our silicon PAs to ultra-low cost silicon PAs, and we like that margin structure as well. So there’s two things actually going on there – one is the decline in the market; the other is transitioning of products from some of our gas and older silicon PAs to our ultra-low cost CMOS PAs. So it’s not something we’re running away from.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Right. And then during this transition from the gas to the higher-margin CMOS PAs, there have been some concerns that you might be losing share in that CMOS PA business to one of your Asia competitors. I’m wondering if you’ve seen a drop off in those sales that you expect to recover from as the transition progresses or if it’s just the total market that’s down.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Let me also remind you that in our comments last quarter and this quarter we also talked about transitioning our high-volume current CMOS customers that are tier one over into the ultra-low cost and that’s beginning. And then we’ve also picked up a second tier one and they drive a lot of volume. So I don’t want you to think just “that China market.” We’re taking this into the tier one players that still use GS MPAs in their 3G phones along with their 2G phones. So it’s still a growth opportunity for us.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Okay, that’s helpful, thanks. And then if I can have a follow-up on the filter arrangement. Given the supplier contract you have arranged what kinds of margins do you get in this arrangement? I understand you’re not selling them as discrete products but how does it affect the margin profile of the modules in which these filters will sit?
Bob Bruggeworth:
Number one, a lot of the filters that we buy are not sold as discrete filters so they’re actually designed to be incorporated into our packaging technology. So from a margin structure, in many cases to us it looks just like we’re buying a semiconductor, whether it’s silicon or gas, from an outside supplier and packaging it. So margin structure should be company average or better, or slightly worse depending on how good we are at designing out the cost to meet our customers’ applications.
JoAnne Feeney – ABR Investment Strategy:
Okay, thanks.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Good evening guys. I’ll add my congrats on the nice margin expansion. Eric, I just wanted to go back to the China market just so I make sure I understand what’s going on. You’ve pointed to China’s weakness both in certainly the December quarter. Is that weakness both for the 2G business as well as low end entry 3G? Can you give us some sense what the mix is between 2G and 3G entry, and then specifically how you guys are positioned single core versus dual core versus quad core in some of the China markets? Guys like MediaTech have been real strong in the second half and it just doesn’t look like you’ve participated as much in those markets as you have in the past.
Eric Creviston:
I’ll try to give you a little more visibility into that. First off the weakness that we saw in December was completely related to 2G alone. Our 3G business actually grew and as we said, it was our gallium arsenide section – as a matter of fact our CMOS PA business is growing as well. So it was related to the legacy PAs that frankly our margin profile wasn’t that good on and we didn’t want to continue chasing that particular business. When it comes to looking forward to new platforms we have a broad family of new products being released in fact this quarter; and in the coming quarters we’ll continue to release more and more products addressing that mid-tier 3G market. But we are very well aligned with MediaTech across all their platforms in both power amplifiers, switches, impedance tuners and so forth. So we’re pleased with our footprint and our attach, and if anything that’s going to increase over the coming quarters quite well.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
And then I might have missed it but just overall the split between CPG, what’s the split now between 2G versus 3G/4G?
Eric Creviston:
Yeah, so 2G is now under 20% of CPG revenues.
Quinn Bolton – Needham & Company:
Okay, great. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Cody Acree with Ascendiant Capital. Please go ahead.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
Thanks, guys, and thanks for taking the questions. I guess with the differential in the consensus and the revenue I’d just like to maybe get a look at timing of when revenue came in and maybe why we didn’t see it pre-announcement.
Bob Bruggeworth:
The quarter from a linearity perspective was fairly linear. So Cody, it just didn’t quite materialize as we expected. Typically as we’ve said before, things increase throughout the quarter and quite honestly they didn’t – if anything they actually softened throughout the quarter. So I think that’s about as best I can give you from what transpired in the quarter.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
And then on the China 2G/3G question, so if the trend continues I guess when do you think we see a real handoff to where that 2G is a small enough piece of business that what you’re seeing in your low-cost CMOS as well as your 3G business is really overriding that?
Bob Bruggeworth:
It’s 80/20 now, and we’re expecting 2G again, just from an inventory perspective, to continue to decline. My comment was a lot of the 3G entry phones still use a GS MTA, but 2G only handsets continue to decline.
Dean Priddy:
And most marquee smartphones also have a standalone CGTA, so that’s not something that’s gone away either. We don’t include that in that category.
Eric Creviston:
And I think we’re even modeling a further decline in March in that 2G segment. I think we commented that overall we expect to grow in China in March.
Dean Priddy:
Right.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
Okay, very good. And then lastly, a lot of companies are talking about the internet of things and you mentioned WiFi specifically on the cellular side. I was just wanting to talk about the MPG group and maybe what you’re seeing outside of WiFi in cellular as a driver maybe in the near term and not so distant future?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Sure, thanks Cody. A couple other things that we see as key drivers in MPG outside of WiFi is we see wireless infrastructure is actually strong right now. We see a real big uptick in China LTE builds, so the cellular base station requirements for LTE are driving some strong building right now and we’re pedaling as fast as possible to keep up right now. So wireless infrastructure is going well right now. We’re also seeing continued good uptake in our new high-powered gallium nitride based products. For the nine month year-to-date we’re up in the 35% to 40% range over last year when we look at our RTN based products shipments across all sectors and types. So we see that continuing to grow into next year. And so those are probably the biggest runners that we’ve got for MPG.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
Any color on the gross margin addition that those might bring versus what you’re seeing in cellular?
Norm Hligendorf:
Sure. For us the WiFi business is running right around the average gross margin for MPG, it may be slightly under. It’s not very dilutive to margin. Both the high-powered GAN products also tend to run around our average gross profit margin, and wireless infrastructure is accretive to our overall margins.
Cody Acree – Ascendiant Capital:
Great, thanks guys and congrats on the gross margins.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Yeah, good afternoon. Maybe just one more question on the China 2G market – when you talk about the weakness there, is it mainly just a unit-driven weakness or are you seeing weakness in pricing as well?
Eric Creviston:
Again, I think in terms of the weakness that we saw it was primarily involved in the product transition that we saw. So we basically end of life’d our gallium arsenide legacy products as we encouraged the market to transfer to our new product portfolio and that transition happened slower than we expected. So it’s not about pricing for sure; it’s more about units and in particular the transition of our product portfolio.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay, thanks. And then obviously you had very strong margins in the quarter. What if any was the impact of the shortfall of revenue on margins then? What could it have been if you were at the high end of your range?
Dean Priddy:
You know, we would have had what I think would have been a breakout quarter from an earnings standpoint with revenue at the high end of our range. While we’re not happy with the revenue we are very happy that we were able to control the things that we could control and deliver on the EPS number. So when the revenue comes back it’s going to have a significant impact on our financial model in a positive direction.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay. And just finally, you talked about a tax rate of 10% to 15% for the quarter. Is that what you’re looking at for the year as well?
Dean Priddy:
Looking into next year we’re probably in the 15% range plus or minus.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay, for the full year F14 or F15?
Dean Priddy:
F2015, yes.
Tom Diffely – D.A. Davidson:
Okay, great. Thank you.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis with Barclays. Please go ahead.
Blayne Curtis – Barclays :
Hey, good afternoon guys and I apologize if this was answered earlier, but on the full-year outlook if you could just talk about what the primary drivers are. I think you were focusing on filters but then there was discussion about BAW. I just wanted to make sure I understood here what you’re actually communicating. Clearly you like your design wins but if you can talk about what products are really driving the uptick.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Hi Blayne. What we talked about earlier was in MPG’s growth and I’ll let Norm repeat what he said; and Eric, if you would pick up on what’s driving your growth as well.
Norm Hilgendorf:
Sure. So yeah, Blayne, in short growth that we’re hitting in MPG – WiFi, we’re getting a strong uptake in both mobile and CPG WiFi applications. So that’s cellular, tablet, access points, routers and set top boxes – it really runs the gamut there for WiFi with some strong new design traction there. In other categories as I mentioned a few minutes ago, gallium nitride based products – we’re seeing a good growth in that category as well, running 35% to 40% over last year. And wireless infrastructure is strong on the back of the China LTE build-outs.
Eric Creviston:
And for CPG we talked about really LTE driving a lot of growth for us during the year, both in the high tier with global LTE handsets with higher band counts; also TD LTE really entering multiple tiers in China and a dramatic year-over-year growth there with a lot of our content; and carrier aggregation as well driving us forward. And across products it’s multi-mode, multi-band power amplifiers that have also advanced, switches and antenna control components.
Blayne Curtis – Barclays :
Eric, just I mean the commentary on securing additional filter capacity, can you wrap any kind of magnitude around that like you did last time? And what type of driver is that for you this year?
Bob Bruggeworth:
So number one, Blayne, we made a multi-million dollar investment to secure capacity which is what we talked about. And as far as driving revenues obviously we expect to get a good return on that investment. So we haven’t sized any revenues so I’m not sure.
Blayne Curtis – Barclays :
Is this incremental to the one you’ve already talked about? I just apologize, I was on a couple calls.
Bob Bruggeworth:
This is a separate investment in BAW filter technology. The first one was in SAW filter technology so they’re separate investments.
Blayne Curtis – Barclays :
I got you. And then just finally for Eric, China up in Q1. Do you expect the market to be up in Q1 and you know, or is that more content and the shortfall that you saw in Q4, is that continuing and you’re just able to offset that with some of the tailwinds from either units or content? Just any color there, thanks.
Eric Creviston:
Yeah, we’re seeing if I could a very aggressive ramp in the TD LTE business in particular which is offsetting the decline in 2G primarily.
Blayne Curtis – Barclays :
Okay, thanks for that.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from the line of Steve Smigie with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Great, thanks a lot. Just on MPG growth can you talk about, now that you have this strong growth coming on the infrastructure side, what does that make that growth look like? I mean strong growth, unfortunately the market hasn’t seemed to grow that much for anybody recently. Is strong growth 5% or is it something better than that on an annual basis?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Sure, relative to our typical run rates in wireless infrastructure I’d say on a quarterly basis it’s having an impact in the order of 10% to 15% higher than our recent run rates for that category.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Just to be clear we’ve talked about it’s not growing, to your point, all throughout the year. Earlier in the year we talked a lot about we were down year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter in that business.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay. And then just on WiFi, can you talk about what that is as a percentage of revenue and how much is kind of cellular or handset type stuff versus internet of things or anything else?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Yeah, sure. For MPG overall the WiFi business today is running around a third of the total MPG business. And as far as the split between mobile and the CPD category it’s roughly 50/50 today. It bounces around from one quarter to the next and the mix can swing – sometimes one quarter the cellular in mobile has a higher share and CPD less. This last quarter CPD was actually a higher share than the mobile sector. So it’s roughly 50/50 on average I would say.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay. And as we think about sort of the internet of things, you come back from CES and you see all the refrigerators and washing machines with WiFi. Is that actually a real market yet or is that a while to come? And obviously you can do it with WiFi but can you put your power amplifiers on anything – ZigBee, any other wireless standards?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Sure. When we talk about internet of things and merging all these different appliances, you also get into advanced meters for industrial meters like water and electrical meters; we’re seeing a variety of standards emerge. You’ll see ZigBee’s used where lower power is applicable, is good enough, but as you’ve probably experienced in your own home higher power gives you better range and better connections. So we’re often seeing WiFi used even in low data rate applications just because it’s so effective and prevalent and has good range. So we’re seeing WiFi being tested in a number of these different applications. TVs in particular, we’re seeing a good uptake in that area and a very rapid uptake in that area. And we’re just starting to see it I think in other appliances, and I think it’s going to be some time before we see what really emerges as the preferred approach. It’s going to vary by application. Automotive is another category where we’re seeing very good uptake in activity and design for the internet of things and the expanding WiFi. We’re seeing WiFi as really the key platform for automotive connectivity.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Great. If I could just stick one last one in
Bob Bruggeworth:
Since a large majority of our semiconductor content is silicon I would say the majority of it is outsourced. And on the backend we do a little bit of that, not a large percentage.
Steve Smigie – Raymond James:
Okay great, thank you.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from the line of Harsh Kumar with Stephens, Inc. Please go ahead.
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
Hey, guys, thanks for squeezing me in here. I started modeling your commentary guys about 10% revenue growth and I’m sort of trying to figure in the commentary about marquee customer ramps. That leads to some pretty substantial backend sort of CPG growth rates. I’m curious if you can just elaborate on your comfort level – are these designs locked in, guys, or why this high level of comfort with the ramp in September and December?
Eric Creviston :
On the CPG side we’re of course engaged with many of our customers, especially the larger ones that drive a lot of volume over multiple cycles. So we have some fairly good visibility. Certainly I can’t say that all the design wins are locked in for the second half of our fiscal year. We do know the basic architectures and which products we’ll be selling and so forth. The final design list has not been placed yet but we’ve got a fair amount of confidence in our second half.
Bob Bruggeworth:
I’ll come at it from a different point, Harsh. We’re confident that we will continue to gain share at the key customers, both our two key customers. It’s our expectation to go and continue to grow our shares across their portfolios.
Harsh Kumar – Stephens, Inc.:
I appreciate it, very helpful, guys. Thank you.
Operator:
We have a follow-up question from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research. Please go ahead.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Great, thanks a lot. Just to be clear here, Eric, when you say that less than 20% of our revenue is 2G are you talking about handsets or interfaces? So in that statement does “2G” mean 2G-only phones or 2G amps into any phone?
Eric Creviston:
It means 2G-only phones.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay, and the margin structure on BAW which I think everybody is well aware is a very expensive technology, but it sounds like you’re going to do fairly well – at least at even. Is that primarily because of the packaging setup you’ve got with that? It sounds like you’re getting raw dye and doing your own packaging?
Eric Creviston:
That’s a potential model. I think the bigger factor here is the fact that the BAW filter will be one piece of many inside the product that we sell it in. And so it’s got a very good technology that helps us differentiate the product, but we have a lot of other content and value that’s wrapped up in the product as well.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay. And then Norm, what products are you shipping into wireless infrastructure? Is it a module, is it a transmitter? I’m just curious on what that product… Or is it spread out? Is it fragments of different products?
Norm Hilgendorf:
It’s a number of different products. It ranges from single-function power amplifiers, typically mimics that get sprinkled throughout the transceiver cards to some integrated modules, some new SOI-based modules with variable attenuators and variable gain amplifiers that are some integrated modules for the wireless infrastructure and base station cards.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
So everything from discrete parts to functional blocks?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Yes, that’s correct – discrete blocks to multi-function modules.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Similar to the WiFi products, are almost all your WiFi products PAs?
Norm Hilgendorf:
No. Actually we really don’t sell that many discrete PAs in WiFi. One of our key advantages is the integration that we can provide in the frontend. So the functionality we’re typically providing is an integrated frontend module that incorporates the transmit PA, the receive low-noise amplifier, and a switch plus sometimes some filtering as well.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
So much more involved. And then what portion of MPG revenue is GAN?
Norm Hilgendorf:
Oh, it’s in kind of like the mid-single digits percentage today but rising.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay, and then a final question back to you, Eric. So just to be clear on the CMOS question, I think you cleared it up on the 2G side of it – now when we’re talking 3G that’s a 2G PA into a 3G handset. Does RF Micro have an offering of a 3G CMOS part today?
Eric Creviston:
So we have a broad portfolio of silicon technology as I mentioned earlier, and for the 3G entry market we are today shipping silicon-based power amplifiers for sure.
Edward Snyder – Charter Equity Research:
Okay, excellent. Thanks guys.
Operator:
I would now like to turn it back to management for any closing remarks.
Bob Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us tonight. RFMD is expanding our content generation over generation in our customers’ devices while at the same time materially enhancing our operating model. In the March quarter we expect continued margin expansion and year-over-year improvements in operating income and earnings per share. This coming fiscal year we expect approximately 10% revenue growth, additional margin expansion and significant growth in operating income supporting return on invested capital well above our cost of capital. Thank you again and good night.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the RF Micro Devices F3Q 2014 Earnings Conference Call. If you’d like to listen to a replay of today’s conference please dial 800-406-7325 and enter access code #4660651. AT&T would like to thank you for your participation; you may now disconnect.
Executives:
Doug DeLieto - Vice President of Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Corporate Development Committee William A. Priddy - Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice President of Administration and Secretary Steven E. Creviston - Corporate Vice President and President of Cellular Products Group Norman A. Hilgendorf - Corporate Vice President and President of Multi Market Products Group
Analysts:
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division Harsh N. Kumar - Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Research Division Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division Jason Rechel - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division Mark Kelley - Barclays Capital, Research Division Anthony J. Stoss - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division
Operator:
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to RFMD's Fiscal 2014 Second Quarter Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This conference is being recorded today, Tuesday, October 22, 2013. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, VP Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks a lot, Vince. Hello, everybody, and welcome to our conference call. At 4:00 p.m. today, we issued a press release. If anyone listening did not receive a copy of the release, please call Samantha Alphonso at the Financial Relations Board at (212) 827-3746. Sam will e-mail a copy to you and verify that your name is on our distribution list. In the meantime, the release is also available on our corporate website, rfmd.com, under the heading Investors. At this time, I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor Statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide the supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends and our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today available on our website, rfmd.com, under Investors. [Operator Instructions] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I'm also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf, who lead our Cellular Products Group and our Multi-Market Products Group, respectively, as well as other members of RFMD's management. And with that I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you, Doug, and welcome, everyone. We're very pleased to report record revenue and solid financial performance highlighted by continued diversification, margin expansion and operating leverage. On a 6% sequential increase, gross margin expanded 110 basis points and operating income increased nearly 33%. This supported earnings per share of $0.12 ahead of our original guidance of $0.10 to $0.11. RFMD's markets continue to grow with the expanding demand for high-performance broadband connectivity. This is increasing our dollar content opportunities and enabling RFMD to grow generation-over-generation in the highest tier [Audio Gap] as well as in the highest volume entry phones and reference designs. In the September quarter, RFMD was very successful in expanding our dollar content in the world's leading smartphones. Looking forward, we're very well positioned to continue to expand our content not only in smartphones, but also in entry-level devices and on reference designs. For RFMD, the shift taking place in the entry-level from voice-centric 2G devices to 3G entry smartphones is doubling and even tripling our content opportunity with an even greater jump anticipated with the deployment of TD-LTE. In the highest tier smartphones, the expanding band coverage is driving up the complexity and the content opportunity for RFMD. RF components like PA duplexes, antenna switch modules, diversity switches, antenna tuners, impedance tuners, APT and ET-capable PAs and ET trackers are creating new high-growth revenue opportunities for RFMD. On top of this, carrier aggregation is expected to proliferate through all tiers of smartphones on the receive path followed in a few years by transmit carrier aggregation. Fewer industry participants are able to solve the resulting system-level challenges related to system efficiency, thermal management, solution-side and multimode-multiband complexity. This is creating new opportunities for RFMD, as our systems level expertise and our strength in envelop tracking, carrier aggregation, antenna tuning and other key competitive differentiators are enabling us to optimize the system efficiency and overall performance of our customers' devices. As a result, we see multiyear opportunities for revenue growth and diversification across customers, product categories, market segments and air standards. And we are better positioned than ever to translate this diversified growth into margin expansion and operating leverage. We are tracking on or ahead of schedule with our key gross margin drivers. Looking forward, we anticipate a fiscal year of record revenue, and we believe we are structured to deliver continued margin expansion even in a seasonally down March quarter. Next year, we anticipate another year of record revenue and continued margin expansion. Now let's look at some of our quarterly highlights by business group. In CPG, our product and technology leadership is helping us to drive diversified growth across customers, market segments and product categories. As I indicated earlier, we were very successful during the quarter in expanding our content in some of the world's leading smartphones. As an example, we won multiple antenna tuners, an antenna switch module and an LTE pad earning RFMD the distinction of being the only supplier to deliver this customer all the critical building blocks of RF functionality, encompassing switching, tuning, amplification and filtering. We also launched multiple new components incorporating our unique ET and APT technologies. We are engaged with multiple channel partners in support of upcoming smartphone, tablet and ultra-book launches, and we expect strong growth of our APT- and ET-capable PAs and our ET power management solutions. RFMD offers the industry's most comprehensive ET product portfolio. And RFMD is the only PA supplier to have co-architected ET PAs with ET power management ICs or PMICs. This yields significant improvement and system efficiency not only when our components operate as a set, but also when our ET PAs are mated with third party ET PMICs. We are already seeing the competitive field narrow around ET, as a result of the complexity and the requirements for customer and channel partner collaboration. In the entry tier, we enjoyed broad customer adoption of our new CMOS PAs extending our leadership in that segment and supporting our margin expansion goals for our 2G product portfolio. In the market served by our Multi-Market Products Group, or MPG, we enjoyed broad representation across high-performance WiFi, wireless infrastructure, broadband networks and a diversified set of other Hi-Rel and specialized communication equipment markets. Our WiFi products grew 49% year-over-year across a broad range of mobile and CPE applications, including routers, access points and set-top boxes. Compared to last year, MPG total revenue grew 12%, demonstrating the stable nature of MPG's industrial and communications end markets. Looked at from a very high level, RFMD is executing on a strategy of product and technology leadership and delivering diversified revenue growth, margin expansion and operating leverage. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dean.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the September quarter increased 6% sequentially and 48% year-over-year to a quarterly record $310.7 million. CPG revenue was $255.4 million, up 7% sequentially and 59% year-over-year. MPG revenue was $55.2 million, relatively flat with the June quarter and up 12% year-over-year. RFMD's robust growth continues to be a direct result of our sharp focus on diversification, dollar content gains and expansion into new product category and the large and growing market supporting always-on broadband data mobility. Gross profit for the quarter increased to $112.3 million, supporting gross margin of 36.2%. On the sequential increase in revenues, we saw an incremental margin of greater than 50%. Two quarters ago, on our quarterly earnings call in April, we outlined our intent to expand RFMD's gross margins by 300 to 400 basis points by the March 2014 quarter. Now we expect to deliver on that goal this quarter. RFMD has delivered 180 basis points of gross margin improvement since March, and we intend to deliver another 120 basis points this quarter. This is a result of an intense focus on cost reductions and our ongoing efforts in support of 3 key margin initiatives. First, RFMD has transitioned to a flexible GAAP sourcing strategy. As part of this, we have sold our U.K. fab. We consistently stated that this will support approximately half of our gross margin expansion goal, and we now expect to achieve the full benefit of that goal this quarter. Second, RFMD is seeing very strong adoption of our ultra low cost CMOS power amplifiers and next-generation handset platforms targeting emerging markets. Overtime, we intend to migrate all of our customers for 2G PAs to this product family. Third, we have installed and qualified additional assembly capacity in our Beijing facility. And we've begun capturing the benefit of this investment in the December quarter. Looking beyond December, our confidence in margin expansion allows us to project margin improvement in a seasonally down March quarter. Even more importantly, for the first time in recent history, we can look into the next calendar year and project achieving our quarterly non-GAAP gross margin model of 40%. The RFMD team is demonstrating crisp execution in support of our gross margin initiatives. This underscores the significant operating leverage RFMD can deliver, given our expectations for diversified revenue growth, margin expansion and modest expense growth. Returning to the P&L. Operating expenses were $75.1 million, compared to $74.7 million last quarter, with G&A of $12 million, sales and marketing of $16.2 million and Research and Development of $47 million. Operating income for the September quarter was $37.2 million, resulting in approximately 12% of sales. Similar to the incremental gross profit, our operating fall-through was better than 50%. Other income was $100,000 and non-GAAP taxes were approximately $3.3 million. Net income for the quarter was $33.9 million or $0.12 per diluted share, based on 287.6 million shares. Now moving to the balance sheet. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled approximately $150 million. Cash flow from operations was $21.5 million. DSOs were 55.3 days compared to 47.1 days in Q1. RFMD's inventory balance declined by $22.6 million, resulting in 5.7 turns versus turns of 4.8 last quarter. During the quarter, we repurchased 2.4 million shares of stock at an average price of $5.03. Net plant property and equipment was $196.6 million and capital expenditures during the quarter were $16.7 million, with depreciation of $11.3 million and intangible amortization of $6.7 million. Capital expenditures included investments in assembly capacity and equipment to reduce gold usage. Now for the financial outlook and business commentary. RFMD expects sequential growth in CPG, partially offset by sequential decline in MPG. RFMD expects quarterly revenue to be approximately flat to up 5% sequentially. RFMD expects sequential gross margin expansion of at least 120 basis points. And RFMD expects a non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 15%. Finally, RFMD expects non-GAAP earnings per share of approximately $0.13 to $0.14. And with that, we'll open up the call to your questions. Thank you.
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question's from the line of Harsh Kumar with Stephens, Inc.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Dean, I'm going to put you on the spot with this. I know you mentioned that gross margins will go up in the March quarter. I'm wondering if you can talk about that and how we should think about the March quarter margin increases?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, thanks, Harsh. As we've been extremely bullish on gross margin expansion going out at the beginning of the year with 300 to 400 basis points of margin expansion in this fiscal year. We expect to achieve the 300 basis points or so in the December quarter. And we intend to deliver on the other 100 basis points to get 400 basis points by the March quarter. And then we're not stopping there. We can see additional margin expansion, if you'd like to model perhaps 50 basis points a quarter until the time we get to our 40% target gross margin model sometime during calendar year '14.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Great. And maybe a follow-up for Eric or Bob. Guys, how many 10% customers were in the quarter this time? And I know that some of your customers are doing really well while others are drawing down inventory. I'm curious if you can give us some color on what you're seeing in your large customer sets.
William A. Priddy:
Yes, Harsh, I can give you the 10% customers. There were 2 10% customers during the quarter, and perhaps Eric and Norm would like to share some -- or Bob on the other part of the question.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Sorry, Harsh. The only part I got was the top 10% customers. You said some customers do a little better than others?
Harsh N. Kumar - Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Research Division:
Yes, I'm just curious. I know one of them was publicly drawing down inventory and the other's seeing a strong ramp. I'm curious if you want to give us any color on what you're seeing in those customer sets.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I think -- thanks, Harsh. I think since most of our customers haven't commented yet on their September quarter or their December guide, I think it maybe be a little bit wrong for us to get out in front of them. However, with that said, I think it is safe to say that when we looked at the market to come up with our guidance, once again, we took conservative stance on the inventory drawdown. As what you said, and some of our customers clearly -- some of our customers are doing quite well. And then we have one Tier 2 customer, BlackBerry, that I think, it's no surprised to anyone out there, that is quite challenged in the marketplace right now and has, from our view, we've taken a very conservative view and with our revenue quarter-over-quarter, we're expecting to be down about $10 million. And then in MPG, and I'll let Norm talk a little bit about his marketplace, we're expecting to be down 5% to 6%, so another $3 million. So right there, if you will, the conservative view, we've got some that are winning, and we're doing well there and some other places, our customers are struggling.
Harsh N. Kumar - Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Research Division:
I think you answered that perfectly for us. If I can ask you one last one. Your company is our proxy for the China handset market. I know that some -- there's a switch going on there to higher handsets but there were some inventory problems. So any color you want to provide on that sector?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Last quarter, as you know, we spent a fair amount of time talking about how we were taking a conservative view in China. We expect it to be off a little bit. And sure enough in the September quarter, we were down a little bit, and we're not really looking for much growth there. We're not forecasting any share loss there. We're going to maintain or grow our share at many of those accounts in China. But I think, once again, we're taking a conservative stance.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
I did want to talk a little bit -- I know a little early here to be talking about the March quarter, but now that so much of the market has moved to the top 2 OEMs and China are really dominating the market, how do you view normal seasonality as we head into that March quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Mike, I appreciate the question. I think as we always try to stay away from guiding out a few quarters and what's typical anymore with what we've seen, March is probably still typically down 10% to 15%. But as you pointed on, it also depends on the timing of new product or marquee phone launches. So that also impact things. And then China, yes, depending on the Chinese New Year and the timing of all of that. But for right now, I would say a typical year is down 10% to 15%.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay, fair enough. And then you touched on the ET and APT portfolio, how really do you view the competition -- the competitive landscape right now both for your tracker, but then also for the PAs that are paired up with Qualcomm's tracker because there seems to be a narrowing of the field there. If you could point out to who your main competition is going forward.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think Eric would love to discuss the ET and APT PAs and his competition. So, Eric, go ahead.
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure, I'd be happy to. Well, we are, in fact, launching production shipments this quarter for both our envelope tracker as well as many envelope tracking power amplifier system for various stance [ph], and those are being shipped to multiple customers. So we think we're out of the gate early in the industry. As you know, we've been leading with the development there of the tracker itself and the co-integration of that with the power amplifier. As we've said many times in the past, I think it's playing out as expected. It will be a much narrower field of competition for these slots. There will be competition of course. There are still a couple of strong folks competing for this, but not as broad a field as we see in the rest of the market.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then last one for me. This is on carrier aggregation. Can help us understand what the incremental content opportunity looks like for this next year? Is it mostly on switching? And if so, what does it do to the TAM? And does it affect anything else in your portfolio?
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure. So received carrier aggregation, which has actually begun already in Korea. We've supported the received carrier aggregation switch there in those models that are shipping today. We do expect that to begin to penetrate in North America and throughout the world in CY '14. So in next year, we do see approximately a $2 content increase overall for the RFs in those handsets, and it is concentrated on the switching and the front end, as well as some filtering. There are a few bands in power amplifiers, as well, that have to be redesigned for more stricter requirements. So a bit of a bump there, but it's primarily content in the switches and filtering content.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
So, Norm, right off that bat. MPG looks to be weak next quarter. It sounds a little bit more than seasonal. Can you localize that? Is that WiFi given so large a part of the business. I'm just trying to get an idea of where you're seeing a weakness. And, Eric, a pads and ET question. You mentioned in previous press releases duplexer capacity a couple of quarters ago. And now teardowns [ph] show that you guys got pads. You're clearly not having a stacked margin problem because of the margin both this quarter and what you're guiding to and it's -- that product has really got be a big part of your revenue mix. Is that a sol [ph] part? And then should we just expect from now on that emerging markets sol-based [ph] pad you wouldn't have a stacked margin problem or are you doing something special? Is Michael doing something special that allows you guys to do a bit better on that than what we'd normally expect? And then the ET. You mentioned that ET PA, you're seeing a narrower competitive environment. Does that translate to premium ASP or just fewer competitors?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
All right, Ed, that's 3 parts. Norm, why don't you take MPG, and his question was, what's driving your business today?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yes, looking at the guidance for the current quarter, Ed. The primary driver right now is our outlook on networking equipment, both wireless and wireline the cable TV networking. We had a nice increase last quarter in wireless infrastructure, primarily due to some China tenders for new equipment. And so we had an uptick in our wireless infrastructure business last quarter. And we don't expect that to repeat in the current quarter. In addition, it's pretty common for us to see cable TV network buildout slowdown in the winter months, causing cable networking to be slower in the December quarter for us. So overall, we're not real bullish in wireless and cable networking for this quarter.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Okay. And then, Eric, the second parts were along duplexers, pads, margins and then ET PAs and competition.
Steven E. Creviston:
Right, so regarding the duplexer integration and the pads business, you're right, that's ramping quite strong right now. And we have been working closely with the duplexer supply base with multiple suppliers, in fact, to assure capacity and competitive pricing there. I think in terms of your question about the stacked margins and the fact that despite a strong ramp of duplexer content we're seeing standing margins, I think you really need to decouple those. On one hand, we're getting a fair price for the pad because we're integrating a lot of capability on the power amplifier side too and making sure that our performance is world-class at the final product so that we get a fair pricing. But a lot of what you're seeing in the margin expansion is really coming from structural cost changes that Dean pointed to. And those are so powerful across the board, across the portfolio, that's really what's driving overall the margin improvement. Regarding the ET premium, we are, in fact, seeing a premium for ET. So like-for-like ET versus APT, we see a 15% to 20% price premium for the ET version.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
For the PA versus, like, the tracker?
Steven E. Creviston:
Correct. Yes, I'm referring to a power amplifier that could support ET mode versus one that supports APT mode.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Right, okay. And then, Dean, CMOS amps seems to be ramping nicely now which is -- and it's accretive, right, to CPG gross margins normally. Where are you in replacing the old GaAs part or the old CMOS part in the 2G business? Are we halfway there? Do we have more to go overall? Or is most of it under your belt already?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, we're only in the first couple of innings of replacing the 2G product portfolio. So still quite a bit of improvement that we can see in the gross margin profile of our 2G business.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Ed, the thing I'd like to add to that is what we are very excited about is when we made the acquisition, we talked about taking that 2G CMOS PA to some of the Tier 1 OEMs. And that's on track and that's looking good for us to be able to do that.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Okay. And then finally, China overall, I know some of the infrastructure business might be weak there but -- and you had some very good quarters in the last couple of them. Is China, would you say, overall down, flat or up, any chance?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I think we're looking at roughly flat-ish this quarter, Ed. We were down last quarter, as we said we were taking a very conservative view of China. And right now, we're just looking flat-ish. But again, we could be up.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
I just wanted to follow up on the Q4 seasonality answer. You guys are guiding margin up for the March quarter, and it sounded like you're sort of guiding down 10% to 15% for March. And so I'm just curious is that down 10% to 15% a likely the scenario, or you're just saying that could happen? And if that's the case, how does the margin come up in that quarter, what's the offset there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Dean, I'll take the first part. I'll let you answer the margin part. The question was around what's normal seasonality? And looking at last year, we had the timing of a Marquee phone that was launched, and that impacted the seasonality from our perspective. And what I was saying was a typical seasonal decline in our industry is about 10% to 15%, and it all depends of what's happening with Marquee phones. And what we've said in my comments, along with Dean's and the press releases, even as sequentially down quarters. So if that quarter you modeled for us down 10% to 15%, we still expect to be able to expand our gross margin in the March quarter.
William A. Priddy:
The 3 things that we've been highlighting is major margin expansion initiatives to get to the 400 basis points are not really very revenue dependent. So it's more execution-oriented. I mean we've already have sold [ph] away for fab. We've already installed assembly equipment and are beginning to utilize it in the December quarter. We're already transitioning our CMOS PAs to the low-cost PAs. But looking beyond that, we have multiple projects that are -- they're keenly laser focused on cost savings, which again, are not as dependent on revenue as they are on simply execution by the teams here in RFMD. Now if we were to see an increase in capacity utilization or fabs and revenue expansion, it will only accentuate what we believe will be a good year, good solid year for margin expansion.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Great. And I guess, if you could just maybe just some thoughts on growth opportunity for 2014 as a whole. I mean, you guys have been -- you had a -- at least this quarter was up 48%, so obviously very strong growth for you guys. So obviously maybe a seasonal Q1, but do you feel fairly confident you have a pretty strong growth year in 2014? And if so, what sort of opportunity do you see?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I think at the highest level what we've talked about and I'll let Norm and Eric both add in -- is with each generation of Marquee smartphones, we've been able to gain share. I think also if you look at each next generation phone, we've been able to grow content in the types of products. And as we highlighted, we now have PAs, filters, switches, tuners, and we expect to be able to continue to grow that and clearly, as they add more and more bands and that complexity increases, we expect to be able to grow our dollar content and gain share across the board there. But I'll let Norm comment on MPG and Eric on CPG. Norm?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yes, so with regard to MPG growth opportunity, certainly WiFi is a major growth driver for us. We've had some very exciting wins in the last quarter. And we see a number of these programs beginning to ramp towards the end of this quarter and into the March quarter and given us some very good momentum going into our next fiscal year. And it's a combination of both WiFi and -- WiFi for mobile applications and for CPE. Earlier this year, we saw a lot of early adopters and mobile 11ac applications. Now we're happy to really see a lot of activity on enterprise equipment, building out the infrastructure that we all need to be able to experience the high data rates with our consumer devices with WiFi. So we're seeing a very strong uptake on the CPE side, that's the consumer premises equipment with routers and access points and even set-top boxes supporting a wide expansion and WiFi infrastructure. That's a key area for us along with mobile WiFi as well where we have very strong customer relationships and a number of good engagements ongoing. So we see a strong year ahead of us in the next fiscal year for MPG. And I'll turn it over to Eric to talk about cellular.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, I guess I can answer that in 3 different ways. The first I think is to look at our footprint, our product portfolio. We're a very broad base supplier now in the RF front end. Certainly, not just PAs anymore. You've seen us stamp out a footprint in antenna control solutions and tuning, real leadership position there, and that market is really just beginning. Also, in switches, broad-based in both antenna switch modules and receive diversity in carrier aggregation switches and then in power management as well. So we're really serving the entire spectrum of the RF front end. We're not a niche supplier at all. Secondly, as we look at the customers we serve, we have lot of customers, which are going through an upgrade cycle in their portfolios as well. So some of the people we've been working with for many years in 2G are now shipping 3G and beginning to design LTE handsets. So a big change in terms of their product portfolio. The challenges are very high for them, and we're very well suited and integrated into their engineering teams to help them make this transition. And then lastly, the integration level in the industry, if anything, is going on. So we have the opportunity to integrate and aggregate more content around each of those footprint placements we have, whether it's adding filters in with our switches, filters with PAs or doing modules that, in fact, include the entire RF function. So with those 3 ways, I think we stand to have a very nice year next year.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So, Steve, kind of when you add all that together, in my opening comments, I talked about another year of record revenues as we look forward to 2014 calendar year and fiscal 2015 and couple that with Dean's comments on the gross margin expansion of roughly 50 basis points a quarter. You can see why we're pretty excited about the next year.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Bob, I just wanted to come back to the seasonality question for a second. Based on your comments here, and the December quarter certainly doesn't feel like RFMD's losing share in December yet. You're kind of guiding overall revs up, flat to 5%. And I think normal seasonality in December quarter has been stronger than that. I guess my question is, do you think that we might be pulling some of the traditional March seasonality into the December quarter, so that we might see a shift in sort of that first quarter seasonality on a go-forward basis?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I'm not sure I'm ready to say that, Quinn. Again, I think until many of our customers have reported and given you guys how they view the world in September's quarter, along with December's, I think little far from us to say that. But clearly, from a cellular perspective, we have broad representation across a wide range of customers, phone tiers, air standards. And from a more specific customer perspective, we're either maintaining or growing share, so we'll have to wait and see what their buying habits are in the consumer and how that really flows through to our revenues. But from today's perspective, too soon to tell.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Okay, great. And then just a couple for Eric. First, Eric, on the baseband -- sorry, the envelope tracking, can you talk about some of the baseband partners? Clearly, you've got one large baseband customer that's got a pretty comprehensive ET portfolio. But the shipments both for the tracker, as well as the PAs, are you shipping that now primarily aligned with one baseband partner? Or are you seeing some of the other LTE baseband guys moving to volume launch and that's who you're more partnered with?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, that's a great question. You're right. Our PA portfolio is ramping, of course, with one particular baseband partner that does have their own envelope tracking capability. But then when we look at shipping our tracker with our PAs, there are multiple baseband manufacturers we're working with. We'll be ramping production this quarter with only one of them, but we're engaged with several others. And to be fair, several of them may launch first edition basebands with envelope tracking with another solution. There's competing envelope trackers out there. And most, if not all, cases, even if they're ramping on someone else, we're engaged with them for the next generation. So this is a technology that takes a lot of co-integration and quite a bit of architecture development. And so it will -- it's something that we expect to continue to add engagements and roll-out with new partners throughout next year.
N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division:
Great. And then just a last question, Eric, on the opportunity for TD LTE. Obviously, you get into China band 38, 40 have some pretty good filter content. As you see that opportunity for RFMD, are you looking at it mostly from additional PA content? Do you have a play on some of those filter-based opportunity, especially with Band 38 and 40?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, we do. There are some cases in which those could be shipped as integrated PA duplexer products. So we'll see some customers preferring the integration level to be done and others prefer to stay discrete.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Rick Schafer with Oppenheimer & Co.
Jason Rechel - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division:
It's Jason Rechel calling in for Rick. Just wanted to ask competitively about both SkyOne and RF360. And when you guys go in and are working with your customers, could you maybe just give us some color about what your customers are telling you in terms of when they design in either of those platforms or when they don't? And more specifically, what you guys are seeing traction-wise from RF360?
Steven E. Creviston:
So I can't speak specifically to the traction of their products. You'll need to ask them about that. But I can say that generally there is a lot of discussion, as I said earlier, about the integration levels going up, and in some cases, we are working with customers on fully integrated modules that have PAs, switches, filters and everything in them, in various future architectures that, as we look out, have various versions of that level of integration. But I think right now, today, the industry is trying to solve some really fundamental problems first. And we need to get the tuning really working well in the industry and adopted broadly. So antenna tuning and impedance tuning and all that and getting that mature, and we're close to that point. Carrier aggregation has just begun, and there's a lot of work to really iron out all the front-end details there and get that mature and envelope tracking ramping right behind it, of course. And that there -- also has its own level of complexity. So what we're hearing from customers are [indiscernible] get things solved first and then we'll get the integration [indiscernible] probably the right timing for that.
Jason Rechel - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division:
Okay. And then just one on gross margins in our models here. Do you guys have a specific revenue target for where we should be thinking about that 40% margin? Or is it just kind of a linear fall-through of the incremental 50% number?
Steven E. Creviston:
No, we don't have a specific revenue target to achieve the type of margin profile that I was discussing.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Cody Acree with Williams Financial.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
Bob, getting back to your caution that you're taking in China after a down September quarter. We're actually seeing decent deployment so I guess if you can provide a little more color as to why the caution is -- is it primarily an inventory issue, if not a components level, maybe it's a handset level?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I think, Cody, we'll incorporate all those into our answer. I mean, we've been watching what we thought was a little bit of a buildup, if you remember, when we gave guidance for the September quarter. I think we're at the tailwind of that in some of the inventory builds. I also think some of the white-box manufacturers are still quite challenged as they migrate their own product portfolios from 2G to 3G. So all of the above. We don't always have good insights as we commented on the last call into their finished goods and how things look. Factoring all that, we just said, we'll just roughly look at the market as roughly flat this quarter. But what's most important is obviously, if it takes off, we can respond.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
And, I guess, just remind us seasonally what -- as we head to the Lunar holiday, when do you typically see a peak for those build patterns, so that if you're going to see it, we know when to expect it.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, it's December and January and with Lunar New Year being late, that could be some of the delay and some of the demand as well.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
And then maybe, to your larger customer, your largest customer going through such a heavy inventory correction in the summer months and typically going through a Q4 rebalancing. I guess, how broadly did you see that customer go through in inventory adjustment? And do you think that, that has or will likely impact the Q4 rebalancing?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think it's safe that we don't comment on whatever our largest customer is going through. I think my comments that we took a conservative view in our outlook with them is probably the best answer I can give you. I really don't want to get too far ahead of them, Cody, because they haven't really said much publicly.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
I guess when you did see their adjustments in the summer, how broadly was that? Or was it more combined geographically or a bit skewed?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think what I will answer from this perspective is we saw significant mix changes which we see mix changes all the time. But I think I'd rather answer it, we saw significant mix in the portfolio of products that we sold to them.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
And then lastly just, Dean, if you could help us with expectations for OpEx trends next year.
William A. Priddy:
I think this quarter, we're flat and maybe down $1 million or so, and expect the same thing going into the March quarter of flat plus or minus $1 million or so.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
Anything we should look for next year? Any spending that you're expecting with the changes one way or the other?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, I think our spending level is appropriate to support $350 million per quarter-type revenue run rate, maybe even slightly ahead of that. So you could see some slight growth here and there, but certainly, as we would define it, very modest expense growth going into fiscal year '15.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So the growth in OpEx would be significantly lower than the revenue growth we're expecting.
Operator:
Our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis with Barclays Capital.
Mark Kelley - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
This is Mark Kelley on for Blayne. My first question is on carrier aggregation. I guess, as you're starting to see first deployments overseas and we're expecting that in early '14 in North America, what bands do you think are causing the most problematic -- are proving the most problematic right now? And I guess, what's being done to kind of work on that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I'm not sure, Eric, how we would want to answer that. Problematic carrier aggregation in itself is a challenge for the industry. We're working with various handset manufacturers, baseband manufacturers and carriers around the world, so I'm not sure I want to call out any one of those.
Mark Kelley - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Okay. That's fair. And I guess is there maybe a bigger picture difference between the transmit and the receive side for carrier agg that's making it more of a 2015 story there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Sure. I'll let Eric go ahead and go through at least what happens to our TAM and the challenges for both the carrier downlink and uplink.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, that's right. There's various ways to look at the transmit carrier aggregation. In either case, they'll certainly be longer to market versus receive carrier agregation. But especially in cases where you actually do need to add 2 parallel transmit pads, that adds a lot of complexity. And of course, costs [ph] into the handset as well. So we're working on various architectures and band combinations that will help reduce some of that impact and enable Tx MIMO or Tx carrier aggregation to be implemented. But it's going to be least CY '15 before we really see any significant traction there.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of Anthony Stoss with Craig-Hallum Capital.
Anthony J. Stoss - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division:
Two part. With RIM affecting you here, are we at a point where RIM is really a very small portion of your revenue where it's not going to impact you much going forward? And then secondly, for Eric, any ASP pressures that you see right now? And also, love to hear your thoughts on the fact that things are getting a lot more complex and you're doing a lot more custom work integration. Is that going to positively impact gross margins here heading into 2014?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Tony. And to your first question concerning BlackBerry, I think it's safe to say that, no, there won't be an impact going forward. We would love for them to be successful. We have great share there. We'd love to grow with them again. But I think as we've learned when a large customer declines, you take a conservative view, and that's what we've put into our plans. Eric, do you want to comment?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, the first question on ASP, really nothing to report there. Business as usual in terms of ASPs across all the tiers I would say. And then on the question of complexity, yes, there's a lot of exciting new products coming out, I think, where we do combine various functions into the different partitioning for different customers that are trying to achieve different things in their portfolio basically. And it does require a lot of systems architecture and systems engineering and real leadership at the component level. We believe one of the things that RFMD has done well over the past several years is understand what's driving the industry and investing well ahead of it, years ahead of that in fact, to develop intellectual property, and also key manufacturing technology, so [indiscernible] going to have leadership at the component level and then the RF systems architecture to put it together. And we've been selling for a couple of years now reference designs, which provide all of that architecture capability to our customers and those always end up being customized reference designs [ph] production basically. So now the opportunity is to take those reference designs and basically package them together and find ways to further improve performance and take cost out and, in particular, reduce size. So, yes, it's an exciting part of the portfolio, and it does require an awful lot of confidence to pull that off and very close customer relationships.
Anthony J. Stoss - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division:
And lastly, Dean, if you wouldn't mind, what percentage of your revenue -- total revenue is China-based right now -- or last quarter I should say?
William A. Priddy:
It's around 20%, if you take out Huawei and the 2 top-tier manufacturers, Huawei and ZTE.
Operator:
Our next question is from the line of James Faucette with Pacific Crest Securities.
James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division:
Just following up quickly on China. Just so I'm clear, you're roughly 20%, excluding Huawei and ZTE, is that correct?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
That's correct.
James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division:
Okay, and then, some of the other component makers and vendors out of China, OEMs out of China, indicated that they had seen issues for demand on product that they in turn export to places like India and Indonesia because of weak currencies in those markets. Do you have much visibility on the impact, or how that may have curtailed demand for you here in the September quarter and what the opportunity is for a bounce back? Those currencies also recover.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Actually, I'm not sure we would agree maybe with some of those commentary about the currency. I think a lot of the white good guys that we work with didn't quite see some of the same experiences. I think it might have been as much maybe as -- we said, we were down in China. I think they were down in China. And I think there might have been some other issues there. I can't comment on what exactly they saw, but I don't think we can collaborate some of what you've said.
James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division:
Okay, that's great. That's really useful. And then as you think about the market going into next year, how are you -- clearly there are opportunities particularly with -- for increased RF component requirements, et cetera. How are you thinking about the overall production environment and overall units next year? And how -- what kind of tailwind that can provide for you?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I guess, Eric, do you want to hit a high level? Just talk about some of the tiers and how we see them growing in the dollar context.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, it's challenging to answer the question as stated because units will be going up for sure. But the complexity is what's increasing really, really rapidly. So we're integrating a lot more functions into the same package essentially, so we definitely see an improvement in terms of density, if you will, functional density within the product, which drives a lot more manufacturing base and scale.
Operator:
Our next question is a follow-up from the line of Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
I didn't get to my second question. Eric, ASPs for the tracker, the ET tracker, you are the only ones who produce it besides -- commercial production. So just trying to bracket how much we can reasonably expect it. You saw the tracker. And then how much of CPG's revenue, would you say, is GaAs related these days? I know you've got a lot of SOI content at this point, too. Is the mix still very heavily weighted to GaAs?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I can -- Ed, at least from a square millimeters perspective, because as you know, we have modules that have both CMOS and GaAs. But we clearly produce 3 to 4x more silicon in square millimeters as we do GaAs. So you can interpret that however you would like. And on the envelope tracker question, Eric, you want to take that?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, I sure don't want to get too specific as, you're right, it's a nascent market and we're one of the few people actually shipping, so we can't be too specific. It's several times more content versus, a say, an APT tracker, if you will. And so...
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
What about relative to like a 3G PAM. Just trying to get a scale of the opportunity for you. If we say a 3G PAM selling for, say, $0.32. Are we on the order of a 3G PAM or 2x, 5x generally?
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes. it would be in that 2 to 4x, that type of common [indiscernible] range.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Okay. And then you said you are getting a premium for the PA at this point. Is that across the board with all vendors? Or is it -- I mean, I know it's going to be relatively limited in the release initially. I think Samsung and LG, the first guys out there with a product. Or is it with the smaller players? Or how does that break out?
Steven E. Creviston:
My comment was sort of across the board.
Operator:
Gentlemen, at this time, I'm showing no further questions. I'll turn the conference back over to you for any closing remarks.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you for joining us tonight. RFMD is executing on multiple opportunities to increase our dollar content on the highest growth and highest profile smartphones and reference designs. We anticipate a long-term revenue growth trajectory producing multiple points of gross margin expansion and continued improvement in our operating results. Thanks again and good night.
Operator:
Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to listen to a replay of today's conference, please dial 1 (800) 406-7325 or (303) 590-3030 using the access code of 4644159 followed by the pound key. This does conclude RFMD's Fiscal 2014 Second Quarter Conference Call. Thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Executives:
Doug DeLieto - Vice President of Investor Relations Robert A. Bruggeworth - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Corporate Development Committee William A. Priddy - Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice President of Administration and Secretary Steven E. Creviston - Corporate Vice President and President of Cellular Products Group Norman A. Hilgendorf - Corporate Vice President and President of Multi Market Products Group Robert M. Van Buskirk - Former Corporate Vice President of Compound Semiconductor Group
Analysts:
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division Christopher Hemmelgarn - Barclays Capital, Research Division Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division Anne Edelstein Sameer Kalucha - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division T. Michael Walkley - Canaccord Genuity, Research Division Tyler Radke - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division
Operator:
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RF Micro Devices Q1 2014 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This conference is being recorded today, July 23, 2013. I would now like to turn the conference over to Doug DeLieto, Vice President of Investor Relations for RF Micro Devices. Please go ahead, sir.
Doug DeLieto:
Thanks, Julia. Hello, everybody, and welcome to our conference call. At 4 p.m. today, we issued a press release. If anyone listening did not receive a copy of the release, please call Samantha Alphonso at the Financial Relations Board at (212) 827-3746. Sam will fax a copy to you and verify that you are on our distribution list. In the meantime, the release is also available on our website, rfmd.com, under the heading Investors. At this time, I want to remind our audience that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statement contained in the earnings release published today, as well as our most recent SEC filings for a complete description. In today's release and on today's call, we provide both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. We provide this supplemental information to enable investors to perform additional comparisons of operating results and to analyze financial performance without the impact of certain noncash expenses or unusual items that may obscure trends and our underlying performance. During our call, our comments and comparisons to income statement items will be based primarily on non-GAAP results. For a complete reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings release issued earlier today, available on our corporate website, rfmd.com, under Investors. [Operator Instructions.] Sitting with me today are Bob Bruggeworth, President and CEO; and Dean Priddy, Chief Financial Officer. I'm also joined by Eric Creviston and Norm Hilgendorf, who lead our Cellular Products Group and Multi-Market Products Group respectively, as well as other members of RFMD's management team. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Bob.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thanks, Doug, and welcome, everyone. For RFMD's June quarter, we're very pleased to report quarterly operating results that continue to reflect the breadth of our product and technology leadership. Quarterly revenue was a record $293 million, representing 45% year-over-year growth. RFMD is capitalizing on the expanding demand for data-rich mobile applications and our products are at the heart of the high-speed data connections enabling always on broadband mobility, both in devices and consumer premise equipment and within the supporting network infrastructure. We are executing on multiple opportunities to increase our dollar content, generation over generation, in the world's leading smartphones. And we are benefiting from increasing participation in the highest volume entry level platforms in reference designs. Looking forward, we believe we are strategically well-positioned this fiscal year to deliver record revenue and improving financial performance. Given our expectations for diversification, content growth, category expansion and market share gains, combined with the benefit of new customer product ramps. From the highest tier flagship devices, to the entry-level smartphones proliferating in emerging markets, the RF complexity in these devices is increasing generation over generation and this is supporting an expansion in RFMD's dollar content opportunities. As a result of this and the diverse nature of RFMD's revenue base, our growth drivers are large, multiyear opportunities that are increasingly less reliant on the unit volumes of any particular phone in a given quarter. From a competitive standpoint, the playing field in our markets continues to narrow. In the high tier, our customers are seeking expertise in system-level architectures, envelope tracking, carrier aggregation and other technologies and capabilities that optimize system performance and improve our efficiency. In the emerging tier, our customers want to choose between cost and performance, while being absolutely assured about supply availability and quality. As a result, we estimate RFMD's average dollar content per handset has increased 40% in just 2 years, as we've expanded our dollar content from the high tier to the low tier. It's our intent to be the industry's most diversified supplier. Diversification that includes customers, product categories, market segment and air standards. Our 2 largest customers are the top 2 smartphone manufacturers. Beyond our top 2 customers, we also support multiple customers who each are low to mid-single digits as a percentage of revenue. These are all large accounts that can drive large volumes, and RFMD is at the heart of their next-generation product ramps. Very often, with a full suite of RFMD components further driving increased dollar content. As we said on our conference call last quarter, we have many accounts where we can grow a lot, and absolutely no accounts where we cannot continue to grow. With our product and technology leadership, our customer diversification and a growth orientation that's in RFMD's DNA, it's our intent to deliver long-term revenue growth that is profitable, predictable and sustainable. Now let's look at some highlights by business group. In our Cellular Products Group, we supported multiple high-volume smartphones across multiple customers, and we expect sequential growth in sales in the flagship devices in the September quarter, across a diverse set of RFMD products. In the higher-tier smartphones and tablets, it's difficult to find an LTE device that doesn't contain an RFMD solution. Soon this will include the TD-LTE standard that is poised for substantial growth beginning this year. RFMD is enjoying robust design activity in smartphones, and we expect to continue our dollar content expansion in this year's programs, as well as in the flagship programs of calendar 2014. In the entry segment, CPG benefited from our lead position on major reference designs in 2G and 3G, including TD-SCDMA. Design activity related to our new low-cost CMOS PA is accelerating, and we continue to expect this will improve margins in our 2G product portfolio by the end of this year. With 56% year-over-year growth, our cellular sales are clearly outpacing the underlying handset industry, and we expect this dynamic will continue into the foreseeable future. In MPG, we've delivered broad-based sequential growth across multiple markets, including WiFi, our broadband and high rel applications. MPG's first quarter revenue represented a 10.4% increase over the prior year. In high-performance WiFi, we achieved 77% growth year-over-year. RFMD's WiFi sales span a broad range of customers and markets. While WiFi growth in prior quarters was led by mobile devices, this quarter's growth was driven by expansion across consumer premise equipment and multiple applications including routers, access points and set-top boxes. Looking forward, RFMD is well-positioned to deliver diversified growth, margin expansion and operating leverage through product and technology leadership. We have exceptional customer relationships in large and growing markets, and we enjoy very strong participation on the industry's most critical platforms and reference designs. We are delivering the industry leaders the products and technologies they need to differentiate their devices, and we are enabling the high-speed data connections that support today's always on broadband mobility. This is driving very favorable design activity, suggesting a long-term growth trajectory and continued improvement in our operating results. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dean.
William A. Priddy:
Thanks Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the June quarter increased 4.4% sequentially to a quarterly record $293 million. CPG revenue was $237.7 million, up 5.3% sequentially and 55.8% year-over-year, and MPG revenue was $55.3 million, up 1% sequentially and 10.4% year-over-year. Our robust growth continues to reflect our sharp focus on diversification, category expansion and content gains in the large markets supporting data mobility. Gross profit for the quarter was $102.7 million, with gross margin of 35.1%. This is a great time to update you on RFMD's commitment to improve gross margin 300 to 400 basis points this year. We're off to a great start. We achieved 70 basis points of our goal in the June quarter, and we're tracking for continued margin improvement in the September quarter. There are 3 key margin drivers this fiscal year. And I'll give you the status of each. First, I'm pleased to report we have signed a definitive agreement to sell our U.K. fab. This is part of our overall flexible GAAP sourcing strategy, and this accounts for roughly half of the margin expansion goal. We expect the full benefit of this transaction will be realized in the December quarter. Second, our ultra low-cost CMOS PA has been fully released and is rapidly ramping production. We have demand for multiple millions of units in the September quarter, and that number is projected to more than double in the December quarter. This initiative represents approximately 100 basis points of margin expansion. Third, assembly capacity has been installed in our Beijing facility and is being qualified. We'll begin to realize the full benefit of this expansion during the December quarter. This represents approximately 50 to 100 basis points of the margin expansion. Our major margin drivers are all on or ahead of schedule. As a result, RFMD is pulling for significant financial leverage throughout the year as we anticipate revenue growth, margin expansion and relatively stable expenses. Returning to the P&L. Operating expenses were $74.7 million compared to $76 million last quarter, with G&A of $11.5 million, sales and marketing of $17 million and research and development of $46.2 million. Operating income for the June quarter was $28 million, representing approximately 9.6% of sales. Other income was $100,000 and non-GAAP taxes were approximately $2.5 million. Net income for the quarter was $25.6 million or $0.09 per diluted share, based on 287.1 million shares. Now going through the balance sheet. Cash, cash equivalent and short-term investments totaled $159.4 million. Cash flows from operations was $7.2 million. DSOs were 47.1 days compared to 46.6 days in Q4. RFMD's inventory balance of $166.9 million resulted in 8 -- in 4.8 turns, consistent with turns last quarter. Net PP&E was $193.3 million. Capital expenditures during the quarter were $27.2 million with depreciation of $11.6 million and intangible amortization of $7.2 million. Capital expenditures included investments in duplexer capacity, assembly equipment and equipment to reduce gold consumption. Now for the financial outlook and business commentary. RFMD currently believes the demand environment in our in-market supports the following financial expectations and projections for the September 2013 quarter
Operator:
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Cody Acree with Williams Financial.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
Maybe, you can't say, and I know you addressed some of this in the prepared remarks but if maybe, to the extent that you can give us a bit in more detail, over just obviously, just the last few weeks we've been seeing some material indications of slowdown at the upper end of the smartphone market, and just as you look at your position in the emerging markets, your dollar content, your market share trends, what impact are you expecting through the second half if this smartphone slowdown continues?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
This is Bob. Eric already made a few opening comments, because I made some of the comments. Number one, as far as we're concerned, the smartphone market remains extremely healthy. I think as you pointed out, there are several of the Chinese manufacturers that continue to migrate their way up the top 10 list. And in fact this year, we actually believe 4 of the top 8 manufacturers will be based in China. So we do see the smartphone market very strong throughout the rest of the year. We haven't changed any of our outlooks. And we continue to see our dollar content expand as the market transitions from 2G to 3G in the entry smartphone market as well. So we see both sides -- both ends of the market's extremely healthy. Eric, I don't know if there's any color you'd like to add?
Steven E. Creviston:
No, I think that covers it. We're very, very excited about both ends of the smartphone market and the long relationships we've had, both with platform providers and the handset manufacturers in China give us a lot of opportunities as they begin to roll out LTE and eventually, TD-LTE systems and so forth, that where we see a lot of dollar content expansion.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
I guess, Eric and Bob -- but as you look at your TAM, and maybe your bill of materials opportunity, if we're seeing is just little bit of a slower ramp of something like an S-4, or the iPhone 5, and knowing your dollar content and the subsequent generations. How much faster growth are you going to have to see in the emerging markets to maintain that base that you're replacing?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I guess you have an assumption that we're replacing something that I don't think we even commented on. So I'm sorry, Cody, I'm not sure exactly how to answer that. We see the smartphone market extremely healthy. We see our ability to expand our content hasn't changed. We continue to expand the products that we offer these people. They continue to advance and complexity continues to grow. In the press release, we talked about carrier aggregation. Funds are beginning to ramp with that, which expands our dollar content. I think we're still very bullish on the market.
Cody G. Acree - Williams Financial Group, Inc., Research Division:
And then lastly, just visibility into what we're seeing in China last -- this time last year, we started running into some sell-through issues, just a market as a whole. I think expectations were a little hotter than maybe what subscribers actually turned out to be. Just what your visibility of actual inventory or finished goods of it?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, our visibility into our components. We've got very good visibility. We see strong uptake and I think last year, China for us, was still pretty strong at this point in time. I can't speak to "end product inventory." We don't have visibility into that, but our customers continue to pull very hard from our hubs, and we're seeing strength right now.
William A. Priddy:
I think it might what it does, that we're not expecting the China market for our growth this quarter. We're not necessarily -- in China, what's strong during the June quarter, as far as the September quarter, we're not counting on the China market to continue to grow to -- for us to be able to hit our growth expectation.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Steve Smigie with Raymond James.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
One of the things you guys talked about was a 40% increase in your dollar content. Can you talk about how much of your revenue at this point has experienced this big dollar content increase as meaning, do we still see a lot of that benefit yet to come in your revenue? Or it's maybe how the handsets are shipping with that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I'll go ahead and take it, it was my comment. That's a rather straightforward calculation. It was actually looking at what our revenues were as a cellular industry, divided by the number of handsets that we believe were built. So if we look at that, that's how we come up with that. And clearly with where we're at, we've got a lot of room for growth as we continue to expand. Again, the products that we sell into the smartphones, coupled with our ability to grow our share.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Okay, great. And if I look at the gross margin opportunity here, you obviously did a good job of listing the opportunity. If I take sort of the midpoint or even the high end of those, it seems like there's quite a bit, and then there's also the -- it felt like there's some gold conversion coming. So it seems like there's a lot of opportunity there. So the 300 to 400 basis points seems like, you should pretty handily be able to beat it over the next several quarters. I was just curious, your thoughts on your opportunity there?
William A. Priddy:
Well, the 300 to 400 basis points, we put that metric out last quarter as what we're committing to for gross margin improvement for the year. So I think with where we stand after the first quarter, and the initiatives that we've got, we clearly have checked one off with the sale of the U.K. fab. We're very far along with ramping the CMOS PAs. We've got the equipment installed in the Beijing facility. So we feel very comfortable hitting what we have committed to. Now obviously, our target gross model -- gross margin model, is, it's 40%. That's something that we're going to work hard to achieve sooner rather than later. And there are a lot of others initiatives that are underway that are going to help us achieve our target gross margin. That's something we're not committing to this year, because it happened. You could construct that scenario. But it would be something that I would expect achieving next fiscal year.
Jonathan Steven Smigie - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division:
Great, if I could take one more, on just -- on the Multi Products Group. Obviously some signs out there that talk on equipment spending's picking up. Just hoping you could talk about the potential growth of that business over the next year or 2.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yes, sure. Hi, this is Norm. The -- in wireless infrastructure, things have actually been rather kind of moving in a measured pace, I would say, for the last few quarters. We've been expecting a big buildout for quite some time, to deal with the crush of data going through the networks. And yet, there seems to be a fair amount of pent-up demands there. We're seeing a pretty good pace of LTE equipment builds in North America. We will also see some signs of increases, requirements over in China for TD LTE. But Europe continues to be pretty soft. We do see some consolidation or structural change in the industry as well, with some of the OEMs as well. So we're still a bit cautious, I think, but hopeful for some strength in the second half.
Operator:
Our next question is from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Had a couple of questions. First of all, we're seeing a lot of positive activity in China. We're also starting to hear about couple of the large handset guys starting to ramp. I'm trying to put your guidance together with the historical seasonality as I know it, call it 7% to 8%. And I'm wondering if you guys have given yourself a lot of room in the guidance. I'm curious if you could comment on that, Bob or Dean.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Harsh, Dean alluded a little bit to that. But I think it's safe to say we've taken a conservative stance with our largest customer, the China market, and the timing of new product brands. So I think that's a fair assessment. However, we'll wait and see how the quarter plays out.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Totally, very helpful. And then maybe one for Dean, and then I'll get back in queue. Dean, you talked about the 300 to 400 basis points of gross margin increases. I'm curious if you could help us out in terms of thinking how much might drop in September. It sounds like a lot's going to drop in December, but just how should we think about when we model the next 2 quarters?
William A. Priddy:
Yes. Clearly, December is a quarter to really watch for, in terms of us converging on the 300 to 400 basis points. I think in the September quarter, you could look at our contribution margin on the additional revenue, something similar to what we saw this past quarter, approaching 50%. And with that, if you would -- if you do the math, you're somewhere around what we achieved this quarter. In terms of a basis -- 50 to 70 basis points in margin expansion this quarter, so somewhere in that range. So we're, position ourselves about halfway to the low end of our guidance midway through the year.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Thanks for the color Dean, and if I can sneak one more in. Your CapEx of $27.2 million, does that contain a lot of kind of one-time things as you get to gold conversion, and maybe some other things. Do we expect the CapEx to drop off in the future quarters?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, we're not going to stay at the same rate and pay. So $2 million of that CapEx was for duplexer capacity. The other 2 significant chunks were gold savings. That's a one-time investment. And the other for additional assembly capacity in Beijing, we don't expect to be investing in additional assembly of, this -- again, this fiscal year. So we're going to expect to see CapEx come down very, very quickly, with the long cart [ph] being, we could see some additional investment in duplexer capacity.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Barclays.
Christopher Hemmelgarn - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
This is Chris Hemmelgarn on for Blayne. Two quick questions. The first is, so you mentioned you were seeing really good traction with the new multi 2G CMOS part? Could you talk a little bit about any plans and timing around a ultimate 3G CMOS part there?
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure. This is Eric, be happy to. First off, regarding that Amalfi part, just to remind everyone as well, that is the new ultralow cost part. It's about a 40% lower cost structure than what we've been shipping, either in GaAs or in CMOS up to this point. So it is really a disruptive new low-cost technology. We've been able to iron out the wrinkles and get it to a complete -- shipping millions this quarter, and tens of millions probably next quarter. So it is a very exciting product ramp and all the engineers now are completely focused on completing the 3G part as well. We expect to be sampling that pretty soon. And revenue's certainly possible this fiscal year.
Christopher Hemmelgarn - Barclays Capital, Research Division:
Then a last, quick question. I could be doing the math wrong here, but the 77% year-over-year growth in wireless, looks like growth is slowing a little bit on a sequential basis. Am I right in seeing that? And if so, I guess, could you talk a little bit about the trajectory there, going forward?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So for WiFi, we'll let Norm go and answer that.
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Yes, that's right. So we're talking WiFi, and relative to a year ago, the number is correct. Up 77% on all the WiFi and there's mobile, CPE, automotive, everything all in there. The first ramping area we had was for -- really is in handsets earlier -- late, late last year. And currently, a lot of the growth is driven by CPE. We're seeing a big move for more infrastructure out there. So the routers and access points are driving a lot of the requirements here. Set-top boxes, and other consumer equipment as well. So we saw a real strong push this last quarter in the CPE area, which is a -- it was a good fit, as we've got a very broad sales network reaching a lot of customers there on WiFi. Relative to kind of quarter over quarter trend, yes, we're -- as the numbers get bigger, the percentage increases do appear smaller. But we still have very strong growth in the coming quarters.
Operator:
Our next question is from Edward Snyder with Charter Equity Research.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Dean, I know there's been a lot of design activity that's kind of driven OpEx. Can we expect that to tail off? Or do you expect this run rate or higher in the December period? And of course, in the first year when you get this stuff opening in...
William A. Priddy:
As I pointed, the OpEx actually was down a bit in the June quarter. Going into the September quarter, we've got a very high rate of R&D activity going on. Now, I don't think it's going to break the bank. I think we're going to get back closer to what we were in the March quarter. So somewhere around $75 million to $76 million, probably for modest, $76 million would probably be a good number for modeling. So once again, stabilization of expenses, as we pointed out last quarter, something consistent for the rest of the year.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
So you basically think you'll remain fairly flattish after this growth design activity for the rest of year, and then we'll talk about '14 when we get there?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, it could bump along in any given quarter. Up a $1 million or down $1 million. Just like we saw this quarter was down, this coming quarter might be up a little over $1 million. But there's something in that range.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Okay, and Eric, historically, even one of the smaller players in pads, is that going to change for the next year? And can you give us some idea of SOI, how large of that -- how much did that come, say for CPG, and will that change, set a run rate level by the year end?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
And this is Bob, and I'll take the first part. Because I'm sure Eric would absolutely love to be able to answer that question. But, as you know, that's a very sensitive topic, and we really can't answer that. But I'm sure Eric can speak to the SOI question.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, absolutely. We've -- you're right. It's been a big part of our growth up to this point. It has actually, sequentially now, we were up a bit as well in the June quarter, but not as the rapid rates that we've experienced in the past. We're currently expecting that to turn and head back up to fairly rapid growth again, beginning in the September quarter. So we still see a lot of opportunities for the SOI product. Of course, antenna control, tuners and so forth, but even more expansion of our Antenna Switch business and Received Diversity Switches. We mentioned in the press release, the bullet about our Carrier Aggregation Switches. We've been working on carrier aggregation for 3 years now, since AT&T first told us they wanted to put it in the network. And they have a very broad portfolio of antenna switch -- Antenna Switches, Received Diversity Switches, Antenna Tuners that are all carrier aggregation capable. And that's evidenced in the first LTE advanced handset that's ramping, and we're going to see a lot more of that activity in the coming quarters as everybody really tries to ramp the LTE capability to the point where really, your wireless mobile device is your fastest way to get data. And LTE has kind of gotten neck to neck with wired networks, the LT advance and carrier aggregation pushes it to the point where it's going to be much faster to get to your data over your wireless device than your wired home network, and that's really the breakthrough that everybody's driving and that's really driving directly towards our SOI activity.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Okay, so then Bob, if you're going to answer Eric's, and I'll just give you one, anyway. Strategically then, it sounds like my expression on the CPG side of the business, and of course, MPG's always, is using less of the internal GaAs foundry. I know utilization is going to go up over the aggregate utilization when the U.K. fab is closed. Do you see that utilization rate over the next year or so as maintaining? Or growing substantially, or given all the SOI and all the GaN, et cetera, can we nominally expect that you have plenty of capacity in Greensboro without any, like additional expenses?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Ed, I think I've got this. Now, yes we expect our GaAs utilization to go up. We also expect our GaN business, as you mentioned there, to go up and that's also running the same fab so that will also help drive utilization. We do expect the SOI and CMOS, as well as Silicon Germanium, for that matter, to become a larger part of our portfolio. So we do not anticipate any significant capital to expand fab capacity over the next year or 2. I mean, our utilization is still nowhere near running optimal.
William A. Priddy:
Plus, we have outsource partners now that we qualified that could bring surge capacity if we start bumping up against headroom in our Greensboro facility. So very, very good shape from a generating the revenue standpoint and in gallium arsenide.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Dean used the term partners, so that sounds like there's more than one. Are you qualified, ready to roll those, or you going through the qual process now?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
We are qualified.
Edward F. Snyder - Charter Equity Research:
Great, and sorry, one more, final question. $10 million on duplexer capacity here. Of the 3 types of duplex filters that you could buy with that, BAW, TC SAW and SAW, is it fair to assume that's mostly SAW?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think, Ed, it's fair to assume we will have access to saw, 10 comp SAW and BAW.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.
Unknown Analyst:
This is Joe, calling on behalf of Quinn. Some of your competitors, namely Qualcomm and Skyworks, have introduced some pretty highly integrated pieces, namely RF 360, and Sky 1. Wondering if you could comment a little bit on, if you have something in the pipe geared towards that, or how you plan on competing with those kind of solutions?
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure, this is Eric again. Yes, we've been working on complete system solutions now for several years, actually, in various levels of integration, multi-node, multi-band amplifiers and so forth. And increasingly adding filters and duplexers into our products. But more importantly, I think what we're all driving towards is helping the customer implement the incredible complexities that's coming from what I mentioned earlier, in trying to make sure your wireless device is your fastest data device. So that entire solution is what we're all providing to people at various levels of integration. I do think the products that you mentioned that raised the bar in terms of discussions with customers and helping them at a higher level, and that's right up our alley. I mean, it's more than just repackaging those components into a single package. It's a lot bigger than that. It's about solving the system-level problem, and we're comfortable with our architecture system's engineering expertise, the relationships we have with the platform providers that enable these things, that we are solving the problem at the right level and offering all the options the customers are looking for.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Mike Burton with Brean Capital.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
First, what percent of revenues was China in the quarter? Sounds like it was pretty strong. And then, if you can help us understand it, I know you said that you weren't expecting a lot of growth there. But is that business expected to be up or down, heading into Q3?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, the -- what you had called about, the white-box manufacturers in the China market was in the low 20s or so as a percentage of revenue. And like I said, you might expect a little bit of a breather in the China market, in the September quarter. We could be a bit conservative there and could actually see some upside. But we're not counting on the growth that we forecasted from the China market, but last quarter was actually a very, very strong quarter for the China market.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay, helpful. Then, can you update us a little bit on that duplexer investment? Has that gone into production for revenues? Or, help us to gain an understanding of when we could expect that you'll start to see a return on that investment?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think it's safe to say we do expect to see a return on the investment, but as my comments earlier, this is a very sensitive topic and I think for now, I'd rather not comment.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay, fair enough, then and Dean, was wondering if you could also help us with the contribution of model going forward into next year.
William A. Priddy:
Yes, well, next year will depend on several factors. And rather, we're sourcing the material internally out of our gallium arsenide facility or externally. Suffice it to say we expect continued margin improvement into FY '15. So I think that we'll just stick with the roughly 50% contribution margin. That would be a good number for now.
Michael A. Burton - Brean Capital LLC, Research Division:
Okay, perfect. And then the last one for me, 10% customers on the quarter and the percent of 2G versus 3G, 4G?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, 10% customers, we had 1, and 80% was 3G, 4G. And I did want one clarification on the China market. I wouldn't make the assumption that, that was primarily 2G. I think it was split pretty evenly between 2G and 3G entry. So we're seeing quite a bit of uptake of 3G entry in the China market.
Operator:
Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America.
Anne Edelstein:
This Anne Edelstein calling in for Vivek. Just a question on -- that if, so your revenues grew at 45% year-over-year, but we only saw about 100 bps of gross margin improvement. Can you just walk us through that?
William A. Priddy:
Yes, let's start with -- it was under the utilization of wafer fabs, and that overhang, which is now gone away or a big part of it. So we've laid out our margin improvement initiatives. We're very confident in achieving 300 to 400 basis points this year. And by the time we get to the end of the year, we're not going to look anything like last year.
Anne Edelstein:
All right, fair enough. And then also as the China market continues to heat up, and you see a fair amount, more competition there. It seems like some of your baseband partners are ready to employ some pretty aggressive pricing pact x to maintain leadership there. Can you provide any color on how you see that playing out, and how that might impact your own margin expansion efforts?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Maybe Eric, you can just comment about ASPs and what's going on there, because...
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, I'm not exactly sure of the context of the question, you mentioned heating up and seeing more competition there. It couldn't get much hotter than it has been over this 10 years or so we've been doing this in that market, but, it's actually seems to be cooling down in terms of competition going forward, certainly in the 2G space, that's very consolidated now. And so there's not nearly as much competition there. And in 3G, the bar is quickly being raised to LTE, and again SOI switch capability and tuning and all the things we're seeing in the traditional smartphone market is now becoming very important down market and even in the entry category. So I guess I don't see the trend that you're referring to.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Coupled with Eric, I know earlier in the call, she may have missed it, your comments about how much lower cost this next generation CMOS PA is, at 40% less cost, I mean...
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, so when you talk about how it might impact our profitability initiatives, I mean that's actually one of our profitability initiatives, is to ramp that ultra low-cost capability into that incredibly high-volume market. And so we -- I guess the bottom line is you're right. It's an aggressive, competitive market, as it always has been. However, it's a fastly growing market with lots of units and a lot of opportunity to make a lot of money.
Operator:
The next question comes from Christopher Danely with JPMorgan.
Sameer Kalucha - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division:
This is Sameer Kalucha calling in for Chris Danely. I have a question on the LTE side of things. I know recently, Verizon and the other couriers have talked about moving to all LTE phones. I wonder, how does that impact you in terms of content performance? Does it increase? Or if it does, I mean, how much does it increase for you?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Sorry, your question is?
William A. Priddy:
Without this LTE would that it's hard to find a phone that doesn't have RFMD content. But I think Eric's better positioned to...
Steven E. Creviston:
I'm sorry, I just didn't catch the actual question.
Sameer Kalucha - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division:
When we move to all LTE phones, including voice-over LTE, how does your content get impacted there?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So when we move to all LTE phones, including voice-over LTE, how is our content affected? So it depends upon your baseline. I suppose, of course, it continues to grow. If you went from 2G to 3G, and then on to 4G and then to LTE as well. Our content is tied not only to the LTE versus 3G, but also to whether it's got a carrier aggregation and, for example, and how many tutors and what sorts our employees in the antenna and so forth. So our content is not just tied to just the system standard and it's not just power amplifiers anymore, by any means. We have a very broad portfolio, switches and antenna tutors and power management to come along in WiFi, of course, in addition to that. So it's just much broader than speaking about just when it becomes LTE how much does our content go up.
Sameer Kalucha - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division:
I guess the number I was looking for, maybe you said like $5 to $7 for mass production phones and does that go up to like $10 or $12 or $15, in that range?
Norman A. Hilgendorf:
Just as you see in each of these trends, there's a broad range, right? So I mean, you're actually beginning to see entry LTE phones on the drawing board as well, right? So they'll be LTE phones as well that might have a lower content than you're expecting in the smartphones today. There are definitely a large volume of LTE phones so they have $10 to $12 worth of our [indiscernible] content, that is absolutely true. So the average content goes up generation over generation.
Operator:
Our next question from Mike Walkley with Canaccord Genuity.
T. Michael Walkley - Canaccord Genuity, Research Division:
For your September quarter, guys, I was wondering if you could elaborate a little more on some of the mix shift for the quarter. It sounds like you have a little bit of the initial lower cost CMOS shipping. Can you elaborate just on maybe some other mix shifts that might be favorable or unfavorable to gross margins, and also just touch on, do you expect those divisions to kind of grow at this 5% midpoint for the quarter?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
From a high-level perspective, we are expecting CPG to grow faster than MPG. So we'll start with that. So from a gross margin perspective, as you know, CPGs margins are a little bit lower than MPGs, so that's kind of going against us. Your point on the CMOS PA, we're beginning that ramp, the majority of that is still legacy products. So it will have some favorability that as well.
T. Michael Walkley - Canaccord Genuity, Research Division:
Okay, that's helpful. And then, I know it's early for December quarter guidance but last year, you had some timing shifts with key customers that led to very large sequential December quarter guidance in order to hit some of your 200 to 400 basis points gross margin expansion. Is there at least a double-digit revenue growth sequential expected in the December quarter?
William A. Priddy:
Well, if you look at the key margin drivers that we outlined, they're more or less independent of volume. And I wouldn't say that's a complete vacuum, but you don't need a lot of revenue growth to achieve the benefit of the sales in U.K.'s facility, or the CMOS PAs are really going to be replacing other parts that are currently in high-volume production. That's just a replacement, if you will, in a much lower cost version. And finally, the assembly in Beijing is just a matter of utilizing that versus using an external supplier. So those 3 things are more or less independent of volume. And if we were to get that volume upside, that could be a nice additional boost to margin.
Operator:
Our next question is from Ian Lee Ing with Lazard Capital Markets.
Tyler Radke - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
This is actually Tyler Radke calling on behalf of Ian. Just wanted to go back to your comments, specifically on China, kind of taking a breather. As you said in September, and how you're not really relying on that for growth, so, how should we think about your comments about sequential growth at your main customers, and then, I mean, how much of conservatism or derating do you guys apply to the forecast for upcoming builds?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Well, I'll start, and guys, feel free to jump in. China, as we discussed, I think we've taken a conservative view on the demand there. You also commented that at our largest customer, we've taken a conservative view and also being careful on the timing of new program ramps. Let's be honest, all our customers are different. That's what we get paid to do, is to help our judgment on how this is all going to play out, and that's how we came up with our guidance.
Tyler Radke - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then staying, in China with your low-cost 2g, can you just remind me where the margins, I mean, obviously it's going to be a big driver for you on the gross margin side of things. But is it, or should we think of it as it's a margin near corporate average, above or was it like a very, very low margin product and now it's just going to be less of a headwind.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Well it clearly is a very low margin product currently, and the one we're ramping would be accretive to current margins.
Tyler Radke - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division:
Okay. And then lastly, given just with respect to your reference designs with spread trim, any kind of implications on the recent acquisition?
William A. Priddy:
Business and relationship remain strong. So we haven't seen any change.
Operator:
The next question is from Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
First a question on the product side. When you talk about the CMOS, the ultra low cost CMOS part, do you have a feeling for how that now compares to the competitor offerings, both here in the U.S. and also in Asia?
Robert M. Van Buskirk:
We're pretty confident. It's by far the lowest cost, lowest solution available on the market and we obviously see them all in benchmarks. And so yes, we're pretty confident we'll have by far, the lowest cost to manufacture a 2G transmit module.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Great, okay. And then, when you look at the TD LTE market, do you think that's a growth driver for the next few quarters? Or is that more of a 2014 story?
Robert M. Van Buskirk:
That's absolutely ramping during this calendar year, beginning to ramp, and we think it'll continue to be a driver throughout next calendar year for sure. But it will drive volume this calendar year, we believe.
Thomas Diffely - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division:
Okay, and then finally, when you look at the possibilities on having another nice sequential ramp in the fourth quarter, are you going to have to build inventory levels in the third quarter to support that?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
I think it's safe to say we typically build inventory ahead of major flagship phone ramps.
Operator:
Our next question comes from James Faucette from Pacific Crest.
James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division:
A couple of clarifying questions. First on, when you talk about the -- your percentage of revenue coming from China, I think you called out that, that was for the white box makers. When we think about players like Huawei and ZTE and some of the larger Chinese handset makers that are also exporting, are you including them within that 20% figure, or would they be in addition to that number? And then also, I'm sorry, also on China, how should we think about the opportunities as we transition from TD-SCDMA to LTE? I guess it would be understandable if we saw new base band suppliers and new suppliers into that mark and just wondering how that might impact you.
William A. Priddy:
Yes, Huawei and LTE are in addition to the white box numbers that we talked about. And by the end of the year, there may be a couple of more major manufacturers in China that we begin to break out as well, to be determined. But you're -- a few percentage points of revenue there for Huawei and ZTE.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, I think, Eric, you want to address the migration from TD to LTE?
Steven E. Creviston:
Sure, so I think you're correct in assuming it could mean a different mix of basebands, if you will, share, if you will, in the TD market as that ramps. However, in terms of implication starts in [indiscernible], we really don't see that as being too impactful, because we are truly represented on all of the manufacturers that are shipping into both TD-SCDMA and TD LTE as well.
James E. Faucette - Pacific Crest Securities, Inc., Research Division:
And then, my final question, just as you start to ramp the CMOS products, can you talk a little bit about, I guess product portfolio management, and mix and just trying to manage that -- those pricing dynamics and what the demand might look like. I guess the concern might be that, that could end up being somewhat cannibalistic, but just wondering how you're thinking about that.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
We're targeting to hold our overall share roughly where it is today, at about 50% overall in the 2G space. And the goal of course is to maintain pricing where it is today, as we transition from the GaAs parts to the CMOS parts. So just see, basically holding share, minimal impact on revenue as margins improved.
Operator:
And we have a follow-up question from Harsh Kumar with Stephens.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
Bob, you talked about carrier aggregation earlier on the call. I'm curious it's -- as to what kind of -- when is that phenomena going to finally hit the market place? Are we talking late this year, are we talking late next year, or even beyond?
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Yes, Harsh, 2 things Eric loves to talk about is envelope tracking and carrier aggregation. I appreciate that. As we said, and I think Eric even commented on it, we've already began shipping that, but I think the majority of the volume's going to be next year, and increasing throughout the year. But I'll let Eric add some color.
Steven E. Creviston:
Yes, absolutely. It is pretty exciting. Again, we were on the leading edge of carrier aggregation from the beginning in terms of total system architecture on the front end, and the whole thing was delivered twice the day rate to the consumers in their mobile devices. So we've got a fairly good visibility into the carrier aggregation rollout. The system providers I think are ready, and so they're ready for devices to be rolled out. You're going to see multiple devices. You've seen, the first LTE advanced phone now shipping at -- in Korea with RFMD parts in it, to support carrier aggregation. But it really begins to roll out in earnest, first half of next year, I think, is when it's going to be basically table stakes for LTE devices to have carrier aggregation and throughout the year. It'll grow to about 25% of the total LTE shipments probably during 2014.
Harsh N. Kumar - Stephens Inc., Research Division:
That's great. And then on your 2G 40% low cost, sort of Amalfi product, Eric. Are you taking share from the local Chinese guys? Are you taking the share from other GaAs guys there?
Steven E. Creviston:
Well like I said in general, our 50% share in 2G is about where we want to be. So with that ultra low cost CMOS, we're basically improving the profitability of our own portfolio through that transition. There may be opportunities to pick up more share, but where we are today, we're going to make sure that we're holding ASP erosion as low as possible. There's considerably less competition in that space now, and so we're going to be very sensitive to maintaining pricing where it is, and just drive cost out to get more profit.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
So Harsh, we'll be migrating over the legacy CMOS product along with our GaAs products to this ultra low-cost CMOS PA.
Operator:
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to management.
Robert A. Bruggeworth:
Thank you very much for joining us tonight. RFMD is increasing our content and our customers' flagship programs. We are generating multiple points of margin improvement, and our OpEx is flattening. Accordingly, we believe we are well-positioned this fiscal year to deliver record revenue and significant operating leverage and earnings growth. We look forward to updating you on our progress and meeting with investors at upcoming investor conferences. Thanks again, and good night.
Operator:
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the RF Micro Devices Q1 2014 Conference Call. This conference will be available for replay after 7 p.m. Eastern time today, July 30, at midnight Eastern time. You may access the replay system at any time by dialing 1 (800) 406-7325 and entering the access code of 4627660. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.